Theorem isushgrm 16325

Description: The predicate "is an undirected simple hypergraph." (Contributed by AV, 19-Jan-2020.) (Revised by AV, 9-Oct-2020.)

Hypotheses

Ref	Expression
isuhgr.v	⊢ 𝑉 = (Vtx‘𝐺)
isuhgr.e	⊢ 𝐸 = (iEdg‘𝐺)

Assertion

Ref	Expression
isushgrm	⊢ (𝐺 ∈ 𝑈 → (𝐺 ∈ USHGraph ↔ 𝐸:dom 𝐸–1-1→{𝑠 ∈ 𝒫 𝑉 ∣ ∃𝑗 𝑗 ∈ 𝑠}))

Distinct variable groups:   𝑗,𝑠   𝑉,𝑠

Allowed substitution hints:   𝑈(𝑗, 𝑠)   𝐸(𝑗, 𝑠)   𝐺(𝑗, 𝑠)   𝑉(𝑗)

Proof of Theorem isushgrm

Dummy variables 𝑔 ℎ 𝑣 𝑒 are mutually distinct and distinct from all other variables.

Step	Hyp	Ref	Expression
1		df-ushgrm 16323	. . 3 ⊢ USHGraph = {𝑔 ∣ [(Vtx‘𝑔) / 𝑣][(iEdg‘𝑔) / 𝑒]𝑒:dom 𝑒–1-1→{𝑠 ∈ 𝒫 𝑣 ∣ ∃𝑗 𝑗 ∈ 𝑠}}
2	1	eleq2i 2305	. 2 ⊢ (𝐺 ∈ USHGraph ↔ 𝐺 ∈ {𝑔 ∣ [(Vtx‘𝑔) / 𝑣][(iEdg‘𝑔) / 𝑒]𝑒:dom 𝑒–1-1→{𝑠 ∈ 𝒫 𝑣 ∣ ∃𝑗 𝑗 ∈ 𝑠}})
3		fveq2 5695	. . . . 5 ⊢ (ℎ = 𝐺 → (iEdg‘ℎ) = (iEdg‘𝐺))
4		isuhgr.e	. . . . 5 ⊢ 𝐸 = (iEdg‘𝐺)
5	3, 4	eqtr4di 2289	. . . 4 ⊢ (ℎ = 𝐺 → (iEdg‘ℎ) = 𝐸)
6	3	dmeqd 4983	. . . . 5 ⊢ (ℎ = 𝐺 → dom (iEdg‘ℎ) = dom (iEdg‘𝐺))
7	4	eqcomi 2242	. . . . . 6 ⊢ (iEdg‘𝐺) = 𝐸
8	7	dmeqi 4982	. . . . 5 ⊢ dom (iEdg‘𝐺) = dom 𝐸
9	6, 8	eqtrdi 2287	. . . 4 ⊢ (ℎ = 𝐺 → dom (iEdg‘ℎ) = dom 𝐸)
10		fveq2 5695	. . . . . . 7 ⊢ (ℎ = 𝐺 → (Vtx‘ℎ) = (Vtx‘𝐺))
11		isuhgr.v	. . . . . . 7 ⊢ 𝑉 = (Vtx‘𝐺)
12	10, 11	eqtr4di 2289	. . . . . 6 ⊢ (ℎ = 𝐺 → (Vtx‘ℎ) = 𝑉)
13	12	pweqd 3693	. . . . 5 ⊢ (ℎ = 𝐺 → 𝒫 (Vtx‘ℎ) = 𝒫 𝑉)
14	13	rabeqdv 2815	. . . 4 ⊢ (ℎ = 𝐺 → {𝑠 ∈ 𝒫 (Vtx‘ℎ) ∣ ∃𝑗 𝑗 ∈ 𝑠} = {𝑠 ∈ 𝒫 𝑉 ∣ ∃𝑗 𝑗 ∈ 𝑠})
15	5, 9, 14	f1eq123d 5631	. . 3 ⊢ (ℎ = 𝐺 → ((iEdg‘ℎ):dom (iEdg‘ℎ)–1-1→{𝑠 ∈ 𝒫 (Vtx‘ℎ) ∣ ∃𝑗 𝑗 ∈ 𝑠} ↔ 𝐸:dom 𝐸–1-1→{𝑠 ∈ 𝒫 𝑉 ∣ ∃𝑗 𝑗 ∈ 𝑠}))
16		vtxex 16271	. . . . . . 7 ⊢ (𝑔 ∈ V → (Vtx‘𝑔) ∈ V)
17	16	elv 2825	. . . . . 6 ⊢ (Vtx‘𝑔) ∈ V
18	17	a1i 9	. . . . 5 ⊢ (𝑔 = ℎ → (Vtx‘𝑔) ∈ V)
19		fveq2 5695	. . . . 5 ⊢ (𝑔 = ℎ → (Vtx‘𝑔) = (Vtx‘ℎ))
