Theorem staddi 32669

Description: If the sum of 2 states is 2, then each state is 1. (Contributed by NM, 12-Nov-1999.) (New usage is discouraged.)

Hypotheses

Ref	Expression
stle.1	⊢ 𝐴 ∈ Cℋ
stle.2	⊢ 𝐵 ∈ Cℋ

Assertion

Ref	Expression
staddi	⊢ (𝑆 ∈ States → (((𝑆‘𝐴) + (𝑆‘𝐵)) = 2 → (𝑆‘𝐴) = 1))

Proof of Theorem staddi

Step	Hyp	Ref	Expression
1		stle.1	. . . . . . 7 ⊢ 𝐴 ∈ Cℋ
2		stcl 32639	. . . . . . 7 ⊢ (𝑆 ∈ States → (𝐴 ∈ Cℋ → (𝑆‘𝐴) ∈ ℝ))
3	1, 2	mpi 21	. . . . . 6 ⊢ (𝑆 ∈ States → (𝑆‘𝐴) ∈ ℝ)
4		stle.2	. . . . . . 7 ⊢ 𝐵 ∈ Cℋ
5		stcl 32639	. . . . . . 7 ⊢ (𝑆 ∈ States → (𝐵 ∈ Cℋ → (𝑆‘𝐵) ∈ ℝ))
6	4, 5	mpi 21	. . . . . 6 ⊢ (𝑆 ∈ States → (𝑆‘𝐵) ∈ ℝ)
7	3, 6	readdcld 11253	. . . . 5 ⊢ (𝑆 ∈ States → ((𝑆‘𝐴) + (𝑆‘𝐵)) ∈ ℝ)
8		ltne 11322	. . . . . 6 ⊢ ((((𝑆‘𝐴) + (𝑆‘𝐵)) ∈ ℝ ∧ ((𝑆‘𝐴) + (𝑆‘𝐵)) < 2) → 2 ≠ ((𝑆‘𝐴) + (𝑆‘𝐵)))
9	8	necomd 3015	. . . . 5 ⊢ ((((𝑆‘𝐴) + (𝑆‘𝐵)) ∈ ℝ ∧ ((𝑆‘𝐴) + (𝑆‘𝐵)) < 2) → ((𝑆‘𝐴) + (𝑆‘𝐵)) ≠ 2)
10	7, 9	sylan 592	. . . 4 ⊢ ((𝑆 ∈ States ∧ ((𝑆‘𝐴) + (𝑆‘𝐵)) < 2) → ((𝑆‘𝐴) + (𝑆‘𝐵)) ≠ 2)
11	10	ex 418	. . 3 ⊢ (𝑆 ∈ States → (((𝑆‘𝐴) + (𝑆‘𝐵)) < 2 → ((𝑆‘𝐴) + (𝑆‘𝐵)) ≠ 2))
12	11	necon2bd 2976	. 2 ⊢ (𝑆 ∈ States → (((𝑆‘𝐴) + (𝑆‘𝐵)) = 2 → ¬ ((𝑆‘𝐴) + (𝑆‘𝐵)) < 2))
13		1re 11223	. . . . . . . . 9 ⊢ 1 ∈ ℝ
14	13	a1i 11	. . . . . . . 8 ⊢ (𝑆 ∈ States → 1 ∈ ℝ)
15		stle1 32648	. . . . . . . . 9 ⊢ (𝑆 ∈ States → (𝐵 ∈ Cℋ → (𝑆‘𝐵) ≤ 1))
16	4, 15	mpi 21	. . . . . . . 8 ⊢ (𝑆 ∈ States → (𝑆‘𝐵) ≤ 1)
17	6, 14, 3, 16	leadd2dd 11844	. . . . . . 7 ⊢ (𝑆 ∈ States → ((𝑆‘𝐴) + (𝑆‘𝐵)) ≤ ((𝑆‘𝐴) + 1))
18	17	adantr 486	. . . . . 6 ⊢ ((𝑆 ∈ States ∧ (𝑆‘𝐴) < 1) → ((𝑆‘𝐴) + (𝑆‘𝐵)) ≤ ((𝑆‘𝐴) + 1))
19		ltadd1 11696	. . . . . . . . 9 ⊢ (((𝑆‘𝐴) ∈ ℝ ∧ 1 ∈ ℝ ∧ 1 ∈ ℝ) → ((𝑆‘𝐴) < 1 ↔ ((𝑆‘𝐴) + 1) < (1 + 1)))
20	19	biimpd 232	. . . . . . . 8 ⊢ (((𝑆‘𝐴) ∈ ℝ ∧ 1 ∈ ℝ ∧ 1 ∈ ℝ) → ((𝑆‘𝐴) < 1 → ((𝑆‘𝐴) + 1) < (1 + 1)))
