P. 91 of Theorem List - Metamath Proof Explorer

Theorem List for Metamath Proof Explorer - 9001-9100   *Has distinct variable group(s)

Type	Label	Description
Statement
Theorem	xpcomf1o 9001*	The canonical bijection from (𝐴 × 𝐵) to (𝐵 × 𝐴). (Contributed by Mario Carneiro, 23-Apr-2014.)
⊢ 𝐹 = (𝑥 ∈ (𝐴 × 𝐵) ↦ ∪ ◡{𝑥})    ⇒   ⊢ 𝐹:(𝐴 × 𝐵)–1-1-onto→(𝐵 × 𝐴)
Theorem	xpcomco 9002*	Composition with the bijection of xpcomf1o 9001 swaps the arguments to a mapping. (Contributed by Mario Carneiro, 30-May-2015.)
⊢ 𝐹 = (𝑥 ∈ (𝐴 × 𝐵) ↦ ∪ ◡{𝑥})    &   ⊢ 𝐺 = (𝑦 ∈ 𝐵, 𝑧 ∈ 𝐴 ↦ 𝐶)    ⇒   ⊢ (𝐺 ∘ 𝐹) = (𝑧 ∈ 𝐴, 𝑦 ∈ 𝐵 ↦ 𝐶)
Theorem	xpcomen 9003	Commutative law for equinumerosity of Cartesian product. Proposition 4.22(d) of [Mendelson] p. 254. (Contributed by NM, 5-Jan-2004.) (Revised by Mario Carneiro, 15-Nov-2014.)
⊢ 𝐴 ∈ V    &   ⊢ 𝐵 ∈ V    ⇒   ⊢ (𝐴 × 𝐵) ≈ (𝐵 × 𝐴)
Theorem	xpcomeng 9004	Commutative law for equinumerosity of Cartesian product. Proposition 4.22(d) of [Mendelson] p. 254. (Contributed by NM, 27-Mar-2006.)
⊢ ((𝐴 ∈ 𝑉 ∧ 𝐵 ∈ 𝑊) → (𝐴 × 𝐵) ≈ (𝐵 × 𝐴))
Theorem	xpsnen2g 9005	A set is equinumerous to its Cartesian product with a singleton on the left. (Contributed by Stefan O'Rear, 21-Nov-2014.)
⊢ ((𝐴 ∈ 𝑉 ∧ 𝐵 ∈ 𝑊) → ({𝐴} × 𝐵) ≈ 𝐵)
Theorem	xpassen 9006	Associative law for equinumerosity of Cartesian product. Proposition 4.22(e) of [Mendelson] p. 254. (Contributed by NM, 22-Jan-2004.) (Revised by Mario Carneiro, 15-Nov-2014.)
⊢ 𝐴 ∈ V    &   ⊢ 𝐵 ∈ V    &   ⊢ 𝐶 ∈ V    ⇒   ⊢ ((𝐴 × 𝐵) × 𝐶) ≈ (𝐴 × (𝐵 × 𝐶))
Theorem	xpdom2 9007	Dominance law for Cartesian product. Proposition 10.33(2) of [TakeutiZaring] p. 92. (Contributed by NM, 24-Jul-2004.) (Revised by Mario Carneiro, 15-Nov-2014.)
⊢ 𝐶 ∈ V    ⇒   ⊢ (𝐴 ≼ 𝐵 → (𝐶 × 𝐴) ≼ (𝐶 × 𝐵))
Theorem	xpdom2g 9008	Dominance law for Cartesian product. Theorem 6L(c) of [Enderton] p. 149. (Contributed by Mario Carneiro, 26-Apr-2015.)
⊢ ((𝐶 ∈ 𝑉 ∧ 𝐴 ≼ 𝐵) → (𝐶 × 𝐴) ≼ (𝐶 × 𝐵))
Theorem	xpdom1g 9009	Dominance law for Cartesian product. Theorem 6L(c) of [Enderton] p. 149. (Contributed by NM, 25-Mar-2006.) (Revised by Mario Carneiro, 26-Apr-2015.)
⊢ ((𝐶 ∈ 𝑉 ∧ 𝐴 ≼ 𝐵) → (𝐴 × 𝐶) ≼ (𝐵 × 𝐶))
Theorem	xpdom3 9010	A set is dominated by its Cartesian product with a nonempty set. Exercise 6 of [Suppes] p. 98. (Contributed by NM, 27-Jul-2004.) (Revised by Mario Carneiro, 29-Apr-2015.)
⊢ ((𝐴 ∈ 𝑉 ∧ 𝐵 ∈ 𝑊 ∧ 𝐵 ≠ ∅) → 𝐴 ≼ (𝐴 × 𝐵))
Theorem	xpdom1 9011	Dominance law for Cartesian product. Theorem 6L(c) of [Enderton] p. 149. (Contributed by NM, 28-Sep-2004.) (Revised by NM, 29-Mar-2006.) (Revised by Mario Carneiro, 7-May-2015.)
⊢ 𝐶 ∈ V    ⇒   ⊢ (𝐴 ≼ 𝐵 → (𝐴 × 𝐶) ≼ (𝐵 × 𝐶))
Theorem	domunsncan 9012	A singleton cancellation law for dominance. (Contributed by Stefan O'Rear, 19-Feb-2015.) (Revised by Stefan O'Rear, 5-May-2015.)
⊢ 𝐴 ∈ V    &   ⊢ 𝐵 ∈ V    ⇒   ⊢ ((¬ 𝐴 ∈ 𝑋 ∧ ¬ 𝐵 ∈ 𝑌) → (({𝐴} ∪ 𝑋) ≼ ({𝐵} ∪ 𝑌) ↔ 𝑋 ≼ 𝑌))
Theorem	omxpenlem 9013*	Lemma for omxpen 9014. (Contributed by Mario Carneiro, 3-Mar-2013.) (Revised by Mario Carneiro, 25-May-2015.)
