Theorem noetasuplem2 27704

Description: Lemma for noeta 27713. The restriction of 𝑍 to dom 𝑆 is 𝑆. (Contributed by Scott Fenton, 9-Aug-2024.)

Hypotheses

Ref	Expression
noetasuplem.1	⊢ 𝑆 = if(∃𝑥 ∈ 𝐴 ∀𝑦 ∈ 𝐴 ¬ 𝑥 <s 𝑦, ((℩𝑥 ∈ 𝐴 ∀𝑦 ∈ 𝐴 ¬ 𝑥 <s 𝑦) ∪ {⟨dom (℩𝑥 ∈ 𝐴 ∀𝑦 ∈ 𝐴 ¬ 𝑥 <s 𝑦), 2o⟩}), (𝑔 ∈ {𝑦 ∣ ∃𝑢 ∈ 𝐴 (𝑦 ∈ dom 𝑢 ∧ ∀𝑣 ∈ 𝐴 (¬ 𝑣 <s 𝑢 → (𝑢 ↾ suc 𝑦) = (𝑣 ↾ suc 𝑦)))} ↦ (℩𝑥∃𝑢 ∈ 𝐴 (𝑔 ∈ dom 𝑢 ∧ ∀𝑣 ∈ 𝐴 (¬ 𝑣 <s 𝑢 → (𝑢 ↾ suc 𝑔) = (𝑣 ↾ suc 𝑔)) ∧ (𝑢‘𝑔) = 𝑥))))
noetasuplem.2	⊢ 𝑍 = (𝑆 ∪ ((suc ∪ ( bday “ 𝐵) ∖ dom 𝑆) × {1o}))

Assertion

Ref	Expression
noetasuplem2	⊢ ((𝐴 ⊆ No ∧ 𝐴 ∈ V ∧ 𝐵 ∈ V) → (𝑍 ↾ dom 𝑆) = 𝑆)

Distinct variable group:   𝐴,𝑔,𝑢,𝑣,𝑥,𝑦

Allowed substitution hints:   𝐵(𝑥,𝑦,𝑣,𝑢,𝑔)   𝑆(𝑥,𝑦,𝑣,𝑢,𝑔)   𝑍(𝑥,𝑦,𝑣,𝑢,𝑔)

