P. 326 of Theorem List - Metamath Proof Explorer

Theorem List for Metamath Proof Explorer - 32501-32600   *Has distinct variable group(s)

Type	Label	Description
Statement
Theorem	mdsymlem6 32501*	Lemma for mdsymi 32504. This is the converse direction of Lemma 4(i) of [Maeda] p. 168, and is based on the proof of Theorem 1(d) to (e) of [Maeda] p. 167. (Contributed by NM, 2-Jul-2004.) (New usage is discouraged.)
⊢ 𝐴 ∈ Cℋ    &   ⊢ 𝐵 ∈ Cℋ    &   ⊢ 𝐶 = (𝐴 ∨ℋ 𝑝)    ⇒   ⊢ (∀𝑝 ∈ HAtoms (𝑝 ⊆ (𝐴 ∨ℋ 𝐵) → ∃𝑞 ∈ HAtoms ∃𝑟 ∈ HAtoms (𝑝 ⊆ (𝑞 ∨ℋ 𝑟) ∧ (𝑞 ⊆ 𝐴 ∧ 𝑟 ⊆ 𝐵))) → 𝐵 𝑀ℋ* 𝐴)
Theorem	mdsymlem7 32502*	Lemma for mdsymi 32504. Lemma 4(i) of [Maeda] p. 168. Note that Maeda's 1965 definition of dual modular pair has reversed arguments compared to the later (1970) definition given in Remark 29.6 of [MaedaMaeda] p. 130, which is the one that we use. (Contributed by NM, 3-Jul-2004.) (New usage is discouraged.)
⊢ 𝐴 ∈ Cℋ    &   ⊢ 𝐵 ∈ Cℋ    &   ⊢ 𝐶 = (𝐴 ∨ℋ 𝑝)    ⇒   ⊢ ((𝐴 ≠ 0ℋ ∧ 𝐵 ≠ 0ℋ) → (𝐵 𝑀ℋ* 𝐴 ↔ ∀𝑝 ∈ HAtoms (𝑝 ⊆ (𝐴 ∨ℋ 𝐵) → ∃𝑞 ∈ HAtoms ∃𝑟 ∈ HAtoms (𝑝 ⊆ (𝑞 ∨ℋ 𝑟) ∧ (𝑞 ⊆ 𝐴 ∧ 𝑟 ⊆ 𝐵)))))
Theorem	mdsymlem8 32503*	Lemma for mdsymi 32504. Lemma 4(ii) of [Maeda] p. 168. (Contributed by NM, 3-Jul-2004.) (New usage is discouraged.)
⊢ 𝐴 ∈ Cℋ    &   ⊢ 𝐵 ∈ Cℋ    &   ⊢ 𝐶 = (𝐴 ∨ℋ 𝑝)    ⇒   ⊢ ((𝐴 ≠ 0ℋ ∧ 𝐵 ≠ 0ℋ) → (𝐵 𝑀ℋ* 𝐴 ↔ 𝐴 𝑀ℋ* 𝐵))
Theorem	mdsymi 32504	M-symmetry of the Hilbert lattice. Lemma 5 of [Maeda] p. 168. (Contributed by NM, 3-Jul-2004.) (New usage is discouraged.)
⊢ 𝐴 ∈ Cℋ    &   ⊢ 𝐵 ∈ Cℋ    ⇒   ⊢ (𝐴 𝑀ℋ 𝐵 ↔ 𝐵 𝑀ℋ 𝐴)
Theorem	mdsym 32505	M-symmetry of the Hilbert lattice. Lemma 5 of [Maeda] p. 168. (Contributed by NM, 6-Jul-2004.) (New usage is discouraged.)
⊢ ((𝐴 ∈ Cℋ ∧ 𝐵 ∈ Cℋ ) → (𝐴 𝑀ℋ 𝐵 ↔ 𝐵 𝑀ℋ 𝐴))
Theorem	dmdsym 32506	Dual M-symmetry of the Hilbert lattice. (Contributed by NM, 25-Jul-2007.) (New usage is discouraged.)
⊢ ((𝐴 ∈ Cℋ ∧ 𝐵 ∈ Cℋ ) → (𝐴 𝑀ℋ* 𝐵 ↔ 𝐵 𝑀ℋ* 𝐴))
Theorem	atdmd2 32507	Two Hilbert lattice elements have the dual modular pair property if the second is an atom. (Contributed by NM, 6-Jul-2004.) (New usage is discouraged.)
⊢ ((𝐴 ∈ Cℋ ∧ 𝐵 ∈ HAtoms) → 𝐴 𝑀ℋ* 𝐵)
Theorem	sumdmdii 32508	If the subspace sum of two Hilbert lattice elements is closed, then the elements are a dual modular pair. Remark in [MaedaMaeda] p. 139. (Contributed by NM, 12-Jul-2004.) (New usage is discouraged.)
⊢ 𝐴 ∈ Cℋ    &   ⊢ 𝐵 ∈ Cℋ    ⇒   ⊢ ((𝐴 +ℋ 𝐵) = (𝐴 ∨ℋ 𝐵) → 𝐴 𝑀ℋ* 𝐵)
Theorem	cmmdi 32509	Commuting subspaces form a modular pair. (Contributed by NM, 16-Jan-2005.) (New usage is discouraged.)
⊢ 𝐴 ∈ Cℋ    &   ⊢ 𝐵 ∈ Cℋ    ⇒   ⊢ (𝐴 𝐶ℋ 𝐵 → 𝐴 𝑀ℋ 𝐵)
Theorem	cmdmdi 32510	Commuting subspaces form a dual modular pair. (Contributed by NM, 25-Apr-2006.) (New usage is discouraged.)
⊢ 𝐴 ∈ Cℋ    &   ⊢ 𝐵 ∈ Cℋ    ⇒   ⊢ (𝐴 𝐶ℋ 𝐵 → 𝐴 𝑀ℋ* 𝐵)
Theorem	sumdmdlem 32511	Lemma for sumdmdi 32513. The span of vector 𝐶 not in the subspace sum is "trimmed off." (Contributed by NM, 18-Dec-2004.) (New usage is discouraged.)
⊢ 𝐴 ∈ Cℋ    &   ⊢ 𝐵 ∈ Cℋ    ⇒   ⊢ ((𝐶 ∈ ℋ ∧ ¬ 𝐶 ∈ (𝐴 +ℋ 𝐵)) → ((𝐵 +ℋ (span‘{𝐶})) ∩ 𝐴) = (𝐵 ∩ 𝐴))
Theorem	sumdmdlem2 32512*	Lemma for sumdmdi 32513. (Contributed by NM, 23-Dec-2004.) (New usage is discouraged.)
⊢ 𝐴 ∈ Cℋ    &   ⊢ 𝐵 ∈ Cℋ    ⇒   ⊢ (∀𝑥 ∈ HAtoms ((𝑥 ∨ℋ 𝐵) ∩ (𝐴 ∨ℋ 𝐵)) ⊆ (((𝑥 ∨ℋ 𝐵) ∩ 𝐴) ∨ℋ 𝐵) → (𝐴 +ℋ 𝐵) = (𝐴 ∨ℋ 𝐵))
Theorem	sumdmdi 32513	The subspace sum of two Hilbert lattice elements is closed iff the elements are a dual modular pair. Theorem 2 of [Holland] p. 1519. (Contributed by NM, 14-Dec-2004.) (New usage is discouraged.)