⊢ 𝐹 = (𝑥 ∈ 𝐵, 𝑦 ∈ 𝐴 ↦ ((𝐴 ·o 𝑥) +o 𝑦))    ⇒   ⊢ ((𝐴 ∈ On ∧ 𝐵 ∈ On) → 𝐹:(𝐵 × 𝐴)–1-1-onto→(𝐴 ·o 𝐵))
Theorem	omxpen 9014	The cardinal and ordinal products are always equinumerous. Exercise 10 of [TakeutiZaring] p. 89. (Contributed by Mario Carneiro, 3-Mar-2013.)
⊢ ((𝐴 ∈ On ∧ 𝐵 ∈ On) → (𝐴 ·o 𝐵) ≈ (𝐴 × 𝐵))
Theorem	omf1o 9015*	Construct an explicit bijection from 𝐴 ·o 𝐵 to 𝐵 ·o 𝐴. (Contributed by Mario Carneiro, 30-May-2015.)
⊢ 𝐹 = (𝑥 ∈ 𝐵, 𝑦 ∈ 𝐴 ↦ ((𝐴 ·o 𝑥) +o 𝑦))    &   ⊢ 𝐺 = (𝑥 ∈ 𝐵, 𝑦 ∈ 𝐴 ↦ ((𝐵 ·o 𝑦) +o 𝑥))    ⇒   ⊢ ((𝐴 ∈ On ∧ 𝐵 ∈ On) → (𝐺 ∘ ◡𝐹):(𝐴 ·o 𝐵)–1-1-onto→(𝐵 ·o 𝐴))
Theorem	pw2f1olem 9016*	Lemma for pw2f1o 9017. (Contributed by Mario Carneiro, 6-Oct-2014.)
⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐴 ∈ 𝑉)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐵 ∈ 𝑊)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐶 ∈ 𝑊)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐵 ≠ 𝐶)    ⇒   ⊢ (𝜑 → ((𝑆 ∈ 𝒫 𝐴 ∧ 𝐺 = (𝑧 ∈ 𝐴 ↦ if(𝑧 ∈ 𝑆, 𝐶, 𝐵))) ↔ (𝐺 ∈ ({𝐵, 𝐶} ↑m 𝐴) ∧ 𝑆 = (◡𝐺 “ {𝐶}))))
Theorem	pw2f1o 9017*	The power set of a set is equinumerous to set exponentiation with an unordered pair base of ordinal 2. Generalized from Proposition 10.44 of [TakeutiZaring] p. 96. (Contributed by Mario Carneiro, 6-Oct-2014.)
⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐴 ∈ 𝑉)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐵 ∈ 𝑊)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐶 ∈ 𝑊)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐵 ≠ 𝐶)    &   ⊢ 𝐹 = (𝑥 ∈ 𝒫 𝐴 ↦ (𝑧 ∈ 𝐴 ↦ if(𝑧 ∈ 𝑥, 𝐶, 𝐵)))    ⇒   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐹:𝒫 𝐴–1-1-onto→({𝐵, 𝐶} ↑m 𝐴))
Theorem	pw2eng 9018	The power set of a set is equinumerous to set exponentiation with a base of ordinal 2o. (Contributed by FL, 22-Feb-2011.) (Revised by Mario Carneiro, 1-Jul-2015.)
⊢ (𝐴 ∈ 𝑉 → 𝒫 𝐴 ≈ (2o ↑m 𝐴))
Theorem	pw2en 9019	The power set of a set is equinumerous to set exponentiation with a base of ordinal 2. Proposition 10.44 of [TakeutiZaring] p. 96. This is Metamath 100 proof #52. (Contributed by NM, 29-Jan-2004.) (Proof shortened by Mario Carneiro, 1-Jul-2015.)
⊢ 𝐴 ∈ V    ⇒   ⊢ 𝒫 𝐴 ≈ (2o ↑m 𝐴)
Theorem	fopwdom 9020	Covering implies injection on power sets. (Contributed by Stefan O'Rear, 6-Nov-2014.) (Revised by Mario Carneiro, 24-Jun-2015.) (Revised by AV, 18-Sep-2021.)
⊢ ((𝐹 ∈ 𝑉 ∧ 𝐹:𝐴–onto→𝐵) → 𝒫 𝐵 ≼ 𝒫 𝐴)
Theorem	enfixsn 9021*	Given two equipollent sets, a bijection can always be chosen which fixes a single point. (Contributed by Stefan O'Rear, 9-Jul-2015.)
⊢ ((𝐴 ∈ 𝑋 ∧ 𝐵 ∈ 𝑌 ∧ 𝑋 ≈ 𝑌) → ∃𝑓(𝑓:𝑋–1-1-onto→𝑌 ∧ (𝑓‘𝐴) = 𝐵))
2.4.30  Schroeder-Bernstein Theorem
Theorem	sbthlem1 9022*	Lemma for sbth 9032. (Contributed by NM, 22-Mar-1998.)
⊢ 𝐴 ∈ V    &   ⊢ 𝐷 = {𝑥 ∣ (𝑥 ⊆ 𝐴 ∧ (𝑔 “ (𝐵 ∖ (𝑓 “ 𝑥))) ⊆ (𝐴 ∖ 𝑥))}    ⇒   ⊢ ∪ 𝐷 ⊆ (𝐴 ∖ (𝑔 “ (𝐵 ∖ (𝑓 “ ∪ 𝐷))))
Theorem	sbthlem2 9023*	Lemma for sbth 9032. (Contributed by NM, 22-Mar-1998.)
⊢ 𝐴 ∈ V    &   ⊢ 𝐷 = {𝑥 ∣ (𝑥 ⊆ 𝐴 ∧ (𝑔 “ (𝐵 ∖ (𝑓 “ 𝑥))) ⊆ (𝐴 ∖ 𝑥))}    ⇒   ⊢ (ran 𝑔 ⊆ 𝐴 → (𝐴 ∖ (𝑔 “ (𝐵 ∖ (𝑓 “ ∪ 𝐷)))) ⊆ ∪ 𝐷)
Theorem	sbthlem3 9024*	Lemma for sbth 9032. (Contributed by NM, 22-Mar-1998.)
