eigorthi - Hilbert Space Explorer

	Hilbert Space Explorer		< Previous Next > Nearby theorems
Mirrors > Home > HSE Home > Th. List > eigorthi		Structured version Visualization version GIF version

Theorem eigorthi 32496

Description: A necessary and sufficient condition (that holds when 𝑇 is a Hermitian operator) for two eigenvectors 𝐴 and 𝐵 to be orthogonal. Generalization of Equation 1.31 of [Hughes] p. 49. (Contributed by NM, 23-Jan-2005.) (New usage is discouraged.)

**Hypotheses**
Ref	Expression
eigorthi.1	⊢ 𝐴 ∈ ℋ
eigorthi.2	⊢ 𝐵 ∈ ℋ
eigorthi.3	⊢ 𝐶 ∈ ℂ
eigorthi.4	⊢ 𝐷 ∈ ℂ

**Assertion**
Ref	Expression
eigorthi	⊢ ((((𝑇‘𝐴) = (𝐶 ·_ℎ 𝐴) ∧ (𝑇‘𝐵) = (𝐷 ·_ℎ 𝐵)) ∧ 𝐶 ≠ (∗‘𝐷)) → ((𝐴 ·_ih (𝑇‘𝐵)) = ((𝑇‘𝐴) ·_ih 𝐵) ↔ (𝐴 ·_ih 𝐵) = 0))

