Intuitionistic Logic Explorer Home Intuitionistic Logic Explorer
Most Recent Proofs 		 
Mirrors  >  Home  >  ILE Home  >  Th. List  >  Recent MPE Most Recent             Other  >  MM 100
Most recent proofs    These are the 100 (Unicode, GIF) or 1000 (Unicode, GIF) most recent proofs in the iset.mm database for the Intuitionistic Logic Explorer. The iset.mm database is maintained on GitHub with master (stable) and develop (development) versions. This page was created from the commit given on the MPE Most Recent Proofs page. The database from that commit is also available here: iset.mm.

See the MPE Most Recent Proofs page for news and some useful links.

Color key:   Intuitionistic Logic Explorer  Intuitionistic Logic Explorer   User Mathboxes  User Mathboxes  

Last updated on 10-Mar-2026 at 7:15 AM ET.
Recent Additions to the Intuitionistic Logic Explorer
DateLabelDescription
Theorem
 
22-Feb-2026isclwwlkni 16176 A word over the set of vertices representing a closed walk of a fixed length. (Contributed by Jim Kingdon, 22-Feb-2026.)
(𝑊 ∈ (𝑁 ClWWalksN 𝐺) → (𝑊 ∈ (ClWWalks‘𝐺) ∧ (♯‘𝑊) = 𝑁))
 
21-Feb-2026clwwlkex 16167 Existence of the set of closed walks (represented by words). (Contributed by Jim Kingdon, 21-Feb-2026.)
(𝐺 ∈ 𝑉 → (ClWWalks‘𝐺) ∈ V)
 
17-Feb-2026vtxdgfif 16079 In a finite graph, the vertex degree function is a function from vertices to nonnegative integers. (Contributed by Jim Kingdon, 17-Feb-2026.)
𝑉 = (Vtx‘𝐺)    &   𝐼 = (iEdg‘𝐺)    &   𝐴 = dom 𝐼    &   (𝜑 → 𝐴 ∈ Fin)    &   (𝜑 → 𝑉 ∈ Fin)    &   (𝜑 → 𝐺 ∈ UPGraph)    ⇒   (𝜑 → (VtxDeg‘𝐺):𝑉⟶ℕ0)
 
16-Feb-2026vtxlpfi 16076 In a finite graph, the number of loops from a given vertex is finite. (Contributed by Jim Kingdon, 16-Feb-2026.)
𝑉 = (Vtx‘𝐺)    &   𝐼 = (iEdg‘𝐺)    &   𝐴 = dom 𝐼    &   (𝜑 → 𝐴 ∈ Fin)    &   (𝜑 → 𝑉 ∈ Fin)    &   (𝜑 → 𝑈 ∈ 𝑉)    &   (𝜑 → 𝐺 ∈ UPGraph)    ⇒   (𝜑 → {𝑥 ∈ 𝐴 ∣ (𝐼‘𝑥) = {𝑈}} ∈ Fin)
 
16-Feb-2026vtxedgfi 16075 In a finite graph, the number of edges from a given vertex is finite. (Contributed by Jim Kingdon, 16-Feb-2026.)
𝑉 = (Vtx‘𝐺)    &   𝐼 = (iEdg‘𝐺)    &   𝐴 = dom 𝐼    &   (𝜑 → 𝐴 ∈ Fin)    &   (𝜑 → 𝑉 ∈ Fin)    &   (𝜑 → 𝑈 ∈ 𝑉)    &   (𝜑 → 𝐺 ∈ UPGraph)    ⇒   (𝜑 → {𝑥 ∈ 𝐴 ∣ 𝑈 ∈ (𝐼‘𝑥)} ∈ Fin)
 
15-Feb-2026eqsndc 7081 Decidability of equality between a finite subset of a set with decidable equality, and a singleton whose element is an element of the larger set. (Contributed by Jim Kingdon, 15-Feb-2026.)
(𝜑 → ∀𝑥 ∈ 𝐵 ∀𝑦 ∈ 𝐵 DECID 𝑥 = 𝑦)    &   (𝜑 → 𝑋 ∈ 𝐵)    &   (𝜑 → 𝐴 ⊆ 𝐵)    &   (𝜑 → 𝐴 ∈ Fin)    ⇒   (𝜑 → DECID 𝐴 = {𝑋})
 
14-Feb-2026pw1ninf 16468 The powerset of 1o is not infinite. Since we cannot prove it is finite (see pw1fin 7088), this provides a concrete example of a set which we cannot show to be finite or infinite, as seen another way at inffiexmid 7084. (Contributed by Jim Kingdon, 14-Feb-2026.)
¬ ω ≼ 𝒫 1o
 
14-Feb-2026pw1ndom3 16467 The powerset of 1o does not dominate 3o. This is another way of saying that 𝒫 1o does not have three elements (like pwntru 4284). (Contributed by Steven Nguyen and Jim Kingdon, 14-Feb-2026.)
¬ 3o ≼ 𝒫 1o
 
14-Feb-2026pw1ndom3lem 16466 Lemma for pw1ndom3 16467. (Contributed by Jim Kingdon, 14-Feb-2026.)
(𝜑 → 𝑋 ∈ 𝒫 1o)    &   (𝜑 → 𝑌 ∈ 𝒫 1o)    &   (𝜑 → 𝑍 ∈ 𝒫 1o)    &   (𝜑 → 𝑋 ≠ 𝑌)    &   (𝜑 → 𝑋 ≠ 𝑍)    &   (𝜑 → 𝑌 ≠ 𝑍)    ⇒   (𝜑 → 𝑋 = ∅)
 
12-Feb-2026pw1dceq 16483 The powerset of 1o having decidable equality is equivalent to excluded middle. (Contributed by Jim Kingdon, 12-Feb-2026.)
(EXMID ↔ ∀𝑥 ∈ 𝒫 1o∀𝑦 ∈ 𝒫 1oDECID 𝑥 = 𝑦)
 
12-Feb-20263dom 16465 A set that dominates ordinal 3 has at least 3 different members. (Contributed by Jim Kingdon, 12-Feb-2026.)
(3o ≼ 𝐴 → ∃𝑥 ∈ 𝐴 ∃𝑦 ∈ 𝐴 ∃𝑧 ∈ 𝐴 (𝑥 ≠ 𝑦 ∧ 𝑥 ≠ 𝑧 ∧ 𝑦 ≠ 𝑧))
 
11-Feb-2026elssdc 7080 Membership in a finite subset of a set with decidable equality is decidable. (Contributed by Jim Kingdon, 11-Feb-2026.)
(𝜑 → ∀𝑥 ∈ 𝐵 ∀𝑦 ∈ 𝐵 DECID 𝑥 = 𝑦)    &   (𝜑 → 𝑋 ∈ 𝐵)    &   (𝜑 → 𝐴 ⊆ 𝐵)    &   (𝜑 → 𝐴 ∈ Fin)    ⇒   (𝜑 → DECID 𝑋 ∈ 𝐴)
 
10-Feb-2026vtxdgfifival 16077 The degree of a vertex for graphs with finite vertex and edge sets. (Contributed by Jim Kingdon, 10-Feb-2026.)
𝑉 = (Vtx‘𝐺)    &   𝐼 = (iEdg‘𝐺)    &   𝐴 = dom 𝐼    &   (𝜑 → 𝐴 ∈ Fin)    &   (𝜑 → 𝑉 ∈ Fin)    &   (𝜑 → 𝑈 ∈ 𝑉)    &   (𝜑 → 𝐺 ∈ UPGraph)    ⇒   (𝜑 → ((VtxDeg‘𝐺)‘𝑈) = ((♯‘{𝑥 ∈ 𝐴 ∣ 𝑈 ∈ (𝐼‘𝑥)}) + (♯‘{𝑥 ∈ 𝐴 ∣ (𝐼‘𝑥) = {𝑈}})))
 
10-Feb-2026fidcen 7074 Equinumerosity of finite sets is decidable. (Contributed by Jim Kingdon, 10-Feb-2026.)
((𝐴 ∈ Fin ∧ 𝐵 ∈ Fin) → DECID 𝐴 ≈ 𝐵)
 
8-Feb-2026wlkvtxm 16112 A graph with a walk has at least one vertex. (Contributed by Jim Kingdon, 8-Feb-2026.)
𝑉 = (Vtx‘𝐺)    ⇒   (𝐹(Walks‘𝐺)𝑃 → ∃𝑥 𝑥 ∈ 𝑉)
 
7-Feb-2026trlsv 16154 The classes involved in a trail are sets. (Contributed by Jim Kingdon, 7-Feb-2026.)
(𝐹(Trails‘𝐺)𝑃 → (𝐺 ∈ V ∧ 𝐹 ∈ V ∧ 𝑃 ∈ V))
 
7-Feb-2026wlkex 16097 The class of walks on a graph is a set. (Contributed by Jim Kingdon, 7-Feb-2026.)
(𝐺 ∈ 𝑉 → (Walks‘𝐺) ∈ V)
 
3-Feb-2026dom1oi 6991 A set with an element dominates one. (Contributed by Jim Kingdon, 3-Feb-2026.)
((𝐴 ∈ 𝑉 ∧ 𝐵 ∈ 𝐴) → 1o ≼ 𝐴)
 
2-Feb-2026edginwlkd 16127 The value of the edge function for an index of an edge within a walk is an edge. (Contributed by AV, 2-Jan-2021.) (Revised by AV, 9-Dec-2021.) (Revised by Jim Kingdon, 2-Feb-2026.)
𝐼 = (iEdg‘𝐺)    &   𝐸 = (Edg‘𝐺)    &   (𝜑 → Fun 𝐼)    &   (𝜑 → 𝐹 ∈ Word dom 𝐼)    &   (𝜑 → 𝐾 ∈ (0..^(♯‘𝐹)))    &   (𝜑 → 𝐺 ∈ 𝑉)    ⇒   (𝜑 → (𝐼‘(𝐹‘𝐾)) ∈ 𝐸)
 
2-Feb-2026wlkelvv 16121 A walk is an ordered pair. (Contributed by Jim Kingdon, 2-Feb-2026.)
(𝑊 ∈ (Walks‘𝐺) → 𝑊 ∈ (V × V))
 
1-Feb-2026wlkcprim 16122 A walk as class with two components. (Contributed by Alexander van der Vekens, 22-Jul-2018.) (Revised by AV, 2-Jan-2021.) (Revised by Jim Kingdon, 1-Feb-2026.)
(𝑊 ∈ (Walks‘𝐺) → (1st ‘𝑊)(Walks‘𝐺)(2nd ‘𝑊))
 
1-Feb-2026wlkmex 16091 If there are walks on a graph, the graph is a set. (Contributed by Jim Kingdon, 1-Feb-2026.)
(𝑊 ∈ (Walks‘𝐺) → 𝐺 ∈ V)
 
31-Jan-2026fvmbr 5667 If a function value is inhabited, the argument is related to the function value. (Contributed by Jim Kingdon, 31-Jan-2026.)
(𝐴 ∈ (𝐹‘𝑋) → 𝑋𝐹(𝐹‘𝑋))
 
30-Jan-2026elfvfvex 5666 If a function value is inhabited, the function value is a set. (Contributed by Jim Kingdon, 30-Jan-2026.)
(𝐴 ∈ (𝐹‘𝐵) → (𝐹‘𝐵) ∈ V)
 
30-Jan-2026reldmm 4945 A relation is inhabited iff its domain is inhabited. (Contributed by Jim Kingdon, 30-Jan-2026.)
(Rel 𝐴 → (∃𝑥 𝑥 ∈ 𝐴 ↔ ∃𝑦 𝑦 ∈ dom 𝐴))
 
25-Jan-2026ifp2 986 Forward direction of dfifp2dc 987. This direction does not require decidability. (Contributed by Jim Kingdon, 25-Jan-2026.)
(if-(𝜑, 𝜓, 𝜒) → ((𝜑 → 𝜓) ∧ (¬ 𝜑 → 𝜒)))
 
25-Jan-2026ifpdc 985 The conditional operator for propositions implies decidability. (Contributed by Jim Kingdon, 25-Jan-2026.)
(if-(𝜑, 𝜓, 𝜒) → DECID 𝜑)
 
20-Jan-2026cats1fvd 11319 A symbol other than the last in a concatenation with a singleton word. (Contributed by Mario Carneiro, 26-Feb-2016.) (Revised by Jim Kingdon, 20-Jan-2026.)
𝑇 = (𝑆 ++ ⟨“𝑋”⟩)    &   (𝜑 → 𝑆 ∈ Word V)    &   (𝜑 → (♯‘𝑆) = 𝑀)    &   (𝜑 → 𝑌 ∈ 𝑉)    &   (𝜑 → 𝑋 ∈ 𝑊)    &   (𝜑 → (𝑆‘𝑁) = 𝑌)    &   (𝜑 → 𝑁 ∈ ℕ0)    &   (𝜑 → 𝑁 < 𝑀)    ⇒   (𝜑 → (𝑇‘𝑁) = 𝑌)
 
20-Jan-2026cats1fvnd 11318 The last symbol of a concatenation with a singleton word. (Contributed by Mario Carneiro, 26-Feb-2016.) (Revised by Jim Kingdon, 20-Jan-2026.)
𝑇 = (𝑆 ++ ⟨“𝑋”⟩)    &   (𝜑 → 𝑆 ∈ Word V)    &   (𝜑 → 𝑋 ∈ 𝑉)    &   (𝜑 → (♯‘𝑆) = 𝑀)    ⇒   (𝜑 → (𝑇‘𝑀) = 𝑋)
 
19-Jan-2026cats2catd 11322 Closure of concatenation of concatenations with singleton words. (Contributed by AV, 1-Mar-2021.) (Revised by Jim Kingdon, 19-Jan-2026.)
(𝜑 → 𝐵 ∈ Word V)    &   (𝜑 → 𝐷 ∈ Word V)    &   (𝜑 → 𝑋 ∈ 𝑉)    &   (𝜑 → 𝑌 ∈ 𝑊)    &   (𝜑 → 𝐴 = (𝐵 ++ ⟨“𝑋”⟩))    &   (𝜑 → 𝐶 = (⟨“𝑌”⟩ ++ 𝐷))    ⇒   (𝜑 → (𝐴 ++ 𝐶) = ((𝐵 ++ ⟨“𝑋𝑌”⟩) ++ 𝐷))
 
19-Jan-2026cats1catd 11321 Closure of concatenation with a singleton word. (Contributed by Mario Carneiro, 26-Feb-2016.) (Revised by Jim Kingdon, 19-Jan-2026.)
𝑇 = (𝑆 ++ ⟨“𝑋”⟩)    &   (𝜑 → 𝐴 ∈ Word V)    &   (𝜑 → 𝑆 ∈ Word V)    &   (𝜑 → 𝑋 ∈ 𝑊)    &   (𝜑 → 𝐶 = (𝐵 ++ ⟨“𝑋”⟩))    &   (𝜑 → 𝐵 = (𝐴 ++ 𝑆))    ⇒   (𝜑 → 𝐶 = (𝐴 ++ 𝑇))
 
19-Jan-2026cats1lend 11320 The length of concatenation with a singleton word. (Contributed by Mario Carneiro, 26-Feb-2016.) (Revised by Jim Kingdon, 19-Jan-2026.)
𝑇 = (𝑆 ++ ⟨“𝑋”⟩)    &   (𝜑 → 𝑆 ∈ Word V)    &   (𝜑 → 𝑋 ∈ 𝑊)    &   (♯‘𝑆) = 𝑀    &   (𝑀 + 1) = 𝑁    ⇒   (𝜑 → (♯‘𝑇) = 𝑁)
 
18-Jan-2026rexanaliim 2636 A transformation of restricted quantifiers and logical connectives. (Contributed by NM, 4-Sep-2005.) (Revised by Jim Kingdon, 18-Jan-2026.)
(∃𝑥 ∈ 𝐴 (𝜑 ∧ ¬ 𝜓) → ¬ ∀𝑥 ∈ 𝐴 (𝜑 → 𝜓))
 
15-Jan-2026df-uspgren 15974 Define the class of all undirected simple pseudographs (which could have loops). An undirected simple pseudograph is a special undirected pseudograph or a special undirected simple hypergraph, consisting of a set 𝑣 (of "vertices") and an injective (one-to-one) function 𝑒 (representing (indexed) "edges") into subsets of 𝑣 of cardinality one or two, representing the two vertices incident to the edge, or the one vertex if the edge is a loop. In contrast to a pseudograph, there is at most one edge between two vertices resp. at most one loop for a vertex. (Contributed by Alexander van der Vekens, 10-Aug-2017.) (Revised by Jim Kingdon, 15-Jan-2026.)
USPGraph = {𝑔 ∣ [(Vtx‘𝑔) / 𝑣][(iEdg‘𝑔) / 𝑒]𝑒:dom 𝑒–1-1→{𝑥 ∈ 𝒫 𝑣 ∣ (𝑥 ≈ 1o ∨ 𝑥 ≈ 2o)}}
 
11-Jan-2026en2prde 7382 A set of size two is an unordered pair of two different elements. (Contributed by Alexander van der Vekens, 8-Dec-2017.) (Revised by Jim Kingdon, 11-Jan-2026.)
(𝑉 ≈ 2o → ∃𝑎∃𝑏(𝑎 ≠ 𝑏 ∧ 𝑉 = {𝑎, 𝑏}))
 
10-Jan-2026pw1mapen 16475 Equinumerosity of (𝒫 1o ↑𝑚 𝐴) and the set of subsets of 𝐴. (Contributed by Jim Kingdon, 10-Jan-2026.)
(𝐴 ∈ 𝑉 → (𝒫 1o ↑𝑚 𝐴) ≈ 𝒫 𝐴)
 
10-Jan-2026pw1if 7426 Expressing a truth value in terms of an if expression. (Contributed by Jim Kingdon, 10-Jan-2026.)
(𝐴 ∈ 𝒫 1o → if(𝐴 = 1o, 1o, ∅) = 𝐴)
 
10-Jan-2026pw1m 7425 A truth value which is inhabited is equal to true. This is a variation of pwntru 4284 and pwtrufal 16476. (Contributed by Jim Kingdon, 10-Jan-2026.)
((𝐴 ∈ 𝒫 1o ∧ ∃𝑥 𝑥 ∈ 𝐴) → 𝐴 = 1o)
 
10-Jan-20261ndom2 7039 Two is not dominated by one. (Contributed by Jim Kingdon, 10-Jan-2026.)
¬ 2o ≼ 1o
 
9-Jan-2026pw1map 16474 Mapping between (𝒫 1o ↑𝑚 𝐴) and subsets of 𝐴. (Contributed by Jim Kingdon, 9-Jan-2026.)
𝐹 = (𝑠 ∈ (𝒫 1o ↑𝑚 𝐴) ↦ {𝑧 ∈ 𝐴 ∣ (𝑠‘𝑧) = 1o})    ⇒   (𝐴 ∈ 𝑉 → 𝐹:(𝒫 1o ↑𝑚 𝐴)–1-1-onto→𝒫 𝐴)
 
9-Jan-2026iftrueb01 7424 Using an if expression to represent a truth value by ∅ or 1o. Unlike some theorems using if, 𝜑 does not need to be decidable. (Contributed by Jim Kingdon, 9-Jan-2026.)
(if(𝜑, 1o, ∅) = 1o ↔ 𝜑)
 
8-Jan-2026pfxclz 11232 Closure of the prefix extractor. This extends pfxclg 11231 from ℕ0 to ℤ (negative lengths are trivial, resulting in the empty word). (Contributed by Jim Kingdon, 8-Jan-2026.)
((𝑆 ∈ Word 𝐴 ∧ 𝐿 ∈ ℤ) → (𝑆 prefix 𝐿) ∈ Word 𝐴)
 
8-Jan-2026fnpfx 11230 The domain of the prefix extractor. (Contributed by Jim Kingdon, 8-Jan-2026.)
prefix Fn (V × ℕ0)
 
7-Jan-2026pr1or2 7383 An unordered pair, with decidable equality for the specified elements, has either one or two elements. (Contributed by Jim Kingdon, 7-Jan-2026.)
((𝐴 ∈ 𝐶 ∧ 𝐵 ∈ 𝐷 ∧ DECID 𝐴 = 𝐵) → ({𝐴, 𝐵} ≈ 1o ∨ {𝐴, 𝐵} ≈ 2o))
 
6-Jan-2026upgr1elem1 15941 Lemma for upgr1edc 15942. (Contributed by AV, 16-Oct-2020.) (Revised by Jim Kingdon, 6-Jan-2026.)
(𝜑 → {𝐵, 𝐶} ∈ 𝑆)    &   (𝜑 → 𝐵 ∈ 𝑊)    &   (𝜑 → 𝐶 ∈ 𝑋)    &   (𝜑 → DECID 𝐵 = 𝐶)    ⇒   (𝜑 → {{𝐵, 𝐶}} ⊆ {𝑥 ∈ 𝑆 ∣ (𝑥 ≈ 1o ∨ 𝑥 ≈ 2o)})
 
3-Jan-2026df-umgren 15915 Define the class of all undirected multigraphs. An (undirected) multigraph consists of a set 𝑣 (of "vertices") and a function 𝑒 (representing indexed "edges") into subsets of 𝑣 of cardinality two, representing the two vertices incident to the edge. In contrast to a pseudograph, a multigraph has no loop. This is according to Chartrand, Gary and Zhang, Ping (2012): "A First Course in Graph Theory.", Dover, ISBN 978-0-486-48368-9, section 1.4, p. 26: "A multigraph M consists of a finite nonempty set V of vertices and a set E of edges, where every two vertices of M are joined by a finite number of edges (possibly zero). If two or more edges join the same pair of (distinct) vertices, then these edges are called parallel edges." (Contributed by AV, 24-Nov-2020.) (Revised by Jim Kingdon, 3-Jan-2026.)
UMGraph = {𝑔 ∣ [(Vtx‘𝑔) / 𝑣][(iEdg‘𝑔) / 𝑒]𝑒:dom 𝑒⟶{𝑥 ∈ 𝒫 𝑣 ∣ 𝑥 ≈ 2o}}
 
3-Jan-2026df-upgren 15914 Define the class of all undirected pseudographs. An (undirected) pseudograph consists of a set 𝑣 (of "vertices") and a function 𝑒 (representing indexed "edges") into subsets of 𝑣 of cardinality one or two, representing the two vertices incident to the edge, or the one vertex if the edge is a loop. This is according to Chartrand, Gary and Zhang, Ping (2012): "A First Course in Graph Theory.", Dover, ISBN 978-0-486-48368-9, section 1.4, p. 26: "In a pseudograph, not only are parallel edges permitted but an edge is also permitted to join a vertex to itself. Such an edge is called a loop." (in contrast to a multigraph, see df-umgren 15915). (Contributed by Mario Carneiro, 11-Mar-2015.) (Revised by AV, 24-Nov-2020.) (Revised by Jim Kingdon, 3-Jan-2026.)
UPGraph = {𝑔 ∣ [(Vtx‘𝑔) / 𝑣][(iEdg‘𝑔) / 𝑒]𝑒:dom 𝑒⟶{𝑥 ∈ 𝒫 𝑣 ∣ (𝑥 ≈ 1o ∨ 𝑥 ≈ 2o)}}
 
3-Jan-2026dom1o 6990 Two ways of saying that a set is inhabited. (Contributed by Jim Kingdon, 3-Jan-2026.)
(𝐴 ∈ 𝑉 → (1o ≼ 𝐴 ↔ ∃𝑗 𝑗 ∈ 𝐴))
 
3-Jan-2026en2m 6987 A set with two elements is inhabited. (Contributed by Jim Kingdon, 3-Jan-2026.)
(𝐴 ≈ 2o → ∃𝑥 𝑥 ∈ 𝐴)
 
3-Jan-2026en1m 6970 A set with one element is inhabited. (Contributed by Jim Kingdon, 3-Jan-2026.)
(𝐴 ≈ 1o → ∃𝑥 𝑥 ∈ 𝐴)
 
31-Dec-2025pw0ss 15904 There are no inhabited subsets of the empty set. (Contributed by Jim Kingdon, 31-Dec-2025.)
{𝑠 ∈ 𝒫 ∅ ∣ ∃𝑗 𝑗 ∈ 𝑠} = ∅
 
31-Dec-2025df-ushgrm 15891 Define the class of all undirected simple hypergraphs. An undirected simple hypergraph is a special (non-simple, multiple, multi-) hypergraph for which the edge function 𝑒 is an injective (one-to-one) function into subsets of the set of vertices 𝑣, representing the (one or more) vertices incident to the edge. This definition corresponds to the definition of hypergraphs in section I.1 of [Bollobas] p. 7 (except that the empty set seems to be allowed to be an "edge") or section 1.10 of [Diestel] p. 27, where "E is a subset of [...] the power set of V, that is the set of all subsets of V" resp. "the elements of E are nonempty subsets (of any cardinality) of V". (Contributed by AV, 19-Jan-2020.) (Revised by Jim Kingdon, 31-Dec-2025.)
USHGraph = {𝑔 ∣ [(Vtx‘𝑔) / 𝑣][(iEdg‘𝑔) / 𝑒]𝑒:dom 𝑒–1-1→{𝑠 ∈ 𝒫 𝑣 ∣ ∃𝑗 𝑗 ∈ 𝑠}}
 
29-Dec-2025df-uhgrm 15890 Define the class of all undirected hypergraphs. An undirected hypergraph consists of a set 𝑣 (of "vertices") and a function 𝑒 (representing indexed "edges") into the set of inhabited subsets of this set. (Contributed by Alexander van der Vekens, 26-Dec-2017.) (Revised by Jim Kingdon, 29-Dec-2025.)
UHGraph = {𝑔 ∣ [(Vtx‘𝑔) / 𝑣][(iEdg‘𝑔) / 𝑒]𝑒:dom 𝑒⟶{𝑠 ∈ 𝒫 𝑣 ∣ ∃𝑗 𝑗 ∈ 𝑠}}
 
29-Dec-2025iedgex 15841 Applying the indexed edge function yields a set. (Contributed by Jim Kingdon, 29-Dec-2025.)
(𝐺 ∈ 𝑉 → (iEdg‘𝐺) ∈ V)
 
29-Dec-2025vtxex 15840 Applying the vertex function yields a set. (Contributed by Jim Kingdon, 29-Dec-2025.)
(𝐺 ∈ 𝑉 → (Vtx‘𝐺) ∈ V)
 
29-Dec-2025snmb 3788 A singleton is inhabited iff its argument is a set. (Contributed by Scott Fenton, 8-May-2018.) (Revised by Jim Kingdon, 29-Dec-2025.)
(𝐴 ∈ V ↔ ∃𝑥 𝑥 ∈ {𝐴})
 
27-Dec-2025lswex 11141 Existence of the last symbol. The last symbol of a word is a set. See lsw0g 11138 or lswcl 11140 if you want more specific results for empty or nonempty words, respectively. (Contributed by Jim Kingdon, 27-Dec-2025.)
(𝑊 ∈ Word 𝑉 → (lastS‘𝑊) ∈ V)
 
23-Dec-2025fzowrddc 11200 Decidability of whether a range of integers is a subset of a word's domain. (Contributed by Jim Kingdon, 23-Dec-2025.)
((𝑆 ∈ Word 𝐴 ∧ 𝐹 ∈ ℤ ∧ 𝐿 ∈ ℤ) → DECID (𝐹..^𝐿) ⊆ dom 𝑆)
 
19-Dec-2025ccatclab 11147 The concatenation of words over two sets is a word over the union of those sets. (Contributed by Jim Kingdon, 19-Dec-2025.)
((𝑆 ∈ Word 𝐴 ∧ 𝑇 ∈ Word 𝐵) → (𝑆 ++ 𝑇) ∈ Word (𝐴 ∪ 𝐵))
 
18-Dec-2025lswwrd 11136 Extract the last symbol of a word. (Contributed by Alexander van der Vekens, 18-Mar-2018.) (Revised by Jim Kingdon, 18-Dec-2025.)
(𝑊 ∈ Word 𝑉 → (lastS‘𝑊) = (𝑊‘((♯‘𝑊) − 1)))
 
14-Dec-20252strstrndx 13172 A constructed two-slot structure not depending on the hard-coded index value of the base set. (Contributed by Mario Carneiro, 29-Aug-2015.) (Revised by Jim Kingdon, 14-Dec-2025.)
𝐺 = {⟨(Base‘ndx), 𝐵⟩, ⟨𝑁, + ⟩}    &   (Base‘ndx) < 𝑁    &   𝑁 ∈ ℕ    ⇒   ((𝐵 ∈ 𝑉 ∧ + ∈ 𝑊) → 𝐺 Struct ⟨(Base‘ndx), 𝑁⟩)
 
12-Dec-2025funiedgdm2vald 15854 The set of indexed edges of an extensible structure with (at least) two slots. (Contributed by AV, 22-Sep-2020.) (Revised by Jim Kingdon, 12-Dec-2025.)
𝐴 ∈ V    &   𝐵 ∈ V    &   (𝜑 → 𝐺 ∈ 𝑋)    &   (𝜑 → Fun (𝐺 ∖ {∅}))    &   (𝜑 → 𝐴 ≠ 𝐵)    &   (𝜑 → {𝐴, 𝐵} ⊆ dom 𝐺)    ⇒   (𝜑 → (iEdg‘𝐺) = (.ef‘𝐺))
 
11-Dec-2025funvtxdm2vald 15853 The set of vertices of an extensible structure with (at least) two slots. (Contributed by AV, 22-Sep-2020.) (Revised by Jim Kingdon, 11-Dec-2025.)
𝐴 ∈ V    &   𝐵 ∈ V    &   (𝜑 → 𝐺 ∈ 𝑋)    &   (𝜑 → Fun (𝐺 ∖ {∅}))    &   (𝜑 → 𝐴 ≠ 𝐵)    &   (𝜑 → {𝐴, 𝐵} ⊆ dom 𝐺)    ⇒   (𝜑 → (Vtx‘𝐺) = (Base‘𝐺))
 
11-Dec-2025funiedgdm2domval 15852 The set of indexed edges of an extensible structure with (at least) two slots. (Contributed by AV, 12-Oct-2020.) (Revised by Jim Kingdon, 11-Dec-2025.)
((𝐺 ∈ 𝑉 ∧ Fun (𝐺 ∖ {∅}) ∧ 2o ≼ dom 𝐺) → (iEdg‘𝐺) = (.ef‘𝐺))
 
11-Dec-2025funvtxdm2domval 15851 The set of vertices of an extensible structure with (at least) two slots. (Contributed by AV, 12-Oct-2020.) (Revised by Jim Kingdon, 11-Dec-2025.)
((𝐺 ∈ 𝑉 ∧ Fun (𝐺 ∖ {∅}) ∧ 2o ≼ dom 𝐺) → (Vtx‘𝐺) = (Base‘𝐺))
 
4-Dec-2025hash2en 11083 Two equivalent ways to say a set has two elements. (Contributed by Jim Kingdon, 4-Dec-2025.)
(𝑉 ≈ 2o ↔ (𝑉 ∈ Fin ∧ (♯‘𝑉) = 2))
 
30-Nov-2025nninfnfiinf 16503 An element of ℕ∞ which is not finite is infinite. (Contributed by Jim Kingdon, 30-Nov-2025.)
((𝐴 ∈ ℕ∞ ∧ ¬ ∃𝑛 ∈ ω 𝐴 = (𝑖 ∈ ω ↦ if(𝑖 ∈ 𝑛, 1o, ∅))) → 𝐴 = (𝑖 ∈ ω ↦ 1o))
 
27-Nov-2025psrelbasfi 14661 Simpler form of psrelbas 14660 when the index set is finite. (Contributed by Jim Kingdon, 27-Nov-2025.)
𝑆 = (𝐼 mPwSer 𝑅)    &   𝐾 = (Base‘𝑅)    &   (𝜑 → 𝐼 ∈ Fin)    &   𝐵 = (Base‘𝑆)    &   (𝜑 → 𝑋 ∈ 𝐵)    ⇒   (𝜑 → 𝑋:(ℕ0 ↑𝑚 𝐼)⟶𝐾)
 
26-Nov-2025mplsubgfileminv 14685 Lemma for mplsubgfi 14686. The additive inverse of a polynomial is a polynomial. (Contributed by Jim Kingdon, 26-Nov-2025.)
𝑆 = (𝐼 mPwSer 𝑅)    &   𝑃 = (𝐼 mPoly 𝑅)    &   𝑈 = (Base‘𝑃)    &   (𝜑 → 𝐼 ∈ Fin)    &   (𝜑 → 𝑅 ∈ Grp)    &   (𝜑 → 𝑋 ∈ 𝑈)    &   𝑁 = (invg‘𝑆)    ⇒   (𝜑 → (𝑁‘𝑋) ∈ 𝑈)
 
26-Nov-2025mplsubgfilemcl 14684 Lemma for mplsubgfi 14686. The sum of two polynomials is a polynomial. (Contributed by Jim Kingdon, 26-Nov-2025.)
𝑆 = (𝐼 mPwSer 𝑅)    &   𝑃 = (𝐼 mPoly 𝑅)    &   𝑈 = (Base‘𝑃)    &   (𝜑 → 𝐼 ∈ Fin)    &   (𝜑 → 𝑅 ∈ Grp)    &   (𝜑 → 𝑋 ∈ 𝑈)    &   (𝜑 → 𝑌 ∈ 𝑈)    &    + = (+g‘𝑆)    ⇒   (𝜑 → (𝑋 + 𝑌) ∈ 𝑈)
 
25-Nov-2025nninfinfwlpo 7363 The point at infinity in ℕ∞ being isolated is equivalent to the Weak Limited Principle of Omniscience (WLPO). By isolated, we mean that the equality of that point with every other element of ℕ∞ is decidable. From an online post by Martin Escardo. By contrast, elements of ℕ∞ corresponding to natural numbers are isolated (nninfisol 7316). (Contributed by Jim Kingdon, 25-Nov-2025.)
(∀𝑥 ∈ ℕ∞ DECID 𝑥 = (𝑖 ∈ ω ↦ 1o) ↔ ω ∈ WOmni)
 
23-Nov-2025psrbagfi 14658 A finite index set gives a simpler expression for finite bags. (Contributed by Jim Kingdon, 23-Nov-2025.)
𝐷 = {𝑓 ∈ (ℕ0 ↑𝑚 𝐼) ∣ (◡𝑓 “ ℕ) ∈ Fin}    ⇒   (𝐼 ∈ Fin → 𝐷 = (ℕ0 ↑𝑚 𝐼))
 
22-Nov-2025df-acnm 7368 Define a local and length-limited version of the axiom of choice. The definition of the predicate 𝑋 ∈ AC 𝐴 is that for all families of inhabited subsets of 𝑋 indexed on 𝐴 (i.e. functions 𝐴⟶{𝑧 ∈ 𝒫 𝑋 ∣ ∃𝑗𝑗 ∈ 𝑧}), there is a function which selects an element from each set in the family. (Contributed by Mario Carneiro, 31-Aug-2015.) Change nonempty to inhabited. (Revised by Jim Kingdon, 22-Nov-2025.)
AC 𝐴 = {𝑥 ∣ (𝐴 ∈ V ∧ ∀𝑓 ∈ ({𝑧 ∈ 𝒫 𝑥 ∣ ∃𝑗 𝑗 ∈ 𝑧} ↑𝑚 𝐴)∃𝑔∀𝑦 ∈ 𝐴 (𝑔‘𝑦) ∈ (𝑓‘𝑦))}
 
21-Nov-2025mplsubgfilemm 14683 Lemma for mplsubgfi 14686. There exists a polynomial. (Contributed by Jim Kingdon, 21-Nov-2025.)
𝑆 = (𝐼 mPwSer 𝑅)    &   𝑃 = (𝐼 mPoly 𝑅)    &   𝑈 = (Base‘𝑃)    &   (𝜑 → 𝐼 ∈ Fin)    &   (𝜑 → 𝑅 ∈ Grp)    ⇒   (𝜑 → ∃𝑗 𝑗 ∈ 𝑈)
 
14-Nov-20252omapen 16473 Equinumerosity of (2o ↑𝑚 𝐴) and the set of decidable subsets of 𝐴. (Contributed by Jim Kingdon, 14-Nov-2025.)
(𝐴 ∈ 𝑉 → (2o ↑𝑚 𝐴) ≈ {𝑥 ∈ 𝒫 𝐴 ∣ ∀𝑦 ∈ 𝐴 DECID 𝑦 ∈ 𝑥})
 
12-Nov-20252omap 16472 Mapping between (2o ↑𝑚 𝐴) and decidable subsets of 𝐴. (Contributed by Jim Kingdon, 12-Nov-2025.)
𝐹 = (𝑠 ∈ (2o ↑𝑚 𝐴) ↦ {𝑧 ∈ 𝐴 ∣ (𝑠‘𝑧) = 1o})    ⇒   (𝐴 ∈ 𝑉 → 𝐹:(2o ↑𝑚 𝐴)–1-1-onto→{𝑥 ∈ 𝒫 𝐴 ∣ ∀𝑦 ∈ 𝐴 DECID 𝑦 ∈ 𝑥})
 
11-Nov-2025domomsubct 16480 A set dominated by ω is subcountable. (Contributed by Jim Kingdon, 11-Nov-2025.)
(𝐴 ≼ ω → ∃𝑠(𝑠 ⊆ ω ∧ ∃𝑓 𝑓:𝑠–onto→𝐴))
 
10-Nov-2025prdsbaslemss 13328 Lemma for prdsbas 13330 and similar theorems. (Contributed by Jim Kingdon, 10-Nov-2025.)
𝑃 = (𝑆Xs𝑅)    &   (𝜑 → 𝑆 ∈ 𝑉)    &   (𝜑 → 𝑅 ∈ 𝑊)    &   𝐴 = (𝐸‘𝑃)    &   𝐸 = Slot (𝐸‘ndx)    &   (𝐸‘ndx) ∈ ℕ    &   (𝜑 → 𝑇 ∈ 𝑋)    &   (𝜑 → {⟨(𝐸‘ndx), 𝑇⟩} ⊆ 𝑃)    ⇒   (𝜑 → 𝐴 = 𝑇)
 
5-Nov-2025fnmpl 14678 mPoly has universal domain. (Contributed by Jim Kingdon, 5-Nov-2025.)
mPoly Fn (V × V)
 
4-Nov-2025mplelbascoe 14677 Property of being a polynomial. (Contributed by Mario Carneiro, 7-Jan-2015.) (Revised by Mario Carneiro, 2-Oct-2015.) (Revised by AV, 25-Jun-2019.) (Revised by Jim Kingdon, 4-Nov-2025.)
𝑃 = (𝐼 mPoly 𝑅)    &   𝑆 = (𝐼 mPwSer 𝑅)    &   𝐵 = (Base‘𝑆)    &    0 = (0g‘𝑅)    &   𝑈 = (Base‘𝑃)    ⇒   ((𝐼 ∈ 𝑉 ∧ 𝑅 ∈ 𝑊) → (𝑋 ∈ 𝑈 ↔ (𝑋 ∈ 𝐵 ∧ ∃𝑎 ∈ (ℕ0 ↑𝑚 𝐼)∀𝑏 ∈ (ℕ0 ↑𝑚 𝐼)(∀𝑘 ∈ 𝐼 (𝑎‘𝑘) < (𝑏‘𝑘) → (𝑋‘𝑏) = 0 ))))
 
4-Nov-2025mplbascoe 14676 Base set of the set of multivariate polynomials. (Contributed by Mario Carneiro, 7-Jan-2015.) (Revised by AV, 25-Jun-2019.) (Revised by Jim Kingdon, 4-Nov-2025.)
𝑃 = (𝐼 mPoly 𝑅)    &   𝑆 = (𝐼 mPwSer 𝑅)    &   𝐵 = (Base‘𝑆)    &    0 = (0g‘𝑅)    &   𝑈 = (Base‘𝑃)    ⇒   ((𝐼 ∈ 𝑉 ∧ 𝑅 ∈ 𝑊) → 𝑈 = {𝑓 ∈ 𝐵 ∣ ∃𝑎 ∈ (ℕ0 ↑𝑚 𝐼)∀𝑏 ∈ (ℕ0 ↑𝑚 𝐼)(∀𝑘 ∈ 𝐼 (𝑎‘𝑘) < (𝑏‘𝑘) → (𝑓‘𝑏) = 0 )})
 
4-Nov-2025mplvalcoe 14675 Value of the set of multivariate polynomials. (Contributed by Mario Carneiro, 7-Jan-2015.) (Revised by AV, 25-Jun-2019.) (Revised by Jim Kingdon, 4-Nov-2025.)
𝑃 = (𝐼 mPoly 𝑅)    &   𝑆 = (𝐼 mPwSer 𝑅)    &   𝐵 = (Base‘𝑆)    &    0 = (0g‘𝑅)    &   𝑈 = {𝑓 ∈ 𝐵 ∣ ∃𝑎 ∈ (ℕ0 ↑𝑚 𝐼)∀𝑏 ∈ (ℕ0 ↑𝑚 𝐼)(∀𝑘 ∈ 𝐼 (𝑎‘𝑘) < (𝑏‘𝑘) → (𝑓‘𝑏) = 0 )}    ⇒   ((𝐼 ∈ 𝑉 ∧ 𝑅 ∈ 𝑊) → 𝑃 = (𝑆 ↾s 𝑈))
 
1-Nov-2025ficardon 7377 The cardinal number of a finite set is an ordinal. (Contributed by Jim Kingdon, 1-Nov-2025.)
(𝐴 ∈ Fin → (card‘𝐴) ∈ On)
 
31-Oct-2025bitsdc 12479 Whether a bit is set is decidable. (Contributed by Jim Kingdon, 31-Oct-2025.)
((𝑁 ∈ ℤ ∧ 𝑀 ∈ ℕ0) → DECID 𝑀 ∈ (bits‘𝑁))
 
28-Oct-2025nn0maxcl 11757 The maximum of two nonnegative integers is a nonnegative integer. (Contributed by Jim Kingdon, 28-Oct-2025.)
((𝐴 ∈ ℕ0 ∧ 𝐵 ∈ ℕ0) → sup({𝐴, 𝐵}, ℝ, < ) ∈ ℕ0)
 
28-Oct-2025qdcle 10483 Rational ≤ is decidable. (Contributed by Jim Kingdon, 28-Oct-2025.)
((𝐴 ∈ ℚ ∧ 𝐵 ∈ ℚ) → DECID 𝐴 ≤ 𝐵)
 
17-Oct-2025plycoeid3 15452 Reconstruct a polynomial as an explicit sum of the coefficient function up to an index no smaller than the degree of the polynomial. (Contributed by Jim Kingdon, 17-Oct-2025.)
(𝜑 → 𝐷 ∈ ℕ0)    &   (𝜑 → 𝐴:ℕ0⟶ℂ)    &   (𝜑 → (𝐴 “ (ℤ≥‘(𝐷 + 1))) = {0})    &   (𝜑 → 𝐹 = (𝑧 ∈ ℂ ↦ Σ𝑘 ∈ (0...𝐷)((𝐴‘𝑘) · (𝑧↑𝑘))))    &   (𝜑 → 𝑀 ∈ (ℤ≥‘𝐷))    &   (𝜑 → 𝑋 ∈ ℂ)    ⇒   (𝜑 → (𝐹‘𝑋) = Σ𝑗 ∈ (0...𝑀)((𝐴‘𝑗) · (𝑋↑𝑗)))
 
13-Oct-2025tpfidceq 7108 A triple is finite if it consists of elements of a class with decidable equality. (Contributed by Jim Kingdon, 13-Oct-2025.)
(𝜑 → 𝐴 ∈ 𝐷)    &   (𝜑 → 𝐵 ∈ 𝐷)    &   (𝜑 → 𝐶 ∈ 𝐷)    &   (𝜑 → ∀𝑥 ∈ 𝐷 ∀𝑦 ∈ 𝐷 DECID 𝑥 = 𝑦)    ⇒   (𝜑 → {𝐴, 𝐵, 𝐶} ∈ Fin)
 
13-Oct-2025prfidceq 7106 A pair is finite if it consists of elements of a class with decidable equality. (Contributed by Jim Kingdon, 13-Oct-2025.)
(𝜑 → 𝐴 ∈ 𝐶)    &   (𝜑 → 𝐵 ∈ 𝐶)    &   (𝜑 → ∀𝑥 ∈ 𝐶 ∀𝑦 ∈ 𝐶 DECID 𝑥 = 𝑦)    ⇒   (𝜑 → {𝐴, 𝐵} ∈ Fin)
 
13-Oct-2025dcun 3601 The union of two decidable classes is decidable. (Contributed by Jim Kingdon, 5-Oct-2022.) (Revised by Jim Kingdon, 13-Oct-2025.)
(𝜑 → DECID 𝐶 ∈ 𝐴)    &   (𝜑 → DECID 𝐶 ∈ 𝐵)    ⇒   (𝜑 → DECID 𝐶 ∈ (𝐴 ∪ 𝐵))
 
9-Oct-2025dvdsfi 12782 A natural number has finitely many divisors. (Contributed by Jim Kingdon, 9-Oct-2025.)
(𝑁 ∈ ℕ → {𝑥 ∈ ℕ ∣ 𝑥 ∥ 𝑁} ∈ Fin)
 
7-Oct-2025df-mplcoe 14649 Define the subalgebra of the power series algebra generated by the variables; this is the polynomial algebra (the set of power series with finite degree).

The index set (which has an element for each variable) is 𝑖, the coefficients are in ring 𝑟, and for each variable there is a "degree" such that the coefficient is zero for a term where the powers are all greater than those degrees. (Degree is in quotes because there is no guarantee that coefficients below that degree are nonzero, as we do not assume decidable equality for 𝑟). (Contributed by Mario Carneiro, 7-Jan-2015.) (Revised by AV, 25-Jun-2019.) (Revised by Jim Kingdon, 7-Oct-2025.)

mPoly = (𝑖 ∈ V, 𝑟 ∈ V ↦ ⦋(𝑖 mPwSer 𝑟) / 𝑤⦌(𝑤 ↾s {𝑓 ∈ (Base‘𝑤) ∣ ∃𝑎 ∈ (ℕ0 ↑𝑚 𝑖)∀𝑏 ∈ (ℕ0 ↑𝑚 𝑖)(∀𝑘 ∈ 𝑖 (𝑎‘𝑘) < (𝑏‘𝑘) → (𝑓‘𝑏) = (0g‘𝑟))}))
 
6-Oct-2025dvconstss 15393 Derivative of a constant function defined on an open set. (Contributed by Jim Kingdon, 6-Oct-2025.)
(𝜑 → 𝑆 ∈ {ℝ, ℂ})    &   𝐽 = (𝐾 ↾t 𝑆)    &   𝐾 = (MetOpen‘(abs ∘ − ))    &   (𝜑 → 𝑋 ∈ 𝐽)    &   (𝜑 → 𝐴 ∈ ℂ)    ⇒   (𝜑 → (𝑆 D (𝑋 × {𝐴})) = (𝑋 × {0}))
 
6-Oct-2025dcfrompeirce 1492 The decidability of a proposition 𝜒 follows from a suitable instance of Peirce's law. Therefore, if we were to introduce Peirce's law as a general principle (without the decidability condition in peircedc 919), then we could prove that every proposition is decidable, giving us the classical system of propositional calculus (since Perice's law is itself classically valid). (Contributed by Adrian Ducourtial, 6-Oct-2025.)
(𝜑 ↔ (𝜒 ∨ ¬ 𝜒))    &   (𝜓 ↔ ⊥)    &   (((𝜑 → 𝜓) → 𝜑) → 𝜑)    ⇒   DECID 𝜒
 
6-Oct-2025dcfromcon 1491 The decidability of a proposition 𝜒 follows from a suitable instance of the principle of contraposition. Therefore, if we were to introduce contraposition as a general principle (without the decidability condition in condc 858), then we could prove that every proposition is decidable, giving us the classical system of propositional calculus (since the principle of contraposition is itself classically valid). (Contributed by Adrian Ducourtial, 6-Oct-2025.)
(𝜑 ↔ (𝜒 ∨ ¬ 𝜒))    &   (𝜓 ↔ ⊤)    &   ((¬ 𝜑 → ¬ 𝜓) → (𝜓 → 𝜑))    ⇒   DECID 𝜒
 
6-Oct-2025dcfromnotnotr 1490 The decidability of a proposition 𝜓 follows from a suitable instance of double negation elimination (DNE). Therefore, if we were to introduce DNE as a general principle (without the decidability condition in notnotrdc 848), then we could prove that every proposition is decidable, giving us the classical system of propositional calculus (since DNE itself is classically valid). (Contributed by Adrian Ducourtial, 6-Oct-2025.)
(𝜑 ↔ (𝜓 ∨ ¬ 𝜓))    &   (¬ ¬ 𝜑 → 𝜑)    ⇒   DECID 𝜓
 
3-Oct-2025dvidre 15392 Real derivative of the identity function. (Contributed by Jim Kingdon, 3-Oct-2025.)
(ℝ D ( I ↾ ℝ)) = (ℝ × {1})
 
3-Oct-2025dvconstre 15391 Real derivative of a constant function. (Contributed by Jim Kingdon, 3-Oct-2025.)
(𝐴 ∈ ℂ → (ℝ D (ℝ × {𝐴})) = (ℝ × {0}))
 
3-Oct-2025dvidsslem 15388 Lemma for dvconstss 15393. Analogue of dvidlemap 15386 where 𝐹 is defined on an open subset of the real or complex numbers. (Contributed by Jim Kingdon, 3-Oct-2025.)
(𝜑 → 𝑆 ∈ {ℝ, ℂ})    &   𝐽 = (𝐾 ↾t 𝑆)    &   𝐾 = (MetOpen‘(abs ∘ − ))    &   (𝜑 → 𝐹:𝑋⟶ℂ)    &   (𝜑 → 𝑋 ∈ 𝐽)    &   ((𝜑 ∧ (𝑥 ∈ 𝑋 ∧ 𝑧 ∈ 𝑋 ∧ 𝑧 # 𝑥)) → (((𝐹‘𝑧) − (𝐹‘𝑥)) / (𝑧 − 𝑥)) = 𝐵)    &   𝐵 ∈ ℂ    ⇒   (𝜑 → (𝑆 D 𝐹) = (𝑋 × {𝐵}))
 
3-Oct-2025dvidrelem 15387 Lemma for dvidre 15392 and dvconstre 15391. Analogue of dvidlemap 15386 for real numbers rather than complex numbers. (Contributed by Jim Kingdon, 3-Oct-2025.)
(𝜑 → 𝐹:ℝ⟶ℂ)    &   ((𝜑 ∧ (𝑥 ∈ ℝ ∧ 𝑧 ∈ ℝ ∧ 𝑧 # 𝑥)) → (((𝐹‘𝑧) − (𝐹‘𝑥)) / (𝑧 − 𝑥)) = 𝐵)    &   𝐵 ∈ ℂ    ⇒   (𝜑 → (ℝ D 𝐹) = (ℝ × {𝐵}))
 
28-Sep-2025metuex 14540 Applying metUnif yields a set. (Contributed by Jim Kingdon, 28-Sep-2025.)
(𝐴 ∈ 𝑉 → (metUnif‘𝐴) ∈ V)
 
28-Sep-2025cndsex 14538 The standard distance function on the complex numbers is a set. (Contributed by Jim Kingdon, 28-Sep-2025.)
(abs ∘ − ) ∈ V
 
25-Sep-2025cntopex 14539 The standard topology on the complex numbers is a set. (Contributed by Jim Kingdon, 25-Sep-2025.)
(MetOpen‘(abs ∘ − )) ∈ V
 
24-Sep-2025mopnset 14537 Getting a set by applying MetOpen. (Contributed by Jim Kingdon, 24-Sep-2025.)
(𝐷 ∈ 𝑉 → (MetOpen‘𝐷) ∈ V)
 
24-Sep-2025blfn 14536 The ball function has universal domain. (Contributed by Jim Kingdon, 24-Sep-2025.)
ball Fn V
 
23-Sep-2025elfzoext 10415 Membership of an integer in an extended open range of integers, extension added to the right. (Contributed by AV, 30-Apr-2020.) (Proof shortened by AV, 23-Sep-2025.)
((𝑍 ∈ (𝑀..^𝑁) ∧ 𝐼 ∈ ℕ0) → 𝑍 ∈ (𝑀..^(𝑁 + 𝐼)))
 
22-Sep-2025plycjlemc 15455 Lemma for plycj 15456. (Contributed by Mario Carneiro, 24-Jul-2014.) (Revised by Jim Kingdon, 22-Sep-2025.)
(𝜑 → 𝑁 ∈ ℕ0)    &   𝐺 = ((∗ ∘ 𝐹) ∘ ∗)    &   (𝜑 → 𝐴:ℕ0⟶(𝑆 ∪ {0}))    &   (𝜑 → 𝐹 = (𝑧 ∈ ℂ ↦ Σ𝑘 ∈ (0...𝑁)((𝐴‘𝑘) · (𝑧↑𝑘))))    &   (𝜑 → 𝐹 ∈ (Poly‘𝑆))    ⇒   (𝜑 → 𝐺 = (𝑧 ∈ ℂ ↦ Σ𝑘 ∈ (0...𝑁)(((∗ ∘ 𝐴)‘𝑘) · (𝑧↑𝑘))))
 
20-Sep-2025plycolemc 15453 Lemma for plyco 15454. The result expressed as a sum, with a degree and coefficients for 𝐹 specified as hypotheses. (Contributed by Jim Kingdon, 20-Sep-2025.)
(𝜑 → 𝐹 ∈ (Poly‘𝑆))    &   (𝜑 → 𝐺 ∈ (Poly‘𝑆))    &   ((𝜑 ∧ (𝑥 ∈ 𝑆 ∧ 𝑦 ∈ 𝑆)) → (𝑥 + 𝑦) ∈ 𝑆)    &   ((𝜑 ∧ (𝑥 ∈ 𝑆 ∧ 𝑦 ∈ 𝑆)) → (𝑥 · 𝑦) ∈ 𝑆)    &   (𝜑 → 𝑁 ∈ ℕ0)    &   (𝜑 → 𝐴:ℕ0⟶(𝑆 ∪ {0}))    &   (𝜑 → (𝐴 “ (ℤ≥‘(𝑁 + 1))) = {0})    &   (𝜑 → 𝐹 = (𝑥 ∈ ℂ ↦ Σ𝑘 ∈ (0...𝑁)((𝐴‘𝑘) · (𝑥↑𝑘))))    ⇒   (𝜑 → (𝑧 ∈ ℂ ↦ Σ𝑘 ∈ (0...𝑁)((𝐴‘𝑘) · ((𝐺‘𝑧)↑𝑘))) ∈ (Poly‘𝑆))
 
18-Sep-2025elfzoextl 10414 Membership of an integer in an extended open range of integers, extension added to the left. (Contributed by AV, 31-Aug-2025.) Generalized by replacing the left border of the ranges. (Revised by SN, 18-Sep-2025.)
((𝑍 ∈ (𝑀..^𝑁) ∧ 𝐼 ∈ ℕ0) → 𝑍 ∈ (𝑀..^(𝐼 + 𝑁)))
 
16-Sep-2025lgsquadlemofi 15776 Lemma for lgsquad 15780. There are finitely many members of 𝑆 with odd first part. (Contributed by Jim Kingdon, 16-Sep-2025.)
(𝜑 → 𝑃 ∈ (ℙ ∖ {2}))    &   (𝜑 → 𝑄 ∈ (ℙ ∖ {2}))    &   (𝜑 → 𝑃 ≠ 𝑄)    &   𝑀 = ((𝑃 − 1) / 2)    &   𝑁 = ((𝑄 − 1) / 2)    &   𝑆 = {⟨𝑥, 𝑦⟩ ∣ ((𝑥 ∈ (1...𝑀) ∧ 𝑦 ∈ (1...𝑁)) ∧ (𝑦 · 𝑃) < (𝑥 · 𝑄))}    ⇒   (𝜑 → {𝑧 ∈ 𝑆 ∣ ¬ 2 ∥ (1st ‘𝑧)} ∈ Fin)
 
16-Sep-2025lgsquadlemsfi 15775 Lemma for lgsquad 15780. 𝑆 is finite. (Contributed by Jim Kingdon, 16-Sep-2025.)
(𝜑 → 𝑃 ∈ (ℙ ∖ {2}))    &   (𝜑 → 𝑄 ∈ (ℙ ∖ {2}))    &   (𝜑 → 𝑃 ≠ 𝑄)    &   𝑀 = ((𝑃 − 1) / 2)    &   𝑁 = ((𝑄 − 1) / 2)    &   𝑆 = {⟨𝑥, 𝑦⟩ ∣ ((𝑥 ∈ (1...𝑀) ∧ 𝑦 ∈ (1...𝑁)) ∧ (𝑦 · 𝑃) < (𝑥 · 𝑄))}    ⇒   (𝜑 → 𝑆 ∈ Fin)
 
16-Sep-2025opabfi 7116 Finiteness of an ordered pair abstraction which is a decidable subset of finite sets. (Contributed by Jim Kingdon, 16-Sep-2025.)
𝑆 = {⟨𝑥, 𝑦⟩ ∣ ((𝑥 ∈ 𝐴 ∧ 𝑦 ∈ 𝐵) ∧ 𝜓)}    &   (𝜑 → 𝐴 ∈ Fin)    &   (𝜑 → 𝐵 ∈ Fin)    &   (𝜑 → ∀𝑥 ∈ 𝐴 ∀𝑦 ∈ 𝐵 DECID 𝜓)    ⇒   (𝜑 → 𝑆 ∈ Fin)
 
13-Sep-2025uchoice 6292 Principle of unique choice. This is also called non-choice. The name choice results in its similarity to something like acfun 7405 (with the key difference being the change of ∃ to ∃!) but unique choice in fact follows from the axiom of collection and our other axioms. This is somewhat similar to Corollary 3.9.2 of [HoTT], p. (varies) but is better described by the paragraph at the end of Section 3.9 which starts "A similar issue arises in set-theoretic mathematics". (Contributed by Jim Kingdon, 13-Sep-2025.)
((𝐴 ∈ 𝑉 ∧ ∀𝑥 ∈ 𝐴 ∃!𝑦𝜑) → ∃𝑓(𝑓 Fn 𝐴 ∧ ∀𝑥 ∈ 𝐴 [(𝑓‘𝑥) / 𝑦]𝜑))
 
11-Sep-2025expghmap 14592 Exponentiation is a group homomorphism from addition to multiplication. (Contributed by Mario Carneiro, 18-Jun-2015.) (Revised by AV, 10-Jun-2019.) (Revised by Jim Kingdon, 11-Sep-2025.)
𝑀 = (mulGrp‘ℂfld)    &   𝑈 = (𝑀 ↾s {𝑧 ∈ ℂ ∣ 𝑧 # 0})    ⇒   ((𝐴 ∈ ℂ ∧ 𝐴 # 0) → (𝑥 ∈ ℤ ↦ (𝐴↑𝑥)) ∈ (ℤring GrpHom 𝑈))
 
11-Sep-2025cnfldui 14574 The invertible complex numbers are exactly those apart from zero. This is recapb 8834 but expressed in terms of ℂfld. (Contributed by Jim Kingdon, 11-Sep-2025.)
{𝑧 ∈ ℂ ∣ 𝑧 # 0} = (Unit‘ℂfld)
 
9-Sep-2025gsumfzfsumlemm 14572 Lemma for gsumfzfsum 14573. The case where the sum is inhabited. (Contributed by Jim Kingdon, 9-Sep-2025.)
(𝜑 → 𝑁 ∈ (ℤ≥‘𝑀))    &   ((𝜑 ∧ 𝑘 ∈ (𝑀...𝑁)) → 𝐵 ∈ ℂ)    ⇒   (𝜑 → (ℂfld Σg (𝑘 ∈ (𝑀...𝑁) ↦ 𝐵)) = Σ𝑘 ∈ (𝑀...𝑁)𝐵)
 
9-Sep-2025gsumfzfsumlem0 14571 Lemma for gsumfzfsum 14573. The case where the sum is empty. (Contributed by Jim Kingdon, 9-Sep-2025.)
(𝜑 → 𝑀 ∈ ℤ)    &   (𝜑 → 𝑁 ∈ ℤ)    &   (𝜑 → 𝑁 < 𝑀)    ⇒   (𝜑 → (ℂfld Σg (𝑘 ∈ (𝑀...𝑁) ↦ 𝐵)) = Σ𝑘 ∈ (𝑀...𝑁)𝐵)
 
9-Sep-2025gsumfzmhm2 13902 Apply a group homomorphism to a group sum, mapping version with implicit substitution. (Contributed by Mario Carneiro, 5-May-2015.) (Revised by AV, 6-Jun-2019.) (Revised by Jim Kingdon, 9-Sep-2025.)
𝐵 = (Base‘𝐺)    &    0 = (0g‘𝐺)    &   (𝜑 → 𝐺 ∈ CMnd)    &   (𝜑 → 𝐻 ∈ Mnd)    &   (𝜑 → 𝑀 ∈ ℤ)    &   (𝜑 → 𝑁 ∈ ℤ)    &   (𝜑 → (𝑥 ∈ 𝐵 ↦ 𝐶) ∈ (𝐺 MndHom 𝐻))    &   ((𝜑 ∧ 𝑘 ∈ (𝑀...𝑁)) → 𝑋 ∈ 𝐵)    &   (𝑥 = 𝑋 → 𝐶 = 𝐷)    &   (𝑥 = (𝐺 Σg (𝑘 ∈ (𝑀...𝑁) ↦ 𝑋)) → 𝐶 = 𝐸)    ⇒   (𝜑 → (𝐻 Σg (𝑘 ∈ (𝑀...𝑁) ↦ 𝐷)) = 𝐸)
 
8-Sep-2025gsumfzmhm 13901 Apply a monoid homomorphism to a group sum. (Contributed by Mario Carneiro, 15-Dec-2014.) (Revised by AV, 6-Jun-2019.) (Revised by Jim Kingdon, 8-Sep-2025.)
𝐵 = (Base‘𝐺)    &    0 = (0g‘𝐺)    &   (𝜑 → 𝐺 ∈ CMnd)    &   (𝜑 → 𝐻 ∈ Mnd)    &   (𝜑 → 𝑀 ∈ ℤ)    &   (𝜑 → 𝑁 ∈ ℤ)    &   (𝜑 → 𝐾 ∈ (𝐺 MndHom 𝐻))    &   (𝜑 → 𝐹:(𝑀...𝑁)⟶𝐵)    ⇒   (𝜑 → (𝐻 Σg (𝐾 ∘ 𝐹)) = (𝐾‘(𝐺 Σg 𝐹)))
 
8-Sep-20255ndvds6 12467 5 does not divide 6. (Contributed by AV, 8-Sep-2025.)
¬ 5 ∥ 6
 
8-Sep-20255ndvds3 12466 5 does not divide 3. (Contributed by AV, 8-Sep-2025.)
¬ 5 ∥ 3
 
6-Sep-2025gsumfzconst 13899 Sum of a constant series. (Contributed by Mario Carneiro, 19-Dec-2014.) (Revised by Jim Kingdon, 6-Sep-2025.)
𝐵 = (Base‘𝐺)    &    · = (.g‘𝐺)    ⇒   ((𝐺 ∈ Mnd ∧ 𝑁 ∈ (ℤ≥‘𝑀) ∧ 𝑋 ∈ 𝐵) → (𝐺 Σg (𝑘 ∈ (𝑀...𝑁) ↦ 𝑋)) = (((𝑁 − 𝑀) + 1) · 𝑋))
 
31-Aug-2025gsumfzmptfidmadd 13897 The sum of two group sums expressed as mappings with finite domain. (Contributed by AV, 23-Jul-2019.) (Revised by Jim Kingdon, 31-Aug-2025.)
𝐵 = (Base‘𝐺)    &    + = (+g‘𝐺)    &   (𝜑 → 𝐺 ∈ CMnd)    &   (𝜑 → 𝑀 ∈ ℤ)    &   (𝜑 → 𝑁 ∈ ℤ)    &   ((𝜑 ∧ 𝑥 ∈ (𝑀...𝑁)) → 𝐶 ∈ 𝐵)    &   ((𝜑 ∧ 𝑥 ∈ (𝑀...𝑁)) → 𝐷 ∈ 𝐵)    &   𝐹 = (𝑥 ∈ (𝑀...𝑁) ↦ 𝐶)    &   𝐻 = (𝑥 ∈ (𝑀...𝑁) ↦ 𝐷)    ⇒   (𝜑 → (𝐺 Σg (𝑥 ∈ (𝑀...𝑁) ↦ (𝐶 + 𝐷))) = ((𝐺 Σg 𝐹) + (𝐺 Σg 𝐻)))
 
30-Aug-2025gsumfzsubmcl 13896 Closure of a group sum in a submonoid. (Contributed by Mario Carneiro, 10-Jan-2015.) (Revised by AV, 3-Jun-2019.) (Revised by Jim Kingdon, 30-Aug-2025.)
(𝜑 → 𝐺 ∈ Mnd)    &   (𝜑 → 𝑀 ∈ ℤ)    &   (𝜑 → 𝑁 ∈ ℤ)    &   (𝜑 → 𝑆 ∈ (SubMnd‘𝐺))    &   (𝜑 → 𝐹:(𝑀...𝑁)⟶𝑆)    ⇒   (𝜑 → (𝐺 Σg 𝐹) ∈ 𝑆)
 
30-Aug-2025seqm1g 10713 Value of the sequence builder function at a successor. (Contributed by Mario Carneiro, 24-Jun-2013.) (Revised by Jim Kingdon, 30-Aug-2025.)
(𝜑 → 𝑀 ∈ ℤ)    &   (𝜑 → 𝑁 ∈ (ℤ≥‘(𝑀 + 1)))    &   (𝜑 → + ∈ 𝑉)    &   (𝜑 → 𝐹 ∈ 𝑊)    ⇒   (𝜑 → (seq𝑀( + , 𝐹)‘𝑁) = ((seq𝑀( + , 𝐹)‘(𝑁 − 1)) + (𝐹‘𝑁)))
 
29-Aug-2025seqf1og 10760 Rearrange a sum via an arbitrary bijection on (𝑀...𝑁). (Contributed by Mario Carneiro, 27-Feb-2014.) (Revised by Jim Kingdon, 29-Aug-2025.)
((𝜑 ∧ (𝑥 ∈ 𝑆 ∧ 𝑦 ∈ 𝑆)) → (𝑥 + 𝑦) ∈ 𝑆)    &   ((𝜑 ∧ (𝑥 ∈ 𝐶 ∧ 𝑦 ∈ 𝐶)) → (𝑥 + 𝑦) = (𝑦 + 𝑥))    &   ((𝜑 ∧ (𝑥 ∈ 𝑆 ∧ 𝑦 ∈ 𝑆 ∧ 𝑧 ∈ 𝑆)) → ((𝑥 + 𝑦) + 𝑧) = (𝑥 + (𝑦 + 𝑧)))    &   (𝜑 → 𝑁 ∈ (ℤ≥‘𝑀))    &   (𝜑 → 𝐶 ⊆ 𝑆)    &   (𝜑 → + ∈ 𝑉)    &   (𝜑 → 𝐹:(𝑀...𝑁)–1-1-onto→(𝑀...𝑁))    &   ((𝜑 ∧ 𝑥 ∈ (𝑀...𝑁)) → (𝐺‘𝑥) ∈ 𝐶)    &   ((𝜑 ∧ 𝑘 ∈ (𝑀...𝑁)) → (𝐻‘𝑘) = (𝐺‘(𝐹‘𝑘)))    &   (𝜑 → 𝐺 ∈ 𝑊)    &   (𝜑 → 𝐻 ∈ 𝑋)    ⇒   (𝜑 → (seq𝑀( + , 𝐻)‘𝑁) = (seq𝑀( + , 𝐺)‘𝑁))
 
25-Aug-2025irrmulap 9860 The product of an irrational with a nonzero rational is irrational. By irrational we mean apart from any rational number. For a similar theorem with not rational in place of irrational, see irrmul 9859. (Contributed by Jim Kingdon, 25-Aug-2025.)
(𝜑 → 𝐴 ∈ ℝ)    &   (𝜑 → ∀𝑞 ∈ ℚ 𝐴 # 𝑞)    &   (𝜑 → 𝐵 ∈ ℚ)    &   (𝜑 → 𝐵 ≠ 0)    &   (𝜑 → 𝑄 ∈ ℚ)    ⇒   (𝜑 → (𝐴 · 𝐵) # 𝑄)
 
19-Aug-2025seqp1g 10705 Value of the sequence builder function at a successor. (Contributed by Mario Carneiro, 24-Jun-2013.) (Revised by Jim Kingdon, 19-Aug-2025.)
((𝑁 ∈ (ℤ≥‘𝑀) ∧ 𝐹 ∈ 𝑉 ∧ + ∈ 𝑊) → (seq𝑀( + , 𝐹)‘(𝑁 + 1)) = ((seq𝑀( + , 𝐹)‘𝑁) + (𝐹‘(𝑁 + 1))))
 
19-Aug-2025seq1g 10702 Value of the sequence builder function at its initial value. (Contributed by Mario Carneiro, 24-Jun-2013.) (Revised by Jim Kingdon, 19-Aug-2025.)
((𝑀 ∈ ℤ ∧ 𝐹 ∈ 𝑉 ∧ + ∈ 𝑊) → (seq𝑀( + , 𝐹)‘𝑀) = (𝐹‘𝑀))
 
18-Aug-2025iswrdiz 11096 A zero-based sequence is a word. In iswrdinn0 11094 we can specify a length as an nonnegative integer. However, it will occasionally be helpful to allow a negative length, as well as zero, to specify an empty sequence. (Contributed by Jim Kingdon, 18-Aug-2025.)
((𝑊:(0..^𝐿)⟶𝑆 ∧ 𝐿 ∈ ℤ) → 𝑊 ∈ Word 𝑆)
 
16-Aug-2025gsumfzcl 13553 Closure of a finite group sum. (Contributed by Mario Carneiro, 15-Dec-2014.) (Revised by AV, 3-Jun-2019.) (Revised by Jim Kingdon, 16-Aug-2025.)
𝐵 = (Base‘𝐺)    &    0 = (0g‘𝐺)    &   (𝜑 → 𝐺 ∈ Mnd)    &   (𝜑 → 𝑀 ∈ ℤ)    &   (𝜑 → 𝑁 ∈ ℤ)    &   (𝜑 → 𝐹:(𝑀...𝑁)⟶𝐵)    ⇒   (𝜑 → (𝐺 Σg 𝐹) ∈ 𝐵)
 
16-Aug-2025iswrdinn0 11094 A zero-based sequence is a word. (Contributed by Stefan O'Rear, 15-Aug-2015.) (Revised by Mario Carneiro, 26-Feb-2016.) (Revised by Jim Kingdon, 16-Aug-2025.)
((𝑊:(0..^𝐿)⟶𝑆 ∧ 𝐿 ∈ ℕ0) → 𝑊 ∈ Word 𝑆)
 
15-Aug-2025gsumfzz 13549 Value of a group sum over the zero element. (Contributed by Mario Carneiro, 7-Dec-2014.) (Revised by Jim Kingdon, 15-Aug-2025.)
0 = (0g‘𝐺)    ⇒   ((𝐺 ∈ Mnd ∧ 𝑀 ∈ ℤ ∧ 𝑁 ∈ ℤ) → (𝐺 Σg (𝑘 ∈ (𝑀...𝑁) ↦ 0 )) = 0 )
 
14-Aug-2025gsumfzval 13445 An expression for Σg when summing over a finite set of sequential integers. (Contributed by Jim Kingdon, 14-Aug-2025.)
𝐵 = (Base‘𝐺)    &    0 = (0g‘𝐺)    &    + = (+g‘𝐺)    &   (𝜑 → 𝐺 ∈ 𝑉)    &   (𝜑 → 𝑀 ∈ ℤ)    &   (𝜑 → 𝑁 ∈ ℤ)    &   (𝜑 → 𝐹:(𝑀...𝑁)⟶𝐵)    ⇒   (𝜑 → (𝐺 Σg 𝐹) = if(𝑁 < 𝑀, 0 , (seq𝑀( + , 𝐹)‘𝑁)))
 
13-Aug-2025znidom 14642 The ℤ/nℤ structure is an integral domain when 𝑛 is prime. (Contributed by Mario Carneiro, 15-Jun-2015.) (Revised by Jim Kingdon, 13-Aug-2025.)
𝑌 = (ℤ/nℤ‘𝑁)    ⇒   (𝑁 ∈ ℙ → 𝑌 ∈ IDomn)
 
12-Aug-2025rrgmex 14246 A structure whose set of left-regular elements is inhabited is a set. (Contributed by Jim Kingdon, 12-Aug-2025.)
𝐸 = (RLReg‘𝑅)    ⇒   (𝐴 ∈ 𝐸 → 𝑅 ∈ V)
 
10-Aug-2025gausslemma2dlem1cl 15759 Lemma for gausslemma2dlem1 15761. Closure of the body of the definition of 𝑅. (Contributed by Jim Kingdon, 10-Aug-2025.)
(𝜑 → 𝑃 ∈ (ℙ ∖ {2}))    &   𝐻 = ((𝑃 − 1) / 2)    &   𝑅 = (𝑥 ∈ (1...𝐻) ↦ if((𝑥 · 2) < (𝑃 / 2), (𝑥 · 2), (𝑃 − (𝑥 · 2))))    &   (𝜑 → 𝐴 ∈ (1...𝐻))    ⇒   (𝜑 → if((𝐴 · 2) < (𝑃 / 2), (𝐴 · 2), (𝑃 − (𝐴 · 2))) ∈ ℤ)
 
9-Aug-2025gausslemma2dlem1f1o 15760 Lemma for gausslemma2dlem1 15761. (Contributed by Jim Kingdon, 9-Aug-2025.)
(𝜑 → 𝑃 ∈ (ℙ ∖ {2}))    &   𝐻 = ((𝑃 − 1) / 2)    &   𝑅 = (𝑥 ∈ (1...𝐻) ↦ if((𝑥 · 2) < (𝑃 / 2), (𝑥 · 2), (𝑃 − (𝑥 · 2))))    ⇒   (𝜑 → 𝑅:(1...𝐻)–1-1-onto→(1...𝐻))
 
7-Aug-2025qdclt 10482 Rational < is decidable. (Contributed by Jim Kingdon, 7-Aug-2025.)
((𝐴 ∈ ℚ ∧ 𝐵 ∈ ℚ) → DECID 𝐴 < 𝐵)
 
22-Jul-2025ivthdich 15348 The intermediate value theorem implies real number dichotomy. Because real number dichotomy (also known as analytic LLPO) is a constructive taboo, this means we will be unable to prove the intermediate value theorem as stated here (although versions with additional conditions, such as ivthinc 15338 for strictly monotonic functions, can be proved).

