Theorem staddi 32905

Description: If the sum of 2 states is 2, then each state is 1. (Contributed by NM, 12-Nov-1999.) (New usage is discouraged.)

Hypotheses

Ref	Expression
stle.1	⊢ 𝐴 ∈ Cℋ
stle.2	⊢ 𝐵 ∈ Cℋ

Assertion

Ref	Expression
staddi	⊢ (𝑆 ∈ States → (((𝑆‘𝐴) + (𝑆‘𝐵)) = 2 → (𝑆‘𝐴) = 1))

Proof of Theorem staddi

Step	Hyp	Ref	Expression
1		stle.1	. . . . . . 7 ⊢ 𝐴 ∈ Cℋ
2		stcl 32875	. . . . . . 7 ⊢ (𝑆 ∈ States → (𝐴 ∈ Cℋ → (𝑆‘𝐴) ∈ ℝ))
3	1, 2	mpi 21	. . . . . 6 ⊢ (𝑆 ∈ States → (𝑆‘𝐴) ∈ ℝ)
4		stle.2	. . . . . . 7 ⊢ 𝐵 ∈ Cℋ
5		stcl 32875	. . . . . . 7 ⊢ (𝑆 ∈ States → (𝐵 ∈ Cℋ → (𝑆‘𝐵) ∈ ℝ))
6	4, 5	mpi 21	. . . . . 6 ⊢ (𝑆 ∈ States → (𝑆‘𝐵) ∈ ℝ)
7	3, 6	readdcld 11377	. . . . 5 ⊢ (𝑆 ∈ States → ((𝑆‘𝐴) + (𝑆‘𝐵)) ∈ ℝ)
8		ltne 11446	. . . . . 6 ⊢ ((((𝑆‘𝐴) + (𝑆‘𝐵)) ∈ ℝ ∧ ((𝑆‘𝐴) + (𝑆‘𝐵)) < 2) → 2 ≠ ((𝑆‘𝐴) + (𝑆‘𝐵)))
9	8	necomd 3014	. . . . 5 ⊢ ((((𝑆‘𝐴) + (𝑆‘𝐵)) ∈ ℝ ∧ ((𝑆‘𝐴) + (𝑆‘𝐵)) < 2) → ((𝑆‘𝐴) + (𝑆‘𝐵)) ≠ 2)
10	7, 9	sylan 592	. . . 4 ⊢ ((𝑆 ∈ States ∧ ((𝑆‘𝐴) + (𝑆‘𝐵)) < 2) → ((𝑆‘𝐴) + (𝑆‘𝐵)) ≠ 2)
11	10	ex 418	. . 3 ⊢ (𝑆 ∈ States → (((𝑆‘𝐴) + (𝑆‘𝐵)) < 2 → ((𝑆‘𝐴) + (𝑆‘𝐵)) ≠ 2))
12	11	necon2bd 2975	. 2 ⊢ (𝑆 ∈ States → (((𝑆‘𝐴) + (𝑆‘𝐵)) = 2 → ¬ ((𝑆‘𝐴) + (𝑆‘𝐵)) < 2))
13		1re 11347	. . . . . . . . 9 ⊢ 1 ∈ ℝ
14	13	a1i 11	. . . . . . . 8 ⊢ (𝑆 ∈ States → 1 ∈ ℝ)
15		stle1 32884	. . . . . . . . 9 ⊢ (𝑆 ∈ States → (𝐵 ∈ Cℋ → (𝑆‘𝐵) ≤ 1))
16	4, 15	mpi 21	. . . . . . . 8 ⊢ (𝑆 ∈ States → (𝑆‘𝐵) ≤ 1)
17	6, 14, 3, 16	leadd2dd 11971	. . . . . . 7 ⊢ (𝑆 ∈ States → ((𝑆‘𝐴) + (𝑆‘𝐵)) ≤ ((𝑆‘𝐴) + 1))
18	17	adantr 486	. . . . . 6 ⊢ ((𝑆 ∈ States ∧ (𝑆‘𝐴) < 1) → ((𝑆‘𝐴) + (𝑆‘𝐵)) ≤ ((𝑆‘𝐴) + 1))
19		ltadd1 11823	. . . . . . . . 9 ⊢ (((𝑆‘𝐴) ∈ ℝ ∧ 1 ∈ ℝ ∧ 1 ∈ ℝ) → ((𝑆‘𝐴) < 1 ↔ ((𝑆‘𝐴) + 1) < (1 + 1)))
20	19	biimpd 232	. . . . . . . 8 ⊢ (((𝑆‘𝐴) ∈ ℝ ∧ 1 ∈ ℝ ∧ 1 ∈ ℝ) → ((𝑆‘𝐴) < 1 → ((𝑆‘𝐴) + 1) < (1 + 1)))
