xrsupssd - Metamath Proof Explorer

	Metamath Proof Explorer		< Previous Next > Nearby theorems
Mirrors > Home > MPE Home > Th. List > xrsupssd		Structured version Visualization version GIF version

Theorem xrsupssd 13377

Description: Inequality deduction for supremum of an extended real subset. (Contributed by Thierry Arnoux, 21-Mar-2017.)

**Hypotheses**
Ref	Expression
xrsupssd.1	⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐵 ⊆ 𝐶)
xrsupssd.2	⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐶 ⊆ ℝ^*)

**Assertion**
Ref	Expression
xrsupssd	⊢ (𝜑 → sup(𝐵, ℝ^, < ) ≤ sup(𝐶, ℝ^, < ))

Proof of Theorem xrsupssd Dummy variables 𝑥 𝑦 𝑧 are mutually distinct and distinct from all other variables.

Step	Hyp	Ref	Expression
1		xrltso 13184	. . . 4 ⊢ < Or ℝ^*
2	1	a1i 11	. . 3 ⊢ (𝜑 → < Or ℝ^*)
3		xrsupssd.1	. . 3 ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐵 ⊆ 𝐶)
4		xrsupssd.2	. . 3 ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐶 ⊆ ℝ^*)
5	3, 4	sstrd 3950	. . . 4 ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐵 ⊆ ℝ^*)
6		xrsupss 13353	. . . 4 ⊢ (𝐵 ⊆ ℝ^* → ∃𝑥 ∈ ℝ^* (∀𝑦 ∈ 𝐵 ¬ 𝑥 < 𝑦 ∧ ∀𝑦 ∈ ℝ^* (𝑦 < 𝑥 → ∃𝑧 ∈ 𝐵 𝑦 < 𝑧)))
7	5, 6	syl 18	. . 3 ⊢ (𝜑 → ∃𝑥 ∈ ℝ^* (∀𝑦 ∈ 𝐵 ¬ 𝑥 < 𝑦 ∧ ∀𝑦 ∈ ℝ^* (𝑦 < 𝑥 → ∃𝑧 ∈ 𝐵 𝑦 < 𝑧)))
8		xrsupss 13353	. . . 4 ⊢ (𝐶 ⊆ ℝ^* → ∃𝑥 ∈ ℝ^* (∀𝑦 ∈ 𝐶 ¬ 𝑥 < 𝑦 ∧ ∀𝑦 ∈ ℝ^* (𝑦 < 𝑥 → ∃𝑧 ∈ 𝐶 𝑦 < 𝑧)))
9	4, 8	syl 18	. . 3 ⊢ (𝜑 → ∃𝑥 ∈ ℝ^* (∀𝑦 ∈ 𝐶 ¬ 𝑥 < 𝑦 ∧ ∀𝑦 ∈ ℝ^* (𝑦 < 𝑥 → ∃𝑧 ∈ 𝐶 𝑦 < 𝑧)))
10	2, 3, 4, 7, 9	supssd 9433	. 2 ⊢ (𝜑 → ¬ sup(𝐶, ℝ^, < ) < sup(𝐵, ℝ^, < ))
11	2, 7	supcl 9428	. . 3 ⊢ (𝜑 → sup(𝐵, ℝ^, < ) ∈ ℝ^)
12	2, 9	supcl 9428	. . 3 ⊢ (𝜑 → sup(𝐶, ℝ^, < ) ∈ ℝ^)
13		xrlenlt 11292	. . 3 ⊢ ((sup(𝐵, ℝ^, < ) ∈ ℝ^ ∧ sup(𝐶, ℝ^, < ) ∈ ℝ^) → (sup(𝐵, ℝ^, < ) ≤ sup(𝐶, ℝ^, < ) ↔ ¬ sup(𝐶, ℝ^, < ) < sup(𝐵, ℝ^, < )))
14	11, 12, 13	syl2anc 596	. 2 ⊢ (𝜑 → (sup(𝐵, ℝ^, < ) ≤ sup(𝐶, ℝ^, < ) ↔ ¬ sup(𝐶, ℝ^, < ) < sup(𝐵, ℝ^, < )))
15	10, 14	mpbird 260	1 ⊢ (𝜑 → sup(𝐵, ℝ^, < ) ≤ sup(𝐶, ℝ^, < ))

Colors of variables: wff setvar class

This proof depends on syntax axioms: ¬ wn 3 → wi 4 ↔ wb 209 ∧ wa 401 ∈ wcel 2146 ∀wral 3082 ∃wrex 3092 ⊆ wss 3908 class class class wbr 5114 Or wor 5573 supcsup 9410 ℝ^*cxr 11260 < clt 11261 ≤ cle 11262

This proof depends on axioms: ax-mp 5 ax-1 6 ax-2 7 ax-3 8 ax-gen 1828 ax-4 1842 ax-5 1943 ax-6 2000 ax-7 2041 ax-8 2148 ax-9 2156 ax-10 2179 ax-11 2195 ax-12 2216 ax-ext 2738 ax-sep 5262 ax-nul 5274 ax-pow 5341 ax-pr 5409 ax-un 7745 ax-cnex 11174 ax-resscn 11175 ax-1cn 11176 ax-icn 11177 ax-addcl 11178 ax-addrcl 11179 ax-mulcl 11180 ax-mulrcl 11181 ax-mulcom 11182 ax-addass 11183 ax-mulass 11184 ax-distr 11185 ax-i2m1 11186 ax-1ne0 11187 ax-1rid 11188 ax-rnegex 11189 ax-rrecex 11190 ax-cnre 11191 ax-pre-lttri 11192 ax-pre-lttrn 11193 ax-pre-ltadd 11194 ax-pre-mulgt0 11195 ax-pre-sup 11196

This proof depends on definitions: df-bi 210 df-an 402 df-or 862 df-3or 1104 df-3an 1105 df-tru 1573 df-fal 1583 df-ex 1813 df-nf 1817 df-sb 2100 df-mo 2570 df-eu 2600 df-clab 2745 df-cleq 2758 df-clel 2841 df-nfc 2915 df-ne 2962 df-nel 3068 df-ral 3083 df-rex 3093 df-rmo 3372 df-reu 3373 df-rab 3420 df-v 3460 df-sbc 3748 df-csb 3857 df-dif 3911 df-un 3913 df-in 3915 df-ss 3925 df-nul 4290 df-if 4493 df-pw 4569 df-sn 4595 df-pr 4597 df-op 4601 df-uni 4878 df-br 5115 df-opab 5179 df-mpt 5198 df-id 5561 df-po 5574 df-so 5575 df-xp 5672 df-rel 5673 df-cnv 5674 df-co 5675 df-dm 5676 df-rn 5677 df-res 5678 df-ima 5679 df-iota 6499 df-fun 6545 df-fn 6546 df-f 6547 df-f1 6548 df-fo 6549 df-f1o 6550 df-fv 6551 df-riota 7380 df-ov 7426 df-oprab 7427 df-mpo 7428 df-er 8703 df-en 8953 df-dom 8954 df-sdom 8955 df-sup 9412 df-pnf 11263 df-mnf 11264 df-xr 11265 df-ltxr 11266 df-le 11267 df-sub 11461 df-neg 11462

This theorem is used by: liminflelimsuplem 46529

W3C validator