Most Recent Proofs - Intuitionistic Logic Explorer

Most recent proofs    These are the 100 (Unicode, GIF) or 1000 (Unicode, GIF) most recent proofs in the iset.mm database for the Intuitionistic Logic Explorer. The iset.mm database is maintained on GitHub with master (stable) and develop (development) versions. This page was created from the commit given on the MPE Most Recent Proofs page. The database from that commit is also available here: iset.mm.

See the MPE Most Recent Proofs page for news and some useful links.

Last updated on 9-Nov-2025 at 6:46 AM ET.

Recent Additions to the Intuitionistic Logic Explorer

Date	Label	Description
Theorem
1-Nov-2025	ficardon 7257	The cardinal number of a finite set is an ordinal. (Contributed by Jim Kingdon, 1-Nov-2025.)
|- ( A e. Fin -> ( card ` A ) e. On )
31-Oct-2025	bitsdc 12114	Whether a bit is set is decidable. (Contributed by Jim Kingdon, 31-Oct-2025.)
|- ( ( N e. ZZ /\ M e. NN0 ) -> DECID M e. (bits ` N ) )
28-Oct-2025	nn0maxcl 11392	The maximum of two nonnegative integers is a nonnegative integer. (Contributed by Jim Kingdon, 28-Oct-2025.)
|- ( ( A e. NN0 /\ B e. NN0 ) -> sup ( { A , B } , RR , < ) e. NN0 )
28-Oct-2025	qdcle 10338	Rational <_ is decidable. (Contributed by Jim Kingdon, 28-Oct-2025.)
|- ( ( A e. QQ /\ B e. QQ ) -> DECID A <_ B )
17-Oct-2025	plycoeid3 15003	Reconstruct a polynomial as an explicit sum of the coefficient function up to an index no smaller than the degree of the polynomial. (Contributed by Jim Kingdon, 17-Oct-2025.)
|- ( ph -> D e. NN0 )   &    |- ( ph -> A : NN0 --> CC )   &    |- ( ph -> ( A " ( ZZ>= ` ( D + 1 ) ) ) = { 0 } )   &    |- ( ph -> F = ( z e. CC |-> sum_ k e. ( 0 ... D ) ( ( A ` k ) x. ( z ^ k ) ) ) )   &    |- ( ph -> M e. ( ZZ>= ` D ) )   &    |- ( ph -> X e. CC )   =>    |- ( ph -> ( F ` X ) = sum_ j e. ( 0 ... M ) ( ( A ` j ) x. ( X ^ j ) ) )
13-Oct-2025	tpfidceq 6992	A triple is finite if it consists of elements of a class with decidable equality. (Contributed by Jim Kingdon, 13-Oct-2025.)
|- ( ph -> A e. D )   &    |- ( ph -> B e. D )   &    |- ( ph -> C e. D )   &    |- ( ph -> A. x e. D A. y e. D DECID x = y )   =>    |- ( ph -> { A , B , C } e. Fin )
13-Oct-2025	prfidceq 6990	A pair is finite if it consists of elements of a class with decidable equality. (Contributed by Jim Kingdon, 13-Oct-2025.)
|- ( ph -> A e. C )   &    |- ( ph -> B e. C )   &    |- ( ph -> A. x e. C A. y e. C DECID x = y )   =>    |- ( ph -> { A , B } e. Fin )
13-Oct-2025	dcun 3561	The union of two decidable classes is decidable. (Contributed by Jim Kingdon, 5-Oct-2022.) (Revised by Jim Kingdon, 13-Oct-2025.)
|- ( ph -> DECID C e. A )   &    |- ( ph -> DECID C e. B )   =>    |- ( ph -> DECID C e. ( A u. B ) )
9-Oct-2025	dvdsfi 12417	A natural number has finitely many divisors. (Contributed by Jim Kingdon, 9-Oct-2025.)
|- ( N e. NN -> { x e. NN | x || N } e. Fin )
6-Oct-2025	dvconstss 14944	Derivative of a constant function defined on an open set. (Contributed by Jim Kingdon, 6-Oct-2025.)
|- ( ph -> S e. { RR , CC } )   &    |- J = ( K ↾t S )   &    |- K = ( MetOpen ` ( abs o. - ) )   &    |- ( ph -> X e. J )   &    |- ( ph -> A e. CC )   =>    |- ( ph -> ( S _D ( X X. { A } ) ) = ( X X. { 0 } ) )
6-Oct-2025	dcfrompeirce 1460	The decidability of a proposition ch follows from a suitable instance of Peirce's law. Therefore, if we were to introduce Peirce's law as a general principle (without the decidability condition in peircedc 915), then we could prove that every proposition is decidable, giving us the classical system of propositional calculus (since Perice's law is itself classically valid). (Contributed by Adrian Ducourtial, 6-Oct-2025.)
|- ( ph <-> ( ch \/ -. ch ) )   &    |- ( ps <-> F. )   &    |- ( ( ( ph -> ps ) -> ph ) -> ph )   =>    |- DECID ch
6-Oct-2025	dcfromcon 1459	The decidability of a proposition ch follows from a suitable instance of the principle of contraposition. Therefore, if we were to introduce contraposition as a general principle (without the decidability condition in condc 854), then we could prove that every proposition is decidable, giving us the classical system of propositional calculus (since the principle of contraposition is itself classically valid). (Contributed by Adrian Ducourtial, 6-Oct-2025.)
|- ( ph <-> ( ch \/ -. ch ) )   &    |- ( ps <-> T. )   &    |- ( ( -. ph -> -. ps ) -> ( ps -> ph ) )   =>    |- DECID ch
6-Oct-2025	dcfromnotnotr 1458	The decidability of a proposition ps follows from a suitable instance of double negation elimination (DNE). Therefore, if we were to introduce DNE as a general principle (without the decidability condition in notnotrdc 844), then we could prove that every proposition is decidable, giving us the classical system of propositional calculus (since DNE itself is classically valid). (Contributed by Adrian Ducourtial, 6-Oct-2025.)
