P. 108 of Theorem List - Metamath Proof Explorer

Theorem List for Metamath Proof Explorer - 10701-10800   *Has distinct variable group(s)

Type	Label	Description
Statement
Theorem	gruina 10701	If a Grothendieck universe 𝑈 is nonempty, then the height of the ordinals in 𝑈 is a strongly inaccessible cardinal. (Contributed by Mario Carneiro, 17-Jun-2013.)
⊢ 𝐴 = (𝑈 ∩ On)    ⇒   ⊢ ((𝑈 ∈ Univ ∧ 𝑈 ≠ ∅) → 𝐴 ∈ Inacc)
Theorem	grur1a 10702	A characterization of Grothendieck universes, part 1. (Contributed by Mario Carneiro, 23-Jun-2013.)
⊢ 𝐴 = (𝑈 ∩ On)    ⇒   ⊢ (𝑈 ∈ Univ → (𝑅1‘𝐴) ⊆ 𝑈)
Theorem	grur1 10703	A characterization of Grothendieck universes, part 2. (Contributed by Mario Carneiro, 24-Jun-2013.)
⊢ 𝐴 = (𝑈 ∩ On)    ⇒   ⊢ ((𝑈 ∈ Univ ∧ 𝑈 ∈ ∪ (𝑅1 “ On)) → 𝑈 = (𝑅1‘𝐴))
Theorem	grutsk1 10704	Grothendieck universes are the same as transitive Tarski classes, part one: a transitive Tarski class is a universe. (The hard work is in tskuni 10666.) (Contributed by Mario Carneiro, 17-Jun-2013.)
⊢ ((𝑇 ∈ Tarski ∧ Tr 𝑇) → 𝑇 ∈ Univ)
Theorem	grutsk 10705	Grothendieck universes are the same as transitive Tarski classes. (The proof in the forward direction requires Foundation.) (Contributed by Mario Carneiro, 24-Jun-2013.)
⊢ Univ = {𝑥 ∈ Tarski ∣ Tr 𝑥}
4.2  ZFC Set Theory plus the Tarski-Grothendieck Axiom
4.2.1  Introduce the Tarski-Grothendieck Axiom
Axiom	ax-groth 10706*	The Tarski-Grothendieck Axiom. For every set 𝑥 there is an inaccessible cardinal 𝑦 such that 𝑦 is not in 𝑥. The addition of this axiom to ZFC set theory provides a framework for category theory, thus for all practical purposes giving us a complete foundation for "all of mathematics". This version of the axiom is used by the Mizar project (http://www.mizar.org/JFM/Axiomatics/tarski.html). Unlike the ZFC axioms, this axiom is very long when expressed in terms of primitive symbols (see grothprim 10717). An open problem is finding a shorter equivalent. (Contributed by NM, 18-Mar-2007.)
⊢ ∃𝑦(𝑥 ∈ 𝑦 ∧ ∀𝑧 ∈ 𝑦 (∀𝑤(𝑤 ⊆ 𝑧 → 𝑤 ∈ 𝑦) ∧ ∃𝑤 ∈ 𝑦 ∀𝑣(𝑣 ⊆ 𝑧 → 𝑣 ∈ 𝑤)) ∧ ∀𝑧(𝑧 ⊆ 𝑦 → (𝑧 ≈ 𝑦 ∨ 𝑧 ∈ 𝑦)))
Theorem	axgroth5 10707*	The Tarski-Grothendieck axiom using abbreviations. (Contributed by NM, 22-Jun-2009.)
⊢ ∃𝑦(𝑥 ∈ 𝑦 ∧ ∀𝑧 ∈ 𝑦 (𝒫 𝑧 ⊆ 𝑦 ∧ ∃𝑤 ∈ 𝑦 𝒫 𝑧 ⊆ 𝑤) ∧ ∀𝑧 ∈ 𝒫 𝑦(𝑧 ≈ 𝑦 ∨ 𝑧 ∈ 𝑦))
Theorem	axgroth2 10708*	Alternate version of the Tarski-Grothendieck Axiom. (Contributed by NM, 18-Mar-2007.)
