4sqlem1 - Metamath Proof Explorer

	Metamath Proof Explorer		< Previous Next > Nearby theorems
Mirrors > Home > MPE Home > Th. List > 4sqlem1		Structured version Visualization version GIF version

Theorem 4sqlem1 16746

Description: Lemma for 4sq 16762. The set 𝑆 is the set of all numbers that are expressible as a sum of four squares. Our goal is to show that 𝑆 = ℕ₀; here we show one subset direction. (Contributed by Mario Carneiro, 14-Jul-2014.)

**Hypothesis**
Ref	Expression
4sq.1	⊢ 𝑆 = {𝑛 ∣ ∃𝑥 ∈ ℤ ∃𝑦 ∈ ℤ ∃𝑧 ∈ ℤ ∃𝑤 ∈ ℤ 𝑛 = (((𝑥↑2) + (𝑦↑2)) + ((𝑧↑2) + (𝑤↑2)))}

**Assertion**
Ref	Expression
4sqlem1	⊢ 𝑆 ⊆ ℕ₀

Distinct variable groups: 𝑤,𝑛,𝑥,𝑦,𝑧 𝑆,𝑛 Allowed substitution hints: 𝑆(𝑥,𝑦,𝑧,𝑤)

**Proof of Theorem 4sqlem1**
Step	Hyp	Ref	Expression
1		4sq.1	. 2 ⊢ 𝑆 = {𝑛 ∣ ∃𝑥 ∈ ℤ ∃𝑦 ∈ ℤ ∃𝑧 ∈ ℤ ∃𝑤 ∈ ℤ 𝑛 = (((𝑥↑2) + (𝑦↑2)) + ((𝑧↑2) + (𝑤↑2)))}
2		zsqcl2 13957	. . . . . . . 8 ⊢ (𝑥 ∈ ℤ → (𝑥↑2) ∈ ℕ₀)
3		zsqcl2 13957	. . . . . . . 8 ⊢ (𝑦 ∈ ℤ → (𝑦↑2) ∈ ℕ₀)
4		nn0addcl 12369	. . . . . . . 8 ⊢ (((𝑥↑2) ∈ ℕ₀ ∧ (𝑦↑2) ∈ ℕ₀) → ((𝑥↑2) + (𝑦↑2)) ∈ ℕ₀)
5	2, 3, 4	syl2an 596	. . . . . . 7 ⊢ ((𝑥 ∈ ℤ ∧ 𝑦 ∈ ℤ) → ((𝑥↑2) + (𝑦↑2)) ∈ ℕ₀)
6		zsqcl2 13957	. . . . . . . 8 ⊢ (𝑧 ∈ ℤ → (𝑧↑2) ∈ ℕ₀)
7		zsqcl2 13957	. . . . . . . 8 ⊢ (𝑤 ∈ ℤ → (𝑤↑2) ∈ ℕ₀)
8		nn0addcl 12369	. . . . . . . 8 ⊢ (((𝑧↑2) ∈ ℕ₀ ∧ (𝑤↑2) ∈ ℕ₀) → ((𝑧↑2) + (𝑤↑2)) ∈ ℕ₀)
9	6, 7, 8	syl2an 596	. . . . . . 7 ⊢ ((𝑧 ∈ ℤ ∧ 𝑤 ∈ ℤ) → ((𝑧↑2) + (𝑤↑2)) ∈ ℕ₀)
10		nn0addcl 12369	. . . . . . 7 ⊢ ((((𝑥↑2) + (𝑦↑2)) ∈ ℕ₀ ∧ ((𝑧↑2) + (𝑤↑2)) ∈ ℕ₀) → (((𝑥↑2) + (𝑦↑2)) + ((𝑧↑2) + (𝑤↑2))) ∈ ℕ₀)
11	5, 9, 10	syl2an 596	. . . . . 6 ⊢ (((𝑥 ∈ ℤ ∧ 𝑦 ∈ ℤ) ∧ (𝑧 ∈ ℤ ∧ 𝑤 ∈ ℤ)) → (((𝑥↑2) + (𝑦↑2)) + ((𝑧↑2) + (𝑤↑2))) ∈ ℕ₀)
12		eleq1a 2832	. . . . . 6 ⊢ ((((𝑥↑2) + (𝑦↑2)) + ((𝑧↑2) + (𝑤↑2))) ∈ ℕ₀ → (𝑛 = (((𝑥↑2) + (𝑦↑2)) + ((𝑧↑2) + (𝑤↑2))) → 𝑛 ∈ ℕ₀))
13	11, 12	syl 17	. . . . 5 ⊢ (((𝑥 ∈ ℤ ∧ 𝑦 ∈ ℤ) ∧ (𝑧 ∈ ℤ ∧ 𝑤 ∈ ℤ)) → (𝑛 = (((𝑥↑2) + (𝑦↑2)) + ((𝑧↑2) + (𝑤↑2))) → 𝑛 ∈ ℕ₀))
14	13	rexlimdvva 3201	. . . 4 ⊢ ((𝑥 ∈ ℤ ∧ 𝑦 ∈ ℤ) → (∃𝑧 ∈ ℤ ∃𝑤 ∈ ℤ 𝑛 = (((𝑥↑2) + (𝑦↑2)) + ((𝑧↑2) + (𝑤↑2))) → 𝑛 ∈ ℕ₀))
15	14	rexlimivv 3192	. . 3 ⊢ (∃𝑥 ∈ ℤ ∃𝑦 ∈ ℤ ∃𝑧 ∈ ℤ ∃𝑤 ∈ ℤ 𝑛 = (((𝑥↑2) + (𝑦↑2)) + ((𝑧↑2) + (𝑤↑2))) → 𝑛 ∈ ℕ₀)
16	15	abssi 4015	. 2 ⊢ {𝑛 ∣ ∃𝑥 ∈ ℤ ∃𝑦 ∈ ℤ ∃𝑧 ∈ ℤ ∃𝑤 ∈ ℤ 𝑛 = (((𝑥↑2) + (𝑦↑2)) + ((𝑧↑2) + (𝑤↑2)))} ⊆ ℕ₀
17	1, 16	eqsstri 3966	1 ⊢ 𝑆 ⊆ ℕ₀

