eigorthi - Hilbert Space Explorer

	Hilbert Space Explorer		< Previous Next > Nearby theorems
Mirrors > Home > HSE Home > Th. List > eigorthi		Structured version Visualization version GIF version

Theorem eigorthi 32319

Description: A necessary and sufficient condition (that holds when 𝑇 is a Hermitian operator) for two eigenvectors 𝐴 and 𝐵 to be orthogonal. Generalization of Equation 1.31 of [Hughes] p. 49. (Contributed by NM, 23-Jan-2005.) (New usage is discouraged.)

**Hypotheses**
Ref	Expression
eigorthi.1	⊢ 𝐴 ∈ ℋ
eigorthi.2	⊢ 𝐵 ∈ ℋ
eigorthi.3	⊢ 𝐶 ∈ ℂ
eigorthi.4	⊢ 𝐷 ∈ ℂ

**Assertion**
Ref	Expression
eigorthi	⊢ ((((𝑇‘𝐴) = (𝐶 ·_ℎ 𝐴) ∧ (𝑇‘𝐵) = (𝐷 ·_ℎ 𝐵)) ∧ 𝐶 ≠ (∗‘𝐷)) → ((𝐴 ·_ih (𝑇‘𝐵)) = ((𝑇‘𝐴) ·_ih 𝐵) ↔ (𝐴 ·_ih 𝐵) = 0))