⊢ 𝐴 ∈ Cℋ    &   ⊢ 𝐵 ∈ Cℋ    ⇒   ⊢ ((𝐴 +ℋ 𝐵) = (𝐴 ∨ℋ 𝐵) ↔ 𝐴 𝑀ℋ* 𝐵)
Theorem	dmdbr4ati 32514*	Dual modular pair property in terms of atoms. (Contributed by NM, 15-Jan-2005.) (New usage is discouraged.)
⊢ 𝐴 ∈ Cℋ    &   ⊢ 𝐵 ∈ Cℋ    ⇒   ⊢ (𝐴 𝑀ℋ* 𝐵 ↔ ∀𝑥 ∈ HAtoms ((𝑥 ∨ℋ 𝐵) ∩ (𝐴 ∨ℋ 𝐵)) ⊆ (((𝑥 ∨ℋ 𝐵) ∩ 𝐴) ∨ℋ 𝐵))
Theorem	dmdbr5ati 32515*	Dual modular pair property in terms of atoms. (Contributed by NM, 14-Jan-2005.) (New usage is discouraged.)
⊢ 𝐴 ∈ Cℋ    &   ⊢ 𝐵 ∈ Cℋ    ⇒   ⊢ (𝐴 𝑀ℋ* 𝐵 ↔ ∀𝑥 ∈ HAtoms (𝑥 ⊆ (𝐴 ∨ℋ 𝐵) → 𝑥 ⊆ (((𝑥 ∨ℋ 𝐵) ∩ 𝐴) ∨ℋ 𝐵)))
Theorem	dmdbr6ati 32516*	Dual modular pair property in terms of atoms. The modular law takes the form of the shearing identity. (Contributed by NM, 18-Jan-2005.) (New usage is discouraged.)
⊢ 𝐴 ∈ Cℋ    &   ⊢ 𝐵 ∈ Cℋ    ⇒   ⊢ (𝐴 𝑀ℋ* 𝐵 ↔ ∀𝑥 ∈ HAtoms ((𝐴 ∨ℋ 𝐵) ∩ 𝑥) = ((((𝑥 ∨ℋ 𝐵) ∩ 𝐴) ∨ℋ 𝐵) ∩ 𝑥))
Theorem	dmdbr7ati 32517*	Dual modular pair property in terms of atoms. (Contributed by NM, 18-Jan-2005.) (New usage is discouraged.)
⊢ 𝐴 ∈ Cℋ    &   ⊢ 𝐵 ∈ Cℋ    ⇒   ⊢ (𝐴 𝑀ℋ* 𝐵 ↔ ∀𝑥 ∈ HAtoms ((𝐴 ∨ℋ 𝐵) ∩ 𝑥) ⊆ (((𝑥 ∨ℋ 𝐵) ∩ 𝐴) ∨ℋ 𝐵))
Theorem	mdoc1i 32518	Orthocomplements form a modular pair. (Contributed by NM, 29-Apr-2006.) (New usage is discouraged.)
⊢ 𝐴 ∈ Cℋ    ⇒   ⊢ 𝐴 𝑀ℋ (⊥‘𝐴)
Theorem	mdoc2i 32519	Orthocomplements form a modular pair. (Contributed by NM, 29-Apr-2006.) (New usage is discouraged.)
⊢ 𝐴 ∈ Cℋ    ⇒   ⊢ (⊥‘𝐴) 𝑀ℋ 𝐴
Theorem	dmdoc1i 32520	Orthocomplements form a dual modular pair. (Contributed by NM, 29-Apr-2006.) (New usage is discouraged.)
⊢ 𝐴 ∈ Cℋ    ⇒   ⊢ 𝐴 𝑀ℋ* (⊥‘𝐴)
Theorem	dmdoc2i 32521	Orthocomplements form a dual modular pair. (Contributed by NM, 29-Apr-2006.) (New usage is discouraged.)
⊢ 𝐴 ∈ Cℋ    ⇒   ⊢ (⊥‘𝐴) 𝑀ℋ* 𝐴
Theorem	mdcompli 32522	A condition equivalent to the modular pair property. Part of proof of Theorem 1.14 of [MaedaMaeda] p. 4. (Contributed by NM, 29-Apr-2006.) (New usage is discouraged.)
⊢ 𝐴 ∈ Cℋ    &   ⊢ 𝐵 ∈ Cℋ    ⇒   ⊢ (𝐴 𝑀ℋ 𝐵 ↔ (𝐴 ∩ (⊥‘(𝐴 ∩ 𝐵))) 𝑀ℋ (𝐵 ∩ (⊥‘(𝐴 ∩ 𝐵))))
Theorem	dmdcompli 32523	A condition equivalent to the dual modular pair property. (Contributed by NM, 29-Apr-2006.) (New usage is discouraged.)
⊢ 𝐴 ∈ Cℋ    &   ⊢ 𝐵 ∈ Cℋ    ⇒   ⊢ (𝐴 𝑀ℋ* 𝐵 ↔ (𝐴 ∩ (⊥‘(𝐴 ∩ 𝐵))) 𝑀ℋ* (𝐵 ∩ (⊥‘(𝐴 ∩ 𝐵))))
Theorem	mddmdin0i 32524*	If dual modular implies modular whenever meet is zero, then dual modular implies modular for arbitrary lattice elements. This theorem is needed for the remark after Lemma 7 of [Holland] p. 1524 to hold. (Contributed by NM, 29-Apr-2006.) (New usage is discouraged.)
⊢ 𝐴 ∈ Cℋ    &   ⊢ 𝐵 ∈ Cℋ    &   ⊢ ∀𝑥 ∈ Cℋ ∀𝑦 ∈ Cℋ ((𝑥 𝑀ℋ* 𝑦 ∧ (𝑥 ∩ 𝑦) = 0ℋ) → 𝑥 𝑀ℋ 𝑦)    ⇒   ⊢ (𝐴 𝑀ℋ* 𝐵 → 𝐴 𝑀ℋ 𝐵)
Theorem	cdjreui 32525*	A member of the sum of disjoint subspaces has a unique decomposition. Part of Lemma 5 of [Holland] p. 1520. (Contributed by NM, 20-May-2005.) (New usage is discouraged.)
⊢ 𝐴 ∈ Sℋ    &   ⊢ 𝐵 ∈ Sℋ    ⇒   ⊢ ((𝐶 ∈ (𝐴 +ℋ 𝐵) ∧ (𝐴 ∩ 𝐵) = 0ℋ) → ∃!𝑥 ∈ 𝐴 ∃𝑦 ∈ 𝐵 𝐶 = (𝑥 +ℎ 𝑦))
Theorem	cdj1i 32526*	Two ways to express "𝐴 and 𝐵 are completely disjoint subspaces." (1) => (2) in Lemma 5 of [Holland] p. 1520. (Contributed by NM, 21-May-2005.) (New usage is discouraged.)