⊢ 𝐴 ∈ V    &   ⊢ 𝐷 = {𝑥 ∣ (𝑥 ⊆ 𝐴 ∧ (𝑔 “ (𝐵 ∖ (𝑓 “ 𝑥))) ⊆ (𝐴 ∖ 𝑥))}    ⇒   ⊢ (ran 𝑔 ⊆ 𝐴 → (𝑔 “ (𝐵 ∖ (𝑓 “ ∪ 𝐷))) = (𝐴 ∖ ∪ 𝐷))
Theorem	sbthlem4 9025*	Lemma for sbth 9032. (Contributed by NM, 27-Mar-1998.)
⊢ 𝐴 ∈ V    &   ⊢ 𝐷 = {𝑥 ∣ (𝑥 ⊆ 𝐴 ∧ (𝑔 “ (𝐵 ∖ (𝑓 “ 𝑥))) ⊆ (𝐴 ∖ 𝑥))}    ⇒   ⊢ (((dom 𝑔 = 𝐵 ∧ ran 𝑔 ⊆ 𝐴) ∧ Fun ◡𝑔) → (◡𝑔 “ (𝐴 ∖ ∪ 𝐷)) = (𝐵 ∖ (𝑓 “ ∪ 𝐷)))
Theorem	sbthlem5 9026*	Lemma for sbth 9032. (Contributed by NM, 22-Mar-1998.)
⊢ 𝐴 ∈ V    &   ⊢ 𝐷 = {𝑥 ∣ (𝑥 ⊆ 𝐴 ∧ (𝑔 “ (𝐵 ∖ (𝑓 “ 𝑥))) ⊆ (𝐴 ∖ 𝑥))}    &   ⊢ 𝐻 = ((𝑓 ↾ ∪ 𝐷) ∪ (◡𝑔 ↾ (𝐴 ∖ ∪ 𝐷)))    ⇒   ⊢ ((dom 𝑓 = 𝐴 ∧ ran 𝑔 ⊆ 𝐴) → dom 𝐻 = 𝐴)
Theorem	sbthlem6 9027*	Lemma for sbth 9032. (Contributed by NM, 27-Mar-1998.)
⊢ 𝐴 ∈ V    &   ⊢ 𝐷 = {𝑥 ∣ (𝑥 ⊆ 𝐴 ∧ (𝑔 “ (𝐵 ∖ (𝑓 “ 𝑥))) ⊆ (𝐴 ∖ 𝑥))}    &   ⊢ 𝐻 = ((𝑓 ↾ ∪ 𝐷) ∪ (◡𝑔 ↾ (𝐴 ∖ ∪ 𝐷)))    ⇒   ⊢ ((ran 𝑓 ⊆ 𝐵 ∧ ((dom 𝑔 = 𝐵 ∧ ran 𝑔 ⊆ 𝐴) ∧ Fun ◡𝑔)) → ran 𝐻 = 𝐵)
Theorem	sbthlem7 9028*	Lemma for sbth 9032. (Contributed by NM, 27-Mar-1998.)
⊢ 𝐴 ∈ V    &   ⊢ 𝐷 = {𝑥 ∣ (𝑥 ⊆ 𝐴 ∧ (𝑔 “ (𝐵 ∖ (𝑓 “ 𝑥))) ⊆ (𝐴 ∖ 𝑥))}    &   ⊢ 𝐻 = ((𝑓 ↾ ∪ 𝐷) ∪ (◡𝑔 ↾ (𝐴 ∖ ∪ 𝐷)))    ⇒   ⊢ ((Fun 𝑓 ∧ Fun ◡𝑔) → Fun 𝐻)
Theorem	sbthlem8 9029*	Lemma for sbth 9032. (Contributed by NM, 27-Mar-1998.)
⊢ 𝐴 ∈ V    &   ⊢ 𝐷 = {𝑥 ∣ (𝑥 ⊆ 𝐴 ∧ (𝑔 “ (𝐵 ∖ (𝑓 “ 𝑥))) ⊆ (𝐴 ∖ 𝑥))}    &   ⊢ 𝐻 = ((𝑓 ↾ ∪ 𝐷) ∪ (◡𝑔 ↾ (𝐴 ∖ ∪ 𝐷)))    ⇒   ⊢ ((Fun ◡𝑓 ∧ (((Fun 𝑔 ∧ dom 𝑔 = 𝐵) ∧ ran 𝑔 ⊆ 𝐴) ∧ Fun ◡𝑔)) → Fun ◡𝐻)
Theorem	sbthlem9 9030*	Lemma for sbth 9032. (Contributed by NM, 28-Mar-1998.)
⊢ 𝐴 ∈ V    &   ⊢ 𝐷 = {𝑥 ∣ (𝑥 ⊆ 𝐴 ∧ (𝑔 “ (𝐵 ∖ (𝑓 “ 𝑥))) ⊆ (𝐴 ∖ 𝑥))}    &   ⊢ 𝐻 = ((𝑓 ↾ ∪ 𝐷) ∪ (◡𝑔 ↾ (𝐴 ∖ ∪ 𝐷)))    ⇒   ⊢ ((𝑓:𝐴–1-1→𝐵 ∧ 𝑔:𝐵–1-1→𝐴) → 𝐻:𝐴–1-1-onto→𝐵)
Theorem	sbthlem10 9031*	Lemma for sbth 9032. (Contributed by NM, 28-Mar-1998.)
