Theorem modqval 10761

Description: The value of the modulo operation. The modulo congruence notation of number theory, J == K (modulo N), can be expressed in our notation as ( J mod N ) = ( K mod N ). Definition 1 in Knuth, The Art of Computer Programming, Vol. I (1972), p. 38. Knuth uses "mod" for the operation and "modulo" for the congruence. Unlike Knuth, we restrict the second argument to positive numbers to simplify certain theorems. (This also gives us future flexibility to extend it to any one of several different conventions for a zero or negative second argument, should there be an advantage in doing so.) As with flqcl 10708 we only prove this for rationals although other particular kinds of real numbers may be possible. (Contributed by Jim Kingdon, 16-Oct-2021.)

Assertion

Ref	Expression
modqval	|- ( ( A e. QQ /\ B e. QQ /\ 0 < B ) -> ( A mod B ) = ( A - ( B x. ( |_ ` ( A / B ) ) ) ) )

Proof of Theorem modqval

Dummy variables x y are mutually distinct and distinct from all other variables.

Step	Hyp	Ref	Expression
1		qre 10025	. . 3 |- ( A e. QQ -> A e. RR )
2	1	3ad2ant1 1049	. 2 |- ( ( A e. QQ /\ B e. QQ /\ 0 < B ) -> A e. RR )
3		qre 10025	. . . 4 |- ( B e. QQ -> B e. RR )
4	3	3ad2ant2 1050	. . 3 |- ( ( A e. QQ /\ B e. QQ /\ 0 < B ) -> B e. RR )
5		simp3 1030	. . 3 |- ( ( A e. QQ /\ B e. QQ /\ 0 < B ) -> 0 < B )
6	4, 5	elrpd 10094	. 2 |- ( ( A e. QQ /\ B e. QQ /\ 0 < B ) -> B e. RR+ )
7	5	gt0ne0d 8840	. . . . . . 7 |- ( ( A e. QQ /\ B e. QQ /\ 0 < B ) -> B =/= 0 )
8		qdivcl 10043	. . . . . . 7 |- ( ( A e. QQ /\ B e. QQ /\ B =/= 0 ) -> ( A / B ) e. QQ )
9	7, 8	syld3an3 1323	. . . . . 6 |- ( ( A e. QQ /\ B e. QQ /\ 0 < B ) -> ( A / B ) e. QQ )
10	9	flqcld 10712	. . . . 5 |- ( ( A e. QQ /\ B e. QQ /\ 0 < B ) -> ( |_ ` ( A / B ) ) e. ZZ )
11	10	zred 9768	. . . 4 |- ( ( A e. QQ /\ B e. QQ /\ 0 < B ) -> ( |_ ` ( A / B ) ) e. RR )
12	4, 11	remulcld 8356	. . 3 |- ( ( A e. QQ /\ B e. QQ /\ 0 < B ) -> ( B x. ( |_ ` ( A / B ) ) ) e. RR )
13	2, 12	resubcld 8708	. 2 |- ( ( A e. QQ /\ B e. QQ /\ 0 < B ) -> ( A - ( B x. ( |_ ` ( A / B ) ) ) ) e. RR )
14		oveq1 6092	. . . . . 6 |- ( x = A -> ( x / y ) = ( A / y ) )
15	14	fveq2d 5699	. . . . 5 |- ( x = A -> ( |_ ` ( x / y ) ) = ( |_ ` ( A / y ) ) )
16	15	oveq2d 6101	. . . 4 |- ( x = A -> ( y x. ( |_ ` ( x / y ) ) ) = ( y x. ( |_ ` ( A / y ) ) ) )
17		oveq12 6094	. . . 4 |- ( ( x = A /\ ( y x. ( |_ ` ( x / y ) ) ) = ( y x. ( |_ ` ( A / y ) ) ) ) -> ( x - ( y x. ( |_ ` ( x / y ) ) ) ) = ( A - ( y x. ( |_ ` ( A / y ) ) ) ) )
18	16, 17	mpdan 425	. . 3 |- ( x = A -> ( x - ( y x. ( |_ ` ( x / y ) ) ) ) = ( A - ( y x. ( |_ ` ( A / y ) ) ) ) )
19		oveq2 6093	. . . . . 6 |- ( y = B -> ( A / y ) = ( A / B ) )
20	19	fveq2d 5699	. . . . 5 |- ( y = B -> ( |_ ` ( A / y ) ) = ( |_ ` ( A / B ) ) )
21		oveq12 6094	. . . . 5 |- ( ( y = B /\ ( |_ ` ( A / y ) ) = ( |_ ` ( A / B ) ) ) -> ( y x. ( |_ ` ( A / y ) ) ) = ( B x. ( |_ ` ( A / B ) ) ) )
22	20, 21	mpdan 425	. . . 4 |- ( y = B -> ( y x. ( |_ ` ( A / y ) ) ) = ( B x. ( |_ ` ( A / B ) ) ) )
23	22	oveq2d 6101	. . 3 |- ( y = B -> ( A - ( y x. ( |_ ` ( A / y ) ) ) ) = ( A - ( B x. ( |_ ` ( A / B ) ) ) ) )
24		df-mod 10760	. . 3 |- mod = ( x e. RR , y e. RR+ |-> ( x - ( y x. ( |_ ` ( x / y ) ) ) ) )
25	18, 23, 24	ovmpog 6223	. 2 |- ( ( A e. RR /\ B e. RR+ /\ ( A - ( B x. ( |_ ` ( A / B ) ) ) ) e. RR ) -> ( A mod B ) = ( A - ( B x. ( |_ ` ( A / B ) ) ) ) )
26	2, 6, 13, 25	syl3anc 1278	1 |- ( ( A e. QQ /\ B e. QQ /\ 0 < B ) -> ( A mod B ) = ( A - ( B x. ( |_ ` ( A / B ) ) ) ) )

