Theorem negsproplem5 27938

Description: Lemma for surreal negation. Show the second half of the inductive hypothesis when 𝐵 is simpler than 𝐴. (Contributed by Scott Fenton, 3-Feb-2025.)

Hypotheses

Ref	Expression
negsproplem.1	⊢ (𝜑 → ∀𝑥 ∈ No ∀𝑦 ∈ No ((( bday ‘𝑥) ∪ ( bday ‘𝑦)) ∈ (( bday ‘𝐴) ∪ ( bday ‘𝐵)) → (( -us ‘𝑥) ∈ No ∧ (𝑥 <s 𝑦 → ( -us ‘𝑦) <s ( -us ‘𝑥)))))
negsproplem4.1	⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐴 ∈ No )
negsproplem4.2	⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐵 ∈ No )
negsproplem4.3	⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐴 <s 𝐵)
negsproplem5.4	⊢ (𝜑 → ( bday ‘𝐵) ∈ ( bday ‘𝐴))

Assertion

Ref	Expression
negsproplem5	⊢ (𝜑 → ( -us ‘𝐵) <s ( -us ‘𝐴))

Distinct variable groups:   𝑥,𝐴,𝑦   𝑥,𝐵,𝑦

Allowed substitution hints:   𝜑(𝑥,𝑦)

Proof of Theorem negsproplem5

Step	Hyp	Ref	Expression
1		negsproplem.1	. . . 4 ⊢ (𝜑 → ∀𝑥 ∈ No ∀𝑦 ∈ No ((( bday ‘𝑥) ∪ ( bday ‘𝑦)) ∈ (( bday ‘𝐴) ∪ ( bday ‘𝐵)) → (( -us ‘𝑥) ∈ No ∧ (𝑥 <s 𝑦 → ( -us ‘𝑦) <s ( -us ‘𝑥)))))
2		negsproplem4.1	. . . 4 ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐴 ∈ No )
3	1, 2	negsproplem3 27936	. . 3 ⊢ (𝜑 → (( -us ‘𝐴) ∈ No ∧ ( -us “ ( R ‘𝐴)) <<s {( -us ‘𝐴)} ∧ {( -us ‘𝐴)} <<s ( -us “ ( L ‘𝐴))))
4	3	simp2d 1143	. 2 ⊢ (𝜑 → ( -us “ ( R ‘𝐴)) <<s {( -us ‘𝐴)})
5		negsfn 27929	. . 3 ⊢ -us Fn No
6		rightssno 27793	. . 3 ⊢ ( R ‘𝐴) ⊆ No
7		negsproplem5.4	. . . . 5 ⊢ (𝜑 → ( bday ‘𝐵) ∈ ( bday ‘𝐴))
8		bdayelon 27688	. . . . . 6 ⊢ ( bday ‘𝐴) ∈ On
9		negsproplem4.2	. . . . . 6 ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐵 ∈ No )
10		oldbday 27812	. . . . . 6 ⊢ ((( bday ‘𝐴) ∈ On ∧ 𝐵 ∈ No ) → (𝐵 ∈ ( O ‘( bday ‘𝐴)) ↔ ( bday ‘𝐵) ∈ ( bday ‘𝐴)))
11	8, 9, 10	sylancr 587	. . . . 5 ⊢ (𝜑 → (𝐵 ∈ ( O ‘( bday ‘𝐴)) ↔ ( bday ‘𝐵) ∈ ( bday ‘𝐴)))
12	7, 11	mpbird 257	. . . 4 ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐵 ∈ ( O ‘( bday ‘𝐴)))
13		negsproplem4.3	. . . 4 ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐴 <s 𝐵)
14		elright 27774	. . . 4 ⊢ (𝐵 ∈ ( R ‘𝐴) ↔ (𝐵 ∈ ( O ‘( bday ‘𝐴)) ∧ 𝐴 <s 𝐵))
15	12, 13, 14	sylanbrc 583	. . 3 ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐵 ∈ ( R ‘𝐴))
16		fnfvima 7207	. . 3 ⊢ (( -us Fn No ∧ ( R ‘𝐴) ⊆ No ∧ 𝐵 ∈ ( R ‘𝐴)) → ( -us ‘𝐵) ∈ ( -us “ ( R ‘𝐴)))
17	5, 6, 15, 16	mp3an12i 1467	. 2 ⊢ (𝜑 → ( -us ‘𝐵) ∈ ( -us “ ( R ‘𝐴)))
18		fvex 6871	. . . 4 ⊢ ( -us ‘𝐴) ∈ V
19	18	snid 4626	. . 3 ⊢ ( -us ‘𝐴) ∈ {( -us ‘𝐴)}
20	19	a1i 11	. 2 ⊢ (𝜑 → ( -us ‘𝐴) ∈ {( -us ‘𝐴)})
21	4, 17, 20	ssltsepcd 27706	1 ⊢ (𝜑 → ( -us ‘𝐵) <s ( -us ‘𝐴))

