Theorem negsproplem3 27955

Description: Lemma for surreal negation. Give the cut properties of surreal negation. (Contributed by Scott Fenton, 2-Feb-2025.)

Hypotheses

Ref	Expression
negsproplem.1	⊢ (𝜑 → ∀𝑥 ∈ No ∀𝑦 ∈ No ((( bday ‘𝑥) ∪ ( bday ‘𝑦)) ∈ (( bday ‘𝐴) ∪ ( bday ‘𝐵)) → (( -us ‘𝑥) ∈ No ∧ (𝑥 <s 𝑦 → ( -us ‘𝑦) <s ( -us ‘𝑥)))))
negsproplem2.1	⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐴 ∈ No )

Assertion

Ref	Expression
negsproplem3	⊢ (𝜑 → (( -us ‘𝐴) ∈ No ∧ ( -us “ ( R ‘𝐴)) <<s {( -us ‘𝐴)} ∧ {( -us ‘𝐴)} <<s ( -us “ ( L ‘𝐴))))

Distinct variable groups:   𝑥,𝐴,𝑦   𝑥,𝐵,𝑦

Allowed substitution hints:   𝜑(𝑥,𝑦)

Proof of Theorem negsproplem3

Step	Hyp	Ref	Expression
1		negsproplem.1	. . . 4 ⊢ (𝜑 → ∀𝑥 ∈ No ∀𝑦 ∈ No ((( bday ‘𝑥) ∪ ( bday ‘𝑦)) ∈ (( bday ‘𝐴) ∪ ( bday ‘𝐵)) → (( -us ‘𝑥) ∈ No ∧ (𝑥 <s 𝑦 → ( -us ‘𝑦) <s ( -us ‘𝑥)))))
2		negsproplem2.1	. . . 4 ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐴 ∈ No )
3	1, 2	negsproplem2 27954	. . 3 ⊢ (𝜑 → ( -us “ ( R ‘𝐴)) <<s ( -us “ ( L ‘𝐴)))
4		scutcut 27747	. . 3 ⊢ (( -us “ ( R ‘𝐴)) <<s ( -us “ ( L ‘𝐴)) → ((( -us “ ( R ‘𝐴)) |s ( -us “ ( L ‘𝐴))) ∈ No ∧ ( -us “ ( R ‘𝐴)) <<s {(( -us “ ( R ‘𝐴)) |s ( -us “ ( L ‘𝐴)))} ∧ {(( -us “ ( R ‘𝐴)) |s ( -us “ ( L ‘𝐴)))} <<s ( -us “ ( L ‘𝐴))))
5	3, 4	syl 17	. 2 ⊢ (𝜑 → ((( -us “ ( R ‘𝐴)) |s ( -us “ ( L ‘𝐴))) ∈ No ∧ ( -us “ ( R ‘𝐴)) <<s {(( -us “ ( R ‘𝐴)) |s ( -us “ ( L ‘𝐴)))} ∧ {(( -us “ ( R ‘𝐴)) |s ( -us “ ( L ‘𝐴)))} <<s ( -us “ ( L ‘𝐴))))
6		negsval 27951	. . . . 5 ⊢ (𝐴 ∈ No → ( -us ‘𝐴) = (( -us “ ( R ‘𝐴)) |s ( -us “ ( L ‘𝐴))))
7	2, 6	syl 17	. . . 4 ⊢ (𝜑 → ( -us ‘𝐴) = (( -us “ ( R ‘𝐴)) |s ( -us “ ( L ‘𝐴))))
8	7	eleq1d 2810	. . 3 ⊢ (𝜑 → (( -us ‘𝐴) ∈ No ↔ (( -us “ ( R ‘𝐴)) |s ( -us “ ( L ‘𝐴))) ∈ No ))
9	7	sneqd 4637	. . . 4 ⊢ (𝜑 → {( -us ‘𝐴)} = {(( -us “ ( R ‘𝐴)) |s ( -us “ ( L ‘𝐴)))})
10	9	breq2d 5156	. . 3 ⊢ (𝜑 → (( -us “ ( R ‘𝐴)) <<s {( -us ‘𝐴)} ↔ ( -us “ ( R ‘𝐴)) <<s {(( -us “ ( R ‘𝐴)) |s ( -us “ ( L ‘𝐴)))}))
11	9	breq1d 5154	. . 3 ⊢ (𝜑 → ({( -us ‘𝐴)} <<s ( -us “ ( L ‘𝐴)) ↔ {(( -us “ ( R ‘𝐴)) |s ( -us “ ( L ‘𝐴)))} <<s ( -us “ ( L ‘𝐴))))
12	8, 10, 11	3anbi123d 1432	. 2 ⊢ (𝜑 → ((( -us ‘𝐴) ∈ No ∧ ( -us “ ( R ‘𝐴)) <<s {( -us ‘𝐴)} ∧ {( -us ‘𝐴)} <<s ( -us “ ( L ‘𝐴))) ↔ ((( -us “ ( R ‘𝐴)) |s ( -us “ ( L ‘𝐴))) ∈ No ∧ ( -us “ ( R ‘𝐴)) <<s {(( -us “ ( R ‘𝐴)) |s ( -us “ ( L ‘𝐴)))} ∧ {(( -us “ ( R ‘𝐴)) |s ( -us “ ( L ‘𝐴)))} <<s ( -us “ ( L ‘𝐴)))))
13	5, 12	mpbird 256	1 ⊢ (𝜑 → (( -us ‘𝐴) ∈ No ∧ ( -us “ ( R ‘𝐴)) <<s {( -us ‘𝐴)} ∧ {( -us ‘𝐴)} <<s ( -us “ ( L ‘𝐴))))