This proof depends on syntax axioms:   -> wi 4   /\ w3a 1009   = wceq 1402   e. wcel 2209   =/= wne 2420   class class class wbr 4130   ` cfv 5377  (class class class)co 6085   RRcr 8178   0cc0 8179   x. cmul 8184   < clt 8360   - cmin 8497   / cdiv 9002   QQcq 10019   RR+crp 10054   |_cfl 10703   mod cmo 10759

This proof depends on axioms:  ax-mp 5  ax-1 6  ax-2 7  ax-ia1 106  ax-ia2 107  ax-ia3 108  ax-in1 623  ax-in2 624  ax-io 721  ax-5 1500  ax-7 1501  ax-gen 1502  ax-ie1 1546  ax-ie2 1547  ax-8 1557  ax-10 1558  ax-11 1559  ax-i12 1560  ax-bndl 1562  ax-4 1563  ax-17 1579  ax-i9 1583  ax-ial 1587  ax-i5r 1588  ax-14 2212  ax-ext 2220  ax-sep 4249  ax-pow 4311  ax-pr 4346  ax-un 4578  ax-setind 4684  ax-cnex 8270  ax-resscn 8271  ax-1cn 8272  ax-1re 8273  ax-icn 8274  ax-addcl 8275  ax-addrcl 8276  ax-mulcl 8277  ax-mulrcl 8278  ax-addcom 8279  ax-mulcom 8280  ax-addass 8281  ax-mulass 8282  ax-distr 8283  ax-i2m1 8284  ax-0lt1 8285  ax-1rid 8286  ax-0id 8287  ax-rnegex 8288  ax-precex 8289  ax-cnre 8290  ax-pre-ltirr 8291  ax-pre-ltwlin 8292  ax-pre-lttrn 8293  ax-pre-apti 8294  ax-pre-ltadd 8295  ax-pre-mulgt0 8296  ax-pre-mulext 8297  ax-arch 8298

This proof depends on definitions:  df-bi 117  df-3or 1010  df-3an 1011  df-tru 1405  df-fal 1408  df-nf 1514  df-sb 1816  df-eu 2089  df-mo 2090  df-clab 2225  df-cleq 2231  df-clel 2234  df-nfc 2381  df-ne 2421  df-nel 2516  df-ral 2533  df-rex 2534  df-reu 2535  df-rmo 2536  df-rab 2537  df-v 2823  df-sbc 3052  df-csb 3148  df-dif 3222  df-un 3224  df-in 3226  df-ss 3233  df-pw 3690  df-sn 3715  df-pr 3716  df-op 3718  df-uni 3936  df-int 3971  df-iun 4014  df-br 4131  df-opab 4193  df-mpt 4194  df-id 4438  df-po 4441  df-iso 4442  df-xp 4780  df-rel 4781  df-cnv 4782  df-co 4783  df-dm 4784  df-rn 4785  df-res 4786  df-ima 4787  df-iota 5337  df-fun 5379  df-fn 5380  df-f 5381  df-fv 5385  df-riota 6038  df-ov 6088  df-oprab 6089  df-mpo 6090  df-1st 6374  df-2nd 6375  df-pnf 8362  df-mnf 8363  df-xr 8364  df-ltxr 8365  df-le 8366  df-sub 8499  df-neg 8500  df-reap 8903  df-ap 8910  df-div 9003  df-inn 9305  df-n0 9564  df-z 9645  df-q 10020  df-rp 10055  df-fl 10705  df-mod 10760

This theorem is used by:  modqvalr  10762  modqcl  10763  modq0  10766  modqge0  10769  modqlt  10770  modqdiffl  10772  modqfrac  10774  modqmulnn  10779  zmodcl  10781  modqid  10786  modqcyc  10796  modqadd1  10798  modqmul1  10814  modqdi  10829  modqsubdir  10830  iexpcyc  11081  dvdsmod  12629  divalgmod  12694  modgcd  12768  prmdiv  13013  odzdvds  13024  fldivp1  13127  mulgmodid  13964  lgseisenlem4  16192