limsupcl - Metamath Proof Explorer

	Metamath Proof Explorer		< Previous Next > Nearby theorems
Mirrors > Home > MPE Home > Th. List > limsupcl		Structured version Visualization version GIF version

Theorem limsupcl 15415

Description: Closure of the superior limit. (Contributed by NM, 26-Oct-2005.) (Revised by AV, 12-Sep-2020.)

**Assertion**
Ref	Expression
limsupcl	⊢ (𝐹 ∈ 𝑉 → (lim sup‘𝐹) ∈ ℝ^*)

Proof of Theorem limsupcl Dummy variables 𝑘 𝑓 are mutually distinct and distinct from all other variables.

Step	Hyp	Ref	Expression
1		elex 3465	. 2 ⊢ (𝐹 ∈ 𝑉 → 𝐹 ∈ V)
2		df-limsup 15413	. . . 4 ⊢ lim sup = (𝑓 ∈ V ↦ inf(ran (𝑘 ∈ ℝ ↦ sup(((𝑓 “ (𝑘[,)+∞)) ∩ ℝ^), ℝ^, < )), ℝ^*, < ))
3		eqid 2729	. . . . . . 7 ⊢ (𝑘 ∈ ℝ ↦ sup(((𝑓 “ (𝑘[,)+∞)) ∩ ℝ^), ℝ^, < )) = (𝑘 ∈ ℝ ↦ sup(((𝑓 “ (𝑘[,)+∞)) ∩ ℝ^), ℝ^, < ))
4		inss2 4197	. . . . . . . 8 ⊢ ((𝑓 “ (𝑘[,)+∞)) ∩ ℝ^) ⊆ ℝ^
5		supxrcl 13251	. . . . . . . 8 ⊢ (((𝑓 “ (𝑘[,)+∞)) ∩ ℝ^) ⊆ ℝ^ → sup(((𝑓 “ (𝑘[,)+∞)) ∩ ℝ^), ℝ^, < ) ∈ ℝ^*)
6	4, 5	mp1i 13	. . . . . . 7 ⊢ (𝑘 ∈ ℝ → sup(((𝑓 “ (𝑘[,)+∞)) ∩ ℝ^), ℝ^, < ) ∈ ℝ^*)
7	3, 6	fmpti 7066	. . . . . 6 ⊢ (𝑘 ∈ ℝ ↦ sup(((𝑓 “ (𝑘[,)+∞)) ∩ ℝ^), ℝ^, < )):ℝ⟶ℝ^*
8		frn 6677	. . . . . 6 ⊢ ((𝑘 ∈ ℝ ↦ sup(((𝑓 “ (𝑘[,)+∞)) ∩ ℝ^), ℝ^, < )):ℝ⟶ℝ^* → ran (𝑘 ∈ ℝ ↦ sup(((𝑓 “ (𝑘[,)+∞)) ∩ ℝ^), ℝ^, < )) ⊆ ℝ^*)
9	7, 8	ax-mp 5	. . . . 5 ⊢ ran (𝑘 ∈ ℝ ↦ sup(((𝑓 “ (𝑘[,)+∞)) ∩ ℝ^), ℝ^, < )) ⊆ ℝ^*
10		infxrcl 13270	. . . . 5 ⊢ (ran (𝑘 ∈ ℝ ↦ sup(((𝑓 “ (𝑘[,)+∞)) ∩ ℝ^), ℝ^, < )) ⊆ ℝ^* → inf(ran (𝑘 ∈ ℝ ↦ sup(((𝑓 “ (𝑘[,)+∞)) ∩ ℝ^), ℝ^, < )), ℝ^, < ) ∈ ℝ^)
11	9, 10	mp1i 13	. . . 4 ⊢ (𝑓 ∈ V → inf(ran (𝑘 ∈ ℝ ↦ sup(((𝑓 “ (𝑘[,)+∞)) ∩ ℝ^), ℝ^, < )), ℝ^, < ) ∈ ℝ^)
12	2, 11	fmpti 7066	. . 3 ⊢ lim sup:V⟶ℝ^*
13	12	ffvelcdmi 7037	. 2 ⊢ (𝐹 ∈ V → (lim sup‘𝐹) ∈ ℝ^*)
14	1, 13	syl 17	1 ⊢ (𝐹 ∈ 𝑉 → (lim sup‘𝐹) ∈ ℝ^*)