20		iedgex 16272	. . . . . . . 8 ⊢ (𝑔 ∈ V → (iEdg‘𝑔) ∈ V)
21	20	elv 2825	. . . . . . 7 ⊢ (iEdg‘𝑔) ∈ V
22	21	a1i 9	. . . . . 6 ⊢ ((𝑔 = ℎ ∧ 𝑣 = (Vtx‘ℎ)) → (iEdg‘𝑔) ∈ V)
23		fveq2 5695	. . . . . . 7 ⊢ (𝑔 = ℎ → (iEdg‘𝑔) = (iEdg‘ℎ))
24	23	adantr 276	. . . . . 6 ⊢ ((𝑔 = ℎ ∧ 𝑣 = (Vtx‘ℎ)) → (iEdg‘𝑔) = (iEdg‘ℎ))
25		simpr 110	. . . . . . 7 ⊢ (((𝑔 = ℎ ∧ 𝑣 = (Vtx‘ℎ)) ∧ 𝑒 = (iEdg‘ℎ)) → 𝑒 = (iEdg‘ℎ))
26	25	dmeqd 4983	. . . . . . 7 ⊢ (((𝑔 = ℎ ∧ 𝑣 = (Vtx‘ℎ)) ∧ 𝑒 = (iEdg‘ℎ)) → dom 𝑒 = dom (iEdg‘ℎ))
27		simpr 110	. . . . . . . . . 10 ⊢ ((𝑔 = ℎ ∧ 𝑣 = (Vtx‘ℎ)) → 𝑣 = (Vtx‘ℎ))
28	27	pweqd 3693	. . . . . . . . 9 ⊢ ((𝑔 = ℎ ∧ 𝑣 = (Vtx‘ℎ)) → 𝒫 𝑣 = 𝒫 (Vtx‘ℎ))
29	28	rabeqdv 2815	. . . . . . . 8 ⊢ ((𝑔 = ℎ ∧ 𝑣 = (Vtx‘ℎ)) → {𝑠 ∈ 𝒫 𝑣 ∣ ∃𝑗 𝑗 ∈ 𝑠} = {𝑠 ∈ 𝒫 (Vtx‘ℎ) ∣ ∃𝑗 𝑗 ∈ 𝑠})
30	29	adantr 276	. . . . . . 7 ⊢ (((𝑔 = ℎ ∧ 𝑣 = (Vtx‘ℎ)) ∧ 𝑒 = (iEdg‘ℎ)) → {𝑠 ∈ 𝒫 𝑣 ∣ ∃𝑗 𝑗 ∈ 𝑠} = {𝑠 ∈ 𝒫 (Vtx‘ℎ) ∣ ∃𝑗 𝑗 ∈ 𝑠})
31	25, 26, 30	f1eq123d 5631	. . . . . 6 ⊢ (((𝑔 = ℎ ∧ 𝑣 = (Vtx‘ℎ)) ∧ 𝑒 = (iEdg‘ℎ)) → (𝑒:dom 𝑒–1-1→{𝑠 ∈ 𝒫 𝑣 ∣ ∃𝑗 𝑗 ∈ 𝑠} ↔ (iEdg‘ℎ):dom (iEdg‘ℎ)–1-1→{𝑠 ∈ 𝒫 (Vtx‘ℎ) ∣ ∃𝑗 𝑗 ∈ 𝑠}))
32	22, 24, 31	sbcied2 3089	. . . . 5 ⊢ ((𝑔 = ℎ ∧ 𝑣 = (Vtx‘ℎ)) → ([(iEdg‘𝑔) / 𝑒]𝑒:dom 𝑒–1-1→{𝑠 ∈ 𝒫 𝑣 ∣ ∃𝑗 𝑗 ∈ 𝑠} ↔ (iEdg‘ℎ):dom (iEdg‘ℎ)–1-1→{𝑠 ∈ 𝒫 (Vtx‘ℎ) ∣ ∃𝑗 𝑗 ∈ 𝑠}))
33	18, 19, 32	sbcied2 3089	. . . 4 ⊢ (𝑔 = ℎ → ([(Vtx‘𝑔) / 𝑣][(iEdg‘𝑔) / 𝑒]𝑒:dom 𝑒–1-1→{𝑠 ∈ 𝒫 𝑣 ∣ ∃𝑗 𝑗 ∈ 𝑠} ↔ (iEdg‘ℎ):dom (iEdg‘ℎ)–1-1→{𝑠 ∈ 𝒫 (Vtx‘ℎ) ∣ ∃𝑗 𝑗 ∈ 𝑠}))
34	33	cbvabv 2365	. . 3 ⊢ {𝑔 ∣ [(Vtx‘𝑔) / 𝑣][(iEdg‘𝑔) / 𝑒]𝑒:dom 𝑒–1-1→{𝑠 ∈ 𝒫 𝑣 ∣ ∃𝑗 𝑗 ∈ 𝑠}} = {ℎ ∣ (iEdg‘ℎ):dom (iEdg‘ℎ)–1-1→{𝑠 ∈ 𝒫 (Vtx‘ℎ) ∣ ∃𝑗 𝑗 ∈ 𝑠}}
35	15, 34	elab2g 2973	. 2 ⊢ (𝐺 ∈ 𝑈 → (𝐺 ∈ {𝑔 ∣ [(Vtx‘𝑔) / 𝑣][(iEdg‘𝑔) / 𝑒]𝑒:dom 𝑒–1-1→{𝑠 ∈ 𝒫 𝑣 ∣ ∃𝑗 𝑗 ∈ 𝑠}} ↔ 𝐸:dom 𝐸–1-1→{𝑠 ∈ 𝒫 𝑉 ∣ ∃𝑗 𝑗 ∈ 𝑠}))
36	2, 35	bitrid 192	1 ⊢ (𝐺 ∈ 𝑈 → (𝐺 ∈ USHGraph ↔ 𝐸:dom 𝐸–1-1→{𝑠 ∈ 𝒫 𝑉 ∣ ∃𝑗 𝑗 ∈ 𝑠}))