21	3, 14, 14, 20	syl3anc 1398	. . . . . . 7 ⊢ (𝑆 ∈ States → ((𝑆‘𝐴) < 1 → ((𝑆‘𝐴) + 1) < (1 + 1)))
22	21	imp 412	. . . . . 6 ⊢ ((𝑆 ∈ States ∧ (𝑆‘𝐴) < 1) → ((𝑆‘𝐴) + 1) < (1 + 1))
23		readdcl 11198	. . . . . . . . 9 ⊢ (((𝑆‘𝐴) ∈ ℝ ∧ 1 ∈ ℝ) → ((𝑆‘𝐴) + 1) ∈ ℝ)
24	3, 13, 23	sylancl 598	. . . . . . . 8 ⊢ (𝑆 ∈ States → ((𝑆‘𝐴) + 1) ∈ ℝ)
25	13, 13	readdcli 11239	. . . . . . . . 9 ⊢ (1 + 1) ∈ ℝ
26	25	a1i 11	. . . . . . . 8 ⊢ (𝑆 ∈ States → (1 + 1) ∈ ℝ)
27		lelttr 11315	. . . . . . . 8 ⊢ ((((𝑆‘𝐴) + (𝑆‘𝐵)) ∈ ℝ ∧ ((𝑆‘𝐴) + 1) ∈ ℝ ∧ (1 + 1) ∈ ℝ) → ((((𝑆‘𝐴) + (𝑆‘𝐵)) ≤ ((𝑆‘𝐴) + 1) ∧ ((𝑆‘𝐴) + 1) < (1 + 1)) → ((𝑆‘𝐴) + (𝑆‘𝐵)) < (1 + 1)))
28	7, 24, 26, 27	syl3anc 1398	. . . . . . 7 ⊢ (𝑆 ∈ States → ((((𝑆‘𝐴) + (𝑆‘𝐵)) ≤ ((𝑆‘𝐴) + 1) ∧ ((𝑆‘𝐴) + 1) < (1 + 1)) → ((𝑆‘𝐴) + (𝑆‘𝐵)) < (1 + 1)))
29	28	adantr 486	. . . . . 6 ⊢ ((𝑆 ∈ States ∧ (𝑆‘𝐴) < 1) → ((((𝑆‘𝐴) + (𝑆‘𝐵)) ≤ ((𝑆‘𝐴) + 1) ∧ ((𝑆‘𝐴) + 1) < (1 + 1)) → ((𝑆‘𝐴) + (𝑆‘𝐵)) < (1 + 1)))
30	18, 22, 29	mp2and 712	. . . . 5 ⊢ ((𝑆 ∈ States ∧ (𝑆‘𝐴) < 1) → ((𝑆‘𝐴) + (𝑆‘𝐵)) < (1 + 1))
31		df-2 12318	. . . . 5 ⊢ 2 = (1 + 1)
32	30, 31	breqtrrdi 5155	. . . 4 ⊢ ((𝑆 ∈ States ∧ (𝑆‘𝐴) < 1) → ((𝑆‘𝐴) + (𝑆‘𝐵)) < 2)
33	32	ex 418	. . 3 ⊢ (𝑆 ∈ States → ((𝑆‘𝐴) < 1 → ((𝑆‘𝐴) + (𝑆‘𝐵)) < 2))
34	33	con3d 153	. 2 ⊢ (𝑆 ∈ States → (¬ ((𝑆‘𝐴) + (𝑆‘𝐵)) < 2 → ¬ (𝑆‘𝐴) < 1))
35		stle1 32648	. . . . 5 ⊢ (𝑆 ∈ States → (𝐴 ∈ Cℋ → (𝑆‘𝐴) ≤ 1))
36	1, 35	mpi 21	. . . 4 ⊢ (𝑆 ∈ States → (𝑆‘𝐴) ≤ 1)
37		leloe 11311	. . . . 5 ⊢ (((𝑆‘𝐴) ∈ ℝ ∧ 1 ∈ ℝ) → ((𝑆‘𝐴) ≤ 1 ↔ ((𝑆‘𝐴) < 1 ∨ (𝑆‘𝐴) = 1)))
38	3, 13, 37	sylancl 598	. . . 4 ⊢ (𝑆 ∈ States → ((𝑆‘𝐴) ≤ 1 ↔ ((𝑆‘𝐴) < 1 ∨ (𝑆‘𝐴) = 1)))
39	36, 38	mpbid 235	. . 3 ⊢ (𝑆 ∈ States → ((𝑆‘𝐴) < 1 ∨ (𝑆‘𝐴) = 1))
40	39	ord 878	. 2 ⊢ (𝑆 ∈ States → (¬ (𝑆‘𝐴) < 1 → (𝑆‘𝐴) = 1))
41	12, 34, 40	3syld 61	1 ⊢ (𝑆 ∈ States → (((𝑆‘𝐴) + (𝑆‘𝐵)) = 2 → (𝑆‘𝐴) = 1))

