xposdif - Metamath Proof Explorer

	Metamath Proof Explorer		< Previous Next > Nearby theorems
Mirrors > Home > MPE Home > Th. List > xposdif		Structured version Visualization version GIF version

Theorem xposdif 12996

Description: Extended real version of posdif 11468. (Contributed by Mario Carneiro, 24-Aug-2015.)

**Assertion**
Ref	Expression
xposdif	⊢ ((𝐴 ∈ ℝ^* ∧ 𝐵 ∈ ℝ^*) → (𝐴 < 𝐵 ↔ 0 < (𝐵 +_𝑒 -_𝑒𝐴)))

**Proof of Theorem xposdif**
Step	Hyp	Ref	Expression
1		xnegcl 12947	. . . 4 ⊢ (𝐵 ∈ ℝ^* → -_𝑒𝐵 ∈ ℝ^*)
2		xaddcl 12973	. . . 4 ⊢ ((𝐴 ∈ ℝ^* ∧ -_𝑒𝐵 ∈ ℝ^) → (𝐴 +_𝑒 -_𝑒𝐵) ∈ ℝ^)
3	1, 2	sylan2 593	. . 3 ⊢ ((𝐴 ∈ ℝ^* ∧ 𝐵 ∈ ℝ^) → (𝐴 +_𝑒 -_𝑒𝐵) ∈ ℝ^)
4		xlt0neg1 12953	. . 3 ⊢ ((𝐴 +_𝑒 -_𝑒𝐵) ∈ ℝ^* → ((𝐴 +_𝑒 -_𝑒𝐵) < 0 ↔ 0 < -_𝑒(𝐴 +_𝑒 -_𝑒𝐵)))
5	3, 4	syl 17	. 2 ⊢ ((𝐴 ∈ ℝ^* ∧ 𝐵 ∈ ℝ^*) → ((𝐴 +_𝑒 -_𝑒𝐵) < 0 ↔ 0 < -_𝑒(𝐴 +_𝑒 -_𝑒𝐵)))
6		xsubge0 12995	. . . 4 ⊢ ((𝐴 ∈ ℝ^* ∧ 𝐵 ∈ ℝ^*) → (0 ≤ (𝐴 +_𝑒 -_𝑒𝐵) ↔ 𝐵 ≤ 𝐴))
7	6	notbid 318	. . 3 ⊢ ((𝐴 ∈ ℝ^* ∧ 𝐵 ∈ ℝ^*) → (¬ 0 ≤ (𝐴 +_𝑒 -_𝑒𝐵) ↔ ¬ 𝐵 ≤ 𝐴))
8		0xr 11022	. . . 4 ⊢ 0 ∈ ℝ^*
9		xrltnle 11042	. . . 4 ⊢ (((𝐴 +_𝑒 -_𝑒𝐵) ∈ ℝ^* ∧ 0 ∈ ℝ^*) → ((𝐴 +_𝑒 -_𝑒𝐵) < 0 ↔ ¬ 0 ≤ (𝐴 +_𝑒 -_𝑒𝐵)))
10	3, 8, 9	sylancl 586	. . 3 ⊢ ((𝐴 ∈ ℝ^* ∧ 𝐵 ∈ ℝ^*) → ((𝐴 +_𝑒 -_𝑒𝐵) < 0 ↔ ¬ 0 ≤ (𝐴 +_𝑒 -_𝑒𝐵)))
11		xrltnle 11042	. . 3 ⊢ ((𝐴 ∈ ℝ^* ∧ 𝐵 ∈ ℝ^*) → (𝐴 < 𝐵 ↔ ¬ 𝐵 ≤ 𝐴))
12	7, 10, 11	3bitr4d 311	. 2 ⊢ ((𝐴 ∈ ℝ^* ∧ 𝐵 ∈ ℝ^*) → ((𝐴 +_𝑒 -_𝑒𝐵) < 0 ↔ 𝐴 < 𝐵))
13		xnegdi 12982	. . . . 5 ⊢ ((𝐴 ∈ ℝ^* ∧ -_𝑒𝐵 ∈ ℝ^*) → -_𝑒(𝐴 +_𝑒 -_𝑒𝐵) = (-_𝑒𝐴 +_𝑒 -_𝑒-_𝑒𝐵))
14	1, 13	sylan2 593	. . . 4 ⊢ ((𝐴 ∈ ℝ^* ∧ 𝐵 ∈ ℝ^*) → -_𝑒(𝐴 +_𝑒 -_𝑒𝐵) = (-_𝑒𝐴 +_𝑒 -_𝑒-_𝑒𝐵))
15		xnegneg 12948	. . . . . 6 ⊢ (𝐵 ∈ ℝ^* → -_𝑒-_𝑒𝐵 = 𝐵)
16	15	oveq2d 7291	. . . . 5 ⊢ (𝐵 ∈ ℝ^* → (-_𝑒𝐴 +_𝑒 -_𝑒-_𝑒𝐵) = (-_𝑒𝐴 +_𝑒 𝐵))
17	16	adantl 482	. . . 4 ⊢ ((𝐴 ∈ ℝ^* ∧ 𝐵 ∈ ℝ^*) → (-_𝑒𝐴 +_𝑒 -_𝑒-_𝑒𝐵) = (-_𝑒𝐴 +_𝑒 𝐵))
18		xnegcl 12947	. . . . 5 ⊢ (𝐴 ∈ ℝ^* → -_𝑒𝐴 ∈ ℝ^*)
19		xaddcom 12974	. . . . 5 ⊢ ((-_𝑒𝐴 ∈ ℝ^* ∧ 𝐵 ∈ ℝ^*) → (-_𝑒𝐴 +_𝑒 𝐵) = (𝐵 +_𝑒 -_𝑒𝐴))
20	18, 19	sylan 580	. . . 4 ⊢ ((𝐴 ∈ ℝ^* ∧ 𝐵 ∈ ℝ^*) → (-_𝑒𝐴 +_𝑒 𝐵) = (𝐵 +_𝑒 -_𝑒𝐴))
21	14, 17, 20	3eqtrd 2782	. . 3 ⊢ ((𝐴 ∈ ℝ^* ∧ 𝐵 ∈ ℝ^*) → -_𝑒(𝐴 +_𝑒 -_𝑒𝐵) = (𝐵 +_𝑒 -_𝑒𝐴))
22	21	breq2d 5086	. 2 ⊢ ((𝐴 ∈ ℝ^* ∧ 𝐵 ∈ ℝ^*) → (0 < -_𝑒(𝐴 +_𝑒 -_𝑒𝐵) ↔ 0 < (𝐵 +_𝑒 -_𝑒𝐴)))
23	5, 12, 22	3bitr3d 309	1 ⊢ ((𝐴 ∈ ℝ^* ∧ 𝐵 ∈ ℝ^*) → (𝐴 < 𝐵 ↔ 0 < (𝐵 +_𝑒 -_𝑒𝐴)))

