Theorem negsproplem5 28042

Description: Lemma for surreal negation. Show the second half of the inductive hypothesis when 𝐵 is simpler than 𝐴. (Contributed by Scott Fenton, 3-Feb-2025.)

Hypotheses

Ref	Expression
negsproplem.1	⊢ (𝜑 → ∀𝑥 ∈ No ∀𝑦 ∈ No ((( bday ‘𝑥) ∪ ( bday ‘𝑦)) ∈ (( bday ‘𝐴) ∪ ( bday ‘𝐵)) → (( -us ‘𝑥) ∈ No ∧ (𝑥 <s 𝑦 → ( -us ‘𝑦) <s ( -us ‘𝑥)))))
negsproplem4.1	⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐴 ∈ No )
negsproplem4.2	⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐵 ∈ No )
negsproplem4.3	⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐴 <s 𝐵)
negsproplem5.4	⊢ (𝜑 → ( bday ‘𝐵) ∈ ( bday ‘𝐴))

Assertion

Ref	Expression
negsproplem5	⊢ (𝜑 → ( -us ‘𝐵) <s ( -us ‘𝐴))

Distinct variable groups:   𝑥,𝐴,𝑦   𝑥,𝐵,𝑦

Allowed substitution hints:   𝜑(𝑥,𝑦)

Proof of Theorem negsproplem5

Step	Hyp	Ref	Expression
1		negsproplem.1	. . . 4 ⊢ (𝜑 → ∀𝑥 ∈ No ∀𝑦 ∈ No ((( bday ‘𝑥) ∪ ( bday ‘𝑦)) ∈ (( bday ‘𝐴) ∪ ( bday ‘𝐵)) → (( -us ‘𝑥) ∈ No ∧ (𝑥 <s 𝑦 → ( -us ‘𝑦) <s ( -us ‘𝑥)))))
2		negsproplem4.1	. . . 4 ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐴 ∈ No )
3	1, 2	negsproplem3 28040	. . 3 ⊢ (𝜑 → (( -us ‘𝐴) ∈ No ∧ ( -us “ ( R ‘𝐴)) <<s {( -us ‘𝐴)} ∧ {( -us ‘𝐴)} <<s ( -us “ ( L ‘𝐴))))
4	3	simp2d 1144	. 2 ⊢ (𝜑 → ( -us “ ( R ‘𝐴)) <<s {( -us ‘𝐴)})
5		negsfn 28033	. . 3 ⊢ -us Fn No
6		rightssno 27884	. . 3 ⊢ ( R ‘𝐴) ⊆ No
7		negsproplem5.4	. . . . 5 ⊢ (𝜑 → ( bday ‘𝐵) ∈ ( bday ‘𝐴))
8		bdayon 27762	. . . . . 6 ⊢ ( bday ‘𝐴) ∈ On
9		negsproplem4.2	. . . . . 6 ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐵 ∈ No )
10		oldbday 27911	. . . . . 6 ⊢ ((( bday ‘𝐴) ∈ On ∧ 𝐵 ∈ No ) → (𝐵 ∈ ( O ‘( bday ‘𝐴)) ↔ ( bday ‘𝐵) ∈ ( bday ‘𝐴)))
11	8, 9, 10	sylancr 588	. . . . 5 ⊢ (𝜑 → (𝐵 ∈ ( O ‘( bday ‘𝐴)) ↔ ( bday ‘𝐵) ∈ ( bday ‘𝐴)))
12	7, 11	mpbird 257	. . . 4 ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐵 ∈ ( O ‘( bday ‘𝐴)))
13		negsproplem4.3	. . . 4 ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐴 <s 𝐵)
14		elright 27862	. . . 4 ⊢ (𝐵 ∈ ( R ‘𝐴) ↔ (𝐵 ∈ ( O ‘( bday ‘𝐴)) ∧ 𝐴 <s 𝐵))
15	12, 13, 14	sylanbrc 584	. . 3 ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐵 ∈ ( R ‘𝐴))
16		fnfvima 7183	. . 3 ⊢ (( -us Fn No ∧ ( R ‘𝐴) ⊆ No ∧ 𝐵 ∈ ( R ‘𝐴)) → ( -us ‘𝐵) ∈ ( -us “ ( R ‘𝐴)))
17	5, 6, 15, 16	mp3an12i 1468	. 2 ⊢ (𝜑 → ( -us ‘𝐵) ∈ ( -us “ ( R ‘𝐴)))
18		fvex 6849	. . . 4 ⊢ ( -us ‘𝐴) ∈ V
19	18	snid 4607	. . 3 ⊢ ( -us ‘𝐴) ∈ {( -us ‘𝐴)}
20	19	a1i 11	. 2 ⊢ (𝜑 → ( -us ‘𝐴) ∈ {( -us ‘𝐴)})
21	4, 17, 20	sltssepcd 27782	1 ⊢ (𝜑 → ( -us ‘𝐵) <s ( -us ‘𝐴))

