Theorem alephom 10615

Description: From canth2 9158, we know that (ℵ‘0) < (2↑ω), but we cannot prove that (2↑ω) = (ℵ‘1) (this is the Continuum Hypothesis), nor can we prove that it is less than any bound whatsoever (i.e. the statement (ℵ‘𝐴) < (2↑ω) is consistent for any ordinal 𝐴). However, we can prove that (2↑ω) is not equal to (ℵ‘ω), nor (ℵ‘(ℵ‘ω)), on cofinality grounds, because by Konig's Theorem konigth 10599 (in the form of cfpwsdom 10614), (2↑ω) has uncountable cofinality, which eliminates limit alephs like (ℵ‘ω). (The first limit aleph that is not eliminated is (ℵ‘(ℵ‘1)), which has cofinality (ℵ‘1).) (Contributed by Mario Carneiro, 21-Mar-2013.)

Assertion

Ref	Expression
alephom	⊢ (card‘(2o ↑m ω)) ≠ (ℵ‘ω)

Proof of Theorem alephom

Step	Hyp	Ref	Expression
1		sdomirr 9142	. 2 ⊢ ¬ ω ≺ ω
2		2onn 8663	. . . . . 6 ⊢ 2o ∈ ω
3	2	elexi 3482	. . . . 5 ⊢ 2o ∈ V
4		domrefg 9008	. . . . 5 ⊢ (2o ∈ V → 2o ≼ 2o)
5	3	cfpwsdom 10614	. . . . 5 ⊢ (2o ≼ 2o → (ℵ‘∅) ≺ (cf‘(card‘(2o ↑m (ℵ‘∅)))))
6	3, 4, 5	mp2b 10	. . . 4 ⊢ (ℵ‘∅) ≺ (cf‘(card‘(2o ↑m (ℵ‘∅))))
7		aleph0 10096	. . . . . 6 ⊢ (ℵ‘∅) = ω
8	7	a1i 11	. . . . 5 ⊢ ((card‘(2o ↑m ω)) = (ℵ‘ω) → (ℵ‘∅) = ω)
9	7	oveq2i 7430	. . . . . . . . . 10 ⊢ (2o ↑m (ℵ‘∅)) = (2o ↑m ω)
10	9	fveq2i 6899	. . . . . . . . 9 ⊢ (card‘(2o ↑m (ℵ‘∅))) = (card‘(2o ↑m ω))
11	10	eqeq1i 2730	. . . . . . . 8 ⊢ ((card‘(2o ↑m (ℵ‘∅))) = (ℵ‘ω) ↔ (card‘(2o ↑m ω)) = (ℵ‘ω))
12	11	biimpri 227	. . . . . . 7 ⊢ ((card‘(2o ↑m ω)) = (ℵ‘ω) → (card‘(2o ↑m (ℵ‘∅))) = (ℵ‘ω))
13	12	fveq2d 6900	. . . . . 6 ⊢ ((card‘(2o ↑m ω)) = (ℵ‘ω) → (cf‘(card‘(2o ↑m (ℵ‘∅)))) = (cf‘(ℵ‘ω)))
14		limom 7887	. . . . . . . 8 ⊢ Lim ω
15		alephsing 10306	. . . . . . . 8 ⊢ (Lim ω → (cf‘(ℵ‘ω)) = (cf‘ω))
16	14, 15	ax-mp 5	. . . . . . 7 ⊢ (cf‘(ℵ‘ω)) = (cf‘ω)
17		cfom 10294	. . . . . . 7 ⊢ (cf‘ω) = ω
18	16, 17	eqtri 2753	. . . . . 6 ⊢ (cf‘(ℵ‘ω)) = ω
19	13, 18	eqtrdi 2781	. . . . 5 ⊢ ((card‘(2o ↑m ω)) = (ℵ‘ω) → (cf‘(card‘(2o ↑m (ℵ‘∅)))) = ω)
20	8, 19	breq12d 5162	. . . 4 ⊢ ((card‘(2o ↑m ω)) = (ℵ‘ω) → ((ℵ‘∅) ≺ (cf‘(card‘(2o ↑m (ℵ‘∅)))) ↔ ω ≺ ω))
21	6, 20	mpbii 232	. . 3 ⊢ ((card‘(2o ↑m ω)) = (ℵ‘ω) → ω ≺ ω)
22	21	necon3bi 2956	. 2 ⊢ (¬ ω ≺ ω → (card‘(2o ↑m ω)) ≠ (ℵ‘ω))
23	1, 22	ax-mp 5	1 ⊢ (card‘(2o ↑m ω)) ≠ (ℵ‘ω)

Syntax hints:  ¬ wn 3   = wceq 1533   ∈ wcel 2098   ≠ wne 2929  Vcvv 3461  ∅c0 4322   class class class wbr 5149  Lim wlim 6372  ‘cfv 6549  (class class class)co 7419  ωcom 7871  2_oc2o 8481   ↑_m cmap 8845   ≼ cdom 8962   ≺ csdm 8963  cardccrd 9965  ℵcale 9966  cfccf 9967

This theorem was proved from axioms:  ax-mp 5  ax-1 6  ax-2 7  ax-3 8  ax-gen 1789  ax-4 1803  ax-5 1905  ax-6 1963  ax-7 2003  ax-8 2100  ax-9 2108  ax-10 2129  ax-11 2146  ax-12 2166  ax-ext 2696  ax-rep 5286  ax-sep 5300  ax-nul 5307  ax-pow 5365  ax-pr 5429  ax-un 7741  ax-inf2 9671  ax-ac2 10493

This theorem depends on definitions:  df-bi 206  df-an 395  df-or 846  df-3or 1085  df-3an 1086  df-tru 1536  df-fal 1546  df-ex 1774  df-nf 1778  df-sb 2060  df-mo 2528  df-eu 2557  df-clab 2703  df-cleq 2717  df-clel 2802  df-nfc 2877  df-ne 2930  df-ral 3051  df-rex 3060  df-rmo 3363  df-reu 3364  df-rab 3419  df-v 3463  df-sbc 3774  df-csb 3890  df-dif 3947  df-un 3949  df-in 3951  df-ss 3961  df-pss 3964  df-nul 4323  df-if 4531  df-pw 4606  df-sn 4631  df-pr 4633  df-op 4637  df-uni 4910  df-int 4951  df-iun 4999  df-iin 5000  df-br 5150  df-opab 5212  df-mpt 5233  df-tr 5267  df-id 5576  df-eprel 5582  df-po 5590  df-so 5591  df-fr 5633  df-se 5634  df-we 5635  df-xp 5684  df-rel 5685  df-cnv 5686  df-co 5687  df-dm 5688  df-rn 5689  df-res 5690  df-ima 5691  df-pred 6307  df-ord 6374  df-on 6375  df-lim 6376  df-suc 6377  df-iota 6501  df-fun 6551  df-fn 6552  df-f 6553  df-f1 6554  df-fo 6555  df-f1o 6556  df-fv 6557  df-isom 6558  df-riota 7375  df-ov 7422  df-oprab 7423  df-mpo 7424  df-om 7872  df-1st 7994  df-2nd 7995  df-frecs 8287  df-wrecs 8318  df-smo 8367  df-recs 8392  df-rdg 8431  df-1o 8487  df-2o 8488  df-er 8725  df-map 8847  df-ixp 8917  df-en 8965  df-dom 8966  df-sdom 8967  df-fin 8968  df-oi 9540  df-har 9587  df-card 9969  df-aleph 9970  df-cf 9971  df-acn 9972  df-ac 10146

This theorem is referenced by: (None)