The proof is via a function which we call the hover function and which is also described in Section 5.1 of [Bauer], p. 493. Consider any real number 𝑧. We want to show that 𝑧 ≤ 0 ∨ 0 ≤ 𝑧. Because of hovercncf 15341, hovera 15342, and hoverb 15343, we are able to apply the intermediate value theorem to get a value 𝑐 such that the hover function at 𝑐 equals 𝑧. By axltwlin 8230, 𝑐 < 1 or 0 < 𝑐, and that leads to 𝑧 ≤ 0 by hoverlt1 15344 or 0 ≤ 𝑧 by hovergt0 15345. (Contributed by Jim Kingdon and Mario Carneiro, 22-Jul-2025.)

(∀𝑓(𝑓 ∈ (ℝ–cn→ℝ) → ∀𝑎 ∈ ℝ ∀𝑏 ∈ ℝ ((𝑎 < 𝑏 ∧ (𝑓‘𝑎) < 0 ∧ 0 < (𝑓‘𝑏)) → ∃𝑥 ∈ ℝ (𝑎 < 𝑥 ∧ 𝑥 < 𝑏 ∧ (𝑓‘𝑥) = 0))) → ∀𝑟 ∈ ℝ ∀𝑠 ∈ ℝ (𝑟 ≤ 𝑠 ∨ 𝑠 ≤ 𝑟))
 
22-Jul-2025dich0 15347 Real number dichotomy stated in terms of two real numbers or a real number and zero. (Contributed by Jim Kingdon, 22-Jul-2025.)
(∀𝑧 ∈ ℝ (𝑧 ≤ 0 ∨ 0 ≤ 𝑧) ↔ ∀𝑥 ∈ ℝ ∀𝑦 ∈ ℝ (𝑥 ≤ 𝑦 ∨ 𝑦 ≤ 𝑥))
 
22-Jul-2025ivthdichlem 15346 Lemma for ivthdich 15348. The result, with a few notational conveniences. (Contributed by Jim Kingdon, 22-Jul-2025.)
𝐹 = (𝑥 ∈ ℝ ↦ sup({inf({𝑥, 0}, ℝ, < ), (𝑥 − 1)}, ℝ, < ))    &   (𝜑 → 𝑍 ∈ ℝ)    &   (𝜑 → ∀𝑓(𝑓 ∈ (ℝ–cn→ℝ) → ∀𝑎 ∈ ℝ ∀𝑏 ∈ ℝ ((𝑎 < 𝑏 ∧ (𝑓‘𝑎) < 0 ∧ 0 < (𝑓‘𝑏)) → ∃𝑥 ∈ ℝ (𝑎 < 𝑥 ∧ 𝑥 < 𝑏 ∧ (𝑓‘𝑥) = 0))))    ⇒   (𝜑 → (𝑍 ≤ 0 ∨ 0 ≤ 𝑍))
 
22-Jul-2025hovergt0 15345 The hover function evaluated at a point greater than zero. (Contributed by Jim Kingdon, 22-Jul-2025.)
𝐹 = (𝑥 ∈ ℝ ↦ sup({inf({𝑥, 0}, ℝ, < ), (𝑥 − 1)}, ℝ, < ))    ⇒   ((𝐶 ∈ ℝ ∧ 0 < 𝐶) → 0 ≤ (𝐹‘𝐶))
 
22-Jul-2025hoverlt1 15344 The hover function evaluated at a point less than one. (Contributed by Jim Kingdon, 22-Jul-2025.)
𝐹 = (𝑥 ∈ ℝ ↦ sup({inf({𝑥, 0}, ℝ, < ), (𝑥 − 1)}, ℝ, < ))    ⇒   ((𝐶 ∈ ℝ ∧ 𝐶 < 1) → (𝐹‘𝐶) ≤ 0)
 
21-Jul-2025hoverb 15343 A point at which the hover function is greater than a given value. (Contributed by Jim Kingdon, 21-Jul-2025.)
𝐹 = (𝑥 ∈ ℝ ↦ sup({inf({𝑥, 0}, ℝ, < ), (𝑥 − 1)}, ℝ, < ))    ⇒   (𝑍 ∈ ℝ → 𝑍 < (𝐹‘(𝑍 + 2)))
 
21-Jul-2025hovera 15342 A point at which the hover function is less than a given value. (Contributed by Jim Kingdon, 21-Jul-2025.)
𝐹 = (𝑥 ∈ ℝ ↦ sup({inf({𝑥, 0}, ℝ, < ), (𝑥 − 1)}, ℝ, < ))    ⇒   (𝑍 ∈ ℝ → (𝐹‘(𝑍 − 1)) < 𝑍)
 
21-Jul-2025rexeqtrrdv 2739 Substitution of equal classes into a restricted existential quantifier. (Contributed by Matthew House, 21-Jul-2025.)
(𝜑 → ∃𝑥 ∈ 𝐴 𝜓)    &   (𝜑 → 𝐵 = 𝐴)    ⇒   (𝜑 → ∃𝑥 ∈ 𝐵 𝜓)
 
21-Jul-2025raleqtrrdv 2738 Substitution of equal classes into a restricted universal quantifier. (Contributed by Matthew House, 21-Jul-2025.)
(𝜑 → ∀𝑥 ∈ 𝐴 𝜓)    &   (𝜑 → 𝐵 = 𝐴)    ⇒   (𝜑 → ∀𝑥 ∈ 𝐵 𝜓)
 
21-Jul-2025rexeqtrdv 2737 Substitution of equal classes into a restricted existential quantifier. (Contributed by Matthew House, 21-Jul-2025.)
(𝜑 → ∃𝑥 ∈ 𝐴 𝜓)    &   (𝜑 → 𝐴 = 𝐵)    ⇒   (𝜑 → ∃𝑥 ∈ 𝐵 𝜓)
 
21-Jul-2025raleqtrdv 2736 Substitution of equal classes into a restricted universal quantifier. (Contributed by Matthew House, 21-Jul-2025.)
(𝜑 → ∀𝑥 ∈ 𝐴 𝜓)    &   (𝜑 → 𝐴 = 𝐵)    ⇒   (𝜑 → ∀𝑥 ∈ 𝐵 𝜓)
 
20-Jul-2025hovercncf 15341 The hover function is continuous. By hover function, we mean a a function which starts out as a line of slope one, is constant at zero from zero to one, and then resumes as a slope of one. (Contributed by Jim Kingdon, 20-Jul-2025.)
𝐹 = (𝑥 ∈ ℝ ↦ sup({inf({𝑥, 0}, ℝ, < ), (𝑥 − 1)}, ℝ, < ))    ⇒   𝐹 ∈ (ℝ–cn→ℝ)
 
19-Jul-2025mincncf 15311 The minimum of two continuous real functions is continuous. (Contributed by Jim Kingdon, 19-Jul-2025.)
(𝜑 → (𝑥 ∈ 𝑋 ↦ 𝐴) ∈ (𝑋–cn→ℝ))    &   (𝜑 → (𝑥 ∈ 𝑋 ↦ 𝐵) ∈ (𝑋–cn→ℝ))    ⇒   (𝜑 → (𝑥 ∈ 𝑋 ↦ inf({𝐴, 𝐵}, ℝ, < )) ∈ (𝑋–cn→ℝ))
 
18-Jul-2025maxcncf 15310 The maximum of two continuous real functions is continuous. (Contributed by Jim Kingdon, 18-Jul-2025.)
(𝜑 → (𝑥 ∈ 𝑋 ↦ 𝐴) ∈ (𝑋–cn→ℝ))    &   (𝜑 → (𝑥 ∈ 𝑋 ↦ 𝐵) ∈ (𝑋–cn→ℝ))    ⇒   (𝜑 → (𝑥 ∈ 𝑋 ↦ sup({𝐴, 𝐵}, ℝ, < )) ∈ (𝑋–cn→ℝ))
 
14-Jul-2025xnn0nnen 10676 The set of extended nonnegative integers is equinumerous to the set of natural numbers. (Contributed by Jim Kingdon, 14-Jul-2025.)
ℕ0* ≈ ℕ
 
12-Jul-2025nninfninc 7306 All values beyond a zero in an ℕ∞ sequence are zero. This is another way of stating that elements of ℕ∞ are nonincreasing. (Contributed by Jim Kingdon, 12-Jul-2025.)
(𝜑 → 𝐴 ∈ ℕ∞)    &   (𝜑 → 𝑋 ∈ ω)    &   (𝜑 → 𝑌 ∈ ω)    &   (𝜑 → 𝑋 ⊆ 𝑌)    &   (𝜑 → (𝐴‘𝑋) = ∅)    ⇒   (𝜑 → (𝐴‘𝑌) = ∅)
 
10-Jul-2025nninfctlemfo 12582 Lemma for nninfct 12583. (Contributed by Jim Kingdon, 10-Jul-2025.)
𝐺 = frec((𝑥 ∈ ℤ ↦ (𝑥 + 1)), 0)    &   𝐹 = (𝑛 ∈ ω ↦ (𝑖 ∈ ω ↦ if(𝑖 ∈ 𝑛, 1o, ∅)))    &   𝐼 = ((𝐹 ∘ ◡𝐺) ∪ {⟨+∞, (ω × {1o})⟩})    ⇒   (ω ∈ Omni → 𝐼:ℕ0*–onto→ℕ∞)
 
8-Jul-2025nnnninfen 16501 Equinumerosity of the natural numbers and ℕ∞ is equivalent to the Limited Principle of Omniscience (LPO). Remark in Section 1.1 of [Pradic2025], p. 2. (Contributed by Jim Kingdon, 8-Jul-2025.)
(ω ≈ ℕ∞ ↔ ω ∈ Omni)
 
8-Jul-2025nninfct 12583 The limited principle of omniscience (LPO) implies that ℕ∞ is countable. (Contributed by Jim Kingdon, 8-Jul-2025.)
(ω ∈ Omni → ∃𝑓 𝑓:ω–onto→(ℕ∞ ⊔ 1o))
 
8-Jul-2025nninfinf 10682 ℕ∞ is infinte. (Contributed by Jim Kingdon, 8-Jul-2025.)
ω ≼ ℕ∞
 
7-Jul-2025ivthreinc 15340 Restating the intermediate value theorem. Given a hypothesis stating the intermediate value theorem (in a strong form which is not provable given our axioms alone), provide a conclusion similar to the theorem as stated in the Metamath Proof Explorer (which is also similar to how we state the theorem for a strictly monotonic function at ivthinc 15338). Being able to have a hypothesis stating the intermediate value theorem will be helpful when it comes time to show that it implies a constructive taboo. This version of the theorem requires that the function 𝐹 is continuous on the entire real line, not just (𝐴[,]𝐵) which may be an unnecessary condition but which is sufficient for the way we want to use it. (Contributed by Jim Kingdon, 7-Jul-2025.)
(𝜑 → 𝐴 ∈ ℝ)    &   (𝜑 → 𝐵 ∈ ℝ)    &   (𝜑 → 𝑈 ∈ ℝ)    &   (𝜑 → 𝐴 < 𝐵)    &   (𝜑 → 𝐹 ∈ (ℝ–cn→ℝ))    &   (𝜑 → ((𝐹‘𝐴) < 𝑈 ∧ 𝑈 < (𝐹‘𝐵)))    &   (𝜑 → ∀𝑓(𝑓 ∈ (ℝ–cn→ℝ) → ∀𝑎 ∈ ℝ ∀𝑏 ∈ ℝ ((𝑎 < 𝑏 ∧ (𝑓‘𝑎) < 0 ∧ 0 < (𝑓‘𝑏)) → ∃𝑥 ∈ ℝ (𝑎 < 𝑥 ∧ 𝑥 < 𝑏 ∧ (𝑓‘𝑥) = 0))))    ⇒   (𝜑 → ∃𝑐 ∈ (𝐴(,)𝐵)(𝐹‘𝑐) = 𝑈)
 
28-Jun-2025fngsum 13442 Iterated sum has a universal domain. (Contributed by Jim Kingdon, 28-Jun-2025.)
Σg Fn (V × V)
 
28-Jun-2025iotaexel 5968 Set existence of an iota expression in which all values are contained within a set. (Contributed by Jim Kingdon, 28-Jun-2025.)
((𝐴 ∈ 𝑉 ∧ ∀𝑥(𝜑 → 𝑥 ∈ 𝐴)) → (℩𝑥𝜑) ∈ V)
 
27-Jun-2025df-igsum 13313 Define a finite group sum (also called "iterated sum") of a structure.

Given 𝐺 Σg 𝐹 where 𝐹:𝐴⟶(Base‘𝐺), the set of indices is 𝐴 and the values are given by 𝐹 at each index. A group sum over a multiplicative group may be viewed as a product. The definition is meaningful in different contexts, depending on the size of the index set 𝐴 and each demanding different properties of 𝐺.

1. If 𝐴 = ∅ and 𝐺 has an identity element, then the sum equals this identity.

2. If 𝐴 = (𝑀...𝑁) and 𝐺 is any magma, then the sum is the sum of the elements, evaluated left-to-right, i.e., ((𝐹‘1) + (𝐹‘2)) + (𝐹‘3), etc.

3. This definition does not handle other cases.

(Contributed by FL, 5-Sep-2010.) (Revised by Mario Carneiro, 7-Dec-2014.) (Revised by Jim Kingdon, 27-Jun-2025.)

Σg = (𝑤 ∈ V, 𝑓 ∈ V ↦ (℩𝑥((dom 𝑓 = ∅ ∧ 𝑥 = (0g‘𝑤)) ∨ ∃𝑚∃𝑛 ∈ (ℤ≥‘𝑚)(dom 𝑓 = (𝑚...𝑛) ∧ 𝑥 = (seq𝑚((+g‘𝑤), 𝑓)‘𝑛)))))
 
20-Jun-2025opprnzrbg 14170 The opposite of a nonzero ring is nonzero, bidirectional form of opprnzr 14171. (Contributed by SN, 20-Jun-2025.)
𝑂 = (oppr‘𝑅)    ⇒   (𝑅 ∈ 𝑉 → (𝑅 ∈ NzRing ↔ 𝑂 ∈ NzRing))
 
16-Jun-2025fnpsr 14652 The multivariate power series constructor has a universal domain. (Contributed by Jim Kingdon, 16-Jun-2025.)
mPwSer Fn (V × V)
 
14-Jun-2025basm 13115 A structure whose base is inhabited is inhabited. (Contributed by Jim Kingdon, 14-Jun-2025.)
𝐵 = (Base‘𝐺)    ⇒   (𝐴 ∈ 𝐵 → ∃𝑗 𝑗 ∈ 𝐺)
 
14-Jun-2025elfvm 5665 If a function value has a member, the function is inhabited. (Contributed by Jim Kingdon, 14-Jun-2025.)
(𝐴 ∈ (𝐹‘𝐵) → ∃𝑗 𝑗 ∈ 𝐹)
 
6-Jun-2025pcxqcl 12856 The general prime count function is an integer or infinite. (Contributed by Jim Kingdon, 6-Jun-2025.)
((𝑃 ∈ ℙ ∧ 𝑁 ∈ ℚ) → ((𝑃 pCnt 𝑁) ∈ ℤ ∨ (𝑃 pCnt 𝑁) = +∞))
 
5-Jun-2025xqltnle 10504 "Less than" expressed in terms of "less than or equal to", for extended numbers which are rational or +∞. We have not yet had enough usage of such numbers to warrant fully developing the concept, as in ℕ0* or ℝ*, so for now we just have a handful of theorems for what we need. (Contributed by Jim Kingdon, 5-Jun-2025.)
(((𝐴 ∈ ℚ ∨ 𝐴 = +∞) ∧ (𝐵 ∈ ℚ ∨ 𝐵 = +∞)) → (𝐴 < 𝐵 ↔ ¬ 𝐵 ≤ 𝐴))
 
5-Jun-2025ceqsexv2d 2840 Elimination of an existential quantifier, using implicit substitution. (Contributed by Thierry Arnoux, 10-Sep-2016.) Shorten, reduce dv conditions. (Revised by Wolf Lammen, 5-Jun-2025.) (Proof shortened by SN, 5-Jun-2025.)
𝐴 ∈ V    &   (𝑥 = 𝐴 → (𝜑 ↔ 𝜓))    &   𝜓    ⇒   ∃𝑥𝜑
 
31-May-2025vtocl4ga 2873 Implicit substitution of 4 classes for 4 setvar variables. (Contributed by AV, 22-Jan-2019.) (Proof shortened by Wolf Lammen, 31-May-2025.)
(𝑥 = 𝐴 → (𝜑 ↔ 𝜓))    &   (𝑦 = 𝐵 → (𝜓 ↔ 𝜒))    &   (𝑧 = 𝐶 → (𝜒 ↔ 𝜌))    &   (𝑤 = 𝐷 → (𝜌 ↔ 𝜃))    &   (((𝑥 ∈ 𝑄 ∧ 𝑦 ∈ 𝑅) ∧ (𝑧 ∈ 𝑆 ∧ 𝑤 ∈ 𝑇)) → 𝜑)    ⇒   (((𝐴 ∈ 𝑄 ∧ 𝐵 ∈ 𝑅) ∧ (𝐶 ∈ 𝑆 ∧ 𝐷 ∈ 𝑇)) → 𝜃)
 
30-May-20254sqexercise2 12943 Exercise which may help in understanding the proof of 4sqlemsdc 12944. (Contributed by Jim Kingdon, 30-May-2025.)
𝑆 = {𝑛 ∣ ∃𝑥 ∈ ℤ ∃𝑦 ∈ ℤ 𝑛 = ((𝑥↑2) + (𝑦↑2))}    ⇒   (𝐴 ∈ ℕ0 → DECID 𝐴 ∈ 𝑆)
 
27-May-2025iotaexab 5300 Existence of the ℩ class when all the possible values are contained in a set. (Contributed by Jim Kingdon, 27-May-2025.)
({𝑥 ∣ 𝜑} ∈ 𝑉 → (℩𝑥𝜑) ∈ V)
 
25-May-20254sqlemsdc 12944 Lemma for 4sq 12954. The property of being the sum of four squares is decidable.

The proof involves showing that (for a particular 𝐴) there are only a finite number of possible ways that it could be the sum of four squares, so checking each of those possibilities in turn decides whether the number is the sum of four squares. If this proof is hard to follow, especially because of its length, the simplified versions at 4sqexercise1 12942 and 4sqexercise2 12943 may help clarify, as they are using very much the same techniques on simplified versions of this lemma. (Contributed by Jim Kingdon, 25-May-2025.)

𝑆 = {𝑛 ∣ ∃𝑥 ∈ ℤ ∃𝑦 ∈ ℤ ∃𝑧 ∈ ℤ ∃𝑤 ∈ ℤ 𝑛 = (((𝑥↑2) + (𝑦↑2)) + ((𝑧↑2) + (𝑤↑2)))}    ⇒   (𝐴 ∈ ℕ0 → DECID 𝐴 ∈ 𝑆)
 
25-May-20254sqexercise1 12942 Exercise which may help in understanding the proof of 4sqlemsdc 12944. (Contributed by Jim Kingdon, 25-May-2025.)
𝑆 = {𝑛 ∣ ∃𝑥 ∈ ℤ 𝑛 = (𝑥↑2)}    ⇒   (𝐴 ∈ ℕ0 → DECID 𝐴 ∈ 𝑆)
 
24-May-20254sqleminfi 12941 Lemma for 4sq 12954. 𝐴 ∩ ran 𝐹 is finite. (Contributed by Jim Kingdon, 24-May-2025.)
(𝜑 → 𝑁 ∈ ℕ)    &   (𝜑 → 𝑃 ∈ ℕ)    &   𝐴 = {𝑢 ∣ ∃𝑚 ∈ (0...𝑁)𝑢 = ((𝑚↑2) mod 𝑃)}    &   𝐹 = (𝑣 ∈ 𝐴 ↦ ((𝑃 − 1) − 𝑣))    ⇒   (𝜑 → (𝐴 ∩ ran 𝐹) ∈ Fin)
 
24-May-20254sqlemffi 12940 Lemma for 4sq 12954. ran 𝐹 is finite. (Contributed by Jim Kingdon, 24-May-2025.)
(𝜑 → 𝑁 ∈ ℕ)    &   (𝜑 → 𝑃 ∈ ℕ)    &   𝐴 = {𝑢 ∣ ∃𝑚 ∈ (0...𝑁)𝑢 = ((𝑚↑2) mod 𝑃)}    &   𝐹 = (𝑣 ∈ 𝐴 ↦ ((𝑃 − 1) − 𝑣))    ⇒   (𝜑 → ran 𝐹 ∈ Fin)
 
24-May-20254sqlemafi 12939 Lemma for 4sq 12954. 𝐴 is finite. (Contributed by Jim Kingdon, 24-May-2025.)
(𝜑 → 𝑁 ∈ ℕ)    &   (𝜑 → 𝑃 ∈ ℕ)    &   𝐴 = {𝑢 ∣ ∃𝑚 ∈ (0...𝑁)𝑢 = ((𝑚↑2) mod 𝑃)}    ⇒   (𝜑 → 𝐴 ∈ Fin)
 
24-May-2025infidc 7117 The intersection of two sets is finite if one of them is and the other is decidable. (Contributed by Jim Kingdon, 24-May-2025.)
((𝐴 ∈ Fin ∧ ∀𝑥 ∈ 𝐴 DECID 𝑥 ∈ 𝐵) → (𝐴 ∩ 𝐵) ∈ Fin)
 
19-May-2025zrhex 14606 Set existence for ℤRHom. (Contributed by Jim Kingdon, 19-May-2025.)
𝐿 = (ℤRHom‘𝑅)    ⇒   (𝑅 ∈ 𝑉 → 𝐿 ∈ V)
 
16-May-2025rhmex 14142 Set existence for ring homomorphism. (Contributed by Jim Kingdon, 16-May-2025.)
((𝑅 ∈ 𝑉 ∧ 𝑆 ∈ 𝑊) → (𝑅 RingHom 𝑆) ∈ V)
 
15-May-2025ghmex 13813 The set of group homomorphisms exists. (Contributed by Jim Kingdon, 15-May-2025.)
((𝑆 ∈ Grp ∧ 𝑇 ∈ Grp) → (𝑆 GrpHom 𝑇) ∈ V)
 
15-May-2025mhmex 13516 The set of monoid homomorphisms exists. (Contributed by Jim Kingdon, 15-May-2025.)
((𝑆 ∈ Mnd ∧ 𝑇 ∈ Mnd) → (𝑆 MndHom 𝑇) ∈ V)
 
14-May-2025idomcringd 14263 An integral domain is a commutative ring with unity. (Contributed by Thierry Arnoux, 4-May-2025.) (Proof shortened by SN, 14-May-2025.)
(𝜑 → 𝑅 ∈ IDomn)    ⇒   (𝜑 → 𝑅 ∈ CRing)
 
6-May-2025rrgnz 14253 In a nonzero ring, the zero is a left zero divisor (that is, not a left-regular element). (Contributed by Thierry Arnoux, 6-May-2025.)
𝐸 = (RLReg‘𝑅)    &    0 = (0g‘𝑅)    ⇒   (𝑅 ∈ NzRing → ¬ 0 ∈ 𝐸)
 
5-May-2025rngressid 13938 A non-unital ring restricted to its base set is a non-unital ring. It will usually be the original non-unital ring exactly, of course, but to show that needs additional conditions such as those in strressid 13125. (Contributed by Jim Kingdon, 5-May-2025.)
𝐵 = (Base‘𝐺)    ⇒   (𝐺 ∈ Rng → (𝐺 ↾s 𝐵) ∈ Rng)
 
5-May-2025ablressid 13893 A commutative group restricted to its base set is a commutative group. It will usually be the original group exactly, of course, but to show that needs additional conditions such as those in strressid 13125. (Contributed by Jim Kingdon, 5-May-2025.)
𝐵 = (Base‘𝐺)    ⇒   (𝐺 ∈ Abel → (𝐺 ↾s 𝐵) ∈ Abel)
 
30-Apr-2025dvply2g 15461 The derivative of a polynomial with coefficients in a subring is a polynomial with coefficients in the same ring. (Contributed by Mario Carneiro, 1-Jan-2017.) (Revised by GG, 30-Apr-2025.)
((𝑆 ∈ (SubRing‘ℂfld) ∧ 𝐹 ∈ (Poly‘𝑆)) → (ℂ D 𝐹) ∈ (Poly‘𝑆))
 
29-Apr-2025rlmscabas 14445 Scalars in the ring module have the same base set. (Contributed by Jim Kingdon, 29-Apr-2025.)
(𝑅 ∈ 𝑋 → (Base‘𝑅) = (Base‘(Scalar‘(ringLMod‘𝑅))))
 
29-Apr-2025ressbasid 13124 The trivial structure restriction leaves the base set unchanged. (Contributed by Jim Kingdon, 29-Apr-2025.)
𝐵 = (Base‘𝑊)    ⇒   (𝑊 ∈ 𝑉 → (Base‘(𝑊 ↾s 𝐵)) = 𝐵)
 
28-Apr-2025lssmex 14340 If a linear subspace is inhabited, the class it is built from is a set. (Contributed by Jim Kingdon, 28-Apr-2025.)
𝑆 = (LSubSp‘𝑊)    ⇒   (𝑈 ∈ 𝑆 → 𝑊 ∈ V)
 
27-Apr-2025cnfldmul 14549 The multiplication operation of the field of complex numbers. (Contributed by Stefan O'Rear, 27-Nov-2014.) (Revised by Mario Carneiro, 6-Oct-2015.) (Revised by Thierry Arnoux, 17-Dec-2017.) (Revised by GG, 27-Apr-2025.)
· = (.r‘ℂfld)
 
27-Apr-2025cnfldadd 14547 The addition operation of the field of complex numbers. (Contributed by Stefan O'Rear, 27-Nov-2014.) (Revised by Mario Carneiro, 6-Oct-2015.) (Revised by Thierry Arnoux, 17-Dec-2017.) (Revised by GG, 27-Apr-2025.)
+ = (+g‘ℂfld)
 
27-Apr-2025lidlex 14458 Existence of the set of left ideals. (Contributed by Jim Kingdon, 27-Apr-2025.)
(𝑊 ∈ 𝑉 → (LIdeal‘𝑊) ∈ V)
 
27-Apr-2025lssex 14339 Existence of a linear subspace. (Contributed by Jim Kingdon, 27-Apr-2025.)
(𝑊 ∈ 𝑉 → (LSubSp‘𝑊) ∈ V)
 
25-Apr-2025rspex 14459 Existence of the ring span. (Contributed by Jim Kingdon, 25-Apr-2025.)
(𝑊 ∈ 𝑉 → (RSpan‘𝑊) ∈ V)
 
25-Apr-2025lspex 14380 Existence of the span of a set of vectors. (Contributed by Jim Kingdon, 25-Apr-2025.)
(𝑊 ∈ 𝑋 → (LSpan‘𝑊) ∈ V)
 
25-Apr-2025eqgex 13779 The left coset equivalence relation exists. (Contributed by Jim Kingdon, 25-Apr-2025.)
((𝐺 ∈ 𝑉 ∧ 𝑆 ∈ 𝑊) → (𝐺 ~QG 𝑆) ∈ V)
 
25-Apr-2025qusex 13379 Existence of a quotient structure. (Contributed by Jim Kingdon, 25-Apr-2025.)
((𝑅 ∈ 𝑉 ∧ ∼ ∈ 𝑊) → (𝑅 /s ∼ ) ∈ V)
 
23-Apr-20251dom1el 16463 If a set is dominated by one, then any two of its elements are equal. (Contributed by Jim Kingdon, 23-Apr-2025.)
((𝐴 ≼ 1o ∧ 𝐵 ∈ 𝐴 ∧ 𝐶 ∈ 𝐴) → 𝐵 = 𝐶)
 
22-Apr-2025mulgex 13681 Existence of the group multiple operation. (Contributed by Jim Kingdon, 22-Apr-2025.)
(𝐺 ∈ 𝑉 → (.g‘𝐺) ∈ V)
 
21-Apr-2025uspgruhgr 16006 An undirected simple pseudograph is an undirected hypergraph. (Contributed by AV, 21-Apr-2025.)
(𝐺 ∈ USPGraph → 𝐺 ∈ UHGraph)
 
20-Apr-2025uspgriedgedg 15998 In a simple pseudograph, for each indexed edge there is exactly one edge. (Contributed by AV, 20-Apr-2025.)
𝐸 = (Edg‘𝐺)    &   𝐼 = (iEdg‘𝐺)    ⇒   ((𝐺 ∈ USPGraph ∧ 𝑋 ∈ dom 𝐼) → ∃!𝑘 ∈ 𝐸 𝑘 = (𝐼‘𝑋))
 
20-Apr-2025uspgredgiedg 15997 In a simple pseudograph, for each edge there is exactly one indexed edge. (Contributed by AV, 20-Apr-2025.)
𝐸 = (Edg‘𝐺)    &   𝐼 = (iEdg‘𝐺)    ⇒   ((𝐺 ∈ USPGraph ∧ 𝐾 ∈ 𝐸) → ∃!𝑥 ∈ dom 𝐼 𝐾 = (𝐼‘𝑥))
 
20-Apr-2025elovmpod 6212 Utility lemma for two-parameter classes. (Contributed by Stefan O'Rear, 21-Jan-2015.) Variant of elovmpo 6213 in deduction form. (Revised by AV, 20-Apr-2025.)
𝑂 = (𝑎 ∈ 𝐴, 𝑏 ∈ 𝐵 ↦ 𝐶)    &   (𝜑 → 𝑋 ∈ 𝐴)    &   (𝜑 → 𝑌 ∈ 𝐵)    &   (𝜑 → 𝐷 ∈ 𝑉)    &   ((𝑎 = 𝑋 ∧ 𝑏 = 𝑌) → 𝐶 = 𝐷)    ⇒   (𝜑 → (𝐸 ∈ (𝑋𝑂𝑌) ↔ 𝐸 ∈ 𝐷))
 
20-Apr-2025fdmeu 5682 There is exactly one codomain element for each element of the domain of a function. (Contributed by AV, 20-Apr-2025.)
((𝐹:𝐴⟶𝐵 ∧ 𝑋 ∈ 𝐴) → ∃!𝑦 ∈ 𝐵 (𝐹‘𝑋) = 𝑦)
 
18-Apr-2025fsumdvdsmul 15686 Product of two divisor sums. (This is also the main part of the proof that "Σ𝑘 ∥ 𝑁𝐹(𝑘) is a multiplicative function if 𝐹 is".) (Contributed by Mario Carneiro, 2-Jul-2015.) Avoid ax-mulf 8138. (Revised by GG, 18-Apr-2025.)
(𝜑 → 𝑀 ∈ ℕ)    &   (𝜑 → 𝑁 ∈ ℕ)    &   (𝜑 → (𝑀 gcd 𝑁) = 1)    &   𝑋 = {𝑥 ∈ ℕ ∣ 𝑥 ∥ 𝑀}    &   𝑌 = {𝑥 ∈ ℕ ∣ 𝑥 ∥ 𝑁}    &   𝑍 = {𝑥 ∈ ℕ ∣ 𝑥 ∥ (𝑀 · 𝑁)}    &   ((𝜑 ∧ 𝑗 ∈ 𝑋) → 𝐴 ∈ ℂ)    &   ((𝜑 ∧ 𝑘 ∈ 𝑌) → 𝐵 ∈ ℂ)    &   ((𝜑 ∧ (𝑗 ∈ 𝑋 ∧ 𝑘 ∈ 𝑌)) → (𝐴 · 𝐵) = 𝐷)    &   (𝑖 = (𝑗 · 𝑘) → 𝐶 = 𝐷)    ⇒   (𝜑 → (Σ𝑗 ∈ 𝑋 𝐴 · Σ𝑘 ∈ 𝑌 𝐵) = Σ𝑖 ∈ 𝑍 𝐶)
 
18-Apr-2025mpodvdsmulf1o 15685 If 𝑀 and 𝑁 are two coprime integers, multiplication forms a bijection from the set of pairs ⟨𝑗, 𝑘⟩ where 𝑗 ∥ 𝑀 and 𝑘 ∥ 𝑁, to the set of divisors of 𝑀 · 𝑁. (Contributed by GG, 18-Apr-2025.)
(𝜑 → 𝑀 ∈ ℕ)    &   (𝜑 → 𝑁 ∈ ℕ)    &   (𝜑 → (𝑀 gcd 𝑁) = 1)    &   𝑋 = {𝑥 ∈ ℕ ∣ 𝑥 ∥ 𝑀}    &   𝑌 = {𝑥 ∈ ℕ ∣ 𝑥 ∥ 𝑁}    &   𝑍 = {𝑥 ∈ ℕ ∣ 𝑥 ∥ (𝑀 · 𝑁)}    ⇒   (𝜑 → ((𝑥 ∈ ℂ, 𝑦 ∈ ℂ ↦ (𝑥 · 𝑦)) ↾ (𝑋 × 𝑌)):(𝑋 × 𝑌)–1-1-onto→𝑍)
 
18-Apr-2025df2idl2 14494 Alternate (the usual textbook) definition of a two-sided ideal of a ring to be a subgroup of the additive group of the ring which is closed under left- and right-multiplication by elements of the full ring. (Contributed by AV, 13-Feb-2025.) (Proof shortened by AV, 18-Apr-2025.)
𝑈 = (2Ideal‘𝑅)    &   𝐵 = (Base‘𝑅)    &    · = (.r‘𝑅)    ⇒   (𝑅 ∈ Ring → (𝐼 ∈ 𝑈 ↔ (𝐼 ∈ (SubGrp‘𝑅) ∧ ∀𝑥 ∈ 𝐵 ∀𝑦 ∈ 𝐼 ((𝑥 · 𝑦) ∈ 𝐼 ∧ (𝑦 · 𝑥) ∈ 𝐼))))
 
18-Apr-20252idlmex 14486 Existence of the set a two-sided ideal is built from (when the ideal is inhabited). (Contributed by Jim Kingdon, 18-Apr-2025.)
𝑇 = (2Ideal‘𝑊)    ⇒   (𝑈 ∈ 𝑇 → 𝑊 ∈ V)
 
18-Apr-2025dflidl2 14473 Alternate (the usual textbook) definition of a (left) ideal of a ring to be a subgroup of the additive group of the ring which is closed under left-multiplication by elements of the full ring. (Contributed by AV, 13-Feb-2025.) (Proof shortened by AV, 18-Apr-2025.)
𝑈 = (LIdeal‘𝑅)    &   𝐵 = (Base‘𝑅)    &    · = (.r‘𝑅)    ⇒   (𝑅 ∈ Ring → (𝐼 ∈ 𝑈 ↔ (𝐼 ∈ (SubGrp‘𝑅) ∧ ∀𝑥 ∈ 𝐵 ∀𝑦 ∈ 𝐼 (𝑥 · 𝑦) ∈ 𝐼)))
 
18-Apr-2025lidlmex 14460 Existence of the set a left ideal is built from (when the ideal is inhabited). (Contributed by Jim Kingdon, 18-Apr-2025.)
𝐼 = (LIdeal‘𝑊)    ⇒   (𝑈 ∈ 𝐼 → 𝑊 ∈ V)
 
18-Apr-2025lsslsp 14414 Spans in submodules correspond to spans in the containing module. (Contributed by Stefan O'Rear, 12-Dec-2014.) Terms in the equation were swapped as proposed by NM on 15-Mar-2015. (Revised by AV, 18-Apr-2025.)
𝑋 = (𝑊 ↾s 𝑈)    &   𝑀 = (LSpan‘𝑊)    &   𝑁 = (LSpan‘𝑋)    &   𝐿 = (LSubSp‘𝑊)    ⇒   ((𝑊 ∈ LMod ∧ 𝑈 ∈ 𝐿 ∧ 𝐺 ⊆ 𝑈) → (𝑁‘𝐺) = (𝑀‘𝐺))
 
16-Apr-2025sraex 14431 Existence of a subring algebra. (Contributed by Jim Kingdon, 16-Apr-2025.)
(𝜑 → 𝐴 = ((subringAlg ‘𝑊)‘𝑆))    &   (𝜑 → 𝑆 ⊆ (Base‘𝑊))    &   (𝜑 → 𝑊 ∈ 𝑋)    ⇒   (𝜑 → 𝐴 ∈ V)
 
14-Apr-2025grpmgmd 13580 A group is a magma, deduction form. (Contributed by SN, 14-Apr-2025.)
(𝜑 → 𝐺 ∈ Grp)    ⇒   (𝜑 → 𝐺 ∈ Mgm)
 
12-Apr-2025psraddcl 14665 Closure of the power series addition operation. (Contributed by Mario Carneiro, 28-Dec-2014.) Generalize to magmas. (Revised by SN, 12-Apr-2025.)
𝑆 = (𝐼 mPwSer 𝑅)    &   𝐵 = (Base‘𝑆)    &    + = (+g‘𝑆)    &   (𝜑 → 𝑅 ∈ Mgm)    &   (𝜑 → 𝑋 ∈ 𝐵)    &   (𝜑 → 𝑌 ∈ 𝐵)    ⇒   (𝜑 → (𝑋 + 𝑌) ∈ 𝐵)
 
10-Apr-2025cndcap 16541 Real number trichotomy is equivalent to decidability of complex number apartness. (Contributed by Jim Kingdon, 10-Apr-2025.)
(∀𝑥 ∈ ℝ ∀𝑦 ∈ ℝ (𝑥 < 𝑦 ∨ 𝑥 = 𝑦 ∨ 𝑦 < 𝑥) ↔ ∀𝑧 ∈ ℂ ∀𝑤 ∈ ℂ DECID 𝑧 # 𝑤)
 
4-Apr-2025ghmf1 13831 Two ways of saying a group homomorphism is 1-1 into its codomain. (Contributed by Paul Chapman, 3-Mar-2008.) (Revised by Mario Carneiro, 13-Jan-2015.) (Proof shortened by AV, 4-Apr-2025.)
𝐴 = (Base‘𝑅)    &   𝐵 = (Base‘𝑆)    &   𝑁 = (0g‘𝑅)    &    0 = (0g‘𝑆)    ⇒   (𝐹 ∈ (𝑅 GrpHom 𝑆) → (𝐹:𝐴–1-1→𝐵 ↔ ∀𝑥 ∈ 𝐴 ((𝐹‘𝑥) = 0 → 𝑥 = 𝑁)))
 
3-Apr-2025quscrng 14518 The quotient of a commutative ring by an ideal is a commutative ring. (Contributed by Mario Carneiro, 15-Jun-2015.) (Proof shortened by AV, 3-Apr-2025.)
𝑈 = (𝑅 /s (𝑅 ~QG 𝑆))    &   𝐼 = (LIdeal‘𝑅)    ⇒   ((𝑅 ∈ CRing ∧ 𝑆 ∈ 𝐼) → 𝑈 ∈ CRing)
 
31-Mar-2025cnfldds 14553 The metric of the field of complex numbers. (Contributed by Mario Carneiro, 14-Aug-2015.) (Revised by Mario Carneiro, 6-Oct-2015.) (Revised by Thierry Arnoux, 17-Dec-2017.) Revise df-cnfld 14542. (Revised by GG, 31-Mar-2025.)
(abs ∘ − ) = (dist‘ℂfld)
 
31-Mar-2025cnfldle 14552 The ordering of the field of complex numbers. Note that this is not actually an ordering on ℂ, but we put it in the structure anyway because restricting to ℝ does not affect this component, so that (ℂfld ↾s ℝ) is an ordered field even though ℂfld itself is not. (Contributed by Mario Carneiro, 14-Aug-2015.) (Revised by Mario Carneiro, 6-Oct-2015.) (Revised by Thierry Arnoux, 17-Dec-2017.) Revise df-cnfld 14542. (Revised by GG, 31-Mar-2025.)
≤ = (le‘ℂfld)
 
31-Mar-2025cnfldtset 14551 The topology component of the field of complex numbers. (Contributed by Mario Carneiro, 14-Aug-2015.) (Revised by Mario Carneiro, 6-Oct-2015.) (Revised by Thierry Arnoux, 17-Dec-2017.) (Revised by GG, 31-Mar-2025.)
(MetOpen‘(abs ∘ − )) = (TopSet‘ℂfld)
 
31-Mar-2025mpocnfldmul 14548 The multiplication operation of the field of complex numbers. Version of cnfldmul 14549 using maps-to notation, which does not require ax-mulf 8138. (Contributed by GG, 31-Mar-2025.)
(𝑥 ∈ ℂ, 𝑦 ∈ ℂ ↦ (𝑥 · 𝑦)) = (.r‘ℂfld)
 
31-Mar-2025mpocnfldadd 14546 The addition operation of the field of complex numbers. Version of cnfldadd 14547 using maps-to notation, which does not require ax-addf 8137. (Contributed by GG, 31-Mar-2025.)
(𝑥 ∈ ℂ, 𝑦 ∈ ℂ ↦ (𝑥 + 𝑦)) = (+g‘ℂfld)
 
31-Mar-2025df-cnfld 14542 The field of complex numbers. Other number fields and rings can be constructed by applying the ↾s restriction operator.

The contract of this set is defined entirely by cnfldex 14544, cnfldadd 14547, cnfldmul 14549, cnfldcj 14550, cnfldtset 14551, cnfldle 14552, cnfldds 14553, and cnfldbas 14545. We may add additional members to this in the future. (Contributed by Stefan O'Rear, 27-Nov-2014.) (Revised by Thierry Arnoux, 15-Dec-2017.) Use maps-to notation for addition and multiplication. (Revised by GG, 31-Mar-2025.) (New usage is discouraged.)

ℂfld = (({⟨(Base‘ndx), ℂ⟩, ⟨(+g‘ndx), (𝑥 ∈ ℂ, 𝑦 ∈ ℂ ↦ (𝑥 + 𝑦))⟩, ⟨(.r‘ndx), (𝑥 ∈ ℂ, 𝑦 ∈ ℂ ↦ (𝑥 · 𝑦))⟩} ∪ {⟨(*𝑟‘ndx), ∗⟩}) ∪ ({⟨(TopSet‘ndx), (MetOpen‘(abs ∘ − ))⟩, ⟨(le‘ndx), ≤ ⟩, ⟨(dist‘ndx), (abs ∘ − )⟩} ∪ {⟨(UnifSet‘ndx), (metUnif‘(abs ∘ − ))⟩}))
 
31-Mar-20252idlcpbl 14509 The coset equivalence relation for a two-sided ideal is compatible with ring multiplication. (Contributed by Mario Carneiro, 14-Jun-2015.) (Proof shortened by AV, 31-Mar-2025.)
𝑋 = (Base‘𝑅)    &   𝐸 = (𝑅 ~QG 𝑆)    &   𝐼 = (2Ideal‘𝑅)    &    · = (.r‘𝑅)    ⇒   ((𝑅 ∈ Ring ∧ 𝑆 ∈ 𝐼) → ((𝐴𝐸𝐶 ∧ 𝐵𝐸𝐷) → (𝐴 · 𝐵)𝐸(𝐶 · 𝐷)))
 
22-Mar-2025idomringd 14264 An integral domain is a ring. (Contributed by Thierry Arnoux, 22-Mar-2025.)
(𝜑 → 𝑅 ∈ IDomn)    ⇒   (𝜑 → 𝑅 ∈ Ring)
 
22-Mar-2025idomdomd 14262 An integral domain is a domain. (Contributed by Thierry Arnoux, 22-Mar-2025.)
(𝜑 → 𝑅 ∈ IDomn)    ⇒   (𝜑 → 𝑅 ∈ Domn)
 
21-Mar-2025df2idl2rng 14493 Alternate (the usual textbook) definition of a two-sided ideal of a non-unital ring to be a subgroup of the additive group of the ring which is closed under left- and right-multiplication by elements of the full ring. (Contributed by AV, 21-Mar-2025.)
𝑈 = (2Ideal‘𝑅)    &   𝐵 = (Base‘𝑅)    &    · = (.r‘𝑅)    ⇒   ((𝑅 ∈ Rng ∧ 𝐼 ∈ (SubGrp‘𝑅)) → (𝐼 ∈ 𝑈 ↔ ∀𝑥 ∈ 𝐵 ∀𝑦 ∈ 𝐼 ((𝑥 · 𝑦) ∈ 𝐼 ∧ (𝑦 · 𝑥) ∈ 𝐼)))
 
21-Mar-2025isridlrng 14467 A right ideal is a left ideal of the opposite non-unital ring. This theorem shows that this definition corresponds to the usual textbook definition of a right ideal of a ring to be a subgroup of the additive group of the ring which is closed under right-multiplication by elements of the full ring. (Contributed by AV, 21-Mar-2025.)
𝑈 = (LIdeal‘(oppr‘𝑅))    &   𝐵 = (Base‘𝑅)    &    · = (.r‘𝑅)    ⇒   ((𝑅 ∈ Rng ∧ 𝐼 ∈ (SubGrp‘𝑅)) → (𝐼 ∈ 𝑈 ↔ ∀𝑥 ∈ 𝐵 ∀𝑦 ∈ 𝐼 (𝑦 · 𝑥) ∈ 𝐼))
 
21-Mar-2025dflidl2rng 14466 Alternate (the usual textbook) definition of a (left) ideal of a non-unital ring to be a subgroup of the additive group of the ring which is closed under left-multiplication by elements of the full ring. (Contributed by AV, 21-Mar-2025.)
𝑈 = (LIdeal‘𝑅)    &   𝐵 = (Base‘𝑅)    &    · = (.r‘𝑅)    ⇒   ((𝑅 ∈ Rng ∧ 𝐼 ∈ (SubGrp‘𝑅)) → (𝐼 ∈ 𝑈 ↔ ∀𝑥 ∈ 𝐵 ∀𝑦 ∈ 𝐼 (𝑥 · 𝑦) ∈ 𝐼))
 
20-Mar-2025ccoslid 13292 Slot property of comp. (Contributed by Jim Kingdon, 20-Mar-2025.)
(comp = Slot (comp‘ndx) ∧ (comp‘ndx) ∈ ℕ)
 
20-Mar-2025homslid 13289 Slot property of Hom. (Contributed by Jim Kingdon, 20-Mar-2025.)
(Hom = Slot (Hom ‘ndx) ∧ (Hom ‘ndx) ∈ ℕ)
 
19-Mar-2025ptex 13318 Existence of the product topology. (Contributed by Jim Kingdon, 19-Mar-2025.)
(𝐹 ∈ 𝑉 → (∏t‘𝐹) ∈ V)
 
18-Mar-2025prdsex 13323 Existence of the structure product. (Contributed by Jim Kingdon, 18-Mar-2025.)
((𝑆 ∈ 𝑉 ∧ 𝑅 ∈ 𝑊) → (𝑆Xs𝑅) ∈ V)
 
16-Mar-2025plycn 15457 A polynomial is a continuous function. (Contributed by Mario Carneiro, 23-Jul-2014.) Avoid ax-mulf 8138. (Revised by GG, 16-Mar-2025.)
(𝐹 ∈ (Poly‘𝑆) → 𝐹 ∈ (ℂ–cn→ℂ))
 
16-Mar-2025expcn 15264 The power function on complex numbers, for fixed exponent 𝑁, is continuous. (Contributed by Mario Carneiro, 5-May-2014.) (Revised by Mario Carneiro, 23-Aug-2014.) Avoid ax-mulf 8138. (Revised by GG, 16-Mar-2025.)
𝐽 = (TopOpen‘ℂfld)    ⇒   (𝑁 ∈ ℕ0 → (𝑥 ∈ ℂ ↦ (𝑥↑𝑁)) ∈ (𝐽 Cn 𝐽))
 
16-Mar-2025mpomulcn 15261 Complex number multiplication is a continuous function. (Contributed by GG, 16-Mar-2025.)
𝐽 = (TopOpen‘ℂfld)    ⇒   (𝑥 ∈ ℂ, 𝑦 ∈ ℂ ↦ (𝑥 · 𝑦)) ∈ ((𝐽 ×t 𝐽) Cn 𝐽)
 
16-Mar-2025mpomulf 8152 Multiplication is an operation on complex numbers. Version of ax-mulf 8138 using maps-to notation, proved from the axioms of set theory and ax-mulcl 8113. (Contributed by GG, 16-Mar-2025.)
(𝑥 ∈ ℂ, 𝑦 ∈ ℂ ↦ (𝑥 · 𝑦)):(ℂ × ℂ)⟶ℂ
 
13-Mar-20252idlss 14499 A two-sided ideal is a subset of the base set. (Contributed by Mario Carneiro, 14-Jun-2015.) (Revised by AV, 20-Feb-2025.) (Proof shortened by AV, 13-Mar-2025.)
𝐵 = (Base‘𝑊)    &   𝐼 = (2Ideal‘𝑊)    ⇒   (𝑈 ∈ 𝐼 → 𝑈 ⊆ 𝐵)
 
13-Mar-2025imasex 13359 Existence of the image structure. (Contributed by Jim Kingdon, 13-Mar-2025.)
((𝐹 ∈ 𝑉 ∧ 𝑅 ∈ 𝑊) → (𝐹 “s 𝑅) ∈ V)
 
11-Mar-2025rng2idlsubgsubrng 14505 A two-sided ideal of a non-unital ring which is a subgroup of the ring is a subring of the ring. (Contributed by AV, 11-Mar-2025.)
(𝜑 → 𝑅 ∈ Rng)    &   (𝜑 → 𝐼 ∈ (2Ideal‘𝑅))    &   (𝜑 → 𝐼 ∈ (SubGrp‘𝑅))    ⇒   (𝜑 → 𝐼 ∈ (SubRng‘𝑅))
 
11-Mar-2025rng2idlsubrng 14502 A two-sided ideal of a non-unital ring which is a non-unital ring is a subring of the ring. (Contributed by AV, 20-Feb-2025.) (Revised by AV, 11-Mar-2025.)
(𝜑 → 𝑅 ∈ Rng)    &   (𝜑 → 𝐼 ∈ (2Ideal‘𝑅))    &   (𝜑 → (𝑅 ↾s 𝐼) ∈ Rng)    ⇒   (𝜑 → 𝐼 ∈ (SubRng‘𝑅))
 
11-Mar-2025rnglidlrng 14483 A (left) ideal of a non-unital ring is a non-unital ring. (Contributed by AV, 17-Feb-2020.) Generalization for non-unital rings. The assumption 𝑈 ∈ (SubGrp‘𝑅) is required because a left ideal of a non-unital ring does not have to be a subgroup. (Revised by AV, 11-Mar-2025.)
𝐿 = (LIdeal‘𝑅)    &   𝐼 = (𝑅 ↾s 𝑈)    ⇒   ((𝑅 ∈ Rng ∧ 𝑈 ∈ 𝐿 ∧ 𝑈 ∈ (SubGrp‘𝑅)) → 𝐼 ∈ Rng)
 
11-Mar-2025rnglidlmsgrp 14482 The multiplicative group of a (left) ideal of a non-unital ring is a semigroup. (Contributed by AV, 17-Feb-2020.) Generalization for non-unital rings. The assumption 0 ∈ 𝑈 is required because a left ideal of a non-unital ring does not have to be a subgroup. (Revised by AV, 11-Mar-2025.)
𝐿 = (LIdeal‘𝑅)    &   𝐼 = (𝑅 ↾s 𝑈)    &    0 = (0g‘𝑅)    ⇒   ((𝑅 ∈ Rng ∧ 𝑈 ∈ 𝐿 ∧ 0 ∈ 𝑈) → (mulGrp‘𝐼) ∈ Smgrp)
 
11-Mar-2025rnglidlmmgm 14481 The multiplicative group of a (left) ideal of a non-unital ring is a magma. (Contributed by AV, 17-Feb-2020.) Generalization for non-unital rings. The assumption 0 ∈ 𝑈 is required because a left ideal of a non-unital ring does not have to be a subgroup. (Revised by AV, 11-Mar-2025.)
𝐿 = (LIdeal‘𝑅)    &   𝐼 = (𝑅 ↾s 𝑈)    &    0 = (0g‘𝑅)    ⇒   ((𝑅 ∈ Rng ∧ 𝑈 ∈ 𝐿 ∧ 0 ∈ 𝑈) → (mulGrp‘𝐼) ∈ Mgm)
 
11-Mar-2025imasival 13360 Value of an image structure. The is a lemma for the theorems imasbas 13361, imasplusg 13362, and imasmulr 13363 and should not be needed once they are proved. (Contributed by Mario Carneiro, 23-Feb-2015.) (Revised by Jim Kingdon, 11-Mar-2025.) (New usage is discouraged.)
(𝜑 → 𝑈 = (𝐹 “s 𝑅))    &   (𝜑 → 𝑉 = (Base‘𝑅))    &    + = (+g‘𝑅)    &    × = (.r‘𝑅)    &    · = ( ·𝑠 ‘𝑅)    &   (𝜑 → ✚ = ∪ 𝑝 ∈ 𝑉 ∪ 𝑞 ∈ 𝑉 {⟨⟨(𝐹‘𝑝), (𝐹‘𝑞)⟩, (𝐹‘(𝑝 + 𝑞))⟩})    &   (𝜑 → ∙ = ∪ 𝑝 ∈ 𝑉 ∪ 𝑞 ∈ 𝑉 {⟨⟨(𝐹‘𝑝), (𝐹‘𝑞)⟩, (𝐹‘(𝑝 × 𝑞))⟩})    &   (𝜑 → 𝐹:𝑉–onto→𝐵)    &   (𝜑 → 𝑅 ∈ 𝑍)    ⇒   (𝜑 → 𝑈 = {⟨(Base‘ndx), 𝐵⟩, ⟨(+g‘ndx), ✚ ⟩, ⟨(.r‘ndx), ∙ ⟩})
 
9-Mar-20252idlridld 14492 A two-sided ideal is a right ideal. (Contributed by Thierry Arnoux, 9-Mar-2025.)
(𝜑 → 𝐼 ∈ (2Ideal‘𝑅))    &   𝑂 = (oppr‘𝑅)    ⇒   (𝜑 → 𝐼 ∈ (LIdeal‘𝑂))
 
9-Mar-20252idllidld 14491 A two-sided ideal is a left ideal. (Contributed by Thierry Arnoux, 9-Mar-2025.)
(𝜑 → 𝐼 ∈ (2Ideal‘𝑅))    ⇒   (𝜑 → 𝐼 ∈ (LIdeal‘𝑅))
 
9-Mar-2025quseccl 13791 Closure of the quotient map for a quotient group. (Contributed by Mario Carneiro, 18-Sep-2015.) (Proof shortened by AV, 9-Mar-2025.)
𝐻 = (𝐺 /s (𝐺 ~QG 𝑆))    &   𝑉 = (Base‘𝐺)    &   𝐵 = (Base‘𝐻)    ⇒   ((𝑆 ∈ (NrmSGrp‘𝐺) ∧ 𝑋 ∈ 𝑉) → [𝑋](𝐺 ~QG 𝑆) ∈ 𝐵)
 
9-Mar-2025fovcl 6119 Closure law for an operation. (Contributed by NM, 19-Apr-2007.) (Proof shortened by AV, 9-Mar-2025.)
𝐹:(𝑅 × 𝑆)⟶𝐶    ⇒   ((𝐴 ∈ 𝑅 ∧ 𝐵 ∈ 𝑆) → (𝐴𝐹𝐵) ∈ 𝐶)
 
8-Mar-2025subgex 13734 The class of subgroups of a group is a set. (Contributed by Jim Kingdon, 8-Mar-2025.)
(𝐺 ∈ Grp → (SubGrp‘𝐺) ∈ V)
 
7-Mar-2025ringrzd 14030 The zero of a unital ring is a right-absorbing element. (Contributed by SN, 7-Mar-2025.)
𝐵 = (Base‘𝑅)    &    · = (.r‘𝑅)    &    0 = (0g‘𝑅)    &   (𝜑 → 𝑅 ∈ Ring)    &   (𝜑 → 𝑋 ∈ 𝐵)    ⇒   (𝜑 → (𝑋 · 0 ) = 0 )
 
7-Mar-2025ringlzd 14029 The zero of a unital ring is a left-absorbing element. (Contributed by SN, 7-Mar-2025.)
𝐵 = (Base‘𝑅)    &    · = (.r‘𝑅)    &    0 = (0g‘𝑅)    &   (𝜑 → 𝑅 ∈ Ring)    &   (𝜑 → 𝑋 ∈ 𝐵)    ⇒   (𝜑 → ( 0 · 𝑋) = 0 )
 
7-Mar-2025qusecsub 13889 Two subgroup cosets are equal if and only if the difference of their representatives is a member of the subgroup. (Contributed by AV, 7-Mar-2025.)
𝐵 = (Base‘𝐺)    &    − = (-g‘𝐺)    &    ∼ = (𝐺 ~QG 𝑆)    ⇒   (((𝐺 ∈ Abel ∧ 𝑆 ∈ (SubGrp‘𝐺)) ∧ (𝑋 ∈ 𝐵 ∧ 𝑌 ∈ 𝐵)) → ([𝑋] ∼ = [𝑌] ∼ ↔ (𝑌 − 𝑋) ∈ 𝑆))
 
1-Mar-2025quselbasg 13788 Membership in the base set of a quotient group. (Contributed by AV, 1-Mar-2025.)
∼ = (𝐺 ~QG 𝑆)    &   𝑈 = (𝐺 /s ∼ )    &   𝐵 = (Base‘𝐺)    ⇒   ((𝐺 ∈ 𝑉 ∧ 𝑋 ∈ 𝑊 ∧ 𝑆 ∈ 𝑍) → (𝑋 ∈ (Base‘𝑈) ↔ ∃𝑥 ∈ 𝐵 𝑋 = [𝑥] ∼ ))
 
28-Feb-2025qusmulrng 14517 Value of the multiplication operation in a quotient ring of a non-unital ring. Formerly part of proof for quscrng 14518. Similar to qusmul2 14514. (Contributed by Mario Carneiro, 15-Jun-2015.) (Revised by AV, 28-Feb-2025.)
∼ = (𝑅 ~QG 𝑆)    &   𝐻 = (𝑅 /s ∼ )    &   𝐵 = (Base‘𝑅)    &    · = (.r‘𝑅)    &    ∙ = (.r‘𝐻)    ⇒   (((𝑅 ∈ Rng ∧ 𝑆 ∈ (2Ideal‘𝑅) ∧ 𝑆 ∈ (SubGrp‘𝑅)) ∧ (𝑋 ∈ 𝐵 ∧ 𝑌 ∈ 𝐵)) → ([𝑋] ∼ ∙ [𝑌] ∼ ) = [(𝑋 · 𝑌)] ∼ )
 
28-Feb-2025ringressid 14047 A ring restricted to its base set is a ring. It will usually be the original ring exactly, of course, but to show that needs additional conditions such as those in strressid 13125. (Contributed by Jim Kingdon, 28-Feb-2025.)
𝐵 = (Base‘𝐺)    ⇒   (𝐺 ∈ Ring → (𝐺 ↾s 𝐵) ∈ Ring)
 
28-Feb-2025grpressid 13615 A group restricted to its base set is a group. It will usually be the original group exactly, of course, but to show that needs additional conditions such as those in strressid 13125. (Contributed by Jim Kingdon, 28-Feb-2025.)
𝐵 = (Base‘𝐺)    ⇒   (𝐺 ∈ Grp → (𝐺 ↾s 𝐵) ∈ Grp)
 
27-Feb-2025imasringf1 14049 The image of a ring under an injection is a ring. (Contributed by AV, 27-Feb-2025.)
𝑈 = (𝐹 “s 𝑅)    &   𝑉 = (Base‘𝑅)    ⇒   ((𝐹:𝑉–1-1→𝐵 ∧ 𝑅 ∈ Ring) → 𝑈 ∈ Ring)
 
26-Feb-2025strext 13159 Extending the upper range of a structure. This works because when we say that a structure has components in 𝐴...𝐶 we are not saying that every slot in that range is present, just that all the slots that are present are within that range. (Contributed by Jim Kingdon, 26-Feb-2025.)
(𝜑 → 𝐹 Struct ⟨𝐴, 𝐵⟩)    &   (𝜑 → 𝐶 ∈ (ℤ≥‘𝐵))    ⇒   (𝜑 → 𝐹 Struct ⟨𝐴, 𝐶⟩)
 
25-Feb-2025subrngringnsg 14190 A subring is a normal subgroup. (Contributed by AV, 25-Feb-2025.)
(𝐴 ∈ (SubRng‘𝑅) → 𝐴 ∈ (NrmSGrp‘𝑅))
 
25-Feb-2025rngansg 13934 Every additive subgroup of a non-unital ring is normal. (Contributed by AV, 25-Feb-2025.)
(𝑅 ∈ Rng → (NrmSGrp‘𝑅) = (SubGrp‘𝑅))
 
25-Feb-2025ecqusaddd 13796 Addition of equivalence classes in a quotient group. (Contributed by AV, 25-Feb-2025.)
(𝜑 → 𝐼 ∈ (NrmSGrp‘𝑅))    &   𝐵 = (Base‘𝑅)    &    ∼ = (𝑅 ~QG 𝐼)    &   𝑄 = (𝑅 /s ∼ )    ⇒   ((𝜑 ∧ (𝐴 ∈ 𝐵 ∧ 𝐶 ∈ 𝐵)) → [(𝐴(+g‘𝑅)𝐶)] ∼ = ([𝐴] ∼ (+g‘𝑄)[𝐶] ∼ ))
 
24-Feb-2025ecqusaddcl 13797 Closure of the addition in a quotient group. (Contributed by AV, 24-Feb-2025.)
(𝜑 → 𝐼 ∈ (NrmSGrp‘𝑅))    &   𝐵 = (Base‘𝑅)    &    ∼ = (𝑅 ~QG 𝐼)    &   𝑄 = (𝑅 /s ∼ )    ⇒   ((𝜑 ∧ (𝐴 ∈ 𝐵 ∧ 𝐶 ∈ 𝐵)) → ([𝐴] ∼ (+g‘𝑄)[𝐶] ∼ ) ∈ (Base‘𝑄))
 
24-Feb-2025quseccl0g 13789 Closure of the quotient map for a quotient group. (Contributed by Mario Carneiro, 18-Sep-2015.) Generalization of quseccl 13791 for arbitrary sets 𝐺. (Revised by AV, 24-Feb-2025.)
∼ = (𝐺 ~QG 𝑆)    &   𝐻 = (𝐺 /s ∼ )    &   𝐶 = (Base‘𝐺)    &   𝐵 = (Base‘𝐻)    ⇒   ((𝐺 ∈ 𝑉 ∧ 𝑋 ∈ 𝐶 ∧ 𝑆 ∈ 𝑍) → [𝑋] ∼ ∈ 𝐵)
 
23-Feb-2025ltlenmkv 16552 If < can be expressed as holding exactly when ≤ holds and the values are not equal, then the analytic Markov's Principle applies. (To get the regular Markov's Principle, combine with neapmkv 16550). (Contributed by Jim Kingdon, 23-Feb-2025.)
(∀𝑥 ∈ ℝ ∀𝑦 ∈ ℝ (𝑥 < 𝑦 ↔ (𝑥 ≤ 𝑦 ∧ 𝑦 ≠ 𝑥)) → ∀𝑥 ∈ ℝ ∀𝑦 ∈ ℝ (𝑥 ≠ 𝑦 → 𝑥 # 𝑦))
 
23-Feb-2025neap0mkv 16551 The analytic Markov principle can be expressed either with two arbitrary real numbers, or one arbitrary number and zero. (Contributed by Jim Kingdon, 23-Feb-2025.)
(∀𝑥 ∈ ℝ ∀𝑦 ∈ ℝ (𝑥 ≠ 𝑦 → 𝑥 # 𝑦) ↔ ∀𝑥 ∈ ℝ (𝑥 ≠ 0 → 𝑥 # 0))
 
23-Feb-2025qus2idrng 14510 The quotient of a non-unital ring modulo a two-sided ideal, which is a subgroup of the additive group of the non-unital ring, is a non-unital ring (qusring 14512 analog). (Contributed by AV, 23-Feb-2025.)
𝑈 = (𝑅 /s (𝑅 ~QG 𝑆))    &   𝐼 = (2Ideal‘𝑅)    ⇒   ((𝑅 ∈ Rng ∧ 𝑆 ∈ 𝐼 ∧ 𝑆 ∈ (SubGrp‘𝑅)) → 𝑈 ∈ Rng)
 
23-Feb-20252idlcpblrng 14508 The coset equivalence relation for a two-sided ideal is compatible with ring multiplication. (Contributed by Mario Carneiro, 14-Jun-2015.) Generalization for non-unital rings and two-sided ideals which are subgroups of the additive group of the non-unital ring. (Revised by AV, 23-Feb-2025.)
𝑋 = (Base‘𝑅)    &   𝐸 = (𝑅 ~QG 𝑆)    &   𝐼 = (2Ideal‘𝑅)    &    · = (.r‘𝑅)    ⇒   ((𝑅 ∈ Rng ∧ 𝑆 ∈ 𝐼 ∧ 𝑆 ∈ (SubGrp‘𝑅)) → ((𝐴𝐸𝐶 ∧ 𝐵𝐸𝐷) → (𝐴 · 𝐵)𝐸(𝐶 · 𝐷)))
 
23-Feb-2025lringuplu 14181 If the sum of two elements of a local ring is invertible, then at least one of the summands must be invertible. (Contributed by Jim Kingdon, 18-Feb-2025.) (Revised by SN, 23-Feb-2025.)
(𝜑 → 𝐵 = (Base‘𝑅))    &   (𝜑 → 𝑈 = (Unit‘𝑅))    &   (𝜑 → + = (+g‘𝑅))    &   (𝜑 → 𝑅 ∈ LRing)    &   (𝜑 → (𝑋 + 𝑌) ∈ 𝑈)    &   (𝜑 → 𝑋 ∈ 𝐵)    &   (𝜑 → 𝑌 ∈ 𝐵)    ⇒   (𝜑 → (𝑋 ∈ 𝑈 ∨ 𝑌 ∈ 𝑈))
 
23-Feb-2025lringnz 14180 A local ring is a nonzero ring. (Contributed by Jim Kingdon, 20-Feb-2025.) (Revised by SN, 23-Feb-2025.)
1 = (1r‘𝑅)    &    0 = (0g‘𝑅)    ⇒   (𝑅 ∈ LRing → 1 ≠ 0 )
 
23-Feb-2025lringring 14179 A local ring is a ring. (Contributed by Jim Kingdon, 20-Feb-2025.) (Revised by SN, 23-Feb-2025.)
(𝑅 ∈ LRing → 𝑅 ∈ Ring)
 
