xposdif - Metamath Proof Explorer

	Metamath Proof Explorer		< Previous Next > Nearby theorems
Mirrors > Home > MPE Home > Th. List > xposdif		Structured version Visualization version GIF version

Theorem xposdif 13222

Description: Extended real version of posdif 11671. (Contributed by Mario Carneiro, 24-Aug-2015.)

**Assertion**
Ref	Expression
xposdif	⊢ ((𝐴 ∈ ℝ^* ∧ 𝐵 ∈ ℝ^*) → (𝐴 < 𝐵 ↔ 0 < (𝐵 +_𝑒 -_𝑒𝐴)))

**Proof of Theorem xposdif**
Step	Hyp	Ref	Expression
1		xnegcl 13173	. . . 4 ⊢ (𝐵 ∈ ℝ^* → -_𝑒𝐵 ∈ ℝ^*)
2		xaddcl 13199	. . . 4 ⊢ ((𝐴 ∈ ℝ^* ∧ -_𝑒𝐵 ∈ ℝ^) → (𝐴 +_𝑒 -_𝑒𝐵) ∈ ℝ^)
3	1, 2	sylan2 593	. . 3 ⊢ ((𝐴 ∈ ℝ^* ∧ 𝐵 ∈ ℝ^) → (𝐴 +_𝑒 -_𝑒𝐵) ∈ ℝ^)
4		xlt0neg1 13179	. . 3 ⊢ ((𝐴 +_𝑒 -_𝑒𝐵) ∈ ℝ^* → ((𝐴 +_𝑒 -_𝑒𝐵) < 0 ↔ 0 < -_𝑒(𝐴 +_𝑒 -_𝑒𝐵)))
5	3, 4	syl 17	. 2 ⊢ ((𝐴 ∈ ℝ^* ∧ 𝐵 ∈ ℝ^*) → ((𝐴 +_𝑒 -_𝑒𝐵) < 0 ↔ 0 < -_𝑒(𝐴 +_𝑒 -_𝑒𝐵)))
6		xsubge0 13221	. . . 4 ⊢ ((𝐴 ∈ ℝ^* ∧ 𝐵 ∈ ℝ^*) → (0 ≤ (𝐴 +_𝑒 -_𝑒𝐵) ↔ 𝐵 ≤ 𝐴))
7	6	notbid 318	. . 3 ⊢ ((𝐴 ∈ ℝ^* ∧ 𝐵 ∈ ℝ^*) → (¬ 0 ≤ (𝐴 +_𝑒 -_𝑒𝐵) ↔ ¬ 𝐵 ≤ 𝐴))
8		0xr 11221	. . . 4 ⊢ 0 ∈ ℝ^*
9		xrltnle 11241	. . . 4 ⊢ (((𝐴 +_𝑒 -_𝑒𝐵) ∈ ℝ^* ∧ 0 ∈ ℝ^*) → ((𝐴 +_𝑒 -_𝑒𝐵) < 0 ↔ ¬ 0 ≤ (𝐴 +_𝑒 -_𝑒𝐵)))
10	3, 8, 9	sylancl 586	. . 3 ⊢ ((𝐴 ∈ ℝ^* ∧ 𝐵 ∈ ℝ^*) → ((𝐴 +_𝑒 -_𝑒𝐵) < 0 ↔ ¬ 0 ≤ (𝐴 +_𝑒 -_𝑒𝐵)))
11		xrltnle 11241	. . 3 ⊢ ((𝐴 ∈ ℝ^* ∧ 𝐵 ∈ ℝ^*) → (𝐴 < 𝐵 ↔ ¬ 𝐵 ≤ 𝐴))
12	7, 10, 11	3bitr4d 311	. 2 ⊢ ((𝐴 ∈ ℝ^* ∧ 𝐵 ∈ ℝ^*) → ((𝐴 +_𝑒 -_𝑒𝐵) < 0 ↔ 𝐴 < 𝐵))
13		xnegdi 13208	. . . . 5 ⊢ ((𝐴 ∈ ℝ^* ∧ -_𝑒𝐵 ∈ ℝ^*) → -_𝑒(𝐴 +_𝑒 -_𝑒𝐵) = (-_𝑒𝐴 +_𝑒 -_𝑒-_𝑒𝐵))
14	1, 13	sylan2 593	. . . 4 ⊢ ((𝐴 ∈ ℝ^* ∧ 𝐵 ∈ ℝ^*) → -_𝑒(𝐴 +_𝑒 -_𝑒𝐵) = (-_𝑒𝐴 +_𝑒 -_𝑒-_𝑒𝐵))
15		xnegneg 13174	. . . . . 6 ⊢ (𝐵 ∈ ℝ^* → -_𝑒-_𝑒𝐵 = 𝐵)
16	15	oveq2d 7403	. . . . 5 ⊢ (𝐵 ∈ ℝ^* → (-_𝑒𝐴 +_𝑒 -_𝑒-_𝑒𝐵) = (-_𝑒𝐴 +_𝑒 𝐵))
17	16	adantl 481	. . . 4 ⊢ ((𝐴 ∈ ℝ^* ∧ 𝐵 ∈ ℝ^*) → (-_𝑒𝐴 +_𝑒 -_𝑒-_𝑒𝐵) = (-_𝑒𝐴 +_𝑒 𝐵))
18		xnegcl 13173	. . . . 5 ⊢ (𝐴 ∈ ℝ^* → -_𝑒𝐴 ∈ ℝ^*)
19		xaddcom 13200	. . . . 5 ⊢ ((-_𝑒𝐴 ∈ ℝ^* ∧ 𝐵 ∈ ℝ^*) → (-_𝑒𝐴 +_𝑒 𝐵) = (𝐵 +_𝑒 -_𝑒𝐴))
20	18, 19	sylan 580	. . . 4 ⊢ ((𝐴 ∈ ℝ^* ∧ 𝐵 ∈ ℝ^*) → (-_𝑒𝐴 +_𝑒 𝐵) = (𝐵 +_𝑒 -_𝑒𝐴))
21	14, 17, 20	3eqtrd 2768	. . 3 ⊢ ((𝐴 ∈ ℝ^* ∧ 𝐵 ∈ ℝ^*) → -_𝑒(𝐴 +_𝑒 -_𝑒𝐵) = (𝐵 +_𝑒 -_𝑒𝐴))
22	21	breq2d 5119	. 2 ⊢ ((𝐴 ∈ ℝ^* ∧ 𝐵 ∈ ℝ^*) → (0 < -_𝑒(𝐴 +_𝑒 -_𝑒𝐵) ↔ 0 < (𝐵 +_𝑒 -_𝑒𝐴)))
23	5, 12, 22	3bitr3d 309	1 ⊢ ((𝐴 ∈ ℝ^* ∧ 𝐵 ∈ ℝ^*) → (𝐴 < 𝐵 ↔ 0 < (𝐵 +_𝑒 -_𝑒𝐴)))

