Theorem limsupbnd1f 46383

Description: If a sequence is eventually at most 𝐴, then the limsup is also at most 𝐴. (Contributed by Glauco Siliprandi, 23-Oct-2021.)

Hypotheses

Ref	Expression
limsupbnd1f.1	⊢ Ⅎ𝑗𝐹
limsupbnd1f.2	⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐵 ⊆ ℝ)
limsupbnd1f.3	⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐹:𝐵⟶ℝ*)
limsupbnd1f.4	⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐴 ∈ ℝ*)
limsupbnd1f.5	⊢ (𝜑 → ∃𝑘 ∈ ℝ ∀𝑗 ∈ 𝐵 (𝑘 ≤ 𝑗 → (𝐹‘𝑗) ≤ 𝐴))

Assertion

Ref	Expression
limsupbnd1f	⊢ (𝜑 → (lim sup‘𝐹) ≤ 𝐴)

Distinct variable groups:   𝐴,𝑗,𝑘   𝐵,𝑗,𝑘   𝑘,𝐹

Allowed substitution hints:   𝜑(𝑗,𝑘)   𝐹(𝑗)

Proof of Theorem limsupbnd1f

Dummy variables 𝑖 𝑙 are mutually distinct and distinct from all other variables.

Step	Hyp	Ref	Expression
1		limsupbnd1f.2	. 2 ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐵 ⊆ ℝ)
2		limsupbnd1f.3	. 2 ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐹:𝐵⟶ℝ*)
3		limsupbnd1f.4	. 2 ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐴 ∈ ℝ*)
4		limsupbnd1f.5	. . 3 ⊢ (𝜑 → ∃𝑘 ∈ ℝ ∀𝑗 ∈ 𝐵 (𝑘 ≤ 𝑗 → (𝐹‘𝑗) ≤ 𝐴))
5		breq1 5113	. . . . . . 7 ⊢ (𝑘 = 𝑖 → (𝑘 ≤ 𝑗 ↔ 𝑖 ≤ 𝑗))
6	5	imbi1d 344	. . . . . 6 ⊢ (𝑘 = 𝑖 → ((𝑘 ≤ 𝑗 → (𝐹‘𝑗) ≤ 𝐴) ↔ (𝑖 ≤ 𝑗 → (𝐹‘𝑗) ≤ 𝐴)))
7	6	ralbidv 3188	. . . . 5 ⊢ (𝑘 = 𝑖 → (∀𝑗 ∈ 𝐵 (𝑘 ≤ 𝑗 → (𝐹‘𝑗) ≤ 𝐴) ↔ ∀𝑗 ∈ 𝐵 (𝑖 ≤ 𝑗 → (𝐹‘𝑗) ≤ 𝐴)))
8		nfv 1944	. . . . . . 7 ⊢ Ⅎ𝑙(𝑖 ≤ 𝑗 → (𝐹‘𝑗) ≤ 𝐴)
9		nfv 1944	. . . . . . . 8 ⊢ Ⅎ𝑗 𝑖 ≤ 𝑙
10		limsupbnd1f.1	. . . . . . . . . 10 ⊢ Ⅎ𝑗𝐹
11		nfcv 2925	. . . . . . . . . 10 ⊢ Ⅎ𝑗𝑙
12	10, 11	nffv 6893	. . . . . . . . 9 ⊢ Ⅎ𝑗(𝐹‘𝑙)
13		nfcv 2925	. . . . . . . . 9 ⊢ Ⅎ𝑗 ≤
14		nfcv 2925	. . . . . . . . 9 ⊢ Ⅎ𝑗𝐴
15	12, 13, 14	nfbr 5159	. . . . . . . 8 ⊢ Ⅎ𝑗(𝐹‘𝑙) ≤ 𝐴
16	9, 15	nfim 1926	. . . . . . 7 ⊢ Ⅎ𝑗(𝑖 ≤ 𝑙 → (𝐹‘𝑙) ≤ 𝐴)
17		breq2 5114	. . . . . . . 8 ⊢ (𝑗 = 𝑙 → (𝑖 ≤ 𝑗 ↔ 𝑖 ≤ 𝑙))
18		fveq2 6883	. . . . . . . . 9 ⊢ (𝑗 = 𝑙 → (𝐹‘𝑗) = (𝐹‘𝑙))
19	18	breq1d 5120	. . . . . . . 8 ⊢ (𝑗 = 𝑙 → ((𝐹‘𝑗) ≤ 𝐴 ↔ (𝐹‘𝑙) ≤ 𝐴))
20	17, 19	imbi12d 347	. . . . . . 7 ⊢ (𝑗 = 𝑙 → ((𝑖 ≤ 𝑗 → (𝐹‘𝑗) ≤ 𝐴) ↔ (𝑖 ≤ 𝑙 → (𝐹‘𝑙) ≤ 𝐴)))
21	8, 16, 20	cbvralw 3307	. . . . . 6 ⊢ (∀𝑗 ∈ 𝐵 (𝑖 ≤ 𝑗 → (𝐹‘𝑗) ≤ 𝐴) ↔ ∀𝑙 ∈ 𝐵 (𝑖 ≤ 𝑙 → (𝐹‘𝑙) ≤ 𝐴))
22	21	a1i 11	. . . . 5 ⊢ (𝑘 = 𝑖 → (∀𝑗 ∈ 𝐵 (𝑖 ≤ 𝑗 → (𝐹‘𝑗) ≤ 𝐴) ↔ ∀𝑙 ∈ 𝐵 (𝑖 ≤ 𝑙 → (𝐹‘𝑙) ≤ 𝐴)))
23	7, 22	bitrd 282	. . . 4 ⊢ (𝑘 = 𝑖 → (∀𝑗 ∈ 𝐵 (𝑘 ≤ 𝑗 → (𝐹‘𝑗) ≤ 𝐴) ↔ ∀𝑙 ∈ 𝐵 (𝑖 ≤ 𝑙 → (𝐹‘𝑙) ≤ 𝐴)))
24	23	cbvrexvw 3244	. . 3 ⊢ (∃𝑘 ∈ ℝ ∀𝑗 ∈ 𝐵 (𝑘 ≤ 𝑗 → (𝐹‘𝑗) ≤ 𝐴) ↔ ∃𝑖 ∈ ℝ ∀𝑙 ∈ 𝐵 (𝑖 ≤ 𝑙 → (𝐹‘𝑙) ≤ 𝐴))
25	4, 24	sylib 221	. 2 ⊢ (𝜑 → ∃𝑖 ∈ ℝ ∀𝑙 ∈ 𝐵 (𝑖 ≤ 𝑙 → (𝐹‘𝑙) ≤ 𝐴))
26	1, 2, 3, 25	limsupbnd1 15535	1 ⊢ (𝜑 → (lim sup‘𝐹) ≤ 𝐴)