23-Feb-2025lringnzr 14178 A local ring is a nonzero ring. (Contributed by SN, 23-Feb-2025.)
(𝑅 ∈ LRing → 𝑅 ∈ NzRing)
 
23-Feb-2025islring 14177 The predicate "is a local ring". (Contributed by SN, 23-Feb-2025.)
𝐵 = (Base‘𝑅)    &    + = (+g‘𝑅)    &    1 = (1r‘𝑅)    &   𝑈 = (Unit‘𝑅)    ⇒   (𝑅 ∈ LRing ↔ (𝑅 ∈ NzRing ∧ ∀𝑥 ∈ 𝐵 ∀𝑦 ∈ 𝐵 ((𝑥 + 𝑦) = 1 → (𝑥 ∈ 𝑈 ∨ 𝑦 ∈ 𝑈))))
 
23-Feb-2025df-lring 14176 A local ring is a nonzero ring where for any two elements summing to one, at least one is invertible. Any field is a local ring; the ring of integers is an example of a ring which is not a local ring. (Contributed by Jim Kingdon, 18-Feb-2025.) (Revised by SN, 23-Feb-2025.)
LRing = {𝑟 ∈ NzRing ∣ ∀𝑥 ∈ (Base‘𝑟)∀𝑦 ∈ (Base‘𝑟)((𝑥(+g‘𝑟)𝑦) = (1r‘𝑟) → (𝑥 ∈ (Unit‘𝑟) ∨ 𝑦 ∈ (Unit‘𝑟)))}
 
23-Feb-202501eq0ring 14174 If the zero and the identity element of a ring are the same, the ring is the zero ring. (Contributed by AV, 16-Apr-2019.) (Proof shortened by SN, 23-Feb-2025.)
𝐵 = (Base‘𝑅)    &    0 = (0g‘𝑅)    &    1 = (1r‘𝑅)    ⇒   ((𝑅 ∈ Ring ∧ 0 = 1 ) → 𝐵 = { 0 })
 
23-Feb-2025nzrring 14168 A nonzero ring is a ring. (Contributed by Stefan O'Rear, 24-Feb-2015.) (Proof shortened by SN, 23-Feb-2025.)
(𝑅 ∈ NzRing → 𝑅 ∈ Ring)
 
23-Feb-2025qusrng 13942 The quotient structure of a non-unital ring is a non-unital ring (qusring2 14050 analog). (Contributed by AV, 23-Feb-2025.)
(𝜑 → 𝑈 = (𝑅 /s ∼ ))    &   (𝜑 → 𝑉 = (Base‘𝑅))    &    + = (+g‘𝑅)    &    · = (.r‘𝑅)    &   (𝜑 → ∼ Er 𝑉)    &   (𝜑 → ((𝑎 ∼ 𝑝 ∧ 𝑏 ∼ 𝑞) → (𝑎 + 𝑏) ∼ (𝑝 + 𝑞)))    &   (𝜑 → ((𝑎 ∼ 𝑝 ∧ 𝑏 ∼ 𝑞) → (𝑎 · 𝑏) ∼ (𝑝 · 𝑞)))    &   (𝜑 → 𝑅 ∈ Rng)    ⇒   (𝜑 → 𝑈 ∈ Rng)
 
23-Feb-2025rngsubdir 13936 Ring multiplication distributes over subtraction. (subdir 8548 analog.) (Contributed by Jeff Madsen, 19-Jun-2010.) (Revised by Mario Carneiro, 2-Jul-2014.) Generalization of ringsubdir 14041. (Revised by AV, 23-Feb-2025.)
𝐵 = (Base‘𝑅)    &    · = (.r‘𝑅)    &    − = (-g‘𝑅)    &   (𝜑 → 𝑅 ∈ Rng)    &   (𝜑 → 𝑋 ∈ 𝐵)    &   (𝜑 → 𝑌 ∈ 𝐵)    &   (𝜑 → 𝑍 ∈ 𝐵)    ⇒   (𝜑 → ((𝑋 − 𝑌) · 𝑍) = ((𝑋 · 𝑍) − (𝑌 · 𝑍)))
 
23-Feb-2025rngsubdi 13935 Ring multiplication distributes over subtraction. (subdi 8547 analog.) (Contributed by Jeff Madsen, 19-Jun-2010.) (Revised by Mario Carneiro, 2-Jul-2014.) Generalization of ringsubdi 14040. (Revised by AV, 23-Feb-2025.)
𝐵 = (Base‘𝑅)    &    · = (.r‘𝑅)    &    − = (-g‘𝑅)    &   (𝜑 → 𝑅 ∈ Rng)    &   (𝜑 → 𝑋 ∈ 𝐵)    &   (𝜑 → 𝑌 ∈ 𝐵)    &   (𝜑 → 𝑍 ∈ 𝐵)    ⇒   (𝜑 → (𝑋 · (𝑌 − 𝑍)) = ((𝑋 · 𝑌) − (𝑋 · 𝑍)))
 
22-Feb-2025imasrngf1 13941 The image of a non-unital ring under an injection is a non-unital ring. (Contributed by AV, 22-Feb-2025.)
𝑈 = (𝐹 “s 𝑅)    &   𝑉 = (Base‘𝑅)    ⇒   ((𝐹:𝑉–1-1→𝐵 ∧ 𝑅 ∈ Rng) → 𝑈 ∈ Rng)
 
22-Feb-2025imasrng 13940 The image structure of a non-unital ring is a non-unital ring (imasring 14048 analog). (Contributed by AV, 22-Feb-2025.)
(𝜑 → 𝑈 = (𝐹 “s 𝑅))    &   (𝜑 → 𝑉 = (Base‘𝑅))    &    + = (+g‘𝑅)    &    · = (.r‘𝑅)    &   (𝜑 → 𝐹:𝑉–onto→𝐵)    &   ((𝜑 ∧ (𝑎 ∈ 𝑉 ∧ 𝑏 ∈ 𝑉) ∧ (𝑝 ∈ 𝑉 ∧ 𝑞 ∈ 𝑉)) → (((𝐹‘𝑎) = (𝐹‘𝑝) ∧ (𝐹‘𝑏) = (𝐹‘𝑞)) → (𝐹‘(𝑎 + 𝑏)) = (𝐹‘(𝑝 + 𝑞))))    &   ((𝜑 ∧ (𝑎 ∈ 𝑉 ∧ 𝑏 ∈ 𝑉) ∧ (𝑝 ∈ 𝑉 ∧ 𝑞 ∈ 𝑉)) → (((𝐹‘𝑎) = (𝐹‘𝑝) ∧ (𝐹‘𝑏) = (𝐹‘𝑞)) → (𝐹‘(𝑎 · 𝑏)) = (𝐹‘(𝑝 · 𝑞))))    &   (𝜑 → 𝑅 ∈ Rng)    ⇒   (𝜑 → 𝑈 ∈ Rng)
 
22-Feb-2025rngmgpf 13921 Restricted functionality of the multiplicative group on non-unital rings (mgpf 13995 analog). (Contributed by AV, 22-Feb-2025.)
(mulGrp ↾ Rng):Rng⟶Smgrp
 
22-Feb-2025imasabl 13894 The image structure of an abelian group is an abelian group (imasgrp 13669 analog). (Contributed by AV, 22-Feb-2025.)
(𝜑 → 𝑈 = (𝐹 “s 𝑅))    &   (𝜑 → 𝑉 = (Base‘𝑅))    &   (𝜑 → + = (+g‘𝑅))    &   (𝜑 → 𝐹:𝑉–onto→𝐵)    &   ((𝜑 ∧ (𝑎 ∈ 𝑉 ∧ 𝑏 ∈ 𝑉) ∧ (𝑝 ∈ 𝑉 ∧ 𝑞 ∈ 𝑉)) → (((𝐹‘𝑎) = (𝐹‘𝑝) ∧ (𝐹‘𝑏) = (𝐹‘𝑞)) → (𝐹‘(𝑎 + 𝑏)) = (𝐹‘(𝑝 + 𝑞))))    &   (𝜑 → 𝑅 ∈ Abel)    &    0 = (0g‘𝑅)    ⇒   (𝜑 → (𝑈 ∈ Abel ∧ (𝐹‘ 0 ) = (0g‘𝑈)))
 
21-Feb-2025prdssgrpd 13469 The product of a family of semigroups is a semigroup. (Contributed by AV, 21-Feb-2025.)
𝑌 = (𝑆Xs𝑅)    &   (𝜑 → 𝐼 ∈ 𝑊)    &   (𝜑 → 𝑆 ∈ 𝑉)    &   (𝜑 → 𝑅:𝐼⟶Smgrp)    ⇒   (𝜑 → 𝑌 ∈ Smgrp)
 
21-Feb-2025prdsplusgsgrpcl 13468 Structure product pointwise sums are closed when the factors are semigroups. (Contributed by AV, 21-Feb-2025.)
𝑌 = (𝑆Xs𝑅)    &   𝐵 = (Base‘𝑌)    &    + = (+g‘𝑌)    &   (𝜑 → 𝑆 ∈ 𝑉)    &   (𝜑 → 𝐼 ∈ 𝑊)    &   (𝜑 → 𝑅:𝐼⟶Smgrp)    &   (𝜑 → 𝐹 ∈ 𝐵)    &   (𝜑 → 𝐺 ∈ 𝐵)    ⇒   (𝜑 → (𝐹 + 𝐺) ∈ 𝐵)
 
21-Feb-2025dftap2 7453 Tight apartness with the apartness properties from df-pap 7450 expanded. (Contributed by Jim Kingdon, 21-Feb-2025.)
(𝑅 TAp 𝐴 ↔ (𝑅 ⊆ (𝐴 × 𝐴) ∧ (∀𝑥 ∈ 𝐴 ¬ 𝑥𝑅𝑥 ∧ ∀𝑥 ∈ 𝐴 ∀𝑦 ∈ 𝐴 (𝑥𝑅𝑦 → 𝑦𝑅𝑥)) ∧ (∀𝑥 ∈ 𝐴 ∀𝑦 ∈ 𝐴 ∀𝑧 ∈ 𝐴 (𝑥𝑅𝑦 → (𝑥𝑅𝑧 ∨ 𝑦𝑅𝑧)) ∧ ∀𝑥 ∈ 𝐴 ∀𝑦 ∈ 𝐴 (¬ 𝑥𝑅𝑦 → 𝑥 = 𝑦))))
 
20-Feb-2025rng2idlsubg0 14507 The zero (additive identity) of a non-unital ring is an element of each two-sided ideal of the ring which is a subgroup of the ring. (Contributed by AV, 20-Feb-2025.)
(𝜑 → 𝑅 ∈ Rng)    &   (𝜑 → 𝐼 ∈ (2Ideal‘𝑅))    &   (𝜑 → 𝐼 ∈ (SubGrp‘𝑅))    ⇒   (𝜑 → (0g‘𝑅) ∈ 𝐼)
 
20-Feb-2025rng2idlsubgnsg 14506 A two-sided ideal of a non-unital ring which is a subgroup of the ring is a normal subgroup of the ring. (Contributed by AV, 20-Feb-2025.)
(𝜑 → 𝑅 ∈ Rng)    &   (𝜑 → 𝐼 ∈ (2Ideal‘𝑅))    &   (𝜑 → 𝐼 ∈ (SubGrp‘𝑅))    ⇒   (𝜑 → 𝐼 ∈ (NrmSGrp‘𝑅))
 
20-Feb-2025rng2idl0 14504 The zero (additive identity) of a non-unital ring is an element of each two-sided ideal of the ring which is a non-unital ring. (Contributed by AV, 20-Feb-2025.)
(𝜑 → 𝑅 ∈ Rng)    &   (𝜑 → 𝐼 ∈ (2Ideal‘𝑅))    &   (𝜑 → (𝑅 ↾s 𝐼) ∈ Rng)    ⇒   (𝜑 → (0g‘𝑅) ∈ 𝐼)
 
20-Feb-2025rng2idlnsg 14503 A two-sided ideal of a non-unital ring which is a non-unital ring is a normal subgroup of the ring. (Contributed by AV, 20-Feb-2025.)
(𝜑 → 𝑅 ∈ Rng)    &   (𝜑 → 𝐼 ∈ (2Ideal‘𝑅))    &   (𝜑 → (𝑅 ↾s 𝐼) ∈ Rng)    ⇒   (𝜑 → 𝐼 ∈ (NrmSGrp‘𝑅))
 
20-Feb-20252idlelbas 14501 The base set of a two-sided ideal as structure is a left and right ideal. (Contributed by AV, 20-Feb-2025.)
(𝜑 → 𝐼 ∈ (2Ideal‘𝑅))    &   𝐽 = (𝑅 ↾s 𝐼)    &   𝐵 = (Base‘𝐽)    ⇒   (𝜑 → (𝐵 ∈ (LIdeal‘𝑅) ∧ 𝐵 ∈ (LIdeal‘(oppr‘𝑅))))
 
20-Feb-20252idlbas 14500 The base set of a two-sided ideal as structure. (Contributed by AV, 20-Feb-2025.)
(𝜑 → 𝐼 ∈ (2Ideal‘𝑅))    &   𝐽 = (𝑅 ↾s 𝐼)    &   𝐵 = (Base‘𝐽)    ⇒   (𝜑 → 𝐵 = 𝐼)
 
20-Feb-20252idlelb 14490 Membership in a two-sided ideal. (Contributed by Mario Carneiro, 14-Jun-2015.) (Revised by AV, 20-Feb-2025.)
𝐼 = (LIdeal‘𝑅)    &   𝑂 = (oppr‘𝑅)    &   𝐽 = (LIdeal‘𝑂)    &   𝑇 = (2Ideal‘𝑅)    ⇒   (𝑈 ∈ 𝑇 ↔ (𝑈 ∈ 𝐼 ∧ 𝑈 ∈ 𝐽))
 
20-Feb-2025aprap 14271 The relation given by df-apr 14266 for a local ring is an apartness relation. (Contributed by Jim Kingdon, 20-Feb-2025.)
(𝑅 ∈ LRing → (#r‘𝑅) Ap (Base‘𝑅))
 
20-Feb-2025setscomd 13094 Different components can be set in any order. (Contributed by Jim Kingdon, 20-Feb-2025.)
(𝜑 → 𝐴 ∈ 𝑌)    &   (𝜑 → 𝐵 ∈ 𝑍)    &   (𝜑 → 𝑆 ∈ 𝑉)    &   (𝜑 → 𝐴 ≠ 𝐵)    &   (𝜑 → 𝐶 ∈ 𝑊)    &   (𝜑 → 𝐷 ∈ 𝑋)    ⇒   (𝜑 → ((𝑆 sSet ⟨𝐴, 𝐶⟩) sSet ⟨𝐵, 𝐷⟩) = ((𝑆 sSet ⟨𝐵, 𝐷⟩) sSet ⟨𝐴, 𝐶⟩))
 
20-Feb-2025ifnebibdc 3648 The converse of ifbi 3623 holds if the two values are not equal. (Contributed by Thierry Arnoux, 20-Feb-2025.)
((DECID 𝜑 ∧ DECID 𝜓 ∧ 𝐴 ≠ 𝐵) → (if(𝜑, 𝐴, 𝐵) = if(𝜓, 𝐴, 𝐵) ↔ (𝜑 ↔ 𝜓)))
 
20-Feb-2025ifnefals 3647 Deduce falsehood from a conditional operator value. (Contributed by Thierry Arnoux, 20-Feb-2025.)
((𝐴 ≠ 𝐵 ∧ if(𝜑, 𝐴, 𝐵) = 𝐵) → ¬ 𝜑)
 
20-Feb-2025ifnetruedc 3646 Deduce truth from a conditional operator value. (Contributed by Thierry Arnoux, 20-Feb-2025.)
((DECID 𝜑 ∧ 𝐴 ≠ 𝐵 ∧ if(𝜑, 𝐴, 𝐵) = 𝐴) → 𝜑)
 
18-Feb-2025rnglidlmcl 14465 A (left) ideal containing the zero element is closed under left-multiplication by elements of the full non-unital ring. If the ring is not a unital ring, and the ideal does not contain the zero element of the ring, then the closure cannot be proven. (Contributed by AV, 18-Feb-2025.)
0 = (0g‘𝑅)    &   𝐵 = (Base‘𝑅)    &    · = (.r‘𝑅)    &   𝑈 = (LIdeal‘𝑅)    ⇒   (((𝑅 ∈ Rng ∧ 𝐼 ∈ 𝑈 ∧ 0 ∈ 𝐼) ∧ (𝑋 ∈ 𝐵 ∧ 𝑌 ∈ 𝐼)) → (𝑋 · 𝑌) ∈ 𝐼)
 
17-Feb-2025aprcotr 14270 The apartness relation given by df-apr 14266 for a local ring is cotransitive. (Contributed by Jim Kingdon, 17-Feb-2025.)
(𝜑 → 𝐵 = (Base‘𝑅))    &   (𝜑 → # = (#r‘𝑅))    &   (𝜑 → 𝑅 ∈ LRing)    &   (𝜑 → 𝑋 ∈ 𝐵)    &   (𝜑 → 𝑌 ∈ 𝐵)    &   (𝜑 → 𝑍 ∈ 𝐵)    ⇒   (𝜑 → (𝑋 # 𝑌 → (𝑋 # 𝑍 ∨ 𝑌 # 𝑍)))
 
17-Feb-2025aprsym 14269 The apartness relation given by df-apr 14266 for a ring is symmetric. (Contributed by Jim Kingdon, 17-Feb-2025.)
(𝜑 → 𝐵 = (Base‘𝑅))    &   (𝜑 → # = (#r‘𝑅))    &   (𝜑 → 𝑅 ∈ Ring)    &   (𝜑 → 𝑋 ∈ 𝐵)    &   (𝜑 → 𝑌 ∈ 𝐵)    ⇒   (𝜑 → (𝑋 # 𝑌 → 𝑌 # 𝑋))
 
17-Feb-2025aprval 14267 Expand Definition df-apr 14266. (Contributed by Jim Kingdon, 17-Feb-2025.)
(𝜑 → 𝐵 = (Base‘𝑅))    &   (𝜑 → # = (#r‘𝑅))    &   (𝜑 → − = (-g‘𝑅))    &   (𝜑 → 𝑈 = (Unit‘𝑅))    &   (𝜑 → 𝑅 ∈ Ring)    &   (𝜑 → 𝑋 ∈ 𝐵)    &   (𝜑 → 𝑌 ∈ 𝐵)    ⇒   (𝜑 → (𝑋 # 𝑌 ↔ (𝑋 − 𝑌) ∈ 𝑈))
 
17-Feb-2025subrngpropd 14201 If two structures have the same ring components (properties), they have the same set of subrings. (Contributed by AV, 17-Feb-2025.)
(𝜑 → 𝐵 = (Base‘𝐾))    &   (𝜑 → 𝐵 = (Base‘𝐿))    &   ((𝜑 ∧ (𝑥 ∈ 𝐵 ∧ 𝑦 ∈ 𝐵)) → (𝑥(+g‘𝐾)𝑦) = (𝑥(+g‘𝐿)𝑦))    &   ((𝜑 ∧ (𝑥 ∈ 𝐵 ∧ 𝑦 ∈ 𝐵)) → (𝑥(.r‘𝐾)𝑦) = (𝑥(.r‘𝐿)𝑦))    ⇒   (𝜑 → (SubRng‘𝐾) = (SubRng‘𝐿))
 
17-Feb-2025rngm2neg 13933 Double negation of a product in a non-unital ring (mul2neg 8560 analog). (Contributed by Mario Carneiro, 4-Dec-2014.) Generalization of ringm2neg 14039. (Revised by AV, 17-Feb-2025.)
𝐵 = (Base‘𝑅)    &    · = (.r‘𝑅)    &   𝑁 = (invg‘𝑅)    &   (𝜑 → 𝑅 ∈ Rng)    &   (𝜑 → 𝑋 ∈ 𝐵)    &   (𝜑 → 𝑌 ∈ 𝐵)    ⇒   (𝜑 → ((𝑁‘𝑋) · (𝑁‘𝑌)) = (𝑋 · 𝑌))
 
17-Feb-2025rngmneg2 13932 Negation of a product in a non-unital ring (mulneg2 8558 analog). In contrast to ringmneg2 14038, the proof does not (and cannot) make use of the existence of a ring unity. (Contributed by AV, 17-Feb-2025.)
𝐵 = (Base‘𝑅)    &    · = (.r‘𝑅)    &   𝑁 = (invg‘𝑅)    &   (𝜑 → 𝑅 ∈ Rng)    &   (𝜑 → 𝑋 ∈ 𝐵)    &   (𝜑 → 𝑌 ∈ 𝐵)    ⇒   (𝜑 → (𝑋 · (𝑁‘𝑌)) = (𝑁‘(𝑋 · 𝑌)))
 
17-Feb-2025rngmneg1 13931 Negation of a product in a non-unital ring (mulneg1 8557 analog). In contrast to ringmneg1 14037, the proof does not (and cannot) make use of the existence of a ring unity. (Contributed by AV, 17-Feb-2025.)
𝐵 = (Base‘𝑅)    &    · = (.r‘𝑅)    &   𝑁 = (invg‘𝑅)    &   (𝜑 → 𝑅 ∈ Rng)    &   (𝜑 → 𝑋 ∈ 𝐵)    &   (𝜑 → 𝑌 ∈ 𝐵)    ⇒   (𝜑 → ((𝑁‘𝑋) · 𝑌) = (𝑁‘(𝑋 · 𝑌)))
 
16-Feb-2025aprirr 14268 The apartness relation given by df-apr 14266 for a nonzero ring is irreflexive. (Contributed by Jim Kingdon, 16-Feb-2025.)
(𝜑 → 𝐵 = (Base‘𝑅))    &   (𝜑 → # = (#r‘𝑅))    &   (𝜑 → 𝑅 ∈ Ring)    &   (𝜑 → 𝑋 ∈ 𝐵)    &   (𝜑 → (1r‘𝑅) ≠ (0g‘𝑅))    ⇒   (𝜑 → ¬ 𝑋 # 𝑋)
 
16-Feb-2025rngrz 13930 The zero of a non-unital ring is a right-absorbing element. (Contributed by FL, 31-Aug-2009.) Generalization of ringrz 14028. (Revised by AV, 16-Feb-2025.)
𝐵 = (Base‘𝑅)    &    · = (.r‘𝑅)    &    0 = (0g‘𝑅)    ⇒   ((𝑅 ∈ Rng ∧ 𝑋 ∈ 𝐵) → (𝑋 · 0 ) = 0 )
 
16-Feb-2025rng0cl 13927 The zero element of a non-unital ring belongs to its base set. (Contributed by AV, 16-Feb-2025.)
𝐵 = (Base‘𝑅)    &    0 = (0g‘𝑅)    ⇒   (𝑅 ∈ Rng → 0 ∈ 𝐵)
 
16-Feb-2025rngacl 13926 Closure of the addition operation of a non-unital ring. (Contributed by AV, 16-Feb-2025.)
𝐵 = (Base‘𝑅)    &    + = (+g‘𝑅)    ⇒   ((𝑅 ∈ Rng ∧ 𝑋 ∈ 𝐵 ∧ 𝑌 ∈ 𝐵) → (𝑋 + 𝑌) ∈ 𝐵)
 
16-Feb-2025rnggrp 13922 A non-unital ring is a (additive) group. (Contributed by AV, 16-Feb-2025.)
(𝑅 ∈ Rng → 𝑅 ∈ Grp)
 
16-Feb-2025aptap 8813 Complex apartness (as defined at df-ap 8745) is a tight apartness (as defined at df-tap 7452). (Contributed by Jim Kingdon, 16-Feb-2025.)
# TAp ℂ
 
15-Feb-2025subsubrng2 14200 The set of subrings of a subring are the smaller subrings. (Contributed by AV, 15-Feb-2025.)
𝑆 = (𝑅 ↾s 𝐴)    ⇒   (𝐴 ∈ (SubRng‘𝑅) → (SubRng‘𝑆) = ((SubRng‘𝑅) ∩ 𝒫 𝐴))
 
15-Feb-2025subsubrng 14199 A subring of a subring is a subring. (Contributed by AV, 15-Feb-2025.)
𝑆 = (𝑅 ↾s 𝐴)    ⇒   (𝐴 ∈ (SubRng‘𝑅) → (𝐵 ∈ (SubRng‘𝑆) ↔ (𝐵 ∈ (SubRng‘𝑅) ∧ 𝐵 ⊆ 𝐴)))
 
15-Feb-2025subrngin 14198 The intersection of two subrings is a subring. (Contributed by AV, 15-Feb-2025.)
((𝐴 ∈ (SubRng‘𝑅) ∧ 𝐵 ∈ (SubRng‘𝑅)) → (𝐴 ∩ 𝐵) ∈ (SubRng‘𝑅))
 
15-Feb-2025subrngintm 14197 The intersection of a nonempty collection of subrings is a subring. (Contributed by AV, 15-Feb-2025.)
((𝑆 ⊆ (SubRng‘𝑅) ∧ ∃𝑗 𝑗 ∈ 𝑆) → ∩ 𝑆 ∈ (SubRng‘𝑅))
 
15-Feb-2025opprsubrngg 14196 Being a subring is a symmetric property. (Contributed by AV, 15-Feb-2025.)
𝑂 = (oppr‘𝑅)    ⇒   (𝑅 ∈ 𝑉 → (SubRng‘𝑅) = (SubRng‘𝑂))
 
15-Feb-2025issubrng2 14195 Characterize the subrings of a ring by closure properties. (Contributed by AV, 15-Feb-2025.)
𝐵 = (Base‘𝑅)    &    · = (.r‘𝑅)    ⇒   (𝑅 ∈ Rng → (𝐴 ∈ (SubRng‘𝑅) ↔ (𝐴 ∈ (SubGrp‘𝑅) ∧ ∀𝑥 ∈ 𝐴 ∀𝑦 ∈ 𝐴 (𝑥 · 𝑦) ∈ 𝐴)))
 
15-Feb-2025opprrngbg 14062 A set is a non-unital ring if and only if its opposite is a non-unital ring. Bidirectional form of opprrng 14061. (Contributed by AV, 15-Feb-2025.)
𝑂 = (oppr‘𝑅)    ⇒   (𝑅 ∈ 𝑉 → (𝑅 ∈ Rng ↔ 𝑂 ∈ Rng))
 
15-Feb-2025opprrng 14061 An opposite non-unital ring is a non-unital ring. (Contributed by AV, 15-Feb-2025.)
𝑂 = (oppr‘𝑅)    ⇒   (𝑅 ∈ Rng → 𝑂 ∈ Rng)
 
15-Feb-2025rngpropd 13939 If two structures have the same base set, and the values of their group (addition) and ring (multiplication) operations are equal for all pairs of elements of the base set, one is a non-unital ring iff the other one is. (Contributed by AV, 15-Feb-2025.)
(𝜑 → 𝐵 = (Base‘𝐾))    &   (𝜑 → 𝐵 = (Base‘𝐿))    &   ((𝜑 ∧ (𝑥 ∈ 𝐵 ∧ 𝑦 ∈ 𝐵)) → (𝑥(+g‘𝐾)𝑦) = (𝑥(+g‘𝐿)𝑦))    &   ((𝜑 ∧ (𝑥 ∈ 𝐵 ∧ 𝑦 ∈ 𝐵)) → (𝑥(.r‘𝐾)𝑦) = (𝑥(.r‘𝐿)𝑦))    ⇒   (𝜑 → (𝐾 ∈ Rng ↔ 𝐿 ∈ Rng))
 
15-Feb-2025sgrppropd 13467 If two structures are sets, have the same base set, and the values of their group (addition) operations are equal for all pairs of elements of the base set, one is a semigroup iff the other one is. (Contributed by AV, 15-Feb-2025.)
(𝜑 → 𝐾 ∈ 𝑉)    &   (𝜑 → 𝐿 ∈ 𝑊)    &   (𝜑 → 𝐵 = (Base‘𝐾))    &   (𝜑 → 𝐵 = (Base‘𝐿))    &   ((𝜑 ∧ (𝑥 ∈ 𝐵 ∧ 𝑦 ∈ 𝐵)) → (𝑥(+g‘𝐾)𝑦) = (𝑥(+g‘𝐿)𝑦))    ⇒   (𝜑 → (𝐾 ∈ Smgrp ↔ 𝐿 ∈ Smgrp))
 
15-Feb-2025sgrpcl 13463 Closure of the operation of a semigroup. (Contributed by AV, 15-Feb-2025.)
𝐵 = (Base‘𝐺)    &    ⚬ = (+g‘𝐺)    ⇒   ((𝐺 ∈ Smgrp ∧ 𝑋 ∈ 𝐵 ∧ 𝑌 ∈ 𝐵) → (𝑋 ⚬ 𝑌) ∈ 𝐵)
 
15-Feb-2025tapeq2 7455 Equality theorem for tight apartness predicate. (Contributed by Jim Kingdon, 15-Feb-2025.)
(𝐴 = 𝐵 → (𝑅 TAp 𝐴 ↔ 𝑅 TAp 𝐵))
 
14-Feb-2025subrngmcl 14194 A subgroup is closed under multiplication. (Contributed by Mario Carneiro, 2-Dec-2014.) Generalization of subrgmcl 14218. (Revised by AV, 14-Feb-2025.)
· = (.r‘𝑅)    ⇒   ((𝐴 ∈ (SubRng‘𝑅) ∧ 𝑋 ∈ 𝐴 ∧ 𝑌 ∈ 𝐴) → (𝑋 · 𝑌) ∈ 𝐴)
 
14-Feb-2025subrngacl 14193 A subring is closed under addition. (Contributed by AV, 14-Feb-2025.)
+ = (+g‘𝑅)    ⇒   ((𝐴 ∈ (SubRng‘𝑅) ∧ 𝑋 ∈ 𝐴 ∧ 𝑌 ∈ 𝐴) → (𝑋 + 𝑌) ∈ 𝐴)
 
14-Feb-2025subrng0 14192 A subring always has the same additive identity. (Contributed by AV, 14-Feb-2025.)
𝑆 = (𝑅 ↾s 𝐴)    &    0 = (0g‘𝑅)    ⇒   (𝐴 ∈ (SubRng‘𝑅) → 0 = (0g‘𝑆))
 
14-Feb-2025subrngbas 14191 Base set of a subring structure. (Contributed by AV, 14-Feb-2025.)
𝑆 = (𝑅 ↾s 𝐴)    ⇒   (𝐴 ∈ (SubRng‘𝑅) → 𝐴 = (Base‘𝑆))
 
14-Feb-2025subrngsubg 14189 A subring is a subgroup. (Contributed by AV, 14-Feb-2025.)
(𝐴 ∈ (SubRng‘𝑅) → 𝐴 ∈ (SubGrp‘𝑅))
 
14-Feb-2025subrngrcl 14188 Reverse closure for a subring predicate. (Contributed by AV, 14-Feb-2025.)
(𝐴 ∈ (SubRng‘𝑅) → 𝑅 ∈ Rng)
 
14-Feb-2025subrngrng 14187 A subring is a non-unital ring. (Contributed by AV, 14-Feb-2025.)
𝑆 = (𝑅 ↾s 𝐴)    ⇒   (𝐴 ∈ (SubRng‘𝑅) → 𝑆 ∈ Rng)
 
14-Feb-2025subrngid 14186 Every non-unital ring is a subring of itself. (Contributed by AV, 14-Feb-2025.)
𝐵 = (Base‘𝑅)    ⇒   (𝑅 ∈ Rng → 𝐵 ∈ (SubRng‘𝑅))
 
14-Feb-2025subrngss 14185 A subring is a subset. (Contributed by AV, 14-Feb-2025.)
𝐵 = (Base‘𝑅)    ⇒   (𝐴 ∈ (SubRng‘𝑅) → 𝐴 ⊆ 𝐵)
 
14-Feb-2025issubrng 14184 The subring of non-unital ring predicate. (Contributed by AV, 14-Feb-2025.)
𝐵 = (Base‘𝑅)    ⇒   (𝐴 ∈ (SubRng‘𝑅) ↔ (𝑅 ∈ Rng ∧ (𝑅 ↾s 𝐴) ∈ Rng ∧ 𝐴 ⊆ 𝐵))
 
14-Feb-2025df-subrng 14183 Define a subring of a non-unital ring as a set of elements that is a non-unital ring in its own right. In this section, a subring of a non-unital ring is simply called "subring", unless it causes any ambiguity with SubRing. (Contributed by AV, 14-Feb-2025.)
SubRng = (𝑤 ∈ Rng ↦ {𝑠 ∈ 𝒫 (Base‘𝑤) ∣ (𝑤 ↾s 𝑠) ∈ Rng})
 
14-Feb-2025isrngd 13937 Properties that determine a non-unital ring. (Contributed by AV, 14-Feb-2025.)
(𝜑 → 𝐵 = (Base‘𝑅))    &   (𝜑 → + = (+g‘𝑅))    &   (𝜑 → · = (.r‘𝑅))    &   (𝜑 → 𝑅 ∈ Abel)    &   ((𝜑 ∧ 𝑥 ∈ 𝐵 ∧ 𝑦 ∈ 𝐵) → (𝑥 · 𝑦) ∈ 𝐵)    &   ((𝜑 ∧ (𝑥 ∈ 𝐵 ∧ 𝑦 ∈ 𝐵 ∧ 𝑧 ∈ 𝐵)) → ((𝑥 · 𝑦) · 𝑧) = (𝑥 · (𝑦 · 𝑧)))    &   ((𝜑 ∧ (𝑥 ∈ 𝐵 ∧ 𝑦 ∈ 𝐵 ∧ 𝑧 ∈ 𝐵)) → (𝑥 · (𝑦 + 𝑧)) = ((𝑥 · 𝑦) + (𝑥 · 𝑧)))    &   ((𝜑 ∧ (𝑥 ∈ 𝐵 ∧ 𝑦 ∈ 𝐵 ∧ 𝑧 ∈ 𝐵)) → ((𝑥 + 𝑦) · 𝑧) = ((𝑥 · 𝑧) + (𝑦 · 𝑧)))    ⇒   (𝜑 → 𝑅 ∈ Rng)
 
14-Feb-2025rngdi 13924 Distributive law for the multiplication operation of a non-unital ring (left-distributivity). (Contributed by AV, 14-Feb-2025.)
𝐵 = (Base‘𝑅)    &    + = (+g‘𝑅)    &    · = (.r‘𝑅)    ⇒   ((𝑅 ∈ Rng ∧ (𝑋 ∈ 𝐵 ∧ 𝑌 ∈ 𝐵 ∧ 𝑍 ∈ 𝐵)) → (𝑋 · (𝑌 + 𝑍)) = ((𝑋 · 𝑌) + (𝑋 · 𝑍)))
 
14-Feb-2025exmidmotap 7463 The proposition that every class has at most one tight apartness is equivalent to excluded middle. (Contributed by Jim Kingdon, 14-Feb-2025.)
(EXMID ↔ ∀𝑥∃*𝑟 𝑟 TAp 𝑥)
 
14-Feb-2025exmidapne 7462 Excluded middle implies there is only one tight apartness on any class, namely negated equality. (Contributed by Jim Kingdon, 14-Feb-2025.)
(EXMID → (𝑅 TAp 𝐴 ↔ 𝑅 = {⟨𝑢, 𝑣⟩ ∣ ((𝑢 ∈ 𝐴 ∧ 𝑣 ∈ 𝐴) ∧ 𝑢 ≠ 𝑣)}))
 
14-Feb-2025df-pap 7450 Apartness predicate. A relation 𝑅 is an apartness if it is irreflexive, symmetric, and cotransitive. (Contributed by Jim Kingdon, 14-Feb-2025.)
(𝑅 Ap 𝐴 ↔ ((𝑅 ⊆ (𝐴 × 𝐴) ∧ ∀𝑥 ∈ 𝐴 ¬ 𝑥𝑅𝑥) ∧ (∀𝑥 ∈ 𝐴 ∀𝑦 ∈ 𝐴 (𝑥𝑅𝑦 → 𝑦𝑅𝑥) ∧ ∀𝑥 ∈ 𝐴 ∀𝑦 ∈ 𝐴 ∀𝑧 ∈ 𝐴 (𝑥𝑅𝑦 → (𝑥𝑅𝑧 ∨ 𝑦𝑅𝑧)))))
 
13-Feb-20252idl1 14498 Every ring contains a unit two-sided ideal. (Contributed by AV, 13-Feb-2025.)
𝐼 = (2Ideal‘𝑅)    &   𝐵 = (Base‘𝑅)    ⇒   (𝑅 ∈ Ring → 𝐵 ∈ 𝐼)
 
13-Feb-20252idl0 14497 Every ring contains a zero two-sided ideal. (Contributed by AV, 13-Feb-2025.)
𝐼 = (2Ideal‘𝑅)    &    0 = (0g‘𝑅)    ⇒   (𝑅 ∈ Ring → { 0 } ∈ 𝐼)
 
13-Feb-2025ridl1 14496 Every ring contains a unit right ideal. (Contributed by AV, 13-Feb-2025.)
𝑈 = (LIdeal‘(oppr‘𝑅))    &   𝐵 = (Base‘𝑅)    ⇒   (𝑅 ∈ Ring → 𝐵 ∈ 𝑈)
 
13-Feb-2025ridl0 14495 Every ring contains a zero right ideal. (Contributed by AV, 13-Feb-2025.)
𝑈 = (LIdeal‘(oppr‘𝑅))    &    0 = (0g‘𝑅)    ⇒   (𝑅 ∈ Ring → { 0 } ∈ 𝑈)
 
13-Feb-2025isridl 14489 A right ideal is a left ideal of the opposite ring. This theorem shows that this definition corresponds to the usual textbook definition of a right ideal of a ring to be a subgroup of the additive group of the ring which is closed under right-multiplication by elements of the full ring. (Contributed by AV, 13-Feb-2025.)
𝑈 = (LIdeal‘(oppr‘𝑅))    &   𝐵 = (Base‘𝑅)    &    · = (.r‘𝑅)    ⇒   (𝑅 ∈ Ring → (𝐼 ∈ 𝑈 ↔ (𝐼 ∈ (SubGrp‘𝑅) ∧ ∀𝑥 ∈ 𝐵 ∀𝑦 ∈ 𝐼 (𝑦 · 𝑥) ∈ 𝐼)))
 
13-Feb-2025df-apr 14266 The relation between elements whose difference is invertible, which for a local ring is an apartness relation by aprap 14271. (Contributed by Jim Kingdon, 13-Feb-2025.)
#r = (𝑤 ∈ V ↦ {⟨𝑥, 𝑦⟩ ∣ ((𝑥 ∈ (Base‘𝑤) ∧ 𝑦 ∈ (Base‘𝑤)) ∧ (𝑥(-g‘𝑤)𝑦) ∈ (Unit‘𝑤))})
 
13-Feb-2025rngass 13923 Associative law for the multiplication operation of a non-unital ring. (Contributed by NM, 27-Aug-2011.) (Revised by AV, 13-Feb-2025.)
𝐵 = (Base‘𝑅)    &    · = (.r‘𝑅)    ⇒   ((𝑅 ∈ Rng ∧ (𝑋 ∈ 𝐵 ∧ 𝑌 ∈ 𝐵 ∧ 𝑍 ∈ 𝐵)) → ((𝑋 · 𝑌) · 𝑍) = (𝑋 · (𝑌 · 𝑍)))
 
13-Feb-2025issgrpd 13466 Deduce a semigroup from its properties. (Contributed by AV, 13-Feb-2025.)
(𝜑 → 𝐵 = (Base‘𝐺))    &   (𝜑 → + = (+g‘𝐺))    &   ((𝜑 ∧ 𝑥 ∈ 𝐵 ∧ 𝑦 ∈ 𝐵) → (𝑥 + 𝑦) ∈ 𝐵)    &   ((𝜑 ∧ (𝑥 ∈ 𝐵 ∧ 𝑦 ∈ 𝐵 ∧ 𝑧 ∈ 𝐵)) → ((𝑥 + 𝑦) + 𝑧) = (𝑥 + (𝑦 + 𝑧)))    &   (𝜑 → 𝐺 ∈ 𝑉)    ⇒   (𝜑 → 𝐺 ∈ Smgrp)
 
8-Feb-20252oneel 7458 ∅ and 1o are two unequal elements of 2o. (Contributed by Jim Kingdon, 8-Feb-2025.)
⟨∅, 1o⟩ ∈ {⟨𝑢, 𝑣⟩ ∣ ((𝑢 ∈ 2o ∧ 𝑣 ∈ 2o) ∧ 𝑢 ≠ 𝑣)}
 
8-Feb-2025tapeq1 7454 Equality theorem for tight apartness predicate. (Contributed by Jim Kingdon, 8-Feb-2025.)
(𝑅 = 𝑆 → (𝑅 TAp 𝐴 ↔ 𝑆 TAp 𝐴))
 
7-Feb-2025psrgrp 14670 The ring of power series is a group. (Contributed by Mario Carneiro, 29-Dec-2014.) (Proof shortened by SN, 7-Feb-2025.)
𝑆 = (𝐼 mPwSer 𝑅)    &   (𝜑 → 𝐼 ∈ 𝑉)    &   (𝜑 → 𝑅 ∈ Grp)    ⇒   (𝜑 → 𝑆 ∈ Grp)
 
7-Feb-2025resrhm2b 14234 Restriction of the codomain of a (ring) homomorphism. resghm2b 13820 analog. (Contributed by SN, 7-Feb-2025.)
𝑈 = (𝑇 ↾s 𝑋)    ⇒   ((𝑋 ∈ (SubRing‘𝑇) ∧ ran 𝐹 ⊆ 𝑋) → (𝐹 ∈ (𝑆 RingHom 𝑇) ↔ 𝐹 ∈ (𝑆 RingHom 𝑈)))
 
6-Feb-2025zzlesq 10947 An integer is less than or equal to its square. (Contributed by BJ, 6-Feb-2025.)
(𝑁 ∈ ℤ → 𝑁 ≤ (𝑁↑2))
 
6-Feb-20252omotap 7461 If there is at most one tight apartness on 2o, excluded middle follows. Based on online discussions by Tom de Jong, Andrew W Swan, and Martin Escardo. (Contributed by Jim Kingdon, 6-Feb-2025.)
(∃*𝑟 𝑟 TAp 2o → EXMID)
 
6-Feb-20252omotaplemst 7460 Lemma for 2omotap 7461. (Contributed by Jim Kingdon, 6-Feb-2025.)
((∃*𝑟 𝑟 TAp 2o ∧ ¬ ¬ 𝜑) → 𝜑)
 
6-Feb-20252omotaplemap 7459 Lemma for 2omotap 7461. (Contributed by Jim Kingdon, 6-Feb-2025.)
(¬ ¬ 𝜑 → {⟨𝑢, 𝑣⟩ ∣ ((𝑢 ∈ 2o ∧ 𝑣 ∈ 2o) ∧ (𝜑 ∧ 𝑢 ≠ 𝑣))} TAp 2o)
 
6-Feb-20252onetap 7457 Negated equality is a tight apartness on 2o. (Contributed by Jim Kingdon, 6-Feb-2025.)
{⟨𝑢, 𝑣⟩ ∣ ((𝑢 ∈ 2o ∧ 𝑣 ∈ 2o) ∧ 𝑢 ≠ 𝑣)} TAp 2o
 
5-Feb-2025netap 7456 Negated equality on a set with decidable equality is a tight apartness. (Contributed by Jim Kingdon, 5-Feb-2025.)
(∀𝑥 ∈ 𝐴 ∀𝑦 ∈ 𝐴 DECID 𝑥 = 𝑦 → {⟨𝑢, 𝑣⟩ ∣ ((𝑢 ∈ 𝐴 ∧ 𝑣 ∈ 𝐴) ∧ 𝑢 ≠ 𝑣)} TAp 𝐴)
 
5-Feb-2025df-tap 7452 Tight apartness predicate. A relation 𝑅 is a tight apartness if it is irreflexive, symmetric, cotransitive, and tight. (Contributed by Jim Kingdon, 5-Feb-2025.)
(𝑅 TAp 𝐴 ↔ (𝑅 Ap 𝐴 ∧ ∀𝑥 ∈ 𝐴 ∀𝑦 ∈ 𝐴 (¬ 𝑥𝑅𝑦 → 𝑥 = 𝑦)))
 
1-Feb-2025mulgnn0cld 13701 Closure of the group multiple (exponentiation) operation for a nonnegative multiplier in a monoid. Deduction associated with mulgnn0cl 13696. (Contributed by SN, 1-Feb-2025.)
𝐵 = (Base‘𝐺)    &    · = (.g‘𝐺)    &   (𝜑 → 𝐺 ∈ Mnd)    &   (𝜑 → 𝑁 ∈ ℕ0)    &   (𝜑 → 𝑋 ∈ 𝐵)    ⇒   (𝜑 → (𝑁 · 𝑋) ∈ 𝐵)
 
31-Jan-20250subg 13757 The zero subgroup of an arbitrary group. (Contributed by Stefan O'Rear, 10-Dec-2014.) (Proof shortened by SN, 31-Jan-2025.)
0 = (0g‘𝐺)    ⇒   (𝐺 ∈ Grp → { 0 } ∈ (SubGrp‘𝐺))
 
29-Jan-2025grprinvd 13610 The right inverse of a group element. Deduction associated with grprinv 13605. (Contributed by SN, 29-Jan-2025.)
𝐵 = (Base‘𝐺)    &    + = (+g‘𝐺)    &    0 = (0g‘𝐺)    &   𝑁 = (invg‘𝐺)    &   (𝜑 → 𝐺 ∈ Grp)    &   (𝜑 → 𝑋 ∈ 𝐵)    ⇒   (𝜑 → (𝑋 + (𝑁‘𝑋)) = 0 )
 
29-Jan-2025grplinvd 13609 The left inverse of a group element. Deduction associated with grplinv 13604. (Contributed by SN, 29-Jan-2025.)
𝐵 = (Base‘𝐺)    &    + = (+g‘𝐺)    &    0 = (0g‘𝐺)    &   𝑁 = (invg‘𝐺)    &   (𝜑 → 𝐺 ∈ Grp)    &   (𝜑 → 𝑋 ∈ 𝐵)    ⇒   (𝜑 → ((𝑁‘𝑋) + 𝑋) = 0 )
 
29-Jan-2025grpinvcld 13603 A group element's inverse is a group element. (Contributed by SN, 29-Jan-2025.)
𝐵 = (Base‘𝐺)    &   𝑁 = (invg‘𝐺)    &   (𝜑 → 𝐺 ∈ Grp)    &   (𝜑 → 𝑋 ∈ 𝐵)    ⇒   (𝜑 → (𝑁‘𝑋) ∈ 𝐵)
 
29-Jan-2025grpridd 13588 The identity element of a group is a right identity. Deduction associated with grprid 13586. (Contributed by SN, 29-Jan-2025.)
𝐵 = (Base‘𝐺)    &    + = (+g‘𝐺)    &    0 = (0g‘𝐺)    &   (𝜑 → 𝐺 ∈ Grp)    &   (𝜑 → 𝑋 ∈ 𝐵)    ⇒   (𝜑 → (𝑋 + 0 ) = 𝑋)
 
29-Jan-2025grplidd 13587 The identity element of a group is a left identity. Deduction associated with grplid 13585. (Contributed by SN, 29-Jan-2025.)
𝐵 = (Base‘𝐺)    &    + = (+g‘𝐺)    &    0 = (0g‘𝐺)    &   (𝜑 → 𝐺 ∈ Grp)    &   (𝜑 → 𝑋 ∈ 𝐵)    ⇒   (𝜑 → ( 0 + 𝑋) = 𝑋)
 
29-Jan-2025grpassd 13566 A group operation is associative. (Contributed by SN, 29-Jan-2025.)
𝐵 = (Base‘𝐺)    &    + = (+g‘𝐺)    &   (𝜑 → 𝐺 ∈ Grp)    &   (𝜑 → 𝑋 ∈ 𝐵)    &   (𝜑 → 𝑌 ∈ 𝐵)    &   (𝜑 → 𝑍 ∈ 𝐵)    ⇒   (𝜑 → ((𝑋 + 𝑌) + 𝑍) = (𝑋 + (𝑌 + 𝑍)))
 
28-Jan-2025dvdsrex 14083 Existence of the divisibility relation. (Contributed by Jim Kingdon, 28-Jan-2025.)
(𝑅 ∈ SRing → (∥r‘𝑅) ∈ V)
 
24-Jan-2025reldvdsrsrg 14077 The divides relation is a relation. (Contributed by Mario Carneiro, 1-Dec-2014.) (Revised by Jim Kingdon, 24-Jan-2025.)
(𝑅 ∈ SRing → Rel (∥r‘𝑅))
 
18-Jan-2025rerecapb 9006 A real number has a multiplicative inverse if and only if it is apart from zero. Theorem 11.2.4 of [HoTT], p. (varies). (Contributed by Jim Kingdon, 18-Jan-2025.)
(𝐴 ∈ ℝ → (𝐴 # 0 ↔ ∃𝑥 ∈ ℝ (𝐴 · 𝑥) = 1))
 
18-Jan-2025recapb 8834 A complex number has a multiplicative inverse if and only if it is apart from zero. Theorem 11.2.4 of [HoTT], p. (varies), generalized from real to complex numbers. (Contributed by Jim Kingdon, 18-Jan-2025.)
(𝐴 ∈ ℂ → (𝐴 # 0 ↔ ∃𝑥 ∈ ℂ (𝐴 · 𝑥) = 1))
 
17-Jan-2025ressval3d 13126 Value of structure restriction, deduction version. (Contributed by AV, 14-Mar-2020.) (Revised by Jim Kingdon, 17-Jan-2025.)
𝑅 = (𝑆 ↾s 𝐴)    &   𝐵 = (Base‘𝑆)    &   𝐸 = (Base‘ndx)    &   (𝜑 → 𝑆 ∈ 𝑉)    &   (𝜑 → Fun 𝑆)    &   (𝜑 → 𝐸 ∈ dom 𝑆)    &   (𝜑 → 𝐴 ⊆ 𝐵)    ⇒   (𝜑 → 𝑅 = (𝑆 sSet ⟨𝐸, 𝐴⟩))
 
17-Jan-2025strressid 13125 Behavior of trivial restriction. (Contributed by Stefan O'Rear, 29-Nov-2014.) (Revised by Jim Kingdon, 17-Jan-2025.)
(𝜑 → 𝐵 = (Base‘𝑊))    &   (𝜑 → 𝑊 Struct ⟨𝑀, 𝑁⟩)    &   (𝜑 → Fun 𝑊)    &   (𝜑 → (Base‘ndx) ∈ dom 𝑊)    ⇒   (𝜑 → (𝑊 ↾s 𝐵) = 𝑊)
 
17-Jan-2025snelpwg 4297 A singleton of a set is a member of the powerclass of a class if and only if that set is a member of that class. (Contributed by NM, 1-Apr-1998.) Put in closed form and avoid ax-nul 4210. (Revised by BJ, 17-Jan-2025.)
(𝐴 ∈ 𝑉 → (𝐴 ∈ 𝐵 ↔ {𝐴} ∈ 𝒫 𝐵))
 
16-Jan-2025ressex 13119 Existence of structure restriction. (Contributed by Jim Kingdon, 16-Jan-2025.)
((𝑊 ∈ 𝑋 ∧ 𝐴 ∈ 𝑌) → (𝑊 ↾s 𝐴) ∈ V)
 
16-Jan-2025ressvalsets 13118 Value of structure restriction. (Contributed by Jim Kingdon, 16-Jan-2025.)
((𝑊 ∈ 𝑋 ∧ 𝐴 ∈ 𝑌) → (𝑊 ↾s 𝐴) = (𝑊 sSet ⟨(Base‘ndx), (𝐴 ∩ (Base‘𝑊))⟩))
 
12-Jan-2025isrim 14154 An isomorphism of rings is a bijective homomorphism. (Contributed by AV, 22-Oct-2019.) Remove sethood antecedent. (Revised by SN, 12-Jan-2025.)
𝐵 = (Base‘𝑅)    &   𝐶 = (Base‘𝑆)    ⇒   (𝐹 ∈ (𝑅 RingIso 𝑆) ↔ (𝐹 ∈ (𝑅 RingHom 𝑆) ∧ 𝐹:𝐵–1-1-onto→𝐶))
 
10-Jan-2025rimrhm 14156 A ring isomorphism is a homomorphism. (Contributed by AV, 22-Oct-2019.) Remove hypotheses. (Revised by SN, 10-Jan-2025.)
(𝐹 ∈ (𝑅 RingIso 𝑆) → 𝐹 ∈ (𝑅 RingHom 𝑆))
 
10-Jan-2025isrim0 14146 A ring isomorphism is a homomorphism whose converse is also a homomorphism. (Contributed by AV, 22-Oct-2019.) Remove sethood antecedent. (Revised by SN, 10-Jan-2025.)
(𝐹 ∈ (𝑅 RingIso 𝑆) ↔ (𝐹 ∈ (𝑅 RingHom 𝑆) ∧ ◡𝐹 ∈ (𝑆 RingHom 𝑅)))
 
10-Jan-2025opprex 14057 Existence of the opposite ring. If you know that 𝑅 is a ring, see opprring 14063. (Contributed by Jim Kingdon, 10-Jan-2025.)
𝑂 = (oppr‘𝑅)    ⇒   (𝑅 ∈ 𝑉 → 𝑂 ∈ V)
 
10-Jan-2025mgpex 13909 Existence of the multiplication group. If 𝑅 is known to be a semiring, see srgmgp 13952. (Contributed by Jim Kingdon, 10-Jan-2025.)
𝑀 = (mulGrp‘𝑅)    ⇒   (𝑅 ∈ 𝑉 → 𝑀 ∈ V)
 
6-Jan-2025ord3 6585 Ordinal 3 is an ordinal class. (Contributed by BTernaryTau, 6-Jan-2025.)
Ord 3o
 
5-Jan-2025imbibi 252 The antecedent of one side of a biconditional can be moved out of the biconditional to become the antecedent of the remaining biconditional. (Contributed by BJ, 1-Jan-2025.) (Proof shortened by Wolf Lammen, 5-Jan-2025.)
(((𝜑 → 𝜓) ↔ 𝜒) → (𝜑 → (𝜓 ↔ 𝜒)))
 
1-Jan-2025snss 3803 The singleton of an element of a class is a subset of the class (inference form of snssg 3802). Theorem 7.4 of [Quine] p. 49. (Contributed by NM, 21-Jun-1993.) (Proof shortened by BJ, 1-Jan-2025.)
𝐴 ∈ V    ⇒   (𝐴 ∈ 𝐵 ↔ {𝐴} ⊆ 𝐵)
 
1-Jan-2025snssg 3802 The singleton formed on a set is included in a class if and only if the set is an element of that class. Theorem 7.4 of [Quine] p. 49. (Contributed by NM, 22-Jul-2001.) (Proof shortened by BJ, 1-Jan-2025.)
(𝐴 ∈ 𝑉 → (𝐴 ∈ 𝐵 ↔ {𝐴} ⊆ 𝐵))
 
1-Jan-2025snssb 3801 Characterization of the inclusion of a singleton in a class. (Contributed by BJ, 1-Jan-2025.)
({𝐴} ⊆ 𝐵 ↔ (𝐴 ∈ V → 𝐴 ∈ 𝐵))
 
30-Dec-2024rex2dom 6984 A set that has at least 2 different members dominates ordinal 2. (Contributed by BTernaryTau, 30-Dec-2024.)
((𝐴 ∈ 𝑉 ∧ ∃𝑥 ∈ 𝐴 ∃𝑦 ∈ 𝐴 𝑥 ≠ 𝑦) → 2o ≼ 𝐴)
 
23-Dec-2024en2prd 6983 Two proper unordered pairs are equinumerous. (Contributed by BTernaryTau, 23-Dec-2024.)
(𝜑 → 𝐴 ∈ 𝑉)    &   (𝜑 → 𝐵 ∈ 𝑊)    &   (𝜑 → 𝐶 ∈ 𝑋)    &   (𝜑 → 𝐷 ∈ 𝑌)    &   (𝜑 → 𝐴 ≠ 𝐵)    &   (𝜑 → 𝐶 ≠ 𝐷)    ⇒   (𝜑 → {𝐴, 𝐵} ≈ {𝐶, 𝐷})
 
11-Dec-2024elopabr 4372 Membership in an ordered-pair class abstraction defined by a binary relation. (Contributed by AV, 16-Feb-2021.) (Proof shortened by SN, 11-Dec-2024.)
(𝐴 ∈ {⟨𝑥, 𝑦⟩ ∣ 𝑥𝑅𝑦} → 𝐴 ∈ 𝑅)
 
10-Dec-2024cbvreuw 2760 Change the bound variable of a restricted unique existential quantifier using implicit substitution. Version of cbvreu 2763 with a disjoint variable condition. (Contributed by Mario Carneiro, 15-Oct-2016.) (Revised by GG, 10-Jan-2024.) (Revised by Wolf Lammen, 10-Dec-2024.)
Ⅎ𝑦𝜑    &   Ⅎ𝑥𝜓    &   (𝑥 = 𝑦 → (𝜑 ↔ 𝜓))    ⇒   (∃!𝑥 ∈ 𝐴 𝜑 ↔ ∃!𝑦 ∈ 𝐴 𝜓)
 
9-Dec-2024nninfwlpoim 7362 Decidable equality for ℕ∞ implies the Weak Limited Principle of Omniscience (WLPO). (Contributed by Jim Kingdon, 9-Dec-2024.)
(∀𝑥 ∈ ℕ∞ ∀𝑦 ∈ ℕ∞ DECID 𝑥 = 𝑦 → ω ∈ WOmni)
 
8-Dec-2024nninfinfwlpolem 7361 Lemma for nninfinfwlpo 7363. (Contributed by Jim Kingdon, 8-Dec-2024.)
(𝜑 → 𝐹:ω⟶2o)    &   𝐺 = (𝑖 ∈ ω ↦ if(∃𝑥 ∈ suc 𝑖(𝐹‘𝑥) = ∅, ∅, 1o))    &   (𝜑 → ∀𝑥 ∈ ℕ∞ DECID 𝑥 = (𝑖 ∈ ω ↦ 1o))    ⇒   (𝜑 → DECID ∀𝑛 ∈ ω (𝐹‘𝑛) = 1o)
 
8-Dec-2024nninfwlpoimlemdc 7360 Lemma for nninfwlpoim 7362. (Contributed by Jim Kingdon, 8-Dec-2024.)
(𝜑 → 𝐹:ω⟶2o)    &   𝐺 = (𝑖 ∈ ω ↦ if(∃𝑥 ∈ suc 𝑖(𝐹‘𝑥) = ∅, ∅, 1o))    &   (𝜑 → ∀𝑥 ∈ ℕ∞ ∀𝑦 ∈ ℕ∞ DECID 𝑥 = 𝑦)    ⇒   (𝜑 → DECID ∀𝑛 ∈ ω (𝐹‘𝑛) = 1o)
 
8-Dec-2024nninfwlpoimlemginf 7359 Lemma for nninfwlpoim 7362. (Contributed by Jim Kingdon, 8-Dec-2024.)
(𝜑 → 𝐹:ω⟶2o)    &   𝐺 = (𝑖 ∈ ω ↦ if(∃𝑥 ∈ suc 𝑖(𝐹‘𝑥) = ∅, ∅, 1o))    ⇒   (𝜑 → (𝐺 = (𝑖 ∈ ω ↦ 1o) ↔ ∀𝑛 ∈ ω (𝐹‘𝑛) = 1o))
 
8-Dec-2024nninfwlpoimlemg 7358 Lemma for nninfwlpoim 7362. (Contributed by Jim Kingdon, 8-Dec-2024.)
(𝜑 → 𝐹:ω⟶2o)    &   𝐺 = (𝑖 ∈ ω ↦ if(∃𝑥 ∈ suc 𝑖(𝐹‘𝑥) = ∅, ∅, 1o))    ⇒   (𝜑 → 𝐺 ∈ ℕ∞)
 
7-Dec-2024nninfwlpor 7357 The Weak Limited Principle of Omniscience (WLPO) implies that equality for ℕ∞ is decidable. (Contributed by Jim Kingdon, 7-Dec-2024.)
(ω ∈ WOmni → ∀𝑥 ∈ ℕ∞ ∀𝑦 ∈ ℕ∞ DECID 𝑥 = 𝑦)
 
7-Dec-2024nninfwlporlem 7356 Lemma for nninfwlpor 7357. The result. (Contributed by Jim Kingdon, 7-Dec-2024.)
(𝜑 → 𝑋:ω⟶2o)    &   (𝜑 → 𝑌:ω⟶2o)    &   𝐷 = (𝑖 ∈ ω ↦ if((𝑋‘𝑖) = (𝑌‘𝑖), 1o, ∅))    &   (𝜑 → ω ∈ WOmni)    ⇒   (𝜑 → DECID 𝑋 = 𝑌)
 
7-Dec-2024domssr 6942 If 𝐶 is a superset of 𝐵 and 𝐵 dominates 𝐴, then 𝐶 also dominates 𝐴. (Contributed by BTernaryTau, 7-Dec-2024.)
((𝐶 ∈ 𝑉 ∧ 𝐵 ⊆ 𝐶 ∧ 𝐴 ≼ 𝐵) → 𝐴 ≼ 𝐶)
 
7-Dec-2024f1dom4g 6917 The domain of a one-to-one set function is dominated by its codomain when the latter is a set. This variation of f1domg 6922 does not require the Axiom of Collection nor the Axiom of Union. (Contributed by BTernaryTau, 7-Dec-2024.)
(((𝐹 ∈ 𝑉 ∧ 𝐴 ∈ 𝑊 ∧ 𝐵 ∈ 𝑋) ∧ 𝐹:𝐴–1-1→𝐵) → 𝐴 ≼ 𝐵)
 
7-Dec-2024f1oen4g 6916 The domain and range of a one-to-one, onto set function are equinumerous. This variation of f1oeng 6921 does not require the Axiom of Collection nor the Axiom of Union. (Contributed by BTernaryTau, 7-Dec-2024.)
(((𝐹 ∈ 𝑉 ∧ 𝐴 ∈ 𝑊 ∧ 𝐵 ∈ 𝑋) ∧ 𝐹:𝐴–1-1-onto→𝐵) → 𝐴 ≈ 𝐵)
 
6-Dec-2024nninfwlporlemd 7355 Given two countably infinite sequences of zeroes and ones, they are equal if and only if a sequence formed by pointwise comparing them is all ones. (Contributed by Jim Kingdon, 6-Dec-2024.)
(𝜑 → 𝑋:ω⟶2o)    &   (𝜑 → 𝑌:ω⟶2o)    &   𝐷 = (𝑖 ∈ ω ↦ if((𝑋‘𝑖) = (𝑌‘𝑖), 1o, ∅))    ⇒   (𝜑 → (𝑋 = 𝑌 ↔ 𝐷 = (𝑖 ∈ ω ↦ 1o)))
 
3-Dec-2024nninfwlpo 7364 Decidability of equality for ℕ∞ is equivalent to the Weak Limited Principle of Omniscience (WLPO). (Contributed by Jim Kingdon, 3-Dec-2024.)
(∀𝑥 ∈ ℕ∞ ∀𝑦 ∈ ℕ∞ DECID 𝑥 = 𝑦 ↔ ω ∈ WOmni)
 
3-Dec-2024nninfdcinf 7354 The Weak Limited Principle of Omniscience (WLPO) implies that it is decidable whether an element of ℕ∞ equals the point at infinity. (Contributed by Jim Kingdon, 3-Dec-2024.)
(𝜑 → ω ∈ WOmni)    &   (𝜑 → 𝑁 ∈ ℕ∞)    ⇒   (𝜑 → DECID 𝑁 = (𝑖 ∈ ω ↦ 1o))
 
29-Nov-2024brdom2g 6909 Dominance relation. This variation of brdomg 6910 does not require the Axiom of Union. (Contributed by NM, 15-Jun-1998.) Extract from a subproof of brdomg 6910. (Revised by BTernaryTau, 29-Nov-2024.)
((𝐴 ∈ 𝑉 ∧ 𝐵 ∈ 𝑊) → (𝐴 ≼ 𝐵 ↔ ∃𝑓 𝑓:𝐴–1-1→𝐵))
 
28-Nov-2024basmexd 13114 A structure whose base is inhabited is a set. (Contributed by Jim Kingdon, 28-Nov-2024.)
(𝜑 → 𝐵 = (Base‘𝐺))    &   (𝜑 → 𝐴 ∈ 𝐵)    ⇒   (𝜑 → 𝐺 ∈ V)
 
22-Nov-2024eliotaeu 5310 An inhabited iota expression has a unique value. (Contributed by Jim Kingdon, 22-Nov-2024.)
(𝐴 ∈ (℩𝑥𝜑) → ∃!𝑥𝜑)
 
22-Nov-2024eliota 5309 An element of an iota expression. (Contributed by Jim Kingdon, 22-Nov-2024.)
(𝐴 ∈ (℩𝑥𝜑) ↔ ∃𝑦(𝐴 ∈ 𝑦 ∧ ∀𝑥(𝜑 ↔ 𝑥 = 𝑦)))
 
18-Nov-2024basmex 13113 A structure whose base is inhabited is a set. (Contributed by Jim Kingdon, 18-Nov-2024.)
𝐵 = (Base‘𝐺)    ⇒   (𝐴 ∈ 𝐵 → 𝐺 ∈ V)
 
14-Nov-2024dcand 938 A conjunction of two decidable propositions is decidable. (Contributed by Jim Kingdon, 12-Apr-2018.) (Revised by BJ, 14-Nov-2024.)
(𝜑 → DECID 𝜓)    &   (𝜑 → DECID 𝜒)    ⇒   (𝜑 → DECID (𝜓 ∧ 𝜒))
 
12-Nov-2024sravscag 14428 The scalar product operation of a subring algebra. (Contributed by Stefan O'Rear, 27-Nov-2014.) (Revised by Mario Carneiro, 4-Oct-2015.) (Revised by Thierry Arnoux, 16-Jun-2019.) (Proof shortened by AV, 12-Nov-2024.)
(𝜑 → 𝐴 = ((subringAlg ‘𝑊)‘𝑆))    &   (𝜑 → 𝑆 ⊆ (Base‘𝑊))    &   (𝜑 → 𝑊 ∈ 𝑋)    ⇒   (𝜑 → (.r‘𝑊) = ( ·𝑠 ‘𝐴))
 
12-Nov-2024srascag 14427 The set of scalars of a subring algebra. (Contributed by Stefan O'Rear, 27-Nov-2014.) (Revised by Mario Carneiro, 4-Oct-2015.) (Revised by Thierry Arnoux, 16-Jun-2019.) (Proof shortened by AV, 12-Nov-2024.)
(𝜑 → 𝐴 = ((subringAlg ‘𝑊)‘𝑆))    &   (𝜑 → 𝑆 ⊆ (Base‘𝑊))    &   (𝜑 → 𝑊 ∈ 𝑋)    ⇒   (𝜑 → (𝑊 ↾s 𝑆) = (Scalar‘𝐴))
 
12-Nov-2024slotsdifipndx 13229 The slot for the scalar is not the index of other slots. (Contributed by AV, 12-Nov-2024.)
(( ·𝑠 ‘ndx) ≠ (·𝑖‘ndx) ∧ (Scalar‘ndx) ≠ (·𝑖‘ndx))
 
11-Nov-2024bj-con1st 16224 Contraposition when the antecedent is a negated stable proposition. See con1dc 861. (Contributed by BJ, 11-Nov-2024.)
(STAB 𝜑 → ((¬ 𝜑 → 𝜓) → (¬ 𝜓 → 𝜑)))
 
11-Nov-2024slotsdifdsndx 13279 The index of the slot for the distance is not the index of other slots. (Contributed by AV, 11-Nov-2024.)
((*𝑟‘ndx) ≠ (dist‘ndx) ∧ (le‘ndx) ≠ (dist‘ndx))
 
11-Nov-2024plendxnocndx 13268 The slot for the orthocomplementation is not the slot for the order in an extensible structure. (Contributed by AV, 11-Nov-2024.)
(le‘ndx) ≠ (oc‘ndx)
 
11-Nov-2024basendxnocndx 13267 The slot for the orthocomplementation is not the slot for the base set in an extensible structure. (Contributed by AV, 11-Nov-2024.)
(Base‘ndx) ≠ (oc‘ndx)
 
11-Nov-2024slotsdifplendx 13264 The index of the slot for the distance is not the index of other slots. (Contributed by AV, 11-Nov-2024.)
((*𝑟‘ndx) ≠ (le‘ndx) ∧ (TopSet‘ndx) ≠ (le‘ndx))
 
11-Nov-2024tsetndxnstarvndx 13248 The slot for the topology is not the slot for the involution in an extensible structure. (Contributed by AV, 11-Nov-2024.)
(TopSet‘ndx) ≠ (*𝑟‘ndx)
 
11-Nov-2024ofeqd 6229 Equality theorem for function operation, deduction form. (Contributed by SN, 11-Nov-2024.)
(𝜑 → 𝑅 = 𝑆)    ⇒   (𝜑 → ∘𝑓 𝑅 = ∘𝑓 𝑆)
 
11-Nov-2024const 857 Contraposition when the antecedent is a negated stable proposition. See comment of condc 858. (Contributed by BJ, 18-Nov-2023.) (Proof shortened by BJ, 11-Nov-2024.)
(STAB 𝜑 → ((¬ 𝜑 → ¬ 𝜓) → (𝜓 → 𝜑)))
 
10-Nov-2024slotsdifunifndx 13286 The index of the slot for the uniform set is not the index of other slots. (Contributed by AV, 10-Nov-2024.)
(((+g‘ndx) ≠ (UnifSet‘ndx) ∧ (.r‘ndx) ≠ (UnifSet‘ndx) ∧ (*𝑟‘ndx) ≠ (UnifSet‘ndx)) ∧ ((le‘ndx) ≠ (UnifSet‘ndx) ∧ (dist‘ndx) ≠ (UnifSet‘ndx)))
 
7-Nov-2024ressbasd 13121 Base set of a structure restriction. (Contributed by Stefan O'Rear, 26-Nov-2014.) (Proof shortened by AV, 7-Nov-2024.)
(𝜑 → 𝑅 = (𝑊 ↾s 𝐴))    &   (𝜑 → 𝐵 = (Base‘𝑊))    &   (𝜑 → 𝑊 ∈ 𝑋)    &   (𝜑 → 𝐴 ∈ 𝑉)    ⇒   (𝜑 → (𝐴 ∩ 𝐵) = (Base‘𝑅))
 