This proof depends on syntax axioms:   → wi 4   ∧ wa 104   ↔ wb 105   = wceq 1402  ∃wex 1545   ∈ wcel 2209  {cab 2224  {crab 2532  Vcvv 2821  [wsbc 3051  𝒫 cpw 3688  dom cdm 4774  –1-1→wf1 5374  ‘cfv 5377  Vtxcvtx 16265  iEdgciedg 16266  USHGraphcushgr 16321

This proof depends on axioms:  ax-mp 5  ax-1 6  ax-2 7  ax-ia1 106  ax-ia2 107  ax-ia3 108  ax-in1 623  ax-in2 624  ax-io 721  ax-5 1500  ax-7 1501  ax-gen 1502  ax-ie1 1546  ax-ie2 1547  ax-8 1557  ax-10 1558  ax-11 1559  ax-i12 1560  ax-bndl 1562  ax-4 1563  ax-17 1579  ax-i9 1583  ax-ial 1587  ax-i5r 1588  ax-14 2212  ax-ext 2220  ax-sep 4249  ax-pow 4311  ax-pr 4346  ax-un 4578  ax-setind 4684  ax-cnex 8270  ax-resscn 8271  ax-1cn 8272  ax-1re 8273  ax-icn 8274  ax-addcl 8275  ax-addrcl 8276  ax-mulcl 8277  ax-addcom 8279  ax-mulcom 8280  ax-addass 8281  ax-mulass 8282  ax-distr 8283  ax-i2m1 8284  ax-1rid 8286  ax-0id 8287  ax-rnegex 8288  ax-cnre 8290

This proof depends on definitions:  df-bi 117  df-3an 1011  df-tru 1405  df-fal 1408  df-nf 1514  df-sb 1816  df-eu 2089  df-mo 2090  df-clab 2225  df-cleq 2231  df-clel 2234  df-nfc 2381  df-ne 2421  df-ral 2533  df-rex 2534  df-reu 2535  df-rab 2537  df-v 2823  df-sbc 3052  df-csb 3148  df-dif 3222  df-un 3224  df-in 3226  df-ss 3233  df-if 3639  df-pw 3690  df-sn 3715  df-pr 3716  df-op 3718  df-uni 3936  df-int 3971  df-br 4131  df-opab 4193  df-mpt 4194  df-id 4438  df-xp 4780  df-rel 4781  df-cnv 4782  df-co 4783  df-dm 4784  df-rn 4785  df-res 4786  df-iota 5337  df-fun 5379  df-fn 5380  df-f 5381  df-f1 5382  df-fo 5383  df-fv 5385  df-riota 6038  df-ov 6088  df-oprab 6089  df-mpo 6090  df-1st 6374  df-2nd 6375  df-sub 8499  df-inn 9306  df-2 9364  df-3 9365  df-4 9366  df-5 9367  df-6 9368  df-7 9369  df-8 9370  df-9 9371  df-n0 9566  df-dec 9780  df-ndx 13357  df-slot 13358  df-base 13360  df-edgf 16258  df-vtx 16267  df-iedg 16268  df-ushgrm 16323

This theorem is used by:  ushgrfm  16327  uspgrushgr  16433