xrsupssd - Metamath Proof Explorer

	Metamath Proof Explorer		< Previous Next > Nearby theorems
Mirrors > Home > MPE Home > Th. List > xrsupssd		Structured version Visualization version GIF version

Theorem xrsupssd 13490

Description: Inequality deduction for supremum of an extended real subset. (Contributed by Thierry Arnoux, 21-Mar-2017.)

**Hypotheses**
Ref	Expression
xrsupssd.1	⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐵 ⊆ 𝐶)
xrsupssd.2	⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐶 ⊆ ℝ^*)

**Assertion**
Ref	Expression
xrsupssd	⊢ (𝜑 → sup(𝐵, ℝ^, < ) ≤ sup(𝐶, ℝ^, < ))

Proof of Theorem xrsupssd Dummy variables 𝑥 𝑦 𝑧 are mutually distinct and distinct from all other variables.

Step	Hyp	Ref	Expression
1		xrltso 13297	. . . 4 ⊢ < Or ℝ^*
2	1	a1i 11	. . 3 ⊢ (𝜑 → < Or ℝ^*)
3		xrsupssd.1	. . 3 ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐵 ⊆ 𝐶)
4		xrsupssd.2	. . 3 ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐶 ⊆ ℝ^*)
5	3, 4	sstrd 3923	. . . 4 ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐵 ⊆ ℝ^*)
6		xrsupss 13466	. . . 4 ⊢ (𝐵 ⊆ ℝ^* → ∃𝑥 ∈ ℝ^* (∀𝑦 ∈ 𝐵 ¬ 𝑥 < 𝑦 ∧ ∀𝑦 ∈ ℝ^* (𝑦 < 𝑥 → ∃𝑧 ∈ 𝐵 𝑦 < 𝑧)))
7	5, 6	syl 18	. . 3 ⊢ (𝜑 → ∃𝑥 ∈ ℝ^* (∀𝑦 ∈ 𝐵 ¬ 𝑥 < 𝑦 ∧ ∀𝑦 ∈ ℝ^* (𝑦 < 𝑥 → ∃𝑧 ∈ 𝐵 𝑦 < 𝑧)))
8		xrsupss 13466	. . . 4 ⊢ (𝐶 ⊆ ℝ^* → ∃𝑥 ∈ ℝ^* (∀𝑦 ∈ 𝐶 ¬ 𝑥 < 𝑦 ∧ ∀𝑦 ∈ ℝ^* (𝑦 < 𝑥 → ∃𝑧 ∈ 𝐶 𝑦 < 𝑧)))
9	4, 8	syl 18	. . 3 ⊢ (𝜑 → ∃𝑥 ∈ ℝ^* (∀𝑦 ∈ 𝐶 ¬ 𝑥 < 𝑦 ∧ ∀𝑦 ∈ ℝ^* (𝑦 < 𝑥 → ∃𝑧 ∈ 𝐶 𝑦 < 𝑧)))
10	2, 3, 4, 7, 9	supssd 9482	. 2 ⊢ (𝜑 → ¬ sup(𝐶, ℝ^, < ) < sup(𝐵, ℝ^, < ))
11	2, 7	supcl 9477	. . 3 ⊢ (𝜑 → sup(𝐵, ℝ^, < ) ∈ ℝ^)
12	2, 9	supcl 9477	. . 3 ⊢ (𝜑 → sup(𝐶, ℝ^, < ) ∈ ℝ^)
13		xrlenlt 11401	. . 3 ⊢ ((sup(𝐵, ℝ^, < ) ∈ ℝ^ ∧ sup(𝐶, ℝ^, < ) ∈ ℝ^) → (sup(𝐵, ℝ^, < ) ≤ sup(𝐶, ℝ^, < ) ↔ ¬ sup(𝐶, ℝ^, < ) < sup(𝐵, ℝ^, < )))
14	11, 12, 13	syl2anc 596	. 2 ⊢ (𝜑 → (sup(𝐵, ℝ^, < ) ≤ sup(𝐶, ℝ^, < ) ↔ ¬ sup(𝐶, ℝ^, < ) < sup(𝐵, ℝ^, < )))
15	10, 14	mpbird 260	1 ⊢ (𝜑 → sup(𝐵, ℝ^, < ) ≤ sup(𝐶, ℝ^, < ))

Colors of variables: wff setvar class

This proof depends on syntax axioms: ¬ wn 3 → wi 4 ↔ wb 209 ∧ wa 401 ∈ wcel 2147 ∀wral 3080 ∃wrex 3090 ⊆ wss 3900 class class class wbr 5106 Or wor 5562 supcsup 9459 ℝ^*cxr 11369 < clt 11370 ≤ cle 11371

This proof depends on axioms: ax-mp 5 ax-1 6 ax-2 7 ax-3 8 ax-gen 1828 ax-4 1842 ax-5 1945 ax-6 2002 ax-7 2043 ax-8 2149 ax-9 2157 ax-10 2180 ax-11 2197 ax-12 2216 ax-ext 2735 ax-sep 5252 ax-nul 5263 ax-pow 5331 ax-pr 5395 ax-un 7775 ax-cnex 11283 ax-resscn 11284 ax-1cn 11285 ax-icn 11286 ax-addcl 11287 ax-addrcl 11288 ax-mulcl 11289 ax-mulrcl 11290 ax-mulcom 11291 ax-addass 11292 ax-mulass 11293 ax-distr 11294 ax-i2m1 11295 ax-1ne0 11296 ax-1rid 11297 ax-rnegex 11298 ax-rrecex 11299 ax-cnre 11300 ax-pre-lttri 11301 ax-pre-lttrn 11302 ax-pre-ltadd 11303 ax-pre-mulgt0 11304 ax-pre-sup 11305

This proof depends on definitions: df-bi 210 df-an 402 df-or 862 df-3or 1104 df-3an 1105 df-tru 1573 df-fal 1583 df-ex 1813 df-nf 1817 df-sb 2102 df-mo 2567 df-eu 2597 df-clab 2742 df-cleq 2755 df-clel 2839 df-nfc 2913 df-ne 2960 df-nel 3066 df-ral 3081 df-rex 3091 df-rmo 3369 df-reu 3370 df-rab 3417 df-v 3456 df-sbc 3743 df-csb 3852 df-ss 3901 df-dif 4050 df-in 4094 df-un 4154 df-nul 4282 df-if 4486 df-pw 4562 df-sn 4589 df-pr 4591 df-op 4839 df-uni 4871 df-br 5107 df-opab 5171 df-mpt 5190 df-id 5550 df-po 5563 df-so 5564 df-xp 5661 df-rel 5662 df-cnv 5663 df-co 5664 df-dm 5665 df-rn 5666 df-res 5667 df-ima 5668 df-iota 6512 df-fun 6560 df-fn 6561 df-f 6562 df-f1 6563 df-fo 6564 df-f1o 6565 df-fv 6566 df-riota 7400 df-ov 7446 df-oprab 7447 df-mpo 7448 df-er 8745 df-en 9002 df-dom 9003 df-sdom 9004 df-sup 9461 df-pnf 11372 df-mnf 11373 df-xr 11374 df-ltxr 11375 df-le 11376 df-sub 11570 df-neg 11571

This theorem is used by: liminflelimsuplem 46990

W3C validator