P. 91 of Theorem List - Metamath Proof Explorer

Theorem List for Metamath Proof Explorer - 9001-9100   *Has distinct variable group(s)

Type	Label	Description
Statement
Theorem	pw2f1olem 9001*	Lemma for pw2f1o 9002. (Contributed by Mario Carneiro, 6-Oct-2014.)
⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐴 ∈ 𝑉)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐵 ∈ 𝑊)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐶 ∈ 𝑊)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐵 ≠ 𝐶)    ⇒   ⊢ (𝜑 → ((𝑆 ∈ 𝒫 𝐴 ∧ 𝐺 = (𝑧 ∈ 𝐴 ↦ if(𝑧 ∈ 𝑆, 𝐶, 𝐵))) ↔ (𝐺 ∈ ({𝐵, 𝐶} ↑m 𝐴) ∧ 𝑆 = (◡𝐺 “ {𝐶}))))
Theorem	pw2f1o 9002*	The power set of a set is equinumerous to set exponentiation with an unordered pair base of ordinal 2. Generalized from Proposition 10.44 of [TakeutiZaring] p. 96. (Contributed by Mario Carneiro, 6-Oct-2014.)
⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐴 ∈ 𝑉)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐵 ∈ 𝑊)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐶 ∈ 𝑊)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐵 ≠ 𝐶)    &   ⊢ 𝐹 = (𝑥 ∈ 𝒫 𝐴 ↦ (𝑧 ∈ 𝐴 ↦ if(𝑧 ∈ 𝑥, 𝐶, 𝐵)))    ⇒   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐹:𝒫 𝐴–1-1-onto→({𝐵, 𝐶} ↑m 𝐴))
Theorem	pw2eng 9003	The power set of a set is equinumerous to set exponentiation with a base of ordinal 2o. (Contributed by FL, 22-Feb-2011.) (Revised by Mario Carneiro, 1-Jul-2015.)
⊢ (𝐴 ∈ 𝑉 → 𝒫 𝐴 ≈ (2o ↑m 𝐴))
Theorem	pw2en 9004	The power set of a set is equinumerous to set exponentiation with a base of ordinal 2. Proposition 10.44 of [TakeutiZaring] p. 96. This is Metamath 100 proof #52. (Contributed by NM, 29-Jan-2004.) (Proof shortened by Mario Carneiro, 1-Jul-2015.)
⊢ 𝐴 ∈ V    ⇒   ⊢ 𝒫 𝐴 ≈ (2o ↑m 𝐴)
Theorem	fopwdom 9005	Covering implies injection on power sets. (Contributed by Stefan O'Rear, 6-Nov-2014.) (Revised by Mario Carneiro, 24-Jun-2015.) (Revised by AV, 18-Sep-2021.)
⊢ ((𝐹 ∈ 𝑉 ∧ 𝐹:𝐴–onto→𝐵) → 𝒫 𝐵 ≼ 𝒫 𝐴)
Theorem	enfixsn 9006*	Given two equipollent sets, a bijection can always be chosen which fixes a single point. (Contributed by Stefan O'Rear, 9-Jul-2015.)
⊢ ((𝐴 ∈ 𝑋 ∧ 𝐵 ∈ 𝑌 ∧ 𝑋 ≈ 𝑌) → ∃𝑓(𝑓:𝑋–1-1-onto→𝑌 ∧ (𝑓‘𝐴) = 𝐵))
2.4.30  Schroeder-Bernstein Theorem
Theorem	sbthlem1 9007*	Lemma for sbth 9017. (Contributed by NM, 22-Mar-1998.)
⊢ 𝐴 ∈ V    &   ⊢ 𝐷 = {𝑥 ∣ (𝑥 ⊆ 𝐴 ∧ (𝑔 “ (𝐵 ∖ (𝑓 “ 𝑥))) ⊆ (𝐴 ∖ 𝑥))}    ⇒   ⊢ ∪ 𝐷 ⊆ (𝐴 ∖ (𝑔 “ (𝐵 ∖ (𝑓 “ ∪ 𝐷))))
Theorem	sbthlem2 9008*	Lemma for sbth 9017. (Contributed by NM, 22-Mar-1998.)
⊢ 𝐴 ∈ V    &   ⊢ 𝐷 = {𝑥 ∣ (𝑥 ⊆ 𝐴 ∧ (𝑔 “ (𝐵 ∖ (𝑓 “ 𝑥))) ⊆ (𝐴 ∖ 𝑥))}    ⇒   ⊢ (ran 𝑔 ⊆ 𝐴 → (𝐴 ∖ (𝑔 “ (𝐵 ∖ (𝑓 “ ∪ 𝐷)))) ⊆ ∪ 𝐷)
Theorem	sbthlem3 9009*	Lemma for sbth 9017. (Contributed by NM, 22-Mar-1998.)
⊢ 𝐴 ∈ V    &   ⊢ 𝐷 = {𝑥 ∣ (𝑥 ⊆ 𝐴 ∧ (𝑔 “ (𝐵 ∖ (𝑓 “ 𝑥))) ⊆ (𝐴 ∖ 𝑥))}    ⇒   ⊢ (ran 𝑔 ⊆ 𝐴 → (𝑔 “ (𝐵 ∖ (𝑓 “ ∪ 𝐷))) = (𝐴 ∖ ∪ 𝐷))
Theorem	sbthlem4 9010*	Lemma for sbth 9017. (Contributed by NM, 27-Mar-1998.)
⊢ 𝐴 ∈ V    &   ⊢ 𝐷 = {𝑥 ∣ (𝑥 ⊆ 𝐴 ∧ (𝑔 “ (𝐵 ∖ (𝑓 “ 𝑥))) ⊆ (𝐴 ∖ 𝑥))}    ⇒   ⊢ (((dom 𝑔 = 𝐵 ∧ ran 𝑔 ⊆ 𝐴) ∧ Fun ◡𝑔) → (◡𝑔 “ (𝐴 ∖ ∪ 𝐷)) = (𝐵 ∖ (𝑓 “ ∪ 𝐷)))
Theorem	sbthlem5 9011*	Lemma for sbth 9017. (Contributed by NM, 22-Mar-1998.)
