P. 452 of Theorem List - Metamath Proof Explorer

Type

Label

Description

Statement

Theorem

pm14.12 45101*

Theorem *14.12 in [WhiteheadRussell] p. 184. (Contributed by Andrew Salmon, 11-Jul-2011.)

⊢ (∃!𝑥𝜑 → ∀𝑥∀𝑦((𝜑 ∧ [𝑦 / 𝑥]𝜑) → 𝑥 = 𝑦))

Theorem

pm14.122a 45102*

Theorem *14.122 in [WhiteheadRussell] p. 185. (Contributed by Andrew Salmon, 9-Jun-2011.)

⊢ (𝐴 ∈ 𝑉 → (∀𝑥(𝜑 ↔ 𝑥 = 𝐴) ↔ (∀𝑥(𝜑 → 𝑥 = 𝐴) ∧ [𝐴 / 𝑥]𝜑)))

Theorem

pm14.122b 45103*

Theorem *14.122 in [WhiteheadRussell] p. 185. (Contributed by Andrew Salmon, 9-Jun-2011.)

⊢ (𝐴 ∈ 𝑉 → ((∀𝑥(𝜑 → 𝑥 = 𝐴) ∧ [𝐴 / 𝑥]𝜑) ↔ (∀𝑥(𝜑 → 𝑥 = 𝐴) ∧ ∃𝑥𝜑)))

Theorem

pm14.122c 45104*

Theorem *14.122 in [WhiteheadRussell] p. 185. (Contributed by Andrew Salmon, 9-Jun-2011.)

⊢ (𝐴 ∈ 𝑉 → (∀𝑥(𝜑 ↔ 𝑥 = 𝐴) ↔ (∀𝑥(𝜑 → 𝑥 = 𝐴) ∧ ∃𝑥𝜑)))

Theorem

pm14.123a 45105*

Theorem *14.123 in [WhiteheadRussell] p. 185. (Contributed by Andrew Salmon, 9-Jun-2011.)

⊢ ((𝐴 ∈ 𝑉 ∧ 𝐵 ∈ 𝑊) → (∀𝑧∀𝑤(𝜑 ↔ (𝑧 = 𝐴 ∧ 𝑤 = 𝐵)) ↔ (∀𝑧∀𝑤(𝜑 → (𝑧 = 𝐴 ∧ 𝑤 = 𝐵)) ∧ [𝐴 / 𝑧][𝐵 / 𝑤]𝜑)))

Theorem

pm14.123b 45106*

Theorem *14.123 in [WhiteheadRussell] p. 185. (Contributed by Andrew Salmon, 9-Jun-2011.)

⊢ ((𝐴 ∈ 𝑉 ∧ 𝐵 ∈ 𝑊) → ((∀𝑧∀𝑤(𝜑 → (𝑧 = 𝐴 ∧ 𝑤 = 𝐵)) ∧ [𝐴 / 𝑧][𝐵 / 𝑤]𝜑) ↔ (∀𝑧∀𝑤(𝜑 → (𝑧 = 𝐴 ∧ 𝑤 = 𝐵)) ∧ ∃𝑧∃𝑤𝜑)))

Theorem

pm14.123c 45107*

Theorem *14.123 in [WhiteheadRussell] p. 185. (Contributed by Andrew Salmon, 9-Jun-2011.)

⊢ ((𝐴 ∈ 𝑉 ∧ 𝐵 ∈ 𝑊) → (∀𝑧∀𝑤(𝜑 ↔ (𝑧 = 𝐴 ∧ 𝑤 = 𝐵)) ↔ (∀𝑧∀𝑤(𝜑 → (𝑧 = 𝐴 ∧ 𝑤 = 𝐵)) ∧ ∃𝑧∃𝑤𝜑)))

Theorem

pm14.18 45108

Theorem *14.18 in [WhiteheadRussell] p. 189. (Contributed by Andrew Salmon, 11-Jul-2011.)

⊢ (∃!𝑥𝜑 → (∀𝑥𝜓 → [(℩𝑥𝜑) / 𝑥]𝜓))

Theorem

iotaequ 45109*

Theorem *14.2 in [WhiteheadRussell] p. 189. (Contributed by Andrew Salmon, 11-Jul-2011.)

⊢ (℩𝑥𝑥 = 𝑦) = 𝑦

Theorem

iotavalb 45110*

Theorem *14.202 in [WhiteheadRussell] p. 189. A biconditional version of iotaval 6510. (Contributed by Andrew Salmon, 11-Jul-2011.)

⊢ (∃!𝑥𝜑 → (∀𝑥(𝜑 ↔ 𝑥 = 𝑦) ↔ (℩𝑥𝜑) = 𝑦))

Theorem

iotasbc5 45111*

Theorem *14.205 in [WhiteheadRussell] p. 190. (Contributed by Andrew Salmon, 11-Jul-2011.)

⊢ (∃!𝑥𝜑 → ([(℩𝑥𝜑) / 𝑦]𝜓 ↔ ∃𝑦(𝑦 = (℩𝑥𝜑) ∧ 𝜓)))

Theorem

pm14.24 45112*

Theorem *14.24 in [WhiteheadRussell] p. 191. (Contributed by Andrew Salmon, 12-Jul-2011.)

⊢ (∃!𝑥𝜑 → ∀𝑦([𝑦 / 𝑥]𝜑 ↔ 𝑦 = (℩𝑥𝜑)))

Theorem

iotavalsb 45113*

Theorem *14.242 in [WhiteheadRussell] p. 192. (Contributed by Andrew Salmon, 11-Jul-2011.)

⊢ (∀𝑥(𝜑 ↔ 𝑥 = 𝑦) → ([𝑦 / 𝑧]𝜓 ↔ [(℩𝑥𝜑) / 𝑧]𝜓))

Theorem

sbiota1 45114

Theorem *14.25 in [WhiteheadRussell] p. 192. (Contributed by Andrew Salmon, 12-Jul-2011.)

⊢ (∃!𝑥𝜑 → (∀𝑥(𝜑 → 𝜓) ↔ [(℩𝑥𝜑) / 𝑥]𝜓))

Theorem

sbaniota 45115

Theorem *14.26 in [WhiteheadRussell] p. 192. (Contributed by Andrew Salmon, 12-Jul-2011.)