⊢ 𝐴 ∈ Sℋ    &   ⊢ 𝐵 ∈ Sℋ    ⇒   ⊢ (∃𝑤 ∈ ℝ (0 < 𝑤 ∧ ∀𝑦 ∈ 𝐴 ∀𝑣 ∈ 𝐵 ((normℎ‘𝑦) + (normℎ‘𝑣)) ≤ (𝑤 · (normℎ‘(𝑦 +ℎ 𝑣)))) → ∃𝑥 ∈ ℝ (0 < 𝑥 ∧ ∀𝑦 ∈ 𝐴 ∀𝑧 ∈ 𝐵 ((normℎ‘𝑦) = 1 → 𝑥 ≤ (normℎ‘(𝑦 −ℎ 𝑧)))))
Theorem	cdj3lem1 32527*	A property of "𝐴 and 𝐵 are completely disjoint subspaces." Part of Lemma 5 of [Holland] p. 1520. (Contributed by NM, 23-May-2005.) (New usage is discouraged.)
⊢ 𝐴 ∈ Sℋ    &   ⊢ 𝐵 ∈ Sℋ    ⇒   ⊢ (∃𝑥 ∈ ℝ (0 < 𝑥 ∧ ∀𝑦 ∈ 𝐴 ∀𝑧 ∈ 𝐵 ((normℎ‘𝑦) + (normℎ‘𝑧)) ≤ (𝑥 · (normℎ‘(𝑦 +ℎ 𝑧)))) → (𝐴 ∩ 𝐵) = 0ℋ)
Theorem	cdj3lem2 32528*	Lemma for cdj3i 32534. Value of the first-component function 𝑆. (Contributed by NM, 23-May-2005.) (New usage is discouraged.)
⊢ 𝐴 ∈ Sℋ    &   ⊢ 𝐵 ∈ Sℋ    &   ⊢ 𝑆 = (𝑥 ∈ (𝐴 +ℋ 𝐵) ↦ (℩𝑧 ∈ 𝐴 ∃𝑤 ∈ 𝐵 𝑥 = (𝑧 +ℎ 𝑤)))    ⇒   ⊢ ((𝐶 ∈ 𝐴 ∧ 𝐷 ∈ 𝐵 ∧ (𝐴 ∩ 𝐵) = 0ℋ) → (𝑆‘(𝐶 +ℎ 𝐷)) = 𝐶)
Theorem	cdj3lem2a 32529*	Lemma for cdj3i 32534. Closure of the first-component function 𝑆. (Contributed by NM, 25-May-2005.) (New usage is discouraged.)
⊢ 𝐴 ∈ Sℋ    &   ⊢ 𝐵 ∈ Sℋ    &   ⊢ 𝑆 = (𝑥 ∈ (𝐴 +ℋ 𝐵) ↦ (℩𝑧 ∈ 𝐴 ∃𝑤 ∈ 𝐵 𝑥 = (𝑧 +ℎ 𝑤)))    ⇒   ⊢ ((𝐶 ∈ (𝐴 +ℋ 𝐵) ∧ (𝐴 ∩ 𝐵) = 0ℋ) → (𝑆‘𝐶) ∈ 𝐴)
Theorem	cdj3lem2b 32530*	Lemma for cdj3i 32534. The first-component function 𝑆 is bounded if the subspaces are completely disjoint. (Contributed by NM, 26-May-2005.) (New usage is discouraged.)
⊢ 𝐴 ∈ Sℋ    &   ⊢ 𝐵 ∈ Sℋ    &   ⊢ 𝑆 = (𝑥 ∈ (𝐴 +ℋ 𝐵) ↦ (℩𝑧 ∈ 𝐴 ∃𝑤 ∈ 𝐵 𝑥 = (𝑧 +ℎ 𝑤)))    ⇒   ⊢ (∃𝑣 ∈ ℝ (0 < 𝑣 ∧ ∀𝑥 ∈ 𝐴 ∀𝑦 ∈ 𝐵 ((normℎ‘𝑥) + (normℎ‘𝑦)) ≤ (𝑣 · (normℎ‘(𝑥 +ℎ 𝑦)))) → ∃𝑣 ∈ ℝ (0 < 𝑣 ∧ ∀𝑢 ∈ (𝐴 +ℋ 𝐵)(normℎ‘(𝑆‘𝑢)) ≤ (𝑣 · (normℎ‘𝑢))))
Theorem	cdj3lem3 32531*	Lemma for cdj3i 32534. Value of the second-component function 𝑇. (Contributed by NM, 23-May-2005.) (New usage is discouraged.)
⊢ 𝐴 ∈ Sℋ    &   ⊢ 𝐵 ∈ Sℋ    &   ⊢ 𝑇 = (𝑥 ∈ (𝐴 +ℋ 𝐵) ↦ (℩𝑤 ∈ 𝐵 ∃𝑧 ∈ 𝐴 𝑥 = (𝑧 +ℎ 𝑤)))    ⇒   ⊢ ((𝐶 ∈ 𝐴 ∧ 𝐷 ∈ 𝐵 ∧ (𝐴 ∩ 𝐵) = 0ℋ) → (𝑇‘(𝐶 +ℎ 𝐷)) = 𝐷)
Theorem	cdj3lem3a 32532*	Lemma for cdj3i 32534. Closure of the second-component function 𝑇. (Contributed by NM, 26-May-2005.) (New usage is discouraged.)
⊢ 𝐴 ∈ Sℋ    &   ⊢ 𝐵 ∈ Sℋ    &   ⊢ 𝑇 = (𝑥 ∈ (𝐴 +ℋ 𝐵) ↦ (℩𝑤 ∈ 𝐵 ∃𝑧 ∈ 𝐴 𝑥 = (𝑧 +ℎ 𝑤)))    ⇒   ⊢ ((𝐶 ∈ (𝐴 +ℋ 𝐵) ∧ (𝐴 ∩ 𝐵) = 0ℋ) → (𝑇‘𝐶) ∈ 𝐵)
Theorem	cdj3lem3b 32533*	Lemma for cdj3i 32534. The second-component function 𝑇 is bounded if the subspaces are completely disjoint. (Contributed by NM, 31-May-2005.) (New usage is discouraged.)
⊢ 𝐴 ∈ Sℋ    &   ⊢ 𝐵 ∈ Sℋ    &   ⊢ 𝑇 = (𝑥 ∈ (𝐴 +ℋ 𝐵) ↦ (℩𝑤 ∈ 𝐵 ∃𝑧 ∈ 𝐴 𝑥 = (𝑧 +ℎ 𝑤)))    ⇒   ⊢ (∃𝑣 ∈ ℝ (0 < 𝑣 ∧ ∀𝑥 ∈ 𝐴 ∀𝑦 ∈ 𝐵 ((normℎ‘𝑥) + (normℎ‘𝑦)) ≤ (𝑣 · (normℎ‘(𝑥 +ℎ 𝑦)))) → ∃𝑣 ∈ ℝ (0 < 𝑣 ∧ ∀𝑢 ∈ (𝐴 +ℋ 𝐵)(normℎ‘(𝑇‘𝑢)) ≤ (𝑣 · (normℎ‘𝑢))))
Theorem	cdj3i 32534*	Two ways to express "𝐴 and 𝐵 are completely disjoint subspaces." (1) <=> (3) in Lemma 5 of [Holland] p. 1520. (Contributed by NM, 1-Jun-2005.) (New usage is discouraged.)
