Theorem goaln0 36055

Description: The "Godel-set of universal quantification" is a Godel formula of at least height 1. (Contributed by AV, 22-Oct-2023.)

Assertion

Ref	Expression
goaln0	⊢ (∀𝑔𝑖𝐴 ∈ (Fmla‘𝑁) → 𝑁 ≠ ∅)

Distinct variable group:   𝐴,𝑖

Allowed substitution hint:   𝑁(𝑖)

Proof of Theorem goaln0

Dummy variables 𝑗 𝑥 𝑘 are mutually distinct and distinct from all other variables.

Step	Hyp	Ref	Expression
1		df-goal 36004	. . . 4 ⊢ ∀𝑔𝑖𝐴 = ⟨2o, ⟨𝑖, 𝐴⟩⟩
2		2on0 8477	. . . . . . . . . . . 12 ⊢ 2o ≠ ∅
3	2	neii 2957	. . . . . . . . . . 11 ⊢ ¬ 2o = ∅
4	3	intnanr 493	. . . . . . . . . 10 ⊢ ¬ (2o = ∅ ∧ ⟨𝑖, 𝐴⟩ = ⟨𝑘, 𝑗⟩)
5		2oex 8474	. . . . . . . . . . 11 ⊢ 2o ∈ V
6		opex 5439	. . . . . . . . . . 11 ⊢ ⟨𝑖, 𝐴⟩ ∈ V
7	5, 6	opth 5452	. . . . . . . . . 10 ⊢ (⟨2o, ⟨𝑖, 𝐴⟩⟩ = ⟨∅, ⟨𝑘, 𝑗⟩⟩ ↔ (2o = ∅ ∧ ⟨𝑖, 𝐴⟩ = ⟨𝑘, 𝑗⟩))
8	4, 7	mtbir 326	. . . . . . . . 9 ⊢ ¬ ⟨2o, ⟨𝑖, 𝐴⟩⟩ = ⟨∅, ⟨𝑘, 𝑗⟩⟩
9		goel 36009	. . . . . . . . . 10 ⊢ ((𝑘 ∈ ω ∧ 𝑗 ∈ ω) → (𝑘∈𝑔𝑗) = ⟨∅, ⟨𝑘, 𝑗⟩⟩)
10	9	eqeq2d 2771	. . . . . . . . 9 ⊢ ((𝑘 ∈ ω ∧ 𝑗 ∈ ω) → (⟨2o, ⟨𝑖, 𝐴⟩⟩ = (𝑘∈𝑔𝑗) ↔ ⟨2o, ⟨𝑖, 𝐴⟩⟩ = ⟨∅, ⟨𝑘, 𝑗⟩⟩))
11	8, 10	mtbiri 330	. . . . . . . 8 ⊢ ((𝑘 ∈ ω ∧ 𝑗 ∈ ω) → ¬ ⟨2o, ⟨𝑖, 𝐴⟩⟩ = (𝑘∈𝑔𝑗))
12	11	rgen2 3202	. . . . . . 7 ⊢ ∀𝑘 ∈ ω ∀𝑗 ∈ ω ¬ ⟨2o, ⟨𝑖, 𝐴⟩⟩ = (𝑘∈𝑔𝑗)
13		ralnex2 3142	. . . . . . 7 ⊢ (∀𝑘 ∈ ω ∀𝑗 ∈ ω ¬ ⟨2o, ⟨𝑖, 𝐴⟩⟩ = (𝑘∈𝑔𝑗) ↔ ¬ ∃𝑘 ∈ ω ∃𝑗 ∈ ω ⟨2o, ⟨𝑖, 𝐴⟩⟩ = (𝑘∈𝑔𝑗))
14	12, 13	mpbi 233	. . . . . 6 ⊢ ¬ ∃𝑘 ∈ ω ∃𝑗 ∈ ω ⟨2o, ⟨𝑖, 𝐴⟩⟩ = (𝑘∈𝑔𝑗)
15	14	intnan 492	. . . . 5 ⊢ ¬ (⟨2o, ⟨𝑖, 𝐴⟩⟩ ∈ V ∧ ∃𝑘 ∈ ω ∃𝑗 ∈ ω ⟨2o, ⟨𝑖, 𝐴⟩⟩ = (𝑘∈𝑔𝑗))
16		eqeq1 2764	. . . . . . 7 ⊢ (𝑥 = ⟨2o, ⟨𝑖, 𝐴⟩⟩ → (𝑥 = (𝑘∈𝑔𝑗) ↔ ⟨2o, ⟨𝑖, 𝐴⟩⟩ = (𝑘∈𝑔𝑗)))
17	16	2rexbidv 3227	. . . . . 6 ⊢ (𝑥 = ⟨2o, ⟨𝑖, 𝐴⟩⟩ → (∃𝑘 ∈ ω ∃𝑗 ∈ ω 𝑥 = (𝑘∈𝑔𝑗) ↔ ∃𝑘 ∈ ω ∃𝑗 ∈ ω ⟨2o, ⟨𝑖, 𝐴⟩⟩ = (𝑘∈𝑔𝑗)))
18		fmla0 36044	. . . . . 6 ⊢ (Fmla‘∅) = {𝑥 ∈ V ∣ ∃𝑘 ∈ ω ∃𝑗 ∈ ω 𝑥 = (𝑘∈𝑔𝑗)}
19	17, 18	elrab2 3649	. . . . 5 ⊢ (⟨2o, ⟨𝑖, 𝐴⟩⟩ ∈ (Fmla‘∅) ↔ (⟨2o, ⟨𝑖, 𝐴⟩⟩ ∈ V ∧ ∃𝑘 ∈ ω ∃𝑗 ∈ ω ⟨2o, ⟨𝑖, 𝐴⟩⟩ = (𝑘∈𝑔𝑗)))
20	15, 19	mtbir 326	. . . 4 ⊢ ¬ ⟨2o, ⟨𝑖, 𝐴⟩⟩ ∈ (Fmla‘∅)
21	1, 20	eqneltri 2879	. . 3 ⊢ ¬ ∀𝑔𝑖𝐴 ∈ (Fmla‘∅)
22		fveq2 6881	. . . 4 ⊢ (𝑁 = ∅ → (Fmla‘𝑁) = (Fmla‘∅))
23	22	eleq2d 2846	. . 3 ⊢ (𝑁 = ∅ → (∀𝑔𝑖𝐴 ∈ (Fmla‘𝑁) ↔ ∀𝑔𝑖𝐴 ∈ (Fmla‘∅)))
24	21, 23	mtbiri 330	. 2 ⊢ (𝑁 = ∅ → ¬ ∀𝑔𝑖𝐴 ∈ (Fmla‘𝑁))
25	24	necon2ai 2984	1 ⊢ (∀𝑔𝑖𝐴 ∈ (Fmla‘𝑁) → 𝑁 ≠ ∅)