Syntax hints:   → wi 4   ↔ wb 206   ∧ wa 395   ∈ wcel 2109  ∀wral 3044   ∪ cun 3912   ⊆ wss 3914  {csn 4589   class class class wbr 5107   “ cima 5641  Oncon0 6332   Fn wfn 6506  ‘cfv 6511   No csur 27551   <s cslt 27552   bday cbday 27553   <<s csslt 27692   O cold 27751   L cleft 27753   R cright 27754   -u_s cnegs 27925

This theorem was proved from axioms:  ax-mp 5  ax-1 6  ax-2 7  ax-3 8  ax-gen 1795  ax-4 1809  ax-5 1910  ax-6 1967  ax-7 2008  ax-8 2111  ax-9 2119  ax-10 2142  ax-11 2158  ax-12 2178  ax-ext 2701  ax-rep 5234  ax-sep 5251  ax-nul 5261  ax-pow 5320  ax-pr 5387  ax-un 7711

This theorem depends on definitions:  df-bi 207  df-an 396  df-or 848  df-3or 1087  df-3an 1088  df-tru 1543  df-fal 1553  df-ex 1780  df-nf 1784  df-sb 2066  df-mo 2533  df-eu 2562  df-clab 2708  df-cleq 2721  df-clel 2803  df-nfc 2878  df-ne 2926  df-ral 3045  df-rex 3054  df-rmo 3354  df-reu 3355  df-rab 3406  df-v 3449  df-sbc 3754  df-csb 3863  df-dif 3917  df-un 3919  df-in 3921  df-ss 3931  df-pss 3934  df-nul 4297  df-if 4489  df-pw 4565  df-sn 4590  df-pr 4592  df-tp 4594  df-op 4596  df-uni 4872  df-int 4911  df-iun 4957  df-br 5108  df-opab 5170  df-mpt 5189  df-tr 5215  df-id 5533  df-eprel 5538  df-po 5546  df-so 5547  df-fr 5591  df-se 5592  df-we 5593  df-xp 5644  df-rel 5645  df-cnv 5646  df-co 5647  df-dm 5648  df-rn 5649  df-res 5650  df-ima 5651  df-pred 6274  df-ord 6335  df-on 6336  df-suc 6338  df-iota 6464  df-fun 6513  df-fn 6514  df-f 6515  df-f1 6516  df-fo 6517  df-f1o 6518  df-fv 6519  df-riota 7344  df-ov 7390  df-oprab 7391  df-mpo 7392  df-2nd 7969  df-frecs 8260  df-wrecs 8291  df-recs 8340  df-1o 8434  df-2o 8435  df-no 27554  df-slt 27555  df-bday 27556  df-sslt 27693  df-scut 27695  df-0s 27736  df-made 27755  df-old 27756  df-left 27758  df-right 27759  df-norec 27845  df-negs 27927

This theorem is referenced by:  negsproplem7  27940