21	3, 14, 14, 20	syl3anc 1399	. . . . . . 7 ⊢ (𝑆 ∈ States → ((𝑆‘𝐴) < 1 → ((𝑆‘𝐴) + 1) < (1 + 1)))
22	21	imp 412	. . . . . 6 ⊢ ((𝑆 ∈ States ∧ (𝑆‘𝐴) < 1) → ((𝑆‘𝐴) + 1) < (1 + 1))
23		readdcl 11322	. . . . . . . . 9 ⊢ (((𝑆‘𝐴) ∈ ℝ ∧ 1 ∈ ℝ) → ((𝑆‘𝐴) + 1) ∈ ℝ)
24	3, 13, 23	sylancl 598	. . . . . . . 8 ⊢ (𝑆 ∈ States → ((𝑆‘𝐴) + 1) ∈ ℝ)
25	13, 13	readdcli 11363	. . . . . . . . 9 ⊢ (1 + 1) ∈ ℝ
26	25	a1i 11	. . . . . . . 8 ⊢ (𝑆 ∈ States → (1 + 1) ∈ ℝ)
27		lelttr 11439	. . . . . . . 8 ⊢ ((((𝑆‘𝐴) + (𝑆‘𝐵)) ∈ ℝ ∧ ((𝑆‘𝐴) + 1) ∈ ℝ ∧ (1 + 1) ∈ ℝ) → ((((𝑆‘𝐴) + (𝑆‘𝐵)) ≤ ((𝑆‘𝐴) + 1) ∧ ((𝑆‘𝐴) + 1) < (1 + 1)) → ((𝑆‘𝐴) + (𝑆‘𝐵)) < (1 + 1)))
28	7, 24, 26, 27	syl3anc 1399	. . . . . . 7 ⊢ (𝑆 ∈ States → ((((𝑆‘𝐴) + (𝑆‘𝐵)) ≤ ((𝑆‘𝐴) + 1) ∧ ((𝑆‘𝐴) + 1) < (1 + 1)) → ((𝑆‘𝐴) + (𝑆‘𝐵)) < (1 + 1)))
29	28	adantr 486	. . . . . 6 ⊢ ((𝑆 ∈ States ∧ (𝑆‘𝐴) < 1) → ((((𝑆‘𝐴) + (𝑆‘𝐵)) ≤ ((𝑆‘𝐴) + 1) ∧ ((𝑆‘𝐴) + 1) < (1 + 1)) → ((𝑆‘𝐴) + (𝑆‘𝐵)) < (1 + 1)))
30	18, 22, 29	mp2and 712	. . . . 5 ⊢ ((𝑆 ∈ States ∧ (𝑆‘𝐴) < 1) → ((𝑆‘𝐴) + (𝑆‘𝐵)) < (1 + 1))
31		df-2 12445	. . . . 5 ⊢ 2 = (1 + 1)
32	30, 31	breqtrrdi 5153	. . . 4 ⊢ ((𝑆 ∈ States ∧ (𝑆‘𝐴) < 1) → ((𝑆‘𝐴) + (𝑆‘𝐵)) < 2)
33	32	ex 418	. . 3 ⊢ (𝑆 ∈ States → ((𝑆‘𝐴) < 1 → ((𝑆‘𝐴) + (𝑆‘𝐵)) < 2))
34	33	con3d 153	. 2 ⊢ (𝑆 ∈ States → (¬ ((𝑆‘𝐴) + (𝑆‘𝐵)) < 2 → ¬ (𝑆‘𝐴) < 1))
35		stle1 32884	. . . . 5 ⊢ (𝑆 ∈ States → (𝐴 ∈ Cℋ → (𝑆‘𝐴) ≤ 1))
36	1, 35	mpi 21	. . . 4 ⊢ (𝑆 ∈ States → (𝑆‘𝐴) ≤ 1)
37		leloe 11435	. . . . 5 ⊢ (((𝑆‘𝐴) ∈ ℝ ∧ 1 ∈ ℝ) → ((𝑆‘𝐴) ≤ 1 ↔ ((𝑆‘𝐴) < 1 ∨ (𝑆‘𝐴) = 1)))
38	3, 13, 37	sylancl 598	. . . 4 ⊢ (𝑆 ∈ States → ((𝑆‘𝐴) ≤ 1 ↔ ((𝑆‘𝐴) < 1 ∨ (𝑆‘𝐴) = 1)))
39	36, 38	mpbid 235	. . 3 ⊢ (𝑆 ∈ States → ((𝑆‘𝐴) < 1 ∨ (𝑆‘𝐴) = 1))
40	39	ord 878	. 2 ⊢ (𝑆 ∈ States → (¬ (𝑆‘𝐴) < 1 → (𝑆‘𝐴) = 1))
41	12, 34, 40	3syld 61	1 ⊢ (𝑆 ∈ States → (((𝑆‘𝐴) + (𝑆‘𝐵)) = 2 → (𝑆‘𝐴) = 1))

