Theorem negsproplem7 28302

Description: Lemma for surreal negation. Show the second half of the inductive hypothesis unconditionally. (Contributed by Scott Fenton, 3-Feb-2025.)

Hypotheses

Ref	Expression
negsproplem.1	⊢ (𝜑 → ∀𝑥 ∈ No ∀𝑦 ∈ No ((( bday ‘𝑥) ∪ ( bday ‘𝑦)) ∈ (( bday ‘𝐴) ∪ ( bday ‘𝐵)) → (( -us ‘𝑥) ∈ No ∧ (𝑥 <s 𝑦 → ( -us ‘𝑦) <s ( -us ‘𝑥)))))
negsproplem4.1	⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐴 ∈ No )
negsproplem4.2	⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐵 ∈ No )
negsproplem4.3	⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐴 <s 𝐵)

Assertion

Ref	Expression
negsproplem7	⊢ (𝜑 → ( -us ‘𝐵) <s ( -us ‘𝐴))

Distinct variable groups:   𝑥,𝐴,𝑦   𝑥,𝐵,𝑦

Allowed substitution hints:   𝜑(𝑥, 𝑦)

Proof of Theorem negsproplem7

Step	Hyp	Ref	Expression
1		bdayon 28020	. . . 4 ⊢ ( bday ‘𝐴) ∈ On
2	1	onordi 6471	. . 3 ⊢ Ord ( bday ‘𝐴)
3		bdayon 28020	. . . 4 ⊢ ( bday ‘𝐵) ∈ On
4	3	onordi 6471	. . 3 ⊢ Ord ( bday ‘𝐵)
5		ordtri3or 6390	. . 3 ⊢ ((Ord ( bday ‘𝐴) ∧ Ord ( bday ‘𝐵)) → (( bday ‘𝐴) ∈ ( bday ‘𝐵) ∨ ( bday ‘𝐴) = ( bday ‘𝐵) ∨ ( bday ‘𝐵) ∈ ( bday ‘𝐴)))
6	2, 4, 5	mp2an 705	. 2 ⊢ (( bday ‘𝐴) ∈ ( bday ‘𝐵) ∨ ( bday ‘𝐴) = ( bday ‘𝐵) ∨ ( bday ‘𝐵) ∈ ( bday ‘𝐴))
7		negsproplem.1	. . . . . 6 ⊢ (𝜑 → ∀𝑥 ∈ No ∀𝑦 ∈ No ((( bday ‘𝑥) ∪ ( bday ‘𝑦)) ∈ (( bday ‘𝐴) ∪ ( bday ‘𝐵)) → (( -us ‘𝑥) ∈ No ∧ (𝑥 <s 𝑦 → ( -us ‘𝑦) <s ( -us ‘𝑥)))))
8	7	adantr 486	. . . . 5 ⊢ ((𝜑 ∧ ( bday ‘𝐴) ∈ ( bday ‘𝐵)) → ∀𝑥 ∈ No ∀𝑦 ∈ No ((( bday ‘𝑥) ∪ ( bday ‘𝑦)) ∈ (( bday ‘𝐴) ∪ ( bday ‘𝐵)) → (( -us ‘𝑥) ∈ No ∧ (𝑥 <s 𝑦 → ( -us ‘𝑦) <s ( -us ‘𝑥)))))
9		negsproplem4.1	. . . . . 6 ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐴 ∈ No )
10	9	adantr 486	. . . . 5 ⊢ ((𝜑 ∧ ( bday ‘𝐴) ∈ ( bday ‘𝐵)) → 𝐴 ∈ No )
11		negsproplem4.2	. . . . . 6 ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐵 ∈ No )
12	11	adantr 486	. . . . 5 ⊢ ((𝜑 ∧ ( bday ‘𝐴) ∈ ( bday ‘𝐵)) → 𝐵 ∈ No )