⊢ 𝐴 ∈ Sℋ    &   ⊢ 𝐵 ∈ Sℋ    &   ⊢ 𝑆 = (𝑥 ∈ (𝐴 +ℋ 𝐵) ↦ (℩𝑧 ∈ 𝐴 ∃𝑤 ∈ 𝐵 𝑥 = (𝑧 +ℎ 𝑤)))    &   ⊢ 𝑇 = (𝑥 ∈ (𝐴 +ℋ 𝐵) ↦ (℩𝑤 ∈ 𝐵 ∃𝑧 ∈ 𝐴 𝑥 = (𝑧 +ℎ 𝑤)))    &   ⊢ (𝜑 ↔ ∃𝑣 ∈ ℝ (0 < 𝑣 ∧ ∀𝑢 ∈ (𝐴 +ℋ 𝐵)(normℎ‘(𝑆‘𝑢)) ≤ (𝑣 · (normℎ‘𝑢))))    &   ⊢ (𝜓 ↔ ∃𝑣 ∈ ℝ (0 < 𝑣 ∧ ∀𝑢 ∈ (𝐴 +ℋ 𝐵)(normℎ‘(𝑇‘𝑢)) ≤ (𝑣 · (normℎ‘𝑢))))    ⇒   ⊢ (∃𝑣 ∈ ℝ (0 < 𝑣 ∧ ∀𝑥 ∈ 𝐴 ∀𝑦 ∈ 𝐵 ((normℎ‘𝑥) + (normℎ‘𝑦)) ≤ (𝑣 · (normℎ‘(𝑥 +ℎ 𝑦)))) ↔ ((𝐴 ∩ 𝐵) = 0ℋ ∧ 𝜑 ∧ 𝜓))
PART 21  SUPPLEMENTARY MATERIAL (USERS' MATHBOXES)
21.1  Mathboxes for user contributions
21.1.1  Mathbox guidelines
Theorem	mathbox 32535	(This theorem is a dummy placeholder for these guidelines. The label of this theorem, "mathbox", is hard-coded into the Metamath program to identify the start of the mathbox section for web page generation.) A "mathbox" is a user-contributed section that is maintained by its contributor independently from the main part of set.mm. For contributors: By making a contribution, you agree to release it into the public domain, according to the statement at the beginning of set.mm. Mathboxes are provided to help keep your work synchronized with changes in set.mm while allowing you to work independently without affecting other contributors. Even though in a sense your mathbox belongs to you, it is still part of the shared body of knowledge contained in set.mm, and occasionally other people may make maintenance edits to your mathbox for things like keeping it synchronized with the rest of set.mm, reducing proof lengths, moving your theorems to the main part of set.mm when needed, and fixing typos or other errors. If you want to preserve it the way you left it, you can keep a local copy or keep track of the GitHub commit number. Guidelines: 1. See conventions 30492 for our general style guidelines. For contributing via GitHub, see https://github.com/metamath/set.mm/blob/develop/CONTRIBUTING.md 30492. The Metamath program command "verify markup *" will check that you have followed many of the conventions we use. 2. If at all possible, please use only nullary class constants for new definitions, for example as in df-div 11803. 3. Each $p and $a statement must be immediately preceded with the comment that will be shown on its web page description. The Metamath program "MM> WRITE SOURCE set.mm / REWRAP" command will take care of indentation conventions and line wrapping. 4. All mathbox content will be on public display and should hopefully reflect the overall quality of the website. 5. Mathboxes must be independent from one another (checked by "verify markup *"). If you need a theorem from another mathbox, typically it is moved to the main part of set.mm. New users should consult with more experienced users before doing this. 6. If a contributor is no longer active, we will continue the usual maintenance edits. As time goes on, often theorems will be moved to main or removed in favor of similar replacements. But we are also willing to maintain mathboxes in place, as work by others from years ago may form the foundation of future work; you could even argue that all of mathematics is like that. 7. For theorems of importance (for example, a Metamath 100 theorem or a dependency of one), we prefer to eventually move them out of mathboxes (although a mathbox is perfectly appropriate as proofs are being developed and refined). (Contributed by NM, 20-Feb-2007.) (Revised by the Metamath team, 9-Sep-2023.) (Proof modification is discouraged.) (New usage is discouraged.)
⊢ 𝜑    ⇒   ⊢ 𝜑
21.2  Mathbox for Stefan Allan
Theorem	sa-abvi 32536	A theorem about the universal class. Inference associated with bj-abv 37274 (which is proved from fewer axioms). (Contributed by Stefan Allan, 9-Dec-2008.)
⊢ 𝜑    ⇒   ⊢ V = {𝑥 ∣ 𝜑}
Theorem	xfree 32537	A partial converse to 19.9t 2218. (Contributed by Stefan Allan, 21-Dec-2008.) (Revised by Mario Carneiro, 11-Dec-2016.)
⊢ (∀𝑥(𝜑 → ∀𝑥𝜑) ↔ ∀𝑥(∃𝑥𝜑 → 𝜑))
Theorem	xfree2 32538	A partial converse to 19.9t 2218. (Contributed by Stefan Allan, 21-Dec-2008.)
⊢ (∀𝑥(𝜑 → ∀𝑥𝜑) ↔ ∀𝑥(¬ 𝜑 → ∀𝑥 ¬ 𝜑))
Theorem	addltmulALT 32539	A proof readability experiment for addltmul 12408. (Contributed by Stefan Allan, 30-Oct-2010.) (New usage is discouraged.) (Proof modification is discouraged.)
⊢ (((𝐴 ∈ ℝ ∧ 𝐵 ∈ ℝ) ∧ (2 < 𝐴 ∧ 2 < 𝐵)) → (𝐴 + 𝐵) < (𝐴 · 𝐵))
21.3  Mathbox for Thierry Arnoux
21.3.1  Propositional Calculus - misc additions
Theorem	ad11antr 32540	Deduction adding 11 conjuncts to antecedent. (Contributed by Thierry Arnoux, 27-Sep-2025.)
⊢ (𝜑 → 𝜓)    ⇒   ⊢ ((((((((((((𝜑 ∧ 𝜒) ∧ 𝜃) ∧ 𝜏) ∧ 𝜂) ∧ 𝜁) ∧ 𝜎) ∧ 𝜌) ∧ 𝜇) ∧ 𝜆) ∧ 𝜅) ∧ 𝜈) → 𝜓)
Theorem	simp-12l 32541	Simplification of a conjunction. (Contributed by Thierry Arnoux, 5-Oct-2025.)
⊢ (((((((((((((𝜑 ∧ 𝜓) ∧ 𝜒) ∧ 𝜃) ∧ 𝜏) ∧ 𝜂) ∧ 𝜁) ∧ 𝜎) ∧ 𝜌) ∧ 𝜇) ∧ 𝜆) ∧ 𝜅) ∧ 𝜈) → 𝜑)
Theorem	simp-12r 32542	Simplification of a conjunction. (Contributed by Thierry Arnoux, 5-Oct-2025.)