Proof of Theorem noetasuplem2

Step	Hyp	Ref	Expression
1		noetasuplem.2	. . . 4 ⊢ 𝑍 = (𝑆 ∪ ((suc ∪ ( bday “ 𝐵) ∖ dom 𝑆) × {1o}))
2	1	reseq1i 5933	. . 3 ⊢ (𝑍 ↾ dom 𝑆) = ((𝑆 ∪ ((suc ∪ ( bday “ 𝐵) ∖ dom 𝑆) × {1o})) ↾ dom 𝑆)
3		resundir 5952	. . 3 ⊢ ((𝑆 ∪ ((suc ∪ ( bday “ 𝐵) ∖ dom 𝑆) × {1o})) ↾ dom 𝑆) = ((𝑆 ↾ dom 𝑆) ∪ (((suc ∪ ( bday “ 𝐵) ∖ dom 𝑆) × {1o}) ↾ dom 𝑆))
4		dmres 5970	. . . . . 6 ⊢ dom (((suc ∪ ( bday “ 𝐵) ∖ dom 𝑆) × {1o}) ↾ dom 𝑆) = (dom 𝑆 ∩ dom ((suc ∪ ( bday “ 𝐵) ∖ dom 𝑆) × {1o}))
5		1oex 8407	. . . . . . . . 9 ⊢ 1o ∈ V
6	5	snnz 4732	. . . . . . . 8 ⊢ {1o} ≠ ∅
7		dmxp 5877	. . . . . . . 8 ⊢ ({1o} ≠ ∅ → dom ((suc ∪ ( bday “ 𝐵) ∖ dom 𝑆) × {1o}) = (suc ∪ ( bday “ 𝐵) ∖ dom 𝑆))
8	6, 7	ax-mp 5	. . . . . . 7 ⊢ dom ((suc ∪ ( bday “ 𝐵) ∖ dom 𝑆) × {1o}) = (suc ∪ ( bday “ 𝐵) ∖ dom 𝑆)
9	8	ineq2i 4168	. . . . . 6 ⊢ (dom 𝑆 ∩ dom ((suc ∪ ( bday “ 𝐵) ∖ dom 𝑆) × {1o})) = (dom 𝑆 ∩ (suc ∪ ( bday “ 𝐵) ∖ dom 𝑆))
10		disjdif 4423	. . . . . 6 ⊢ (dom 𝑆 ∩ (suc ∪ ( bday “ 𝐵) ∖ dom 𝑆)) = ∅
11	4, 9, 10	3eqtri 2762	. . . . 5 ⊢ dom (((suc ∪ ( bday “ 𝐵) ∖ dom 𝑆) × {1o}) ↾ dom 𝑆) = ∅
12		relres 5963	. . . . . 6 ⊢ Rel (((suc ∪ ( bday “ 𝐵) ∖ dom 𝑆) × {1o}) ↾ dom 𝑆)
13		reldm0 5876	. . . . . 6 ⊢ (Rel (((suc ∪ ( bday “ 𝐵) ∖ dom 𝑆) × {1o}) ↾ dom 𝑆) → ((((suc ∪ ( bday “ 𝐵) ∖ dom 𝑆) × {1o}) ↾ dom 𝑆) = ∅ ↔ dom (((suc ∪ ( bday “ 𝐵) ∖ dom 𝑆) × {1o}) ↾ dom 𝑆) = ∅))
14	12, 13	ax-mp 5	. . . . 5 ⊢ ((((suc ∪ ( bday “ 𝐵) ∖ dom 𝑆) × {1o}) ↾ dom 𝑆) = ∅ ↔ dom (((suc ∪ ( bday “ 𝐵) ∖ dom 𝑆) × {1o}) ↾ dom 𝑆) = ∅)
15	11, 14	mpbir 231	. . . 4 ⊢ (((suc ∪ ( bday “ 𝐵) ∖ dom 𝑆) × {1o}) ↾ dom 𝑆) = ∅
16	15	uneq2i 4116	. . 3 ⊢ ((𝑆 ↾ dom 𝑆) ∪ (((suc ∪ ( bday “ 𝐵) ∖ dom 𝑆) × {1o}) ↾ dom 𝑆)) = ((𝑆 ↾ dom 𝑆) ∪ ∅)
17	2, 3, 16	3eqtri 2762	. 2 ⊢ (𝑍 ↾ dom 𝑆) = ((𝑆 ↾ dom 𝑆) ∪ ∅)
18		noetasuplem.1	. . . . . . 7 ⊢ 𝑆 = if(∃𝑥 ∈ 𝐴 ∀𝑦 ∈ 𝐴 ¬ 𝑥 <s 𝑦, ((℩𝑥 ∈ 𝐴 ∀𝑦 ∈ 𝐴 ¬ 𝑥 <s 𝑦) ∪ {⟨dom (℩𝑥 ∈ 𝐴 ∀𝑦 ∈ 𝐴 ¬ 𝑥 <s 𝑦), 2o⟩}), (𝑔 ∈ {𝑦 ∣ ∃𝑢 ∈ 𝐴 (𝑦 ∈ dom 𝑢 ∧ ∀𝑣 ∈ 𝐴 (¬ 𝑣 <s 𝑢 → (𝑢 ↾ suc 𝑦) = (𝑣 ↾ suc 𝑦)))} ↦ (℩𝑥∃𝑢 ∈ 𝐴 (𝑔 ∈ dom 𝑢 ∧ ∀𝑣 ∈ 𝐴 (¬ 𝑣 <s 𝑢 → (𝑢 ↾ suc 𝑔) = (𝑣 ↾ suc 𝑔)) ∧ (𝑢‘𝑔) = 𝑥))))
19	18	nosupno 27673	. . . . . 6 ⊢ ((𝐴 ⊆ No ∧ 𝐴 ∈ V) → 𝑆 ∈ No )
20	19	3adant3 1133	. . . . 5 ⊢ ((𝐴 ⊆ No ∧ 𝐴 ∈ V ∧ 𝐵 ∈ V) → 𝑆 ∈ No )
21		nofun 27619	. . . . 5 ⊢ (𝑆 ∈ No → Fun 𝑆)
22		funrel 6508	. . . . 5 ⊢ (Fun 𝑆 → Rel 𝑆)
23		resdm 5984	. . . . 5 ⊢ (Rel 𝑆 → (𝑆 ↾ dom 𝑆) = 𝑆)
24	20, 21, 22, 23	4syl 19	. . . 4 ⊢ ((𝐴 ⊆ No ∧ 𝐴 ∈ V ∧ 𝐵 ∈ V) → (𝑆 ↾ dom 𝑆) = 𝑆)
25	24	uneq1d 4118	. . 3 ⊢ ((𝐴 ⊆ No ∧ 𝐴 ∈ V ∧ 𝐵 ∈ V) → ((𝑆 ↾ dom 𝑆) ∪ ∅) = (𝑆 ∪ ∅))
26		un0 4345	. . 3 ⊢ (𝑆 ∪ ∅) = 𝑆
27	25, 26	eqtrdi 2786	. 2 ⊢ ((𝐴 ⊆ No ∧ 𝐴 ∈ V ∧ 𝐵 ∈ V) → ((𝑆 ↾ dom 𝑆) ∪ ∅) = 𝑆)
28	17, 27	eqtrid 2782	1 ⊢ ((𝐴 ⊆ No ∧ 𝐴 ∈ V ∧ 𝐵 ∈ V) → (𝑍 ↾ dom 𝑆) = 𝑆)

