xrsupssd - Metamath Proof Explorer

	Metamath Proof Explorer		< Previous Next > Nearby theorems
Mirrors > Home > MPE Home > Th. List > xrsupssd		Structured version Visualization version GIF version

Theorem xrsupssd 13387

Description: Inequality deduction for supremum of an extended real subset. (Contributed by Thierry Arnoux, 21-Mar-2017.)

**Hypotheses**
Ref	Expression
xrsupssd.1	⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐵 ⊆ 𝐶)
xrsupssd.2	⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐶 ⊆ ℝ^*)

**Assertion**
Ref	Expression
xrsupssd	⊢ (𝜑 → sup(𝐵, ℝ^, < ) ≤ sup(𝐶, ℝ^, < ))

Proof of Theorem xrsupssd Dummy variables 𝑥 𝑦 𝑧 are mutually distinct and distinct from all other variables.

Step	Hyp	Ref	Expression
1		xrltso 13194	. . . 4 ⊢ < Or ℝ^*
2	1	a1i 11	. . 3 ⊢ (𝜑 → < Or ℝ^*)
3		xrsupssd.1	. . 3 ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐵 ⊆ 𝐶)
4		xrsupssd.2	. . 3 ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐶 ⊆ ℝ^*)
5	3, 4	sstrd 3944	. . . 4 ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐵 ⊆ ℝ^*)
6		xrsupss 13363	. . . 4 ⊢ (𝐵 ⊆ ℝ^* → ∃𝑥 ∈ ℝ^* (∀𝑦 ∈ 𝐵 ¬ 𝑥 < 𝑦 ∧ ∀𝑦 ∈ ℝ^* (𝑦 < 𝑥 → ∃𝑧 ∈ 𝐵 𝑦 < 𝑧)))
7	5, 6	syl 18	. . 3 ⊢ (𝜑 → ∃𝑥 ∈ ℝ^* (∀𝑦 ∈ 𝐵 ¬ 𝑥 < 𝑦 ∧ ∀𝑦 ∈ ℝ^* (𝑦 < 𝑥 → ∃𝑧 ∈ 𝐵 𝑦 < 𝑧)))
8		xrsupss 13363	. . . 4 ⊢ (𝐶 ⊆ ℝ^* → ∃𝑥 ∈ ℝ^* (∀𝑦 ∈ 𝐶 ¬ 𝑥 < 𝑦 ∧ ∀𝑦 ∈ ℝ^* (𝑦 < 𝑥 → ∃𝑧 ∈ 𝐶 𝑦 < 𝑧)))
9	4, 8	syl 18	. . 3 ⊢ (𝜑 → ∃𝑥 ∈ ℝ^* (∀𝑦 ∈ 𝐶 ¬ 𝑥 < 𝑦 ∧ ∀𝑦 ∈ ℝ^* (𝑦 < 𝑥 → ∃𝑧 ∈ 𝐶 𝑦 < 𝑧)))
10	2, 3, 4, 7, 9	supssd 9436	. 2 ⊢ (𝜑 → ¬ sup(𝐶, ℝ^, < ) < sup(𝐵, ℝ^, < ))
11	2, 7	supcl 9431	. . 3 ⊢ (𝜑 → sup(𝐵, ℝ^, < ) ∈ ℝ^)
12	2, 9	supcl 9431	. . 3 ⊢ (𝜑 → sup(𝐶, ℝ^, < ) ∈ ℝ^)
13		xrlenlt 11301	. . 3 ⊢ ((sup(𝐵, ℝ^, < ) ∈ ℝ^ ∧ sup(𝐶, ℝ^, < ) ∈ ℝ^) → (sup(𝐵, ℝ^, < ) ≤ sup(𝐶, ℝ^, < ) ↔ ¬ sup(𝐶, ℝ^, < ) < sup(𝐵, ℝ^, < )))
14	11, 12, 13	syl2anc 596	. 2 ⊢ (𝜑 → (sup(𝐵, ℝ^, < ) ≤ sup(𝐶, ℝ^, < ) ↔ ¬ sup(𝐶, ℝ^, < ) < sup(𝐵, ℝ^, < )))
15	10, 14	mpbird 260	1 ⊢ (𝜑 → sup(𝐵, ℝ^, < ) ≤ sup(𝐶, ℝ^, < ))

Colors of variables: wff setvar class

This proof depends on syntax axioms: ¬ wn 3 → wi 4 ↔ wb 209 ∧ wa 401 ∈ wcel 2145 ∀wral 3078 ∃wrex 3088 ⊆ wss 3902 class class class wbr 5107 Or wor 5566 supcsup 9413 ℝ^*cxr 11269 < clt 11270 ≤ cle 11271

This proof depends on axioms: ax-mp 5 ax-1 6 ax-2 7 ax-3 8 ax-gen 1828 ax-4 1842 ax-5 1943 ax-6 2000 ax-7 2041 ax-8 2147 ax-9 2155 ax-10 2178 ax-11 2194 ax-12 2215 ax-ext 2734 ax-sep 5255 ax-nul 5267 ax-pow 5334 ax-pr 5402 ax-un 7739 ax-cnex 11183 ax-resscn 11184 ax-1cn 11185 ax-icn 11186 ax-addcl 11187 ax-addrcl 11188 ax-mulcl 11189 ax-mulrcl 11190 ax-mulcom 11191 ax-addass 11192 ax-mulass 11193 ax-distr 11194 ax-i2m1 11195 ax-1ne0 11196 ax-1rid 11197 ax-rnegex 11198 ax-rrecex 11199 ax-cnre 11200 ax-pre-lttri 11201 ax-pre-lttrn 11202 ax-pre-ltadd 11203 ax-pre-mulgt0 11204 ax-pre-sup 11205

This proof depends on definitions: df-bi 210 df-an 402 df-or 862 df-3or 1104 df-3an 1105 df-tru 1573 df-fal 1583 df-ex 1813 df-nf 1817 df-sb 2100 df-mo 2566 df-eu 2596 df-clab 2741 df-cleq 2754 df-clel 2837 df-nfc 2911 df-ne 2958 df-nel 3064 df-ral 3079 df-rex 3089 df-rmo 3367 df-reu 3368 df-rab 3415 df-v 3455 df-sbc 3743 df-csb 3851 df-dif 3905 df-un 3907 df-in 3909 df-ss 3919 df-nul 4283 df-if 4486 df-pw 4562 df-sn 4588 df-pr 4590 df-op 4594 df-uni 4871 df-br 5108 df-opab 5172 df-mpt 5191 df-id 5554 df-po 5567 df-so 5568 df-xp 5665 df-rel 5666 df-cnv 5667 df-co 5668 df-dm 5669 df-rn 5670 df-res 5671 df-ima 5672 df-iota 6493 df-fun 6539 df-fn 6540 df-f 6541 df-f1 6542 df-fo 6543 df-f1o 6544 df-fv 6545 df-riota 7373 df-ov 7419 df-oprab 7420 df-mpo 7421 df-er 8699 df-en 8956 df-dom 8957 df-sdom 8958 df-sup 9415 df-pnf 11272 df-mnf 11273 df-xr 11274 df-ltxr 11275 df-le 11276 df-sub 11470 df-neg 11471

This theorem is used by: liminflelimsuplem 46605

W3C validator