⊢ (((((((((((((𝜑 ∧ 𝜓) ∧ 𝜒) ∧ 𝜃) ∧ 𝜏) ∧ 𝜂) ∧ 𝜁) ∧ 𝜎) ∧ 𝜌) ∧ 𝜇) ∧ 𝜆) ∧ 𝜅) ∧ 𝜈) → 𝜓)
Theorem	an52ds 32543	Inference exchanging the last antecedent with the second. (Contributed by Thierry Arnoux, 3-Jun-2025.)
⊢ (((((𝜑 ∧ 𝜓) ∧ 𝜒) ∧ 𝜃) ∧ 𝜏) → 𝜂)    ⇒   ⊢ (((((𝜑 ∧ 𝜏) ∧ 𝜒) ∧ 𝜃) ∧ 𝜓) → 𝜂)
Theorem	an62ds 32544	Inference exchanging the last antecedent with the second one. (Contributed by Thierry Arnoux, 3-Jun-2025.)
⊢ ((((((𝜑 ∧ 𝜓) ∧ 𝜒) ∧ 𝜃) ∧ 𝜏) ∧ 𝜂) → 𝜁)    ⇒   ⊢ ((((((𝜑 ∧ 𝜂) ∧ 𝜒) ∧ 𝜃) ∧ 𝜏) ∧ 𝜓) → 𝜁)
Theorem	an72ds 32545	Inference exchanging the last antecedent with the second one. (Contributed by Thierry Arnoux, 3-Jun-2025.)
⊢ (((((((𝜑 ∧ 𝜓) ∧ 𝜒) ∧ 𝜃) ∧ 𝜏) ∧ 𝜂) ∧ 𝜁) → 𝜎)    ⇒   ⊢ (((((((𝜑 ∧ 𝜁) ∧ 𝜒) ∧ 𝜃) ∧ 𝜏) ∧ 𝜂) ∧ 𝜓) → 𝜎)
Theorem	an82ds 32546	Inference exchanging the last antecedent with the second one. (Contributed by Thierry Arnoux, 3-Jun-2025.)
⊢ ((((((((𝜑 ∧ 𝜓) ∧ 𝜒) ∧ 𝜃) ∧ 𝜏) ∧ 𝜂) ∧ 𝜁) ∧ 𝜎) → 𝜌)    ⇒   ⊢ ((((((((𝜑 ∧ 𝜎) ∧ 𝜒) ∧ 𝜃) ∧ 𝜏) ∧ 𝜂) ∧ 𝜁) ∧ 𝜓) → 𝜌)
Theorem	syl22anbrc 32547	Syllogism inference. (Contributed by Thierry Arnoux, 19-Oct-2025.)
⊢ (𝜑 → 𝜓)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝜒)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝜃)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝜏)    &   ⊢ (𝜂 ↔ ((𝜓 ∧ 𝜒) ∧ (𝜃 ∧ 𝜏)))    ⇒   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝜂)
Theorem	bian1dOLD 32548	Obsolete version of bian1d 586 as of 29-Jun-2025. (Contributed by Thierry Arnoux, 26-Feb-2017.) (Proof modification is discouraged.) (New usage is discouraged.)
⊢ (𝜑 → (𝜓 ↔ (𝜒 ∧ 𝜃)))    ⇒   ⊢ (𝜑 → ((𝜒 ∧ 𝜓) ↔ (𝜒 ∧ 𝜃)))
Theorem	orim12da 32549	Deduce a disjunction from another one. Variation on orim12d 973. (Contributed by Thierry Arnoux, 18-May-2025.)
⊢ ((𝜑 ∧ 𝜓) → 𝜃)    &   ⊢ ((𝜑 ∧ 𝜒) → 𝜏)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → (𝜓 ∨ 𝜒))    ⇒   ⊢ (𝜑 → (𝜃 ∨ 𝜏))
Theorem	or3di 32550	Distributive law for disjunction. (Contributed by Thierry Arnoux, 3-Jul-2017.)
⊢ ((𝜑 ∨ (𝜓 ∧ 𝜒 ∧ 𝜏)) ↔ ((𝜑 ∨ 𝜓) ∧ (𝜑 ∨ 𝜒) ∧ (𝜑 ∨ 𝜏)))
Theorem	or3dir 32551	Distributive law for disjunction. (Contributed by Thierry Arnoux, 3-Jul-2017.)
⊢ (((𝜑 ∧ 𝜓 ∧ 𝜒) ∨ 𝜏) ↔ ((𝜑 ∨ 𝜏) ∧ (𝜓 ∨ 𝜏) ∧ (𝜒 ∨ 𝜏)))
Theorem	3o1cs 32552	Deduction eliminating disjunct. (Contributed by Thierry Arnoux, 19-Dec-2016.)
⊢ ((𝜑 ∨ 𝜓 ∨ 𝜒) → 𝜃)    ⇒   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝜃)
Theorem	3o2cs 32553	Deduction eliminating disjunct. (Contributed by Thierry Arnoux, 19-Dec-2016.)
⊢ ((𝜑 ∨ 𝜓 ∨ 𝜒) → 𝜃)    ⇒   ⊢ (𝜓 → 𝜃)
Theorem	3o3cs 32554	Deduction eliminating disjunct. (Contributed by Thierry Arnoux, 19-Dec-2016.)
⊢ ((𝜑 ∨ 𝜓 ∨ 𝜒) → 𝜃)    ⇒   ⊢ (𝜒 → 𝜃)
Theorem	13an22anass 32555	Associative law for four conjunctions with a triple conjunction. (Contributed by Thierry Arnoux, 21-Jan-2025.)
⊢ ((𝜑 ∧ (𝜓 ∧ 𝜒 ∧ 𝜃)) ↔ ((𝜑 ∧ 𝜓) ∧ (𝜒 ∧ 𝜃)))
21.3.2  Predicate Calculus
21.3.2.1  Predicate Calculus - misc additions
Theorem	sbc2iedf 32556*	Conversion of implicit substitution to explicit class substitution. (Contributed by Thierry Arnoux, 4-Jul-2023.)
⊢ Ⅎ𝑥𝜑    &   ⊢ Ⅎ𝑦𝜑    &   ⊢ Ⅎ𝑥𝜒    &   ⊢ Ⅎ𝑦𝜒    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐴 ∈ 𝑉)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐵 ∈ 𝑊)    &   ⊢ ((𝜑 ∧ (𝑥 = 𝐴 ∧ 𝑦 = 𝐵)) → (𝜓 ↔ 𝜒))    ⇒   ⊢ (𝜑 → ([𝐴 / 𝑥][𝐵 / 𝑦]𝜓 ↔ 𝜒))
Theorem	rspc2daf 32557*	Double restricted specialization, using implicit substitution. (Contributed by Thierry Arnoux, 4-Jul-2023.)
