P. 161 of Theorem List - Intuitionistic Logic Explorer

Theorem List for Intuitionistic Logic Explorer - 16001-16100   *Has distinct variable group(s)

Type	Label	Description
Statement
Theorem	rpcxp1 16001	Value of the complex power function at one. (Contributed by Mario Carneiro, 2-Aug-2014.)
⊢ (𝐴 ∈ ℝ+ → (𝐴↑𝑐1) = 𝐴)
Theorem	1cxp 16002	Value of the complex power function at one. (Contributed by Mario Carneiro, 2-Aug-2014.)
⊢ (𝐴 ∈ ℂ → (1↑𝑐𝐴) = 1)
Theorem	ecxp 16003	Write the exponential function as an exponent to the power e. (Contributed by Mario Carneiro, 2-Aug-2014.)
⊢ (𝐴 ∈ ℂ → (e↑𝑐𝐴) = (exp‘𝐴))
Theorem	rpcncxpcl 16004	Closure of the complex power function. (Contributed by Jim Kingdon, 12-Jun-2024.)
⊢ ((𝐴 ∈ ℝ+ ∧ 𝐵 ∈ ℂ) → (𝐴↑𝑐𝐵) ∈ ℂ)
Theorem	rpcxpcl 16005	Positive real closure of the complex power function. (Contributed by Mario Carneiro, 2-Aug-2014.)
⊢ ((𝐴 ∈ ℝ+ ∧ 𝐵 ∈ ℝ) → (𝐴↑𝑐𝐵) ∈ ℝ+)
Theorem	cxpap0 16006	Complex exponentiation is apart from zero. (Contributed by Mario Carneiro, 2-Aug-2014.) (Revised by Jim Kingdon, 12-Jun-2024.)
⊢ ((𝐴 ∈ ℝ+ ∧ 𝐵 ∈ ℂ) → (𝐴↑𝑐𝐵) # 0)
Theorem	rpcxpadd 16007	Sum of exponents law for complex exponentiation. (Contributed by Mario Carneiro, 2-Aug-2014.) (Revised by Jim Kingdon, 13-Jun-2024.)
⊢ ((𝐴 ∈ ℝ+ ∧ 𝐵 ∈ ℂ ∧ 𝐶 ∈ ℂ) → (𝐴↑𝑐(𝐵 + 𝐶)) = ((𝐴↑𝑐𝐵) · (𝐴↑𝑐𝐶)))
Theorem	rpcxpp1 16008	Value of a nonzero complex number raised to a complex power plus one. (Contributed by Mario Carneiro, 2-Aug-2014.)
⊢ ((𝐴 ∈ ℝ+ ∧ 𝐵 ∈ ℂ) → (𝐴↑𝑐(𝐵 + 1)) = ((𝐴↑𝑐𝐵) · 𝐴))
Theorem	rpcxpneg 16009	Value of a complex number raised to a negative power. (Contributed by Mario Carneiro, 2-Aug-2014.)
⊢ ((𝐴 ∈ ℝ+ ∧ 𝐵 ∈ ℂ) → (𝐴↑𝑐-𝐵) = (1 / (𝐴↑𝑐𝐵)))
Theorem	rpcxpsub 16010	Exponent subtraction law for complex exponentiation. (Contributed by Mario Carneiro, 22-Sep-2014.)
⊢ ((𝐴 ∈ ℝ+ ∧ 𝐵 ∈ ℂ ∧ 𝐶 ∈ ℂ) → (𝐴↑𝑐(𝐵 − 𝐶)) = ((𝐴↑𝑐𝐵) / (𝐴↑𝑐𝐶)))
Theorem	rpmulcxp 16011	Complex exponentiation of a product. Proposition 10-4.2(c) of [Gleason] p. 135. (Contributed by Mario Carneiro, 2-Aug-2014.)
⊢ ((𝐴 ∈ ℝ+ ∧ 𝐵 ∈ ℝ+ ∧ 𝐶 ∈ ℂ) → ((𝐴 · 𝐵)↑𝑐𝐶) = ((𝐴↑𝑐𝐶) · (𝐵↑𝑐𝐶)))
Theorem	cxprec 16012	Complex exponentiation of a reciprocal. (Contributed by Mario Carneiro, 2-Aug-2014.)
⊢ ((𝐴 ∈ ℝ+ ∧ 𝐵 ∈ ℂ) → ((1 / 𝐴)↑𝑐𝐵) = (1 / (𝐴↑𝑐𝐵)))
Theorem	rpdivcxp 16013	Complex exponentiation of a quotient. (Contributed by Mario Carneiro, 8-Sep-2014.)
⊢ ((𝐴 ∈ ℝ+ ∧ 𝐵 ∈ ℝ+ ∧ 𝐶 ∈ ℂ) → ((𝐴 / 𝐵)↑𝑐𝐶) = ((𝐴↑𝑐𝐶) / (𝐵↑𝑐𝐶)))
Theorem	cxpmul 16014	Product of exponents law for complex exponentiation. Proposition 10-4.2(b) of [Gleason] p. 135. (Contributed by Mario Carneiro, 2-Aug-2014.)
⊢ ((𝐴 ∈ ℝ+ ∧ 𝐵 ∈ ℝ ∧ 𝐶 ∈ ℂ) → (𝐴↑𝑐(𝐵 · 𝐶)) = ((𝐴↑𝑐𝐵)↑𝑐𝐶))
Theorem	rpcxpmul2 16015	Product of exponents law for complex exponentiation. Variation on cxpmul 16014 with more general conditions on 𝐴 and 𝐵 when 𝐶 is a nonnegative integer. (Contributed by Mario Carneiro, 9-Aug-2014.)
⊢ ((𝐴 ∈ ℝ+ ∧ 𝐵 ∈ ℂ ∧ 𝐶 ∈ ℕ0) → (𝐴↑𝑐(𝐵 · 𝐶)) = ((𝐴↑𝑐𝐵)↑𝐶))
Theorem	rpcxproot 16016	The complex power function allows us to write n-th roots via the idiom 𝐴↑𝑐(1 / 𝑁). (Contributed by Mario Carneiro, 6-May-2015.)
