Theorem tskr1om 10175

Description: A nonempty Tarski class is infinite, because it contains all the finite levels of the cumulative hierarchy. (This proof does not use ax-inf 9087.) (Contributed by Mario Carneiro, 24-Jun-2013.)

Assertion

Ref	Expression
tskr1om	⊢ ((𝑇 ∈ Tarski ∧ 𝑇 ≠ ∅) → (𝑅1 “ ω) ⊆ 𝑇)

Proof of Theorem tskr1om

Dummy variables 𝑥 𝑦 are mutually distinct and distinct from all other variables.

Step	Hyp	Ref	Expression
1		fveq2 6656	. . . . . . 7 ⊢ (𝑥 = ∅ → (𝑅1‘𝑥) = (𝑅1‘∅))
2	1	eleq1d 2897	. . . . . 6 ⊢ (𝑥 = ∅ → ((𝑅1‘𝑥) ∈ 𝑇 ↔ (𝑅1‘∅) ∈ 𝑇))
3		fveq2 6656	. . . . . . 7 ⊢ (𝑥 = 𝑦 → (𝑅1‘𝑥) = (𝑅1‘𝑦))
4	3	eleq1d 2897	. . . . . 6 ⊢ (𝑥 = 𝑦 → ((𝑅1‘𝑥) ∈ 𝑇 ↔ (𝑅1‘𝑦) ∈ 𝑇))
5		fveq2 6656	. . . . . . 7 ⊢ (𝑥 = suc 𝑦 → (𝑅1‘𝑥) = (𝑅1‘suc 𝑦))
6	5	eleq1d 2897	. . . . . 6 ⊢ (𝑥 = suc 𝑦 → ((𝑅1‘𝑥) ∈ 𝑇 ↔ (𝑅1‘suc 𝑦) ∈ 𝑇))
7		r10 9183	. . . . . . 7 ⊢ (𝑅1‘∅) = ∅
8		tsk0 10171	. . . . . . 7 ⊢ ((𝑇 ∈ Tarski ∧ 𝑇 ≠ ∅) → ∅ ∈ 𝑇)
9	7, 8	eqeltrid 2917	. . . . . 6 ⊢ ((𝑇 ∈ Tarski ∧ 𝑇 ≠ ∅) → (𝑅1‘∅) ∈ 𝑇)
10		tskpw 10161	. . . . . . . . 9 ⊢ ((𝑇 ∈ Tarski ∧ (𝑅1‘𝑦) ∈ 𝑇) → 𝒫 (𝑅1‘𝑦) ∈ 𝑇)
11		nnon 7572	. . . . . . . . . . 11 ⊢ (𝑦 ∈ ω → 𝑦 ∈ On)
12		r1suc 9185	. . . . . . . . . . 11 ⊢ (𝑦 ∈ On → (𝑅1‘suc 𝑦) = 𝒫 (𝑅1‘𝑦))
13	11, 12	syl 17	. . . . . . . . . 10 ⊢ (𝑦 ∈ ω → (𝑅1‘suc 𝑦) = 𝒫 (𝑅1‘𝑦))
14	13	eleq1d 2897	. . . . . . . . 9 ⊢ (𝑦 ∈ ω → ((𝑅1‘suc 𝑦) ∈ 𝑇 ↔ 𝒫 (𝑅1‘𝑦) ∈ 𝑇))
15	10, 14	syl5ibr 248	. . . . . . . 8 ⊢ (𝑦 ∈ ω → ((𝑇 ∈ Tarski ∧ (𝑅1‘𝑦) ∈ 𝑇) → (𝑅1‘suc 𝑦) ∈ 𝑇))
16	15	expd 418	. . . . . . 7 ⊢ (𝑦 ∈ ω → (𝑇 ∈ Tarski → ((𝑅1‘𝑦) ∈ 𝑇 → (𝑅1‘suc 𝑦) ∈ 𝑇)))
17	16	adantrd 494	. . . . . 6 ⊢ (𝑦 ∈ ω → ((𝑇 ∈ Tarski ∧ 𝑇 ≠ ∅) → ((𝑅1‘𝑦) ∈ 𝑇 → (𝑅1‘suc 𝑦) ∈ 𝑇)))
18	2, 4, 6, 9, 17	finds2 7596	. . . . 5 ⊢ (𝑥 ∈ ω → ((𝑇 ∈ Tarski ∧ 𝑇 ≠ ∅) → (𝑅1‘𝑥) ∈ 𝑇))
19		eleq1 2900	. . . . . 6 ⊢ ((𝑅1‘𝑥) = 𝑦 → ((𝑅1‘𝑥) ∈ 𝑇 ↔ 𝑦 ∈ 𝑇))
20	19	imbi2d 343	. . . . 5 ⊢ ((𝑅1‘𝑥) = 𝑦 → (((𝑇 ∈ Tarski ∧ 𝑇 ≠ ∅) → (𝑅1‘𝑥) ∈ 𝑇) ↔ ((𝑇 ∈ Tarski ∧ 𝑇 ≠ ∅) → 𝑦 ∈ 𝑇)))
21	18, 20	syl5ibcom 247	. . . 4 ⊢ (𝑥 ∈ ω → ((𝑅1‘𝑥) = 𝑦 → ((𝑇 ∈ Tarski ∧ 𝑇 ≠ ∅) → 𝑦 ∈ 𝑇)))
22	21	rexlimiv 3280	. . 3 ⊢ (∃𝑥 ∈ ω (𝑅1‘𝑥) = 𝑦 → ((𝑇 ∈ Tarski ∧ 𝑇 ≠ ∅) → 𝑦 ∈ 𝑇))
23		r1fnon 9182	. . . . 5 ⊢ 𝑅1 Fn On
24		fnfun 6439	. . . . 5 ⊢ (𝑅1 Fn On → Fun 𝑅1)
25	23, 24	ax-mp 5	. . . 4 ⊢ Fun 𝑅1
26		fvelima 6717	. . . 4 ⊢ ((Fun 𝑅1 ∧ 𝑦 ∈ (𝑅1 “ ω)) → ∃𝑥 ∈ ω (𝑅1‘𝑥) = 𝑦)
27	25, 26	mpan 688	. . 3 ⊢ (𝑦 ∈ (𝑅1 “ ω) → ∃𝑥 ∈ ω (𝑅1‘𝑥) = 𝑦)
28	22, 27	syl11 33	. 2 ⊢ ((𝑇 ∈ Tarski ∧ 𝑇 ≠ ∅) → (𝑦 ∈ (𝑅1 “ ω) → 𝑦 ∈ 𝑇))
29	28	ssrdv 3961	1 ⊢ ((𝑇 ∈ Tarski ∧ 𝑇 ≠ ∅) → (𝑅1 “ ω) ⊆ 𝑇)

