Theorem alephom 10529

Description: From canth2 9087, we know that (ℵ‘0) < (2↑ω), but we cannot prove that (2↑ω) = (ℵ‘1) (this is the Continuum Hypothesis), nor can we prove that it is less than any bound whatsoever (i.e. the statement (ℵ‘𝐴) < (2↑ω) is consistent for any ordinal 𝐴). However, we can prove that (2↑ω) is not equal to (ℵ‘ω), nor (ℵ‘(ℵ‘ω)), on cofinality grounds, because by Konig's Theorem konigth 10513 (in the form of cfpwsdom 10528), (2↑ω) has uncountable cofinality, which eliminates limit alephs like (ℵ‘ω). (The first limit aleph that is not eliminated is (ℵ‘(ℵ‘1)), which has cofinality (ℵ‘1).) (Contributed by Mario Carneiro, 21-Mar-2013.)

Assertion

Ref	Expression
alephom	⊢ (card‘(2o ↑m ω)) ≠ (ℵ‘ω)

Proof of Theorem alephom

Step	Hyp	Ref	Expression
1		sdomirr 9071	. 2 ⊢ ¬ ω ≺ ω
2		2onn 8596	. . . . . 6 ⊢ 2o ∈ ω
3	2	elexi 3466	. . . . 5 ⊢ 2o ∈ V
4		domrefg 8953	. . . . 5 ⊢ (2o ∈ V → 2o ≼ 2o)
5	3	cfpwsdom 10528	. . . . 5 ⊢ (2o ≼ 2o → (ℵ‘∅) ≺ (cf‘(card‘(2o ↑m (ℵ‘∅)))))
6	3, 4, 5	mp2b 10	. . . 4 ⊢ (ℵ‘∅) ≺ (cf‘(card‘(2o ↑m (ℵ‘∅))))
7		aleph0 10008	. . . . . 6 ⊢ (ℵ‘∅) = ω
8	7	a1i 11	. . . . 5 ⊢ ((card‘(2o ↑m ω)) = (ℵ‘ω) → (ℵ‘∅) = ω)
9	7	oveq2i 7392	. . . . . . . . . 10 ⊢ (2o ↑m (ℵ‘∅)) = (2o ↑m ω)
10	9	fveq2i 6855	. . . . . . . . 9 ⊢ (card‘(2o ↑m (ℵ‘∅))) = (card‘(2o ↑m ω))
11	10	eqeq1i 2757	. . . . . . . 8 ⊢ ((card‘(2o ↑m (ℵ‘∅))) = (ℵ‘ω) ↔ (card‘(2o ↑m ω)) = (ℵ‘ω))
12	11	biimpri 230	. . . . . . 7 ⊢ ((card‘(2o ↑m ω)) = (ℵ‘ω) → (card‘(2o ↑m (ℵ‘∅))) = (ℵ‘ω))
13	12	fveq2d 6856	. . . . . 6 ⊢ ((card‘(2o ↑m ω)) = (ℵ‘ω) → (cf‘(card‘(2o ↑m (ℵ‘∅)))) = (cf‘(ℵ‘ω)))
14		limom 7847	. . . . . . . 8 ⊢ Lim ω
15		alephsing 10219	. . . . . . . 8 ⊢ (Lim ω → (cf‘(ℵ‘ω)) = (cf‘ω))
16	14, 15	ax-mp 5	. . . . . . 7 ⊢ (cf‘(ℵ‘ω)) = (cf‘ω)
17		cfom 10207	. . . . . . 7 ⊢ (cf‘ω) = ω
18	16, 17	eqtri 2775	. . . . . 6 ⊢ (cf‘(ℵ‘ω)) = ω
19	13, 18	eqtrdi 2803	. . . . 5 ⊢ ((card‘(2o ↑m ω)) = (ℵ‘ω) → (cf‘(card‘(2o ↑m (ℵ‘∅)))) = ω)
20	8, 19	breq12d 5103	. . . 4 ⊢ ((card‘(2o ↑m ω)) = (ℵ‘ω) → ((ℵ‘∅) ≺ (cf‘(card‘(2o ↑m (ℵ‘∅)))) ↔ ω ≺ ω))
21	6, 20	mpbii 235	. . 3 ⊢ ((card‘(2o ↑m ω)) = (ℵ‘ω) → ω ≺ ω)
22	21	necon3bi 2973	. 2 ⊢ (¬ ω ≺ ω → (card‘(2o ↑m ω)) ≠ (ℵ‘ω))
23	1, 22	ax-mp 5	1 ⊢ (card‘(2o ↑m ω)) ≠ (ℵ‘ω)

Syntax hints:  ¬ wn 3   = wceq 1550   ∈ wcel 2132   ≠ wne 2947  Vcvv 3444  ∅c0 4276   class class class wbr 5090  Lim wlim 6332  ‘cfv 6506  (class class class)co 7381  ωcom 7831  2_oc2o 8415   ↑_m cmap 8792   ≼ cdom 8910   ≺ csdm 8911  cardccrd 9879  ℵcale 9880  cfccf 9881

This theorem was proved from axioms:  ax-mp 5  ax-1 6  ax-2 7  ax-3 8  ax-gen 1805  ax-4 1819  ax-5 1920  ax-6 1977  ax-7 2018  ax-8 2134  ax-9 2142  ax-10 2165  ax-11 2181  ax-12 2202  ax-ext 2724  ax-rep 5217  ax-sep 5236  ax-nul 5246  ax-pow 5312  ax-pr 5380  ax-un 7703  ax-inf2 9582  ax-ac2 10406

This theorem depends on definitions:  df-bi 209  df-an 399  df-or 857  df-3or 1096  df-3an 1097  df-tru 1553  df-fal 1563  df-ex 1790  df-nf 1794  df-sb 2081  df-mo 2556  df-eu 2586  df-clab 2731  df-cleq 2744  df-clel 2827  df-nfc 2901  df-ne 2948  df-ral 3067  df-rex 3077  df-rmo 3357  df-reu 3358  df-rab 3405  df-v 3446  df-sbc 3736  df-csb 3844  df-dif 3898  df-un 3900  df-in 3902  df-ss 3912  df-pss 3915  df-nul 4277  df-if 4471  df-pw 4547  df-sn 4573  df-pr 4575  df-op 4579  df-uni 4856  df-int 4896  df-iun 4941  df-iin 4942  df-br 5091  df-opab 5153  df-mpt 5172  df-tr 5198  df-id 5531  df-eprel 5536  df-po 5544  df-so 5545  df-fr 5589  df-se 5590  df-we 5591  df-xp 5642  df-rel 5643  df-cnv 5644  df-co 5645  df-dm 5646  df-rn 5647  df-res 5648  df-ima 5649  df-pred 6273  df-ord 6334  df-on 6335  df-lim 6336  df-suc 6337  df-iota 6462  df-fun 6508  df-fn 6509  df-f 6510  df-f1 6511  df-fo 6512  df-f1o 6513  df-fv 6514  df-isom 6515  df-riota 7338  df-ov 7384  df-oprab 7385  df-mpo 7386  df-om 7832  df-1st 7955  df-2nd 7956  df-frecs 8246  df-wrecs 8277  df-smo 8301  df-recs 8326  df-rdg 8365  df-1o 8421  df-2o 8422  df-er 8662  df-map 8794  df-ixp 8865  df-en 8913  df-dom 8914  df-sdom 8915  df-fin 8916  df-oi 9444  df-har 9491  df-card 9883  df-aleph 9884  df-cf 9885  df-acn 9886  df-ac 10058

This theorem is referenced by: (None)