⊢ ((𝐴 ∈ ℝ+ ∧ 𝑁 ∈ ℕ) → ((𝐴↑𝑐(1 / 𝑁))↑𝑁) = 𝐴)
Theorem	abscxp 16017	Absolute value of a power, when the base is real. (Contributed by Mario Carneiro, 15-Sep-2014.)
⊢ ((𝐴 ∈ ℝ+ ∧ 𝐵 ∈ ℂ) → (abs‘(𝐴↑𝑐𝐵)) = (𝐴↑𝑐(ℜ‘𝐵)))
Theorem	cxplt 16018	Ordering property for complex exponentiation. (Contributed by Mario Carneiro, 2-Aug-2014.)
⊢ (((𝐴 ∈ ℝ ∧ 1 < 𝐴) ∧ (𝐵 ∈ ℝ ∧ 𝐶 ∈ ℝ)) → (𝐵 < 𝐶 ↔ (𝐴↑𝑐𝐵) < (𝐴↑𝑐𝐶)))
Theorem	cxple 16019	Ordering property for complex exponentiation. (Contributed by Mario Carneiro, 2-Aug-2014.)
⊢ (((𝐴 ∈ ℝ ∧ 1 < 𝐴) ∧ (𝐵 ∈ ℝ ∧ 𝐶 ∈ ℝ)) → (𝐵 ≤ 𝐶 ↔ (𝐴↑𝑐𝐵) ≤ (𝐴↑𝑐𝐶)))
Theorem	rpcxple2 16020	Ordering property for complex exponentiation. (Contributed by Mario Carneiro, 8-Sep-2014.)
⊢ ((𝐴 ∈ ℝ+ ∧ 𝐵 ∈ ℝ+ ∧ 𝐶 ∈ ℝ+) → (𝐴 ≤ 𝐵 ↔ (𝐴↑𝑐𝐶) ≤ (𝐵↑𝑐𝐶)))
Theorem	rpcxplt2 16021	Ordering property for complex exponentiation. (Contributed by Mario Carneiro, 15-Sep-2014.)
⊢ ((𝐴 ∈ ℝ+ ∧ 𝐵 ∈ ℝ+ ∧ 𝐶 ∈ ℝ+) → (𝐴 < 𝐵 ↔ (𝐴↑𝑐𝐶) < (𝐵↑𝑐𝐶)))
Theorem	cxplt3 16022	Ordering property for complex exponentiation. (Contributed by Mario Carneiro, 2-May-2016.)
⊢ (((𝐴 ∈ ℝ+ ∧ 𝐴 < 1) ∧ (𝐵 ∈ ℝ ∧ 𝐶 ∈ ℝ)) → (𝐵 < 𝐶 ↔ (𝐴↑𝑐𝐶) < (𝐴↑𝑐𝐵)))
Theorem	cxple3 16023	Ordering property for complex exponentiation. (Contributed by Mario Carneiro, 2-May-2016.)
⊢ (((𝐴 ∈ ℝ+ ∧ 𝐴 < 1) ∧ (𝐵 ∈ ℝ ∧ 𝐶 ∈ ℝ)) → (𝐵 ≤ 𝐶 ↔ (𝐴↑𝑐𝐶) ≤ (𝐴↑𝑐𝐵)))
Theorem	rpcxpsqrt 16024	The exponential function with exponent 1 / 2 exactly matches the square root function, and thus serves as a suitable generalization to other 𝑛-th roots and irrational roots. (Contributed by Mario Carneiro, 2-Aug-2014.) (Revised by Jim Kingdon, 16-Jun-2024.)
⊢ (𝐴 ∈ ℝ+ → (𝐴↑𝑐(1 / 2)) = (√‘𝐴))
Theorem	logsqrt 16025	Logarithm of a square root. (Contributed by Mario Carneiro, 5-May-2016.)
⊢ (𝐴 ∈ ℝ+ → (log‘(√‘𝐴)) = ((log‘𝐴) / 2))
Theorem	rpcxp0d 16026	Value of the complex power function when the second argument is zero. (Contributed by Mario Carneiro, 30-May-2016.)
⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐴 ∈ ℝ+)    ⇒   ⊢ (𝜑 → (𝐴↑𝑐0) = 1)
Theorem	rpcxp1d 16027	Value of the complex power function at one. (Contributed by Mario Carneiro, 30-May-2016.)
⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐴 ∈ ℝ+)    ⇒   ⊢ (𝜑 → (𝐴↑𝑐1) = 𝐴)
Theorem	1cxpd 16028	Value of the complex power function at one. (Contributed by Mario Carneiro, 30-May-2016.)
⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐴 ∈ ℂ)    ⇒   ⊢ (𝜑 → (1↑𝑐𝐴) = 1)
Theorem	rpcncxpcld 16029	Closure of the complex power function. (Contributed by Mario Carneiro, 30-May-2016.)
⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐴 ∈ ℝ+)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐵 ∈ ℂ)    ⇒   ⊢ (𝜑 → (𝐴↑𝑐𝐵) ∈ ℂ)
Theorem	cxpltd 16030	Ordering property for complex exponentiation. (Contributed by Mario Carneiro, 30-May-2016.)
⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐴 ∈ ℝ)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 1 < 𝐴)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐵 ∈ ℝ)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐶 ∈ ℝ)    ⇒   ⊢ (𝜑 → (𝐵 < 𝐶 ↔ (𝐴↑𝑐𝐵) < (𝐴↑𝑐𝐶)))
Theorem	cxpled 16031	Ordering property for complex exponentiation. (Contributed by Mario Carneiro, 30-May-2016.)
⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐴 ∈ ℝ)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 1 < 𝐴)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐵 ∈ ℝ)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐶 ∈ ℝ)    ⇒   ⊢ (𝜑 → (𝐵 ≤ 𝐶 ↔ (𝐴↑𝑐𝐵) ≤ (𝐴↑𝑐𝐶)))
Theorem	rpcxpsqrtth 16032	Square root theorem over the complex numbers for the complex power function. Compare with resqrtth 11797. (Contributed by AV, 23-Dec-2022.)
⊢ (𝐴 ∈ ℝ+ → ((√‘𝐴)↑𝑐2) = 𝐴)
Theorem	cxprecd 16033	Complex exponentiation of a reciprocal. (Contributed by Mario Carneiro, 30-May-2016.)
⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐴 ∈ ℝ+)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐵 ∈ ℂ)    ⇒   ⊢ (𝜑 → ((1 / 𝐴)↑𝑐𝐵) = (1 / (𝐴↑𝑐𝐵)))
Theorem	rpcxpmul2d 16034	Product of exponents law for complex exponentiation. Variation on cxpmul 16014 with more general conditions on 𝐴 and 𝐵 when 𝐶 is a nonnegative integer. (Contributed by Mario Carneiro, 30-May-2016.)
⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐴 ∈ ℝ+)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐵 ∈ ℂ)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐶 ∈ ℕ0)    ⇒   ⊢ (𝜑 → (𝐴↑𝑐(𝐵 · 𝐶)) = ((𝐴↑𝑐𝐵)↑𝐶))
Theorem	rpcxpcld 16035	Positive real closure of the complex power function. (Contributed by Mario Carneiro, 30-May-2016.)
⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐴 ∈ ℝ+)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐵 ∈ ℝ)    ⇒   ⊢ (𝜑 → (𝐴↑𝑐𝐵) ∈ ℝ+)
Theorem	logcxpd 16036	Logarithm of a complex power. (Contributed by Mario Carneiro, 30-May-2016.)
⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐴 ∈ ℝ+)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐵 ∈ ℝ)    ⇒   ⊢ (𝜑 → (log‘(𝐴↑𝑐𝐵)) = (𝐵 · (log‘𝐴)))
Theorem	cxplt3d 16037	Ordering property for complex exponentiation. (Contributed by Mario Carneiro, 30-May-2016.)
⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐴 ∈ ℝ+)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐵 ∈ ℝ)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐴 < 1)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐶 ∈ ℝ)    ⇒   ⊢ (𝜑 → (𝐵 < 𝐶 ↔ (𝐴↑𝑐𝐶) < (𝐴↑𝑐𝐵)))
Theorem	cxple3d 16038	Ordering property for complex exponentiation. (Contributed by Mario Carneiro, 30-May-2016.)
⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐴 ∈ ℝ+)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐵 ∈ ℝ)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐴 < 1)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐶 ∈ ℝ)    ⇒   ⊢ (𝜑 → (𝐵 ≤ 𝐶 ↔ (𝐴↑𝑐𝐶) ≤ (𝐴↑𝑐𝐵)))
Theorem	cxpmuld 16039	Product of exponents law for complex exponentiation. Proposition 10-4.2(b) of [Gleason] p. 135. (Contributed by Mario Carneiro, 30-May-2016.)
⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐴 ∈ ℝ+)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐵 ∈ ℝ)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐶 ∈ ℂ)    ⇒   ⊢ (𝜑 → (𝐴↑𝑐(𝐵 · 𝐶)) = ((𝐴↑𝑐𝐵)↑𝑐𝐶))
Theorem	cxpcom 16040	Commutative law for real exponentiation. (Contributed by AV, 29-Dec-2022.)
⊢ ((𝐴 ∈ ℝ+ ∧ 𝐵 ∈ ℝ ∧ 𝐶 ∈ ℝ) → ((𝐴↑𝑐𝐵)↑𝑐𝐶) = ((𝐴↑𝑐𝐶)↑𝑐𝐵))
Theorem	apcxp2 16041	Apartness and real exponentiation. (Contributed by Jim Kingdon, 10-Jul-2024.)
⊢ (((𝐴 ∈ ℝ+ ∧ 𝐴 # 1) ∧ (𝐵 ∈ ℝ ∧ 𝐶 ∈ ℝ)) → (𝐵 # 𝐶 ↔ (𝐴↑𝑐𝐵) # (𝐴↑𝑐𝐶)))
Theorem	rpabscxpbnd 16042	Bound on the absolute value of a complex power. (Contributed by Mario Carneiro, 15-Sep-2014.) (Revised by Jim Kingdon, 19-Jun-2024.)
⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐴 ∈ ℝ+)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐵 ∈ ℂ)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 0 < (ℜ‘𝐵))    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝑀 ∈ ℝ)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → (abs‘𝐴) ≤ 𝑀)    ⇒   ⊢ (𝜑 → (abs‘(𝐴↑𝑐𝐵)) ≤ ((𝑀↑𝑐(ℜ‘𝐵)) · (exp‘((abs‘𝐵) · π))))
Theorem	ltexp2 16043	Ordering law for exponentiation. (Contributed by NM, 2-Aug-2006.) (Revised by Mario Carneiro, 5-Jun-2014.)
⊢ (((𝐴 ∈ ℝ ∧ 𝑀 ∈ ℤ ∧ 𝑁 ∈ ℤ) ∧ 1 < 𝐴) → (𝑀 < 𝑁 ↔ (𝐴↑𝑀) < (𝐴↑𝑁)))
Theorem	ltexp2d 16044	Ordering relationship for exponentiation. (Contributed by Mario Carneiro, 28-May-2016.)
⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐴 ∈ ℝ)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝑀 ∈ ℤ)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝑁 ∈ ℤ)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 1 < 𝐴)    ⇒   ⊢ (𝜑 → (𝑀 < 𝑁 ↔ (𝐴↑𝑀) < (𝐴↑𝑁)))
11.2.4  Logarithms to an arbitrary base Define "log using an arbitrary base" function and then prove some of its properties. As with df-relog 15959 this is for real logarithms rather than complex logarithms. Metamath doesn't care what letters are used to represent classes. Usually classes begin with the letter "A", but here we use "B" and "X" to more clearly distinguish between "base" and "other parameter of log". There are different ways this could be defined in Metamath. The approach used here is intentionally similar to existing 2-parameter Metamath functions (operations): (𝐵 logb 𝑋) where 𝐵 is the base and 𝑋 is the argument of the logarithm function. An alternative would be to support the notational form (( logb ‘𝐵)‘𝑋); that looks a little more like traditional notation.
Syntax	clogb 16045	Extend class notation to include the logarithm generalized to an arbitrary base.
class logb
Definition	df-logb 16046*	Define the logb operator. This is the logarithm generalized to an arbitrary base. It can be used as (𝐵 logb 𝑋) for "log base B of X". In the most common traditional notation, base B is a subscript of "log". The definition will only be useful where 𝑥 is a positive real apart from one and where 𝑦 is a positive real, so the choice of (ℂ ∖ {0, 1}) and (ℂ ∖ {0}) is somewhat arbitrary (we adopt the definition used in set.mm). (Contributed by David A. Wheeler, 21-Jan-2017.)
