![]() |
Metamath
Proof Explorer Theorem List (p. 316 of 486) | < Previous Next > |
Bad symbols? Try the
GIF version. |
||
Mirrors > Metamath Home Page > MPE Home Page > Theorem List Contents > Recent Proofs This page: Page List |
Color key: | ![]() (1-30851) |
![]() (30852-32374) |
![]() (32375-48553) |
Type | Label | Description |
---|---|---|
Statement | ||
Theorem | spansncol 31501 | The singletons of collinear vectors have the same span. (Contributed by NM, 6-Jun-2004.) (New usage is discouraged.) |
⊢ ((𝐴 ∈ ℋ ∧ 𝐵 ∈ ℂ ∧ 𝐵 ≠ 0) → (span‘{(𝐵 ·ℎ 𝐴)}) = (span‘{𝐴})) | ||
Theorem | spansneleqi 31502 | Membership relation implied by equality of spans. (Contributed by NM, 6-Jun-2004.) (New usage is discouraged.) |
⊢ (𝐴 ∈ ℋ → ((span‘{𝐴}) = (span‘{𝐵}) → 𝐴 ∈ (span‘{𝐵}))) | ||
Theorem | spansneleq 31503 | Membership relation that implies equality of spans. (Contributed by NM, 6-Jun-2004.) (New usage is discouraged.) |
⊢ ((𝐵 ∈ ℋ ∧ 𝐴 ≠ 0ℎ) → (𝐴 ∈ (span‘{𝐵}) → (span‘{𝐴}) = (span‘{𝐵}))) | ||
Theorem | spansnss 31504 | The span of the singleton of an element of a subspace is included in the subspace. (Contributed by NM, 5-Jun-2004.) (New usage is discouraged.) |
⊢ ((𝐴 ∈ Sℋ ∧ 𝐵 ∈ 𝐴) → (span‘{𝐵}) ⊆ 𝐴) | ||
Theorem | elspansn3 31505 | A member of the span of the singleton of a vector is a member of a subspace containing the vector. (Contributed by NM, 16-Dec-2004.) (New usage is discouraged.) |
⊢ ((𝐴 ∈ Sℋ ∧ 𝐵 ∈ 𝐴 ∧ 𝐶 ∈ (span‘{𝐵})) → 𝐶 ∈ 𝐴) | ||
Theorem | elspansn4 31506 | A span membership condition implying two vectors belong to the same subspace. (Contributed by NM, 17-Dec-2004.) (New usage is discouraged.) |
⊢ (((𝐴 ∈ Sℋ ∧ 𝐵 ∈ ℋ) ∧ (𝐶 ∈ (span‘{𝐵}) ∧ 𝐶 ≠ 0ℎ)) → (𝐵 ∈ 𝐴 ↔ 𝐶 ∈ 𝐴)) | ||
Theorem | elspansn5 31507 | A vector belonging to both a subspace and the span of the singleton of a vector not in it must be zero. (Contributed by NM, 17-Dec-2004.) (New usage is discouraged.) |
⊢ (𝐴 ∈ Sℋ → (((𝐵 ∈ ℋ ∧ ¬ 𝐵 ∈ 𝐴) ∧ (𝐶 ∈ (span‘{𝐵}) ∧ 𝐶 ∈ 𝐴)) → 𝐶 = 0ℎ)) | ||
Theorem | spansnss2 31508 | The span of the singleton of an element of a subspace is included in the subspace. (Contributed by NM, 16-Dec-2004.) (New usage is discouraged.) |
⊢ ((𝐴 ∈ Sℋ ∧ 𝐵 ∈ ℋ) → (𝐵 ∈ 𝐴 ↔ (span‘{𝐵}) ⊆ 𝐴)) | ||
Theorem | normcan 31509 | Cancellation-type law that "extracts" a vector 𝐴 from its inner product with a proportional vector 𝐵. (Contributed by NM, 18-Mar-2006.) (New usage is discouraged.) |
⊢ ((𝐵 ∈ ℋ ∧ 𝐵 ≠ 0ℎ ∧ 𝐴 ∈ (span‘{𝐵})) → (((𝐴 ·ih 𝐵) / ((normℎ‘𝐵)↑2)) ·ℎ 𝐵) = 𝐴) | ||
Theorem | pjspansn 31510 | A projection on the span of a singleton. (The proof ws shortened by Mario Carneiro, 15-Dec-2013.) (Contributed by NM, 28-May-2006.) (Revised by Mario Carneiro, 15-Dec-2013.) (New usage is discouraged.) |
⊢ ((𝐴 ∈ ℋ ∧ 𝐵 ∈ ℋ ∧ 𝐴 ≠ 0ℎ) → ((projℎ‘(span‘{𝐴}))‘𝐵) = (((𝐵 ·ih 𝐴) / ((normℎ‘𝐴)↑2)) ·ℎ 𝐴)) | ||
Theorem | spansnpji 31511 | A subset of Hilbert space is orthogonal to the span of the singleton of a projection onto its orthocomplement. (Contributed by NM, 4-Jun-2004.) (Revised by Mario Carneiro, 15-May-2014.) (New usage is discouraged.) |
⊢ 𝐴 ⊆ ℋ & ⊢ 𝐵 ∈ ℋ ⇒ ⊢ 𝐴 ⊆ (⊥‘(span‘{((projℎ‘(⊥‘𝐴))‘𝐵)})) | ||
Theorem | spanunsni 31512 | The span of the union of a closed subspace with a singleton equals the span of its union with an orthogonal singleton. (Contributed by NM, 3-Jun-2004.) (New usage is discouraged.) |
⊢ 𝐴 ∈ Cℋ & ⊢ 𝐵 ∈ ℋ ⇒ ⊢ (span‘(𝐴 ∪ {𝐵})) = (span‘(𝐴 ∪ {((projℎ‘(⊥‘𝐴))‘𝐵)})) | ||
Theorem | spanpr 31513 | The span of a pair of vectors. (Contributed by NM, 9-Jun-2006.) (New usage is discouraged.) |
⊢ ((𝐴 ∈ ℋ ∧ 𝐵 ∈ ℋ) → (span‘{(𝐴 +ℎ 𝐵)}) ⊆ (span‘{𝐴, 𝐵})) | ||
