Theorem gchac 10437

Description: The Generalized Continuum Hypothesis implies the Axiom of Choice. The original proof is due to Sierpiński (1947); we use a refinement of Sierpiński's result due to Specker. (Contributed by Mario Carneiro, 15-May-2015.)

Assertion

Ref	Expression
gchac	⊢ (GCH = V → CHOICE)

Proof of Theorem gchac

Step	Hyp	Ref	Expression
1		vex 3436	. . . . . . . . 9 ⊢ 𝑥 ∈ V
2		omex 9401	. . . . . . . . 9 ⊢ ω ∈ V
3	1, 2	unex 7596	. . . . . . . 8 ⊢ (𝑥 ∪ ω) ∈ V
4		ssun2 4107	. . . . . . . 8 ⊢ ω ⊆ (𝑥 ∪ ω)
5		ssdomg 8786	. . . . . . . 8 ⊢ ((𝑥 ∪ ω) ∈ V → (ω ⊆ (𝑥 ∪ ω) → ω ≼ (𝑥 ∪ ω)))
6	3, 4, 5	mp2 9	. . . . . . 7 ⊢ ω ≼ (𝑥 ∪ ω)
7		id 22	. . . . . . . 8 ⊢ (GCH = V → GCH = V)
8	3, 7	eleqtrrid 2846	. . . . . . 7 ⊢ (GCH = V → (𝑥 ∪ ω) ∈ GCH)
9	3	pwex 5303	. . . . . . . 8 ⊢ 𝒫 (𝑥 ∪ ω) ∈ V
10	9, 7	eleqtrrid 2846	. . . . . . 7 ⊢ (GCH = V → 𝒫 (𝑥 ∪ ω) ∈ GCH)
11		gchacg 10436	. . . . . . 7 ⊢ ((ω ≼ (𝑥 ∪ ω) ∧ (𝑥 ∪ ω) ∈ GCH ∧ 𝒫 (𝑥 ∪ ω) ∈ GCH) → 𝒫 (𝑥 ∪ ω) ∈ dom card)
12	6, 8, 10, 11	mp3an2i 1465	. . . . . 6 ⊢ (GCH = V → 𝒫 (𝑥 ∪ ω) ∈ dom card)
13	3	canth2 8917	. . . . . . 7 ⊢ (𝑥 ∪ ω) ≺ 𝒫 (𝑥 ∪ ω)
14		sdomdom 8768	. . . . . . 7 ⊢ ((𝑥 ∪ ω) ≺ 𝒫 (𝑥 ∪ ω) → (𝑥 ∪ ω) ≼ 𝒫 (𝑥 ∪ ω))
15	13, 14	ax-mp 5	. . . . . 6 ⊢ (𝑥 ∪ ω) ≼ 𝒫 (𝑥 ∪ ω)
16		numdom 9794	. . . . . 6 ⊢ ((𝒫 (𝑥 ∪ ω) ∈ dom card ∧ (𝑥 ∪ ω) ≼ 𝒫 (𝑥 ∪ ω)) → (𝑥 ∪ ω) ∈ dom card)
17	12, 15, 16	sylancl 586	. . . . 5 ⊢ (GCH = V → (𝑥 ∪ ω) ∈ dom card)
18		ssun1 4106	. . . . 5 ⊢ 𝑥 ⊆ (𝑥 ∪ ω)
19		ssnum 9795	. . . . 5 ⊢ (((𝑥 ∪ ω) ∈ dom card ∧ 𝑥 ⊆ (𝑥 ∪ ω)) → 𝑥 ∈ dom card)
20	17, 18, 19	sylancl 586	. . . 4 ⊢ (GCH = V → 𝑥 ∈ dom card)
21	1	a1i 11	. . . 4 ⊢ (GCH = V → 𝑥 ∈ V)
22	20, 21	2thd 264	. . 3 ⊢ (GCH = V → (𝑥 ∈ dom card ↔ 𝑥 ∈ V))
23	22	eqrdv 2736	. 2 ⊢ (GCH = V → dom card = V)
24		dfac10 9893	. 2 ⊢ (CHOICE ↔ dom card = V)
25	23, 24	sylibr 233	1 ⊢ (GCH = V → CHOICE)

Syntax hints:   → wi 4   = wceq 1539   ∈ wcel 2106  Vcvv 3432   ∪ cun 3885   ⊆ wss 3887  𝒫 cpw 4533   class class class wbr 5074  dom cdm 5589  ωcom 7712   ≼ cdom 8731   ≺ csdm 8732  cardccrd 9693  CHOICEwac 9871  GCHcgch 10376

This theorem was proved from axioms:  ax-mp 5  ax-1 6  ax-2 7  ax-3 8  ax-gen 1798  ax-4 1812  ax-5 1913  ax-6 1971  ax-7 2011  ax-8 2108  ax-9 2116  ax-10 2137  ax-11 2154  ax-12 2171  ax-ext 2709  ax-rep 5209  ax-sep 5223  ax-nul 5230  ax-pow 5288  ax-pr 5352  ax-un 7588  ax-inf2 9399

This theorem depends on definitions:  df-bi 206  df-an 397  df-or 845  df-3or 1087  df-3an 1088  df-tru 1542  df-fal 1552  df-ex 1783  df-nf 1787  df-sb 2068  df-mo 2540  df-eu 2569  df-clab 2716  df-cleq 2730  df-clel 2816  df-nfc 2889  df-ne 2944  df-ral 3069  df-rex 3070  df-rmo 3071  df-reu 3072  df-rab 3073  df-v 3434  df-sbc 3717  df-csb 3833  df-dif 3890  df-un 3892  df-in 3894  df-ss 3904  df-pss 3906  df-nul 4257  df-if 4460  df-pw 4535  df-sn 4562  df-pr 4564  df-tp 4566  df-op 4568  df-uni 4840  df-int 4880  df-iun 4926  df-br 5075  df-opab 5137  df-mpt 5158  df-tr 5192  df-id 5489  df-eprel 5495  df-po 5503  df-so 5504  df-fr 5544  df-se 5545  df-we 5546  df-xp 5595  df-rel 5596  df-cnv 5597  df-co 5598  df-dm 5599  df-rn 5600  df-res 5601  df-ima 5602  df-pred 6202  df-ord 6269  df-on 6270  df-lim 6271  df-suc 6272  df-iota 6391  df-fun 6435  df-fn 6436  df-f 6437  df-f1 6438  df-fo 6439  df-f1o 6440  df-fv 6441  df-isom 6442  df-riota 7232  df-ov 7278  df-oprab 7279  df-mpo 7280  df-om 7713  df-1st 7831  df-2nd 7832  df-supp 7978  df-frecs 8097  df-wrecs 8128  df-recs 8202  df-rdg 8241  df-seqom 8279  df-1o 8297  df-2o 8298  df-oadd 8301  df-omul 8302  df-oexp 8303  df-er 8498  df-map 8617  df-en 8734  df-dom 8735  df-sdom 8736  df-fin 8737  df-fsupp 9129  df-oi 9269  df-har 9316  df-wdom 9324  df-cnf 9420  df-dju 9659  df-card 9697  df-ac 9872  df-fin4 10043  df-gch 10377

This theorem is referenced by: (None)