limsupcl - Metamath Proof Explorer

	Metamath Proof Explorer		< Previous Next > Nearby theorems
Mirrors > Home > MPE Home > Th. List > limsupcl		Structured version Visualization version GIF version

Theorem limsupcl 15429

Description: Closure of the superior limit. (Contributed by NM, 26-Oct-2005.) (Revised by AV, 12-Sep-2020.)

**Assertion**
Ref	Expression
limsupcl	⊢ (𝐹 ∈ 𝑉 → (lim sup‘𝐹) ∈ ℝ^*)

Proof of Theorem limsupcl Dummy variables 𝑘 𝑓 are mutually distinct and distinct from all other variables.

Step	Hyp	Ref	Expression
1		elex 3451	. 2 ⊢ (𝐹 ∈ 𝑉 → 𝐹 ∈ V)
2		df-limsup 15427	. . . 4 ⊢ lim sup = (𝑓 ∈ V ↦ inf(ran (𝑘 ∈ ℝ ↦ sup(((𝑓 “ (𝑘[,)+∞)) ∩ ℝ^), ℝ^, < )), ℝ^*, < ))
3		eqid 2737	. . . . . . 7 ⊢ (𝑘 ∈ ℝ ↦ sup(((𝑓 “ (𝑘[,)+∞)) ∩ ℝ^), ℝ^, < )) = (𝑘 ∈ ℝ ↦ sup(((𝑓 “ (𝑘[,)+∞)) ∩ ℝ^), ℝ^, < ))
4		inss2 4179	. . . . . . . 8 ⊢ ((𝑓 “ (𝑘[,)+∞)) ∩ ℝ^) ⊆ ℝ^
5		supxrcl 13261	. . . . . . . 8 ⊢ (((𝑓 “ (𝑘[,)+∞)) ∩ ℝ^) ⊆ ℝ^ → sup(((𝑓 “ (𝑘[,)+∞)) ∩ ℝ^), ℝ^, < ) ∈ ℝ^*)
6	4, 5	mp1i 13	. . . . . . 7 ⊢ (𝑘 ∈ ℝ → sup(((𝑓 “ (𝑘[,)+∞)) ∩ ℝ^), ℝ^, < ) ∈ ℝ^*)
7	3, 6	fmpti 7059	. . . . . 6 ⊢ (𝑘 ∈ ℝ ↦ sup(((𝑓 “ (𝑘[,)+∞)) ∩ ℝ^), ℝ^, < )):ℝ⟶ℝ^*
8		frn 6670	. . . . . 6 ⊢ ((𝑘 ∈ ℝ ↦ sup(((𝑓 “ (𝑘[,)+∞)) ∩ ℝ^), ℝ^, < )):ℝ⟶ℝ^* → ran (𝑘 ∈ ℝ ↦ sup(((𝑓 “ (𝑘[,)+∞)) ∩ ℝ^), ℝ^, < )) ⊆ ℝ^*)
9	7, 8	ax-mp 5	. . . . 5 ⊢ ran (𝑘 ∈ ℝ ↦ sup(((𝑓 “ (𝑘[,)+∞)) ∩ ℝ^), ℝ^, < )) ⊆ ℝ^*
10		infxrcl 13280	. . . . 5 ⊢ (ran (𝑘 ∈ ℝ ↦ sup(((𝑓 “ (𝑘[,)+∞)) ∩ ℝ^), ℝ^, < )) ⊆ ℝ^* → inf(ran (𝑘 ∈ ℝ ↦ sup(((𝑓 “ (𝑘[,)+∞)) ∩ ℝ^), ℝ^, < )), ℝ^, < ) ∈ ℝ^)
11	9, 10	mp1i 13	. . . 4 ⊢ (𝑓 ∈ V → inf(ran (𝑘 ∈ ℝ ↦ sup(((𝑓 “ (𝑘[,)+∞)) ∩ ℝ^), ℝ^, < )), ℝ^, < ) ∈ ℝ^)
12	2, 11	fmpti 7059	. . 3 ⊢ lim sup:V⟶ℝ^*
13	12	ffvelcdmi 7030	. 2 ⊢ (𝐹 ∈ V → (lim sup‘𝐹) ∈ ℝ^*)
14	1, 13	syl 17	1 ⊢ (𝐹 ∈ 𝑉 → (lim sup‘𝐹) ∈ ℝ^*)