⊢ 𝐴 ∈ V    &   ⊢ 𝐷 = {𝑥 ∣ (𝑥 ⊆ 𝐴 ∧ (𝑔 “ (𝐵 ∖ (𝑓 “ 𝑥))) ⊆ (𝐴 ∖ 𝑥))}    &   ⊢ 𝐻 = ((𝑓 ↾ ∪ 𝐷) ∪ (◡𝑔 ↾ (𝐴 ∖ ∪ 𝐷)))    &   ⊢ 𝐵 ∈ V    ⇒   ⊢ ((𝐴 ≼ 𝐵 ∧ 𝐵 ≼ 𝐴) → 𝐴 ≈ 𝐵)
Theorem	sbth 9032	Schroeder-Bernstein Theorem. Theorem 18 of [Suppes] p. 95. This theorem states that if set 𝐴 is smaller (has lower cardinality) than 𝐵 and vice-versa, then 𝐴 and 𝐵 are equinumerous (have the same cardinality). The interesting thing is that this can be proved without invoking the Axiom of Choice, as we do here. The theorem can also be proved from the axiom of choice and the linear order of the cardinal numbers, but our development does not provide the linear order of cardinal numbers until much later and in ways that depend on Schroeder-Bernstein. The main proof consists of lemmas sbthlem1 9022 through sbthlem10 9031; this final piece mainly changes bound variables to eliminate the hypotheses of sbthlem10 9031. We follow closely the proof in Suppes, which you should consult to understand our proof at a higher level. Note that Suppes' proof, which is credited to J. M. Whitaker, does not require the Axiom of Infinity. In the Intuitionistic Logic Explorer (ILE) the Schroeder-Bernstein Theorem has been proven equivalent to the law of the excluded middle (LEM), and in ILE the LEM is not accepted as necessarily true; see https://us.metamath.org/ileuni/exmidsbth.html 9031. This is Metamath 100 proof #25. (Contributed by NM, 8-Jun-1998.)
⊢ ((𝐴 ≼ 𝐵 ∧ 𝐵 ≼ 𝐴) → 𝐴 ≈ 𝐵)
Theorem	sbthb 9033	Schroeder-Bernstein Theorem and its converse. (Contributed by NM, 8-Jun-1998.)
⊢ ((𝐴 ≼ 𝐵 ∧ 𝐵 ≼ 𝐴) ↔ 𝐴 ≈ 𝐵)
Theorem	sbthcl 9034	Schroeder-Bernstein Theorem in class form. (Contributed by NM, 28-Mar-1998.)
⊢ ≈ = ( ≼ ∩ ◡ ≼ )
Theorem	dfsdom2 9035	Alternate definition of strict dominance. Compare Definition 3 of [Suppes] p. 97. (Contributed by NM, 31-Mar-1998.)
⊢ ≺ = ( ≼ ∖ ◡ ≼ )
Theorem	brsdom2 9036	Alternate definition of strict dominance. Definition 3 of [Suppes] p. 97. (Contributed by NM, 27-Jul-2004.)
⊢ 𝐴 ∈ V    &   ⊢ 𝐵 ∈ V    ⇒   ⊢ (𝐴 ≺ 𝐵 ↔ (𝐴 ≼ 𝐵 ∧ ¬ 𝐵 ≼ 𝐴))
Theorem	sdomnsym 9037	Strict dominance is asymmetric. Theorem 21(ii) of [Suppes] p. 97. (Contributed by NM, 8-Jun-1998.)
⊢ (𝐴 ≺ 𝐵 → ¬ 𝐵 ≺ 𝐴)
Theorem	domnsym 9038	Theorem 22(i) of [Suppes] p. 97. (Contributed by NM, 10-Jun-1998.)
⊢ (𝐴 ≼ 𝐵 → ¬ 𝐵 ≺ 𝐴)
Theorem	0domg 9039	Any set dominates the empty set. (Contributed by NM, 26-Oct-2003.) (Revised by Mario Carneiro, 26-Apr-2015.) Avoid ax-pow 5301, ax-un 7685. (Revised by BTernaryTau, 29-Nov-2024.)
⊢ (𝐴 ∈ 𝑉 → ∅ ≼ 𝐴)
Theorem	dom0 9040	A set dominated by the empty set is empty. (Contributed by NM, 22-Nov-2004.) Avoid ax-pow 5301, ax-un 7685. (Revised by BTernaryTau, 29-Nov-2024.)
⊢ (𝐴 ≼ ∅ ↔ 𝐴 = ∅)
Theorem	0sdomg 9041	A set strictly dominates the empty set iff it is not empty. (Contributed by NM, 23-Mar-2006.) Avoid ax-pow 5301, ax-un 7685. (Revised by BTernaryTau, 29-Nov-2024.)
⊢ (𝐴 ∈ 𝑉 → (∅ ≺ 𝐴 ↔ 𝐴 ≠ ∅))
Theorem	0dom 9042	Any set dominates the empty set. (Contributed by NM, 26-Oct-2003.) (Revised by Mario Carneiro, 26-Apr-2015.)
⊢ 𝐴 ∈ V    ⇒   ⊢ ∅ ≼ 𝐴
Theorem	0sdom 9043	A set strictly dominates the empty set iff it is not empty. (Contributed by NM, 29-Jul-2004.)
⊢ 𝐴 ∈ V    ⇒   ⊢ (∅ ≺ 𝐴 ↔ 𝐴 ≠ ∅)
Theorem	sdom0 9044	The empty set does not strictly dominate any set. (Contributed by NM, 26-Oct-2003.) Avoid ax-pow 5301, ax-un 7685. (Revised by BTernaryTau, 29-Nov-2024.)
⊢ ¬ 𝐴 ≺ ∅
Theorem	sdomdomtr 9045	Transitivity of strict dominance and dominance. Theorem 22(iii) of [Suppes] p. 97. (Contributed by NM, 26-Oct-2003.) (Revised by Mario Carneiro, 26-Apr-2015.)
⊢ ((𝐴 ≺ 𝐵 ∧ 𝐵 ≼ 𝐶) → 𝐴 ≺ 𝐶)
Theorem	sdomentr 9046	Transitivity of strict dominance and equinumerosity. Exercise 11 of [Suppes] p. 98. (Contributed by NM, 26-Oct-2003.)
⊢ ((𝐴 ≺ 𝐵 ∧ 𝐵 ≈ 𝐶) → 𝐴 ≺ 𝐶)
Theorem	domsdomtr 9047	Transitivity of dominance and strict dominance. Theorem 22(ii) of [Suppes] p. 97. (Contributed by NM, 10-Jun-1998.) (Revised by Mario Carneiro, 26-Apr-2015.)
⊢ ((𝐴 ≼ 𝐵 ∧ 𝐵 ≺ 𝐶) → 𝐴 ≺ 𝐶)
Theorem	ensdomtr 9048	Transitivity of equinumerosity and strict dominance. (Contributed by NM, 26-Oct-2003.) (Revised by Mario Carneiro, 26-Apr-2015.)