**Proof of Theorem eigorthi**
Step	Hyp	Ref	Expression
1		oveq2 7422	. . . 4 ⊢ ((𝑇‘𝐵) = (𝐷 ·_ℎ 𝐵) → (𝐴 ·_ih (𝑇‘𝐵)) = (𝐴 ·_ih (𝐷 ·_ℎ 𝐵)))
2		eigorthi.4	. . . . 5 ⊢ 𝐷 ∈ ℂ
3		eigorthi.1	. . . . 5 ⊢ 𝐴 ∈ ℋ
4		eigorthi.2	. . . . 5 ⊢ 𝐵 ∈ ℋ
5		his5 31568	. . . . 5 ⊢ ((𝐷 ∈ ℂ ∧ 𝐴 ∈ ℋ ∧ 𝐵 ∈ ℋ) → (𝐴 ·_ih (𝐷 ·_ℎ 𝐵)) = ((∗‘𝐷) · (𝐴 ·_ih 𝐵)))
6	2, 3, 4, 5	mp3an 1490	. . . 4 ⊢ (𝐴 ·_ih (𝐷 ·_ℎ 𝐵)) = ((∗‘𝐷) · (𝐴 ·_ih 𝐵))
7	1, 6	eqtrdi 2811	. . 3 ⊢ ((𝑇‘𝐵) = (𝐷 ·_ℎ 𝐵) → (𝐴 ·_ih (𝑇‘𝐵)) = ((∗‘𝐷) · (𝐴 ·_ih 𝐵)))
8		oveq1 7421	. . . 4 ⊢ ((𝑇‘𝐴) = (𝐶 ·_ℎ 𝐴) → ((𝑇‘𝐴) ·_ih 𝐵) = ((𝐶 ·_ℎ 𝐴) ·_ih 𝐵))
9		eigorthi.3	. . . . 5 ⊢ 𝐶 ∈ ℂ
10		ax-his3 31566	. . . . 5 ⊢ ((𝐶 ∈ ℂ ∧ 𝐴 ∈ ℋ ∧ 𝐵 ∈ ℋ) → ((𝐶 ·_ℎ 𝐴) ·_ih 𝐵) = (𝐶 · (𝐴 ·_ih 𝐵)))
11	9, 3, 4, 10	mp3an 1490	. . . 4 ⊢ ((𝐶 ·_ℎ 𝐴) ·_ih 𝐵) = (𝐶 · (𝐴 ·_ih 𝐵))
12	8, 11	eqtrdi 2811	. . 3 ⊢ ((𝑇‘𝐴) = (𝐶 ·_ℎ 𝐴) → ((𝑇‘𝐴) ·_ih 𝐵) = (𝐶 · (𝐴 ·_ih 𝐵)))
13	7, 12	eqeqan12rd 2775	. 2 ⊢ (((𝑇‘𝐴) = (𝐶 ·_ℎ 𝐴) ∧ (𝑇‘𝐵) = (𝐷 ·_ℎ 𝐵)) → ((𝐴 ·_ih (𝑇‘𝐵)) = ((𝑇‘𝐴) ·_ih 𝐵) ↔ ((∗‘𝐷) · (𝐴 ·_ih 𝐵)) = (𝐶 · (𝐴 ·_ih 𝐵))))
14	3, 4	hicli 31563	. . . . . . . 8 ⊢ (𝐴 ·_ih 𝐵) ∈ ℂ
15	2	cjcli 15257	. . . . . . . . 9 ⊢ (∗‘𝐷) ∈ ℂ
16		mulcan2 11877	. . . . . . . . 9 ⊢ (((∗‘𝐷) ∈ ℂ ∧ 𝐶 ∈ ℂ ∧ ((𝐴 ·_ih 𝐵) ∈ ℂ ∧ (𝐴 ·_ih 𝐵) ≠ 0)) → (((∗‘𝐷) · (𝐴 ·_ih 𝐵)) = (𝐶 · (𝐴 ·_ih 𝐵)) ↔ (∗‘𝐷) = 𝐶))
17	15, 9, 16	mp3an12 1480	. . . . . . . 8 ⊢ (((𝐴 ·_ih 𝐵) ∈ ℂ ∧ (𝐴 ·_ih 𝐵) ≠ 0) → (((∗‘𝐷) · (𝐴 ·_ih 𝐵)) = (𝐶 · (𝐴 ·_ih 𝐵)) ↔ (∗‘𝐷) = 𝐶))
18	14, 17	mpan 703	. . . . . . 7 ⊢ ((𝐴 ·_ih 𝐵) ≠ 0 → (((∗‘𝐷) · (𝐴 ·_ih 𝐵)) = (𝐶 · (𝐴 ·_ih 𝐵)) ↔ (∗‘𝐷) = 𝐶))
19		eqcom 2767	. . . . . . 7 ⊢ ((∗‘𝐷) = 𝐶 ↔ 𝐶 = (∗‘𝐷))
20	18, 19	bitrdi 290	. . . . . 6 ⊢ ((𝐴 ·_ih 𝐵) ≠ 0 → (((∗‘𝐷) · (𝐴 ·_ih 𝐵)) = (𝐶 · (𝐴 ·_ih 𝐵)) ↔ 𝐶 = (∗‘𝐷)))
21	20	biimpcd 252	. . . . 5 ⊢ (((∗‘𝐷) · (𝐴 ·_ih 𝐵)) = (𝐶 · (𝐴 ·_ih 𝐵)) → ((𝐴 ·_ih 𝐵) ≠ 0 → 𝐶 = (∗‘𝐷)))
22	21	necon1d 2977	. . . 4 ⊢ (((∗‘𝐷) · (𝐴 ·_ih 𝐵)) = (𝐶 · (𝐴 ·_ih 𝐵)) → (𝐶 ≠ (∗‘𝐷) → (𝐴 ·_ih 𝐵) = 0))
23	22	com12 33	. . 3 ⊢ (𝐶 ≠ (∗‘𝐷) → (((∗‘𝐷) · (𝐴 ·_ih 𝐵)) = (𝐶 · (𝐴 ·_ih 𝐵)) → (𝐴 ·_ih 𝐵) = 0))
24		oveq2 7422	. . . 4 ⊢ ((𝐴 ·_ih 𝐵) = 0 → ((∗‘𝐷) · (𝐴 ·_ih 𝐵)) = ((∗‘𝐷) · 0))
25		oveq2 7422	. . . . 5 ⊢ ((𝐴 ·_ih 𝐵) = 0 → (𝐶 · (𝐴 ·_ih 𝐵)) = (𝐶 · 0))
26	9	mul01i 11425	. . . . . 6 ⊢ (𝐶 · 0) = 0
27	15	mul01i 11425	. . . . . 6 ⊢ ((∗‘𝐷) · 0) = 0
28	26, 27	eqtr4i 2786	. . . . 5 ⊢ (𝐶 · 0) = ((∗‘𝐷) · 0)
29	25, 28	eqtrdi 2811	. . . 4 ⊢ ((𝐴 ·_ih 𝐵) = 0 → (𝐶 · (𝐴 ·_ih 𝐵)) = ((∗‘𝐷) · 0))
30	24, 29	eqtr4d 2798	. . 3 ⊢ ((𝐴 ·_ih 𝐵) = 0 → ((∗‘𝐷) · (𝐴 ·_ih 𝐵)) = (𝐶 · (𝐴 ·_ih 𝐵)))
31	23, 30	impbid1 228	. 2 ⊢ (𝐶 ≠ (∗‘𝐷) → (((∗‘𝐷) · (𝐴 ·_ih 𝐵)) = (𝐶 · (𝐴 ·_ih 𝐵)) ↔ (𝐴 ·_ih 𝐵) = 0))
32	13, 31	sylan9bb 519	1 ⊢ ((((𝑇‘𝐴) = (𝐶 ·_ℎ 𝐴) ∧ (𝑇‘𝐵) = (𝐷 ·_ℎ 𝐵)) ∧ 𝐶 ≠ (∗‘𝐷)) → ((𝐴 ·_ih (𝑇‘𝐵)) = ((𝑇‘𝐴) ·_ih 𝐵) ↔ (𝐴 ·_ih 𝐵) = 0))