⊢ ∃𝑦(𝑥 ∈ 𝑦 ∧ ∀𝑧 ∈ 𝑦 (∀𝑤(𝑤 ⊆ 𝑧 → 𝑤 ∈ 𝑦) ∧ ∃𝑤 ∈ 𝑦 ∀𝑣(𝑣 ⊆ 𝑧 → 𝑣 ∈ 𝑤)) ∧ ∀𝑧(𝑧 ⊆ 𝑦 → (𝑦 ≼ 𝑧 ∨ 𝑧 ∈ 𝑦)))
4.2.2  Derive the Power Set, Infinity and Choice Axioms
Theorem	grothpw 10709*	Derive the Axiom of Power Sets ax-pow 5301 from the Tarski-Grothendieck axiom ax-groth 10706. That it follows is mentioned by Bob Solovay at http://www.cs.nyu.edu/pipermail/fom/2008-March/012783.html 10706. Note that ax-pow 5301 is not used by the proof. (Contributed by Gérard Lang, 22-Jun-2009.) (New usage is discouraged.)
⊢ ∃𝑦∀𝑧(∀𝑤(𝑤 ∈ 𝑧 → 𝑤 ∈ 𝑥) → 𝑧 ∈ 𝑦)
Theorem	grothpwex 10710	Derive the Axiom of Power Sets from the Tarski-Grothendieck axiom ax-groth 10706. Note that ax-pow 5301 is not used by the proof. Use axpweq 5287 to obtain ax-pow 5301. Use pwex 5316 or pwexg 5314 instead. (Contributed by Gérard Lang, 22-Jun-2009.) (New usage is discouraged.)
⊢ 𝒫 𝑥 ∈ V
Theorem	axgroth6 10711*	The Tarski-Grothendieck axiom using abbreviations. This version is called Tarski's axiom: given a set 𝑥, there exists a set 𝑦 containing 𝑥, the subsets of the members of 𝑦, the power sets of the members of 𝑦, and the subsets of 𝑦 of cardinality less than that of 𝑦. (Contributed by NM, 21-Jun-2009.)
⊢ ∃𝑦(𝑥 ∈ 𝑦 ∧ ∀𝑧 ∈ 𝑦 (𝒫 𝑧 ⊆ 𝑦 ∧ 𝒫 𝑧 ∈ 𝑦) ∧ ∀𝑧 ∈ 𝒫 𝑦(𝑧 ≺ 𝑦 → 𝑧 ∈ 𝑦))
Theorem	grothomex 10712	The Tarski-Grothendieck Axiom implies the Axiom of Infinity (in the form of omex 9528). Note that our proof depends on neither the Axiom of Infinity nor Regularity. (Contributed by Mario Carneiro, 19-Apr-2013.) (New usage is discouraged.)
⊢ ω ∈ V
Theorem	grothac 10713	The Tarski-Grothendieck Axiom implies the Axiom of Choice (in the form of cardeqv 10352). This can be put in a more conventional form via ween 9918 and dfac8 10019. Note that the mere existence of strongly inaccessible cardinals doesn't imply AC, but rather the particular form of the Tarski-Grothendieck axiom (see http://www.cs.nyu.edu/pipermail/fom/2008-March/012783.html 10019). (Contributed by Mario Carneiro, 19-Apr-2013.) (New usage is discouraged.)
⊢ dom card = V
Theorem	axgroth3 10714*	Alternate version of the Tarski-Grothendieck Axiom. ax-cc 10318 is used to derive this version. (Contributed by NM, 26-Mar-2007.)
⊢ ∃𝑦(𝑥 ∈ 𝑦 ∧ ∀𝑧 ∈ 𝑦 (∀𝑤(𝑤 ⊆ 𝑧 → 𝑤 ∈ 𝑦) ∧ ∃𝑤 ∈ 𝑦 ∀𝑣(𝑣 ⊆ 𝑧 → 𝑣 ∈ 𝑤)) ∧ ∀𝑧(𝑧 ⊆ 𝑦 → ((𝑦 ∖ 𝑧) ≼ 𝑧 ∨ 𝑧 ∈ 𝑦)))
Theorem	axgroth4 10715*	Alternate version of the Tarski-Grothendieck Axiom. ax-ac 10342 is used to derive this version. (Contributed by NM, 16-Apr-2007.)