|- ( ph <-> ( ps \/ -. ps ) )   &    |- ( -. -. ph -> ph )   =>    |- DECID ps
3-Oct-2025	dvidre 14943	Real derivative of the identity function. (Contributed by Jim Kingdon, 3-Oct-2025.)
|- ( RR _D ( _I |` RR ) ) = ( RR X. { 1 } )
3-Oct-2025	dvconstre 14942	Real derivative of a constant function. (Contributed by Jim Kingdon, 3-Oct-2025.)
|- ( A e. CC -> ( RR _D ( RR X. { A } ) ) = ( RR X. { 0 } ) )
3-Oct-2025	dvidsslem 14939	Lemma for dvconstss 14944. Analogue of dvidlemap 14937 where F is defined on an open subset of the real or complex numbers. (Contributed by Jim Kingdon, 3-Oct-2025.)
|- ( ph -> S e. { RR , CC } )   &    |- J = ( K ↾t S )   &    |- K = ( MetOpen ` ( abs o. - ) )   &    |- ( ph -> F : X --> CC )   &    |- ( ph -> X e. J )   &    |- ( ( ph /\ ( x e. X /\ z e. X /\ z # x ) ) -> ( ( ( F ` z ) - ( F ` x ) ) / ( z - x ) ) = B )   &    |- B e. CC   =>    |- ( ph -> ( S _D F ) = ( X X. { B } ) )
3-Oct-2025	dvidrelem 14938	Lemma for dvidre 14943 and dvconstre 14942. Analogue of dvidlemap 14937 for real numbers rather than complex numbers. (Contributed by Jim Kingdon, 3-Oct-2025.)
|- ( ph -> F : RR --> CC )   &    |- ( ( ph /\ ( x e. RR /\ z e. RR /\ z # x ) ) -> ( ( ( F ` z ) - ( F ` x ) ) / ( z - x ) ) = B )   &    |- B e. CC   =>    |- ( ph -> ( RR _D F ) = ( RR X. { B } ) )
28-Sep-2025	metuex 14121	Applying metUnif yields a set. (Contributed by Jim Kingdon, 28-Sep-2025.)
|- ( A e. V -> (metUnif ` A ) e. _V )
28-Sep-2025	cndsex 14119	The standard distance function on the complex numbers is a set. (Contributed by Jim Kingdon, 28-Sep-2025.)
|- ( abs o. - ) e. _V
25-Sep-2025	cntopex 14120	The standard topology on the complex numbers is a set. (Contributed by Jim Kingdon, 25-Sep-2025.)
|- ( MetOpen ` ( abs o. - ) ) e. _V
24-Sep-2025	mopnset 14118	Getting a set by applying MetOpen. (Contributed by Jim Kingdon, 24-Sep-2025.)
|- ( D e. V -> ( MetOpen ` D ) e. _V )
24-Sep-2025	blfn 14117	The ball function has universal domain. (Contributed by Jim Kingdon, 24-Sep-2025.)
|- ball Fn _V
22-Sep-2025	plycjlemc 15006	Lemma for plycj 15007. (Contributed by Mario Carneiro, 24-Jul-2014.) (Revised by Jim Kingdon, 22-Sep-2025.)
|- ( ph -> N e. NN0 )   &    |- G = ( ( * o. F ) o. * )   &    |- ( ph -> A : NN0 --> ( S u. { 0 } ) )   &    |- ( ph -> F = ( z e. CC |-> sum_ k e. ( 0 ... N ) ( ( A ` k ) x. ( z ^ k ) ) ) )   &    |- ( ph -> F e. (Poly ` S ) )   =>    |- ( ph -> G = ( z e. CC |-> sum_ k e. ( 0 ... N ) ( ( ( * o. A ) ` k ) x. ( z ^ k ) ) ) )
20-Sep-2025	plycolemc 15004	Lemma for plyco 15005. The result expressed as a sum, with a degree and coefficients for F specified as hypotheses. (Contributed by Jim Kingdon, 20-Sep-2025.)
|- ( ph -> F e. (Poly ` S ) )   &    |- ( ph -> G e. (Poly ` S ) )   &    |- ( ( ph /\ ( x e. S /\ y e. S ) ) -> ( x + y ) e. S )   &    |- ( ( ph /\ ( x e. S /\ y e. S ) ) -> ( x x. y ) e. S )   &    |- ( ph -> N e. NN0 )   &    |- ( ph -> A : NN0 --> ( S u. { 0 } ) )   &    |- ( ph -> ( A " ( ZZ>= ` ( N + 1 ) ) ) = { 0 } )   &    |- ( ph -> F = ( x e. CC |-> sum_ k e. ( 0 ... N ) ( ( A ` k ) x. ( x ^ k ) ) ) )   =>    |- ( ph -> ( z e. CC |-> sum_ k e. ( 0 ... N ) ( ( A ` k ) x. ( ( G ` z ) ^ k ) ) ) e. (Poly ` S ) )
16-Sep-2025	lgsquadlemofi 15327	Lemma for lgsquad 15331. There are finitely many members of S with odd first part. (Contributed by Jim Kingdon, 16-Sep-2025.)
|- ( ph -> P e. ( Prime \ { 2 } ) )   &    |- ( ph -> Q e. ( Prime \ { 2 } ) )   &    |- ( ph -> P =/= Q )   &    |- M = ( ( P - 1 ) / 2 )   &    |- N = ( ( Q - 1 ) / 2 )   &    |- S = { <. x , y >. | ( ( x e. ( 1 ... M ) /\ y e. ( 1 ... N ) ) /\ ( y x. P ) < ( x x. Q ) ) }   =>    |- ( ph -> { z e. S | -. 2 || ( 1st ` z ) } e. Fin )
16-Sep-2025	lgsquadlemsfi 15326	Lemma for lgsquad 15331. S is finite. (Contributed by Jim Kingdon, 16-Sep-2025.)