Theorem | h1datomi 31514 | A 1-dimensional subspace is an atom. (Contributed by NM, 20-Jul-2001.) (New usage is discouraged.) |
⊢ 𝐴 ∈ Cℋ & ⊢ 𝐵 ∈ ℋ ⇒ ⊢ (𝐴 ⊆ (⊥‘(⊥‘{𝐵})) → (𝐴 = (⊥‘(⊥‘{𝐵})) ∨ 𝐴 = 0ℋ)) | ||
Theorem | h1datom 31515 | A 1-dimensional subspace is an atom. (Contributed by NM, 22-Jul-2001.) (New usage is discouraged.) |
⊢ ((𝐴 ∈ Cℋ ∧ 𝐵 ∈ ℋ) → (𝐴 ⊆ (⊥‘(⊥‘{𝐵})) → (𝐴 = (⊥‘(⊥‘{𝐵})) ∨ 𝐴 = 0ℋ))) | ||
Definition | df-cm 31516* | Define the commutes relation (on the Hilbert lattice). Definition of commutes in [Kalmbach] p. 20, who uses the notation xCy for "x commutes with y." See cmbri 31523 for membership relation. (Contributed by NM, 14-Jun-2004.) (New usage is discouraged.) |
⊢ 𝐶ℋ = {〈𝑥, 𝑦〉 ∣ ((𝑥 ∈ Cℋ ∧ 𝑦 ∈ Cℋ ) ∧ 𝑥 = ((𝑥 ∩ 𝑦) ∨ℋ (𝑥 ∩ (⊥‘𝑦))))} | ||
Theorem | cmbr 31517 | Binary relation expressing 𝐴 commutes with 𝐵. Definition of commutes in [Kalmbach] p. 20. (Contributed by NM, 14-Jun-2004.) (New usage is discouraged.) |
⊢ ((𝐴 ∈ Cℋ ∧ 𝐵 ∈ Cℋ ) → (𝐴 𝐶ℋ 𝐵 ↔ 𝐴 = ((𝐴 ∩ 𝐵) ∨ℋ (𝐴 ∩ (⊥‘𝐵))))) | ||
Theorem | pjoml2i 31518 | Variation of orthomodular law. Definition in [Kalmbach] p. 22. (Contributed by NM, 31-Oct-2000.) (New usage is discouraged.) |
⊢ 𝐴 ∈ Cℋ & ⊢ 𝐵 ∈ Cℋ ⇒ ⊢ (𝐴 ⊆ 𝐵 → (𝐴 ∨ℋ ((⊥‘𝐴) ∩ 𝐵)) = 𝐵) | ||
Theorem | pjoml3i 31519 | Variation of orthomodular law. (Contributed by NM, 24-Jun-2004.) (New usage is discouraged.) |
⊢ 𝐴 ∈ Cℋ & ⊢ 𝐵 ∈ Cℋ ⇒ ⊢ (𝐵 ⊆ 𝐴 → (𝐴 ∩ ((⊥‘𝐴) ∨ℋ 𝐵)) = 𝐵) | ||
Theorem | pjoml4i 31520 | Variation of orthomodular law. (Contributed by NM, 6-Dec-2000.) (New usage is discouraged.) |
⊢ 𝐴 ∈ Cℋ & ⊢ 𝐵 ∈ Cℋ ⇒ ⊢ (𝐴 ∨ℋ (𝐵 ∩ ((⊥‘𝐴) ∨ℋ (⊥‘𝐵)))) = (𝐴 ∨ℋ 𝐵) | ||
Theorem | pjoml5i 31521 | The orthomodular law. Remark in [Kalmbach] p. 22. (Contributed by NM, 12-Jun-2006.) (New usage is discouraged.) |
⊢ 𝐴 ∈ Cℋ & ⊢ 𝐵 ∈ Cℋ ⇒ ⊢ (𝐴 ∨ℋ ((⊥‘𝐴) ∩ (𝐴 ∨ℋ 𝐵))) = (𝐴 ∨ℋ 𝐵) | ||
Theorem | pjoml6i 31522* | An equivalent of the orthomodular law. Theorem 29.13(e) of [MaedaMaeda] p. 132. (Contributed by NM, 30-May-2004.) (New usage is discouraged.) |
⊢ 𝐴 ∈ Cℋ & ⊢ 𝐵 ∈ Cℋ ⇒ ⊢ (𝐴 ⊆ 𝐵 → ∃𝑥 ∈ Cℋ (𝐴 ⊆ (⊥‘𝑥) ∧ (𝐴 ∨ℋ 𝑥) = 𝐵)) | ||
Theorem | cmbri 31523 | Binary relation expressing the commutes relation. Definition of commutes in [Kalmbach] p. 20. (Contributed by NM, 6-Aug-2004.) (New usage is discouraged.) |
⊢ 𝐴 ∈ Cℋ & ⊢ 𝐵 ∈ Cℋ ⇒ ⊢ (𝐴 𝐶ℋ 𝐵 ↔ 𝐴 = ((𝐴 ∩ 𝐵) ∨ℋ (𝐴 ∩ (⊥‘𝐵)))) | ||
Theorem | cmcmlem 31524 | Commutation is symmetric. Theorem 3.4 of [Beran] p. 45. (Contributed by NM, 3-Nov-2000.) (New usage is discouraged.) |
⊢ 𝐴 ∈ Cℋ & ⊢ 𝐵 ∈ Cℋ ⇒ ⊢ (𝐴 𝐶ℋ 𝐵 → 𝐵 𝐶ℋ 𝐴) | ||
Theorem | cmcmi 31525 | Commutation is symmetric. Theorem 2(v) of [Kalmbach] p. 22. (Contributed by NM, 4-Nov-2000.) (New usage is discouraged.) |
⊢ 𝐴 ∈ Cℋ & ⊢ 𝐵 ∈ Cℋ ⇒ ⊢ (𝐴 𝐶ℋ 𝐵 ↔ 𝐵 𝐶ℋ 𝐴) | ||
Theorem | cmcm2i 31526 | Commutation with orthocomplement. Theorem 2.3(i) of [Beran] p. 39. (Contributed by NM, 4-Nov-2000.) (New usage is discouraged.) |
⊢ 𝐴 ∈ Cℋ & ⊢ 𝐵 ∈ Cℋ ⇒ ⊢ (𝐴 𝐶ℋ 𝐵 ↔ 𝐴 𝐶ℋ (⊥‘𝐵)) | ||
Theorem | cmcm3i 31527 | Commutation with orthocomplement. Remark in [Kalmbach] p. 23. (Contributed by NM, 4-Nov-2000.) (New usage is discouraged.) |
⊢ 𝐴 ∈ Cℋ & ⊢ 𝐵 ∈ Cℋ ⇒ ⊢ (𝐴 𝐶ℋ 𝐵 ↔ (⊥‘𝐴) 𝐶ℋ 𝐵) | ||
Theorem | cmcm4i 31528 | Commutation with orthocomplement. Remark in [Kalmbach] p. 23. (Contributed by NM, 7-Aug-2004.) (New usage is discouraged.) |
⊢ 𝐴 ∈ Cℋ & ⊢ 𝐵 ∈ Cℋ ⇒ ⊢ (𝐴 𝐶ℋ 𝐵 ↔ (⊥‘𝐴) 𝐶ℋ (⊥‘𝐵)) | ||
Theorem | cmbr2i 31529 | Alternate definition of the commutes relation. Remark in [Kalmbach] p. 23. (Contributed by NM, 7-Aug-2004.) (New usage is discouraged.) |
⊢ 𝐴 ∈ Cℋ & ⊢ 𝐵 ∈ Cℋ ⇒ ⊢ (𝐴 𝐶ℋ 𝐵 ↔ 𝐴 = ((𝐴 ∨ℋ 𝐵) ∩ (𝐴 ∨ℋ (⊥‘𝐵)))) | ||
Theorem | cmcmii 31530 | Commutation is symmetric. Theorem 2(v) of [Kalmbach] p. 22. (Contributed by NM, 7-Aug-2004.) (New usage is discouraged.) |