13		negsproplem4.3	. . . . . 6 ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐴 <s 𝐵)
14	13	adantr 486	. . . . 5 ⊢ ((𝜑 ∧ ( bday ‘𝐴) ∈ ( bday ‘𝐵)) → 𝐴 <s 𝐵)
15		simpr 490	. . . . 5 ⊢ ((𝜑 ∧ ( bday ‘𝐴) ∈ ( bday ‘𝐵)) → ( bday ‘𝐴) ∈ ( bday ‘𝐵))
16	8, 10, 12, 14, 15	negsproplem4 28299	. . . 4 ⊢ ((𝜑 ∧ ( bday ‘𝐴) ∈ ( bday ‘𝐵)) → ( -us ‘𝐵) <s ( -us ‘𝐴))
17	16	ex 418	. . 3 ⊢ (𝜑 → (( bday ‘𝐴) ∈ ( bday ‘𝐵) → ( -us ‘𝐵) <s ( -us ‘𝐴)))
18	7	adantr 486	. . . . 5 ⊢ ((𝜑 ∧ ( bday ‘𝐴) = ( bday ‘𝐵)) → ∀𝑥 ∈ No ∀𝑦 ∈ No ((( bday ‘𝑥) ∪ ( bday ‘𝑦)) ∈ (( bday ‘𝐴) ∪ ( bday ‘𝐵)) → (( -us ‘𝑥) ∈ No ∧ (𝑥 <s 𝑦 → ( -us ‘𝑦) <s ( -us ‘𝑥)))))
19	9	adantr 486	. . . . 5 ⊢ ((𝜑 ∧ ( bday ‘𝐴) = ( bday ‘𝐵)) → 𝐴 ∈ No )
20	11	adantr 486	. . . . 5 ⊢ ((𝜑 ∧ ( bday ‘𝐴) = ( bday ‘𝐵)) → 𝐵 ∈ No )
21	13	adantr 486	. . . . 5 ⊢ ((𝜑 ∧ ( bday ‘𝐴) = ( bday ‘𝐵)) → 𝐴 <s 𝐵)
22		simpr 490	. . . . 5 ⊢ ((𝜑 ∧ ( bday ‘𝐴) = ( bday ‘𝐵)) → ( bday ‘𝐴) = ( bday ‘𝐵))
23	18, 19, 20, 21, 22	negsproplem6 28301	. . . 4 ⊢ ((𝜑 ∧ ( bday ‘𝐴) = ( bday ‘𝐵)) → ( -us ‘𝐵) <s ( -us ‘𝐴))
24	23	ex 418	. . 3 ⊢ (𝜑 → (( bday ‘𝐴) = ( bday ‘𝐵) → ( -us ‘𝐵) <s ( -us ‘𝐴)))
25	7	adantr 486	. . . . 5 ⊢ ((𝜑 ∧ ( bday ‘𝐵) ∈ ( bday ‘𝐴)) → ∀𝑥 ∈ No ∀𝑦 ∈ No ((( bday ‘𝑥) ∪ ( bday ‘𝑦)) ∈ (( bday ‘𝐴) ∪ ( bday ‘𝐵)) → (( -us ‘𝑥) ∈ No ∧ (𝑥 <s 𝑦 → ( -us ‘𝑦) <s ( -us ‘𝑥)))))
26	9	adantr 486	. . . . 5 ⊢ ((𝜑 ∧ ( bday ‘𝐵) ∈ ( bday ‘𝐴)) → 𝐴 ∈ No )
27	11	adantr 486	. . . . 5 ⊢ ((𝜑 ∧ ( bday ‘𝐵) ∈ ( bday ‘𝐴)) → 𝐵 ∈ No )
28	13	adantr 486	. . . . 5 ⊢ ((𝜑 ∧ ( bday ‘𝐵) ∈ ( bday ‘𝐴)) → 𝐴 <s 𝐵)
29		simpr 490	. . . . 5 ⊢ ((𝜑 ∧ ( bday ‘𝐵) ∈ ( bday ‘𝐴)) → ( bday ‘𝐵) ∈ ( bday ‘𝐴))
30	25, 26, 27, 28, 29	negsproplem5 28300	. . . 4 ⊢ ((𝜑 ∧ ( bday ‘𝐵) ∈ ( bday ‘𝐴)) → ( -us ‘𝐵) <s ( -us ‘𝐴))
31	30	ex 418	. . 3 ⊢ (𝜑 → (( bday ‘𝐵) ∈ ( bday ‘𝐴) → ( -us ‘𝐵) <s ( -us ‘𝐴)))
32	17, 24, 31	3jaod 1456	. 2 ⊢ (𝜑 → ((( bday ‘𝐴) ∈ ( bday ‘𝐵) ∨ ( bday ‘𝐴) = ( bday ‘𝐵) ∨ ( bday ‘𝐵) ∈ ( bday ‘𝐴)) → ( -us ‘𝐵) <s ( -us ‘𝐴)))
33	6, 32	mpi 21	1 ⊢ (𝜑 → ( -us ‘𝐵) <s ( -us ‘𝐴))