|- ( ph -> P e. ( Prime \ { 2 } ) )   &    |- ( ph -> Q e. ( Prime \ { 2 } ) )   &    |- ( ph -> P =/= Q )   &    |- M = ( ( P - 1 ) / 2 )   &    |- N = ( ( Q - 1 ) / 2 )   &    |- S = { <. x , y >. | ( ( x e. ( 1 ... M ) /\ y e. ( 1 ... N ) ) /\ ( y x. P ) < ( x x. Q ) ) }   =>    |- ( ph -> S e. Fin )
16-Sep-2025	opabfi 7000	Finiteness of an ordered pair abstraction which is a decidable subset of finite sets. (Contributed by Jim Kingdon, 16-Sep-2025.)
|- S = { <. x , y >. | ( ( x e. A /\ y e. B ) /\ ps ) }   &    |- ( ph -> A e. Fin )   &    |- ( ph -> B e. Fin )   &    |- ( ph -> A. x e. A A. y e. B DECID ps )   =>    |- ( ph -> S e. Fin )
13-Sep-2025	uchoice 6196	Principle of unique choice. This is also called non-choice. The name choice results in its similarity to something like acfun 7276 (with the key difference being the change of E. to E!) but unique choice in fact follows from the axiom of collection and our other axioms. This is somewhat similar to Corollary 3.9.2 of [HoTT], p. (varies) but is better described by the paragraph at the end of Section 3.9 which starts "A similar issue arises in set-theoretic mathematics". (Contributed by Jim Kingdon, 13-Sep-2025.)
|- ( ( A e. V /\ A. x e. A E! y ph ) -> E. f ( f Fn A /\ A. x e. A [. ( f ` x ) / y ]. ph ) )
11-Sep-2025	expghmap 14173	Exponentiation is a group homomorphism from addition to multiplication. (Contributed by Mario Carneiro, 18-Jun-2015.) (Revised by AV, 10-Jun-2019.) (Revised by Jim Kingdon, 11-Sep-2025.)
|- M = (mulGrp ` ℂfld )   &    |- U = ( M ↾s { z e. CC | z # 0 } )   =>    |- ( ( A e. CC /\ A # 0 ) -> ( x e. ZZ |-> ( A ^ x ) ) e. (ℤring GrpHom U ) )
11-Sep-2025	cnfldui 14155	The invertible complex numbers are exactly those apart from zero. This is recapb 8700 but expressed in terms of ℂfld. (Contributed by Jim Kingdon, 11-Sep-2025.)
|- { z e. CC | z # 0 } = (Unit ` ℂfld )
9-Sep-2025	gsumfzfsumlemm 14153	Lemma for gsumfzfsum 14154. The case where the sum is inhabited. (Contributed by Jim Kingdon, 9-Sep-2025.)
|- ( ph -> N e. ( ZZ>= ` M ) )   &    |- ( ( ph /\ k e. ( M ... N ) ) -> B e. CC )   =>    |- ( ph -> (ℂfld gsumg ( k e. ( M ... N ) |-> B ) ) = sum_ k e. ( M ... N ) B )
9-Sep-2025	gsumfzfsumlem0 14152	Lemma for gsumfzfsum 14154. The case where the sum is empty. (Contributed by Jim Kingdon, 9-Sep-2025.)
|- ( ph -> M e. ZZ )   &    |- ( ph -> N e. ZZ )   &    |- ( ph -> N < M )   =>    |- ( ph -> (ℂfld gsumg ( k e. ( M ... N ) |-> B ) ) = sum_ k e. ( M ... N ) B )
9-Sep-2025	gsumfzmhm2 13484	Apply a group homomorphism to a group sum, mapping version with implicit substitution. (Contributed by Mario Carneiro, 5-May-2015.) (Revised by AV, 6-Jun-2019.) (Revised by Jim Kingdon, 9-Sep-2025.)
|- B = ( Base ` G )   &    |- .0. = ( 0g ` G )   &    |- ( ph -> G e. CMnd )   &    |- ( ph -> H e. Mnd )   &    |- ( ph -> M e. ZZ )   &    |- ( ph -> N e. ZZ )   &    |- ( ph -> ( x e. B |-> C ) e. ( G MndHom H ) )   &    |- ( ( ph /\ k e. ( M ... N ) ) -> X e. B )   &    |- ( x = X -> C = D )   &    |- ( x = ( G gsumg ( k e. ( M ... N ) |-> X ) ) -> C = E )   =>    |- ( ph -> ( H gsumg ( k e. ( M ... N ) |-> D ) ) = E )
8-Sep-2025	gsumfzmhm 13483	Apply a monoid homomorphism to a group sum. (Contributed by Mario Carneiro, 15-Dec-2014.) (Revised by AV, 6-Jun-2019.) (Revised by Jim Kingdon, 8-Sep-2025.)
|- B = ( Base ` G )   &    |- .0. = ( 0g ` G )   &    |- ( ph -> G e. CMnd )   &    |- ( ph -> H e. Mnd )   &    |- ( ph -> M e. ZZ )   &    |- ( ph -> N e. ZZ )   &    |- ( ph -> K e. ( G MndHom H ) )   &    |- ( ph -> F : ( M ... N ) --> B )   =>    |- ( ph -> ( H gsumg ( K o. F ) ) = ( K ` ( G gsumg F ) ) )
8-Sep-2025	5ndvds6 12102	5 does not divide 6. (Contributed by AV, 8-Sep-2025.)
|- -. 5 || 6
8-Sep-2025	5ndvds3 12101	5 does not divide 3. (Contributed by AV, 8-Sep-2025.)
|- -. 5 || 3
6-Sep-2025	gsumfzconst 13481	Sum of a constant series. (Contributed by Mario Carneiro, 19-Dec-2014.) (Revised by Jim Kingdon, 6-Sep-2025.)