⊢ (∃!𝑥𝜑 → (∃𝑥(𝜑 ∧ 𝜓) ↔ [(℩𝑥𝜑) / 𝑥]𝜓))

Theorem

iotasbcq 45116

Theorem *14.272 in [WhiteheadRussell] p. 193. (Contributed by Andrew Salmon, 11-Jul-2011.)

⊢ (∀𝑥(𝜑 ↔ 𝜓) → ([(℩𝑥𝜑) / 𝑦]𝜒 ↔ [(℩𝑥𝜓) / 𝑦]𝜒))

21.41.5  Set Theory

Theorem

elnev 45117*

Any set that contains one element less than the universe is not equal to it. (Contributed by Andrew Salmon, 16-Jun-2011.)

⊢ (𝐴 ∈ V ↔ {𝑥 ∣ ¬ 𝑥 = 𝐴} ≠ V)

Theorem

rusbcALT 45118

A version of Russell's paradox which is proven using proper substitution. (Contributed by Andrew Salmon, 18-Jun-2011.) (New usage is discouraged.) (Proof modification is discouraged.)

⊢ {𝑥 ∣ 𝑥 ∉ 𝑥} ∉ V

Theorem

compeq 45119*

Equality between two ways of saying "the complement of 𝐴". (Contributed by Andrew Salmon, 15-Jul-2011.)

⊢ (V ∖ 𝐴) = {𝑥 ∣ ¬ 𝑥 ∈ 𝐴}

Theorem

compne 45120

The complement of 𝐴 is not equal to 𝐴. (Contributed by Andrew Salmon, 15-Jul-2011.) (Proof shortened by BJ, 11-Nov-2021.)

⊢ (V ∖ 𝐴) ≠ 𝐴

Theorem

compab 45121

Two ways of saying "the complement of a class abstraction". (Contributed by Andrew Salmon, 15-Jul-2011.) (Proof shortened by Mario Carneiro, 11-Dec-2016.)

⊢ (V ∖ {𝑧 ∣ 𝜑}) = {𝑧 ∣ ¬ 𝜑}

Theorem

conss2 45122

Contrapositive law for subsets. (Contributed by Andrew Salmon, 15-Jul-2011.)

⊢ (𝐴 ⊆ (V ∖ 𝐵) ↔ 𝐵 ⊆ (V ∖ 𝐴))

Theorem

conss1 45123

Contrapositive law for subsets. (Contributed by Andrew Salmon, 15-Jul-2011.)

⊢ ((V ∖ 𝐴) ⊆ 𝐵 ↔ (V ∖ 𝐵) ⊆ 𝐴)

Theorem

ralbidar 45124

More general form of ralbida 3274. (Contributed by Andrew Salmon, 25-Jul-2011.)

⊢ (𝜑 → ∀𝑥 ∈ 𝐴 𝜑)    &   ⊢ ((𝜑 ∧ 𝑥 ∈ 𝐴) → (𝜓 ↔ 𝜒))    ⇒   ⊢ (𝜑 → (∀𝑥 ∈ 𝐴 𝜓 ↔ ∀𝑥 ∈ 𝐴 𝜒))

Theorem

rexbidar 45125

More general form of rexbida 3275. (Contributed by Andrew Salmon, 25-Jul-2011.)

⊢ (𝜑 → ∀𝑥 ∈ 𝐴 𝜑)    &   ⊢ ((𝜑 ∧ 𝑥 ∈ 𝐴) → (𝜓 ↔ 𝜒))    ⇒   ⊢ (𝜑 → (∃𝑥 ∈ 𝐴 𝜓 ↔ ∃𝑥 ∈ 𝐴 𝜒))

Theorem

dropab1 45126

Theorem to aid use of the distinctor reduction theorem with ordered pair class abstraction. (Contributed by Andrew Salmon, 25-Jul-2011.)

⊢ (∀𝑥 𝑥 = 𝑦 → {⟨𝑥, 𝑧⟩ ∣ 𝜑} = {⟨𝑦, 𝑧⟩ ∣ 𝜑})

Theorem

dropab2 45127

Theorem to aid use of the distinctor reduction theorem with ordered pair class abstraction. (Contributed by Andrew Salmon, 25-Jul-2011.)

⊢ (∀𝑥 𝑥 = 𝑦 → {⟨𝑧, 𝑥⟩ ∣ 𝜑} = {⟨𝑧, 𝑦⟩ ∣ 𝜑})

Theorem

ipo0 45128

If the identity relation partially orders any class, then that class is the null class. (Contributed by Andrew Salmon, 25-Jul-2011.)

⊢ ( I Po 𝐴 ↔ 𝐴 = ∅)

Theorem

ifr0 45129

A class that is founded by the identity relation is null. (Contributed by Andrew Salmon, 25-Jul-2011.)

⊢ ( I Fr 𝐴 ↔ 𝐴 = ∅)

Theorem

fvsb 45130*

Explicit substitution of a value of a function into a wff. (Contributed by Andrew Salmon, 1-Aug-2011.)

⊢ (∃!𝑦 𝐴𝐹𝑦 → ([(𝐹‘𝐴) / 𝑥]𝜑 ↔ ∃𝑥(∀𝑦(𝐴𝐹𝑦 ↔ 𝑦 = 𝑥) ∧ 𝜑)))

Theorem

fveqsb 45131*

Implicit substitution of a value of a function into a wff. (Contributed by Andrew Salmon, 1-Aug-2011.)

⊢ (𝑥 = (𝐹‘𝐴) → (𝜑 ↔ 𝜓))    &   ⊢ Ⅎ𝑥𝜓    ⇒   ⊢ (∃!𝑦 𝐴𝐹𝑦 → (𝜓 ↔ ∃𝑥(∀𝑦(𝐴𝐹𝑦 ↔ 𝑦 = 𝑥) ∧ 𝜑)))

Theorem

xpexb 45132

A Cartesian product exists iff its converse does. Corollary 6.9(1) in [TakeutiZaring] p. 26. (Contributed by Andrew Salmon, 13-Nov-2011.)

⊢ ((𝐴 × 𝐵) ∈ V ↔ (𝐵 × 𝐴) ∈ V)

Theorem

trelpss 45133

An element of a transitive set is a proper subset of it. Theorem 7.2 in [TakeutiZaring] p. 35. Unlike tz7.2 5644, ax-reg 9553 is required for its proof. (Contributed by Andrew Salmon, 13-Nov-2011.)