6-Nov-2024oppraddg 14060 Addition operation of an opposite ring. (Contributed by Mario Carneiro, 1-Dec-2014.) (Proof shortened by AV, 6-Nov-2024.)
𝑂 = (oppr‘𝑅)    &    + = (+g‘𝑅)    ⇒   (𝑅 ∈ 𝑉 → + = (+g‘𝑂))
 
6-Nov-2024opprbasg 14059 Base set of an opposite ring. (Contributed by Mario Carneiro, 1-Dec-2014.) (Proof shortened by AV, 6-Nov-2024.)
𝑂 = (oppr‘𝑅)    &   𝐵 = (Base‘𝑅)    ⇒   (𝑅 ∈ 𝑉 → 𝐵 = (Base‘𝑂))
 
6-Nov-2024opprsllem 14058 Lemma for opprbasg 14059 and oppraddg 14060. (Contributed by Mario Carneiro, 1-Dec-2014.) (Revised by AV, 6-Nov-2024.)
𝑂 = (oppr‘𝑅)    &   (𝐸 = Slot (𝐸‘ndx) ∧ (𝐸‘ndx) ∈ ℕ)    &   (𝐸‘ndx) ≠ (.r‘ndx)    ⇒   (𝑅 ∈ 𝑉 → (𝐸‘𝑅) = (𝐸‘𝑂))
 
4-Nov-2024lgsfvalg 15705 Value of the function 𝐹 which defines the Legendre symbol at the primes. (Contributed by Mario Carneiro, 4-Feb-2015.) (Revised by Jim Kingdon, 4-Nov-2024.)
𝐹 = (𝑛 ∈ ℕ ↦ if(𝑛 ∈ ℙ, (if(𝑛 = 2, if(2 ∥ 𝐴, 0, if((𝐴 mod 8) ∈ {1, 7}, 1, -1)), ((((𝐴↑((𝑛 − 1) / 2)) + 1) mod 𝑛) − 1))↑(𝑛 pCnt 𝑁)), 1))    ⇒   ((𝐴 ∈ ℤ ∧ 𝑁 ∈ ℕ ∧ 𝑀 ∈ ℕ) → (𝐹‘𝑀) = if(𝑀 ∈ ℙ, (if(𝑀 = 2, if(2 ∥ 𝐴, 0, if((𝐴 mod 8) ∈ {1, 7}, 1, -1)), ((((𝐴↑((𝑀 − 1) / 2)) + 1) mod 𝑀) − 1))↑(𝑀 pCnt 𝑁)), 1))
 
3-Nov-2024znmul 14627 The multiplicative structure of ℤ/nℤ is the same as the quotient ring it is based on. (Contributed by Mario Carneiro, 15-Jun-2015.) (Revised by AV, 13-Jun-2019.) (Revised by AV, 3-Nov-2024.)
𝑆 = (RSpan‘ℤring)    &   𝑈 = (ℤring /s (ℤring ~QG (𝑆‘{𝑁})))    &   𝑌 = (ℤ/nℤ‘𝑁)    ⇒   (𝑁 ∈ ℕ0 → (.r‘𝑈) = (.r‘𝑌))
 
3-Nov-2024znadd 14626 The additive structure of ℤ/nℤ is the same as the quotient ring it is based on. (Contributed by Mario Carneiro, 15-Jun-2015.) (Revised by AV, 13-Jun-2019.) (Revised by AV, 3-Nov-2024.)
𝑆 = (RSpan‘ℤring)    &   𝑈 = (ℤring /s (ℤring ~QG (𝑆‘{𝑁})))    &   𝑌 = (ℤ/nℤ‘𝑁)    ⇒   (𝑁 ∈ ℕ0 → (+g‘𝑈) = (+g‘𝑌))
 
3-Nov-2024znbas2 14625 The base set of ℤ/nℤ is the same as the quotient ring it is based on. (Contributed by Mario Carneiro, 15-Jun-2015.) (Revised by AV, 13-Jun-2019.) (Revised by AV, 3-Nov-2024.)
𝑆 = (RSpan‘ℤring)    &   𝑈 = (ℤring /s (ℤring ~QG (𝑆‘{𝑁})))    &   𝑌 = (ℤ/nℤ‘𝑁)    ⇒   (𝑁 ∈ ℕ0 → (Base‘𝑈) = (Base‘𝑌))
 
3-Nov-2024znbaslemnn 14624 Lemma for znbas 14629. (Contributed by Mario Carneiro, 14-Jun-2015.) (Revised by Mario Carneiro, 14-Aug-2015.) (Revised by AV, 13-Jun-2019.) (Revised by AV, 9-Sep-2021.) (Revised by AV, 3-Nov-2024.)
𝑆 = (RSpan‘ℤring)    &   𝑈 = (ℤring /s (ℤring ~QG (𝑆‘{𝑁})))    &   𝑌 = (ℤ/nℤ‘𝑁)    &   𝐸 = Slot (𝐸‘ndx)    &   (𝐸‘ndx) ∈ ℕ    &   (𝐸‘ndx) ≠ (le‘ndx)    ⇒   (𝑁 ∈ ℕ0 → (𝐸‘𝑈) = (𝐸‘𝑌))
 
3-Nov-2024zlmmulrg 14616 Ring operation of a ℤ-module (if present). (Contributed by Mario Carneiro, 2-Oct-2015.) (Revised by AV, 3-Nov-2024.)
𝑊 = (ℤMod‘𝐺)    &    · = (.r‘𝐺)    ⇒   (𝐺 ∈ 𝑉 → · = (.r‘𝑊))
 
3-Nov-2024zlmplusgg 14615 Group operation of a ℤ-module. (Contributed by Mario Carneiro, 2-Oct-2015.) (Revised by AV, 3-Nov-2024.)
𝑊 = (ℤMod‘𝐺)    &    + = (+g‘𝐺)    ⇒   (𝐺 ∈ 𝑉 → + = (+g‘𝑊))
 
3-Nov-2024zlmbasg 14614 Base set of a ℤ-module. (Contributed by Mario Carneiro, 2-Oct-2015.) (Revised by AV, 3-Nov-2024.)
𝑊 = (ℤMod‘𝐺)    &   𝐵 = (Base‘𝐺)    ⇒   (𝐺 ∈ 𝑉 → 𝐵 = (Base‘𝑊))
 
3-Nov-2024zlmlemg 14613 Lemma for zlmbasg 14614 and zlmplusgg 14615. (Contributed by Mario Carneiro, 2-Oct-2015.) (Revised by AV, 3-Nov-2024.)
𝑊 = (ℤMod‘𝐺)    &   𝐸 = Slot (𝐸‘ndx)    &   (𝐸‘ndx) ∈ ℕ    &   (𝐸‘ndx) ≠ (Scalar‘ndx)    &   (𝐸‘ndx) ≠ ( ·𝑠 ‘ndx)    ⇒   (𝐺 ∈ 𝑉 → (𝐸‘𝐺) = (𝐸‘𝑊))
 
2-Nov-2024zlmsca 14617 Scalar ring of a ℤ-module. (Contributed by Mario Carneiro, 2-Oct-2015.) (Revised by AV, 12-Jun-2019.) (Proof shortened by AV, 2-Nov-2024.)
𝑊 = (ℤMod‘𝐺)    ⇒   (𝐺 ∈ 𝑉 → ℤring = (Scalar‘𝑊))
 
1-Nov-2024plendxnvscandx 13263 The slot for the "less than or equal to" ordering is not the slot for the scalar product in an extensible structure. (Contributed by AV, 1-Nov-2024.)
(le‘ndx) ≠ ( ·𝑠 ‘ndx)
 
1-Nov-2024plendxnscandx 13262 The slot for the "less than or equal to" ordering is not the slot for the scalar in an extensible structure. (Contributed by AV, 1-Nov-2024.)
(le‘ndx) ≠ (Scalar‘ndx)
 
1-Nov-2024plendxnmulrndx 13261 The slot for the "less than or equal to" ordering is not the slot for the ring multiplication operation in an extensible structure. (Contributed by AV, 1-Nov-2024.)
(le‘ndx) ≠ (.r‘ndx)
 
1-Nov-2024qsqeqor 10889 The squares of two rational numbers are equal iff one number equals the other or its negative. (Contributed by Jim Kingdon, 1-Nov-2024.)
((𝐴 ∈ ℚ ∧ 𝐵 ∈ ℚ) → ((𝐴↑2) = (𝐵↑2) ↔ (𝐴 = 𝐵 ∨ 𝐴 = -𝐵)))
 
31-Oct-2024dsndxnmulrndx 13276 The slot for the distance function is not the slot for the ring multiplication operation in an extensible structure. (Contributed by AV, 31-Oct-2024.)
(dist‘ndx) ≠ (.r‘ndx)
 
31-Oct-2024tsetndxnmulrndx 13247 The slot for the topology is not the slot for the ring multiplication operation in an extensible structure. (Contributed by AV, 31-Oct-2024.)
(TopSet‘ndx) ≠ (.r‘ndx)
 
31-Oct-2024tsetndxnbasendx 13245 The slot for the topology is not the slot for the base set in an extensible structure. (Contributed by AV, 21-Oct-2024.) (Proof shortened by AV, 31-Oct-2024.)
(TopSet‘ndx) ≠ (Base‘ndx)
 
31-Oct-2024basendxlttsetndx 13244 The index of the slot for the base set is less then the index of the slot for the topology in an extensible structure. (Contributed by AV, 31-Oct-2024.)
(Base‘ndx) < (TopSet‘ndx)
 
31-Oct-2024tsetndxnn 13243 The index of the slot for the group operation in an extensible structure is a positive integer. (Contributed by AV, 31-Oct-2024.)
(TopSet‘ndx) ∈ ℕ
 
30-Oct-2024basendxltedgfndx 15832 The index value of the Base slot is less than the index value of the .ef slot. (Contributed by AV, 21-Sep-2020.) (Proof shortened by AV, 30-Oct-2024.)
(Base‘ndx) < (.ef‘ndx)
 
30-Oct-2024plendxnbasendx 13259 The slot for the order is not the slot for the base set in an extensible structure. (Contributed by AV, 21-Oct-2024.) (Proof shortened by AV, 30-Oct-2024.)
(le‘ndx) ≠ (Base‘ndx)
 
30-Oct-2024basendxltplendx 13258 The index value of the Base slot is less than the index value of the le slot. (Contributed by AV, 30-Oct-2024.)
(Base‘ndx) < (le‘ndx)
 
30-Oct-2024plendxnn 13257 The index value of the order slot is a positive integer. This property should be ensured for every concrete coding because otherwise it could not be used in an extensible structure (slots must be positive integers). (Contributed by AV, 30-Oct-2024.)
(le‘ndx) ∈ ℕ
 
29-Oct-2024sradsg 14433 Distance function of a subring algebra. (Contributed by Mario Carneiro, 4-Oct-2015.) (Revised by Thierry Arnoux, 16-Jun-2019.) (Revised by AV, 29-Oct-2024.)
(𝜑 → 𝐴 = ((subringAlg ‘𝑊)‘𝑆))    &   (𝜑 → 𝑆 ⊆ (Base‘𝑊))    &   (𝜑 → 𝑊 ∈ 𝑋)    ⇒   (𝜑 → (dist‘𝑊) = (dist‘𝐴))
 
29-Oct-2024sratsetg 14430 Topology component of a subring algebra. (Contributed by Mario Carneiro, 4-Oct-2015.) (Revised by Thierry Arnoux, 16-Jun-2019.) (Revised by AV, 29-Oct-2024.)
(𝜑 → 𝐴 = ((subringAlg ‘𝑊)‘𝑆))    &   (𝜑 → 𝑆 ⊆ (Base‘𝑊))    &   (𝜑 → 𝑊 ∈ 𝑋)    ⇒   (𝜑 → (TopSet‘𝑊) = (TopSet‘𝐴))
 
29-Oct-2024sramulrg 14426 Multiplicative operation of a subring algebra. (Contributed by Stefan O'Rear, 27-Nov-2014.) (Revised by Mario Carneiro, 4-Oct-2015.) (Revised by Thierry Arnoux, 16-Jun-2019.) (Revised by AV, 29-Oct-2024.)
(𝜑 → 𝐴 = ((subringAlg ‘𝑊)‘𝑆))    &   (𝜑 → 𝑆 ⊆ (Base‘𝑊))    &   (𝜑 → 𝑊 ∈ 𝑋)    ⇒   (𝜑 → (.r‘𝑊) = (.r‘𝐴))
 
29-Oct-2024sraaddgg 14425 Additive operation of a subring algebra. (Contributed by Stefan O'Rear, 27-Nov-2014.) (Revised by Mario Carneiro, 4-Oct-2015.) (Revised by Thierry Arnoux, 16-Jun-2019.) (Revised by AV, 29-Oct-2024.)
(𝜑 → 𝐴 = ((subringAlg ‘𝑊)‘𝑆))    &   (𝜑 → 𝑆 ⊆ (Base‘𝑊))    &   (𝜑 → 𝑊 ∈ 𝑋)    ⇒   (𝜑 → (+g‘𝑊) = (+g‘𝐴))
 
29-Oct-2024srabaseg 14424 Base set of a subring algebra. (Contributed by Stefan O'Rear, 27-Nov-2014.) (Revised by Mario Carneiro, 4-Oct-2015.) (Revised by Thierry Arnoux, 16-Jun-2019.) (Revised by AV, 29-Oct-2024.)
(𝜑 → 𝐴 = ((subringAlg ‘𝑊)‘𝑆))    &   (𝜑 → 𝑆 ⊆ (Base‘𝑊))    &   (𝜑 → 𝑊 ∈ 𝑋)    ⇒   (𝜑 → (Base‘𝑊) = (Base‘𝐴))
 
29-Oct-2024sralemg 14423 Lemma for srabaseg 14424 and similar theorems. (Contributed by Mario Carneiro, 4-Oct-2015.) (Revised by Thierry Arnoux, 16-Jun-2019.) (Revised by AV, 29-Oct-2024.)
(𝜑 → 𝐴 = ((subringAlg ‘𝑊)‘𝑆))    &   (𝜑 → 𝑆 ⊆ (Base‘𝑊))    &   (𝜑 → 𝑊 ∈ 𝑋)    &   (𝐸 = Slot (𝐸‘ndx) ∧ (𝐸‘ndx) ∈ ℕ)    &   (Scalar‘ndx) ≠ (𝐸‘ndx)    &   ( ·𝑠 ‘ndx) ≠ (𝐸‘ndx)    &   (·𝑖‘ndx) ≠ (𝐸‘ndx)    ⇒   (𝜑 → (𝐸‘𝑊) = (𝐸‘𝐴))
 
29-Oct-2024dsndxntsetndx 13278 The slot for the distance function is not the slot for the topology in an extensible structure. (Contributed by AV, 29-Oct-2024.)
(dist‘ndx) ≠ (TopSet‘ndx)
 
29-Oct-2024slotsdnscsi 13277 The slots Scalar, ·𝑠 and ·𝑖 are different from the slot dist. (Contributed by AV, 29-Oct-2024.)
((dist‘ndx) ≠ (Scalar‘ndx) ∧ (dist‘ndx) ≠ ( ·𝑠 ‘ndx) ∧ (dist‘ndx) ≠ (·𝑖‘ndx))
 
29-Oct-2024slotstnscsi 13249 The slots Scalar, ·𝑠 and ·𝑖 are different from the slot TopSet. (Contributed by AV, 29-Oct-2024.)
((TopSet‘ndx) ≠ (Scalar‘ndx) ∧ (TopSet‘ndx) ≠ ( ·𝑠 ‘ndx) ∧ (TopSet‘ndx) ≠ (·𝑖‘ndx))
 
29-Oct-2024ipndxnmulrndx 13228 The slot for the inner product is not the slot for the ring (multiplication) operation in an extensible structure. (Contributed by AV, 29-Oct-2024.)
(·𝑖‘ndx) ≠ (.r‘ndx)
 
29-Oct-2024ipndxnplusgndx 13227 The slot for the inner product is not the slot for the group operation in an extensible structure. (Contributed by AV, 29-Oct-2024.)
(·𝑖‘ndx) ≠ (+g‘ndx)
 
29-Oct-2024vscandxnmulrndx 13215 The slot for the scalar product is not the slot for the ring (multiplication) operation in an extensible structure. (Contributed by AV, 29-Oct-2024.)
( ·𝑠 ‘ndx) ≠ (.r‘ndx)
 
29-Oct-2024scandxnmulrndx 13210 The slot for the scalar field is not the slot for the ring (multiplication) operation in an extensible structure. (Contributed by AV, 29-Oct-2024.)
(Scalar‘ndx) ≠ (.r‘ndx)
 
29-Oct-2024fiubnn 11070 A finite set of natural numbers has an upper bound which is a a natural number. (Contributed by Jim Kingdon, 29-Oct-2024.)
((𝐴 ⊆ ℕ ∧ 𝐴 ∈ Fin) → ∃𝑥 ∈ ℕ ∀𝑦 ∈ 𝐴 𝑦 ≤ 𝑥)
 
29-Oct-2024fiubz 11069 A finite set of integers has an upper bound which is an integer. (Contributed by Jim Kingdon, 29-Oct-2024.)
((𝐴 ⊆ ℤ ∧ 𝐴 ∈ Fin) → ∃𝑥 ∈ ℤ ∀𝑦 ∈ 𝐴 𝑦 ≤ 𝑥)
 
29-Oct-2024fiubm 11068 Lemma for fiubz 11069 and fiubnn 11070. A general form of those theorems. (Contributed by Jim Kingdon, 29-Oct-2024.)
(𝜑 → 𝐴 ⊆ 𝐵)    &   (𝜑 → 𝐵 ⊆ ℚ)    &   (𝜑 → 𝐶 ∈ 𝐵)    &   (𝜑 → 𝐴 ∈ Fin)    ⇒   (𝜑 → ∃𝑥 ∈ 𝐵 ∀𝑦 ∈ 𝐴 𝑦 ≤ 𝑥)
 
28-Oct-2024edgfndxid 15831 The value of the edge function extractor is the value of the corresponding slot of the structure. (Contributed by AV, 21-Sep-2020.) (Proof shortened by AV, 28-Oct-2024.)
(𝐺 ∈ 𝑉 → (.ef‘𝐺) = (𝐺‘(.ef‘ndx)))
 
28-Oct-2024unifndxntsetndx 13285 The slot for the uniform set is not the slot for the topology in an extensible structure. (Contributed by AV, 28-Oct-2024.)
(UnifSet‘ndx) ≠ (TopSet‘ndx)
 
28-Oct-2024basendxltunifndx 13283 The index of the slot for the base set is less then the index of the slot for the uniform set in an extensible structure. (Contributed by AV, 28-Oct-2024.)
(Base‘ndx) < (UnifSet‘ndx)
 
28-Oct-2024unifndxnn 13282 The index of the slot for the uniform set in an extensible structure is a positive integer. (Contributed by AV, 28-Oct-2024.)
(UnifSet‘ndx) ∈ ℕ
 
28-Oct-2024dsndxnbasendx 13274 The slot for the distance is not the slot for the base set in an extensible structure. (Contributed by AV, 21-Oct-2024.) (Proof shortened by AV, 28-Oct-2024.)
(dist‘ndx) ≠ (Base‘ndx)
 
28-Oct-2024basendxltdsndx 13273 The index of the slot for the base set is less then the index of the slot for the distance in an extensible structure. (Contributed by AV, 28-Oct-2024.)
(Base‘ndx) < (dist‘ndx)
 
28-Oct-2024dsndxnn 13272 The index of the slot for the distance in an extensible structure is a positive integer. (Contributed by AV, 28-Oct-2024.)
(dist‘ndx) ∈ ℕ
 
27-Oct-2024bj-nnst 16216 Double negation of stability of a formula. Intuitionistic logic refutes unstability (but does not prove stability) of any formula. This theorem can also be proved in classical refutability calculus (see https://us.metamath.org/mpeuni/bj-peircestab.html) but not in minimal calculus (see https://us.metamath.org/mpeuni/bj-stabpeirce.html). See nnnotnotr 16462 for the version not using the definition of stability. (Contributed by BJ, 9-Oct-2019.) Prove it in ( → , ¬ ) -intuitionistic calculus with definitions (uses of ax-ia1 106, ax-ia2 107, ax-ia3 108 are via sylibr 134, necessary for definition unpackaging), and in ( → , ↔ , ¬ )-intuitionistic calculus, following a discussion with Jim Kingdon. (Revised by BJ, 27-Oct-2024.)
¬ ¬ STAB 𝜑
 
27-Oct-2024bj-imnimnn 16211 If a formula is implied by both a formula and its negation, then it is not refutable. There is another proof using the inference associated with bj-nnclavius 16210 as its last step. (Contributed by BJ, 27-Oct-2024.)
(𝜑 → 𝜓)    &   (¬ 𝜑 → 𝜓)    ⇒    ¬ ¬ 𝜓
 
25-Oct-2024nnwosdc 12581 Well-ordering principle: any inhabited decidable set of positive integers has a least element (schema form). (Contributed by NM, 17-Aug-2001.) (Revised by Jim Kingdon, 25-Oct-2024.)
(𝑥 = 𝑦 → (𝜑 ↔ 𝜓))    ⇒   ((∃𝑥 ∈ ℕ 𝜑 ∧ ∀𝑥 ∈ ℕ DECID 𝜑) → ∃𝑥 ∈ ℕ (𝜑 ∧ ∀𝑦 ∈ ℕ (𝜓 → 𝑥 ≤ 𝑦)))
 
23-Oct-2024nnwodc 12578 Well-ordering principle: any inhabited decidable set of positive integers has a least element. Theorem I.37 (well-ordering principle) of [Apostol] p. 34. (Contributed by NM, 17-Aug-2001.) (Revised by Jim Kingdon, 23-Oct-2024.)
((𝐴 ⊆ ℕ ∧ ∃𝑤 𝑤 ∈ 𝐴 ∧ ∀𝑗 ∈ ℕ DECID 𝑗 ∈ 𝐴) → ∃𝑥 ∈ 𝐴 ∀𝑦 ∈ 𝐴 𝑥 ≤ 𝑦)
 
22-Oct-2024uzwodc 12579 Well-ordering principle: any inhabited decidable subset of an upper set of integers has a least element. (Contributed by NM, 8-Oct-2005.) (Revised by Jim Kingdon, 22-Oct-2024.)
((𝑆 ⊆ (ℤ≥‘𝑀) ∧ ∃𝑥 𝑥 ∈ 𝑆 ∧ ∀𝑥 ∈ (ℤ≥‘𝑀)DECID 𝑥 ∈ 𝑆) → ∃𝑗 ∈ 𝑆 ∀𝑘 ∈ 𝑆 𝑗 ≤ 𝑘)
 
21-Oct-2024nnnotnotr 16462 Double negation of double negation elimination. Suggested by an online post by Martin Escardo. Although this statement resembles nnexmid 855, it can be proved with reference only to implication and negation (that is, without use of disjunction). (Contributed by Jim Kingdon, 21-Oct-2024.)
¬ ¬ (¬ ¬ 𝜑 → 𝜑)
 
21-Oct-2024unifndxnbasendx 13284 The slot for the uniform set is not the slot for the base set in an extensible structure. (Contributed by AV, 21-Oct-2024.)
(UnifSet‘ndx) ≠ (Base‘ndx)
 
21-Oct-2024ipndxnbasendx 13226 The slot for the inner product is not the slot for the base set in an extensible structure. (Contributed by AV, 21-Oct-2024.)
(·𝑖‘ndx) ≠ (Base‘ndx)
 
21-Oct-2024scandxnbasendx 13208 The slot for the scalar is not the slot for the base set in an extensible structure. (Contributed by AV, 21-Oct-2024.)
(Scalar‘ndx) ≠ (Base‘ndx)
 
20-Oct-2024isprm5lem 12684 Lemma for isprm5 12685. The interesting direction (showing that one only needs to check prime divisors up to the square root of 𝑃). (Contributed by Jim Kingdon, 20-Oct-2024.)
(𝜑 → 𝑃 ∈ (ℤ≥‘2))    &   (𝜑 → ∀𝑧 ∈ ℙ ((𝑧↑2) ≤ 𝑃 → ¬ 𝑧 ∥ 𝑃))    &   (𝜑 → 𝑋 ∈ (2...(𝑃 − 1)))    ⇒   (𝜑 → ¬ 𝑋 ∥ 𝑃)
 
19-Oct-2024resseqnbasd 13127 The components of an extensible structure except the base set remain unchanged on a structure restriction. (Contributed by Mario Carneiro, 26-Nov-2014.) (Revised by Mario Carneiro, 2-Dec-2014.) (Revised by AV, 19-Oct-2024.)
𝑅 = (𝑊 ↾s 𝐴)    &   𝐶 = (𝐸‘𝑊)    &   (𝐸 = Slot (𝐸‘ndx) ∧ (𝐸‘ndx) ∈ ℕ)    &   (𝐸‘ndx) ≠ (Base‘ndx)    &   (𝜑 → 𝑊 ∈ 𝑋)    &   (𝜑 → 𝐴 ∈ 𝑉)    ⇒   (𝜑 → 𝐶 = (𝐸‘𝑅))
 
18-Oct-2024rmodislmod 14336 The right module 𝑅 induces a left module 𝐿 by replacing the scalar multiplication with a reversed multiplication if the scalar ring is commutative. The hypothesis "rmodislmod.r" is a definition of a right module analogous to Definition df-lmod 14274 of a left module, see also islmod 14276. (Contributed by AV, 3-Dec-2021.) (Proof shortened by AV, 18-Oct-2024.)
𝑉 = (Base‘𝑅)    &    + = (+g‘𝑅)    &    · = ( ·𝑠 ‘𝑅)    &   𝐹 = (Scalar‘𝑅)    &   𝐾 = (Base‘𝐹)    &    ⨣ = (+g‘𝐹)    &    × = (.r‘𝐹)    &    1 = (1r‘𝐹)    &   (𝑅 ∈ Grp ∧ 𝐹 ∈ Ring ∧ ∀𝑞 ∈ 𝐾 ∀𝑟 ∈ 𝐾 ∀𝑥 ∈ 𝑉 ∀𝑤 ∈ 𝑉 (((𝑤 · 𝑟) ∈ 𝑉 ∧ ((𝑤 + 𝑥) · 𝑟) = ((𝑤 · 𝑟) + (𝑥 · 𝑟)) ∧ (𝑤 · (𝑞 ⨣ 𝑟)) = ((𝑤 · 𝑞) + (𝑤 · 𝑟))) ∧ ((𝑤 · (𝑞 × 𝑟)) = ((𝑤 · 𝑞) · 𝑟) ∧ (𝑤 · 1 ) = 𝑤)))    &    ∗ = (𝑠 ∈ 𝐾, 𝑣 ∈ 𝑉 ↦ (𝑣 · 𝑠))    &   𝐿 = (𝑅 sSet ⟨( ·𝑠 ‘ndx), ∗ ⟩)    ⇒   (𝐹 ∈ CRing → 𝐿 ∈ LMod)
 
18-Oct-2024mgpress 13915 Subgroup commutes with the multiplicative group operator. (Contributed by Mario Carneiro, 10-Jan-2015.) (Proof shortened by AV, 18-Oct-2024.)
𝑆 = (𝑅 ↾s 𝐴)    &   𝑀 = (mulGrp‘𝑅)    ⇒   ((𝑅 ∈ 𝑉 ∧ 𝐴 ∈ 𝑊) → (𝑀 ↾s 𝐴) = (mulGrp‘𝑆))
 
18-Oct-2024dsndxnplusgndx 13275 The slot for the distance function is not the slot for the group operation in an extensible structure. (Contributed by AV, 18-Oct-2024.)
(dist‘ndx) ≠ (+g‘ndx)
 
18-Oct-2024plendxnplusgndx 13260 The slot for the "less than or equal to" ordering is not the slot for the group operation in an extensible structure. (Contributed by AV, 18-Oct-2024.)
(le‘ndx) ≠ (+g‘ndx)
 
18-Oct-2024tsetndxnplusgndx 13246 The slot for the topology is not the slot for the group operation in an extensible structure. (Contributed by AV, 18-Oct-2024.)
(TopSet‘ndx) ≠ (+g‘ndx)
 
18-Oct-2024vscandxnscandx 13216 The slot for the scalar product is not the slot for the scalar field in an extensible structure. (Contributed by AV, 18-Oct-2024.)
( ·𝑠 ‘ndx) ≠ (Scalar‘ndx)
 
18-Oct-2024vscandxnplusgndx 13214 The slot for the scalar product is not the slot for the group operation in an extensible structure. (Contributed by AV, 18-Oct-2024.)
( ·𝑠 ‘ndx) ≠ (+g‘ndx)
 
18-Oct-2024vscandxnbasendx 13213 The slot for the scalar product is not the slot for the base set in an extensible structure. (Contributed by AV, 18-Oct-2024.)
( ·𝑠 ‘ndx) ≠ (Base‘ndx)
 
18-Oct-2024scandxnplusgndx 13209 The slot for the scalar field is not the slot for the group operation in an extensible structure. (Contributed by AV, 18-Oct-2024.)
(Scalar‘ndx) ≠ (+g‘ndx)
 
18-Oct-2024starvndxnmulrndx 13198 The slot for the involution function is not the slot for the base set in an extensible structure. (Contributed by AV, 18-Oct-2024.)
(*𝑟‘ndx) ≠ (.r‘ndx)
 
18-Oct-2024starvndxnplusgndx 13197 The slot for the involution function is not the slot for the base set in an extensible structure. (Contributed by AV, 18-Oct-2024.)
(*𝑟‘ndx) ≠ (+g‘ndx)
 
18-Oct-2024starvndxnbasendx 13196 The slot for the involution function is not the slot for the base set in an extensible structure. (Contributed by AV, 18-Oct-2024.)
(*𝑟‘ndx) ≠ (Base‘ndx)
 
17-Oct-2024basendxltplusgndx 13167 The index of the slot for the base set is less then the index of the slot for the group operation in an extensible structure. (Contributed by AV, 17-Oct-2024.)
(Base‘ndx) < (+g‘ndx)
 
17-Oct-2024plusgndxnn 13165 The index of the slot for the group operation in an extensible structure is a positive integer. (Contributed by AV, 17-Oct-2024.)
(+g‘ndx) ∈ ℕ
 
17-Oct-2024elnndc 9824 Membership of an integer in ℕ is decidable. (Contributed by Jim Kingdon, 17-Oct-2024.)
(𝑁 ∈ ℤ → DECID 𝑁 ∈ ℕ)
 
14-Oct-20242zinfmin 11775 Two ways to express the minimum of two integers. Because order of integers is decidable, we have more flexibility than for real numbers. (Contributed by Jim Kingdon, 14-Oct-2024.)
((𝐴 ∈ ℤ ∧ 𝐵 ∈ ℤ) → inf({𝐴, 𝐵}, ℝ, < ) = if(𝐴 ≤ 𝐵, 𝐴, 𝐵))
 
14-Oct-2024mingeb 11774 Equivalence of ≤ and being equal to the minimum of two reals. (Contributed by Jim Kingdon, 14-Oct-2024.)
((𝐴 ∈ ℝ ∧ 𝐵 ∈ ℝ) → (𝐴 ≤ 𝐵 ↔ inf({𝐴, 𝐵}, ℝ, < ) = 𝐴))
 
13-Oct-2024edgfndxnn 15830 The index value of the edge function extractor is a positive integer. This property should be ensured for every concrete coding because otherwise it could not be used in an extensible structure (slots must be positive integers). (Contributed by AV, 21-Sep-2020.) (Proof shortened by AV, 13-Oct-2024.)
(.ef‘ndx) ∈ ℕ
 
13-Oct-2024edgfndx 15829 Index value of the df-edgf 15827 slot. (Contributed by AV, 13-Oct-2024.) (New usage is discouraged.)
(.ef‘ndx) = 18
 
13-Oct-2024prdsvallem 13326 Lemma for prdsval 13327. (Contributed by Stefan O'Rear, 3-Jan-2015.) Extracted from the former proof of prdsval 13327, dependency on df-hom 13155 removed. (Revised by AV, 13-Oct-2024.)
(𝑓 ∈ 𝑣, 𝑔 ∈ 𝑣 ↦ X𝑥 ∈ dom 𝑟((𝑓‘𝑥)(Hom ‘(𝑟‘𝑥))(𝑔‘𝑥))) ∈ V
 
13-Oct-2024pcxnn0cl 12854 Extended nonnegative integer closure of the general prime count function. (Contributed by Jim Kingdon, 13-Oct-2024.)
((𝑃 ∈ ℙ ∧ 𝑁 ∈ ℤ) → (𝑃 pCnt 𝑁) ∈ ℕ0*)
 
13-Oct-2024xnn0letri 10016 Dichotomy for extended nonnegative integers. (Contributed by Jim Kingdon, 13-Oct-2024.)
((𝐴 ∈ ℕ0* ∧ 𝐵 ∈ ℕ0*) → (𝐴 ≤ 𝐵 ∨ 𝐵 ≤ 𝐴))
 
13-Oct-2024xnn0dcle 10015 Decidability of ≤ for extended nonnegative integers. (Contributed by Jim Kingdon, 13-Oct-2024.)
((𝐴 ∈ ℕ0* ∧ 𝐵 ∈ ℕ0*) → DECID 𝐴 ≤ 𝐵)
 
9-Oct-2024nn0leexp2 10949 Ordering law for exponentiation. (Contributed by Jim Kingdon, 9-Oct-2024.)
(((𝐴 ∈ ℝ ∧ 𝑀 ∈ ℕ0 ∧ 𝑁 ∈ ℕ0) ∧ 1 < 𝐴) → (𝑀 ≤ 𝑁 ↔ (𝐴↑𝑀) ≤ (𝐴↑𝑁)))
 
8-Oct-2024pclemdc 12832 Lemma for the prime power pre-function's properties. (Contributed by Jim Kingdon, 8-Oct-2024.)
𝐴 = {𝑛 ∈ ℕ0 ∣ (𝑃↑𝑛) ∥ 𝑁}    ⇒   ((𝑃 ∈ (ℤ≥‘2) ∧ (𝑁 ∈ ℤ ∧ 𝑁 ≠ 0)) → ∀𝑥 ∈ ℤ DECID 𝑥 ∈ 𝐴)
 
8-Oct-2024elnn0dc 9823 Membership of an integer in ℕ0 is decidable. (Contributed by Jim Kingdon, 8-Oct-2024.)
(𝑁 ∈ ℤ → DECID 𝑁 ∈ ℕ0)
 
7-Oct-2024pclemub 12831 Lemma for the prime power pre-function's properties. (Contributed by Mario Carneiro, 23-Feb-2014.) (Revised by Jim Kingdon, 7-Oct-2024.)
𝐴 = {𝑛 ∈ ℕ0 ∣ (𝑃↑𝑛) ∥ 𝑁}    ⇒   ((𝑃 ∈ (ℤ≥‘2) ∧ (𝑁 ∈ ℤ ∧ 𝑁 ≠ 0)) → ∃𝑥 ∈ ℤ ∀𝑦 ∈ 𝐴 𝑦 ≤ 𝑥)
 
7-Oct-2024pclem0 12830 Lemma for the prime power pre-function's properties. (Contributed by Mario Carneiro, 23-Feb-2014.) (Revised by Jim Kingdon, 7-Oct-2024.)
𝐴 = {𝑛 ∈ ℕ0 ∣ (𝑃↑𝑛) ∥ 𝑁}    ⇒   ((𝑃 ∈ (ℤ≥‘2) ∧ (𝑁 ∈ ℤ ∧ 𝑁 ≠ 0)) → 0 ∈ 𝐴)
 
7-Oct-2024nn0ltexp2 10948 Special case of ltexp2 15636 which we use here because we haven't yet defined df-rpcxp 15554 which is used in the current proof of ltexp2 15636. (Contributed by Jim Kingdon, 7-Oct-2024.)
(((𝐴 ∈ ℝ ∧ 𝑀 ∈ ℕ0 ∧ 𝑁 ∈ ℕ0) ∧ 1 < 𝐴) → (𝑀 < 𝑁 ↔ (𝐴↑𝑀) < (𝐴↑𝑁)))
 
6-Oct-2024suprzcl2dc 10476 The supremum of a bounded-above decidable set of integers is a member of the set. (This theorem avoids ax-pre-suploc 8136.) (Contributed by Mario Carneiro, 21-Apr-2015.) (Revised by Jim Kingdon, 6-Oct-2024.)
(𝜑 → 𝐴 ⊆ ℤ)    &   (𝜑 → ∀𝑥 ∈ ℤ DECID 𝑥 ∈ 𝐴)    &   (𝜑 → ∃𝑥 ∈ ℤ ∀𝑦 ∈ 𝐴 𝑦 ≤ 𝑥)    &   (𝜑 → ∃𝑥 𝑥 ∈ 𝐴)    ⇒   (𝜑 → sup(𝐴, ℝ, < ) ∈ 𝐴)
 
5-Oct-2024zsupssdc 10475 An inhabited decidable bounded subset of integers has a supremum in the set. (The proof does not use ax-pre-suploc 8136.) (Contributed by Mario Carneiro, 21-Apr-2015.) (Revised by Jim Kingdon, 5-Oct-2024.)
(𝜑 → 𝐴 ⊆ ℤ)    &   (𝜑 → ∃𝑥 𝑥 ∈ 𝐴)    &   (𝜑 → ∀𝑥 ∈ ℤ DECID 𝑥 ∈ 𝐴)    &   (𝜑 → ∃𝑥 ∈ ℤ ∀𝑦 ∈ 𝐴 𝑦 ≤ 𝑥)    ⇒   (𝜑 → ∃𝑥 ∈ 𝐴 (∀𝑦 ∈ 𝐴 ¬ 𝑥 < 𝑦 ∧ ∀𝑦 ∈ 𝐵 (𝑦 < 𝑥 → ∃𝑧 ∈ 𝐴 𝑦 < 𝑧)))
 
5-Oct-2024suprzubdc 10473 The supremum of a bounded-above decidable set of integers is greater than any member of the set. (Contributed by Mario Carneiro, 21-Apr-2015.) (Revised by Jim Kingdon, 5-Oct-2024.)
(𝜑 → 𝐴 ⊆ ℤ)    &   (𝜑 → ∀𝑥 ∈ ℤ DECID 𝑥 ∈ 𝐴)    &   (𝜑 → ∃𝑥 ∈ ℤ ∀𝑦 ∈ 𝐴 𝑦 ≤ 𝑥)    &   (𝜑 → 𝐵 ∈ 𝐴)    ⇒   (𝜑 → 𝐵 ≤ sup(𝐴, ℝ, < ))
 
1-Oct-2024infex2g 7217 Existence of infimum. (Contributed by Jim Kingdon, 1-Oct-2024.)
(𝐴 ∈ 𝐶 → inf(𝐵, 𝐴, 𝑅) ∈ V)
 
30-Sep-2024unbendc 13046 An unbounded decidable set of positive integers is infinite. (Contributed by NM, 5-May-2005.) (Revised by Jim Kingdon, 30-Sep-2024.)
((𝐴 ⊆ ℕ ∧ ∀𝑥 ∈ ℕ DECID 𝑥 ∈ 𝐴 ∧ ∀𝑚 ∈ ℕ ∃𝑛 ∈ 𝐴 𝑚 < 𝑛) → 𝐴 ≈ ℕ)
 
30-Sep-2024prmdc 12673 Primality is decidable. (Contributed by Jim Kingdon, 30-Sep-2024.)
(𝑁 ∈ ℕ → DECID 𝑁 ∈ ℙ)
 
30-Sep-2024dcfi 7164 Decidability of a family of propositions indexed by a finite set. (Contributed by Jim Kingdon, 30-Sep-2024.)
((𝐴 ∈ Fin ∧ ∀𝑥 ∈ 𝐴 DECID 𝜑) → DECID ∀𝑥 ∈ 𝐴 𝜑)
 
30-Sep-2024cbvriotavw 5974 Change bound variable in a restricted description binder. Version of cbvriotav 5976 with a disjoint variable condition. (Contributed by NM, 18-Mar-2013.) (Revised by GG, 30-Sep-2024.)
(𝑥 = 𝑦 → (𝜑 ↔ 𝜓))    ⇒   (℩𝑥 ∈ 𝐴 𝜑) = (℩𝑦 ∈ 𝐴 𝜓)
 
30-Sep-2024cbviotavw 5287 Change bound variables in a description binder. Version of cbviotav 5288 with a disjoint variable condition. (Contributed by Andrew Salmon, 1-Aug-2011.) (Revised by GG, 30-Sep-2024.)
(𝑥 = 𝑦 → (𝜑 ↔ 𝜓))    ⇒   (℩𝑥𝜑) = (℩𝑦𝜓)
 
29-Sep-2024ssnnct 13039 A decidable subset of ℕ is countable. (Contributed by Jim Kingdon, 29-Sep-2024.)
((𝐴 ⊆ ℕ ∧ ∀𝑥 ∈ ℕ DECID 𝑥 ∈ 𝐴) → ∃𝑓 𝑓:ω–onto→(𝐴 ⊔ 1o))
 
29-Sep-2024ssnnctlemct 13038 Lemma for ssnnct 13039. The result. (Contributed by Jim Kingdon, 29-Sep-2024.)
𝐺 = frec((𝑥 ∈ ℤ ↦ (𝑥 + 1)), 1)    ⇒   ((𝐴 ⊆ ℕ ∧ ∀𝑥 ∈ ℕ DECID 𝑥 ∈ 𝐴) → ∃𝑓 𝑓:ω–onto→(𝐴 ⊔ 1o))
 
28-Sep-2024nninfdcex 10474 A decidable set of natural numbers has an infimum. (Contributed by Jim Kingdon, 28-Sep-2024.)
(𝜑 → 𝐴 ⊆ ℕ)    &   (𝜑 → ∀𝑥 ∈ ℕ DECID 𝑥 ∈ 𝐴)    &   (𝜑 → ∃𝑦 𝑦 ∈ 𝐴)    ⇒   (𝜑 → ∃𝑥 ∈ ℝ (∀𝑦 ∈ 𝐴 ¬ 𝑦 < 𝑥 ∧ ∀𝑦 ∈ ℝ (𝑥 < 𝑦 → ∃𝑧 ∈ 𝐴 𝑧 < 𝑦)))
 
27-Sep-2024infregelbex 9810 Any lower bound of a set of real numbers with an infimum is less than or equal to the infimum. (Contributed by Jim Kingdon, 27-Sep-2024.)
(𝜑 → ∃𝑥 ∈ ℝ (∀𝑦 ∈ 𝐴 ¬ 𝑦 < 𝑥 ∧ ∀𝑦 ∈ ℝ (𝑥 < 𝑦 → ∃𝑧 ∈ 𝐴 𝑧 < 𝑦)))    &   (𝜑 → 𝐴 ⊆ ℝ)    &   (𝜑 → 𝐵 ∈ ℝ)    ⇒   (𝜑 → (𝐵 ≤ inf(𝐴, ℝ, < ) ↔ ∀𝑧 ∈ 𝐴 𝐵 ≤ 𝑧))
 
26-Sep-2024nninfdclemp1 13042 Lemma for nninfdc 13045. Each element of the sequence 𝐹 is greater than the previous element. (Contributed by Jim Kingdon, 26-Sep-2024.)
(𝜑 → 𝐴 ⊆ ℕ)    &   (𝜑 → ∀𝑥 ∈ ℕ DECID 𝑥 ∈ 𝐴)    &   (𝜑 → ∀𝑚 ∈ ℕ ∃𝑛 ∈ 𝐴 𝑚 < 𝑛)    &   (𝜑 → (𝐽 ∈ 𝐴 ∧ 1 < 𝐽))    &   𝐹 = seq1((𝑦 ∈ ℕ, 𝑧 ∈ ℕ ↦ inf((𝐴 ∩ (ℤ≥‘(𝑦 + 1))), ℝ, < )), (𝑖 ∈ ℕ ↦ 𝐽))    &   (𝜑 → 𝑈 ∈ ℕ)    ⇒   (𝜑 → (𝐹‘𝑈) < (𝐹‘(𝑈 + 1)))
 
26-Sep-2024nnminle 12577 The infimum of a decidable subset of the natural numbers is less than an element of the set. The infimum is also a minimum as shown at nnmindc 12576. (Contributed by Jim Kingdon, 26-Sep-2024.)
((𝐴 ⊆ ℕ ∧ ∀𝑥 ∈ ℕ DECID 𝑥 ∈ 𝐴 ∧ 𝐵 ∈ 𝐴) → inf(𝐴, ℝ, < ) ≤ 𝐵)
 
25-Sep-2024nninfdclemcl 13040 Lemma for nninfdc 13045. (Contributed by Jim Kingdon, 25-Sep-2024.)
(𝜑 → 𝐴 ⊆ ℕ)    &   (𝜑 → ∀𝑥 ∈ ℕ DECID 𝑥 ∈ 𝐴)    &   (𝜑 → ∀𝑚 ∈ ℕ ∃𝑛 ∈ 𝐴 𝑚 < 𝑛)    &   (𝜑 → 𝑃 ∈ 𝐴)    &   (𝜑 → 𝑄 ∈ 𝐴)    ⇒   (𝜑 → (𝑃(𝑦 ∈ ℕ, 𝑧 ∈ ℕ ↦ inf((𝐴 ∩ (ℤ≥‘(𝑦 + 1))), ℝ, < ))𝑄) ∈ 𝐴)
 
24-Sep-2024nninfdclemlt 13043 Lemma for nninfdc 13045. The function from nninfdclemf 13041 is strictly monotonic. (Contributed by Jim Kingdon, 24-Sep-2024.)
(𝜑 → 𝐴 ⊆ ℕ)    &   (𝜑 → ∀𝑥 ∈ ℕ DECID 𝑥 ∈ 𝐴)    &   (𝜑 → ∀𝑚 ∈ ℕ ∃𝑛 ∈ 𝐴 𝑚 < 𝑛)    &   (𝜑 → (𝐽 ∈ 𝐴 ∧ 1 < 𝐽))    &   𝐹 = seq1((𝑦 ∈ ℕ, 𝑧 ∈ ℕ ↦ inf((𝐴 ∩ (ℤ≥‘(𝑦 + 1))), ℝ, < )), (𝑖 ∈ ℕ ↦ 𝐽))    &   (𝜑 → 𝑈 ∈ ℕ)    &   (𝜑 → 𝑉 ∈ ℕ)    &   (𝜑 → 𝑈 < 𝑉)    ⇒   (𝜑 → (𝐹‘𝑈) < (𝐹‘𝑉))
 
23-Sep-2024nninfdc 13045 An unbounded decidable set of positive integers is infinite. (Contributed by Jim Kingdon, 23-Sep-2024.)
((𝐴 ⊆ ℕ ∧ ∀𝑥 ∈ ℕ DECID 𝑥 ∈ 𝐴 ∧ ∀𝑚 ∈ ℕ ∃𝑛 ∈ 𝐴 𝑚 < 𝑛) → ω ≼ 𝐴)
 
23-Sep-2024nninfdclemf1 13044 Lemma for nninfdc 13045. The function from nninfdclemf 13041 is one-to-one. (Contributed by Jim Kingdon, 23-Sep-2024.)
(𝜑 → 𝐴 ⊆ ℕ)    &   (𝜑 → ∀𝑥 ∈ ℕ DECID 𝑥 ∈ 𝐴)    &   (𝜑 → ∀𝑚 ∈ ℕ ∃𝑛 ∈ 𝐴 𝑚 < 𝑛)    &   (𝜑 → (𝐽 ∈ 𝐴 ∧ 1 < 𝐽))    &   𝐹 = seq1((𝑦 ∈ ℕ, 𝑧 ∈ ℕ ↦ inf((𝐴 ∩ (ℤ≥‘(𝑦 + 1))), ℝ, < )), (𝑖 ∈ ℕ ↦ 𝐽))    ⇒   (𝜑 → 𝐹:ℕ–1-1→𝐴)
 
23-Sep-2024nninfdclemf 13041 Lemma for nninfdc 13045. A function from the natural numbers into 𝐴. (Contributed by Jim Kingdon, 23-Sep-2024.)
(𝜑 → 𝐴 ⊆ ℕ)    &   (𝜑 → ∀𝑥 ∈ ℕ DECID 𝑥 ∈ 𝐴)    &   (𝜑 → ∀𝑚 ∈ ℕ ∃𝑛 ∈ 𝐴 𝑚 < 𝑛)    &   (𝜑 → (𝐽 ∈ 𝐴 ∧ 1 < 𝐽))    &   𝐹 = seq1((𝑦 ∈ ℕ, 𝑧 ∈ ℕ ↦ inf((𝐴 ∩ (ℤ≥‘(𝑦 + 1))), ℝ, < )), (𝑖 ∈ ℕ ↦ 𝐽))    ⇒   (𝜑 → 𝐹:ℕ⟶𝐴)
 
23-Sep-2024nnmindc 12576 An inhabited decidable subset of the natural numbers has a minimum. (Contributed by Jim Kingdon, 23-Sep-2024.)
((𝐴 ⊆ ℕ ∧ ∀𝑥 ∈ ℕ DECID 𝑥 ∈ 𝐴 ∧ ∃𝑦 𝑦 ∈ 𝐴) → inf(𝐴, ℝ, < ) ∈ 𝐴)
 
23-Sep-2024breng 6907 Equinumerosity relation. This variation of bren 6908 does not require the Axiom of Union. (Contributed by NM, 15-Jun-1998.) Extract from a subproof of bren 6908. (Revised by BTernaryTau, 23-Sep-2024.)
((𝐴 ∈ 𝑉 ∧ 𝐵 ∈ 𝑊) → (𝐴 ≈ 𝐵 ↔ ∃𝑓 𝑓:𝐴–1-1-onto→𝐵))
 
19-Sep-2024ssomct 13037 A decidable subset of ω is countable. (Contributed by Jim Kingdon, 19-Sep-2024.)
((𝐴 ⊆ ω ∧ ∀𝑥 ∈ ω DECID 𝑥 ∈ 𝐴) → ∃𝑓 𝑓:ω–onto→(𝐴 ⊔ 1o))
 
19-Sep-20242oex 6590 2o is a set. (Contributed by BJ, 6-Apr-2019.) (Proof shortened by Zhi Wang, 19-Sep-2024.)
2o ∈ V
 
19-Sep-2024ecase2d 1385 Deduction for elimination by cases. (Contributed by NM, 21-Apr-1994.) (Proof shortened by Wolf Lammen, 19-Sep-2024.)
(𝜑 → 𝜓)    &   (𝜑 → ¬ (𝜓 ∧ 𝜒))    &   (𝜑 → ¬ (𝜓 ∧ 𝜃))    &   (𝜑 → (𝜏 ∨ (𝜒 ∨ 𝜃)))    ⇒   (𝜑 → 𝜏)
 
18-Sep-2024fcof 5825 Composition of a function with domain and codomain and a function as a function with domain and codomain. Generalization of fco 5494. (Contributed by AV, 18-Sep-2024.)
((𝐹:𝐴⟶𝐵 ∧ Fun 𝐺) → (𝐹 ∘ 𝐺):(◡𝐺 “ 𝐴)⟶𝐵)
 
17-Sep-2024fncofn 5824 Composition of a function with domain and a function as a function with domain. Generalization of fnco 5434. (Contributed by AV, 17-Sep-2024.)
((𝐹 Fn 𝐴 ∧ Fun 𝐺) → (𝐹 ∘ 𝐺) Fn (◡𝐺 “ 𝐴))
 
14-Sep-2024nnpredlt 4717 The predecessor (see nnpredcl 4716) of a nonzero natural number is less than (see df-iord 4458) that number. (Contributed by Jim Kingdon, 14-Sep-2024.)
((𝐴 ∈ ω ∧ 𝐴 ≠ ∅) → ∪ 𝐴 ∈ 𝐴)
 
13-Sep-2024nninfisollemeq 7315 Lemma for nninfisol 7316. The case where 𝑁 is a successor and 𝑁 and 𝑋 are equal. (Contributed by Jim Kingdon, 13-Sep-2024.)
(𝜑 → 𝑋 ∈ ℕ∞)    &   (𝜑 → (𝑋‘𝑁) = ∅)    &   (𝜑 → 𝑁 ∈ ω)    &   (𝜑 → 𝑁 ≠ ∅)    &   (𝜑 → (𝑋‘∪ 𝑁) = 1o)    ⇒   (𝜑 → DECID (𝑖 ∈ ω ↦ if(𝑖 ∈ 𝑁, 1o, ∅)) = 𝑋)
 
13-Sep-2024nninfisollemne 7314 Lemma for nninfisol 7316. A case where 𝑁 is a successor and 𝑁 and 𝑋 are not equal. (Contributed by Jim Kingdon, 13-Sep-2024.)
(𝜑 → 𝑋 ∈ ℕ∞)    &   (𝜑 → (𝑋‘𝑁) = ∅)    &   (𝜑 → 𝑁 ∈ ω)    &   (𝜑 → 𝑁 ≠ ∅)    &   (𝜑 → (𝑋‘∪ 𝑁) = ∅)    ⇒   (𝜑 → DECID (𝑖 ∈ ω ↦ if(𝑖 ∈ 𝑁, 1o, ∅)) = 𝑋)
 
13-Sep-2024nninfisollem0 7313 Lemma for nninfisol 7316. The case where 𝑁 is zero. (Contributed by Jim Kingdon, 13-Sep-2024.)
(𝜑 → 𝑋 ∈ ℕ∞)    &   (𝜑 → (𝑋‘𝑁) = ∅)    &   (𝜑 → 𝑁 ∈ ω)    &   (𝜑 → 𝑁 = ∅)    ⇒   (𝜑 → DECID (𝑖 ∈ ω ↦ if(𝑖 ∈ 𝑁, 1o, ∅)) = 𝑋)
 
12-Sep-2024nninfisol 7316 Finite elements of ℕ∞ are isolated. That is, given a natural number and any element of ℕ∞, it is decidable whether the natural number (when converted to an element of ℕ∞) is equal to the given element of ℕ∞. Stated in an online post by Martin Escardo. One way to understand this theorem is that you do not need to look at an unbounded number of elements of the sequence 𝑋 to decide whether it is equal to 𝑁 (in fact, you only need to look at two elements and 𝑁 tells you where to look).

By contrast, the point at infinity being isolated is equivalent to the Weak Limited Principle of Omniscience (WLPO) (nninfinfwlpo 7363). (Contributed by BJ and Jim Kingdon, 12-Sep-2024.)

((𝑁 ∈ ω ∧ 𝑋 ∈ ℕ∞) → DECID (𝑖 ∈ ω ↦ if(𝑖 ∈ 𝑁, 1o, ∅)) = 𝑋)
 
8-Sep-2024relopabv 4849 A class of ordered pairs is a relation. For a version without a disjoint variable condition, see relopab 4851. (Contributed by SN, 8-Sep-2024.)
Rel {⟨𝑥, 𝑦⟩ ∣ 𝜑}
 
7-Sep-2024eulerthlemfi 12771 Lemma for eulerth 12776. The set 𝑆 is finite. (Contributed by Mario Carneiro, 28-Feb-2014.) (Revised by Jim Kingdon, 7-Sep-2024.)
(𝜑 → (𝑁 ∈ ℕ ∧ 𝐴 ∈ ℤ ∧ (𝐴 gcd 𝑁) = 1))    &   𝑆 = {𝑦 ∈ (0..^𝑁) ∣ (𝑦 gcd 𝑁) = 1}    ⇒   (𝜑 → 𝑆 ∈ Fin)
 
7-Sep-2024modqexp 10905 Exponentiation property of the modulo operation, see theorem 5.2(c) in [ApostolNT] p. 107. (Contributed by Mario Carneiro, 28-Feb-2014.) (Revised by Jim Kingdon, 7-Sep-2024.)
(𝜑 → 𝐴 ∈ ℤ)    &   (𝜑 → 𝐵 ∈ ℤ)    &   (𝜑 → 𝐶 ∈ ℕ0)    &   (𝜑 → 𝐷 ∈ ℚ)    &   (𝜑 → 0 < 𝐷)    &   (𝜑 → (𝐴 mod 𝐷) = (𝐵 mod 𝐷))    ⇒   (𝜑 → ((𝐴↑𝐶) mod 𝐷) = ((𝐵↑𝐶) mod 𝐷))
 
5-Sep-2024eulerthlemh 12774 Lemma for eulerth 12776. A permutation of (1...(ϕ‘𝑁)). (Contributed by Mario Carneiro, 28-Feb-2014.) (Revised by Jim Kingdon, 5-Sep-2024.)
(𝜑 → (𝑁 ∈ ℕ ∧ 𝐴 ∈ ℤ ∧ (𝐴 gcd 𝑁) = 1))    &   𝑆 = {𝑦 ∈ (0..^𝑁) ∣ (𝑦 gcd 𝑁) = 1}    &   (𝜑 → 𝐹:(1...(ϕ‘𝑁))–1-1-onto→𝑆)    &   𝐻 = (◡𝐹 ∘ (𝑦 ∈ (1...(ϕ‘𝑁)) ↦ ((𝐴 · (𝐹‘𝑦)) mod 𝑁)))    ⇒   (𝜑 → 𝐻:(1...(ϕ‘𝑁))–1-1-onto→(1...(ϕ‘𝑁)))
 
2-Sep-2024eulerthlemth 12775 Lemma for eulerth 12776. The result. (Contributed by Mario Carneiro, 28-Feb-2014.) (Revised by Jim Kingdon, 2-Sep-2024.)
(𝜑 → (𝑁 ∈ ℕ ∧ 𝐴 ∈ ℤ ∧ (𝐴 gcd 𝑁) = 1))    &   𝑆 = {𝑦 ∈ (0..^𝑁) ∣ (𝑦 gcd 𝑁) = 1}    &   (𝜑 → 𝐹:(1...(ϕ‘𝑁))–1-1-onto→𝑆)    ⇒   (𝜑 → ((𝐴↑(ϕ‘𝑁)) mod 𝑁) = (1 mod 𝑁))
 
2-Sep-2024eulerthlema 12773 Lemma for eulerth 12776. (Contributed by Mario Carneiro, 28-Feb-2014.) (Revised by Jim Kingdon, 2-Sep-2024.)
(𝜑 → (𝑁 ∈ ℕ ∧ 𝐴 ∈ ℤ ∧ (𝐴 gcd 𝑁) = 1))    &   𝑆 = {𝑦 ∈ (0..^𝑁) ∣ (𝑦 gcd 𝑁) = 1}    &   (𝜑 → 𝐹:(1...(ϕ‘𝑁))–1-1-onto→𝑆)    ⇒   (𝜑 → (((𝐴↑(ϕ‘𝑁)) · ∏𝑥 ∈ (1...(ϕ‘𝑁))(𝐹‘𝑥)) mod 𝑁) = (∏𝑥 ∈ (1...(ϕ‘𝑁))((𝐴 · (𝐹‘𝑥)) mod 𝑁) mod 𝑁))
 
2-Sep-2024eulerthlemrprm 12772 Lemma for eulerth 12776. 𝑁 and ∏𝑥 ∈ (1...(ϕ‘𝑁))(𝐹‘𝑥) are relatively prime. (Contributed by Mario Carneiro, 28-Feb-2014.) (Revised by Jim Kingdon, 2-Sep-2024.)
(𝜑 → (𝑁 ∈ ℕ ∧ 𝐴 ∈ ℤ ∧ (𝐴 gcd 𝑁) = 1))    &   𝑆 = {𝑦 ∈ (0..^𝑁) ∣ (𝑦 gcd 𝑁) = 1}    &   (𝜑 → 𝐹:(1...(ϕ‘𝑁))–1-1-onto→𝑆)    ⇒   (𝜑 → (𝑁 gcd ∏𝑥 ∈ (1...(ϕ‘𝑁))(𝐹‘𝑥)) = 1)
 
1-Sep-2024qusmul2 14514 Value of the ring operation in a quotient ring. (Contributed by Thierry Arnoux, 1-Sep-2024.)
𝑄 = (𝑅 /s (𝑅 ~QG 𝐼))    &   𝐵 = (Base‘𝑅)    &    · = (.r‘𝑅)    &    × = (.r‘𝑄)    &   (𝜑 → 𝑅 ∈ Ring)    &   (𝜑 → 𝐼 ∈ (2Ideal‘𝑅))    &   (𝜑 → 𝑋 ∈ 𝐵)    &   (𝜑 → 𝑌 ∈ 𝐵)    ⇒   (𝜑 → ([𝑋](𝑅 ~QG 𝐼) × [𝑌](𝑅 ~QG 𝐼)) = [(𝑋 · 𝑌)](𝑅 ~QG 𝐼))
 
30-Aug-2024fprodap0f 12168 A finite product of terms apart from zero is apart from zero. A version of fprodap0 12153 using bound-variable hypotheses instead of distinct variable conditions. (Contributed by Glauco Siliprandi, 5-Apr-2020.) (Revised by Jim Kingdon, 30-Aug-2024.)
Ⅎ𝑘𝜑    &   (𝜑 → 𝐴 ∈ Fin)    &   ((𝜑 ∧ 𝑘 ∈ 𝐴) → 𝐵 ∈ ℂ)    &   ((𝜑 ∧ 𝑘 ∈ 𝐴) → 𝐵 # 0)    ⇒   (𝜑 → ∏𝑘 ∈ 𝐴 𝐵 # 0)
 
28-Aug-2024fprodrec 12161 The finite product of reciprocals is the reciprocal of the product. (Contributed by Jim Kingdon, 28-Aug-2024.)
(𝜑 → 𝐴 ∈ Fin)    &   ((𝜑 ∧ 𝑘 ∈ 𝐴) → 𝐵 ∈ ℂ)    &   ((𝜑 ∧ 𝑘 ∈ 𝐴) → 𝐵 # 0)    ⇒   (𝜑 → ∏𝑘 ∈ 𝐴 (1 / 𝐵) = (1 / ∏𝑘 ∈ 𝐴 𝐵))
 
26-Aug-2024exmidontri2or 7444 Ordinal trichotomy is equivalent to excluded middle. (Contributed by Jim Kingdon, 26-Aug-2024.)
(EXMID ↔ ∀𝑥 ∈ On ∀𝑦 ∈ On (𝑥 ⊆ 𝑦 ∨ 𝑦 ⊆ 𝑥))
 
26-Aug-2024exmidontri 7440 Ordinal trichotomy is equivalent to excluded middle. (Contributed by Jim Kingdon, 26-Aug-2024.)
(EXMID ↔ ∀𝑥 ∈ On ∀𝑦 ∈ On (𝑥 ∈ 𝑦 ∨ 𝑥 = 𝑦 ∨ 𝑦 ∈ 𝑥))
 
26-Aug-2024ontri2orexmidim 4665 Ordinal trichotomy implies excluded middle. Closed form of ordtri2or2exmid 4664. (Contributed by Jim Kingdon, 26-Aug-2024.)
(∀𝑥 ∈ On ∀𝑦 ∈ On (𝑥 ⊆ 𝑦 ∨ 𝑦 ⊆ 𝑥) → DECID 𝜑)
 
26-Aug-2024ontriexmidim 4615 Ordinal trichotomy implies excluded middle. Closed form of ordtriexmid 4614. (Contributed by Jim Kingdon, 26-Aug-2024.)
(∀𝑥 ∈ On ∀𝑦 ∈ On (𝑥 ∈ 𝑦 ∨ 𝑥 = 𝑦 ∨ 𝑦 ∈ 𝑥) → DECID 𝜑)
 
25-Aug-2024onntri2or 7447 Double negated ordinal trichotomy. (Contributed by Jim Kingdon, 25-Aug-2024.)
(¬ ¬ EXMID ↔ ∀𝑥 ∈ On ∀𝑦 ∈ On ¬ ¬ (𝑥 ⊆ 𝑦 ∨ 𝑦 ⊆ 𝑥))
 
25-Aug-2024onntri3or 7446 Double negated ordinal trichotomy. (Contributed by Jim Kingdon, 25-Aug-2024.)
(¬ ¬ EXMID ↔ ∀𝑥 ∈ On ∀𝑦 ∈ On ¬ ¬ (𝑥 ∈ 𝑦 ∨ 𝑥 = 𝑦 ∨ 𝑦 ∈ 𝑥))
 
25-Aug-2024csbcow 3135 Composition law for chained substitutions into a class. Version of csbco 3134 with a disjoint variable condition, which requires fewer axioms. (Contributed by NM, 10-Nov-2005.) (Revised by GG, 25-Aug-2024.)
⦋𝐴 / 𝑦⦌⦋𝑦 / 𝑥⦌𝐵 = ⦋𝐴 / 𝑥⦌𝐵
 
25-Aug-2024cbvreuvw 2771 Version of cbvreuv 2767 with a disjoint variable condition. (Contributed by GG, 10-Jan-2024.) Reduce axiom usage. (Revised by GG, 25-Aug-2024.)
(𝑥 = 𝑦 → (𝜑 ↔ 𝜓))    ⇒   (∃!𝑥 ∈ 𝐴 𝜑 ↔ ∃!𝑦 ∈ 𝐴 𝜓)
 
25-Aug-2024cbvrexvw 2770 Version of cbvrexv 2766 with a disjoint variable condition. (Contributed by GG, 10-Jan-2024.) Reduce axiom usage. (Revised by GG, 25-Aug-2024.)
(𝑥 = 𝑦 → (𝜑 ↔ 𝜓))    ⇒   (∃𝑥 ∈ 𝐴 𝜑 ↔ ∃𝑦 ∈ 𝐴 𝜓)
 
25-Aug-2024cbvralvw 2769 Version of cbvralv 2765 with a disjoint variable condition. (Contributed by GG, 10-Jan-2024.) Reduce axiom usage. (Revised by GG, 25-Aug-2024.)
(𝑥 = 𝑦 → (𝜑 ↔ 𝜓))    ⇒   (∀𝑥 ∈ 𝐴 𝜑 ↔ ∀𝑦 ∈ 𝐴 𝜓)
 
25-Aug-2024cbvabw 2352 Version of cbvab 2353 with a disjoint variable condition. (Contributed by GG, 10-Jan-2024.) Reduce axiom usage. (Revised by GG, 25-Aug-2024.)
Ⅎ𝑦𝜑    &   Ⅎ𝑥𝜓    &   (𝑥 = 𝑦 → (𝜑 ↔ 𝜓))    ⇒   {𝑥 ∣ 𝜑} = {𝑦 ∣ 𝜓}
 
25-Aug-2024nfsbv 1998 If 𝑧 is not free in 𝜑, it is not free in [𝑦 / 𝑥]𝜑 when 𝑧 is distinct from 𝑥 and 𝑦. Version of nfsb 1997 requiring more disjoint variables. (Contributed by Wolf Lammen, 7-Feb-2023.) Remove disjoint variable condition on 𝑥, 𝑦. (Revised by Steven Nguyen, 13-Aug-2023.) Reduce axiom usage. (Revised by GG, 25-Aug-2024.)
Ⅎ𝑧𝜑    ⇒   Ⅎ𝑧[𝑦 / 𝑥]𝜑
 
25-Aug-2024cbvexvw 1967 Change bound variable. See cbvexv 1965 for a version with fewer disjoint variable conditions. (Contributed by NM, 19-Apr-2017.) Avoid ax-7 1494. (Revised by GG, 25-Aug-2024.)
(𝑥 = 𝑦 → (𝜑 ↔ 𝜓))    ⇒   (∃𝑥𝜑 ↔ ∃𝑦𝜓)
 
25-Aug-2024cbvalvw 1966 Change bound variable. See cbvalv 1964 for a version with fewer disjoint variable conditions. (Contributed by NM, 9-Apr-2017.) Avoid ax-7 1494. (Revised by GG, 25-Aug-2024.)
(𝑥 = 𝑦 → (𝜑 ↔ 𝜓))    ⇒   (∀𝑥𝜑 ↔ ∀𝑦𝜓)
 
25-Aug-2024nfal 1622 If 𝑥 is not free in 𝜑, it is not free in ∀𝑦𝜑. (Contributed by Mario Carneiro, 11-Aug-2016.) Remove dependency on ax-4 1556. (Revised by GG, 25-Aug-2024.)
Ⅎ𝑥𝜑    ⇒   Ⅎ𝑥∀𝑦𝜑
 
24-Aug-2024gcdcomd 12516 The gcd operator is commutative, deduction version. (Contributed by SN, 24-Aug-2024.)
(𝜑 → 𝑀 ∈ ℤ)    &   (𝜑 → 𝑁 ∈ ℤ)    ⇒   (𝜑 → (𝑀 gcd 𝑁) = (𝑁 gcd 𝑀))
 
21-Aug-2024dvds2addd 12361 Deduction form of dvds2add 12357. (Contributed by SN, 21-Aug-2024.)
(𝜑 → 𝐾 ∈ ℤ)    &   (𝜑 → 𝑀 ∈ ℤ)    &   (𝜑 → 𝑁 ∈ ℤ)    &   (𝜑 → 𝐾 ∥ 𝑀)    &   (𝜑 → 𝐾 ∥ 𝑁)    ⇒   (𝜑 → 𝐾 ∥ (𝑀 + 𝑁))
 
18-Aug-2024prdsmulr 13332 Multiplication in a structure product. (Contributed by Mario Carneiro, 11-Jan-2015.) (Revised by Mario Carneiro, 15-Aug-2015.) (Revised by Thierry Arnoux, 16-Jun-2019.) (Revised by Zhi Wang, 18-Aug-2024.)
𝑃 = (𝑆Xs𝑅)    &   (𝜑 → 𝑆 ∈ 𝑉)    &   (𝜑 → 𝑅 ∈ 𝑊)    &   𝐵 = (Base‘𝑃)    &   (𝜑 → dom 𝑅 = 𝐼)    &    · = (.r‘𝑃)    ⇒   (𝜑 → · = (𝑓 ∈ 𝐵, 𝑔 ∈ 𝐵 ↦ (𝑥 ∈ 𝐼 ↦ ((𝑓‘𝑥)(.r‘(𝑅‘𝑥))(𝑔‘𝑥)))))
 
18-Aug-2024prdsplusg 13331 Addition in a structure product. (Contributed by Stefan O'Rear, 3-Jan-2015.) (Revised by Mario Carneiro, 15-Aug-2015.) (Revised by Thierry Arnoux, 16-Jun-2019.) (Revised by Zhi Wang, 18-Aug-2024.)
𝑃 = (𝑆Xs𝑅)    &   (𝜑 → 𝑆 ∈ 𝑉)    &   (𝜑 → 𝑅 ∈ 𝑊)    &   𝐵 = (Base‘𝑃)    &   (𝜑 → dom 𝑅 = 𝐼)    &    + = (+g‘𝑃)    ⇒   (𝜑 → + = (𝑓 ∈ 𝐵, 𝑔 ∈ 𝐵 ↦ (𝑥 ∈ 𝐼 ↦ ((𝑓‘𝑥)(+g‘(𝑅‘𝑥))(𝑔‘𝑥)))))
 
18-Aug-2024prdsbas 13330 Base set of a structure product. (Contributed by Stefan O'Rear, 3-Jan-2015.) (Revised by Mario Carneiro, 15-Aug-2015.) (Revised by Thierry Arnoux, 16-Jun-2019.) (Revised by Zhi Wang, 18-Aug-2024.)
𝑃 = (𝑆Xs𝑅)    &   (𝜑 → 𝑆 ∈ 𝑉)    &   (𝜑 → 𝑅 ∈ 𝑊)    &   𝐵 = (Base‘𝑃)    &   (𝜑 → dom 𝑅 = 𝐼)    ⇒   (𝜑 → 𝐵 = X𝑥 ∈ 𝐼 (Base‘(𝑅‘𝑥)))
 
18-Aug-2024prdssca 13329 Scalar ring of a structure product. (Contributed by Stefan O'Rear, 5-Jan-2015.) (Revised by Mario Carneiro, 15-Aug-2015.) (Revised by Thierry Arnoux, 16-Jun-2019.) (Revised by Zhi Wang, 18-Aug-2024.)
𝑃 = (𝑆Xs𝑅)    &   (𝜑 → 𝑆 ∈ 𝑉)    &   (𝜑 → 𝑅 ∈ 𝑊)    ⇒   (𝜑 → 𝑆 = (Scalar‘𝑃))
 
18-Aug-2024prdsval 13327 Value of the structure product. (Contributed by Stefan O'Rear, 3-Jan-2015.) (Revised by Mario Carneiro, 7-Jan-2017.) (Revised by Thierry Arnoux, 16-Jun-2019.) (Revised by Zhi Wang, 18-Aug-2024.)
𝑃 = (𝑆Xs𝑅)    &   𝐾 = (Base‘𝑆)    &   (𝜑 → dom 𝑅 = 𝐼)    &   (𝜑 → 𝐵 = X𝑥 ∈ 𝐼 (Base‘(𝑅‘𝑥)))    &   (𝜑 → + = (𝑓 ∈ 𝐵, 𝑔 ∈ 𝐵 ↦ (𝑥 ∈ 𝐼 ↦ ((𝑓‘𝑥)(+g‘(𝑅‘𝑥))(𝑔‘𝑥)))))    &   (𝜑 → × = (𝑓 ∈ 𝐵, 𝑔 ∈ 𝐵 ↦ (𝑥 ∈ 𝐼 ↦ ((𝑓‘𝑥)(.r‘(𝑅‘𝑥))(𝑔‘𝑥)))))    &   (𝜑 → · = (𝑓 ∈ 𝐾, 𝑔 ∈ 𝐵 ↦ (𝑥 ∈ 𝐼 ↦ (𝑓( ·𝑠 ‘(𝑅‘𝑥))(𝑔‘𝑥)))))    &   (𝜑 → , = (𝑓 ∈ 𝐵, 𝑔 ∈ 𝐵 ↦ (𝑆 Σg (𝑥 ∈ 𝐼 ↦ ((𝑓‘𝑥)(·𝑖‘(𝑅‘𝑥))(𝑔‘𝑥))))))    &   (𝜑 → 𝑂 = (∏t‘(TopOpen ∘ 𝑅)))    &   (𝜑 → ≤ = {⟨𝑓, 𝑔⟩ ∣ ({𝑓, 𝑔} ⊆ 𝐵 ∧ ∀𝑥 ∈ 𝐼 (𝑓‘𝑥)(le‘(𝑅‘𝑥))(𝑔‘𝑥))})    &   (𝜑 → 𝐷 = (𝑓 ∈ 𝐵, 𝑔 ∈ 𝐵 ↦ sup((ran (𝑥 ∈ 𝐼 ↦ ((𝑓‘𝑥)(dist‘(𝑅‘𝑥))(𝑔‘𝑥))) ∪ {0}), ℝ*, < )))    &   (𝜑 → 𝐻 = (𝑓 ∈ 𝐵, 𝑔 ∈ 𝐵 ↦ X𝑥 ∈ 𝐼 ((𝑓‘𝑥)(Hom ‘(𝑅‘𝑥))(𝑔‘𝑥))))    &   (𝜑 → ∙ = (𝑎 ∈ (𝐵 × 𝐵), 𝑐 ∈ 𝐵 ↦ (𝑑 ∈ ((2nd ‘𝑎)𝐻𝑐), 𝑒 ∈ (𝐻‘𝑎) ↦ (𝑥 ∈ 𝐼 ↦ ((𝑑‘𝑥)(⟨((1st ‘𝑎)‘𝑥), ((2nd ‘𝑎)‘𝑥)⟩(comp‘(𝑅‘𝑥))(𝑐‘𝑥))(𝑒‘𝑥))))))    &   (𝜑 → 𝑆 ∈ 𝑊)    &   (𝜑 → 𝑅 ∈ 𝑍)    ⇒   (𝜑 → 𝑃 = (({⟨(Base‘ndx), 𝐵⟩, ⟨(+g‘ndx), + ⟩, ⟨(.r‘ndx), × ⟩} ∪ {⟨(Scalar‘ndx), 𝑆⟩, ⟨( ·𝑠 ‘ndx), · ⟩, ⟨(·𝑖‘ndx), , ⟩}) ∪ ({⟨(TopSet‘ndx), 𝑂⟩, ⟨(le‘ndx), ≤ ⟩, ⟨(dist‘ndx), 𝐷⟩} ∪ {⟨(Hom ‘ndx), 𝐻⟩, ⟨(comp‘ndx), ∙ ⟩})))
 
18-Aug-2024df-prds 13321 Define a structure product. This can be a product of groups, rings, modules, or ordered topological fields; any unused components will have garbage in them but this is usually not relevant for the purpose of inheriting the structures present in the factors. (Contributed by Stefan O'Rear, 3-Jan-2015.) (Revised by Thierry Arnoux, 15-Jun-2019.) (Revised by Zhi Wang, 18-Aug-2024.)
Xs = (𝑠 ∈ V, 𝑟 ∈ V ↦ ⦋X𝑥 ∈ dom 𝑟(Base‘(𝑟‘𝑥)) / 𝑣⦌⦋(𝑓 ∈ 𝑣, 𝑔 ∈ 𝑣 ↦ X𝑥 ∈ dom 𝑟((𝑓‘𝑥)(Hom ‘(𝑟‘𝑥))(𝑔‘𝑥))) / ℎ⦌(({⟨(Base‘ndx), 𝑣⟩, ⟨(+g‘ndx), (𝑓 ∈ 𝑣, 𝑔 ∈ 𝑣 ↦ (𝑥 ∈ dom 𝑟 ↦ ((𝑓‘𝑥)(+g‘(𝑟‘𝑥))(𝑔‘𝑥))))⟩, ⟨(.r‘ndx), (𝑓 ∈ 𝑣, 𝑔 ∈ 𝑣 ↦ (𝑥 ∈ dom 𝑟 ↦ ((𝑓‘𝑥)(.r‘(𝑟‘𝑥))(𝑔‘𝑥))))⟩} ∪ {⟨(Scalar‘ndx), 𝑠⟩, ⟨( ·𝑠 ‘ndx), (𝑓 ∈ (Base‘𝑠), 𝑔 ∈ 𝑣 ↦ (𝑥 ∈ dom 𝑟 ↦ (𝑓( ·𝑠 ‘(𝑟‘𝑥))(𝑔‘𝑥))))⟩, ⟨(·𝑖‘ndx), (𝑓 ∈ 𝑣, 𝑔 ∈ 𝑣 ↦ (𝑠 Σg (𝑥 ∈ dom 𝑟 ↦ ((𝑓‘𝑥)(·𝑖‘(𝑟‘𝑥))(𝑔‘𝑥)))))⟩}) ∪ ({⟨(TopSet‘ndx), (∏t‘(TopOpen ∘ 𝑟))⟩, ⟨(le‘ndx), {⟨𝑓, 𝑔⟩ ∣ ({𝑓, 𝑔} ⊆ 𝑣 ∧ ∀𝑥 ∈ dom 𝑟(𝑓‘𝑥)(le‘(𝑟‘𝑥))(𝑔‘𝑥))}⟩, ⟨(dist‘ndx), (𝑓 ∈ 𝑣, 𝑔 ∈ 𝑣 ↦ sup((ran (𝑥 ∈ dom 𝑟 ↦ ((𝑓‘𝑥)(dist‘(𝑟‘𝑥))(𝑔‘𝑥))) ∪ {0}), ℝ*, < ))⟩} ∪ {⟨(Hom ‘ndx), ℎ⟩, ⟨(comp‘ndx), (𝑎 ∈ (𝑣 × 𝑣), 𝑐 ∈ 𝑣 ↦ (𝑑 ∈ ((2nd ‘𝑎)ℎ𝑐), 𝑒 ∈ (ℎ‘𝑎) ↦ (𝑥 ∈ dom 𝑟 ↦ ((𝑑‘𝑥)(⟨((1st ‘𝑎)‘𝑥), ((2nd ‘𝑎)‘𝑥)⟩(comp‘(𝑟‘𝑥))(𝑐‘𝑥))(𝑒‘𝑥)))))⟩})))
 
17-Aug-2024fprodcl2lem 12137 Finite product closure lemma. (Contributed by Scott Fenton, 14-Dec-2017.) (Revised by Jim Kingdon, 17-Aug-2024.)
(𝜑 → 𝑆 ⊆ ℂ)    &   ((𝜑 ∧ (𝑥 ∈ 𝑆 ∧ 𝑦 ∈ 𝑆)) → (𝑥 · 𝑦) ∈ 𝑆)    &   (𝜑 → 𝐴 ∈ Fin)    &   ((𝜑 ∧ 𝑘 ∈ 𝐴) → 𝐵 ∈ 𝑆)    &   (𝜑 → 𝐴 ≠ ∅)    ⇒   (𝜑 → ∏𝑘 ∈ 𝐴 𝐵 ∈ 𝑆)
 
16-Aug-2024if0ab 16278 Expression of a conditional class as a class abstraction when the False alternative is the empty class: in that case, the conditional class is the extension, in the True alternative, of the condition.

