Theorem modqval 10782

Description: The value of the modulo operation. The modulo congruence notation of number theory, J == K (modulo N), can be expressed in our notation as ( J mod N ) = ( K mod N ). Definition 1 in Knuth, The Art of Computer Programming, Vol. I (1972), p. 38. Knuth uses "mod" for the operation and "modulo" for the congruence. Unlike Knuth, we restrict the second argument to positive numbers to simplify certain theorems. (This also gives us future flexibility to extend it to any one of several different conventions for a zero or negative second argument, should there be an advantage in doing so.) As with flqcl 10725 we only prove this for rationals although other particular kinds of real numbers may be possible. (Contributed by Jim Kingdon, 16-Oct-2021.)

Assertion

Ref	Expression
modqval	|- ( ( A e. QQ /\ B e. QQ /\ 0 < B ) -> ( A mod B ) = ( A - ( B x. ( |_ ` ( A / B ) ) ) ) )

Proof of Theorem modqval

Dummy variables x y are mutually distinct and distinct from all other variables.

Step	Hyp	Ref	Expression
1		qre 10041	. . 3 |- ( A e. QQ -> A e. RR )
2	1	3ad2ant1 1049	. 2 |- ( ( A e. QQ /\ B e. QQ /\ 0 < B ) -> A e. RR )
3		qre 10041	. . . 4 |- ( B e. QQ -> B e. RR )
4	3	3ad2ant2 1050	. . 3 |- ( ( A e. QQ /\ B e. QQ /\ 0 < B ) -> B e. RR )
5		simp3 1030	. . 3 |- ( ( A e. QQ /\ B e. QQ /\ 0 < B ) -> 0 < B )
6	4, 5	elrpd 10111	. 2 |- ( ( A e. QQ /\ B e. QQ /\ 0 < B ) -> B e. RR+ )
7	5	gt0ne0d 8847	. . . . . . 7 |- ( ( A e. QQ /\ B e. QQ /\ 0 < B ) -> B =/= 0 )
8		qdivcl 10059	. . . . . . 7 |- ( ( A e. QQ /\ B e. QQ /\ B =/= 0 ) -> ( A / B ) e. QQ )
9	7, 8	syld3an3 1323	. . . . . 6 |- ( ( A e. QQ /\ B e. QQ /\ 0 < B ) -> ( A / B ) e. QQ )
10	9	flqcld 10731	. . . . 5 |- ( ( A e. QQ /\ B e. QQ /\ 0 < B ) -> ( |_ ` ( A / B ) ) e. ZZ )
11	10	zred 9779	. . . 4 |- ( ( A e. QQ /\ B e. QQ /\ 0 < B ) -> ( |_ ` ( A / B ) ) e. RR )
12	4, 11	remulcld 8362	. . 3 |- ( ( A e. QQ /\ B e. QQ /\ 0 < B ) -> ( B x. ( |_ ` ( A / B ) ) ) e. RR )
13	2, 12	resubcld 8715	. 2 |- ( ( A e. QQ /\ B e. QQ /\ 0 < B ) -> ( A - ( B x. ( |_ ` ( A / B ) ) ) ) e. RR )
14		oveq1 6095	. . . . . 6 |- ( x = A -> ( x / y ) = ( A / y ) )
15	14	fveq2d 5702	. . . . 5 |- ( x = A -> ( |_ ` ( x / y ) ) = ( |_ ` ( A / y ) ) )
16	15	oveq2d 6104	. . . 4 |- ( x = A -> ( y x. ( |_ ` ( x / y ) ) ) = ( y x. ( |_ ` ( A / y ) ) ) )
17		oveq12 6097	. . . 4 |- ( ( x = A /\ ( y x. ( |_ ` ( x / y ) ) ) = ( y x. ( |_ ` ( A / y ) ) ) ) -> ( x - ( y x. ( |_ ` ( x / y ) ) ) ) = ( A - ( y x. ( |_ ` ( A / y ) ) ) ) )
18	16, 17	mpdan 425	. . 3 |- ( x = A -> ( x - ( y x. ( |_ ` ( x / y ) ) ) ) = ( A - ( y x. ( |_ ` ( A / y ) ) ) ) )
19		oveq2 6096	. . . . . 6 |- ( y = B -> ( A / y ) = ( A / B ) )
20	19	fveq2d 5702	. . . . 5 |- ( y = B -> ( |_ ` ( A / y ) ) = ( |_ ` ( A / B ) ) )
21		oveq12 6097	. . . . 5 |- ( ( y = B /\ ( |_ ` ( A / y ) ) = ( |_ ` ( A / B ) ) ) -> ( y x. ( |_ ` ( A / y ) ) ) = ( B x. ( |_ ` ( A / B ) ) ) )
22	20, 21	mpdan 425	. . . 4 |- ( y = B -> ( y x. ( |_ ` ( A / y ) ) ) = ( B x. ( |_ ` ( A / B ) ) ) )
23	22	oveq2d 6104	. . 3 |- ( y = B -> ( A - ( y x. ( |_ ` ( A / y ) ) ) ) = ( A - ( B x. ( |_ ` ( A / B ) ) ) ) )
24		df-mod 10781	. . 3 |- mod = ( x e. RR , y e. RR+ |-> ( x - ( y x. ( |_ ` ( x / y ) ) ) ) )
25	18, 23, 24	ovmpog 6226	. 2 |- ( ( A e. RR /\ B e. RR+ /\ ( A - ( B x. ( |_ ` ( A / B ) ) ) ) e. RR ) -> ( A mod B ) = ( A - ( B x. ( |_ ` ( A / B ) ) ) ) )
26	2, 6, 13, 25	syl3anc 1278	1 |- ( ( A e. QQ /\ B e. QQ /\ 0 < B ) -> ( A mod B ) = ( A - ( B x. ( |_ ` ( A / B ) ) ) ) )

