xposdif - Metamath Proof Explorer

	Metamath Proof Explorer		< Previous Next > Nearby theorems
Mirrors > Home > MPE Home > Th. List > xposdif		Structured version Visualization version GIF version

Theorem xposdif 13324

Description: Extended real version of posdif 11783. (Contributed by Mario Carneiro, 24-Aug-2015.)

**Assertion**
Ref	Expression
xposdif	⊢ ((𝐴 ∈ ℝ^* ∧ 𝐵 ∈ ℝ^*) → (𝐴 < 𝐵 ↔ 0 < (𝐵 +_𝑒 -_𝑒𝐴)))

**Proof of Theorem xposdif**
Step	Hyp	Ref	Expression
1		xnegcl 13275	. . . 4 ⊢ (𝐵 ∈ ℝ^* → -_𝑒𝐵 ∈ ℝ^*)
2		xaddcl 13301	. . . 4 ⊢ ((𝐴 ∈ ℝ^* ∧ -_𝑒𝐵 ∈ ℝ^) → (𝐴 +_𝑒 -_𝑒𝐵) ∈ ℝ^)
3	1, 2	sylan2 592	. . 3 ⊢ ((𝐴 ∈ ℝ^* ∧ 𝐵 ∈ ℝ^) → (𝐴 +_𝑒 -_𝑒𝐵) ∈ ℝ^)
4		xlt0neg1 13281	. . 3 ⊢ ((𝐴 +_𝑒 -_𝑒𝐵) ∈ ℝ^* → ((𝐴 +_𝑒 -_𝑒𝐵) < 0 ↔ 0 < -_𝑒(𝐴 +_𝑒 -_𝑒𝐵)))
5	3, 4	syl 17	. 2 ⊢ ((𝐴 ∈ ℝ^* ∧ 𝐵 ∈ ℝ^*) → ((𝐴 +_𝑒 -_𝑒𝐵) < 0 ↔ 0 < -_𝑒(𝐴 +_𝑒 -_𝑒𝐵)))
6		xsubge0 13323	. . . 4 ⊢ ((𝐴 ∈ ℝ^* ∧ 𝐵 ∈ ℝ^*) → (0 ≤ (𝐴 +_𝑒 -_𝑒𝐵) ↔ 𝐵 ≤ 𝐴))
7	6	notbid 318	. . 3 ⊢ ((𝐴 ∈ ℝ^* ∧ 𝐵 ∈ ℝ^*) → (¬ 0 ≤ (𝐴 +_𝑒 -_𝑒𝐵) ↔ ¬ 𝐵 ≤ 𝐴))
8		0xr 11337	. . . 4 ⊢ 0 ∈ ℝ^*
9		xrltnle 11357	. . . 4 ⊢ (((𝐴 +_𝑒 -_𝑒𝐵) ∈ ℝ^* ∧ 0 ∈ ℝ^*) → ((𝐴 +_𝑒 -_𝑒𝐵) < 0 ↔ ¬ 0 ≤ (𝐴 +_𝑒 -_𝑒𝐵)))
10	3, 8, 9	sylancl 585	. . 3 ⊢ ((𝐴 ∈ ℝ^* ∧ 𝐵 ∈ ℝ^*) → ((𝐴 +_𝑒 -_𝑒𝐵) < 0 ↔ ¬ 0 ≤ (𝐴 +_𝑒 -_𝑒𝐵)))
11		xrltnle 11357	. . 3 ⊢ ((𝐴 ∈ ℝ^* ∧ 𝐵 ∈ ℝ^*) → (𝐴 < 𝐵 ↔ ¬ 𝐵 ≤ 𝐴))
12	7, 10, 11	3bitr4d 311	. 2 ⊢ ((𝐴 ∈ ℝ^* ∧ 𝐵 ∈ ℝ^*) → ((𝐴 +_𝑒 -_𝑒𝐵) < 0 ↔ 𝐴 < 𝐵))
13		xnegdi 13310	. . . . 5 ⊢ ((𝐴 ∈ ℝ^* ∧ -_𝑒𝐵 ∈ ℝ^*) → -_𝑒(𝐴 +_𝑒 -_𝑒𝐵) = (-_𝑒𝐴 +_𝑒 -_𝑒-_𝑒𝐵))
14	1, 13	sylan2 592	. . . 4 ⊢ ((𝐴 ∈ ℝ^* ∧ 𝐵 ∈ ℝ^*) → -_𝑒(𝐴 +_𝑒 -_𝑒𝐵) = (-_𝑒𝐴 +_𝑒 -_𝑒-_𝑒𝐵))
15		xnegneg 13276	. . . . . 6 ⊢ (𝐵 ∈ ℝ^* → -_𝑒-_𝑒𝐵 = 𝐵)
16	15	oveq2d 7464	. . . . 5 ⊢ (𝐵 ∈ ℝ^* → (-_𝑒𝐴 +_𝑒 -_𝑒-_𝑒𝐵) = (-_𝑒𝐴 +_𝑒 𝐵))
17	16	adantl 481	. . . 4 ⊢ ((𝐴 ∈ ℝ^* ∧ 𝐵 ∈ ℝ^*) → (-_𝑒𝐴 +_𝑒 -_𝑒-_𝑒𝐵) = (-_𝑒𝐴 +_𝑒 𝐵))
18		xnegcl 13275	. . . . 5 ⊢ (𝐴 ∈ ℝ^* → -_𝑒𝐴 ∈ ℝ^*)
19		xaddcom 13302	. . . . 5 ⊢ ((-_𝑒𝐴 ∈ ℝ^* ∧ 𝐵 ∈ ℝ^*) → (-_𝑒𝐴 +_𝑒 𝐵) = (𝐵 +_𝑒 -_𝑒𝐴))
20	18, 19	sylan 579	. . . 4 ⊢ ((𝐴 ∈ ℝ^* ∧ 𝐵 ∈ ℝ^*) → (-_𝑒𝐴 +_𝑒 𝐵) = (𝐵 +_𝑒 -_𝑒𝐴))
21	14, 17, 20	3eqtrd 2784	. . 3 ⊢ ((𝐴 ∈ ℝ^* ∧ 𝐵 ∈ ℝ^*) → -_𝑒(𝐴 +_𝑒 -_𝑒𝐵) = (𝐵 +_𝑒 -_𝑒𝐴))
22	21	breq2d 5178	. 2 ⊢ ((𝐴 ∈ ℝ^* ∧ 𝐵 ∈ ℝ^*) → (0 < -_𝑒(𝐴 +_𝑒 -_𝑒𝐵) ↔ 0 < (𝐵 +_𝑒 -_𝑒𝐴)))
23	5, 12, 22	3bitr3d 309	1 ⊢ ((𝐴 ∈ ℝ^* ∧ 𝐵 ∈ ℝ^*) → (𝐴 < 𝐵 ↔ 0 < (𝐵 +_𝑒 -_𝑒𝐴)))

