Theorem limsupbnd1 15629

Description: If a sequence is eventually at most 𝐴, then the limsup is also at most 𝐴. (The converse is only true if the less or equal is replaced by strictly less than; consider the sequence 1 / 𝑛 which is never less or equal to zero even though the limsup is.) (Contributed by Mario Carneiro, 7-Sep-2014.) (Revised by AV, 12-Sep-2020.)

Hypotheses

Ref	Expression
limsupbnd.1	⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐵 ⊆ ℝ)
limsupbnd.2	⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐹:𝐵⟶ℝ*)
limsupbnd.3	⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐴 ∈ ℝ*)
limsupbnd1.4	⊢ (𝜑 → ∃𝑘 ∈ ℝ ∀𝑗 ∈ 𝐵 (𝑘 ≤ 𝑗 → (𝐹‘𝑗) ≤ 𝐴))

Assertion

Ref	Expression
limsupbnd1	⊢ (𝜑 → (lim sup‘𝐹) ≤ 𝐴)

Distinct variable groups:   𝑗,𝑘,𝐴   𝐵,𝑗,𝑘   𝑗,𝐹,𝑘   𝜑,𝑗,𝑘

Proof of Theorem limsupbnd1

Dummy variable 𝑛 is distinct from all other variables.

Step	Hyp	Ref	Expression
1		limsupbnd1.4	. 2 ⊢ (𝜑 → ∃𝑘 ∈ ℝ ∀𝑗 ∈ 𝐵 (𝑘 ≤ 𝑗 → (𝐹‘𝑗) ≤ 𝐴))
2		limsupbnd.1	. . . . . 6 ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐵 ⊆ ℝ)
3	2	adantr 486	. . . . 5 ⊢ ((𝜑 ∧ 𝑘 ∈ ℝ) → 𝐵 ⊆ ℝ)
4		limsupbnd.2	. . . . . 6 ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐹:𝐵⟶ℝ*)
5	4	adantr 486	. . . . 5 ⊢ ((𝜑 ∧ 𝑘 ∈ ℝ) → 𝐹:𝐵⟶ℝ*)
6		simpr 490	. . . . 5 ⊢ ((𝜑 ∧ 𝑘 ∈ ℝ) → 𝑘 ∈ ℝ)
7		limsupbnd.3	. . . . . 6 ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐴 ∈ ℝ*)
8	7	adantr 486	. . . . 5 ⊢ ((𝜑 ∧ 𝑘 ∈ ℝ) → 𝐴 ∈ ℝ*)
9		eqid 2761	. . . . . 6 ⊢ (𝑛 ∈ ℝ ↦ sup(((𝐹 “ (𝑛[,)+∞)) ∩ ℝ*), ℝ*, < )) = (𝑛 ∈ ℝ ↦ sup(((𝐹 “ (𝑛[,)+∞)) ∩ ℝ*), ℝ*, < ))
10	9	limsupgle 15624	. . . . 5 ⊢ (((𝐵 ⊆ ℝ ∧ 𝐹:𝐵⟶ℝ*) ∧ 𝑘 ∈ ℝ ∧ 𝐴 ∈ ℝ*) → (((𝑛 ∈ ℝ ↦ sup(((𝐹 “ (𝑛[,)+∞)) ∩ ℝ*), ℝ*, < ))‘𝑘) ≤ 𝐴 ↔ ∀𝑗 ∈ 𝐵 (𝑘 ≤ 𝑗 → (𝐹‘𝑗) ≤ 𝐴)))
11	3, 5, 6, 8, 10	syl211anc 1403	. . . 4 ⊢ ((𝜑 ∧ 𝑘 ∈ ℝ) → (((𝑛 ∈ ℝ ↦ sup(((𝐹 “ (𝑛[,)+∞)) ∩ ℝ*), ℝ*, < ))‘𝑘) ≤ 𝐴 ↔ ∀𝑗 ∈ 𝐵 (𝑘 ≤ 𝑗 → (𝐹‘𝑗) ≤ 𝐴)))
12		reex 11272	. . . . . . . . . . . 12 ⊢ ℝ ∈ V
13	12	ssex 5282	. . . . . . . . . . 11 ⊢ (𝐵 ⊆ ℝ → 𝐵 ∈ V)
14	2, 13	syl 18	. . . . . . . . . 10 ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐵 ∈ V)
15		xrex 13096	. . . . . . . . . . 11 ⊢ ℝ* ∈ V
