Theorem negsproplem3 27976

Description: Lemma for surreal negation. Give the cut properties of surreal negation. (Contributed by Scott Fenton, 2-Feb-2025.)

Hypotheses

Ref	Expression
negsproplem.1	⊢ (𝜑 → ∀𝑥 ∈ No ∀𝑦 ∈ No ((( bday ‘𝑥) ∪ ( bday ‘𝑦)) ∈ (( bday ‘𝐴) ∪ ( bday ‘𝐵)) → (( -us ‘𝑥) ∈ No ∧ (𝑥 <s 𝑦 → ( -us ‘𝑦) <s ( -us ‘𝑥)))))
negsproplem2.1	⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐴 ∈ No )

Assertion

Ref	Expression
negsproplem3	⊢ (𝜑 → (( -us ‘𝐴) ∈ No ∧ ( -us “ ( R ‘𝐴)) <<s {( -us ‘𝐴)} ∧ {( -us ‘𝐴)} <<s ( -us “ ( L ‘𝐴))))

Distinct variable groups:   𝑥,𝐴,𝑦   𝑥,𝐵,𝑦

Allowed substitution hints:   𝜑(𝑥,𝑦)

Proof of Theorem negsproplem3

Step	Hyp	Ref	Expression
1		negsproplem.1	. . . 4 ⊢ (𝜑 → ∀𝑥 ∈ No ∀𝑦 ∈ No ((( bday ‘𝑥) ∪ ( bday ‘𝑦)) ∈ (( bday ‘𝐴) ∪ ( bday ‘𝐵)) → (( -us ‘𝑥) ∈ No ∧ (𝑥 <s 𝑦 → ( -us ‘𝑦) <s ( -us ‘𝑥)))))
2		negsproplem2.1	. . . 4 ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐴 ∈ No )
3	1, 2	negsproplem2 27975	. . 3 ⊢ (𝜑 → ( -us “ ( R ‘𝐴)) <<s ( -us “ ( L ‘𝐴)))
4		scutcut 27747	. . 3 ⊢ (( -us “ ( R ‘𝐴)) <<s ( -us “ ( L ‘𝐴)) → ((( -us “ ( R ‘𝐴)) |s ( -us “ ( L ‘𝐴))) ∈ No ∧ ( -us “ ( R ‘𝐴)) <<s {(( -us “ ( R ‘𝐴)) |s ( -us “ ( L ‘𝐴)))} ∧ {(( -us “ ( R ‘𝐴)) |s ( -us “ ( L ‘𝐴)))} <<s ( -us “ ( L ‘𝐴))))
5	3, 4	syl 17	. 2 ⊢ (𝜑 → ((( -us “ ( R ‘𝐴)) |s ( -us “ ( L ‘𝐴))) ∈ No ∧ ( -us “ ( R ‘𝐴)) <<s {(( -us “ ( R ‘𝐴)) |s ( -us “ ( L ‘𝐴)))} ∧ {(( -us “ ( R ‘𝐴)) |s ( -us “ ( L ‘𝐴)))} <<s ( -us “ ( L ‘𝐴))))
6		negsval 27971	. . . . 5 ⊢ (𝐴 ∈ No → ( -us ‘𝐴) = (( -us “ ( R ‘𝐴)) |s ( -us “ ( L ‘𝐴))))
7	2, 6	syl 17	. . . 4 ⊢ (𝜑 → ( -us ‘𝐴) = (( -us “ ( R ‘𝐴)) |s ( -us “ ( L ‘𝐴))))
8	7	eleq1d 2813	. . 3 ⊢ (𝜑 → (( -us ‘𝐴) ∈ No ↔ (( -us “ ( R ‘𝐴)) |s ( -us “ ( L ‘𝐴))) ∈ No ))
9	7	sneqd 4597	. . . 4 ⊢ (𝜑 → {( -us ‘𝐴)} = {(( -us “ ( R ‘𝐴)) |s ( -us “ ( L ‘𝐴)))})
10	9	breq2d 5114	. . 3 ⊢ (𝜑 → (( -us “ ( R ‘𝐴)) <<s {( -us ‘𝐴)} ↔ ( -us “ ( R ‘𝐴)) <<s {(( -us “ ( R ‘𝐴)) |s ( -us “ ( L ‘𝐴)))}))
11	9	breq1d 5112	. . 3 ⊢ (𝜑 → ({( -us ‘𝐴)} <<s ( -us “ ( L ‘𝐴)) ↔ {(( -us “ ( R ‘𝐴)) |s ( -us “ ( L ‘𝐴)))} <<s ( -us “ ( L ‘𝐴))))
12	8, 10, 11	3anbi123d 1438	. 2 ⊢ (𝜑 → ((( -us ‘𝐴) ∈ No ∧ ( -us “ ( R ‘𝐴)) <<s {( -us ‘𝐴)} ∧ {( -us ‘𝐴)} <<s ( -us “ ( L ‘𝐴))) ↔ ((( -us “ ( R ‘𝐴)) |s ( -us “ ( L ‘𝐴))) ∈ No ∧ ( -us “ ( R ‘𝐴)) <<s {(( -us “ ( R ‘𝐴)) |s ( -us “ ( L ‘𝐴)))} ∧ {(( -us “ ( R ‘𝐴)) |s ( -us “ ( L ‘𝐴)))} <<s ( -us “ ( L ‘𝐴)))))
13	5, 12	mpbird 257	1 ⊢ (𝜑 → (( -us ‘𝐴) ∈ No ∧ ( -us “ ( R ‘𝐴)) <<s {( -us ‘𝐴)} ∧ {( -us ‘𝐴)} <<s ( -us “ ( L ‘𝐴))))