|- B = ( Base ` G )   &    |- .x. = (.g ` G )   =>    |- ( ( G e. Mnd /\ N e. ( ZZ>= ` M ) /\ X e. B ) -> ( G gsumg ( k e. ( M ... N ) |-> X ) ) = ( ( ( N - M ) + 1 ) .x. X ) )
31-Aug-2025	gsumfzmptfidmadd 13479	The sum of two group sums expressed as mappings with finite domain. (Contributed by AV, 23-Jul-2019.) (Revised by Jim Kingdon, 31-Aug-2025.)
|- B = ( Base ` G )   &    |- .+ = ( +g ` G )   &    |- ( ph -> G e. CMnd )   &    |- ( ph -> M e. ZZ )   &    |- ( ph -> N e. ZZ )   &    |- ( ( ph /\ x e. ( M ... N ) ) -> C e. B )   &    |- ( ( ph /\ x e. ( M ... N ) ) -> D e. B )   &    |- F = ( x e. ( M ... N ) |-> C )   &    |- H = ( x e. ( M ... N ) |-> D )   =>    |- ( ph -> ( G gsumg ( x e. ( M ... N ) |-> ( C .+ D ) ) ) = ( ( G gsumg F ) .+ ( G gsumg H ) ) )
30-Aug-2025	gsumfzsubmcl 13478	Closure of a group sum in a submonoid. (Contributed by Mario Carneiro, 10-Jan-2015.) (Revised by AV, 3-Jun-2019.) (Revised by Jim Kingdon, 30-Aug-2025.)
|- ( ph -> G e. Mnd )   &    |- ( ph -> M e. ZZ )   &    |- ( ph -> N e. ZZ )   &    |- ( ph -> S e. (SubMnd ` G ) )   &    |- ( ph -> F : ( M ... N ) --> S )   =>    |- ( ph -> ( G gsumg F ) e. S )
30-Aug-2025	seqm1g 10568	Value of the sequence builder function at a successor. (Contributed by Mario Carneiro, 24-Jun-2013.) (Revised by Jim Kingdon, 30-Aug-2025.)
|- ( ph -> M e. ZZ )   &    |- ( ph -> N e. ( ZZ>= ` ( M + 1 ) ) )   &    |- ( ph -> .+ e. V )   &    |- ( ph -> F e. W )   =>    |- ( ph -> ( seq M ( .+ , F ) ` N ) = ( ( seq M ( .+ , F ) ` ( N - 1 ) ) .+ ( F ` N ) ) )
29-Aug-2025	seqf1og 10615	Rearrange a sum via an arbitrary bijection on ( M ... N ). (Contributed by Mario Carneiro, 27-Feb-2014.) (Revised by Jim Kingdon, 29-Aug-2025.)
|- ( ( ph /\ ( x e. S /\ y e. S ) ) -> ( x .+ y ) e. S )   &    |- ( ( ph /\ ( x e. C /\ y e. C ) ) -> ( x .+ y ) = ( y .+ x ) )   &    |- ( ( ph /\ ( x e. S /\ y e. S /\ z e. S ) ) -> ( ( x .+ y ) .+ z ) = ( x .+ ( y .+ z ) ) )   &    |- ( ph -> N e. ( ZZ>= ` M ) )   &    |- ( ph -> C C_ S )   &    |- ( ph -> .+ e. V )   &    |- ( ph -> F : ( M ... N ) -1-1-onto-> ( M ... N ) )   &    |- ( ( ph /\ x e. ( M ... N ) ) -> ( G ` x ) e. C )   &    |- ( ( ph /\ k e. ( M ... N ) ) -> ( H ` k ) = ( G ` ( F ` k ) ) )   &    |- ( ph -> G e. W )   &    |- ( ph -> H e. X )   =>    |- ( ph -> ( seq M ( .+ , H ) ` N ) = ( seq M ( .+ , G ) ` N ) )
25-Aug-2025	irrmulap 9724	The product of an irrational with a nonzero rational is irrational. By irrational we mean apart from any rational number. For a similar theorem with not rational in place of irrational, see irrmul 9723. (Contributed by Jim Kingdon, 25-Aug-2025.)
|- ( ph -> A e. RR )   &    |- ( ph -> A. q e. QQ A # q )   &    |- ( ph -> B e. QQ )   &    |- ( ph -> B =/= 0 )   &    |- ( ph -> Q e. QQ )   =>    |- ( ph -> ( A x. B ) # Q )
19-Aug-2025	seqp1g 10560	Value of the sequence builder function at a successor. (Contributed by Mario Carneiro, 24-Jun-2013.) (Revised by Jim Kingdon, 19-Aug-2025.)
|- ( ( N e. ( ZZ>= ` M ) /\ F e. V /\ .+ e. W ) -> ( seq M ( .+ , F ) ` ( N + 1 ) ) = ( ( seq M ( .+ , F ) ` N ) .+ ( F ` ( N + 1 ) ) ) )
19-Aug-2025	seq1g 10557	Value of the sequence builder function at its initial value. (Contributed by Mario Carneiro, 24-Jun-2013.) (Revised by Jim Kingdon, 19-Aug-2025.)
|- ( ( M e. ZZ /\ F e. V /\ .+ e. W ) -> ( seq M ( .+ , F ) ` M ) = ( F ` M ) )
18-Aug-2025	iswrdiz 10944	A zero-based sequence is a word. In iswrdinn0 10942 we can specify a length as an nonnegative integer. However, it will occasionally be helpful to allow a negative length, as well as zero, to specify an empty sequence. (Contributed by Jim Kingdon, 18-Aug-2025.)
|- ( ( W : ( 0..^ L ) --> S /\ L e. ZZ ) -> W e. Word S )
16-Aug-2025	gsumfzcl 13141	Closure of a finite group sum. (Contributed by Mario Carneiro, 15-Dec-2014.) (Revised by AV, 3-Jun-2019.) (Revised by Jim Kingdon, 16-Aug-2025.)
