| Metamath Proof Explorer |
< Previous
Next >
Nearby theorems |
||
| Mirrors > Home > MPE Home > Th. List > gch-kn | Structured version Visualization version GIF version | ||
| Description: The equivalence of two versions of the Generalized Continuum Hypothesis. The right-hand side is the standard version in the literature. The left-hand side is a version devised by Kannan Nambiar, which he calls the Axiom of Combinatorial Sets. For the notation and motivation behind this axiom, see his paper, "Derivation of Continuum Hypothesis from Axiom of Combinatorial Sets", available at http://www.e-atheneum.net/science/derivation_ch.pdf. The equivalence of the two sides provides a negative answer to Open Problem 2 in http://www.e-atheneum.net/science/open_problem_print.pdf. The key idea in the proof below is to equate both sides of alephexp2 10647 to the successor aleph using enen2 9121. (Contributed by NM, 1-Oct-2004.) |
| Ref | Expression |
|---|---|
| gch-kn | ⊢ (𝐴 ∈ On → ((ℵ‘suc 𝐴) ≈ {𝑥 ∣ (𝑥 ⊆ (ℵ‘𝐴) ∧ 𝑥 ≈ (ℵ‘𝐴))} ↔ (ℵ‘suc 𝐴) ≈ (2o ↑m (ℵ‘𝐴)))) |
| Step | Hyp | Ref | Expression |
|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | alephexp2 10647 | . . 3 ⊢ (𝐴 ∈ On → (2o ↑m (ℵ‘𝐴)) ≈ {𝑥 ∣ (𝑥 ⊆ (ℵ‘𝐴) ∧ 𝑥 ≈ (ℵ‘𝐴))}) | |
| 2 | enen2 9121 | . . 3 ⊢ ((2o ↑m (ℵ‘𝐴)) ≈ {𝑥 ∣ (𝑥 ⊆ (ℵ‘𝐴) ∧ 𝑥 ≈ (ℵ‘𝐴))} → ((ℵ‘suc 𝐴) ≈ (2o ↑m (ℵ‘𝐴)) ↔ (ℵ‘suc 𝐴) ≈ {𝑥 ∣ (𝑥 ⊆ (ℵ‘𝐴) ∧ 𝑥 ≈ (ℵ‘𝐴))})) | |
| 3 | 1, 2 | syl 18 | . 2 ⊢ (𝐴 ∈ On → ((ℵ‘suc 𝐴) ≈ (2o ↑m (ℵ‘𝐴)) ↔ (ℵ‘suc 𝐴) ≈ {𝑥 ∣ (𝑥 ⊆ (ℵ‘𝐴) ∧ 𝑥 ≈ (ℵ‘𝐴))})) |
| 4 | 3 | bicomd 226 | 1 ⊢ (𝐴 ∈ On → ((ℵ‘suc 𝐴) ≈ {𝑥 ∣ (𝑥 ⊆ (ℵ‘𝐴) ∧ 𝑥 ≈ (ℵ‘𝐴))} ↔ (ℵ‘suc 𝐴) ≈ (2o ↑m (ℵ‘𝐴)))) |
| Colors of variables: wff setvar class |
| This proof depends on syntax axioms: → wi 4 ↔ wb 209 ∧ wa 401 ∈ wcel 2145 {cab 2739 ⊆ wss 3899 class class class wbr 5103 Oncon0 6355 suc csuc 6357 ‘cfv 6531 (class class class)co 7412 2oc2o 8454 ↑m cmap 8831 ≈ cen 8954 ℵcale 9998 |
| This proof depends on axioms: ax-mp 5 ax-1 6 ax-2 7 ax-3 8 ax-gen 1828 ax-4 1842 ax-5 1943 ax-6 2000 ax-7 2041 ax-8 2147 ax-9 2155 ax-10 2178 ax-11 2194 ax-12 2213 ax-ext 2733 ax-rep 5232 ax-sep 5249 ax-nul 5260 ax-pow 5327 ax-pr 5391 ax-un 7740 ax-inf2 9626 ax-ac2 10522 |
| This proof depends on definitions: df-bi 210 df-an 402 df-or 862 df-3or 1104 df-3an 1105 df-tru 1573 df-fal 1583 df-ex 1813 df-nf 1817 df-sb 2100 df-mo 2565 df-eu 2595 df-clab 2740 df-cleq 2753 df-clel 2836 df-nfc 2910 df-ne 2957 df-ral 3078 df-rex 3088 df-rmo 3366 df-reu 3367 df-rab 3414 df-v 3453 df-sbc 3740 df-csb 3848 df-dif 3902 df-un 3904 df-in 3906 df-ss 3916 df-pss 3919 df-nul 4280 df-if 4483 df-pw 4559 df-sn 4585 df-pr 4587 df-op 4591 df-uni 4868 df-int 4908 df-iun 4953 df-br 5104 df-opab 5168 df-mpt 5187 df-tr 5213 df-id 5546 df-eprel 5551 df-po 5559 df-so 5560 df-fr 5604 df-se 5605 df-we 5606 df-xp 5657 df-rel 5658 df-cnv 5659 df-co 5660 df-dm 5661 df-rn 5662 df-res 5663 df-ima 5664 df-pred 6297 df-ord 6358 df-on 6359 df-lim 6360 df-suc 6361 df-iota 6487 df-fun 6533 df-fn 6534 df-f 6535 df-f1 6536 df-fo 6537 df-f1o 6538 df-fv 6539 df-isom 6540 df-riota 7369 df-ov 7415 df-oprab 7416 df-mpo 7417 df-om 7867 df-1st 7990 df-2nd 7991 df-frecs 8283 df-wrecs 8314 df-recs 8363 df-rdg 8402 df-1o 8460 df-2o 8461 df-er 8701 df-map 8833 df-en 8958 df-dom 8959 df-sdom 8960 df-fin 8961 df-oi 9488 df-har 9535 df-card 10001 df-aleph 10002 df-acn 10004 df-ac 10176 |
| This theorem is used by: (None) |
| Copyright terms: Public domain | W3C validator |