Theorem wfaxrep 45731

Description: The class of well-founded sets models the Axiom of Replacement ax-rep 5237. Actually, our statement is stronger, since it is an instance of Replacement only when all quantifiers in ∀𝑦𝜑 are relativized to 𝑊. Essentially part of Corollary II.2.5 of [Kunen2] p. 112, but note that our Replacement is different from Kunen's. (Contributed by Eric Schmidt, 29-Sep-2025.)

Hypothesis

Ref	Expression
wfax.1	⊢ 𝑊 = ∪ (𝑅1 “ On)

Assertion

Ref	Expression
wfaxrep	⊢ ∀𝑥 ∈ 𝑊 (∀𝑤 ∈ 𝑊 ∃𝑦 ∈ 𝑊 ∀𝑧 ∈ 𝑊 (∀𝑦𝜑 → 𝑧 = 𝑦) → ∃𝑦 ∈ 𝑊 ∀𝑧 ∈ 𝑊 (𝑧 ∈ 𝑦 ↔ ∃𝑤 ∈ 𝑊 (𝑤 ∈ 𝑥 ∧ ∀𝑦𝜑)))

Distinct variable group:   𝑥,𝑦,𝑧,𝑤,𝑊

Allowed substitution hints:   𝜑(𝑥, 𝑦, 𝑧, 𝑤)

Proof of Theorem wfaxrep

Dummy variable 𝑓 is distinct from all other variables.

Step	Hyp	Ref	Expression
1		wfax.1	. 2 ⊢ 𝑊 = ∪ (𝑅1 “ On)
2		trwf 45696	. . . 4 ⊢ Tr ∪ (𝑅1 “ On)
3		treq 5224	. . . 4 ⊢ (𝑊 = ∪ (𝑅1 “ On) → (Tr 𝑊 ↔ Tr ∪ (𝑅1 “ On)))
4	2, 3	mpbiri 261	. . 3 ⊢ (𝑊 = ∪ (𝑅1 “ On) → Tr 𝑊)
5		vex 3458	. . . . . . . . . 10 ⊢ 𝑓 ∈ V
6	5	rnex 7905	. . . . . . . . 9 ⊢ ran 𝑓 ∈ V
7	6	r1elss 9776	. . . . . . . 8 ⊢ (ran 𝑓 ∈ ∪ (𝑅1 “ On) ↔ ran 𝑓 ⊆ ∪ (𝑅1 “ On))
8	7	biimpri 231	. . . . . . 7 ⊢ (ran 𝑓 ⊆ ∪ (𝑅1 “ On) → ran 𝑓 ∈ ∪ (𝑅1 “ On))
9	1	sseq2i 3965	. . . . . . 7 ⊢ (ran 𝑓 ⊆ 𝑊 ↔ ran 𝑓 ⊆ ∪ (𝑅1 “ On))
10	1	eleq2i 2854	. . . . . . 7 ⊢ (ran 𝑓 ∈ 𝑊 ↔ ran 𝑓 ∈ ∪ (𝑅1 “ On))
11	8, 9, 10	3imtr4i 295	. . . . . 6 ⊢ (ran 𝑓 ⊆ 𝑊 → ran 𝑓 ∈ 𝑊)
12	11	3ad2ant3 1152	. . . . 5 ⊢ ((Fun 𝑓 ∧ dom 𝑓 ∈ 𝑊 ∧ ran 𝑓 ⊆ 𝑊) → ran 𝑓 ∈ 𝑊)
13	12	ax-gen 1824	. . . 4 ⊢ ∀𝑓((Fun 𝑓 ∧ dom 𝑓 ∈ 𝑊 ∧ ran 𝑓 ⊆ 𝑊) → ran 𝑓 ∈ 𝑊)
14	13	a1i 11	. . 3 ⊢ (𝑊 = ∪ (𝑅1 “ On) → ∀𝑓((Fun 𝑓 ∧ dom 𝑓 ∈ 𝑊 ∧ ran 𝑓 ⊆ 𝑊) → ran 𝑓 ∈ 𝑊))
15		onwf 9800	. . . . 5 ⊢ On ⊆ ∪ (𝑅1 “ On)
16		0elon 6416	. . . . 5 ⊢ ∅ ∈ On
17	15, 16	sselii 3933	. . . 4 ⊢ ∅ ∈ ∪ (𝑅1 “ On)
18		eleq2 2851	. . . 4 ⊢ (𝑊 = ∪ (𝑅1 “ On) → (∅ ∈ 𝑊 ↔ ∅ ∈ ∪ (𝑅1 “ On)))
19	17, 18	mpbiri 261	. . 3 ⊢ (𝑊 = ∪ (𝑅1 “ On) → ∅ ∈ 𝑊)
20	4, 14, 19	modelaxrep 45718	. 2 ⊢ (𝑊 = ∪ (𝑅1 “ On) → ∀𝑥 ∈ 𝑊 (∀𝑤 ∈ 𝑊 ∃𝑦 ∈ 𝑊 ∀𝑧 ∈ 𝑊 (∀𝑦𝜑 → 𝑧 = 𝑦) → ∃𝑦 ∈ 𝑊 ∀𝑧 ∈ 𝑊 (𝑧 ∈ 𝑦 ↔ ∃𝑤 ∈ 𝑊 (𝑤 ∈ 𝑥 ∧ ∀𝑦𝜑))))
21	1, 20	ax-mp 5	1 ⊢ ∀𝑥 ∈ 𝑊 (∀𝑤 ∈ 𝑊 ∃𝑦 ∈ 𝑊 ∀𝑧 ∈ 𝑊 (∀𝑦𝜑 → 𝑧 = 𝑦) → ∃𝑦 ∈ 𝑊 ∀𝑧 ∈ 𝑊 (𝑧 ∈ 𝑦 ↔ ∃𝑤 ∈ 𝑊 (𝑤 ∈ 𝑥 ∧ ∀𝑦𝜑)))

