Theorem negsproplem3 28040

Description: Lemma for surreal negation. Give the cut properties of surreal negation. (Contributed by Scott Fenton, 2-Feb-2025.)

Hypotheses

Ref	Expression
negsproplem.1	⊢ (𝜑 → ∀𝑥 ∈ No ∀𝑦 ∈ No ((( bday ‘𝑥) ∪ ( bday ‘𝑦)) ∈ (( bday ‘𝐴) ∪ ( bday ‘𝐵)) → (( -us ‘𝑥) ∈ No ∧ (𝑥 <s 𝑦 → ( -us ‘𝑦) <s ( -us ‘𝑥)))))
negsproplem2.1	⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐴 ∈ No )

Assertion

Ref	Expression
negsproplem3	⊢ (𝜑 → (( -us ‘𝐴) ∈ No ∧ ( -us “ ( R ‘𝐴)) <<s {( -us ‘𝐴)} ∧ {( -us ‘𝐴)} <<s ( -us “ ( L ‘𝐴))))

Distinct variable groups:   𝑥,𝐴,𝑦   𝑥,𝐵,𝑦

Allowed substitution hints:   𝜑(𝑥,𝑦)

Proof of Theorem negsproplem3

Step	Hyp	Ref	Expression
1		negsproplem.1	. . . 4 ⊢ (𝜑 → ∀𝑥 ∈ No ∀𝑦 ∈ No ((( bday ‘𝑥) ∪ ( bday ‘𝑦)) ∈ (( bday ‘𝐴) ∪ ( bday ‘𝐵)) → (( -us ‘𝑥) ∈ No ∧ (𝑥 <s 𝑦 → ( -us ‘𝑦) <s ( -us ‘𝑥)))))
2		negsproplem2.1	. . . 4 ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐴 ∈ No )
3	1, 2	negsproplem2 28039	. . 3 ⊢ (𝜑 → ( -us “ ( R ‘𝐴)) <<s ( -us “ ( L ‘𝐴)))
4		cutcuts 27791	. . 3 ⊢ (( -us “ ( R ‘𝐴)) <<s ( -us “ ( L ‘𝐴)) → ((( -us “ ( R ‘𝐴)) |s ( -us “ ( L ‘𝐴))) ∈ No ∧ ( -us “ ( R ‘𝐴)) <<s {(( -us “ ( R ‘𝐴)) |s ( -us “ ( L ‘𝐴)))} ∧ {(( -us “ ( R ‘𝐴)) |s ( -us “ ( L ‘𝐴)))} <<s ( -us “ ( L ‘𝐴))))
5	3, 4	syl 17	. 2 ⊢ (𝜑 → ((( -us “ ( R ‘𝐴)) |s ( -us “ ( L ‘𝐴))) ∈ No ∧ ( -us “ ( R ‘𝐴)) <<s {(( -us “ ( R ‘𝐴)) |s ( -us “ ( L ‘𝐴)))} ∧ {(( -us “ ( R ‘𝐴)) |s ( -us “ ( L ‘𝐴)))} <<s ( -us “ ( L ‘𝐴))))
6		negsval 28035	. . . . 5 ⊢ (𝐴 ∈ No → ( -us ‘𝐴) = (( -us “ ( R ‘𝐴)) |s ( -us “ ( L ‘𝐴))))
7	2, 6	syl 17	. . . 4 ⊢ (𝜑 → ( -us ‘𝐴) = (( -us “ ( R ‘𝐴)) |s ( -us “ ( L ‘𝐴))))
8	7	eleq1d 2822	. . 3 ⊢ (𝜑 → (( -us ‘𝐴) ∈ No ↔ (( -us “ ( R ‘𝐴)) |s ( -us “ ( L ‘𝐴))) ∈ No ))
9	7	sneqd 4580	. . . 4 ⊢ (𝜑 → {( -us ‘𝐴)} = {(( -us “ ( R ‘𝐴)) |s ( -us “ ( L ‘𝐴)))})
10	9	breq2d 5098	. . 3 ⊢ (𝜑 → (( -us “ ( R ‘𝐴)) <<s {( -us ‘𝐴)} ↔ ( -us “ ( R ‘𝐴)) <<s {(( -us “ ( R ‘𝐴)) |s ( -us “ ( L ‘𝐴)))}))
11	9	breq1d 5096	. . 3 ⊢ (𝜑 → ({( -us ‘𝐴)} <<s ( -us “ ( L ‘𝐴)) ↔ {(( -us “ ( R ‘𝐴)) |s ( -us “ ( L ‘𝐴)))} <<s ( -us “ ( L ‘𝐴))))
12	8, 10, 11	3anbi123d 1439	. 2 ⊢ (𝜑 → ((( -us ‘𝐴) ∈ No ∧ ( -us “ ( R ‘𝐴)) <<s {( -us ‘𝐴)} ∧ {( -us ‘𝐴)} <<s ( -us “ ( L ‘𝐴))) ↔ ((( -us “ ( R ‘𝐴)) |s ( -us “ ( L ‘𝐴))) ∈ No ∧ ( -us “ ( R ‘𝐴)) <<s {(( -us “ ( R ‘𝐴)) |s ( -us “ ( L ‘𝐴)))} ∧ {(( -us “ ( R ‘𝐴)) |s ( -us “ ( L ‘𝐴)))} <<s ( -us “ ( L ‘𝐴)))))
13	5, 12	mpbird 257	1 ⊢ (𝜑 → (( -us ‘𝐴) ∈ No ∧ ( -us “ ( R ‘𝐴)) <<s {( -us ‘𝐴)} ∧ {( -us ‘𝐴)} <<s ( -us “ ( L ‘𝐴))))