⊢ 𝐴 ∈ Cℋ & ⊢ 𝐵 ∈ Cℋ & ⊢ 𝐴 𝐶ℋ 𝐵 ⇒ ⊢ 𝐵 𝐶ℋ 𝐴 | ||
Theorem | cmcm2ii 31531 | Commutation with orthocomplement. Theorem 2.3(i) of [Beran] p. 39. (Contributed by NM, 7-Aug-2004.) (New usage is discouraged.) |
⊢ 𝐴 ∈ Cℋ & ⊢ 𝐵 ∈ Cℋ & ⊢ 𝐴 𝐶ℋ 𝐵 ⇒ ⊢ 𝐴 𝐶ℋ (⊥‘𝐵) | ||
Theorem | cmcm3ii 31532 | Commutation with orthocomplement. Remark in [Kalmbach] p. 23. (Contributed by NM, 7-Aug-2004.) (New usage is discouraged.) |
⊢ 𝐴 ∈ Cℋ & ⊢ 𝐵 ∈ Cℋ & ⊢ 𝐴 𝐶ℋ 𝐵 ⇒ ⊢ (⊥‘𝐴) 𝐶ℋ 𝐵 | ||
Theorem | cmbr3i 31533 | Alternate definition for the commutes relation. Lemma 3 of [Kalmbach] p. 23. (Contributed by NM, 6-Dec-2000.) (New usage is discouraged.) |
⊢ 𝐴 ∈ Cℋ & ⊢ 𝐵 ∈ Cℋ ⇒ ⊢ (𝐴 𝐶ℋ 𝐵 ↔ (𝐴 ∩ ((⊥‘𝐴) ∨ℋ 𝐵)) = (𝐴 ∩ 𝐵)) | ||
Theorem | cmbr4i 31534 | Alternate definition for the commutes relation. (Contributed by NM, 6-Dec-2000.) (New usage is discouraged.) |
⊢ 𝐴 ∈ Cℋ & ⊢ 𝐵 ∈ Cℋ ⇒ ⊢ (𝐴 𝐶ℋ 𝐵 ↔ (𝐴 ∩ ((⊥‘𝐴) ∨ℋ 𝐵)) ⊆ 𝐵) | ||
Theorem | lecmi 31535 | Comparable Hilbert lattice elements commute. Theorem 2.3(iii) of [Beran] p. 40. (Contributed by NM, 16-Jan-2005.) (New usage is discouraged.) |
⊢ 𝐴 ∈ Cℋ & ⊢ 𝐵 ∈ Cℋ ⇒ ⊢ (𝐴 ⊆ 𝐵 → 𝐴 𝐶ℋ 𝐵) | ||
Theorem | lecmii 31536 | Comparable Hilbert lattice elements commute. Theorem 2.3(iii) of [Beran] p. 40. (Contributed by NM, 7-Aug-2004.) (New usage is discouraged.) |
⊢ 𝐴 ∈ Cℋ & ⊢ 𝐵 ∈ Cℋ & ⊢ 𝐴 ⊆ 𝐵 ⇒ ⊢ 𝐴 𝐶ℋ 𝐵 | ||
Theorem | cmj1i 31537 | A Hilbert lattice element commutes with its join. (Contributed by NM, 7-Aug-2004.) (New usage is discouraged.) |
⊢ 𝐴 ∈ Cℋ & ⊢ 𝐵 ∈ Cℋ ⇒ ⊢ 𝐴 𝐶ℋ (𝐴 ∨ℋ 𝐵) | ||
Theorem | cmj2i 31538 | A Hilbert lattice element commutes with its join. (Contributed by NM, 7-Aug-2004.) (New usage is discouraged.) |
⊢ 𝐴 ∈ Cℋ & ⊢ 𝐵 ∈ Cℋ ⇒ ⊢ 𝐵 𝐶ℋ (𝐴 ∨ℋ 𝐵) | ||
Theorem | cmm1i 31539 | A Hilbert lattice element commutes with its meet. (Contributed by NM, 7-Aug-2004.) (New usage is discouraged.) |
⊢ 𝐴 ∈ Cℋ & ⊢ 𝐵 ∈ Cℋ ⇒ ⊢ 𝐴 𝐶ℋ (𝐴 ∩ 𝐵) | ||
Theorem | cmm2i 31540 | A Hilbert lattice element commutes with its meet. (Contributed by NM, 7-Aug-2004.) (New usage is discouraged.) |
⊢ 𝐴 ∈ Cℋ & ⊢ 𝐵 ∈ Cℋ ⇒ ⊢ 𝐵 𝐶ℋ (𝐴 ∩ 𝐵) | ||
Theorem | cmbr3 31541 | Alternate definition for the commutes relation. Lemma 3 of [Kalmbach] p. 23. (Contributed by NM, 14-Jun-2006.) (New usage is discouraged.) |
⊢ ((𝐴 ∈ Cℋ ∧ 𝐵 ∈ Cℋ ) → (𝐴 𝐶ℋ 𝐵 ↔ (𝐴 ∩ ((⊥‘𝐴) ∨ℋ 𝐵)) = (𝐴 ∩ 𝐵))) | ||
Theorem | cm0 31542 | The zero Hilbert lattice element commutes with every element. (Contributed by NM, 16-Jun-2006.) (New usage is discouraged.) |
⊢ (𝐴 ∈ Cℋ → 0ℋ 𝐶ℋ 𝐴) | ||
Theorem | cmidi 31543 | The commutes relation is reflexive. (Contributed by NM, 7-Aug-2004.) (New usage is discouraged.) |
⊢ 𝐴 ∈ Cℋ ⇒ ⊢ 𝐴 𝐶ℋ 𝐴 | ||
Theorem | pjoml2 31544 | Variation of orthomodular law. Definition in [Kalmbach] p. 22. (Contributed by NM, 13-Jun-2006.) (New usage is discouraged.) |
⊢ ((𝐴 ∈ Cℋ ∧ 𝐵 ∈ Cℋ ∧ 𝐴 ⊆ 𝐵) → (𝐴 ∨ℋ ((⊥‘𝐴) ∩ 𝐵)) = 𝐵) | ||
Theorem | pjoml3 31545 | Variation of orthomodular law. (Contributed by NM, 24-Jun-2004.) (New usage is discouraged.) |
⊢ ((𝐴 ∈ Cℋ ∧ 𝐵 ∈ Cℋ ) → (𝐵 ⊆ 𝐴 → (𝐴 ∩ ((⊥‘𝐴) ∨ℋ 𝐵)) = 𝐵)) | ||
Theorem | pjoml5 31546 | The orthomodular law. Remark in [Kalmbach] p. 22. (Contributed by NM, 12-Jun-2006.) (New usage is discouraged.) |
⊢ ((𝐴 ∈ Cℋ ∧ 𝐵 ∈ Cℋ ) → (𝐴 ∨ℋ ((⊥‘𝐴) ∩ (𝐴 ∨ℋ 𝐵))) = (𝐴 ∨ℋ 𝐵)) | ||
Theorem | cmcm 31547 | Commutation is symmetric. Theorem 2(v) of [Kalmbach] p. 22. (Contributed by NM, 13-Jun-2006.) (New usage is discouraged.) |
⊢ ((𝐴 ∈ Cℋ ∧ 𝐵 ∈ Cℋ ) → (𝐴 𝐶ℋ 𝐵 ↔ 𝐵 𝐶ℋ 𝐴)) | ||
Theorem | cmcm3 31548 | Commutation with orthocomplement. Remark in [Kalmbach] p. 23. (Contributed by NM, 13-Jun-2006.) (New usage is discouraged.) |