**Proof of Theorem eigorthi**
Step	Hyp	Ref	Expression
1		oveq2 7459	. . . 4 ⊢ ((𝑇‘𝐵) = (𝐷 ·_ℎ 𝐵) → (𝐴 ·_ih (𝑇‘𝐵)) = (𝐴 ·_ih (𝐷 ·_ℎ 𝐵)))
2		eigorthi.4	. . . . 5 ⊢ 𝐷 ∈ ℂ
3		eigorthi.1	. . . . 5 ⊢ 𝐴 ∈ ℋ
4		eigorthi.2	. . . . 5 ⊢ 𝐵 ∈ ℋ
5		his5 31745	. . . . 5 ⊢ ((𝐷 ∈ ℂ ∧ 𝐴 ∈ ℋ ∧ 𝐵 ∈ ℋ) → (𝐴 ·_ih (𝐷 ·_ℎ 𝐵)) = ((∗‘𝐷) · (𝐴 ·_ih 𝐵)))
6	2, 3, 4, 5	mp3an 1491	. . . 4 ⊢ (𝐴 ·_ih (𝐷 ·_ℎ 𝐵)) = ((∗‘𝐷) · (𝐴 ·_ih 𝐵))
7	1, 6	eqtrdi 2814	. . 3 ⊢ ((𝑇‘𝐵) = (𝐷 ·_ℎ 𝐵) → (𝐴 ·_ih (𝑇‘𝐵)) = ((∗‘𝐷) · (𝐴 ·_ih 𝐵)))
8		oveq1 7458	. . . 4 ⊢ ((𝑇‘𝐴) = (𝐶 ·_ℎ 𝐴) → ((𝑇‘𝐴) ·_ih 𝐵) = ((𝐶 ·_ℎ 𝐴) ·_ih 𝐵))
9		eigorthi.3	. . . . 5 ⊢ 𝐶 ∈ ℂ
10		ax-his3 31743	. . . . 5 ⊢ ((𝐶 ∈ ℂ ∧ 𝐴 ∈ ℋ ∧ 𝐵 ∈ ℋ) → ((𝐶 ·_ℎ 𝐴) ·_ih 𝐵) = (𝐶 · (𝐴 ·_ih 𝐵)))
11	9, 3, 4, 10	mp3an 1491	. . . 4 ⊢ ((𝐶 ·_ℎ 𝐴) ·_ih 𝐵) = (𝐶 · (𝐴 ·_ih 𝐵))
12	8, 11	eqtrdi 2814	. . 3 ⊢ ((𝑇‘𝐴) = (𝐶 ·_ℎ 𝐴) → ((𝑇‘𝐴) ·_ih 𝐵) = (𝐶 · (𝐴 ·_ih 𝐵)))
13	7, 12	eqeqan12rd 2778	. 2 ⊢ (((𝑇‘𝐴) = (𝐶 ·_ℎ 𝐴) ∧ (𝑇‘𝐵) = (𝐷 ·_ℎ 𝐵)) → ((𝐴 ·_ih (𝑇‘𝐵)) = ((𝑇‘𝐴) ·_ih 𝐵) ↔ ((∗‘𝐷) · (𝐴 ·_ih 𝐵)) = (𝐶 · (𝐴 ·_ih 𝐵))))
14	3, 4	hicli 31740	. . . . . . . 8 ⊢ (𝐴 ·_ih 𝐵) ∈ ℂ
15	2	cjcli 15379	. . . . . . . . 9 ⊢ (∗‘𝐷) ∈ ℂ
16		mulcan2 11994	. . . . . . . . 9 ⊢ (((∗‘𝐷) ∈ ℂ ∧ 𝐶 ∈ ℂ ∧ ((𝐴 ·_ih 𝐵) ∈ ℂ ∧ (𝐴 ·_ih 𝐵) ≠ 0)) → (((∗‘𝐷) · (𝐴 ·_ih 𝐵)) = (𝐶 · (𝐴 ·_ih 𝐵)) ↔ (∗‘𝐷) = 𝐶))
17	15, 9, 16	mp3an12 1481	. . . . . . . 8 ⊢ (((𝐴 ·_ih 𝐵) ∈ ℂ ∧ (𝐴 ·_ih 𝐵) ≠ 0) → (((∗‘𝐷) · (𝐴 ·_ih 𝐵)) = (𝐶 · (𝐴 ·_ih 𝐵)) ↔ (∗‘𝐷) = 𝐶))
18	14, 17	mpan 703	. . . . . . 7 ⊢ ((𝐴 ·_ih 𝐵) ≠ 0 → (((∗‘𝐷) · (𝐴 ·_ih 𝐵)) = (𝐶 · (𝐴 ·_ih 𝐵)) ↔ (∗‘𝐷) = 𝐶))
19		eqcom 2770	. . . . . . 7 ⊢ ((∗‘𝐷) = 𝐶 ↔ 𝐶 = (∗‘𝐷))
20	18, 19	bitrdi 290	. . . . . 6 ⊢ ((𝐴 ·_ih 𝐵) ≠ 0 → (((∗‘𝐷) · (𝐴 ·_ih 𝐵)) = (𝐶 · (𝐴 ·_ih 𝐵)) ↔ 𝐶 = (∗‘𝐷)))
21	20	biimpcd 252	. . . . 5 ⊢ (((∗‘𝐷) · (𝐴 ·_ih 𝐵)) = (𝐶 · (𝐴 ·_ih 𝐵)) → ((𝐴 ·_ih 𝐵) ≠ 0 → 𝐶 = (∗‘𝐷)))
22	21	necon1d 2981	. . . 4 ⊢ (((∗‘𝐷) · (𝐴 ·_ih 𝐵)) = (𝐶 · (𝐴 ·_ih 𝐵)) → (𝐶 ≠ (∗‘𝐷) → (𝐴 ·_ih 𝐵) = 0))
23	22	com12 33	. . 3 ⊢ (𝐶 ≠ (∗‘𝐷) → (((∗‘𝐷) · (𝐴 ·_ih 𝐵)) = (𝐶 · (𝐴 ·_ih 𝐵)) → (𝐴 ·_ih 𝐵) = 0))
24		oveq2 7459	. . . 4 ⊢ ((𝐴 ·_ih 𝐵) = 0 → ((∗‘𝐷) · (𝐴 ·_ih 𝐵)) = ((∗‘𝐷) · 0))
25		oveq2 7459	. . . . 5 ⊢ ((𝐴 ·_ih 𝐵) = 0 → (𝐶 · (𝐴 ·_ih 𝐵)) = (𝐶 · 0))
26	9	mul01i 11539	. . . . . 6 ⊢ (𝐶 · 0) = 0
27	15	mul01i 11539	. . . . . 6 ⊢ ((∗‘𝐷) · 0) = 0
28	26, 27	eqtr4i 2789	. . . . 5 ⊢ (𝐶 · 0) = ((∗‘𝐷) · 0)
29	25, 28	eqtrdi 2814	. . . 4 ⊢ ((𝐴 ·_ih 𝐵) = 0 → (𝐶 · (𝐴 ·_ih 𝐵)) = ((∗‘𝐷) · 0))
30	24, 29	eqtr4d 2801	. . 3 ⊢ ((𝐴 ·_ih 𝐵) = 0 → ((∗‘𝐷) · (𝐴 ·_ih 𝐵)) = (𝐶 · (𝐴 ·_ih 𝐵)))
31	23, 30	impbid1 228	. 2 ⊢ (𝐶 ≠ (∗‘𝐷) → (((∗‘𝐷) · (𝐴 ·_ih 𝐵)) = (𝐶 · (𝐴 ·_ih 𝐵)) ↔ (𝐴 ·_ih 𝐵) = 0))
32	13, 31	sylan9bb 519	1 ⊢ ((((𝑇‘𝐴) = (𝐶 ·_ℎ 𝐴) ∧ (𝑇‘𝐵) = (𝐷 ·_ℎ 𝐵)) ∧ 𝐶 ≠ (∗‘𝐷)) → ((𝐴 ·_ih (𝑇‘𝐵)) = ((𝑇‘𝐴) ·_ih 𝐵) ↔ (𝐴 ·_ih 𝐵) = 0))

