Theorem tskr1om 10454

Description: A nonempty Tarski class is infinite, because it contains all the finite levels of the cumulative hierarchy. (This proof does not use ax-inf 9326.) (Contributed by Mario Carneiro, 24-Jun-2013.)

Assertion

Ref	Expression
tskr1om	⊢ ((𝑇 ∈ Tarski ∧ 𝑇 ≠ ∅) → (𝑅1 “ ω) ⊆ 𝑇)

Proof of Theorem tskr1om

Dummy variables 𝑥 𝑦 are mutually distinct and distinct from all other variables.

Step	Hyp	Ref	Expression
1		fveq2 6756	. . . . . . 7 ⊢ (𝑥 = ∅ → (𝑅1‘𝑥) = (𝑅1‘∅))
2	1	eleq1d 2823	. . . . . 6 ⊢ (𝑥 = ∅ → ((𝑅1‘𝑥) ∈ 𝑇 ↔ (𝑅1‘∅) ∈ 𝑇))
3		fveq2 6756	. . . . . . 7 ⊢ (𝑥 = 𝑦 → (𝑅1‘𝑥) = (𝑅1‘𝑦))
4	3	eleq1d 2823	. . . . . 6 ⊢ (𝑥 = 𝑦 → ((𝑅1‘𝑥) ∈ 𝑇 ↔ (𝑅1‘𝑦) ∈ 𝑇))
5		fveq2 6756	. . . . . . 7 ⊢ (𝑥 = suc 𝑦 → (𝑅1‘𝑥) = (𝑅1‘suc 𝑦))
6	5	eleq1d 2823	. . . . . 6 ⊢ (𝑥 = suc 𝑦 → ((𝑅1‘𝑥) ∈ 𝑇 ↔ (𝑅1‘suc 𝑦) ∈ 𝑇))
7		r10 9457	. . . . . . 7 ⊢ (𝑅1‘∅) = ∅
8		tsk0 10450	. . . . . . 7 ⊢ ((𝑇 ∈ Tarski ∧ 𝑇 ≠ ∅) → ∅ ∈ 𝑇)
9	7, 8	eqeltrid 2843	. . . . . 6 ⊢ ((𝑇 ∈ Tarski ∧ 𝑇 ≠ ∅) → (𝑅1‘∅) ∈ 𝑇)
10		tskpw 10440	. . . . . . . . 9 ⊢ ((𝑇 ∈ Tarski ∧ (𝑅1‘𝑦) ∈ 𝑇) → 𝒫 (𝑅1‘𝑦) ∈ 𝑇)
11		nnon 7693	. . . . . . . . . . 11 ⊢ (𝑦 ∈ ω → 𝑦 ∈ On)
12		r1suc 9459	. . . . . . . . . . 11 ⊢ (𝑦 ∈ On → (𝑅1‘suc 𝑦) = 𝒫 (𝑅1‘𝑦))
13	11, 12	syl 17	. . . . . . . . . 10 ⊢ (𝑦 ∈ ω → (𝑅1‘suc 𝑦) = 𝒫 (𝑅1‘𝑦))
14	13	eleq1d 2823	. . . . . . . . 9 ⊢ (𝑦 ∈ ω → ((𝑅1‘suc 𝑦) ∈ 𝑇 ↔ 𝒫 (𝑅1‘𝑦) ∈ 𝑇))
15	10, 14	syl5ibr 245	. . . . . . . 8 ⊢ (𝑦 ∈ ω → ((𝑇 ∈ Tarski ∧ (𝑅1‘𝑦) ∈ 𝑇) → (𝑅1‘suc 𝑦) ∈ 𝑇))
16	15	expd 415	. . . . . . 7 ⊢ (𝑦 ∈ ω → (𝑇 ∈ Tarski → ((𝑅1‘𝑦) ∈ 𝑇 → (𝑅1‘suc 𝑦) ∈ 𝑇)))
17	16	adantrd 491	. . . . . 6 ⊢ (𝑦 ∈ ω → ((𝑇 ∈ Tarski ∧ 𝑇 ≠ ∅) → ((𝑅1‘𝑦) ∈ 𝑇 → (𝑅1‘suc 𝑦) ∈ 𝑇)))
18	2, 4, 6, 9, 17	finds2 7721	. . . . 5 ⊢ (𝑥 ∈ ω → ((𝑇 ∈ Tarski ∧ 𝑇 ≠ ∅) → (𝑅1‘𝑥) ∈ 𝑇))
19		eleq1 2826	. . . . . 6 ⊢ ((𝑅1‘𝑥) = 𝑦 → ((𝑅1‘𝑥) ∈ 𝑇 ↔ 𝑦 ∈ 𝑇))
20	19	imbi2d 340	. . . . 5 ⊢ ((𝑅1‘𝑥) = 𝑦 → (((𝑇 ∈ Tarski ∧ 𝑇 ≠ ∅) → (𝑅1‘𝑥) ∈ 𝑇) ↔ ((𝑇 ∈ Tarski ∧ 𝑇 ≠ ∅) → 𝑦 ∈ 𝑇)))
21	18, 20	syl5ibcom 244	. . . 4 ⊢ (𝑥 ∈ ω → ((𝑅1‘𝑥) = 𝑦 → ((𝑇 ∈ Tarski ∧ 𝑇 ≠ ∅) → 𝑦 ∈ 𝑇)))
22	21	rexlimiv 3208	. . 3 ⊢ (∃𝑥 ∈ ω (𝑅1‘𝑥) = 𝑦 → ((𝑇 ∈ Tarski ∧ 𝑇 ≠ ∅) → 𝑦 ∈ 𝑇))
23		r1fnon 9456	. . . . 5 ⊢ 𝑅1 Fn On
24		fnfun 6517	. . . . 5 ⊢ (𝑅1 Fn On → Fun 𝑅1)
25	23, 24	ax-mp 5	. . . 4 ⊢ Fun 𝑅1
26		fvelima 6817	. . . 4 ⊢ ((Fun 𝑅1 ∧ 𝑦 ∈ (𝑅1 “ ω)) → ∃𝑥 ∈ ω (𝑅1‘𝑥) = 𝑦)
27	25, 26	mpan 686	. . 3 ⊢ (𝑦 ∈ (𝑅1 “ ω) → ∃𝑥 ∈ ω (𝑅1‘𝑥) = 𝑦)
28	22, 27	syl11 33	. 2 ⊢ ((𝑇 ∈ Tarski ∧ 𝑇 ≠ ∅) → (𝑦 ∈ (𝑅1 “ ω) → 𝑦 ∈ 𝑇))
29	28	ssrdv 3923	1 ⊢ ((𝑇 ∈ Tarski ∧ 𝑇 ≠ ∅) → (𝑅1 “ ω) ⊆ 𝑇)