⊢ ((Tr 𝐴 ∧ 𝐵 ∈ 𝐴) → 𝐵 ⊊ 𝐴)

21.41.6  Arithmetic

Theorem

addcomgi 45134

Generalization of commutative law for addition. Simplifies proofs dealing with vectors. However, it is dependent on our particular definition of ordered pair. (Contributed by Andrew Salmon, 28-Jan-2012.) (Revised by Mario Carneiro, 6-May-2015.)

⊢ (𝐴 + 𝐵) = (𝐵 + 𝐴)

21.41.7  Geometry

Syntax

cplusr 45135

Introduce the operation of vector addition.

class +_𝑟

Syntax

cminusr 45136

Introduce the operation of vector subtraction.

class -_𝑟

Syntax

ctimesr 45137

Introduce the operation of scalar multiplication.

class ._𝑣

Syntax

cptdfc 45138

PtDf is a predicate that is crucial for the definition of lines as well as proving a number of important theorems.

class PtDf(𝐴, 𝐵)

Syntax

crr3c 45139

RR3 is a class.

class RR3

Syntax

cline3 45140

line3 is a class.

class line3

Definition

df-addr 45141*

Define the operation of vector addition. (Contributed by Andrew Salmon, 27-Jan-2012.)

⊢ +_𝑟 = (𝑥 ∈ V, 𝑦 ∈ V ↦ (𝑣 ∈ ℝ ↦ ((𝑥‘𝑣) + (𝑦‘𝑣))))

Definition

df-subr 45142*

Define the operation of vector subtraction. (Contributed by Andrew Salmon, 27-Jan-2012.)

⊢ -_𝑟 = (𝑥 ∈ V, 𝑦 ∈ V ↦ (𝑣 ∈ ℝ ↦ ((𝑥‘𝑣) − (𝑦‘𝑣))))

Definition

df-mulv 45143*

Define the operation of scalar multiplication. (Contributed by Andrew Salmon, 27-Jan-2012.)

⊢ ._𝑣 = (𝑥 ∈ V, 𝑦 ∈ V ↦ (𝑣 ∈ ℝ ↦ (𝑥 · (𝑦‘𝑣))))

Theorem

addrval 45144*

Value of the operation of vector addition. (Contributed by Andrew Salmon, 27-Jan-2012.)

⊢ ((𝐴 ∈ 𝐶 ∧ 𝐵 ∈ 𝐷) → (𝐴+_𝑟𝐵) = (𝑣 ∈ ℝ ↦ ((𝐴‘𝑣) + (𝐵‘𝑣))))

Theorem

subrval 45145*

Value of the operation of vector subtraction. (Contributed by Andrew Salmon, 27-Jan-2012.)

⊢ ((𝐴 ∈ 𝐶 ∧ 𝐵 ∈ 𝐷) → (𝐴-_𝑟𝐵) = (𝑣 ∈ ℝ ↦ ((𝐴‘𝑣) − (𝐵‘𝑣))))

Theorem

mulvval 45146*

Value of the operation of scalar multiplication. (Contributed by Andrew Salmon, 27-Jan-2012.)

⊢ ((𝐴 ∈ 𝐶 ∧ 𝐵 ∈ 𝐷) → (𝐴._𝑣𝐵) = (𝑣 ∈ ℝ ↦ (𝐴 · (𝐵‘𝑣))))

Theorem

addrfv 45147

Vector addition at a value. The operation takes each vector 𝐴 and 𝐵 and forms a new vector whose values are the sum of each of the values of 𝐴 and 𝐵. (Contributed by Andrew Salmon, 27-Jan-2012.)

⊢ ((𝐴 ∈ 𝐸 ∧ 𝐵 ∈ 𝐷 ∧ 𝐶 ∈ ℝ) → ((𝐴+_𝑟𝐵)‘𝐶) = ((𝐴‘𝐶) + (𝐵‘𝐶)))

Theorem

subrfv 45148

Vector subtraction at a value. (Contributed by Andrew Salmon, 27-Jan-2012.)

⊢ ((𝐴 ∈ 𝐸 ∧ 𝐵 ∈ 𝐷 ∧ 𝐶 ∈ ℝ) → ((𝐴-_𝑟𝐵)‘𝐶) = ((𝐴‘𝐶) − (𝐵‘𝐶)))

Theorem

mulvfv 45149

Scalar multiplication at a value. (Contributed by Andrew Salmon, 27-Jan-2012.)

⊢ ((𝐴 ∈ 𝐸 ∧ 𝐵 ∈ 𝐷 ∧ 𝐶 ∈ ℝ) → ((𝐴._𝑣𝐵)‘𝐶) = (𝐴 · (𝐵‘𝐶)))

Theorem

addrfn 45150

Vector addition produces a function. (Contributed by Andrew Salmon, 27-Jan-2012.)

⊢ ((𝐴 ∈ 𝐶 ∧ 𝐵 ∈ 𝐷) → (𝐴+_𝑟𝐵) Fn ℝ)

Theorem

subrfn 45151

Vector subtraction produces a function. (Contributed by Andrew Salmon, 27-Jan-2012.)

⊢ ((𝐴 ∈ 𝐶 ∧ 𝐵 ∈ 𝐷) → (𝐴-_𝑟𝐵) Fn ℝ)

Theorem

mulvfn 45152

Scalar multiplication producees a function. (Contributed by Andrew Salmon, 27-Jan-2012.)

⊢ ((𝐴 ∈ 𝐶 ∧ 𝐵 ∈ 𝐷) → (𝐴._𝑣𝐵) Fn ℝ)

Theorem

addrcom 45153

Vector addition is commutative. (Contributed by Andrew Salmon, 28-Jan-2012.)

⊢ ((𝐴 ∈ 𝐶 ∧ 𝐵 ∈ 𝐷) → (𝐴+_𝑟𝐵) = (𝐵+_𝑟𝐴))

Definition

df-ptdf 45154*

Define the predicate PtDf, which is a utility definition used to shorten definitions and simplify proofs. (Contributed by Andrew Salmon, 15-Jul-2012.)

⊢ PtDf(𝐴, 𝐵) = (𝑥 ∈ ℝ ↦ (((𝑥._𝑣(𝐵-_𝑟𝐴)) +_𝑣 𝐴) “ {1, 2, 3}))

Definition

df-rr3 45155

Define the set of all points RR3. We define each point 𝐴 as a function to allow the use of vector addition and subtraction as well as scalar multiplication in our proofs. (Contributed by Andrew Salmon, 15-Jul-2012.)