Syntax hints:  ¬ wn 3   → wi 4   ↔ wb 206   ∧ wa 395   ∧ w3a 1087   = wceq 1542   ∈ wcel 2114  {cab 2713   ≠ wne 2931  ∀wral 3050  ∃wrex 3059  Vcvv 3439   ∖ cdif 3897   ∪ cun 3898   ∩ cin 3899   ⊆ wss 3900  ∅c0 4284  ifcif 4478  {csn 4579  ⟨cop 4585  ∪ cuni 4862   class class class wbr 5097   ↦ cmpt 5178   × cxp 5621  dom cdm 5623   ↾ cres 5625   “ cima 5626  Rel wrel 5628  suc csuc 6318  ℩cio 6445  Fun wfun 6485  ‘cfv 6491  ℩crio 7314  1_oc1o 8390  2_oc2o 8391   No csur 27609   <s cslt 27610   bday cbday 27611

This theorem was proved from axioms:  ax-mp 5  ax-1 6  ax-2 7  ax-3 8  ax-gen 1797  ax-4 1811  ax-5 1912  ax-6 1969  ax-7 2010  ax-8 2116  ax-9 2124  ax-10 2147  ax-11 2163  ax-12 2183  ax-ext 2707  ax-rep 5223  ax-sep 5240  ax-nul 5250  ax-pow 5309  ax-pr 5376  ax-un 7680

This theorem depends on definitions:  df-bi 207  df-an 396  df-or 849  df-3or 1088  df-3an 1089  df-tru 1545  df-fal 1555  df-ex 1782  df-nf 1786  df-sb 2069  df-mo 2538  df-eu 2568  df-clab 2714  df-cleq 2727  df-clel 2810  df-nfc 2884  df-ne 2932  df-ral 3051  df-rex 3060  df-rmo 3349  df-reu 3350  df-rab 3399  df-v 3441  df-sbc 3740  df-csb 3849  df-dif 3903  df-un 3905  df-in 3907  df-ss 3917  df-pss 3920  df-nul 4285  df-if 4479  df-pw 4555  df-sn 4580  df-pr 4582  df-tp 4584  df-op 4586  df-uni 4863  df-br 5098  df-opab 5160  df-mpt 5179  df-tr 5205  df-id 5518  df-eprel 5523  df-po 5531  df-so 5532  df-fr 5576  df-we 5578  df-xp 5629  df-rel 5630  df-cnv 5631  df-co 5632  df-dm 5633  df-rn 5634  df-res 5635  df-ima 5636  df-ord 6319  df-on 6320  df-suc 6322  df-iota 6447  df-fun 6493  df-fn 6494  df-f 6495  df-fo 6497  df-fv 6499  df-riota 7315  df-1o 8397  df-2o 8398  df-no 27612  df-slt 27613  df-bday 27614

This theorem is referenced by:  noetalem1  27711