Colors of variables: wff setvar class

Syntax hints: → wi 4 ∈ wcel 2114 Vcvv 3430 ∩ cin 3889 ⊆ wss 3890 ↦ cmpt 5167 ran crn 5626 “ cima 5628 ⟶wf 6489 ‘cfv 6493 (class class class)co 7361 supcsup 9347 infcinf 9348 ℝcr 11031 +∞cpnf 11170 ℝ^*cxr 11172 < clt 11173 [,)cico 13294 lim supclsp 15426

This theorem was proved from axioms: ax-mp 5 ax-1 6 ax-2 7 ax-3 8 ax-gen 1797 ax-4 1811 ax-5 1912 ax-6 1969 ax-7 2010 ax-8 2116 ax-9 2124 ax-10 2147 ax-11 2163 ax-12 2185 ax-ext 2709 ax-sep 5232 ax-nul 5242 ax-pow 5303 ax-pr 5371 ax-un 7683 ax-cnex 11088 ax-resscn 11089 ax-1cn 11090 ax-icn 11091 ax-addcl 11092 ax-addrcl 11093 ax-mulcl 11094 ax-mulrcl 11095 ax-mulcom 11096 ax-addass 11097 ax-mulass 11098 ax-distr 11099 ax-i2m1 11100 ax-1ne0 11101 ax-1rid 11102 ax-rnegex 11103 ax-rrecex 11104 ax-cnre 11105 ax-pre-lttri 11106 ax-pre-lttrn 11107 ax-pre-ltadd 11108 ax-pre-mulgt0 11109 ax-pre-sup 11110

This theorem depends on definitions: df-bi 207 df-an 396 df-or 849 df-3or 1088 df-3an 1089 df-tru 1545 df-fal 1555 df-ex 1782 df-nf 1786 df-sb 2069 df-mo 2540 df-eu 2570 df-clab 2716 df-cleq 2729 df-clel 2812 df-nfc 2886 df-ne 2934 df-nel 3038 df-ral 3053 df-rex 3063 df-rmo 3343 df-reu 3344 df-rab 3391 df-v 3432 df-sbc 3730 df-csb 3839 df-dif 3893 df-un 3895 df-in 3897 df-ss 3907 df-nul 4275 df-if 4468 df-pw 4544 df-sn 4569 df-pr 4571 df-op 4575 df-uni 4852 df-br 5087 df-opab 5149 df-mpt 5168 df-id 5520 df-po 5533 df-so 5534 df-xp 5631 df-rel 5632 df-cnv 5633 df-co 5634 df-dm 5635 df-rn 5636 df-res 5637 df-ima 5638 df-iota 6449 df-fun 6495 df-fn 6496 df-f 6497 df-f1 6498 df-fo 6499 df-f1o 6500 df-fv 6501 df-riota 7318 df-ov 7364 df-oprab 7365 df-mpo 7366 df-er 8637 df-en 8888 df-dom 8889 df-sdom 8890 df-sup 9349 df-inf 9350 df-pnf 11175 df-mnf 11176 df-xr 11177 df-ltxr 11178 df-le 11179 df-sub 11373 df-neg 11374 df-limsup 15427

This theorem is referenced by: limsuplt 15435 limsupbnd1 15438 caucvgrlem 15629 limsupre 46090 limsupcld 46139 limsupcli 46206 limsupval4 46243 liminfreuzlem 46251

W3C validator