Theorem limsupbnd1 15678

Description: If a sequence is eventually at most 𝐴, then the limsup is also at most 𝐴. (The converse is only true if the less or equal is replaced by strictly less than; consider the sequence 1 / 𝑛 which is never less or equal to zero even though the limsup is.) (Contributed by Mario Carneiro, 7-Sep-2014.) (Revised by AV, 12-Sep-2020.)

Hypotheses

Ref	Expression
limsupbnd.1	⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐵 ⊆ ℝ)
limsupbnd.2	⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐹:𝐵⟶ℝ*)
limsupbnd.3	⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐴 ∈ ℝ*)
limsupbnd1.4	⊢ (𝜑 → ∃𝑘 ∈ ℝ ∀𝑗 ∈ 𝐵 (𝑘 ≤ 𝑗 → (𝐹‘𝑗) ≤ 𝐴))

Assertion

Ref	Expression
limsupbnd1	⊢ (𝜑 → (lim sup‘𝐹) ≤ 𝐴)

Distinct variable groups:   𝑗,𝑘,𝐴   𝐵,𝑗,𝑘   𝑗,𝐹,𝑘   𝜑,𝑗,𝑘

Proof of Theorem limsupbnd1

Dummy variable 𝑛 is distinct from all other variables.

Step	Hyp	Ref	Expression
1		limsupbnd1.4	. 2 ⊢ (𝜑 → ∃𝑘 ∈ ℝ ∀𝑗 ∈ 𝐵 (𝑘 ≤ 𝑗 → (𝐹‘𝑗) ≤ 𝐴))
2		limsupbnd.1	. . . . . 6 ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐵 ⊆ ℝ)
3	2	adantr 486	. . . . 5 ⊢ ((𝜑 ∧ 𝑘 ∈ ℝ) → 𝐵 ⊆ ℝ)
4		limsupbnd.2	. . . . . 6 ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐹:𝐵⟶ℝ*)
5	4	adantr 486	. . . . 5 ⊢ ((𝜑 ∧ 𝑘 ∈ ℝ) → 𝐹:𝐵⟶ℝ*)
6		simpr 490	. . . . 5 ⊢ ((𝜑 ∧ 𝑘 ∈ ℝ) → 𝑘 ∈ ℝ)
7		limsupbnd.3	. . . . . 6 ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐴 ∈ ℝ*)
8	7	adantr 486	. . . . 5 ⊢ ((𝜑 ∧ 𝑘 ∈ ℝ) → 𝐴 ∈ ℝ*)
9		eqid 2763	. . . . . 6 ⊢ (𝑛 ∈ ℝ ↦ sup(((𝐹 “ (𝑛[,)+∞)) ∩ ℝ*), ℝ*, < )) = (𝑛 ∈ ℝ ↦ sup(((𝐹 “ (𝑛[,)+∞)) ∩ ℝ*), ℝ*, < ))
10	9	limsupgle 15673	. . . . 5 ⊢ (((𝐵 ⊆ ℝ ∧ 𝐹:𝐵⟶ℝ*) ∧ 𝑘 ∈ ℝ ∧ 𝐴 ∈ ℝ*) → (((𝑛 ∈ ℝ ↦ sup(((𝐹 “ (𝑛[,)+∞)) ∩ ℝ*), ℝ*, < ))‘𝑘) ≤ 𝐴 ↔ ∀𝑗 ∈ 𝐵 (𝑘 ≤ 𝑗 → (𝐹‘𝑗) ≤ 𝐴)))
11	3, 5, 6, 8, 10	syl211anc 1404	. . . 4 ⊢ ((𝜑 ∧ 𝑘 ∈ ℝ) → (((𝑛 ∈ ℝ ↦ sup(((𝐹 “ (𝑛[,)+∞)) ∩ ℝ*), ℝ*, < ))‘𝑘) ≤ 𝐴 ↔ ∀𝑗 ∈ 𝐵 (𝑘 ≤ 𝑗 → (𝐹‘𝑗) ≤ 𝐴)))
12		reex 11318	. . . . . . . . . . . 12 ⊢ ℝ ∈ V
13	12	ssex 5286	. . . . . . . . . . 11 ⊢ (𝐵 ⊆ ℝ → 𝐵 ∈ V)
14	2, 13	syl 18	. . . . . . . . . 10 ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐵 ∈ V)
15		xrex 13142	. . . . . . . . . . 11 ⊢ ℝ* ∈ V
