xposdif - Metamath Proof Explorer

	Metamath Proof Explorer		< Previous Next > Nearby theorems
Mirrors > Home > MPE Home > Th. List > xposdif		Structured version Visualization version GIF version

Theorem xposdif 13262

Description: Extended real version of posdif 11677. (Contributed by Mario Carneiro, 24-Aug-2015.)

**Assertion**
Ref	Expression
xposdif	⊢ ((𝐴 ∈ ℝ^* ∧ 𝐵 ∈ ℝ^*) → (𝐴 < 𝐵 ↔ 0 < (𝐵 +_𝑒 -_𝑒𝐴)))

**Proof of Theorem xposdif**
Step	Hyp	Ref	Expression
1		xnegcl 13213	. . . 4 ⊢ (𝐵 ∈ ℝ^* → -_𝑒𝐵 ∈ ℝ^*)
2		xaddcl 13239	. . . 4 ⊢ ((𝐴 ∈ ℝ^* ∧ -_𝑒𝐵 ∈ ℝ^) → (𝐴 +_𝑒 -_𝑒𝐵) ∈ ℝ^)
3	1, 2	sylan2 602	. . 3 ⊢ ((𝐴 ∈ ℝ^* ∧ 𝐵 ∈ ℝ^) → (𝐴 +_𝑒 -_𝑒𝐵) ∈ ℝ^)
4		xlt0neg1 13219	. . 3 ⊢ ((𝐴 +_𝑒 -_𝑒𝐵) ∈ ℝ^* → ((𝐴 +_𝑒 -_𝑒𝐵) < 0 ↔ 0 < -_𝑒(𝐴 +_𝑒 -_𝑒𝐵)))
5	3, 4	syl 17	. 2 ⊢ ((𝐴 ∈ ℝ^* ∧ 𝐵 ∈ ℝ^*) → ((𝐴 +_𝑒 -_𝑒𝐵) < 0 ↔ 0 < -_𝑒(𝐴 +_𝑒 -_𝑒𝐵)))
6		xsubge0 13261	. . . 4 ⊢ ((𝐴 ∈ ℝ^* ∧ 𝐵 ∈ ℝ^*) → (0 ≤ (𝐴 +_𝑒 -_𝑒𝐵) ↔ 𝐵 ≤ 𝐴))
7	6	notbid 320	. . 3 ⊢ ((𝐴 ∈ ℝ^* ∧ 𝐵 ∈ ℝ^*) → (¬ 0 ≤ (𝐴 +_𝑒 -_𝑒𝐵) ↔ ¬ 𝐵 ≤ 𝐴))
8		0xr 11226	. . . 4 ⊢ 0 ∈ ℝ^*
9		xrltnle 11246	. . . 4 ⊢ (((𝐴 +_𝑒 -_𝑒𝐵) ∈ ℝ^* ∧ 0 ∈ ℝ^*) → ((𝐴 +_𝑒 -_𝑒𝐵) < 0 ↔ ¬ 0 ≤ (𝐴 +_𝑒 -_𝑒𝐵)))
10	3, 8, 9	sylancl 595	. . 3 ⊢ ((𝐴 ∈ ℝ^* ∧ 𝐵 ∈ ℝ^*) → ((𝐴 +_𝑒 -_𝑒𝐵) < 0 ↔ ¬ 0 ≤ (𝐴 +_𝑒 -_𝑒𝐵)))
11		xrltnle 11246	. . 3 ⊢ ((𝐴 ∈ ℝ^* ∧ 𝐵 ∈ ℝ^*) → (𝐴 < 𝐵 ↔ ¬ 𝐵 ≤ 𝐴))
12	7, 10, 11	3bitr4d 313	. 2 ⊢ ((𝐴 ∈ ℝ^* ∧ 𝐵 ∈ ℝ^*) → ((𝐴 +_𝑒 -_𝑒𝐵) < 0 ↔ 𝐴 < 𝐵))
13		xnegdi 13248	. . . . 5 ⊢ ((𝐴 ∈ ℝ^* ∧ -_𝑒𝐵 ∈ ℝ^*) → -_𝑒(𝐴 +_𝑒 -_𝑒𝐵) = (-_𝑒𝐴 +_𝑒 -_𝑒-_𝑒𝐵))
14	1, 13	sylan2 602	. . . 4 ⊢ ((𝐴 ∈ ℝ^* ∧ 𝐵 ∈ ℝ^*) → -_𝑒(𝐴 +_𝑒 -_𝑒𝐵) = (-_𝑒𝐴 +_𝑒 -_𝑒-_𝑒𝐵))
15		xnegneg 13214	. . . . . 6 ⊢ (𝐵 ∈ ℝ^* → -_𝑒-_𝑒𝐵 = 𝐵)
16	15	oveq2d 7408	. . . . 5 ⊢ (𝐵 ∈ ℝ^* → (-_𝑒𝐴 +_𝑒 -_𝑒-_𝑒𝐵) = (-_𝑒𝐴 +_𝑒 𝐵))
17	16	adantl 485	. . . 4 ⊢ ((𝐴 ∈ ℝ^* ∧ 𝐵 ∈ ℝ^*) → (-_𝑒𝐴 +_𝑒 -_𝑒-_𝑒𝐵) = (-_𝑒𝐴 +_𝑒 𝐵))
18		xnegcl 13213	. . . . 5 ⊢ (𝐴 ∈ ℝ^* → -_𝑒𝐴 ∈ ℝ^*)
19		xaddcom 13240	. . . . 5 ⊢ ((-_𝑒𝐴 ∈ ℝ^* ∧ 𝐵 ∈ ℝ^*) → (-_𝑒𝐴 +_𝑒 𝐵) = (𝐵 +_𝑒 -_𝑒𝐴))
20	18, 19	sylan 589	. . . 4 ⊢ ((𝐴 ∈ ℝ^* ∧ 𝐵 ∈ ℝ^*) → (-_𝑒𝐴 +_𝑒 𝐵) = (𝐵 +_𝑒 -_𝑒𝐴))
21	14, 17, 20	3eqtrd 2800	. . 3 ⊢ ((𝐴 ∈ ℝ^* ∧ 𝐵 ∈ ℝ^*) → -_𝑒(𝐴 +_𝑒 -_𝑒𝐵) = (𝐵 +_𝑒 -_𝑒𝐴))
22	21	breq2d 5111	. 2 ⊢ ((𝐴 ∈ ℝ^* ∧ 𝐵 ∈ ℝ^*) → (0 < -_𝑒(𝐴 +_𝑒 -_𝑒𝐵) ↔ 0 < (𝐵 +_𝑒 -_𝑒𝐴)))
23	5, 12, 22	3bitr3d 311	1 ⊢ ((𝐴 ∈ ℝ^* ∧ 𝐵 ∈ ℝ^*) → (𝐴 < 𝐵 ↔ 0 < (𝐵 +_𝑒 -_𝑒𝐴)))

