limsuplt - Metamath Proof Explorer

	Metamath Proof Explorer		< Previous Next > Nearby theorems
Mirrors > Home > MPE Home > Th. List > limsuplt		Structured version Visualization version GIF version

Theorem limsuplt 15188

Description: The defining property of the superior limit. (Contributed by Mario Carneiro, 7-Sep-2014.) (Revised by AV, 12-Sep-2020.)

**Hypothesis**
Ref	Expression
limsupval.1	⊢ 𝐺 = (𝑘 ∈ ℝ ↦ sup(((𝐹 “ (𝑘[,)+∞)) ∩ ℝ^), ℝ^, < ))

**Assertion**
Ref	Expression
limsuplt	⊢ ((𝐵 ⊆ ℝ ∧ 𝐹:𝐵⟶ℝ^* ∧ 𝐴 ∈ ℝ^*) → ((lim sup‘𝐹) < 𝐴 ↔ ∃𝑗 ∈ ℝ (𝐺‘𝑗) < 𝐴))

Distinct variable groups: 𝑘,𝐹 𝐴,𝑗 𝐵,𝑗 𝑗,𝑘,𝐹 𝑗,𝐺 Allowed substitution hints: 𝐴(𝑘) 𝐵(𝑘) 𝐺(𝑘)

**Proof of Theorem limsuplt**
Step	Hyp	Ref	Expression
1		limsupval.1	. . . . 5 ⊢ 𝐺 = (𝑘 ∈ ℝ ↦ sup(((𝐹 “ (𝑘[,)+∞)) ∩ ℝ^), ℝ^, < ))
2	1	limsuple 15187	. . . 4 ⊢ ((𝐵 ⊆ ℝ ∧ 𝐹:𝐵⟶ℝ^* ∧ 𝐴 ∈ ℝ^*) → (𝐴 ≤ (lim sup‘𝐹) ↔ ∀𝑗 ∈ ℝ 𝐴 ≤ (𝐺‘𝑗)))
3	2	notbid 318	. . 3 ⊢ ((𝐵 ⊆ ℝ ∧ 𝐹:𝐵⟶ℝ^* ∧ 𝐴 ∈ ℝ^*) → (¬ 𝐴 ≤ (lim sup‘𝐹) ↔ ¬ ∀𝑗 ∈ ℝ 𝐴 ≤ (𝐺‘𝑗)))
4		rexnal 3169	. . 3 ⊢ (∃𝑗 ∈ ℝ ¬ 𝐴 ≤ (𝐺‘𝑗) ↔ ¬ ∀𝑗 ∈ ℝ 𝐴 ≤ (𝐺‘𝑗))
5	3, 4	bitr4di 289	. 2 ⊢ ((𝐵 ⊆ ℝ ∧ 𝐹:𝐵⟶ℝ^* ∧ 𝐴 ∈ ℝ^*) → (¬ 𝐴 ≤ (lim sup‘𝐹) ↔ ∃𝑗 ∈ ℝ ¬ 𝐴 ≤ (𝐺‘𝑗)))
6		simp2 1136	. . . . 5 ⊢ ((𝐵 ⊆ ℝ ∧ 𝐹:𝐵⟶ℝ^* ∧ 𝐴 ∈ ℝ^) → 𝐹:𝐵⟶ℝ^)
7		reex 10962	. . . . . . 7 ⊢ ℝ ∈ V
8	7	ssex 5245	. . . . . 6 ⊢ (𝐵 ⊆ ℝ → 𝐵 ∈ V)
9	8	3ad2ant1 1132	. . . . 5 ⊢ ((𝐵 ⊆ ℝ ∧ 𝐹:𝐵⟶ℝ^* ∧ 𝐴 ∈ ℝ^*) → 𝐵 ∈ V)
10		xrex 12727	. . . . . 6 ⊢ ℝ^* ∈ V
11	10	a1i 11	. . . . 5 ⊢ ((𝐵 ⊆ ℝ ∧ 𝐹:𝐵⟶ℝ^* ∧ 𝐴 ∈ ℝ^) → ℝ^ ∈ V)
12		fex2 7780	. . . . 5 ⊢ ((𝐹:𝐵⟶ℝ^* ∧ 𝐵 ∈ V ∧ ℝ^* ∈ V) → 𝐹 ∈ V)
13	6, 9, 11, 12	syl3anc 1370	. . . 4 ⊢ ((𝐵 ⊆ ℝ ∧ 𝐹:𝐵⟶ℝ^* ∧ 𝐴 ∈ ℝ^*) → 𝐹 ∈ V)
14		limsupcl 15182	. . . 4 ⊢ (𝐹 ∈ V → (lim sup‘𝐹) ∈ ℝ^*)
15	13, 14	syl 17	. . 3 ⊢ ((𝐵 ⊆ ℝ ∧ 𝐹:𝐵⟶ℝ^* ∧ 𝐴 ∈ ℝ^) → (lim sup‘𝐹) ∈ ℝ^)
16		simp3 1137	. . 3 ⊢ ((𝐵 ⊆ ℝ ∧ 𝐹:𝐵⟶ℝ^* ∧ 𝐴 ∈ ℝ^) → 𝐴 ∈ ℝ^)
17		xrltnle 11042	. . 3 ⊢ (((lim sup‘𝐹) ∈ ℝ^* ∧ 𝐴 ∈ ℝ^*) → ((lim sup‘𝐹) < 𝐴 ↔ ¬ 𝐴 ≤ (lim sup‘𝐹)))
18	15, 16, 17	syl2anc 584	. 2 ⊢ ((𝐵 ⊆ ℝ ∧ 𝐹:𝐵⟶ℝ^* ∧ 𝐴 ∈ ℝ^*) → ((lim sup‘𝐹) < 𝐴 ↔ ¬ 𝐴 ≤ (lim sup‘𝐹)))
19	1	limsupgf 15184	. . . . 5 ⊢ 𝐺:ℝ⟶ℝ^*
20	19	ffvelrni 6960	. . . 4 ⊢ (𝑗 ∈ ℝ → (𝐺‘𝑗) ∈ ℝ^*)
21		xrltnle 11042	. . . 4 ⊢ (((𝐺‘𝑗) ∈ ℝ^* ∧ 𝐴 ∈ ℝ^*) → ((𝐺‘𝑗) < 𝐴 ↔ ¬ 𝐴 ≤ (𝐺‘𝑗)))
22	20, 16, 21	syl2anr 597	. . 3 ⊢ (((𝐵 ⊆ ℝ ∧ 𝐹:𝐵⟶ℝ^* ∧ 𝐴 ∈ ℝ^*) ∧ 𝑗 ∈ ℝ) → ((𝐺‘𝑗) < 𝐴 ↔ ¬ 𝐴 ≤ (𝐺‘𝑗)))
23	22	rexbidva 3225	. 2 ⊢ ((𝐵 ⊆ ℝ ∧ 𝐹:𝐵⟶ℝ^* ∧ 𝐴 ∈ ℝ^*) → (∃𝑗 ∈ ℝ (𝐺‘𝑗) < 𝐴 ↔ ∃𝑗 ∈ ℝ ¬ 𝐴 ≤ (𝐺‘𝑗)))
24	5, 18, 23	3bitr4d 311	1 ⊢ ((𝐵 ⊆ ℝ ∧ 𝐹:𝐵⟶ℝ^* ∧ 𝐴 ∈ ℝ^*) → ((lim sup‘𝐹) < 𝐴 ↔ ∃𝑗 ∈ ℝ (𝐺‘𝑗) < 𝐴))