⊢ 𝐴 ∈ V    &   ⊢ 𝐷 = {𝑥 ∣ (𝑥 ⊆ 𝐴 ∧ (𝑔 “ (𝐵 ∖ (𝑓 “ 𝑥))) ⊆ (𝐴 ∖ 𝑥))}    &   ⊢ 𝐻 = ((𝑓 ↾ ∪ 𝐷) ∪ (◡𝑔 ↾ (𝐴 ∖ ∪ 𝐷)))    ⇒   ⊢ ((dom 𝑓 = 𝐴 ∧ ran 𝑔 ⊆ 𝐴) → dom 𝐻 = 𝐴)
Theorem	sbthlem6 9012*	Lemma for sbth 9017. (Contributed by NM, 27-Mar-1998.)
⊢ 𝐴 ∈ V    &   ⊢ 𝐷 = {𝑥 ∣ (𝑥 ⊆ 𝐴 ∧ (𝑔 “ (𝐵 ∖ (𝑓 “ 𝑥))) ⊆ (𝐴 ∖ 𝑥))}    &   ⊢ 𝐻 = ((𝑓 ↾ ∪ 𝐷) ∪ (◡𝑔 ↾ (𝐴 ∖ ∪ 𝐷)))    ⇒   ⊢ ((ran 𝑓 ⊆ 𝐵 ∧ ((dom 𝑔 = 𝐵 ∧ ran 𝑔 ⊆ 𝐴) ∧ Fun ◡𝑔)) → ran 𝐻 = 𝐵)
Theorem	sbthlem7 9013*	Lemma for sbth 9017. (Contributed by NM, 27-Mar-1998.)
⊢ 𝐴 ∈ V    &   ⊢ 𝐷 = {𝑥 ∣ (𝑥 ⊆ 𝐴 ∧ (𝑔 “ (𝐵 ∖ (𝑓 “ 𝑥))) ⊆ (𝐴 ∖ 𝑥))}    &   ⊢ 𝐻 = ((𝑓 ↾ ∪ 𝐷) ∪ (◡𝑔 ↾ (𝐴 ∖ ∪ 𝐷)))    ⇒   ⊢ ((Fun 𝑓 ∧ Fun ◡𝑔) → Fun 𝐻)
Theorem	sbthlem8 9014*	Lemma for sbth 9017. (Contributed by NM, 27-Mar-1998.)
⊢ 𝐴 ∈ V    &   ⊢ 𝐷 = {𝑥 ∣ (𝑥 ⊆ 𝐴 ∧ (𝑔 “ (𝐵 ∖ (𝑓 “ 𝑥))) ⊆ (𝐴 ∖ 𝑥))}    &   ⊢ 𝐻 = ((𝑓 ↾ ∪ 𝐷) ∪ (◡𝑔 ↾ (𝐴 ∖ ∪ 𝐷)))    ⇒   ⊢ ((Fun ◡𝑓 ∧ (((Fun 𝑔 ∧ dom 𝑔 = 𝐵) ∧ ran 𝑔 ⊆ 𝐴) ∧ Fun ◡𝑔)) → Fun ◡𝐻)
Theorem	sbthlem9 9015*	Lemma for sbth 9017. (Contributed by NM, 28-Mar-1998.)
⊢ 𝐴 ∈ V    &   ⊢ 𝐷 = {𝑥 ∣ (𝑥 ⊆ 𝐴 ∧ (𝑔 “ (𝐵 ∖ (𝑓 “ 𝑥))) ⊆ (𝐴 ∖ 𝑥))}    &   ⊢ 𝐻 = ((𝑓 ↾ ∪ 𝐷) ∪ (◡𝑔 ↾ (𝐴 ∖ ∪ 𝐷)))    ⇒   ⊢ ((𝑓:𝐴–1-1→𝐵 ∧ 𝑔:𝐵–1-1→𝐴) → 𝐻:𝐴–1-1-onto→𝐵)
Theorem	sbthlem10 9016*	Lemma for sbth 9017. (Contributed by NM, 28-Mar-1998.)
⊢ 𝐴 ∈ V    &   ⊢ 𝐷 = {𝑥 ∣ (𝑥 ⊆ 𝐴 ∧ (𝑔 “ (𝐵 ∖ (𝑓 “ 𝑥))) ⊆ (𝐴 ∖ 𝑥))}    &   ⊢ 𝐻 = ((𝑓 ↾ ∪ 𝐷) ∪ (◡𝑔 ↾ (𝐴 ∖ ∪ 𝐷)))    &   ⊢ 𝐵 ∈ V    ⇒   ⊢ ((𝐴 ≼ 𝐵 ∧ 𝐵 ≼ 𝐴) → 𝐴 ≈ 𝐵)
Theorem	sbth 9017	Schroeder-Bernstein Theorem. Theorem 18 of [Suppes] p. 95. This theorem states that if set 𝐴 is smaller (has lower cardinality) than 𝐵 and vice-versa, then 𝐴 and 𝐵 are equinumerous (have the same cardinality). The interesting thing is that this can be proved without invoking the Axiom of Choice, as we do here. The theorem can also be proved from the axiom of choice and the linear order of the cardinal numbers, but our development does not provide the linear order of cardinal numbers until much later and in ways that depend on Schroeder-Bernstein. The main proof consists of lemmas sbthlem1 9007 through sbthlem10 9016; this final piece mainly changes bound variables to eliminate the hypotheses of sbthlem10 9016. We follow closely the proof in Suppes, which you should consult to understand our proof at a higher level. Note that Suppes' proof, which is credited to J. M. Whitaker, does not require the Axiom of Infinity. In the Intuitionistic Logic Explorer (ILE) the Schroeder-Bernstein Theorem has been proven equivalent to the law of the excluded middle (LEM), and in ILE the LEM is not accepted as necessarily true; see https://us.metamath.org/ileuni/exmidsbth.html 9016. This is Metamath 100 proof #25. (Contributed by NM, 8-Jun-1998.)