⊢ ((𝐴 ≈ 𝐵 ∧ 𝐵 ≺ 𝐶) → 𝐴 ≺ 𝐶)
Theorem	sdomirr 9049	Strict dominance is irreflexive. Theorem 21(i) of [Suppes] p. 97. (Contributed by NM, 4-Jun-1998.)
⊢ ¬ 𝐴 ≺ 𝐴
Theorem	sdomtr 9050	Strict dominance is transitive. Theorem 21(iii) of [Suppes] p. 97. (Contributed by NM, 9-Jun-1998.)
⊢ ((𝐴 ≺ 𝐵 ∧ 𝐵 ≺ 𝐶) → 𝐴 ≺ 𝐶)
Theorem	sdomn2lp 9051	Strict dominance has no 2-cycle loops. (Contributed by NM, 6-May-2008.)
⊢ ¬ (𝐴 ≺ 𝐵 ∧ 𝐵 ≺ 𝐴)
Theorem	enen1 9052	Equality-like theorem for equinumerosity. (Contributed by NM, 18-Dec-2003.)
⊢ (𝐴 ≈ 𝐵 → (𝐴 ≈ 𝐶 ↔ 𝐵 ≈ 𝐶))
Theorem	enen2 9053	Equality-like theorem for equinumerosity. (Contributed by NM, 18-Dec-2003.)
⊢ (𝐴 ≈ 𝐵 → (𝐶 ≈ 𝐴 ↔ 𝐶 ≈ 𝐵))
Theorem	domen1 9054	Equality-like theorem for equinumerosity and dominance. (Contributed by NM, 8-Nov-2003.)
⊢ (𝐴 ≈ 𝐵 → (𝐴 ≼ 𝐶 ↔ 𝐵 ≼ 𝐶))
Theorem	domen2 9055	Equality-like theorem for equinumerosity and dominance. (Contributed by NM, 8-Nov-2003.)
⊢ (𝐴 ≈ 𝐵 → (𝐶 ≼ 𝐴 ↔ 𝐶 ≼ 𝐵))
Theorem	sdomen1 9056	Equality-like theorem for equinumerosity and strict dominance. (Contributed by NM, 8-Nov-2003.)
⊢ (𝐴 ≈ 𝐵 → (𝐴 ≺ 𝐶 ↔ 𝐵 ≺ 𝐶))
Theorem	sdomen2 9057	Equality-like theorem for equinumerosity and strict dominance. (Contributed by NM, 8-Nov-2003.)
⊢ (𝐴 ≈ 𝐵 → (𝐶 ≺ 𝐴 ↔ 𝐶 ≺ 𝐵))
Theorem	domtriord 9058	Dominance is trichotomous in the restricted case of ordinal numbers. (Contributed by Jeff Hankins, 24-Oct-2009.)
⊢ ((𝐴 ∈ On ∧ 𝐵 ∈ On) → (𝐴 ≼ 𝐵 ↔ ¬ 𝐵 ≺ 𝐴))
Theorem	sdomel 9059	For ordinals, strict dominance implies membership. (Contributed by Mario Carneiro, 13-Jan-2013.)
⊢ ((𝐴 ∈ On ∧ 𝐵 ∈ On) → (𝐴 ≺ 𝐵 → 𝐴 ∈ 𝐵))
Theorem	sdomdif 9060	The difference of a set from a smaller set cannot be empty. (Contributed by Mario Carneiro, 5-Feb-2013.)
⊢ (𝐴 ≺ 𝐵 → (𝐵 ∖ 𝐴) ≠ ∅)
Theorem	onsdominel 9061	An ordinal with more elements of some type is larger. (Contributed by Stefan O'Rear, 2-Nov-2014.)
⊢ ((𝐴 ∈ On ∧ 𝐵 ∈ On ∧ (𝐴 ∩ 𝐶) ≺ (𝐵 ∩ 𝐶)) → 𝐴 ∈ 𝐵)
Theorem	domunsn 9062	Dominance over a set with one element added. (Contributed by Mario Carneiro, 18-May-2015.)
⊢ (𝐴 ≺ 𝐵 → (𝐴 ∪ {𝐶}) ≼ 𝐵)
Theorem	fodomr 9063*	There exists a mapping from a set onto any (nonempty) set that it dominates. (Contributed by NM, 23-Mar-2006.)
⊢ ((∅ ≺ 𝐵 ∧ 𝐵 ≼ 𝐴) → ∃𝑓 𝑓:𝐴–onto→𝐵)
Theorem	pwdom 9064	Injection of sets implies injection on power sets. (Contributed by Mario Carneiro, 9-Apr-2015.)
⊢ (𝐴 ≼ 𝐵 → 𝒫 𝐴 ≼ 𝒫 𝐵)
Theorem	canth2 9065	Cantor's Theorem. No set is equinumerous to its power set. Specifically, any set has a cardinality (size) strictly less than the cardinality of its power set. For example, the cardinality of real numbers is the same as the cardinality of the power set of integers, so real numbers cannot be put into a one-to-one correspondence with integers. Theorem 23 of [Suppes] p. 97. For the function version, see canth 7317. This is Metamath 100 proof #63. (Contributed by NM, 7-Aug-1994.)
⊢ 𝐴 ∈ V    ⇒   ⊢ 𝐴 ≺ 𝒫 𝐴
Theorem	canth2g 9066	Cantor's theorem with the sethood requirement expressed as an antecedent. Theorem 23 of [Suppes] p. 97. (Contributed by NM, 7-Nov-2003.)
⊢ (𝐴 ∈ 𝑉 → 𝐴 ≺ 𝒫 𝐴)
Theorem	2pwuninel 9067	The power set of the power set of the union of a set does not belong to the set. This theorem provides a way of constructing a new set that doesn't belong to a given set. (Contributed by NM, 27-Jun-2008.)
⊢ ¬ 𝒫 𝒫 ∪ 𝐴 ∈ 𝐴
Theorem	2pwne 9068	No set equals the power set of its power set. (Contributed by NM, 17-Nov-2008.)