⊢ Ⅎ𝑥𝜑    &   ⊢ Ⅎ𝑦𝜑    &   ⊢ Ⅎ𝑥𝜒    &   ⊢ Ⅎ𝑦𝜒    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐴 ∈ 𝑉)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐵 ∈ 𝑊)    &   ⊢ ((𝜑 ∧ (𝑥 = 𝐴 ∧ 𝑦 = 𝐵)) → (𝜓 ↔ 𝜒))    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → ∀𝑥 ∈ 𝑉 ∀𝑦 ∈ 𝑊 𝜓)    ⇒   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝜒)
21.3.2.2  Restricted quantification - misc additions
Theorem	ralcom4f 32558*	Commutation of restricted and unrestricted universal quantifiers. (Contributed by NM, 26-Mar-2004.) (Proof shortened by Andrew Salmon, 8-Jun-2011.) (Revised by Thierry Arnoux, 8-Mar-2017.)
⊢ Ⅎ𝑦𝐴    ⇒   ⊢ (∀𝑥 ∈ 𝐴 ∀𝑦𝜑 ↔ ∀𝑦∀𝑥 ∈ 𝐴 𝜑)
Theorem	rexcom4f 32559*	Commutation of restricted and unrestricted existential quantifiers. (Contributed by NM, 12-Apr-2004.) (Proof shortened by Andrew Salmon, 8-Jun-2011.) (Revised by Thierry Arnoux, 8-Mar-2017.)
⊢ Ⅎ𝑦𝐴    ⇒   ⊢ (∃𝑥 ∈ 𝐴 ∃𝑦𝜑 ↔ ∃𝑦∃𝑥 ∈ 𝐴 𝜑)
Theorem	19.9d2rf 32560	A deduction version of one direction of 19.9 2219 with two variables. (Contributed by Thierry Arnoux, 20-Mar-2017.)
⊢ Ⅎ𝑦𝜑    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → Ⅎ𝑥𝜓)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → Ⅎ𝑦𝜓)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → ∃𝑥 ∈ 𝐴 ∃𝑦 ∈ 𝐵 𝜓)    ⇒   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝜓)
Theorem	19.9d2r 32561*	A deduction version of one direction of 19.9 2219 with two variables. (Contributed by Thierry Arnoux, 30-Jan-2017.)
⊢ (𝜑 → Ⅎ𝑥𝜓)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → Ⅎ𝑦𝜓)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → ∃𝑥 ∈ 𝐴 ∃𝑦 ∈ 𝐵 𝜓)    ⇒   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝜓)
Theorem	r19.29ffa 32562*	A commonly used pattern based on r19.29 3104, version with two restricted quantifiers. (Contributed by Thierry Arnoux, 26-Nov-2017.)
⊢ ((((𝜑 ∧ 𝑥 ∈ 𝐴) ∧ 𝑦 ∈ 𝐵) ∧ 𝜓) → 𝜒)    ⇒   ⊢ ((𝜑 ∧ ∃𝑥 ∈ 𝐴 ∃𝑦 ∈ 𝐵 𝜓) → 𝜒)
Theorem	n0limd 32563*	Deduction rule for nonempty classes. (Contributed by Thierry Arnoux, 3-Aug-2025.)
⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐴 ≠ ∅)    &   ⊢ ((𝜑 ∧ 𝑥 ∈ 𝐴) → 𝜓)    ⇒   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝜓)
Theorem	reu6dv 32564*	A condition which implies existential uniqueness. (Contributed by Thierry Arnoux, 13-Oct-2025.)
⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐵 ∈ 𝐴)    &   ⊢ ((𝜑 ∧ 𝑥 ∈ 𝐴) → (𝜓 ↔ 𝑥 = 𝐵))    ⇒   ⊢ (𝜑 → ∃!𝑥 ∈ 𝐴 𝜓)
21.3.2.3  Equality
Theorem	eqtrb 32565	A transposition of equality. (Contributed by Thierry Arnoux, 20-Aug-2023.)
⊢ ((𝐴 = 𝐵 ∧ 𝐴 = 𝐶) ↔ (𝐴 = 𝐵 ∧ 𝐵 = 𝐶))
Theorem	eqelbid 32566*	A variable elimination law for equality within a given set 𝐴. See equvel 2466. (Contributed by Thierry Arnoux, 20-Feb-2025.)
⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐵 ∈ 𝐴)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐶 ∈ 𝐴)    ⇒   ⊢ (𝜑 → (∀𝑥 ∈ 𝐴 (𝑥 = 𝐵 ↔ 𝑥 = 𝐶) ↔ 𝐵 = 𝐶))
21.3.2.4  Double restricted existential uniqueness quantification
Theorem	opsbc2ie 32567*	Conversion of implicit substitution to explicit class substitution for ordered pairs. (Contributed by Thierry Arnoux, 4-Jul-2023.)
⊢ (𝑝 = ⟨𝑎, 𝑏⟩ → (𝜑 ↔ 𝜒))    ⇒   ⊢ (𝑝 = ⟨𝑥, 𝑦⟩ → (𝜑 ↔ [𝑦 / 𝑏][𝑥 / 𝑎]𝜒))
Theorem	opreu2reuALT 32568*	Correspondence between uniqueness of ordered pairs and double restricted existential uniqueness quantification. Alternate proof of one direction only, use opreu2reurex 6249 instead. (Contributed by Thierry Arnoux, 4-Jul-2023.) (Proof modification is discouraged.) (New usage is discouraged.)
⊢ (𝑝 = ⟨𝑎, 𝑏⟩ → (𝜑 ↔ 𝜒))    ⇒   ⊢ ((∃!𝑎 ∈ 𝐴 ∃𝑏 ∈ 𝐵 𝜒 ∧ ∃!𝑏 ∈ 𝐵 ∃𝑎 ∈ 𝐴 𝜒) → ∃!𝑝 ∈ (𝐴 × 𝐵)𝜑)
21.3.2.5  Double restricted existential uniqueness quantification syntax
Syntax	w2reu 32569	Syntax for double restricted existential uniqueness quantification.
wff ∃!𝑥 ∈ 𝐴 , 𝑦 ∈ 𝐵𝜑
Definition	df-2reu 32570	Define the double restricted existential uniqueness quantifier. (Contributed by Thierry Arnoux, 4-Jul-2023.)
⊢ (∃!𝑥 ∈ 𝐴 , 𝑦 ∈ 𝐵𝜑 ↔ (∃!𝑥 ∈ 𝐴 ∃𝑦 ∈ 𝐵 𝜑 ∧ ∃!𝑦 ∈ 𝐵 ∃𝑥 ∈ 𝐴 𝜑))
Theorem	2reucom 32571	Double restricted existential uniqueness commutes. (Contributed by Thierry Arnoux, 4-Jul-2023.)
⊢ (∃!𝑥 ∈ 𝐴 , 𝑦 ∈ 𝐵𝜑 ↔ ∃!𝑦 ∈ 𝐵 , 𝑥 ∈ 𝐴𝜑)
Theorem	2reu2rex1 32572	Double restricted existential uniqueness implies double restricted existence. (Contributed by Thierry Arnoux, 4-Jul-2023.)
⊢ (∃!𝑥 ∈ 𝐴 , 𝑦 ∈ 𝐵𝜑 → ∃𝑥 ∈ 𝐴 ∃𝑦 ∈ 𝐵 𝜑)
Theorem	2reureurex 32573	Double restricted existential uniqueness implies restricted existential uniqueness with restricted existence. (Contributed by AV, 5-Jul-2023.)