Colors of variables: wff setvar class

Syntax hints: → wi 4 ∈ wcel 2109 Vcvv 3444 ∩ cin 3910 ⊆ wss 3911 ↦ cmpt 5183 ran crn 5632 “ cima 5634 ⟶wf 6495 ‘cfv 6499 (class class class)co 7369 supcsup 9367 infcinf 9368 ℝcr 11043 +∞cpnf 11181 ℝ^*cxr 11183 < clt 11184 [,)cico 13284 lim supclsp 15412

This theorem was proved from axioms: ax-mp 5 ax-1 6 ax-2 7 ax-3 8 ax-gen 1795 ax-4 1809 ax-5 1910 ax-6 1967 ax-7 2008 ax-8 2111 ax-9 2119 ax-10 2142 ax-11 2158 ax-12 2178 ax-ext 2701 ax-sep 5246 ax-nul 5256 ax-pow 5315 ax-pr 5382 ax-un 7691 ax-cnex 11100 ax-resscn 11101 ax-1cn 11102 ax-icn 11103 ax-addcl 11104 ax-addrcl 11105 ax-mulcl 11106 ax-mulrcl 11107 ax-mulcom 11108 ax-addass 11109 ax-mulass 11110 ax-distr 11111 ax-i2m1 11112 ax-1ne0 11113 ax-1rid 11114 ax-rnegex 11115 ax-rrecex 11116 ax-cnre 11117 ax-pre-lttri 11118 ax-pre-lttrn 11119 ax-pre-ltadd 11120 ax-pre-mulgt0 11121 ax-pre-sup 11122

This theorem depends on definitions: df-bi 207 df-an 396 df-or 848 df-3or 1087 df-3an 1088 df-tru 1543 df-fal 1553 df-ex 1780 df-nf 1784 df-sb 2066 df-mo 2533 df-eu 2562 df-clab 2708 df-cleq 2721 df-clel 2803 df-nfc 2878 df-ne 2926 df-nel 3030 df-ral 3045 df-rex 3054 df-rmo 3351 df-reu 3352 df-rab 3403 df-v 3446 df-sbc 3751 df-csb 3860 df-dif 3914 df-un 3916 df-in 3918 df-ss 3928 df-nul 4293 df-if 4485 df-pw 4561 df-sn 4586 df-pr 4588 df-op 4592 df-uni 4868 df-br 5103 df-opab 5165 df-mpt 5184 df-id 5526 df-po 5539 df-so 5540 df-xp 5637 df-rel 5638 df-cnv 5639 df-co 5640 df-dm 5641 df-rn 5642 df-res 5643 df-ima 5644 df-iota 6452 df-fun 6501 df-fn 6502 df-f 6503 df-f1 6504 df-fo 6505 df-f1o 6506 df-fv 6507 df-riota 7326 df-ov 7372 df-oprab 7373 df-mpo 7374 df-er 8648 df-en 8896 df-dom 8897 df-sdom 8898 df-sup 9369 df-inf 9370 df-pnf 11186 df-mnf 11187 df-xr 11188 df-ltxr 11189 df-le 11190 df-sub 11383 df-neg 11384 df-limsup 15413

This theorem is referenced by: limsuplt 15421 limsupbnd1 15424 caucvgrlem 15615 limsupre 45612 limsupcld 45661 limsupcli 45728 limsupval4 45765 liminfreuzlem 45773

W3C validator