Theorem pcmplfinf 34379

Description: Given a paracompact topology 𝐽 and an open cover 𝑈, there exists an open refinement ran 𝑓 that is locally finite, using the same index as the original cover 𝑈. (Contributed by Thierry Arnoux, 31-Jan-2020.)

Hypothesis

Ref	Expression
pcmplfin.x	⊢ 𝑋 = ∪ 𝐽

Assertion

Ref	Expression
pcmplfinf	⊢ ((𝐽 ∈ Paracomp ∧ 𝑈 ⊆ 𝐽 ∧ 𝑋 = ∪ 𝑈) → ∃𝑓(𝑓:𝑈⟶𝐽 ∧ ran 𝑓Ref𝑈 ∧ ran 𝑓 ∈ (LocFin‘𝐽)))

Distinct variable groups:   𝑓,𝐽   𝑈,𝑓   𝑓,𝑋

Proof of Theorem pcmplfinf

Dummy variable 𝑣 is distinct from all other variables.

Step	Hyp	Ref	Expression
1		pcmplfin.x	. . 3 ⊢ 𝑋 = ∪ 𝐽
2		simpll2 1232	. . 3 ⊢ ((((𝐽 ∈ Paracomp ∧ 𝑈 ⊆ 𝐽 ∧ 𝑋 = ∪ 𝑈) ∧ 𝑣 ∈ 𝒫 𝐽) ∧ (𝑣 ∈ (LocFin‘𝐽) ∧ 𝑣Ref𝑈)) → 𝑈 ⊆ 𝐽)
3		simpll3 1233	. . 3 ⊢ ((((𝐽 ∈ Paracomp ∧ 𝑈 ⊆ 𝐽 ∧ 𝑋 = ∪ 𝑈) ∧ 𝑣 ∈ 𝒫 𝐽) ∧ (𝑣 ∈ (LocFin‘𝐽) ∧ 𝑣Ref𝑈)) → 𝑋 = ∪ 𝑈)
4		elpwi 4567	. . . 4 ⊢ (𝑣 ∈ 𝒫 𝐽 → 𝑣 ⊆ 𝐽)
5	4	ad2antlr 740	. . 3 ⊢ ((((𝐽 ∈ Paracomp ∧ 𝑈 ⊆ 𝐽 ∧ 𝑋 = ∪ 𝑈) ∧ 𝑣 ∈ 𝒫 𝐽) ∧ (𝑣 ∈ (LocFin‘𝐽) ∧ 𝑣Ref𝑈)) → 𝑣 ⊆ 𝐽)
6		simprr 785	. . 3 ⊢ ((((𝐽 ∈ Paracomp ∧ 𝑈 ⊆ 𝐽 ∧ 𝑋 = ∪ 𝑈) ∧ 𝑣 ∈ 𝒫 𝐽) ∧ (𝑣 ∈ (LocFin‘𝐽) ∧ 𝑣Ref𝑈)) → 𝑣Ref𝑈)
7		simprl 783	. . 3 ⊢ ((((𝐽 ∈ Paracomp ∧ 𝑈 ⊆ 𝐽 ∧ 𝑋 = ∪ 𝑈) ∧ 𝑣 ∈ 𝒫 𝐽) ∧ (𝑣 ∈ (LocFin‘𝐽) ∧ 𝑣Ref𝑈)) → 𝑣 ∈ (LocFin‘𝐽))
8	1, 2, 3, 5, 6, 7	locfinref 34359	. 2 ⊢ ((((𝐽 ∈ Paracomp ∧ 𝑈 ⊆ 𝐽 ∧ 𝑋 = ∪ 𝑈) ∧ 𝑣 ∈ 𝒫 𝐽) ∧ (𝑣 ∈ (LocFin‘𝐽) ∧ 𝑣Ref𝑈)) → ∃𝑓(𝑓:𝑈⟶𝐽 ∧ ran 𝑓Ref𝑈 ∧ ran 𝑓 ∈ (LocFin‘𝐽)))
9	1	pcmplfin 34378	. 2 ⊢ ((𝐽 ∈ Paracomp ∧ 𝑈 ⊆ 𝐽 ∧ 𝑋 = ∪ 𝑈) → ∃𝑣 ∈ 𝒫 𝐽(𝑣 ∈ (LocFin‘𝐽) ∧ 𝑣Ref𝑈))
10	8, 9	r19.29a 3172	1 ⊢ ((𝐽 ∈ Paracomp ∧ 𝑈 ⊆ 𝐽 ∧ 𝑋 = ∪ 𝑈) → ∃𝑓(𝑓:𝑈⟶𝐽 ∧ ran 𝑓Ref𝑈 ∧ ran 𝑓 ∈ (LocFin‘𝐽)))

This proof depends on syntax axioms:   → wi 4   ∧ wa 401   ∧ w3a 1103   = wceq 1570  ∃wex 1812   ∈ wcel 2145   ⊆ wss 3902  𝒫 cpw 4560  ∪ cuni 4870   class class class wbr 5107  ran crn 5660  ⟶wf 6533  ‘cfv 6537  Refcref 23734  LocFinclocfin 23736  Paracompcpcmp 34373

This proof depends on axioms:  ax-mp 5  ax-1 6  ax-2 7  ax-3 8  ax-gen 1828  ax-4 1842  ax-5 1943  ax-6 2000  ax-7 2041  ax-8 2147  ax-9 2155  ax-10 2178  ax-11 2194  ax-12 2215  ax-ext 2734  ax-rep 5236  ax-sep 5255  ax-nul 5267  ax-pow 5334  ax-pr 5402  ax-un 7740  ax-reg 9568  ax-inf2 9624  ax-ac2 10469

This proof depends on definitions:  df-bi 210  df-an 402  df-or 862  df-3or 1104  df-3an 1105  df-tru 1573  df-fal 1583  df-ex 1813  df-nf 1817  df-sb 2100  df-mo 2566  df-eu 2596  df-clab 2741  df-cleq 2754  df-clel 2837  df-nfc 2911  df-ne 2958  df-ral 3079  df-rex 3089  df-rmo 3367  df-reu 3368  df-rab 3415  df-v 3455  df-sbc 3743  df-csb 3851  df-dif 3905  df-un 3907  df-in 3909  df-ss 3919  df-pss 3922  df-nul 4283  df-if 4486  df-pw 4562  df-sn 4588  df-pr 4590  df-op 4594  df-uni 4871  df-int 4911  df-iun 4956  df-iin 4957  df-br 5108  df-opab 5172  df-mpt 5191  df-tr 5217  df-id 5554  df-eprel 5559  df-po 5567  df-so 5568  df-fr 5612  df-se 5613  df-we 5614  df-xp 5665  df-rel 5666  df-cnv 5667  df-co 5668  df-dm 5669  df-rn 5670  df-res 5671  df-ima 5672  df-pred 6303  df-ord 6364  df-on 6365  df-lim 6366  df-suc 6367  df-iota 6493  df-fun 6539  df-fn 6540  df-f 6541  df-f1 6542  df-fo 6543  df-f1o 6544  df-fv 6545  df-isom 6546  df-riota 7374  df-ov 7420  df-om 7867  df-2nd 7991  df-frecs 8284  df-wrecs 8315  df-recs 8364  df-rdg 8403  df-1o 8459  df-er 8700  df-en 8957  df-dom 8958  df-fin 8960  df-r1 9750  df-rank 9751  df-scott 9872  df-card 9948  df-ac 10123  df-top 23125  df-topon 23142  df-ref 23737  df-locfin 23739  df-cref 34361  df-pcmp 34374

This theorem is used by: (None)