|- B = ( Base ` G )   &    |- .0. = ( 0g ` G )   &    |- ( ph -> G e. Mnd )   &    |- ( ph -> M e. ZZ )   &    |- ( ph -> N e. ZZ )   &    |- ( ph -> F : ( M ... N ) --> B )   =>    |- ( ph -> ( G gsumg F ) e. B )
16-Aug-2025	iswrdinn0 10942	A zero-based sequence is a word. (Contributed by Stefan O'Rear, 15-Aug-2015.) (Revised by Mario Carneiro, 26-Feb-2016.) (Revised by Jim Kingdon, 16-Aug-2025.)
|- ( ( W : ( 0..^ L ) --> S /\ L e. NN0 ) -> W e. Word S )
15-Aug-2025	gsumfzz 13137	Value of a group sum over the zero element. (Contributed by Mario Carneiro, 7-Dec-2014.) (Revised by Jim Kingdon, 15-Aug-2025.)
|- .0. = ( 0g ` G )   =>    |- ( ( G e. Mnd /\ M e. ZZ /\ N e. ZZ ) -> ( G gsumg ( k e. ( M ... N ) |-> .0. ) ) = .0. )
14-Aug-2025	gsumfzval 13044	An expression for gsumg when summing over a finite set of sequential integers. (Contributed by Jim Kingdon, 14-Aug-2025.)
|- B = ( Base ` G )   &    |- .0. = ( 0g ` G )   &    |- .+ = ( +g ` G )   &    |- ( ph -> G e. V )   &    |- ( ph -> M e. ZZ )   &    |- ( ph -> N e. ZZ )   &    |- ( ph -> F : ( M ... N ) --> B )   =>    |- ( ph -> ( G gsumg F ) = if ( N < M , .0. , ( seq M ( .+ , F ) ` N ) ) )
13-Aug-2025	znidom 14223	The ℤ/nℤ structure is an integral domain when n is prime. (Contributed by Mario Carneiro, 15-Jun-2015.) (Revised by Jim Kingdon, 13-Aug-2025.)
|- Y = (ℤ/nℤ ` N )   =>    |- ( N e. Prime -> Y e. IDomn )
12-Aug-2025	rrgmex 13827	A structure whose set of left-regular elements is inhabited is a set. (Contributed by Jim Kingdon, 12-Aug-2025.)
|- E = (RLReg ` R )   =>    |- ( A e. E -> R e. _V )
10-Aug-2025	gausslemma2dlem1cl 15310	Lemma for gausslemma2dlem1 15312. Closure of the body of the definition of R. (Contributed by Jim Kingdon, 10-Aug-2025.)
|- ( ph -> P e. ( Prime \ { 2 } ) )   &    |- H = ( ( P - 1 ) / 2 )   &    |- R = ( x e. ( 1 ... H ) |-> if ( ( x x. 2 ) < ( P / 2 ) , ( x x. 2 ) , ( P - ( x x. 2 ) ) ) )   &    |- ( ph -> A e. ( 1 ... H ) )   =>    |- ( ph -> if ( ( A x. 2 ) < ( P / 2 ) , ( A x. 2 ) , ( P - ( A x. 2 ) ) ) e. ZZ )
9-Aug-2025	gausslemma2dlem1f1o 15311	Lemma for gausslemma2dlem1 15312. (Contributed by Jim Kingdon, 9-Aug-2025.)
|- ( ph -> P e. ( Prime \ { 2 } ) )   &    |- H = ( ( P - 1 ) / 2 )   &    |- R = ( x e. ( 1 ... H ) |-> if ( ( x x. 2 ) < ( P / 2 ) , ( x x. 2 ) , ( P - ( x x. 2 ) ) ) )   =>    |- ( ph -> R : ( 1 ... H ) -1-1-onto-> ( 1 ... H ) )
7-Aug-2025	qdclt 10337	Rational < is decidable. (Contributed by Jim Kingdon, 7-Aug-2025.)
|- ( ( A e. QQ /\ B e. QQ ) -> DECID A < B )
22-Jul-2025	ivthdich 14899	The intermediate value theorem implies real number dichotomy. Because real number dichotomy (also known as analytic LLPO) is a constructive taboo, this means we will be unable to prove the intermediate value theorem as stated here (although versions with additional conditions, such as ivthinc 14889 for strictly monotonic functions, can be proved). The proof is via a function which we call the hover function and which is also described in Section 5.1 of [Bauer], p. 493. Consider any real number z. We want to show that z <_ 0 \/ 0 <_ z. Because of hovercncf 14892, hovera 14893, and hoverb 14894, we are able to apply the intermediate value theorem to get a value c such that the hover function at c equals z. By axltwlin 8096, c < 1 or 0 < c, and that leads to z <_ 0 by hoverlt1 14895 or 0 <_ z by hovergt0 14896. (Contributed by Jim Kingdon and Mario Carneiro, 22-Jul-2025.)
|- ( A. f ( f e. ( RR -cn-> RR ) -> A. a e. RR A. b e. RR ( ( a < b /\ ( f ` a ) < 0 /\ 0 < ( f ` b ) ) -> E. x e. RR ( a < x /\ x < b /\ ( f ` x ) = 0 ) ) ) -> A. r e. RR A. s e. RR ( r <_ s \/ s <_ r ) )
22-Jul-2025	dich0 14898	Real number dichotomy stated in terms of two real numbers or a real number and zero. (Contributed by Jim Kingdon, 22-Jul-2025.)
|- ( A. z e. RR ( z <_ 0 \/ 0 <_ z ) <-> A. x e. RR A. y e. RR ( x <_ y \/ y <_ x ) )
22-Jul-2025	ivthdichlem 14897	Lemma for ivthdich 14899. The result, with a few notational conveniences. (Contributed by Jim Kingdon, 22-Jul-2025.)