⊢ (∃!𝑥 ∈ 𝐴 , 𝑦 ∈ 𝐵𝜑 → ∃!𝑥 ∈ 𝐴 ∃𝑦 ∈ 𝐵 𝜑)
Theorem	2reu2reu2 32574*	Double restricted existential uniqueness implies two nested restricted existential uniqueness. (Contributed by AV, 5-Jul-2023.)
⊢ (∃!𝑥 ∈ 𝐴 , 𝑦 ∈ 𝐵𝜑 → ∃!𝑥 ∈ 𝐴 ∃!𝑦 ∈ 𝐵 𝜑)
Theorem	opreu2reu1 32575*	Equivalent definition of the double restricted existential uniqueness quantifier, using uniqueness of ordered pairs. (Contributed by Thierry Arnoux, 4-Jul-2023.)
⊢ (𝑝 = ⟨𝑥, 𝑦⟩ → (𝜒 ↔ 𝜑))    ⇒   ⊢ (∃!𝑥 ∈ 𝐴 , 𝑦 ∈ 𝐵𝜑 ↔ ∃!𝑝 ∈ (𝐴 × 𝐵)𝜒)
Theorem	sq2reunnltb 32576*	There exists a unique decomposition of a prime as a sum of squares of two different positive integers iff the prime is of the form 4𝑘 + 1. Double restricted existential uniqueness variant of 2sqreunnltb 27446. (Contributed by AV, 5-Jul-2023.)
⊢ (𝑃 ∈ ℙ → ((𝑃 mod 4) = 1 ↔ ∃!𝑎 ∈ ℕ , 𝑏 ∈ ℕ(𝑎 < 𝑏 ∧ ((𝑎↑2) + (𝑏↑2)) = 𝑃)))
Theorem	addsqnot2reu 32577*	For each complex number 𝐶, there does not uniquely exist two complex numbers 𝑎 and 𝑏, with 𝑏 squared and added to 𝑎 resulting in the given complex number 𝐶. Double restricted existential uniqueness variant of addsqn2reurex2 27430. (Contributed by AV, 5-Jul-2023.)
⊢ (𝐶 ∈ ℂ → ¬ ∃!𝑎 ∈ ℂ , 𝑏 ∈ ℂ(𝑎 + (𝑏↑2)) = 𝐶)
21.3.2.6  Substitution (without distinct variables) - misc additions
Theorem	sbceqbidf 32578	Equality theorem for class substitution. (Contributed by Thierry Arnoux, 4-Sep-2018.)
⊢ Ⅎ𝑥𝜑    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐴 = 𝐵)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → (𝜓 ↔ 𝜒))    ⇒   ⊢ (𝜑 → ([𝐴 / 𝑥]𝜓 ↔ [𝐵 / 𝑥]𝜒))
Theorem	sbcies 32579*	A special version of class substitution commonly used for structures. (Contributed by Thierry Arnoux, 14-Mar-2019.)
⊢ 𝐴 = (𝐸‘𝑊)    &   ⊢ (𝑎 = 𝐴 → (𝜑 ↔ 𝜓))    ⇒   ⊢ (𝑤 = 𝑊 → ([(𝐸‘𝑤) / 𝑎]𝜓 ↔ 𝜑))
21.3.2.7  Existential "at most one" - misc additions
Theorem	mo5f 32580*	Alternate definition of "at most one." (Contributed by Thierry Arnoux, 1-Mar-2017.)
⊢ Ⅎ𝑖𝜑    &   ⊢ Ⅎ𝑗𝜑    ⇒   ⊢ (∃*𝑥𝜑 ↔ ∀𝑖∀𝑗(([𝑖 / 𝑥]𝜑 ∧ [𝑗 / 𝑥]𝜑) → 𝑖 = 𝑗))
Theorem	nmo 32581*	Negation of "at most one". (Contributed by Thierry Arnoux, 26-Feb-2017.)
⊢ Ⅎ𝑦𝜑    ⇒   ⊢ (¬ ∃*𝑥𝜑 ↔ ∀𝑦∃𝑥(𝜑 ∧ 𝑥 ≠ 𝑦))
21.3.2.8  Existential uniqueness - misc additions
Theorem	reuxfrdf 32582*	Transfer existential uniqueness from a variable 𝑥 to another variable 𝑦 contained in expression 𝐴. Cf. reuxfrd 3691 (Contributed by Thierry Arnoux, 7-Apr-2017.) (Revised by Thierry Arnoux, 8-Oct-2017.) (Revised by Thierry Arnoux, 30-Mar-2018.)
⊢ Ⅎ𝑦𝐵    &   ⊢ ((𝜑 ∧ 𝑦 ∈ 𝐶) → 𝐴 ∈ 𝐵)    &   ⊢ ((𝜑 ∧ 𝑥 ∈ 𝐵) → ∃*𝑦 ∈ 𝐶 𝑥 = 𝐴)    ⇒   ⊢ (𝜑 → (∃!𝑥 ∈ 𝐵 ∃𝑦 ∈ 𝐶 (𝑥 = 𝐴 ∧ 𝜓) ↔ ∃!𝑦 ∈ 𝐶 𝜓))
Theorem	rexunirn 32583*	Restricted existential quantification over the union of the range of a function. Cf. rexrn 7032 and eluni2 4845. (Contributed by Thierry Arnoux, 19-Sep-2017.)
⊢ 𝐹 = (𝑥 ∈ 𝐴 ↦ 𝐵)    &   ⊢ (𝑥 ∈ 𝐴 → 𝐵 ∈ 𝑉)    ⇒   ⊢ (∃𝑥 ∈ 𝐴 ∃𝑦 ∈ 𝐵 𝜑 → ∃𝑦 ∈ ∪ ran 𝐹𝜑)
21.3.2.9  Restricted "at most one" - misc additions
Theorem	rmoxfrd 32584*	Transfer "at most one" restricted quantification from a variable 𝑥 to another variable 𝑦 contained in expression 𝐴. (Contributed by Thierry Arnoux, 7-Apr-2017.) (Revised by Thierry Arnoux, 8-Oct-2017.)
⊢ ((𝜑 ∧ 𝑦 ∈ 𝐶) → 𝐴 ∈ 𝐵)    &   ⊢ ((𝜑 ∧ 𝑥 ∈ 𝐵) → ∃!𝑦 ∈ 𝐶 𝑥 = 𝐴)    &   ⊢ ((𝜑 ∧ 𝑥 = 𝐴) → (𝜓 ↔ 𝜒))    ⇒   ⊢ (𝜑 → (∃*𝑥 ∈ 𝐵 𝜓 ↔ ∃*𝑦 ∈ 𝐶 𝜒))
Theorem	rmoun 32585	"At most one" restricted existential quantifier for a union implies the same quantifier on both sets. (Contributed by Thierry Arnoux, 27-Nov-2023.)
