Theorem tskr1om 10804

Description: A nonempty Tarski class is infinite, because it contains all the finite levels of the cumulative hierarchy. (This proof does not use ax-inf 9675.) (Contributed by Mario Carneiro, 24-Jun-2013.)

Assertion

Ref	Expression
tskr1om	⊢ ((𝑇 ∈ Tarski ∧ 𝑇 ≠ ∅) → (𝑅1 “ ω) ⊆ 𝑇)

Proof of Theorem tskr1om

Dummy variables 𝑥 𝑦 are mutually distinct and distinct from all other variables.

Step	Hyp	Ref	Expression
1		fveq2 6906	. . . . . . 7 ⊢ (𝑥 = ∅ → (𝑅1‘𝑥) = (𝑅1‘∅))
2	1	eleq1d 2823	. . . . . 6 ⊢ (𝑥 = ∅ → ((𝑅1‘𝑥) ∈ 𝑇 ↔ (𝑅1‘∅) ∈ 𝑇))
3		fveq2 6906	. . . . . . 7 ⊢ (𝑥 = 𝑦 → (𝑅1‘𝑥) = (𝑅1‘𝑦))
4	3	eleq1d 2823	. . . . . 6 ⊢ (𝑥 = 𝑦 → ((𝑅1‘𝑥) ∈ 𝑇 ↔ (𝑅1‘𝑦) ∈ 𝑇))
5		fveq2 6906	. . . . . . 7 ⊢ (𝑥 = suc 𝑦 → (𝑅1‘𝑥) = (𝑅1‘suc 𝑦))
6	5	eleq1d 2823	. . . . . 6 ⊢ (𝑥 = suc 𝑦 → ((𝑅1‘𝑥) ∈ 𝑇 ↔ (𝑅1‘suc 𝑦) ∈ 𝑇))
7		r10 9805	. . . . . . 7 ⊢ (𝑅1‘∅) = ∅
8		tsk0 10800	. . . . . . 7 ⊢ ((𝑇 ∈ Tarski ∧ 𝑇 ≠ ∅) → ∅ ∈ 𝑇)
9	7, 8	eqeltrid 2842	. . . . . 6 ⊢ ((𝑇 ∈ Tarski ∧ 𝑇 ≠ ∅) → (𝑅1‘∅) ∈ 𝑇)
10		tskpw 10790	. . . . . . . . 9 ⊢ ((𝑇 ∈ Tarski ∧ (𝑅1‘𝑦) ∈ 𝑇) → 𝒫 (𝑅1‘𝑦) ∈ 𝑇)
11		nnon 7892	. . . . . . . . . . 11 ⊢ (𝑦 ∈ ω → 𝑦 ∈ On)
12		r1suc 9807	. . . . . . . . . . 11 ⊢ (𝑦 ∈ On → (𝑅1‘suc 𝑦) = 𝒫 (𝑅1‘𝑦))
13	11, 12	syl 17	. . . . . . . . . 10 ⊢ (𝑦 ∈ ω → (𝑅1‘suc 𝑦) = 𝒫 (𝑅1‘𝑦))
14	13	eleq1d 2823	. . . . . . . . 9 ⊢ (𝑦 ∈ ω → ((𝑅1‘suc 𝑦) ∈ 𝑇 ↔ 𝒫 (𝑅1‘𝑦) ∈ 𝑇))
15	10, 14	imbitrrid 246	. . . . . . . 8 ⊢ (𝑦 ∈ ω → ((𝑇 ∈ Tarski ∧ (𝑅1‘𝑦) ∈ 𝑇) → (𝑅1‘suc 𝑦) ∈ 𝑇))
16	15	expd 415	. . . . . . 7 ⊢ (𝑦 ∈ ω → (𝑇 ∈ Tarski → ((𝑅1‘𝑦) ∈ 𝑇 → (𝑅1‘suc 𝑦) ∈ 𝑇)))
17	16	adantrd 491	. . . . . 6 ⊢ (𝑦 ∈ ω → ((𝑇 ∈ Tarski ∧ 𝑇 ≠ ∅) → ((𝑅1‘𝑦) ∈ 𝑇 → (𝑅1‘suc 𝑦) ∈ 𝑇)))
18	2, 4, 6, 9, 17	finds2 7920	. . . . 5 ⊢ (𝑥 ∈ ω → ((𝑇 ∈ Tarski ∧ 𝑇 ≠ ∅) → (𝑅1‘𝑥) ∈ 𝑇))
19		eleq1 2826	. . . . . 6 ⊢ ((𝑅1‘𝑥) = 𝑦 → ((𝑅1‘𝑥) ∈ 𝑇 ↔ 𝑦 ∈ 𝑇))
20	19	imbi2d 340	. . . . 5 ⊢ ((𝑅1‘𝑥) = 𝑦 → (((𝑇 ∈ Tarski ∧ 𝑇 ≠ ∅) → (𝑅1‘𝑥) ∈ 𝑇) ↔ ((𝑇 ∈ Tarski ∧ 𝑇 ≠ ∅) → 𝑦 ∈ 𝑇)))
21	18, 20	syl5ibcom 245	. . . 4 ⊢ (𝑥 ∈ ω → ((𝑅1‘𝑥) = 𝑦 → ((𝑇 ∈ Tarski ∧ 𝑇 ≠ ∅) → 𝑦 ∈ 𝑇)))
22	21	rexlimiv 3145	. . 3 ⊢ (∃𝑥 ∈ ω (𝑅1‘𝑥) = 𝑦 → ((𝑇 ∈ Tarski ∧ 𝑇 ≠ ∅) → 𝑦 ∈ 𝑇))
23		r1fnon 9804	. . . . 5 ⊢ 𝑅1 Fn On
24		fnfun 6668	. . . . 5 ⊢ (𝑅1 Fn On → Fun 𝑅1)
25	23, 24	ax-mp 5	. . . 4 ⊢ Fun 𝑅1
26		fvelima 6973	. . . 4 ⊢ ((Fun 𝑅1 ∧ 𝑦 ∈ (𝑅1 “ ω)) → ∃𝑥 ∈ ω (𝑅1‘𝑥) = 𝑦)
27	25, 26	mpan 690	. . 3 ⊢ (𝑦 ∈ (𝑅1 “ ω) → ∃𝑥 ∈ ω (𝑅1‘𝑥) = 𝑦)
28	22, 27	syl11 33	. 2 ⊢ ((𝑇 ∈ Tarski ∧ 𝑇 ≠ ∅) → (𝑦 ∈ (𝑅1 “ ω) → 𝑦 ∈ 𝑇))
29	28	ssrdv 4000	1 ⊢ ((𝑇 ∈ Tarski ∧ 𝑇 ≠ ∅) → (𝑅1 “ ω) ⊆ 𝑇)