|- F = ( x e. RR |-> sup ( {inf ( { x , 0 } , RR , < ) , ( x - 1 ) } , RR , < ) )   &    |- ( ph -> Z e. RR )   &    |- ( ph -> A. f ( f e. ( RR -cn-> RR ) -> A. a e. RR A. b e. RR ( ( a < b /\ ( f ` a ) < 0 /\ 0 < ( f ` b ) ) -> E. x e. RR ( a < x /\ x < b /\ ( f ` x ) = 0 ) ) ) )   =>    |- ( ph -> ( Z <_ 0 \/ 0 <_ Z ) )
22-Jul-2025	hovergt0 14896	The hover function evaluated at a point greater than zero. (Contributed by Jim Kingdon, 22-Jul-2025.)
|- F = ( x e. RR |-> sup ( {inf ( { x , 0 } , RR , < ) , ( x - 1 ) } , RR , < ) )   =>    |- ( ( C e. RR /\ 0 < C ) -> 0 <_ ( F ` C ) )
22-Jul-2025	hoverlt1 14895	The hover function evaluated at a point less than one. (Contributed by Jim Kingdon, 22-Jul-2025.)
|- F = ( x e. RR |-> sup ( {inf ( { x , 0 } , RR , < ) , ( x - 1 ) } , RR , < ) )   =>    |- ( ( C e. RR /\ C < 1 ) -> ( F ` C ) <_ 0 )
21-Jul-2025	hoverb 14894	A point at which the hover function is greater than a given value. (Contributed by Jim Kingdon, 21-Jul-2025.)
|- F = ( x e. RR |-> sup ( {inf ( { x , 0 } , RR , < ) , ( x - 1 ) } , RR , < ) )   =>    |- ( Z e. RR -> Z < ( F ` ( Z + 2 ) ) )
21-Jul-2025	hovera 14893	A point at which the hover function is less than a given value. (Contributed by Jim Kingdon, 21-Jul-2025.)
|- F = ( x e. RR |-> sup ( {inf ( { x , 0 } , RR , < ) , ( x - 1 ) } , RR , < ) )   =>    |- ( Z e. RR -> ( F ` ( Z - 1 ) ) < Z )
21-Jul-2025	rexeqtrrdv 2704	Substitution of equal classes into a restricted existential quantifier. (Contributed by Matthew House, 21-Jul-2025.)
|- ( ph -> E. x e. A ps )   &    |- ( ph -> B = A )   =>    |- ( ph -> E. x e. B ps )
21-Jul-2025	raleqtrrdv 2703	Substitution of equal classes into a restricted universal quantifier. (Contributed by Matthew House, 21-Jul-2025.)
|- ( ph -> A. x e. A ps )   &    |- ( ph -> B = A )   =>    |- ( ph -> A. x e. B ps )
21-Jul-2025	rexeqtrdv 2702	Substitution of equal classes into a restricted existential quantifier. (Contributed by Matthew House, 21-Jul-2025.)
|- ( ph -> E. x e. A ps )   &    |- ( ph -> A = B )   =>    |- ( ph -> E. x e. B ps )
21-Jul-2025	raleqtrdv 2701	Substitution of equal classes into a restricted universal quantifier. (Contributed by Matthew House, 21-Jul-2025.)
|- ( ph -> A. x e. A ps )   &    |- ( ph -> A = B )   =>    |- ( ph -> A. x e. B ps )
20-Jul-2025	hovercncf 14892	The hover function is continuous. By hover function, we mean a a function which starts out as a line of slope one, is constant at zero from zero to one, and then resumes as a slope of one. (Contributed by Jim Kingdon, 20-Jul-2025.)
|- F = ( x e. RR |-> sup ( {inf ( { x , 0 } , RR , < ) , ( x - 1 ) } , RR , < ) )   =>    |- F e. ( RR -cn-> RR )
19-Jul-2025	mincncf 14862	The minimum of two continuous real functions is continuous. (Contributed by Jim Kingdon, 19-Jul-2025.)
|- ( ph -> ( x e. X |-> A ) e. ( X -cn-> RR ) )   &    |- ( ph -> ( x e. X |-> B ) e. ( X -cn-> RR ) )   =>    |- ( ph -> ( x e. X |-> inf ( { A , B } , RR , < ) ) e. ( X -cn-> RR ) )
18-Jul-2025	maxcncf 14861	The maximum of two continuous real functions is continuous. (Contributed by Jim Kingdon, 18-Jul-2025.)
|- ( ph -> ( x e. X |-> A ) e. ( X -cn-> RR ) )   &    |- ( ph -> ( x e. X |-> B ) e. ( X -cn-> RR ) )   =>    |- ( ph -> ( x e. X |-> sup ( { A , B } , RR , < ) ) e. ( X -cn-> RR ) )
14-Jul-2025	xnn0nnen 10531	The set of extended nonnegative integers is equinumerous to the set of natural numbers. (Contributed by Jim Kingdon, 14-Jul-2025.)
|- NN0* ~~ NN
12-Jul-2025	nninfninc 7190	All values beyond a zero in an ℕ∞ sequence are zero. This is another way of stating that elements of ℕ∞ are nonincreasing. (Contributed by Jim Kingdon, 12-Jul-2025.)
|- ( ph -> A e. ℕ∞ )   &    |- ( ph -> X e. om )   &    |- ( ph -> Y e. om )   &    |- ( ph -> X C_ Y )   &    |- ( ph -> ( A ` X ) = (/) )   =>    |- ( ph -> ( A ` Y ) = (/) )
10-Jul-2025	nninfctlemfo 12217	Lemma for nninfct 12218. (Contributed by Jim Kingdon, 10-Jul-2025.)