⊢ ∃𝑦(𝑥 ∈ 𝑦 ∧ ∀𝑧 ∈ 𝑦 ∃𝑣 ∈ 𝑦 ∀𝑤(𝑤 ⊆ 𝑧 → 𝑤 ∈ (𝑦 ∩ 𝑣)) ∧ ∀𝑧(𝑧 ⊆ 𝑦 → ((𝑦 ∖ 𝑧) ≼ 𝑧 ∨ 𝑧 ∈ 𝑦)))
Theorem	grothprimlem 10716*	Lemma for grothprim 10717. Expand the membership of an unordered pair into primitives. (Contributed by NM, 29-Mar-2007.)
⊢ ({𝑢, 𝑣} ∈ 𝑤 ↔ ∃𝑔(𝑔 ∈ 𝑤 ∧ ∀ℎ(ℎ ∈ 𝑔 ↔ (ℎ = 𝑢 ∨ ℎ = 𝑣))))
Theorem	grothprim 10717*	The Tarski-Grothendieck Axiom ax-groth 10706 expanded into set theory primitives using 163 symbols (allowing the defined symbols ∧, ∨, ↔, and ∃). An open problem is whether a shorter equivalent exists (when expanded to primitives). (Contributed by NM, 16-Apr-2007.)
⊢ ∃𝑦(𝑥 ∈ 𝑦 ∧ ∀𝑧((𝑧 ∈ 𝑦 → ∃𝑣(𝑣 ∈ 𝑦 ∧ ∀𝑤(∀𝑢(𝑢 ∈ 𝑤 → 𝑢 ∈ 𝑧) → (𝑤 ∈ 𝑦 ∧ 𝑤 ∈ 𝑣)))) ∧ ∃𝑤((𝑤 ∈ 𝑧 → 𝑤 ∈ 𝑦) → (∀𝑣((𝑣 ∈ 𝑧 → ∃𝑡∀𝑢(∃𝑔(𝑔 ∈ 𝑤 ∧ ∀ℎ(ℎ ∈ 𝑔 ↔ (ℎ = 𝑣 ∨ ℎ = 𝑢))) → 𝑢 = 𝑡)) ∧ (𝑣 ∈ 𝑦 → (𝑣 ∈ 𝑧 ∨ ∃𝑢(𝑢 ∈ 𝑧 ∧ ∃𝑔(𝑔 ∈ 𝑤 ∧ ∀ℎ(ℎ ∈ 𝑔 ↔ (ℎ = 𝑢 ∨ ℎ = 𝑣))))))) ∨ 𝑧 ∈ 𝑦))))
Theorem	grothtsk 10718	The Tarski-Grothendieck Axiom, using abbreviations. (Contributed by Mario Carneiro, 28-May-2013.)
⊢ ∪ Tarski = V
Theorem	inaprc 10719	An equivalent to the Tarski-Grothendieck Axiom: there is a proper class of inaccessible cardinals. (Contributed by Mario Carneiro, 9-Jun-2013.)
⊢ Inacc ∉ V
4.2.3  Tarski map function
Syntax	ctskm 10720	Extend class definition to include the map whose value is the smallest Tarski class.
class tarskiMap
Definition	df-tskm 10721*	A function that maps a set 𝑥 to the smallest Tarski class that contains the set. (Contributed by FL, 30-Dec-2010.)
⊢ tarskiMap = (𝑥 ∈ V ↦ ∩ {𝑦 ∈ Tarski ∣ 𝑥 ∈ 𝑦})
Theorem	tskmval 10722*	Value of our tarski map. (Contributed by FL, 30-Dec-2010.) (Revised by Mario Carneiro, 20-Sep-2014.)
