Theorem gchac 10575

Description: The Generalized Continuum Hypothesis implies the Axiom of Choice. The original proof is due to Sierpiński (1947); we use a refinement of Sierpiński's result due to Specker. (Contributed by Mario Carneiro, 15-May-2015.)

Assertion

Ref	Expression
gchac	⊢ (GCH = V → CHOICE)

Proof of Theorem gchac

Step	Hyp	Ref	Expression
1		vex 3440	. . . . . . . . 9 ⊢ 𝑥 ∈ V
2		omex 9539	. . . . . . . . 9 ⊢ ω ∈ V
3	1, 2	unex 7680	. . . . . . . 8 ⊢ (𝑥 ∪ ω) ∈ V
4		ssun2 4130	. . . . . . . 8 ⊢ ω ⊆ (𝑥 ∪ ω)
5		ssdomg 8925	. . . . . . . 8 ⊢ ((𝑥 ∪ ω) ∈ V → (ω ⊆ (𝑥 ∪ ω) → ω ≼ (𝑥 ∪ ω)))
6	3, 4, 5	mp2 9	. . . . . . 7 ⊢ ω ≼ (𝑥 ∪ ω)
7		id 22	. . . . . . . 8 ⊢ (GCH = V → GCH = V)
8	3, 7	eleqtrrid 2835	. . . . . . 7 ⊢ (GCH = V → (𝑥 ∪ ω) ∈ GCH)
9	3	pwex 5319	. . . . . . . 8 ⊢ 𝒫 (𝑥 ∪ ω) ∈ V
10	9, 7	eleqtrrid 2835	. . . . . . 7 ⊢ (GCH = V → 𝒫 (𝑥 ∪ ω) ∈ GCH)
11		gchacg 10574	. . . . . . 7 ⊢ ((ω ≼ (𝑥 ∪ ω) ∧ (𝑥 ∪ ω) ∈ GCH ∧ 𝒫 (𝑥 ∪ ω) ∈ GCH) → 𝒫 (𝑥 ∪ ω) ∈ dom card)
12	6, 8, 10, 11	mp3an2i 1468	. . . . . 6 ⊢ (GCH = V → 𝒫 (𝑥 ∪ ω) ∈ dom card)
13	3	canth2 9047	. . . . . . 7 ⊢ (𝑥 ∪ ω) ≺ 𝒫 (𝑥 ∪ ω)
14		sdomdom 8905	. . . . . . 7 ⊢ ((𝑥 ∪ ω) ≺ 𝒫 (𝑥 ∪ ω) → (𝑥 ∪ ω) ≼ 𝒫 (𝑥 ∪ ω))
15	13, 14	ax-mp 5	. . . . . 6 ⊢ (𝑥 ∪ ω) ≼ 𝒫 (𝑥 ∪ ω)
16		numdom 9932	. . . . . 6 ⊢ ((𝒫 (𝑥 ∪ ω) ∈ dom card ∧ (𝑥 ∪ ω) ≼ 𝒫 (𝑥 ∪ ω)) → (𝑥 ∪ ω) ∈ dom card)
17	12, 15, 16	sylancl 586	. . . . 5 ⊢ (GCH = V → (𝑥 ∪ ω) ∈ dom card)
18		ssun1 4129	. . . . 5 ⊢ 𝑥 ⊆ (𝑥 ∪ ω)
19		ssnum 9933	. . . . 5 ⊢ (((𝑥 ∪ ω) ∈ dom card ∧ 𝑥 ⊆ (𝑥 ∪ ω)) → 𝑥 ∈ dom card)
20	17, 18, 19	sylancl 586	. . . 4 ⊢ (GCH = V → 𝑥 ∈ dom card)
21	1	a1i 11	. . . 4 ⊢ (GCH = V → 𝑥 ∈ V)
22	20, 21	2thd 265	. . 3 ⊢ (GCH = V → (𝑥 ∈ dom card ↔ 𝑥 ∈ V))
23	22	eqrdv 2727	. 2 ⊢ (GCH = V → dom card = V)
24		dfac10 10032	. 2 ⊢ (CHOICE ↔ dom card = V)
25	23, 24	sylibr 234	1 ⊢ (GCH = V → CHOICE)

Syntax hints:   → wi 4   = wceq 1540   ∈ wcel 2109  Vcvv 3436   ∪ cun 3901   ⊆ wss 3903  𝒫 cpw 4551   class class class wbr 5092  dom cdm 5619  ωcom 7799   ≼ cdom 8870   ≺ csdm 8871  cardccrd 9831  CHOICEwac 10009  GCHcgch 10514

This theorem was proved from axioms:  ax-mp 5  ax-1 6  ax-2 7  ax-3 8  ax-gen 1795  ax-4 1809  ax-5 1910  ax-6 1967  ax-7 2008  ax-8 2111  ax-9 2119  ax-10 2142  ax-11 2158  ax-12 2178  ax-ext 2701  ax-rep 5218  ax-sep 5235  ax-nul 5245  ax-pow 5304  ax-pr 5371  ax-un 7671  ax-inf2 9537

This theorem depends on definitions:  df-bi 207  df-an 396  df-or 848  df-3or 1087  df-3an 1088  df-tru 1543  df-fal 1553  df-ex 1780  df-nf 1784  df-sb 2066  df-mo 2533  df-eu 2562  df-clab 2708  df-cleq 2721  df-clel 2803  df-nfc 2878  df-ne 2926  df-ral 3045  df-rex 3054  df-rmo 3343  df-reu 3344  df-rab 3395  df-v 3438  df-sbc 3743  df-csb 3852  df-dif 3906  df-un 3908  df-in 3910  df-ss 3920  df-pss 3923  df-nul 4285  df-if 4477  df-pw 4553  df-sn 4578  df-pr 4580  df-tp 4582  df-op 4584  df-uni 4859  df-int 4897  df-iun 4943  df-br 5093  df-opab 5155  df-mpt 5174  df-tr 5200  df-id 5514  df-eprel 5519  df-po 5527  df-so 5528  df-fr 5572  df-se 5573  df-we 5574  df-xp 5625  df-rel 5626  df-cnv 5627  df-co 5628  df-dm 5629  df-rn 5630  df-res 5631  df-ima 5632  df-pred 6249  df-ord 6310  df-on 6311  df-lim 6312  df-suc 6313  df-iota 6438  df-fun 6484  df-fn 6485  df-f 6486  df-f1 6487  df-fo 6488  df-f1o 6489  df-fv 6490  df-isom 6491  df-riota 7306  df-ov 7352  df-oprab 7353  df-mpo 7354  df-om 7800  df-1st 7924  df-2nd 7925  df-supp 8094  df-frecs 8214  df-wrecs 8245  df-recs 8294  df-rdg 8332  df-seqom 8370  df-1o 8388  df-2o 8389  df-oadd 8392  df-omul 8393  df-oexp 8394  df-er 8625  df-map 8755  df-en 8873  df-dom 8874  df-sdom 8875  df-fin 8876  df-fsupp 9252  df-oi 9402  df-har 9449  df-wdom 9457  df-cnf 9558  df-dju 9797  df-card 9835  df-ac 10010  df-fin4 10181  df-gch 10515

This theorem is referenced by: (None)