Theorem goaln0 32753

Description: The "Godel-set of universal quantification" is a Godel formula of at least height 1. (Contributed by AV, 22-Oct-2023.)

Assertion

Ref	Expression
goaln0	⊢ (∀𝑔𝑖𝐴 ∈ (Fmla‘𝑁) → 𝑁 ≠ ∅)

Distinct variable group:   𝐴,𝑖

Allowed substitution hint:   𝑁(𝑖)

Proof of Theorem goaln0

Dummy variables 𝑗 𝑥 𝑘 are mutually distinct and distinct from all other variables.

Step	Hyp	Ref	Expression
1		df-goal 32702	. . . 4 ⊢ ∀𝑔𝑖𝐴 = ⟨2o, ⟨𝑖, 𝐴⟩⟩
2		2on0 8096	. . . . . . . . . . . 12 ⊢ 2o ≠ ∅
3	2	neii 2989	. . . . . . . . . . 11 ⊢ ¬ 2o = ∅
4	3	intnanr 491	. . . . . . . . . 10 ⊢ ¬ (2o = ∅ ∧ ⟨𝑖, 𝐴⟩ = ⟨𝑘, 𝑗⟩)
5		2oex 8095	. . . . . . . . . . 11 ⊢ 2o ∈ V
6		opex 5321	. . . . . . . . . . 11 ⊢ ⟨𝑖, 𝐴⟩ ∈ V
7	5, 6	opth 5333	. . . . . . . . . 10 ⊢ (⟨2o, ⟨𝑖, 𝐴⟩⟩ = ⟨∅, ⟨𝑘, 𝑗⟩⟩ ↔ (2o = ∅ ∧ ⟨𝑖, 𝐴⟩ = ⟨𝑘, 𝑗⟩))
8	4, 7	mtbir 326	. . . . . . . . 9 ⊢ ¬ ⟨2o, ⟨𝑖, 𝐴⟩⟩ = ⟨∅, ⟨𝑘, 𝑗⟩⟩
9		goel 32707	. . . . . . . . . 10 ⊢ ((𝑘 ∈ ω ∧ 𝑗 ∈ ω) → (𝑘∈𝑔𝑗) = ⟨∅, ⟨𝑘, 𝑗⟩⟩)
10	9	eqeq2d 2809	. . . . . . . . 9 ⊢ ((𝑘 ∈ ω ∧ 𝑗 ∈ ω) → (⟨2o, ⟨𝑖, 𝐴⟩⟩ = (𝑘∈𝑔𝑗) ↔ ⟨2o, ⟨𝑖, 𝐴⟩⟩ = ⟨∅, ⟨𝑘, 𝑗⟩⟩))
11	8, 10	mtbiri 330	. . . . . . . 8 ⊢ ((𝑘 ∈ ω ∧ 𝑗 ∈ ω) → ¬ ⟨2o, ⟨𝑖, 𝐴⟩⟩ = (𝑘∈𝑔𝑗))
12	11	rgen2 3168	. . . . . . 7 ⊢ ∀𝑘 ∈ ω ∀𝑗 ∈ ω ¬ ⟨2o, ⟨𝑖, 𝐴⟩⟩ = (𝑘∈𝑔𝑗)
13		ralnex2 3221	. . . . . . 7 ⊢ (∀𝑘 ∈ ω ∀𝑗 ∈ ω ¬ ⟨2o, ⟨𝑖, 𝐴⟩⟩ = (𝑘∈𝑔𝑗) ↔ ¬ ∃𝑘 ∈ ω ∃𝑗 ∈ ω ⟨2o, ⟨𝑖, 𝐴⟩⟩ = (𝑘∈𝑔𝑗))
14	12, 13	mpbi 233	. . . . . 6 ⊢ ¬ ∃𝑘 ∈ ω ∃𝑗 ∈ ω ⟨2o, ⟨𝑖, 𝐴⟩⟩ = (𝑘∈𝑔𝑗)
15	14	intnan 490	. . . . 5 ⊢ ¬ (⟨2o, ⟨𝑖, 𝐴⟩⟩ ∈ V ∧ ∃𝑘 ∈ ω ∃𝑗 ∈ ω ⟨2o, ⟨𝑖, 𝐴⟩⟩ = (𝑘∈𝑔𝑗))
16		eqeq1 2802	. . . . . . 7 ⊢ (𝑥 = ⟨2o, ⟨𝑖, 𝐴⟩⟩ → (𝑥 = (𝑘∈𝑔𝑗) ↔ ⟨2o, ⟨𝑖, 𝐴⟩⟩ = (𝑘∈𝑔𝑗)))
17	16	2rexbidv 3259	. . . . . 6 ⊢ (𝑥 = ⟨2o, ⟨𝑖, 𝐴⟩⟩ → (∃𝑘 ∈ ω ∃𝑗 ∈ ω 𝑥 = (𝑘∈𝑔𝑗) ↔ ∃𝑘 ∈ ω ∃𝑗 ∈ ω ⟨2o, ⟨𝑖, 𝐴⟩⟩ = (𝑘∈𝑔𝑗)))
18		fmla0 32742	. . . . . 6 ⊢ (Fmla‘∅) = {𝑥 ∈ V ∣ ∃𝑘 ∈ ω ∃𝑗 ∈ ω 𝑥 = (𝑘∈𝑔𝑗)}
19	17, 18	elrab2 3631	. . . . 5 ⊢ (⟨2o, ⟨𝑖, 𝐴⟩⟩ ∈ (Fmla‘∅) ↔ (⟨2o, ⟨𝑖, 𝐴⟩⟩ ∈ V ∧ ∃𝑘 ∈ ω ∃𝑗 ∈ ω ⟨2o, ⟨𝑖, 𝐴⟩⟩ = (𝑘∈𝑔𝑗)))
20	15, 19	mtbir 326	. . . 4 ⊢ ¬ ⟨2o, ⟨𝑖, 𝐴⟩⟩ ∈ (Fmla‘∅)
21	1, 20	eqneltri 2883	. . 3 ⊢ ¬ ∀𝑔𝑖𝐴 ∈ (Fmla‘∅)
22		fveq2 6645	. . . 4 ⊢ (𝑁 = ∅ → (Fmla‘𝑁) = (Fmla‘∅))
23	22	eleq2d 2875	. . 3 ⊢ (𝑁 = ∅ → (∀𝑔𝑖𝐴 ∈ (Fmla‘𝑁) ↔ ∀𝑔𝑖𝐴 ∈ (Fmla‘∅)))
24	21, 23	mtbiri 330	. 2 ⊢ (𝑁 = ∅ → ¬ ∀𝑔𝑖𝐴 ∈ (Fmla‘𝑁))
25	24	necon2ai 3016	1 ⊢ (∀𝑔𝑖𝐴 ∈ (Fmla‘𝑁) → 𝑁 ≠ ∅)

