Theorem negsproplem4 28078

Description: Lemma for surreal negation. Show the second half of the inductive hypothesis when 𝐴 is simpler than 𝐵. (Contributed by Scott Fenton, 2-Feb-2025.)

Hypotheses

Ref	Expression
negsproplem.1	⊢ (𝜑 → ∀𝑥 ∈ No ∀𝑦 ∈ No ((( bday ‘𝑥) ∪ ( bday ‘𝑦)) ∈ (( bday ‘𝐴) ∪ ( bday ‘𝐵)) → (( -us ‘𝑥) ∈ No ∧ (𝑥 <s 𝑦 → ( -us ‘𝑦) <s ( -us ‘𝑥)))))
negsproplem4.1	⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐴 ∈ No )
negsproplem4.2	⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐵 ∈ No )
negsproplem4.3	⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐴 <s 𝐵)
negsproplem4.4	⊢ (𝜑 → ( bday ‘𝐴) ∈ ( bday ‘𝐵))

Assertion

Ref	Expression
negsproplem4	⊢ (𝜑 → ( -us ‘𝐵) <s ( -us ‘𝐴))

Distinct variable groups:   𝑥,𝐴,𝑦   𝑥,𝐵,𝑦

Allowed substitution hints:   𝜑(𝑥,𝑦)

Proof of Theorem negsproplem4

Dummy variable 𝑎 is distinct from all other variables.

Step	Hyp	Ref	Expression
1		negsproplem.1	. . . . 5 ⊢ (𝜑 → ∀𝑥 ∈ No ∀𝑦 ∈ No ((( bday ‘𝑥) ∪ ( bday ‘𝑦)) ∈ (( bday ‘𝐴) ∪ ( bday ‘𝐵)) → (( -us ‘𝑥) ∈ No ∧ (𝑥 <s 𝑦 → ( -us ‘𝑦) <s ( -us ‘𝑥)))))
2		uncom 4168	. . . . . . . 8 ⊢ (( bday ‘𝐴) ∪ ( bday ‘𝐵)) = (( bday ‘𝐵) ∪ ( bday ‘𝐴))
3	2	eleq2i 2831	. . . . . . 7 ⊢ ((( bday ‘𝑥) ∪ ( bday ‘𝑦)) ∈ (( bday ‘𝐴) ∪ ( bday ‘𝐵)) ↔ (( bday ‘𝑥) ∪ ( bday ‘𝑦)) ∈ (( bday ‘𝐵) ∪ ( bday ‘𝐴)))
4	3	imbi1i 349	. . . . . 6 ⊢ (((( bday ‘𝑥) ∪ ( bday ‘𝑦)) ∈ (( bday ‘𝐴) ∪ ( bday ‘𝐵)) → (( -us ‘𝑥) ∈ No ∧ (𝑥 <s 𝑦 → ( -us ‘𝑦) <s ( -us ‘𝑥)))) ↔ ((( bday ‘𝑥) ∪ ( bday ‘𝑦)) ∈ (( bday ‘𝐵) ∪ ( bday ‘𝐴)) → (( -us ‘𝑥) ∈ No ∧ (𝑥 <s 𝑦 → ( -us ‘𝑦) <s ( -us ‘𝑥)))))
5	4	2ralbii 3126	. . . . 5 ⊢ (∀𝑥 ∈ No ∀𝑦 ∈ No ((( bday ‘𝑥) ∪ ( bday ‘𝑦)) ∈ (( bday ‘𝐴) ∪ ( bday ‘𝐵)) → (( -us ‘𝑥) ∈ No ∧ (𝑥 <s 𝑦 → ( -us ‘𝑦) <s ( -us ‘𝑥)))) ↔ ∀𝑥 ∈ No ∀𝑦 ∈ No ((( bday ‘𝑥) ∪ ( bday ‘𝑦)) ∈ (( bday ‘𝐵) ∪ ( bday ‘𝐴)) → (( -us ‘𝑥) ∈ No ∧ (𝑥 <s 𝑦 → ( -us ‘𝑦) <s ( -us ‘𝑥)))))
6	1, 5	sylib 218	. . . 4 ⊢ (𝜑 → ∀𝑥 ∈ No ∀𝑦 ∈ No ((( bday ‘𝑥) ∪ ( bday ‘𝑦)) ∈ (( bday ‘𝐵) ∪ ( bday ‘𝐴)) → (( -us ‘𝑥) ∈ No ∧ (𝑥 <s 𝑦 → ( -us ‘𝑦) <s ( -us ‘𝑥)))))
7		negsproplem4.2	. . . 4 ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐵 ∈ No )
8	6, 7	negsproplem3 28077	. . 3 ⊢ (𝜑 → (( -us ‘𝐵) ∈ No ∧ ( -us “ ( R ‘𝐵)) <<s {( -us ‘𝐵)} ∧ {( -us ‘𝐵)} <<s ( -us “ ( L ‘𝐵))))
9	8	simp3d 1143	. 2 ⊢ (𝜑 → {( -us ‘𝐵)} <<s ( -us “ ( L ‘𝐵)))
10		fvex 6920	. . . 4 ⊢ ( -us ‘𝐵) ∈ V
11	10	snid 4667	. . 3 ⊢ ( -us ‘𝐵) ∈ {( -us ‘𝐵)}
12	11	a1i 11	. 2 ⊢ (𝜑 → ( -us ‘𝐵) ∈ {( -us ‘𝐵)})
13		negsfn 28070	. . 3 ⊢ -us Fn No
14		leftssno 27934	. . 3 ⊢ ( L ‘𝐵) ⊆ No
15		negsproplem4.4	. . . . 5 ⊢ (𝜑 → ( bday ‘𝐴) ∈ ( bday ‘𝐵))
16		bdayelon 27836	. . . . . 6 ⊢ ( bday ‘𝐵) ∈ On
17		negsproplem4.1	. . . . . 6 ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐴 ∈ No )
18		oldbday 27954	. . . . . 6 ⊢ ((( bday ‘𝐵) ∈ On ∧ 𝐴 ∈ No ) → (𝐴 ∈ ( O ‘( bday ‘𝐵)) ↔ ( bday ‘𝐴) ∈ ( bday ‘𝐵)))
19	16, 17, 18	sylancr 587	. . . . 5 ⊢ (𝜑 → (𝐴 ∈ ( O ‘( bday ‘𝐵)) ↔ ( bday ‘𝐴) ∈ ( bday ‘𝐵)))
20	15, 19	mpbird 257	. . . 4 ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐴 ∈ ( O ‘( bday ‘𝐵)))
21		negsproplem4.3	. . . 4 ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐴 <s 𝐵)
22		breq1 5151	. . . . 5 ⊢ (𝑎 = 𝐴 → (𝑎 <s 𝐵 ↔ 𝐴 <s 𝐵))
23		leftval 27917	. . . . 5 ⊢ ( L ‘𝐵) = {𝑎 ∈ ( O ‘( bday ‘𝐵)) ∣ 𝑎 <s 𝐵}
24	22, 23	elrab2 3698	. . . 4 ⊢ (𝐴 ∈ ( L ‘𝐵) ↔ (𝐴 ∈ ( O ‘( bday ‘𝐵)) ∧ 𝐴 <s 𝐵))
25	20, 21, 24	sylanbrc 583	. . 3 ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐴 ∈ ( L ‘𝐵))
26		fnfvima 7253	. . 3 ⊢ (( -us Fn No ∧ ( L ‘𝐵) ⊆ No ∧ 𝐴 ∈ ( L ‘𝐵)) → ( -us ‘𝐴) ∈ ( -us “ ( L ‘𝐵)))
27	13, 14, 25, 26	mp3an12i 1464	. 2 ⊢ (𝜑 → ( -us ‘𝐴) ∈ ( -us “ ( L ‘𝐵)))
28	9, 12, 27	ssltsepcd 27854	1 ⊢ (𝜑 → ( -us ‘𝐵) <s ( -us ‘𝐴))