|- G = frec ( ( x e. ZZ |-> ( x + 1 ) ) , 0 )   &    |- F = ( n e. om |-> ( i e. om |-> if ( i e. n , 1o , (/) ) ) )   &    |- I = ( ( F o. `' G ) u. { <. +oo , ( om X. { 1o } ) >. } )   =>    |- ( om e. Omni -> I :NN0* -onto->ℕ∞ )
8-Jul-2025	nnnninfen 15675	Equinumerosity of the natural numbers and ℕ∞ is equivalent to the Limited Principle of Omniscience (LPO). Remark in Section 1.1 of [Pradic2025], p. 2. (Contributed by Jim Kingdon, 8-Jul-2025.)
|- ( om ~~ ℕ∞ <-> om e. Omni )
8-Jul-2025	nninfct 12218	The limited principle of omniscience (LPO) implies that ℕ∞ is countable. (Contributed by Jim Kingdon, 8-Jul-2025.)
|- ( om e. Omni -> E. f f : om -onto-> (ℕ∞ ⊔ 1o ) )
8-Jul-2025	nninfinf 10537	ℕ∞ is infinte. (Contributed by Jim Kingdon, 8-Jul-2025.)
|- om ~<_ ℕ∞
7-Jul-2025	ivthreinc 14891	Restating the intermediate value theorem. Given a hypothesis stating the intermediate value theorem (in a strong form which is not provable given our axioms alone), provide a conclusion similar to the theorem as stated in the Metamath Proof Explorer (which is also similar to how we state the theorem for a strictly monotonic function at ivthinc 14889). Being able to have a hypothesis stating the intermediate value theorem will be helpful when it comes time to show that it implies a constructive taboo. This version of the theorem requires that the function F is continuous on the entire real line, not just ( A [,] B ) which may be an unnecessary condition but which is sufficient for the way we want to use it. (Contributed by Jim Kingdon, 7-Jul-2025.)
|- ( ph -> A e. RR )   &    |- ( ph -> B e. RR )   &    |- ( ph -> U e. RR )   &    |- ( ph -> A < B )   &    |- ( ph -> F e. ( RR -cn-> RR ) )   &    |- ( ph -> ( ( F ` A ) < U /\ U < ( F ` B ) ) )   &    |- ( ph -> A. f ( f e. ( RR -cn-> RR ) -> A. a e. RR A. b e. RR ( ( a < b /\ ( f ` a ) < 0 /\ 0 < ( f ` b ) ) -> E. x e. RR ( a < x /\ x < b /\ ( f ` x ) = 0 ) ) ) )   =>    |- ( ph -> E. c e. ( A (,) B ) ( F ` c ) = U )
28-Jun-2025	fngsum 13041	Iterated sum has a universal domain. (Contributed by Jim Kingdon, 28-Jun-2025.)
|- gsumg Fn ( _V X. _V )
28-Jun-2025	iotaexel 5883	Set existence of an iota expression in which all values are contained within a set. (Contributed by Jim Kingdon, 28-Jun-2025.)
|- ( ( A e. V /\ A. x ( ph -> x e. A ) ) -> ( iota x ph ) e. _V )
27-Jun-2025	df-igsum 12940	Define a finite group sum (also called "iterated sum") of a structure. Given G gsumg F where F : A --> ( Base ` G ), the set of indices is A and the values are given by F at each index. A group sum over a multiplicative group may be viewed as a product. The definition is meaningful in different contexts, depending on the size of the index set A and each demanding different properties of G. 1. If A = (/) and G has an identity element, then the sum equals this identity. 2. If A = ( M ... N ) and G is any magma, then the sum is the sum of the elements, evaluated left-to-right, i.e., ( ( F ` 1 ) + ( F ` 2 ) ) + ( F ` 3 ), etc. 3. This definition does not handle other cases. (Contributed by FL, 5-Sep-2010.) (Revised by Mario Carneiro, 7-Dec-2014.) (Revised by Jim Kingdon, 27-Jun-2025.)
|- gsumg = ( w e. _V , f e. _V |-> ( iota x ( ( dom f = (/) /\ x = ( 0g ` w ) ) \/ E. m E. n e. ( ZZ>= ` m ) ( dom f = ( m ... n ) /\ x = ( seq m ( ( +g ` w ) , f ) ` n ) ) ) ) )
20-Jun-2025	opprnzrbg 13751	The opposite of a nonzero ring is nonzero, bidirectional form of opprnzr 13752. (Contributed by SN, 20-Jun-2025.)
|- O = (oppr ` R )   =>    |- ( R e. V -> ( R e. NzRing <-> O e. NzRing ) )
16-Jun-2025	fnpsr 14231	The multivariate power series constructor has a universal domain. (Contributed by Jim Kingdon, 16-Jun-2025.)
|- mPwSer Fn ( _V X. _V )
14-Jun-2025	basm 12749	A structure whose base is inhabited is inhabited. (Contributed by Jim Kingdon, 14-Jun-2025.)
|- B = ( Base ` G )   =>    |- ( A e. B -> E. j j e. G )
14-Jun-2025	elfvm 5592	If a function value has a member, the function is inhabited. (Contributed by Jim Kingdon, 14-Jun-2025.)
|- ( A e. ( F ` B ) -> E. j j e. F )
6-Jun-2025	pcxqcl 12491	The general prime count function is an integer or infinite. (Contributed by Jim Kingdon, 6-Jun-2025.)
|- ( ( P e. Prime /\ N e. QQ ) -> ( ( P pCnt N ) e. ZZ \/ ( P pCnt N ) = +oo ) )
5-Jun-2025	xqltnle 10359	"Less than" expressed in terms of "less than or equal to", for extended numbers which are rational or +oo. We have not yet had enough usage of such numbers to warrant fully developing the concept, as in NN0* or RR*, so for now we just have a handful of theorems for what we need. (Contributed by Jim Kingdon, 5-Jun-2025.)