⊢ (𝐴 ∈ 𝑉 → (tarskiMap‘𝐴) = ∩ {𝑥 ∈ Tarski ∣ 𝐴 ∈ 𝑥})
Theorem	tskmid 10723	The set 𝐴 is an element of the smallest Tarski class that contains 𝐴. CLASSES1 th. 5. (Contributed by FL, 30-Dec-2010.) (Proof shortened by Mario Carneiro, 21-Sep-2014.)
⊢ (𝐴 ∈ 𝑉 → 𝐴 ∈ (tarskiMap‘𝐴))
Theorem	tskmcl 10724	A Tarski class that contains 𝐴 is a Tarski class. (Contributed by FL, 17-Apr-2011.) (Proof shortened by Mario Carneiro, 21-Sep-2014.)
⊢ (tarskiMap‘𝐴) ∈ Tarski
Theorem	sstskm 10725*	Being a part of (tarskiMap‘𝐴). (Contributed by FL, 17-Apr-2011.) (Proof shortened by Mario Carneiro, 20-Sep-2014.)
⊢ (𝐴 ∈ 𝑉 → (𝐵 ⊆ (tarskiMap‘𝐴) ↔ ∀𝑥 ∈ Tarski (𝐴 ∈ 𝑥 → 𝐵 ⊆ 𝑥)))
Theorem	eltskm 10726*	Belonging to (tarskiMap‘𝐴). (Contributed by FL, 17-Apr-2011.) (Proof shortened by Mario Carneiro, 21-Sep-2014.)
⊢ (𝐴 ∈ 𝑉 → (𝐵 ∈ (tarskiMap‘𝐴) ↔ ∀𝑥 ∈ Tarski (𝐴 ∈ 𝑥 → 𝐵 ∈ 𝑥)))
PART 5  REAL AND COMPLEX NUMBERS This section derives the basics of real and complex numbers. We first construct and axiomatize real and complex numbers (e.g., ax-resscn 11055). After that, we derive their basic properties, various operations like addition (df-add 11009) and sine (df-sin 15968), and subsets such as the integers (df-z 12461) and natural numbers (df-nn 12118).
5.1  Construction and axiomatization of real and complex numbers
5.1.1  Dedekind-cut construction of real and complex numbers
Syntax	cnpi 10727	The set of positive integers, which is the set of natural numbers ω with 0 removed. Note: This is the start of the Dedekind-cut construction of real and complex numbers. The last lemma of the construction is mulcnsrec 11027. The actual set of Dedekind cuts is defined by df-np 10864.
class N
Syntax	cpli 10728	Positive integer addition.
class +N
Syntax	cmi 10729	Positive integer multiplication.
class ·N
Syntax	clti 10730	Positive integer ordering relation.
class <N
Syntax	cplpq 10731	Positive pre-fraction addition.
class +pQ
Syntax	cmpq 10732	Positive pre-fraction multiplication.
class ·pQ
Syntax	cltpq 10733	Positive pre-fraction ordering relation.
class <pQ
Syntax	ceq 10734	Equivalence class used to construct positive fractions.
class ~Q
Syntax	cnq 10735	Set of positive fractions.
class Q
Syntax	c1q 10736	The positive fraction constant 1.
class 1Q
Syntax	cerq 10737	Positive fraction equivalence class.
class [Q]
Syntax	cplq 10738	Positive fraction addition.
class +Q
Syntax	cmq 10739	Positive fraction multiplication.
class ·Q
Syntax	crq 10740	Positive fraction reciprocal operation.
class *Q
Syntax	cltq 10741	Positive fraction ordering relation.
class <Q
Syntax	cnp 10742	Set of positive reals.
class P
Syntax	c1p 10743	Positive real constant 1.
class 1P
Syntax	cpp 10744	Positive real addition.
class +P
Syntax	cmp 10745	Positive real multiplication.
class ·P
Syntax	cltp 10746	Positive real ordering relation.
class <P
Syntax	cer 10747	Equivalence class used to construct signed reals.
class ~R
Syntax	cnr 10748	Set of signed reals.