Syntax hints:   → wi 4   ∧ wa 395   ∧ w3a 1087   = wceq 1542   ∈ wcel 2114  ∀wral 3052   ∪ cun 3888  {csn 4568   class class class wbr 5086   “ cima 5629  ‘cfv 6494  (class class class)co 7362   No csur 27621   <s clts 27622   bday cbday 27623   <<s cslts 27767   |s ccuts 27769   L cleft 27835   R cright 27836   -u_s cnegs 28029

This theorem was proved from axioms:  ax-mp 5  ax-1 6  ax-2 7  ax-3 8  ax-gen 1797  ax-4 1811  ax-5 1912  ax-6 1969  ax-7 2010  ax-8 2116  ax-9 2124  ax-10 2147  ax-11 2163  ax-12 2185  ax-ext 2709  ax-rep 5213  ax-sep 5232  ax-nul 5242  ax-pow 5304  ax-pr 5372  ax-un 7684

This theorem depends on definitions:  df-bi 207  df-an 396  df-or 849  df-3or 1088  df-3an 1089  df-tru 1545  df-fal 1555  df-ex 1782  df-nf 1786  df-sb 2069  df-mo 2540  df-eu 2570  df-clab 2716  df-cleq 2729  df-clel 2812  df-nfc 2886  df-ne 2934  df-ral 3053  df-rex 3063  df-rmo 3343  df-reu 3344  df-rab 3391  df-v 3432  df-sbc 3730  df-csb 3839  df-dif 3893  df-un 3895  df-in 3897  df-ss 3907  df-pss 3910  df-nul 4275  df-if 4468  df-pw 4544  df-sn 4569  df-pr 4571  df-tp 4573  df-op 4575  df-uni 4852  df-int 4891  df-iun 4936  df-br 5087  df-opab 5149  df-mpt 5168  df-tr 5194  df-id 5521  df-eprel 5526  df-po 5534  df-so 5535  df-fr 5579  df-se 5580  df-we 5581  df-xp 5632  df-rel 5633  df-cnv 5634  df-co 5635  df-dm 5636  df-rn 5637  df-res 5638  df-ima 5639  df-pred 6261  df-ord 6322  df-on 6323  df-suc 6325  df-iota 6450  df-fun 6496  df-fn 6497  df-f 6498  df-f1 6499  df-fo 6500  df-f1o 6501  df-fv 6502  df-riota 7319  df-ov 7365  df-oprab 7366  df-mpo 7367  df-2nd 7938  df-frecs 8226  df-wrecs 8257  df-recs 8306  df-1o 8400  df-2o 8401  df-no 27624  df-lts 27625  df-bday 27626  df-slts 27768  df-cuts 27770  df-0s 27817  df-made 27837  df-old 27838  df-left 27840  df-right 27841  df-norec 27948  df-negs 28031

This theorem is referenced by:  negsproplem4  28041  negsproplem5  28042  negsproplem6  28043  negsprop  28045  negcut  28049