⊢ RR3 = (ℝ ↑_m {1, 2, 3})

Definition

df-line3 45156*

Define the set of all lines. A line is an infinite subset of RR3 that satisfies a PtDf property. (Contributed by Andrew Salmon, 15-Jul-2012.)

⊢ line3 = {𝑥 ∈ 𝒫 RR3 ∣ (2_o ≼ 𝑥 ∧ ∀𝑦 ∈ 𝑥 ∀𝑧 ∈ 𝑥 (𝑧 ≠ 𝑦 → ran PtDf(𝑦, 𝑧) = 𝑥))}

21.42  Mathbox for Alan Sare

We are sad to report the passing of long-time contributor Alan Sare (Nov. 9, 1954 - Mar. 23, 2019).

Alan's first contribution to Metamath was a shorter proof for tfrlem8 8370 in 2008.

He developed a tool called "completeusersproof" that assists developing proofs using his "virtual deduction" method: https://us.metamath.org/other.html#completeusersproof 8370. His virtual deduction method is explained in the comment for wvd1 45248.

Below are some excerpts from his first emails to NM in 2007:

...I have been interested in proving set theory theorems for many years for mental exercise. I enjoy it. I have used a book by Martin Zuckerman. It is informal. I am interested in completely and perfectly proving theorems. Mr. Zuckerman leaves out most of the steps of a proof, of course, like most authors do, as you have noted. A complete proof for higher theorems would require a volume of writing similar to the Metamath documents. So I am frustrated when I am not capable of constructing a proof and Zuckerman leaves out steps I do not understand. I could search for the steps in other texts, but I don't do that too much. Metamath may be the answer for me....

...If we go beyond mathematics, I believe that it is possible to write down all human knowledge in a way similar to the way you have explicated large areas of mathematics. Of course, that would be a much, much more difficult job. For example, it is possible to take a hard science like physics, construct axioms based on experimental results, and to cast all of physics into a collection of axioms and theorems. Maybe this has already been attempted, although I am not familiar with it. When one then moves on to the soft sciences such as social science, this job gets much more difficult. The key is: All human thought consists of logical operations on abstract objects. Usually, these logical operations are done informally. There is no reason why one cannot take any subject and explicate it and take it down to the indivisible postulates in a formal rigorous way....

...When I read a math book or an engineering book I come across something I don't understand and I am compelled to understand it. But, often it is hopeless. I don't have the time. Or, I would have to read the same thing by multiple authors in the hope that different authors would give parts of the working proof that others have omitted. It is very inefficient. Because I have always been inclined to "get to the bottom" for a 100% fully understood proof....

21.42.1  Auxiliary theorems for the Virtual Deduction tool

Theorem

idiALT 45157

Placeholder for idi 1. Though unnecessary, this theorem is sometimes used in proofs in this mathbox for pedagogical purposes. (Contributed by Alan Sare, 31-Dec-2011.) (Proof modification is discouraged.) (New usage is discouraged.)

⊢ 𝜑    ⇒   ⊢ 𝜑

Theorem

exbir 45158

Exportation implication also converting the consequent from a biconditional to an implication. Derived automatically from exbirVD 45531. (Contributed by Alan Sare, 31-Dec-2011.)

⊢ (((𝜑 ∧ 𝜓) → (𝜒 ↔ 𝜃)) → (𝜑 → (𝜓 → (𝜃 → 𝜒))))

Theorem

3impexpbicom 45159

Version of 3impexp 1375 where in addition the consequent is commuted. (Contributed by Alan Sare, 31-Dec-2011.)

⊢ (((𝜑 ∧ 𝜓 ∧ 𝜒) → (𝜃 ↔ 𝜏)) ↔ (𝜑 → (𝜓 → (𝜒 → (𝜏 ↔ 𝜃)))))

Theorem

3impexpbicomi 45160

Inference associated with 3impexpbicom 45159. Derived automatically from 3impexpbicomiVD 45536. (Contributed by Alan Sare, 31-Dec-2011.)

⊢ ((𝜑 ∧ 𝜓 ∧ 𝜒) → (𝜃 ↔ 𝜏))    ⇒   ⊢ (𝜑 → (𝜓 → (𝜒 → (𝜏 ↔ 𝜃))))

21.42.2  Supplementary unification deductions

Theorem

bi1imp 45161

Importation inference similar to imp 411, except the outermost implication of the hypothesis is a biconditional. (Contributed by Alan Sare, 6-Nov-2017.)

⊢ (𝜑 ↔ (𝜓 → 𝜒))    ⇒   ⊢ ((𝜑 ∧ 𝜓) → 𝜒)

Theorem

bi2imp 45162

Importation inference similar to imp 411, except both implications of the hypothesis are biconditionals. (Contributed by Alan Sare, 6-Nov-2017.)

⊢ (𝜑 ↔ (𝜓 ↔ 𝜒))    ⇒   ⊢ ((𝜑 ∧ 𝜓) → 𝜒)

Theorem

bi3impb 45163

Similar to 3impb 1130 with implication in hypothesis replaced by biconditional. (Contributed by Alan Sare, 6-Nov-2017.)

⊢ ((𝜑 ∧ (𝜓 ∧ 𝜒)) ↔ 𝜃)    ⇒   ⊢ ((𝜑 ∧ 𝜓 ∧ 𝜒) → 𝜃)

Theorem

bi3impa 45164

Similar to 3impa 1125 with implication in hypothesis replaced by biconditional. (Contributed by Alan Sare, 6-Nov-2017.)

⊢ (((𝜑 ∧ 𝜓) ∧ 𝜒) ↔ 𝜃)    ⇒   ⊢ ((𝜑 ∧ 𝜓 ∧ 𝜒) → 𝜃)

Theorem

bi23impib 45165

3impib 1132 with the inner implication of the hypothesis a biconditional. (Contributed by Alan Sare, 6-Nov-2017.)

⊢ (𝜑 → ((𝜓 ∧ 𝜒) ↔ 𝜃))    ⇒   ⊢ ((𝜑 ∧ 𝜓 ∧ 𝜒) → 𝜃)

Theorem

bi13impib 45166

3impib 1132 with the outer implication of the hypothesis a biconditional. (Contributed by Alan Sare, 6-Nov-2017.)