⊢ (𝐴 ∈ 𝑉 → 𝒫 𝒫 𝐴 ≠ 𝐴)
Theorem	disjen 9069	A stronger form of pwuninel 8222. We can use pwuninel 8222, 2pwuninel 9067 to create one or two sets disjoint from a given set 𝐴, but here we show that in fact such constructions exist for arbitrarily large disjoint extensions, which is to say that for any set 𝐵 we can construct a set 𝑥 that is equinumerous to it and disjoint from 𝐴. (Contributed by Mario Carneiro, 7-Feb-2015.)
⊢ ((𝐴 ∈ 𝑉 ∧ 𝐵 ∈ 𝑊) → ((𝐴 ∩ (𝐵 × {𝒫 ∪ ran 𝐴})) = ∅ ∧ (𝐵 × {𝒫 ∪ ran 𝐴}) ≈ 𝐵))
Theorem	disjenex 9070*	Existence version of disjen 9069. (Contributed by Mario Carneiro, 7-Feb-2015.)
⊢ ((𝐴 ∈ 𝑉 ∧ 𝐵 ∈ 𝑊) → ∃𝑥((𝐴 ∩ 𝑥) = ∅ ∧ 𝑥 ≈ 𝐵))
Theorem	domss2 9071	A corollary of disjenex 9070. If 𝐹 is an injection from 𝐴 to 𝐵 then 𝐺 is a right inverse of 𝐹 from 𝐵 to a superset of 𝐴. (Contributed by Mario Carneiro, 7-Feb-2015.) (Revised by Mario Carneiro, 24-Jun-2015.)
⊢ 𝐺 = ◡(𝐹 ∪ (1st ↾ ((𝐵 ∖ ran 𝐹) × {𝒫 ∪ ran 𝐴})))    ⇒   ⊢ ((𝐹:𝐴–1-1→𝐵 ∧ 𝐴 ∈ 𝑉 ∧ 𝐵 ∈ 𝑊) → (𝐺:𝐵–1-1-onto→ran 𝐺 ∧ 𝐴 ⊆ ran 𝐺 ∧ (𝐺 ∘ 𝐹) = ( I ↾ 𝐴)))
Theorem	domssex2 9072*	A corollary of disjenex 9070. If 𝐹 is an injection from 𝐴 to 𝐵 then there is a right inverse 𝑔 of 𝐹 from 𝐵 to a superset of 𝐴. (Contributed by Mario Carneiro, 7-Feb-2015.) (Revised by Mario Carneiro, 24-Jun-2015.)
⊢ ((𝐹:𝐴–1-1→𝐵 ∧ 𝐴 ∈ 𝑉 ∧ 𝐵 ∈ 𝑊) → ∃𝑔(𝑔:𝐵–1-1→V ∧ (𝑔 ∘ 𝐹) = ( I ↾ 𝐴)))
Theorem	domssex 9073*	Weakening of domssex2 9072 to forget the functions in favor of dominance and equinumerosity. (Contributed by Mario Carneiro, 7-Feb-2015.) (Revised by Mario Carneiro, 24-Jun-2015.)
⊢ (𝐴 ≼ 𝐵 → ∃𝑥(𝐴 ⊆ 𝑥 ∧ 𝐵 ≈ 𝑥))
2.4.31  Equinumerosity (cont.)
Theorem	xpf1o 9074*	Construct a bijection on a Cartesian product given bijections on the factors. (Contributed by Mario Carneiro, 30-May-2015.)
⊢ (𝜑 → (𝑥 ∈ 𝐴 ↦ 𝑋):𝐴–1-1-onto→𝐵)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → (𝑦 ∈ 𝐶 ↦ 𝑌):𝐶–1-1-onto→𝐷)    ⇒   ⊢ (𝜑 → (𝑥 ∈ 𝐴, 𝑦 ∈ 𝐶 ↦ ⟨𝑋, 𝑌⟩):(𝐴 × 𝐶)–1-1-onto→(𝐵 × 𝐷))
Theorem	xpen 9075	Equinumerosity law for Cartesian product. Proposition 4.22(b) of [Mendelson] p. 254. (Contributed by NM, 24-Jul-2004.) (Proof shortened by Mario Carneiro, 26-Apr-2015.)
⊢ ((𝐴 ≈ 𝐵 ∧ 𝐶 ≈ 𝐷) → (𝐴 × 𝐶) ≈ (𝐵 × 𝐷))
Theorem	mapen 9076	Two set exponentiations are equinumerous when their bases and exponents are equinumerous. Theorem 6H(c) of [Enderton] p. 139. (Contributed by NM, 16-Dec-2003.) (Proof shortened by Mario Carneiro, 26-Apr-2015.)
⊢ ((𝐴 ≈ 𝐵 ∧ 𝐶 ≈ 𝐷) → (𝐴 ↑m 𝐶) ≈ (𝐵 ↑m 𝐷))
Theorem	mapdom1 9077	Order-preserving property of set exponentiation. Theorem 6L(c) of [Enderton] p. 149. (Contributed by NM, 27-Jul-2004.) (Revised by Mario Carneiro, 9-Mar-2013.)
⊢ (𝐴 ≼ 𝐵 → (𝐴 ↑m 𝐶) ≼ (𝐵 ↑m 𝐶))
Theorem	mapxpen 9078	Equinumerosity law for double set exponentiation. Proposition 10.45 of [TakeutiZaring] p. 96. (Contributed by NM, 21-Feb-2004.) (Revised by Mario Carneiro, 24-Jun-2015.)
⊢ ((𝐴 ∈ 𝑉 ∧ 𝐵 ∈ 𝑊 ∧ 𝐶 ∈ 𝑋) → ((𝐴 ↑m 𝐵) ↑m 𝐶) ≈ (𝐴 ↑m (𝐵 × 𝐶)))
Theorem	xpmapenlem 9079*	Lemma for xpmapen 9080. (Contributed by NM, 1-May-2004.) (Revised by Mario Carneiro, 16-Nov-2014.)