Colors of variables: wff setvar class

Syntax hints: ¬ wn 3 → wi 4 ↔ wb 206 ∧ wa 395 = wceq 1540 ∈ wcel 2109 class class class wbr 5107 (class class class)co 7387 0cc0 11068 ℝ^*cxr 11207 < clt 11208 ≤ cle 11209 -_𝑒cxne 13069 +_𝑒 cxad 13070

This theorem was proved from axioms: ax-mp 5 ax-1 6 ax-2 7 ax-3 8 ax-gen 1795 ax-4 1809 ax-5 1910 ax-6 1967 ax-7 2008 ax-8 2111 ax-9 2119 ax-10 2142 ax-11 2158 ax-12 2178 ax-ext 2701 ax-sep 5251 ax-nul 5261 ax-pow 5320 ax-pr 5387 ax-un 7711 ax-cnex 11124 ax-resscn 11125 ax-1cn 11126 ax-icn 11127 ax-addcl 11128 ax-addrcl 11129 ax-mulcl 11130 ax-mulrcl 11131 ax-mulcom 11132 ax-addass 11133 ax-mulass 11134 ax-distr 11135 ax-i2m1 11136 ax-1ne0 11137 ax-1rid 11138 ax-rnegex 11139 ax-rrecex 11140 ax-cnre 11141 ax-pre-lttri 11142 ax-pre-lttrn 11143 ax-pre-ltadd 11144

This theorem depends on definitions: df-bi 207 df-an 396 df-or 848 df-3or 1087 df-3an 1088 df-tru 1543 df-fal 1553 df-ex 1780 df-nf 1784 df-sb 2066 df-mo 2533 df-eu 2562 df-clab 2708 df-cleq 2721 df-clel 2803 df-nfc 2878 df-ne 2926 df-nel 3030 df-ral 3045 df-rex 3054 df-reu 3355 df-rab 3406 df-v 3449 df-sbc 3754 df-csb 3863 df-dif 3917 df-un 3919 df-in 3921 df-ss 3931 df-nul 4297 df-if 4489 df-pw 4565 df-sn 4590 df-pr 4592 df-op 4596 df-uni 4872 df-iun 4957 df-br 5108 df-opab 5170 df-mpt 5189 df-id 5533 df-po 5546 df-so 5547 df-xp 5644 df-rel 5645 df-cnv 5646 df-co 5647 df-dm 5648 df-rn 5649 df-res 5650 df-ima 5651 df-iota 6464 df-fun 6513 df-fn 6514 df-f 6515 df-f1 6516 df-fo 6517 df-f1o 6518 df-fv 6519 df-riota 7344 df-ov 7390 df-oprab 7391 df-mpo 7392 df-1st 7968 df-2nd 7969 df-er 8671 df-en 8919 df-dom 8920 df-sdom 8921 df-pnf 11210 df-mnf 11211 df-xr 11212 df-ltxr 11213 df-le 11214 df-sub 11407 df-neg 11408 df-xneg 13072 df-xadd 13073

This theorem is referenced by: blcld 24393 metdstri 24740

W3C validator