limsuplt - Metamath Proof Explorer

	Metamath Proof Explorer		< Previous Next > Nearby theorems
Mirrors > Home > MPE Home > Th. List > limsuplt		Structured version Visualization version GIF version

Theorem limsuplt 15184

Description: The defining property of the superior limit. (Contributed by Mario Carneiro, 7-Sep-2014.) (Revised by AV, 12-Sep-2020.)

**Hypothesis**
Ref	Expression
limsupval.1	⊢ 𝐺 = (𝑘 ∈ ℝ ↦ sup(((𝐹 “ (𝑘[,)+∞)) ∩ ℝ^), ℝ^, < ))

**Assertion**
Ref	Expression
limsuplt	⊢ ((𝐵 ⊆ ℝ ∧ 𝐹:𝐵⟶ℝ^* ∧ 𝐴 ∈ ℝ^*) → ((lim sup‘𝐹) < 𝐴 ↔ ∃𝑗 ∈ ℝ (𝐺‘𝑗) < 𝐴))

Distinct variable groups: 𝑘,𝐹 𝐴,𝑗 𝐵,𝑗 𝑗,𝑘,𝐹 𝑗,𝐺 Allowed substitution hints: 𝐴(𝑘) 𝐵(𝑘) 𝐺(𝑘)

**Proof of Theorem limsuplt**
Step	Hyp	Ref	Expression
1		limsupval.1	. . . . 5 ⊢ 𝐺 = (𝑘 ∈ ℝ ↦ sup(((𝐹 “ (𝑘[,)+∞)) ∩ ℝ^), ℝ^, < ))
2	1	limsuple 15183	. . . 4 ⊢ ((𝐵 ⊆ ℝ ∧ 𝐹:𝐵⟶ℝ^* ∧ 𝐴 ∈ ℝ^*) → (𝐴 ≤ (lim sup‘𝐹) ↔ ∀𝑗 ∈ ℝ 𝐴 ≤ (𝐺‘𝑗)))
3	2	notbid 318	. . 3 ⊢ ((𝐵 ⊆ ℝ ∧ 𝐹:𝐵⟶ℝ^* ∧ 𝐴 ∈ ℝ^*) → (¬ 𝐴 ≤ (lim sup‘𝐹) ↔ ¬ ∀𝑗 ∈ ℝ 𝐴 ≤ (𝐺‘𝑗)))
4		rexnal 3168	. . 3 ⊢ (∃𝑗 ∈ ℝ ¬ 𝐴 ≤ (𝐺‘𝑗) ↔ ¬ ∀𝑗 ∈ ℝ 𝐴 ≤ (𝐺‘𝑗))
5	3, 4	bitr4di 289	. 2 ⊢ ((𝐵 ⊆ ℝ ∧ 𝐹:𝐵⟶ℝ^* ∧ 𝐴 ∈ ℝ^*) → (¬ 𝐴 ≤ (lim sup‘𝐹) ↔ ∃𝑗 ∈ ℝ ¬ 𝐴 ≤ (𝐺‘𝑗)))
6		simp2 1136	. . . . 5 ⊢ ((𝐵 ⊆ ℝ ∧ 𝐹:𝐵⟶ℝ^* ∧ 𝐴 ∈ ℝ^) → 𝐹:𝐵⟶ℝ^)
7		reex 10961	. . . . . . 7 ⊢ ℝ ∈ V
8	7	ssex 5249	. . . . . 6 ⊢ (𝐵 ⊆ ℝ → 𝐵 ∈ V)
9	8	3ad2ant1 1132	. . . . 5 ⊢ ((𝐵 ⊆ ℝ ∧ 𝐹:𝐵⟶ℝ^* ∧ 𝐴 ∈ ℝ^*) → 𝐵 ∈ V)
10		xrex 12724	. . . . . 6 ⊢ ℝ^* ∈ V
11	10	a1i 11	. . . . 5 ⊢ ((𝐵 ⊆ ℝ ∧ 𝐹:𝐵⟶ℝ^* ∧ 𝐴 ∈ ℝ^) → ℝ^ ∈ V)
12		fex2 7772	. . . . 5 ⊢ ((𝐹:𝐵⟶ℝ^* ∧ 𝐵 ∈ V ∧ ℝ^* ∈ V) → 𝐹 ∈ V)
13	6, 9, 11, 12	syl3anc 1370	. . . 4 ⊢ ((𝐵 ⊆ ℝ ∧ 𝐹:𝐵⟶ℝ^* ∧ 𝐴 ∈ ℝ^*) → 𝐹 ∈ V)
14		limsupcl 15178	. . . 4 ⊢ (𝐹 ∈ V → (lim sup‘𝐹) ∈ ℝ^*)
15	13, 14	syl 17	. . 3 ⊢ ((𝐵 ⊆ ℝ ∧ 𝐹:𝐵⟶ℝ^* ∧ 𝐴 ∈ ℝ^) → (lim sup‘𝐹) ∈ ℝ^)
16		simp3 1137	. . 3 ⊢ ((𝐵 ⊆ ℝ ∧ 𝐹:𝐵⟶ℝ^* ∧ 𝐴 ∈ ℝ^) → 𝐴 ∈ ℝ^)
17		xrltnle 11041	. . 3 ⊢ (((lim sup‘𝐹) ∈ ℝ^* ∧ 𝐴 ∈ ℝ^*) → ((lim sup‘𝐹) < 𝐴 ↔ ¬ 𝐴 ≤ (lim sup‘𝐹)))
18	15, 16, 17	syl2anc 584	. 2 ⊢ ((𝐵 ⊆ ℝ ∧ 𝐹:𝐵⟶ℝ^* ∧ 𝐴 ∈ ℝ^*) → ((lim sup‘𝐹) < 𝐴 ↔ ¬ 𝐴 ≤ (lim sup‘𝐹)))
19	1	limsupgf 15180	. . . . 5 ⊢ 𝐺:ℝ⟶ℝ^*
20	19	ffvelrni 6955	. . . 4 ⊢ (𝑗 ∈ ℝ → (𝐺‘𝑗) ∈ ℝ^*)
21		xrltnle 11041	. . . 4 ⊢ (((𝐺‘𝑗) ∈ ℝ^* ∧ 𝐴 ∈ ℝ^*) → ((𝐺‘𝑗) < 𝐴 ↔ ¬ 𝐴 ≤ (𝐺‘𝑗)))
22	20, 16, 21	syl2anr 597	. . 3 ⊢ (((𝐵 ⊆ ℝ ∧ 𝐹:𝐵⟶ℝ^* ∧ 𝐴 ∈ ℝ^*) ∧ 𝑗 ∈ ℝ) → ((𝐺‘𝑗) < 𝐴 ↔ ¬ 𝐴 ≤ (𝐺‘𝑗)))
23	22	rexbidva 3227	. 2 ⊢ ((𝐵 ⊆ ℝ ∧ 𝐹:𝐵⟶ℝ^* ∧ 𝐴 ∈ ℝ^*) → (∃𝑗 ∈ ℝ (𝐺‘𝑗) < 𝐴 ↔ ∃𝑗 ∈ ℝ ¬ 𝐴 ≤ (𝐺‘𝑗)))
24	5, 18, 23	3bitr4d 311	1 ⊢ ((𝐵 ⊆ ℝ ∧ 𝐹:𝐵⟶ℝ^* ∧ 𝐴 ∈ ℝ^*) → ((lim sup‘𝐹) < 𝐴 ↔ ∃𝑗 ∈ ℝ (𝐺‘𝑗) < 𝐴))