16	15	a1i 11	. . . . . . . . . 10 ⊢ (𝜑 → ℝ* ∈ V)
17		fex2 7972	. . . . . . . . . 10 ⊢ ((𝐹:𝐵⟶ℝ* ∧ 𝐵 ∈ V ∧ ℝ* ∈ V) → 𝐹 ∈ V)
18	4, 14, 16, 17	syl3anc 1399	. . . . . . . . 9 ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐹 ∈ V)
19		limsupcl 15669	. . . . . . . . 9 ⊢ (𝐹 ∈ V → (lim sup‘𝐹) ∈ ℝ*)
20	18, 19	syl 18	. . . . . . . 8 ⊢ (𝜑 → (lim sup‘𝐹) ∈ ℝ*)
21	20	xrleidd 13308	. . . . . . 7 ⊢ (𝜑 → (lim sup‘𝐹) ≤ (lim sup‘𝐹))
22	9	limsuple 15674	. . . . . . . 8 ⊢ ((𝐵 ⊆ ℝ ∧ 𝐹:𝐵⟶ℝ* ∧ (lim sup‘𝐹) ∈ ℝ*) → ((lim sup‘𝐹) ≤ (lim sup‘𝐹) ↔ ∀𝑘 ∈ ℝ (lim sup‘𝐹) ≤ ((𝑛 ∈ ℝ ↦ sup(((𝐹 “ (𝑛[,)+∞)) ∩ ℝ*), ℝ*, < ))‘𝑘)))
23	2, 4, 20, 22	syl3anc 1399	. . . . . . 7 ⊢ (𝜑 → ((lim sup‘𝐹) ≤ (lim sup‘𝐹) ↔ ∀𝑘 ∈ ℝ (lim sup‘𝐹) ≤ ((𝑛 ∈ ℝ ↦ sup(((𝐹 “ (𝑛[,)+∞)) ∩ ℝ*), ℝ*, < ))‘𝑘)))
24	21, 23	mpbid 235	. . . . . 6 ⊢ (𝜑 → ∀𝑘 ∈ ℝ (lim sup‘𝐹) ≤ ((𝑛 ∈ ℝ ↦ sup(((𝐹 “ (𝑛[,)+∞)) ∩ ℝ*), ℝ*, < ))‘𝑘))
25	24	r19.21bi 3258	. . . . 5 ⊢ ((𝜑 ∧ 𝑘 ∈ ℝ) → (lim sup‘𝐹) ≤ ((𝑛 ∈ ℝ ↦ sup(((𝐹 “ (𝑛[,)+∞)) ∩ ℝ*), ℝ*, < ))‘𝑘))
26	20	adantr 486	. . . . . 6 ⊢ ((𝜑 ∧ 𝑘 ∈ ℝ) → (lim sup‘𝐹) ∈ ℝ*)
27	9	limsupgf 15671	. . . . . . . 8 ⊢ (𝑛 ∈ ℝ ↦ sup(((𝐹 “ (𝑛[,)+∞)) ∩ ℝ*), ℝ*, < )):ℝ⟶ℝ*
28	27	a1i 11	. . . . . . 7 ⊢ (𝜑 → (𝑛 ∈ ℝ ↦ sup(((𝐹 “ (𝑛[,)+∞)) ∩ ℝ*), ℝ*, < )):ℝ⟶ℝ*)
29	28	ffvelcdmda 7108	. . . . . 6 ⊢ ((𝜑 ∧ 𝑘 ∈ ℝ) → ((𝑛 ∈ ℝ ↦ sup(((𝐹 “ (𝑛[,)+∞)) ∩ ℝ*), ℝ*, < ))‘𝑘) ∈ ℝ*)
30		xrletr 13314	. . . . . 6 ⊢ (((lim sup‘𝐹) ∈ ℝ* ∧ ((𝑛 ∈ ℝ ↦ sup(((𝐹 “ (𝑛[,)+∞)) ∩ ℝ*), ℝ*, < ))‘𝑘) ∈ ℝ* ∧ 𝐴 ∈ ℝ*) → (((lim sup‘𝐹) ≤ ((𝑛 ∈ ℝ ↦ sup(((𝐹 “ (𝑛[,)+∞)) ∩ ℝ*), ℝ*, < ))‘𝑘) ∧ ((𝑛 ∈ ℝ ↦ sup(((𝐹 “ (𝑛[,)+∞)) ∩ ℝ*), ℝ*, < ))‘𝑘) ≤ 𝐴) → (lim sup‘𝐹) ≤ 𝐴))
31	26, 29, 8, 30	syl3anc 1399	. . . . 5 ⊢ ((𝜑 ∧ 𝑘 ∈ ℝ) → (((lim sup‘𝐹) ≤ ((𝑛 ∈ ℝ ↦ sup(((𝐹 “ (𝑛[,)+∞)) ∩ ℝ*), ℝ*, < ))‘𝑘) ∧ ((𝑛 ∈ ℝ ↦ sup(((𝐹 “ (𝑛[,)+∞)) ∩ ℝ*), ℝ*, < ))‘𝑘) ≤ 𝐴) → (lim sup‘𝐹) ≤ 𝐴))
32	25, 31	mpand 708	. . . 4 ⊢ ((𝜑 ∧ 𝑘 ∈ ℝ) → (((𝑛 ∈ ℝ ↦ sup(((𝐹 “ (𝑛[,)+∞)) ∩ ℝ*), ℝ*, < ))‘𝑘) ≤ 𝐴 → (lim sup‘𝐹) ≤ 𝐴))
33	11, 32	sylbird 263	. . 3 ⊢ ((𝜑 ∧ 𝑘 ∈ ℝ) → (∀𝑗 ∈ 𝐵 (𝑘 ≤ 𝑗 → (𝐹‘𝑗) ≤ 𝐴) → (lim sup‘𝐹) ≤ 𝐴))
34	33	rexlimdva 3167	. 2 ⊢ (𝜑 → (∃𝑘 ∈ ℝ ∀𝑗 ∈ 𝐵 (𝑘 ≤ 𝑗 → (𝐹‘𝑗) ≤ 𝐴) → (lim sup‘𝐹) ≤ 𝐴))
35	1, 34	mpd 16	1 ⊢ (𝜑 → (lim sup‘𝐹) ≤ 𝐴)