This proof depends on syntax axioms:  ¬ wn 3   → wi 4   ∧ wa 401   = wceq 1570   ∈ wcel 2145   ≠ wne 2955  ∀wral 3076  ∃wrex 3086  Vcvv 3450  ∅c0 4279  ⟨cop 4590  ‘cfv 6535  (class class class)co 7416  ωcom 7868  2_oc2o 8456  ∈_𝑔cgoe 35995  ∀_𝑔cgol 35997  Fmlacfmla 35999

This proof depends on axioms:  ax-mp 5  ax-1 6  ax-2 7  ax-3 8  ax-gen 1828  ax-4 1842  ax-5 1943  ax-6 2000  ax-7 2041  ax-8 2147  ax-9 2155  ax-10 2178  ax-11 2194  ax-12 2213  ax-ext 2732  ax-rep 5232  ax-sep 5251  ax-nul 5263  ax-pow 5330  ax-pr 5398  ax-un 7742  ax-inf2 9627

This proof depends on definitions:  df-bi 210  df-an 402  df-or 862  df-3or 1104  df-3an 1105  df-tru 1573  df-fal 1583  df-ex 1813  df-nf 1817  df-sb 2100  df-mo 2564  df-eu 2594  df-clab 2739  df-cleq 2752  df-clel 2835  df-nfc 2909  df-ne 2956  df-ral 3077  df-rex 3087  df-reu 3366  df-rab 3413  df-v 3452  df-sbc 3740  df-csb 3848  df-dif 3902  df-un 3904  df-in 3906  df-ss 3916  df-pss 3919  df-nul 4280  df-if 4483  df-pw 4559  df-sn 4585  df-pr 4587  df-op 4591  df-uni 4868  df-iun 4953  df-br 5104  df-opab 5168  df-mpt 5187  df-tr 5213  df-id 5550  df-eprel 5555  df-po 5563  df-so 5564  df-fr 5608  df-we 5610  df-xp 5661  df-rel 5662  df-cnv 5663  df-co 5664  df-dm 5665  df-rn 5666  df-res 5667  df-ima 5668  df-pred 6301  df-ord 6362  df-on 6363  df-lim 6364  df-suc 6365  df-iota 6491  df-fun 6537  df-fn 6538  df-f 6539  df-f1 6540  df-fo 6541  df-f1o 6542  df-fv 6543  df-ov 7419  df-oprab 7420  df-mpo 7421  df-om 7869  df-1st 7992  df-2nd 7993  df-frecs 8285  df-wrecs 8316  df-recs 8365  df-rdg 8404  df-1o 8462  df-2o 8463  df-map 8835  df-goel 36002  df-goal 36004  df-sat 36005  df-fmla 36007

This theorem is used by:  goalr  36059