⊢ ((𝐴 ≼ 𝐵 ∧ 𝐵 ≼ 𝐴) → 𝐴 ≈ 𝐵)
Theorem	sbthb 9018	Schroeder-Bernstein Theorem and its converse. (Contributed by NM, 8-Jun-1998.)
⊢ ((𝐴 ≼ 𝐵 ∧ 𝐵 ≼ 𝐴) ↔ 𝐴 ≈ 𝐵)
Theorem	sbthcl 9019	Schroeder-Bernstein Theorem in class form. (Contributed by NM, 28-Mar-1998.)
⊢ ≈ = ( ≼ ∩ ◡ ≼ )
Theorem	dfsdom2 9020	Alternate definition of strict dominance. Compare Definition 3 of [Suppes] p. 97. (Contributed by NM, 31-Mar-1998.)
⊢ ≺ = ( ≼ ∖ ◡ ≼ )
Theorem	brsdom2 9021	Alternate definition of strict dominance. Definition 3 of [Suppes] p. 97. (Contributed by NM, 27-Jul-2004.)
⊢ 𝐴 ∈ V    &   ⊢ 𝐵 ∈ V    ⇒   ⊢ (𝐴 ≺ 𝐵 ↔ (𝐴 ≼ 𝐵 ∧ ¬ 𝐵 ≼ 𝐴))
Theorem	sdomnsym 9022	Strict dominance is asymmetric. Theorem 21(ii) of [Suppes] p. 97. (Contributed by NM, 8-Jun-1998.)
⊢ (𝐴 ≺ 𝐵 → ¬ 𝐵 ≺ 𝐴)
Theorem	domnsym 9023	Theorem 22(i) of [Suppes] p. 97. (Contributed by NM, 10-Jun-1998.)
⊢ (𝐴 ≼ 𝐵 → ¬ 𝐵 ≺ 𝐴)
Theorem	0domg 9024	Any set dominates the empty set. (Contributed by NM, 26-Oct-2003.) (Revised by Mario Carneiro, 26-Apr-2015.) Avoid ax-pow 5305, ax-un 7674. (Revised by BTernaryTau, 29-Nov-2024.)
⊢ (𝐴 ∈ 𝑉 → ∅ ≼ 𝐴)
Theorem	dom0 9025	A set dominated by the empty set is empty. (Contributed by NM, 22-Nov-2004.) Avoid ax-pow 5305, ax-un 7674. (Revised by BTernaryTau, 29-Nov-2024.)
⊢ (𝐴 ≼ ∅ ↔ 𝐴 = ∅)
Theorem	0sdomg 9026	A set strictly dominates the empty set iff it is not empty. (Contributed by NM, 23-Mar-2006.) Avoid ax-pow 5305, ax-un 7674. (Revised by BTernaryTau, 29-Nov-2024.)
⊢ (𝐴 ∈ 𝑉 → (∅ ≺ 𝐴 ↔ 𝐴 ≠ ∅))
Theorem	0dom 9027	Any set dominates the empty set. (Contributed by NM, 26-Oct-2003.) (Revised by Mario Carneiro, 26-Apr-2015.)
⊢ 𝐴 ∈ V    ⇒   ⊢ ∅ ≼ 𝐴
Theorem	0sdom 9028	A set strictly dominates the empty set iff it is not empty. (Contributed by NM, 29-Jul-2004.)
⊢ 𝐴 ∈ V    ⇒   ⊢ (∅ ≺ 𝐴 ↔ 𝐴 ≠ ∅)
Theorem	sdom0 9029	The empty set does not strictly dominate any set. (Contributed by NM, 26-Oct-2003.) Avoid ax-pow 5305, ax-un 7674. (Revised by BTernaryTau, 29-Nov-2024.)
⊢ ¬ 𝐴 ≺ ∅
Theorem	sdomdomtr 9030	Transitivity of strict dominance and dominance. Theorem 22(iii) of [Suppes] p. 97. (Contributed by NM, 26-Oct-2003.) (Revised by Mario Carneiro, 26-Apr-2015.)
⊢ ((𝐴 ≺ 𝐵 ∧ 𝐵 ≼ 𝐶) → 𝐴 ≺ 𝐶)
Theorem	sdomentr 9031	Transitivity of strict dominance and equinumerosity. Exercise 11 of [Suppes] p. 98. (Contributed by NM, 26-Oct-2003.)
⊢ ((𝐴 ≺ 𝐵 ∧ 𝐵 ≈ 𝐶) → 𝐴 ≺ 𝐶)
Theorem	domsdomtr 9032	Transitivity of dominance and strict dominance. Theorem 22(ii) of [Suppes] p. 97. (Contributed by NM, 10-Jun-1998.) (Revised by Mario Carneiro, 26-Apr-2015.)
⊢ ((𝐴 ≼ 𝐵 ∧ 𝐵 ≺ 𝐶) → 𝐴 ≺ 𝐶)
Theorem	ensdomtr 9033	Transitivity of equinumerosity and strict dominance. (Contributed by NM, 26-Oct-2003.) (Revised by Mario Carneiro, 26-Apr-2015.)
⊢ ((𝐴 ≈ 𝐵 ∧ 𝐵 ≺ 𝐶) → 𝐴 ≺ 𝐶)
Theorem	sdomirr 9034	Strict dominance is irreflexive. Theorem 21(i) of [Suppes] p. 97. (Contributed by NM, 4-Jun-1998.)