Syntax hints:   → wi 4   ∧ wa 398   = wceq 1537   ∈ wcel 2114   ≠ wne 3016  ∃wrex 3139   ⊆ wss 3924  ∅c0 4279  𝒫 cpw 4525   “ cima 5544  Oncon0 6177  suc csuc 6179  Fun wfun 6335   Fn wfn 6336  ‘cfv 6341  ωcom 7566  𝑅₁cr1 9177  Tarskictsk 10156

This theorem was proved from axioms:  ax-mp 5  ax-1 6  ax-2 7  ax-3 8  ax-gen 1796  ax-4 1810  ax-5 1911  ax-6 1970  ax-7 2015  ax-8 2116  ax-9 2124  ax-10 2145  ax-11 2161  ax-12 2177  ax-ext 2793  ax-rep 5176  ax-sep 5189  ax-nul 5196  ax-pow 5252  ax-pr 5316  ax-un 7447

This theorem depends on definitions:  df-bi 209  df-an 399  df-or 844  df-3or 1084  df-3an 1085  df-tru 1540  df-ex 1781  df-nf 1785  df-sb 2070  df-mo 2622  df-eu 2654  df-clab 2800  df-cleq 2814  df-clel 2893  df-nfc 2963  df-ne 3017  df-ral 3143  df-rex 3144  df-reu 3145  df-rab 3147  df-v 3488  df-sbc 3764  df-csb 3872  df-dif 3927  df-un 3929  df-in 3931  df-ss 3940  df-pss 3942  df-nul 4280  df-if 4454  df-pw 4527  df-sn 4554  df-pr 4556  df-tp 4558  df-op 4560  df-uni 4825  df-iun 4907  df-br 5053  df-opab 5115  df-mpt 5133  df-tr 5159  df-id 5446  df-eprel 5451  df-po 5460  df-so 5461  df-fr 5500  df-we 5502  df-xp 5547  df-rel 5548  df-cnv 5549  df-co 5550  df-dm 5551  df-rn 5552  df-res 5553  df-ima 5554  df-pred 6134  df-ord 6180  df-on 6181  df-lim 6182  df-suc 6183  df-iota 6300  df-fun 6343  df-fn 6344  df-f 6345  df-f1 6346  df-fo 6347  df-f1o 6348  df-fv 6349  df-om 7567  df-wrecs 7933  df-recs 7994  df-rdg 8032  df-r1 9179  df-tsk 10157

This theorem is referenced by:  tskr1om2  10176  tskinf  10177