Syntax hints:   → wi 4   ∧ wa 395   = wceq 1536   ∈ wcel 2105   ≠ wne 2937  ∃wrex 3067   ⊆ wss 3962  ∅c0 4338  𝒫 cpw 4604   “ cima 5691  Oncon0 6385  suc csuc 6387  Fun wfun 6556   Fn wfn 6557  ‘cfv 6562  ωcom 7886  𝑅₁cr1 9799  Tarskictsk 10785

This theorem was proved from axioms:  ax-mp 5  ax-1 6  ax-2 7  ax-3 8  ax-gen 1791  ax-4 1805  ax-5 1907  ax-6 1964  ax-7 2004  ax-8 2107  ax-9 2115  ax-10 2138  ax-11 2154  ax-12 2174  ax-ext 2705  ax-rep 5284  ax-sep 5301  ax-nul 5311  ax-pow 5370  ax-pr 5437  ax-un 7753

This theorem depends on definitions:  df-bi 207  df-an 396  df-or 848  df-3or 1087  df-3an 1088  df-tru 1539  df-fal 1549  df-ex 1776  df-nf 1780  df-sb 2062  df-mo 2537  df-eu 2566  df-clab 2712  df-cleq 2726  df-clel 2813  df-nfc 2889  df-ne 2938  df-ral 3059  df-rex 3068  df-reu 3378  df-rab 3433  df-v 3479  df-sbc 3791  df-csb 3908  df-dif 3965  df-un 3967  df-in 3969  df-ss 3979  df-pss 3982  df-nul 4339  df-if 4531  df-pw 4606  df-sn 4631  df-pr 4633  df-op 4637  df-uni 4912  df-iun 4997  df-br 5148  df-opab 5210  df-mpt 5231  df-tr 5265  df-id 5582  df-eprel 5588  df-po 5596  df-so 5597  df-fr 5640  df-we 5642  df-xp 5694  df-rel 5695  df-cnv 5696  df-co 5697  df-dm 5698  df-rn 5699  df-res 5700  df-ima 5701  df-pred 6322  df-ord 6388  df-on 6389  df-lim 6390  df-suc 6391  df-iota 6515  df-fun 6564  df-fn 6565  df-f 6566  df-f1 6567  df-fo 6568  df-f1o 6569  df-fv 6570  df-ov 7433  df-om 7887  df-2nd 8013  df-frecs 8304  df-wrecs 8335  df-recs 8409  df-rdg 8448  df-r1 9801  df-tsk 10786

This theorem is referenced by:  tskr1om2  10805  tskinf  10806