⊢ 𝐴 ∈ V    &   ⊢ 𝐵 ∈ V    &   ⊢ 𝐶 ∈ V    &   ⊢ 𝐷 = (𝑧 ∈ 𝐶 ↦ (1st ‘(𝑥‘𝑧)))    &   ⊢ 𝑅 = (𝑧 ∈ 𝐶 ↦ (2nd ‘(𝑥‘𝑧)))    &   ⊢ 𝑆 = (𝑧 ∈ 𝐶 ↦ ⟨((1st ‘𝑦)‘𝑧), ((2nd ‘𝑦)‘𝑧)⟩)    ⇒   ⊢ ((𝐴 × 𝐵) ↑m 𝐶) ≈ ((𝐴 ↑m 𝐶) × (𝐵 ↑m 𝐶))
Theorem	xpmapen 9080	Equinumerosity law for set exponentiation of a Cartesian product. Exercise 4.47 of [Mendelson] p. 255. (Contributed by NM, 23-Feb-2004.) (Proof shortened by Mario Carneiro, 16-Nov-2014.)
⊢ 𝐴 ∈ V    &   ⊢ 𝐵 ∈ V    &   ⊢ 𝐶 ∈ V    ⇒   ⊢ ((𝐴 × 𝐵) ↑m 𝐶) ≈ ((𝐴 ↑m 𝐶) × (𝐵 ↑m 𝐶))
Theorem	mapunen 9081	Equinumerosity law for set exponentiation of a disjoint union. Exercise 4.45 of [Mendelson] p. 255. (Contributed by NM, 23-Sep-2004.) (Revised by Mario Carneiro, 29-Apr-2015.)
⊢ (((𝐴 ∈ 𝑉 ∧ 𝐵 ∈ 𝑊 ∧ 𝐶 ∈ 𝑋) ∧ (𝐴 ∩ 𝐵) = ∅) → (𝐶 ↑m (𝐴 ∪ 𝐵)) ≈ ((𝐶 ↑m 𝐴) × (𝐶 ↑m 𝐵)))
Theorem	map2xp 9082	A cardinal power with exponent 2 is equivalent to a Cartesian product with itself. (Contributed by Mario Carneiro, 31-May-2015.) (Proof shortened by AV, 17-Jul-2022.)
⊢ (𝐴 ∈ 𝑉 → (𝐴 ↑m 2o) ≈ (𝐴 × 𝐴))
Theorem	mapdom2 9083	Order-preserving property of set exponentiation. Theorem 6L(d) of [Enderton] p. 149. (Contributed by NM, 23-Sep-2004.) (Revised by Mario Carneiro, 30-Apr-2015.)
⊢ ((𝐴 ≼ 𝐵 ∧ ¬ (𝐴 = ∅ ∧ 𝐶 = ∅)) → (𝐶 ↑m 𝐴) ≼ (𝐶 ↑m 𝐵))
Theorem	mapdom3 9084	Set exponentiation dominates the base. (Contributed by Mario Carneiro, 30-Apr-2015.) (Proof shortened by AV, 17-Jul-2022.)
⊢ ((𝐴 ∈ 𝑉 ∧ 𝐵 ∈ 𝑊 ∧ 𝐵 ≠ ∅) → 𝐴 ≼ (𝐴 ↑m 𝐵))
Theorem	pwen 9085	If two sets are equinumerous, then their power sets are equinumerous. Proposition 10.15 of [TakeutiZaring] p. 87. (Contributed by NM, 29-Jan-2004.) (Revised by Mario Carneiro, 9-Apr-2015.)
⊢ (𝐴 ≈ 𝐵 → 𝒫 𝐴 ≈ 𝒫 𝐵)
Theorem	ssenen 9086*	Equinumerosity of equinumerous subsets of a set. (Contributed by NM, 30-Sep-2004.) (Revised by Mario Carneiro, 16-Nov-2014.)
⊢ (𝐴 ≈ 𝐵 → {𝑥 ∣ (𝑥 ⊆ 𝐴 ∧ 𝑥 ≈ 𝐶)} ≈ {𝑥 ∣ (𝑥 ⊆ 𝐵 ∧ 𝑥 ≈ 𝐶)})
Theorem	limenpsi 9087	A limit ordinal is equinumerous to a proper subset of itself. (Contributed by NM, 30-Oct-2003.) (Revised by Mario Carneiro, 16-Nov-2014.)
⊢ Lim 𝐴    ⇒   ⊢ (𝐴 ∈ 𝑉 → 𝐴 ≈ (𝐴 ∖ {∅}))
Theorem	limensuci 9088	A limit ordinal is equinumerous to its successor. (Contributed by NM, 30-Oct-2003.)
⊢ Lim 𝐴    ⇒   ⊢ (𝐴 ∈ 𝑉 → 𝐴 ≈ suc 𝐴)
Theorem	limensuc 9089	A limit ordinal is equinumerous to its successor. (Contributed by NM, 30-Oct-2003.)
⊢ ((𝐴 ∈ 𝑉 ∧ Lim 𝐴) → 𝐴 ≈ suc 𝐴)
Theorem	infensuc 9090	Any infinite ordinal is equinumerous to its successor. Exercise 7 of [TakeutiZaring] p. 88. Proved without the Axiom of Infinity. (Contributed by NM, 30-Oct-2003.) (Revised by Mario Carneiro, 13-Jan-2013.)
⊢ ((𝐴 ∈ On ∧ ω ⊆ 𝐴) → 𝐴 ≈ suc 𝐴)
2.4.32  Finite sets
Theorem	dif1enlem 9091	Lemma for rexdif1en 9092 and dif1en 9093. (Contributed by BTernaryTau, 18-Aug-2024.) Generalize to all ordinals and add a sethood requirement to avoid ax-un 7685. (Revised by BTernaryTau, 5-Jan-2025.)