⊢ logb = (𝑥 ∈ (ℂ ∖ {0, 1}), 𝑦 ∈ (ℂ ∖ {0}) ↦ ((log‘𝑦) / (log‘𝑥)))
Theorem	rplogbval 16047	Define the value of the logb function, the logarithm generalized to an arbitrary base, when used as infix. Most Metamath statements select variables in order of their use, but to make the order clearer we use "B" for base and "X" for the argument of the logarithm function here. (Contributed by David A. Wheeler, 21-Jan-2017.) (Revised by Jim Kingdon, 3-Jul-2024.)
⊢ ((𝐵 ∈ ℝ+ ∧ 𝐵 # 1 ∧ 𝑋 ∈ ℝ+) → (𝐵 logb 𝑋) = ((log‘𝑋) / (log‘𝐵)))
Theorem	rplogbcl 16048	General logarithm closure. (Contributed by David A. Wheeler, 17-Jul-2017.)
⊢ ((𝐵 ∈ ℝ+ ∧ 𝐵 # 1 ∧ 𝑋 ∈ ℝ+) → (𝐵 logb 𝑋) ∈ ℝ)
Theorem	rplogbid1 16049	General logarithm is 1 when base and arg match. Property 1(a) of [Cohen4] p. 361. (Contributed by Stefan O'Rear, 19-Sep-2014.) (Revised by David A. Wheeler, 22-Jul-2017.)
⊢ ((𝐴 ∈ ℝ+ ∧ 𝐴 # 1) → (𝐴 logb 𝐴) = 1)
Theorem	rplogb1 16050	The logarithm of 1 to an arbitrary base 𝐵 is 0. Property 1(b) of [Cohen4] p. 361. See log1 15967. (Contributed by Stefan O'Rear, 19-Sep-2014.) (Revised by Thierry Arnoux, 27-Sep-2017.)
⊢ ((𝐵 ∈ ℝ+ ∧ 𝐵 # 1) → (𝐵 logb 1) = 0)
Theorem	rpelogb 16051	The general logarithm of a number to the base being Euler's constant is the natural logarithm of the number. Put another way, using e as the base in logb is the same as log. Definition in [Cohen4] p. 352. (Contributed by David A. Wheeler, 17-Oct-2017.) (Revised by David A. Wheeler and AV, 16-Jun-2020.)
⊢ (𝐴 ∈ ℝ+ → (e logb 𝐴) = (log‘𝐴))
Theorem	rplogbchbase 16052	Change of base for logarithms. Property in [Cohen4] p. 367. (Contributed by AV, 11-Jun-2020.)
⊢ (((𝐴 ∈ ℝ+ ∧ 𝐴 # 1) ∧ (𝐵 ∈ ℝ+ ∧ 𝐵 # 1) ∧ 𝑋 ∈ ℝ+) → (𝐴 logb 𝑋) = ((𝐵 logb 𝑋) / (𝐵 logb 𝐴)))
Theorem	relogbval 16053	Value of the general logarithm with integer base. (Contributed by Thierry Arnoux, 27-Sep-2017.)
⊢ ((𝐵 ∈ (ℤ≥‘2) ∧ 𝑋 ∈ ℝ+) → (𝐵 logb 𝑋) = ((log‘𝑋) / (log‘𝐵)))
Theorem	relogbzcl 16054	Closure of the general logarithm with integer base on positive reals. (Contributed by Thierry Arnoux, 27-Sep-2017.) (Proof shortened by AV, 9-Jun-2020.)
⊢ ((𝐵 ∈ (ℤ≥‘2) ∧ 𝑋 ∈ ℝ+) → (𝐵 logb 𝑋) ∈ ℝ)
Theorem	rplogbreexp 16055	Power law for the general logarithm for real powers: The logarithm of a positive real number to the power of a real number is equal to the product of the exponent and the logarithm of the base of the power. Property 4 of [Cohen4] p. 361. (Contributed by AV, 9-Jun-2020.)
⊢ (((𝐵 ∈ ℝ+ ∧ 𝐵 # 1) ∧ 𝐶 ∈ ℝ+ ∧ 𝐸 ∈ ℝ) → (𝐵 logb (𝐶↑𝑐𝐸)) = (𝐸 · (𝐵 logb 𝐶)))
Theorem	rplogbzexp 16056	Power law for the general logarithm for integer powers: The logarithm of a positive real number to the power of an integer is equal to the product of the exponent and the logarithm of the base of the power. (Contributed by Stefan O'Rear, 19-Sep-2014.) (Revised by AV, 9-Jun-2020.)
⊢ (((𝐵 ∈ ℝ+ ∧ 𝐵 # 1) ∧ 𝐶 ∈ ℝ+ ∧ 𝑁 ∈ ℤ) → (𝐵 logb (𝐶↑𝑁)) = (𝑁 · (𝐵 logb 𝐶)))
Theorem	rprelogbmul 16057	The logarithm of the product of two positive real numbers is the sum of logarithms. Property 2 of [Cohen4] p. 361. (Contributed by Stefan O'Rear, 19-Sep-2014.) (Revised by AV, 29-May-2020.)
⊢ (((𝐵 ∈ ℝ+ ∧ 𝐵 # 1) ∧ (𝐴 ∈ ℝ+ ∧ 𝐶 ∈ ℝ+)) → (𝐵 logb (𝐴 · 𝐶)) = ((𝐵 logb 𝐴) + (𝐵 logb 𝐶)))
Theorem	rprelogbmulexp 16058	The logarithm of the product of a positive real and a positive real number to the power of a real number is the sum of the logarithm of the first real number and the scaled logarithm of the second real number. (Contributed by AV, 29-May-2020.)
⊢ (((𝐵 ∈ ℝ+ ∧ 𝐵 # 1) ∧ (𝐴 ∈ ℝ+ ∧ 𝐶 ∈ ℝ+ ∧ 𝐸 ∈ ℝ)) → (𝐵 logb (𝐴 · (𝐶↑𝑐𝐸))) = ((𝐵 logb 𝐴) + (𝐸 · (𝐵 logb 𝐶))))
Theorem	rprelogbdiv 16059	The logarithm of the quotient of two positive real numbers is the difference of logarithms. Property 3 of [Cohen4] p. 361. (Contributed by AV, 29-May-2020.)