Colors of variables: wff setvar class

This proof depends on syntax axioms: → wi 4 ↔ wb 209 ∧ wa 401 = wceq 1570 ∈ wcel 2147 ≠ wne 2959 ‘cfv 6566 (class class class)co 7451 ℂcc 11237 0cc0 11239 · cmul 11244 ∗ccj 15306 ℋchba 31578 ·_ℎ csm 31580 ·_ih csp 31581

This proof depends on axioms: ax-mp 5 ax-1 6 ax-2 7 ax-3 8 ax-gen 1828 ax-4 1842 ax-5 1945 ax-6 2002 ax-7 2043 ax-8 2149 ax-9 2157 ax-10 2180 ax-11 2197 ax-12 2216 ax-ext 2735 ax-sep 5255 ax-nul 5266 ax-pow 5334 ax-pr 5398 ax-un 7783 ax-resscn 11296 ax-1cn 11297 ax-icn 11298 ax-addcl 11299 ax-addrcl 11300 ax-mulcl 11301 ax-mulrcl 11302 ax-mulcom 11303 ax-addass 11304 ax-mulass 11305 ax-distr 11306 ax-i2m1 11307 ax-1ne0 11308 ax-1rid 11309 ax-rnegex 11310 ax-rrecex 11311 ax-cnre 11312 ax-pre-lttri 11313 ax-pre-lttrn 11314 ax-pre-ltadd 11315 ax-pre-mulgt0 11316 ax-hfvmul 31664 ax-hfi 31738 ax-his1 31741 ax-his3 31743

This proof depends on definitions: df-bi 210 df-an 402 df-or 862 df-3or 1104 df-3an 1105 df-tru 1573 df-fal 1583 df-ex 1813 df-nf 1817 df-sb 2102 df-mo 2567 df-eu 2597 df-clab 2742 df-cleq 2755 df-clel 2839 df-nfc 2913 df-ne 2960 df-nel 3066 df-ral 3081 df-rex 3091 df-rmo 3369 df-reu 3370 df-rab 3417 df-v 3456 df-sbc 3743 df-csb 3852 df-ss 3901 df-pss 4017 df-dif 4050 df-in 4094 df-un 4154 df-nul 4282 df-if 4486 df-pw 4562 df-sn 4589 df-pr 4591 df-op 4841 df-uni 4873 df-iun 4958 df-br 5109 df-opab 5174 df-mpt 5193 df-tr 5219 df-id 5553 df-eprel 5558 df-po 5566 df-so 5567 df-fr 5611 df-we 5613 df-xp 5664 df-rel 5665 df-cnv 5666 df-co 5667 df-dm 5668 df-rn 5669 df-res 5670 df-ima 5671 df-pred 6330 df-ord 6391 df-on 6392 df-lim 6393 df-suc 6394 df-iota 6520 df-fun 6568 df-fn 6569 df-f 6570 df-f1 6571 df-fo 6572 df-f1o 6573 df-fv 6574 df-riota 7408 df-ov 7454 df-oprab 7455 df-mpo 7456 df-om 7912 df-2nd 8036 df-frecs 8337 df-wrecs 8368 df-recs 8417 df-rdg 8456 df-er 8755 df-en 9012 df-dom 9013 df-sdom 9014 df-pnf 11384 df-mnf 11385 df-xr 11386 df-ltxr 11387 df-le 11388 df-sub 11582 df-neg 11583 df-div 12014 df-nn 12376 df-2 12445 df-cj 15309 df-re 15310 df-im 15311

This theorem is used by: eigorth 32497

W3C validator