Theorem gch-kn 10590

Description: The equivalence of two versions of the Generalized Continuum Hypothesis. The right-hand side is the standard version in the literature. The left-hand side is a version devised by Kannan Nambiar, which he calls the Axiom of Combinatorial Sets. For the notation and motivation behind this axiom, see his paper, "Derivation of Continuum Hypothesis from Axiom of Combinatorial Sets", available at http://www.e-atheneum.net/science/derivation_ch.pdf. The equivalence of the two sides provides a negative answer to Open Problem 2 in http://www.e-atheneum.net/science/open_problem_print.pdf. The key idea in the proof below is to equate both sides of alephexp2 10494 to the successor aleph using enen2 9042. (Contributed by NM, 1-Oct-2004.)

Assertion

Ref	Expression
gch-kn	⊢ (𝐴 ∈ On → ((ℵ‘suc 𝐴) ≈ {𝑥 ∣ (𝑥 ⊆ (ℵ‘𝐴) ∧ 𝑥 ≈ (ℵ‘𝐴))} ↔ (ℵ‘suc 𝐴) ≈ (2o ↑m (ℵ‘𝐴))))

Distinct variable group:   𝑥,𝐴

Proof of Theorem gch-kn

Step	Hyp	Ref	Expression
1		alephexp2 10494	. . 3 ⊢ (𝐴 ∈ On → (2o ↑m (ℵ‘𝐴)) ≈ {𝑥 ∣ (𝑥 ⊆ (ℵ‘𝐴) ∧ 𝑥 ≈ (ℵ‘𝐴))})
2		enen2 9042	. . 3 ⊢ ((2o ↑m (ℵ‘𝐴)) ≈ {𝑥 ∣ (𝑥 ⊆ (ℵ‘𝐴) ∧ 𝑥 ≈ (ℵ‘𝐴))} → ((ℵ‘suc 𝐴) ≈ (2o ↑m (ℵ‘𝐴)) ↔ (ℵ‘suc 𝐴) ≈ {𝑥 ∣ (𝑥 ⊆ (ℵ‘𝐴) ∧ 𝑥 ≈ (ℵ‘𝐴))}))
3	1, 2	syl 17	. 2 ⊢ (𝐴 ∈ On → ((ℵ‘suc 𝐴) ≈ (2o ↑m (ℵ‘𝐴)) ↔ (ℵ‘suc 𝐴) ≈ {𝑥 ∣ (𝑥 ⊆ (ℵ‘𝐴) ∧ 𝑥 ≈ (ℵ‘𝐴))}))
4	3	bicomd 223	1 ⊢ (𝐴 ∈ On → ((ℵ‘suc 𝐴) ≈ {𝑥 ∣ (𝑥 ⊆ (ℵ‘𝐴) ∧ 𝑥 ≈ (ℵ‘𝐴))} ↔ (ℵ‘suc 𝐴) ≈ (2o ↑m (ℵ‘𝐴))))

Syntax hints:   → wi 4   ↔ wb 206   ∧ wa 395   ∈ wcel 2109  {cab 2707   ⊆ wss 3905   class class class wbr 5095  Oncon0 6311  suc csuc 6313  ‘cfv 6486  (class class class)co 7353  2_oc2o 8389   ↑_m cmap 8760   ≈ cen 8876  ℵcale 9851

This theorem was proved from axioms:  ax-mp 5  ax-1 6  ax-2 7  ax-3 8  ax-gen 1795  ax-4 1809  ax-5 1910  ax-6 1967  ax-7 2008  ax-8 2111  ax-9 2119  ax-10 2142  ax-11 2158  ax-12 2178  ax-ext 2701  ax-rep 5221  ax-sep 5238  ax-nul 5248  ax-pow 5307  ax-pr 5374  ax-un 7675  ax-inf2 9556  ax-ac2 10376

This theorem depends on definitions:  df-bi 207  df-an 396  df-or 848  df-3or 1087  df-3an 1088  df-tru 1543  df-fal 1553  df-ex 1780  df-nf 1784  df-sb 2066  df-mo 2533  df-eu 2562  df-clab 2708  df-cleq 2721  df-clel 2803  df-nfc 2878  df-ne 2926  df-ral 3045  df-rex 3054  df-rmo 3345  df-reu 3346  df-rab 3397  df-v 3440  df-sbc 3745  df-csb 3854  df-dif 3908  df-un 3910  df-in 3912  df-ss 3922  df-pss 3925  df-nul 4287  df-if 4479  df-pw 4555  df-sn 4580  df-pr 4582  df-op 4586  df-uni 4862  df-int 4900  df-iun 4946  df-br 5096  df-opab 5158  df-mpt 5177  df-tr 5203  df-id 5518  df-eprel 5523  df-po 5531  df-so 5532  df-fr 5576  df-se 5577  df-we 5578  df-xp 5629  df-rel 5630  df-cnv 5631  df-co 5632  df-dm 5633  df-rn 5634  df-res 5635  df-ima 5636  df-pred 6253  df-ord 6314  df-on 6315  df-lim 6316  df-suc 6317  df-iota 6442  df-fun 6488  df-fn 6489  df-f 6490  df-f1 6491  df-fo 6492  df-f1o 6493  df-fv 6494  df-isom 6495  df-riota 7310  df-ov 7356  df-oprab 7357  df-mpo 7358  df-om 7807  df-1st 7931  df-2nd 7932  df-frecs 8221  df-wrecs 8252  df-recs 8301  df-rdg 8339  df-1o 8395  df-2o 8396  df-er 8632  df-map 8762  df-en 8880  df-dom 8881  df-sdom 8882  df-fin 8883  df-oi 9421  df-har 9468  df-card 9854  df-aleph 9855  df-acn 9857  df-ac 10029

This theorem is referenced by: (None)