⊢ ¬ 𝐴 ≺ 𝐴
Theorem	sdomtr 9035	Strict dominance is transitive. Theorem 21(iii) of [Suppes] p. 97. (Contributed by NM, 9-Jun-1998.)
⊢ ((𝐴 ≺ 𝐵 ∧ 𝐵 ≺ 𝐶) → 𝐴 ≺ 𝐶)
Theorem	sdomn2lp 9036	Strict dominance has no 2-cycle loops. (Contributed by NM, 6-May-2008.)
⊢ ¬ (𝐴 ≺ 𝐵 ∧ 𝐵 ≺ 𝐴)
Theorem	enen1 9037	Equality-like theorem for equinumerosity. (Contributed by NM, 18-Dec-2003.)
⊢ (𝐴 ≈ 𝐵 → (𝐴 ≈ 𝐶 ↔ 𝐵 ≈ 𝐶))
Theorem	enen2 9038	Equality-like theorem for equinumerosity. (Contributed by NM, 18-Dec-2003.)
⊢ (𝐴 ≈ 𝐵 → (𝐶 ≈ 𝐴 ↔ 𝐶 ≈ 𝐵))
Theorem	domen1 9039	Equality-like theorem for equinumerosity and dominance. (Contributed by NM, 8-Nov-2003.)
⊢ (𝐴 ≈ 𝐵 → (𝐴 ≼ 𝐶 ↔ 𝐵 ≼ 𝐶))
Theorem	domen2 9040	Equality-like theorem for equinumerosity and dominance. (Contributed by NM, 8-Nov-2003.)
⊢ (𝐴 ≈ 𝐵 → (𝐶 ≼ 𝐴 ↔ 𝐶 ≼ 𝐵))
Theorem	sdomen1 9041	Equality-like theorem for equinumerosity and strict dominance. (Contributed by NM, 8-Nov-2003.)
⊢ (𝐴 ≈ 𝐵 → (𝐴 ≺ 𝐶 ↔ 𝐵 ≺ 𝐶))
Theorem	sdomen2 9042	Equality-like theorem for equinumerosity and strict dominance. (Contributed by NM, 8-Nov-2003.)
⊢ (𝐴 ≈ 𝐵 → (𝐶 ≺ 𝐴 ↔ 𝐶 ≺ 𝐵))
Theorem	domtriord 9043	Dominance is trichotomous in the restricted case of ordinal numbers. (Contributed by Jeff Hankins, 24-Oct-2009.)
⊢ ((𝐴 ∈ On ∧ 𝐵 ∈ On) → (𝐴 ≼ 𝐵 ↔ ¬ 𝐵 ≺ 𝐴))
Theorem	sdomel 9044	For ordinals, strict dominance implies membership. (Contributed by Mario Carneiro, 13-Jan-2013.)
⊢ ((𝐴 ∈ On ∧ 𝐵 ∈ On) → (𝐴 ≺ 𝐵 → 𝐴 ∈ 𝐵))
Theorem	sdomdif 9045	The difference of a set from a smaller set cannot be empty. (Contributed by Mario Carneiro, 5-Feb-2013.)
⊢ (𝐴 ≺ 𝐵 → (𝐵 ∖ 𝐴) ≠ ∅)
Theorem	onsdominel 9046	An ordinal with more elements of some type is larger. (Contributed by Stefan O'Rear, 2-Nov-2014.)
⊢ ((𝐴 ∈ On ∧ 𝐵 ∈ On ∧ (𝐴 ∩ 𝐶) ≺ (𝐵 ∩ 𝐶)) → 𝐴 ∈ 𝐵)
Theorem	domunsn 9047	Dominance over a set with one element added. (Contributed by Mario Carneiro, 18-May-2015.)
⊢ (𝐴 ≺ 𝐵 → (𝐴 ∪ {𝐶}) ≼ 𝐵)
Theorem	fodomr 9048*	There exists a mapping from a set onto any (nonempty) set that it dominates. (Contributed by NM, 23-Mar-2006.)
⊢ ((∅ ≺ 𝐵 ∧ 𝐵 ≼ 𝐴) → ∃𝑓 𝑓:𝐴–onto→𝐵)
Theorem	pwdom 9049	Injection of sets implies injection on power sets. (Contributed by Mario Carneiro, 9-Apr-2015.)
⊢ (𝐴 ≼ 𝐵 → 𝒫 𝐴 ≼ 𝒫 𝐵)
Theorem	canth2 9050	Cantor's Theorem. No set is equinumerous to its power set. Specifically, any set has a cardinality (size) strictly less than the cardinality of its power set. For example, the cardinality of real numbers is the same as the cardinality of the power set of integers, so real numbers cannot be put into a one-to-one correspondence with integers. Theorem 23 of [Suppes] p. 97. For the function version, see canth 7306. This is Metamath 100 proof #63. (Contributed by NM, 7-Aug-1994.)
⊢ 𝐴 ∈ V    ⇒   ⊢ 𝐴 ≺ 𝒫 𝐴
Theorem	canth2g 9051	Cantor's theorem with the sethood requirement expressed as an antecedent. Theorem 23 of [Suppes] p. 97. (Contributed by NM, 7-Nov-2003.)
⊢ (𝐴 ∈ 𝑉 → 𝐴 ≺ 𝒫 𝐴)
Theorem	2pwuninel 9052	The power set of the power set of the union of a set does not belong to the set. This theorem provides a way of constructing a new set that doesn't belong to a given set. (Contributed by NM, 27-Jun-2008.)
⊢ ¬ 𝒫 𝒫 ∪ 𝐴 ∈ 𝐴
Theorem	2pwne 9053	No set equals the power set of its power set. (Contributed by NM, 17-Nov-2008.)
