Theorem alephom 10530

Description: From canth2 9081, we know that (ℵ‘0) < (2↑ω), but we cannot prove that (2↑ω) = (ℵ‘1) (this is the Continuum Hypothesis), nor can we prove that it is less than any bound whatsoever (i.e. the statement (ℵ‘𝐴) < (2↑ω) is consistent for any ordinal 𝐴). However, we can prove that (2↑ω) is not equal to (ℵ‘ω), nor (ℵ‘(ℵ‘ω)), on cofinality grounds, because by Konig's Theorem konigth 10514 (in the form of cfpwsdom 10529), (2↑ω) has uncountable cofinality, which eliminates limit alephs like (ℵ‘ω). (The first limit aleph that is not eliminated is (ℵ‘(ℵ‘1)), which has cofinality (ℵ‘1).) (Contributed by Mario Carneiro, 21-Mar-2013.)

Assertion

Ref	Expression
alephom	⊢ (card‘(2o ↑m ω)) ≠ (ℵ‘ω)

Proof of Theorem alephom

Step	Hyp	Ref	Expression
1		sdomirr 9065	. 2 ⊢ ¬ ω ≺ ω
2		2onn 8593	. . . . . 6 ⊢ 2o ∈ ω
3	2	elexi 3465	. . . . 5 ⊢ 2o ∈ V
4		domrefg 8934	. . . . 5 ⊢ (2o ∈ V → 2o ≼ 2o)
5	3	cfpwsdom 10529	. . . . 5 ⊢ (2o ≼ 2o → (ℵ‘∅) ≺ (cf‘(card‘(2o ↑m (ℵ‘∅)))))
6	3, 4, 5	mp2b 10	. . . 4 ⊢ (ℵ‘∅) ≺ (cf‘(card‘(2o ↑m (ℵ‘∅))))
7		aleph0 10011	. . . . . 6 ⊢ (ℵ‘∅) = ω
8	7	a1i 11	. . . . 5 ⊢ ((card‘(2o ↑m ω)) = (ℵ‘ω) → (ℵ‘∅) = ω)
9	7	oveq2i 7373	. . . . . . . . . 10 ⊢ (2o ↑m (ℵ‘∅)) = (2o ↑m ω)
10	9	fveq2i 6850	. . . . . . . . 9 ⊢ (card‘(2o ↑m (ℵ‘∅))) = (card‘(2o ↑m ω))
11	10	eqeq1i 2736	. . . . . . . 8 ⊢ ((card‘(2o ↑m (ℵ‘∅))) = (ℵ‘ω) ↔ (card‘(2o ↑m ω)) = (ℵ‘ω))
12	11	biimpri 227	. . . . . . 7 ⊢ ((card‘(2o ↑m ω)) = (ℵ‘ω) → (card‘(2o ↑m (ℵ‘∅))) = (ℵ‘ω))
13	12	fveq2d 6851	. . . . . 6 ⊢ ((card‘(2o ↑m ω)) = (ℵ‘ω) → (cf‘(card‘(2o ↑m (ℵ‘∅)))) = (cf‘(ℵ‘ω)))
14		limom 7823	. . . . . . . 8 ⊢ Lim ω
15		alephsing 10221	. . . . . . . 8 ⊢ (Lim ω → (cf‘(ℵ‘ω)) = (cf‘ω))
16	14, 15	ax-mp 5	. . . . . . 7 ⊢ (cf‘(ℵ‘ω)) = (cf‘ω)
17		cfom 10209	. . . . . . 7 ⊢ (cf‘ω) = ω
18	16, 17	eqtri 2759	. . . . . 6 ⊢ (cf‘(ℵ‘ω)) = ω
19	13, 18	eqtrdi 2787	. . . . 5 ⊢ ((card‘(2o ↑m ω)) = (ℵ‘ω) → (cf‘(card‘(2o ↑m (ℵ‘∅)))) = ω)
20	8, 19	breq12d 5123	. . . 4 ⊢ ((card‘(2o ↑m ω)) = (ℵ‘ω) → ((ℵ‘∅) ≺ (cf‘(card‘(2o ↑m (ℵ‘∅)))) ↔ ω ≺ ω))
21	6, 20	mpbii 232	. . 3 ⊢ ((card‘(2o ↑m ω)) = (ℵ‘ω) → ω ≺ ω)
22	21	necon3bi 2966	. 2 ⊢ (¬ ω ≺ ω → (card‘(2o ↑m ω)) ≠ (ℵ‘ω))
23	1, 22	ax-mp 5	1 ⊢ (card‘(2o ↑m ω)) ≠ (ℵ‘ω)

Syntax hints:  ¬ wn 3   = wceq 1541   ∈ wcel 2106   ≠ wne 2939  Vcvv 3446  ∅c0 4287   class class class wbr 5110  Lim wlim 6323  ‘cfv 6501  (class class class)co 7362  ωcom 7807  2_oc2o 8411   ↑_m cmap 8772   ≼ cdom 8888   ≺ csdm 8889  cardccrd 9880  ℵcale 9881  cfccf 9882

This theorem was proved from axioms:  ax-mp 5  ax-1 6  ax-2 7  ax-3 8  ax-gen 1797  ax-4 1811  ax-5 1913  ax-6 1971  ax-7 2011  ax-8 2108  ax-9 2116  ax-10 2137  ax-11 2154  ax-12 2171  ax-ext 2702  ax-rep 5247  ax-sep 5261  ax-nul 5268  ax-pow 5325  ax-pr 5389  ax-un 7677  ax-inf2 9586  ax-ac2 10408

This theorem depends on definitions:  df-bi 206  df-an 397  df-or 846  df-3or 1088  df-3an 1089  df-tru 1544  df-fal 1554  df-ex 1782  df-nf 1786  df-sb 2068  df-mo 2533  df-eu 2562  df-clab 2709  df-cleq 2723  df-clel 2809  df-nfc 2884  df-ne 2940  df-ral 3061  df-rex 3070  df-rmo 3351  df-reu 3352  df-rab 3406  df-v 3448  df-sbc 3743  df-csb 3859  df-dif 3916  df-un 3918  df-in 3920  df-ss 3930  df-pss 3932  df-nul 4288  df-if 4492  df-pw 4567  df-sn 4592  df-pr 4594  df-op 4598  df-uni 4871  df-int 4913  df-iun 4961  df-iin 4962  df-br 5111  df-opab 5173  df-mpt 5194  df-tr 5228  df-id 5536  df-eprel 5542  df-po 5550  df-so 5551  df-fr 5593  df-se 5594  df-we 5595  df-xp 5644  df-rel 5645  df-cnv 5646  df-co 5647  df-dm 5648  df-rn 5649  df-res 5650  df-ima 5651  df-pred 6258  df-ord 6325  df-on 6326  df-lim 6327  df-suc 6328  df-iota 6453  df-fun 6503  df-fn 6504  df-f 6505  df-f1 6506  df-fo 6507  df-f1o 6508  df-fv 6509  df-isom 6510  df-riota 7318  df-ov 7365  df-oprab 7366  df-mpo 7367  df-om 7808  df-1st 7926  df-2nd 7927  df-frecs 8217  df-wrecs 8248  df-smo 8297  df-recs 8322  df-rdg 8361  df-1o 8417  df-2o 8418  df-er 8655  df-map 8774  df-ixp 8843  df-en 8891  df-dom 8892  df-sdom 8893  df-fin 8894  df-oi 9455  df-har 9502  df-card 9884  df-aleph 9885  df-cf 9886  df-acn 9887  df-ac 10061

This theorem is referenced by: (None)