⊢ (∃*𝑥 ∈ (𝐴 ∪ 𝐵)𝜑 → (∃*𝑥 ∈ 𝐴 𝜑 ∧ ∃*𝑥 ∈ 𝐵 𝜑))
Theorem	rmounid 32586*	A case where an "at most one" restricted existential quantifier for a union is equivalent to such a quantifier for one of the sets. (Contributed by Thierry Arnoux, 27-Nov-2023.)
⊢ ((𝜑 ∧ 𝑥 ∈ 𝐵) → ¬ 𝜓)    ⇒   ⊢ (𝜑 → (∃*𝑥 ∈ (𝐴 ∪ 𝐵)𝜓 ↔ ∃*𝑥 ∈ 𝐴 𝜓))
21.3.2.10  Restricted iota (description binder)
Theorem	riotaeqbidva 32587*	Equivalent wff's yield equal restricted definition binders (deduction form). (raleqbidva 3305 analog.) (Contributed by Thierry Arnoux, 29-Jan-2025.)
⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐴 = 𝐵)    &   ⊢ ((𝜑 ∧ 𝑥 ∈ 𝐴) → (𝜓 ↔ 𝜒))    ⇒   ⊢ (𝜑 → (℩𝑥 ∈ 𝐴 𝜓) = (℩𝑥 ∈ 𝐵 𝜒))
21.3.3  General Set Theory
21.3.3.1  Class abstractions (a.k.a. class builders)
Theorem	dmrab 32588*	Domain of a restricted class abstraction over a cartesian product. (Contributed by Thierry Arnoux, 3-Jul-2023.)
⊢ (𝑧 = ⟨𝑥, 𝑦⟩ → (𝜑 ↔ 𝜓))    ⇒   ⊢ dom {𝑧 ∈ (𝐴 × 𝐵) ∣ 𝜑} = {𝑥 ∈ 𝐴 ∣ ∃𝑦 ∈ 𝐵 𝜓}
Theorem	difrab2 32589	Difference of two restricted class abstractions. Compare with difrab 4249. (Contributed by Thierry Arnoux, 3-Jan-2022.)
⊢ ({𝑥 ∈ 𝐴 ∣ 𝜑} ∖ {𝑥 ∈ 𝐵 ∣ 𝜑}) = {𝑥 ∈ (𝐴 ∖ 𝐵) ∣ 𝜑}
Theorem	elrabrd 32590*	Deduction version of elrab 3631, just like elrabd 3633, but backwards direction. (Contributed by Thierry Arnoux, 15-Jan-2026.)
⊢ (𝑥 = 𝐴 → (𝜓 ↔ 𝜒))    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐴 ∈ {𝑥 ∈ 𝐵 ∣ 𝜓})    ⇒   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝜒)
Theorem	rabexgfGS 32591	Separation Scheme in terms of a restricted class abstraction. To be removed in profit of Glauco's equivalent version. (Contributed by Thierry Arnoux, 11-May-2017.)
⊢ Ⅎ𝑥𝐴    ⇒   ⊢ (𝐴 ∈ 𝑉 → {𝑥 ∈ 𝐴 ∣ 𝜑} ∈ V)
Theorem	rabsnel 32592*	Truth implied by equality of a restricted class abstraction and a singleton. (Contributed by Thierry Arnoux, 15-Sep-2018.)
⊢ 𝐵 ∈ V    ⇒   ⊢ ({𝑥 ∈ 𝐴 ∣ 𝜑} = {𝐵} → 𝐵 ∈ 𝐴)
Theorem	rabsspr 32593*	Conditions for a restricted class abstraction to be a subset of an unordered pair. (Contributed by Thierry Arnoux, 6-Jul-2025.)
⊢ ({𝑥 ∈ 𝑉 ∣ 𝜑} ⊆ {𝑋, 𝑌} ↔ ∀𝑥 ∈ 𝑉 (𝜑 → (𝑥 = 𝑋 ∨ 𝑥 = 𝑌)))
Theorem	rabsstp 32594*	Conditions for a restricted class abstraction to be a subset of an unordered triple. (Contributed by Thierry Arnoux, 6-Jul-2025.)
⊢ ({𝑥 ∈ 𝑉 ∣ 𝜑} ⊆ {𝑋, 𝑌, 𝑍} ↔ ∀𝑥 ∈ 𝑉 (𝜑 → (𝑥 = 𝑋 ∨ 𝑥 = 𝑌 ∨ 𝑥 = 𝑍)))
Theorem	3unrab 32595	Union of three restricted class abstractions. (Contributed by Thierry Arnoux, 6-Jul-2025.)
⊢ (({𝑥 ∈ 𝐴 ∣ 𝜑} ∪ {𝑥 ∈ 𝐴 ∣ 𝜓}) ∪ {𝑥 ∈ 𝐴 ∣ 𝜒}) = {𝑥 ∈ 𝐴 ∣ (𝜑 ∨ 𝜓 ∨ 𝜒)}
Theorem	foresf1o 32596*	From a surjective function, *choose* a subset of the domain, such that the restricted function is bijective. (Contributed by Thierry Arnoux, 27-Jan-2020.)
⊢ ((𝐴 ∈ 𝑉 ∧ 𝐹:𝐴–onto→𝐵) → ∃𝑥 ∈ 𝒫 𝐴(𝐹 ↾ 𝑥):𝑥–1-1-onto→𝐵)
Theorem	rabfodom 32597*	Domination relation for restricted abstract class builders, based on a surjective function. (Contributed by Thierry Arnoux, 27-Jan-2020.)
⊢ ((𝜑 ∧ 𝑥 ∈ 𝐴 ∧ 𝑦 = (𝐹‘𝑥)) → (𝜒 ↔ 𝜓))    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐴 ∈ 𝑉)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐹:𝐴–onto→𝐵)    ⇒   ⊢ (𝜑 → {𝑦 ∈ 𝐵 ∣ 𝜒} ≼ {𝑥 ∈ 𝐴 ∣ 𝜓})
Theorem	rabrexfi 32598*	Conditions for a class abstraction with a restricted existential quantification to be finite. (Contributed by Thierry Arnoux, 6-Jul-2025.)
⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐵 ∈ Fin)    &   ⊢ ((𝜑 ∧ 𝑦 ∈ 𝐵) → {𝑥 ∈ 𝐴 ∣ 𝜓} ∈ Fin)    ⇒   ⊢ (𝜑 → {𝑥 ∈ 𝐴 ∣ ∃𝑦 ∈ 𝐵 𝜓} ∈ Fin)
21.3.3.2  Image Sets
Theorem	abrexdomjm 32599*	An indexed set is dominated by the indexing set. (Contributed by Jeff Madsen, 2-Sep-2009.)
⊢ (𝑦 ∈ 𝐴 → ∃*𝑥𝜑)    ⇒   ⊢ (𝐴 ∈ 𝑉 → {𝑥 ∣ ∃𝑦 ∈ 𝐴 𝜑} ≼ 𝐴)
Theorem	abrexdom2jm 32600*	An indexed set is dominated by the indexing set. (Contributed by Jeff Madsen, 2-Sep-2009.)
⊢ (𝐴 ∈ 𝑉 → {𝑥 ∣ ∃𝑦 ∈ 𝐴 𝑥 = 𝐵} ≼ 𝐴)