⊢ (𝐴 ∈ 𝑉 → 𝒫 𝒫 𝐴 ≠ 𝐴)
Theorem	disjen 9054	A stronger form of pwuninel 8211. We can use pwuninel 8211, 2pwuninel 9052 to create one or two sets disjoint from a given set 𝐴, but here we show that in fact such constructions exist for arbitrarily large disjoint extensions, which is to say that for any set 𝐵 we can construct a set 𝑥 that is equinumerous to it and disjoint from 𝐴. (Contributed by Mario Carneiro, 7-Feb-2015.)
⊢ ((𝐴 ∈ 𝑉 ∧ 𝐵 ∈ 𝑊) → ((𝐴 ∩ (𝐵 × {𝒫 ∪ ran 𝐴})) = ∅ ∧ (𝐵 × {𝒫 ∪ ran 𝐴}) ≈ 𝐵))
Theorem	disjenex 9055*	Existence version of disjen 9054. (Contributed by Mario Carneiro, 7-Feb-2015.)
⊢ ((𝐴 ∈ 𝑉 ∧ 𝐵 ∈ 𝑊) → ∃𝑥((𝐴 ∩ 𝑥) = ∅ ∧ 𝑥 ≈ 𝐵))
Theorem	domss2 9056	A corollary of disjenex 9055. If 𝐹 is an injection from 𝐴 to 𝐵 then 𝐺 is a right inverse of 𝐹 from 𝐵 to a superset of 𝐴. (Contributed by Mario Carneiro, 7-Feb-2015.) (Revised by Mario Carneiro, 24-Jun-2015.)
⊢ 𝐺 = ◡(𝐹 ∪ (1st ↾ ((𝐵 ∖ ran 𝐹) × {𝒫 ∪ ran 𝐴})))    ⇒   ⊢ ((𝐹:𝐴–1-1→𝐵 ∧ 𝐴 ∈ 𝑉 ∧ 𝐵 ∈ 𝑊) → (𝐺:𝐵–1-1-onto→ran 𝐺 ∧ 𝐴 ⊆ ran 𝐺 ∧ (𝐺 ∘ 𝐹) = ( I ↾ 𝐴)))
Theorem	domssex2 9057*	A corollary of disjenex 9055. If 𝐹 is an injection from 𝐴 to 𝐵 then there is a right inverse 𝑔 of 𝐹 from 𝐵 to a superset of 𝐴. (Contributed by Mario Carneiro, 7-Feb-2015.) (Revised by Mario Carneiro, 24-Jun-2015.)
⊢ ((𝐹:𝐴–1-1→𝐵 ∧ 𝐴 ∈ 𝑉 ∧ 𝐵 ∈ 𝑊) → ∃𝑔(𝑔:𝐵–1-1→V ∧ (𝑔 ∘ 𝐹) = ( I ↾ 𝐴)))
Theorem	domssex 9058*	Weakening of domssex2 9057 to forget the functions in favor of dominance and equinumerosity. (Contributed by Mario Carneiro, 7-Feb-2015.) (Revised by Mario Carneiro, 24-Jun-2015.)
⊢ (𝐴 ≼ 𝐵 → ∃𝑥(𝐴 ⊆ 𝑥 ∧ 𝐵 ≈ 𝑥))
2.4.31  Equinumerosity (cont.)
Theorem	xpf1o 9059*	Construct a bijection on a Cartesian product given bijections on the factors. (Contributed by Mario Carneiro, 30-May-2015.)
⊢ (𝜑 → (𝑥 ∈ 𝐴 ↦ 𝑋):𝐴–1-1-onto→𝐵)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → (𝑦 ∈ 𝐶 ↦ 𝑌):𝐶–1-1-onto→𝐷)    ⇒   ⊢ (𝜑 → (𝑥 ∈ 𝐴, 𝑦 ∈ 𝐶 ↦ ⟨𝑋, 𝑌⟩):(𝐴 × 𝐶)–1-1-onto→(𝐵 × 𝐷))
Theorem	xpen 9060	Equinumerosity law for Cartesian product. Proposition 4.22(b) of [Mendelson] p. 254. (Contributed by NM, 24-Jul-2004.) (Proof shortened by Mario Carneiro, 26-Apr-2015.)
⊢ ((𝐴 ≈ 𝐵 ∧ 𝐶 ≈ 𝐷) → (𝐴 × 𝐶) ≈ (𝐵 × 𝐷))
Theorem	mapen 9061	Two set exponentiations are equinumerous when their bases and exponents are equinumerous. Theorem 6H(c) of [Enderton] p. 139. (Contributed by NM, 16-Dec-2003.) (Proof shortened by Mario Carneiro, 26-Apr-2015.)
⊢ ((𝐴 ≈ 𝐵 ∧ 𝐶 ≈ 𝐷) → (𝐴 ↑m 𝐶) ≈ (𝐵 ↑m 𝐷))
Theorem	mapdom1 9062	Order-preserving property of set exponentiation. Theorem 6L(c) of [Enderton] p. 149. (Contributed by NM, 27-Jul-2004.) (Revised by Mario Carneiro, 9-Mar-2013.)
⊢ (𝐴 ≼ 𝐵 → (𝐴 ↑m 𝐶) ≼ (𝐵 ↑m 𝐶))
Theorem	mapxpen 9063	Equinumerosity law for double set exponentiation. Proposition 10.45 of [TakeutiZaring] p. 96. (Contributed by NM, 21-Feb-2004.) (Revised by Mario Carneiro, 24-Jun-2015.)
⊢ ((𝐴 ∈ 𝑉 ∧ 𝐵 ∈ 𝑊 ∧ 𝐶 ∈ 𝑋) → ((𝐴 ↑m 𝐵) ↑m 𝐶) ≈ (𝐴 ↑m (𝐵 × 𝐶)))
Theorem	xpmapenlem 9064*	Lemma for xpmapen 9065. (Contributed by NM, 1-May-2004.) (Revised by Mario Carneiro, 16-Nov-2014.)