Syntax hints:   → wi 4   ∧ wa 395   ∧ w3a 1086   = wceq 1540   ∈ wcel 2109  ∀wral 3044   ∪ cun 3909  {csn 4585   class class class wbr 5102   “ cima 5634  ‘cfv 6499  (class class class)co 7369   No csur 27584   <s cslt 27585   bday cbday 27586   <<s csslt 27726   |s cscut 27728   L cleft 27790   R cright 27791   -u_s cnegs 27965

This theorem was proved from axioms:  ax-mp 5  ax-1 6  ax-2 7  ax-3 8  ax-gen 1795  ax-4 1809  ax-5 1910  ax-6 1967  ax-7 2008  ax-8 2111  ax-9 2119  ax-10 2142  ax-11 2158  ax-12 2178  ax-ext 2701  ax-rep 5229  ax-sep 5246  ax-nul 5256  ax-pow 5315  ax-pr 5382  ax-un 7691

This theorem depends on definitions:  df-bi 207  df-an 396  df-or 848  df-3or 1087  df-3an 1088  df-tru 1543  df-fal 1553  df-ex 1780  df-nf 1784  df-sb 2066  df-mo 2533  df-eu 2562  df-clab 2708  df-cleq 2721  df-clel 2803  df-nfc 2878  df-ne 2926  df-ral 3045  df-rex 3054  df-rmo 3351  df-reu 3352  df-rab 3403  df-v 3446  df-sbc 3751  df-csb 3860  df-dif 3914  df-un 3916  df-in 3918  df-ss 3928  df-pss 3931  df-nul 4293  df-if 4485  df-pw 4561  df-sn 4586  df-pr 4588  df-tp 4590  df-op 4592  df-uni 4868  df-int 4907  df-iun 4953  df-br 5103  df-opab 5165  df-mpt 5184  df-tr 5210  df-id 5526  df-eprel 5531  df-po 5539  df-so 5540  df-fr 5584  df-se 5585  df-we 5586  df-xp 5637  df-rel 5638  df-cnv 5639  df-co 5640  df-dm 5641  df-rn 5642  df-res 5643  df-ima 5644  df-pred 6262  df-ord 6323  df-on 6324  df-suc 6326  df-iota 6452  df-fun 6501  df-fn 6502  df-f 6503  df-f1 6504  df-fo 6505  df-f1o 6506  df-fv 6507  df-riota 7326  df-ov 7372  df-oprab 7373  df-mpo 7374  df-2nd 7948  df-frecs 8237  df-wrecs 8268  df-recs 8317  df-1o 8411  df-2o 8412  df-no 27587  df-slt 27588  df-bday 27589  df-sslt 27727  df-scut 27729  df-0s 27773  df-made 27792  df-old 27793  df-left 27795  df-right 27796  df-norec 27885  df-negs 27967

This theorem is referenced by:  negsproplem4  27977  negsproplem5  27978  negsproplem6  27979  negsprop  27981  negscut  27985