xrsupssd - Metamath Proof Explorer

	Metamath Proof Explorer		< Previous Next > Nearby theorems
Mirrors > Home > MPE Home > Th. List > xrsupssd		Structured version Visualization version GIF version

Theorem xrsupssd 13464

Description: Inequality deduction for supremum of an extended real subset. (Contributed by Thierry Arnoux, 21-Mar-2017.)

**Hypotheses**
Ref	Expression
xrsupssd.1	⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐵 ⊆ 𝐶)
xrsupssd.2	⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐶 ⊆ ℝ^*)

**Assertion**
Ref	Expression
xrsupssd	⊢ (𝜑 → sup(𝐵, ℝ^, < ) ≤ sup(𝐶, ℝ^, < ))

Proof of Theorem xrsupssd Dummy variables 𝑥 𝑦 𝑧 are mutually distinct and distinct from all other variables.

Step	Hyp	Ref	Expression
1		xrltso 13271	. . . 4 ⊢ < Or ℝ^*
2	1	a1i 11	. . 3 ⊢ (𝜑 → < Or ℝ^*)
3		xrsupssd.1	. . 3 ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐵 ⊆ 𝐶)
4		xrsupssd.2	. . 3 ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐶 ⊆ ℝ^*)
5	3, 4	sstrd 3918	. . . 4 ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐵 ⊆ ℝ^*)
6		xrsupss 13440	. . . 4 ⊢ (𝐵 ⊆ ℝ^* → ∃𝑥 ∈ ℝ^* (∀𝑦 ∈ 𝐵 ¬ 𝑥 < 𝑦 ∧ ∀𝑦 ∈ ℝ^* (𝑦 < 𝑥 → ∃𝑧 ∈ 𝐵 𝑦 < 𝑧)))
7	5, 6	syl 18	. . 3 ⊢ (𝜑 → ∃𝑥 ∈ ℝ^* (∀𝑦 ∈ 𝐵 ¬ 𝑥 < 𝑦 ∧ ∀𝑦 ∈ ℝ^* (𝑦 < 𝑥 → ∃𝑧 ∈ 𝐵 𝑦 < 𝑧)))
8		xrsupss 13440	. . . 4 ⊢ (𝐶 ⊆ ℝ^* → ∃𝑥 ∈ ℝ^* (∀𝑦 ∈ 𝐶 ¬ 𝑥 < 𝑦 ∧ ∀𝑦 ∈ ℝ^* (𝑦 < 𝑥 → ∃𝑧 ∈ 𝐶 𝑦 < 𝑧)))
9	4, 8	syl 18	. . 3 ⊢ (𝜑 → ∃𝑥 ∈ ℝ^* (∀𝑦 ∈ 𝐶 ¬ 𝑥 < 𝑦 ∧ ∀𝑦 ∈ ℝ^* (𝑦 < 𝑥 → ∃𝑧 ∈ 𝐶 𝑦 < 𝑧)))
10	2, 3, 4, 7, 9	supssd 9456	. 2 ⊢ (𝜑 → ¬ sup(𝐶, ℝ^, < ) < sup(𝐵, ℝ^, < ))
11	2, 7	supcl 9451	. . 3 ⊢ (𝜑 → sup(𝐵, ℝ^, < ) ∈ ℝ^)
12	2, 9	supcl 9451	. . 3 ⊢ (𝜑 → sup(𝐶, ℝ^, < ) ∈ ℝ^)
13		xrlenlt 11375	. . 3 ⊢ ((sup(𝐵, ℝ^, < ) ∈ ℝ^ ∧ sup(𝐶, ℝ^, < ) ∈ ℝ^) → (sup(𝐵, ℝ^, < ) ≤ sup(𝐶, ℝ^, < ) ↔ ¬ sup(𝐶, ℝ^, < ) < sup(𝐵, ℝ^, < )))
14	11, 12, 13	syl2anc 596	. 2 ⊢ (𝜑 → (sup(𝐵, ℝ^, < ) ≤ sup(𝐶, ℝ^, < ) ↔ ¬ sup(𝐶, ℝ^, < ) < sup(𝐵, ℝ^, < )))
15	10, 14	mpbird 260	1 ⊢ (𝜑 → sup(𝐵, ℝ^, < ) ≤ sup(𝐶, ℝ^, < ))

Colors of variables: wff setvar class

This proof depends on syntax axioms: ¬ wn 3 → wi 4 ↔ wb 209 ∧ wa 401 ∈ wcel 2144 ∀wral 3076 ∃wrex 3086 ⊆ wss 3895 class class class wbr 5102 Or wor 5557 supcsup 9433 ℝ^*cxr 11343 < clt 11344 ≤ cle 11345

This proof depends on axioms: ax-mp 5 ax-1 6 ax-2 7 ax-3 8 ax-gen 1827 ax-4 1841 ax-5 1942 ax-6 1999 ax-7 2040 ax-8 2146 ax-9 2154 ax-10 2177 ax-11 2193 ax-12 2212 ax-ext 2732 ax-sep 5248 ax-nul 5259 ax-pow 5326 ax-pr 5390 ax-un 7751 ax-cnex 11257 ax-resscn 11258 ax-1cn 11259 ax-icn 11260 ax-addcl 11261 ax-addrcl 11262 ax-mulcl 11263 ax-mulrcl 11264 ax-mulcom 11265 ax-addass 11266 ax-mulass 11267 ax-distr 11268 ax-i2m1 11269 ax-1ne0 11270 ax-1rid 11271 ax-rnegex 11272 ax-rrecex 11273 ax-cnre 11274 ax-pre-lttri 11275 ax-pre-lttrn 11276 ax-pre-ltadd 11277 ax-pre-mulgt0 11278 ax-pre-sup 11279

This proof depends on definitions: df-bi 210 df-an 402 df-or 862 df-3or 1104 df-3an 1105 df-tru 1572 df-fal 1582 df-ex 1812 df-nf 1816 df-sb 2099 df-mo 2564 df-eu 2594 df-clab 2739 df-cleq 2752 df-clel 2835 df-nfc 2909 df-ne 2956 df-nel 3062 df-ral 3077 df-rex 3087 df-rmo 3365 df-reu 3366 df-rab 3413 df-v 3452 df-sbc 3739 df-csb 3847 df-ss 3896 df-dif 4047 df-in 4091 df-un 4151 df-nul 4279 df-if 4482 df-pw 4558 df-sn 4584 df-pr 4586 df-op 4590 df-uni 4867 df-br 5103 df-opab 5167 df-mpt 5186 df-id 5545 df-po 5558 df-so 5559 df-xp 5656 df-rel 5657 df-cnv 5658 df-co 5659 df-dm 5660 df-rn 5661 df-res 5662 df-ima 5663 df-iota 6494 df-fun 6540 df-fn 6541 df-f 6542 df-f1 6543 df-fo 6544 df-f1o 6545 df-fv 6546 df-riota 7377 df-ov 7423 df-oprab 7424 df-mpo 7425 df-er 8718 df-en 8975 df-dom 8976 df-sdom 8977 df-sup 9435 df-pnf 11346 df-mnf 11347 df-xr 11348 df-ltxr 11349 df-le 11350 df-sub 11544 df-neg 11545

This theorem is used by: liminflelimsuplem 46861

W3C validator