This proof depends on syntax axioms:  ¬ wn 3   → wi 4   ↔ wb 209   ∧ wa 401   ∨ wo 861   ∧ w3a 1103   = wceq 1570   ∈ wcel 2146   ≠ wne 2960   class class class wbr 5111  ‘cfv 6540  (class class class)co 7419  ℝcr 11114  1c1 11116   + caddc 11118   < clt 11258   ≤ cle 11259  2c2 12310   C_ℋ cch 31352  Statescst 31385

This proof depends on axioms:  ax-mp 5  ax-1 6  ax-2 7  ax-3 8  ax-gen 1828  ax-4 1842  ax-5 1943  ax-6 2000  ax-7 2041  ax-8 2148  ax-9 2156  ax-10 2179  ax-11 2195  ax-12 2216  ax-ext 2737  ax-sep 5259  ax-nul 5271  ax-pow 5338  ax-pr 5406  ax-un 7742  ax-cnex 11171  ax-resscn 11172  ax-1cn 11173  ax-icn 11174  ax-addcl 11175  ax-addrcl 11176  ax-mulcl 11177  ax-mulrcl 11178  ax-mulcom 11179  ax-addass 11180  ax-mulass 11181  ax-distr 11182  ax-i2m1 11183  ax-1ne0 11184  ax-1rid 11185  ax-rnegex 11186  ax-rrecex 11187  ax-cnre 11188  ax-pre-lttri 11189  ax-pre-lttrn 11190  ax-pre-ltadd 11191  ax-hilex 31422

This proof depends on definitions:  df-bi 210  df-an 402  df-or 862  df-3or 1104  df-3an 1105  df-tru 1573  df-fal 1583  df-ex 1813  df-nf 1817  df-sb 2100  df-mo 2569  df-eu 2599  df-clab 2744  df-cleq 2757  df-clel 2840  df-nfc 2914  df-ne 2961  df-nel 3067  df-ral 3082  df-rex 3092  df-rab 3419  df-v 3459  df-sbc 3747  df-csb 3855  df-dif 3909  df-un 3911  df-in 3913  df-ss 3923  df-nul 4287  df-if 4490  df-pw 4566  df-sn 4592  df-pr 4594  df-op 4598  df-uni 4875  df-br 5112  df-opab 5176  df-mpt 5195  df-id 5558  df-po 5571  df-so 5572  df-xp 5669  df-rel 5670  df-cnv 5671  df-co 5672  df-dm 5673  df-rn 5674  df-res 5675  df-ima 5676  df-iota 6496  df-fun 6542  df-fn 6543  df-f 6544  df-f1 6545  df-fo 6546  df-f1o 6547  df-fv 6548  df-ov 7422  df-oprab 7423  df-mpo 7424  df-er 8700  df-map 8832  df-en 8950  df-dom 8951  df-sdom 8952  df-pnf 11260  df-mnf 11261  df-xr 11262  df-ltxr 11263  df-le 11264  df-2 12318  df-icc 13395  df-sh 31630  df-ch 31644  df-st 32634

This theorem is used by: (None)