Theorem negsproplem4 28190

Description: Lemma for surreal negation. Show the second half of the inductive hypothesis when 𝐴 is simpler than 𝐵. (Contributed by Scott Fenton, 2-Feb-2025.)

Hypotheses

Ref	Expression
negsproplem.1	⊢ (𝜑 → ∀𝑥 ∈ No ∀𝑦 ∈ No ((( bday ‘𝑥) ∪ ( bday ‘𝑦)) ∈ (( bday ‘𝐴) ∪ ( bday ‘𝐵)) → (( -us ‘𝑥) ∈ No ∧ (𝑥 <s 𝑦 → ( -us ‘𝑦) <s ( -us ‘𝑥)))))
negsproplem4.1	⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐴 ∈ No )
negsproplem4.2	⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐵 ∈ No )
negsproplem4.3	⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐴 <s 𝐵)
negsproplem4.4	⊢ (𝜑 → ( bday ‘𝐴) ∈ ( bday ‘𝐵))

Assertion

Ref	Expression
negsproplem4	⊢ (𝜑 → ( -us ‘𝐵) <s ( -us ‘𝐴))

Distinct variable groups:   𝑥,𝐴,𝑦   𝑥,𝐵,𝑦

Allowed substitution hints:   𝜑(𝑥,𝑦)

Proof of Theorem negsproplem4

Step	Hyp	Ref	Expression
1		negsproplem.1	. . . . 5 ⊢ (𝜑 → ∀𝑥 ∈ No ∀𝑦 ∈ No ((( bday ‘𝑥) ∪ ( bday ‘𝑦)) ∈ (( bday ‘𝐴) ∪ ( bday ‘𝐵)) → (( -us ‘𝑥) ∈ No ∧ (𝑥 <s 𝑦 → ( -us ‘𝑦) <s ( -us ‘𝑥)))))
2		uncom 4118	. . . . . . . 8 ⊢ (( bday ‘𝐴) ∪ ( bday ‘𝐵)) = (( bday ‘𝐵) ∪ ( bday ‘𝐴))
3	2	eleq2i 2861	. . . . . . 7 ⊢ ((( bday ‘𝑥) ∪ ( bday ‘𝑦)) ∈ (( bday ‘𝐴) ∪ ( bday ‘𝐵)) ↔ (( bday ‘𝑥) ∪ ( bday ‘𝑦)) ∈ (( bday ‘𝐵) ∪ ( bday ‘𝐴)))
4	3	imbi1i 352	. . . . . 6 ⊢ (((( bday ‘𝑥) ∪ ( bday ‘𝑦)) ∈ (( bday ‘𝐴) ∪ ( bday ‘𝐵)) → (( -us ‘𝑥) ∈ No ∧ (𝑥 <s 𝑦 → ( -us ‘𝑦) <s ( -us ‘𝑥)))) ↔ ((( bday ‘𝑥) ∪ ( bday ‘𝑦)) ∈ (( bday ‘𝐵) ∪ ( bday ‘𝐴)) → (( -us ‘𝑥) ∈ No ∧ (𝑥 <s 𝑦 → ( -us ‘𝑦) <s ( -us ‘𝑥)))))
5	4	2ralbii 3146	. . . . 5 ⊢ (∀𝑥 ∈ No ∀𝑦 ∈ No ((( bday ‘𝑥) ∪ ( bday ‘𝑦)) ∈ (( bday ‘𝐴) ∪ ( bday ‘𝐵)) → (( -us ‘𝑥) ∈ No ∧ (𝑥 <s 𝑦 → ( -us ‘𝑦) <s ( -us ‘𝑥)))) ↔ ∀𝑥 ∈ No ∀𝑦 ∈ No ((( bday ‘𝑥) ∪ ( bday ‘𝑦)) ∈ (( bday ‘𝐵) ∪ ( bday ‘𝐴)) → (( -us ‘𝑥) ∈ No ∧ (𝑥 <s 𝑦 → ( -us ‘𝑦) <s ( -us ‘𝑥)))))
6	1, 5	sylib 221	. . . 4 ⊢ (𝜑 → ∀𝑥 ∈ No ∀𝑦 ∈ No ((( bday ‘𝑥) ∪ ( bday ‘𝑦)) ∈ (( bday ‘𝐵) ∪ ( bday ‘𝐴)) → (( -us ‘𝑥) ∈ No ∧ (𝑥 <s 𝑦 → ( -us ‘𝑦) <s ( -us ‘𝑥)))))
7		negsproplem4.2	. . . 4 ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐵 ∈ No )
8	6, 7	negsproplem3 28189	. . 3 ⊢ (𝜑 → (( -us ‘𝐵) ∈ No ∧ ( -us “ ( R ‘𝐵)) <<s {( -us ‘𝐵)} ∧ {( -us ‘𝐵)} <<s ( -us “ ( L ‘𝐵))))
9	8	simp3d 1160	. 2 ⊢ (𝜑 → {( -us ‘𝐵)} <<s ( -us “ ( L ‘𝐵)))
10		fvex 6895	. . . 4 ⊢ ( -us ‘𝐵) ∈ V
11	10	snid 4631	. . 3 ⊢ ( -us ‘𝐵) ∈ {( -us ‘𝐵)}
12	11	a1i 11	. 2 ⊢ (𝜑 → ( -us ‘𝐵) ∈ {( -us ‘𝐵)})
13		negsfn 28182	. . 3 ⊢ -us Fn No
14		leftssno 28032	. . 3 ⊢ ( L ‘𝐵) ⊆ No
15		negsproplem4.4	. . . . 5 ⊢ (𝜑 → ( bday ‘𝐴) ∈ ( bday ‘𝐵))
16		bdayon 27911	. . . . . 6 ⊢ ( bday ‘𝐵) ∈ On
17		negsproplem4.1	. . . . . 6 ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐴 ∈ No )
18		oldbday 28060	. . . . . 6 ⊢ ((( bday ‘𝐵) ∈ On ∧ 𝐴 ∈ No ) → (𝐴 ∈ ( O ‘( bday ‘𝐵)) ↔ ( bday ‘𝐴) ∈ ( bday ‘𝐵)))
19	16, 17, 18	sylancr 598	. . . . 5 ⊢ (𝜑 → (𝐴 ∈ ( O ‘( bday ‘𝐵)) ↔ ( bday ‘𝐴) ∈ ( bday ‘𝐵)))
20	15, 19	mpbird 260	. . . 4 ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐴 ∈ ( O ‘( bday ‘𝐵)))
21		negsproplem4.3	. . . 4 ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐴 <s 𝐵)
22		elleft 28010	. . . 4 ⊢ (𝐴 ∈ ( L ‘𝐵) ↔ (𝐴 ∈ ( O ‘( bday ‘𝐵)) ∧ 𝐴 <s 𝐵))
23	20, 21, 22	sylanbrc 594	. . 3 ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐴 ∈ ( L ‘𝐵))
24		fnfvima 7232	. . 3 ⊢ (( -us Fn No ∧ ( L ‘𝐵) ⊆ No ∧ 𝐴 ∈ ( L ‘𝐵)) → ( -us ‘𝐴) ∈ ( -us “ ( L ‘𝐵)))
25	13, 14, 23, 24	mp3an12i 1491	. 2 ⊢ (𝜑 → ( -us ‘𝐴) ∈ ( -us “ ( L ‘𝐵)))
26	9, 12, 25	sltssepcd 27931	1 ⊢ (𝜑 → ( -us ‘𝐵) <s ( -us ‘𝐴))

