Theorem negsproplem5 27990

Description: Lemma for surreal negation. Show the second half of the inductive hypothesis when 𝐵 is simpler than 𝐴. (Contributed by Scott Fenton, 3-Feb-2025.)

Hypotheses

Ref	Expression
negsproplem.1	⊢ (𝜑 → ∀𝑥 ∈ No ∀𝑦 ∈ No ((( bday ‘𝑥) ∪ ( bday ‘𝑦)) ∈ (( bday ‘𝐴) ∪ ( bday ‘𝐵)) → (( -us ‘𝑥) ∈ No ∧ (𝑥 <s 𝑦 → ( -us ‘𝑦) <s ( -us ‘𝑥)))))
negsproplem4.1	⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐴 ∈ No )
negsproplem4.2	⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐵 ∈ No )
negsproplem4.3	⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐴 <s 𝐵)
negsproplem5.4	⊢ (𝜑 → ( bday ‘𝐵) ∈ ( bday ‘𝐴))

Assertion

Ref	Expression
negsproplem5	⊢ (𝜑 → ( -us ‘𝐵) <s ( -us ‘𝐴))

Distinct variable groups:   𝑥,𝐴,𝑦   𝑥,𝐵,𝑦

Allowed substitution hints:   𝜑(𝑥,𝑦)

Proof of Theorem negsproplem5

Step	Hyp	Ref	Expression
1		negsproplem.1	. . . 4 ⊢ (𝜑 → ∀𝑥 ∈ No ∀𝑦 ∈ No ((( bday ‘𝑥) ∪ ( bday ‘𝑦)) ∈ (( bday ‘𝐴) ∪ ( bday ‘𝐵)) → (( -us ‘𝑥) ∈ No ∧ (𝑥 <s 𝑦 → ( -us ‘𝑦) <s ( -us ‘𝑥)))))
2		negsproplem4.1	. . . 4 ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐴 ∈ No )
3	1, 2	negsproplem3 27988	. . 3 ⊢ (𝜑 → (( -us ‘𝐴) ∈ No ∧ ( -us “ ( R ‘𝐴)) <<s {( -us ‘𝐴)} ∧ {( -us ‘𝐴)} <<s ( -us “ ( L ‘𝐴))))
4	3	simp2d 1143	. 2 ⊢ (𝜑 → ( -us “ ( R ‘𝐴)) <<s {( -us ‘𝐴)})
5		negsfn 27981	. . 3 ⊢ -us Fn No
6		rightssno 27845	. . 3 ⊢ ( R ‘𝐴) ⊆ No
7		negsproplem5.4	. . . . 5 ⊢ (𝜑 → ( bday ‘𝐵) ∈ ( bday ‘𝐴))
8		bdayelon 27740	. . . . . 6 ⊢ ( bday ‘𝐴) ∈ On
9		negsproplem4.2	. . . . . 6 ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐵 ∈ No )
10		oldbday 27864	. . . . . 6 ⊢ ((( bday ‘𝐴) ∈ On ∧ 𝐵 ∈ No ) → (𝐵 ∈ ( O ‘( bday ‘𝐴)) ↔ ( bday ‘𝐵) ∈ ( bday ‘𝐴)))
11	8, 9, 10	sylancr 587	. . . . 5 ⊢ (𝜑 → (𝐵 ∈ ( O ‘( bday ‘𝐴)) ↔ ( bday ‘𝐵) ∈ ( bday ‘𝐴)))
12	7, 11	mpbird 257	. . . 4 ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐵 ∈ ( O ‘( bday ‘𝐴)))
13		negsproplem4.3	. . . 4 ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐴 <s 𝐵)
14		elright 27826	. . . 4 ⊢ (𝐵 ∈ ( R ‘𝐴) ↔ (𝐵 ∈ ( O ‘( bday ‘𝐴)) ∧ 𝐴 <s 𝐵))
15	12, 13, 14	sylanbrc 583	. . 3 ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐵 ∈ ( R ‘𝐴))
16		fnfvima 7225	. . 3 ⊢ (( -us Fn No ∧ ( R ‘𝐴) ⊆ No ∧ 𝐵 ∈ ( R ‘𝐴)) → ( -us ‘𝐵) ∈ ( -us “ ( R ‘𝐴)))
17	5, 6, 15, 16	mp3an12i 1467	. 2 ⊢ (𝜑 → ( -us ‘𝐵) ∈ ( -us “ ( R ‘𝐴)))
18		fvex 6889	. . . 4 ⊢ ( -us ‘𝐴) ∈ V
19	18	snid 4638	. . 3 ⊢ ( -us ‘𝐴) ∈ {( -us ‘𝐴)}
20	19	a1i 11	. 2 ⊢ (𝜑 → ( -us ‘𝐴) ∈ {( -us ‘𝐴)})
21	4, 17, 20	ssltsepcd 27758	1 ⊢ (𝜑 → ( -us ‘𝐵) <s ( -us ‘𝐴))