⊢ 𝐴 ∈ V    &   ⊢ 𝐵 ∈ V    &   ⊢ 𝐶 ∈ V    &   ⊢ 𝐷 = (𝑧 ∈ 𝐶 ↦ (1st ‘(𝑥‘𝑧)))    &   ⊢ 𝑅 = (𝑧 ∈ 𝐶 ↦ (2nd ‘(𝑥‘𝑧)))    &   ⊢ 𝑆 = (𝑧 ∈ 𝐶 ↦ ⟨((1st ‘𝑦)‘𝑧), ((2nd ‘𝑦)‘𝑧)⟩)    ⇒   ⊢ ((𝐴 × 𝐵) ↑m 𝐶) ≈ ((𝐴 ↑m 𝐶) × (𝐵 ↑m 𝐶))
Theorem	xpmapen 9065	Equinumerosity law for set exponentiation of a Cartesian product. Exercise 4.47 of [Mendelson] p. 255. (Contributed by NM, 23-Feb-2004.) (Proof shortened by Mario Carneiro, 16-Nov-2014.)
⊢ 𝐴 ∈ V    &   ⊢ 𝐵 ∈ V    &   ⊢ 𝐶 ∈ V    ⇒   ⊢ ((𝐴 × 𝐵) ↑m 𝐶) ≈ ((𝐴 ↑m 𝐶) × (𝐵 ↑m 𝐶))
Theorem	mapunen 9066	Equinumerosity law for set exponentiation of a disjoint union. Exercise 4.45 of [Mendelson] p. 255. (Contributed by NM, 23-Sep-2004.) (Revised by Mario Carneiro, 29-Apr-2015.)
⊢ (((𝐴 ∈ 𝑉 ∧ 𝐵 ∈ 𝑊 ∧ 𝐶 ∈ 𝑋) ∧ (𝐴 ∩ 𝐵) = ∅) → (𝐶 ↑m (𝐴 ∪ 𝐵)) ≈ ((𝐶 ↑m 𝐴) × (𝐶 ↑m 𝐵)))
Theorem	map2xp 9067	A cardinal power with exponent 2 is equivalent to a Cartesian product with itself. (Contributed by Mario Carneiro, 31-May-2015.) (Proof shortened by AV, 17-Jul-2022.)
⊢ (𝐴 ∈ 𝑉 → (𝐴 ↑m 2o) ≈ (𝐴 × 𝐴))
Theorem	mapdom2 9068	Order-preserving property of set exponentiation. Theorem 6L(d) of [Enderton] p. 149. (Contributed by NM, 23-Sep-2004.) (Revised by Mario Carneiro, 30-Apr-2015.)
⊢ ((𝐴 ≼ 𝐵 ∧ ¬ (𝐴 = ∅ ∧ 𝐶 = ∅)) → (𝐶 ↑m 𝐴) ≼ (𝐶 ↑m 𝐵))
Theorem	mapdom3 9069	Set exponentiation dominates the base. (Contributed by Mario Carneiro, 30-Apr-2015.) (Proof shortened by AV, 17-Jul-2022.)
⊢ ((𝐴 ∈ 𝑉 ∧ 𝐵 ∈ 𝑊 ∧ 𝐵 ≠ ∅) → 𝐴 ≼ (𝐴 ↑m 𝐵))
Theorem	pwen 9070	If two sets are equinumerous, then their power sets are equinumerous. Proposition 10.15 of [TakeutiZaring] p. 87. (Contributed by NM, 29-Jan-2004.) (Revised by Mario Carneiro, 9-Apr-2015.)
⊢ (𝐴 ≈ 𝐵 → 𝒫 𝐴 ≈ 𝒫 𝐵)
Theorem	ssenen 9071*	Equinumerosity of equinumerous subsets of a set. (Contributed by NM, 30-Sep-2004.) (Revised by Mario Carneiro, 16-Nov-2014.)
⊢ (𝐴 ≈ 𝐵 → {𝑥 ∣ (𝑥 ⊆ 𝐴 ∧ 𝑥 ≈ 𝐶)} ≈ {𝑥 ∣ (𝑥 ⊆ 𝐵 ∧ 𝑥 ≈ 𝐶)})
Theorem	limenpsi 9072	A limit ordinal is equinumerous to a proper subset of itself. (Contributed by NM, 30-Oct-2003.) (Revised by Mario Carneiro, 16-Nov-2014.)
⊢ Lim 𝐴    ⇒   ⊢ (𝐴 ∈ 𝑉 → 𝐴 ≈ (𝐴 ∖ {∅}))
Theorem	limensuci 9073	A limit ordinal is equinumerous to its successor. (Contributed by NM, 30-Oct-2003.)
⊢ Lim 𝐴    ⇒   ⊢ (𝐴 ∈ 𝑉 → 𝐴 ≈ suc 𝐴)
Theorem	limensuc 9074	A limit ordinal is equinumerous to its successor. (Contributed by NM, 30-Oct-2003.)
⊢ ((𝐴 ∈ 𝑉 ∧ Lim 𝐴) → 𝐴 ≈ suc 𝐴)
Theorem	infensuc 9075	Any infinite ordinal is equinumerous to its successor. Exercise 7 of [TakeutiZaring] p. 88. Proved without the Axiom of Infinity. (Contributed by NM, 30-Oct-2003.) (Revised by Mario Carneiro, 13-Jan-2013.)
⊢ ((𝐴 ∈ On ∧ ω ⊆ 𝐴) → 𝐴 ≈ suc 𝐴)
2.4.32  Finite sets
Theorem	dif1enlem 9076	Lemma for rexdif1en 9077 and dif1en 9078. (Contributed by BTernaryTau, 18-Aug-2024.) Generalize to all ordinals and add a sethood requirement to avoid ax-un 7674. (Revised by BTernaryTau, 5-Jan-2025.)