Colors of variables: wff setvar class

Syntax hints: ¬ wn 3 → wi 4 ↔ wb 205 ∧ w3a 1086 = wceq 1542 ∈ wcel 2110 ∀wral 3066 ∃wrex 3067 Vcvv 3431 ∩ cin 3891 ⊆ wss 3892 class class class wbr 5079 ↦ cmpt 5162 “ cima 5592 ⟶wf 6427 ‘cfv 6431 (class class class)co 7269 supcsup 9175 ℝcr 10869 +∞cpnf 11005 ℝ^*cxr 11007 < clt 11008 ≤ cle 11009 [,)cico 13078 lim supclsp 15175

This theorem was proved from axioms: ax-mp 5 ax-1 6 ax-2 7 ax-3 8 ax-gen 1802 ax-4 1816 ax-5 1917 ax-6 1975 ax-7 2015 ax-8 2112 ax-9 2120 ax-10 2141 ax-11 2158 ax-12 2175 ax-ext 2711 ax-sep 5227 ax-nul 5234 ax-pow 5292 ax-pr 5356 ax-un 7580 ax-cnex 10926 ax-resscn 10927 ax-1cn 10928 ax-icn 10929 ax-addcl 10930 ax-addrcl 10931 ax-mulcl 10932 ax-mulrcl 10933 ax-mulcom 10934 ax-addass 10935 ax-mulass 10936 ax-distr 10937 ax-i2m1 10938 ax-1ne0 10939 ax-1rid 10940 ax-rnegex 10941 ax-rrecex 10942 ax-cnre 10943 ax-pre-lttri 10944 ax-pre-lttrn 10945 ax-pre-ltadd 10946 ax-pre-mulgt0 10947 ax-pre-sup 10948

This theorem depends on definitions: df-bi 206 df-an 397 df-or 845 df-3or 1087 df-3an 1088 df-tru 1545 df-fal 1555 df-ex 1787 df-nf 1791 df-sb 2072 df-mo 2542 df-eu 2571 df-clab 2718 df-cleq 2732 df-clel 2818 df-nfc 2891 df-ne 2946 df-nel 3052 df-ral 3071 df-rex 3072 df-reu 3073 df-rmo 3074 df-rab 3075 df-v 3433 df-sbc 3721 df-csb 3838 df-dif 3895 df-un 3897 df-in 3899 df-ss 3909 df-nul 4263 df-if 4466 df-pw 4541 df-sn 4568 df-pr 4570 df-op 4574 df-uni 4846 df-br 5080 df-opab 5142 df-mpt 5163 df-id 5489 df-po 5503 df-so 5504 df-xp 5595 df-rel 5596 df-cnv 5597 df-co 5598 df-dm 5599 df-rn 5600 df-res 5601 df-ima 5602 df-iota 6389 df-fun 6433 df-fn 6434 df-f 6435 df-f1 6436 df-fo 6437 df-f1o 6438 df-fv 6439 df-riota 7226 df-ov 7272 df-oprab 7273 df-mpo 7274 df-er 8479 df-en 8715 df-dom 8716 df-sdom 8717 df-sup 9177 df-inf 9178 df-pnf 11010 df-mnf 11011 df-xr 11012 df-ltxr 11013 df-le 11014 df-sub 11205 df-neg 11206 df-limsup 15176

This theorem is referenced by: limsupgre 15186 limsuplt2 43263

W3C validator