⊢ ((𝐴 ∈ Cℋ ∧ 𝐵 ∈ Cℋ ) → (𝐴 𝐶ℋ 𝐵 ↔ (⊥‘𝐴) 𝐶ℋ 𝐵)) | ||
Theorem | cmcm2 31549 | Commutation with orthocomplement. Theorem 2.3(i) of [Beran] p. 39. (Contributed by NM, 14-Jun-2006.) (New usage is discouraged.) |
⊢ ((𝐴 ∈ Cℋ ∧ 𝐵 ∈ Cℋ ) → (𝐴 𝐶ℋ 𝐵 ↔ 𝐴 𝐶ℋ (⊥‘𝐵))) | ||
Theorem | lecm 31550 | Comparable Hilbert lattice elements commute. Theorem 2.3(iii) of [Beran] p. 40. (Contributed by NM, 13-Jun-2006.) (New usage is discouraged.) |
⊢ ((𝐴 ∈ Cℋ ∧ 𝐵 ∈ Cℋ ∧ 𝐴 ⊆ 𝐵) → 𝐴 𝐶ℋ 𝐵) | ||
Theorem | fh1 31551 | Foulis-Holland Theorem. If any 2 pairs in a triple of orthomodular lattice elements commute, the triple is distributive. First of two parts. Theorem 5 of [Kalmbach] p. 25. (Contributed by NM, 14-Jun-2006.) (New usage is discouraged.) |
⊢ (((𝐴 ∈ Cℋ ∧ 𝐵 ∈ Cℋ ∧ 𝐶 ∈ Cℋ ) ∧ (𝐴 𝐶ℋ 𝐵 ∧ 𝐴 𝐶ℋ 𝐶)) → (𝐴 ∩ (𝐵 ∨ℋ 𝐶)) = ((𝐴 ∩ 𝐵) ∨ℋ (𝐴 ∩ 𝐶))) | ||
Theorem | fh2 31552 | Foulis-Holland Theorem. If any 2 pairs in a triple of orthomodular lattice elements commute, the triple is distributive. Second of two parts. Theorem 5 of [Kalmbach] p. 25. (Contributed by NM, 14-Jun-2006.) (New usage is discouraged.) |
⊢ (((𝐴 ∈ Cℋ ∧ 𝐵 ∈ Cℋ ∧ 𝐶 ∈ Cℋ ) ∧ (𝐵 𝐶ℋ 𝐴 ∧ 𝐵 𝐶ℋ 𝐶)) → (𝐴 ∩ (𝐵 ∨ℋ 𝐶)) = ((𝐴 ∩ 𝐵) ∨ℋ (𝐴 ∩ 𝐶))) | ||
Theorem | cm2j 31553 | A lattice element that commutes with two others also commutes with their join. Theorem 4.2 of [Beran] p. 49. (Contributed by NM, 15-Jun-2006.) (New usage is discouraged.) |
⊢ (((𝐴 ∈ Cℋ ∧ 𝐵 ∈ Cℋ ∧ 𝐶 ∈ Cℋ ) ∧ (𝐴 𝐶ℋ 𝐵 ∧ 𝐴 𝐶ℋ 𝐶)) → 𝐴 𝐶ℋ (𝐵 ∨ℋ 𝐶)) | ||
Theorem | fh1i 31554 | Foulis-Holland Theorem. If any 2 pairs in a triple of orthomodular lattice elements commute, the triple is distributive. First of two parts. Theorem 5 of [Kalmbach] p. 25. (Contributed by NM, 7-Aug-2004.) (New usage is discouraged.) |
⊢ 𝐴 ∈ Cℋ & ⊢ 𝐵 ∈ Cℋ & ⊢ 𝐶 ∈ Cℋ & ⊢ 𝐴 𝐶ℋ 𝐵 & ⊢ 𝐴 𝐶ℋ 𝐶 ⇒ ⊢ (𝐴 ∩ (𝐵 ∨ℋ 𝐶)) = ((𝐴 ∩ 𝐵) ∨ℋ (𝐴 ∩ 𝐶)) | ||
Theorem | fh2i 31555 | Foulis-Holland Theorem. If any 2 pairs in a triple of orthomodular lattice elements commute, the triple is distributive. Second of two parts. Theorem 5 of [Kalmbach] p. 25. (Contributed by NM, 7-Aug-2004.) (New usage is discouraged.) |
⊢ 𝐴 ∈ Cℋ & ⊢ 𝐵 ∈ Cℋ & ⊢ 𝐶 ∈ Cℋ & ⊢ 𝐴 𝐶ℋ 𝐵 & ⊢ 𝐴 𝐶ℋ 𝐶 ⇒ ⊢ (𝐵 ∩ (𝐴 ∨ℋ 𝐶)) = ((𝐵 ∩ 𝐴) ∨ℋ (𝐵 ∩ 𝐶)) | ||
Theorem | fh3i 31556 | Variation of the Foulis-Holland Theorem. (Contributed by NM, 16-Jan-2005.) (New usage is discouraged.) |
⊢ 𝐴 ∈ Cℋ & ⊢ 𝐵 ∈ Cℋ & ⊢ 𝐶 ∈ Cℋ & ⊢ 𝐴 𝐶ℋ 𝐵 & ⊢ 𝐴 𝐶ℋ 𝐶 ⇒ ⊢ (𝐴 ∨ℋ (𝐵 ∩ 𝐶)) = ((𝐴 ∨ℋ 𝐵) ∩ (𝐴 ∨ℋ 𝐶)) | ||
Theorem | fh4i 31557 | Variation of the Foulis-Holland Theorem. (Contributed by NM, 16-Jan-2005.) (New usage is discouraged.) |
⊢ 𝐴 ∈ Cℋ & ⊢ 𝐵 ∈ Cℋ & ⊢ 𝐶 ∈ Cℋ & ⊢ 𝐴 𝐶ℋ 𝐵 & ⊢ 𝐴 𝐶ℋ 𝐶 ⇒ ⊢ (𝐵 ∨ℋ (𝐴 ∩ 𝐶)) = ((𝐵 ∨ℋ 𝐴) ∩ (𝐵 ∨ℋ 𝐶)) | ||
Theorem | cm2ji 31558 | A lattice element that commutes with two others also commutes with their join. Theorem 4.2 of [Beran] p. 49. (Contributed by NM, 11-May-2009.) (New usage is discouraged.) |
⊢ 𝐴 ∈ Cℋ & ⊢ 𝐵 ∈ Cℋ & ⊢ 𝐶 ∈ Cℋ & ⊢ 𝐴 𝐶ℋ 𝐵 & ⊢ 𝐴 𝐶ℋ 𝐶 ⇒ ⊢ 𝐴 𝐶ℋ (𝐵 ∨ℋ 𝐶) | ||
Theorem | cm2mi 31559 | A lattice element that commutes with two others also commutes with their meet. Theorem 4.2 of [Beran] p. 49. (Contributed by NM, 11-May-2009.) (New usage is discouraged.) |
⊢ 𝐴 ∈ Cℋ & ⊢ 𝐵 ∈ Cℋ & ⊢ 𝐶 ∈ Cℋ & ⊢ 𝐴 𝐶ℋ 𝐵 & ⊢ 𝐴 𝐶ℋ 𝐶 ⇒ ⊢ 𝐴 𝐶ℋ (𝐵 ∩ 𝐶) | ||
Theorem | qlax1i 31560 | One of the equations showing Cℋ is an ortholattice. (This corresponds to axiom "ax-1" in the Quantum Logic Explorer.) (Contributed by NM, 4-Aug-2004.) (New usage is discouraged.) |
⊢ 𝐴 ∈ Cℋ ⇒ ⊢ 𝐴 = (⊥‘(⊥‘𝐴)) | ||
Theorem | qlax2i 31561 | One of the equations showing Cℋ is an ortholattice. (This corresponds to axiom "ax-2" in the Quantum Logic Explorer.) (Contributed by NM, 4-Aug-2004.) (New usage is discouraged.) |
