Theorem alephom 10500

Description: From canth2 9062, we know that (ℵ‘0) < (2↑ω), but we cannot prove that (2↑ω) = (ℵ‘1) (this is the Continuum Hypothesis), nor can we prove that it is less than any bound whatsoever (i.e. the statement (ℵ‘𝐴) < (2↑ω) is consistent for any ordinal 𝐴). However, we can prove that (2↑ω) is not equal to (ℵ‘ω), nor (ℵ‘(ℵ‘ω)), on cofinality grounds, because by Konig's Theorem konigth 10484 (in the form of cfpwsdom 10499), (2↑ω) has uncountable cofinality, which eliminates limit alephs like (ℵ‘ω). (The first limit aleph that is not eliminated is (ℵ‘(ℵ‘1)), which has cofinality (ℵ‘1).) (Contributed by Mario Carneiro, 21-Mar-2013.)

Assertion

Ref	Expression
alephom	⊢ (card‘(2o ↑m ω)) ≠ (ℵ‘ω)

Proof of Theorem alephom

Step	Hyp	Ref	Expression
1		sdomirr 9046	. 2 ⊢ ¬ ω ≺ ω
2		2onn 8572	. . . . . 6 ⊢ 2o ∈ ω
3	2	elexi 3464	. . . . 5 ⊢ 2o ∈ V
4		domrefg 8928	. . . . 5 ⊢ (2o ∈ V → 2o ≼ 2o)
5	3	cfpwsdom 10499	. . . . 5 ⊢ (2o ≼ 2o → (ℵ‘∅) ≺ (cf‘(card‘(2o ↑m (ℵ‘∅)))))
6	3, 4, 5	mp2b 10	. . . 4 ⊢ (ℵ‘∅) ≺ (cf‘(card‘(2o ↑m (ℵ‘∅))))
7		aleph0 9980	. . . . . 6 ⊢ (ℵ‘∅) = ω
8	7	a1i 11	. . . . 5 ⊢ ((card‘(2o ↑m ω)) = (ℵ‘ω) → (ℵ‘∅) = ω)
9	7	oveq2i 7371	. . . . . . . . . 10 ⊢ (2o ↑m (ℵ‘∅)) = (2o ↑m ω)
10	9	fveq2i 6838	. . . . . . . . 9 ⊢ (card‘(2o ↑m (ℵ‘∅))) = (card‘(2o ↑m ω))
11	10	eqeq1i 2742	. . . . . . . 8 ⊢ ((card‘(2o ↑m (ℵ‘∅))) = (ℵ‘ω) ↔ (card‘(2o ↑m ω)) = (ℵ‘ω))
12	11	biimpri 228	. . . . . . 7 ⊢ ((card‘(2o ↑m ω)) = (ℵ‘ω) → (card‘(2o ↑m (ℵ‘∅))) = (ℵ‘ω))
13	12	fveq2d 6839	. . . . . 6 ⊢ ((card‘(2o ↑m ω)) = (ℵ‘ω) → (cf‘(card‘(2o ↑m (ℵ‘∅)))) = (cf‘(ℵ‘ω)))
14		limom 7826	. . . . . . . 8 ⊢ Lim ω
15		alephsing 10190	. . . . . . . 8 ⊢ (Lim ω → (cf‘(ℵ‘ω)) = (cf‘ω))
16	14, 15	ax-mp 5	. . . . . . 7 ⊢ (cf‘(ℵ‘ω)) = (cf‘ω)
17		cfom 10178	. . . . . . 7 ⊢ (cf‘ω) = ω
18	16, 17	eqtri 2760	. . . . . 6 ⊢ (cf‘(ℵ‘ω)) = ω
19	13, 18	eqtrdi 2788	. . . . 5 ⊢ ((card‘(2o ↑m ω)) = (ℵ‘ω) → (cf‘(card‘(2o ↑m (ℵ‘∅)))) = ω)
20	8, 19	breq12d 5112	. . . 4 ⊢ ((card‘(2o ↑m ω)) = (ℵ‘ω) → ((ℵ‘∅) ≺ (cf‘(card‘(2o ↑m (ℵ‘∅)))) ↔ ω ≺ ω))
21	6, 20	mpbii 233	. . 3 ⊢ ((card‘(2o ↑m ω)) = (ℵ‘ω) → ω ≺ ω)
22	21	necon3bi 2959	. 2 ⊢ (¬ ω ≺ ω → (card‘(2o ↑m ω)) ≠ (ℵ‘ω))
23	1, 22	ax-mp 5	1 ⊢ (card‘(2o ↑m ω)) ≠ (ℵ‘ω)

Syntax hints:  ¬ wn 3   = wceq 1542   ∈ wcel 2114   ≠ wne 2933  Vcvv 3441  ∅c0 4286   class class class wbr 5099  Lim wlim 6319  ‘cfv 6493  (class class class)co 7360  ωcom 7810  2_oc2o 8393   ↑_m cmap 8767   ≼ cdom 8885   ≺ csdm 8886  cardccrd 9851  ℵcale 9852  cfccf 9853

This theorem was proved from axioms:  ax-mp 5  ax-1 6  ax-2 7  ax-3 8  ax-gen 1797  ax-4 1811  ax-5 1912  ax-6 1969  ax-7 2010  ax-8 2116  ax-9 2124  ax-10 2147  ax-11 2163  ax-12 2185  ax-ext 2709  ax-rep 5225  ax-sep 5242  ax-nul 5252  ax-pow 5311  ax-pr 5378  ax-un 7682  ax-inf2 9554  ax-ac2 10377

This theorem depends on definitions:  df-bi 207  df-an 396  df-or 849  df-3or 1088  df-3an 1089  df-tru 1545  df-fal 1555  df-ex 1782  df-nf 1786  df-sb 2069  df-mo 2540  df-eu 2570  df-clab 2716  df-cleq 2729  df-clel 2812  df-nfc 2886  df-ne 2934  df-ral 3053  df-rex 3062  df-rmo 3351  df-reu 3352  df-rab 3401  df-v 3443  df-sbc 3742  df-csb 3851  df-dif 3905  df-un 3907  df-in 3909  df-ss 3919  df-pss 3922  df-nul 4287  df-if 4481  df-pw 4557  df-sn 4582  df-pr 4584  df-op 4588  df-uni 4865  df-int 4904  df-iun 4949  df-iin 4950  df-br 5100  df-opab 5162  df-mpt 5181  df-tr 5207  df-id 5520  df-eprel 5525  df-po 5533  df-so 5534  df-fr 5578  df-se 5579  df-we 5580  df-xp 5631  df-rel 5632  df-cnv 5633  df-co 5634  df-dm 5635  df-rn 5636  df-res 5637  df-ima 5638  df-pred 6260  df-ord 6321  df-on 6322  df-lim 6323  df-suc 6324  df-iota 6449  df-fun 6495  df-fn 6496  df-f 6497  df-f1 6498  df-fo 6499  df-f1o 6500  df-fv 6501  df-isom 6502  df-riota 7317  df-ov 7363  df-oprab 7364  df-mpo 7365  df-om 7811  df-1st 7935  df-2nd 7936  df-frecs 8225  df-wrecs 8256  df-smo 8280  df-recs 8305  df-rdg 8343  df-1o 8399  df-2o 8400  df-er 8637  df-map 8769  df-ixp 8840  df-en 8888  df-dom 8889  df-sdom 8890  df-fin 8891  df-oi 9419  df-har 9466  df-card 9855  df-aleph 9856  df-cf 9857  df-acn 9858  df-ac 10030

This theorem is referenced by: (None)