This proof depends on syntax axioms:  ¬ wn 3   → wi 4   ↔ wb 209   ∧ wa 401   ∨ wo 861   ∧ w3a 1103   = wceq 1570   ∈ wcel 2147   ≠ wne 2959   class class class wbr 5108  ‘cfv 6566  (class class class)co 7451  ℝcr 11238  1c1 11240   + caddc 11242   < clt 11382   ≤ cle 11383  2c2 12437   C_ℋ cch 31588  Statescst 31621

This proof depends on axioms:  ax-mp 5  ax-1 6  ax-2 7  ax-3 8  ax-gen 1828  ax-4 1842  ax-5 1945  ax-6 2002  ax-7 2043  ax-8 2149  ax-9 2157  ax-10 2180  ax-11 2197  ax-12 2216  ax-ext 2735  ax-sep 5255  ax-nul 5266  ax-pow 5334  ax-pr 5398  ax-un 7783  ax-cnex 11295  ax-resscn 11296  ax-1cn 11297  ax-icn 11298  ax-addcl 11299  ax-addrcl 11300  ax-mulcl 11301  ax-mulrcl 11302  ax-mulcom 11303  ax-addass 11304  ax-mulass 11305  ax-distr 11306  ax-i2m1 11307  ax-1ne0 11308  ax-1rid 11309  ax-rnegex 11310  ax-rrecex 11311  ax-cnre 11312  ax-pre-lttri 11313  ax-pre-lttrn 11314  ax-pre-ltadd 11315  ax-hilex 31658

This proof depends on definitions:  df-bi 210  df-an 402  df-or 862  df-3or 1104  df-3an 1105  df-tru 1573  df-fal 1583  df-ex 1813  df-nf 1817  df-sb 2102  df-mo 2567  df-eu 2597  df-clab 2742  df-cleq 2755  df-clel 2839  df-nfc 2913  df-ne 2960  df-nel 3066  df-ral 3081  df-rex 3091  df-rab 3417  df-v 3456  df-sbc 3743  df-csb 3852  df-ss 3901  df-dif 4050  df-in 4094  df-un 4154  df-nul 4282  df-if 4486  df-pw 4562  df-sn 4589  df-pr 4591  df-op 4841  df-uni 4873  df-br 5109  df-opab 5174  df-mpt 5193  df-id 5553  df-po 5566  df-so 5567  df-xp 5664  df-rel 5665  df-cnv 5666  df-co 5667  df-dm 5668  df-rn 5669  df-res 5670  df-ima 5671  df-iota 6520  df-fun 6568  df-fn 6569  df-f 6570  df-f1 6571  df-fo 6572  df-f1o 6573  df-fv 6574  df-ov 7454  df-oprab 7455  df-mpo 7456  df-er 8755  df-map 8887  df-en 9012  df-dom 9013  df-sdom 9014  df-pnf 11384  df-mnf 11385  df-xr 11386  df-ltxr 11387  df-le 11388  df-2 12445  df-icc 13523  df-sh 31866  df-ch 31880  df-st 32870

This theorem is used by: (None)