Colors of variables: wff setvar class

Syntax hints: → wi 4 ∧ wa 396 = wceq 1540 ∈ wcel 2105 {cab 2713 ∃wrex 3070 ⊆ wss 3898 (class class class)co 7337 + caddc 10975 2c2 12129 ℕ₀cn0 12334 ℤcz 12420 ↑cexp 13883

This theorem was proved from axioms: ax-mp 5 ax-1 6 ax-2 7 ax-3 8 ax-gen 1796 ax-4 1810 ax-5 1912 ax-6 1970 ax-7 2010 ax-8 2107 ax-9 2115 ax-10 2136 ax-11 2153 ax-12 2170 ax-ext 2707 ax-sep 5243 ax-nul 5250 ax-pow 5308 ax-pr 5372 ax-un 7650 ax-cnex 11028 ax-resscn 11029 ax-1cn 11030 ax-icn 11031 ax-addcl 11032 ax-addrcl 11033 ax-mulcl 11034 ax-mulrcl 11035 ax-mulcom 11036 ax-addass 11037 ax-mulass 11038 ax-distr 11039 ax-i2m1 11040 ax-1ne0 11041 ax-1rid 11042 ax-rnegex 11043 ax-rrecex 11044 ax-cnre 11045 ax-pre-lttri 11046 ax-pre-lttrn 11047 ax-pre-ltadd 11048 ax-pre-mulgt0 11049

This theorem depends on definitions: df-bi 206 df-an 397 df-or 845 df-3or 1087 df-3an 1088 df-tru 1543 df-fal 1553 df-ex 1781 df-nf 1785 df-sb 2067 df-mo 2538 df-eu 2567 df-clab 2714 df-cleq 2728 df-clel 2814 df-nfc 2886 df-ne 2941 df-nel 3047 df-ral 3062 df-rex 3071 df-reu 3350 df-rab 3404 df-v 3443 df-sbc 3728 df-csb 3844 df-dif 3901 df-un 3903 df-in 3905 df-ss 3915 df-pss 3917 df-nul 4270 df-if 4474 df-pw 4549 df-sn 4574 df-pr 4576 df-op 4580 df-uni 4853 df-iun 4943 df-br 5093 df-opab 5155 df-mpt 5176 df-tr 5210 df-id 5518 df-eprel 5524 df-po 5532 df-so 5533 df-fr 5575 df-we 5577 df-xp 5626 df-rel 5627 df-cnv 5628 df-co 5629 df-dm 5630 df-rn 5631 df-res 5632 df-ima 5633 df-pred 6238 df-ord 6305 df-on 6306 df-lim 6307 df-suc 6308 df-iota 6431 df-fun 6481 df-fn 6482 df-f 6483 df-f1 6484 df-fo 6485 df-f1o 6486 df-fv 6487 df-riota 7293 df-ov 7340 df-oprab 7341 df-mpo 7342 df-om 7781 df-2nd 7900 df-frecs 8167 df-wrecs 8198 df-recs 8272 df-rdg 8311 df-er 8569 df-en 8805 df-dom 8806 df-sdom 8807 df-pnf 11112 df-mnf 11113 df-xr 11114 df-ltxr 11115 df-le 11116 df-sub 11308 df-neg 11309 df-nn 12075 df-2 12137 df-n0 12335 df-z 12421 df-uz 12684 df-seq 13823 df-exp 13884

This theorem is referenced by: 4sqlem19 16761

W3C validator