limsupcl - Metamath Proof Explorer

	Metamath Proof Explorer		< Previous Next > Nearby theorems
Mirrors > Home > MPE Home > Th. List > limsupcl		Structured version Visualization version GIF version

Theorem limsupcl 15489

Description: Closure of the superior limit. (Contributed by NM, 26-Oct-2005.) (Revised by AV, 12-Sep-2020.)

**Assertion**
Ref	Expression
limsupcl	⊢ (𝐹 ∈ 𝑉 → (lim sup‘𝐹) ∈ ℝ^*)

Proof of Theorem limsupcl Dummy variables 𝑘 𝑓 are mutually distinct and distinct from all other variables.

Step	Hyp	Ref	Expression
1		elex 3480	. 2 ⊢ (𝐹 ∈ 𝑉 → 𝐹 ∈ V)
2		df-limsup 15487	. . . 4 ⊢ lim sup = (𝑓 ∈ V ↦ inf(ran (𝑘 ∈ ℝ ↦ sup(((𝑓 “ (𝑘[,)+∞)) ∩ ℝ^), ℝ^, < )), ℝ^*, < ))
3		eqid 2735	. . . . . . 7 ⊢ (𝑘 ∈ ℝ ↦ sup(((𝑓 “ (𝑘[,)+∞)) ∩ ℝ^), ℝ^, < )) = (𝑘 ∈ ℝ ↦ sup(((𝑓 “ (𝑘[,)+∞)) ∩ ℝ^), ℝ^, < ))
4		inss2 4213	. . . . . . . 8 ⊢ ((𝑓 “ (𝑘[,)+∞)) ∩ ℝ^) ⊆ ℝ^
5		supxrcl 13331	. . . . . . . 8 ⊢ (((𝑓 “ (𝑘[,)+∞)) ∩ ℝ^) ⊆ ℝ^ → sup(((𝑓 “ (𝑘[,)+∞)) ∩ ℝ^), ℝ^, < ) ∈ ℝ^*)
6	4, 5	mp1i 13	. . . . . . 7 ⊢ (𝑘 ∈ ℝ → sup(((𝑓 “ (𝑘[,)+∞)) ∩ ℝ^), ℝ^, < ) ∈ ℝ^*)
7	3, 6	fmpti 7102	. . . . . 6 ⊢ (𝑘 ∈ ℝ ↦ sup(((𝑓 “ (𝑘[,)+∞)) ∩ ℝ^), ℝ^, < )):ℝ⟶ℝ^*
8		frn 6713	. . . . . 6 ⊢ ((𝑘 ∈ ℝ ↦ sup(((𝑓 “ (𝑘[,)+∞)) ∩ ℝ^), ℝ^, < )):ℝ⟶ℝ^* → ran (𝑘 ∈ ℝ ↦ sup(((𝑓 “ (𝑘[,)+∞)) ∩ ℝ^), ℝ^, < )) ⊆ ℝ^*)
9	7, 8	ax-mp 5	. . . . 5 ⊢ ran (𝑘 ∈ ℝ ↦ sup(((𝑓 “ (𝑘[,)+∞)) ∩ ℝ^), ℝ^, < )) ⊆ ℝ^*
10		infxrcl 13350	. . . . 5 ⊢ (ran (𝑘 ∈ ℝ ↦ sup(((𝑓 “ (𝑘[,)+∞)) ∩ ℝ^), ℝ^, < )) ⊆ ℝ^* → inf(ran (𝑘 ∈ ℝ ↦ sup(((𝑓 “ (𝑘[,)+∞)) ∩ ℝ^), ℝ^, < )), ℝ^, < ) ∈ ℝ^)
11	9, 10	mp1i 13	. . . 4 ⊢ (𝑓 ∈ V → inf(ran (𝑘 ∈ ℝ ↦ sup(((𝑓 “ (𝑘[,)+∞)) ∩ ℝ^), ℝ^, < )), ℝ^, < ) ∈ ℝ^)
12	2, 11	fmpti 7102	. . 3 ⊢ lim sup:V⟶ℝ^*
13	12	ffvelcdmi 7073	. 2 ⊢ (𝐹 ∈ V → (lim sup‘𝐹) ∈ ℝ^*)
14	1, 13	syl 17	1 ⊢ (𝐹 ∈ 𝑉 → (lim sup‘𝐹) ∈ ℝ^*)