⊢ 𝐴 ∈ Cℋ & ⊢ 𝐵 ∈ Cℋ ⇒ ⊢ (𝐴 ∨ℋ 𝐵) = (𝐵 ∨ℋ 𝐴) | ||
Theorem | qlax3i 31562 | One of the equations showing Cℋ is an ortholattice. (This corresponds to axiom "ax-3" in the Quantum Logic Explorer.) (Contributed by NM, 4-Aug-2004.) (New usage is discouraged.) |
⊢ 𝐴 ∈ Cℋ & ⊢ 𝐵 ∈ Cℋ & ⊢ 𝐶 ∈ Cℋ ⇒ ⊢ ((𝐴 ∨ℋ 𝐵) ∨ℋ 𝐶) = (𝐴 ∨ℋ (𝐵 ∨ℋ 𝐶)) | ||
Theorem | qlax4i 31563 | One of the equations showing Cℋ is an ortholattice. (This corresponds to axiom "ax-4" in the Quantum Logic Explorer.) (Contributed by NM, 4-Aug-2004.) (New usage is discouraged.) |
⊢ 𝐴 ∈ Cℋ & ⊢ 𝐵 ∈ Cℋ ⇒ ⊢ (𝐴 ∨ℋ (𝐵 ∨ℋ (⊥‘𝐵))) = (𝐵 ∨ℋ (⊥‘𝐵)) | ||
Theorem | qlax5i 31564 | One of the equations showing Cℋ is an ortholattice. (This corresponds to axiom "ax-5" in the Quantum Logic Explorer.) (Contributed by NM, 4-Aug-2004.) (New usage is discouraged.) |
⊢ 𝐴 ∈ Cℋ & ⊢ 𝐵 ∈ Cℋ ⇒ ⊢ (𝐴 ∨ℋ (⊥‘((⊥‘𝐴) ∨ℋ 𝐵))) = 𝐴 | ||
Theorem | qlaxr1i 31565 | One of the conditions showing Cℋ is an ortholattice. (This corresponds to axiom "ax-r1" in the Quantum Logic Explorer.) (Contributed by NM, 4-Aug-2004.) (New usage is discouraged.) |
⊢ 𝐴 ∈ Cℋ & ⊢ 𝐵 ∈ Cℋ & ⊢ 𝐴 = 𝐵 ⇒ ⊢ 𝐵 = 𝐴 | ||
Theorem | qlaxr2i 31566 | One of the conditions showing Cℋ is an ortholattice. (This corresponds to axiom "ax-r2" in the Quantum Logic Explorer.) (Contributed by NM, 4-Aug-2004.) (New usage is discouraged.) |
⊢ 𝐴 ∈ Cℋ & ⊢ 𝐵 ∈ Cℋ & ⊢ 𝐶 ∈ Cℋ & ⊢ 𝐴 = 𝐵 & ⊢ 𝐵 = 𝐶 ⇒ ⊢ 𝐴 = 𝐶 | ||
Theorem | qlaxr4i 31567 | One of the conditions showing Cℋ is an ortholattice. (This corresponds to axiom "ax-r4" in the Quantum Logic Explorer.) (Contributed by NM, 4-Aug-2004.) (New usage is discouraged.) |
⊢ 𝐴 ∈ Cℋ & ⊢ 𝐵 ∈ Cℋ & ⊢ 𝐴 = 𝐵 ⇒ ⊢ (⊥‘𝐴) = (⊥‘𝐵) | ||
Theorem | qlaxr5i 31568 | One of the conditions showing Cℋ is an ortholattice. (This corresponds to axiom "ax-r5" in the Quantum Logic Explorer.) (Contributed by NM, 4-Aug-2004.) (New usage is discouraged.) |
⊢ 𝐴 ∈ Cℋ & ⊢ 𝐵 ∈ Cℋ & ⊢ 𝐶 ∈ Cℋ & ⊢ 𝐴 = 𝐵 ⇒ ⊢ (𝐴 ∨ℋ 𝐶) = (𝐵 ∨ℋ 𝐶) | ||
Theorem | qlaxr3i 31569 | A variation of the orthomodular law, showing Cℋ is an orthomodular lattice. (This corresponds to axiom "ax-r3" in the Quantum Logic Explorer.) (Contributed by NM, 7-Aug-2004.) (New usage is discouraged.) |
⊢ 𝐴 ∈ Cℋ & ⊢ 𝐵 ∈ Cℋ & ⊢ 𝐶 ∈ Cℋ & ⊢ (𝐶 ∨ℋ (⊥‘𝐶)) = ((⊥‘((⊥‘𝐴) ∨ℋ (⊥‘𝐵))) ∨ℋ (⊥‘(𝐴 ∨ℋ 𝐵))) ⇒ ⊢ 𝐴 = 𝐵 | ||
Theorem | chscllem1 31570* | Lemma for chscl 31574. (Contributed by Mario Carneiro, 19-May-2014.) (New usage is discouraged.) |
⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐴 ∈ Cℋ ) & ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐵 ∈ Cℋ ) & ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐵 ⊆ (⊥‘𝐴)) & ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐻:ℕ⟶(𝐴 +ℋ 𝐵)) & ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐻 ⇝𝑣 𝑢) & ⊢ 𝐹 = (𝑛 ∈ ℕ ↦ ((projℎ‘𝐴)‘(𝐻‘𝑛))) ⇒ ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐹:ℕ⟶𝐴) | ||
Theorem | chscllem2 31571* | Lemma for chscl 31574. (Contributed by Mario Carneiro, 19-May-2014.) (New usage is discouraged.) |
⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐴 ∈ Cℋ ) & ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐵 ∈ Cℋ ) & ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐵 ⊆ (⊥‘𝐴)) & ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐻:ℕ⟶(𝐴 +ℋ 𝐵)) & ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐻 ⇝𝑣 𝑢) & ⊢ 𝐹 = (𝑛 ∈ ℕ ↦ ((projℎ‘𝐴)‘(𝐻‘𝑛))) ⇒ ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐹 ∈ dom ⇝𝑣 ) | ||
Theorem | chscllem3 31572* | Lemma for chscl 31574. (Contributed by Mario Carneiro, 19-May-2014.) (New usage is discouraged.) |
⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐴 ∈ Cℋ ) & ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐵 ∈ Cℋ ) & ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐵 ⊆ (⊥‘𝐴)) & ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐻:ℕ⟶(𝐴 +ℋ 𝐵)) & ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐻 ⇝𝑣 𝑢) & ⊢ 𝐹 = (𝑛 ∈ ℕ ↦ ((projℎ‘𝐴)‘(𝐻‘𝑛))) & ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝑁 ∈ ℕ) & ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐶 ∈ 𝐴) & ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐷 ∈ 𝐵) & ⊢ (𝜑 → (𝐻‘𝑁) = (𝐶 +ℎ 𝐷)) ⇒ ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐶 = (𝐹‘𝑁)) | ||
Theorem | chscllem4 31573* | Lemma for chscl 31574. (Contributed by Mario Carneiro, 19-May-2014.) (New usage is discouraged.) |
⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐴 ∈ Cℋ ) & ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐵 ∈ Cℋ ) & ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐵 ⊆ (⊥‘𝐴)) & ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐻:ℕ⟶(𝐴 +ℋ 𝐵)) & ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐻 ⇝𝑣 𝑢) & ⊢ 𝐹 = (𝑛 ∈ ℕ ↦ ((projℎ‘𝐴)‘(𝐻‘𝑛))) & ⊢ 𝐺 = (𝑛 ∈ ℕ ↦ ((projℎ‘𝐵)‘(𝐻‘𝑛))) ⇒ ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝑢 ∈ (𝐴 +ℋ 𝐵)) | ||
Theorem | chscl 31574 | The subspace sum of two closed orthogonal spaces is closed. (Contributed by NM, 19-Oct-1999.) (Proof shortened by Mario Carneiro, 19-May-2014.) (New usage is discouraged.) |
⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐴 ∈ Cℋ ) & ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐵 ∈ Cℋ ) & ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐵 ⊆ (⊥‘𝐴)) ⇒ ⊢ (𝜑 → (𝐴 +ℋ 𝐵) ∈ Cℋ ) | ||
Theorem | osumi 31575 | If two closed subspaces of a Hilbert space are orthogonal, their subspace sum equals their subspace join. Lemma 3 of [Kalmbach] p. 67. Note that the (countable) Axiom of Choice is used for this proof via pjhth 31326, although "the hard part" of this proof, chscl 31574, requires no choice. (Contributed by NM, 28-Oct-1999.) (Revised by Mario Carneiro, 19-May-2014.) (New usage is discouraged.) |
⊢ 𝐴 ∈ Cℋ & ⊢ 𝐵 ∈ Cℋ ⇒ ⊢ (𝐴 ⊆ (⊥‘𝐵) → (𝐴 +ℋ 𝐵) = (𝐴 ∨ℋ 𝐵)) | ||
Theorem | osumcori 31576 | Corollary of osumi 31575. (Contributed by NM, 5-Nov-2000.) (New usage is discouraged.) |
⊢ 𝐴 ∈ Cℋ & ⊢ 𝐵 ∈ Cℋ ⇒ ⊢ ((𝐴 ∩ 𝐵) +ℋ (𝐴 ∩ (⊥‘𝐵))) = ((𝐴 ∩ 𝐵) ∨ℋ (𝐴 ∩ (⊥‘𝐵))) | ||
Theorem | osumcor2i 31577 | Corollary of osumi 31575, showing it holds under the weaker hypothesis that 𝐴 and 𝐵 commute. (Contributed by NM, 6-Dec-2000.) (New usage is discouraged.) |
⊢ 𝐴 ∈ Cℋ & ⊢ 𝐵 ∈ Cℋ ⇒ ⊢ (𝐴 𝐶ℋ 𝐵 → (𝐴 +ℋ 𝐵) = (𝐴 ∨ℋ 𝐵)) | ||
Theorem | osum 31578 | If two closed subspaces of a Hilbert space are orthogonal, their subspace sum equals their subspace join. Lemma 3 of [Kalmbach] p. 67. (Contributed by NM, 31-Oct-2005.) (New usage is discouraged.) |
⊢ ((𝐴 ∈ Cℋ ∧ 𝐵 ∈ Cℋ ∧ 𝐴 ⊆ (⊥‘𝐵)) → (𝐴 +ℋ 𝐵) = (𝐴 ∨ℋ 𝐵)) | ||
Theorem | spansnji 31579 | The subspace sum of a closed subspace and a one-dimensional subspace equals their join. (Proof suggested by Eric Schechter 1-Jun-2004.) (Contributed by NM, 1-Jun-2004.) (New usage is discouraged.) |
⊢ 𝐴 ∈ Cℋ & ⊢ 𝐵 ∈ ℋ ⇒ ⊢ (𝐴 +ℋ (span‘{𝐵})) = (𝐴 ∨ℋ (span‘{𝐵})) | ||
Theorem | spansnj 31580 | The subspace sum of a closed subspace and a one-dimensional subspace equals their join. (Contributed by NM, 4-Jun-2004.) (New usage is discouraged.) |
⊢ ((𝐴 ∈ Cℋ ∧ 𝐵 ∈ ℋ) → (𝐴 +ℋ (span‘{𝐵})) = (𝐴 ∨ℋ (span‘{𝐵}))) | ||
Theorem | spansnscl 31581 | The subspace sum of a closed subspace and a one-dimensional subspace is closed. (Contributed by NM, 17-Dec-2004.) (New usage is discouraged.) |
⊢ ((𝐴 ∈ Cℋ ∧ 𝐵 ∈ ℋ) → (𝐴 +ℋ (span‘{𝐵})) ∈ Cℋ ) | ||