Syntax hints:   → wi 4   ↔ wb 206   ∧ wa 395   ∈ wcel 2114  ∀wral 3052   ∪ cun 3888   ⊆ wss 3890  {csn 4568   class class class wbr 5086   “ cima 5629  Oncon0 6319   Fn wfn 6489  ‘cfv 6494   No csur 27621   <s clts 27622   bday cbday 27623   <<s cslts 27767   O cold 27833   L cleft 27835   R cright 27836   -u_s cnegs 28029

This theorem was proved from axioms:  ax-mp 5  ax-1 6  ax-2 7  ax-3 8  ax-gen 1797  ax-4 1811  ax-5 1912  ax-6 1969  ax-7 2010  ax-8 2116  ax-9 2124  ax-10 2147  ax-11 2163  ax-12 2185  ax-ext 2709  ax-rep 5213  ax-sep 5232  ax-nul 5242  ax-pow 5304  ax-pr 5372  ax-un 7684

This theorem depends on definitions:  df-bi 207  df-an 396  df-or 849  df-3or 1088  df-3an 1089  df-tru 1545  df-fal 1555  df-ex 1782  df-nf 1786  df-sb 2069  df-mo 2540  df-eu 2570  df-clab 2716  df-cleq 2729  df-clel 2812  df-nfc 2886  df-ne 2934  df-ral 3053  df-rex 3063  df-rmo 3343  df-reu 3344  df-rab 3391  df-v 3432  df-sbc 3730  df-csb 3839  df-dif 3893  df-un 3895  df-in 3897  df-ss 3907  df-pss 3910  df-nul 4275  df-if 4468  df-pw 4544  df-sn 4569  df-pr 4571  df-tp 4573  df-op 4575  df-uni 4852  df-int 4891  df-iun 4936  df-br 5087  df-opab 5149  df-mpt 5168  df-tr 5194  df-id 5521  df-eprel 5526  df-po 5534  df-so 5535  df-fr 5579  df-se 5580  df-we 5581  df-xp 5632  df-rel 5633  df-cnv 5634  df-co 5635  df-dm 5636  df-rn 5637  df-res 5638  df-ima 5639  df-pred 6261  df-ord 6322  df-on 6323  df-suc 6325  df-iota 6450  df-fun 6496  df-fn 6497  df-f 6498  df-f1 6499  df-fo 6500  df-f1o 6501  df-fv 6502  df-riota 7319  df-ov 7365  df-oprab 7366  df-mpo 7367  df-2nd 7938  df-frecs 8226  df-wrecs 8257  df-recs 8306  df-1o 8400  df-2o 8401  df-no 27624  df-lts 27625  df-bday 27626  df-slts 27768  df-cuts 27770  df-0s 27817  df-made 27837  df-old 27838  df-left 27840  df-right 27841  df-norec 27948  df-negs 28031

This theorem is referenced by:  negsproplem7  28044