Syntax hints:   → wi 4   ∧ wa 395   = wceq 1539   ∈ wcel 2108   ≠ wne 2942  ∃wrex 3064   ⊆ wss 3883  ∅c0 4253  𝒫 cpw 4530   “ cima 5583  Oncon0 6251  suc csuc 6253  Fun wfun 6412   Fn wfn 6413  ‘cfv 6418  ωcom 7687  𝑅₁cr1 9451  Tarskictsk 10435

This theorem was proved from axioms:  ax-mp 5  ax-1 6  ax-2 7  ax-3 8  ax-gen 1799  ax-4 1813  ax-5 1914  ax-6 1972  ax-7 2012  ax-8 2110  ax-9 2118  ax-10 2139  ax-11 2156  ax-12 2173  ax-ext 2709  ax-rep 5205  ax-sep 5218  ax-nul 5225  ax-pow 5283  ax-pr 5347  ax-un 7566

This theorem depends on definitions:  df-bi 206  df-an 396  df-or 844  df-3or 1086  df-3an 1087  df-tru 1542  df-fal 1552  df-ex 1784  df-nf 1788  df-sb 2069  df-mo 2540  df-eu 2569  df-clab 2716  df-cleq 2730  df-clel 2817  df-nfc 2888  df-ne 2943  df-ral 3068  df-rex 3069  df-reu 3070  df-rab 3072  df-v 3424  df-sbc 3712  df-csb 3829  df-dif 3886  df-un 3888  df-in 3890  df-ss 3900  df-pss 3902  df-nul 4254  df-if 4457  df-pw 4532  df-sn 4559  df-pr 4561  df-tp 4563  df-op 4565  df-uni 4837  df-iun 4923  df-br 5071  df-opab 5133  df-mpt 5154  df-tr 5188  df-id 5480  df-eprel 5486  df-po 5494  df-so 5495  df-fr 5535  df-we 5537  df-xp 5586  df-rel 5587  df-cnv 5588  df-co 5589  df-dm 5590  df-rn 5591  df-res 5592  df-ima 5593  df-pred 6191  df-ord 6254  df-on 6255  df-lim 6256  df-suc 6257  df-iota 6376  df-fun 6420  df-fn 6421  df-f 6422  df-f1 6423  df-fo 6424  df-f1o 6425  df-fv 6426  df-ov 7258  df-om 7688  df-2nd 7805  df-frecs 8068  df-wrecs 8099  df-recs 8173  df-rdg 8212  df-r1 9453  df-tsk 10436

This theorem is referenced by:  tskr1om2  10455  tskinf  10456