Remark: a consequence which could be formalized is the inclusion if(𝜑, 𝐴, ∅) ⊆ 𝐴 and therefore, using elpwg 3657, (𝐴 ∈ 𝑉 → if(𝜑, 𝐴, ∅) ∈ 𝒫 𝐴), from which fmelpw1o 7448 could be derived, yielding an alternative proof. (Contributed by BJ, 16-Aug-2024.)

if(𝜑, 𝐴, ∅) = {𝑥 ∈ 𝐴 ∣ 𝜑}
 
16-Aug-2024fprodunsn 12136 Multiply in an additional term in a finite product. See also fprodsplitsn 12165 which is the same but with a Ⅎ𝑘𝜑 hypothesis in place of the distinct variable condition between 𝜑 and 𝑘. (Contributed by Jim Kingdon, 16-Aug-2024.)
Ⅎ𝑘𝐷    &   (𝜑 → 𝐴 ∈ Fin)    &   (𝜑 → 𝐵 ∈ 𝑉)    &   (𝜑 → ¬ 𝐵 ∈ 𝐴)    &   ((𝜑 ∧ 𝑘 ∈ 𝐴) → 𝐶 ∈ ℂ)    &   (𝜑 → 𝐷 ∈ ℂ)    &   (𝑘 = 𝐵 → 𝐶 = 𝐷)    ⇒   (𝜑 → ∏𝑘 ∈ (𝐴 ∪ {𝐵})𝐶 = (∏𝑘 ∈ 𝐴 𝐶 · 𝐷))
 
15-Aug-2024bj-charfundcALT 16281 Alternate proof of bj-charfundc 16280. It was expected to be much shorter since it uses bj-charfun 16279 for the main part of the proof and the rest is basic computations, but these turn out to be lengthy, maybe because of the limited library of available lemmas. (Contributed by BJ, 15-Aug-2024.) (Proof modification is discouraged.) (New usage is discouraged.)
(𝜑 → 𝐹 = (𝑥 ∈ 𝑋 ↦ if(𝑥 ∈ 𝐴, 1o, ∅)))    &   (𝜑 → ∀𝑥 ∈ 𝑋 DECID 𝑥 ∈ 𝐴)    ⇒   (𝜑 → (𝐹:𝑋⟶2o ∧ (∀𝑥 ∈ (𝑋 ∩ 𝐴)(𝐹‘𝑥) = 1o ∧ ∀𝑥 ∈ (𝑋 ∖ 𝐴)(𝐹‘𝑥) = ∅)))
 
15-Aug-2024bj-charfun 16279 Properties of the characteristic function on the class 𝑋 of the class 𝐴. (Contributed by BJ, 15-Aug-2024.)
(𝜑 → 𝐹 = (𝑥 ∈ 𝑋 ↦ if(𝑥 ∈ 𝐴, 1o, ∅)))    ⇒   (𝜑 → ((𝐹:𝑋⟶𝒫 1o ∧ (𝐹 ↾ ((𝑋 ∩ 𝐴) ∪ (𝑋 ∖ 𝐴))):((𝑋 ∩ 𝐴) ∪ (𝑋 ∖ 𝐴))⟶2o) ∧ (∀𝑥 ∈ (𝑋 ∩ 𝐴)(𝐹‘𝑥) = 1o ∧ ∀𝑥 ∈ (𝑋 ∖ 𝐴)(𝐹‘𝑥) = ∅)))
 
15-Aug-2024cnstab 8808 Equality of complex numbers is stable. Stability here means ¬ ¬ 𝐴 = 𝐵 → 𝐴 = 𝐵 as defined at df-stab 836. This theorem for real numbers is Proposition 5.2 of [BauerHanson], p. 27. (Contributed by Jim Kingdon, 1-Aug-2023.) (Proof shortened by BJ, 15-Aug-2024.)
((𝐴 ∈ ℂ ∧ 𝐵 ∈ ℂ) → STAB 𝐴 = 𝐵)
 
15-Aug-2024subap0d 8807 Two numbers apart from each other have difference apart from zero. (Contributed by Jim Kingdon, 12-Aug-2021.) (Proof shortened by BJ, 15-Aug-2024.)
(𝜑 → 𝐴 ∈ ℂ)    &   (𝜑 → 𝐵 ∈ ℂ)    &   (𝜑 → 𝐴 # 𝐵)    ⇒   (𝜑 → (𝐴 − 𝐵) # 0)
 
15-Aug-2024fmelpw1o 7448 With a formula 𝜑 one can associate an element of 𝒫 1o, which can therefore be thought of as the set of "truth values" (but recall that there are no other genuine truth values than ⊤ and ⊥, by nndc 856, which translate to 1o and ∅ respectively by iftrue 3607 and iffalse 3610, giving pwtrufal 16476).

As proved in if0ab 16278, the associated element of 𝒫 1o is the extension, in 𝒫 1o, of the formula 𝜑. (Contributed by BJ, 15-Aug-2024.)

if(𝜑, 1o, ∅) ∈ 𝒫 1o
 
15-Aug-2024ifexd 4576 Existence of a conditional class (deduction form). (Contributed by BJ, 15-Aug-2024.)
(𝜑 → 𝐴 ∈ 𝑉)    &   (𝜑 → 𝐵 ∈ 𝑊)    ⇒   (𝜑 → if(𝜓, 𝐴, 𝐵) ∈ V)
 
15-Aug-2024ifelpwun 4575 Existence of a conditional class, quantitative version (inference form). (Contributed by BJ, 15-Aug-2024.)
𝐴 ∈ V    &   𝐵 ∈ V    ⇒   if(𝜑, 𝐴, 𝐵) ∈ 𝒫 (𝐴 ∪ 𝐵)
 
15-Aug-2024ifelpwund 4574 Existence of a conditional class, quantitative version (deduction form). (Contributed by BJ, 15-Aug-2024.)
(𝜑 → 𝐴 ∈ 𝑉)    &   (𝜑 → 𝐵 ∈ 𝑊)    ⇒   (𝜑 → if(𝜓, 𝐴, 𝐵) ∈ 𝒫 (𝐴 ∪ 𝐵))
 
15-Aug-2024ifelpwung 4573 Existence of a conditional class, quantitative version (closed form). (Contributed by BJ, 15-Aug-2024.)
((𝐴 ∈ 𝑉 ∧ 𝐵 ∈ 𝑊) → if(𝜑, 𝐴, 𝐵) ∈ 𝒫 (𝐴 ∪ 𝐵))
 
15-Aug-2024ifidss 3618 A conditional class whose two alternatives are equal is included in that alternative. With excluded middle, we can prove it is equal to it. (Contributed by BJ, 15-Aug-2024.)
if(𝜑, 𝐴, 𝐴) ⊆ 𝐴
 
15-Aug-2024ifssun 3617 A conditional class is included in the union of its two alternatives. (Contributed by BJ, 15-Aug-2024.)
if(𝜑, 𝐴, 𝐵) ⊆ (𝐴 ∪ 𝐵)
 
12-Aug-2024exmidontriimlem2 7420 Lemma for exmidontriim 7423. (Contributed by Jim Kingdon, 12-Aug-2024.)
(𝜑 → 𝐵 ∈ On)    &   (𝜑 → EXMID)    &   (𝜑 → ∀𝑦 ∈ 𝐵 (𝐴 ∈ 𝑦 ∨ 𝐴 = 𝑦 ∨ 𝑦 ∈ 𝐴))    ⇒   (𝜑 → (𝐴 ∈ 𝐵 ∨ ∀𝑦 ∈ 𝐵 𝑦 ∈ 𝐴))
 
12-Aug-2024exmidontriimlem1 7419 Lemma for exmidontriim 7423. A variation of r19.30dc 2678. (Contributed by Jim Kingdon, 12-Aug-2024.)
((∀𝑥 ∈ 𝐴 (𝜑 ∨ 𝜓 ∨ 𝜒) ∧ EXMID) → (∃𝑥 ∈ 𝐴 𝜑 ∨ ∃𝑥 ∈ 𝐴 𝜓 ∨ ∀𝑥 ∈ 𝐴 𝜒))
 
11-Aug-2024nndc 856 Double negation of decidability of a formula. Intuitionistic logic refutes the negation of decidability (but does not prove decidability) of any formula.

This should not trick the reader into thinking that ¬ ¬ EXMID is provable in intuitionistic logic. Indeed, if we could quantify over formula metavariables, then generalizing nnexmid 855 over 𝜑 would give "∀𝜑¬ ¬ DECID 𝜑", but EXMID is "∀𝜑DECID 𝜑", so proving ¬ ¬ EXMID would amount to proving "¬ ¬ ∀𝜑DECID 𝜑", which is not implied by the above theorem. Indeed, the converse of nnal 1695 does not hold. Since our system does not allow quantification over formula metavariables, we can reproduce this argument by representing formulas as subsets of 𝒫 1o, like we do in our definition of EXMID (df-exmid 4280): then, we can prove ∀𝑥 ∈ 𝒫 1o¬ ¬ DECID 𝑥 = 1o but we cannot prove ¬ ¬ ∀𝑥 ∈ 𝒫 1oDECID 𝑥 = 1o because the converse of nnral 2520 does not hold.

Actually, ¬ ¬ EXMID is not provable in intuitionistic logic since intuitionistic logic has models satisfying ¬ EXMID and noncontradiction holds (pm3.24 698). (Contributed by BJ, 9-Oct-2019.) Add explanation on non-provability of ¬ ¬ EXMID. (Revised by BJ, 11-Aug-2024.)

¬ ¬ DECID 𝜑
 
10-Aug-2024exmidontriim 7423 Excluded middle implies ordinal trichotomy. Lemma 10.4.1 of [HoTT], p. (varies). The proof follows the proof from the HoTT book fairly closely. (Contributed by Jim Kingdon, 10-Aug-2024.)
(EXMID → ∀𝑥 ∈ On ∀𝑦 ∈ On (𝑥 ∈ 𝑦 ∨ 𝑥 = 𝑦 ∨ 𝑦 ∈ 𝑥))
 
10-Aug-2024exmidontriimlem4 7422 Lemma for exmidontriim 7423. The induction step for the induction on 𝐴. (Contributed by Jim Kingdon, 10-Aug-2024.)
(𝜑 → 𝐴 ∈ On)    &   (𝜑 → 𝐵 ∈ On)    &   (𝜑 → EXMID)    &   (𝜑 → ∀𝑧 ∈ 𝐴 ∀𝑦 ∈ On (𝑧 ∈ 𝑦 ∨ 𝑧 = 𝑦 ∨ 𝑦 ∈ 𝑧))    ⇒   (𝜑 → (𝐴 ∈ 𝐵 ∨ 𝐴 = 𝐵 ∨ 𝐵 ∈ 𝐴))
 
10-Aug-2024exmidontriimlem3 7421 Lemma for exmidontriim 7423. What we get to do based on induction on both 𝐴 and 𝐵. (Contributed by Jim Kingdon, 10-Aug-2024.)
(𝜑 → 𝐴 ∈ On)    &   (𝜑 → 𝐵 ∈ On)    &   (𝜑 → EXMID)    &   (𝜑 → ∀𝑧 ∈ 𝐴 ∀𝑦 ∈ On (𝑧 ∈ 𝑦 ∨ 𝑧 = 𝑦 ∨ 𝑦 ∈ 𝑧))    &   (𝜑 → ∀𝑦 ∈ 𝐵 (𝐴 ∈ 𝑦 ∨ 𝐴 = 𝑦 ∨ 𝑦 ∈ 𝐴))    ⇒   (𝜑 → (𝐴 ∈ 𝐵 ∨ 𝐴 = 𝐵 ∨ 𝐵 ∈ 𝐴))
 
10-Aug-2024nnnninf2 7310 Canonical embedding of suc ω into ℕ∞. (Contributed by BJ, 10-Aug-2024.)
(𝑁 ∈ suc ω → (𝑖 ∈ ω ↦ if(𝑖 ∈ 𝑁, 1o, ∅)) ∈ ℕ∞)
 
10-Aug-2024infnninf 7307 The point at infinity in ℕ∞ is the constant sequence equal to 1o. Note that with our encoding of functions, that constant function can also be expressed as (ω × {1o}), as fconstmpt 4768 shows. (Contributed by Jim Kingdon, 14-Jul-2022.) Use maps-to notation. (Revised by BJ, 10-Aug-2024.)
(𝑖 ∈ ω ↦ 1o) ∈ ℕ∞
 
9-Aug-2024ss1o0el1o 7091 Reformulation of ss1o0el1 4282 using 1o instead of {∅}. (Contributed by BJ, 9-Aug-2024.)
(𝐴 ⊆ 1o → (∅ ∈ 𝐴 ↔ 𝐴 = 1o))
 
9-Aug-2024pw1dc0el 7089 Another equivalent of excluded middle, which is a mere reformulation of the definition. (Contributed by BJ, 9-Aug-2024.)
(EXMID ↔ ∀𝑥 ∈ 𝒫 1oDECID ∅ ∈ 𝑥)
 
9-Aug-2024ss1o0el1 4282 A subclass of {∅} contains the empty set if and only if it equals {∅}. (Contributed by BJ and Jim Kingdon, 9-Aug-2024.)
(𝐴 ⊆ {∅} → (∅ ∈ 𝐴 ↔ 𝐴 = {∅}))
 
8-Aug-2024pw1dc1 7092 If, in the set of truth values (the powerset of 1o), equality to 1o is decidable, then excluded middle holds (and conversely). (Contributed by BJ and Jim Kingdon, 8-Aug-2024.)
(EXMID ↔ ∀𝑥 ∈ 𝒫 1oDECID 𝑥 = 1o)
 
7-Aug-2024pw1fin 7088 Excluded middle is equivalent to the power set of 1o being finite. (Contributed by SN and Jim Kingdon, 7-Aug-2024.)
(EXMID ↔ 𝒫 1o ∈ Fin)
 
7-Aug-2024elomssom 4698 A natural number ordinal is, as a set, included in the set of natural number ordinals. (Contributed by NM, 21-Jun-1998.) Extract this result from the previous proof of elnn 4699. (Revised by BJ, 7-Aug-2024.)
(𝐴 ∈ ω → 𝐴 ⊆ ω)
 
6-Aug-2024bj-charfunbi 16283 In an ambient set 𝑋, if membership in 𝐴 is stable, then it is decidable if and only if 𝐴 has a characteristic function.

This characterization can be applied to singletons when the set 𝑋 has stable equality, which is the case as soon as it has a tight apartness relation. (Contributed by BJ, 6-Aug-2024.)

(𝜑 → 𝑋 ∈ 𝑉)    &   (𝜑 → ∀𝑥 ∈ 𝑋 STAB 𝑥 ∈ 𝐴)    ⇒   (𝜑 → (∀𝑥 ∈ 𝑋 DECID 𝑥 ∈ 𝐴 ↔ ∃𝑓 ∈ (2o ↑𝑚 𝑋)(∀𝑥 ∈ (𝑋 ∩ 𝐴)(𝑓‘𝑥) = 1o ∧ ∀𝑥 ∈ (𝑋 ∖ 𝐴)(𝑓‘𝑥) = ∅)))
 
6-Aug-2024bj-charfunr 16282 If a class 𝐴 has a "weak" characteristic function on a class 𝑋, then negated membership in 𝐴 is decidable (in other words, membership in 𝐴 is testable) in 𝑋.

The hypothesis imposes that 𝑋 be a set. As usual, it could be formulated as (𝜑 → (𝐹:𝑋⟶ω ∧ ...)) to deal with general classes, but that extra generality would not make the theorem much more useful.

The theorem would still hold if the codomain of 𝑓 were any class with testable equality to the point where (𝑋 ∖ 𝐴) is sent. (Contributed by BJ, 6-Aug-2024.)

(𝜑 → ∃𝑓 ∈ (ω ↑𝑚 𝑋)(∀𝑥 ∈ (𝑋 ∩ 𝐴)(𝑓‘𝑥) ≠ ∅ ∧ ∀𝑥 ∈ (𝑋 ∖ 𝐴)(𝑓‘𝑥) = ∅))    ⇒   (𝜑 → ∀𝑥 ∈ 𝑋 DECID ¬ 𝑥 ∈ 𝐴)
 
6-Aug-2024bj-charfundc 16280 Properties of the characteristic function on the class 𝑋 of the class 𝐴, provided membership in 𝐴 is decidable in 𝑋. (Contributed by BJ, 6-Aug-2024.)
(𝜑 → 𝐹 = (𝑥 ∈ 𝑋 ↦ if(𝑥 ∈ 𝐴, 1o, ∅)))    &   (𝜑 → ∀𝑥 ∈ 𝑋 DECID 𝑥 ∈ 𝐴)    ⇒   (𝜑 → (𝐹:𝑋⟶2o ∧ (∀𝑥 ∈ (𝑋 ∩ 𝐴)(𝐹‘𝑥) = 1o ∧ ∀𝑥 ∈ (𝑋 ∖ 𝐴)(𝐹‘𝑥) = ∅)))
 
6-Aug-2024prodssdc 12121 Change the index set to a subset in an upper integer product. (Contributed by Scott Fenton, 11-Dec-2017.) (Revised by Jim Kingdon, 6-Aug-2024.)
(𝜑 → 𝐴 ⊆ 𝐵)    &   ((𝜑 ∧ 𝑘 ∈ 𝐴) → 𝐶 ∈ ℂ)    &   (𝜑 → ∃𝑛 ∈ (ℤ≥‘𝑀)∃𝑦(𝑦 # 0 ∧ seq𝑛( · , (𝑘 ∈ (ℤ≥‘𝑀) ↦ if(𝑘 ∈ 𝐵, 𝐶, 1))) ⇝ 𝑦))    &   (𝜑 → ∀𝑗 ∈ (ℤ≥‘𝑀)DECID 𝑗 ∈ 𝐴)    &   (𝜑 → 𝑀 ∈ ℤ)    &   ((𝜑 ∧ 𝑘 ∈ (𝐵 ∖ 𝐴)) → 𝐶 = 1)    &   (𝜑 → 𝐵 ⊆ (ℤ≥‘𝑀))    &   (𝜑 → ∀𝑗 ∈ (ℤ≥‘𝑀)DECID 𝑗 ∈ 𝐵)    ⇒   (𝜑 → ∏𝑘 ∈ 𝐴 𝐶 = ∏𝑘 ∈ 𝐵 𝐶)
 
5-Aug-2024fnmptd 16277 The maps-to notation defines a function with domain (deduction form). (Contributed by BJ, 5-Aug-2024.)
(𝜑 → 𝐹 = (𝑥 ∈ 𝐴 ↦ 𝐵))    &   ((𝜑 ∧ 𝑥 ∈ 𝐴) → 𝐵 ∈ 𝑉)    ⇒   (𝜑 → 𝐹 Fn 𝐴)
 
5-Aug-2024funmptd 16276 The maps-to notation defines a function (deduction form).

Note: one should similarly prove a deduction form of funopab4 5358, then prove funmptd 16276 from it, and then prove funmpt 5359 from that: this would reduce global proof length. (Contributed by BJ, 5-Aug-2024.)

(𝜑 → 𝐹 = (𝑥 ∈ 𝐴 ↦ 𝐵))    ⇒   (𝜑 → Fun 𝐹)
 
5-Aug-2024bj-dcfal 16228 The false truth value is decidable. (Contributed by BJ, 5-Aug-2024.)
DECID ⊥
 
5-Aug-2024bj-dctru 16226 The true truth value is decidable. (Contributed by BJ, 5-Aug-2024.)
DECID ⊤
 
5-Aug-2024bj-stfal 16215 The false truth value is stable. (Contributed by BJ, 5-Aug-2024.)
STAB ⊥
 
5-Aug-2024bj-sttru 16213 The true truth value is stable. (Contributed by BJ, 5-Aug-2024.)
STAB ⊤
 
5-Aug-2024prod1dc 12118 Any product of one over a valid set is one. (Contributed by Scott Fenton, 7-Dec-2017.) (Revised by Jim Kingdon, 5-Aug-2024.)
(((𝑀 ∈ ℤ ∧ 𝐴 ⊆ (ℤ≥‘𝑀) ∧ ∀𝑗 ∈ (ℤ≥‘𝑀)DECID 𝑗 ∈ 𝐴) ∨ 𝐴 ∈ Fin) → ∏𝑘 ∈ 𝐴 1 = 1)
 
5-Aug-20242ssom 6683 The ordinal 2 is included in the set of natural number ordinals. (Contributed by BJ, 5-Aug-2024.)
2o ⊆ ω
 
2-Aug-2024onntri52 7445 Double negated ordinal trichotomy. (Contributed by James E. Hanson and Jim Kingdon, 2-Aug-2024.)
(¬ ¬ EXMID → ¬ ¬ ∀𝑥 ∈ On ∀𝑦 ∈ On (𝑥 ⊆ 𝑦 ∨ 𝑦 ⊆ 𝑥))
 
2-Aug-2024onntri24 7443 Double negated ordinal trichotomy. (Contributed by James E. Hanson and Jim Kingdon, 2-Aug-2024.)
(¬ ¬ ∀𝑥 ∈ On ∀𝑦 ∈ On (𝑥 ⊆ 𝑦 ∨ 𝑦 ⊆ 𝑥) → ∀𝑥 ∈ On ∀𝑦 ∈ On ¬ ¬ (𝑥 ⊆ 𝑦 ∨ 𝑦 ⊆ 𝑥))
 
2-Aug-2024onntri45 7442 Double negated ordinal trichotomy. (Contributed by James E. Hanson and Jim Kingdon, 2-Aug-2024.)
(∀𝑥 ∈ On ∀𝑦 ∈ On ¬ ¬ (𝑥 ⊆ 𝑦 ∨ 𝑦 ⊆ 𝑥) → ¬ ¬ EXMID)
 
2-Aug-2024onntri51 7441 Double negated ordinal trichotomy. (Contributed by James E. Hanson and Jim Kingdon, 2-Aug-2024.)
(¬ ¬ EXMID → ¬ ¬ ∀𝑥 ∈ On ∀𝑦 ∈ On (𝑥 ∈ 𝑦 ∨ 𝑥 = 𝑦 ∨ 𝑦 ∈ 𝑥))
 
2-Aug-2024onntri13 7439 Double negated ordinal trichotomy. (Contributed by James E. Hanson and Jim Kingdon, 2-Aug-2024.)
(¬ ¬ ∀𝑥 ∈ On ∀𝑦 ∈ On (𝑥 ∈ 𝑦 ∨ 𝑥 = 𝑦 ∨ 𝑦 ∈ 𝑥) → ∀𝑥 ∈ On ∀𝑦 ∈ On ¬ ¬ (𝑥 ∈ 𝑦 ∨ 𝑥 = 𝑦 ∨ 𝑦 ∈ 𝑥))
 
2-Aug-2024onntri35 7438 Double negated ordinal trichotomy.

There are five equivalent statements: (1) ¬ ¬ ∀𝑥 ∈ On∀𝑦 ∈ On(𝑥 ∈ 𝑦 ∨ 𝑥 = 𝑦 ∨ 𝑦 ∈ 𝑥), (2) ¬ ¬ ∀𝑥 ∈ On∀𝑦 ∈ On(𝑥 ⊆ 𝑦 ∨ 𝑦 ⊆ 𝑥), (3) ∀𝑥 ∈ On∀𝑦 ∈ On¬ ¬ (𝑥 ∈ 𝑦 ∨ 𝑥 = 𝑦 ∨ 𝑦 ∈ 𝑥), (4) ∀𝑥 ∈ On∀𝑦 ∈ On¬ ¬ (𝑥 ⊆ 𝑦 ∨ 𝑦 ⊆ 𝑥), and (5) ¬ ¬ EXMID. That these are all equivalent is expressed by (1) implies (3) (onntri13 7439), (3) implies (5) (onntri35 7438), (5) implies (1) (onntri51 7441), (2) implies (4) (onntri24 7443), (4) implies (5) (onntri45 7442), and (5) implies (2) (onntri52 7445).

Another way of stating this is that EXMID is equivalent to trichotomy, either the 𝑥 ∈ 𝑦 ∨ 𝑥 = 𝑦 ∨ 𝑦 ∈ 𝑥 or the 𝑥 ⊆ 𝑦 ∨ 𝑦 ⊆ 𝑥 form, as shown in exmidontri 7440 and exmidontri2or 7444, respectively. Thus ¬ ¬ EXMID is equivalent to (1) or (2). In addition, ¬ ¬ EXMID is equivalent to (3) by onntri3or 7446 and (4) by onntri2or 7447.

(Contributed by James E. Hanson and Jim Kingdon, 2-Aug-2024.)

(∀𝑥 ∈ On ∀𝑦 ∈ On ¬ ¬ (𝑥 ∈ 𝑦 ∨ 𝑥 = 𝑦 ∨ 𝑦 ∈ 𝑥) → ¬ ¬ EXMID)
 
1-Aug-2024nnral 2520 The double negation of a universal quantification implies the universal quantification of the double negation. Restricted quantifier version of nnal 1695. (Contributed by Jim Kingdon, 1-Aug-2024.)
(¬ ¬ ∀𝑥 ∈ 𝐴 𝜑 → ∀𝑥 ∈ 𝐴 ¬ ¬ 𝜑)
 
31-Jul-20243nsssucpw1 7437 Negated excluded middle implies that 3o is not a subset of the successor of the power set of 1o. (Contributed by James E. Hanson and Jim Kingdon, 31-Jul-2024.)
(¬ EXMID → ¬ 3o ⊆ suc 𝒫 1o)
 
31-Jul-2024sucpw1nss3 7436 Negated excluded middle implies that the successor of the power set of 1o is not a subset of 3o. (Contributed by James E. Hanson and Jim Kingdon, 31-Jul-2024.)
(¬ EXMID → ¬ suc 𝒫 1o ⊆ 3o)
 
30-Jul-2024psrbagf 14655 A finite bag is a function. (Contributed by Mario Carneiro, 29-Dec-2014.) Remove a sethood antecedent. (Revised by SN, 30-Jul-2024.)
𝐷 = {𝑓 ∈ (ℕ0 ↑𝑚 𝐼) ∣ (◡𝑓 “ ℕ) ∈ Fin}    ⇒   (𝐹 ∈ 𝐷 → 𝐹:𝐼⟶ℕ0)
 
30-Jul-20243nelsucpw1 7435 Three is not an element of the successor of the power set of 1o. (Contributed by James E. Hanson and Jim Kingdon, 30-Jul-2024.)
¬ 3o ∈ suc 𝒫 1o
 
30-Jul-2024sucpw1nel3 7434 The successor of the power set of 1o is not an element of 3o. (Contributed by James E. Hanson and Jim Kingdon, 30-Jul-2024.)
¬ suc 𝒫 1o ∈ 3o
 
30-Jul-2024sucpw1ne3 7433 Negated excluded middle implies that the successor of the power set of 1o is not three . (Contributed by James E. Hanson and Jim Kingdon, 30-Jul-2024.)
(¬ EXMID → suc 𝒫 1o ≠ 3o)
 
30-Jul-2024pw1nel3 7432 Negated excluded middle implies that the power set of 1o is not an element of 3o. (Contributed by James E. Hanson and Jim Kingdon, 30-Jul-2024.)
(¬ EXMID → ¬ 𝒫 1o ∈ 3o)
 
30-Jul-2024pw1ne3 7431 The power set of 1o is not three. (Contributed by James E. Hanson and Jim Kingdon, 30-Jul-2024.)
𝒫 1o ≠ 3o
 
30-Jul-2024pw1ne1 7430 The power set of 1o is not one. (Contributed by Jim Kingdon, 30-Jul-2024.)
𝒫 1o ≠ 1o
 
30-Jul-2024pw1ne0 7429 The power set of 1o is not zero. (Contributed by Jim Kingdon, 30-Jul-2024.)
𝒫 1o ≠ ∅
 
29-Jul-2024grpcld 13568 Closure of the operation of a group. (Contributed by SN, 29-Jul-2024.)
𝐵 = (Base‘𝐺)    &    + = (+g‘𝐺)    &   (𝜑 → 𝐺 ∈ Grp)    &   (𝜑 → 𝑋 ∈ 𝐵)    &   (𝜑 → 𝑌 ∈ 𝐵)    ⇒   (𝜑 → (𝑋 + 𝑌) ∈ 𝐵)
 
29-Jul-2024pw1on 7427 The power set of 1o is an ordinal. (Contributed by Jim Kingdon, 29-Jul-2024.)
𝒫 1o ∈ On
 
28-Jul-2024exmidpweq 7087 Excluded middle is equivalent to the power set of 1o being 2o. (Contributed by Jim Kingdon, 28-Jul-2024.)
(EXMID ↔ 𝒫 1o = 2o)
 
27-Jul-2024dcapnconstALT 16544 Decidability of real number apartness implies the existence of a certain non-constant function from real numbers to integers. A proof of dcapnconst 16543 by means of dceqnconst 16542. (Contributed by Jim Kingdon, 27-Jul-2024.) (New usage is discouraged.) (Proof modification is discouraged.)
(∀𝑥 ∈ ℝ DECID 𝑥 # 0 → ∃𝑓(𝑓:ℝ⟶ℤ ∧ (𝑓‘0) = 0 ∧ ∀𝑥 ∈ ℝ+ (𝑓‘𝑥) ≠ 0))
 
27-Jul-2024reap0 16540 Real number trichotomy is equivalent to decidability of apartness from zero. (Contributed by Jim Kingdon, 27-Jul-2024.)
(∀𝑥 ∈ ℝ ∀𝑦 ∈ ℝ (𝑥 < 𝑦 ∨ 𝑥 = 𝑦 ∨ 𝑦 < 𝑥) ↔ ∀𝑧 ∈ ℝ DECID 𝑧 # 0)
 
26-Jul-2024nconstwlpolemgt0 16546 Lemma for nconstwlpo 16548. If one of the terms of series is positive, so is the sum. (Contributed by Jim Kingdon, 26-Jul-2024.)
(𝜑 → 𝐺:ℕ⟶{0, 1})    &   𝐴 = Σ𝑖 ∈ ℕ ((1 / (2↑𝑖)) · (𝐺‘𝑖))    &   (𝜑 → ∃𝑥 ∈ ℕ (𝐺‘𝑥) = 1)    ⇒   (𝜑 → 0 < 𝐴)
 
26-Jul-2024nconstwlpolem0 16545 Lemma for nconstwlpo 16548. If all the terms of the series are zero, so is their sum. (Contributed by Jim Kingdon, 26-Jul-2024.)
(𝜑 → 𝐺:ℕ⟶{0, 1})    &   𝐴 = Σ𝑖 ∈ ℕ ((1 / (2↑𝑖)) · (𝐺‘𝑖))    &   (𝜑 → ∀𝑥 ∈ ℕ (𝐺‘𝑥) = 0)    ⇒   (𝜑 → 𝐴 = 0)
 
24-Jul-2024tridceq 16538 Real trichotomy implies decidability of real number equality. Or in other words, analytic LPO implies analytic WLPO (see trilpo 16525 and redcwlpo 16537). Thus, this is an analytic analogue to lpowlpo 7351. (Contributed by Jim Kingdon, 24-Jul-2024.)
(∀𝑥 ∈ ℝ ∀𝑦 ∈ ℝ (𝑥 < 𝑦 ∨ 𝑥 = 𝑦 ∨ 𝑦 < 𝑥) → ∀𝑥 ∈ ℝ ∀𝑦 ∈ ℝ DECID 𝑥 = 𝑦)
 
24-Jul-2024iswomni0 16533 Weak omniscience stated in terms of equality with 0. Like iswomninn 16532 but with zero in place of one. (Contributed by Jim Kingdon, 24-Jul-2024.)
(𝐴 ∈ 𝑉 → (𝐴 ∈ WOmni ↔ ∀𝑓 ∈ ({0, 1} ↑𝑚 𝐴)DECID ∀𝑥 ∈ 𝐴 (𝑓‘𝑥) = 0))
 
24-Jul-2024lpowlpo 7351 LPO implies WLPO. Easy corollary of the more general omniwomnimkv 7350. There is an analogue in terms of analytic omniscience principles at tridceq 16538. (Contributed by Jim Kingdon, 24-Jul-2024.)
(ω ∈ Omni → ω ∈ WOmni)
 
23-Jul-2024nconstwlpolem 16547 Lemma for nconstwlpo 16548. (Contributed by Jim Kingdon, 23-Jul-2024.)
(𝜑 → 𝐹:ℝ⟶ℤ)    &   (𝜑 → (𝐹‘0) = 0)    &   ((𝜑 ∧ 𝑥 ∈ ℝ+) → (𝐹‘𝑥) ≠ 0)    &   (𝜑 → 𝐺:ℕ⟶{0, 1})    &   𝐴 = Σ𝑖 ∈ ℕ ((1 / (2↑𝑖)) · (𝐺‘𝑖))    ⇒   (𝜑 → (∀𝑦 ∈ ℕ (𝐺‘𝑦) = 0 ∨ ¬ ∀𝑦 ∈ ℕ (𝐺‘𝑦) = 0))
 
23-Jul-2024dceqnconst 16542 Decidability of real number equality implies the existence of a certain non-constant function from real numbers to integers. Variation of Exercise 11.6(i) of [HoTT], p. (varies). See redcwlpo 16537 for more discussion of decidability of real number equality. (Contributed by BJ and Jim Kingdon, 24-Jun-2024.) (Revised by Jim Kingdon, 23-Jul-2024.)
(∀𝑥 ∈ ℝ DECID 𝑥 = 0 → ∃𝑓(𝑓:ℝ⟶ℤ ∧ (𝑓‘0) = 0 ∧ ∀𝑥 ∈ ℝ+ (𝑓‘𝑥) ≠ 0))
 
23-Jul-2024redc0 16539 Two ways to express decidability of real number equality. (Contributed by Jim Kingdon, 23-Jul-2024.)
(∀𝑥 ∈ ℝ ∀𝑦 ∈ ℝ DECID 𝑥 = 𝑦 ↔ ∀𝑧 ∈ ℝ DECID 𝑧 = 0)
 
23-Jul-2024canth 5961 No set 𝐴 is equinumerous to its power set (Cantor's theorem), i.e., no function can map 𝐴 onto its power set. Compare Theorem 6B(b) of [Enderton] p. 132. (Use nex 1546 if you want the form ¬ ∃𝑓𝑓:𝐴–onto→𝒫 𝐴.) (Contributed by NM, 7-Aug-1994.) (Revised by Noah R Kingdon, 23-Jul-2024.)
𝐴 ∈ V    ⇒    ¬ 𝐹:𝐴–onto→𝒫 𝐴
 
22-Jul-2024nconstwlpo 16548 Existence of a certain non-constant function from reals to integers implies ω ∈ WOmni (the Weak Limited Principle of Omniscience or WLPO). Based on Exercise 11.6(ii) of [HoTT], p. (varies). (Contributed by BJ and Jim Kingdon, 22-Jul-2024.)
(𝜑 → 𝐹:ℝ⟶ℤ)    &   (𝜑 → (𝐹‘0) = 0)    &   ((𝜑 ∧ 𝑥 ∈ ℝ+) → (𝐹‘𝑥) ≠ 0)    ⇒   (𝜑 → ω ∈ WOmni)
 
15-Jul-2024fprodseq 12115 The value of a product over a nonempty finite set. (Contributed by Scott Fenton, 6-Dec-2017.) (Revised by Jim Kingdon, 15-Jul-2024.)
(𝑘 = (𝐹‘𝑛) → 𝐵 = 𝐶)    &   (𝜑 → 𝑀 ∈ ℕ)    &   (𝜑 → 𝐹:(1...𝑀)–1-1-onto→𝐴)    &   ((𝜑 ∧ 𝑘 ∈ 𝐴) → 𝐵 ∈ ℂ)    &   ((𝜑 ∧ 𝑛 ∈ (1...𝑀)) → (𝐺‘𝑛) = 𝐶)    ⇒   (𝜑 → ∏𝑘 ∈ 𝐴 𝐵 = (seq1( · , (𝑛 ∈ ℕ ↦ if(𝑛 ≤ 𝑀, (𝐺‘𝑛), 1)))‘𝑀))
 
14-Jul-2024rexbid2 2535 Formula-building rule for restricted existential quantifier (deduction form). (Contributed by BJ, 14-Jul-2024.)
Ⅎ𝑥𝜑    &   (𝜑 → ((𝑥 ∈ 𝐴 ∧ 𝜓) ↔ (𝑥 ∈ 𝐵 ∧ 𝜒)))    ⇒   (𝜑 → (∃𝑥 ∈ 𝐴 𝜓 ↔ ∃𝑥 ∈ 𝐵 𝜒))
 
14-Jul-2024ralbid2 2534 Formula-building rule for restricted universal quantifier (deduction form). (Contributed by BJ, 14-Jul-2024.)
Ⅎ𝑥𝜑    &   (𝜑 → ((𝑥 ∈ 𝐴 → 𝜓) ↔ (𝑥 ∈ 𝐵 → 𝜒)))    ⇒   (𝜑 → (∀𝑥 ∈ 𝐴 𝜓 ↔ ∀𝑥 ∈ 𝐵 𝜒))
 
12-Jul-20242irrexpqap 15673 There exist real numbers 𝑎 and 𝑏 which are irrational (in the sense of being apart from any rational number) such that (𝑎↑𝑏) is rational. Statement in the Metamath book, section 1.1.5, footnote 27 on page 17, and the "constructive proof" for theorem 1.2 of [Bauer], p. 483. This is a constructive proof because it is based on two explicitly named irrational numbers (√‘2) and (2 logb 9), see sqrt2irrap 12723, 2logb9irrap 15672 and sqrt2cxp2logb9e3 15670. Therefore, this proof is acceptable/usable in intuitionistic logic. (Contributed by Jim Kingdon, 12-Jul-2024.)
∃𝑎 ∈ ℝ ∃𝑏 ∈ ℝ (∀𝑝 ∈ ℚ 𝑎 # 𝑝 ∧ ∀𝑞 ∈ ℚ 𝑏 # 𝑞 ∧ (𝑎↑𝑐𝑏) ∈ ℚ)
 
12-Jul-20242logb9irrap 15672 Example for logbgcd1irrap 15665. The logarithm of nine to base two is irrational (in the sense of being apart from any rational number). (Contributed by Jim Kingdon, 12-Jul-2024.)
(𝑄 ∈ ℚ → (2 logb 9) # 𝑄)
 
12-Jul-2024erlecpbl 13386 Translate the relation compatibility relation to a quotient set. (Contributed by Mario Carneiro, 24-Feb-2015.) (Revised by Mario Carneiro, 12-Aug-2015.) (Revised by AV, 12-Jul-2024.)
(𝜑 → ∼ Er 𝑉)    &   (𝜑 → 𝑉 ∈ 𝑊)    &   𝐹 = (𝑥 ∈ 𝑉 ↦ [𝑥] ∼ )    &   (𝜑 → ((𝐴 ∼ 𝐶 ∧ 𝐵 ∼ 𝐷) → (𝐴𝑁𝐵 ↔ 𝐶𝑁𝐷)))    ⇒   ((𝜑 ∧ (𝐴 ∈ 𝑉 ∧ 𝐵 ∈ 𝑉) ∧ (𝐶 ∈ 𝑉 ∧ 𝐷 ∈ 𝑉)) → (((𝐹‘𝐴) = (𝐹‘𝐶) ∧ (𝐹‘𝐵) = (𝐹‘𝐷)) → (𝐴𝑁𝐵 ↔ 𝐶𝑁𝐷)))
 
12-Jul-2024ercpbl 13385 Translate the function compatibility relation to a quotient set. (Contributed by Mario Carneiro, 24-Feb-2015.) (Revised by Mario Carneiro, 12-Aug-2015.) (Revised by AV, 12-Jul-2024.)
(𝜑 → ∼ Er 𝑉)    &   (𝜑 → 𝑉 ∈ 𝑊)    &   𝐹 = (𝑥 ∈ 𝑉 ↦ [𝑥] ∼ )    &   ((𝜑 ∧ (𝑎 ∈ 𝑉 ∧ 𝑏 ∈ 𝑉)) → (𝑎 + 𝑏) ∈ 𝑉)    &   (𝜑 → ((𝐴 ∼ 𝐶 ∧ 𝐵 ∼ 𝐷) → (𝐴 + 𝐵) ∼ (𝐶 + 𝐷)))    ⇒   ((𝜑 ∧ (𝐴 ∈ 𝑉 ∧ 𝐵 ∈ 𝑉) ∧ (𝐶 ∈ 𝑉 ∧ 𝐷 ∈ 𝑉)) → (((𝐹‘𝐴) = (𝐹‘𝐶) ∧ (𝐹‘𝐵) = (𝐹‘𝐷)) → (𝐹‘(𝐴 + 𝐵)) = (𝐹‘(𝐶 + 𝐷))))
 
12-Jul-2024ercpbllemg 13384 Lemma for ercpbl 13385. (Contributed by Mario Carneiro, 24-Feb-2015.) (Revised by AV, 12-Jul-2024.)
(𝜑 → ∼ Er 𝑉)    &   (𝜑 → 𝑉 ∈ 𝑊)    &   𝐹 = (𝑥 ∈ 𝑉 ↦ [𝑥] ∼ )    &   (𝜑 → 𝐴 ∈ 𝑉)    &   (𝜑 → 𝐵 ∈ 𝑉)    ⇒   (𝜑 → ((𝐹‘𝐴) = (𝐹‘𝐵) ↔ 𝐴 ∼ 𝐵))
 
12-Jul-2024divsfvalg 13383 Value of the function in qusval 13377. (Contributed by Mario Carneiro, 24-Feb-2015.) (Revised by Mario Carneiro, 12-Aug-2015.) (Revised by AV, 12-Jul-2024.)
(𝜑 → ∼ Er 𝑉)    &   (𝜑 → 𝑉 ∈ 𝑊)    &   𝐹 = (𝑥 ∈ 𝑉 ↦ [𝑥] ∼ )    &   (𝜑 → 𝐴 ∈ 𝑉)    ⇒   (𝜑 → (𝐹‘𝐴) = [𝐴] ∼ )
 
12-Jul-2024divsfval 13382 Value of the function in qusval 13377. (Contributed by Mario Carneiro, 24-Feb-2015.) (Revised by Mario Carneiro, 12-Aug-2015.) (Revised by AV, 12-Jul-2024.)
(𝜑 → ∼ Er 𝑉)    &   (𝜑 → 𝑉 ∈ 𝑊)    &   𝐹 = (𝑥 ∈ 𝑉 ↦ [𝑥] ∼ )    ⇒   (𝜑 → (𝐹‘𝐴) = [𝐴] ∼ )
 
11-Jul-2024logbgcd1irraplemexp 15663 Lemma for logbgcd1irrap 15665. Apartness of 𝑋↑𝑁 and 𝐵↑𝑀. (Contributed by Jim Kingdon, 11-Jul-2024.)
(𝜑 → 𝑋 ∈ (ℤ≥‘2))    &   (𝜑 → 𝐵 ∈ (ℤ≥‘2))    &   (𝜑 → (𝑋 gcd 𝐵) = 1)    &   (𝜑 → 𝑀 ∈ ℤ)    &   (𝜑 → 𝑁 ∈ ℕ)    ⇒   (𝜑 → (𝑋↑𝑁) # (𝐵↑𝑀))
 
11-Jul-2024reapef 15473 Apartness and the exponential function for reals. (Contributed by Jim Kingdon, 11-Jul-2024.)
((𝐴 ∈ ℝ ∧ 𝐵 ∈ ℝ) → (𝐴 # 𝐵 ↔ (exp‘𝐴) # (exp‘𝐵)))
 
10-Jul-2024apcxp2 15634 Apartness and real exponentiation. (Contributed by Jim Kingdon, 10-Jul-2024.)
(((𝐴 ∈ ℝ+ ∧ 𝐴 # 1) ∧ (𝐵 ∈ ℝ ∧ 𝐶 ∈ ℝ)) → (𝐵 # 𝐶 ↔ (𝐴↑𝑐𝐵) # (𝐴↑𝑐𝐶)))
 
9-Jul-2024logbgcd1irraplemap 15664 Lemma for logbgcd1irrap 15665. The result, with the rational number expressed as numerator and denominator. (Contributed by Jim Kingdon, 9-Jul-2024.)
(𝜑 → 𝑋 ∈ (ℤ≥‘2))    &   (𝜑 → 𝐵 ∈ (ℤ≥‘2))    &   (𝜑 → (𝑋 gcd 𝐵) = 1)    &   (𝜑 → 𝑀 ∈ ℤ)    &   (𝜑 → 𝑁 ∈ ℕ)    ⇒   (𝜑 → (𝐵 logb 𝑋) # (𝑀 / 𝑁))
 
9-Jul-2024apexp1 10957 Exponentiation and apartness. (Contributed by Jim Kingdon, 9-Jul-2024.)
((𝐴 ∈ ℂ ∧ 𝐵 ∈ ℂ ∧ 𝑁 ∈ ℕ) → ((𝐴↑𝑁) # (𝐵↑𝑁) → 𝐴 # 𝐵))
 
5-Jul-2024logrpap0 15572 The logarithm is apart from 0 if its argument is apart from 1. (Contributed by Jim Kingdon, 5-Jul-2024.)
((𝐴 ∈ ℝ+ ∧ 𝐴 # 1) → (log‘𝐴) # 0)
 
3-Jul-2024rplogbval 15640 Define the value of the logb function, the logarithm generalized to an arbitrary base, when used as infix. Most Metamath statements select variables in order of their use, but to make the order clearer we use "B" for base and "X" for the argument of the logarithm function here. (Contributed by David A. Wheeler, 21-Jan-2017.) (Revised by Jim Kingdon, 3-Jul-2024.)
((𝐵 ∈ ℝ+ ∧ 𝐵 # 1 ∧ 𝑋 ∈ ℝ+) → (𝐵 logb 𝑋) = ((log‘𝑋) / (log‘𝐵)))
 
3-Jul-2024logrpap0d 15573 Deduction form of logrpap0 15572. (Contributed by Jim Kingdon, 3-Jul-2024.)
(𝜑 → 𝐴 ∈ ℝ+)    &   (𝜑 → 𝐴 # 1)    ⇒   (𝜑 → (log‘𝐴) # 0)
 
3-Jul-2024logrpap0b 15571 The logarithm is apart from 0 if and only if its argument is apart from 1. (Contributed by Jim Kingdon, 3-Jul-2024.)
(𝐴 ∈ ℝ+ → (𝐴 # 1 ↔ (log‘𝐴) # 0))
 
28-Jun-20242o01f 16471 Mapping zero and one between ω and ℕ0 style integers. (Contributed by Jim Kingdon, 28-Jun-2024.)
𝐺 = frec((𝑥 ∈ ℤ ↦ (𝑥 + 1)), 0)    ⇒   (𝐺 ↾ 2o):2o⟶{0, 1}
 
28-Jun-2024012of 16470 Mapping zero and one between ℕ0 and ω style integers. (Contributed by Jim Kingdon, 28-Jun-2024.)
𝐺 = frec((𝑥 ∈ ℤ ↦ (𝑥 + 1)), 0)    ⇒   (◡𝐺 ↾ {0, 1}):{0, 1}⟶2o
 
27-Jun-2024iooreen 16517 An open interval is equinumerous to the real numbers. (Contributed by Jim Kingdon, 27-Jun-2024.)
(0(,)1) ≈ ℝ
 
27-Jun-2024iooref1o 16516 A one-to-one mapping from the real numbers onto the open unit interval. (Contributed by Jim Kingdon, 27-Jun-2024.)
𝐹 = (𝑥 ∈ ℝ ↦ (1 / (1 + (exp‘𝑥))))    ⇒   𝐹:ℝ–1-1-onto→(0(,)1)
 
25-Jun-2024neapmkvlem 16549 Lemma for neapmkv 16550. The result, with a few hypotheses broken out for convenience. (Contributed by Jim Kingdon, 25-Jun-2024.)
(𝜑 → 𝐹:ℕ⟶{0, 1})    &   𝐴 = Σ𝑖 ∈ ℕ ((1 / (2↑𝑖)) · (𝐹‘𝑖))    &   ((𝜑 ∧ 𝐴 ≠ 1) → 𝐴 # 1)    ⇒   (𝜑 → (¬ ∀𝑥 ∈ ℕ (𝐹‘𝑥) = 1 → ∃𝑥 ∈ ℕ (𝐹‘𝑥) = 0))
 
25-Jun-2024ismkvnn 16535 The predicate of being Markov stated in terms of set exponentiation. (Contributed by Jim Kingdon, 25-Jun-2024.)
(𝐴 ∈ 𝑉 → (𝐴 ∈ Markov ↔ ∀𝑓 ∈ ({0, 1} ↑𝑚 𝐴)(¬ ∀𝑥 ∈ 𝐴 (𝑓‘𝑥) = 1 → ∃𝑥 ∈ 𝐴 (𝑓‘𝑥) = 0)))
 
25-Jun-2024ismkvnnlem 16534 Lemma for ismkvnn 16535. The result, with a hypothesis to give a name to an expression for convenience. (Contributed by Jim Kingdon, 25-Jun-2024.)
𝐺 = frec((𝑥 ∈ ℤ ↦ (𝑥 + 1)), 0)    ⇒   (𝐴 ∈ 𝑉 → (𝐴 ∈ Markov ↔ ∀𝑓 ∈ ({0, 1} ↑𝑚 𝐴)(¬ ∀𝑥 ∈ 𝐴 (𝑓‘𝑥) = 1 → ∃𝑥 ∈ 𝐴 (𝑓‘𝑥) = 0)))
 
25-Jun-2024enmkvlem 7344 Lemma for enmkv 7345. One direction of the biconditional. (Contributed by Jim Kingdon, 25-Jun-2024.)
(𝐴 ≈ 𝐵 → (𝐴 ∈ Markov → 𝐵 ∈ Markov))
 
24-Jun-2024neapmkv 16550 If negated equality for real numbers implies apartness, Markov's Principle follows. Exercise 11.10 of [HoTT], p. (varies). (Contributed by Jim Kingdon, 24-Jun-2024.)
(∀𝑥 ∈ ℝ ∀𝑦 ∈ ℝ (𝑥 ≠ 𝑦 → 𝑥 # 𝑦) → ω ∈ Markov)
 
24-Jun-2024dcapnconst 16543 Decidability of real number apartness implies the existence of a certain non-constant function from real numbers to integers. Variation of Exercise 11.6(i) of [HoTT], p. (varies). See trilpo 16525 for more discussion of decidability of real number apartness.

This is a weaker form of dceqnconst 16542 and in fact this theorem can be proved using dceqnconst 16542 as shown at dcapnconstALT 16544. (Contributed by BJ and Jim Kingdon, 24-Jun-2024.)

(∀𝑥 ∈ ℝ DECID 𝑥 # 0 → ∃𝑓(𝑓:ℝ⟶ℤ ∧ (𝑓‘0) = 0 ∧ ∀𝑥 ∈ ℝ+ (𝑓‘𝑥) ≠ 0))
 
24-Jun-2024enmkv 7345 Being Markov is invariant with respect to equinumerosity. For example, this means that we can express the Markov's Principle as either ω ∈ Markov or ℕ0 ∈ Markov. The former is a better match to conventional notation in the sense that df2o3 6588 says that 2o = {∅, 1o} whereas the corresponding relationship does not exist between 2 and {0, 1}. (Contributed by Jim Kingdon, 24-Jun-2024.)
(𝐴 ≈ 𝐵 → (𝐴 ∈ Markov ↔ 𝐵 ∈ Markov))
 
21-Jun-2024redcwlpolemeq1 16536 Lemma for redcwlpo 16537. A biconditionalized version of trilpolemeq1 16522. (Contributed by Jim Kingdon, 21-Jun-2024.)
(𝜑 → 𝐹:ℕ⟶{0, 1})    &   𝐴 = Σ𝑖 ∈ ℕ ((1 / (2↑𝑖)) · (𝐹‘𝑖))    ⇒   (𝜑 → (𝐴 = 1 ↔ ∀𝑥 ∈ ℕ (𝐹‘𝑥) = 1))
 
20-Jun-2024redcwlpo 16537 Decidability of real number equality implies the Weak Limited Principle of Omniscience (WLPO). We expect that we'd need some form of countable choice to prove the converse.

Here's the outline of the proof. Given an infinite sequence F of zeroes and ones, we need to show the sequence is all ones or it is not. Construct a real number A whose representation in base two consists of a zero, a decimal point, and then the numbers of the sequence. This real number will equal one if and only if the sequence is all ones (redcwlpolemeq1 16536). Therefore decidability of real number equality would imply decidability of whether the sequence is all ones.

Because of this theorem, decidability of real number equality is sometimes called "analytic WLPO".

WLPO is known to not be provable in IZF (and most constructive foundations), so this theorem establishes that we will be unable to prove an analogue to qdceq 10481 for real numbers. (Contributed by Jim Kingdon, 20-Jun-2024.)

(∀𝑥 ∈ ℝ ∀𝑦 ∈ ℝ DECID 𝑥 = 𝑦 → ω ∈ WOmni)
 
20-Jun-2024iswomninn 16532 Weak omniscience stated in terms of natural numbers. Similar to iswomnimap 7349 but it will sometimes be more convenient to use 0 and 1 rather than ∅ and 1o. (Contributed by Jim Kingdon, 20-Jun-2024.)
(𝐴 ∈ 𝑉 → (𝐴 ∈ WOmni ↔ ∀𝑓 ∈ ({0, 1} ↑𝑚 𝐴)DECID ∀𝑥 ∈ 𝐴 (𝑓‘𝑥) = 1))
 
20-Jun-2024iswomninnlem 16531 Lemma for iswomnimap 7349. The result, with a hypothesis for convenience. (Contributed by Jim Kingdon, 20-Jun-2024.)
𝐺 = frec((𝑥 ∈ ℤ ↦ (𝑥 + 1)), 0)    ⇒   (𝐴 ∈ 𝑉 → (𝐴 ∈ WOmni ↔ ∀𝑓 ∈ ({0, 1} ↑𝑚 𝐴)DECID ∀𝑥 ∈ 𝐴 (𝑓‘𝑥) = 1))
 
20-Jun-2024enwomni 7353 Weak omniscience is invariant with respect to equinumerosity. For example, this means that we can express the Weak Limited Principle of Omniscience as either ω ∈ WOmni or ℕ0 ∈ WOmni. The former is a better match to conventional notation in the sense that df2o3 6588 says that 2o = {∅, 1o} whereas the corresponding relationship does not exist between 2 and {0, 1}. (Contributed by Jim Kingdon, 20-Jun-2024.)
(𝐴 ≈ 𝐵 → (𝐴 ∈ WOmni ↔ 𝐵 ∈ WOmni))
 
20-Jun-2024enwomnilem 7352 Lemma for enwomni 7353. One direction of the biconditional. (Contributed by Jim Kingdon, 20-Jun-2024.)
(𝐴 ≈ 𝐵 → (𝐴 ∈ WOmni → 𝐵 ∈ WOmni))
 
19-Jun-2024rpabscxpbnd 15635 Bound on the absolute value of a complex power. (Contributed by Mario Carneiro, 15-Sep-2014.) (Revised by Jim Kingdon, 19-Jun-2024.)
(𝜑 → 𝐴 ∈ ℝ+)    &   (𝜑 → 𝐵 ∈ ℂ)    &   (𝜑 → 0 < (ℜ‘𝐵))    &   (𝜑 → 𝑀 ∈ ℝ)    &   (𝜑 → (abs‘𝐴) ≤ 𝑀)    ⇒   (𝜑 → (abs‘(𝐴↑𝑐𝐵)) ≤ ((𝑀↑𝑐(ℜ‘𝐵)) · (exp‘((abs‘𝐵) · π))))
 
16-Jun-2024rpcxpsqrt 15617 The exponential function with exponent 1 / 2 exactly matches the square root function, and thus serves as a suitable generalization to other 𝑛-th roots and irrational roots. (Contributed by Mario Carneiro, 2-Aug-2014.) (Revised by Jim Kingdon, 16-Jun-2024.)
(𝐴 ∈ ℝ+ → (𝐴↑𝑐(1 / 2)) = (√‘𝐴))
 
16-Jun-2024biadanid 616 Deduction associated with biadani 614. Add a conjunction to an equivalence. (Contributed by Thierry Arnoux, 16-Jun-2024.)
((𝜑 ∧ 𝜓) → 𝜒)    &   ((𝜑 ∧ 𝜒) → (𝜓 ↔ 𝜃))    ⇒   (𝜑 → (𝜓 ↔ (𝜒 ∧ 𝜃)))
 
13-Jun-2024rpcxpadd 15600 Sum of exponents law for complex exponentiation. (Contributed by Mario Carneiro, 2-Aug-2014.) (Revised by Jim Kingdon, 13-Jun-2024.)
((𝐴 ∈ ℝ+ ∧ 𝐵 ∈ ℂ ∧ 𝐶 ∈ ℂ) → (𝐴↑𝑐(𝐵 + 𝐶)) = ((𝐴↑𝑐𝐵) · (𝐴↑𝑐𝐶)))
 
12-Jun-2024cxpap0 15599 Complex exponentiation is apart from zero. (Contributed by Mario Carneiro, 2-Aug-2014.) (Revised by Jim Kingdon, 12-Jun-2024.)
((𝐴 ∈ ℝ+ ∧ 𝐵 ∈ ℂ) → (𝐴↑𝑐𝐵) # 0)
 
12-Jun-2024rpcncxpcl 15597 Closure of the complex power function. (Contributed by Jim Kingdon, 12-Jun-2024.)
((𝐴 ∈ ℝ+ ∧ 𝐵 ∈ ℂ) → (𝐴↑𝑐𝐵) ∈ ℂ)
 
12-Jun-2024rpcxp0 15593 Value of the complex power function when the second argument is zero. (Contributed by Mario Carneiro, 2-Aug-2014.) (Revised by Jim Kingdon, 12-Jun-2024.)
(𝐴 ∈ ℝ+ → (𝐴↑𝑐0) = 1)
 
12-Jun-2024cxpexpnn 15591 Relate the complex power function to the integer power function. (Contributed by Mario Carneiro, 2-Aug-2014.) (Revised by Jim Kingdon, 12-Jun-2024.)
((𝐴 ∈ ℕ ∧ 𝐵 ∈ ℤ) → (𝐴↑𝑐𝐵) = (𝐴↑𝐵))
 
12-Jun-2024cxpexprp 15590 Relate the complex power function to the integer power function. (Contributed by Mario Carneiro, 2-Aug-2014.) (Revised by Jim Kingdon, 12-Jun-2024.)
((𝐴 ∈ ℝ+ ∧ 𝐵 ∈ ℤ) → (𝐴↑𝑐𝐵) = (𝐴↑𝐵))
 
12-Jun-2024rpcxpef 15589 Value of the complex power function. (Contributed by Mario Carneiro, 2-Aug-2014.) (Revised by Jim Kingdon, 12-Jun-2024.)
((𝐴 ∈ ℝ+ ∧ 𝐵 ∈ ℂ) → (𝐴↑𝑐𝐵) = (exp‘(𝐵 · (log‘𝐴))))
 
12-Jun-2024df-rpcxp 15554 Define the power function on complex numbers. Because df-relog 15553 is only defined on positive reals, this definition only allows for a base which is a positive real. (Contributed by Jim Kingdon, 12-Jun-2024.)
↑𝑐 = (𝑥 ∈ ℝ+, 𝑦 ∈ ℂ ↦ (exp‘(𝑦 · (log‘𝑥))))
 
10-Jun-2024trirec0xor 16527 Version of trirec0 16526 with exclusive-or.

The definition of a discrete field is sometimes stated in terms of exclusive-or but as proved here, this is equivalent to inclusive-or because the two disjuncts cannot be simultaneously true. (Contributed by Jim Kingdon, 10-Jun-2024.)

(∀𝑥 ∈ ℝ ∀𝑦 ∈ ℝ (𝑥 < 𝑦 ∨ 𝑥 = 𝑦 ∨ 𝑦 < 𝑥) ↔ ∀𝑥 ∈ ℝ (∃𝑧 ∈ ℝ (𝑥 · 𝑧) = 1 ⊻ 𝑥 = 0))
 
10-Jun-2024trirec0 16526 Every real number having a reciprocal or equaling zero is equivalent to real number trichotomy.

This is the key part of the definition of what is known as a discrete field, so "the real numbers are a discrete field" can be taken as an equivalent way to state real trichotomy (see further discussion at trilpo 16525). (Contributed by Jim Kingdon, 10-Jun-2024.)

