Theorem wfaxrep 44949

Description: The class of well-founded sets models the Axiom of Replacement ax-rep 5284. Actually, our statement is stronger, since it is an instance of Replacement only when all quantifiers in ∀𝑦𝜑 are relativized to 𝑊. Essentially part of Corollary II.2.5 of [Kunen2] p. 112, but note that our Replacement is different from Kunen's. (Contributed by Eric Schmidt, 29-Sep-2025.)

Hypothesis

Ref	Expression
wfax.1	⊢ 𝑊 = ∪ (𝑅1 “ On)

Assertion

Ref	Expression
wfaxrep	⊢ ∀𝑥 ∈ 𝑊 (∀𝑤 ∈ 𝑊 ∃𝑦 ∈ 𝑊 ∀𝑧 ∈ 𝑊 (∀𝑦𝜑 → 𝑧 = 𝑦) → ∃𝑦 ∈ 𝑊 ∀𝑧 ∈ 𝑊 (𝑧 ∈ 𝑦 ↔ ∃𝑤 ∈ 𝑊 (𝑤 ∈ 𝑥 ∧ ∀𝑦𝜑)))

Distinct variable group:   𝑥,𝑦,𝑧,𝑤,𝑊

Allowed substitution hints:   𝜑(𝑥,𝑦,𝑧,𝑤)

Proof of Theorem wfaxrep

Dummy variable 𝑓 is distinct from all other variables.

Step	Hyp	Ref	Expression
1		wfax.1	. 2 ⊢ 𝑊 = ∪ (𝑅1 “ On)
2		trwf 44936	. . . 4 ⊢ Tr ∪ (𝑅1 “ On)
3		treq 5272	. . . 4 ⊢ (𝑊 = ∪ (𝑅1 “ On) → (Tr 𝑊 ↔ Tr ∪ (𝑅1 “ On)))
4	2, 3	mpbiri 258	. . 3 ⊢ (𝑊 = ∪ (𝑅1 “ On) → Tr 𝑊)
5		vex 3481	. . . . . . . . . 10 ⊢ 𝑓 ∈ V
6	5	rnex 7932	. . . . . . . . 9 ⊢ ran 𝑓 ∈ V
7	6	r1elss 9843	. . . . . . . 8 ⊢ (ran 𝑓 ∈ ∪ (𝑅1 “ On) ↔ ran 𝑓 ⊆ ∪ (𝑅1 “ On))
8	7	biimpri 228	. . . . . . 7 ⊢ (ran 𝑓 ⊆ ∪ (𝑅1 “ On) → ran 𝑓 ∈ ∪ (𝑅1 “ On))
9	1	sseq2i 4024	. . . . . . 7 ⊢ (ran 𝑓 ⊆ 𝑊 ↔ ran 𝑓 ⊆ ∪ (𝑅1 “ On))
10	1	eleq2i 2830	. . . . . . 7 ⊢ (ran 𝑓 ∈ 𝑊 ↔ ran 𝑓 ∈ ∪ (𝑅1 “ On))
11	8, 9, 10	3imtr4i 292	. . . . . 6 ⊢ (ran 𝑓 ⊆ 𝑊 → ran 𝑓 ∈ 𝑊)
12	11	3ad2ant3 1134	. . . . 5 ⊢ ((Fun 𝑓 ∧ dom 𝑓 ∈ 𝑊 ∧ ran 𝑓 ⊆ 𝑊) → ran 𝑓 ∈ 𝑊)
13	12	ax-gen 1791	. . . 4 ⊢ ∀𝑓((Fun 𝑓 ∧ dom 𝑓 ∈ 𝑊 ∧ ran 𝑓 ⊆ 𝑊) → ran 𝑓 ∈ 𝑊)
14	13	a1i 11	. . 3 ⊢ (𝑊 = ∪ (𝑅1 “ On) → ∀𝑓((Fun 𝑓 ∧ dom 𝑓 ∈ 𝑊 ∧ ran 𝑓 ⊆ 𝑊) → ran 𝑓 ∈ 𝑊))
15		onwf 9867	. . . . 5 ⊢ On ⊆ ∪ (𝑅1 “ On)
16		0elon 6439	. . . . 5 ⊢ ∅ ∈ On
17	15, 16	sselii 3991	. . . 4 ⊢ ∅ ∈ ∪ (𝑅1 “ On)
18		eleq2 2827	. . . 4 ⊢ (𝑊 = ∪ (𝑅1 “ On) → (∅ ∈ 𝑊 ↔ ∅ ∈ ∪ (𝑅1 “ On)))
19	17, 18	mpbiri 258	. . 3 ⊢ (𝑊 = ∪ (𝑅1 “ On) → ∅ ∈ 𝑊)
20	4, 14, 19	modelaxrep 44945	. 2 ⊢ (𝑊 = ∪ (𝑅1 “ On) → ∀𝑥 ∈ 𝑊 (∀𝑤 ∈ 𝑊 ∃𝑦 ∈ 𝑊 ∀𝑧 ∈ 𝑊 (∀𝑦𝜑 → 𝑧 = 𝑦) → ∃𝑦 ∈ 𝑊 ∀𝑧 ∈ 𝑊 (𝑧 ∈ 𝑦 ↔ ∃𝑤 ∈ 𝑊 (𝑤 ∈ 𝑥 ∧ ∀𝑦𝜑))))
21	1, 20	ax-mp 5	1 ⊢ ∀𝑥 ∈ 𝑊 (∀𝑤 ∈ 𝑊 ∃𝑦 ∈ 𝑊 ∀𝑧 ∈ 𝑊 (∀𝑦𝜑 → 𝑧 = 𝑦) → ∃𝑦 ∈ 𝑊 ∀𝑧 ∈ 𝑊 (𝑧 ∈ 𝑦 ↔ ∃𝑤 ∈ 𝑊 (𝑤 ∈ 𝑥 ∧ ∀𝑦𝜑)))