Colors of variables: wff setvar class

Syntax hints: → wi 4 ∈ wcel 2108 Vcvv 3459 ∩ cin 3925 ⊆ wss 3926 ↦ cmpt 5201 ran crn 5655 “ cima 5657 ⟶wf 6527 ‘cfv 6531 (class class class)co 7405 supcsup 9452 infcinf 9453 ℝcr 11128 +∞cpnf 11266 ℝ^*cxr 11268 < clt 11269 [,)cico 13364 lim supclsp 15486

This theorem was proved from axioms: ax-mp 5 ax-1 6 ax-2 7 ax-3 8 ax-gen 1795 ax-4 1809 ax-5 1910 ax-6 1967 ax-7 2007 ax-8 2110 ax-9 2118 ax-10 2141 ax-11 2157 ax-12 2177 ax-ext 2707 ax-sep 5266 ax-nul 5276 ax-pow 5335 ax-pr 5402 ax-un 7729 ax-cnex 11185 ax-resscn 11186 ax-1cn 11187 ax-icn 11188 ax-addcl 11189 ax-addrcl 11190 ax-mulcl 11191 ax-mulrcl 11192 ax-mulcom 11193 ax-addass 11194 ax-mulass 11195 ax-distr 11196 ax-i2m1 11197 ax-1ne0 11198 ax-1rid 11199 ax-rnegex 11200 ax-rrecex 11201 ax-cnre 11202 ax-pre-lttri 11203 ax-pre-lttrn 11204 ax-pre-ltadd 11205 ax-pre-mulgt0 11206 ax-pre-sup 11207

This theorem depends on definitions: df-bi 207 df-an 396 df-or 848 df-3or 1087 df-3an 1088 df-tru 1543 df-fal 1553 df-ex 1780 df-nf 1784 df-sb 2065 df-mo 2539 df-eu 2568 df-clab 2714 df-cleq 2727 df-clel 2809 df-nfc 2885 df-ne 2933 df-nel 3037 df-ral 3052 df-rex 3061 df-rmo 3359 df-reu 3360 df-rab 3416 df-v 3461 df-sbc 3766 df-csb 3875 df-dif 3929 df-un 3931 df-in 3933 df-ss 3943 df-nul 4309 df-if 4501 df-pw 4577 df-sn 4602 df-pr 4604 df-op 4608 df-uni 4884 df-br 5120 df-opab 5182 df-mpt 5202 df-id 5548 df-po 5561 df-so 5562 df-xp 5660 df-rel 5661 df-cnv 5662 df-co 5663 df-dm 5664 df-rn 5665 df-res 5666 df-ima 5667 df-iota 6484 df-fun 6533 df-fn 6534 df-f 6535 df-f1 6536 df-fo 6537 df-f1o 6538 df-fv 6539 df-riota 7362 df-ov 7408 df-oprab 7409 df-mpo 7410 df-er 8719 df-en 8960 df-dom 8961 df-sdom 8962 df-sup 9454 df-inf 9455 df-pnf 11271 df-mnf 11272 df-xr 11273 df-ltxr 11274 df-le 11275 df-sub 11468 df-neg 11469 df-limsup 15487

This theorem is referenced by: limsuplt 15495 limsupbnd1 15498 caucvgrlem 15689 limsupre 45670 limsupcld 45719 limsupcli 45786 limsupval4 45823 liminfreuzlem 45831

W3C validator