Syntax hints:  ¬ wn 3   → wi 4   ∧ wa 399   = wceq 1538   ∈ wcel 2111   ≠ wne 2987  ∀wral 3106  ∃wrex 3107  Vcvv 3441  ∅c0 4243  ⟨cop 4531  ‘cfv 6324  (class class class)co 7135  ωcom 7560  2_oc2o 8079  ∈_𝑔cgoe 32693  ∀_𝑔cgol 32695  Fmlacfmla 32697

This theorem was proved from axioms:  ax-mp 5  ax-1 6  ax-2 7  ax-3 8  ax-gen 1797  ax-4 1811  ax-5 1911  ax-6 1970  ax-7 2015  ax-8 2113  ax-9 2121  ax-10 2142  ax-11 2158  ax-12 2175  ax-ext 2770  ax-rep 5154  ax-sep 5167  ax-nul 5174  ax-pow 5231  ax-pr 5295  ax-un 7441  ax-inf2 9088

This theorem depends on definitions:  df-bi 210  df-an 400  df-or 845  df-3or 1085  df-3an 1086  df-tru 1541  df-ex 1782  df-nf 1786  df-sb 2070  df-mo 2598  df-eu 2629  df-clab 2777  df-cleq 2791  df-clel 2870  df-nfc 2938  df-ne 2988  df-ral 3111  df-rex 3112  df-reu 3113  df-rab 3115  df-v 3443  df-sbc 3721  df-csb 3829  df-dif 3884  df-un 3886  df-in 3888  df-ss 3898  df-pss 3900  df-nul 4244  df-if 4426  df-pw 4499  df-sn 4526  df-pr 4528  df-tp 4530  df-op 4532  df-uni 4801  df-iun 4883  df-br 5031  df-opab 5093  df-mpt 5111  df-tr 5137  df-id 5425  df-eprel 5430  df-po 5438  df-so 5439  df-fr 5478  df-we 5480  df-xp 5525  df-rel 5526  df-cnv 5527  df-co 5528  df-dm 5529  df-rn 5530  df-res 5531  df-ima 5532  df-pred 6116  df-ord 6162  df-on 6163  df-lim 6164  df-suc 6165  df-iota 6283  df-fun 6326  df-fn 6327  df-f 6328  df-f1 6329  df-fo 6330  df-f1o 6331  df-fv 6332  df-ov 7138  df-oprab 7139  df-mpo 7140  df-om 7561  df-1st 7671  df-2nd 7672  df-wrecs 7930  df-recs 7991  df-rdg 8029  df-1o 8085  df-2o 8086  df-map 8391  df-goel 32700  df-goal 32702  df-sat 32703  df-fmla 32705

This theorem is referenced by:  goalr  32757