⊢ (((𝐵 ∈ ℝ+ ∧ 𝐵 # 1) ∧ (𝐴 ∈ ℝ+ ∧ 𝐶 ∈ ℝ+)) → (𝐵 logb (𝐴 / 𝐶)) = ((𝐵 logb 𝐴) − (𝐵 logb 𝐶)))
Theorem	relogbexpap 16060	Identity law for general logarithm: the logarithm of a power to the base is the exponent. Property 6 of [Cohen4] p. 361. (Contributed by Stefan O'Rear, 19-Sep-2014.) (Revised by AV, 9-Jun-2020.)
⊢ ((𝐵 ∈ ℝ+ ∧ 𝐵 # 1 ∧ 𝑀 ∈ ℤ) → (𝐵 logb (𝐵↑𝑀)) = 𝑀)
Theorem	nnlogbexp 16061	Identity law for general logarithm with integer base. (Contributed by Stefan O'Rear, 19-Sep-2014.) (Revised by Thierry Arnoux, 27-Sep-2017.)
⊢ ((𝐵 ∈ (ℤ≥‘2) ∧ 𝑀 ∈ ℤ) → (𝐵 logb (𝐵↑𝑀)) = 𝑀)
Theorem	logbrec 16062	Logarithm of a reciprocal changes sign. Particular case of Property 3 of [Cohen4] p. 361. (Contributed by Thierry Arnoux, 27-Sep-2017.)
⊢ ((𝐵 ∈ (ℤ≥‘2) ∧ 𝐴 ∈ ℝ+) → (𝐵 logb (1 / 𝐴)) = -(𝐵 logb 𝐴))
Theorem	logbleb 16063	The general logarithm function is monotone/increasing. See logleb 15976. (Contributed by Stefan O'Rear, 19-Oct-2014.) (Revised by AV, 31-May-2020.)
⊢ ((𝐵 ∈ (ℤ≥‘2) ∧ 𝑋 ∈ ℝ+ ∧ 𝑌 ∈ ℝ+) → (𝑋 ≤ 𝑌 ↔ (𝐵 logb 𝑋) ≤ (𝐵 logb 𝑌)))
Theorem	logblt 16064	The general logarithm function is strictly monotone/increasing. Property 2 of [Cohen4] p. 377. See logltb 15975. (Contributed by Stefan O'Rear, 19-Oct-2014.) (Revised by Thierry Arnoux, 27-Sep-2017.)
⊢ ((𝐵 ∈ (ℤ≥‘2) ∧ 𝑋 ∈ ℝ+ ∧ 𝑌 ∈ ℝ+) → (𝑋 < 𝑌 ↔ (𝐵 logb 𝑋) < (𝐵 logb 𝑌)))
Theorem	rplogbcxp 16065	Identity law for the general logarithm for real numbers. (Contributed by AV, 22-May-2020.)
⊢ ((𝐵 ∈ ℝ+ ∧ 𝐵 # 1 ∧ 𝑋 ∈ ℝ) → (𝐵 logb (𝐵↑𝑐𝑋)) = 𝑋)
Theorem	rpcxplogb 16066	Identity law for the general logarithm. (Contributed by AV, 22-May-2020.)
⊢ ((𝐵 ∈ ℝ+ ∧ 𝐵 # 1 ∧ 𝑋 ∈ ℝ+) → (𝐵↑𝑐(𝐵 logb 𝑋)) = 𝑋)
Theorem	relogbcxpbap 16067	The logarithm is the inverse of the exponentiation. Observation in [Cohen4] p. 348. (Contributed by AV, 11-Jun-2020.)
⊢ (((𝐵 ∈ ℝ+ ∧ 𝐵 # 1) ∧ 𝑋 ∈ ℝ+ ∧ 𝑌 ∈ ℝ) → ((𝐵 logb 𝑋) = 𝑌 ↔ (𝐵↑𝑐𝑌) = 𝑋))
Theorem	logbgt0b 16068	The logarithm of a positive real number to a real base greater than 1 is positive iff the number is greater than 1. (Contributed by AV, 29-Dec-2022.)
⊢ ((𝐴 ∈ ℝ+ ∧ (𝐵 ∈ ℝ+ ∧ 1 < 𝐵)) → (0 < (𝐵 logb 𝐴) ↔ 1 < 𝐴))
Theorem	logbgcd1irr 16069	The logarithm of an integer greater than 1 to an integer base greater than 1 is not rational if the argument and the base are relatively prime. For example, (2 logb 9) ∈ (ℝ ∖ ℚ). (Contributed by AV, 29-Dec-2022.)
⊢ ((𝑋 ∈ (ℤ≥‘2) ∧ 𝐵 ∈ (ℤ≥‘2) ∧ (𝑋 gcd 𝐵) = 1) → (𝐵 logb 𝑋) ∈ (ℝ ∖ ℚ))
Theorem	logbgcd1irraplemexp 16070	Lemma for logbgcd1irrap 16072. Apartness of 𝑋↑𝑁 and 𝐵↑𝑀. (Contributed by Jim Kingdon, 11-Jul-2024.)
⊢ (𝜑 → 𝑋 ∈ (ℤ≥‘2))    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐵 ∈ (ℤ≥‘2))    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → (𝑋 gcd 𝐵) = 1)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝑀 ∈ ℤ)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝑁 ∈ ℕ)    ⇒   ⊢ (𝜑 → (𝑋↑𝑁) # (𝐵↑𝑀))
Theorem	logbgcd1irraplemap 16071	Lemma for logbgcd1irrap 16072. The result, with the rational number expressed as numerator and denominator. (Contributed by Jim Kingdon, 9-Jul-2024.)
⊢ (𝜑 → 𝑋 ∈ (ℤ≥‘2))    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐵 ∈ (ℤ≥‘2))    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → (𝑋 gcd 𝐵) = 1)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝑀 ∈ ℤ)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝑁 ∈ ℕ)    ⇒   ⊢ (𝜑 → (𝐵 logb 𝑋) # (𝑀 / 𝑁))
Theorem	logbgcd1irrap 16072	The logarithm of an integer greater than 1 to an integer base greater than 1 is irrational (in the sense of being apart from any rational number) if the argument and the base are relatively prime. For example, (2 logb 9) # 𝑄 where 𝑄 is rational. (Contributed by AV, 29-Dec-2022.)