⊢ (𝜑 ↔ ((𝜓 ∧ 𝜒) → 𝜃))    ⇒   ⊢ ((𝜑 ∧ 𝜓 ∧ 𝜒) → 𝜃)

Theorem

bi123impib 45167

3impib 1132 with the implications of the hypothesis biconditionals. (Contributed by Alan Sare, 6-Nov-2017.)

⊢ (𝜑 ↔ ((𝜓 ∧ 𝜒) ↔ 𝜃))    ⇒   ⊢ ((𝜑 ∧ 𝜓 ∧ 𝜒) → 𝜃)

Theorem

bi13impia 45168

3impia 1133 with the outer implication of the hypothesis a biconditional. (Contributed by Alan Sare, 6-Nov-2017.)

⊢ ((𝜑 ∧ 𝜓) ↔ (𝜒 → 𝜃))    ⇒   ⊢ ((𝜑 ∧ 𝜓 ∧ 𝜒) → 𝜃)

Theorem

bi123impia 45169

3impia 1133 with the implications of the hypothesis biconditionals. (Contributed by Alan Sare, 6-Nov-2017.)

⊢ ((𝜑 ∧ 𝜓) ↔ (𝜒 ↔ 𝜃))    ⇒   ⊢ ((𝜑 ∧ 𝜓 ∧ 𝜒) → 𝜃)

Theorem

bi33imp12 45170

3imp 1126 with innermost implication of the hypothesis a biconditional. (Contributed by Alan Sare, 6-Nov-2017.)

⊢ (𝜑 → (𝜓 → (𝜒 ↔ 𝜃)))    ⇒   ⊢ ((𝜑 ∧ 𝜓 ∧ 𝜒) → 𝜃)

Theorem

bi13imp23 45171

3imp 1126 with outermost implication of the hypothesis a biconditional. (Contributed by Alan Sare, 6-Nov-2017.)

⊢ (𝜑 ↔ (𝜓 → (𝜒 → 𝜃)))    ⇒   ⊢ ((𝜑 ∧ 𝜓 ∧ 𝜒) → 𝜃)

Theorem

bi13imp2 45172

Similar to 3imp 1126 except the outermost and innermost implications are biconditionals. (Contributed by Alan Sare, 6-Nov-2017.)

⊢ (𝜑 ↔ (𝜓 → (𝜒 ↔ 𝜃)))    ⇒   ⊢ ((𝜑 ∧ 𝜓 ∧ 𝜒) → 𝜃)

Theorem

bi12imp3 45173

Similar to 3imp 1126 except all but innermost implication are biconditionals. (Contributed by Alan Sare, 6-Nov-2017.)

⊢ (𝜑 ↔ (𝜓 ↔ (𝜒 → 𝜃)))    ⇒   ⊢ ((𝜑 ∧ 𝜓 ∧ 𝜒) → 𝜃)

Theorem

bi23imp1 45174

Similar to 3imp 1126 except all but outermost implication are biconditionals. (Contributed by Alan Sare, 6-Nov-2017.)

⊢ (𝜑 → (𝜓 ↔ (𝜒 ↔ 𝜃)))    ⇒   ⊢ ((𝜑 ∧ 𝜓 ∧ 𝜒) → 𝜃)

Theorem

bi123imp0 45175

Similar to 3imp 1126 except all implications are biconditionals. (Contributed by Alan Sare, 6-Nov-2017.)

⊢ (𝜑 ↔ (𝜓 ↔ (𝜒 ↔ 𝜃)))    ⇒   ⊢ ((𝜑 ∧ 𝜓 ∧ 𝜒) → 𝜃)

Theorem

4animp1 45176

A single hypothesis unification deduction with an assertion which is an implication with a 4-right-nested conjunction antecedent. (Contributed by Alan Sare, 30-May-2018.)

⊢ ((𝜑 ∧ 𝜓 ∧ 𝜒) → (𝜏 ↔ 𝜃))    ⇒   ⊢ ((((𝜑 ∧ 𝜓) ∧ 𝜒) ∧ 𝜃) → 𝜏)

Theorem

4an31 45177

A rearrangement of conjuncts for a 4-right-nested conjunction. (Contributed by Alan Sare, 30-May-2018.)

⊢ ((((𝜒 ∧ 𝜓) ∧ 𝜑) ∧ 𝜃) → 𝜏)    ⇒   ⊢ ((((𝜑 ∧ 𝜓) ∧ 𝜒) ∧ 𝜃) → 𝜏)

Theorem

4an4132 45178

A rearrangement of conjuncts for a 4-right-nested conjunction. (Contributed by Alan Sare, 30-May-2018.)

⊢ ((((𝜃 ∧ 𝜒) ∧ 𝜓) ∧ 𝜑) → 𝜏)    ⇒   ⊢ ((((𝜑 ∧ 𝜓) ∧ 𝜒) ∧ 𝜃) → 𝜏)

Theorem

expcomdg 45179

Biconditional form of expcomd 421. (Contributed by Alan Sare, 22-Jul-2012.) (New usage is discouraged.)

⊢ ((𝜑 → ((𝜓 ∧ 𝜒) → 𝜃)) ↔ (𝜑 → (𝜒 → (𝜓 → 𝜃))))

21.42.3  Conventional Metamath proofs, some derived from VD proofs

Theorem

iidn3 45180

idn3 45294 without virtual deduction connectives. Special theorem needed for the Virtual Deduction translation tool. (Contributed by Alan Sare, 23-Jul-2011.) (Proof modification is discouraged.) (New usage is discouraged.)

⊢ (𝜑 → (𝜓 → (𝜒 → 𝜒)))

Theorem

ee222 45181

e222 45315 without virtual deduction connectives. Special theorem needed for the Virtual Deduction translation tool. (Contributed by Alan Sare, 7-Jul-2011.) (Proof modification is discouraged.) (New usage is discouraged.)

⊢ (𝜑 → (𝜓 → 𝜒))    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → (𝜓 → 𝜃))    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → (𝜓 → 𝜏))    &   ⊢ (𝜒 → (𝜃 → (𝜏 → 𝜂)))    ⇒   ⊢ (𝜑 → (𝜓 → 𝜂))

Theorem

ee3bir 45182

Right-biconditional form of e3 45415 without virtual deduction connectives. Special theorem needed for the Virtual Deduction translation tool. (Contributed by Alan Sare, 22-Jul-2011.) (Proof modification is discouraged.) (New usage is discouraged.)