This proof depends on syntax axioms:   → wi 4   ↔ wb 209   ∧ wa 400   ∧ w3a 1102  ∀wal 1567   = wceq 1569   ∈ wcel 2142  ∀wral 3078  ∃wrex 3088   ⊆ wss 3904  ∅c0 4285  ∪ cuni 4871  Tr wtr 5217  dom cdm 5660  ran crn 5661   “ cima 5663  Oncon0 6360  Fun wfun 6530  𝑅₁cr1 9732

This proof depends on axioms:  ax-mp 5  ax-1 6  ax-2 7  ax-3 8  ax-gen 1824  ax-4 1838  ax-5 1939  ax-6 1996  ax-7 2037  ax-8 2144  ax-9 2152  ax-10 2175  ax-11 2191  ax-12 2212  ax-ext 2734  ax-rep 5237  ax-sep 5256  ax-nul 5268  ax-pow 5335  ax-pr 5403  ax-un 7734

This proof depends on definitions:  df-bi 210  df-an 401  df-or 861  df-3or 1103  df-3an 1104  df-tru 1572  df-fal 1582  df-ex 1809  df-nf 1813  df-sb 2096  df-mo 2566  df-eu 2596  df-clab 2741  df-cleq 2754  df-clel 2837  df-nfc 2911  df-ne 2958  df-ral 3079  df-rex 3089  df-rmo 3368  df-reu 3369  df-rab 3416  df-v 3456  df-sbc 3744  df-csb 3853  df-dif 3907  df-un 3909  df-in 3911  df-ss 3921  df-pss 3924  df-nul 4286  df-if 4487  df-pw 4563  df-sn 4589  df-pr 4591  df-op 4595  df-uni 4872  df-int 4912  df-iun 4957  df-br 5109  df-opab 5173  df-mpt 5192  df-tr 5218  df-id 5555  df-eprel 5560  df-po 5568  df-so 5569  df-fr 5613  df-we 5615  df-xp 5666  df-rel 5667  df-cnv 5668  df-co 5669  df-dm 5670  df-rn 5671  df-res 5672  df-ima 5673  df-pred 6302  df-ord 6363  df-on 6364  df-lim 6365  df-suc 6366  df-iota 6492  df-fun 6538  df-fn 6539  df-f 6540  df-f1 6541  df-fo 6542  df-f1o 6543  df-fv 6544  df-ov 7415  df-om 7861  df-2nd 7985  df-frecs 8276  df-wrecs 8307  df-recs 8356  df-rdg 8395  df-en 8942  df-dom 8943  df-sdom 8944  df-r1 9734  df-rank 9735

This theorem is used by: (None)