This proof depends on syntax axioms:   → wi 4   ∧ wa 401   ∨ w3o 1102   = wceq 1570   ∈ wcel 2145  ∀wral 3076   ∪ cun 3897   class class class wbr 5103  Ord word 6356  ‘cfv 6533   No csur 27879   <s clts 27880   bday cbday 27881   -u_s cnegs 28287

This proof depends on axioms:  ax-mp 5  ax-1 6  ax-2 7  ax-3 8  ax-gen 1828  ax-4 1842  ax-5 1943  ax-6 2000  ax-7 2041  ax-8 2147  ax-9 2155  ax-10 2178  ax-11 2194  ax-12 2213  ax-ext 2732  ax-rep 5232  ax-sep 5251  ax-nul 5263  ax-pow 5330  ax-pr 5398  ax-un 7737

This proof depends on definitions:  df-bi 210  df-an 402  df-or 862  df-3or 1104  df-3an 1105  df-tru 1573  df-fal 1583  df-ex 1813  df-nf 1817  df-sb 2100  df-mo 2564  df-eu 2594  df-clab 2739  df-cleq 2752  df-clel 2835  df-nfc 2909  df-ne 2956  df-ral 3077  df-rex 3087  df-rmo 3365  df-reu 3366  df-rab 3413  df-v 3452  df-sbc 3740  df-csb 3848  df-dif 3902  df-un 3904  df-in 3906  df-ss 3916  df-pss 3919  df-nul 4280  df-if 4483  df-pw 4559  df-sn 4585  df-pr 4587  df-tp 4589  df-op 4591  df-uni 4868  df-int 4908  df-iun 4953  df-br 5104  df-opab 5168  df-mpt 5187  df-tr 5213  df-id 5550  df-eprel 5555  df-po 5563  df-so 5564  df-fr 5608  df-se 5609  df-we 5610  df-xp 5661  df-rel 5662  df-cnv 5663  df-co 5664  df-dm 5665  df-rn 5666  df-res 5667  df-ima 5668  df-pred 6299  df-ord 6360  df-on 6361  df-suc 6363  df-iota 6489  df-fun 6535  df-fn 6536  df-f 6537  df-f1 6538  df-fo 6539  df-f1o 6540  df-fv 6541  df-riota 7371  df-ov 7417  df-oprab 7418  df-mpo 7419  df-2nd 7988  df-frecs 8281  df-wrecs 8312  df-recs 8361  df-1o 8458  df-2o 8459  df-no 27882  df-lts 27883  df-bday 27884  df-slts 28026  df-cuts 28028  df-0s 28075  df-made 28095  df-old 28096  df-left 28098  df-right 28099  df-norec 28206  df-negs 28289

This theorem is used by:  negsprop  28303