Theorem wfaxrep 44987

Description: The class of well-founded sets models the Axiom of Replacement ax-rep 5277. Actually, our statement is stronger, since it is an instance of Replacement only when all quantifiers in ∀𝑦𝜑 are relativized to 𝑊. Essentially part of Corollary II.2.5 of [Kunen2] p. 112, but note that our Replacement is different from Kunen's. (Contributed by Eric Schmidt, 29-Sep-2025.)

Hypothesis

Ref	Expression
wfax.1	⊢ 𝑊 = ∪ (𝑅1 “ On)

Assertion

Ref	Expression
wfaxrep	⊢ ∀𝑥 ∈ 𝑊 (∀𝑤 ∈ 𝑊 ∃𝑦 ∈ 𝑊 ∀𝑧 ∈ 𝑊 (∀𝑦𝜑 → 𝑧 = 𝑦) → ∃𝑦 ∈ 𝑊 ∀𝑧 ∈ 𝑊 (𝑧 ∈ 𝑦 ↔ ∃𝑤 ∈ 𝑊 (𝑤 ∈ 𝑥 ∧ ∀𝑦𝜑)))

Distinct variable group:   𝑥,𝑦,𝑧,𝑤,𝑊

Allowed substitution hints:   𝜑(𝑥,𝑦,𝑧,𝑤)

Proof of Theorem wfaxrep

Dummy variable 𝑓 is distinct from all other variables.

Step	Hyp	Ref	Expression
1		wfax.1	. 2 ⊢ 𝑊 = ∪ (𝑅1 “ On)
2		trwf 44954	. . . 4 ⊢ Tr ∪ (𝑅1 “ On)
3		treq 5265	. . . 4 ⊢ (𝑊 = ∪ (𝑅1 “ On) → (Tr 𝑊 ↔ Tr ∪ (𝑅1 “ On)))
4	2, 3	mpbiri 258	. . 3 ⊢ (𝑊 = ∪ (𝑅1 “ On) → Tr 𝑊)
5		vex 3483	. . . . . . . . . 10 ⊢ 𝑓 ∈ V
6	5	rnex 7928	. . . . . . . . 9 ⊢ ran 𝑓 ∈ V
7	6	r1elss 9842	. . . . . . . 8 ⊢ (ran 𝑓 ∈ ∪ (𝑅1 “ On) ↔ ran 𝑓 ⊆ ∪ (𝑅1 “ On))
8	7	biimpri 228	. . . . . . 7 ⊢ (ran 𝑓 ⊆ ∪ (𝑅1 “ On) → ran 𝑓 ∈ ∪ (𝑅1 “ On))
9	1	sseq2i 4012	. . . . . . 7 ⊢ (ran 𝑓 ⊆ 𝑊 ↔ ran 𝑓 ⊆ ∪ (𝑅1 “ On))
10	1	eleq2i 2832	. . . . . . 7 ⊢ (ran 𝑓 ∈ 𝑊 ↔ ran 𝑓 ∈ ∪ (𝑅1 “ On))
11	8, 9, 10	3imtr4i 292	. . . . . 6 ⊢ (ran 𝑓 ⊆ 𝑊 → ran 𝑓 ∈ 𝑊)
12	11	3ad2ant3 1136	. . . . 5 ⊢ ((Fun 𝑓 ∧ dom 𝑓 ∈ 𝑊 ∧ ran 𝑓 ⊆ 𝑊) → ran 𝑓 ∈ 𝑊)
13	12	ax-gen 1795	. . . 4 ⊢ ∀𝑓((Fun 𝑓 ∧ dom 𝑓 ∈ 𝑊 ∧ ran 𝑓 ⊆ 𝑊) → ran 𝑓 ∈ 𝑊)
14	13	a1i 11	. . 3 ⊢ (𝑊 = ∪ (𝑅1 “ On) → ∀𝑓((Fun 𝑓 ∧ dom 𝑓 ∈ 𝑊 ∧ ran 𝑓 ⊆ 𝑊) → ran 𝑓 ∈ 𝑊))
15		onwf 9866	. . . . 5 ⊢ On ⊆ ∪ (𝑅1 “ On)
16		0elon 6436	. . . . 5 ⊢ ∅ ∈ On
17	15, 16	sselii 3979	. . . 4 ⊢ ∅ ∈ ∪ (𝑅1 “ On)
18		eleq2 2829	. . . 4 ⊢ (𝑊 = ∪ (𝑅1 “ On) → (∅ ∈ 𝑊 ↔ ∅ ∈ ∪ (𝑅1 “ On)))
19	17, 18	mpbiri 258	. . 3 ⊢ (𝑊 = ∪ (𝑅1 “ On) → ∅ ∈ 𝑊)
20	4, 14, 19	modelaxrep 44974	. 2 ⊢ (𝑊 = ∪ (𝑅1 “ On) → ∀𝑥 ∈ 𝑊 (∀𝑤 ∈ 𝑊 ∃𝑦 ∈ 𝑊 ∀𝑧 ∈ 𝑊 (∀𝑦𝜑 → 𝑧 = 𝑦) → ∃𝑦 ∈ 𝑊 ∀𝑧 ∈ 𝑊 (𝑧 ∈ 𝑦 ↔ ∃𝑤 ∈ 𝑊 (𝑤 ∈ 𝑥 ∧ ∀𝑦𝜑))))
21	1, 20	ax-mp 5	1 ⊢ ∀𝑥 ∈ 𝑊 (∀𝑤 ∈ 𝑊 ∃𝑦 ∈ 𝑊 ∀𝑧 ∈ 𝑊 (∀𝑦𝜑 → 𝑧 = 𝑦) → ∃𝑦 ∈ 𝑊 ∀𝑧 ∈ 𝑊 (𝑧 ∈ 𝑦 ↔ ∃𝑤 ∈ 𝑊 (𝑤 ∈ 𝑥 ∧ ∀𝑦𝜑)))

