Theorem upgrwlkcompim 16483

Description: Implications for the properties of the components of a walk in a pseudograph. (Contributed by Alexander van der Vekens, 23-Jun-2018.) (Revised by AV, 14-Apr-2021.)

Hypotheses

Ref	Expression
upgrwlkcompim.v	⊢ 𝑉 = (Vtx‘𝐺)
upgrwlkcompim.i	⊢ 𝐼 = (iEdg‘𝐺)
upgrwlkcompim.1	⊢ 𝐹 = (1st ‘𝑊)
upgrwlkcompim.2	⊢ 𝑃 = (2nd ‘𝑊)

Assertion

Ref	Expression
upgrwlkcompim	⊢ ((𝐺 ∈ UPGraph ∧ 𝑊 ∈ (Walks‘𝐺)) → (𝐹 ∈ Word dom 𝐼 ∧ 𝑃:(0...(♯‘𝐹))⟶𝑉 ∧ ∀𝑘 ∈ (0..^(♯‘𝐹))(𝐼‘(𝐹‘𝑘)) = {(𝑃‘𝑘), (𝑃‘(𝑘 + 1))}))

Distinct variable groups:   𝑘,𝐹   𝑘,𝐺   𝑘,𝐼   𝑃,𝑘   𝑘,𝑉

Allowed substitution hint:   𝑊(𝑘)

Proof of Theorem upgrwlkcompim

Step	Hyp	Ref	Expression
1		upgrwlkcompim.v	. . . . 5 ⊢ 𝑉 = (Vtx‘𝐺)
2		upgrwlkcompim.i	. . . . 5 ⊢ 𝐼 = (iEdg‘𝐺)
3	1, 2	upgriswlkdc 16481	. . . 4 ⊢ (𝐺 ∈ UPGraph → (𝐹(Walks‘𝐺)𝑃 ↔ (𝐹 ∈ Word dom 𝐼 ∧ 𝑃:(0...(♯‘𝐹))⟶𝑉 ∧ ∀𝑘 ∈ (0..^(♯‘𝐹))(DECID (𝑃‘𝑘) = (𝑃‘(𝑘 + 1)) ∧ (𝐼‘(𝐹‘𝑘)) = {(𝑃‘𝑘), (𝑃‘(𝑘 + 1))}))))
4	3	biimpd 144	. . 3 ⊢ (𝐺 ∈ UPGraph → (𝐹(Walks‘𝐺)𝑃 → (𝐹 ∈ Word dom 𝐼 ∧ 𝑃:(0...(♯‘𝐹))⟶𝑉 ∧ ∀𝑘 ∈ (0..^(♯‘𝐹))(DECID (𝑃‘𝑘) = (𝑃‘(𝑘 + 1)) ∧ (𝐼‘(𝐹‘𝑘)) = {(𝑃‘𝑘), (𝑃‘(𝑘 + 1))}))))
5		wlkcprim 16471	. . . 4 ⊢ (𝑊 ∈ (Walks‘𝐺) → (1st ‘𝑊)(Walks‘𝐺)(2nd ‘𝑊))
6		upgrwlkcompim.1	. . . 4 ⊢ 𝐹 = (1st ‘𝑊)
7		upgrwlkcompim.2	. . . 4 ⊢ 𝑃 = (2nd ‘𝑊)
8	5, 6, 7	3brtr4g 4148	. . 3 ⊢ (𝑊 ∈ (Walks‘𝐺) → 𝐹(Walks‘𝐺)𝑃)
9	4, 8	impel 280	. 2 ⊢ ((𝐺 ∈ UPGraph ∧ 𝑊 ∈ (Walks‘𝐺)) → (𝐹 ∈ Word dom 𝐼 ∧ 𝑃:(0...(♯‘𝐹))⟶𝑉 ∧ ∀𝑘 ∈ (0..^(♯‘𝐹))(DECID (𝑃‘𝑘) = (𝑃‘(𝑘 + 1)) ∧ (𝐼‘(𝐹‘𝑘)) = {(𝑃‘𝑘), (𝑃‘(𝑘 + 1))})))
10		simpr 110	. . . 4 ⊢ ((DECID (𝑃‘𝑘) = (𝑃‘(𝑘 + 1)) ∧ (𝐼‘(𝐹‘𝑘)) = {(𝑃‘𝑘), (𝑃‘(𝑘 + 1))}) → (𝐼‘(𝐹‘𝑘)) = {(𝑃‘𝑘), (𝑃‘(𝑘 + 1))})
11	10	ralimi 2607	. . 3 ⊢ (∀𝑘 ∈ (0..^(♯‘𝐹))(DECID (𝑃‘𝑘) = (𝑃‘(𝑘 + 1)) ∧ (𝐼‘(𝐹‘𝑘)) = {(𝑃‘𝑘), (𝑃‘(𝑘 + 1))}) → ∀𝑘 ∈ (0..^(♯‘𝐹))(𝐼‘(𝐹‘𝑘)) = {(𝑃‘𝑘), (𝑃‘(𝑘 + 1))})
12	11	3anim3i 1214	. 2 ⊢ ((𝐹 ∈ Word dom 𝐼 ∧ 𝑃:(0...(♯‘𝐹))⟶𝑉 ∧ ∀𝑘 ∈ (0..^(♯‘𝐹))(DECID (𝑃‘𝑘) = (𝑃‘(𝑘 + 1)) ∧ (𝐼‘(𝐹‘𝑘)) = {(𝑃‘𝑘), (𝑃‘(𝑘 + 1))})) → (𝐹 ∈ Word dom 𝐼 ∧ 𝑃:(0...(♯‘𝐹))⟶𝑉 ∧ ∀𝑘 ∈ (0..^(♯‘𝐹))(𝐼‘(𝐹‘𝑘)) = {(𝑃‘𝑘), (𝑃‘(𝑘 + 1))}))
13	9, 12	syl 14	1 ⊢ ((𝐺 ∈ UPGraph ∧ 𝑊 ∈ (Walks‘𝐺)) → (𝐹 ∈ Word dom 𝐼 ∧ 𝑃:(0...(♯‘𝐹))⟶𝑉 ∧ ∀𝑘 ∈ (0..^(♯‘𝐹))(𝐼‘(𝐹‘𝑘)) = {(𝑃‘𝑘), (𝑃‘(𝑘 + 1))}))

