Theorem negsproplem3 28041

Description: Lemma for surreal negation. Give the cut properties of surreal negation. (Contributed by Scott Fenton, 2-Feb-2025.)

Hypotheses

Ref	Expression
negsproplem.1	⊢ (𝜑 → ∀𝑥 ∈ No ∀𝑦 ∈ No ((( bday ‘𝑥) ∪ ( bday ‘𝑦)) ∈ (( bday ‘𝐴) ∪ ( bday ‘𝐵)) → (( -us ‘𝑥) ∈ No ∧ (𝑥 <s 𝑦 → ( -us ‘𝑦) <s ( -us ‘𝑥)))))
negsproplem2.1	⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐴 ∈ No )

Assertion

Ref	Expression
negsproplem3	⊢ (𝜑 → (( -us ‘𝐴) ∈ No ∧ ( -us “ ( R ‘𝐴)) <<s {( -us ‘𝐴)} ∧ {( -us ‘𝐴)} <<s ( -us “ ( L ‘𝐴))))

Distinct variable groups:   𝑥,𝐴,𝑦   𝑥,𝐵,𝑦

Allowed substitution hints:   𝜑(𝑥,𝑦)

Proof of Theorem negsproplem3

Step	Hyp	Ref	Expression
1		negsproplem.1	. . . 4 ⊢ (𝜑 → ∀𝑥 ∈ No ∀𝑦 ∈ No ((( bday ‘𝑥) ∪ ( bday ‘𝑦)) ∈ (( bday ‘𝐴) ∪ ( bday ‘𝐵)) → (( -us ‘𝑥) ∈ No ∧ (𝑥 <s 𝑦 → ( -us ‘𝑦) <s ( -us ‘𝑥)))))
2		negsproplem2.1	. . . 4 ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐴 ∈ No )
3	1, 2	negsproplem2 28040	. . 3 ⊢ (𝜑 → ( -us “ ( R ‘𝐴)) <<s ( -us “ ( L ‘𝐴)))
4		cutcuts 27792	. . 3 ⊢ (( -us “ ( R ‘𝐴)) <<s ( -us “ ( L ‘𝐴)) → ((( -us “ ( R ‘𝐴)) |s ( -us “ ( L ‘𝐴))) ∈ No ∧ ( -us “ ( R ‘𝐴)) <<s {(( -us “ ( R ‘𝐴)) |s ( -us “ ( L ‘𝐴)))} ∧ {(( -us “ ( R ‘𝐴)) |s ( -us “ ( L ‘𝐴)))} <<s ( -us “ ( L ‘𝐴))))
5	3, 4	syl 17	. 2 ⊢ (𝜑 → ((( -us “ ( R ‘𝐴)) |s ( -us “ ( L ‘𝐴))) ∈ No ∧ ( -us “ ( R ‘𝐴)) <<s {(( -us “ ( R ‘𝐴)) |s ( -us “ ( L ‘𝐴)))} ∧ {(( -us “ ( R ‘𝐴)) |s ( -us “ ( L ‘𝐴)))} <<s ( -us “ ( L ‘𝐴))))
6		negsval 28036	. . . . 5 ⊢ (𝐴 ∈ No → ( -us ‘𝐴) = (( -us “ ( R ‘𝐴)) |s ( -us “ ( L ‘𝐴))))
7	2, 6	syl 17	. . . 4 ⊢ (𝜑 → ( -us ‘𝐴) = (( -us “ ( R ‘𝐴)) |s ( -us “ ( L ‘𝐴))))
8	7	eleq1d 2824	. . 3 ⊢ (𝜑 → (( -us ‘𝐴) ∈ No ↔ (( -us “ ( R ‘𝐴)) |s ( -us “ ( L ‘𝐴))) ∈ No ))
9	7	sneqd 4568	. . . 4 ⊢ (𝜑 → {( -us ‘𝐴)} = {(( -us “ ( R ‘𝐴)) |s ( -us “ ( L ‘𝐴)))})
10	9	breq2d 5085	. . 3 ⊢ (𝜑 → (( -us “ ( R ‘𝐴)) <<s {( -us ‘𝐴)} ↔ ( -us “ ( R ‘𝐴)) <<s {(( -us “ ( R ‘𝐴)) |s ( -us “ ( L ‘𝐴)))}))
11	9	breq1d 5083	. . 3 ⊢ (𝜑 → ({( -us ‘𝐴)} <<s ( -us “ ( L ‘𝐴)) ↔ {(( -us “ ( R ‘𝐴)) |s ( -us “ ( L ‘𝐴)))} <<s ( -us “ ( L ‘𝐴))))
12	8, 10, 11	3anbi123d 1444	. 2 ⊢ (𝜑 → ((( -us ‘𝐴) ∈ No ∧ ( -us “ ( R ‘𝐴)) <<s {( -us ‘𝐴)} ∧ {( -us ‘𝐴)} <<s ( -us “ ( L ‘𝐴))) ↔ ((( -us “ ( R ‘𝐴)) |s ( -us “ ( L ‘𝐴))) ∈ No ∧ ( -us “ ( R ‘𝐴)) <<s {(( -us “ ( R ‘𝐴)) |s ( -us “ ( L ‘𝐴)))} ∧ {(( -us “ ( R ‘𝐴)) |s ( -us “ ( L ‘𝐴)))} <<s ( -us “ ( L ‘𝐴)))))
13	5, 12	mpbird 258	1 ⊢ (𝜑 → (( -us ‘𝐴) ∈ No ∧ ( -us “ ( R ‘𝐴)) <<s {( -us ‘𝐴)} ∧ {( -us ‘𝐴)} <<s ( -us “ ( L ‘𝐴))))