Colors of variables: wff setvar class

This proof depends on syntax axioms: → wi 4 ↔ wb 209 ∧ wa 401 = wceq 1570 ∈ wcel 2145 ≠ wne 2955 ‘cfv 6533 (class class class)co 7414 ℂcc 11123 0cc0 11125 · cmul 11130 ∗ccj 15184 ℋchba 31401 ·_ℎ csm 31403 ·_ih csp 31404

This proof depends on axioms: ax-mp 5 ax-1 6 ax-2 7 ax-3 8 ax-gen 1828 ax-4 1842 ax-5 1943 ax-6 2000 ax-7 2041 ax-8 2147 ax-9 2155 ax-10 2178 ax-11 2194 ax-12 2213 ax-ext 2732 ax-sep 5251 ax-nul 5263 ax-pow 5330 ax-pr 5398 ax-un 7737 ax-resscn 11182 ax-1cn 11183 ax-icn 11184 ax-addcl 11185 ax-addrcl 11186 ax-mulcl 11187 ax-mulrcl 11188 ax-mulcom 11189 ax-addass 11190 ax-mulass 11191 ax-distr 11192 ax-i2m1 11193 ax-1ne0 11194 ax-1rid 11195 ax-rnegex 11196 ax-rrecex 11197 ax-cnre 11198 ax-pre-lttri 11199 ax-pre-lttrn 11200 ax-pre-ltadd 11201 ax-pre-mulgt0 11202 ax-hfvmul 31487 ax-hfi 31561 ax-his1 31564 ax-his3 31566

This proof depends on definitions: df-bi 210 df-an 402 df-or 862 df-3or 1104 df-3an 1105 df-tru 1573 df-fal 1583 df-ex 1813 df-nf 1817 df-sb 2100 df-mo 2564 df-eu 2594 df-clab 2739 df-cleq 2752 df-clel 2835 df-nfc 2909 df-ne 2956 df-nel 3062 df-ral 3077 df-rex 3087 df-rmo 3365 df-reu 3366 df-rab 3413 df-v 3452 df-sbc 3740 df-csb 3848 df-dif 3902 df-un 3904 df-in 3906 df-ss 3916 df-pss 3919 df-nul 4280 df-if 4483 df-pw 4559 df-sn 4585 df-pr 4587 df-op 4591 df-uni 4868 df-iun 4953 df-br 5104 df-opab 5168 df-mpt 5187 df-tr 5213 df-id 5550 df-eprel 5555 df-po 5563 df-so 5564 df-fr 5608 df-we 5610 df-xp 5661 df-rel 5662 df-cnv 5663 df-co 5664 df-dm 5665 df-rn 5666 df-res 5667 df-ima 5668 df-pred 6299 df-ord 6360 df-on 6361 df-lim 6362 df-suc 6363 df-iota 6489 df-fun 6535 df-fn 6536 df-f 6537 df-f1 6538 df-fo 6539 df-f1o 6540 df-fv 6541 df-riota 7371 df-ov 7417 df-oprab 7418 df-mpo 7419 df-om 7864 df-2nd 7988 df-frecs 8281 df-wrecs 8312 df-recs 8361 df-rdg 8400 df-er 8697 df-en 8954 df-dom 8955 df-sdom 8956 df-pnf 11270 df-mnf 11271 df-xr 11272 df-ltxr 11273 df-le 11274 df-sub 11468 df-neg 11469 df-div 11897 df-nn 12259 df-2 12328 df-cj 15187 df-re 15188 df-im 15189

This theorem is used by: eigorth 32320

W3C validator