Syntax hints:   → wi 4   ↔ wb 206   ∧ wa 395   ∧ w3a 1087  ∀wal 1538   = wceq 1540   ∈ wcel 2108  ∀wral 3060  ∃wrex 3069   ⊆ wss 3950  ∅c0 4332  ∪ cuni 4905  Tr wtr 5257  dom cdm 5683  ran crn 5684   “ cima 5686  Oncon0 6382  Fun wfun 6553  𝑅₁cr1 9798

This theorem was proved from axioms:  ax-mp 5  ax-1 6  ax-2 7  ax-3 8  ax-gen 1795  ax-4 1809  ax-5 1910  ax-6 1967  ax-7 2007  ax-8 2110  ax-9 2118  ax-10 2141  ax-11 2157  ax-12 2177  ax-ext 2707  ax-rep 5277  ax-sep 5294  ax-nul 5304  ax-pow 5363  ax-pr 5430  ax-un 7751

This theorem depends on definitions:  df-bi 207  df-an 396  df-or 849  df-3or 1088  df-3an 1089  df-tru 1543  df-fal 1553  df-ex 1780  df-nf 1784  df-sb 2065  df-mo 2539  df-eu 2568  df-clab 2714  df-cleq 2728  df-clel 2815  df-nfc 2891  df-ne 2940  df-ral 3061  df-rex 3070  df-rmo 3379  df-reu 3380  df-rab 3436  df-v 3481  df-sbc 3788  df-csb 3899  df-dif 3953  df-un 3955  df-in 3957  df-ss 3967  df-pss 3970  df-nul 4333  df-if 4525  df-pw 4600  df-sn 4625  df-pr 4627  df-op 4631  df-uni 4906  df-int 4945  df-iun 4991  df-br 5142  df-opab 5204  df-mpt 5224  df-tr 5258  df-id 5576  df-eprel 5582  df-po 5590  df-so 5591  df-fr 5635  df-we 5637  df-xp 5689  df-rel 5690  df-cnv 5691  df-co 5692  df-dm 5693  df-rn 5694  df-res 5695  df-ima 5696  df-pred 6319  df-ord 6385  df-on 6386  df-lim 6387  df-suc 6388  df-iota 6512  df-fun 6561  df-fn 6562  df-f 6563  df-f1 6564  df-fo 6565  df-f1o 6566  df-fv 6567  df-ov 7432  df-om 7884  df-2nd 8011  df-frecs 8302  df-wrecs 8333  df-recs 8407  df-rdg 8446  df-en 8982  df-dom 8983  df-sdom 8984  df-r1 9800  df-rank 9801

This theorem is referenced by: (None)