Theorem negsproplem3 28043

Description: Lemma for surreal negation. Give the cut properties of surreal negation. (Contributed by Scott Fenton, 2-Feb-2025.)

Hypotheses

Ref	Expression
negsproplem.1	⊢ (𝜑 → ∀𝑥 ∈ No ∀𝑦 ∈ No ((( bday ‘𝑥) ∪ ( bday ‘𝑦)) ∈ (( bday ‘𝐴) ∪ ( bday ‘𝐵)) → (( -us ‘𝑥) ∈ No ∧ (𝑥 <s 𝑦 → ( -us ‘𝑦) <s ( -us ‘𝑥)))))
negsproplem2.1	⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐴 ∈ No )

Assertion

Ref	Expression
negsproplem3	⊢ (𝜑 → (( -us ‘𝐴) ∈ No ∧ ( -us “ ( R ‘𝐴)) <<s {( -us ‘𝐴)} ∧ {( -us ‘𝐴)} <<s ( -us “ ( L ‘𝐴))))

Distinct variable groups:   𝑥,𝐴,𝑦   𝑥,𝐵,𝑦

Allowed substitution hints:   𝜑(𝑥,𝑦)

Proof of Theorem negsproplem3

Step	Hyp	Ref	Expression
1		negsproplem.1	. . . 4 ⊢ (𝜑 → ∀𝑥 ∈ No ∀𝑦 ∈ No ((( bday ‘𝑥) ∪ ( bday ‘𝑦)) ∈ (( bday ‘𝐴) ∪ ( bday ‘𝐵)) → (( -us ‘𝑥) ∈ No ∧ (𝑥 <s 𝑦 → ( -us ‘𝑦) <s ( -us ‘𝑥)))))
2		negsproplem2.1	. . . 4 ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐴 ∈ No )
3	1, 2	negsproplem2 28042	. . 3 ⊢ (𝜑 → ( -us “ ( R ‘𝐴)) <<s ( -us “ ( L ‘𝐴)))
4		cutcuts 27794	. . 3 ⊢ (( -us “ ( R ‘𝐴)) <<s ( -us “ ( L ‘𝐴)) → ((( -us “ ( R ‘𝐴)) |s ( -us “ ( L ‘𝐴))) ∈ No ∧ ( -us “ ( R ‘𝐴)) <<s {(( -us “ ( R ‘𝐴)) |s ( -us “ ( L ‘𝐴)))} ∧ {(( -us “ ( R ‘𝐴)) |s ( -us “ ( L ‘𝐴)))} <<s ( -us “ ( L ‘𝐴))))
5	3, 4	syl 17	. 2 ⊢ (𝜑 → ((( -us “ ( R ‘𝐴)) |s ( -us “ ( L ‘𝐴))) ∈ No ∧ ( -us “ ( R ‘𝐴)) <<s {(( -us “ ( R ‘𝐴)) |s ( -us “ ( L ‘𝐴)))} ∧ {(( -us “ ( R ‘𝐴)) |s ( -us “ ( L ‘𝐴)))} <<s ( -us “ ( L ‘𝐴))))
6		negsval 28038	. . . . 5 ⊢ (𝐴 ∈ No → ( -us ‘𝐴) = (( -us “ ( R ‘𝐴)) |s ( -us “ ( L ‘𝐴))))
7	2, 6	syl 17	. . . 4 ⊢ (𝜑 → ( -us ‘𝐴) = (( -us “ ( R ‘𝐴)) |s ( -us “ ( L ‘𝐴))))
8	7	eleq1d 2822	. . 3 ⊢ (𝜑 → (( -us ‘𝐴) ∈ No ↔ (( -us “ ( R ‘𝐴)) |s ( -us “ ( L ‘𝐴))) ∈ No ))
9	7	sneqd 4594	. . . 4 ⊢ (𝜑 → {( -us ‘𝐴)} = {(( -us “ ( R ‘𝐴)) |s ( -us “ ( L ‘𝐴)))})
10	9	breq2d 5112	. . 3 ⊢ (𝜑 → (( -us “ ( R ‘𝐴)) <<s {( -us ‘𝐴)} ↔ ( -us “ ( R ‘𝐴)) <<s {(( -us “ ( R ‘𝐴)) |s ( -us “ ( L ‘𝐴)))}))
11	9	breq1d 5110	. . 3 ⊢ (𝜑 → ({( -us ‘𝐴)} <<s ( -us “ ( L ‘𝐴)) ↔ {(( -us “ ( R ‘𝐴)) |s ( -us “ ( L ‘𝐴)))} <<s ( -us “ ( L ‘𝐴))))
12	8, 10, 11	3anbi123d 1439	. 2 ⊢ (𝜑 → ((( -us ‘𝐴) ∈ No ∧ ( -us “ ( R ‘𝐴)) <<s {( -us ‘𝐴)} ∧ {( -us ‘𝐴)} <<s ( -us “ ( L ‘𝐴))) ↔ ((( -us “ ( R ‘𝐴)) |s ( -us “ ( L ‘𝐴))) ∈ No ∧ ( -us “ ( R ‘𝐴)) <<s {(( -us “ ( R ‘𝐴)) |s ( -us “ ( L ‘𝐴)))} ∧ {(( -us “ ( R ‘𝐴)) |s ( -us “ ( L ‘𝐴)))} <<s ( -us “ ( L ‘𝐴)))))
13	5, 12	mpbird 257	1 ⊢ (𝜑 → (( -us ‘𝐴) ∈ No ∧ ( -us “ ( R ‘𝐴)) <<s {( -us ‘𝐴)} ∧ {( -us ‘𝐴)} <<s ( -us “ ( L ‘𝐴))))

