Theorem gchac 10661

Description: The Generalized Continuum Hypothesis implies the Axiom of Choice. The original proof is due to Sierpiński (1947); we use a refinement of Sierpiński's result due to Specker. (Contributed by Mario Carneiro, 15-May-2015.)

Assertion

Ref	Expression
gchac	⊢ (GCH = V → CHOICE)

Proof of Theorem gchac

Step	Hyp	Ref	Expression
1		vex 3459	. . . . . . . . 9 ⊢ 𝑥 ∈ V
2		omex 9608	. . . . . . . . 9 ⊢ ω ∈ V
3	1, 2	unex 7742	. . . . . . . 8 ⊢ (𝑥 ∪ ω) ∈ V
4		ssun2 4132	. . . . . . . 8 ⊢ ω ⊆ (𝑥 ∪ ω)
5		ssdomg 8993	. . . . . . . 8 ⊢ ((𝑥 ∪ ω) ∈ V → (ω ⊆ (𝑥 ∪ ω) → ω ≼ (𝑥 ∪ ω)))
6	3, 4, 5	mp2 9	. . . . . . 7 ⊢ ω ≼ (𝑥 ∪ ω)
7		id 23	. . . . . . . 8 ⊢ (GCH = V → GCH = V)
8	3, 7	eleqtrrid 2870	. . . . . . 7 ⊢ (GCH = V → (𝑥 ∪ ω) ∈ GCH)
9	3	pwex 5351	. . . . . . . 8 ⊢ 𝒫 (𝑥 ∪ ω) ∈ V
10	9, 7	eleqtrrid 2870	. . . . . . 7 ⊢ (GCH = V → 𝒫 (𝑥 ∪ ω) ∈ GCH)
11		gchacg 10660	. . . . . . 7 ⊢ ((ω ≼ (𝑥 ∪ ω) ∧ (𝑥 ∪ ω) ∈ GCH ∧ 𝒫 (𝑥 ∪ ω) ∈ GCH) → 𝒫 (𝑥 ∪ ω) ∈ dom card)
12	6, 8, 10, 11	mp3an2i 1495	. . . . . 6 ⊢ (GCH = V → 𝒫 (𝑥 ∪ ω) ∈ dom card)
13	3	canth2 9114	. . . . . . 7 ⊢ (𝑥 ∪ ω) ≺ 𝒫 (𝑥 ∪ ω)
14		sdomdom 8973	. . . . . . 7 ⊢ ((𝑥 ∪ ω) ≺ 𝒫 (𝑥 ∪ ω) → (𝑥 ∪ ω) ≼ 𝒫 (𝑥 ∪ ω))
15	13, 14	ax-mp 5	. . . . . 6 ⊢ (𝑥 ∪ ω) ≼ 𝒫 (𝑥 ∪ ω)
16		numdom 10018	. . . . . 6 ⊢ ((𝒫 (𝑥 ∪ ω) ∈ dom card ∧ (𝑥 ∪ ω) ≼ 𝒫 (𝑥 ∪ ω)) → (𝑥 ∪ ω) ∈ dom card)
17	12, 15, 16	sylancl 597	. . . . 5 ⊢ (GCH = V → (𝑥 ∪ ω) ∈ dom card)
18		ssun1 4131	. . . . 5 ⊢ 𝑥 ⊆ (𝑥 ∪ ω)
19		ssnum 10019	. . . . 5 ⊢ (((𝑥 ∪ ω) ∈ dom card ∧ 𝑥 ⊆ (𝑥 ∪ ω)) → 𝑥 ∈ dom card)
20	17, 18, 19	sylancl 597	. . . 4 ⊢ (GCH = V → 𝑥 ∈ dom card)
21	1	a1i 11	. . . 4 ⊢ (GCH = V → 𝑥 ∈ V)
22	20, 21	2thd 268	. . 3 ⊢ (GCH = V → (𝑥 ∈ dom card ↔ 𝑥 ∈ V))
23	22	eqrdv 2761	. 2 ⊢ (GCH = V → dom card = V)
24		dfac10 10117	. 2 ⊢ (CHOICE ↔ dom card = V)
25	23, 24	sylibr 237	1 ⊢ (GCH = V → CHOICE)

Syntax hints:   → wi 4   = wceq 1570   ∈ wcel 2143  Vcvv 3455   ∪ cun 3903   ⊆ wss 3905  𝒫 cpw 4562   class class class wbr 5109  dom cdm 5661  ωcom 7858   ≼ cdom 8937   ≺ csdm 8938  cardccrd 9917  CHOICEwac 10095  GCHcgch 10600

This theorem was proved from axioms:  ax-mp 5  ax-1 6  ax-2 7  ax-3 8  ax-gen 1825  ax-4 1839  ax-5 1940  ax-6 1997  ax-7 2038  ax-8 2145  ax-9 2153  ax-10 2176  ax-11 2192  ax-12 2213  ax-ext 2735  ax-rep 5238  ax-sep 5257  ax-nul 5269  ax-pow 5336  ax-pr 5404  ax-un 7732  ax-inf2 9606

This theorem depends on definitions:  df-bi 210  df-an 401  df-or 861  df-3or 1104  df-3an 1105  df-tru 1573  df-fal 1583  df-ex 1810  df-nf 1814  df-sb 2097  df-mo 2567  df-eu 2597  df-clab 2742  df-cleq 2755  df-clel 2838  df-nfc 2912  df-ne 2959  df-ral 3080  df-rex 3090  df-rmo 3369  df-reu 3370  df-rab 3417  df-v 3457  df-sbc 3745  df-csb 3854  df-dif 3908  df-un 3910  df-in 3912  df-ss 3922  df-pss 3925  df-nul 4287  df-if 4488  df-pw 4564  df-sn 4590  df-pr 4592  df-tp 4594  df-op 4596  df-uni 4873  df-int 4913  df-iun 4958  df-br 5110  df-opab 5174  df-mpt 5193  df-tr 5219  df-id 5556  df-eprel 5561  df-po 5569  df-so 5570  df-fr 5614  df-se 5615  df-we 5616  df-xp 5667  df-rel 5668  df-cnv 5669  df-co 5670  df-dm 5671  df-rn 5672  df-res 5673  df-ima 5674  df-pred 6302  df-ord 6363  df-on 6364  df-lim 6365  df-suc 6366  df-iota 6492  df-fun 6538  df-fn 6539  df-f 6540  df-f1 6541  df-fo 6542  df-f1o 6543  df-fv 6544  df-isom 6545  df-riota 7367  df-ov 7413  df-oprab 7414  df-mpo 7415  df-om 7859  df-1st 7982  df-2nd 7983  df-supp 8153  df-frecs 8274  df-wrecs 8305  df-recs 8354  df-rdg 8393  df-seqom 8431  df-1o 8449  df-2o 8450  df-oadd 8453  df-omul 8454  df-oexp 8455  df-er 8690  df-map 8822  df-en 8940  df-dom 8941  df-sdom 8942  df-fin 8943  df-fsupp 9318  df-oi 9468  df-har 9515  df-wdom 9523  df-cnf 9627  df-dju 9883  df-card 9921  df-ac 10096  df-fin4 10266  df-gch 10601

This theorem is referenced by: (None)