Theorem negsproplem4 27745

Description: Lemma for surreal negation. Show the second half of the inductive hypothesis when 𝐴 is simpler than 𝐵. (Contributed by Scott Fenton, 2-Feb-2025.)

Hypotheses

Ref	Expression
negsproplem.1	⊢ (𝜑 → ∀𝑥 ∈ No ∀𝑦 ∈ No ((( bday ‘𝑥) ∪ ( bday ‘𝑦)) ∈ (( bday ‘𝐴) ∪ ( bday ‘𝐵)) → (( -us ‘𝑥) ∈ No ∧ (𝑥 <s 𝑦 → ( -us ‘𝑦) <s ( -us ‘𝑥)))))
negsproplem4.1	⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐴 ∈ No )
negsproplem4.2	⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐵 ∈ No )
negsproplem4.3	⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐴 <s 𝐵)
negsproplem4.4	⊢ (𝜑 → ( bday ‘𝐴) ∈ ( bday ‘𝐵))

Assertion

Ref	Expression
negsproplem4	⊢ (𝜑 → ( -us ‘𝐵) <s ( -us ‘𝐴))

Distinct variable groups:   𝑥,𝐴,𝑦   𝑥,𝐵,𝑦

Allowed substitution hints:   𝜑(𝑥,𝑦)

Proof of Theorem negsproplem4

Dummy variable 𝑎 is distinct from all other variables.

Step	Hyp	Ref	Expression
1		negsproplem.1	. . . . 5 ⊢ (𝜑 → ∀𝑥 ∈ No ∀𝑦 ∈ No ((( bday ‘𝑥) ∪ ( bday ‘𝑦)) ∈ (( bday ‘𝐴) ∪ ( bday ‘𝐵)) → (( -us ‘𝑥) ∈ No ∧ (𝑥 <s 𝑦 → ( -us ‘𝑦) <s ( -us ‘𝑥)))))
2		uncom 4153	. . . . . . . 8 ⊢ (( bday ‘𝐴) ∪ ( bday ‘𝐵)) = (( bday ‘𝐵) ∪ ( bday ‘𝐴))
3	2	eleq2i 2824	. . . . . . 7 ⊢ ((( bday ‘𝑥) ∪ ( bday ‘𝑦)) ∈ (( bday ‘𝐴) ∪ ( bday ‘𝐵)) ↔ (( bday ‘𝑥) ∪ ( bday ‘𝑦)) ∈ (( bday ‘𝐵) ∪ ( bday ‘𝐴)))
4	3	imbi1i 349	. . . . . 6 ⊢ (((( bday ‘𝑥) ∪ ( bday ‘𝑦)) ∈ (( bday ‘𝐴) ∪ ( bday ‘𝐵)) → (( -us ‘𝑥) ∈ No ∧ (𝑥 <s 𝑦 → ( -us ‘𝑦) <s ( -us ‘𝑥)))) ↔ ((( bday ‘𝑥) ∪ ( bday ‘𝑦)) ∈ (( bday ‘𝐵) ∪ ( bday ‘𝐴)) → (( -us ‘𝑥) ∈ No ∧ (𝑥 <s 𝑦 → ( -us ‘𝑦) <s ( -us ‘𝑥)))))
5	4	2ralbii 3127	. . . . 5 ⊢ (∀𝑥 ∈ No ∀𝑦 ∈ No ((( bday ‘𝑥) ∪ ( bday ‘𝑦)) ∈ (( bday ‘𝐴) ∪ ( bday ‘𝐵)) → (( -us ‘𝑥) ∈ No ∧ (𝑥 <s 𝑦 → ( -us ‘𝑦) <s ( -us ‘𝑥)))) ↔ ∀𝑥 ∈ No ∀𝑦 ∈ No ((( bday ‘𝑥) ∪ ( bday ‘𝑦)) ∈ (( bday ‘𝐵) ∪ ( bday ‘𝐴)) → (( -us ‘𝑥) ∈ No ∧ (𝑥 <s 𝑦 → ( -us ‘𝑦) <s ( -us ‘𝑥)))))
6	1, 5	sylib 217	. . . 4 ⊢ (𝜑 → ∀𝑥 ∈ No ∀𝑦 ∈ No ((( bday ‘𝑥) ∪ ( bday ‘𝑦)) ∈ (( bday ‘𝐵) ∪ ( bday ‘𝐴)) → (( -us ‘𝑥) ∈ No ∧ (𝑥 <s 𝑦 → ( -us ‘𝑦) <s ( -us ‘𝑥)))))
7		negsproplem4.2	. . . 4 ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐵 ∈ No )
8	6, 7	negsproplem3 27744	. . 3 ⊢ (𝜑 → (( -us ‘𝐵) ∈ No ∧ ( -us “ ( R ‘𝐵)) <<s {( -us ‘𝐵)} ∧ {( -us ‘𝐵)} <<s ( -us “ ( L ‘𝐵))))
9	8	simp3d 1143	. 2 ⊢ (𝜑 → {( -us ‘𝐵)} <<s ( -us “ ( L ‘𝐵)))
10		fvex 6904	. . . 4 ⊢ ( -us ‘𝐵) ∈ V
11	10	snid 4664	. . 3 ⊢ ( -us ‘𝐵) ∈ {( -us ‘𝐵)}
12	11	a1i 11	. 2 ⊢ (𝜑 → ( -us ‘𝐵) ∈ {( -us ‘𝐵)})
13		negsfn 27738	. . 3 ⊢ -us Fn No
14		leftssno 27613	. . 3 ⊢ ( L ‘𝐵) ⊆ No
15		negsproplem4.4	. . . . 5 ⊢ (𝜑 → ( bday ‘𝐴) ∈ ( bday ‘𝐵))
16		bdayelon 27515	. . . . . 6 ⊢ ( bday ‘𝐵) ∈ On
17		negsproplem4.1	. . . . . 6 ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐴 ∈ No )
18		oldbday 27633	. . . . . 6 ⊢ ((( bday ‘𝐵) ∈ On ∧ 𝐴 ∈ No ) → (𝐴 ∈ ( O ‘( bday ‘𝐵)) ↔ ( bday ‘𝐴) ∈ ( bday ‘𝐵)))
19	16, 17, 18	sylancr 586	. . . . 5 ⊢ (𝜑 → (𝐴 ∈ ( O ‘( bday ‘𝐵)) ↔ ( bday ‘𝐴) ∈ ( bday ‘𝐵)))
20	15, 19	mpbird 257	. . . 4 ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐴 ∈ ( O ‘( bday ‘𝐵)))
21		negsproplem4.3	. . . 4 ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐴 <s 𝐵)
22		breq1 5151	. . . . 5 ⊢ (𝑎 = 𝐴 → (𝑎 <s 𝐵 ↔ 𝐴 <s 𝐵))
23		leftval 27596	. . . . 5 ⊢ ( L ‘𝐵) = {𝑎 ∈ ( O ‘( bday ‘𝐵)) ∣ 𝑎 <s 𝐵}
24	22, 23	elrab2 3686	. . . 4 ⊢ (𝐴 ∈ ( L ‘𝐵) ↔ (𝐴 ∈ ( O ‘( bday ‘𝐵)) ∧ 𝐴 <s 𝐵))
25	20, 21, 24	sylanbrc 582	. . 3 ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐴 ∈ ( L ‘𝐵))
26		fnfvima 7237	. . 3 ⊢ (( -us Fn No ∧ ( L ‘𝐵) ⊆ No ∧ 𝐴 ∈ ( L ‘𝐵)) → ( -us ‘𝐴) ∈ ( -us “ ( L ‘𝐵)))
27	13, 14, 25, 26	mp3an12i 1464	. 2 ⊢ (𝜑 → ( -us ‘𝐴) ∈ ( -us “ ( L ‘𝐵)))
28	9, 12, 27	ssltsepcd 27533	1 ⊢ (𝜑 → ( -us ‘𝐵) <s ( -us ‘𝐴))