Syntax hints:   → wi 4   ↔ wb 209   = wceq 1570   ∈ wcel 2143  Ⅎwnfc 2910  ∀wral 3079  ∃wrex 3089   ⊆ wss 3906   class class class wbr 5110  ⟶wf 6534  ‘cfv 6538  ℝcr 11100  ℝ^*cxr 11243   ≤ cle 11245  lim supclsp 15523

This theorem was proved from axioms:  ax-mp 5  ax-1 6  ax-2 7  ax-3 8  ax-gen 1825  ax-4 1839  ax-5 1940  ax-6 1997  ax-7 2038  ax-8 2145  ax-9 2153  ax-10 2176  ax-11 2192  ax-12 2213  ax-ext 2735  ax-sep 5258  ax-nul 5270  ax-pow 5338  ax-pr 5406  ax-un 7734  ax-cnex 11157  ax-resscn 11158  ax-1cn 11159  ax-icn 11160  ax-addcl 11161  ax-addrcl 11162  ax-mulcl 11163  ax-mulrcl 11164  ax-mulcom 11165  ax-addass 11166  ax-mulass 11167  ax-distr 11168  ax-i2m1 11169  ax-1ne0 11170  ax-1rid 11171  ax-rnegex 11172  ax-rrecex 11173  ax-cnre 11174  ax-pre-lttri 11175  ax-pre-lttrn 11176  ax-pre-ltadd 11177  ax-pre-mulgt0 11178  ax-pre-sup 11179

This theorem depends on definitions:  df-bi 210  df-an 401  df-or 861  df-3or 1104  df-3an 1105  df-tru 1573  df-fal 1583  df-ex 1810  df-nf 1814  df-sb 2097  df-mo 2567  df-eu 2597  df-clab 2742  df-cleq 2755  df-clel 2838  df-nfc 2912  df-ne 2959  df-nel 3065  df-ral 3080  df-rex 3090  df-rmo 3369  df-reu 3370  df-rab 3417  df-v 3457  df-sbc 3746  df-csb 3855  df-dif 3909  df-un 3911  df-in 3913  df-ss 3923  df-nul 4288  df-if 4489  df-pw 4565  df-sn 4591  df-pr 4593  df-op 4597  df-uni 4874  df-br 5111  df-opab 5175  df-mpt 5194  df-id 5558  df-po 5571  df-so 5572  df-xp 5669  df-rel 5670  df-cnv 5671  df-co 5672  df-dm 5673  df-rn 5674  df-res 5675  df-ima 5676  df-iota 6494  df-fun 6540  df-fn 6541  df-f 6542  df-f1 6543  df-fo 6544  df-f1o 6545  df-fv 6546  df-riota 7369  df-ov 7415  df-oprab 7416  df-mpo 7417  df-er 8695  df-en 8945  df-dom 8946  df-sdom 8947  df-sup 9403  df-inf 9404  df-pnf 11246  df-mnf 11247  df-xr 11248  df-ltxr 11249  df-le 11250  df-sub 11444  df-neg 11445  df-ico 13379  df-limsup 15524

This theorem is referenced by:  limsuppnflem  46407