This proof depends on syntax axioms:   -> wi 4   /\ w3a 1009   = wceq 1402   e. wcel 2209   =/= wne 2420   class class class wbr 4131   ` cfv 5380  (class class class)co 6088   RRcr 8184   0cc0 8185   x. cmul 8190   < clt 8366   - cmin 8504   / cdiv 9010   QQcq 10035   RR+crp 10071   |_cfl 10720   mod cmo 10780

This proof depends on axioms:  ax-mp 5  ax-1 6  ax-2 7  ax-ia1 106  ax-ia2 107  ax-ia3 108  ax-in1 623  ax-in2 624  ax-io 721  ax-5 1500  ax-7 1501  ax-gen 1502  ax-ie1 1546  ax-ie2 1547  ax-8 1557  ax-10 1558  ax-11 1559  ax-i12 1560  ax-bndl 1562  ax-4 1563  ax-17 1579  ax-i9 1583  ax-ial 1587  ax-i5r 1588  ax-14 2212  ax-ext 2220  ax-sep 4251  ax-pow 4313  ax-pr 4348  ax-un 4580  ax-setind 4686  ax-cnex 8276  ax-resscn 8277  ax-1cn 8278  ax-1re 8279  ax-icn 8280  ax-addcl 8281  ax-addrcl 8282  ax-mulcl 8283  ax-mulrcl 8284  ax-addcom 8285  ax-mulcom 8286  ax-addass 8287  ax-mulass 8288  ax-distr 8289  ax-i2m1 8290  ax-0lt1 8291  ax-1rid 8292  ax-0id 8293  ax-rnegex 8294  ax-precex 8295  ax-cnre 8296  ax-pre-ltirr 8297  ax-pre-ltwlin 8298  ax-pre-lttrn 8299  ax-pre-apti 8300  ax-pre-ltadd 8301  ax-pre-mulgt0 8302  ax-pre-mulext 8303  ax-arch 8304

This proof depends on definitions:  df-bi 117  df-3or 1010  df-3an 1011  df-tru 1405  df-fal 1408  df-nf 1514  df-sb 1816  df-eu 2089  df-mo 2090  df-clab 2225  df-cleq 2231  df-clel 2234  df-nfc 2381  df-ne 2421  df-nel 2516  df-ral 2533  df-rex 2534  df-reu 2535  df-rmo 2536  df-rab 2537  df-v 2823  df-sbc 3052  df-csb 3148  df-dif 3222  df-un 3224  df-in 3226  df-ss 3233  df-pw 3690  df-sn 3715  df-pr 3716  df-op 3718  df-uni 3936  df-int 3971  df-iun 4014  df-br 4132  df-opab 4194  df-mpt 4195  df-id 4440  df-po 4443  df-iso 4444  df-xp 4782  df-rel 4783  df-cnv 4784  df-co 4785  df-dm 4786  df-rn 4787  df-res 4788  df-ima 4789  df-iota 5340  df-fun 5382  df-fn 5383  df-f 5384  df-fv 5388  df-riota 6041  df-ov 6091  df-oprab 6092  df-mpo 6093  df-1st 6378  df-2nd 6379  df-pnf 8368  df-mnf 8369  df-xr 8370  df-ltxr 8371  df-le 8372  df-sub 8506  df-neg 8507  df-reap 8911  df-ap 8918  df-div 9011  df-inn 9314  df-n0 9575  df-z 9656  df-q 10036  df-rp 10072  df-fl 10722  df-mod 10781

This theorem is used by:  modqvalr  10783  modqcl  10784  modq0  10787  modqge0  10790  modqlt  10791  modqdiffl  10793  modqfrac  10795  modqmulnn  10800  zmodcl  10802  modqid  10807  modqcyc  10817  modqadd1  10819  modqmul1  10835  modqdi  10850  modqsubdir  10851  iexpcyc  11102  dvdsmod  12654  divalgmod  12719  modgcd  12793  prmdiv  13042  odzdvds  13053  fldivp1  13156  mulgmodid  14023  lgseisenlem4  16397