Syntax hints:   → wi 4   ↔ wb 209   ∧ wa 400   ∈ wcel 2149  ∀wral 3085   ∪ cun 3909   ⊆ wss 3911  {csn 4592   class class class wbr 5111   “ cima 5665  Oncon0 6361   Fn wfn 6532  ‘cfv 6537   No csur 27770   <s clts 27771   bday cbday 27772   <<s cslts 27916   O cold 27982   L cleft 27984   R cright 27985   -u_s cnegs 28178

This theorem was proved from axioms:  ax-mp 5  ax-1 6  ax-2 7  ax-3 8  ax-gen 1822  ax-4 1836  ax-5 1937  ax-6 1994  ax-7 2035  ax-8 2151  ax-9 2159  ax-10 2182  ax-11 2198  ax-12 2219  ax-ext 2741  ax-rep 5240  ax-sep 5259  ax-nul 5271  ax-pow 5337  ax-pr 5405  ax-un 7733

This theorem depends on definitions:  df-bi 210  df-an 401  df-or 861  df-3or 1102  df-3an 1103  df-tru 1570  df-fal 1580  df-ex 1807  df-nf 1811  df-sb 2098  df-mo 2573  df-eu 2603  df-clab 2748  df-cleq 2761  df-clel 2844  df-nfc 2918  df-ne 2965  df-ral 3086  df-rex 3096  df-rmo 3375  df-reu 3376  df-rab 3423  df-v 3463  df-sbc 3752  df-csb 3860  df-dif 3914  df-un 3916  df-in 3918  df-ss 3928  df-pss 3931  df-nul 4293  df-if 4491  df-pw 4567  df-sn 4593  df-pr 4595  df-tp 4597  df-op 4599  df-uni 4875  df-int 4915  df-iun 4960  df-br 5112  df-opab 5176  df-mpt 5195  df-tr 5221  df-id 5557  df-eprel 5562  df-po 5570  df-so 5571  df-fr 5615  df-se 5616  df-we 5617  df-xp 5668  df-rel 5669  df-cnv 5670  df-co 5671  df-dm 5672  df-rn 5673  df-res 5674  df-ima 5675  df-pred 6303  df-ord 6364  df-on 6365  df-suc 6367  df-iota 6493  df-fun 6539  df-fn 6540  df-f 6541  df-f1 6542  df-fo 6543  df-f1o 6544  df-fv 6545  df-riota 7368  df-ov 7414  df-oprab 7415  df-mpo 7416  df-2nd 7987  df-frecs 8278  df-wrecs 8309  df-recs 8358  df-1o 8453  df-2o 8454  df-no 27773  df-lts 27774  df-bday 27775  df-slts 27917  df-cuts 27919  df-0s 27966  df-made 27986  df-old 27987  df-left 27989  df-right 27990  df-norec 28097  df-negs 28180

This theorem is referenced by:  negsproplem7  28193