Syntax hints:   → wi 4   ∧ wa 104  DECID wdc 842   ∧ w3a 1005   = wceq 1398   ∈ wcel 2205  ∀wral 2522  {cpr 3695   class class class wbr 4114  dom cdm 4754  ⟶wf 5353  ‘cfv 5357  (class class class)co 6058  1^st c1st 6345  2^nd c2nd 6346  0cc0 8143  1c1 8144   + caddc 8146  ...cfz 10361  ..^cfzo 10498  ♯chash 11163  Word cword 11249  Vtxcvtx 16133  iEdgciedg 16134  UPGraphcupgr 16212  Walkscwlks 16438

This theorem was proved from axioms:  ax-mp 5  ax-1 6  ax-2 7  ax-ia1 106  ax-ia2 107  ax-ia3 108  ax-in1 619  ax-in2 620  ax-io 717  ax-5 1496  ax-7 1497  ax-gen 1498  ax-ie1 1542  ax-ie2 1543  ax-8 1553  ax-10 1554  ax-11 1555  ax-i12 1556  ax-bndl 1558  ax-4 1559  ax-17 1575  ax-i9 1579  ax-ial 1583  ax-i5r 1584  ax-13 2207  ax-14 2208  ax-ext 2216  ax-coll 4230  ax-sep 4233  ax-nul 4241  ax-pow 4292  ax-pr 4327  ax-un 4559  ax-setind 4664  ax-iinf 4715  ax-cnex 8234  ax-resscn 8235  ax-1cn 8236  ax-1re 8237  ax-icn 8238  ax-addcl 8239  ax-addrcl 8240  ax-mulcl 8241  ax-addcom 8243  ax-mulcom 8244  ax-addass 8245  ax-mulass 8246  ax-distr 8247  ax-i2m1 8248  ax-0lt1 8249  ax-1rid 8250  ax-0id 8251  ax-rnegex 8252  ax-cnre 8254  ax-pre-ltirr 8255  ax-pre-ltwlin 8256  ax-pre-lttrn 8257  ax-pre-apti 8258  ax-pre-ltadd 8259

This theorem depends on definitions:  df-bi 117  df-dc 843  df-ifp 987  df-3or 1006  df-3an 1007  df-tru 1401  df-fal 1404  df-nf 1510  df-sb 1812  df-eu 2085  df-mo 2086  df-clab 2221  df-cleq 2227  df-clel 2230  df-nfc 2375  df-ne 2415  df-nel 2510  df-ral 2527  df-rex 2528  df-reu 2529  df-rab 2531  df-v 2817  df-sbc 3046  df-csb 3142  df-dif 3216  df-un 3218  df-in 3220  df-ss 3227  df-nul 3513  df-if 3625  df-pw 3676  df-sn 3700  df-pr 3701  df-op 3703  df-uni 3920  df-int 3955  df-iun 3998  df-br 4115  df-opab 4177  df-mpt 4178  df-tr 4214  df-id 4419  df-iord 4492  df-on 4494  df-ilim 4495  df-suc 4497  df-iom 4718  df-xp 4760  df-rel 4761  df-cnv 4762  df-co 4763  df-dm 4764  df-rn 4765  df-res 4766  df-ima 4767  df-iota 5317  df-fun 5359  df-fn 5360  df-f 5361  df-f1 5362  df-fo 5363  df-f1o 5364  df-fv 5365  df-riota 6011  df-ov 6061  df-oprab 6062  df-mpo 6063  df-1st 6347  df-2nd 6348  df-recs 6549  df-frec 6635  df-1o 6660  df-2o 6661  df-er 6780  df-map 6897  df-en 6989  df-dom 6990  df-fin 6991  df-pnf 8326  df-mnf 8327  df-xr 8328  df-ltxr 8329  df-le 8330  df-sub 8462  df-neg 8463  df-inn 9255  df-2 9313  df-3 9314  df-4 9315  df-5 9316  df-6 9317  df-7 9318  df-8 9319  df-9 9320  df-n0 9514  df-z 9595  df-dec 9728  df-uz 9872  df-fz 10362  df-fzo 10499  df-ihash 11164  df-word 11250  df-ndx 13299  df-slot 13300  df-base 13302  df-edgf 16126  df-vtx 16135  df-iedg 16136  df-edg 16179  df-uhgrm 16190  df-upgren 16214  df-wlks 16439

This theorem is referenced by:  uspgr2wlkeq  16486