|- ( ( ( A e. QQ \/ A = +oo ) /\ ( B e. QQ \/ B = +oo ) ) -> ( A < B <-> -. B <_ A ) )
5-Jun-2025	ceqsexv2d 2803	Elimination of an existential quantifier, using implicit substitution. (Contributed by Thierry Arnoux, 10-Sep-2016.) Shorten, reduce dv conditions. (Revised by Wolf Lammen, 5-Jun-2025.) (Proof shortened by SN, 5-Jun-2025.)
|- A e. _V   &    |- ( x = A -> ( ph <-> ps ) )   &    |- ps   =>    |- E. x ph
30-May-2025	4sqexercise2 12578	Exercise which may help in understanding the proof of 4sqlemsdc 12579. (Contributed by Jim Kingdon, 30-May-2025.)
|- S = { n | E. x e. ZZ E. y e. ZZ n = ( ( x ^ 2 ) + ( y ^ 2 ) ) }   =>    |- ( A e. NN0 -> DECID A e. S )
27-May-2025	iotaexab 5238	Existence of the iota class when all the possible values are contained in a set. (Contributed by Jim Kingdon, 27-May-2025.)
|- ( { x | ph } e. V -> ( iota x ph ) e. _V )
25-May-2025	4sqlemsdc 12579	Lemma for 4sq 12589. The property of being the sum of four squares is decidable. The proof involves showing that (for a particular A) there are only a finite number of possible ways that it could be the sum of four squares, so checking each of those possibilities in turn decides whether the number is the sum of four squares. If this proof is hard to follow, especially because of its length, the simplified versions at 4sqexercise1 12577 and 4sqexercise2 12578 may help clarify, as they are using very much the same techniques on simplified versions of this lemma. (Contributed by Jim Kingdon, 25-May-2025.)
|- S = { n | E. x e. ZZ E. y e. ZZ E. z e. ZZ E. w e. ZZ n = ( ( ( x ^ 2 ) + ( y ^ 2 ) ) + ( ( z ^ 2 ) + ( w ^ 2 ) ) ) }   =>    |- ( A e. NN0 -> DECID A e. S )
25-May-2025	4sqexercise1 12577	Exercise which may help in understanding the proof of 4sqlemsdc 12579. (Contributed by Jim Kingdon, 25-May-2025.)
|- S = { n | E. x e. ZZ n = ( x ^ 2 ) }   =>    |- ( A e. NN0 -> DECID A e. S )
24-May-2025	4sqleminfi 12576	Lemma for 4sq 12589. A i^i ran F is finite. (Contributed by Jim Kingdon, 24-May-2025.)
|- ( ph -> N e. NN )   &    |- ( ph -> P e. NN )   &    |- A = { u | E. m e. ( 0 ... N ) u = ( ( m ^ 2 ) mod P ) }   &    |- F = ( v e. A |-> ( ( P - 1 ) - v ) )   =>    |- ( ph -> ( A i^i ran F ) e. Fin )
24-May-2025	4sqlemffi 12575	Lemma for 4sq 12589. ran F is finite. (Contributed by Jim Kingdon, 24-May-2025.)
|- ( ph -> N e. NN )   &    |- ( ph -> P e. NN )   &    |- A = { u | E. m e. ( 0 ... N ) u = ( ( m ^ 2 ) mod P ) }   &    |- F = ( v e. A |-> ( ( P - 1 ) - v ) )   =>    |- ( ph -> ran F e. Fin )
24-May-2025	4sqlemafi 12574	Lemma for 4sq 12589. A is finite. (Contributed by Jim Kingdon, 24-May-2025.)
|- ( ph -> N e. NN )   &    |- ( ph -> P e. NN )   &    |- A = { u | E. m e. ( 0 ... N ) u = ( ( m ^ 2 ) mod P ) }   =>    |- ( ph -> A e. Fin )
24-May-2025	infidc 7001	The intersection of two sets is finite if one of them is and the other is decidable. (Contributed by Jim Kingdon, 24-May-2025.)
|- ( ( A e. Fin /\ A. x e. A DECID x e. B ) -> ( A i^i B ) e. Fin )
19-May-2025	zrhex 14187	Set existence for ZRHom. (Contributed by Jim Kingdon, 19-May-2025.)
|- L = ( ZRHom ` R )   =>    |- ( R e. V -> L e. _V )
16-May-2025	rhmex 13723	Set existence for ring homomorphism. (Contributed by Jim Kingdon, 16-May-2025.)
|- ( ( R e. V /\ S e. W ) -> ( R RingHom S ) e. _V )
15-May-2025	ghmex 13395	The set of group homomorphisms exists. (Contributed by Jim Kingdon, 15-May-2025.)
|- ( ( S e. Grp /\ T e. Grp ) -> ( S GrpHom T ) e. _V )
15-May-2025	mhmex 13104	The set of monoid homomorphisms exists. (Contributed by Jim Kingdon, 15-May-2025.)
|- ( ( S e. Mnd /\ T e. Mnd ) -> ( S MndHom T ) e. _V )
14-May-2025	idomcringd 13844	An integral domain is a commutative ring with unity. (Contributed by Thierry Arnoux, 4-May-2025.) (Proof shortened by SN, 14-May-2025.)
|- ( ph -> R e. IDomn )   =>    |- ( ph -> R e. CRing )
6-May-2025	rrgnz 13834	In a nonzero ring, the zero is a left zero divisor (that is, not a left-regular element). (Contributed by Thierry Arnoux, 6-May-2025.)
|- E = (RLReg ` R )   &    |- .0. = ( 0g ` R )   =>    |- ( R e. NzRing -> -. .0. e. E )
5-May-2025	rngressid 13520	A non-unital ring restricted to its base set is a non-unital ring. It will usually be the original non-unital ring exactly, of course, but to show that needs additional conditions such as those in strressid 12759. (Contributed by Jim Kingdon, 5-May-2025.)
|- B = ( Base ` G )   =>    |- ( G e. Rng -> ( G ↾s B ) e. Rng )