Theorem alephom 10626

Description: From canth2 9171, we know that (ℵ‘0) < (2↑ω), but we cannot prove that (2↑ω) = (ℵ‘1) (this is the Continuum Hypothesis), nor can we prove that it is less than any bound whatsoever (i.e. the statement (ℵ‘𝐴) < (2↑ω) is consistent for any ordinal 𝐴). However, we can prove that (2↑ω) is not equal to (ℵ‘ω), nor (ℵ‘(ℵ‘ω)), on cofinality grounds, because by Konig's Theorem konigth 10610 (in the form of cfpwsdom 10625), (2↑ω) has uncountable cofinality, which eliminates limit alephs like (ℵ‘ω). (The first limit aleph that is not eliminated is (ℵ‘(ℵ‘1)), which has cofinality (ℵ‘1).) (Contributed by Mario Carneiro, 21-Mar-2013.)

Assertion

Ref	Expression
alephom	⊢ (card‘(2o ↑m ω)) ≠ (ℵ‘ω)

Proof of Theorem alephom

Step	Hyp	Ref	Expression
1		sdomirr 9155	. 2 ⊢ ¬ ω ≺ ω
2		2onn 8681	. . . . . 6 ⊢ 2o ∈ ω
3	2	elexi 3502	. . . . 5 ⊢ 2o ∈ V
4		domrefg 9028	. . . . 5 ⊢ (2o ∈ V → 2o ≼ 2o)
5	3	cfpwsdom 10625	. . . . 5 ⊢ (2o ≼ 2o → (ℵ‘∅) ≺ (cf‘(card‘(2o ↑m (ℵ‘∅)))))
6	3, 4, 5	mp2b 10	. . . 4 ⊢ (ℵ‘∅) ≺ (cf‘(card‘(2o ↑m (ℵ‘∅))))
7		aleph0 10107	. . . . . 6 ⊢ (ℵ‘∅) = ω
8	7	a1i 11	. . . . 5 ⊢ ((card‘(2o ↑m ω)) = (ℵ‘ω) → (ℵ‘∅) = ω)
9	7	oveq2i 7443	. . . . . . . . . 10 ⊢ (2o ↑m (ℵ‘∅)) = (2o ↑m ω)
10	9	fveq2i 6908	. . . . . . . . 9 ⊢ (card‘(2o ↑m (ℵ‘∅))) = (card‘(2o ↑m ω))
11	10	eqeq1i 2741	. . . . . . . 8 ⊢ ((card‘(2o ↑m (ℵ‘∅))) = (ℵ‘ω) ↔ (card‘(2o ↑m ω)) = (ℵ‘ω))
12	11	biimpri 228	. . . . . . 7 ⊢ ((card‘(2o ↑m ω)) = (ℵ‘ω) → (card‘(2o ↑m (ℵ‘∅))) = (ℵ‘ω))
13	12	fveq2d 6909	. . . . . 6 ⊢ ((card‘(2o ↑m ω)) = (ℵ‘ω) → (cf‘(card‘(2o ↑m (ℵ‘∅)))) = (cf‘(ℵ‘ω)))
14		limom 7904	. . . . . . . 8 ⊢ Lim ω
15		alephsing 10317	. . . . . . . 8 ⊢ (Lim ω → (cf‘(ℵ‘ω)) = (cf‘ω))
16	14, 15	ax-mp 5	. . . . . . 7 ⊢ (cf‘(ℵ‘ω)) = (cf‘ω)
17		cfom 10305	. . . . . . 7 ⊢ (cf‘ω) = ω
18	16, 17	eqtri 2764	. . . . . 6 ⊢ (cf‘(ℵ‘ω)) = ω
19	13, 18	eqtrdi 2792	. . . . 5 ⊢ ((card‘(2o ↑m ω)) = (ℵ‘ω) → (cf‘(card‘(2o ↑m (ℵ‘∅)))) = ω)
20	8, 19	breq12d 5155	. . . 4 ⊢ ((card‘(2o ↑m ω)) = (ℵ‘ω) → ((ℵ‘∅) ≺ (cf‘(card‘(2o ↑m (ℵ‘∅)))) ↔ ω ≺ ω))
21	6, 20	mpbii 233	. . 3 ⊢ ((card‘(2o ↑m ω)) = (ℵ‘ω) → ω ≺ ω)
22	21	necon3bi 2966	. 2 ⊢ (¬ ω ≺ ω → (card‘(2o ↑m ω)) ≠ (ℵ‘ω))
23	1, 22	ax-mp 5	1 ⊢ (card‘(2o ↑m ω)) ≠ (ℵ‘ω)

Syntax hints:  ¬ wn 3   = wceq 1539   ∈ wcel 2107   ≠ wne 2939  Vcvv 3479  ∅c0 4332   class class class wbr 5142  Lim wlim 6384  ‘cfv 6560  (class class class)co 7432  ωcom 7888  2_oc2o 8501   ↑_m cmap 8867   ≼ cdom 8984   ≺ csdm 8985  cardccrd 9976  ℵcale 9977  cfccf 9978

This theorem was proved from axioms:  ax-mp 5  ax-1 6  ax-2 7  ax-3 8  ax-gen 1794  ax-4 1808  ax-5 1909  ax-6 1966  ax-7 2006  ax-8 2109  ax-9 2117  ax-10 2140  ax-11 2156  ax-12 2176  ax-ext 2707  ax-rep 5278  ax-sep 5295  ax-nul 5305  ax-pow 5364  ax-pr 5431  ax-un 7756  ax-inf2 9682  ax-ac2 10504

This theorem depends on definitions:  df-bi 207  df-an 396  df-or 848  df-3or 1087  df-3an 1088  df-tru 1542  df-fal 1552  df-ex 1779  df-nf 1783  df-sb 2064  df-mo 2539  df-eu 2568  df-clab 2714  df-cleq 2728  df-clel 2815  df-nfc 2891  df-ne 2940  df-ral 3061  df-rex 3070  df-rmo 3379  df-reu 3380  df-rab 3436  df-v 3481  df-sbc 3788  df-csb 3899  df-dif 3953  df-un 3955  df-in 3957  df-ss 3967  df-pss 3970  df-nul 4333  df-if 4525  df-pw 4601  df-sn 4626  df-pr 4628  df-op 4632  df-uni 4907  df-int 4946  df-iun 4992  df-iin 4993  df-br 5143  df-opab 5205  df-mpt 5225  df-tr 5259  df-id 5577  df-eprel 5583  df-po 5591  df-so 5592  df-fr 5636  df-se 5637  df-we 5638  df-xp 5690  df-rel 5691  df-cnv 5692  df-co 5693  df-dm 5694  df-rn 5695  df-res 5696  df-ima 5697  df-pred 6320  df-ord 6386  df-on 6387  df-lim 6388  df-suc 6389  df-iota 6513  df-fun 6562  df-fn 6563  df-f 6564  df-f1 6565  df-fo 6566  df-f1o 6567  df-fv 6568  df-isom 6569  df-riota 7389  df-ov 7435  df-oprab 7436  df-mpo 7437  df-om 7889  df-1st 8015  df-2nd 8016  df-frecs 8307  df-wrecs 8338  df-smo 8387  df-recs 8412  df-rdg 8451  df-1o 8507  df-2o 8508  df-er 8746  df-map 8869  df-ixp 8939  df-en 8987  df-dom 8988  df-sdom 8989  df-fin 8990  df-oi 9551  df-har 9598  df-card 9980  df-aleph 9981  df-cf 9982  df-acn 9983  df-ac 10157

This theorem is referenced by: (None)