Theorem | sumspansn 31582 | The sum of two vectors belong to the span of one of them iff the other vector also belongs. (Contributed by NM, 1-Nov-2005.) (New usage is discouraged.) |
⊢ ((𝐴 ∈ ℋ ∧ 𝐵 ∈ ℋ) → ((𝐴 +ℎ 𝐵) ∈ (span‘{𝐴}) ↔ 𝐵 ∈ (span‘{𝐴}))) | ||
Theorem | spansnm0i 31583 | The meet of different one-dimensional subspaces is the zero subspace. (Contributed by NM, 1-Nov-2005.) (New usage is discouraged.) |
⊢ 𝐴 ∈ ℋ & ⊢ 𝐵 ∈ ℋ ⇒ ⊢ (¬ 𝐴 ∈ (span‘{𝐵}) → ((span‘{𝐴}) ∩ (span‘{𝐵})) = 0ℋ) | ||
Theorem | nonbooli 31584 | A Hilbert lattice with two or more dimensions fails the distributive law and therefore cannot be a Boolean algebra. This counterexample demonstrates a condition where ((𝐻 ∩ 𝐹) ∨ℋ (𝐻 ∩ 𝐺)) = 0ℋ but (𝐻 ∩ (𝐹 ∨ℋ 𝐺)) ≠ 0ℋ. The antecedent specifies that the vectors 𝐴 and 𝐵 are nonzero and non-colinear. The last three hypotheses assign one-dimensional subspaces to 𝐹, 𝐺, and 𝐻. (Contributed by NM, 1-Nov-2005.) (New usage is discouraged.) |
⊢ 𝐴 ∈ ℋ & ⊢ 𝐵 ∈ ℋ & ⊢ 𝐹 = (span‘{𝐴}) & ⊢ 𝐺 = (span‘{𝐵}) & ⊢ 𝐻 = (span‘{(𝐴 +ℎ 𝐵)}) ⇒ ⊢ (¬ (𝐴 ∈ 𝐺 ∨ 𝐵 ∈ 𝐹) → (𝐻 ∩ (𝐹 ∨ℋ 𝐺)) ≠ ((𝐻 ∩ 𝐹) ∨ℋ (𝐻 ∩ 𝐺))) | ||
Theorem | spansncvi 31585 | Hilbert space has the covering property (using spans of singletons to represent atoms). Exercise 5 of [Kalmbach] p. 153. (Contributed by NM, 7-Jun-2004.) (New usage is discouraged.) |
⊢ 𝐴 ∈ Cℋ & ⊢ 𝐵 ∈ Cℋ & ⊢ 𝐶 ∈ ℋ ⇒ ⊢ ((𝐴 ⊊ 𝐵 ∧ 𝐵 ⊆ (𝐴 ∨ℋ (span‘{𝐶}))) → 𝐵 = (𝐴 ∨ℋ (span‘{𝐶}))) | ||
Theorem | spansncv 31586 | Hilbert space has the covering property (using spans of singletons to represent atoms). Exercise 5 of [Kalmbach] p. 153. (Contributed by NM, 9-Jun-2004.) (New usage is discouraged.) |
⊢ ((𝐴 ∈ Cℋ ∧ 𝐵 ∈ Cℋ ∧ 𝐶 ∈ ℋ) → ((𝐴 ⊊ 𝐵 ∧ 𝐵 ⊆ (𝐴 ∨ℋ (span‘{𝐶}))) → 𝐵 = (𝐴 ∨ℋ (span‘{𝐶})))) | ||
Theorem | 5oalem1 31587 | Lemma for orthoarguesian law 5OA. (Contributed by NM, 1-Apr-2000.) (New usage is discouraged.) |
⊢ 𝐴 ∈ Sℋ & ⊢ 𝐵 ∈ Sℋ & ⊢ 𝐶 ∈ Sℋ & ⊢ 𝑅 ∈ Sℋ ⇒ ⊢ ((((𝑥 ∈ 𝐴 ∧ 𝑦 ∈ 𝐵) ∧ 𝑣 = (𝑥 +ℎ 𝑦)) ∧ (𝑧 ∈ 𝐶 ∧ (𝑥 −ℎ 𝑧) ∈ 𝑅)) → 𝑣 ∈ (𝐵 +ℋ (𝐴 ∩ (𝐶 +ℋ 𝑅)))) | ||
Theorem | 5oalem2 31588 | Lemma for orthoarguesian law 5OA. (Contributed by NM, 2-Apr-2000.) (New usage is discouraged.) |
⊢ 𝐴 ∈ Sℋ & ⊢ 𝐵 ∈ Sℋ & ⊢ 𝐶 ∈ Sℋ & ⊢ 𝐷 ∈ Sℋ ⇒ ⊢ ((((𝑥 ∈ 𝐴 ∧ 𝑦 ∈ 𝐵) ∧ (𝑧 ∈ 𝐶 ∧ 𝑤 ∈ 𝐷)) ∧ (𝑥 +ℎ 𝑦) = (𝑧 +ℎ 𝑤)) → (𝑥 −ℎ 𝑧) ∈ ((𝐴 +ℋ 𝐶) ∩ (𝐵 +ℋ 𝐷))) | ||
Theorem | 5oalem3 31589 | Lemma for orthoarguesian law 5OA. (Contributed by NM, 2-Apr-2000.) (New usage is discouraged.) |
⊢ 𝐴 ∈ Sℋ & ⊢ 𝐵 ∈ Sℋ & ⊢ 𝐶 ∈ Sℋ & ⊢ 𝐷 ∈ Sℋ & ⊢ 𝐹 ∈ Sℋ & ⊢ 𝐺 ∈ Sℋ ⇒ ⊢ (((((𝑥 ∈ 𝐴 ∧ 𝑦 ∈ 𝐵) ∧ (𝑧 ∈ 𝐶 ∧ 𝑤 ∈ 𝐷)) ∧ (𝑓 ∈ 𝐹 ∧ 𝑔 ∈ 𝐺)) ∧ ((𝑥 +ℎ 𝑦) = (𝑓 +ℎ 𝑔) ∧ (𝑧 +ℎ 𝑤) = (𝑓 +ℎ 𝑔))) → (𝑥 −ℎ 𝑧) ∈ (((𝐴 +ℋ 𝐹) ∩ (𝐵 +ℋ 𝐺)) +ℋ ((𝐶 +ℋ 𝐹) ∩ (𝐷 +ℋ 𝐺)))) | ||
Theorem | 5oalem4 31590 | Lemma for orthoarguesian law 5OA. (Contributed by NM, 2-Apr-2000.) (New usage is discouraged.) |
⊢ 𝐴 ∈ Sℋ & ⊢ 𝐵 ∈ Sℋ & ⊢ 𝐶 ∈ Sℋ & ⊢ 𝐷 ∈ Sℋ & ⊢ 𝐹 ∈ Sℋ & ⊢ 𝐺 ∈ Sℋ ⇒ ⊢ (((((𝑥 ∈ 𝐴 ∧ 𝑦 ∈ 𝐵) ∧ (𝑧 ∈ 𝐶 ∧ 𝑤 ∈ 𝐷)) ∧ (𝑓 ∈ 𝐹 ∧ 𝑔 ∈ 𝐺)) ∧ ((𝑥 +ℎ 𝑦) = (𝑓 +ℎ 𝑔) ∧ (𝑧 +ℎ 𝑤) = (𝑓 +ℎ 𝑔))) → (𝑥 −ℎ 𝑧) ∈ (((𝐴 +ℋ 𝐶) ∩ (𝐵 +ℋ 𝐷)) ∩ (((𝐴 +ℋ 𝐹) ∩ (𝐵 +ℋ 𝐺)) +ℋ ((𝐶 +ℋ 𝐹) ∩ (𝐷 +ℋ 𝐺))))) | ||
Theorem | 5oalem5 31591 | Lemma for orthoarguesian law 5OA. (Contributed by NM, 2-May-2000.) (New usage is discouraged.) |
⊢ 𝐴 ∈ Sℋ & ⊢ 𝐵 ∈ Sℋ & ⊢ 𝐶 ∈ Sℋ & ⊢ 𝐷 ∈ Sℋ & ⊢ 𝐹 ∈ Sℋ & ⊢ 𝐺 ∈ Sℋ & ⊢ 𝑅 ∈ Sℋ & ⊢ 𝑆 ∈ Sℋ ⇒ ⊢ (((((𝑥 ∈ 𝐴 ∧ 𝑦 ∈ 𝐵) ∧ (𝑧 ∈ 𝐶 ∧ 𝑤 ∈ 𝐷)) ∧ ((𝑓 ∈ 𝐹 ∧ 𝑔 ∈ 𝐺) ∧ (𝑣 ∈ 𝑅 ∧ 𝑢 ∈ 𝑆))) ∧ (((𝑥 +ℎ 𝑦) = (𝑣 +ℎ 𝑢) ∧ (𝑧 +ℎ 𝑤) = (𝑣 +ℎ 𝑢)) ∧ (𝑓 +ℎ 𝑔) = (𝑣 +ℎ 𝑢))) → (𝑥 −ℎ 𝑧) ∈ ((((𝐴 +ℋ 𝐶) ∩ (𝐵 +ℋ 𝐷)) ∩ (((𝐴 +ℋ 𝑅) ∩ (𝐵 +ℋ 𝑆)) +ℋ ((𝐶 +ℋ 𝑅) ∩ (𝐷 +ℋ 𝑆)))) ∩ ((((𝐴 +ℋ 𝐹) ∩ (𝐵 +ℋ 𝐺)) ∩ (((𝐴 +ℋ 𝑅) ∩ (𝐵 +ℋ 𝑆)) +ℋ ((𝐹 +ℋ 𝑅) ∩ (𝐺 +ℋ 𝑆)))) +ℋ (((𝐶 +ℋ 𝐹) ∩ (𝐷 +ℋ 𝐺)) ∩ (((𝐶 +ℋ 𝑅) ∩ (𝐷 +ℋ 𝑆)) +ℋ ((𝐹 +ℋ 𝑅) ∩ (𝐺 +ℋ 𝑆))))))) | ||