16	15	a1i 11	. . . . . . . . . 10 ⊢ (𝜑 → ℝ* ∈ V)
17		fex2 7937	. . . . . . . . . 10 ⊢ ((𝐹:𝐵⟶ℝ* ∧ 𝐵 ∈ V ∧ ℝ* ∈ V) → 𝐹 ∈ V)
18	4, 14, 16, 17	syl3anc 1398	. . . . . . . . 9 ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐹 ∈ V)
19		limsupcl 15620	. . . . . . . . 9 ⊢ (𝐹 ∈ V → (lim sup‘𝐹) ∈ ℝ*)
20	18, 19	syl 18	. . . . . . . 8 ⊢ (𝜑 → (lim sup‘𝐹) ∈ ℝ*)
21	20	xrleidd 13262	. . . . . . 7 ⊢ (𝜑 → (lim sup‘𝐹) ≤ (lim sup‘𝐹))
22	9	limsuple 15625	. . . . . . . 8 ⊢ ((𝐵 ⊆ ℝ ∧ 𝐹:𝐵⟶ℝ* ∧ (lim sup‘𝐹) ∈ ℝ*) → ((lim sup‘𝐹) ≤ (lim sup‘𝐹) ↔ ∀𝑘 ∈ ℝ (lim sup‘𝐹) ≤ ((𝑛 ∈ ℝ ↦ sup(((𝐹 “ (𝑛[,)+∞)) ∩ ℝ*), ℝ*, < ))‘𝑘)))
23	2, 4, 20, 22	syl3anc 1398	. . . . . . 7 ⊢ (𝜑 → ((lim sup‘𝐹) ≤ (lim sup‘𝐹) ↔ ∀𝑘 ∈ ℝ (lim sup‘𝐹) ≤ ((𝑛 ∈ ℝ ↦ sup(((𝐹 “ (𝑛[,)+∞)) ∩ ℝ*), ℝ*, < ))‘𝑘)))
24	21, 23	mpbid 235	. . . . . 6 ⊢ (𝜑 → ∀𝑘 ∈ ℝ (lim sup‘𝐹) ≤ ((𝑛 ∈ ℝ ↦ sup(((𝐹 “ (𝑛[,)+∞)) ∩ ℝ*), ℝ*, < ))‘𝑘))
25	24	r19.21bi 3255	. . . . 5 ⊢ ((𝜑 ∧ 𝑘 ∈ ℝ) → (lim sup‘𝐹) ≤ ((𝑛 ∈ ℝ ↦ sup(((𝐹 “ (𝑛[,)+∞)) ∩ ℝ*), ℝ*, < ))‘𝑘))
26	20	adantr 486	. . . . . 6 ⊢ ((𝜑 ∧ 𝑘 ∈ ℝ) → (lim sup‘𝐹) ∈ ℝ*)
27	9	limsupgf 15622	. . . . . . . 8 ⊢ (𝑛 ∈ ℝ ↦ sup(((𝐹 “ (𝑛[,)+∞)) ∩ ℝ*), ℝ*, < )):ℝ⟶ℝ*
28	27	a1i 11	. . . . . . 7 ⊢ (𝜑 → (𝑛 ∈ ℝ ↦ sup(((𝐹 “ (𝑛[,)+∞)) ∩ ℝ*), ℝ*, < )):ℝ⟶ℝ*)
29	28	ffvelcdmda 7076	. . . . . 6 ⊢ ((𝜑 ∧ 𝑘 ∈ ℝ) → ((𝑛 ∈ ℝ ↦ sup(((𝐹 “ (𝑛[,)+∞)) ∩ ℝ*), ℝ*, < ))‘𝑘) ∈ ℝ*)
30		xrletr 13268	. . . . . 6 ⊢ (((lim sup‘𝐹) ∈ ℝ* ∧ ((𝑛 ∈ ℝ ↦ sup(((𝐹 “ (𝑛[,)+∞)) ∩ ℝ*), ℝ*, < ))‘𝑘) ∈ ℝ* ∧ 𝐴 ∈ ℝ*) → (((lim sup‘𝐹) ≤ ((𝑛 ∈ ℝ ↦ sup(((𝐹 “ (𝑛[,)+∞)) ∩ ℝ*), ℝ*, < ))‘𝑘) ∧ ((𝑛 ∈ ℝ ↦ sup(((𝐹 “ (𝑛[,)+∞)) ∩ ℝ*), ℝ*, < ))‘𝑘) ≤ 𝐴) → (lim sup‘𝐹) ≤ 𝐴))
31	26, 29, 8, 30	syl3anc 1398	. . . . 5 ⊢ ((𝜑 ∧ 𝑘 ∈ ℝ) → (((lim sup‘𝐹) ≤ ((𝑛 ∈ ℝ ↦ sup(((𝐹 “ (𝑛[,)+∞)) ∩ ℝ*), ℝ*, < ))‘𝑘) ∧ ((𝑛 ∈ ℝ ↦ sup(((𝐹 “ (𝑛[,)+∞)) ∩ ℝ*), ℝ*, < ))‘𝑘) ≤ 𝐴) → (lim sup‘𝐹) ≤ 𝐴))
32	25, 31	mpand 708	. . . 4 ⊢ ((𝜑 ∧ 𝑘 ∈ ℝ) → (((𝑛 ∈ ℝ ↦ sup(((𝐹 “ (𝑛[,)+∞)) ∩ ℝ*), ℝ*, < ))‘𝑘) ≤ 𝐴 → (lim sup‘𝐹) ≤ 𝐴))
33	11, 32	sylbird 263	. . 3 ⊢ ((𝜑 ∧ 𝑘 ∈ ℝ) → (∀𝑗 ∈ 𝐵 (𝑘 ≤ 𝑗 → (𝐹‘𝑗) ≤ 𝐴) → (lim sup‘𝐹) ≤ 𝐴))
34	33	rexlimdva 3164	. 2 ⊢ (𝜑 → (∃𝑘 ∈ ℝ ∀𝑗 ∈ 𝐵 (𝑘 ≤ 𝑗 → (𝐹‘𝑗) ≤ 𝐴) → (lim sup‘𝐹) ≤ 𝐴))
35	1, 34	mpd 16	1 ⊢ (𝜑 → (lim sup‘𝐹) ≤ 𝐴)