⊢ (𝜑 → (𝜓 → (𝜒 → 𝜃)))    &   ⊢ (𝜏 ↔ 𝜃)    ⇒   ⊢ (𝜑 → (𝜓 → (𝜒 → 𝜏)))

Theorem

ee13 45183

e13 45426 without virtual deduction connectives. Special theorem needed for the Virtual Deduction translation tool. (Contributed by Alan Sare, 28-Oct-2011.) (Proof modification is discouraged.) (New usage is discouraged.)

⊢ (𝜑 → 𝜓)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → (𝜒 → (𝜃 → 𝜏)))    &   ⊢ (𝜓 → (𝜏 → 𝜂))    ⇒   ⊢ (𝜑 → (𝜒 → (𝜃 → 𝜂)))

Theorem

ee121 45184

e121 45335 without virtual deductions. (Contributed by Alan Sare, 13-Jul-2011.) (Proof modification is discouraged.) (New usage is discouraged.)

⊢ (𝜑 → 𝜓)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → (𝜒 → 𝜃))    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝜏)    &   ⊢ (𝜓 → (𝜃 → (𝜏 → 𝜂)))    ⇒   ⊢ (𝜑 → (𝜒 → 𝜂))

Theorem

ee122 45185

e122 45332 without virtual deductions. (Contributed by Alan Sare, 13-Jul-2011.) (Proof modification is discouraged.) (New usage is discouraged.)

⊢ (𝜑 → 𝜓)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → (𝜒 → 𝜃))    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → (𝜒 → 𝜏))    &   ⊢ (𝜓 → (𝜃 → (𝜏 → 𝜂)))    ⇒   ⊢ (𝜑 → (𝜒 → 𝜂))

Theorem

ee333 45186

e333 45411 without virtual deductions. (Contributed by Alan Sare, 17-Jul-2011.) (Proof modification is discouraged.) (New usage is discouraged.)

⊢ (𝜑 → (𝜓 → (𝜒 → 𝜃)))    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → (𝜓 → (𝜒 → 𝜏)))    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → (𝜓 → (𝜒 → 𝜂)))    &   ⊢ (𝜃 → (𝜏 → (𝜂 → 𝜁)))    ⇒   ⊢ (𝜑 → (𝜓 → (𝜒 → 𝜁)))

Theorem

ee323 45187

e323 45444 without virtual deductions. (Contributed by Alan Sare, 17-Apr-2012.) (Proof modification is discouraged.) (New usage is discouraged.)

⊢ (𝜑 → (𝜓 → (𝜒 → 𝜃)))    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → (𝜓 → 𝜏))    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → (𝜓 → (𝜒 → 𝜂)))    &   ⊢ (𝜃 → (𝜏 → (𝜂 → 𝜁)))    ⇒   ⊢ (𝜑 → (𝜓 → (𝜒 → 𝜁)))

Theorem

3ornot23 45188

If the second and third disjuncts of a true triple disjunction are false, then the first disjunct is true. Automatically derived from 3ornot23VD 45525. (Contributed by Alan Sare, 31-Dec-2011.) (Proof modification is discouraged.) (New usage is discouraged.)

⊢ ((¬ 𝜑 ∧ ¬ 𝜓) → ((𝜒 ∨ 𝜑 ∨ 𝜓) → 𝜒))

Theorem

orbi1r 45189

orbi1 930 with order of disjuncts reversed. Derived from orbi1rVD 45526. (Contributed by Alan Sare, 31-Dec-2011.) (Proof modification is discouraged.) (New usage is discouraged.)

⊢ ((𝜑 ↔ 𝜓) → ((𝜒 ∨ 𝜑) ↔ (𝜒 ∨ 𝜓)))

Theorem

3orbi123 45190

pm4.39 992 with a 3-conjunct antecedent. This proof is 3orbi123VD 45528 automatically translated and minimized. (Contributed by Alan Sare, 31-Dec-2011.) (Proof modification is discouraged.) (New usage is discouraged.)

⊢ (((𝜑 ↔ 𝜓) ∧ (𝜒 ↔ 𝜃) ∧ (𝜏 ↔ 𝜂)) → ((𝜑 ∨ 𝜒 ∨ 𝜏) ↔ (𝜓 ∨ 𝜃 ∨ 𝜂)))

Theorem

syl5imp 45191

Closed form of syl5 35. Derived automatically from syl5impVD 45541. (Contributed by Alan Sare, 31-Dec-2011.) (Proof modification is discouraged.) (New usage is discouraged.)

⊢ ((𝜑 → (𝜓 → 𝜒)) → ((𝜃 → 𝜓) → (𝜑 → (𝜃 → 𝜒))))

Theorem

impexpd 45192

The following User's Proof is a Virtual Deduction proof completed automatically by the tools program completeusersproof.cmd, which invokes Mel L. O'Cat's mmj2 and Norm Megill's Metamath Proof Assistant. After the User's Proof was completed, it was minimized. The completed User's Proof before minimization is not shown. (Contributed by Alan Sare, 18-Mar-2012.) (Proof modification is discouraged.) (New usage is discouraged.)

1::	⊢ (((𝜓 ∧ 𝜒) → 𝜃) ↔ (𝜓 → (𝜒 → 𝜃)))
qed:1:	⊢ ((𝜑 → ((𝜓 ∧ 𝜒) → 𝜃)) ↔ (𝜑 → (𝜓 → (𝜒 → 𝜃))))

⊢ ((𝜑 → ((𝜓 ∧ 𝜒) → 𝜃)) ↔ (𝜑 → (𝜓 → (𝜒 → 𝜃))))

Theorem

com3rgbi 45193

The following User's Proof is a Virtual Deduction proof completed automatically by the tools program completeusersproof.cmd, which invokes Mel L. O'Cat's mmj2 and Norm Megill's Metamath Proof Assistant. The completed Virtual Deduction Proof (not shown) was minimized. The minimized proof is shown. (Contributed by Alan Sare, 18-Mar-2012.) (Proof modification is discouraged.) (New usage is discouraged.)