Colors of variables: wff setvar class

Syntax hints: ¬ wn 3 → wi 4 ↔ wb 206 ∧ wa 395 = wceq 1537 ∈ wcel 2108 class class class wbr 5166 (class class class)co 7448 0cc0 11184 ℝ^*cxr 11323 < clt 11324 ≤ cle 11325 -_𝑒cxne 13172 +_𝑒 cxad 13173

This theorem was proved from axioms: ax-mp 5 ax-1 6 ax-2 7 ax-3 8 ax-gen 1793 ax-4 1807 ax-5 1909 ax-6 1967 ax-7 2007 ax-8 2110 ax-9 2118 ax-10 2141 ax-11 2158 ax-12 2178 ax-ext 2711 ax-sep 5317 ax-nul 5324 ax-pow 5383 ax-pr 5447 ax-un 7770 ax-cnex 11240 ax-resscn 11241 ax-1cn 11242 ax-icn 11243 ax-addcl 11244 ax-addrcl 11245 ax-mulcl 11246 ax-mulrcl 11247 ax-mulcom 11248 ax-addass 11249 ax-mulass 11250 ax-distr 11251 ax-i2m1 11252 ax-1ne0 11253 ax-1rid 11254 ax-rnegex 11255 ax-rrecex 11256 ax-cnre 11257 ax-pre-lttri 11258 ax-pre-lttrn 11259 ax-pre-ltadd 11260

This theorem depends on definitions: df-bi 207 df-an 396 df-or 847 df-3or 1088 df-3an 1089 df-tru 1540 df-fal 1550 df-ex 1778 df-nf 1782 df-sb 2065 df-mo 2543 df-eu 2572 df-clab 2718 df-cleq 2732 df-clel 2819 df-nfc 2895 df-ne 2947 df-nel 3053 df-ral 3068 df-rex 3077 df-reu 3389 df-rab 3444 df-v 3490 df-sbc 3805 df-csb 3922 df-dif 3979 df-un 3981 df-in 3983 df-ss 3993 df-nul 4353 df-if 4549 df-pw 4624 df-sn 4649 df-pr 4651 df-op 4655 df-uni 4932 df-iun 5017 df-br 5167 df-opab 5229 df-mpt 5250 df-id 5593 df-po 5607 df-so 5608 df-xp 5706 df-rel 5707 df-cnv 5708 df-co 5709 df-dm 5710 df-rn 5711 df-res 5712 df-ima 5713 df-iota 6525 df-fun 6575 df-fn 6576 df-f 6577 df-f1 6578 df-fo 6579 df-f1o 6580 df-fv 6581 df-riota 7404 df-ov 7451 df-oprab 7452 df-mpo 7453 df-1st 8030 df-2nd 8031 df-er 8763 df-en 9004 df-dom 9005 df-sdom 9006 df-pnf 11326 df-mnf 11327 df-xr 11328 df-ltxr 11329 df-le 11330 df-sub 11522 df-neg 11523 df-xneg 13175 df-xadd 13176

This theorem is referenced by: blcld 24539 metdstri 24892

W3C validator