limsupcl - Metamath Proof Explorer

	Metamath Proof Explorer		< Previous Next > Nearby theorems
Mirrors > Home > MPE Home > Th. List > limsupcl		Structured version Visualization version GIF version

Theorem limsupcl 15182

Description: Closure of the superior limit. (Contributed by NM, 26-Oct-2005.) (Revised by AV, 12-Sep-2020.)

**Assertion**
Ref	Expression
limsupcl	⊢ (𝐹 ∈ 𝑉 → (lim sup‘𝐹) ∈ ℝ^*)

Proof of Theorem limsupcl Dummy variables 𝑘 𝑓 are mutually distinct and distinct from all other variables.

Step	Hyp	Ref	Expression
1		elex 3450	. 2 ⊢ (𝐹 ∈ 𝑉 → 𝐹 ∈ V)
2		df-limsup 15180	. . . 4 ⊢ lim sup = (𝑓 ∈ V ↦ inf(ran (𝑘 ∈ ℝ ↦ sup(((𝑓 “ (𝑘[,)+∞)) ∩ ℝ^), ℝ^, < )), ℝ^*, < ))
3		eqid 2738	. . . . . . 7 ⊢ (𝑘 ∈ ℝ ↦ sup(((𝑓 “ (𝑘[,)+∞)) ∩ ℝ^), ℝ^, < )) = (𝑘 ∈ ℝ ↦ sup(((𝑓 “ (𝑘[,)+∞)) ∩ ℝ^), ℝ^, < ))
4		inss2 4163	. . . . . . . 8 ⊢ ((𝑓 “ (𝑘[,)+∞)) ∩ ℝ^) ⊆ ℝ^
5		supxrcl 13049	. . . . . . . 8 ⊢ (((𝑓 “ (𝑘[,)+∞)) ∩ ℝ^) ⊆ ℝ^ → sup(((𝑓 “ (𝑘[,)+∞)) ∩ ℝ^), ℝ^, < ) ∈ ℝ^*)
6	4, 5	mp1i 13	. . . . . . 7 ⊢ (𝑘 ∈ ℝ → sup(((𝑓 “ (𝑘[,)+∞)) ∩ ℝ^), ℝ^, < ) ∈ ℝ^*)
7	3, 6	fmpti 6986	. . . . . 6 ⊢ (𝑘 ∈ ℝ ↦ sup(((𝑓 “ (𝑘[,)+∞)) ∩ ℝ^), ℝ^, < )):ℝ⟶ℝ^*
8		frn 6607	. . . . . 6 ⊢ ((𝑘 ∈ ℝ ↦ sup(((𝑓 “ (𝑘[,)+∞)) ∩ ℝ^), ℝ^, < )):ℝ⟶ℝ^* → ran (𝑘 ∈ ℝ ↦ sup(((𝑓 “ (𝑘[,)+∞)) ∩ ℝ^), ℝ^, < )) ⊆ ℝ^*)
9	7, 8	ax-mp 5	. . . . 5 ⊢ ran (𝑘 ∈ ℝ ↦ sup(((𝑓 “ (𝑘[,)+∞)) ∩ ℝ^), ℝ^, < )) ⊆ ℝ^*
10		infxrcl 13067	. . . . 5 ⊢ (ran (𝑘 ∈ ℝ ↦ sup(((𝑓 “ (𝑘[,)+∞)) ∩ ℝ^), ℝ^, < )) ⊆ ℝ^* → inf(ran (𝑘 ∈ ℝ ↦ sup(((𝑓 “ (𝑘[,)+∞)) ∩ ℝ^), ℝ^, < )), ℝ^, < ) ∈ ℝ^)
11	9, 10	mp1i 13	. . . 4 ⊢ (𝑓 ∈ V → inf(ran (𝑘 ∈ ℝ ↦ sup(((𝑓 “ (𝑘[,)+∞)) ∩ ℝ^), ℝ^, < )), ℝ^, < ) ∈ ℝ^)
12	2, 11	fmpti 6986	. . 3 ⊢ lim sup:V⟶ℝ^*
13	12	ffvelrni 6960	. 2 ⊢ (𝐹 ∈ V → (lim sup‘𝐹) ∈ ℝ^*)
14	1, 13	syl 17	1 ⊢ (𝐹 ∈ 𝑉 → (lim sup‘𝐹) ∈ ℝ^*)