(∀𝑥 ∈ ℝ ∀𝑦 ∈ ℝ (𝑥 < 𝑦 ∨ 𝑥 = 𝑦 ∨ 𝑦 < 𝑥) ↔ ∀𝑥 ∈ ℝ (∃𝑧 ∈ ℝ (𝑥 · 𝑧) = 1 ∨ 𝑥 = 0))
 
9-Jun-2024omniwomnimkv 7350 A set is omniscient if and only if it is weakly omniscient and Markov. The case 𝐴 = ω says that LPO ↔ WLPO ∧ MP which is a remark following Definition 2.5 of [Pierik], p. 9. (Contributed by Jim Kingdon, 9-Jun-2024.)
(𝐴 ∈ Omni ↔ (𝐴 ∈ WOmni ∧ 𝐴 ∈ Markov))
 
9-Jun-2024iswomnimap 7349 The predicate of being weakly omniscient stated in terms of set exponentiation. (Contributed by Jim Kingdon, 9-Jun-2024.)
(𝐴 ∈ 𝑉 → (𝐴 ∈ WOmni ↔ ∀𝑓 ∈ (2o ↑𝑚 𝐴)DECID ∀𝑥 ∈ 𝐴 (𝑓‘𝑥) = 1o))
 
9-Jun-2024iswomni 7348 The predicate of being weakly omniscient. (Contributed by Jim Kingdon, 9-Jun-2024.)
(𝐴 ∈ 𝑉 → (𝐴 ∈ WOmni ↔ ∀𝑓(𝑓:𝐴⟶2o → DECID ∀𝑥 ∈ 𝐴 (𝑓‘𝑥) = 1o)))
 
9-Jun-2024df-womni 7347 A weakly omniscient set is one where we can decide whether a predicate (here represented by a function 𝑓) holds (is equal to 1o) for all elements or not. Generalization of definition 2.4 of [Pierik], p. 9.

In particular, ω ∈ WOmni is known as the Weak Limited Principle of Omniscience (WLPO).

The term WLPO is common in the literature; there appears to be no widespread term for what we are calling a weakly omniscient set. (Contributed by Jim Kingdon, 9-Jun-2024.)

WOmni = {𝑦 ∣ ∀𝑓(𝑓:𝑦⟶2o → DECID ∀𝑥 ∈ 𝑦 (𝑓‘𝑥) = 1o)}
 
1-Jun-2024ringcmnd 14019 A ring is a commutative monoid. (Contributed by SN, 1-Jun-2024.)
(𝜑 → 𝑅 ∈ Ring)    ⇒   (𝜑 → 𝑅 ∈ CMnd)
 
1-Jun-2024ringabld 14018 A ring is an Abelian group. (Contributed by SN, 1-Jun-2024.)
(𝜑 → 𝑅 ∈ Ring)    ⇒   (𝜑 → 𝑅 ∈ Abel)
 
1-Jun-2024cmnmndd 13866 A commutative monoid is a monoid. (Contributed by SN, 1-Jun-2024.)
(𝜑 → 𝐺 ∈ CMnd)    ⇒   (𝜑 → 𝐺 ∈ Mnd)
 
1-Jun-2024ablcmnd 13850 An Abelian group is a commutative monoid. (Contributed by SN, 1-Jun-2024.)
(𝜑 → 𝐺 ∈ Abel)    ⇒   (𝜑 → 𝐺 ∈ CMnd)
 
1-Jun-2024grpmndd 13567 A group is a monoid. (Contributed by SN, 1-Jun-2024.)
(𝜑 → 𝐺 ∈ Grp)    ⇒   (𝜑 → 𝐺 ∈ Mnd)
 
1-Jun-2024fndmi 5424 The domain of a function. (Contributed by Wolf Lammen, 1-Jun-2024.)
𝐹 Fn 𝐴    ⇒   dom 𝐹 = 𝐴
 
29-May-2024pw1nct 16482 A condition which ensures that the powerset of a singleton is not countable. The antecedent here can be referred to as the uniformity principle. Based on Mastodon posts by Andrej Bauer and Rahul Chhabra. (Contributed by Jim Kingdon, 29-May-2024.)
(∀𝑟(𝑟 ⊆ (𝒫 1o × ω) → (∀𝑝 ∈ 𝒫 1o∃𝑛 ∈ ω 𝑝𝑟𝑛 → ∃𝑚 ∈ ω ∀𝑞 ∈ 𝒫 1o𝑞𝑟𝑚)) → ¬ ∃𝑓 𝑓:ω–onto→(𝒫 1o ⊔ 1o))
 
28-May-2024sssneq 16481 Any two elements of a subset of a singleton are equal. (Contributed by Jim Kingdon, 28-May-2024.)
(𝐴 ⊆ {𝐵} → ∀𝑦 ∈ 𝐴 ∀𝑧 ∈ 𝐴 𝑦 = 𝑧)
 
26-May-2024elpwi2 4243 Membership in a power class. (Contributed by Glauco Siliprandi, 3-Mar-2021.) (Proof shortened by Wolf Lammen, 26-May-2024.)
𝐵 ∈ 𝑉    &   𝐴 ⊆ 𝐵    ⇒   𝐴 ∈ 𝒫 𝐵
 
25-May-2024mplnegfi 14690 The negative function on multivariate polynomials. (Contributed by SN, 25-May-2024.)
𝑃 = (𝐼 mPoly 𝑅)    &   𝐵 = (Base‘𝑃)    &   𝑁 = (invg‘𝑅)    &   𝑀 = (invg‘𝑃)    &   (𝜑 → 𝐼 ∈ Fin)    &   (𝜑 → 𝑅 ∈ Grp)    &   (𝜑 → 𝑋 ∈ 𝐵)    ⇒   (𝜑 → (𝑀‘𝑋) = (𝑁 ∘ 𝑋))
 
24-May-2024dvmptcjx 15419 Function-builder for derivative, conjugate rule. (Contributed by Mario Carneiro, 1-Sep-2014.) (Revised by Jim Kingdon, 24-May-2024.)
((𝜑 ∧ 𝑥 ∈ 𝑋) → 𝐴 ∈ ℂ)    &   ((𝜑 ∧ 𝑥 ∈ 𝑋) → 𝐵 ∈ 𝑉)    &   (𝜑 → (ℝ D (𝑥 ∈ 𝑋 ↦ 𝐴)) = (𝑥 ∈ 𝑋 ↦ 𝐵))    &   (𝜑 → 𝑋 ⊆ ℝ)    ⇒   (𝜑 → (ℝ D (𝑥 ∈ 𝑋 ↦ (∗‘𝐴))) = (𝑥 ∈ 𝑋 ↦ (∗‘𝐵)))
 
23-May-2024cbvralfw 2754 Rule used to change bound variables, using implicit substitution. Version of cbvralf 2756 with a disjoint variable condition. Although we don't do so yet, we expect this disjoint variable condition will allow us to remove reliance on ax-i12 1553 and ax-bndl 1555 in the proof. (Contributed by NM, 7-Mar-2004.) (Revised by GG, 23-May-2024.)
Ⅎ𝑥𝐴    &   Ⅎ𝑦𝐴    &   Ⅎ𝑦𝜑    &   Ⅎ𝑥𝜓    &   (𝑥 = 𝑦 → (𝜑 ↔ 𝜓))    ⇒   (∀𝑥 ∈ 𝐴 𝜑 ↔ ∀𝑦 ∈ 𝐴 𝜓)
 
23-May-2024cbvrmow 2714 Change the bound variable of a restricted at-most-one quantifier using implicit substitution. Version of cbvrmo 2764 with a disjoint variable condition. (Contributed by NM, 16-Jun-2017.) (Revised by GG, 23-May-2024.)
Ⅎ𝑦𝜑    &   Ⅎ𝑥𝜓    &   (𝑥 = 𝑦 → (𝜑 ↔ 𝜓))    ⇒   (∃*𝑥 ∈ 𝐴 𝜑 ↔ ∃*𝑦 ∈ 𝐴 𝜓)
 
23-May-2024cbvmow 2118 Rule used to change bound variables, using implicit substitution. Version of cbvmo 2117 with a disjoint variable condition. (Contributed by NM, 9-Mar-1995.) (Revised by GG, 23-May-2024.)
Ⅎ𝑦𝜑    &   Ⅎ𝑥𝜓    &   (𝑥 = 𝑦 → (𝜑 ↔ 𝜓))    ⇒   (∃*𝑥𝜑 ↔ ∃*𝑦𝜓)
 
22-May-2024efltlemlt 15469 Lemma for eflt 15470. The converse of efltim 12230 plus the epsilon-delta setup. (Contributed by Jim Kingdon, 22-May-2024.)
(𝜑 → 𝐴 ∈ ℝ)    &   (𝜑 → 𝐵 ∈ ℝ)    &   (𝜑 → (exp‘𝐴) < (exp‘𝐵))    &   (𝜑 → 𝐷 ∈ ℝ+)    &   (𝜑 → ((abs‘(𝐴 − 𝐵)) < 𝐷 → (abs‘((exp‘𝐴) − (exp‘𝐵))) < ((exp‘𝐵) − (exp‘𝐴))))    ⇒   (𝜑 → 𝐴 < 𝐵)
 
21-May-2024eflt 15470 The exponential function on the reals is strictly increasing. (Contributed by Paul Chapman, 21-Aug-2007.) (Revised by Jim Kingdon, 21-May-2024.)
((𝐴 ∈ ℝ ∧ 𝐵 ∈ ℝ) → (𝐴 < 𝐵 ↔ (exp‘𝐴) < (exp‘𝐵)))
 
20-May-2024nsyl5 653 A negated syllogism inference. (Contributed by Wolf Lammen, 20-May-2024.)
(𝜑 → 𝜓)    &   (¬ 𝜑 → 𝜒)    ⇒   (¬ 𝜓 → 𝜒)
 
19-May-2024apdifflemr 16529 Lemma for apdiff 16530. (Contributed by Jim Kingdon, 19-May-2024.)
(𝜑 → 𝐴 ∈ ℝ)    &   (𝜑 → 𝑆 ∈ ℚ)    &   (𝜑 → (abs‘(𝐴 − -1)) # (abs‘(𝐴 − 1)))    &   ((𝜑 ∧ 𝑆 ≠ 0) → (abs‘(𝐴 − 0)) # (abs‘(𝐴 − (2 · 𝑆))))    ⇒   (𝜑 → 𝐴 # 𝑆)
 
18-May-2024apdifflemf 16528 Lemma for apdiff 16530. Being apart from the point halfway between 𝑄 and 𝑅 suffices for 𝐴 to be a different distance from 𝑄 and from 𝑅. (Contributed by Jim Kingdon, 18-May-2024.)
(𝜑 → 𝐴 ∈ ℝ)    &   (𝜑 → 𝑄 ∈ ℚ)    &   (𝜑 → 𝑅 ∈ ℚ)    &   (𝜑 → 𝑄 < 𝑅)    &   (𝜑 → ((𝑄 + 𝑅) / 2) # 𝐴)    ⇒   (𝜑 → (abs‘(𝐴 − 𝑄)) # (abs‘(𝐴 − 𝑅)))
 
17-May-2024apdiff 16530 The irrationals (reals apart from any rational) are exactly those reals that are a different distance from every rational. (Contributed by Jim Kingdon, 17-May-2024.)
(𝐴 ∈ ℝ → (∀𝑞 ∈ ℚ 𝐴 # 𝑞 ↔ ∀𝑞 ∈ ℚ ∀𝑟 ∈ ℚ (𝑞 ≠ 𝑟 → (abs‘(𝐴 − 𝑞)) # (abs‘(𝐴 − 𝑟)))))
 
16-May-2024lmodgrpd 14282 A left module is a group. (Contributed by SN, 16-May-2024.)
(𝜑 → 𝑊 ∈ LMod)    ⇒   (𝜑 → 𝑊 ∈ Grp)
 
16-May-2024crnggrpd 13994 A commutative ring is a group. (Contributed by SN, 16-May-2024.)
(𝜑 → 𝑅 ∈ CRing)    ⇒   (𝜑 → 𝑅 ∈ Grp)
 
16-May-2024crngringd 13993 A commutative ring is a ring. (Contributed by SN, 16-May-2024.)
(𝜑 → 𝑅 ∈ CRing)    ⇒   (𝜑 → 𝑅 ∈ Ring)
 
16-May-2024ringgrpd 13989 A ring is a group. (Contributed by SN, 16-May-2024.)
(𝜑 → 𝑅 ∈ Ring)    ⇒   (𝜑 → 𝑅 ∈ Grp)
 
15-May-2024reeff1oleme 15467 Lemma for reeff1o 15468. (Contributed by Jim Kingdon, 15-May-2024.)
(𝑈 ∈ (0(,)e) → ∃𝑥 ∈ ℝ (exp‘𝑥) = 𝑈)
 
14-May-2024df-relog 15553 Define the natural logarithm function. Defining the logarithm on complex numbers is similar to square root - there are ways to define it but they tend to make use of excluded middle. Therefore, we merely define logarithms on positive reals. See http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Natural_logarithm and https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Complex_logarithm. (Contributed by Jim Kingdon, 14-May-2024.)
log = ◡(exp ↾ ℝ)
 
14-May-2024fvmpopr2d 6150 Value of an operation given by maps-to notation. (Contributed by Rohan Ridenour, 14-May-2024.)
(𝜑 → 𝐹 = (𝑎 ∈ 𝐴, 𝑏 ∈ 𝐵 ↦ 𝐶))    &   (𝜑 → 𝑃 = ⟨𝑎, 𝑏⟩)    &   ((𝜑 ∧ 𝑎 ∈ 𝐴 ∧ 𝑏 ∈ 𝐵) → 𝐶 ∈ 𝑉)    ⇒   ((𝜑 ∧ 𝑎 ∈ 𝐴 ∧ 𝑏 ∈ 𝐵) → (𝐹‘𝑃) = 𝐶)
 
12-May-2024dvdstrd 12362 The divides relation is transitive, a deduction version of dvdstr 12360. (Contributed by metakunt, 12-May-2024.)
(𝜑 → 𝐾 ∈ ℤ)    &   (𝜑 → 𝑀 ∈ ℤ)    &   (𝜑 → 𝑁 ∈ ℤ)    &   (𝜑 → 𝐾 ∥ 𝑀)    &   (𝜑 → 𝑀 ∥ 𝑁)    ⇒   (𝜑 → 𝐾 ∥ 𝑁)
 
7-May-2024ioocosf1o 15549 The cosine function is a bijection when restricted to its principal domain. (Contributed by Mario Carneiro, 12-May-2014.) (Revised by Jim Kingdon, 7-May-2024.)
(cos ↾ (0(,)π)):(0(,)π)–1-1-onto→(-1(,)1)
 
7-May-2024cos0pilt1 15547 Cosine is between minus one and one on the open interval between zero and π. (Contributed by Jim Kingdon, 7-May-2024.)
(𝐴 ∈ (0(,)π) → (cos‘𝐴) ∈ (-1(,)1))
 
6-May-2024cos11 15548 Cosine is one-to-one over the closed interval from 0 to π. (Contributed by Paul Chapman, 16-Mar-2008.) (Revised by Jim Kingdon, 6-May-2024.)
((𝐴 ∈ (0[,]π) ∧ 𝐵 ∈ (0[,]π)) → (𝐴 = 𝐵 ↔ (cos‘𝐴) = (cos‘𝐵)))
 
5-May-2024omiunct 13036 The union of a countably infinite collection of countable sets is countable. Theorem 8.1.28 of [AczelRathjen], p. 78. Compare with ctiunct 13032 which has a stronger hypothesis but does not require countable choice. (Contributed by Jim Kingdon, 5-May-2024.)
(𝜑 → CCHOICE)    &   ((𝜑 ∧ 𝑥 ∈ ω) → ∃𝑔 𝑔:ω–onto→(𝐵 ⊔ 1o))    ⇒   (𝜑 → ∃ℎ ℎ:ω–onto→(∪ 𝑥 ∈ ω 𝐵 ⊔ 1o))
 
5-May-2024ctiunctal 13033 Variation of ctiunct 13032 which allows 𝑥 to be present in 𝜑. (Contributed by Jim Kingdon, 5-May-2024.)
(𝜑 → 𝐹:ω–onto→(𝐴 ⊔ 1o))    &   (𝜑 → ∀𝑥 ∈ 𝐴 𝐺:ω–onto→(𝐵 ⊔ 1o))    ⇒   (𝜑 → ∃ℎ ℎ:ω–onto→(∪ 𝑥 ∈ 𝐴 𝐵 ⊔ 1o))
 
5-May-2024ifpnst 994 Conditional operator for the negation of a proposition. (Contributed by BJ, 30-Sep-2019.) (Proof shortened by Wolf Lammen, 5-May-2024.)
(STAB 𝜑 → (if-(𝜑, 𝜓, 𝜒) ↔ if-(¬ 𝜑, 𝜒, 𝜓)))
 
3-May-2024cc4n 7473 Countable choice with a simpler restriction on how every set in the countable collection needs to be inhabited. That is, compared with cc4 7472, the hypotheses only require an A(n) for each value of 𝑛, not a single set 𝐴 which suffices for every 𝑛 ∈ ω. (Contributed by Mario Carneiro, 7-Apr-2013.) (Revised by Jim Kingdon, 3-May-2024.)
(𝜑 → CCHOICE)    &   (𝜑 → ∀𝑛 ∈ 𝑁 {𝑥 ∈ 𝐴 ∣ 𝜓} ∈ 𝑉)    &   (𝜑 → 𝑁 ≈ ω)    &   (𝑥 = (𝑓‘𝑛) → (𝜓 ↔ 𝜒))    &   (𝜑 → ∀𝑛 ∈ 𝑁 ∃𝑥 ∈ 𝐴 𝜓)    ⇒   (𝜑 → ∃𝑓(𝑓 Fn 𝑁 ∧ ∀𝑛 ∈ 𝑁 𝜒))
 
3-May-2024cc4f 7471 Countable choice by showing the existence of a function 𝑓 which can choose a value at each index 𝑛 such that 𝜒 holds. (Contributed by Mario Carneiro, 7-Apr-2013.) (Revised by Jim Kingdon, 3-May-2024.)
(𝜑 → CCHOICE)    &   (𝜑 → 𝐴 ∈ 𝑉)    &   Ⅎ𝑛𝐴    &   (𝜑 → 𝑁 ≈ ω)    &   (𝑥 = (𝑓‘𝑛) → (𝜓 ↔ 𝜒))    &   (𝜑 → ∀𝑛 ∈ 𝑁 ∃𝑥 ∈ 𝐴 𝜓)    ⇒   (𝜑 → ∃𝑓(𝑓:𝑁⟶𝐴 ∧ ∀𝑛 ∈ 𝑁 𝜒))
 
1-May-2024cc4 7472 Countable choice by showing the existence of a function 𝑓 which can choose a value at each index 𝑛 such that 𝜒 holds. (Contributed by Mario Carneiro, 7-Apr-2013.) (Revised by Jim Kingdon, 1-May-2024.)
(𝜑 → CCHOICE)    &   (𝜑 → 𝐴 ∈ 𝑉)    &   (𝜑 → 𝑁 ≈ ω)    &   (𝑥 = (𝑓‘𝑛) → (𝜓 ↔ 𝜒))    &   (𝜑 → ∀𝑛 ∈ 𝑁 ∃𝑥 ∈ 𝐴 𝜓)    ⇒   (𝜑 → ∃𝑓(𝑓:𝑁⟶𝐴 ∧ ∀𝑛 ∈ 𝑁 𝜒))
 
30-Apr-2024ifpdfbidc 991 Define the biconditional as conditional logic operator. (Contributed by RP, 20-Apr-2020.) (Proof shortened by Wolf Lammen, 30-Apr-2024.)
(DECID 𝜑 → ((𝜑 ↔ 𝜓) ↔ if-(𝜑, 𝜓, ¬ 𝜓)))
 
29-Apr-2024cc3 7470 Countable choice using a sequence F(n) . (Contributed by Mario Carneiro, 8-Feb-2013.) (Revised by Jim Kingdon, 29-Apr-2024.)
(𝜑 → CCHOICE)    &   (𝜑 → ∀𝑛 ∈ 𝑁 𝐹 ∈ V)    &   (𝜑 → ∀𝑛 ∈ 𝑁 ∃𝑤 𝑤 ∈ 𝐹)    &   (𝜑 → 𝑁 ≈ ω)    ⇒   (𝜑 → ∃𝑓(𝑓 Fn 𝑁 ∧ ∀𝑛 ∈ 𝑁 (𝑓‘𝑛) ∈ 𝐹))
 
28-Apr-2024ifpbi23d 999 Equivalence deduction for conditional operator for propositions. Convenience theorem for a frequent case. (Contributed by Wolf Lammen, 28-Apr-2024.)
(𝜑 → (𝜒 ↔ 𝜂))    &   (𝜑 → (𝜃 ↔ 𝜁))    ⇒   (𝜑 → (if-(𝜓, 𝜒, 𝜃) ↔ if-(𝜓, 𝜂, 𝜁)))
 
27-Apr-2024cc2 7469 Countable choice using sequences instead of countable sets. (Contributed by Jim Kingdon, 27-Apr-2024.)
(𝜑 → CCHOICE)    &   (𝜑 → 𝐹 Fn ω)    &   (𝜑 → ∀𝑥 ∈ ω ∃𝑤 𝑤 ∈ (𝐹‘𝑥))    ⇒   (𝜑 → ∃𝑔(𝑔 Fn ω ∧ ∀𝑛 ∈ ω (𝑔‘𝑛) ∈ (𝐹‘𝑛)))
 
27-Apr-2024cc2lem 7468 Lemma for cc2 7469. (Contributed by Jim Kingdon, 27-Apr-2024.)
(𝜑 → CCHOICE)    &   (𝜑 → 𝐹 Fn ω)    &   (𝜑 → ∀𝑥 ∈ ω ∃𝑤 𝑤 ∈ (𝐹‘𝑥))    &   𝐴 = (𝑛 ∈ ω ↦ ({𝑛} × (𝐹‘𝑛)))    &   𝐺 = (𝑛 ∈ ω ↦ (2nd ‘(𝑓‘(𝐴‘𝑛))))    ⇒   (𝜑 → ∃𝑔(𝑔 Fn ω ∧ ∀𝑛 ∈ ω (𝑔‘𝑛) ∈ (𝐹‘𝑛)))
 
27-Apr-2024cc1 7467 Countable choice in terms of a choice function on a countably infinite set of inhabited sets. (Contributed by Jim Kingdon, 27-Apr-2024.)
(CCHOICE → ∀𝑥((𝑥 ≈ ω ∧ ∀𝑧 ∈ 𝑥 ∃𝑤 𝑤 ∈ 𝑧) → ∃𝑓∀𝑧 ∈ 𝑥 (𝑓‘𝑧) ∈ 𝑧))
 
24-Apr-2024lsppropd 14417 If two structures have the same components (properties), they have the same span function. (Contributed by Mario Carneiro, 9-Feb-2015.) (Revised by Mario Carneiro, 14-Jun-2015.) (Revised by AV, 24-Apr-2024.)
(𝜑 → 𝐵 = (Base‘𝐾))    &   (𝜑 → 𝐵 = (Base‘𝐿))    &   (𝜑 → 𝐵 ⊆ 𝑊)    &   ((𝜑 ∧ (𝑥 ∈ 𝑊 ∧ 𝑦 ∈ 𝑊)) → (𝑥(+g‘𝐾)𝑦) = (𝑥(+g‘𝐿)𝑦))    &   ((𝜑 ∧ (𝑥 ∈ 𝑃 ∧ 𝑦 ∈ 𝐵)) → (𝑥( ·𝑠 ‘𝐾)𝑦) ∈ 𝑊)    &   ((𝜑 ∧ (𝑥 ∈ 𝑃 ∧ 𝑦 ∈ 𝐵)) → (𝑥( ·𝑠 ‘𝐾)𝑦) = (𝑥( ·𝑠 ‘𝐿)𝑦))    &   (𝜑 → 𝑃 = (Base‘(Scalar‘𝐾)))    &   (𝜑 → 𝑃 = (Base‘(Scalar‘𝐿)))    &   (𝜑 → 𝐾 ∈ 𝑋)    &   (𝜑 → 𝐿 ∈ 𝑌)    ⇒   (𝜑 → (LSpan‘𝐾) = (LSpan‘𝐿))
 
19-Apr-2024omctfn 13035 Using countable choice to find a sequence of enumerations for a collection of countable sets. Lemma 8.1.27 of [AczelRathjen], p. 77. (Contributed by Jim Kingdon, 19-Apr-2024.)
(𝜑 → CCHOICE)    &   ((𝜑 ∧ 𝑥 ∈ ω) → ∃𝑔 𝑔:ω–onto→(𝐵 ⊔ 1o))    ⇒   (𝜑 → ∃𝑓(𝑓 Fn ω ∧ ∀𝑥 ∈ ω (𝑓‘𝑥):ω–onto→(𝐵 ⊔ 1o)))
 
17-Apr-2024ifpbi123d 998 Equivalence deduction for conditional operator for propositions. (Contributed by AV, 30-Dec-2020.) (Proof shortened by Wolf Lammen, 17-Apr-2024.)
(𝜑 → (𝜓 ↔ 𝜏))    &   (𝜑 → (𝜒 ↔ 𝜂))    &   (𝜑 → (𝜃 ↔ 𝜁))    ⇒   (𝜑 → (if-(𝜓, 𝜒, 𝜃) ↔ if-(𝜏, 𝜂, 𝜁)))
 
13-Apr-2024prodmodclem2 12109 Lemma for prodmodc 12110. (Contributed by Scott Fenton, 4-Dec-2017.) (Revised by Jim Kingdon, 13-Apr-2024.)
𝐹 = (𝑘 ∈ ℤ ↦ if(𝑘 ∈ 𝐴, 𝐵, 1))    &   ((𝜑 ∧ 𝑘 ∈ 𝐴) → 𝐵 ∈ ℂ)    &   𝐺 = (𝑗 ∈ ℕ ↦ if(𝑗 ≤ (♯‘𝐴), ⦋(𝑓‘𝑗) / 𝑘⦌𝐵, 1))    ⇒   ((𝜑 ∧ ∃𝑚 ∈ ℤ ((𝐴 ⊆ (ℤ≥‘𝑚) ∧ ∀𝑗 ∈ (ℤ≥‘𝑚)DECID 𝑗 ∈ 𝐴) ∧ (∃𝑛 ∈ (ℤ≥‘𝑚)∃𝑦(𝑦 # 0 ∧ seq𝑛( · , 𝐹) ⇝ 𝑦) ∧ seq𝑚( · , 𝐹) ⇝ 𝑥))) → (∃𝑚 ∈ ℕ ∃𝑓(𝑓:(1...𝑚)–1-1-onto→𝐴 ∧ 𝑧 = (seq1( · , 𝐺)‘𝑚)) → 𝑥 = 𝑧))
 
11-Apr-2024prodmodclem2a 12108 Lemma for prodmodc 12110. (Contributed by Scott Fenton, 4-Dec-2017.) (Revised by Jim Kingdon, 11-Apr-2024.)
𝐹 = (𝑘 ∈ ℤ ↦ if(𝑘 ∈ 𝐴, 𝐵, 1))    &   ((𝜑 ∧ 𝑘 ∈ 𝐴) → 𝐵 ∈ ℂ)    &   𝐺 = (𝑗 ∈ ℕ ↦ if(𝑗 ≤ (♯‘𝐴), ⦋(𝑓‘𝑗) / 𝑘⦌𝐵, 1))    &   𝐻 = (𝑗 ∈ ℕ ↦ if(𝑗 ≤ (♯‘𝐴), ⦋(𝐾‘𝑗) / 𝑘⦌𝐵, 1))    &   ((𝜑 ∧ 𝑘 ∈ (ℤ≥‘𝑀)) → DECID 𝑘 ∈ 𝐴)    &   (𝜑 → 𝑁 ∈ ℕ)    &   (𝜑 → 𝑀 ∈ ℤ)    &   (𝜑 → 𝐴 ⊆ (ℤ≥‘𝑀))    &   (𝜑 → 𝑓:(1...𝑁)–1-1-onto→𝐴)    &   (𝜑 → 𝐾 Isom < , < ((1...(♯‘𝐴)), 𝐴))    ⇒   (𝜑 → seq𝑀( · , 𝐹) ⇝ (seq1( · , 𝐺)‘𝑁))
 
11-Apr-2024prodmodclem3 12107 Lemma for prodmodc 12110. (Contributed by Scott Fenton, 4-Dec-2017.) (Revised by Jim Kingdon, 11-Apr-2024.)
𝐹 = (𝑘 ∈ ℤ ↦ if(𝑘 ∈ 𝐴, 𝐵, 1))    &   ((𝜑 ∧ 𝑘 ∈ 𝐴) → 𝐵 ∈ ℂ)    &   𝐺 = (𝑗 ∈ ℕ ↦ if(𝑗 ≤ (♯‘𝐴), ⦋(𝑓‘𝑗) / 𝑘⦌𝐵, 1))    &   𝐻 = (𝑗 ∈ ℕ ↦ if(𝑗 ≤ (♯‘𝐴), ⦋(𝐾‘𝑗) / 𝑘⦌𝐵, 1))    &   (𝜑 → (𝑀 ∈ ℕ ∧ 𝑁 ∈ ℕ))    &   (𝜑 → 𝑓:(1...𝑀)–1-1-onto→𝐴)    &   (𝜑 → 𝐾:(1...𝑁)–1-1-onto→𝐴)    ⇒   (𝜑 → (seq1( · , 𝐺)‘𝑀) = (seq1( · , 𝐻)‘𝑁))
 
10-Apr-2024jcnd 656 Deduction joining the consequents of two premises. (Contributed by Glauco Siliprandi, 11-Dec-2019.) (Proof shortened by Wolf Lammen, 10-Apr-2024.)
(𝜑 → 𝜓)    &   (𝜑 → ¬ 𝜒)    ⇒   (𝜑 → ¬ (𝜓 → 𝜒))
 
4-Apr-2024prodrbdclem 12103 Lemma for prodrbdc 12106. (Contributed by Scott Fenton, 4-Dec-2017.) (Revised by Jim Kingdon, 4-Apr-2024.)
𝐹 = (𝑘 ∈ ℤ ↦ if(𝑘 ∈ 𝐴, 𝐵, 1))    &   ((𝜑 ∧ 𝑘 ∈ 𝐴) → 𝐵 ∈ ℂ)    &   ((𝜑 ∧ 𝑘 ∈ (ℤ≥‘𝑀)) → DECID 𝑘 ∈ 𝐴)    &   (𝜑 → 𝑁 ∈ (ℤ≥‘𝑀))    ⇒   ((𝜑 ∧ 𝐴 ⊆ (ℤ≥‘𝑁)) → (seq𝑀( · , 𝐹) ↾ (ℤ≥‘𝑁)) = seq𝑁( · , 𝐹))
 
24-Mar-2024prodfdivap 12079 The quotient of two products. (Contributed by Scott Fenton, 15-Jan-2018.) (Revised by Jim Kingdon, 24-Mar-2024.)
(𝜑 → 𝑁 ∈ (ℤ≥‘𝑀))    &   ((𝜑 ∧ 𝑘 ∈ (ℤ≥‘𝑀)) → (𝐹‘𝑘) ∈ ℂ)    &   ((𝜑 ∧ 𝑘 ∈ (ℤ≥‘𝑀)) → (𝐺‘𝑘) ∈ ℂ)    &   ((𝜑 ∧ 𝑘 ∈ (ℤ≥‘𝑀)) → (𝐺‘𝑘) # 0)    &   ((𝜑 ∧ 𝑘 ∈ (ℤ≥‘𝑀)) → (𝐻‘𝑘) = ((𝐹‘𝑘) / (𝐺‘𝑘)))    ⇒   (𝜑 → (seq𝑀( · , 𝐻)‘𝑁) = ((seq𝑀( · , 𝐹)‘𝑁) / (seq𝑀( · , 𝐺)‘𝑁)))
 
24-Mar-2024prodfrecap 12078 The reciprocal of a finite product. (Contributed by Scott Fenton, 15-Jan-2018.) (Revised by Jim Kingdon, 24-Mar-2024.)
(𝜑 → 𝑁 ∈ (ℤ≥‘𝑀))    &   ((𝜑 ∧ 𝑘 ∈ (ℤ≥‘𝑀)) → (𝐹‘𝑘) ∈ ℂ)    &   ((𝜑 ∧ 𝑘 ∈ (𝑀...𝑁)) → (𝐹‘𝑘) # 0)    &   ((𝜑 ∧ 𝑘 ∈ (𝑀...𝑁)) → (𝐺‘𝑘) = (1 / (𝐹‘𝑘)))    &   ((𝜑 ∧ 𝑘 ∈ (ℤ≥‘𝑀)) → (𝐺‘𝑘) ∈ ℂ)    ⇒   (𝜑 → (seq𝑀( · , 𝐺)‘𝑁) = (1 / (seq𝑀( · , 𝐹)‘𝑁)))
 
23-Mar-2024prodfap0 12077 The product of finitely many terms apart from zero is apart from zero. (Contributed by Scott Fenton, 14-Jan-2018.) (Revised by Jim Kingdon, 23-Mar-2024.)
(𝜑 → 𝑁 ∈ (ℤ≥‘𝑀))    &   ((𝜑 ∧ 𝑘 ∈ (ℤ≥‘𝑀)) → (𝐹‘𝑘) ∈ ℂ)    &   ((𝜑 ∧ 𝑘 ∈ (𝑀...𝑁)) → (𝐹‘𝑘) # 0)    ⇒   (𝜑 → (seq𝑀( · , 𝐹)‘𝑁) # 0)
 
22-Mar-2024prod3fmul 12073 The product of two infinite products. (Contributed by Scott Fenton, 18-Dec-2017.) (Revised by Jim Kingdon, 22-Mar-2024.)
(𝜑 → 𝑁 ∈ (ℤ≥‘𝑀))    &   ((𝜑 ∧ 𝑘 ∈ (ℤ≥‘𝑀)) → (𝐹‘𝑘) ∈ ℂ)    &   ((𝜑 ∧ 𝑘 ∈ (ℤ≥‘𝑀)) → (𝐺‘𝑘) ∈ ℂ)    &   ((𝜑 ∧ 𝑘 ∈ (ℤ≥‘𝑀)) → (𝐻‘𝑘) = ((𝐹‘𝑘) · (𝐺‘𝑘)))    ⇒   (𝜑 → (seq𝑀( · , 𝐻)‘𝑁) = ((seq𝑀( · , 𝐹)‘𝑁) · (seq𝑀( · , 𝐺)‘𝑁)))
 
21-Mar-2024df-proddc 12083 Define the product of a series with an index set of integers 𝐴. This definition takes most of the aspects of df-sumdc 11886 and adapts them for multiplication instead of addition. However, we insist that in the infinite case, there is a nonzero tail of the sequence. This ensures that the convergence criteria match those of infinite sums. (Contributed by Scott Fenton, 4-Dec-2017.) (Revised by Jim Kingdon, 21-Mar-2024.)
∏𝑘 ∈ 𝐴 𝐵 = (℩𝑥(∃𝑚 ∈ ℤ ((𝐴 ⊆ (ℤ≥‘𝑚) ∧ ∀𝑗 ∈ (ℤ≥‘𝑚)DECID 𝑗 ∈ 𝐴) ∧ (∃𝑛 ∈ (ℤ≥‘𝑚)∃𝑦(𝑦 # 0 ∧ seq𝑛( · , (𝑘 ∈ ℤ ↦ if(𝑘 ∈ 𝐴, 𝐵, 1))) ⇝ 𝑦) ∧ seq𝑚( · , (𝑘 ∈ ℤ ↦ if(𝑘 ∈ 𝐴, 𝐵, 1))) ⇝ 𝑥)) ∨ ∃𝑚 ∈ ℕ ∃𝑓(𝑓:(1...𝑚)–1-1-onto→𝐴 ∧ 𝑥 = (seq1( · , (𝑛 ∈ ℕ ↦ if(𝑛 ≤ 𝑚, ⦋(𝑓‘𝑛) / 𝑘⦌𝐵, 1)))‘𝑚))))
 
19-Mar-2024cos02pilt1 15546 Cosine is less than one between zero and 2 · π. (Contributed by Jim Kingdon, 19-Mar-2024.)
(𝐴 ∈ (0(,)(2 · π)) → (cos‘𝐴) < 1)
 
19-Mar-2024cosq34lt1 15545 Cosine is less than one in the third and fourth quadrants. (Contributed by Jim Kingdon, 19-Mar-2024.)
(𝐴 ∈ (π[,)(2 · π)) → (cos‘𝐴) < 1)
 
14-Mar-2024coseq0q4123 15529 Location of the zeroes of cosine in (-(π / 2)(,)(3 · (π / 2))). (Contributed by Jim Kingdon, 14-Mar-2024.)
(𝐴 ∈ (-(π / 2)(,)(3 · (π / 2))) → ((cos‘𝐴) = 0 ↔ 𝐴 = (π / 2)))
 
14-Mar-2024cosq23lt0 15528 The cosine of a number in the second and third quadrants is negative. (Contributed by Jim Kingdon, 14-Mar-2024.)
(𝐴 ∈ ((π / 2)(,)(3 · (π / 2))) → (cos‘𝐴) < 0)
 
9-Mar-2024pilem3 15478 Lemma for pi related theorems. (Contributed by Jim Kingdon, 9-Mar-2024.)
(π ∈ (2(,)4) ∧ (sin‘π) = 0)
 
9-Mar-2024exmidonfin 7388 If a finite ordinal is a natural number, excluded middle follows. That excluded middle implies that a finite ordinal is a natural number is proved in the Metamath Proof Explorer. That a natural number is a finite ordinal is shown at nnfi 7047 and nnon 4703. (Contributed by Andrew W Swan and Jim Kingdon, 9-Mar-2024.)
(ω = (On ∩ Fin) → EXMID)
 
9-Mar-2024exmidonfinlem 7387 Lemma for exmidonfin 7388. (Contributed by Andrew W Swan and Jim Kingdon, 9-Mar-2024.)
𝐴 = {{𝑥 ∈ {∅} ∣ 𝜑}, {𝑥 ∈ {∅} ∣ ¬ 𝜑}}    ⇒   (ω = (On ∩ Fin) → DECID 𝜑)
 
8-Mar-2024sin0pilem2 15477 Lemma for pi related theorems. (Contributed by Mario Carneiro and Jim Kingdon, 8-Mar-2024.)
∃𝑞 ∈ (2(,)4)((sin‘𝑞) = 0 ∧ ∀𝑥 ∈ (0(,)𝑞)0 < (sin‘𝑥))
 
8-Mar-2024sin0pilem1 15476 Lemma for pi related theorems. (Contributed by Mario Carneiro and Jim Kingdon, 8-Mar-2024.)
∃𝑝 ∈ (1(,)2)((cos‘𝑝) = 0 ∧ ∀𝑥 ∈ (𝑝(,)(2 · 𝑝))0 < (sin‘𝑥))
 
7-Mar-2024cosz12 15475 Cosine has a zero between 1 and 2. (Contributed by Mario Carneiro and Jim Kingdon, 7-Mar-2024.)
∃𝑝 ∈ (1(,)2)(cos‘𝑝) = 0
 
6-Mar-2024cos12dec 12300 Cosine is decreasing from one to two. (Contributed by Mario Carneiro and Jim Kingdon, 6-Mar-2024.)
((𝐴 ∈ (1[,]2) ∧ 𝐵 ∈ (1[,]2) ∧ 𝐴 < 𝐵) → (cos‘𝐵) < (cos‘𝐴))
 
2-Mar-2024scaffvalg 14291 The scalar multiplication operation as a function. (Contributed by Mario Carneiro, 5-Oct-2015.) (Proof shortened by AV, 2-Mar-2024.)
𝐵 = (Base‘𝑊)    &   𝐹 = (Scalar‘𝑊)    &   𝐾 = (Base‘𝐹)    &    ∙ = ( ·sf ‘𝑊)    &    · = ( ·𝑠 ‘𝑊)    ⇒   (𝑊 ∈ 𝑉 → ∙ = (𝑥 ∈ 𝐾, 𝑦 ∈ 𝐵 ↦ (𝑥 · 𝑦)))
 
2-Mar-2024dvrfvald 14118 Division operation in a ring. (Contributed by Mario Carneiro, 2-Jul-2014.) (Revised by Mario Carneiro, 2-Dec-2014.) (Proof shortened by AV, 2-Mar-2024.)
(𝜑 → 𝐵 = (Base‘𝑅))    &   (𝜑 → · = (.r‘𝑅))    &   (𝜑 → 𝑈 = (Unit‘𝑅))    &   (𝜑 → 𝐼 = (invr‘𝑅))    &   (𝜑 → / = (/r‘𝑅))    &   (𝜑 → 𝑅 ∈ SRing)    ⇒   (𝜑 → / = (𝑥 ∈ 𝐵, 𝑦 ∈ 𝑈 ↦ (𝑥 · (𝐼‘𝑦))))
 
2-Mar-2024plusffvalg 13416 The group addition operation as a function. (Contributed by Mario Carneiro, 14-Aug-2015.) (Proof shortened by AV, 2-Mar-2024.)
𝐵 = (Base‘𝐺)    &    + = (+g‘𝐺)    &    ⨣ = (+𝑓‘𝐺)    ⇒   (𝐺 ∈ 𝑉 → ⨣ = (𝑥 ∈ 𝐵, 𝑦 ∈ 𝐵 ↦ (𝑥 + 𝑦)))
 
25-Feb-2024insubm 13539 The intersection of two submonoids is a submonoid. (Contributed by AV, 25-Feb-2024.)
((𝐴 ∈ (SubMnd‘𝑀) ∧ 𝐵 ∈ (SubMnd‘𝑀)) → (𝐴 ∩ 𝐵) ∈ (SubMnd‘𝑀))
 
25-Feb-2024mul2lt0pn 9977 The product of multiplicands of different signs is negative. (Contributed by Jim Kingdon, 25-Feb-2024.)
(𝜑 → 𝐴 ∈ ℝ)    &   (𝜑 → 𝐵 ∈ ℝ)    &   (𝜑 → 𝐴 < 0)    &   (𝜑 → 0 < 𝐵)    ⇒   (𝜑 → (𝐵 · 𝐴) < 0)
 
25-Feb-2024mul2lt0np 9976 The product of multiplicands of different signs is negative. (Contributed by Jim Kingdon, 25-Feb-2024.)
(𝜑 → 𝐴 ∈ ℝ)    &   (𝜑 → 𝐵 ∈ ℝ)    &   (𝜑 → 𝐴 < 0)    &   (𝜑 → 0 < 𝐵)    ⇒   (𝜑 → (𝐴 · 𝐵) < 0)
 
25-Feb-2024lt0ap0 8811 A number which is less than zero is apart from zero. (Contributed by Jim Kingdon, 25-Feb-2024.)
((𝐴 ∈ ℝ ∧ 𝐴 < 0) → 𝐴 # 0)
 
25-Feb-2024negap0d 8794 The negative of a number apart from zero is apart from zero. (Contributed by Jim Kingdon, 25-Feb-2024.)
(𝜑 → 𝐴 ∈ ℂ)    &   (𝜑 → 𝐴 # 0)    ⇒   (𝜑 → -𝐴 # 0)
 
24-Feb-2024lt0ap0d 8812 A real number less than zero is apart from zero. Deduction form. (Contributed by Jim Kingdon, 24-Feb-2024.)
(𝜑 → 𝐴 ∈ ℝ)    &   (𝜑 → 𝐴 < 0)    ⇒   (𝜑 → 𝐴 # 0)
 
20-Feb-2024ivthdec 15339 The intermediate value theorem, decreasing case, for a strictly monotonic function. (Contributed by Jim Kingdon, 20-Feb-2024.)
(𝜑 → 𝐴 ∈ ℝ)    &   (𝜑 → 𝐵 ∈ ℝ)    &   (𝜑 → 𝑈 ∈ ℝ)    &   (𝜑 → 𝐴 < 𝐵)    &   (𝜑 → (𝐴[,]𝐵) ⊆ 𝐷)    &   (𝜑 → 𝐹 ∈ (𝐷–cn→ℂ))    &   ((𝜑 ∧ 𝑥 ∈ (𝐴[,]𝐵)) → (𝐹‘𝑥) ∈ ℝ)    &   (𝜑 → ((𝐹‘𝐵) < 𝑈 ∧ 𝑈 < (𝐹‘𝐴)))    &   (((𝜑 ∧ 𝑥 ∈ (𝐴[,]𝐵)) ∧ (𝑦 ∈ (𝐴[,]𝐵) ∧ 𝑥 < 𝑦)) → (𝐹‘𝑦) < (𝐹‘𝑥))    ⇒   (𝜑 → ∃𝑐 ∈ (𝐴(,)𝐵)(𝐹‘𝑐) = 𝑈)
 
20-Feb-2024ivthinclemex 15337 Lemma for ivthinc 15338. Existence of a number between the lower cut and the upper cut. (Contributed by Jim Kingdon, 20-Feb-2024.)
(𝜑 → 𝐴 ∈ ℝ)    &   (𝜑 → 𝐵 ∈ ℝ)    &   (𝜑 → 𝑈 ∈ ℝ)    &   (𝜑 → 𝐴 < 𝐵)    &   (𝜑 → (𝐴[,]𝐵) ⊆ 𝐷)    &   (𝜑 → 𝐹 ∈ (𝐷–cn→ℂ))    &   ((𝜑 ∧ 𝑥 ∈ (𝐴[,]𝐵)) → (𝐹‘𝑥) ∈ ℝ)    &   (𝜑 → ((𝐹‘𝐴) < 𝑈 ∧ 𝑈 < (𝐹‘𝐵)))    &   (((𝜑 ∧ 𝑥 ∈ (𝐴[,]𝐵)) ∧ (𝑦 ∈ (𝐴[,]𝐵) ∧ 𝑥 < 𝑦)) → (𝐹‘𝑥) < (𝐹‘𝑦))    &   𝐿 = {𝑤 ∈ (𝐴[,]𝐵) ∣ (𝐹‘𝑤) < 𝑈}    &   𝑅 = {𝑤 ∈ (𝐴[,]𝐵) ∣ 𝑈 < (𝐹‘𝑤)}    ⇒   (𝜑 → ∃!𝑧 ∈ (𝐴(,)𝐵)(∀𝑞 ∈ 𝐿 𝑞 < 𝑧 ∧ ∀𝑟 ∈ 𝑅 𝑧 < 𝑟))
 
19-Feb-2024ivthinclemuopn 15333 Lemma for ivthinc 15338. The upper cut is open. (Contributed by Jim Kingdon, 19-Feb-2024.)
(𝜑 → 𝐴 ∈ ℝ)    &   (𝜑 → 𝐵 ∈ ℝ)    &   (𝜑 → 𝑈 ∈ ℝ)    &   (𝜑 → 𝐴 < 𝐵)    &   (𝜑 → (𝐴[,]𝐵) ⊆ 𝐷)    &   (𝜑 → 𝐹 ∈ (𝐷–cn→ℂ))    &   ((𝜑 ∧ 𝑥 ∈ (𝐴[,]𝐵)) → (𝐹‘𝑥) ∈ ℝ)    &   (𝜑 → ((𝐹‘𝐴) < 𝑈 ∧ 𝑈 < (𝐹‘𝐵)))    &   (((𝜑 ∧ 𝑥 ∈ (𝐴[,]𝐵)) ∧ (𝑦 ∈ (𝐴[,]𝐵) ∧ 𝑥 < 𝑦)) → (𝐹‘𝑥) < (𝐹‘𝑦))    &   𝐿 = {𝑤 ∈ (𝐴[,]𝐵) ∣ (𝐹‘𝑤) < 𝑈}    &   𝑅 = {𝑤 ∈ (𝐴[,]𝐵) ∣ 𝑈 < (𝐹‘𝑤)}    &   (𝜑 → 𝑆 ∈ 𝑅)    ⇒   (𝜑 → ∃𝑞 ∈ 𝑅 𝑞 < 𝑆)
 
19-Feb-2024dedekindicc 15328 A Dedekind cut identifies a unique real number. Similar to df-inp 7669 except that the Dedekind cut is formed by sets of reals (rather than positive rationals). But in both cases the defining property of a Dedekind cut is that it is inhabited (bounded), rounded, disjoint, and located. (Contributed by Jim Kingdon, 19-Feb-2024.)
(𝜑 → 𝐴 ∈ ℝ)    &   (𝜑 → 𝐵 ∈ ℝ)    &   (𝜑 → 𝐿 ⊆ (𝐴[,]𝐵))    &   (𝜑 → 𝑈 ⊆ (𝐴[,]𝐵))    &   (𝜑 → ∃𝑞 ∈ (𝐴[,]𝐵)𝑞 ∈ 𝐿)    &   (𝜑 → ∃𝑟 ∈ (𝐴[,]𝐵)𝑟 ∈ 𝑈)    &   (𝜑 → ∀𝑞 ∈ (𝐴[,]𝐵)(𝑞 ∈ 𝐿 ↔ ∃𝑟 ∈ 𝐿 𝑞 < 𝑟))    &   (𝜑 → ∀𝑟 ∈ (𝐴[,]𝐵)(𝑟 ∈ 𝑈 ↔ ∃𝑞 ∈ 𝑈 𝑞 < 𝑟))    &   (𝜑 → (𝐿 ∩ 𝑈) = ∅)    &   (𝜑 → ∀𝑞 ∈ (𝐴[,]𝐵)∀𝑟 ∈ (𝐴[,]𝐵)(𝑞 < 𝑟 → (𝑞 ∈ 𝐿 ∨ 𝑟 ∈ 𝑈)))    &   (𝜑 → 𝐴 < 𝐵)    ⇒   (𝜑 → ∃!𝑥 ∈ (𝐴(,)𝐵)(∀𝑞 ∈ 𝐿 𝑞 < 𝑥 ∧ ∀𝑟 ∈ 𝑈 𝑥 < 𝑟))
 
19-Feb-2024grpsubfvalg 13599 Group subtraction (division) operation. (Contributed by NM, 31-Mar-2014.) (Revised by Stefan O'Rear, 27-Mar-2015.) (Proof shortened by AV, 19-Feb-2024.)
𝐵 = (Base‘𝐺)    &    + = (+g‘𝐺)    &   𝐼 = (invg‘𝐺)    &    − = (-g‘𝐺)    ⇒   (𝐺 ∈ 𝑉 → − = (𝑥 ∈ 𝐵, 𝑦 ∈ 𝐵 ↦ (𝑥 + (𝐼‘𝑦))))
 
18-Feb-2024ivthinclemloc 15336 Lemma for ivthinc 15338. Locatedness. (Contributed by Jim Kingdon, 18-Feb-2024.)
(𝜑 → 𝐴 ∈ ℝ)    &   (𝜑 → 𝐵 ∈ ℝ)    &   (𝜑 → 𝑈 ∈ ℝ)    &   (𝜑 → 𝐴 < 𝐵)    &   (𝜑 → (𝐴[,]𝐵) ⊆ 𝐷)    &   (𝜑 → 𝐹 ∈ (𝐷–cn→ℂ))    &   ((𝜑 ∧ 𝑥 ∈ (𝐴[,]𝐵)) → (𝐹‘𝑥) ∈ ℝ)    &   (𝜑 → ((𝐹‘𝐴) < 𝑈 ∧ 𝑈 < (𝐹‘𝐵)))    &   (((𝜑 ∧ 𝑥 ∈ (𝐴[,]𝐵)) ∧ (𝑦 ∈ (𝐴[,]𝐵) ∧ 𝑥 < 𝑦)) → (𝐹‘𝑥) < (𝐹‘𝑦))    &   𝐿 = {𝑤 ∈ (𝐴[,]𝐵) ∣ (𝐹‘𝑤) < 𝑈}    &   𝑅 = {𝑤 ∈ (𝐴[,]𝐵) ∣ 𝑈 < (𝐹‘𝑤)}    ⇒   (𝜑 → ∀𝑞 ∈ (𝐴[,]𝐵)∀𝑟 ∈ (𝐴[,]𝐵)(𝑞 < 𝑟 → (𝑞 ∈ 𝐿 ∨ 𝑟 ∈ 𝑅)))
 
18-Feb-2024ivthinclemdisj 15335 Lemma for ivthinc 15338. The lower and upper cuts are disjoint. (Contributed by Jim Kingdon, 18-Feb-2024.)
(𝜑 → 𝐴 ∈ ℝ)    &   (𝜑 → 𝐵 ∈ ℝ)    &   (𝜑 → 𝑈 ∈ ℝ)    &   (𝜑 → 𝐴 < 𝐵)    &   (𝜑 → (𝐴[,]𝐵) ⊆ 𝐷)    &   (𝜑 → 𝐹 ∈ (𝐷–cn→ℂ))    &   ((𝜑 ∧ 𝑥 ∈ (𝐴[,]𝐵)) → (𝐹‘𝑥) ∈ ℝ)    &   (𝜑 → ((𝐹‘𝐴) < 𝑈 ∧ 𝑈 < (𝐹‘𝐵)))    &   (((𝜑 ∧ 𝑥 ∈ (𝐴[,]𝐵)) ∧ (𝑦 ∈ (𝐴[,]𝐵) ∧ 𝑥 < 𝑦)) → (𝐹‘𝑥) < (𝐹‘𝑦))    &   𝐿 = {𝑤 ∈ (𝐴[,]𝐵) ∣ (𝐹‘𝑤) < 𝑈}    &   𝑅 = {𝑤 ∈ (𝐴[,]𝐵) ∣ 𝑈 < (𝐹‘𝑤)}    ⇒   (𝜑 → (𝐿 ∩ 𝑅) = ∅)
 
18-Feb-2024ivthinclemur 15334 Lemma for ivthinc 15338. The upper cut is rounded. (Contributed by Jim Kingdon, 18-Feb-2024.)
(𝜑 → 𝐴 ∈ ℝ)    &   (𝜑 → 𝐵 ∈ ℝ)    &   (𝜑 → 𝑈 ∈ ℝ)    &   (𝜑 → 𝐴 < 𝐵)    &   (𝜑 → (𝐴[,]𝐵) ⊆ 𝐷)    &   (𝜑 → 𝐹 ∈ (𝐷–cn→ℂ))    &   ((𝜑 ∧ 𝑥 ∈ (𝐴[,]𝐵)) → (𝐹‘𝑥) ∈ ℝ)    &   (𝜑 → ((𝐹‘𝐴) < 𝑈 ∧ 𝑈 < (𝐹‘𝐵)))    &   (((𝜑 ∧ 𝑥 ∈ (𝐴[,]𝐵)) ∧ (𝑦 ∈ (𝐴[,]𝐵) ∧ 𝑥 < 𝑦)) → (𝐹‘𝑥) < (𝐹‘𝑦))    &   𝐿 = {𝑤 ∈ (𝐴[,]𝐵) ∣ (𝐹‘𝑤) < 𝑈}    &   𝑅 = {𝑤 ∈ (𝐴[,]𝐵) ∣ 𝑈 < (𝐹‘𝑤)}    ⇒   (𝜑 → ∀𝑟 ∈ (𝐴[,]𝐵)(𝑟 ∈ 𝑅 ↔ ∃𝑞 ∈ 𝑅 𝑞 < 𝑟))
 
18-Feb-2024ivthinclemlr 15332 Lemma for ivthinc 15338. The lower cut is rounded. (Contributed by Jim Kingdon, 18-Feb-2024.)
(𝜑 → 𝐴 ∈ ℝ)    &   (𝜑 → 𝐵 ∈ ℝ)    &   (𝜑 → 𝑈 ∈ ℝ)    &   (𝜑 → 𝐴 < 𝐵)    &   (𝜑 → (𝐴[,]𝐵) ⊆ 𝐷)    &   (𝜑 → 𝐹 ∈ (𝐷–cn→ℂ))    &   ((𝜑 ∧ 𝑥 ∈ (𝐴[,]𝐵)) → (𝐹‘𝑥) ∈ ℝ)    &   (𝜑 → ((𝐹‘𝐴) < 𝑈 ∧ 𝑈 < (𝐹‘𝐵)))    &   (((𝜑 ∧ 𝑥 ∈ (𝐴[,]𝐵)) ∧ (𝑦 ∈ (𝐴[,]𝐵) ∧ 𝑥 < 𝑦)) → (𝐹‘𝑥) < (𝐹‘𝑦))    &   𝐿 = {𝑤 ∈ (𝐴[,]𝐵) ∣ (𝐹‘𝑤) < 𝑈}    &   𝑅 = {𝑤 ∈ (𝐴[,]𝐵) ∣ 𝑈 < (𝐹‘𝑤)}    ⇒   (𝜑 → ∀𝑞 ∈ (𝐴[,]𝐵)(𝑞 ∈ 𝐿 ↔ ∃𝑟 ∈ 𝐿 𝑞 < 𝑟))
 
18-Feb-2024ivthinclemum 15330 Lemma for ivthinc 15338. The upper cut is bounded. (Contributed by Jim Kingdon, 18-Feb-2024.)
(𝜑 → 𝐴 ∈ ℝ)    &   (𝜑 → 𝐵 ∈ ℝ)    &   (𝜑 → 𝑈 ∈ ℝ)    &   (𝜑 → 𝐴 < 𝐵)    &   (𝜑 → (𝐴[,]𝐵) ⊆ 𝐷)    &   (𝜑 → 𝐹 ∈ (𝐷–cn→ℂ))    &   ((𝜑 ∧ 𝑥 ∈ (𝐴[,]𝐵)) → (𝐹‘𝑥) ∈ ℝ)    &   (𝜑 → ((𝐹‘𝐴) < 𝑈 ∧ 𝑈 < (𝐹‘𝐵)))    &   (((𝜑 ∧ 𝑥 ∈ (𝐴[,]𝐵)) ∧ (𝑦 ∈ (𝐴[,]𝐵) ∧ 𝑥 < 𝑦)) → (𝐹‘𝑥) < (𝐹‘𝑦))    &   𝐿 = {𝑤 ∈ (𝐴[,]𝐵) ∣ (𝐹‘𝑤) < 𝑈}    &   𝑅 = {𝑤 ∈ (𝐴[,]𝐵) ∣ 𝑈 < (𝐹‘𝑤)}    ⇒   (𝜑 → ∃𝑟 ∈ (𝐴[,]𝐵)𝑟 ∈ 𝑅)
 
18-Feb-2024ivthinclemlm 15329 Lemma for ivthinc 15338. The lower cut is bounded. (Contributed by Jim Kingdon, 18-Feb-2024.)
(𝜑 → 𝐴 ∈ ℝ)    &   (𝜑 → 𝐵 ∈ ℝ)    &   (𝜑 → 𝑈 ∈ ℝ)    &   (𝜑 → 𝐴 < 𝐵)    &   (𝜑 → (𝐴[,]𝐵) ⊆ 𝐷)    &   (𝜑 → 𝐹 ∈ (𝐷–cn→ℂ))    &   ((𝜑 ∧ 𝑥 ∈ (𝐴[,]𝐵)) → (𝐹‘𝑥) ∈ ℝ)    &   (𝜑 → ((𝐹‘𝐴) < 𝑈 ∧ 𝑈 < (𝐹‘𝐵)))    &   (((𝜑 ∧ 𝑥 ∈ (𝐴[,]𝐵)) ∧ (𝑦 ∈ (𝐴[,]𝐵) ∧ 𝑥 < 𝑦)) → (𝐹‘𝑥) < (𝐹‘𝑦))    &   𝐿 = {𝑤 ∈ (𝐴[,]𝐵) ∣ (𝐹‘𝑤) < 𝑈}    &   𝑅 = {𝑤 ∈ (𝐴[,]𝐵) ∣ 𝑈 < (𝐹‘𝑤)}    ⇒   (𝜑 → ∃𝑞 ∈ (𝐴[,]𝐵)𝑞 ∈ 𝐿)
 
17-Feb-20240subm 13538 The zero submonoid of an arbitrary monoid. (Contributed by AV, 17-Feb-2024.)
0 = (0g‘𝐺)    ⇒   (𝐺 ∈ Mnd → { 0 } ∈ (SubMnd‘𝐺))
 
17-Feb-2024mndissubm 13529 If the base set of a monoid is contained in the base set of another monoid, and the group operation of the monoid is the restriction of the group operation of the other monoid to its base set, and the identity element of the the other monoid is contained in the base set of the monoid, then the (base set of the) monoid is a submonoid of the other monoid. (Contributed by AV, 17-Feb-2024.)
𝐵 = (Base‘𝐺)    &   𝑆 = (Base‘𝐻)    &    0 = (0g‘𝐺)    ⇒   ((𝐺 ∈ Mnd ∧ 𝐻 ∈ Mnd) → ((𝑆 ⊆ 𝐵 ∧ 0 ∈ 𝑆 ∧ (+g‘𝐻) = ((+g‘𝐺) ↾ (𝑆 × 𝑆))) → 𝑆 ∈ (SubMnd‘𝐺)))
 
17-Feb-2024mgmsscl 13415 If the base set of a magma is contained in the base set of another magma, and the group operation of the magma is the restriction of the group operation of the other magma to its base set, then the base set of the magma is closed under the group operation of the other magma. (Contributed by AV, 17-Feb-2024.)
𝐵 = (Base‘𝐺)    &   𝑆 = (Base‘𝐻)    ⇒   (((𝐺 ∈ Mgm ∧ 𝐻 ∈ Mgm) ∧ (𝑆 ⊆ 𝐵 ∧ (+g‘𝐻) = ((+g‘𝐺) ↾ (𝑆 × 𝑆))) ∧ (𝑋 ∈ 𝑆 ∧ 𝑌 ∈ 𝑆)) → (𝑋(+g‘𝐺)𝑌) ∈ 𝑆)
 
15-Feb-2024dedekindicclemeu 15326 Lemma for dedekindicc 15328. Part of proving uniqueness. (Contributed by Jim Kingdon, 15-Feb-2024.)
(𝜑 → 𝐴 ∈ ℝ)    &   (𝜑 → 𝐵 ∈ ℝ)    &   (𝜑 → 𝐿 ⊆ (𝐴[,]𝐵))    &   (𝜑 → 𝑈 ⊆ (𝐴[,]𝐵))    &   (𝜑 → ∃𝑞 ∈ (𝐴[,]𝐵)𝑞 ∈ 𝐿)    &   (𝜑 → ∃𝑟 ∈ (𝐴[,]𝐵)𝑟 ∈ 𝑈)    &   (𝜑 → ∀𝑞 ∈ (𝐴[,]𝐵)(𝑞 ∈ 𝐿 ↔ ∃𝑟 ∈ 𝐿 𝑞 < 𝑟))    &   (𝜑 → ∀𝑟 ∈ (𝐴[,]𝐵)(𝑟 ∈ 𝑈 ↔ ∃𝑞 ∈ 𝑈 𝑞 < 𝑟))    &   (𝜑 → (𝐿 ∩ 𝑈) = ∅)    &   (𝜑 → ∀𝑞 ∈ (𝐴[,]𝐵)∀𝑟 ∈ (𝐴[,]𝐵)(𝑞 < 𝑟 → (𝑞 ∈ 𝐿 ∨ 𝑟 ∈ 𝑈)))    &   (𝜑 → 𝐴 < 𝐵)    &   (𝜑 → 𝐶 ∈ (𝐴[,]𝐵))    &   (𝜑 → (∀𝑞 ∈ 𝐿 𝑞 < 𝐶 ∧ ∀𝑟 ∈ 𝑈 𝐶 < 𝑟))    &   (𝜑 → 𝐷 ∈ (𝐴[,]𝐵))    &   (𝜑 → (∀𝑞 ∈ 𝐿 𝑞 < 𝐷 ∧ ∀𝑟 ∈ 𝑈 𝐷 < 𝑟))    &   (𝜑 → 𝐶 < 𝐷)    ⇒   (𝜑 → ⊥)
 
15-Feb-2024dedekindicclemlu 15325 Lemma for dedekindicc 15328. There is a number which separates the lower and upper cuts. (Contributed by Jim Kingdon, 15-Feb-2024.)
(𝜑 → 𝐴 ∈ ℝ)    &   (𝜑 → 𝐵 ∈ ℝ)    &   (𝜑 → 𝐿 ⊆ (𝐴[,]𝐵))    &   (𝜑 → 𝑈 ⊆ (𝐴[,]𝐵))    &   (𝜑 → ∃𝑞 ∈ (𝐴[,]𝐵)𝑞 ∈ 𝐿)    &   (𝜑 → ∃𝑟 ∈ (𝐴[,]𝐵)𝑟 ∈ 𝑈)    &   (𝜑 → ∀𝑞 ∈ (𝐴[,]𝐵)(𝑞 ∈ 𝐿 ↔ ∃𝑟 ∈ 𝐿 𝑞 < 𝑟))    &   (𝜑 → ∀𝑟 ∈ (𝐴[,]𝐵)(𝑟 ∈ 𝑈 ↔ ∃𝑞 ∈ 𝑈 𝑞 < 𝑟))    &   (𝜑 → (𝐿 ∩ 𝑈) = ∅)    &   (𝜑 → ∀𝑞 ∈ (𝐴[,]𝐵)∀𝑟 ∈ (𝐴[,]𝐵)(𝑞 < 𝑟 → (𝑞 ∈ 𝐿 ∨ 𝑟 ∈ 𝑈)))    &   (𝜑 → 𝐴 < 𝐵)    ⇒   (𝜑 → ∃𝑥 ∈ (𝐴[,]𝐵)(∀𝑞 ∈ 𝐿 𝑞 < 𝑥 ∧ ∀𝑟 ∈ 𝑈 𝑥 < 𝑟))
 
15-Feb-2024dedekindicclemlub 15324 Lemma for dedekindicc 15328. The set L has a least upper bound. (Contributed by Jim Kingdon, 15-Feb-2024.)
(𝜑 → 𝐴 ∈ ℝ)    &   (𝜑 → 𝐵 ∈ ℝ)    &   (𝜑 → 𝐿 ⊆ (𝐴[,]𝐵))    &   (𝜑 → 𝑈 ⊆ (𝐴[,]𝐵))    &   (𝜑 → ∃𝑞 ∈ (𝐴[,]𝐵)𝑞 ∈ 𝐿)    &   (𝜑 → ∃𝑟 ∈ (𝐴[,]𝐵)𝑟 ∈ 𝑈)    &   (𝜑 → ∀𝑞 ∈ (𝐴[,]𝐵)(𝑞 ∈ 𝐿 ↔ ∃𝑟 ∈ 𝐿 𝑞 < 𝑟))    &   (𝜑 → ∀𝑟 ∈ (𝐴[,]𝐵)(𝑟 ∈ 𝑈 ↔ ∃𝑞 ∈ 𝑈 𝑞 < 𝑟))    &   (𝜑 → (𝐿 ∩ 𝑈) = ∅)    &   (𝜑 → ∀𝑞 ∈ (𝐴[,]𝐵)∀𝑟 ∈ (𝐴[,]𝐵)(𝑞 < 𝑟 → (𝑞 ∈ 𝐿 ∨ 𝑟 ∈ 𝑈)))    &   (𝜑 → 𝐴 < 𝐵)    ⇒   (𝜑 → ∃𝑥 ∈ (𝐴[,]𝐵)(∀𝑦 ∈ 𝐿 ¬ 𝑥 < 𝑦 ∧ ∀𝑦 ∈ (𝐴[,]𝐵)(𝑦 < 𝑥 → ∃𝑧 ∈ 𝐿 𝑦 < 𝑧)))
 
15-Feb-2024dedekindicclemloc 15323 Lemma for dedekindicc 15328. The set L is located. (Contributed by Jim Kingdon, 15-Feb-2024.)
(𝜑 → 𝐴 ∈ ℝ)    &   (𝜑 → 𝐵 ∈ ℝ)    &   (𝜑 → 𝐿 ⊆ (𝐴[,]𝐵))    &   (𝜑 → 𝑈 ⊆ (𝐴[,]𝐵))    &   (𝜑 → ∃𝑞 ∈ (𝐴[,]𝐵)𝑞 ∈ 𝐿)    &   (𝜑 → ∃𝑟 ∈ (𝐴[,]𝐵)𝑟 ∈ 𝑈)    &   (𝜑 → ∀𝑞 ∈ (𝐴[,]𝐵)(𝑞 ∈ 𝐿 ↔ ∃𝑟 ∈ 𝐿 𝑞 < 𝑟))    &   (𝜑 → ∀𝑟 ∈ (𝐴[,]𝐵)(𝑟 ∈ 𝑈 ↔ ∃𝑞 ∈ 𝑈 𝑞 < 𝑟))    &   (𝜑 → (𝐿 ∩ 𝑈) = ∅)    &   (𝜑 → ∀𝑞 ∈ (𝐴[,]𝐵)∀𝑟 ∈ (𝐴[,]𝐵)(𝑞 < 𝑟 → (𝑞 ∈ 𝐿 ∨ 𝑟 ∈ 𝑈)))    ⇒   (𝜑 → ∀𝑥 ∈ (𝐴[,]𝐵)∀𝑦 ∈ (𝐴[,]𝐵)(𝑥 < 𝑦 → (∃𝑧 ∈ 𝐿 𝑥 < 𝑧 ∨ ∀𝑧 ∈ 𝐿 𝑧 < 𝑦)))
 
15-Feb-2024dedekindicclemub 15322 Lemma for dedekindicc 15328. The lower cut has an upper bound. (Contributed by Jim Kingdon, 15-Feb-2024.)
(𝜑 → 𝐴 ∈ ℝ)    &   (𝜑 → 𝐵 ∈ ℝ)    &   (𝜑 → 𝐿 ⊆ (𝐴[,]𝐵))    &   (𝜑 → 𝑈 ⊆ (𝐴[,]𝐵))    &   (𝜑 → ∃𝑞 ∈ (𝐴[,]𝐵)𝑞 ∈ 𝐿)    &   (𝜑 → ∃𝑟 ∈ (𝐴[,]𝐵)𝑟 ∈ 𝑈)    &   (𝜑 → ∀𝑞 ∈ (𝐴[,]𝐵)(𝑞 ∈ 𝐿 ↔ ∃𝑟 ∈ 𝐿 𝑞 < 𝑟))    &   (𝜑 → ∀𝑟 ∈ (𝐴[,]𝐵)(𝑟 ∈ 𝑈 ↔ ∃𝑞 ∈ 𝑈 𝑞 < 𝑟))    &   (𝜑 → (𝐿 ∩ 𝑈) = ∅)    &   (𝜑 → ∀𝑞 ∈ (𝐴[,]𝐵)∀𝑟 ∈ (𝐴[,]𝐵)(𝑞 < 𝑟 → (𝑞 ∈ 𝐿 ∨ 𝑟 ∈ 𝑈)))    ⇒   (𝜑 → ∃𝑥 ∈ (𝐴[,]𝐵)∀𝑦 ∈ 𝐿 𝑦 < 𝑥)
 