class R
Syntax	c0r 10749	The signed real constant 0.
class 0R
Syntax	c1r 10750	The signed real constant 1.
class 1R
Syntax	cm1r 10751	The signed real constant -1.
class -1R
Syntax	cplr 10752	Signed real addition.
class +R
Syntax	cmr 10753	Signed real multiplication.
class ·R
Syntax	cltr 10754	Signed real ordering relation.
class <R
Definition	df-ni 10755	Define the class of positive integers. This is a "temporary" set used in the construction of complex numbers df-c 11004, and is intended to be used only by the construction. (Contributed by NM, 15-Aug-1995.) (New usage is discouraged.)
⊢ N = (ω ∖ {∅})
Definition	df-pli 10756	Define addition on positive integers. This is a "temporary" set used in the construction of complex numbers df-c 11004, and is intended to be used only by the construction. (Contributed by NM, 26-Aug-1995.) (New usage is discouraged.)
⊢ +N = ( +o ↾ (N × N))
Definition	df-mi 10757	Define multiplication on positive integers. This is a "temporary" set used in the construction of complex numbers df-c 11004, and is intended to be used only by the construction. (Contributed by NM, 26-Aug-1995.) (New usage is discouraged.)
⊢ ·N = ( ·o ↾ (N × N))
Definition	df-lti 10758	Define 'less than' on positive integers. This is a "temporary" set used in the construction of complex numbers df-c 11004, and is intended to be used only by the construction. (Contributed by NM, 6-Feb-1996.) (New usage is discouraged.)
⊢ <N = ( E ∩ (N × N))
Theorem	elni 10759	Membership in the class of positive integers. (Contributed by NM, 15-Aug-1995.) (New usage is discouraged.)
⊢ (𝐴 ∈ N ↔ (𝐴 ∈ ω ∧ 𝐴 ≠ ∅))
Theorem	elni2 10760	Membership in the class of positive integers. (Contributed by NM, 27-Nov-1995.) (New usage is discouraged.)
⊢ (𝐴 ∈ N ↔ (𝐴 ∈ ω ∧ ∅ ∈ 𝐴))
Theorem	pinn 10761	A positive integer is a natural number. (Contributed by NM, 15-Aug-1995.) (New usage is discouraged.)
⊢ (𝐴 ∈ N → 𝐴 ∈ ω)
Theorem	pion 10762	A positive integer is an ordinal number. (Contributed by NM, 23-Mar-1996.) (New usage is discouraged.)
⊢ (𝐴 ∈ N → 𝐴 ∈ On)
Theorem	piord 10763	A positive integer is ordinal. (Contributed by NM, 29-Jan-1996.) (New usage is discouraged.)
⊢ (𝐴 ∈ N → Ord 𝐴)
Theorem	niex 10764	The class of positive integers is a set. (Contributed by NM, 15-Aug-1995.) (New usage is discouraged.)
⊢ N ∈ V
Theorem	0npi 10765	The empty set is not a positive integer. (Contributed by NM, 26-Aug-1995.) (New usage is discouraged.)
⊢ ¬ ∅ ∈ N
Theorem	1pi 10766	Ordinal 'one' is a positive integer. (Contributed by NM, 29-Oct-1995.) (New usage is discouraged.)
⊢ 1o ∈ N
Theorem	addpiord 10767	Positive integer addition in terms of ordinal addition. (Contributed by NM, 27-Aug-1995.) (New usage is discouraged.)
⊢ ((𝐴 ∈ N ∧ 𝐵 ∈ N) → (𝐴 +N 𝐵) = (𝐴 +o 𝐵))
Theorem	mulpiord 10768	Positive integer multiplication in terms of ordinal multiplication. (Contributed by NM, 27-Aug-1995.) (New usage is discouraged.)
⊢ ((𝐴 ∈ N ∧ 𝐵 ∈ N) → (𝐴 ·N 𝐵) = (𝐴 ·o 𝐵))
Theorem	mulidpi 10769	1 is an identity element for multiplication on positive integers. (Contributed by NM, 4-Mar-1996.) (Revised by Mario Carneiro, 17-Nov-2014.) (New usage is discouraged.)