⊢ (((𝐹 ∈ 𝑉 ∧ 𝐴 ∈ 𝑊 ∧ 𝑀 ∈ On) ∧ 𝐹:𝐴–1-1-onto→suc 𝑀) → (𝐴 ∖ {(◡𝐹‘𝑀)}) ≈ 𝑀)
Theorem	rexdif1en 9077*	If a set is equinumerous to a nonzero ordinal, then there exists an element in that set such that removing it leaves the set equinumerous to the predecessor of that ordinal. (Contributed by BTernaryTau, 26-Aug-2024.) Generalize to all ordinals and avoid ax-un 7674. (Revised by BTernaryTau, 5-Jan-2025.)
⊢ ((𝑀 ∈ On ∧ 𝐴 ≈ suc 𝑀) → ∃𝑥 ∈ 𝐴 (𝐴 ∖ {𝑥}) ≈ 𝑀)
Theorem	dif1en 9078	If a set 𝐴 is equinumerous to the successor of an ordinal 𝑀, then 𝐴 with an element removed is equinumerous to 𝑀. (Contributed by Jeff Madsen, 2-Sep-2009.) (Revised by Stefan O'Rear, 16-Aug-2015.) Avoid ax-pow 5305. (Revised by BTernaryTau, 26-Aug-2024.) Generalize to all ordinals. (Revised by BTernaryTau, 6-Jan-2025.)
⊢ ((𝑀 ∈ On ∧ 𝐴 ≈ suc 𝑀 ∧ 𝑋 ∈ 𝐴) → (𝐴 ∖ {𝑋}) ≈ 𝑀)
Theorem	dif1ennn 9079	If a set 𝐴 is equinumerous to the successor of a natural number 𝑀, then 𝐴 with an element removed is equinumerous to 𝑀. See also dif1ennnALT 9168. (Contributed by BTernaryTau, 6-Jan-2025.)
⊢ ((𝑀 ∈ ω ∧ 𝐴 ≈ suc 𝑀 ∧ 𝑋 ∈ 𝐴) → (𝐴 ∖ {𝑋}) ≈ 𝑀)
Theorem	findcard 9080*	Schema for induction on the cardinality of a finite set. The inductive hypothesis is that the result is true on the given set with any one element removed. The result is then proven to be true for all finite sets. (Contributed by Jeff Madsen, 2-Sep-2009.)
⊢ (𝑥 = ∅ → (𝜑 ↔ 𝜓))    &   ⊢ (𝑥 = (𝑦 ∖ {𝑧}) → (𝜑 ↔ 𝜒))    &   ⊢ (𝑥 = 𝑦 → (𝜑 ↔ 𝜃))    &   ⊢ (𝑥 = 𝐴 → (𝜑 ↔ 𝜏))    &   ⊢ 𝜓    &   ⊢ (𝑦 ∈ Fin → (∀𝑧 ∈ 𝑦 𝜒 → 𝜃))    ⇒   ⊢ (𝐴 ∈ Fin → 𝜏)
Theorem	findcard2 9081*	Schema for induction on the cardinality of a finite set. The inductive step shows that the result is true if one more element is added to the set. The result is then proven to be true for all finite sets. (Contributed by Jeff Madsen, 8-Jul-2010.) Avoid ax-pow 5305. (Revised by BTernaryTau, 26-Aug-2024.)
⊢ (𝑥 = ∅ → (𝜑 ↔ 𝜓))    &   ⊢ (𝑥 = 𝑦 → (𝜑 ↔ 𝜒))    &   ⊢ (𝑥 = (𝑦 ∪ {𝑧}) → (𝜑 ↔ 𝜃))    &   ⊢ (𝑥 = 𝐴 → (𝜑 ↔ 𝜏))    &   ⊢ 𝜓    &   ⊢ (𝑦 ∈ Fin → (𝜒 → 𝜃))    ⇒   ⊢ (𝐴 ∈ Fin → 𝜏)
Theorem	findcard2s 9082*	Variation of findcard2 9081 requiring that the element added in the induction step not be a member of the original set. (Contributed by Paul Chapman, 30-Nov-2012.)
⊢ (𝑥 = ∅ → (𝜑 ↔ 𝜓))    &   ⊢ (𝑥 = 𝑦 → (𝜑 ↔ 𝜒))    &   ⊢ (𝑥 = (𝑦 ∪ {𝑧}) → (𝜑 ↔ 𝜃))    &   ⊢ (𝑥 = 𝐴 → (𝜑 ↔ 𝜏))    &   ⊢ 𝜓    &   ⊢ ((𝑦 ∈ Fin ∧ ¬ 𝑧 ∈ 𝑦) → (𝜒 → 𝜃))    ⇒   ⊢ (𝐴 ∈ Fin → 𝜏)
Theorem	findcard2d 9083*	Deduction version of findcard2 9081. (Contributed by SO, 16-Jul-2018.)
⊢ (𝑥 = ∅ → (𝜓 ↔ 𝜒))    &   ⊢ (𝑥 = 𝑦 → (𝜓 ↔ 𝜃))    &   ⊢ (𝑥 = (𝑦 ∪ {𝑧}) → (𝜓 ↔ 𝜏))    &   ⊢ (𝑥 = 𝐴 → (𝜓 ↔ 𝜂))    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝜒)    &   ⊢ ((𝜑 ∧ (𝑦 ⊆ 𝐴 ∧ 𝑧 ∈ (𝐴 ∖ 𝑦))) → (𝜃 → 𝜏))    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐴 ∈ Fin)    ⇒   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝜂)
Theorem	nnfi 9084	Natural numbers are finite sets. (Contributed by Stefan O'Rear, 21-Mar-2015.) Avoid ax-pow 5305. (Revised by BTernaryTau, 23-Sep-2024.)
⊢ (𝐴 ∈ ω → 𝐴 ∈ Fin)
Theorem	pssnn 9085*	A proper subset of a natural number is equinumerous to some smaller number. Lemma 6F of [Enderton] p. 137. (Contributed by NM, 22-Jun-1998.) (Revised by Mario Carneiro, 16-Nov-2014.) Avoid ax-pow 5305. (Revised by BTernaryTau, 31-Jul-2024.)