Colors of variables: wff setvar class

Syntax hints: → wi 4 ∈ wcel 2106 Vcvv 3432 ∩ cin 3886 ⊆ wss 3887 ↦ cmpt 5157 ran crn 5590 “ cima 5592 ⟶wf 6429 ‘cfv 6433 (class class class)co 7275 supcsup 9199 infcinf 9200 ℝcr 10870 +∞cpnf 11006 ℝ^*cxr 11008 < clt 11009 [,)cico 13081 lim supclsp 15179

This theorem was proved from axioms: ax-mp 5 ax-1 6 ax-2 7 ax-3 8 ax-gen 1798 ax-4 1812 ax-5 1913 ax-6 1971 ax-7 2011 ax-8 2108 ax-9 2116 ax-10 2137 ax-11 2154 ax-12 2171 ax-ext 2709 ax-sep 5223 ax-nul 5230 ax-pow 5288 ax-pr 5352 ax-un 7588 ax-cnex 10927 ax-resscn 10928 ax-1cn 10929 ax-icn 10930 ax-addcl 10931 ax-addrcl 10932 ax-mulcl 10933 ax-mulrcl 10934 ax-mulcom 10935 ax-addass 10936 ax-mulass 10937 ax-distr 10938 ax-i2m1 10939 ax-1ne0 10940 ax-1rid 10941 ax-rnegex 10942 ax-rrecex 10943 ax-cnre 10944 ax-pre-lttri 10945 ax-pre-lttrn 10946 ax-pre-ltadd 10947 ax-pre-mulgt0 10948 ax-pre-sup 10949

This theorem depends on definitions: df-bi 206 df-an 397 df-or 845 df-3or 1087 df-3an 1088 df-tru 1542 df-fal 1552 df-ex 1783 df-nf 1787 df-sb 2068 df-mo 2540 df-eu 2569 df-clab 2716 df-cleq 2730 df-clel 2816 df-nfc 2889 df-ne 2944 df-nel 3050 df-ral 3069 df-rex 3070 df-rmo 3071 df-reu 3072 df-rab 3073 df-v 3434 df-sbc 3717 df-csb 3833 df-dif 3890 df-un 3892 df-in 3894 df-ss 3904 df-nul 4257 df-if 4460 df-pw 4535 df-sn 4562 df-pr 4564 df-op 4568 df-uni 4840 df-br 5075 df-opab 5137 df-mpt 5158 df-id 5489 df-po 5503 df-so 5504 df-xp 5595 df-rel 5596 df-cnv 5597 df-co 5598 df-dm 5599 df-rn 5600 df-res 5601 df-ima 5602 df-iota 6391 df-fun 6435 df-fn 6436 df-f 6437 df-f1 6438 df-fo 6439 df-f1o 6440 df-fv 6441 df-riota 7232 df-ov 7278 df-oprab 7279 df-mpo 7280 df-er 8498 df-en 8734 df-dom 8735 df-sdom 8736 df-sup 9201 df-inf 9202 df-pnf 11011 df-mnf 11012 df-xr 11013 df-ltxr 11014 df-le 11015 df-sub 11207 df-neg 11208 df-limsup 15180

This theorem is referenced by: limsuplt 15188 limsupbnd1 15191 caucvgrlem 15384 limsupre 43182 limsupcld 43231 limsupcli 43298 limsupval4 43335 liminfreuzlem 43343

W3C validator