⊢ (𝐴 ∈ N → (𝐴 ·N 1o) = 𝐴)
Theorem	ltpiord 10770	Positive integer 'less than' in terms of ordinal membership. (Contributed by NM, 6-Feb-1996.) (Revised by Mario Carneiro, 28-Apr-2015.) (New usage is discouraged.)
⊢ ((𝐴 ∈ N ∧ 𝐵 ∈ N) → (𝐴 <N 𝐵 ↔ 𝐴 ∈ 𝐵))
Theorem	ltsopi 10771	Positive integer 'less than' is a strict ordering. (Contributed by NM, 8-Feb-1996.) (Proof shortened by Mario Carneiro, 10-Jul-2014.) (New usage is discouraged.)
⊢ <N Or N
Theorem	ltrelpi 10772	Positive integer 'less than' is a relation on positive integers. (Contributed by NM, 8-Feb-1996.) (New usage is discouraged.)
⊢ <N ⊆ (N × N)
Theorem	dmaddpi 10773	Domain of addition on positive integers. (Contributed by NM, 26-Aug-1995.) (New usage is discouraged.)
⊢ dom +N = (N × N)
Theorem	dmmulpi 10774	Domain of multiplication on positive integers. (Contributed by NM, 26-Aug-1995.) (New usage is discouraged.)
⊢ dom ·N = (N × N)
Theorem	addclpi 10775	Closure of addition of positive integers. (Contributed by NM, 18-Oct-1995.) (New usage is discouraged.)
⊢ ((𝐴 ∈ N ∧ 𝐵 ∈ N) → (𝐴 +N 𝐵) ∈ N)
Theorem	mulclpi 10776	Closure of multiplication of positive integers. (Contributed by NM, 18-Oct-1995.) (New usage is discouraged.)
⊢ ((𝐴 ∈ N ∧ 𝐵 ∈ N) → (𝐴 ·N 𝐵) ∈ N)
Theorem	addcompi 10777	Addition of positive integers is commutative. (Contributed by NM, 27-Aug-1995.) (New usage is discouraged.)
⊢ (𝐴 +N 𝐵) = (𝐵 +N 𝐴)
Theorem	addasspi 10778	Addition of positive integers is associative. (Contributed by NM, 27-Aug-1995.) (New usage is discouraged.)
⊢ ((𝐴 +N 𝐵) +N 𝐶) = (𝐴 +N (𝐵 +N 𝐶))
Theorem	mulcompi 10779	Multiplication of positive integers is commutative. (Contributed by NM, 21-Sep-1995.) (New usage is discouraged.)
⊢ (𝐴 ·N 𝐵) = (𝐵 ·N 𝐴)
Theorem	mulasspi 10780	Multiplication of positive integers is associative. (Contributed by NM, 21-Sep-1995.) (New usage is discouraged.)
⊢ ((𝐴 ·N 𝐵) ·N 𝐶) = (𝐴 ·N (𝐵 ·N 𝐶))
Theorem	distrpi 10781	Multiplication of positive integers is distributive. (Contributed by NM, 21-Sep-1995.) (New usage is discouraged.)
⊢ (𝐴 ·N (𝐵 +N 𝐶)) = ((𝐴 ·N 𝐵) +N (𝐴 ·N 𝐶))
Theorem	addcanpi 10782	Addition cancellation law for positive integers. (Contributed by Mario Carneiro, 8-May-2013.) (New usage is discouraged.)
⊢ ((𝐴 ∈ N ∧ 𝐵 ∈ N) → ((𝐴 +N 𝐵) = (𝐴 +N 𝐶) ↔ 𝐵 = 𝐶))
Theorem	mulcanpi 10783	Multiplication cancellation law for positive integers. (Contributed by NM, 4-Feb-1996.) (Revised by Mario Carneiro, 10-May-2013.) (New usage is discouraged.)
