MPE Home Metamath Proof Explorer < Previous   Next >
Nearby theorems
Mirrors  >  Home  >  MPE Home  >  Th. List  >  nvaddsub4 Structured version   Visualization version   GIF version

Theorem nvaddsub4 31020
Description: Rearrangement of 4 terms in a mixed vector addition and subtraction. (Contributed by NM, 8-Feb-2008.) (New usage is discouraged.)
Hypotheses
Ref Expression
nvpncan2.1 𝑋 = (BaseSet‘𝑈)
nvpncan2.2 𝐺 = ( +𝑣𝑈)
nvpncan2.3 𝑀 = ( −𝑣𝑈)
Assertion
Ref Expression
nvaddsub4 ((𝑈 ∈ NrmCVec ∧ (𝐴𝑋𝐵𝑋) ∧ (𝐶𝑋𝐷𝑋)) → ((𝐴𝐺𝐵)𝑀(𝐶𝐺𝐷)) = ((𝐴𝑀𝐶)𝐺(𝐵𝑀𝐷)))

Proof of Theorem nvaddsub4
StepHypRef Expression
1 neg1cn 12209 . . . . . 6 -1 ∈ ℂ
2 nvpncan2.1 . . . . . . 7 𝑋 = (BaseSet‘𝑈)
3 nvpncan2.2 . . . . . . 7 𝐺 = ( +𝑣𝑈)
4 eqid 2762 . . . . . . 7 ( ·𝑠OLD𝑈) = ( ·𝑠OLD𝑈)
52, 3, 4nvdi 30993 . . . . . 6 ((𝑈 ∈ NrmCVec ∧ (-1 ∈ ℂ ∧ 𝐶𝑋𝐷𝑋)) → (-1( ·𝑠OLD𝑈)(𝐶𝐺𝐷)) = ((-1( ·𝑠OLD𝑈)𝐶)𝐺(-1( ·𝑠OLD𝑈)𝐷)))
61, 5mp3anr1 1486 . . . . 5 ((𝑈 ∈ NrmCVec ∧ (𝐶𝑋𝐷𝑋)) → (-1( ·𝑠OLD𝑈)(𝐶𝐺𝐷)) = ((-1( ·𝑠OLD𝑈)𝐶)𝐺(-1( ·𝑠OLD𝑈)𝐷)))
763adant2 1148 . . . 4 ((𝑈 ∈ NrmCVec ∧ (𝐴𝑋𝐵𝑋) ∧ (𝐶𝑋𝐷𝑋)) → (-1( ·𝑠OLD𝑈)(𝐶𝐺𝐷)) = ((-1( ·𝑠OLD𝑈)𝐶)𝐺(-1( ·𝑠OLD𝑈)𝐷)))
87oveq2d 7428 . . 3 ((𝑈 ∈ NrmCVec ∧ (𝐴𝑋𝐵𝑋) ∧ (𝐶𝑋𝐷𝑋)) → ((𝐴𝐺𝐵)𝐺(-1( ·𝑠OLD𝑈)(𝐶𝐺𝐷))) = ((𝐴𝐺𝐵)𝐺((-1( ·𝑠OLD𝑈)𝐶)𝐺(-1( ·𝑠OLD𝑈)𝐷))))
92, 4nvscl 30989 . . . . . . 7 ((𝑈 ∈ NrmCVec ∧ -1 ∈ ℂ ∧ 𝐶𝑋) → (-1( ·𝑠OLD𝑈)𝐶) ∈ 𝑋)
101, 9mp3an2 1477 . . . . . 6 ((𝑈 ∈ NrmCVec ∧ 𝐶𝑋) → (-1( ·𝑠OLD𝑈)𝐶) ∈ 𝑋)
112, 4nvscl 30989 . . . . . . 7 ((𝑈 ∈ NrmCVec ∧ -1 ∈ ℂ ∧ 𝐷𝑋) → (-1( ·𝑠OLD𝑈)𝐷) ∈ 𝑋)
121, 11mp3an2 1477 . . . . . 6 ((𝑈 ∈ NrmCVec ∧ 𝐷𝑋) → (-1( ·𝑠OLD𝑈)𝐷) ∈ 𝑋)
1310, 12anim12dan 630 . . . . 5 ((𝑈 ∈ NrmCVec ∧ (𝐶𝑋𝐷𝑋)) → ((-1( ·𝑠OLD𝑈)𝐶) ∈ 𝑋 ∧ (-1( ·𝑠OLD𝑈)𝐷) ∈ 𝑋))
14133adant2 1148 . . . 4 ((𝑈 ∈ NrmCVec ∧ (𝐴𝑋𝐵𝑋) ∧ (𝐶𝑋𝐷𝑋)) → ((-1( ·𝑠OLD𝑈)𝐶) ∈ 𝑋 ∧ (-1( ·𝑠OLD𝑈)𝐷) ∈ 𝑋))
152, 3nvadd4 30988 . . . 4 ((𝑈 ∈ NrmCVec ∧ (𝐴𝑋𝐵𝑋) ∧ ((-1( ·𝑠OLD𝑈)𝐶) ∈ 𝑋 ∧ (-1( ·𝑠OLD𝑈)𝐷) ∈ 𝑋)) → ((𝐴𝐺𝐵)𝐺((-1( ·𝑠OLD𝑈)𝐶)𝐺(-1( ·𝑠OLD𝑈)𝐷))) = ((𝐴𝐺(-1( ·𝑠OLD𝑈)𝐶))𝐺(𝐵𝐺(-1( ·𝑠OLD𝑈)𝐷))))
