xrsupssd - Metamath Proof Explorer

	Metamath Proof Explorer		< Previous Next > Nearby theorems
Mirrors > Home > MPE Home > Th. List > xrsupssd		Structured version Visualization version GIF version

Theorem xrsupssd 13433

Description: Inequality deduction for supremum of an extended real subset. (Contributed by Thierry Arnoux, 21-Mar-2017.)

**Hypotheses**
Ref	Expression
xrsupssd.1	⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐵 ⊆ 𝐶)
xrsupssd.2	⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐶 ⊆ ℝ^*)

**Assertion**
Ref	Expression
xrsupssd	⊢ (𝜑 → sup(𝐵, ℝ^, < ) ≤ sup(𝐶, ℝ^, < ))

Proof of Theorem xrsupssd Dummy variables 𝑥 𝑦 𝑧 are mutually distinct and distinct from all other variables.

Step	Hyp	Ref	Expression
1		xrltso 13240	. . . 4 ⊢ < Or ℝ^*
2	1	a1i 11	. . 3 ⊢ (𝜑 → < Or ℝ^*)
3		xrsupssd.1	. . 3 ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐵 ⊆ 𝐶)
4		xrsupssd.2	. . 3 ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐶 ⊆ ℝ^*)
5	3, 4	sstrd 3940	. . . 4 ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐵 ⊆ ℝ^*)
6		xrsupss 13409	. . . 4 ⊢ (𝐵 ⊆ ℝ^* → ∃𝑥 ∈ ℝ^* (∀𝑦 ∈ 𝐵 ¬ 𝑥 < 𝑦 ∧ ∀𝑦 ∈ ℝ^* (𝑦 < 𝑥 → ∃𝑧 ∈ 𝐵 𝑦 < 𝑧)))
7	5, 6	syl 18	. . 3 ⊢ (𝜑 → ∃𝑥 ∈ ℝ^* (∀𝑦 ∈ 𝐵 ¬ 𝑥 < 𝑦 ∧ ∀𝑦 ∈ ℝ^* (𝑦 < 𝑥 → ∃𝑧 ∈ 𝐵 𝑦 < 𝑧)))
8		xrsupss 13409	. . . 4 ⊢ (𝐶 ⊆ ℝ^* → ∃𝑥 ∈ ℝ^* (∀𝑦 ∈ 𝐶 ¬ 𝑥 < 𝑦 ∧ ∀𝑦 ∈ ℝ^* (𝑦 < 𝑥 → ∃𝑧 ∈ 𝐶 𝑦 < 𝑧)))
9	4, 8	syl 18	. . 3 ⊢ (𝜑 → ∃𝑥 ∈ ℝ^* (∀𝑦 ∈ 𝐶 ¬ 𝑥 < 𝑦 ∧ ∀𝑦 ∈ ℝ^* (𝑦 < 𝑥 → ∃𝑧 ∈ 𝐶 𝑦 < 𝑧)))
10	2, 3, 4, 7, 9	supssd 9433	. 2 ⊢ (𝜑 → ¬ sup(𝐶, ℝ^, < ) < sup(𝐵, ℝ^, < ))
11	2, 7	supcl 9428	. . 3 ⊢ (𝜑 → sup(𝐵, ℝ^, < ) ∈ ℝ^)
12	2, 9	supcl 9428	. . 3 ⊢ (𝜑 → sup(𝐶, ℝ^, < ) ∈ ℝ^)
13		xrlenlt 11346	. . 3 ⊢ ((sup(𝐵, ℝ^, < ) ∈ ℝ^ ∧ sup(𝐶, ℝ^, < ) ∈ ℝ^) → (sup(𝐵, ℝ^, < ) ≤ sup(𝐶, ℝ^, < ) ↔ ¬ sup(𝐶, ℝ^, < ) < sup(𝐵, ℝ^, < )))
14	11, 12, 13	syl2anc 596	. 2 ⊢ (𝜑 → (sup(𝐵, ℝ^, < ) ≤ sup(𝐶, ℝ^, < ) ↔ ¬ sup(𝐶, ℝ^, < ) < sup(𝐵, ℝ^, < )))
15	10, 14	mpbird 260	1 ⊢ (𝜑 → sup(𝐵, ℝ^, < ) ≤ sup(𝐶, ℝ^, < ))

Colors of variables: wff setvar class

This proof depends on syntax axioms: ¬ wn 3 → wi 4 ↔ wb 209 ∧ wa 401 ∈ wcel 2145 ∀wral 3076 ∃wrex 3086 ⊆ wss 3898 class class class wbr 5102 Or wor 5554 supcsup 9410 ℝ^*cxr 11314 < clt 11315 ≤ cle 11316

This proof depends on axioms: ax-mp 5 ax-1 6 ax-2 7 ax-3 8 ax-gen 1828 ax-4 1842 ax-5 1943 ax-6 2000 ax-7 2041 ax-8 2147 ax-9 2155 ax-10 2178 ax-11 2194 ax-12 2213 ax-ext 2732 ax-sep 5248 ax-nul 5259 ax-pow 5326 ax-pr 5390 ax-un 7734 ax-cnex 11228 ax-resscn 11229 ax-1cn 11230 ax-icn 11231 ax-addcl 11232 ax-addrcl 11233 ax-mulcl 11234 ax-mulrcl 11235 ax-mulcom 11236 ax-addass 11237 ax-mulass 11238 ax-distr 11239 ax-i2m1 11240 ax-1ne0 11241 ax-1rid 11242 ax-rnegex 11243 ax-rrecex 11244 ax-cnre 11245 ax-pre-lttri 11246 ax-pre-lttrn 11247 ax-pre-ltadd 11248 ax-pre-mulgt0 11249 ax-pre-sup 11250

This proof depends on definitions: df-bi 210 df-an 402 df-or 862 df-3or 1104 df-3an 1105 df-tru 1573 df-fal 1583 df-ex 1813 df-nf 1817 df-sb 2100 df-mo 2564 df-eu 2594 df-clab 2739 df-cleq 2752 df-clel 2835 df-nfc 2909 df-ne 2956 df-nel 3062 df-ral 3077 df-rex 3087 df-rmo 3365 df-reu 3366 df-rab 3413 df-v 3452 df-sbc 3739 df-csb 3847 df-dif 3901 df-un 3903 df-in 3905 df-ss 3915 df-nul 4279 df-if 4482 df-pw 4558 df-sn 4584 df-pr 4586 df-op 4590 df-uni 4867 df-br 5103 df-opab 5167 df-mpt 5186 df-id 5542 df-po 5555 df-so 5556 df-xp 5653 df-rel 5654 df-cnv 5655 df-co 5656 df-dm 5657 df-rn 5658 df-res 5659 df-ima 5660 df-iota 6483 df-fun 6529 df-fn 6530 df-f 6531 df-f1 6532 df-fo 6533 df-f1o 6534 df-fv 6535 df-riota 7365 df-ov 7411 df-oprab 7412 df-mpo 7413 df-er 8695 df-en 8952 df-dom 8953 df-sdom 8954 df-sup 9412 df-pnf 11317 df-mnf 11318 df-xr 11319 df-ltxr 11320 df-le 11321 df-sub 11515 df-neg 11516

This theorem is used by: liminflelimsuplem 46707

W3C validator