⊢ ((𝐴 ∈ N ∧ 𝐵 ∈ N) → ((𝐴 ·N 𝐵) = (𝐴 ·N 𝐶) ↔ 𝐵 = 𝐶))
Theorem	addnidpi 10784	There is no identity element for addition on positive integers. (Contributed by NM, 28-Nov-1995.) (New usage is discouraged.)
⊢ (𝐴 ∈ N → ¬ (𝐴 +N 𝐵) = 𝐴)
Theorem	ltexpi 10785*	Ordering on positive integers in terms of existence of sum. (Contributed by NM, 15-Mar-1996.) (Revised by Mario Carneiro, 14-Jun-2013.) (New usage is discouraged.)
⊢ ((𝐴 ∈ N ∧ 𝐵 ∈ N) → (𝐴 <N 𝐵 ↔ ∃𝑥 ∈ N (𝐴 +N 𝑥) = 𝐵))
Theorem	ltapi 10786	Ordering property of addition for positive integers. (Contributed by NM, 7-Mar-1996.) (New usage is discouraged.)
⊢ (𝐶 ∈ N → (𝐴 <N 𝐵 ↔ (𝐶 +N 𝐴) <N (𝐶 +N 𝐵)))
Theorem	ltmpi 10787	Ordering property of multiplication for positive integers. (Contributed by NM, 8-Feb-1996.) (New usage is discouraged.)
⊢ (𝐶 ∈ N → (𝐴 <N 𝐵 ↔ (𝐶 ·N 𝐴) <N (𝐶 ·N 𝐵)))
Theorem	1lt2pi 10788	One is less than two (one plus one). (Contributed by NM, 13-Mar-1996.) (New usage is discouraged.)
⊢ 1o <N (1o +N 1o)
Theorem	nlt1pi 10789	No positive integer is less than one. (Contributed by NM, 23-Mar-1996.) (New usage is discouraged.)
⊢ ¬ 𝐴 <N 1o
Theorem	indpi 10790*	Principle of Finite Induction on positive integers. (Contributed by NM, 23-Mar-1996.) (New usage is discouraged.)
⊢ (𝑥 = 1o → (𝜑 ↔ 𝜓))    &   ⊢ (𝑥 = 𝑦 → (𝜑 ↔ 𝜒))    &   ⊢ (𝑥 = (𝑦 +N 1o) → (𝜑 ↔ 𝜃))    &   ⊢ (𝑥 = 𝐴 → (𝜑 ↔ 𝜏))    &   ⊢ 𝜓    &   ⊢ (𝑦 ∈ N → (𝜒 → 𝜃))    ⇒   ⊢ (𝐴 ∈ N → 𝜏)
Definition	df-plpq 10791*	Define pre-addition on positive fractions. This is a "temporary" set used in the construction of complex numbers df-c 11004, and is intended to be used only by the construction. This "pre-addition" operation works directly with ordered pairs of integers. The actual positive fraction addition +Q (df-plq 10797) works with the equivalence classes of these ordered pairs determined by the equivalence relation ~Q (df-enq 10794). (Analogous remarks apply to the other "pre-" operations in the complex number construction that follows.) From Proposition 9-2.3 of [Gleason] p. 117. (Contributed by NM, 28-Aug-1995.) (New usage is discouraged.)
⊢ +pQ = (𝑥 ∈ (N × N), 𝑦 ∈ (N × N) ↦ ⟨(((1st ‘𝑥) ·N (2nd ‘𝑦)) +N ((1st ‘𝑦) ·N (2nd ‘𝑥))), ((2nd ‘𝑥) ·N (2nd ‘𝑦))⟩)
Definition	df-mpq 10792*	Define pre-multiplication on positive fractions. This is a "temporary" set used in the construction of complex numbers df-c 11004, and is intended to be used only by the construction. From Proposition 9-2.4 of [Gleason] p. 119. (Contributed by NM, 28-Aug-1995.) (New usage is discouraged.)