Colors of variables: wff setvar class

Syntax hints: ¬ wn 3 → wi 4 ↔ wb 205 ∧ w3a 1086 = wceq 1539 ∈ wcel 2106 ∀wral 3064 ∃wrex 3065 Vcvv 3432 ∩ cin 3886 ⊆ wss 3887 class class class wbr 5074 ↦ cmpt 5157 “ cima 5592 ⟶wf 6429 ‘cfv 6433 (class class class)co 7275 supcsup 9199 ℝcr 10870 +∞cpnf 11006 ℝ^*cxr 11008 < clt 11009 ≤ cle 11010 [,)cico 13081 lim supclsp 15179

This theorem was proved from axioms: ax-mp 5 ax-1 6 ax-2 7 ax-3 8 ax-gen 1798 ax-4 1812 ax-5 1913 ax-6 1971 ax-7 2011 ax-8 2108 ax-9 2116 ax-10 2137 ax-11 2154 ax-12 2171 ax-ext 2709 ax-sep 5223 ax-nul 5230 ax-pow 5288 ax-pr 5352 ax-un 7588 ax-cnex 10927 ax-resscn 10928 ax-1cn 10929 ax-icn 10930 ax-addcl 10931 ax-addrcl 10932 ax-mulcl 10933 ax-mulrcl 10934 ax-mulcom 10935 ax-addass 10936 ax-mulass 10937 ax-distr 10938 ax-i2m1 10939 ax-1ne0 10940 ax-1rid 10941 ax-rnegex 10942 ax-rrecex 10943 ax-cnre 10944 ax-pre-lttri 10945 ax-pre-lttrn 10946 ax-pre-ltadd 10947 ax-pre-mulgt0 10948 ax-pre-sup 10949

This theorem depends on definitions: df-bi 206 df-an 397 df-or 845 df-3or 1087 df-3an 1088 df-tru 1542 df-fal 1552 df-ex 1783 df-nf 1787 df-sb 2068 df-mo 2540 df-eu 2569 df-clab 2716 df-cleq 2730 df-clel 2816 df-nfc 2889 df-ne 2944 df-nel 3050 df-ral 3069 df-rex 3070 df-rmo 3071 df-reu 3072 df-rab 3073 df-v 3434 df-sbc 3717 df-csb 3833 df-dif 3890 df-un 3892 df-in 3894 df-ss 3904 df-nul 4257 df-if 4460 df-pw 4535 df-sn 4562 df-pr 4564 df-op 4568 df-uni 4840 df-br 5075 df-opab 5137 df-mpt 5158 df-id 5489 df-po 5503 df-so 5504 df-xp 5595 df-rel 5596 df-cnv 5597 df-co 5598 df-dm 5599 df-rn 5600 df-res 5601 df-ima 5602 df-iota 6391 df-fun 6435 df-fn 6436 df-f 6437 df-f1 6438 df-fo 6439 df-f1o 6440 df-fv 6441 df-riota 7232 df-ov 7278 df-oprab 7279 df-mpo 7280 df-er 8498 df-en 8734 df-dom 8735 df-sdom 8736 df-sup 9201 df-inf 9202 df-pnf 11011 df-mnf 11012 df-xr 11013 df-ltxr 11014 df-le 11015 df-sub 11207 df-neg 11208 df-limsup 15180

This theorem is referenced by: limsupgre 15190 limsuplt2 43294

W3C validator