This proof depends on syntax axioms:   → wi 4   ↔ wb 209   ∧ wa 401   ∈ wcel 2145  ∀wral 3077  ∃wrex 3087  Vcvv 3451   ∩ cin 3898   ⊆ wss 3899   class class class wbr 5103   ↦ cmpt 5186   “ cima 5654  ⟶wf 6527  ‘cfv 6531  (class class class)co 7412  supcsup 9416  ℝcr 11180  +∞cpnf 11321  ℝ^*cxr 11323   < clt 11324   ≤ cle 11325  [,)cico 13459  lim supclsp 15617

This proof depends on axioms:  ax-mp 5  ax-1 6  ax-2 7  ax-3 8  ax-gen 1828  ax-4 1842  ax-5 1943  ax-6 2000  ax-7 2041  ax-8 2147  ax-9 2155  ax-10 2178  ax-11 2194  ax-12 2213  ax-ext 2733  ax-sep 5249  ax-nul 5260  ax-pow 5327  ax-pr 5391  ax-un 7740  ax-cnex 11237  ax-resscn 11238  ax-1cn 11239  ax-icn 11240  ax-addcl 11241  ax-addrcl 11242  ax-mulcl 11243  ax-mulrcl 11244  ax-mulcom 11245  ax-addass 11246  ax-mulass 11247  ax-distr 11248  ax-i2m1 11249  ax-1ne0 11250  ax-1rid 11251  ax-rnegex 11252  ax-rrecex 11253  ax-cnre 11254  ax-pre-lttri 11255  ax-pre-lttrn 11256  ax-pre-ltadd 11257  ax-pre-mulgt0 11258  ax-pre-sup 11259

This proof depends on definitions:  df-bi 210  df-an 402  df-or 862  df-3or 1104  df-3an 1105  df-tru 1573  df-fal 1583  df-ex 1813  df-nf 1817  df-sb 2100  df-mo 2565  df-eu 2595  df-clab 2740  df-cleq 2753  df-clel 2836  df-nfc 2910  df-ne 2957  df-nel 3063  df-ral 3078  df-rex 3088  df-rmo 3366  df-reu 3367  df-rab 3414  df-v 3453  df-sbc 3740  df-csb 3848  df-dif 3902  df-un 3904  df-in 3906  df-ss 3916  df-nul 4280  df-if 4483  df-pw 4559  df-sn 4585  df-pr 4587  df-op 4591  df-uni 4868  df-br 5104  df-opab 5168  df-mpt 5187  df-id 5546  df-po 5559  df-so 5560  df-xp 5657  df-rel 5658  df-cnv 5659  df-co 5660  df-dm 5661  df-rn 5662  df-res 5663  df-ima 5664  df-iota 6487  df-fun 6533  df-fn 6534  df-f 6535  df-f1 6536  df-fo 6537  df-f1o 6538  df-fv 6539  df-riota 7369  df-ov 7415  df-oprab 7416  df-mpo 7417  df-er 8701  df-en 8958  df-dom 8959  df-sdom 8960  df-sup 9418  df-inf 9419  df-pnf 11326  df-mnf 11327  df-xr 11328  df-ltxr 11329  df-le 11330  df-sub 11524  df-neg 11525  df-ico 13463  df-limsup 15618

This theorem is used by:  caucvgrlem  15820  limsupre  46595  limsupbnd1f  46640