Syntax hints:   → wi 4   ∧ wa 396   ∧ w3a 1092   = wceq 1547   ∈ wcel 2119  ∀wral 3053   ∪ cun 3881  {csn 4556   class class class wbr 5073   “ cima 5622  ‘cfv 6486  (class class class)co 7357   No csur 27622   <s clts 27623   bday cbday 27624   <<s cslts 27768   |s ccuts 27770   L cleft 27836   R cright 27837   -u_s cnegs 28030

This theorem was proved from axioms:  ax-mp 5  ax-1 6  ax-2 7  ax-3 8  ax-gen 1802  ax-4 1816  ax-5 1917  ax-6 1974  ax-7 2015  ax-8 2121  ax-9 2129  ax-10 2152  ax-11 2168  ax-12 2189  ax-ext 2711  ax-rep 5200  ax-sep 5219  ax-nul 5229  ax-pow 5295  ax-pr 5363  ax-un 7679

This theorem depends on definitions:  df-bi 208  df-an 397  df-or 854  df-3or 1093  df-3an 1094  df-tru 1550  df-fal 1560  df-ex 1787  df-nf 1791  df-sb 2074  df-mo 2543  df-eu 2573  df-clab 2718  df-cleq 2731  df-clel 2814  df-nfc 2888  df-ne 2935  df-ral 3054  df-rex 3064  df-rmo 3344  df-reu 3345  df-rab 3392  df-v 3433  df-sbc 3724  df-csb 3832  df-dif 3886  df-un 3888  df-in 3890  df-ss 3900  df-pss 3903  df-nul 4263  df-if 4456  df-pw 4532  df-sn 4557  df-pr 4559  df-tp 4561  df-op 4563  df-uni 4840  df-int 4879  df-iun 4924  df-br 5074  df-opab 5136  df-mpt 5155  df-tr 5181  df-id 5514  df-eprel 5519  df-po 5527  df-so 5528  df-fr 5572  df-se 5573  df-we 5574  df-xp 5625  df-rel 5626  df-cnv 5627  df-co 5628  df-dm 5629  df-rn 5630  df-res 5631  df-ima 5632  df-pred 6253  df-ord 6314  df-on 6315  df-suc 6317  df-iota 6442  df-fun 6488  df-fn 6489  df-f 6490  df-f1 6491  df-fo 6492  df-f1o 6493  df-fv 6494  df-riota 7314  df-ov 7360  df-oprab 7361  df-mpo 7362  df-2nd 7933  df-frecs 8222  df-wrecs 8253  df-recs 8302  df-1o 8396  df-2o 8397  df-no 27625  df-lts 27626  df-bday 27627  df-slts 27769  df-cuts 27771  df-0s 27818  df-made 27838  df-old 27839  df-left 27841  df-right 27842  df-norec 27949  df-negs 28032

This theorem is referenced by:  negsproplem4  28042  negsproplem5  28043  negsproplem6  28044  negsprop  28046  negcut  28050