Colors of variables: wff setvar class

Syntax hints: ¬ wn 3 → wi 4 ↔ wb 205 ∧ wa 396 = wceq 1539 ∈ wcel 2106 class class class wbr 5074 (class class class)co 7275 0cc0 10871 ℝ^*cxr 11008 < clt 11009 ≤ cle 11010 -_𝑒cxne 12845 +_𝑒 cxad 12846

This theorem was proved from axioms: ax-mp 5 ax-1 6 ax-2 7 ax-3 8 ax-gen 1798 ax-4 1812 ax-5 1913 ax-6 1971 ax-7 2011 ax-8 2108 ax-9 2116 ax-10 2137 ax-11 2154 ax-12 2171 ax-ext 2709 ax-sep 5223 ax-nul 5230 ax-pow 5288 ax-pr 5352 ax-un 7588 ax-cnex 10927 ax-resscn 10928 ax-1cn 10929 ax-icn 10930 ax-addcl 10931 ax-addrcl 10932 ax-mulcl 10933 ax-mulrcl 10934 ax-mulcom 10935 ax-addass 10936 ax-mulass 10937 ax-distr 10938 ax-i2m1 10939 ax-1ne0 10940 ax-1rid 10941 ax-rnegex 10942 ax-rrecex 10943 ax-cnre 10944 ax-pre-lttri 10945 ax-pre-lttrn 10946 ax-pre-ltadd 10947

This theorem depends on definitions: df-bi 206 df-an 397 df-or 845 df-3or 1087 df-3an 1088 df-tru 1542 df-fal 1552 df-ex 1783 df-nf 1787 df-sb 2068 df-mo 2540 df-eu 2569 df-clab 2716 df-cleq 2730 df-clel 2816 df-nfc 2889 df-ne 2944 df-nel 3050 df-ral 3069 df-rex 3070 df-reu 3072 df-rab 3073 df-v 3434 df-sbc 3717 df-csb 3833 df-dif 3890 df-un 3892 df-in 3894 df-ss 3904 df-nul 4257 df-if 4460 df-pw 4535 df-sn 4562 df-pr 4564 df-op 4568 df-uni 4840 df-iun 4926 df-br 5075 df-opab 5137 df-mpt 5158 df-id 5489 df-po 5503 df-so 5504 df-xp 5595 df-rel 5596 df-cnv 5597 df-co 5598 df-dm 5599 df-rn 5600 df-res 5601 df-ima 5602 df-iota 6391 df-fun 6435 df-fn 6436 df-f 6437 df-f1 6438 df-fo 6439 df-f1o 6440 df-fv 6441 df-riota 7232 df-ov 7278 df-oprab 7279 df-mpo 7280 df-1st 7831 df-2nd 7832 df-er 8498 df-en 8734 df-dom 8735 df-sdom 8736 df-pnf 11011 df-mnf 11012 df-xr 11013 df-ltxr 11014 df-le 11015 df-sub 11207 df-neg 11208 df-xneg 12848 df-xadd 12849

This theorem is referenced by: blcld 23661 metdstri 24014

W3C validator