⊢ (((𝑋 ∈ (ℤ≥‘2) ∧ 𝐵 ∈ (ℤ≥‘2)) ∧ ((𝑋 gcd 𝐵) = 1 ∧ 𝑄 ∈ ℚ)) → (𝐵 logb 𝑋) # 𝑄)
Theorem	2logb9irr 16073	Example for logbgcd1irr 16069. The logarithm of nine to base two is not rational. Also see 2logb9irrap 16079 which says that it is irrational (in the sense of being apart from any rational number). (Contributed by AV, 29-Dec-2022.)
⊢ (2 logb 9) ∈ (ℝ ∖ ℚ)
Theorem	logbprmirr 16074	The logarithm of a prime to a different prime base is not rational. For example, (2 logb 3) ∈ (ℝ ∖ ℚ) (see 2logb3irr 16075). (Contributed by AV, 31-Dec-2022.)
⊢ ((𝑋 ∈ ℙ ∧ 𝐵 ∈ ℙ ∧ 𝑋 ≠ 𝐵) → (𝐵 logb 𝑋) ∈ (ℝ ∖ ℚ))
Theorem	2logb3irr 16075	Example for logbprmirr 16074. The logarithm of three to base two is not rational. (Contributed by AV, 31-Dec-2022.)
⊢ (2 logb 3) ∈ (ℝ ∖ ℚ)
Theorem	2logb9irrALT 16076	Alternate proof of 2logb9irr 16073: The logarithm of nine to base two is not rational. (Contributed by AV, 31-Dec-2022.) (Proof modification is discouraged.) (New usage is discouraged.)
⊢ (2 logb 9) ∈ (ℝ ∖ ℚ)
Theorem	sqrt2cxp2logb9e3 16077	The square root of two to the power of the logarithm of nine to base two is three. (√‘2) and (2 logb 9) are not rational (see sqrt2irr0 12942 resp. 2logb9irr 16073), satisfying the statement in 2irrexpq 16078. (Contributed by AV, 29-Dec-2022.)
⊢ ((√‘2)↑𝑐(2 logb 9)) = 3
Theorem	2irrexpq 16078*	There exist real numbers 𝑎 and 𝑏 which are not rational such that (𝑎↑𝑏) is rational. Statement in the Metamath book, section 1.1.5, footnote 27 on page 17, and the "constructive proof" for theorem 1.2 of [Bauer], p. 483. This is a constructive proof because it is based on two explicitly named non-rational numbers (√‘2) and (2 logb 9), see sqrt2irr0 12942, 2logb9irr 16073 and sqrt2cxp2logb9e3 16077. Therefore, this proof is acceptable/usable in intuitionistic logic. For a theorem which is the same but proves that 𝑎 and 𝑏 are irrational (in the sense of being apart from any rational number), see 2irrexpqap 16080. (Contributed by AV, 23-Dec-2022.)
⊢ ∃𝑎 ∈ (ℝ ∖ ℚ)∃𝑏 ∈ (ℝ ∖ ℚ)(𝑎↑𝑐𝑏) ∈ ℚ
Theorem	2logb9irrap 16079	Example for logbgcd1irrap 16072. The logarithm of nine to base two is irrational (in the sense of being apart from any rational number). (Contributed by Jim Kingdon, 12-Jul-2024.)
⊢ (𝑄 ∈ ℚ → (2 logb 9) # 𝑄)
Theorem	2irrexpqap 16080*	There exist real numbers 𝑎 and 𝑏 which are irrational (in the sense of being apart from any rational number) such that (𝑎↑𝑏) is rational. Statement in the Metamath book, section 1.1.5, footnote 27 on page 17, and the "constructive proof" for theorem 1.2 of [Bauer], p. 483. This is a constructive proof because it is based on two explicitly named irrational numbers (√‘2) and (2 logb 9), see sqrt2irrap 12958, 2logb9irrap 16079 and sqrt2cxp2logb9e3 16077. Therefore, this proof is acceptable/usable in intuitionistic logic. (Contributed by Jim Kingdon, 12-Jul-2024.)
⊢ ∃𝑎 ∈ ℝ ∃𝑏 ∈ ℝ (∀𝑝 ∈ ℚ 𝑎 # 𝑝 ∧ ∀𝑞 ∈ ℚ 𝑏 # 𝑞 ∧ (𝑎↑𝑐𝑏) ∈ ℚ)
11.2.5  Quartic binomial expansion
Theorem	binom4 16081	Work out a quartic binomial. (You would think that by this point it would be faster to use binom 12251, but it turns out to be just as much work to put it into this form after clearing all the sums and calculating binomial coefficients.) (Contributed by Mario Carneiro, 6-May-2015.)
⊢ ((𝐴 ∈ ℂ ∧ 𝐵 ∈ ℂ) → ((𝐴 + 𝐵)↑4) = (((𝐴↑4) + (4 · ((𝐴↑3) · 𝐵))) + ((6 · ((𝐴↑2) · (𝐵↑2))) + ((4 · (𝐴 · (𝐵↑3))) + (𝐵↑4)))))
11.2.6  Logarithms (cont.)
Theorem	log2tlbndlog2 16082*	Bound the error term in the series of the hypothesis. The presence of the hypothesis here is a temporary measure until it can be proved as log2cnv . (Contributed by Mario Carneiro, 7-Apr-2015.)
⊢ seq0( + , (𝑘 ∈ ℕ0 ↦ (2 / ((3 · ((2 · 𝑘) + 1)) · (9↑𝑘))))) ⇝ (log‘2)    ⇒   ⊢ (𝑁 ∈ ℕ0 → ((log‘2) − Σ𝑛 ∈ (0...(𝑁 − 1))(2 / ((3 · ((2 · 𝑛) + 1)) · (9↑𝑛)))) ∈ (0[,](3 / ((4 · ((2 · 𝑁) + 1)) · (9↑𝑁)))))
11.2.7  The Birthday Problem
Theorem	log2ublem1 16083	Lemma for log2ublog2 16086. The proof of log2ublog2 16086, which is simply the evaluation of log2tlbndlog2 16082 for 𝑁 = 4, takes the form of the addition of five fractions and showing this is less than another fraction. We could just perform exact arithmetic on these fractions, get a large rational number, and just multiply everything to verify the claim, but as anyone who uses decimal numbers for this task knows, it is often better to pick a common denominator 𝑑 (usually a large power of 10) and work with the closest approximations of the form 𝑛 / 𝑑 for some integer 𝑛 instead. It turns out that for our purposes it is sufficient to take 𝑑 = (3↑7) · 5 · 7, which is also nice because it shares many factors in common with the fractions in question. (Contributed by Mario Carneiro, 17-Apr-2015.)