Syntax hints:   → wi 4   ↔ wb 206   ∧ wa 395   ∧ w3a 1086  ∀wal 1534   = wceq 1536   ∈ wcel 2105  ∀wral 3058  ∃wrex 3067   ⊆ wss 3962  ∅c0 4338  ∪ cuni 4911  Tr wtr 5264  dom cdm 5688  ran crn 5689   “ cima 5691  Oncon0 6385  Fun wfun 6556  𝑅₁cr1 9799

This theorem was proved from axioms:  ax-mp 5  ax-1 6  ax-2 7  ax-3 8  ax-gen 1791  ax-4 1805  ax-5 1907  ax-6 1964  ax-7 2004  ax-8 2107  ax-9 2115  ax-10 2138  ax-11 2154  ax-12 2174  ax-ext 2705  ax-rep 5284  ax-sep 5301  ax-nul 5311  ax-pow 5370  ax-pr 5437  ax-un 7753

This theorem depends on definitions:  df-bi 207  df-an 396  df-or 848  df-3or 1087  df-3an 1088  df-tru 1539  df-fal 1549  df-ex 1776  df-nf 1780  df-sb 2062  df-mo 2537  df-eu 2566  df-clab 2712  df-cleq 2726  df-clel 2813  df-nfc 2889  df-ne 2938  df-ral 3059  df-rex 3068  df-rmo 3377  df-reu 3378  df-rab 3433  df-v 3479  df-sbc 3791  df-csb 3908  df-dif 3965  df-un 3967  df-in 3969  df-ss 3979  df-pss 3982  df-nul 4339  df-if 4531  df-pw 4606  df-sn 4631  df-pr 4633  df-op 4637  df-uni 4912  df-int 4951  df-iun 4997  df-br 5148  df-opab 5210  df-mpt 5231  df-tr 5265  df-id 5582  df-eprel 5588  df-po 5596  df-so 5597  df-fr 5640  df-we 5642  df-xp 5694  df-rel 5695  df-cnv 5696  df-co 5697  df-dm 5698  df-rn 5699  df-res 5700  df-ima 5701  df-pred 6322  df-ord 6388  df-on 6389  df-lim 6390  df-suc 6391  df-iota 6515  df-fun 6564  df-fn 6565  df-f 6566  df-f1 6567  df-fo 6568  df-f1o 6569  df-fv 6570  df-ov 7433  df-om 7887  df-2nd 8013  df-frecs 8304  df-wrecs 8335  df-recs 8409  df-rdg 8448  df-en 8984  df-dom 8985  df-sdom 8986  df-r1 9801  df-rank 9802

This theorem is referenced by: (None)