15-Feb-2024dedekindicclemuub 15321 Lemma for dedekindicc 15328. Any element of the upper cut is an upper bound for the lower cut. (Contributed by Jim Kingdon, 15-Feb-2024.)
(𝜑 → 𝐴 ∈ ℝ)    &   (𝜑 → 𝐵 ∈ ℝ)    &   (𝜑 → 𝐿 ⊆ (𝐴[,]𝐵))    &   (𝜑 → 𝑈 ⊆ (𝐴[,]𝐵))    &   (𝜑 → ∃𝑞 ∈ (𝐴[,]𝐵)𝑞 ∈ 𝐿)    &   (𝜑 → ∃𝑟 ∈ (𝐴[,]𝐵)𝑟 ∈ 𝑈)    &   (𝜑 → ∀𝑞 ∈ (𝐴[,]𝐵)(𝑞 ∈ 𝐿 ↔ ∃𝑟 ∈ 𝐿 𝑞 < 𝑟))    &   (𝜑 → ∀𝑟 ∈ (𝐴[,]𝐵)(𝑟 ∈ 𝑈 ↔ ∃𝑞 ∈ 𝑈 𝑞 < 𝑟))    &   (𝜑 → (𝐿 ∩ 𝑈) = ∅)    &   (𝜑 → ∀𝑞 ∈ (𝐴[,]𝐵)∀𝑟 ∈ (𝐴[,]𝐵)(𝑞 < 𝑟 → (𝑞 ∈ 𝐿 ∨ 𝑟 ∈ 𝑈)))    &   (𝜑 → 𝐶 ∈ 𝑈)    ⇒   (𝜑 → ∀𝑧 ∈ 𝐿 𝑧 < 𝐶)
 
14-Feb-2024suplociccex 15320 An inhabited, bounded-above, located set of reals in a closed interval has a supremum. A similar theorem is axsuploc 8235 but that one is for the entire real line rather than a closed interval. (Contributed by Jim Kingdon, 14-Feb-2024.)
(𝜑 → 𝐵 ∈ ℝ)    &   (𝜑 → 𝐶 ∈ ℝ)    &   (𝜑 → 𝐵 < 𝐶)    &   (𝜑 → 𝐴 ⊆ (𝐵[,]𝐶))    &   (𝜑 → ∃𝑥 𝑥 ∈ 𝐴)    &   (𝜑 → ∀𝑥 ∈ (𝐵[,]𝐶)∀𝑦 ∈ (𝐵[,]𝐶)(𝑥 < 𝑦 → (∃𝑧 ∈ 𝐴 𝑥 < 𝑧 ∨ ∀𝑧 ∈ 𝐴 𝑧 < 𝑦)))    ⇒   (𝜑 → ∃𝑥 ∈ (𝐵[,]𝐶)(∀𝑦 ∈ 𝐴 ¬ 𝑥 < 𝑦 ∧ ∀𝑦 ∈ (𝐵[,]𝐶)(𝑦 < 𝑥 → ∃𝑧 ∈ 𝐴 𝑦 < 𝑧)))
 
14-Feb-2024suplociccreex 15319 An inhabited, bounded-above, located set of reals in a closed interval has a supremum. A similar theorem is axsuploc 8235 but that one is for the entire real line rather than a closed interval. (Contributed by Jim Kingdon, 14-Feb-2024.)
(𝜑 → 𝐵 ∈ ℝ)    &   (𝜑 → 𝐶 ∈ ℝ)    &   (𝜑 → 𝐵 < 𝐶)    &   (𝜑 → 𝐴 ⊆ (𝐵[,]𝐶))    &   (𝜑 → ∃𝑥 𝑥 ∈ 𝐴)    &   (𝜑 → ∀𝑥 ∈ (𝐵[,]𝐶)∀𝑦 ∈ (𝐵[,]𝐶)(𝑥 < 𝑦 → (∃𝑧 ∈ 𝐴 𝑥 < 𝑧 ∨ ∀𝑧 ∈ 𝐴 𝑧 < 𝑦)))    ⇒   (𝜑 → ∃𝑥 ∈ ℝ (∀𝑦 ∈ 𝐴 ¬ 𝑥 < 𝑦 ∧ ∀𝑦 ∈ ℝ (𝑦 < 𝑥 → ∃𝑧 ∈ 𝐴 𝑦 < 𝑧)))
 
10-Feb-2024cbvexdvaw 1978 Rule used to change the bound variable in an existential quantifier with implicit substitution. Deduction form. Version of cbvexdva 1976 with a disjoint variable condition. (Contributed by David Moews, 1-May-2017.) (Revised by GG, 10-Jan-2024.) (Revised by Wolf Lammen, 10-Feb-2024.)
((𝜑 ∧ 𝑥 = 𝑦) → (𝜓 ↔ 𝜒))    ⇒   (𝜑 → (∃𝑥𝜓 ↔ ∃𝑦𝜒))
 
10-Feb-2024cbvaldvaw 1977 Rule used to change the bound variable in a universal quantifier with implicit substitution. Deduction form. Version of cbvaldva 1975 with a disjoint variable condition. (Contributed by David Moews, 1-May-2017.) (Revised by GG, 10-Jan-2024.) (Revised by Wolf Lammen, 10-Feb-2024.)
((𝜑 ∧ 𝑥 = 𝑦) → (𝜓 ↔ 𝜒))    ⇒   (𝜑 → (∀𝑥𝜓 ↔ ∀𝑦𝜒))
 
6-Feb-2024ivthinclemlopn 15331 Lemma for ivthinc 15338. The lower cut is open. (Contributed by Jim Kingdon, 6-Feb-2024.)
(𝜑 → 𝐴 ∈ ℝ)    &   (𝜑 → 𝐵 ∈ ℝ)    &   (𝜑 → 𝑈 ∈ ℝ)    &   (𝜑 → 𝐴 < 𝐵)    &   (𝜑 → (𝐴[,]𝐵) ⊆ 𝐷)    &   (𝜑 → 𝐹 ∈ (𝐷–cn→ℂ))    &   ((𝜑 ∧ 𝑥 ∈ (𝐴[,]𝐵)) → (𝐹‘𝑥) ∈ ℝ)    &   (𝜑 → ((𝐹‘𝐴) < 𝑈 ∧ 𝑈 < (𝐹‘𝐵)))    &   (((𝜑 ∧ 𝑥 ∈ (𝐴[,]𝐵)) ∧ (𝑦 ∈ (𝐴[,]𝐵) ∧ 𝑥 < 𝑦)) → (𝐹‘𝑥) < (𝐹‘𝑦))    &   𝐿 = {𝑤 ∈ (𝐴[,]𝐵) ∣ (𝐹‘𝑤) < 𝑈}    &   𝑅 = {𝑤 ∈ (𝐴[,]𝐵) ∣ 𝑈 < (𝐹‘𝑤)}    &   (𝜑 → 𝑄 ∈ 𝐿)    ⇒   (𝜑 → ∃𝑟 ∈ 𝐿 𝑄 < 𝑟)
 
5-Feb-2024ivthinc 15338 The intermediate value theorem, increasing case, for a strictly monotonic function. Theorem 5.5 of [Bauer], p. 494. This is Metamath 100 proof #79. (Contributed by Jim Kingdon, 5-Feb-2024.)
(𝜑 → 𝐴 ∈ ℝ)    &   (𝜑 → 𝐵 ∈ ℝ)    &   (𝜑 → 𝑈 ∈ ℝ)    &   (𝜑 → 𝐴 < 𝐵)    &   (𝜑 → (𝐴[,]𝐵) ⊆ 𝐷)    &   (𝜑 → 𝐹 ∈ (𝐷–cn→ℂ))    &   ((𝜑 ∧ 𝑥 ∈ (𝐴[,]𝐵)) → (𝐹‘𝑥) ∈ ℝ)    &   (𝜑 → ((𝐹‘𝐴) < 𝑈 ∧ 𝑈 < (𝐹‘𝐵)))    &   (((𝜑 ∧ 𝑥 ∈ (𝐴[,]𝐵)) ∧ (𝑦 ∈ (𝐴[,]𝐵) ∧ 𝑥 < 𝑦)) → (𝐹‘𝑥) < (𝐹‘𝑦))    ⇒   (𝜑 → ∃𝑐 ∈ (𝐴(,)𝐵)(𝐹‘𝑐) = 𝑈)
 
2-Feb-2024dedekindeulemuub 15312 Lemma for dedekindeu 15318. Any element of the upper cut is an upper bound for the lower cut. (Contributed by Jim Kingdon, 2-Feb-2024.)
(𝜑 → 𝐿 ⊆ ℝ)    &   (𝜑 → 𝑈 ⊆ ℝ)    &   (𝜑 → ∃𝑞 ∈ ℝ 𝑞 ∈ 𝐿)    &   (𝜑 → ∃𝑟 ∈ ℝ 𝑟 ∈ 𝑈)    &   (𝜑 → ∀𝑞 ∈ ℝ (𝑞 ∈ 𝐿 ↔ ∃𝑟 ∈ 𝐿 𝑞 < 𝑟))    &   (𝜑 → ∀𝑟 ∈ ℝ (𝑟 ∈ 𝑈 ↔ ∃𝑞 ∈ 𝑈 𝑞 < 𝑟))    &   (𝜑 → (𝐿 ∩ 𝑈) = ∅)    &   (𝜑 → ∀𝑞 ∈ ℝ ∀𝑟 ∈ ℝ (𝑞 < 𝑟 → (𝑞 ∈ 𝐿 ∨ 𝑟 ∈ 𝑈)))    &   (𝜑 → 𝐴 ∈ 𝑈)    ⇒   (𝜑 → ∀𝑧 ∈ 𝐿 𝑧 < 𝐴)
 
31-Jan-2024dedekindeulemeu 15317 Lemma for dedekindeu 15318. Part of proving uniqueness. (Contributed by Jim Kingdon, 31-Jan-2024.)
(𝜑 → 𝐿 ⊆ ℝ)    &   (𝜑 → 𝑈 ⊆ ℝ)    &   (𝜑 → ∃𝑞 ∈ ℝ 𝑞 ∈ 𝐿)    &   (𝜑 → ∃𝑟 ∈ ℝ 𝑟 ∈ 𝑈)    &   (𝜑 → ∀𝑞 ∈ ℝ (𝑞 ∈ 𝐿 ↔ ∃𝑟 ∈ 𝐿 𝑞 < 𝑟))    &   (𝜑 → ∀𝑟 ∈ ℝ (𝑟 ∈ 𝑈 ↔ ∃𝑞 ∈ 𝑈 𝑞 < 𝑟))    &   (𝜑 → (𝐿 ∩ 𝑈) = ∅)    &   (𝜑 → ∀𝑞 ∈ ℝ ∀𝑟 ∈ ℝ (𝑞 < 𝑟 → (𝑞 ∈ 𝐿 ∨ 𝑟 ∈ 𝑈)))    &   (𝜑 → 𝐴 ∈ ℝ)    &   (𝜑 → (∀𝑞 ∈ 𝐿 𝑞 < 𝐴 ∧ ∀𝑟 ∈ 𝑈 𝐴 < 𝑟))    &   (𝜑 → 𝐵 ∈ ℝ)    &   (𝜑 → (∀𝑞 ∈ 𝐿 𝑞 < 𝐵 ∧ ∀𝑟 ∈ 𝑈 𝐵 < 𝑟))    &   (𝜑 → 𝐴 < 𝐵)    ⇒   (𝜑 → ⊥)
 
31-Jan-2024dedekindeulemlu 15316 Lemma for dedekindeu 15318. There is a number which separates the lower and upper cuts. (Contributed by Jim Kingdon, 31-Jan-2024.)
(𝜑 → 𝐿 ⊆ ℝ)    &   (𝜑 → 𝑈 ⊆ ℝ)    &   (𝜑 → ∃𝑞 ∈ ℝ 𝑞 ∈ 𝐿)    &   (𝜑 → ∃𝑟 ∈ ℝ 𝑟 ∈ 𝑈)    &   (𝜑 → ∀𝑞 ∈ ℝ (𝑞 ∈ 𝐿 ↔ ∃𝑟 ∈ 𝐿 𝑞 < 𝑟))    &   (𝜑 → ∀𝑟 ∈ ℝ (𝑟 ∈ 𝑈 ↔ ∃𝑞 ∈ 𝑈 𝑞 < 𝑟))    &   (𝜑 → (𝐿 ∩ 𝑈) = ∅)    &   (𝜑 → ∀𝑞 ∈ ℝ ∀𝑟 ∈ ℝ (𝑞 < 𝑟 → (𝑞 ∈ 𝐿 ∨ 𝑟 ∈ 𝑈)))    ⇒   (𝜑 → ∃𝑥 ∈ ℝ (∀𝑞 ∈ 𝐿 𝑞 < 𝑥 ∧ ∀𝑟 ∈ 𝑈 𝑥 < 𝑟))
 
31-Jan-2024dedekindeulemlub 15315 Lemma for dedekindeu 15318. The set L has a least upper bound. (Contributed by Jim Kingdon, 31-Jan-2024.)
(𝜑 → 𝐿 ⊆ ℝ)    &   (𝜑 → 𝑈 ⊆ ℝ)    &   (𝜑 → ∃𝑞 ∈ ℝ 𝑞 ∈ 𝐿)    &   (𝜑 → ∃𝑟 ∈ ℝ 𝑟 ∈ 𝑈)    &   (𝜑 → ∀𝑞 ∈ ℝ (𝑞 ∈ 𝐿 ↔ ∃𝑟 ∈ 𝐿 𝑞 < 𝑟))    &   (𝜑 → ∀𝑟 ∈ ℝ (𝑟 ∈ 𝑈 ↔ ∃𝑞 ∈ 𝑈 𝑞 < 𝑟))    &   (𝜑 → (𝐿 ∩ 𝑈) = ∅)    &   (𝜑 → ∀𝑞 ∈ ℝ ∀𝑟 ∈ ℝ (𝑞 < 𝑟 → (𝑞 ∈ 𝐿 ∨ 𝑟 ∈ 𝑈)))    ⇒   (𝜑 → ∃𝑥 ∈ ℝ (∀𝑦 ∈ 𝐿 ¬ 𝑥 < 𝑦 ∧ ∀𝑦 ∈ ℝ (𝑦 < 𝑥 → ∃𝑧 ∈ 𝐿 𝑦 < 𝑧)))
 
31-Jan-2024dedekindeulemloc 15314 Lemma for dedekindeu 15318. The set L is located. (Contributed by Jim Kingdon, 31-Jan-2024.)
(𝜑 → 𝐿 ⊆ ℝ)    &   (𝜑 → 𝑈 ⊆ ℝ)    &   (𝜑 → ∃𝑞 ∈ ℝ 𝑞 ∈ 𝐿)    &   (𝜑 → ∃𝑟 ∈ ℝ 𝑟 ∈ 𝑈)    &   (𝜑 → ∀𝑞 ∈ ℝ (𝑞 ∈ 𝐿 ↔ ∃𝑟 ∈ 𝐿 𝑞 < 𝑟))    &   (𝜑 → ∀𝑟 ∈ ℝ (𝑟 ∈ 𝑈 ↔ ∃𝑞 ∈ 𝑈 𝑞 < 𝑟))    &   (𝜑 → (𝐿 ∩ 𝑈) = ∅)    &   (𝜑 → ∀𝑞 ∈ ℝ ∀𝑟 ∈ ℝ (𝑞 < 𝑟 → (𝑞 ∈ 𝐿 ∨ 𝑟 ∈ 𝑈)))    ⇒   (𝜑 → ∀𝑥 ∈ ℝ ∀𝑦 ∈ ℝ (𝑥 < 𝑦 → (∃𝑧 ∈ 𝐿 𝑥 < 𝑧 ∨ ∀𝑧 ∈ 𝐿 𝑧 < 𝑦)))
 
31-Jan-2024dedekindeulemub 15313 Lemma for dedekindeu 15318. The lower cut has an upper bound. (Contributed by Jim Kingdon, 31-Jan-2024.)
(𝜑 → 𝐿 ⊆ ℝ)    &   (𝜑 → 𝑈 ⊆ ℝ)    &   (𝜑 → ∃𝑞 ∈ ℝ 𝑞 ∈ 𝐿)    &   (𝜑 → ∃𝑟 ∈ ℝ 𝑟 ∈ 𝑈)    &   (𝜑 → ∀𝑞 ∈ ℝ (𝑞 ∈ 𝐿 ↔ ∃𝑟 ∈ 𝐿 𝑞 < 𝑟))    &   (𝜑 → ∀𝑟 ∈ ℝ (𝑟 ∈ 𝑈 ↔ ∃𝑞 ∈ 𝑈 𝑞 < 𝑟))    &   (𝜑 → (𝐿 ∩ 𝑈) = ∅)    &   (𝜑 → ∀𝑞 ∈ ℝ ∀𝑟 ∈ ℝ (𝑞 < 𝑟 → (𝑞 ∈ 𝐿 ∨ 𝑟 ∈ 𝑈)))    ⇒   (𝜑 → ∃𝑥 ∈ ℝ ∀𝑦 ∈ 𝐿 𝑦 < 𝑥)
 
30-Jan-2024axsuploc 8235 An inhabited, bounded-above, located set of reals has a supremum. Axiom for real and complex numbers, derived from ZF set theory. (This restates ax-pre-suploc 8136 with ordering on the extended reals.) (Contributed by Jim Kingdon, 30-Jan-2024.)
(((𝐴 ⊆ ℝ ∧ ∃𝑥 𝑥 ∈ 𝐴) ∧ (∃𝑥 ∈ ℝ ∀𝑦 ∈ 𝐴 𝑦 < 𝑥 ∧ ∀𝑥 ∈ ℝ ∀𝑦 ∈ ℝ (𝑥 < 𝑦 → (∃𝑧 ∈ 𝐴 𝑥 < 𝑧 ∨ ∀𝑧 ∈ 𝐴 𝑧 < 𝑦)))) → ∃𝑥 ∈ ℝ (∀𝑦 ∈ 𝐴 ¬ 𝑥 < 𝑦 ∧ ∀𝑦 ∈ ℝ (𝑦 < 𝑥 → ∃𝑧 ∈ 𝐴 𝑦 < 𝑧)))
 
30-Jan-2024iotam 5313 Representation of "the unique element such that 𝜑 " with a class expression 𝐴 which is inhabited (that means that "the unique element such that 𝜑 " exists). (Contributed by AV, 30-Jan-2024.)
(𝑥 = 𝐴 → (𝜑 ↔ 𝜓))    ⇒   ((𝐴 ∈ 𝑉 ∧ ∃𝑤 𝑤 ∈ 𝐴 ∧ 𝐴 = (℩𝑥𝜑)) → 𝜓)
 
29-Jan-2024sgrpidmndm 13474 A semigroup with an identity element which is inhabited is a monoid. Of course there could be monoids with the empty set as identity element, but these cannot be proven to be monoids with this theorem. (Contributed by AV, 29-Jan-2024.)
𝐵 = (Base‘𝐺)    &    0 = (0g‘𝐺)    ⇒   ((𝐺 ∈ Smgrp ∧ ∃𝑒 ∈ 𝐵 (∃𝑤 𝑤 ∈ 𝑒 ∧ 𝑒 = 0 )) → 𝐺 ∈ Mnd)
 
26-Jan-2024elovmporab1w 6215 Implications for the value of an operation, defined by the maps-to notation with a class abstraction as a result, having an element. Here, the base set of the class abstraction depends on the first operand. (Contributed by Alexander van der Vekens, 15-Jul-2018.) (Revised by GG, 26-Jan-2024.)
𝑂 = (𝑥 ∈ V, 𝑦 ∈ V ↦ {𝑧 ∈ ⦋𝑥 / 𝑚⦌𝑀 ∣ 𝜑})    &   ((𝑋 ∈ V ∧ 𝑌 ∈ V) → ⦋𝑋 / 𝑚⦌𝑀 ∈ V)    ⇒   (𝑍 ∈ (𝑋𝑂𝑌) → (𝑋 ∈ V ∧ 𝑌 ∈ V ∧ 𝑍 ∈ ⦋𝑋 / 𝑚⦌𝑀))
 
26-Jan-2024opabidw 4346 The law of concretion. Special case of Theorem 9.5 of [Quine] p. 61. Version of opabid 4345 with a disjoint variable condition. (Contributed by NM, 14-Apr-1995.) (Revised by GG, 26-Jan-2024.)
(⟨𝑥, 𝑦⟩ ∈ {⟨𝑥, 𝑦⟩ ∣ 𝜑} ↔ 𝜑)
 
26-Jan-2024invdisjrab 4077 The restricted class abstractions {𝑥 ∈ 𝐵 ∣ 𝐶 = 𝑦} for distinct 𝑦 ∈ 𝐴 are disjoint. (Contributed by AV, 6-May-2020.) (Proof shortened by GG, 26-Jan-2024.)
Disj 𝑦 ∈ 𝐴 {𝑥 ∈ 𝐵 ∣ 𝐶 = 𝑦}
 
24-Jan-2024axpre-suploclemres 8104 Lemma for axpre-suploc 8105. The result. The proof just needs to define 𝐵 as basically the same set as 𝐴 (but expressed as a subset of R rather than a subset of ℝ), and apply suplocsr 8012. (Contributed by Jim Kingdon, 24-Jan-2024.)
(𝜑 → 𝐴 ⊆ ℝ)    &   (𝜑 → 𝐶 ∈ 𝐴)    &   (𝜑 → ∃𝑥 ∈ ℝ ∀𝑦 ∈ 𝐴 𝑦 <ℝ 𝑥)    &   (𝜑 → ∀𝑥 ∈ ℝ ∀𝑦 ∈ ℝ (𝑥 <ℝ 𝑦 → (∃𝑧 ∈ 𝐴 𝑥 <ℝ 𝑧 ∨ ∀𝑧 ∈ 𝐴 𝑧 <ℝ 𝑦)))    &   𝐵 = {𝑤 ∈ R ∣ ⟨𝑤, 0R⟩ ∈ 𝐴}    ⇒   (𝜑 → ∃𝑥 ∈ ℝ (∀𝑦 ∈ 𝐴 ¬ 𝑥 <ℝ 𝑦 ∧ ∀𝑦 ∈ ℝ (𝑦 <ℝ 𝑥 → ∃𝑧 ∈ 𝐴 𝑦 <ℝ 𝑧)))
 
23-Jan-2024ax-pre-suploc 8136 An inhabited, bounded-above, located set of reals has a supremum.

Locatedness here means that given 𝑥 < 𝑦, either there is an element of the set greater than 𝑥, or 𝑦 is an upper bound.

Although this and ax-caucvg 8135 are both completeness properties, countable choice would probably be needed to derive this from ax-caucvg 8135.

(Contributed by Jim Kingdon, 23-Jan-2024.)

(((𝐴 ⊆ ℝ ∧ ∃𝑥 𝑥 ∈ 𝐴) ∧ (∃𝑥 ∈ ℝ ∀𝑦 ∈ 𝐴 𝑦 <ℝ 𝑥 ∧ ∀𝑥 ∈ ℝ ∀𝑦 ∈ ℝ (𝑥 <ℝ 𝑦 → (∃𝑧 ∈ 𝐴 𝑥 <ℝ 𝑧 ∨ ∀𝑧 ∈ 𝐴 𝑧 <ℝ 𝑦)))) → ∃𝑥 ∈ ℝ (∀𝑦 ∈ 𝐴 ¬ 𝑥 <ℝ 𝑦 ∧ ∀𝑦 ∈ ℝ (𝑦 <ℝ 𝑥 → ∃𝑧 ∈ 𝐴 𝑦 <ℝ 𝑧)))
 
23-Jan-2024axpre-suploc 8105 An inhabited, bounded-above, located set of reals has a supremum.

Locatedness here means that given 𝑥 < 𝑦, either there is an element of the set greater than 𝑥, or 𝑦 is an upper bound.

This construction-dependent theorem should not be referenced directly; instead, use ax-pre-suploc 8136. (Contributed by Jim Kingdon, 23-Jan-2024.) (New usage is discouraged.)

(((𝐴 ⊆ ℝ ∧ ∃𝑥 𝑥 ∈ 𝐴) ∧ (∃𝑥 ∈ ℝ ∀𝑦 ∈ 𝐴 𝑦 <ℝ 𝑥 ∧ ∀𝑥 ∈ ℝ ∀𝑦 ∈ ℝ (𝑥 <ℝ 𝑦 → (∃𝑧 ∈ 𝐴 𝑥 <ℝ 𝑧 ∨ ∀𝑧 ∈ 𝐴 𝑧 <ℝ 𝑦)))) → ∃𝑥 ∈ ℝ (∀𝑦 ∈ 𝐴 ¬ 𝑥 <ℝ 𝑦 ∧ ∀𝑦 ∈ ℝ (𝑦 <ℝ 𝑥 → ∃𝑧 ∈ 𝐴 𝑦 <ℝ 𝑧)))
 
22-Jan-2024suplocsr 8012 An inhabited, bounded, located set of signed reals has a supremum. (Contributed by Jim Kingdon, 22-Jan-2024.)
(𝜑 → ∃𝑥 𝑥 ∈ 𝐴)    &   (𝜑 → ∃𝑥 ∈ R ∀𝑦 ∈ 𝐴 𝑦 <R 𝑥)    &   (𝜑 → ∀𝑥 ∈ R ∀𝑦 ∈ R (𝑥 <R 𝑦 → (∃𝑧 ∈ 𝐴 𝑥 <R 𝑧 ∨ ∀𝑧 ∈ 𝐴 𝑧 <R 𝑦)))    ⇒   (𝜑 → ∃𝑥 ∈ R (∀𝑦 ∈ 𝐴 ¬ 𝑥 <R 𝑦 ∧ ∀𝑦 ∈ R (𝑦 <R 𝑥 → ∃𝑧 ∈ 𝐴 𝑦 <R 𝑧)))
 
21-Jan-2024bj-el2oss1o 16247 Shorter proof of el2oss1o 6602 using more axioms. (Contributed by BJ, 21-Jan-2024.) (Proof modification is discouraged.) (New usage is discouraged.)
(𝐴 ∈ 2o → 𝐴 ⊆ 1o)
 
21-Jan-2024ltm1sr 7980 Adding minus one to a signed real yields a smaller signed real. (Contributed by Jim Kingdon, 21-Jan-2024.)
(𝐴 ∈ R → (𝐴 +R -1R) <R 𝐴)
 
20-Jan-2024mndinvmod 13499 Uniqueness of an inverse element in a monoid, if it exists. (Contributed by AV, 20-Jan-2024.)
𝐵 = (Base‘𝐺)    &    0 = (0g‘𝐺)    &    + = (+g‘𝐺)    &   (𝜑 → 𝐺 ∈ Mnd)    &   (𝜑 → 𝐴 ∈ 𝐵)    ⇒   (𝜑 → ∃*𝑤 ∈ 𝐵 ((𝑤 + 𝐴) = 0 ∧ (𝐴 + 𝑤) = 0 ))
 
20-Jan-2024ccats1val1g 11191 Value of a symbol in the left half of a word concatenated with a single symbol. (Contributed by Alexander van der Vekens, 5-Aug-2018.) (Revised by JJ, 20-Jan-2024.)
((𝑊 ∈ Word 𝑉 ∧ 𝑆 ∈ 𝑌 ∧ 𝐼 ∈ (0..^(♯‘𝑊))) → ((𝑊 ++ ⟨“𝑆”⟩)‘𝐼) = (𝑊‘𝐼))
 
19-Jan-2024suplocsrlempr 8010 Lemma for suplocsr 8012. The set 𝐵 has a least upper bound. (Contributed by Jim Kingdon, 19-Jan-2024.)
𝐵 = {𝑤 ∈ P ∣ (𝐶 +R [⟨𝑤, 1P⟩] ~R ) ∈ 𝐴}    &   (𝜑 → 𝐴 ⊆ R)    &   (𝜑 → 𝐶 ∈ 𝐴)    &   (𝜑 → ∃𝑥 ∈ R ∀𝑦 ∈ 𝐴 𝑦 <R 𝑥)    &   (𝜑 → ∀𝑥 ∈ R ∀𝑦 ∈ R (𝑥 <R 𝑦 → (∃𝑧 ∈ 𝐴 𝑥 <R 𝑧 ∨ ∀𝑧 ∈ 𝐴 𝑧 <R 𝑦)))    ⇒   (𝜑 → ∃𝑣 ∈ P (∀𝑤 ∈ 𝐵 ¬ 𝑣<P 𝑤 ∧ ∀𝑤 ∈ P (𝑤<P 𝑣 → ∃𝑢 ∈ 𝐵 𝑤<P 𝑢)))
 
18-Jan-2024ccatval1 11150 Value of a symbol in the left half of a concatenated word. (Contributed by Stefan O'Rear, 15-Aug-2015.) (Revised by Mario Carneiro, 22-Sep-2015.) (Proof shortened by AV, 30-Apr-2020.) (Revised by JJ, 18-Jan-2024.)
((𝑆 ∈ Word 𝐴 ∧ 𝑇 ∈ Word 𝐵 ∧ 𝐼 ∈ (0..^(♯‘𝑆))) → ((𝑆 ++ 𝑇)‘𝐼) = (𝑆‘𝐼))
 
18-Jan-2024ccat0 11149 The concatenation of two words is empty iff the two words are empty. (Contributed by AV, 4-Mar-2022.) (Revised by JJ, 18-Jan-2024.)
((𝑆 ∈ Word 𝐴 ∧ 𝑇 ∈ Word 𝐵) → ((𝑆 ++ 𝑇) = ∅ ↔ (𝑆 = ∅ ∧ 𝑇 = ∅)))
 
18-Jan-2024suplocsrlemb 8009 Lemma for suplocsr 8012. The set 𝐵 is located. (Contributed by Jim Kingdon, 18-Jan-2024.)
𝐵 = {𝑤 ∈ P ∣ (𝐶 +R [⟨𝑤, 1P⟩] ~R ) ∈ 𝐴}    &   (𝜑 → 𝐴 ⊆ R)    &   (𝜑 → 𝐶 ∈ 𝐴)    &   (𝜑 → ∃𝑥 ∈ R ∀𝑦 ∈ 𝐴 𝑦 <R 𝑥)    &   (𝜑 → ∀𝑥 ∈ R ∀𝑦 ∈ R (𝑥 <R 𝑦 → (∃𝑧 ∈ 𝐴 𝑥 <R 𝑧 ∨ ∀𝑧 ∈ 𝐴 𝑧 <R 𝑦)))    ⇒   (𝜑 → ∀𝑢 ∈ P ∀𝑣 ∈ P (𝑢<P 𝑣 → (∃𝑞 ∈ 𝐵 𝑢<P 𝑞 ∨ ∀𝑞 ∈ 𝐵 𝑞<P 𝑣)))
 
16-Jan-2024suplocsrlem 8011 Lemma for suplocsr 8012. The set 𝐴 has a least upper bound. (Contributed by Jim Kingdon, 16-Jan-2024.)
𝐵 = {𝑤 ∈ P ∣ (𝐶 +R [⟨𝑤, 1P⟩] ~R ) ∈ 𝐴}    &   (𝜑 → 𝐴 ⊆ R)    &   (𝜑 → 𝐶 ∈ 𝐴)    &   (𝜑 → ∃𝑥 ∈ R ∀𝑦 ∈ 𝐴 𝑦 <R 𝑥)    &   (𝜑 → ∀𝑥 ∈ R ∀𝑦 ∈ R (𝑥 <R 𝑦 → (∃𝑧 ∈ 𝐴 𝑥 <R 𝑧 ∨ ∀𝑧 ∈ 𝐴 𝑧 <R 𝑦)))    ⇒   (𝜑 → ∃𝑥 ∈ R (∀𝑦 ∈ 𝐴 ¬ 𝑥 <R 𝑦 ∧ ∀𝑦 ∈ R (𝑦 <R 𝑥 → ∃𝑧 ∈ 𝐴 𝑦 <R 𝑧)))
 
15-Jan-2024eqg0el 13787 Equivalence class of a quotient group for a subgroup. (Contributed by Thierry Arnoux, 15-Jan-2024.)
∼ = (𝐺 ~QG 𝐻)    ⇒   ((𝐺 ∈ Grp ∧ 𝐻 ∈ (SubGrp‘𝐺)) → ([𝑋] ∼ = 𝐻 ↔ 𝑋 ∈ 𝐻))
 
14-Jan-2024wlklenvclwlk 16145 The number of vertices in a walk equals the length of the walk after it is "closed" (i.e. enhanced by an edge from its last vertex to its first vertex). (Contributed by Alexander van der Vekens, 29-Jun-2018.) (Revised by AV, 2-May-2021.) (Revised by JJ, 14-Jan-2024.)
(𝑊 ∈ Word (Vtx‘𝐺) → (⟨𝐹, (𝑊 ++ ⟨“(𝑊‘0)”⟩)⟩ ∈ (Walks‘𝐺) → (♯‘𝐹) = (♯‘𝑊)))
 
14-Jan-2024suplocexprlemlub 7927 Lemma for suplocexpr 7928. The putative supremum is a least upper bound. (Contributed by Jim Kingdon, 14-Jan-2024.)
(𝜑 → ∃𝑥 𝑥 ∈ 𝐴)    &   (𝜑 → ∃𝑥 ∈ P ∀𝑦 ∈ 𝐴 𝑦<P 𝑥)    &   (𝜑 → ∀𝑥 ∈ P ∀𝑦 ∈ P (𝑥<P 𝑦 → (∃𝑧 ∈ 𝐴 𝑥<P 𝑧 ∨ ∀𝑧 ∈ 𝐴 𝑧<P 𝑦)))    &   𝐵 = ⟨∪ (1st “ 𝐴), {𝑢 ∈ Q ∣ ∃𝑤 ∈ ∩ (2nd “ 𝐴)𝑤 <Q 𝑢}⟩    ⇒   (𝜑 → (𝑦<P 𝐵 → ∃𝑧 ∈ 𝐴 𝑦<P 𝑧))
 
14-Jan-2024suplocexprlemub 7926 Lemma for suplocexpr 7928. The putative supremum is an upper bound. (Contributed by Jim Kingdon, 14-Jan-2024.)
(𝜑 → ∃𝑥 𝑥 ∈ 𝐴)    &   (𝜑 → ∃𝑥 ∈ P ∀𝑦 ∈ 𝐴 𝑦<P 𝑥)    &   (𝜑 → ∀𝑥 ∈ P ∀𝑦 ∈ P (𝑥<P 𝑦 → (∃𝑧 ∈ 𝐴 𝑥<P 𝑧 ∨ ∀𝑧 ∈ 𝐴 𝑧<P 𝑦)))    &   𝐵 = ⟨∪ (1st “ 𝐴), {𝑢 ∈ Q ∣ ∃𝑤 ∈ ∩ (2nd “ 𝐴)𝑤 <Q 𝑢}⟩    ⇒   (𝜑 → ∀𝑦 ∈ 𝐴 ¬ 𝐵<P 𝑦)
 
10-Jan-2024nfcsbw 3161 Bound-variable hypothesis builder for substitution into a class. Version of nfcsb 3162 with a disjoint variable condition. (Contributed by Mario Carneiro, 12-Oct-2016.) (Revised by GG, 10-Jan-2024.)
Ⅎ𝑥𝐴    &   Ⅎ𝑥𝐵    ⇒   Ⅎ𝑥⦋𝐴 / 𝑦⦌𝐵
 
10-Jan-2024nfsbcw 3159 Bound-variable hypothesis builder for class substitution. Version of nfsbc 3049 with a disjoint variable condition, which in the future may make it possible to reduce axiom usage. (Contributed by NM, 7-Sep-2014.) (Revised by GG, 10-Jan-2024.)
Ⅎ𝑥𝐴    &   Ⅎ𝑥𝜑    ⇒   Ⅎ𝑥[𝐴 / 𝑦]𝜑
 
10-Jan-2024nfsbcdw 3158 Version of nfsbcd 3048 with a disjoint variable condition. (Contributed by NM, 23-Nov-2005.) (Revised by GG, 10-Jan-2024.)
Ⅎ𝑦𝜑    &   (𝜑 → Ⅎ𝑥𝐴)    &   (𝜑 → Ⅎ𝑥𝜓)    ⇒   (𝜑 → Ⅎ𝑥[𝐴 / 𝑦]𝜓)
 
10-Jan-2024cbvcsbw 3128 Version of cbvcsb 3129 with a disjoint variable condition. (Contributed by GG, 10-Jan-2024.)
Ⅎ𝑦𝐶    &   Ⅎ𝑥𝐷    &   (𝑥 = 𝑦 → 𝐶 = 𝐷)    ⇒   ⦋𝐴 / 𝑥⦌𝐶 = ⦋𝐴 / 𝑦⦌𝐷
 
10-Jan-2024cbvsbcw 3056 Version of cbvsbc 3057 with a disjoint variable condition. (Contributed by GG, 10-Jan-2024.)
Ⅎ𝑦𝜑    &   Ⅎ𝑥𝜓    &   (𝑥 = 𝑦 → (𝜑 ↔ 𝜓))    ⇒   ([𝐴 / 𝑥]𝜑 ↔ [𝐴 / 𝑦]𝜓)
 
10-Jan-2024cbvrex2vw 2777 Change bound variables of double restricted universal quantification, using implicit substitution. Version of cbvrex2v 2779 with a disjoint variable condition, which does not require ax-13 2202. (Contributed by FL, 2-Jul-2012.) (Revised by GG, 10-Jan-2024.)
(𝑥 = 𝑧 → (𝜑 ↔ 𝜒))    &   (𝑦 = 𝑤 → (𝜒 ↔ 𝜓))    ⇒   (∃𝑥 ∈ 𝐴 ∃𝑦 ∈ 𝐵 𝜑 ↔ ∃𝑧 ∈ 𝐴 ∃𝑤 ∈ 𝐵 𝜓)
 
10-Jan-2024cbvral2vw 2776 Change bound variables of double restricted universal quantification, using implicit substitution. Version of cbvral2v 2778 with a disjoint variable condition, which does not require ax-13 2202. (Contributed by NM, 10-Aug-2004.) (Revised by GG, 10-Jan-2024.)
(𝑥 = 𝑧 → (𝜑 ↔ 𝜒))    &   (𝑦 = 𝑤 → (𝜒 ↔ 𝜓))    ⇒   (∀𝑥 ∈ 𝐴 ∀𝑦 ∈ 𝐵 𝜑 ↔ ∀𝑧 ∈ 𝐴 ∀𝑤 ∈ 𝐵 𝜓)
 
10-Jan-2024cbvrexw 2759 Rule used to change bound variables, using implicit substitution. Version of cbvrexfw 2755 with more disjoint variable conditions. Although we don't do so yet, we expect the disjoint variable conditions will allow us to remove reliance on ax-i12 1553 and ax-bndl 1555 in the proof. (Contributed by NM, 31-Jul-2003.) (Revised by GG, 10-Jan-2024.)
Ⅎ𝑦𝜑    &   Ⅎ𝑥𝜓    &   (𝑥 = 𝑦 → (𝜑 ↔ 𝜓))    ⇒   (∃𝑥 ∈ 𝐴 𝜑 ↔ ∃𝑦 ∈ 𝐴 𝜓)
 
10-Jan-2024cbvralw 2758 Rule used to change bound variables, using implicit substitution. Version of cbvral 2761 with a disjoint variable condition. Although we don't do so yet, we expect this disjoint variable condition will allow us to remove reliance on ax-i12 1553 and ax-bndl 1555 in the proof. (Contributed by NM, 31-Jul-2003.) (Revised by GG, 10-Jan-2024.)
Ⅎ𝑦𝜑    &   Ⅎ𝑥𝜓    &   (𝑥 = 𝑦 → (𝜑 ↔ 𝜓))    ⇒   (∀𝑥 ∈ 𝐴 𝜑 ↔ ∀𝑦 ∈ 𝐴 𝜓)
 
10-Jan-2024cbvrexfw 2755 Rule used to change bound variables, using implicit substitution. Version of cbvrexf 2757 with a disjoint variable condition. Although we don't do so yet, we expect this disjoint variable condition will allow us to remove reliance on ax-i12 1553 and ax-bndl 1555 in the proof. (Contributed by FL, 27-Apr-2008.) (Revised by GG, 10-Jan-2024.)
Ⅎ𝑥𝐴    &   Ⅎ𝑦𝐴    &   Ⅎ𝑦𝜑    &   Ⅎ𝑥𝜓    &   (𝑥 = 𝑦 → (𝜑 ↔ 𝜓))    ⇒   (∃𝑥 ∈ 𝐴 𝜑 ↔ ∃𝑦 ∈ 𝐴 𝜓)
 
10-Jan-2024nfralw 2567 Bound-variable hypothesis builder for restricted quantification. See nfralya 2570 for a version with 𝑦 and 𝐴 distinct instead of 𝑥 and 𝑦. (Contributed by NM, 1-Sep-1999.) (Revised by GG, 10-Jan-2024.)
Ⅎ𝑥𝐴    &   Ⅎ𝑥𝜑    ⇒   Ⅎ𝑥∀𝑦 ∈ 𝐴 𝜑
 
10-Jan-2024nfraldw 2562 Not-free for restricted universal quantification where 𝑥 and 𝑦 are distinct. See nfraldya 2565 for a version with 𝑦 and 𝐴 distinct instead. (Contributed by NM, 15-Feb-2013.) (Revised by GG, 10-Jan-2024.)
Ⅎ𝑦𝜑    &   (𝜑 → Ⅎ𝑥𝐴)    &   (𝜑 → Ⅎ𝑥𝜓)    ⇒   (𝜑 → Ⅎ𝑥∀𝑦 ∈ 𝐴 𝜓)
 
10-Jan-2024nfabdw 2391 Bound-variable hypothesis builder for a class abstraction. Version of nfabd 2392 with a disjoint variable condition. (Contributed by Mario Carneiro, 8-Oct-2016.) (Revised by GG, 10-Jan-2024.)
Ⅎ𝑦𝜑    &   (𝜑 → Ⅎ𝑥𝜓)    ⇒   (𝜑 → Ⅎ𝑥{𝑦 ∣ 𝜓})
 
10-Jan-2024cbvex2vw 1980 Rule used to change bound variables, using implicit substitution. (Contributed by NM, 26-Jul-1995.) (Revised by GG, 10-Jan-2024.)
((𝑥 = 𝑧 ∧ 𝑦 = 𝑤) → (𝜑 ↔ 𝜓))    ⇒   (∃𝑥∃𝑦𝜑 ↔ ∃𝑧∃𝑤𝜓)
 
10-Jan-2024cbval2vw 1979 Rule used to change bound variables, using implicit substitution. (Contributed by NM, 4-Feb-2005.) (Revised by GG, 10-Jan-2024.)
((𝑥 = 𝑧 ∧ 𝑦 = 𝑤) → (𝜑 ↔ 𝜓))    ⇒   (∀𝑥∀𝑦𝜑 ↔ ∀𝑧∀𝑤𝜓)
 
10-Jan-2024cbv2w 1796 Rule used to change bound variables, using implicit substitution. Version of cbv2 1795 with a disjoint variable condition. (Contributed by NM, 5-Aug-1993.) (Revised by GG, 10-Jan-2024.)
Ⅎ𝑥𝜑    &   Ⅎ𝑦𝜑    &   (𝜑 → Ⅎ𝑦𝜓)    &   (𝜑 → Ⅎ𝑥𝜒)    &   (𝜑 → (𝑥 = 𝑦 → (𝜓 ↔ 𝜒)))    ⇒   (𝜑 → (∀𝑥𝜓 ↔ ∀𝑦𝜒))
 
9-Jan-2024suplocexprlemloc 7924 Lemma for suplocexpr 7928. The putative supremum is located. (Contributed by Jim Kingdon, 9-Jan-2024.)
(𝜑 → ∃𝑥 𝑥 ∈ 𝐴)    &   (𝜑 → ∃𝑥 ∈ P ∀𝑦 ∈ 𝐴 𝑦<P 𝑥)    &   (𝜑 → ∀𝑥 ∈ P ∀𝑦 ∈ P (𝑥<P 𝑦 → (∃𝑧 ∈ 𝐴 𝑥<P 𝑧 ∨ ∀𝑧 ∈ 𝐴 𝑧<P 𝑦)))    &   𝐵 = ⟨∪ (1st “ 𝐴), {𝑢 ∈ Q ∣ ∃𝑤 ∈ ∩ (2nd “ 𝐴)𝑤 <Q 𝑢}⟩    ⇒   (𝜑 → ∀𝑞 ∈ Q ∀𝑟 ∈ Q (𝑞 <Q 𝑟 → (𝑞 ∈ ∪ (1st “ 𝐴) ∨ 𝑟 ∈ (2nd ‘𝐵))))
 
9-Jan-2024suplocexprlemdisj 7923 Lemma for suplocexpr 7928. The putative supremum is disjoint. (Contributed by Jim Kingdon, 9-Jan-2024.)
(𝜑 → ∃𝑥 𝑥 ∈ 𝐴)    &   (𝜑 → ∃𝑥 ∈ P ∀𝑦 ∈ 𝐴 𝑦<P 𝑥)    &   (𝜑 → ∀𝑥 ∈ P ∀𝑦 ∈ P (𝑥<P 𝑦 → (∃𝑧 ∈ 𝐴 𝑥<P 𝑧 ∨ ∀𝑧 ∈ 𝐴 𝑧<P 𝑦)))    &   𝐵 = ⟨∪ (1st “ 𝐴), {𝑢 ∈ Q ∣ ∃𝑤 ∈ ∩ (2nd “ 𝐴)𝑤 <Q 𝑢}⟩    ⇒   (𝜑 → ∀𝑞 ∈ Q ¬ (𝑞 ∈ ∪ (1st “ 𝐴) ∧ 𝑞 ∈ (2nd ‘𝐵)))
 
9-Jan-2024suplocexprlemru 7922 Lemma for suplocexpr 7928. The upper cut of the putative supremum is rounded. (Contributed by Jim Kingdon, 9-Jan-2024.)
(𝜑 → ∃𝑥 𝑥 ∈ 𝐴)    &   (𝜑 → ∃𝑥 ∈ P ∀𝑦 ∈ 𝐴 𝑦<P 𝑥)    &   (𝜑 → ∀𝑥 ∈ P ∀𝑦 ∈ P (𝑥<P 𝑦 → (∃𝑧 ∈ 𝐴 𝑥<P 𝑧 ∨ ∀𝑧 ∈ 𝐴 𝑧<P 𝑦)))    &   𝐵 = ⟨∪ (1st “ 𝐴), {𝑢 ∈ Q ∣ ∃𝑤 ∈ ∩ (2nd “ 𝐴)𝑤 <Q 𝑢}⟩    ⇒   (𝜑 → ∀𝑟 ∈ Q (𝑟 ∈ (2nd ‘𝐵) ↔ ∃𝑞 ∈ Q (𝑞 <Q 𝑟 ∧ 𝑞 ∈ (2nd ‘𝐵))))
 
9-Jan-2024suplocexprlemrl 7920 Lemma for suplocexpr 7928. The lower cut of the putative supremum is rounded. (Contributed by Jim Kingdon, 9-Jan-2024.)
(𝜑 → ∃𝑥 𝑥 ∈ 𝐴)    &   (𝜑 → ∃𝑥 ∈ P ∀𝑦 ∈ 𝐴 𝑦<P 𝑥)    &   (𝜑 → ∀𝑥 ∈ P ∀𝑦 ∈ P (𝑥<P 𝑦 → (∃𝑧 ∈ 𝐴 𝑥<P 𝑧 ∨ ∀𝑧 ∈ 𝐴 𝑧<P 𝑦)))    ⇒   (𝜑 → ∀𝑞 ∈ Q (𝑞 ∈ ∪ (1st “ 𝐴) ↔ ∃𝑟 ∈ Q (𝑞 <Q 𝑟 ∧ 𝑟 ∈ ∪ (1st “ 𝐴))))
 
9-Jan-2024suplocexprlem2b 7917 Lemma for suplocexpr 7928. Expression for the lower cut of the putative supremum. (Contributed by Jim Kingdon, 9-Jan-2024.)
𝐵 = ⟨∪ (1st “ 𝐴), {𝑢 ∈ Q ∣ ∃𝑤 ∈ ∩ (2nd “ 𝐴)𝑤 <Q 𝑢}⟩    ⇒   (𝐴 ⊆ P → (2nd ‘𝐵) = {𝑢 ∈ Q ∣ ∃𝑤 ∈ ∩ (2nd “ 𝐴)𝑤 <Q 𝑢})
 
9-Jan-2024suplocexprlemell 7916 Lemma for suplocexpr 7928. Membership in the lower cut of the putative supremum. (Contributed by Jim Kingdon, 9-Jan-2024.)
(𝐵 ∈ ∪ (1st “ 𝐴) ↔ ∃𝑥 ∈ 𝐴 𝐵 ∈ (1st ‘𝑥))
 
7-Jan-2024suplocexpr 7928 An inhabited, bounded-above, located set of positive reals has a supremum. (Contributed by Jim Kingdon, 7-Jan-2024.)
(𝜑 → ∃𝑥 𝑥 ∈ 𝐴)    &   (𝜑 → ∃𝑥 ∈ P ∀𝑦 ∈ 𝐴 𝑦<P 𝑥)    &   (𝜑 → ∀𝑥 ∈ P ∀𝑦 ∈ P (𝑥<P 𝑦 → (∃𝑧 ∈ 𝐴 𝑥<P 𝑧 ∨ ∀𝑧 ∈ 𝐴 𝑧<P 𝑦)))    ⇒   (𝜑 → ∃𝑥 ∈ P (∀𝑦 ∈ 𝐴 ¬ 𝑥<P 𝑦 ∧ ∀𝑦 ∈ P (𝑦<P 𝑥 → ∃𝑧 ∈ 𝐴 𝑦<P 𝑧)))
 
7-Jan-2024suplocexprlemex 7925 Lemma for suplocexpr 7928. The putative supremum is a positive real. (Contributed by Jim Kingdon, 7-Jan-2024.)
(𝜑 → ∃𝑥 𝑥 ∈ 𝐴)    &   (𝜑 → ∃𝑥 ∈ P ∀𝑦 ∈ 𝐴 𝑦<P 𝑥)    &   (𝜑 → ∀𝑥 ∈ P ∀𝑦 ∈ P (𝑥<P 𝑦 → (∃𝑧 ∈ 𝐴 𝑥<P 𝑧 ∨ ∀𝑧 ∈ 𝐴 𝑧<P 𝑦)))    &   𝐵 = ⟨∪ (1st “ 𝐴), {𝑢 ∈ Q ∣ ∃𝑤 ∈ ∩ (2nd “ 𝐴)𝑤 <Q 𝑢}⟩    ⇒   (𝜑 → 𝐵 ∈ P)
 
7-Jan-2024suplocexprlemmu 7921 Lemma for suplocexpr 7928. The upper cut of the putative supremum is inhabited. (Contributed by Jim Kingdon, 7-Jan-2024.)
(𝜑 → ∃𝑥 𝑥 ∈ 𝐴)    &   (𝜑 → ∃𝑥 ∈ P ∀𝑦 ∈ 𝐴 𝑦<P 𝑥)    &   (𝜑 → ∀𝑥 ∈ P ∀𝑦 ∈ P (𝑥<P 𝑦 → (∃𝑧 ∈ 𝐴 𝑥<P 𝑧 ∨ ∀𝑧 ∈ 𝐴 𝑧<P 𝑦)))    &   𝐵 = ⟨∪ (1st “ 𝐴), {𝑢 ∈ Q ∣ ∃𝑤 ∈ ∩ (2nd “ 𝐴)𝑤 <Q 𝑢}⟩    ⇒   (𝜑 → ∃𝑠 ∈ Q 𝑠 ∈ (2nd ‘𝐵))
 
7-Jan-2024suplocexprlemml 7919 Lemma for suplocexpr 7928. The lower cut of the putative supremum is inhabited. (Contributed by Jim Kingdon, 7-Jan-2024.)
(𝜑 → ∃𝑥 𝑥 ∈ 𝐴)    &   (𝜑 → ∃𝑥 ∈ P ∀𝑦 ∈ 𝐴 𝑦<P 𝑥)    &   (𝜑 → ∀𝑥 ∈ P ∀𝑦 ∈ P (𝑥<P 𝑦 → (∃𝑧 ∈ 𝐴 𝑥<P 𝑧 ∨ ∀𝑧 ∈ 𝐴 𝑧<P 𝑦)))    ⇒   (𝜑 → ∃𝑠 ∈ Q 𝑠 ∈ ∪ (1st “ 𝐴))
 
7-Jan-2024suplocexprlemss 7918 Lemma for suplocexpr 7928. 𝐴 is a set of positive reals. (Contributed by Jim Kingdon, 7-Jan-2024.)
(𝜑 → ∃𝑥 𝑥 ∈ 𝐴)    &   (𝜑 → ∃𝑥 ∈ P ∀𝑦 ∈ 𝐴 𝑦<P 𝑥)    &   (𝜑 → ∀𝑥 ∈ P ∀𝑦 ∈ P (𝑥<P 𝑦 → (∃𝑧 ∈ 𝐴 𝑥<P 𝑧 ∨ ∀𝑧 ∈ 𝐴 𝑧<P 𝑦)))    ⇒   (𝜑 → 𝐴 ⊆ P)
 
5-Jan-2024dedekindicclemicc 15327 Lemma for dedekindicc 15328. Same as dedekindicc 15328, except that we merely show 𝑥 to be an element of (𝐴[,]𝐵). Later we will strengthen that to (𝐴(,)𝐵). (Contributed by Jim Kingdon, 5-Jan-2024.)
(𝜑 → 𝐴 ∈ ℝ)    &   (𝜑 → 𝐵 ∈ ℝ)    &   (𝜑 → 𝐿 ⊆ (𝐴[,]𝐵))    &   (𝜑 → 𝑈 ⊆ (𝐴[,]𝐵))    &   (𝜑 → ∃𝑞 ∈ (𝐴[,]𝐵)𝑞 ∈ 𝐿)    &   (𝜑 → ∃𝑟 ∈ (𝐴[,]𝐵)𝑟 ∈ 𝑈)    &   (𝜑 → ∀𝑞 ∈ (𝐴[,]𝐵)(𝑞 ∈ 𝐿 ↔ ∃𝑟 ∈ 𝐿 𝑞 < 𝑟))    &   (𝜑 → ∀𝑟 ∈ (𝐴[,]𝐵)(𝑟 ∈ 𝑈 ↔ ∃𝑞 ∈ 𝑈 𝑞 < 𝑟))    &   (𝜑 → (𝐿 ∩ 𝑈) = ∅)    &   (𝜑 → ∀𝑞 ∈ (𝐴[,]𝐵)∀𝑟 ∈ (𝐴[,]𝐵)(𝑞 < 𝑟 → (𝑞 ∈ 𝐿 ∨ 𝑟 ∈ 𝑈)))    &   (𝜑 → 𝐴 < 𝐵)    ⇒   (𝜑 → ∃!𝑥 ∈ (𝐴[,]𝐵)(∀𝑞 ∈ 𝐿 𝑞 < 𝑥 ∧ ∀𝑟 ∈ 𝑈 𝑥 < 𝑟))
 
5-Jan-2024dedekindeu 15318 A Dedekind cut identifies a unique real number. Similar to df-inp 7669 except that the the Dedekind cut is formed by sets of reals (rather than positive rationals). But in both cases the defining property of a Dedekind cut is that it is inhabited (bounded), rounded, disjoint, and located. (Contributed by Jim Kingdon, 5-Jan-2024.)
(𝜑 → 𝐿 ⊆ ℝ)    &   (𝜑 → 𝑈 ⊆ ℝ)    &   (𝜑 → ∃𝑞 ∈ ℝ 𝑞 ∈ 𝐿)    &   (𝜑 → ∃𝑟 ∈ ℝ 𝑟 ∈ 𝑈)    &   (𝜑 → ∀𝑞 ∈ ℝ (𝑞 ∈ 𝐿 ↔ ∃𝑟 ∈ 𝐿 𝑞 < 𝑟))    &   (𝜑 → ∀𝑟 ∈ ℝ (𝑟 ∈ 𝑈 ↔ ∃𝑞 ∈ 𝑈 𝑞 < 𝑟))    &   (𝜑 → (𝐿 ∩ 𝑈) = ∅)    &   (𝜑 → ∀𝑞 ∈ ℝ ∀𝑟 ∈ ℝ (𝑞 < 𝑟 → (𝑞 ∈ 𝐿 ∨ 𝑟 ∈ 𝑈)))    ⇒   (𝜑 → ∃!𝑥 ∈ ℝ (∀𝑞 ∈ 𝐿 𝑞 < 𝑥 ∧ ∀𝑟 ∈ 𝑈 𝑥 < 𝑟))
 
1-Jan-2024ccatlen 11148 The length of a concatenated word. (Contributed by Stefan O'Rear, 15-Aug-2015.) (Revised by JJ, 1-Jan-2024.)
((𝑆 ∈ Word 𝐴 ∧ 𝑇 ∈ Word 𝐵) → (♯‘(𝑆 ++ 𝑇)) = ((♯‘𝑆) + (♯‘𝑇)))
 
31-Dec-2023dvmptsubcn 15418 Function-builder for derivative, subtraction rule. (Contributed by Mario Carneiro, 1-Sep-2014.) (Revised by Jim Kingdon, 31-Dec-2023.)
((𝜑 ∧ 𝑥 ∈ ℂ) → 𝐴 ∈ ℂ)    &   ((𝜑 ∧ 𝑥 ∈ ℂ) → 𝐵 ∈ 𝑉)    &   (𝜑 → (ℂ D (𝑥 ∈ ℂ ↦ 𝐴)) = (𝑥 ∈ ℂ ↦ 𝐵))    &   ((𝜑 ∧ 𝑥 ∈ ℂ) → 𝐶 ∈ ℂ)    &   ((𝜑 ∧ 𝑥 ∈ ℂ) → 𝐷 ∈ 𝑊)    &   (𝜑 → (ℂ D (𝑥 ∈ ℂ ↦ 𝐶)) = (𝑥 ∈ ℂ ↦ 𝐷))    ⇒   (𝜑 → (ℂ D (𝑥 ∈ ℂ ↦ (𝐴 − 𝐶))) = (𝑥 ∈ ℂ ↦ (𝐵 − 𝐷)))
 
31-Dec-2023dvmptnegcn 15417 Function-builder for derivative, product rule for negatives. (Contributed by Mario Carneiro, 1-Sep-2014.) (Revised by Jim Kingdon, 31-Dec-2023.)
((𝜑 ∧ 𝑥 ∈ ℂ) → 𝐴 ∈ ℂ)    &   ((𝜑 ∧ 𝑥 ∈ ℂ) → 𝐵 ∈ 𝑉)    &   (𝜑 → (ℂ D (𝑥 ∈ ℂ ↦ 𝐴)) = (𝑥 ∈ ℂ ↦ 𝐵))    ⇒   (𝜑 → (ℂ D (𝑥 ∈ ℂ ↦ -𝐴)) = (𝑥 ∈ ℂ ↦ -𝐵))
 
31-Dec-2023dvmptcmulcn 15416 Function-builder for derivative, product rule for constant multiplier. (Contributed by Mario Carneiro, 1-Sep-2014.) (Revised by Jim Kingdon, 31-Dec-2023.)
((𝜑 ∧ 𝑥 ∈ ℂ) → 𝐴 ∈ ℂ)    &   ((𝜑 ∧ 𝑥 ∈ ℂ) → 𝐵 ∈ 𝑉)    &   (𝜑 → (ℂ D (𝑥 ∈ ℂ ↦ 𝐴)) = (𝑥 ∈ ℂ ↦ 𝐵))    &   (𝜑 → 𝐶 ∈ ℂ)    ⇒   (𝜑 → (ℂ D (𝑥 ∈ ℂ ↦ (𝐶 · 𝐴))) = (𝑥 ∈ ℂ ↦ (𝐶 · 𝐵)))
 
31-Dec-2023rinvmod 13867 Uniqueness of a right inverse element in a commutative monoid, if it exists. Corresponds to caovimo 6208. (Contributed by AV, 31-Dec-2023.)
𝐵 = (Base‘𝐺)    &    0 = (0g‘𝐺)    &    + = (+g‘𝐺)    &   (𝜑 → 𝐺 ∈ CMnd)    &   (𝜑 → 𝐴 ∈ 𝐵)    ⇒   (𝜑 → ∃*𝑤 ∈ 𝐵 (𝐴 + 𝑤) = 0 )
 
31-Dec-2023brm 4134 If two sets are in a binary relation, the relation is inhabited. (Contributed by Jim Kingdon, 31-Dec-2023.)
(𝐴𝑅𝐵 → ∃𝑥 𝑥 ∈ 𝑅)
 
30-Dec-2023dvmptccn 15410 Function-builder for derivative: derivative of a constant. (Contributed by Mario Carneiro, 1-Sep-2014.) (Revised by Jim Kingdon, 30-Dec-2023.)
(𝜑 → 𝐴 ∈ ℂ)    ⇒   (𝜑 → (ℂ D (𝑥 ∈ ℂ ↦ 𝐴)) = (𝑥 ∈ ℂ ↦ 0))
 
30-Dec-2023dvmptidcn 15409 Function-builder for derivative: derivative of the identity. (Contributed by Mario Carneiro, 1-Sep-2014.) (Revised by Jim Kingdon, 30-Dec-2023.)
(ℂ D (𝑥 ∈ ℂ ↦ 𝑥)) = (𝑥 ∈ ℂ ↦ 1)
 
30-Dec-2023eqwrd 11130 Two words are equal iff they have the same length and the same symbol at each position. (Contributed by AV, 13-Apr-2018.) (Revised by JJ, 30-Dec-2023.)
((𝑈 ∈ Word 𝑆 ∧ 𝑊 ∈ Word 𝑇) → (𝑈 = 𝑊 ↔ ((♯‘𝑈) = (♯‘𝑊) ∧ ∀𝑖 ∈ (0..^(♯‘𝑈))(𝑈‘𝑖) = (𝑊‘𝑖))))
 
29-Dec-2023mndbn0 13485 The base set of a monoid is not empty. (It is also inhabited, as seen at mndidcl 13484). Statement in [Lang] p. 3. (Contributed by AV, 29-Dec-2023.)
𝐵 = (Base‘𝐺)    ⇒   (𝐺 ∈ Mnd → 𝐵 ≠ ∅)
 
28-Dec-2023mulgnn0gsum 13686 Group multiple (exponentiation) operation at a nonnegative integer expressed by a group sum. This corresponds to the definition in [Lang] p. 6, second formula. (Contributed by AV, 28-Dec-2023.)
𝐵 = (Base‘𝐺)    &    · = (.g‘𝐺)    &   𝐹 = (𝑥 ∈ (1...𝑁) ↦ 𝑋)    ⇒   ((𝑁 ∈ ℕ0 ∧ 𝑋 ∈ 𝐵) → (𝑁 · 𝑋) = (𝐺 Σg 𝐹))
 
28-Dec-2023mulgnngsum 13685 Group multiple (exponentiation) operation at a positive integer expressed by a group sum. (Contributed by AV, 28-Dec-2023.)
𝐵 = (Base‘𝐺)    &    · = (.g‘𝐺)    &   𝐹 = (𝑥 ∈ (1...𝑁) ↦ 𝑋)    ⇒   ((𝑁 ∈ ℕ ∧ 𝑋 ∈ 𝐵) → (𝑁 · 𝑋) = (𝐺 Σg 𝐹))
 
26-Dec-2023gsumfzreidx 13895 Re-index a finite group sum using a bijection. Corresponds to the first equation in [Lang] p. 5 with 𝑀 = 1. (Contributed by AV, 26-Dec-2023.)
𝐵 = (Base‘𝐺)    &    0 = (0g‘𝐺)    &   (𝜑 → 𝐺 ∈ CMnd)    &   (𝜑 → 𝑀 ∈ ℤ)    &   (𝜑 → 𝑁 ∈ ℤ)    &   (𝜑 → 𝐹:(𝑀...𝑁)⟶𝐵)    &   (𝜑 → 𝐻:(𝑀...𝑁)–1-1-onto→(𝑀...𝑁))    ⇒   (𝜑 → (𝐺 Σg 𝐹) = (𝐺 Σg (𝐹 ∘ 𝐻)))
 
26-Dec-2023gsumsplit1r 13452 Splitting off the rightmost summand of a group sum. This corresponds to the (inductive) definition of a (finite) product in [Lang] p. 4, first formula. (Contributed by AV, 26-Dec-2023.)
𝐵 = (Base‘𝐺)    &    + = (+g‘𝐺)    &   (𝜑 → 𝐺 ∈ 𝑉)    &   (𝜑 → 𝑀 ∈ ℤ)    &   (𝜑 → 𝑁 ∈ (ℤ≥‘𝑀))    &   (𝜑 → 𝐹:(𝑀...(𝑁 + 1))⟶𝐵)    ⇒   (𝜑 → (𝐺 Σg 𝐹) = ((𝐺 Σg (𝐹 ↾ (𝑀...𝑁))) + (𝐹‘(𝑁 + 1))))
 
26-Dec-2023lidrididd 13436 If there is a left and right identity element for any binary operation (group operation) +, the left identity element (and therefore also the right identity element according to lidrideqd 13435) is equal to the two-sided identity element. (Contributed by AV, 26-Dec-2023.)
(𝜑 → 𝐿 ∈ 𝐵)    &   (𝜑 → 𝑅 ∈ 𝐵)    &   (𝜑 → ∀𝑥 ∈ 𝐵 (𝐿 + 𝑥) = 𝑥)    &   (𝜑 → ∀𝑥 ∈ 𝐵 (𝑥 + 𝑅) = 𝑥)    &   𝐵 = (Base‘𝐺)    &    + = (+g‘𝐺)    &    0 = (0g‘𝐺)    ⇒   (𝜑 → 𝐿 = 0 )
 
26-Dec-2023lidrideqd 13435 If there is a left and right identity element for any binary operation (group operation) +, both identity elements are equal. Generalization of statement in [Lang] p. 3: it is sufficient that "e" is a left identity element and "e`" is a right identity element instead of both being (two-sided) identity elements. (Contributed by AV, 26-Dec-2023.)
(𝜑 → 𝐿 ∈ 𝐵)    &   (𝜑 → 𝑅 ∈ 𝐵)    &   (𝜑 → ∀𝑥 ∈ 𝐵 (𝐿 + 𝑥) = 𝑥)    &   (𝜑 → ∀𝑥 ∈ 𝐵 (𝑥 + 𝑅) = 𝑥)    ⇒   (𝜑 → 𝐿 = 𝑅)
 
25-Dec-2023ctfoex 7301 A countable class is a set. (Contributed by Jim Kingdon, 25-Dec-2023.)
(∃𝑓 𝑓:ω–onto→(𝐴 ⊔ 1o) → 𝐴 ∈ V)
 
23-Dec-2023enct 13025 Countability is invariant relative to equinumerosity. (Contributed by Jim Kingdon, 23-Dec-2023.)
(𝐴 ≈ 𝐵 → (∃𝑓 𝑓:ω–onto→(𝐴 ⊔ 1o) ↔ ∃𝑔 𝑔:ω–onto→(𝐵 ⊔ 1o)))
 
23-Dec-2023enctlem 13024 Lemma for enct 13025. One direction of the biconditional. (Contributed by Jim Kingdon, 23-Dec-2023.)
(𝐴 ≈ 𝐵 → (∃𝑓 𝑓:ω–onto→(𝐴 ⊔ 1o) → ∃𝑔 𝑔:ω–onto→(𝐵 ⊔ 1o)))
 
23-Dec-2023omct 7300 ω is countable. (Contributed by Jim Kingdon, 23-Dec-2023.)
∃𝑓 𝑓:ω–onto→(ω ⊔ 1o)
 
21-Dec-2023dvcoapbr 15402 The chain rule for derivatives at a point. The 𝑢 # 𝐶 → (𝐺‘𝑢) # (𝐺‘𝐶) hypothesis constrains what functions work for 𝐺. (Contributed by Mario Carneiro, 9-Aug-2014.) (Revised by Jim Kingdon, 21-Dec-2023.)
(𝜑 → 𝐹:𝑋⟶ℂ)    &   (𝜑 → 𝑋 ⊆ 𝑆)    &   (𝜑 → 𝐺:𝑌⟶𝑋)    &   (𝜑 → 𝑌 ⊆ 𝑇)    &   (𝜑 → ∀𝑢 ∈ 𝑌 (𝑢 # 𝐶 → (𝐺‘𝑢) # (𝐺‘𝐶)))    &   (𝜑 → 𝑆 ⊆ ℂ)    &   (𝜑 → 𝑇 ⊆ ℂ)    &   (𝜑 → (𝐺‘𝐶)(𝑆 D 𝐹)𝐾)    &   (𝜑 → 𝐶(𝑇 D 𝐺)𝐿)    &   𝐽 = (MetOpen‘(abs ∘ − ))    ⇒   (𝜑 → 𝐶(𝑇 D (𝐹 ∘ 𝐺))(𝐾 · 𝐿))
 
19-Dec-2023apsscn 8810 The points apart from a given point are complex numbers. (Contributed by Jim Kingdon, 19-Dec-2023.)
{𝑥 ∈ 𝐴 ∣ 𝑥 # 𝐵} ⊆ ℂ
 
19-Dec-2023aprcl 8809 Reverse closure for apartness. (Contributed by Jim Kingdon, 19-Dec-2023.)
(𝐴 # 𝐵 → (𝐴 ∈ ℂ ∧ 𝐵 ∈ ℂ))
 
18-Dec-2023limccoap 15373 Composition of two limits. This theorem is only usable in the case where 𝑥 # 𝑋 implies R(x) # 𝐶 so it is less general than might appear at first. (Contributed by Mario Carneiro, 29-Dec-2016.) (Revised by Jim Kingdon, 18-Dec-2023.)
((𝜑 ∧ 𝑥 ∈ {𝑤 ∈ 𝐴 ∣ 𝑤 # 𝑋}) → 𝑅 ∈ {𝑤 ∈ 𝐵 ∣ 𝑤 # 𝐶})    &   ((𝜑 ∧ 𝑦 ∈ {𝑤 ∈ 𝐵 ∣ 𝑤 # 𝐶}) → 𝑆 ∈ ℂ)    &   (𝜑 → 𝐶 ∈ ((𝑥 ∈ {𝑤 ∈ 𝐴 ∣ 𝑤 # 𝑋} ↦ 𝑅) limℂ 𝑋))    &   (𝜑 → 𝐷 ∈ ((𝑦 ∈ {𝑤 ∈ 𝐵 ∣ 𝑤 # 𝐶} ↦ 𝑆) limℂ 𝐶))    &   (𝑦 = 𝑅 → 𝑆 = 𝑇)    ⇒   (𝜑 → 𝐷 ∈ ((𝑥 ∈ {𝑤 ∈ 𝐴 ∣ 𝑤 # 𝑋} ↦ 𝑇) limℂ 𝑋))
 