⊢ (((3↑7) · (5 · 7)) · 𝐴) ≤ 𝐵    &   ⊢ 𝐴 ∈ ℝ    &   ⊢ 𝐷 ∈ ℕ0    &   ⊢ 𝐸 ∈ ℕ    &   ⊢ 𝐵 ∈ ℕ0    &   ⊢ 𝐹 ∈ ℕ0    &   ⊢ 𝐶 = (𝐴 + (𝐷 / 𝐸))    &   ⊢ (𝐵 + 𝐹) = 𝐺    &   ⊢ (((3↑7) · (5 · 7)) · 𝐷) ≤ (𝐸 · 𝐹)    ⇒   ⊢ (((3↑7) · (5 · 7)) · 𝐶) ≤ 𝐺
Theorem	log2ublem2 16084*	Lemma for log2ublog2 16086. (Contributed by Mario Carneiro, 17-Apr-2015.)
⊢ (((3↑7) · (5 · 7)) · Σ𝑛 ∈ (0...𝐾)(2 / ((3 · ((2 · 𝑛) + 1)) · (9↑𝑛)))) ≤ (2 · 𝐵)    &   ⊢ 𝐵 ∈ ℕ0    &   ⊢ 𝐹 ∈ ℕ0    &   ⊢ 𝑁 ∈ ℕ0    &   ⊢ (𝑁 − 1) = 𝐾    &   ⊢ (𝐵 + 𝐹) = 𝐺    &   ⊢ 𝑀 ∈ ℕ0    &   ⊢ (𝑀 + 𝑁) = 3    &   ⊢ ((5 · 7) · (9↑𝑀)) = (((2 · 𝑁) + 1) · 𝐹)    ⇒   ⊢ (((3↑7) · (5 · 7)) · Σ𝑛 ∈ (0...𝑁)(2 / ((3 · ((2 · 𝑛) + 1)) · (9↑𝑛)))) ≤ (2 · 𝐺)
Theorem	log2ublem3 16085	Lemma for log2ublog2 16086. In decimal, this is a proof that the first four terms of the series for log2 is less than 53056 / 76545. (Contributed by Mario Carneiro, 17-Apr-2015.) (Proof shortened by AV, 15-Sep-2021.)
⊢ (((3↑7) · (5 · 7)) · Σ𝑛 ∈ (0...3)(2 / ((3 · ((2 · 𝑛) + 1)) · (9↑𝑛)))) ≤ ;;;;53056
Theorem	log2ublog2 16086	log2 is less than 253 / 365. If written in decimal, this is because log2 = 0.693147... is less than 253/365 = 0.693151... , so this is a very tight bound, at five decimal places. The presence of the hypothesis here is a temporary measure until it can be proved as log2cnv . (Contributed by Mario Carneiro, 7-Apr-2015.) (Proof shortened by AV, 16-Sep-2021.)
⊢ seq0( + , (𝑘 ∈ ℕ0 ↦ (2 / ((3 · ((2 · 𝑘) + 1)) · (9↑𝑘))))) ⇝ (log‘2)    ⇒   ⊢ (log‘2) < (;;253 / ;;365)
Theorem	birthdaylem1g 16087*	Lemma for birthdaylog2 16090. (Contributed by Mario Carneiro, 17-Apr-2015.)
⊢ 𝑆 = {𝑓 ∣ 𝑓:(1...𝐾)⟶(1...𝑁)}    &   ⊢ 𝑇 = {𝑓 ∣ 𝑓:(1...𝐾)–1-1→(1...𝑁)}    ⇒   ⊢ ((𝐾 ∈ ℕ0 ∧ 𝑁 ∈ ℕ) → (𝑇 ⊆ 𝑆 ∧ 𝑆 ∈ Fin ∧ 𝑆 ≠ ∅))
Theorem	birthdaylem2 16088*	For general 𝑁 and 𝐾, count the fraction of injective functions from 1...𝐾 to 1...𝑁. (Contributed by Mario Carneiro, 7-May-2015.)
⊢ 𝑆 = {𝑓 ∣ 𝑓:(1...𝐾)⟶(1...𝑁)}    &   ⊢ 𝑇 = {𝑓 ∣ 𝑓:(1...𝐾)–1-1→(1...𝑁)}    ⇒   ⊢ ((𝑁 ∈ ℕ ∧ 𝐾 ∈ (0...𝑁)) → ((♯‘𝑇) / (♯‘𝑆)) = (exp‘Σ𝑘 ∈ (0...(𝐾 − 1))(log‘(1 − (𝑘 / 𝑁)))))
Theorem	birthdaylem3 16089*	For general 𝑁 and 𝐾, upper-bound the fraction of injective functions from 1...𝐾 to 1...𝑁. (Contributed by Mario Carneiro, 17-Apr-2015.)
⊢ 𝑆 = {𝑓 ∣ 𝑓:(1...𝐾)⟶(1...𝑁)}    &   ⊢ 𝑇 = {𝑓 ∣ 𝑓:(1...𝐾)–1-1→(1...𝑁)}    ⇒   ⊢ ((𝐾 ∈ ℕ0 ∧ 𝑁 ∈ ℕ) → ((♯‘𝑇) / (♯‘𝑆)) ≤ (exp‘-((((𝐾↑2) − 𝐾) / 2) / 𝑁)))
Theorem	birthdaylog2 16090*	The Birthday Problem. There is a more than even chance that out of 23 people in a room, at least two of them have the same birthday. Mathematically, this is asserting that for 𝐾 = 23 and 𝑁 = 365, fewer than half of the set of all functions from 1...𝐾 to 1...𝑁 are injective. The presence of the hypothesis giving a series which converges to (log‘2) is a temporary measure until it can be proved as log2cnv . Although this is Metamath 100 proof #93, we cannot consider it proved until we prove the missing log2cnv piece (or prove the theorem another way which does not require it). (Contributed by Mario Carneiro, 17-Apr-2015.)