Colors of variables: wff setvar class

Syntax hints: ¬ wn 3 → wi 4 ↔ wb 208 ∧ wa 399 = wceq 1559 ∈ wcel 2141 class class class wbr 5099 (class class class)co 7392 0cc0 11070 ℝ^*cxr 11212 < clt 11213 ≤ cle 11214 -_𝑒cxne 13108 +_𝑒 cxad 13109

This theorem was proved from axioms: ax-mp 5 ax-1 6 ax-2 7 ax-3 8 ax-gen 1814 ax-4 1828 ax-5 1929 ax-6 1986 ax-7 2027 ax-8 2143 ax-9 2151 ax-10 2174 ax-11 2190 ax-12 2211 ax-ext 2733 ax-sep 5245 ax-nul 5255 ax-pow 5321 ax-pr 5389 ax-un 7714 ax-cnex 11126 ax-resscn 11127 ax-1cn 11128 ax-icn 11129 ax-addcl 11130 ax-addrcl 11131 ax-mulcl 11132 ax-mulrcl 11133 ax-mulcom 11134 ax-addass 11135 ax-mulass 11136 ax-distr 11137 ax-i2m1 11138 ax-1ne0 11139 ax-1rid 11140 ax-rnegex 11141 ax-rrecex 11142 ax-cnre 11143 ax-pre-lttri 11144 ax-pre-lttrn 11145 ax-pre-ltadd 11146

This theorem depends on definitions: df-bi 209 df-an 400 df-or 859 df-3or 1098 df-3an 1099 df-tru 1562 df-fal 1572 df-ex 1799 df-nf 1803 df-sb 2090 df-mo 2565 df-eu 2595 df-clab 2740 df-cleq 2753 df-clel 2836 df-nfc 2910 df-ne 2957 df-nel 3061 df-ral 3076 df-rex 3086 df-reu 3367 df-rab 3414 df-v 3455 df-sbc 3745 df-csb 3853 df-dif 3907 df-un 3909 df-in 3911 df-ss 3921 df-nul 4286 df-if 4480 df-pw 4556 df-sn 4582 df-pr 4584 df-op 4588 df-uni 4865 df-iun 4950 df-br 5100 df-opab 5162 df-mpt 5181 df-id 5540 df-po 5553 df-so 5554 df-xp 5651 df-rel 5652 df-cnv 5653 df-co 5654 df-dm 5655 df-rn 5656 df-res 5657 df-ima 5658 df-iota 6473 df-fun 6519 df-fn 6520 df-f 6521 df-f1 6522 df-fo 6523 df-f1o 6524 df-fv 6525 df-riota 7349 df-ov 7395 df-oprab 7396 df-mpo 7397 df-1st 7966 df-2nd 7967 df-er 8673 df-en 8924 df-dom 8925 df-sdom 8926 df-pnf 11215 df-mnf 11216 df-xr 11217 df-ltxr 11218 df-le 11219 df-sub 11413 df-neg 11414 df-xneg 13111 df-xadd 13112

This theorem is referenced by: blcld 24545 metdstri 24892

W3C validator