1614, 15syld3an3 1435 . . 3 ((𝑈 ∈ NrmCVec ∧ (𝐴𝑋𝐵𝑋) ∧ (𝐶𝑋𝐷𝑋)) → ((𝐴𝐺𝐵)𝐺((-1( ·𝑠OLD𝑈)𝐶)𝐺(-1( ·𝑠OLD𝑈)𝐷))) = ((𝐴𝐺(-1( ·𝑠OLD𝑈)𝐶))𝐺(𝐵𝐺(-1( ·𝑠OLD𝑈)𝐷))))
178, 16eqtrd 2797 . 2 ((𝑈 ∈ NrmCVec ∧ (𝐴𝑋𝐵𝑋) ∧ (𝐶𝑋𝐷𝑋)) → ((𝐴𝐺𝐵)𝐺(-1( ·𝑠OLD𝑈)(𝐶𝐺𝐷))) = ((𝐴𝐺(-1( ·𝑠OLD𝑈)𝐶))𝐺(𝐵𝐺(-1( ·𝑠OLD𝑈)𝐷))))
18 simp1 1153 . . 3 ((𝑈 ∈ NrmCVec ∧ (𝐴𝑋𝐵𝑋) ∧ (𝐶𝑋𝐷𝑋)) → 𝑈 ∈ NrmCVec)
192, 3nvgcl 30983 . . . . 5 ((𝑈 ∈ NrmCVec ∧ 𝐴𝑋𝐵𝑋) → (𝐴𝐺𝐵) ∈ 𝑋)
20193expb 1137 . . . 4 ((𝑈 ∈ NrmCVec ∧ (𝐴𝑋𝐵𝑋)) → (𝐴𝐺𝐵) ∈ 𝑋)
21203adant3 1149 . . 3 ((𝑈 ∈ NrmCVec ∧ (𝐴𝑋𝐵𝑋) ∧ (𝐶𝑋𝐷𝑋)) → (𝐴𝐺𝐵) ∈ 𝑋)
222, 3nvgcl 30983 . . . . 5 ((𝑈 ∈ NrmCVec ∧ 𝐶𝑋𝐷𝑋) → (𝐶𝐺𝐷) ∈ 𝑋)
23223expb 1137 . . . 4 ((𝑈 ∈ NrmCVec ∧ (𝐶𝑋𝐷𝑋)) → (𝐶𝐺𝐷) ∈ 𝑋)
24233adant2 1148 . . 3 ((𝑈 ∈ NrmCVec ∧ (𝐴𝑋𝐵𝑋) ∧ (𝐶𝑋𝐷𝑋)) → (𝐶𝐺𝐷) ∈ 𝑋)
25 nvpncan2.3 . . . 4 𝑀 = ( −𝑣𝑈)
262, 3, 4, 25nvmval 31005 . . 3 ((𝑈 ∈ NrmCVec ∧ (𝐴𝐺𝐵) ∈ 𝑋 ∧ (𝐶𝐺𝐷) ∈ 𝑋) → ((𝐴𝐺𝐵)𝑀(𝐶𝐺𝐷)) = ((𝐴𝐺𝐵)𝐺(-1( ·𝑠OLD𝑈)(𝐶𝐺𝐷))))
2718, 21, 24, 26syl3anc 1397 . 2 ((𝑈 ∈ NrmCVec ∧ (𝐴𝑋𝐵𝑋) ∧ (𝐶𝑋𝐷𝑋)) → ((𝐴𝐺𝐵)𝑀(𝐶𝐺𝐷)) = ((𝐴𝐺𝐵)𝐺(-1( ·𝑠OLD𝑈)(𝐶𝐺𝐷))))
282, 3, 4, 25nvmval 31005 . . . . 5 ((𝑈 ∈ NrmCVec ∧ 𝐴𝑋𝐶𝑋) → (𝐴𝑀𝐶) = (𝐴𝐺(-1( ·𝑠OLD𝑈)𝐶)))
29283adant3r 1199 . . . 4 ((𝑈 ∈ NrmCVec ∧ 𝐴𝑋 ∧ (𝐶𝑋𝐷𝑋)) → (𝐴𝑀𝐶) = (𝐴𝐺(-1( ·𝑠OLD𝑈)𝐶)))
30293adant2r 1197 . . 3 ((𝑈 ∈ NrmCVec ∧ (𝐴𝑋𝐵𝑋) ∧ (𝐶𝑋𝐷𝑋)) → (𝐴𝑀𝐶) = (𝐴𝐺(-1( ·𝑠OLD𝑈)𝐶)))
312, 3, 4, 25nvmval 31005 . . . . 5 ((𝑈 ∈ NrmCVec ∧ 𝐵𝑋𝐷𝑋) → (𝐵𝑀𝐷) = (𝐵𝐺(-1( ·𝑠OLD𝑈)𝐷)))
32313adant3l 1198 . . . 4 ((𝑈 ∈ NrmCVec ∧ 𝐵𝑋 ∧ (𝐶𝑋𝐷𝑋)) → (𝐵𝑀𝐷) = (𝐵𝐺(-1( ·𝑠OLD𝑈)𝐷)))
33323adant2l 1196 . . 3 ((𝑈 ∈ NrmCVec ∧ (𝐴𝑋𝐵𝑋) ∧ (𝐶𝑋𝐷𝑋)) → (𝐵𝑀𝐷) = (𝐵𝐺(-1( ·𝑠OLD𝑈)𝐷)))
3430, 33oveq12d 7430 . 2 ((𝑈 ∈ NrmCVec ∧ (𝐴𝑋𝐵𝑋) ∧ (𝐶𝑋𝐷𝑋)) → ((𝐴𝑀𝐶)𝐺(𝐵𝑀𝐷)) = ((𝐴𝐺(-1( ·𝑠OLD𝑈)𝐶))𝐺(𝐵𝐺(-1( ·𝑠OLD𝑈)𝐷))))
3517, 27, 343eqtr4d 2807 1 ((𝑈 ∈ NrmCVec ∧ (𝐴𝑋𝐵𝑋) ∧ (𝐶𝑋𝐷𝑋)) → ((𝐴𝐺𝐵)𝑀(𝐶𝐺𝐷)) = ((𝐴𝑀𝐶)𝐺(𝐵𝑀𝐷)))
Colors of variables:    wff setvar class
This proof depends on syntax axioms:  wi 4  wa 400  w3a 1102   = wceq 1569  wcel 2142  cfv 6536  (class class class)co 7412  cc 11104  1c1 11107  -cneg 11448  NrmCVeccnv 30947   +𝑣 cpv 30948  BaseSetcba 30949   ·𝑠OLD cns 30950  𝑣 cnsb 30952