1::	⊢ ((𝜑 → (𝜓 → (𝜒 → 𝜃))) → (𝜑 → (𝜒 → (𝜓 → 𝜃))))
2::	⊢ ((𝜑 → (𝜒 → (𝜓 → 𝜃))) → (𝜒 → (𝜑 → (𝜓 → 𝜃))))
3:1,2:	⊢ ((𝜑 → (𝜓 → (𝜒 → 𝜃))) → (𝜒 → (𝜑 → (𝜓 → 𝜃))))
4::	⊢ ((𝜒 → (𝜑 → (𝜓 → 𝜃))) → (𝜑 → (𝜒 → (𝜓 → 𝜃))))
5::	⊢ ((𝜑 → (𝜒 → (𝜓 → 𝜃))) → (𝜑 → (𝜓 → (𝜒 → 𝜃))))
6:4,5:	⊢ ((𝜒 → (𝜑 → (𝜓 → 𝜃))) → (𝜑 → (𝜓 → (𝜒 → 𝜃))))
qed:3,6:	⊢ ((𝜑 → (𝜓 → (𝜒 → 𝜃))) ↔ (𝜒 → (𝜑 → (𝜓 → 𝜃))))

⊢ ((𝜑 → (𝜓 → (𝜒 → 𝜃))) ↔ (𝜒 → (𝜑 → (𝜓 → 𝜃))))

Theorem

impexpdcom 45194

The following User's Proof is a Virtual Deduction proof completed automatically by the tools program completeusersproof.cmd, which invokes Mel L. O'Cat's mmj2 and Norm Megill's Metamath Proof Assistant. The completed Virtual Deduction Proof (not shown) was minimized. The minimized proof is shown. (Contributed by Alan Sare, 18-Mar-2012.) (Proof modification is discouraged.) (New usage is discouraged.)

1::	⊢ ((𝜑 → ((𝜓 ∧ 𝜒) → 𝜃)) ↔ (𝜑 → (𝜓 → (𝜒 → 𝜃))))
2::	⊢ ((𝜓 → (𝜒 → (𝜑 → 𝜃))) ↔ (𝜑 → (𝜓 → (𝜒 → 𝜃))))
qed:1,2:	⊢ ((𝜑 → ((𝜓 ∧ 𝜒) → 𝜃)) ↔ (𝜓 → (𝜒 → (𝜑 → 𝜃))))

⊢ ((𝜑 → ((𝜓 ∧ 𝜒) → 𝜃)) ↔ (𝜓 → (𝜒 → (𝜑 → 𝜃))))

Theorem

ee1111 45195

Non-virtual deduction form of e1111 45354. (Contributed by Alan Sare, 18-Mar-2012.) (Proof modification is discouraged.) (New usage is discouraged.) The following User's Proof is a Virtual Deduction proof completed automatically by the tools program completeusersproof.cmd, which invokes Mel L. O'Cat's mmj2 and Norm Megill's Metamath Proof Assistant. The completed Virtual Deduction Proof (not shown) was minimized. The minimized proof is shown.

h1::	⊢ (𝜑 → 𝜓)
h2::	⊢ (𝜑 → 𝜒)
h3::	⊢ (𝜑 → 𝜃)
h4::	⊢ (𝜑 → 𝜏)
h5::	⊢ (𝜓 → (𝜒 → (𝜃 → (𝜏 → 𝜂))))
6:1,5:	⊢ (𝜑 → (𝜒 → (𝜃 → (𝜏 → 𝜂))))
7:6:	⊢ (𝜒 → (𝜑 → (𝜃 → (𝜏 → 𝜂))))
8:2,7:	⊢ (𝜑 → (𝜑 → (𝜃 → (𝜏 → 𝜂))))
9:8:	⊢ (𝜑 → (𝜃 → (𝜏 → 𝜂)))
10:9:	⊢ (𝜃 → (𝜑 → (𝜏 → 𝜂)))
11:3,10:	⊢ (𝜑 → (𝜑 → (𝜏 → 𝜂)))
12:11:	⊢ (𝜑 → (𝜏 → 𝜂))
13:12:	⊢ (𝜏 → (𝜑 → 𝜂))
14:4,13:	⊢ (𝜑 → (𝜑 → 𝜂))
qed:14:	⊢ (𝜑 → 𝜂)

⊢ (𝜑 → 𝜓)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝜒)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝜃)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝜏)    &   ⊢ (𝜓 → (𝜒 → (𝜃 → (𝜏 → 𝜂))))    ⇒   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝜂)

Theorem

pm2.43bgbi 45196

Logical equivalence of a 2-left-nested implication and a 1-left-nested implicated when two antecedents of the former implication are identical. (Contributed by Alan Sare, 18-Mar-2012.) (Proof modification is discouraged.) (New usage is discouraged.) The following User's Proof is a Virtual Deduction proof completed automatically by the tools program completeusersproof.cmd, which invokes Mel L. O'Cat's mmj2 and Norm Megill's Metamath Proof Assistant. The completed Virtual Deduction Proof (not shown) was minimized. The minimized proof is shown.

1::	⊢ ((𝜑 → (𝜓 → (𝜑 → 𝜒))) → (𝜑 → (𝜑 → (𝜓 → 𝜒))))
2::	⊢ ((𝜑 → (𝜑 → (𝜓 → 𝜒))) → (𝜑 → (𝜓 → 𝜒)))
3:1,2:	⊢ ((𝜑 → (𝜓 → (𝜑 → 𝜒))) → (𝜑 → (𝜓 → 𝜒)))
4::	⊢ ((𝜑 → (𝜓 → 𝜒)) → (𝜓 → (𝜑 → 𝜒)))
5:3,4:	⊢ ((𝜑 → (𝜓 → (𝜑 → 𝜒))) → (𝜓 → (𝜑 → 𝜒)))
6::	⊢ ((𝜓 → (𝜑 → 𝜒)) → (𝜑 → (𝜓 → (𝜑 → 𝜒))))
qed:5,6:	⊢ ((𝜑 → (𝜓 → (𝜑 → 𝜒))) ↔ (𝜓 → (𝜑 → 𝜒)))

⊢ ((𝜑 → (𝜓 → (𝜑 → 𝜒))) ↔ (𝜓 → (𝜑 → 𝜒)))

Theorem

pm2.43cbi 45197

Logical equivalence of a 3-left-nested implication and a 2-left-nested implicated when two antecedents of the former implication are identical. (Contributed by Alan Sare, 18-Mar-2012.) (Proof modification is discouraged.) (New usage is discouraged.) The following User's Proof is a Virtual Deduction proof completed automatically by the tools program completeusersproof.cmd, which invokes Mel L. O'Cat's mmj2 and Norm Megill's Metamath Proof Assistant. The completed Virtual Deduction Proof (not shown) was minimized. The minimized proof is shown.