Theorem | 5oalem6 31592 | Lemma for orthoarguesian law 5OA. (Contributed by NM, 4-May-2000.) (New usage is discouraged.) |
⊢ 𝐴 ∈ Sℋ & ⊢ 𝐵 ∈ Sℋ & ⊢ 𝐶 ∈ Sℋ & ⊢ 𝐷 ∈ Sℋ & ⊢ 𝐹 ∈ Sℋ & ⊢ 𝐺 ∈ Sℋ & ⊢ 𝑅 ∈ Sℋ & ⊢ 𝑆 ∈ Sℋ ⇒ ⊢ (((((𝑥 ∈ 𝐴 ∧ 𝑦 ∈ 𝐵) ∧ ℎ = (𝑥 +ℎ 𝑦)) ∧ ((𝑧 ∈ 𝐶 ∧ 𝑤 ∈ 𝐷) ∧ ℎ = (𝑧 +ℎ 𝑤))) ∧ (((𝑓 ∈ 𝐹 ∧ 𝑔 ∈ 𝐺) ∧ ℎ = (𝑓 +ℎ 𝑔)) ∧ ((𝑣 ∈ 𝑅 ∧ 𝑢 ∈ 𝑆) ∧ ℎ = (𝑣 +ℎ 𝑢)))) → ℎ ∈ (𝐵 +ℋ (𝐴 ∩ (𝐶 +ℋ ((((𝐴 +ℋ 𝐶) ∩ (𝐵 +ℋ 𝐷)) ∩ (((𝐴 +ℋ 𝑅) ∩ (𝐵 +ℋ 𝑆)) +ℋ ((𝐶 +ℋ 𝑅) ∩ (𝐷 +ℋ 𝑆)))) ∩ ((((𝐴 +ℋ 𝐹) ∩ (𝐵 +ℋ 𝐺)) ∩ (((𝐴 +ℋ 𝑅) ∩ (𝐵 +ℋ 𝑆)) +ℋ ((𝐹 +ℋ 𝑅) ∩ (𝐺 +ℋ 𝑆)))) +ℋ (((𝐶 +ℋ 𝐹) ∩ (𝐷 +ℋ 𝐺)) ∩ (((𝐶 +ℋ 𝑅) ∩ (𝐷 +ℋ 𝑆)) +ℋ ((𝐹 +ℋ 𝑅) ∩ (𝐺 +ℋ 𝑆)))))))))) | ||
Theorem | 5oalem7 31593 | Lemma for orthoarguesian law 5OA. (Contributed by NM, 4-May-2000.) TODO: replace uses of ee4anv 2342 with 4exdistrv 1953 as in 3oalem3 31597. (New usage is discouraged.) |
⊢ 𝐴 ∈ Sℋ & ⊢ 𝐵 ∈ Sℋ & ⊢ 𝐶 ∈ Sℋ & ⊢ 𝐷 ∈ Sℋ & ⊢ 𝐹 ∈ Sℋ & ⊢ 𝐺 ∈ Sℋ & ⊢ 𝑅 ∈ Sℋ & ⊢ 𝑆 ∈ Sℋ ⇒ ⊢ (((𝐴 +ℋ 𝐵) ∩ (𝐶 +ℋ 𝐷)) ∩ ((𝐹 +ℋ 𝐺) ∩ (𝑅 +ℋ 𝑆))) ⊆ (𝐵 +ℋ (𝐴 ∩ (𝐶 +ℋ ((((𝐴 +ℋ 𝐶) ∩ (𝐵 +ℋ 𝐷)) ∩ (((𝐴 +ℋ 𝑅) ∩ (𝐵 +ℋ 𝑆)) +ℋ ((𝐶 +ℋ 𝑅) ∩ (𝐷 +ℋ 𝑆)))) ∩ ((((𝐴 +ℋ 𝐹) ∩ (𝐵 +ℋ 𝐺)) ∩ (((𝐴 +ℋ 𝑅) ∩ (𝐵 +ℋ 𝑆)) +ℋ ((𝐹 +ℋ 𝑅) ∩ (𝐺 +ℋ 𝑆)))) +ℋ (((𝐶 +ℋ 𝐹) ∩ (𝐷 +ℋ 𝐺)) ∩ (((𝐶 +ℋ 𝑅) ∩ (𝐷 +ℋ 𝑆)) +ℋ ((𝐹 +ℋ 𝑅) ∩ (𝐺 +ℋ 𝑆))))))))) | ||
Theorem | 5oai 31594 | Orthoarguesian law 5OA. This 8-variable inference is called 5OA because it can be converted to a 5-variable equation (see Quantum Logic Explorer). (Contributed by NM, 5-May-2000.) (New usage is discouraged.) |
⊢ 𝐴 ∈ Cℋ & ⊢ 𝐵 ∈ Cℋ & ⊢ 𝐶 ∈ Cℋ & ⊢ 𝐷 ∈ Cℋ & ⊢ 𝐹 ∈ Cℋ & ⊢ 𝐺 ∈ Cℋ & ⊢ 𝑅 ∈ Cℋ & ⊢ 𝑆 ∈ Cℋ & ⊢ 𝐴 ⊆ (⊥‘𝐵) & ⊢ 𝐶 ⊆ (⊥‘𝐷) & ⊢ 𝐹 ⊆ (⊥‘𝐺) & ⊢ 𝑅 ⊆ (⊥‘𝑆) ⇒ ⊢ (((𝐴 ∨ℋ 𝐵) ∩ (𝐶 ∨ℋ 𝐷)) ∩ ((𝐹 ∨ℋ 𝐺) ∩ (𝑅 ∨ℋ 𝑆))) ⊆ (𝐵 ∨ℋ (𝐴 ∩ (𝐶 ∨ℋ ((((𝐴 ∨ℋ 𝐶) ∩ (𝐵 ∨ℋ 𝐷)) ∩ (((𝐴 ∨ℋ 𝑅) ∩ (𝐵 ∨ℋ 𝑆)) ∨ℋ ((𝐶 ∨ℋ 𝑅) ∩ (𝐷 ∨ℋ 𝑆)))) ∩ ((((𝐴 ∨ℋ 𝐹) ∩ (𝐵 ∨ℋ 𝐺)) ∩ (((𝐴 ∨ℋ 𝑅) ∩ (𝐵 ∨ℋ 𝑆)) ∨ℋ ((𝐹 ∨ℋ 𝑅) ∩ (𝐺 ∨ℋ 𝑆)))) ∨ℋ (((𝐶 ∨ℋ 𝐹) ∩ (𝐷 ∨ℋ 𝐺)) ∩ (((𝐶 ∨ℋ 𝑅) ∩ (𝐷 ∨ℋ 𝑆)) ∨ℋ ((𝐹 ∨ℋ 𝑅) ∩ (𝐺 ∨ℋ 𝑆))))))))) | ||
Theorem | 3oalem1 31595* | Lemma for 3OA (weak) orthoarguesian law. (Contributed by NM, 19-Oct-1999.) (New usage is discouraged.) |
⊢ 𝐵 ∈ Cℋ & ⊢ 𝐶 ∈ Cℋ & ⊢ 𝑅 ∈ Cℋ & ⊢ 𝑆 ∈ Cℋ ⇒ ⊢ ((((𝑥 ∈ 𝐵 ∧ 𝑦 ∈ 𝑅) ∧ 𝑣 = (𝑥 +ℎ 𝑦)) ∧ ((𝑧 ∈ 𝐶 ∧ 𝑤 ∈ 𝑆) ∧ 𝑣 = (𝑧 +ℎ 𝑤))) → (((𝑥 ∈ ℋ ∧ 𝑦 ∈ ℋ) ∧ 𝑣 ∈ ℋ) ∧ (𝑧 ∈ ℋ ∧ 𝑤 ∈ ℋ))) | ||
Theorem | 3oalem2 31596* | Lemma for 3OA (weak) orthoarguesian law. (Contributed by NM, 19-Oct-1999.) (New usage is discouraged.) |
⊢ 𝐵 ∈ Cℋ & ⊢ 𝐶 ∈ Cℋ & ⊢ 𝑅 ∈ Cℋ & ⊢ 𝑆 ∈ Cℋ ⇒ ⊢ ((((𝑥 ∈ 𝐵 ∧ 𝑦 ∈ 𝑅) ∧ 𝑣 = (𝑥 +ℎ 𝑦)) ∧ ((𝑧 ∈ 𝐶 ∧ 𝑤 ∈ 𝑆) ∧ 𝑣 = (𝑧 +ℎ 𝑤))) → 𝑣 ∈ (𝐵 +ℋ (𝑅 ∩ (𝑆 +ℋ ((𝐵 +ℋ 𝐶) ∩ (𝑅 +ℋ 𝑆)))))) | ||
Theorem | 3oalem3 31597 | Lemma for 3OA (weak) orthoarguesian law. (Contributed by NM, 19-Oct-1999.) (New usage is discouraged.) |
⊢ 𝐵 ∈ Cℋ & ⊢ 𝐶 ∈ Cℋ & ⊢ 𝑅 ∈ Cℋ & ⊢ 𝑆 ∈ Cℋ ⇒ ⊢ ((𝐵 +ℋ 𝑅) ∩ (𝐶 +ℋ 𝑆)) ⊆ (𝐵 +ℋ (𝑅 ∩ (𝑆 +ℋ ((𝐵 +ℋ 𝐶) ∩ (𝑅 +ℋ 𝑆))))) | ||
Theorem | 3oalem4 31598 | Lemma for 3OA (weak) orthoarguesian law. (Contributed by NM, 19-Oct-1999.) (New usage is discouraged.) |
⊢ 𝑅 = ((⊥‘𝐵) ∩ (𝐵 ∨ℋ 𝐴)) ⇒ ⊢ 𝑅 ⊆ (⊥‘𝐵) | ||
Theorem | 3oalem5 31599 | Lemma for 3OA (weak) orthoarguesian law. (Contributed by NM, 19-Oct-1999.) (New usage is discouraged.) |
⊢ 𝐴 ∈ Cℋ & ⊢ 𝐵 ∈ Cℋ & ⊢ 𝐶 ∈ Cℋ & ⊢ 𝑅 = ((⊥‘𝐵) ∩ (𝐵 ∨ℋ 𝐴)) & ⊢ 𝑆 = ((⊥‘𝐶) ∩ (𝐶 ∨ℋ 𝐴)) ⇒ ⊢ ((𝐵 +ℋ 𝑅) ∩ (𝐶 +ℋ 𝑆)) = ((𝐵 ∨ℋ 𝑅) ∩ (𝐶 ∨ℋ 𝑆)) | ||
Theorem | 3oalem6 31600 | Lemma for 3OA (weak) orthoarguesian law. (Contributed by NM, 19-Oct-1999.) (New usage is discouraged.) |
⊢ 𝐴 ∈ Cℋ & ⊢ 𝐵 ∈ Cℋ & ⊢ 𝐶 ∈ Cℋ & ⊢ 𝑅 = ((⊥‘𝐵) ∩ (𝐵 ∨ℋ 𝐴)) & ⊢ 𝑆 = ((⊥‘𝐶) ∩ (𝐶 ∨ℋ 𝐴)) ⇒ ⊢ (𝐵 +ℋ (𝑅 ∩ (𝑆 +ℋ ((𝐵 +ℋ 𝐶) ∩ (𝑅 +ℋ 𝑆))))) ⊆ (𝐵 ∨ℋ (𝑅 ∩ (𝑆 ∨ℋ ((𝐵 ∨ℋ 𝐶) ∩ (𝑅 ∨ℋ 𝑆))))) |
< Previous Next > |
Copyright terms: Public domain | < Previous Next > |