⊢ ((𝐴 ∈ ω ∧ 𝐵 ⊊ 𝐴) → ∃𝑥 ∈ 𝐴 𝐵 ≈ 𝑥)
Theorem	ssnnfi 9086	A subset of a natural number is finite. (Contributed by NM, 24-Jun-1998.) (Proof shortened by BTernaryTau, 23-Sep-2024.)
⊢ ((𝐴 ∈ ω ∧ 𝐵 ⊆ 𝐴) → 𝐵 ∈ Fin)
Theorem	unfi 9087	The union of two finite sets is finite. Part of Corollary 6K of [Enderton] p. 144. (Contributed by NM, 16-Nov-2002.) Avoid ax-pow 5305. (Revised by BTernaryTau, 7-Aug-2024.)
⊢ ((𝐴 ∈ Fin ∧ 𝐵 ∈ Fin) → (𝐴 ∪ 𝐵) ∈ Fin)
Theorem	unfid 9088	The union of two finite sets is finite. (Contributed by Glauco Siliprandi, 5-Feb-2022.)
⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐴 ∈ Fin)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐵 ∈ Fin)    ⇒   ⊢ (𝜑 → (𝐴 ∪ 𝐵) ∈ Fin)
Theorem	ssfi 9089	A subset of a finite set is finite. Corollary 6G of [Enderton] p. 138. For a shorter proof using ax-pow 5305, see ssfiALT 9090. (Contributed by NM, 24-Jun-1998.) Avoid ax-pow 5305. (Revised by BTernaryTau, 12-Aug-2024.)
⊢ ((𝐴 ∈ Fin ∧ 𝐵 ⊆ 𝐴) → 𝐵 ∈ Fin)
Theorem	ssfiALT 9090	Shorter proof of ssfi 9089 using ax-pow 5305. (Contributed by NM, 24-Jun-1998.) (Proof modification is discouraged.) (New usage is discouraged.)
⊢ ((𝐴 ∈ Fin ∧ 𝐵 ⊆ 𝐴) → 𝐵 ∈ Fin)
Theorem	diffi 9091	If 𝐴 is finite, (𝐴 ∖ 𝐵) is finite. (Contributed by FL, 3-Aug-2009.)
⊢ (𝐴 ∈ Fin → (𝐴 ∖ 𝐵) ∈ Fin)
Theorem	cnvfi 9092	If a set is finite, its converse is as well. (Contributed by Mario Carneiro, 28-Dec-2014.) Avoid ax-pow 5305. (Revised by BTernaryTau, 9-Sep-2024.)
⊢ (𝐴 ∈ Fin → ◡𝐴 ∈ Fin)
Theorem	pwssfi 9093	Every element of the power set of 𝐴 is finite if and only if 𝐴 is finite. (Contributed by Glauco Siliprandi, 17-Aug-2020.)
⊢ (𝐴 ∈ 𝑉 → (𝐴 ∈ Fin ↔ 𝒫 𝐴 ⊆ Fin))
Theorem	fnfi 9094	A version of fnex 7157 for finite sets that does not require Replacement or Power Sets. (Contributed by Mario Carneiro, 16-Nov-2014.) (Revised by Mario Carneiro, 24-Jun-2015.)
⊢ ((𝐹 Fn 𝐴 ∧ 𝐴 ∈ Fin) → 𝐹 ∈ Fin)
Theorem	f1oenfi 9095	If the domain of a one-to-one, onto function is finite, then the domain and range of the function are equinumerous. This theorem is proved without using the Axiom of Replacement or the Axiom of Power Sets (unlike f1oeng 8899). (Contributed by BTernaryTau, 8-Sep-2024.)
⊢ ((𝐴 ∈ Fin ∧ 𝐹:𝐴–1-1-onto→𝐵) → 𝐴 ≈ 𝐵)
Theorem	f1oenfirn 9096	If the range of a one-to-one, onto function is finite, then the domain and range of the function are equinumerous. (Contributed by BTernaryTau, 9-Sep-2024.)
⊢ ((𝐵 ∈ Fin ∧ 𝐹:𝐴–1-1-onto→𝐵) → 𝐴 ≈ 𝐵)
Theorem	f1domfi 9097	If the codomain of a one-to-one function is finite, then the function's domain is dominated by its codomain. This theorem is proved without using the Axiom of Replacement or the Axiom of Power Sets (unlike f1domg 8900). (Contributed by BTernaryTau, 25-Sep-2024.)
⊢ ((𝐵 ∈ Fin ∧ 𝐹:𝐴–1-1→𝐵) → 𝐴 ≼ 𝐵)
Theorem	f1domfi2 9098	If the domain of a one-to-one function is finite, then the function's domain is dominated by its codomain when the latter is a set. This theorem is proved without using the Axiom of Power Sets (unlike f1dom2g 8898). (Contributed by BTernaryTau, 24-Nov-2024.)
⊢ ((𝐴 ∈ Fin ∧ 𝐵 ∈ 𝑉 ∧ 𝐹:𝐴–1-1→𝐵) → 𝐴 ≼ 𝐵)
Theorem	enreffi 9099	Equinumerosity is reflexive for finite sets, proved without using the Axiom of Power Sets (unlike enrefg 8913). (Contributed by BTernaryTau, 8-Sep-2024.)
⊢ (𝐴 ∈ Fin → 𝐴 ≈ 𝐴)
Theorem	ensymfib 9100	Symmetry of equinumerosity for finite sets, proved without using the Axiom of Power Sets (unlike ensymb 8931). (Contributed by BTernaryTau, 9-Sep-2024.)
⊢ (𝐴 ∈ Fin → (𝐴 ≈ 𝐵 ↔ 𝐵 ≈ 𝐴))