⊢ (((𝐹 ∈ 𝑉 ∧ 𝐴 ∈ 𝑊 ∧ 𝑀 ∈ On) ∧ 𝐹:𝐴–1-1-onto→suc 𝑀) → (𝐴 ∖ {(◡𝐹‘𝑀)}) ≈ 𝑀)
Theorem	rexdif1en 9092*	If a set is equinumerous to a nonzero ordinal, then there exists an element in that set such that removing it leaves the set equinumerous to the predecessor of that ordinal. (Contributed by BTernaryTau, 26-Aug-2024.) Generalize to all ordinals and avoid ax-un 7685. (Revised by BTernaryTau, 5-Jan-2025.)
⊢ ((𝑀 ∈ On ∧ 𝐴 ≈ suc 𝑀) → ∃𝑥 ∈ 𝐴 (𝐴 ∖ {𝑥}) ≈ 𝑀)
Theorem	dif1en 9093	If a set 𝐴 is equinumerous to the successor of an ordinal 𝑀, then 𝐴 with an element removed is equinumerous to 𝑀. (Contributed by Jeff Madsen, 2-Sep-2009.) (Revised by Stefan O'Rear, 16-Aug-2015.) Avoid ax-pow 5301. (Revised by BTernaryTau, 26-Aug-2024.) Generalize to all ordinals. (Revised by BTernaryTau, 6-Jan-2025.)
⊢ ((𝑀 ∈ On ∧ 𝐴 ≈ suc 𝑀 ∧ 𝑋 ∈ 𝐴) → (𝐴 ∖ {𝑋}) ≈ 𝑀)
Theorem	dif1ennn 9094	If a set 𝐴 is equinumerous to the successor of a natural number 𝑀, then 𝐴 with an element removed is equinumerous to 𝑀. See also dif1ennnALT 9184. (Contributed by BTernaryTau, 6-Jan-2025.)
⊢ ((𝑀 ∈ ω ∧ 𝐴 ≈ suc 𝑀 ∧ 𝑋 ∈ 𝐴) → (𝐴 ∖ {𝑋}) ≈ 𝑀)
Theorem	findcard 9095*	Schema for induction on the cardinality of a finite set. The inductive hypothesis is that the result is true on the given set with any one element removed. The result is then proven to be true for all finite sets. (Contributed by Jeff Madsen, 2-Sep-2009.)
⊢ (𝑥 = ∅ → (𝜑 ↔ 𝜓))    &   ⊢ (𝑥 = (𝑦 ∖ {𝑧}) → (𝜑 ↔ 𝜒))    &   ⊢ (𝑥 = 𝑦 → (𝜑 ↔ 𝜃))    &   ⊢ (𝑥 = 𝐴 → (𝜑 ↔ 𝜏))    &   ⊢ 𝜓    &   ⊢ (𝑦 ∈ Fin → (∀𝑧 ∈ 𝑦 𝜒 → 𝜃))    ⇒   ⊢ (𝐴 ∈ Fin → 𝜏)
Theorem	findcard2 9096*	Schema for induction on the cardinality of a finite set. The inductive step shows that the result is true if one more element is added to the set. The result is then proven to be true for all finite sets. (Contributed by Jeff Madsen, 8-Jul-2010.) Avoid ax-pow 5301. (Revised by BTernaryTau, 26-Aug-2024.)
⊢ (𝑥 = ∅ → (𝜑 ↔ 𝜓))    &   ⊢ (𝑥 = 𝑦 → (𝜑 ↔ 𝜒))    &   ⊢ (𝑥 = (𝑦 ∪ {𝑧}) → (𝜑 ↔ 𝜃))    &   ⊢ (𝑥 = 𝐴 → (𝜑 ↔ 𝜏))    &   ⊢ 𝜓    &   ⊢ (𝑦 ∈ Fin → (𝜒 → 𝜃))    ⇒   ⊢ (𝐴 ∈ Fin → 𝜏)
Theorem	findcard2s 9097*	Variation of findcard2 9096 requiring that the element added in the induction step not be a member of the original set. (Contributed by Paul Chapman, 30-Nov-2012.)
⊢ (𝑥 = ∅ → (𝜑 ↔ 𝜓))    &   ⊢ (𝑥 = 𝑦 → (𝜑 ↔ 𝜒))    &   ⊢ (𝑥 = (𝑦 ∪ {𝑧}) → (𝜑 ↔ 𝜃))    &   ⊢ (𝑥 = 𝐴 → (𝜑 ↔ 𝜏))    &   ⊢ 𝜓    &   ⊢ ((𝑦 ∈ Fin ∧ ¬ 𝑧 ∈ 𝑦) → (𝜒 → 𝜃))    ⇒   ⊢ (𝐴 ∈ Fin → 𝜏)
Theorem	findcard2d 9098*	Deduction version of findcard2 9096. (Contributed by SO, 16-Jul-2018.)
⊢ (𝑥 = ∅ → (𝜓 ↔ 𝜒))    &   ⊢ (𝑥 = 𝑦 → (𝜓 ↔ 𝜃))    &   ⊢ (𝑥 = (𝑦 ∪ {𝑧}) → (𝜓 ↔ 𝜏))    &   ⊢ (𝑥 = 𝐴 → (𝜓 ↔ 𝜂))    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝜒)    &   ⊢ ((𝜑 ∧ (𝑦 ⊆ 𝐴 ∧ 𝑧 ∈ (𝐴 ∖ 𝑦))) → (𝜃 → 𝜏))    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐴 ∈ Fin)    ⇒   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝜂)
Theorem	nnfi 9099	Natural numbers are finite sets. (Contributed by Stefan O'Rear, 21-Mar-2015.) Avoid ax-pow 5301. (Revised by BTernaryTau, 23-Sep-2024.)
⊢ (𝐴 ∈ ω → 𝐴 ∈ Fin)
Theorem	pssnn 9100*	A proper subset of a natural number is equinumerous to some smaller number. Lemma 6F of [Enderton] p. 137. (Contributed by NM, 22-Jun-1998.) (Revised by Mario Carneiro, 16-Nov-2014.) Avoid ax-pow 5301. (Revised by BTernaryTau, 31-Jul-2024.)
⊢ ((𝐴 ∈ ω ∧ 𝐵 ⊊ 𝐴) → ∃𝑥 ∈ 𝐴 𝐵 ≈ 𝑥)