This proof depends on syntax axioms:   → wi 4   ↔ wb 209   ∧ wa 401   ∈ wcel 2147  ∀wral 3080  ∃wrex 3090  Vcvv 3454   ⊆ wss 3900   ∩ cin 4092   class class class wbr 5106   ↦ cmpt 5189   “ cima 5658  ⟶wf 6554  ‘cfv 6558  (class class class)co 7443  supcsup 9459  ℝcr 11226  +∞cpnf 11367  ℝ^*cxr 11369   < clt 11370   ≤ cle 11371  [,)cico 13505  lim supclsp 15666

This proof depends on axioms:  ax-mp 5  ax-1 6  ax-2 7  ax-3 8  ax-gen 1828  ax-4 1842  ax-5 1945  ax-6 2002  ax-7 2043  ax-8 2149  ax-9 2157  ax-10 2180  ax-11 2197  ax-12 2216  ax-ext 2735  ax-sep 5252  ax-nul 5263  ax-pow 5331  ax-pr 5395  ax-un 7775  ax-cnex 11283  ax-resscn 11284  ax-1cn 11285  ax-icn 11286  ax-addcl 11287  ax-addrcl 11288  ax-mulcl 11289  ax-mulrcl 11290  ax-mulcom 11291  ax-addass 11292  ax-mulass 11293  ax-distr 11294  ax-i2m1 11295  ax-1ne0 11296  ax-1rid 11297  ax-rnegex 11298  ax-rrecex 11299  ax-cnre 11300  ax-pre-lttri 11301  ax-pre-lttrn 11302  ax-pre-ltadd 11303  ax-pre-mulgt0 11304  ax-pre-sup 11305

This proof depends on definitions:  df-bi 210  df-an 402  df-or 862  df-3or 1104  df-3an 1105  df-tru 1573  df-fal 1583  df-ex 1813  df-nf 1817  df-sb 2102  df-mo 2567  df-eu 2597  df-clab 2742  df-cleq 2755  df-clel 2839  df-nfc 2913  df-ne 2960  df-nel 3066  df-ral 3081  df-rex 3091  df-rmo 3369  df-reu 3370  df-rab 3417  df-v 3456  df-sbc 3743  df-csb 3852  df-ss 3901  df-dif 4050  df-in 4094  df-un 4154  df-nul 4282  df-if 4486  df-pw 4562  df-sn 4589  df-pr 4591  df-op 4839  df-uni 4871  df-br 5107  df-opab 5171  df-mpt 5190  df-id 5550  df-po 5563  df-so 5564  df-xp 5661  df-rel 5662  df-cnv 5663  df-co 5664  df-dm 5665  df-rn 5666  df-res 5667  df-ima 5668  df-iota 6512  df-fun 6560  df-fn 6561  df-f 6562  df-f1 6563  df-fo 6564  df-f1o 6565  df-fv 6566  df-riota 7400  df-ov 7446  df-oprab 7447  df-mpo 7448  df-er 8745  df-en 9002  df-dom 9003  df-sdom 9004  df-sup 9461  df-inf 9462  df-pnf 11372  df-mnf 11373  df-xr 11374  df-ltxr 11375  df-le 11376  df-sub 11570  df-neg 11571  df-ico 13509  df-limsup 15667

This theorem is used by:  caucvgrlem  15869  limsupre  46856  limsupbnd1f  46901