⊢ ·pQ = (𝑥 ∈ (N × N), 𝑦 ∈ (N × N) ↦ ⟨((1st ‘𝑥) ·N (1st ‘𝑦)), ((2nd ‘𝑥) ·N (2nd ‘𝑦))⟩)
Definition	df-ltpq 10793*	Define pre-ordering relation on positive fractions. This is a "temporary" set used in the construction of complex numbers df-c 11004, and is intended to be used only by the construction. Similar to Definition 5 of [Suppes] p. 162. (Contributed by NM, 28-Aug-1995.) (New usage is discouraged.)
⊢ <pQ = {⟨𝑥, 𝑦⟩ ∣ ((𝑥 ∈ (N × N) ∧ 𝑦 ∈ (N × N)) ∧ ((1st ‘𝑥) ·N (2nd ‘𝑦)) <N ((1st ‘𝑦) ·N (2nd ‘𝑥)))}
Definition	df-enq 10794*	Define equivalence relation for positive fractions. This is a "temporary" set used in the construction of complex numbers df-c 11004, and is intended to be used only by the construction. From Proposition 9-2.1 of [Gleason] p. 117. (Contributed by NM, 27-Aug-1995.) (New usage is discouraged.)
⊢ ~Q = {⟨𝑥, 𝑦⟩ ∣ ((𝑥 ∈ (N × N) ∧ 𝑦 ∈ (N × N)) ∧ ∃𝑧∃𝑤∃𝑣∃𝑢((𝑥 = ⟨𝑧, 𝑤⟩ ∧ 𝑦 = ⟨𝑣, 𝑢⟩) ∧ (𝑧 ·N 𝑢) = (𝑤 ·N 𝑣)))}
Definition	df-nq 10795*	Define class of positive fractions. This is a "temporary" set used in the construction of complex numbers df-c 11004, and is intended to be used only by the construction. From Proposition 9-2.2 of [Gleason] p. 117. (Contributed by NM, 16-Aug-1995.) (New usage is discouraged.)
⊢ Q = {𝑥 ∈ (N × N) ∣ ∀𝑦 ∈ (N × N)(𝑥 ~Q 𝑦 → ¬ (2nd ‘𝑦) <N (2nd ‘𝑥))}
Definition	df-erq 10796	Define a convenience function that "reduces" a fraction to lowest terms. Note that in this form, it is not obviously a function; we prove this in nqerf 10813. (Contributed by NM, 27-Aug-1995.) (New usage is discouraged.)
⊢ [Q] = ( ~Q ∩ ((N × N) × Q))
Definition	df-plq 10797	Define addition on positive fractions. This is a "temporary" set used in the construction of complex numbers df-c 11004, and is intended to be used only by the construction. From Proposition 9-2.3 of [Gleason] p. 117. (Contributed by NM, 24-Aug-1995.) (New usage is discouraged.)
⊢ +Q = (([Q] ∘ +pQ ) ↾ (Q × Q))
Definition	df-mq 10798	Define multiplication on positive fractions. This is a "temporary" set used in the construction of complex numbers df-c 11004, and is intended to be used only by the construction. From Proposition 9-2.4 of [Gleason] p. 119. (Contributed by NM, 24-Aug-1995.) (New usage is discouraged.)
⊢ ·Q = (([Q] ∘ ·pQ ) ↾ (Q × Q))
Definition	df-1nq 10799	Define positive fraction constant 1. This is a "temporary" set used in the construction of complex numbers df-c 11004, and is intended to be used only by the construction. From Proposition 9-2.2 of [Gleason] p. 117. (Contributed by NM, 29-Oct-1995.) (New usage is discouraged.)
⊢ 1Q = ⟨1o, 1o⟩
Definition	df-rq 10800	Define reciprocal on positive fractions. It means the same thing as one divided by the argument (although we don't define full division since we will never need it). This is a "temporary" set used in the construction of complex numbers df-c 11004, and is intended to be used only by the construction. From Proposition 9-2.5 of [Gleason] p. 119, who uses an asterisk to denote this unary operation. (Contributed by NM, 6-Mar-1996.) (New usage is discouraged.)
⊢ *Q = (◡ ·Q “ {1Q})