Theorem alephom 10497

Description: From canth2 9057, we know that (ℵ‘0) < (2↑ω), but we cannot prove that (2↑ω) = (ℵ‘1) (this is the Continuum Hypothesis), nor can we prove that it is less than any bound whatsoever (i.e. the statement (ℵ‘𝐴) < (2↑ω) is consistent for any ordinal 𝐴). However, we can prove that (2↑ω) is not equal to (ℵ‘ω), nor (ℵ‘(ℵ‘ω)), on cofinality grounds, because by Konig's Theorem konigth 10481 (in the form of cfpwsdom 10496), (2↑ω) has uncountable cofinality, which eliminates limit alephs like (ℵ‘ω). (The first limit aleph that is not eliminated is (ℵ‘(ℵ‘1)), which has cofinality (ℵ‘1).) (Contributed by Mario Carneiro, 21-Mar-2013.)

Assertion

Ref	Expression
alephom	⊢ (card‘(2o ↑m ω)) ≠ (ℵ‘ω)

Proof of Theorem alephom

Step	Hyp	Ref	Expression
1		sdomirr 9041	. 2 ⊢ ¬ ω ≺ ω
2		2onn 8567	. . . . . 6 ⊢ 2o ∈ ω
3	2	elexi 3450	. . . . 5 ⊢ 2o ∈ V
4		domrefg 8923	. . . . 5 ⊢ (2o ∈ V → 2o ≼ 2o)
5	3	cfpwsdom 10496	. . . . 5 ⊢ (2o ≼ 2o → (ℵ‘∅) ≺ (cf‘(card‘(2o ↑m (ℵ‘∅)))))
6	3, 4, 5	mp2b 10	. . . 4 ⊢ (ℵ‘∅) ≺ (cf‘(card‘(2o ↑m (ℵ‘∅))))
7		aleph0 9977	. . . . . 6 ⊢ (ℵ‘∅) = ω
8	7	a1i 11	. . . . 5 ⊢ ((card‘(2o ↑m ω)) = (ℵ‘ω) → (ℵ‘∅) = ω)
9	7	oveq2i 7367	. . . . . . . . . 10 ⊢ (2o ↑m (ℵ‘∅)) = (2o ↑m ω)
10	9	fveq2i 6832	. . . . . . . . 9 ⊢ (card‘(2o ↑m (ℵ‘∅))) = (card‘(2o ↑m ω))
11	10	eqeq1i 2740	. . . . . . . 8 ⊢ ((card‘(2o ↑m (ℵ‘∅))) = (ℵ‘ω) ↔ (card‘(2o ↑m ω)) = (ℵ‘ω))
12	11	biimpri 228	. . . . . . 7 ⊢ ((card‘(2o ↑m ω)) = (ℵ‘ω) → (card‘(2o ↑m (ℵ‘∅))) = (ℵ‘ω))
13	12	fveq2d 6833	. . . . . 6 ⊢ ((card‘(2o ↑m ω)) = (ℵ‘ω) → (cf‘(card‘(2o ↑m (ℵ‘∅)))) = (cf‘(ℵ‘ω)))
14		limom 7822	. . . . . . . 8 ⊢ Lim ω
15		alephsing 10187	. . . . . . . 8 ⊢ (Lim ω → (cf‘(ℵ‘ω)) = (cf‘ω))
16	14, 15	ax-mp 5	. . . . . . 7 ⊢ (cf‘(ℵ‘ω)) = (cf‘ω)
17		cfom 10175	. . . . . . 7 ⊢ (cf‘ω) = ω
18	16, 17	eqtri 2758	. . . . . 6 ⊢ (cf‘(ℵ‘ω)) = ω
19	13, 18	eqtrdi 2786	. . . . 5 ⊢ ((card‘(2o ↑m ω)) = (ℵ‘ω) → (cf‘(card‘(2o ↑m (ℵ‘∅)))) = ω)
20	8, 19	breq12d 5087	. . . 4 ⊢ ((card‘(2o ↑m ω)) = (ℵ‘ω) → ((ℵ‘∅) ≺ (cf‘(card‘(2o ↑m (ℵ‘∅)))) ↔ ω ≺ ω))
21	6, 20	mpbii 233	. . 3 ⊢ ((card‘(2o ↑m ω)) = (ℵ‘ω) → ω ≺ ω)
22	21	necon3bi 2956	. 2 ⊢ (¬ ω ≺ ω → (card‘(2o ↑m ω)) ≠ (ℵ‘ω))
23	1, 22	ax-mp 5	1 ⊢ (card‘(2o ↑m ω)) ≠ (ℵ‘ω)

Syntax hints:  ¬ wn 3   = wceq 1542   ∈ wcel 2114   ≠ wne 2930  Vcvv 3427  ∅c0 4263   class class class wbr 5074  Lim wlim 6313  ‘cfv 6487  (class class class)co 7356  ωcom 7806  2_oc2o 8388   ↑_m cmap 8762   ≼ cdom 8880   ≺ csdm 8881  cardccrd 9848  ℵcale 9849  cfccf 9850

This theorem was proved from axioms:  ax-mp 5  ax-1 6  ax-2 7  ax-3 8  ax-gen 1797  ax-4 1811  ax-5 1912  ax-6 1969  ax-7 2010  ax-8 2116  ax-9 2124  ax-10 2147  ax-11 2163  ax-12 2184  ax-ext 2707  ax-rep 5201  ax-sep 5220  ax-nul 5230  ax-pow 5296  ax-pr 5364  ax-un 7678  ax-inf2 9551  ax-ac2 10374

This theorem depends on definitions:  df-bi 207  df-an 396  df-or 849  df-3or 1088  df-3an 1089  df-tru 1545  df-fal 1555  df-ex 1782  df-nf 1786  df-sb 2069  df-mo 2538  df-eu 2568  df-clab 2714  df-cleq 2727  df-clel 2810  df-nfc 2884  df-ne 2931  df-ral 3050  df-rex 3060  df-rmo 3340  df-reu 3341  df-rab 3388  df-v 3429  df-sbc 3726  df-csb 3834  df-dif 3888  df-un 3890  df-in 3892  df-ss 3902  df-pss 3905  df-nul 4264  df-if 4457  df-pw 4533  df-sn 4558  df-pr 4560  df-op 4564  df-uni 4841  df-int 4880  df-iun 4925  df-iin 4926  df-br 5075  df-opab 5137  df-mpt 5156  df-tr 5182  df-id 5515  df-eprel 5520  df-po 5528  df-so 5529  df-fr 5573  df-se 5574  df-we 5575  df-xp 5626  df-rel 5627  df-cnv 5628  df-co 5629  df-dm 5630  df-rn 5631  df-res 5632  df-ima 5633  df-pred 6254  df-ord 6315  df-on 6316  df-lim 6317  df-suc 6318  df-iota 6443  df-fun 6489  df-fn 6490  df-f 6491  df-f1 6492  df-fo 6493  df-f1o 6494  df-fv 6495  df-isom 6496  df-riota 7313  df-ov 7359  df-oprab 7360  df-mpo 7361  df-om 7807  df-1st 7931  df-2nd 7932  df-frecs 8220  df-wrecs 8251  df-smo 8275  df-recs 8300  df-rdg 8338  df-1o 8394  df-2o 8395  df-er 8632  df-map 8764  df-ixp 8835  df-en 8883  df-dom 8884  df-sdom 8885  df-fin 8886  df-oi 9414  df-har 9461  df-card 9852  df-aleph 9853  df-cf 9854  df-acn 9855  df-ac 10027

This theorem is referenced by: (None)