Syntax hints:   → wi 4   ∧ wa 395   ∧ w3a 1087   = wceq 1542   ∈ wcel 2114  ∀wral 3052   ∪ cun 3901  {csn 4582   class class class wbr 5100   “ cima 5637  ‘cfv 6502  (class class class)co 7370   No csur 27624   <s clts 27625   bday cbday 27626   <<s cslts 27770   |s ccuts 27772   L cleft 27838   R cright 27839   -u_s cnegs 28032

This theorem was proved from axioms:  ax-mp 5  ax-1 6  ax-2 7  ax-3 8  ax-gen 1797  ax-4 1811  ax-5 1912  ax-6 1969  ax-7 2010  ax-8 2116  ax-9 2124  ax-10 2147  ax-11 2163  ax-12 2185  ax-ext 2709  ax-rep 5226  ax-sep 5245  ax-nul 5255  ax-pow 5314  ax-pr 5381  ax-un 7692

This theorem depends on definitions:  df-bi 207  df-an 396  df-or 849  df-3or 1088  df-3an 1089  df-tru 1545  df-fal 1555  df-ex 1782  df-nf 1786  df-sb 2069  df-mo 2540  df-eu 2570  df-clab 2716  df-cleq 2729  df-clel 2812  df-nfc 2886  df-ne 2934  df-ral 3053  df-rex 3063  df-rmo 3352  df-reu 3353  df-rab 3402  df-v 3444  df-sbc 3743  df-csb 3852  df-dif 3906  df-un 3908  df-in 3910  df-ss 3920  df-pss 3923  df-nul 4288  df-if 4482  df-pw 4558  df-sn 4583  df-pr 4585  df-tp 4587  df-op 4589  df-uni 4866  df-int 4905  df-iun 4950  df-br 5101  df-opab 5163  df-mpt 5182  df-tr 5208  df-id 5529  df-eprel 5534  df-po 5542  df-so 5543  df-fr 5587  df-se 5588  df-we 5589  df-xp 5640  df-rel 5641  df-cnv 5642  df-co 5643  df-dm 5644  df-rn 5645  df-res 5646  df-ima 5647  df-pred 6269  df-ord 6330  df-on 6331  df-suc 6333  df-iota 6458  df-fun 6504  df-fn 6505  df-f 6506  df-f1 6507  df-fo 6508  df-f1o 6509  df-fv 6510  df-riota 7327  df-ov 7373  df-oprab 7374  df-mpo 7375  df-2nd 7946  df-frecs 8235  df-wrecs 8266  df-recs 8315  df-1o 8409  df-2o 8410  df-no 27627  df-lts 27628  df-bday 27629  df-slts 27771  df-cuts 27773  df-0s 27820  df-made 27840  df-old 27841  df-left 27843  df-right 27844  df-norec 27951  df-negs 28034

This theorem is referenced by:  negsproplem4  28044  negsproplem5  28045  negsproplem6  28046  negsprop  28048  negcut  28052