cantnfs - Metamath Proof Explorer

	Metamath Proof Explorer		< Previous Next > Nearby theorems
Mirrors > Home > MPE Home > Th. List > cantnfs		Structured version Visualization version GIF version

Theorem cantnfs 9649

Description: Elementhood in the set of finitely supported functions from 𝐵 to 𝐴. (Contributed by Mario Carneiro, 25-May-2015.) (Revised by AV, 28-Jun-2019.)

**Hypotheses**
Ref	Expression
cantnfs.s	⊢ 𝑆 = dom (𝐴 CNF 𝐵)
cantnfs.a	⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐴 ∈ On)
cantnfs.b	⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐵 ∈ On)

**Assertion**
Ref	Expression
cantnfs	⊢ (𝜑 → (𝐹 ∈ 𝑆 ↔ (𝐹:𝐵⟶𝐴 ∧ 𝐹 finSupp ∅)))

Proof of Theorem cantnfs Dummy variable 𝑔 is distinct from all other variables.

Step	Hyp	Ref	Expression
1		cantnfs.s	. . . . 5 ⊢ 𝑆 = dom (𝐴 CNF 𝐵)
2		eqid 2762	. . . . . 6 ⊢ {𝑔 ∈ (𝐴 ↑_m 𝐵) ∣ 𝑔 finSupp ∅} = {𝑔 ∈ (𝐴 ↑_m 𝐵) ∣ 𝑔 finSupp ∅}
3		cantnfs.a	. . . . . 6 ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐴 ∈ On)
4		cantnfs.b	. . . . . 6 ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐵 ∈ On)
5	2, 3, 4	cantnfdm 9647	. . . . 5 ⊢ (𝜑 → dom (𝐴 CNF 𝐵) = {𝑔 ∈ (𝐴 ↑_m 𝐵) ∣ 𝑔 finSupp ∅})
6	1, 5	eqtrid 2809	. . . 4 ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝑆 = {𝑔 ∈ (𝐴 ↑_m 𝐵) ∣ 𝑔 finSupp ∅})
7	6	eleq2d 2848	. . 3 ⊢ (𝜑 → (𝐹 ∈ 𝑆 ↔ 𝐹 ∈ {𝑔 ∈ (𝐴 ↑_m 𝐵) ∣ 𝑔 finSupp ∅}))
8		breq1 5110	. . . 4 ⊢ (𝑔 = 𝐹 → (𝑔 finSupp ∅ ↔ 𝐹 finSupp ∅))
9	8	elrab 3648	. . 3 ⊢ (𝐹 ∈ {𝑔 ∈ (𝐴 ↑_m 𝐵) ∣ 𝑔 finSupp ∅} ↔ (𝐹 ∈ (𝐴 ↑_m 𝐵) ∧ 𝐹 finSupp ∅))
10	7, 9	bitrdi 290	. 2 ⊢ (𝜑 → (𝐹 ∈ 𝑆 ↔ (𝐹 ∈ (𝐴 ↑_m 𝐵) ∧ 𝐹 finSupp ∅)))
11	3, 4	elmapd 8843	. . 3 ⊢ (𝜑 → (𝐹 ∈ (𝐴 ↑_m 𝐵) ↔ 𝐹:𝐵⟶𝐴))
12	11	anbi1d 643	. 2 ⊢ (𝜑 → ((𝐹 ∈ (𝐴 ↑_m 𝐵) ∧ 𝐹 finSupp ∅) ↔ (𝐹:𝐵⟶𝐴 ∧ 𝐹 finSupp ∅)))
13	10, 12	bitrd 282	1 ⊢ (𝜑 → (𝐹 ∈ 𝑆 ↔ (𝐹:𝐵⟶𝐴 ∧ 𝐹 finSupp ∅)))

Colors of variables: wff setvar class

This proof depends on syntax axioms: → wi 4 ↔ wb 209 ∧ wa 401 = wceq 1570 ∈ wcel 2145 {crab 3414 ∅c0 4282 class class class wbr 5107 dom cdm 5659 Oncon0 6361 ⟶wf 6533 (class class class)co 7417 ↑_m cmap 8830 finSupp cfsupp 9335 CNF ccnf 9644

This proof depends on axioms: ax-mp 5 ax-1 6 ax-2 7 ax-3 8 ax-gen 1828 ax-4 1842 ax-5 1943 ax-6 2000 ax-7 2041 ax-8 2147 ax-9 2155 ax-10 2178 ax-11 2194 ax-12 2215 ax-ext 2734 ax-rep 5236 ax-sep 5255 ax-nul 5267 ax-pow 5334 ax-pr 5402 ax-un 7740

This proof depends on definitions: df-bi 210 df-an 402 df-or 862 df-3an 1105 df-tru 1573 df-fal 1583 df-ex 1813 df-nf 1817 df-sb 2100 df-mo 2566 df-eu 2596 df-clab 2741 df-cleq 2754 df-clel 2837 df-nfc 2911 df-ne 2958 df-ral 3079 df-rex 3089 df-reu 3368 df-rab 3415 df-v 3455 df-sbc 3743 df-csb 3851 df-dif 3905 df-un 3907 df-in 3909 df-ss 3919 df-nul 4283 df-if 4486 df-pw 4562 df-sn 4588 df-pr 4590 df-op 4594 df-uni 4871 df-iun 4956 df-br 5108 df-opab 5172 df-mpt 5191 df-id 5554 df-xp 5665 df-rel 5666 df-cnv 5667 df-co 5668 df-dm 5669 df-rn 5670 df-res 5671 df-ima 5672 df-pred 6303 df-iota 6493 df-fun 6539 df-fn 6540 df-f 6541 df-f1 6542 df-fo 6543 df-f1o 6544 df-fv 6545 df-ov 7420 df-oprab 7421 df-mpo 7422 df-frecs 8284 df-wrecs 8315 df-recs 8364 df-rdg 8403 df-seqom 8441 df-map 8832 df-cnf 9645

This theorem is used by: cantnfcl 9650 cantnfle 9654 cantnflt 9655 cantnff 9657 cantnf0 9658 cantnfrescl 9659 cantnfp1lem1 9661 cantnfp1lem2 9662 cantnfp1lem3 9663 cantnfp1 9664 oemapvali 9667 cantnflem1a 9668 cantnflem1b 9669 cantnflem1c 9670 cantnflem1d 9671 cantnflem1 9672 cantnflem3 9674 cantnf 9676 cnfcomlem 9682 cnfcom 9683 cnfcom2lem 9684 cnfcom3lem 9686 cnfcom3 9687 cantnfub 44170 cantnfresb 44173 cantnf2 44174 naddcnff 44211 naddcnffo 44213 naddcnfcom 44215 naddcnfid1 44216 naddcnfid2 44217 naddcnfass 44218

W3C validator