⊢ 𝑆 = {𝑓 ∣ 𝑓:(1...𝐾)⟶(1...𝑁)}    &   ⊢ 𝑇 = {𝑓 ∣ 𝑓:(1...𝐾)–1-1→(1...𝑁)}    &   ⊢ 𝐾 = ;23    &   ⊢ 𝑁 = ;;365    &   ⊢ seq0( + , (𝑘 ∈ ℕ0 ↦ (2 / ((3 · ((2 · 𝑘) + 1)) · (9↑𝑘))))) ⇝ (log‘2)    ⇒   ⊢ ((♯‘𝑇) / (♯‘𝑆)) < (1 / 2)
11.3  Pell equations
11.3.1  Pell equations 1: A nontrivial solution always exists
Theorem	pellexlem1 16091	Lemma for pellex . Arithmetical core of pellexlem3, norm lower bound. This begins Dirichlet's proof of the Pell equation solution existence; the proof here follows theorem 62 of [vandenDries] p. 43. (Contributed by Stefan O'Rear, 14-Sep-2014.)
⊢ (((𝐷 ∈ ℕ ∧ 𝐴 ∈ ℕ ∧ 𝐵 ∈ ℕ) ∧ ¬ (√‘𝐷) ∈ ℚ) → ((𝐴↑2) − (𝐷 · (𝐵↑2))) ≠ 0)
Theorem	pellexlem2 16092	Lemma for pellex . Arithmetical core of pellexlem3, norm upper bound. (Contributed by Stefan O'Rear, 14-Sep-2014.)
⊢ (((𝐷 ∈ ℕ ∧ 𝐴 ∈ ℕ ∧ 𝐵 ∈ ℕ) ∧ (abs‘((𝐴 / 𝐵) − (√‘𝐷))) < (𝐵↑-2)) → (abs‘((𝐴↑2) − (𝐷 · (𝐵↑2)))) < (1 + (2 · (√‘𝐷))))
Theorem	pellexlem3 16093*	Lemma for pellex . To each good rational approximation of (√‘𝐷), there exists a near-solution. (Contributed by Stefan O'Rear, 14-Sep-2014.)
⊢ ((𝐷 ∈ ℕ ∧ ¬ (√‘𝐷) ∈ ℚ) → {𝑥 ∈ ℚ ∣ (0 < 𝑥 ∧ (abs‘(𝑥 − (√‘𝐷))) < ((denom‘𝑥)↑-2))} ≼ {⟨𝑦, 𝑧⟩ ∣ ((𝑦 ∈ ℕ ∧ 𝑧 ∈ ℕ) ∧ (((𝑦↑2) − (𝐷 · (𝑧↑2))) ≠ 0 ∧ (abs‘((𝑦↑2) − (𝐷 · (𝑧↑2)))) < (1 + (2 · (√‘𝐷)))))})
11.4  Basic number theory
11.4.1  Wilson's theorem
Theorem	wilthlem1 16094	The only elements that are equal to their own inverses in the multiplicative group of nonzero elements in ℤ / 𝑃ℤ are 1 and -1≡𝑃 − 1. (Note that from prmdiveq 13014, (𝑁↑(𝑃 − 2)) mod 𝑃 is the modular inverse of 𝑁 in ℤ / 𝑃ℤ. (Contributed by Mario Carneiro, 24-Jan-2015.)
⊢ ((𝑃 ∈ ℙ ∧ 𝑁 ∈ (1...(𝑃 − 1))) → (𝑁 = ((𝑁↑(𝑃 − 2)) mod 𝑃) ↔ (𝑁 = 1 ∨ 𝑁 = (𝑃 − 1))))
11.4.2  Number-theoretical functions
Syntax	csgm 16095	Extend class notation with the divisor function.
class σ
Definition	df-sgm 16096*	Define the sum of positive divisors function (𝑥 σ 𝑛), which is the sum of the xth powers of the positive integer divisors of n, see definition in [ApostolNT] p. 38. For 𝑥 = 0, (𝑥 σ 𝑛) counts the number of divisors of 𝑛, i.e. (0 σ 𝑛) is the divisor function, see remark in [ApostolNT] p. 38. (Contributed by Mario Carneiro, 22-Sep-2014.)
⊢ σ = (𝑥 ∈ ℂ, 𝑛 ∈ ℕ ↦ Σ𝑘 ∈ {𝑝 ∈ ℕ ∣ 𝑝 ∥ 𝑛} (𝑘↑𝑐𝑥))
Theorem	sgmval 16097*	The value of the divisor function. (Contributed by Mario Carneiro, 22-Sep-2014.) (Revised by Mario Carneiro, 21-Jun-2015.)
⊢ ((𝐴 ∈ ℂ ∧ 𝐵 ∈ ℕ) → (𝐴 σ 𝐵) = Σ𝑘 ∈ {𝑝 ∈ ℕ ∣ 𝑝 ∥ 𝐵} (𝑘↑𝑐𝐴))
Theorem	sgmval2 16098*	The value of the divisor function. (Contributed by Mario Carneiro, 21-Jun-2015.)
⊢ ((𝐴 ∈ ℤ ∧ 𝐵 ∈ ℕ) → (𝐴 σ 𝐵) = Σ𝑘 ∈ {𝑝 ∈ ℕ ∣ 𝑝 ∥ 𝐵} (𝑘↑𝐴))
Theorem	0sgm 16099*	The value of the sum-of-divisors function, usually denoted σ<SUB>0</SUB>(<i>n</i>). (Contributed by Mario Carneiro, 21-Jun-2015.)
⊢ (𝐴 ∈ ℕ → (0 σ 𝐴) = (♯‘{𝑝 ∈ ℕ ∣ 𝑝 ∥ 𝐴}))
Theorem	sgmf 16100	The divisor function is a function into the complex numbers. (Contributed by Mario Carneiro, 22-Sep-2014.) (Revised by Mario Carneiro, 21-Jun-2015.)
⊢ σ :(ℂ × ℕ)⟶ℂ