Syntax hints:   → wi 4   ↔ wb 206   ∧ wa 395   ∈ wcel 2108  ∀wral 3051   ∪ cun 3924   ⊆ wss 3926  {csn 4601   class class class wbr 5119   “ cima 5657  Oncon0 6352   Fn wfn 6526  ‘cfv 6531   No csur 27603   <s cslt 27604   bday cbday 27605   <<s csslt 27744   O cold 27803   L cleft 27805   R cright 27806   -u_s cnegs 27977

This theorem was proved from axioms:  ax-mp 5  ax-1 6  ax-2 7  ax-3 8  ax-gen 1795  ax-4 1809  ax-5 1910  ax-6 1967  ax-7 2007  ax-8 2110  ax-9 2118  ax-10 2141  ax-11 2157  ax-12 2177  ax-ext 2707  ax-rep 5249  ax-sep 5266  ax-nul 5276  ax-pow 5335  ax-pr 5402  ax-un 7729

This theorem depends on definitions:  df-bi 207  df-an 396  df-or 848  df-3or 1087  df-3an 1088  df-tru 1543  df-fal 1553  df-ex 1780  df-nf 1784  df-sb 2065  df-mo 2539  df-eu 2568  df-clab 2714  df-cleq 2727  df-clel 2809  df-nfc 2885  df-ne 2933  df-ral 3052  df-rex 3061  df-rmo 3359  df-reu 3360  df-rab 3416  df-v 3461  df-sbc 3766  df-csb 3875  df-dif 3929  df-un 3931  df-in 3933  df-ss 3943  df-pss 3946  df-nul 4309  df-if 4501  df-pw 4577  df-sn 4602  df-pr 4604  df-tp 4606  df-op 4608  df-uni 4884  df-int 4923  df-iun 4969  df-br 5120  df-opab 5182  df-mpt 5202  df-tr 5230  df-id 5548  df-eprel 5553  df-po 5561  df-so 5562  df-fr 5606  df-se 5607  df-we 5608  df-xp 5660  df-rel 5661  df-cnv 5662  df-co 5663  df-dm 5664  df-rn 5665  df-res 5666  df-ima 5667  df-pred 6290  df-ord 6355  df-on 6356  df-suc 6358  df-iota 6484  df-fun 6533  df-fn 6534  df-f 6535  df-f1 6536  df-fo 6537  df-f1o 6538  df-fv 6539  df-riota 7362  df-ov 7408  df-oprab 7409  df-mpo 7410  df-2nd 7989  df-frecs 8280  df-wrecs 8311  df-recs 8385  df-1o 8480  df-2o 8481  df-no 27606  df-slt 27607  df-bday 27608  df-sslt 27745  df-scut 27747  df-0s 27788  df-made 27807  df-old 27808  df-left 27810  df-right 27811  df-norec 27897  df-negs 27979

This theorem is referenced by:  negsproplem7  27992