16-Dec-2023cnreim 11510 Complex apartness in terms of real and imaginary parts. See also apreim 8766 which is similar but with different notation. (Contributed by Jim Kingdon, 16-Dec-2023.)
((𝐴 ∈ ℂ ∧ 𝐵 ∈ ℂ) → (𝐴 # 𝐵 ↔ ((ℜ‘𝐴) # (ℜ‘𝐵) ∨ (ℑ‘𝐴) # (ℑ‘𝐵))))
 
14-Dec-2023cnopnap 15306 The complex numbers apart from a given complex number form an open set. (Contributed by Jim Kingdon, 14-Dec-2023.)
(𝐴 ∈ ℂ → {𝑤 ∈ ℂ ∣ 𝑤 # 𝐴} ∈ (MetOpen‘(abs ∘ − )))
 
14-Dec-2023cnovex 14891 The class of all continuous functions from a topology to another is a set. (Contributed by Jim Kingdon, 14-Dec-2023.)
((𝐽 ∈ Top ∧ 𝐾 ∈ Top) → (𝐽 Cn 𝐾) ∈ V)
 
13-Dec-2023reopnap 15241 The real numbers apart from a given real number form an open set. (Contributed by Jim Kingdon, 13-Dec-2023.)
(𝐴 ∈ ℝ → {𝑤 ∈ ℝ ∣ 𝑤 # 𝐴} ∈ (topGen‘ran (,)))
 
12-Dec-2023cnopncntop 15239 The set of complex numbers is open with respect to the standard topology on complex numbers. (Contributed by Glauco Siliprandi, 11-Dec-2019.) (Revised by Jim Kingdon, 12-Dec-2023.)
ℂ ∈ (MetOpen‘(abs ∘ − ))
 
12-Dec-2023unicntopcntop 15237 The underlying set of the standard topology on the complex numbers is the set of complex numbers. (Contributed by Glauco Siliprandi, 11-Dec-2019.) (Revised by Jim Kingdon, 12-Dec-2023.)
ℂ = ∪ (MetOpen‘(abs ∘ − ))
 
4-Dec-2023bj-pm2.18st 16223 Clavius law for stable formulas. See pm2.18dc 860. (Contributed by BJ, 4-Dec-2023.)
(STAB 𝜑 → ((¬ 𝜑 → 𝜑) → 𝜑))
 
4-Dec-2023bj-nnclavius 16210 Clavius law with doubly negated consequent. (Contributed by BJ, 4-Dec-2023.)
((¬ 𝜑 → 𝜑) → ¬ ¬ 𝜑)
 
2-Dec-2023dvmulxx 15399 The product rule for derivatives at a point. For the (more general) relation version, see dvmulxxbr 15397. (Contributed by Mario Carneiro, 9-Aug-2014.) (Revised by Jim Kingdon, 2-Dec-2023.)
(𝜑 → 𝐹:𝑋⟶ℂ)    &   (𝜑 → 𝑋 ⊆ 𝑆)    &   (𝜑 → 𝐺:𝑋⟶ℂ)    &   (𝜑 → 𝑆 ∈ {ℝ, ℂ})    &   (𝜑 → 𝐶 ∈ dom (𝑆 D 𝐹))    &   (𝜑 → 𝐶 ∈ dom (𝑆 D 𝐺))    ⇒   (𝜑 → ((𝑆 D (𝐹 ∘𝑓 · 𝐺))‘𝐶) = ((((𝑆 D 𝐹)‘𝐶) · (𝐺‘𝐶)) + (((𝑆 D 𝐺)‘𝐶) · (𝐹‘𝐶))))
 
1-Dec-2023dvmulxxbr 15397 The product rule for derivatives at a point. For the (simpler but more limited) function version, see dvmulxx 15399. (Contributed by Mario Carneiro, 9-Aug-2014.) (Revised by Jim Kingdon, 1-Dec-2023.)
(𝜑 → 𝐹:𝑋⟶ℂ)    &   (𝜑 → 𝑋 ⊆ 𝑆)    &   (𝜑 → 𝐺:𝑋⟶ℂ)    &   (𝜑 → 𝑆 ⊆ ℂ)    &   (𝜑 → 𝐶(𝑆 D 𝐹)𝐾)    &   (𝜑 → 𝐶(𝑆 D 𝐺)𝐿)    &   𝐽 = (MetOpen‘(abs ∘ − ))    ⇒   (𝜑 → 𝐶(𝑆 D (𝐹 ∘𝑓 · 𝐺))((𝐾 · (𝐺‘𝐶)) + (𝐿 · (𝐹‘𝐶))))
 
29-Nov-2023subctctexmid 16479 If every subcountable set is countable and Markov's principle holds, excluded middle follows. Proposition 2.6 of [BauerSwan], p. 14:4. The proof is taken from that paper. (Contributed by Jim Kingdon, 29-Nov-2023.)
(𝜑 → ∀𝑥(∃𝑠(𝑠 ⊆ ω ∧ ∃𝑓 𝑓:𝑠–onto→𝑥) → ∃𝑔 𝑔:ω–onto→(𝑥 ⊔ 1o)))    &   (𝜑 → ω ∈ Markov)    ⇒   (𝜑 → EXMID)
 
29-Nov-2023ismkvnex 7338 The predicate of being Markov stated in terms of double negation and comparison with 1o. (Contributed by Jim Kingdon, 29-Nov-2023.)
(𝐴 ∈ 𝑉 → (𝐴 ∈ Markov ↔ ∀𝑓 ∈ (2o ↑𝑚 𝐴)(¬ ¬ ∃𝑥 ∈ 𝐴 (𝑓‘𝑥) = 1o → ∃𝑥 ∈ 𝐴 (𝑓‘𝑥) = 1o)))
 
28-Nov-2023ccfunen 7466 Existence of a choice function for a countably infinite set. (Contributed by Jim Kingdon, 28-Nov-2023.)
(𝜑 → CCHOICE)    &   (𝜑 → 𝐴 ≈ ω)    &   (𝜑 → ∀𝑥 ∈ 𝐴 ∃𝑤 𝑤 ∈ 𝑥)    ⇒   (𝜑 → ∃𝑓(𝑓 Fn 𝐴 ∧ ∀𝑥 ∈ 𝐴 (𝑓‘𝑥) ∈ 𝑥))
 
28-Nov-2023exmid1stab 4293 If every proposition is stable, excluded middle follows. We are thinking of 𝑥 as a proposition and 𝑥 = {∅} as "𝑥 is true". (Contributed by Jim Kingdon, 28-Nov-2023.)
((𝜑 ∧ 𝑥 ⊆ {∅}) → STAB 𝑥 = {∅})    ⇒   (𝜑 → EXMID)
 
27-Nov-2023df-cc 7465 The expression CCHOICE will be used as a readable shorthand for any form of countable choice, analogous to df-ac 7404 for full choice. (Contributed by Jim Kingdon, 27-Nov-2023.)
(CCHOICE ↔ ∀𝑥(dom 𝑥 ≈ ω → ∃𝑓(𝑓 ⊆ 𝑥 ∧ 𝑓 Fn dom 𝑥)))
 
26-Nov-2023offeq 6241 Convert an identity of the operation to the analogous identity on the function operation. (Contributed by Jim Kingdon, 26-Nov-2023.)
((𝜑 ∧ (𝑥 ∈ 𝑆 ∧ 𝑦 ∈ 𝑇)) → (𝑥𝑅𝑦) ∈ 𝑈)    &   (𝜑 → 𝐹:𝐴⟶𝑆)    &   (𝜑 → 𝐺:𝐵⟶𝑇)    &   (𝜑 → 𝐴 ∈ 𝑉)    &   (𝜑 → 𝐵 ∈ 𝑊)    &   (𝐴 ∩ 𝐵) = 𝐶    &   (𝜑 → 𝐻:𝐶⟶𝑈)    &   ((𝜑 ∧ 𝑥 ∈ 𝐴) → (𝐹‘𝑥) = 𝐷)    &   ((𝜑 ∧ 𝑥 ∈ 𝐵) → (𝐺‘𝑥) = 𝐸)    &   ((𝜑 ∧ 𝑥 ∈ 𝐶) → (𝐷𝑅𝐸) = (𝐻‘𝑥))    ⇒   (𝜑 → (𝐹 ∘𝑓 𝑅𝐺) = 𝐻)
 
25-Nov-2023dvaddxx 15398 The sum rule for derivatives at a point. For the (more general) relation version, see dvaddxxbr 15396. (Contributed by Mario Carneiro, 9-Aug-2014.) (Revised by Jim Kingdon, 25-Nov-2023.)
(𝜑 → 𝐹:𝑋⟶ℂ)    &   (𝜑 → 𝑋 ⊆ 𝑆)    &   (𝜑 → 𝐺:𝑋⟶ℂ)    &   (𝜑 → 𝑆 ∈ {ℝ, ℂ})    &   (𝜑 → 𝐶 ∈ dom (𝑆 D 𝐹))    &   (𝜑 → 𝐶 ∈ dom (𝑆 D 𝐺))    ⇒   (𝜑 → ((𝑆 D (𝐹 ∘𝑓 + 𝐺))‘𝐶) = (((𝑆 D 𝐹)‘𝐶) + ((𝑆 D 𝐺)‘𝐶)))
 
25-Nov-2023dvaddxxbr 15396 The sum rule for derivatives at a point. That is, if the derivative of 𝐹 at 𝐶 is 𝐾 and the derivative of 𝐺 at 𝐶 is 𝐿, then the derivative of the pointwise sum of those two functions at 𝐶 is 𝐾 + 𝐿. (Contributed by Mario Carneiro, 9-Aug-2014.) (Revised by Jim Kingdon, 25-Nov-2023.)
(𝜑 → 𝐹:𝑋⟶ℂ)    &   (𝜑 → 𝑋 ⊆ 𝑆)    &   (𝜑 → 𝐺:𝑋⟶ℂ)    &   (𝜑 → 𝑆 ⊆ ℂ)    &   (𝜑 → 𝐶(𝑆 D 𝐹)𝐾)    &   (𝜑 → 𝐶(𝑆 D 𝐺)𝐿)    &   𝐽 = (MetOpen‘(abs ∘ − ))    ⇒   (𝜑 → 𝐶(𝑆 D (𝐹 ∘𝑓 + 𝐺))(𝐾 + 𝐿))
 
25-Nov-2023dcnn 853 Decidability of the negation of a proposition is equivalent to decidability of its double negation. See also dcn 847. The relation between dcn 847 and dcnn 853 is analogous to that between notnot 632 and notnotnot 637 (and directly stems from it). Using the notion of "testable proposition" (proposition whose negation is decidable), dcnn 853 means that a proposition is testable if and only if its negation is testable, and dcn 847 means that decidability implies testability. (Contributed by David A. Wheeler, 6-Dec-2018.) (Proof shortened by BJ, 25-Nov-2023.)
(DECID ¬ 𝜑 ↔ DECID ¬ ¬ 𝜑)
 
24-Nov-2023bj-dcst 16234 Stability of a proposition is decidable if and only if that proposition is stable. (Contributed by BJ, 24-Nov-2023.)
(DECID STAB 𝜑 ↔ STAB 𝜑)
 
24-Nov-2023bj-nnbidc 16230 If a formula is not refutable, then it is decidable if and only if it is provable. See also comment of bj-nnbist 16217. (Contributed by BJ, 24-Nov-2023.)
(¬ ¬ 𝜑 → (DECID 𝜑 ↔ 𝜑))
 
24-Nov-2023bj-dcstab 16229 A decidable formula is stable. (Contributed by BJ, 24-Nov-2023.) (Proof modification is discouraged.)
(DECID 𝜑 → STAB 𝜑)
 
24-Nov-2023bj-fadc 16227 A refutable formula is decidable. (Contributed by BJ, 24-Nov-2023.)
(¬ 𝜑 → DECID 𝜑)
 
24-Nov-2023bj-trdc 16225 A provable formula is decidable. (Contributed by BJ, 24-Nov-2023.)
(𝜑 → DECID 𝜑)
 
24-Nov-2023bj-stal 16222 The universal quantification of a stable formula is stable. See bj-stim 16219 for implication, stabnot 838 for negation, and bj-stan 16220 for conjunction. (Contributed by BJ, 24-Nov-2023.)
(∀𝑥STAB 𝜑 → STAB ∀𝑥𝜑)
 
24-Nov-2023bj-stand 16221 The conjunction of two stable formulas is stable. Deduction form of bj-stan 16220. Its proof is shorter (when counting all steps, including syntactic steps), so one could prove it first and then bj-stan 16220 from it, the usual way. (Contributed by BJ, 24-Nov-2023.) (Proof modification is discouraged.)
(𝜑 → STAB 𝜓)    &   (𝜑 → STAB 𝜒)    ⇒   (𝜑 → STAB (𝜓 ∧ 𝜒))
 
24-Nov-2023bj-stan 16220 The conjunction of two stable formulas is stable. See bj-stim 16219 for implication, stabnot 838 for negation, and bj-stal 16222 for universal quantification. (Contributed by BJ, 24-Nov-2023.)
((STAB 𝜑 ∧ STAB 𝜓) → STAB (𝜑 ∧ 𝜓))
 
24-Nov-2023bj-stim 16219 A conjunction with a stable consequent is stable. See stabnot 838 for negation , bj-stan 16220 for conjunction , and bj-stal 16222 for universal quantification. (Contributed by BJ, 24-Nov-2023.)
(STAB 𝜓 → STAB (𝜑 → 𝜓))
 
24-Nov-2023bj-nnbist 16217 If a formula is not refutable, then it is stable if and only if it is provable. By double-negation translation, if 𝜑 is a classical tautology, then ¬ ¬ 𝜑 is an intuitionistic tautology. Therefore, if 𝜑 is a classical tautology, then 𝜑 is intuitionistically equivalent to its stability (and to its decidability, see bj-nnbidc 16230). (Contributed by BJ, 24-Nov-2023.)
(¬ ¬ 𝜑 → (STAB 𝜑 ↔ 𝜑))
 
24-Nov-2023bj-fast 16214 A refutable formula is stable. (Contributed by BJ, 24-Nov-2023.)
(¬ 𝜑 → STAB 𝜑)
 
24-Nov-2023bj-trst 16212 A provable formula is stable. (Contributed by BJ, 24-Nov-2023.)
(𝜑 → STAB 𝜑)
 
24-Nov-2023bj-nnan 16209 The double negation of a conjunction implies the conjunction of the double negations. (Contributed by BJ, 24-Nov-2023.)
(¬ ¬ (𝜑 ∧ 𝜓) → (¬ ¬ 𝜑 ∧ ¬ ¬ 𝜓))
 
24-Nov-2023bj-nnim 16208 The double negation of an implication implies the implication with the consequent doubly negated. (Contributed by BJ, 24-Nov-2023.)
(¬ ¬ (𝜑 → 𝜓) → (𝜑 → ¬ ¬ 𝜓))
 
24-Nov-2023bj-nnsn 16206 As far as implying a negated formula is concerned, a formula is equivalent to its double negation. (Contributed by BJ, 24-Nov-2023.)
((𝜑 → ¬ 𝜓) ↔ (¬ ¬ 𝜑 → ¬ 𝜓))
 
24-Nov-2023nnal 1695 The double negation of a universal quantification implies the universal quantification of the double negation. (Contributed by BJ, 24-Nov-2023.)
(¬ ¬ ∀𝑥𝜑 → ∀𝑥 ¬ ¬ 𝜑)
 
22-Nov-2023ofvalg 6237 Evaluate a function operation at a point. (Contributed by Mario Carneiro, 20-Jul-2014.) (Revised by Jim Kingdon, 22-Nov-2023.)
(𝜑 → 𝐹 Fn 𝐴)    &   (𝜑 → 𝐺 Fn 𝐵)    &   (𝜑 → 𝐴 ∈ 𝑉)    &   (𝜑 → 𝐵 ∈ 𝑊)    &   (𝐴 ∩ 𝐵) = 𝑆    &   ((𝜑 ∧ 𝑋 ∈ 𝐴) → (𝐹‘𝑋) = 𝐶)    &   ((𝜑 ∧ 𝑋 ∈ 𝐵) → (𝐺‘𝑋) = 𝐷)    &   ((𝜑 ∧ 𝑋 ∈ 𝑆) → (𝐶𝑅𝐷) ∈ 𝑈)    ⇒   ((𝜑 ∧ 𝑋 ∈ 𝑆) → ((𝐹 ∘𝑓 𝑅𝐺)‘𝑋) = (𝐶𝑅𝐷))
 
21-Nov-2023exmidac 7407 The axiom of choice implies excluded middle. See acexmid 6009 for more discussion of this theorem and a way of stating it without using CHOICE or EXMID. (Contributed by Jim Kingdon, 21-Nov-2023.)
(CHOICE → EXMID)
 
21-Nov-2023exmidaclem 7406 Lemma for exmidac 7407. The result, with a few hypotheses to break out commonly used expressions. (Contributed by Jim Kingdon, 21-Nov-2023.)
𝐴 = {𝑥 ∈ {∅, {∅}} ∣ (𝑥 = ∅ ∨ 𝑦 = {∅})}    &   𝐵 = {𝑥 ∈ {∅, {∅}} ∣ (𝑥 = {∅} ∨ 𝑦 = {∅})}    &   𝐶 = {𝐴, 𝐵}    ⇒   (CHOICE → EXMID)
 
21-Nov-2023exmid1dc 4285 A convenience theorem for proving that something implies EXMID. Think of this as an alternative to using a proposition, as in proofs like undifexmid 4278 or ordtriexmid 4614. In this context 𝑥 = {∅} can be thought of as "x is true". (Contributed by Jim Kingdon, 21-Nov-2023.)
((𝜑 ∧ 𝑥 ⊆ {∅}) → DECID 𝑥 = {∅})    ⇒   (𝜑 → EXMID)
 
20-Nov-2023acfun 7405 A convenient form of choice. The goal here is to state choice as the existence of a choice function on a set of inhabited sets, while making full use of our notation around functions and function values. (Contributed by Jim Kingdon, 20-Nov-2023.)
(𝜑 → CHOICE)    &   (𝜑 → 𝐴 ∈ 𝑉)    &   (𝜑 → ∀𝑥 ∈ 𝐴 ∃𝑤 𝑤 ∈ 𝑥)    ⇒   (𝜑 → ∃𝑓(𝑓 Fn 𝐴 ∧ ∀𝑥 ∈ 𝐴 (𝑓‘𝑥) ∈ 𝑥))
 
18-Nov-2023rnrhmsubrg 14237 The range of a ring homomorphism is a subring. (Contributed by SN, 18-Nov-2023.)
(𝐹 ∈ (𝑀 RingHom 𝑁) → ran 𝐹 ∈ (SubRing‘𝑁))
 
18-Nov-2023condc 858 Contraposition of a decidable proposition.

This theorem swaps or "transposes" the order of the consequents when negation is removed. An informal example is that the statement "if there are no clouds in the sky, it is not raining" implies the statement "if it is raining, there are clouds in the sky". This theorem (without the decidability condition, of course) is called Transp or "the principle of transposition" in Principia Mathematica (Theorem *2.17 of [WhiteheadRussell] p. 103) and is Axiom A3 of [Margaris] p. 49. We will also use the term "contraposition" for this principle, although the reader is advised that in the field of philosophical logic, "contraposition" has a different technical meaning.

(Contributed by Jim Kingdon, 13-Mar-2018.) (Proof shortened by BJ, 18-Nov-2023.)

(DECID 𝜑 → ((¬ 𝜑 → ¬ 𝜓) → (𝜓 → 𝜑)))
 
18-Nov-2023stdcn 852 A formula is stable if and only if the decidability of its negation implies its decidability. Note that the right-hand side of this biconditional is the converse of dcn 847. (Contributed by BJ, 18-Nov-2023.)
(STAB 𝜑 ↔ (DECID ¬ 𝜑 → DECID 𝜑))
 
17-Nov-2023cnplimclemr 15364 Lemma for cnplimccntop 15365. The reverse direction. (Contributed by Mario Carneiro and Jim Kingdon, 17-Nov-2023.)
𝐾 = (MetOpen‘(abs ∘ − ))    &   𝐽 = (𝐾 ↾t 𝐴)    &   (𝜑 → 𝐴 ⊆ ℂ)    &   (𝜑 → 𝐹:𝐴⟶ℂ)    &   (𝜑 → 𝐵 ∈ 𝐴)    &   (𝜑 → (𝐹‘𝐵) ∈ (𝐹 limℂ 𝐵))    ⇒   (𝜑 → 𝐹 ∈ ((𝐽 CnP 𝐾)‘𝐵))
 
17-Nov-2023cnplimclemle 15363 Lemma for cnplimccntop 15365. Satisfying the epsilon condition for continuity. (Contributed by Mario Carneiro and Jim Kingdon, 17-Nov-2023.)
𝐾 = (MetOpen‘(abs ∘ − ))    &   𝐽 = (𝐾 ↾t 𝐴)    &   (𝜑 → 𝐴 ⊆ ℂ)    &   (𝜑 → 𝐹:𝐴⟶ℂ)    &   (𝜑 → 𝐵 ∈ 𝐴)    &   (𝜑 → (𝐹‘𝐵) ∈ (𝐹 limℂ 𝐵))    &   (𝜑 → 𝐸 ∈ ℝ+)    &   (𝜑 → 𝐷 ∈ ℝ+)    &   (𝜑 → 𝑍 ∈ 𝐴)    &   ((𝜑 ∧ 𝑍 # 𝐵 ∧ (abs‘(𝑍 − 𝐵)) < 𝐷) → (abs‘((𝐹‘𝑍) − (𝐹‘𝐵))) < (𝐸 / 2))    &   (𝜑 → (abs‘(𝑍 − 𝐵)) < 𝐷)    ⇒   (𝜑 → (abs‘((𝐹‘𝑍) − (𝐹‘𝐵))) < 𝐸)
 
14-Nov-2023limccnp2cntop 15372 The image of a convergent sequence under a continuous map is convergent to the image of the original point. Binary operation version. (Contributed by Mario Carneiro, 28-Dec-2016.) (Revised by Jim Kingdon, 14-Nov-2023.)
((𝜑 ∧ 𝑥 ∈ 𝐴) → 𝑅 ∈ 𝑋)    &   ((𝜑 ∧ 𝑥 ∈ 𝐴) → 𝑆 ∈ 𝑌)    &   (𝜑 → 𝑋 ⊆ ℂ)    &   (𝜑 → 𝑌 ⊆ ℂ)    &   𝐾 = (MetOpen‘(abs ∘ − ))    &   𝐽 = ((𝐾 ×t 𝐾) ↾t (𝑋 × 𝑌))    &   (𝜑 → 𝐶 ∈ ((𝑥 ∈ 𝐴 ↦ 𝑅) limℂ 𝐵))    &   (𝜑 → 𝐷 ∈ ((𝑥 ∈ 𝐴 ↦ 𝑆) limℂ 𝐵))    &   (𝜑 → 𝐻 ∈ ((𝐽 CnP 𝐾)‘⟨𝐶, 𝐷⟩))    ⇒   (𝜑 → (𝐶𝐻𝐷) ∈ ((𝑥 ∈ 𝐴 ↦ (𝑅𝐻𝑆)) limℂ 𝐵))
 
10-Nov-2023rpmaxcl 11755 The maximum of two positive real numbers is a positive real number. (Contributed by Jim Kingdon, 10-Nov-2023.)
((𝐴 ∈ ℝ+ ∧ 𝐵 ∈ ℝ+) → sup({𝐴, 𝐵}, ℝ, < ) ∈ ℝ+)
 
9-Nov-2023limccnp2lem 15371 Lemma for limccnp2cntop 15372. This is most of the result, expressed in epsilon-delta form, with a large number of hypotheses so that lengthy expressions do not need to be repeated. (Contributed by Jim Kingdon, 9-Nov-2023.)
((𝜑 ∧ 𝑥 ∈ 𝐴) → 𝑅 ∈ 𝑋)    &   ((𝜑 ∧ 𝑥 ∈ 𝐴) → 𝑆 ∈ 𝑌)    &   (𝜑 → 𝑋 ⊆ ℂ)    &   (𝜑 → 𝑌 ⊆ ℂ)    &   𝐾 = (MetOpen‘(abs ∘ − ))    &   𝐽 = ((𝐾 ×t 𝐾) ↾t (𝑋 × 𝑌))    &   (𝜑 → 𝐶 ∈ ((𝑥 ∈ 𝐴 ↦ 𝑅) limℂ 𝐵))    &   (𝜑 → 𝐷 ∈ ((𝑥 ∈ 𝐴 ↦ 𝑆) limℂ 𝐵))    &   (𝜑 → 𝐻 ∈ ((𝐽 CnP 𝐾)‘⟨𝐶, 𝐷⟩))    &   Ⅎ𝑥𝜑    &   (𝜑 → 𝐸 ∈ ℝ+)    &   (𝜑 → 𝐿 ∈ ℝ+)    &   (𝜑 → ∀𝑟 ∈ 𝑋 ∀𝑠 ∈ 𝑌 (((𝐶((abs ∘ − ) ↾ (𝑋 × 𝑋))𝑟) < 𝐿 ∧ (𝐷((abs ∘ − ) ↾ (𝑌 × 𝑌))𝑠) < 𝐿) → ((𝐶𝐻𝐷)(abs ∘ − )(𝑟𝐻𝑠)) < 𝐸))    &   (𝜑 → 𝐹 ∈ ℝ+)    &   (𝜑 → ∀𝑥 ∈ 𝐴 ((𝑥 # 𝐵 ∧ (abs‘(𝑥 − 𝐵)) < 𝐹) → (abs‘(𝑅 − 𝐶)) < 𝐿))    &   (𝜑 → 𝐺 ∈ ℝ+)    &   (𝜑 → ∀𝑥 ∈ 𝐴 ((𝑥 # 𝐵 ∧ (abs‘(𝑥 − 𝐵)) < 𝐺) → (abs‘(𝑆 − 𝐷)) < 𝐿))    ⇒   (𝜑 → ∃𝑑 ∈ ℝ+ ∀𝑥 ∈ 𝐴 ((𝑥 # 𝐵 ∧ (abs‘(𝑥 − 𝐵)) < 𝑑) → (abs‘((𝑅𝐻𝑆) − (𝐶𝐻𝐷))) < 𝐸))
 
4-Nov-2023ellimc3apf 15355 Write the epsilon-delta definition of a limit. (Contributed by Mario Carneiro, 28-Dec-2016.) (Revised by Jim Kingdon, 4-Nov-2023.)
(𝜑 → 𝐹:𝐴⟶ℂ)    &   (𝜑 → 𝐴 ⊆ ℂ)    &   (𝜑 → 𝐵 ∈ ℂ)    &   Ⅎ𝑧𝐹    ⇒   (𝜑 → (𝐶 ∈ (𝐹 limℂ 𝐵) ↔ (𝐶 ∈ ℂ ∧ ∀𝑥 ∈ ℝ+ ∃𝑦 ∈ ℝ+ ∀𝑧 ∈ 𝐴 ((𝑧 # 𝐵 ∧ (abs‘(𝑧 − 𝐵)) < 𝑦) → (abs‘((𝐹‘𝑧) − 𝐶)) < 𝑥))))
 
3-Nov-2023limcmpted 15358 Express the limit operator for a function defined by a mapping, via epsilon-delta. (Contributed by Jim Kingdon, 3-Nov-2023.)
(𝜑 → 𝐴 ⊆ ℂ)    &   (𝜑 → 𝐵 ∈ ℂ)    &   ((𝜑 ∧ 𝑧 ∈ 𝐴) → 𝐷 ∈ ℂ)    ⇒   (𝜑 → (𝐶 ∈ ((𝑧 ∈ 𝐴 ↦ 𝐷) limℂ 𝐵) ↔ (𝐶 ∈ ℂ ∧ ∀𝑥 ∈ ℝ+ ∃𝑦 ∈ ℝ+ ∀𝑧 ∈ 𝐴 ((𝑧 # 𝐵 ∧ (abs‘(𝑧 − 𝐵)) < 𝑦) → (abs‘(𝐷 − 𝐶)) < 𝑥))))
 
1-Nov-2023unct 13034 The union of two countable sets is countable. Corollary 8.1.20 of [AczelRathjen], p. 75. (Contributed by Jim Kingdon, 1-Nov-2023.)
((∃𝑓 𝑓:ω–onto→(𝐴 ⊔ 1o) ∧ ∃𝑔 𝑔:ω–onto→(𝐵 ⊔ 1o)) → ∃ℎ ℎ:ω–onto→((𝐴 ∪ 𝐵) ⊔ 1o))
 
31-Oct-2023ctiunct 13032 A sequence of enumerations gives an enumeration of the union. We refer to "sequence of enumerations" rather than "countably many countable sets" because the hypothesis provides more than countability for each 𝐵(𝑥): it refers to 𝐵(𝑥) together with the 𝐺(𝑥) which enumerates it. Theorem 8.1.19 of [AczelRathjen], p. 74.

For "countably many countable sets" the key hypothesis would be (𝜑 ∧ 𝑥 ∈ 𝐴) → ∃𝑔𝑔:ω–onto→(𝐵 ⊔ 1o). This is almost omiunct 13036 (which uses countable choice) although that is for a countably infinite collection not any countable collection.

Compare with the case of two sets instead of countably many, as seen at unct 13034, which says that the union of two countable sets is countable .

The proof proceeds by mapping a natural number to a pair of natural numbers (by xpomen 12987) and using the first number to map to an element 𝑥 of 𝐴 and the second number to map to an element of B(x) . In this way we are able to map to every element of ∪ 𝑥 ∈ 𝐴𝐵. Although it would be possible to work directly with countability expressed as 𝐹:ω–onto→(𝐴 ⊔ 1o), we instead use functions from subsets of the natural numbers via ctssdccl 7294 and ctssdc 7296.

(Contributed by Jim Kingdon, 31-Oct-2023.)

(𝜑 → 𝐹:ω–onto→(𝐴 ⊔ 1o))    &   ((𝜑 ∧ 𝑥 ∈ 𝐴) → 𝐺:ω–onto→(𝐵 ⊔ 1o))    ⇒   (𝜑 → ∃ℎ ℎ:ω–onto→(∪ 𝑥 ∈ 𝐴 𝐵 ⊔ 1o))
 
30-Oct-2023ctssdccl 7294 A mapping from a decidable subset of the natural numbers onto a countable set. This is similar to one direction of ctssdc 7296 but expressed in terms of classes rather than ∃. (Contributed by Jim Kingdon, 30-Oct-2023.)
(𝜑 → 𝐹:ω–onto→(𝐴 ⊔ 1o))    &   𝑆 = {𝑥 ∈ ω ∣ (𝐹‘𝑥) ∈ (inl “ 𝐴)}    &   𝐺 = (◡inl ∘ 𝐹)    ⇒   (𝜑 → (𝑆 ⊆ ω ∧ 𝐺:𝑆–onto→𝐴 ∧ ∀𝑛 ∈ ω DECID 𝑛 ∈ 𝑆))
 
28-Oct-2023ctiunctlemfo 13031 Lemma for ctiunct 13032. (Contributed by Jim Kingdon, 28-Oct-2023.)
(𝜑 → 𝑆 ⊆ ω)    &   (𝜑 → ∀𝑛 ∈ ω DECID 𝑛 ∈ 𝑆)    &   (𝜑 → 𝐹:𝑆–onto→𝐴)    &   ((𝜑 ∧ 𝑥 ∈ 𝐴) → 𝑇 ⊆ ω)    &   ((𝜑 ∧ 𝑥 ∈ 𝐴) → ∀𝑛 ∈ ω DECID 𝑛 ∈ 𝑇)    &   ((𝜑 ∧ 𝑥 ∈ 𝐴) → 𝐺:𝑇–onto→𝐵)    &   (𝜑 → 𝐽:ω–1-1-onto→(ω × ω))    &   𝑈 = {𝑧 ∈ ω ∣ ((1st ‘(𝐽‘𝑧)) ∈ 𝑆 ∧ (2nd ‘(𝐽‘𝑧)) ∈ ⦋(𝐹‘(1st ‘(𝐽‘𝑧))) / 𝑥⦌𝑇)}    &   𝐻 = (𝑛 ∈ 𝑈 ↦ (⦋(𝐹‘(1st ‘(𝐽‘𝑛))) / 𝑥⦌𝐺‘(2nd ‘(𝐽‘𝑛))))    &   Ⅎ𝑥𝐻    &   Ⅎ𝑥𝑈    ⇒   (𝜑 → 𝐻:𝑈–onto→∪ 𝑥 ∈ 𝐴 𝐵)
 
28-Oct-2023ctiunctlemf 13030 Lemma for ctiunct 13032. (Contributed by Jim Kingdon, 28-Oct-2023.)
(𝜑 → 𝑆 ⊆ ω)    &   (𝜑 → ∀𝑛 ∈ ω DECID 𝑛 ∈ 𝑆)    &   (𝜑 → 𝐹:𝑆–onto→𝐴)    &   ((𝜑 ∧ 𝑥 ∈ 𝐴) → 𝑇 ⊆ ω)    &   ((𝜑 ∧ 𝑥 ∈ 𝐴) → ∀𝑛 ∈ ω DECID 𝑛 ∈ 𝑇)    &   ((𝜑 ∧ 𝑥 ∈ 𝐴) → 𝐺:𝑇–onto→𝐵)    &   (𝜑 → 𝐽:ω–1-1-onto→(ω × ω))    &   𝑈 = {𝑧 ∈ ω ∣ ((1st ‘(𝐽‘𝑧)) ∈ 𝑆 ∧ (2nd ‘(𝐽‘𝑧)) ∈ ⦋(𝐹‘(1st ‘(𝐽‘𝑧))) / 𝑥⦌𝑇)}    &   𝐻 = (𝑛 ∈ 𝑈 ↦ (⦋(𝐹‘(1st ‘(𝐽‘𝑛))) / 𝑥⦌𝐺‘(2nd ‘(𝐽‘𝑛))))    ⇒   (𝜑 → 𝐻:𝑈⟶∪ 𝑥 ∈ 𝐴 𝐵)
 
28-Oct-2023ctiunctlemudc 13029 Lemma for ctiunct 13032. (Contributed by Jim Kingdon, 28-Oct-2023.)
(𝜑 → 𝑆 ⊆ ω)    &   (𝜑 → ∀𝑛 ∈ ω DECID 𝑛 ∈ 𝑆)    &   (𝜑 → 𝐹:𝑆–onto→𝐴)    &   ((𝜑 ∧ 𝑥 ∈ 𝐴) → 𝑇 ⊆ ω)    &   ((𝜑 ∧ 𝑥 ∈ 𝐴) → ∀𝑛 ∈ ω DECID 𝑛 ∈ 𝑇)    &   ((𝜑 ∧ 𝑥 ∈ 𝐴) → 𝐺:𝑇–onto→𝐵)    &   (𝜑 → 𝐽:ω–1-1-onto→(ω × ω))    &   𝑈 = {𝑧 ∈ ω ∣ ((1st ‘(𝐽‘𝑧)) ∈ 𝑆 ∧ (2nd ‘(𝐽‘𝑧)) ∈ ⦋(𝐹‘(1st ‘(𝐽‘𝑧))) / 𝑥⦌𝑇)}    ⇒   (𝜑 → ∀𝑛 ∈ ω DECID 𝑛 ∈ 𝑈)
 
28-Oct-2023ctiunctlemuom 13028 Lemma for ctiunct 13032. (Contributed by Jim Kingdon, 28-Oct-2023.)
(𝜑 → 𝑆 ⊆ ω)    &   (𝜑 → ∀𝑛 ∈ ω DECID 𝑛 ∈ 𝑆)    &   (𝜑 → 𝐹:𝑆–onto→𝐴)    &   ((𝜑 ∧ 𝑥 ∈ 𝐴) → 𝑇 ⊆ ω)    &   ((𝜑 ∧ 𝑥 ∈ 𝐴) → ∀𝑛 ∈ ω DECID 𝑛 ∈ 𝑇)    &   ((𝜑 ∧ 𝑥 ∈ 𝐴) → 𝐺:𝑇–onto→𝐵)    &   (𝜑 → 𝐽:ω–1-1-onto→(ω × ω))    &   𝑈 = {𝑧 ∈ ω ∣ ((1st ‘(𝐽‘𝑧)) ∈ 𝑆 ∧ (2nd ‘(𝐽‘𝑧)) ∈ ⦋(𝐹‘(1st ‘(𝐽‘𝑧))) / 𝑥⦌𝑇)}    ⇒   (𝜑 → 𝑈 ⊆ ω)
 
28-Oct-2023ctiunctlemu2nd 13027 Lemma for ctiunct 13032. (Contributed by Jim Kingdon, 28-Oct-2023.)
(𝜑 → 𝑆 ⊆ ω)    &   (𝜑 → ∀𝑛 ∈ ω DECID 𝑛 ∈ 𝑆)    &   (𝜑 → 𝐹:𝑆–onto→𝐴)    &   ((𝜑 ∧ 𝑥 ∈ 𝐴) → 𝑇 ⊆ ω)    &   ((𝜑 ∧ 𝑥 ∈ 𝐴) → ∀𝑛 ∈ ω DECID 𝑛 ∈ 𝑇)    &   ((𝜑 ∧ 𝑥 ∈ 𝐴) → 𝐺:𝑇–onto→𝐵)    &   (𝜑 → 𝐽:ω–1-1-onto→(ω × ω))    &   𝑈 = {𝑧 ∈ ω ∣ ((1st ‘(𝐽‘𝑧)) ∈ 𝑆 ∧ (2nd ‘(𝐽‘𝑧)) ∈ ⦋(𝐹‘(1st ‘(𝐽‘𝑧))) / 𝑥⦌𝑇)}    &   (𝜑 → 𝑁 ∈ 𝑈)    ⇒   (𝜑 → (2nd ‘(𝐽‘𝑁)) ∈ ⦋(𝐹‘(1st ‘(𝐽‘𝑁))) / 𝑥⦌𝑇)
 
28-Oct-2023ctiunctlemu1st 13026 Lemma for ctiunct 13032. (Contributed by Jim Kingdon, 28-Oct-2023.)
(𝜑 → 𝑆 ⊆ ω)    &   (𝜑 → ∀𝑛 ∈ ω DECID 𝑛 ∈ 𝑆)    &   (𝜑 → 𝐹:𝑆–onto→𝐴)    &   ((𝜑 ∧ 𝑥 ∈ 𝐴) → 𝑇 ⊆ ω)    &   ((𝜑 ∧ 𝑥 ∈ 𝐴) → ∀𝑛 ∈ ω DECID 𝑛 ∈ 𝑇)    &   ((𝜑 ∧ 𝑥 ∈ 𝐴) → 𝐺:𝑇–onto→𝐵)    &   (𝜑 → 𝐽:ω–1-1-onto→(ω × ω))    &   𝑈 = {𝑧 ∈ ω ∣ ((1st ‘(𝐽‘𝑧)) ∈ 𝑆 ∧ (2nd ‘(𝐽‘𝑧)) ∈ ⦋(𝐹‘(1st ‘(𝐽‘𝑧))) / 𝑥⦌𝑇)}    &   (𝜑 → 𝑁 ∈ 𝑈)    ⇒   (𝜑 → (1st ‘(𝐽‘𝑁)) ∈ 𝑆)
 
28-Oct-2023pm2.521gdc 873 A general instance of Theorem *2.521 of [WhiteheadRussell] p. 107, under a decidability condition. (Contributed by BJ, 28-Oct-2023.)
(DECID 𝜑 → (¬ (𝜑 → 𝜓) → (𝜒 → 𝜑)))
 
28-Oct-2023stdcndc 850 A formula is decidable if and only if its negation is decidable and it is stable (that is, it is testable and stable). (Contributed by David A. Wheeler, 13-Aug-2018.) (Proof shortened by BJ, 28-Oct-2023.)
((STAB 𝜑 ∧ DECID ¬ 𝜑) ↔ DECID 𝜑)
 
28-Oct-2023conax1k 658 Weakening of conax1 657. General instance of pm2.51 659 and of pm2.52 660. (Contributed by BJ, 28-Oct-2023.)
(¬ (𝜑 → 𝜓) → (𝜒 → ¬ 𝜓))
 
28-Oct-2023conax1 657 Contrapositive of ax-1 6. (Contributed by BJ, 28-Oct-2023.)
(¬ (𝜑 → 𝜓) → ¬ 𝜓)
 
25-Oct-2023divcnap 15260 Complex number division is a continuous function, when the second argument is apart from zero. (Contributed by Mario Carneiro, 12-Aug-2014.) (Revised by Jim Kingdon, 25-Oct-2023.)
𝐽 = (MetOpen‘(abs ∘ − ))    &   𝐾 = (𝐽 ↾t {𝑥 ∈ ℂ ∣ 𝑥 # 0})    ⇒   (𝑦 ∈ ℂ, 𝑧 ∈ {𝑥 ∈ ℂ ∣ 𝑥 # 0} ↦ (𝑦 / 𝑧)) ∈ ((𝐽 ×t 𝐾) Cn 𝐽)
 
23-Oct-2023cnm 8035 A complex number is an inhabited set. Note: do not use this after the real number axioms are developed, since it is a construction-dependent property. (Contributed by Jim Kingdon, 23-Oct-2023.) (New usage is discouraged.)
(𝐴 ∈ ℂ → ∃𝑥 𝑥 ∈ 𝐴)
 
23-Oct-2023oprssdmm 6326 Domain of closure of an operation. (Contributed by Jim Kingdon, 23-Oct-2023.)
((𝜑 ∧ 𝑢 ∈ 𝑆) → ∃𝑣 𝑣 ∈ 𝑢)    &   ((𝜑 ∧ (𝑥 ∈ 𝑆 ∧ 𝑦 ∈ 𝑆)) → (𝑥𝐹𝑦) ∈ 𝑆)    &   (𝜑 → Rel 𝐹)    ⇒   (𝜑 → (𝑆 × 𝑆) ⊆ dom 𝐹)
 
22-Oct-2023addcncntoplem 15256 Lemma for addcncntop 15257, subcncntop 15258, and mulcncntop 15259. (Contributed by Mario Carneiro, 5-May-2014.) (Revised by Jim Kingdon, 22-Oct-2023.)
𝐽 = (MetOpen‘(abs ∘ − ))    &    + :(ℂ × ℂ)⟶ℂ    &   ((𝑎 ∈ ℝ+ ∧ 𝑏 ∈ ℂ ∧ 𝑐 ∈ ℂ) → ∃𝑦 ∈ ℝ+ ∃𝑧 ∈ ℝ+ ∀𝑢 ∈ ℂ ∀𝑣 ∈ ℂ (((abs‘(𝑢 − 𝑏)) < 𝑦 ∧ (abs‘(𝑣 − 𝑐)) < 𝑧) → (abs‘((𝑢 + 𝑣) − (𝑏 + 𝑐))) < 𝑎))    ⇒    + ∈ ((𝐽 ×t 𝐽) Cn 𝐽)
 
22-Oct-2023txmetcnp 15213 Continuity of a binary operation on metric spaces. (Contributed by Mario Carneiro, 2-Sep-2015.) (Revised by Jim Kingdon, 22-Oct-2023.)
𝐽 = (MetOpen‘𝐶)    &   𝐾 = (MetOpen‘𝐷)    &   𝐿 = (MetOpen‘𝐸)    ⇒   (((𝐶 ∈ (∞Met‘𝑋) ∧ 𝐷 ∈ (∞Met‘𝑌) ∧ 𝐸 ∈ (∞Met‘𝑍)) ∧ (𝐴 ∈ 𝑋 ∧ 𝐵 ∈ 𝑌)) → (𝐹 ∈ (((𝐽 ×t 𝐾) CnP 𝐿)‘⟨𝐴, 𝐵⟩) ↔ (𝐹:(𝑋 × 𝑌)⟶𝑍 ∧ ∀𝑧 ∈ ℝ+ ∃𝑤 ∈ ℝ+ ∀𝑢 ∈ 𝑋 ∀𝑣 ∈ 𝑌 (((𝐴𝐶𝑢) < 𝑤 ∧ (𝐵𝐷𝑣) < 𝑤) → ((𝐴𝐹𝐵)𝐸(𝑢𝐹𝑣)) < 𝑧))))
 
22-Oct-2023xmetxpbl 15203 The maximum metric (Chebyshev distance) on the product of two sets, expressed in terms of balls centered on a point 𝐶 with radius 𝑅. (Contributed by Jim Kingdon, 22-Oct-2023.)
𝑃 = (𝑢 ∈ (𝑋 × 𝑌), 𝑣 ∈ (𝑋 × 𝑌) ↦ sup({((1st ‘𝑢)𝑀(1st ‘𝑣)), ((2nd ‘𝑢)𝑁(2nd ‘𝑣))}, ℝ*, < ))    &   (𝜑 → 𝑀 ∈ (∞Met‘𝑋))    &   (𝜑 → 𝑁 ∈ (∞Met‘𝑌))    &   (𝜑 → 𝑅 ∈ ℝ*)    &   (𝜑 → 𝐶 ∈ (𝑋 × 𝑌))    ⇒   (𝜑 → (𝐶(ball‘𝑃)𝑅) = (((1st ‘𝐶)(ball‘𝑀)𝑅) × ((2nd ‘𝐶)(ball‘𝑁)𝑅)))
 
21-Oct-2023pr2cv2 7385 If an unordered pair is equinumerous to ordinal two, then a part is a set. (Contributed by RP, 21-Oct-2023.)
({𝐴, 𝐵} ≈ 2o → 𝐵 ∈ V)
 
21-Oct-2023pr2cv1 7384 If an unordered pair is equinumerous to ordinal two, then a part is a set. (Contributed by RP, 21-Oct-2023.)
({𝐴, 𝐵} ≈ 2o → 𝐴 ∈ V)
 
15-Oct-2023xmettxlem 15204 Lemma for xmettx 15205. (Contributed by Jim Kingdon, 15-Oct-2023.)
𝑃 = (𝑢 ∈ (𝑋 × 𝑌), 𝑣 ∈ (𝑋 × 𝑌) ↦ sup({((1st ‘𝑢)𝑀(1st ‘𝑣)), ((2nd ‘𝑢)𝑁(2nd ‘𝑣))}, ℝ*, < ))    &   (𝜑 → 𝑀 ∈ (∞Met‘𝑋))    &   (𝜑 → 𝑁 ∈ (∞Met‘𝑌))    &   𝐽 = (MetOpen‘𝑀)    &   𝐾 = (MetOpen‘𝑁)    &   𝐿 = (MetOpen‘𝑃)    ⇒   (𝜑 → 𝐿 ⊆ (𝐽 ×t 𝐾))
 
11-Oct-2023xmettx 15205 The maximum metric (Chebyshev distance) on the product of two sets, expressed as a binary topological product. (Contributed by Jim Kingdon, 11-Oct-2023.)
𝑃 = (𝑢 ∈ (𝑋 × 𝑌), 𝑣 ∈ (𝑋 × 𝑌) ↦ sup({((1st ‘𝑢)𝑀(1st ‘𝑣)), ((2nd ‘𝑢)𝑁(2nd ‘𝑣))}, ℝ*, < ))    &   (𝜑 → 𝑀 ∈ (∞Met‘𝑋))    &   (𝜑 → 𝑁 ∈ (∞Met‘𝑌))    &   𝐽 = (MetOpen‘𝑀)    &   𝐾 = (MetOpen‘𝑁)    &   𝐿 = (MetOpen‘𝑃)    ⇒   (𝜑 → 𝐿 = (𝐽 ×t 𝐾))
 
11-Oct-2023xmetxp 15202 The maximum metric (Chebyshev distance) on the product of two sets. (Contributed by Jim Kingdon, 11-Oct-2023.)
𝑃 = (𝑢 ∈ (𝑋 × 𝑌), 𝑣 ∈ (𝑋 × 𝑌) ↦ sup({((1st ‘𝑢)𝑀(1st ‘𝑣)), ((2nd ‘𝑢)𝑁(2nd ‘𝑣))}, ℝ*, < ))    &   (𝜑 → 𝑀 ∈ (∞Met‘𝑋))    &   (𝜑 → 𝑁 ∈ (∞Met‘𝑌))    ⇒   (𝜑 → 𝑃 ∈ (∞Met‘(𝑋 × 𝑌)))
 
8-Oct-2023pr2cv 7386 If an unordered pair is equinumerous to ordinal two, then both parts are sets. (Contributed by RP, 8-Oct-2023.)
({𝐴, 𝐵} ≈ 2o → (𝐴 ∈ V ∧ 𝐵 ∈ V))
 
7-Oct-2023df-iress 13061 Define a multifunction restriction operator for extensible structures, which can be used to turn statements about rings into statements about subrings, modules into submodules, etc. This definition knows nothing about individual structures and merely truncates the Base set while leaving operators alone; individual kinds of structures will need to handle this behavior, by ignoring operators' values outside the range, defining a function using the base set and applying that, or explicitly truncating the slot before use.

(Credit for this operator, as well as the 2023 modification for iset.mm, goes to Mario Carneiro.)

(Contributed by Stefan O'Rear, 29-Nov-2014.) (Revised by Jim Kingdon, 7-Oct-2023.)

↾s = (𝑤 ∈ V, 𝑥 ∈ V ↦ (𝑤 sSet ⟨(Base‘ndx), (𝑥 ∩ (Base‘𝑤))⟩))
 
29-Sep-2023syl2anc2 412 Double syllogism inference combined with contraction. (Contributed by BTernaryTau, 29-Sep-2023.)
(𝜑 → 𝜓)    &   (𝜓 → 𝜒)    &   ((𝜓 ∧ 𝜒) → 𝜃)    ⇒   (𝜑 → 𝜃)
 
27-Sep-2023fnpr2ob 13394 Biconditional version of fnpr2o 13393. (Contributed by Jim Kingdon, 27-Sep-2023.)
((𝐴 ∈ V ∧ 𝐵 ∈ V) ↔ {⟨∅, 𝐴⟩, ⟨1o, 𝐵⟩} Fn 2o)
 
25-Sep-2023xpsval 13406 Value of the binary structure product function. (Contributed by Mario Carneiro, 14-Aug-2015.) (Revised by Jim Kingdon, 25-Sep-2023.)
𝑇 = (𝑅 ×s 𝑆)    &   𝑋 = (Base‘𝑅)    &   𝑌 = (Base‘𝑆)    &   (𝜑 → 𝑅 ∈ 𝑉)    &   (𝜑 → 𝑆 ∈ 𝑊)    &   𝐹 = (𝑥 ∈ 𝑋, 𝑦 ∈ 𝑌 ↦ {⟨∅, 𝑥⟩, ⟨1o, 𝑦⟩})    &   𝐺 = (Scalar‘𝑅)    &   𝑈 = (𝐺Xs{⟨∅, 𝑅⟩, ⟨1o, 𝑆⟩})    ⇒   (𝜑 → 𝑇 = (◡𝐹 “s 𝑈))
 
25-Sep-2023fvpr1o 13396 The value of a function with a domain of (at most) two elements. (Contributed by Jim Kingdon, 25-Sep-2023.)
(𝐵 ∈ 𝑉 → ({⟨∅, 𝐴⟩, ⟨1o, 𝐵⟩}‘1o) = 𝐵)
 
25-Sep-2023fvpr0o 13395 The value of a function with a domain of (at most) two elements. (Contributed by Jim Kingdon, 25-Sep-2023.)
(𝐴 ∈ 𝑉 → ({⟨∅, 𝐴⟩, ⟨1o, 𝐵⟩}‘∅) = 𝐴)
 
25-Sep-2023fnpr2o 13393 Function with a domain of 2o. (Contributed by Jim Kingdon, 25-Sep-2023.)
((𝐴 ∈ 𝑉 ∧ 𝐵 ∈ 𝑊) → {⟨∅, 𝐴⟩, ⟨1o, 𝐵⟩} Fn 2o)
 
25-Sep-2023df-xps 13358 Define a binary product on structures. (Contributed by Mario Carneiro, 14-Aug-2015.) (Revised by Jim Kingdon, 25-Sep-2023.)
×s = (𝑟 ∈ V, 𝑠 ∈ V ↦ (◡(𝑥 ∈ (Base‘𝑟), 𝑦 ∈ (Base‘𝑠) ↦ {⟨∅, 𝑥⟩, ⟨1o, 𝑦⟩}) “s ((Scalar‘𝑟)Xs{⟨∅, 𝑟⟩, ⟨1o, 𝑠⟩})))
 
12-Sep-2023pwntru 4284 A slight strengthening of pwtrufal 16476. (Contributed by Mario Carneiro and Jim Kingdon, 12-Sep-2023.)
((𝐴 ⊆ {∅} ∧ 𝐴 ≠ {∅}) → 𝐴 = ∅)
 
11-Sep-2023pwtrufal 16476 A subset of the singleton {∅} cannot be anything other than ∅ or {∅}. Removing the double negation would change the meaning, as seen at exmid01 4283. If we view a subset of a singleton as a truth value (as seen in theorems like exmidexmid 4281), then this theorem states there are no truth values other than true and false, as described in section 1.1 of [Bauer], p. 481. (Contributed by Mario Carneiro and Jim Kingdon, 11-Sep-2023.)
(𝐴 ⊆ {∅} → ¬ ¬ (𝐴 = ∅ ∨ 𝐴 = {∅}))
 
9-Sep-2023mathbox 16205 (This theorem is a dummy placeholder for these guidelines. The label of this theorem, "mathbox", is hard-coded into the Metamath program to identify the start of the mathbox section for web page generation.)

A "mathbox" is a user-contributed section that is maintained by its contributor independently from the main part of iset.mm.

For contributors:

By making a contribution, you agree to release it into the public domain, according to the statement at the beginning of iset.mm.

Guidelines:

Mathboxes in iset.mm follow the same practices as in set.mm, so refer to the mathbox guidelines there for more details.

(Contributed by NM, 20-Feb-2007.) (Revised by the Metamath team, 9-Sep-2023.) (New usage is discouraged.)

𝜑    ⇒   𝜑
 
6-Sep-2023djuexb 7227 The disjoint union of two classes is a set iff both classes are sets. (Contributed by Jim Kingdon, 6-Sep-2023.)
((𝐴 ∈ V ∧ 𝐵 ∈ V) ↔ (𝐴 ⊔ 𝐵) ∈ V)
 
3-Sep-2023pwf1oexmid 16478 An exercise related to 𝑁 copies of a singleton and the power set of a singleton (where the latter can also be thought of as representing truth values). Posed as an exercise by Martin Escardo online. (Contributed by Jim Kingdon, 3-Sep-2023.)
𝑇 = ∪ 𝑥 ∈ 𝑁 ({𝑥} × 1o)    ⇒   ((𝑁 ∈ ω ∧ 𝐺:𝑇–1-1→𝒫 1o) → (ran 𝐺 = 𝒫 1o ↔ (𝑁 = 2o ∧ EXMID)))
 
3-Sep-2023pwle2 16477 An exercise related to 𝑁 copies of a singleton and the power set of a singleton (where the latter can also be thought of as representing truth values). Posed as an exercise by Martin Escardo online. (Contributed by Jim Kingdon, 3-Sep-2023.)
𝑇 = ∪ 𝑥 ∈ 𝑁 ({𝑥} × 1o)    ⇒   ((𝑁 ∈ ω ∧ 𝐺:𝑇–1-1→𝒫 1o) → 𝑁 ⊆ 2o)
 
30-Aug-2023isomninn 16513 Omniscience stated in terms of natural numbers. Similar to isomnimap 7320 but it will sometimes be more convenient to use 0 and 1 rather than ∅ and 1o. (Contributed by Jim Kingdon, 30-Aug-2023.)
(𝐴 ∈ 𝑉 → (𝐴 ∈ Omni ↔ ∀𝑓 ∈ ({0, 1} ↑𝑚 𝐴)(∃𝑥 ∈ 𝐴 (𝑓‘𝑥) = 0 ∨ ∀𝑥 ∈ 𝐴 (𝑓‘𝑥) = 1)))
 
30-Aug-2023isomninnlem 16512 Lemma for isomninn 16513. The result, with a hypothesis to provide a convenient notation. (Contributed by Jim Kingdon, 30-Aug-2023.)
𝐺 = frec((𝑥 ∈ ℤ ↦ (𝑥 + 1)), 0)    ⇒   (𝐴 ∈ 𝑉 → (𝐴 ∈ Omni ↔ ∀𝑓 ∈ ({0, 1} ↑𝑚 𝐴)(∃𝑥 ∈ 𝐴 (𝑓‘𝑥) = 0 ∨ ∀𝑥 ∈ 𝐴 (𝑓‘𝑥) = 1)))
 
28-Aug-2023trilpolemisumle 16520 Lemma for trilpo 16525. An upper bound for the sum of the digits beyond a certain point. (Contributed by Jim Kingdon, 28-Aug-2023.)
(𝜑 → 𝐹:ℕ⟶{0, 1})    &   𝐴 = Σ𝑖 ∈ ℕ ((1 / (2↑𝑖)) · (𝐹‘𝑖))    &   𝑍 = (ℤ≥‘𝑀)    &   (𝜑 → 𝑀 ∈ ℕ)    ⇒   (𝜑 → Σ𝑖 ∈ 𝑍 ((1 / (2↑𝑖)) · (𝐹‘𝑖)) ≤ Σ𝑖 ∈ 𝑍 (1 / (2↑𝑖)))
 
25-Aug-2023cvgcmp2n 16515 A comparison test for convergence of a real infinite series. (Contributed by Jim Kingdon, 25-Aug-2023.)
((𝜑 ∧ 𝑘 ∈ ℕ) → (𝐺‘𝑘) ∈ ℝ)    &   ((𝜑 ∧ 𝑘 ∈ ℕ) → 0 ≤ (𝐺‘𝑘))    &   ((𝜑 ∧ 𝑘 ∈ ℕ) → (𝐺‘𝑘) ≤ (1 / (2↑𝑘)))    ⇒   (𝜑 → seq1( + , 𝐺) ∈ dom ⇝ )
 
25-Aug-2023cvgcmp2nlemabs 16514 Lemma for cvgcmp2n 16515. The partial sums get closer to each other as we go further out. The proof proceeds by rewriting (seq1( + , 𝐺)‘𝑁) as the sum of (seq1( + , 𝐺)‘𝑀) and a term which gets smaller as 𝑀 gets large. (Contributed by Jim Kingdon, 25-Aug-2023.)
((𝜑 ∧ 𝑘 ∈ ℕ) → (𝐺‘𝑘) ∈ ℝ)    &   ((𝜑 ∧ 𝑘 ∈ ℕ) → 0 ≤ (𝐺‘𝑘))    &   ((𝜑 ∧ 𝑘 ∈ ℕ) → (𝐺‘𝑘) ≤ (1 / (2↑𝑘)))    &   (𝜑 → 𝑀 ∈ ℕ)    &   (𝜑 → 𝑁 ∈ (ℤ≥‘𝑀))    ⇒   (𝜑 → (abs‘((seq1( + , 𝐺)‘𝑁) − (seq1( + , 𝐺)‘𝑀))) < (2 / 𝑀))
 
24-Aug-2023trilpolemclim 16518 Lemma for trilpo 16525. Convergence of the series. (Contributed by Jim Kingdon, 24-Aug-2023.)
(𝜑 → 𝐹:ℕ⟶{0, 1})    &   𝐺 = (𝑛 ∈ ℕ ↦ ((1 / (2↑𝑛)) · (𝐹‘𝑛)))    ⇒   (𝜑 → seq1( + , 𝐺) ∈ dom ⇝ )
 
23-Aug-2023trilpo 16525 Real number trichotomy implies the Limited Principle of Omniscience (LPO). We expect that we'd need some form of countable choice to prove the converse.

Here's the outline of the proof. Given an infinite sequence F of zeroes and ones, we need to show the sequence contains a zero or it is all ones. Construct a real number A whose representation in base two consists of a zero, a decimal point, and then the numbers of the sequence. Compare it with one using trichotomy. The three cases from trichotomy are trilpolemlt1 16523 (which means the sequence contains a zero), trilpolemeq1 16522 (which means the sequence is all ones), and trilpolemgt1 16521 (which is not possible).

Equivalent ways to state real number trichotomy (sometimes called "analytic LPO") include decidability of real number apartness (see triap 16511) or that the real numbers are a discrete field (see trirec0 16526).

LPO is known to not be provable in IZF (and most constructive foundations), so this theorem establishes that we will be unable to prove an analogue to qtri3or 10477 for real numbers. (Contributed by Jim Kingdon, 23-Aug-2023.)

(∀𝑥 ∈ ℝ ∀𝑦 ∈ ℝ (𝑥 < 𝑦 ∨ 𝑥 = 𝑦 ∨ 𝑦 < 𝑥) → ω ∈ Omni)
 
23-Aug-2023trilpolemres 16524 Lemma for trilpo 16525. The result. (Contributed by Jim Kingdon, 23-Aug-2023.)
(𝜑 → 𝐹:ℕ⟶{0, 1})    &   𝐴 = Σ𝑖 ∈ ℕ ((1 / (2↑𝑖)) · (𝐹‘𝑖))    &   (𝜑 → (𝐴 < 1 ∨ 𝐴 = 1 ∨ 1 < 𝐴))    ⇒   (𝜑 → (∃𝑥 ∈ ℕ (𝐹‘𝑥) = 0 ∨ ∀𝑥 ∈ ℕ (𝐹‘𝑥) = 1))
 
23-Aug-2023trilpolemlt1 16523 Lemma for trilpo 16525. The 𝐴 < 1 case. We can use the distance between 𝐴 and one (that is, 1 − 𝐴) to find a position in the sequence 𝑛 where terms after that point will not add up to as much as 1 − 𝐴. By finomni 7323 we know the terms up to 𝑛 either contain a zero or are all one. But if they are all one that contradicts the way we constructed 𝑛, so we know that the sequence contains a zero. (Contributed by Jim Kingdon, 23-Aug-2023.)
(𝜑 → 𝐹:ℕ⟶{0, 1})    &   𝐴 = Σ𝑖 ∈ ℕ ((1 / (2↑𝑖)) · (𝐹‘𝑖))    &   (𝜑 → 𝐴 < 1)    ⇒   (𝜑 → ∃𝑥 ∈ ℕ (𝐹‘𝑥) = 0)
 
23-Aug-2023trilpolemeq1 16522 Lemma for trilpo 16525. The 𝐴 = 1 case. This is proved by noting that if any (𝐹‘𝑥) is zero, then the infinite sum 𝐴 is less than one based on the term which is zero. We are using the fact that the 𝐹 sequence is decidable (in the sense that each element is either zero or one). (Contributed by Jim Kingdon, 23-Aug-2023.)
(𝜑 → 𝐹:ℕ⟶{0, 1})    &   𝐴 = Σ𝑖 ∈ ℕ ((1 / (2↑𝑖)) · (𝐹‘𝑖))    &   (𝜑 → 𝐴 = 1)    ⇒   (𝜑 → ∀𝑥 ∈ ℕ (𝐹‘𝑥) = 1)
 
23-Aug-2023trilpolemgt1 16521 Lemma for trilpo 16525. The 1 < 𝐴 case. (Contributed by Jim Kingdon, 23-Aug-2023.)
(𝜑 → 𝐹:ℕ⟶{0, 1})    &   𝐴 = Σ𝑖 ∈ ℕ ((1 / (2↑𝑖)) · (𝐹‘𝑖))    ⇒   (𝜑 → ¬ 1 < 𝐴)
 
23-Aug-2023trilpolemcl 16519 Lemma for trilpo 16525. The sum exists. (Contributed by Jim Kingdon, 23-Aug-2023.)
(𝜑 → 𝐹:ℕ⟶{0, 1})    &   𝐴 = Σ𝑖 ∈ ℕ ((1 / (2↑𝑖)) · (𝐹‘𝑖))    ⇒   (𝜑 → 𝐴 ∈ ℝ)
 
23-Aug-2023triap 16511 Two ways of stating real number trichotomy. (Contributed by Jim Kingdon, 23-Aug-2023.)
((𝐴 ∈ ℝ ∧ 𝐵 ∈ ℝ) → ((𝐴 < 𝐵 ∨ 𝐴 = 𝐵 ∨ 𝐵 < 𝐴) ↔ DECID 𝐴 # 𝐵))
 
19-Aug-2023djuenun 7410 Disjoint union is equinumerous to union for disjoint sets. (Contributed by Mario Carneiro, 29-Apr-2015.) (Revised by Jim Kingdon, 19-Aug-2023.)
((𝐴 ≈ 𝐵 ∧ 𝐶 ≈ 𝐷 ∧ (𝐵 ∩ 𝐷) = ∅) → (𝐴 ⊔ 𝐶) ≈ (𝐵 ∪ 𝐷))
 
16-Aug-2023ctssdclemr 7295 Lemma for ctssdc 7296. Showing that our usual definition of countable implies the alternate one. (Contributed by Jim Kingdon, 16-Aug-2023.)
(∃𝑓 𝑓:ω–onto→(𝐴 ⊔ 1o) → ∃𝑠(𝑠 ⊆ ω ∧ ∃𝑓 𝑓:𝑠–onto→𝐴 ∧ ∀𝑛 ∈ ω DECID 𝑛 ∈ 𝑠))
 
16-Aug-2023ctssdclemn0 7293 Lemma for ctssdc 7296. The ¬ ∅ ∈ 𝑆 case. (Contributed by Jim Kingdon, 16-Aug-2023.)
(𝜑 → 𝑆 ⊆ ω)    &   (𝜑 → ∀𝑛 ∈ ω DECID 𝑛 ∈ 𝑆)    &   (𝜑 → 𝐹:𝑆–onto→𝐴)    &   (𝜑 → ¬ ∅ ∈ 𝑆)    ⇒   (𝜑 → ∃𝑔 𝑔:ω–onto→(𝐴 ⊔ 1o))
 
15-Aug-2023ctssexmid 7333 The decidability condition in ctssdc 7296 is needed. More specifically, ctssdc 7296 minus that condition, plus the Limited Principle of Omniscience (LPO), implies excluded middle. (Contributed by Jim Kingdon, 15-Aug-2023.)
((𝑦 ⊆ ω ∧ ∃𝑓 𝑓:𝑦–onto→𝑥) → ∃𝑓 𝑓:ω–onto→(𝑥 ⊔ 1o))    &   ω ∈ Omni    ⇒   (𝜑 ∨ ¬ 𝜑)
 
15-Aug-2023ctssdc 7296 A set is countable iff there is a surjection from a decidable subset of the natural numbers onto it. The decidability condition is needed as shown at ctssexmid 7333. (Contributed by Jim Kingdon, 15-Aug-2023.)
(∃𝑠(𝑠 ⊆ ω ∧ ∃𝑓 𝑓:𝑠–onto→𝐴 ∧ ∀𝑛 ∈ ω DECID 𝑛 ∈ 𝑠) ↔ ∃𝑓 𝑓:ω–onto→(𝐴 ⊔ 1o))
 
14-Aug-2023mpoexw 6370 Weak version of mpoex 6371 that holds without ax-coll 4199. If the domain and codomain of an operation given by maps-to notation are sets, the operation is a set. (Contributed by Rohan Ridenour, 14-Aug-2023.)
𝐴 ∈ V    &   𝐵 ∈ V    &   𝐷 ∈ V    &   ∀𝑥 ∈ 𝐴 ∀𝑦 ∈ 𝐵 𝐶 ∈ 𝐷    ⇒   (𝑥 ∈ 𝐴, 𝑦 ∈ 𝐵 ↦ 𝐶) ∈ V
 
13-Aug-2023grpinvfvalg 13596 The inverse function of a group. (Contributed by NM, 24-Aug-2011.) (Revised by Mario Carneiro, 7-Aug-2013.) (Revised by Rohan Ridenour, 13-Aug-2023.)
𝐵 = (Base‘𝐺)    &    + = (+g‘𝐺)    &    0 = (0g‘𝐺)    &   𝑁 = (invg‘𝐺)    ⇒   (𝐺 ∈ 𝑉 → 𝑁 = (𝑥 ∈ 𝐵 ↦ (℩𝑦 ∈ 𝐵 (𝑦 + 𝑥) = 0 )))
 
13-Aug-2023ltntri 8290 Negative trichotomy property for real numbers. It is well known that we cannot prove real number trichotomy, 𝐴 < 𝐵 ∨ 𝐴 = 𝐵 ∨ 𝐵 < 𝐴. Does that mean there is a pair of real numbers where none of those hold (that is, where we can refute each of those three relationships)? Actually, no, as shown here. This is another example of distinguishing between being unable to prove something, or being able to refute it. (Contributed by Jim Kingdon, 13-Aug-2023.)
((𝐴 ∈ ℝ ∧ 𝐵 ∈ ℝ) → ¬ (¬ 𝐴 < 𝐵 ∧ ¬ 𝐴 = 𝐵 ∧ ¬ 𝐵 < 𝐴))
 
13-Aug-2023mptexw 6267 Weak version of mptex 5872 that holds without ax-coll 4199. If the domain and codomain of a function given by maps-to notation are sets, the function is a set. (Contributed by Rohan Ridenour, 13-Aug-2023.)
𝐴 ∈ V    &   𝐶 ∈ V    &   ∀𝑥 ∈ 𝐴 𝐵 ∈ 𝐶    ⇒   (𝑥 ∈ 𝐴 ↦ 𝐵) ∈ V
 
13-Aug-2023funexw 6266 Weak version of funex 5869 that holds without ax-coll 4199. If the domain and codomain of a function exist, so does the function. (Contributed by Rohan Ridenour, 13-Aug-2023.)
((Fun 𝐹 ∧ dom 𝐹 ∈ 𝐵 ∧ ran 𝐹 ∈ 𝐶) → 𝐹 ∈ V)
 
11-Aug-2023qnnen 13023 The rational numbers are countably infinite. Corollary 8.1.23 of [AczelRathjen], p. 75. This is Metamath 100 proof #3. (Contributed by Jim Kingdon, 11-Aug-2023.)
ℚ ≈ ℕ
  Copyright terms: Public domain W3C HTML validation [external]