This proof depends on axioms:  ax-mp 5  ax-1 6  ax-2 7  ax-3 8  ax-gen 1824  ax-4 1838  ax-5 1939  ax-6 1996  ax-7 2037  ax-8 2144  ax-9 2152  ax-10 2175  ax-11 2191  ax-12 2212  ax-ext 2734  ax-rep 5237  ax-sep 5256  ax-nul 5268  ax-pow 5335  ax-pr 5403  ax-un 7734  ax-resscn 11163  ax-1cn 11164  ax-icn 11165  ax-addcl 11166  ax-addrcl 11167  ax-mulcl 11168  ax-mulrcl 11169  ax-mulcom 11170  ax-addass 11171  ax-mulass 11172  ax-distr 11173  ax-i2m1 11174  ax-1ne0 11175  ax-1rid 11176  ax-rnegex 11177  ax-rrecex 11178  ax-cnre 11179  ax-pre-lttri 11180  ax-pre-lttrn 11181  ax-pre-ltadd 11182
This proof depends on definitions:  df-bi 210  df-an 401  df-or 861  df-3or 1103  df-3an 1104  df-tru 1572  df-fal 1582  df-ex 1809  df-nf 1813  df-sb 2096  df-mo 2566  df-eu 2596  df-clab 2741  df-cleq 2754  df-clel 2837  df-nfc 2911  df-ne 2958  df-nel 3064  df-ral 3079  df-rex 3089  df-reu 3369  df-rab 3416  df-v 3456  df-sbc 3744  df-csb 3853  df-dif 3907  df-un 3909  df-in 3911  df-ss 3921  df-nul 4286  df-if 4487  df-pw 4563  df-sn 4589  df-pr 4591  df-op 4595  df-uni 4872  df-iun 4957  df-br 5109  df-opab 5173  df-mpt 5192  df-id 5555  df-po 5568  df-so 5569  df-xp 5666  df-rel 5667  df-cnv 5668  df-co 5669  df-dm 5670  df-rn 5671  df-res 5672  df-ima 5673  df-iota 6492  df-fun 6538  df-fn 6539  df-f 6540  df-f1 6541  df-fo 6542  df-f1o 6543  df-fv 6544  df-riota 7369  df-ov 7415  df-oprab 7416  df-mpo 7417  df-1st 7984  df-2nd 7985  df-er 8692  df-en 8942  df-dom 8943  df-sdom 8944  df-pnf 11251  df-mnf 11252  df-ltxr 11254  df-sub 11449  df-neg 11450  df-grpo 30856  df-gid 30857  df-ginv 30858  df-gdiv 30859  df-ablo 30908  df-vc 30922  df-nv 30955  df-va 30958  df-ba 30959  df-sm 30960  df-0v 30961  df-vs 30962  df-nmcv 30963
This theorem is used by:  vacn  31057  minvecolem2  31238
  Copyright terms: Public domain W3C validator