Syntax hints:   → wi 4   ↔ wb 206   ∧ wa 395   ∈ wcel 2106  ∀wral 3059   ∪ cun 3961   ⊆ wss 3963  {csn 4631   class class class wbr 5148   “ cima 5692  Oncon0 6386   Fn wfn 6558  ‘cfv 6563   No csur 27699   <s cslt 27700   bday cbday 27701   <<s csslt 27840   O cold 27897   L cleft 27899   R cright 27900   -u_s cnegs 28066

This theorem was proved from axioms:  ax-mp 5  ax-1 6  ax-2 7  ax-3 8  ax-gen 1792  ax-4 1806  ax-5 1908  ax-6 1965  ax-7 2005  ax-8 2108  ax-9 2116  ax-10 2139  ax-11 2155  ax-12 2175  ax-ext 2706  ax-rep 5285  ax-sep 5302  ax-nul 5312  ax-pow 5371  ax-pr 5438  ax-un 7754

This theorem depends on definitions:  df-bi 207  df-an 396  df-or 848  df-3or 1087  df-3an 1088  df-tru 1540  df-fal 1550  df-ex 1777  df-nf 1781  df-sb 2063  df-mo 2538  df-eu 2567  df-clab 2713  df-cleq 2727  df-clel 2814  df-nfc 2890  df-ne 2939  df-ral 3060  df-rex 3069  df-rmo 3378  df-reu 3379  df-rab 3434  df-v 3480  df-sbc 3792  df-csb 3909  df-dif 3966  df-un 3968  df-in 3970  df-ss 3980  df-pss 3983  df-nul 4340  df-if 4532  df-pw 4607  df-sn 4632  df-pr 4634  df-tp 4636  df-op 4638  df-uni 4913  df-int 4952  df-iun 4998  df-br 5149  df-opab 5211  df-mpt 5232  df-tr 5266  df-id 5583  df-eprel 5589  df-po 5597  df-so 5598  df-fr 5641  df-se 5642  df-we 5643  df-xp 5695  df-rel 5696  df-cnv 5697  df-co 5698  df-dm 5699  df-rn 5700  df-res 5701  df-ima 5702  df-pred 6323  df-ord 6389  df-on 6390  df-suc 6392  df-iota 6516  df-fun 6565  df-fn 6566  df-f 6567  df-f1 6568  df-fo 6569  df-f1o 6570  df-fv 6571  df-riota 7388  df-ov 7434  df-oprab 7435  df-mpo 7436  df-2nd 8014  df-frecs 8305  df-wrecs 8336  df-recs 8410  df-1o 8505  df-2o 8506  df-no 27702  df-slt 27703  df-bday 27704  df-sslt 27841  df-scut 27843  df-0s 27884  df-made 27901  df-old 27902  df-left 27904  df-right 27905  df-norec 27986  df-negs 28068

This theorem is referenced by:  negsproplem7  28081