1::	⊢ ((𝜑 → (𝜓 → (𝜒 → (𝜑 → 𝜃))) ) → (𝜑 → (𝜓 → (𝜑 → (𝜒 → 𝜃)))))
2::	⊢ ((𝜑 → (𝜓 → (𝜑 → (𝜒 → 𝜃))) ) → (𝜓 → (𝜑 → (𝜒 → 𝜃))))
3:1,2:	⊢ ((𝜑 → (𝜓 → (𝜒 → (𝜑 → 𝜃))) ) → (𝜓 → (𝜑 → (𝜒 → 𝜃))))
4::	⊢ ((𝜓 → (𝜑 → (𝜒 → 𝜃))) → (𝜓 → (𝜒 → (𝜑 → 𝜃))))
5:3,4:	⊢ ((𝜑 → (𝜓 → (𝜒 → (𝜑 → 𝜃))) ) → (𝜓 → (𝜒 → (𝜑 → 𝜃))))
6::	⊢ ((𝜓 → (𝜒 → (𝜑 → 𝜃))) → (𝜑 → (𝜓 → (𝜒 → (𝜑 → 𝜃)))))
qed:5,6:	⊢ ((𝜑 → (𝜓 → (𝜒 → (𝜑 → 𝜃))) ) ↔ (𝜓 → (𝜒 → (𝜑 → 𝜃))))

⊢ ((𝜑 → (𝜓 → (𝜒 → (𝜑 → 𝜃)))) ↔ (𝜓 → (𝜒 → (𝜑 → 𝜃))))

Theorem

ee233 45198

Non-virtual deduction form of e233 45443. (Contributed by Alan Sare, 18-Mar-2012.) (Proof modification is discouraged.) (New usage is discouraged.) The following User's Proof is a Virtual Deduction proof completed automatically by the tools program completeusersproof.cmd, which invokes Mel L. O'Cat's mmj2 and Norm Megill's Metamath Proof Assistant. The completed Virtual Deduction Proof (not shown) was minimized. The minimized proof is shown.

h1::	⊢ (𝜑 → (𝜓 → 𝜒))
h2::	⊢ (𝜑 → (𝜓 → (𝜃 → 𝜏)))
h3::	⊢ (𝜑 → (𝜓 → (𝜃 → 𝜂)))
h4::	⊢ (𝜒 → (𝜏 → (𝜂 → 𝜁)))
5:1,4:	⊢ (𝜑 → (𝜓 → (𝜏 → (𝜂 → 𝜁))) )
6:5:	⊢ (𝜏 → (𝜑 → (𝜓 → (𝜂 → 𝜁))) )
7:2,6:	⊢ (𝜑 → (𝜓 → (𝜃 → (𝜑 → (𝜓 → (𝜂 → 𝜁))))))
8:7:	⊢ (𝜓 → (𝜃 → (𝜑 → (𝜓 → (𝜂 → 𝜁)))))
9:8:	⊢ (𝜃 → (𝜑 → (𝜓 → (𝜂 → 𝜁))) )
10:9:	⊢ (𝜑 → (𝜓 → (𝜃 → (𝜂 → 𝜁))) )
11:10:	⊢ (𝜂 → (𝜑 → (𝜓 → (𝜃 → 𝜁))) )
12:3,11:	⊢ (𝜑 → (𝜓 → (𝜃 → (𝜑 → (𝜓 → (𝜃 → 𝜁))))))
13:12:	⊢ (𝜓 → (𝜃 → (𝜑 → (𝜓 → (𝜃 → 𝜁)))))
14:13:	⊢ (𝜃 → (𝜑 → (𝜓 → (𝜃 → 𝜁))) )
qed:14:	⊢ (𝜑 → (𝜓 → (𝜃 → 𝜁)))

⊢ (𝜑 → (𝜓 → 𝜒))    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → (𝜓 → (𝜃 → 𝜏)))    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → (𝜓 → (𝜃 → 𝜂)))    &   ⊢ (𝜒 → (𝜏 → (𝜂 → 𝜁)))    ⇒   ⊢ (𝜑 → (𝜓 → (𝜃 → 𝜁)))

Theorem

imbi13 45199

Join three logical equivalences to form equivalence of implications. imbi13 45199 is imbi13VD 45552 without virtual deductions and was automatically derived from imbi13VD 45552 using the tools program translate..without..overwriting.cmd and Metamath's minimize command. (Contributed by Alan Sare, 18-Mar-2012.) (Proof modification is discouraged.) (New usage is discouraged.)

⊢ ((𝜑 ↔ 𝜓) → ((𝜒 ↔ 𝜃) → ((𝜏 ↔ 𝜂) → ((𝜑 → (𝜒 → 𝜏)) ↔ (𝜓 → (𝜃 → 𝜂))))))

Theorem

ee33 45200

Non-virtual deduction form of e33 45412. (Contributed by Alan Sare, 18-Mar-2012.) (Proof modification is discouraged.) (New usage is discouraged.) The following User's Proof is a Virtual Deduction proof completed automatically by the tools program completeusersproof.cmd, which invokes Mel L. O'Cat's mmj2 and Norm Megill's Metamath Proof Assistant. The completed Virtual Deduction Proof (not shown) was minimized. The minimized proof is shown.

h1::	⊢ (𝜑 → (𝜓 → (𝜒 → 𝜃)))
h2::	⊢ (𝜑 → (𝜓 → (𝜒 → 𝜏)))
h3::	⊢ (𝜃 → (𝜏 → 𝜂))
4:1,3:	⊢ (𝜑 → (𝜓 → (𝜒 → (𝜏 → 𝜂))))
5:4:	⊢ (𝜏 → (𝜑 → (𝜓 → (𝜒 → 𝜂))))
6:2,5:	⊢ (𝜑 → (𝜓 → (𝜒 → (𝜑 → (𝜓 → (𝜒 → 𝜂))))))
7:6:	⊢ (𝜓 → (𝜒 → (𝜑 → (𝜓 → (𝜒 → 𝜂)))))
8:7:	⊢ (𝜒 → (𝜑 → (𝜓 → (𝜒 → 𝜂))))
qed:8:	⊢ (𝜑 → (𝜓 → (𝜒 → 𝜂)))

⊢ (𝜑 → (𝜓 → (𝜒 → 𝜃)))    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → (𝜓 → (𝜒 → 𝜏)))    &   ⊢ (𝜃 → (𝜏 → 𝜂))    ⇒   ⊢ (𝜑 → (𝜓 → (𝜒 → 𝜂)))