Syntax hints:   → wi 4   ↔ wb 205   ∧ wa 395   ∈ wcel 2105  ∀wral 3060   ∪ cun 3946   ⊆ wss 3948  {csn 4628   class class class wbr 5148   “ cima 5679  Oncon0 6364   Fn wfn 6538  ‘cfv 6543   No csur 27380   <s cslt 27381   bday cbday 27382   <<s csslt 27519   O cold 27576   L cleft 27578   R cright 27579   -u_s cnegs 27734

This theorem was proved from axioms:  ax-mp 5  ax-1 6  ax-2 7  ax-3 8  ax-gen 1796  ax-4 1810  ax-5 1912  ax-6 1970  ax-7 2010  ax-8 2107  ax-9 2115  ax-10 2136  ax-11 2153  ax-12 2170  ax-ext 2702  ax-rep 5285  ax-sep 5299  ax-nul 5306  ax-pow 5363  ax-pr 5427  ax-un 7729

This theorem depends on definitions:  df-bi 206  df-an 396  df-or 845  df-3or 1087  df-3an 1088  df-tru 1543  df-fal 1553  df-ex 1781  df-nf 1785  df-sb 2067  df-mo 2533  df-eu 2562  df-clab 2709  df-cleq 2723  df-clel 2809  df-nfc 2884  df-ne 2940  df-ral 3061  df-rex 3070  df-rmo 3375  df-reu 3376  df-rab 3432  df-v 3475  df-sbc 3778  df-csb 3894  df-dif 3951  df-un 3953  df-in 3955  df-ss 3965  df-pss 3967  df-nul 4323  df-if 4529  df-pw 4604  df-sn 4629  df-pr 4631  df-tp 4633  df-op 4635  df-uni 4909  df-int 4951  df-iun 4999  df-br 5149  df-opab 5211  df-mpt 5232  df-tr 5266  df-id 5574  df-eprel 5580  df-po 5588  df-so 5589  df-fr 5631  df-se 5632  df-we 5633  df-xp 5682  df-rel 5683  df-cnv 5684  df-co 5685  df-dm 5686  df-rn 5687  df-res 5688  df-ima 5689  df-pred 6300  df-ord 6367  df-on 6368  df-suc 6370  df-iota 6495  df-fun 6545  df-fn 6546  df-f 6547  df-f1 6548  df-fo 6549  df-f1o 6550  df-fv 6551  df-riota 7368  df-ov 7415  df-oprab 7416  df-mpo 7417  df-2nd 7980  df-frecs 8270  df-wrecs 8301  df-recs 8375  df-1o 8470  df-2o 8471  df-no 27383  df-slt 27384  df-bday 27385  df-sslt 27520  df-scut 27522  df-0s 27563  df-made 27580  df-old 27581  df-left 27583  df-right 27584  df-norec 27661  df-negs 27736

This theorem is referenced by:  negsproplem7  27748