Syntax hints:   → wi 4   ∧ wa 394   ∧ w3a 1084   = wceq 1533   ∈ wcel 2098  ∀wral 3051   ∪ cun 3939  {csn 4625   class class class wbr 5144   “ cima 5676  ‘cfv 6543  (class class class)co 7413   No csur 27586   <s cslt 27587   bday cbday 27588   <<s csslt 27726   |s cscut 27728   L cleft 27785   R cright 27786   -u_s cnegs 27945

This theorem was proved from axioms:  ax-mp 5  ax-1 6  ax-2 7  ax-3 8  ax-gen 1789  ax-4 1803  ax-5 1905  ax-6 1963  ax-7 2003  ax-8 2100  ax-9 2108  ax-10 2129  ax-11 2146  ax-12 2166  ax-ext 2696  ax-rep 5281  ax-sep 5295  ax-nul 5302  ax-pow 5360  ax-pr 5424  ax-un 7735

This theorem depends on definitions:  df-bi 206  df-an 395  df-or 846  df-3or 1085  df-3an 1086  df-tru 1536  df-fal 1546  df-ex 1774  df-nf 1778  df-sb 2060  df-mo 2528  df-eu 2557  df-clab 2703  df-cleq 2717  df-clel 2802  df-nfc 2877  df-ne 2931  df-ral 3052  df-rex 3061  df-rmo 3364  df-reu 3365  df-rab 3420  df-v 3465  df-sbc 3771  df-csb 3887  df-dif 3944  df-un 3946  df-in 3948  df-ss 3958  df-pss 3961  df-nul 4320  df-if 4526  df-pw 4601  df-sn 4626  df-pr 4628  df-tp 4630  df-op 4632  df-uni 4905  df-int 4946  df-iun 4994  df-br 5145  df-opab 5207  df-mpt 5228  df-tr 5262  df-id 5571  df-eprel 5577  df-po 5585  df-so 5586  df-fr 5628  df-se 5629  df-we 5630  df-xp 5679  df-rel 5680  df-cnv 5681  df-co 5682  df-dm 5683  df-rn 5684  df-res 5685  df-ima 5686  df-pred 6301  df-ord 6368  df-on 6369  df-suc 6371  df-iota 6495  df-fun 6545  df-fn 6546  df-f 6547  df-f1 6548  df-fo 6549  df-f1o 6550  df-fv 6551  df-riota 7369  df-ov 7416  df-oprab 7417  df-mpo 7418  df-2nd 7988  df-frecs 8280  df-wrecs 8311  df-recs 8385  df-1o 8480  df-2o 8481  df-no 27589  df-slt 27590  df-bday 27591  df-sslt 27727  df-scut 27729  df-0s 27770  df-made 27787  df-old 27788  df-left 27790  df-right 27791  df-norec 27868  df-negs 27947

This theorem is referenced by:  negsproplem4  27956  negsproplem5  27957  negsproplem6  27958  negsprop  27960  negscut  27964