Theorem gchac 9954

Description: The Generalized Continuum Hypothesis implies the Axiom of Choice. The original proof is due to Sierpiński (1947); we use a refinement of Sierpiński's result due to Specker. (Contributed by Mario Carneiro, 15-May-2015.)

Assertion

Ref	Expression
gchac	⊢ (GCH = V → CHOICE)

Proof of Theorem gchac

Step	Hyp	Ref	Expression
1		vex 3440	. . . . . . . . 9 ⊢ 𝑥 ∈ V
2		omex 8957	. . . . . . . . 9 ⊢ ω ∈ V
3	1, 2	unex 7331	. . . . . . . 8 ⊢ (𝑥 ∪ ω) ∈ V
4		ssun2 4074	. . . . . . . 8 ⊢ ω ⊆ (𝑥 ∪ ω)
5		ssdomg 8408	. . . . . . . 8 ⊢ ((𝑥 ∪ ω) ∈ V → (ω ⊆ (𝑥 ∪ ω) → ω ≼ (𝑥 ∪ ω)))
6	3, 4, 5	mp2 9	. . . . . . 7 ⊢ ω ≼ (𝑥 ∪ ω)
7		id 22	. . . . . . . 8 ⊢ (GCH = V → GCH = V)
8	3, 7	syl5eleqr 2890	. . . . . . 7 ⊢ (GCH = V → (𝑥 ∪ ω) ∈ GCH)
9	3	pwex 5177	. . . . . . . 8 ⊢ 𝒫 (𝑥 ∪ ω) ∈ V
10	9, 7	syl5eleqr 2890	. . . . . . 7 ⊢ (GCH = V → 𝒫 (𝑥 ∪ ω) ∈ GCH)
11		gchacg 9953	. . . . . . 7 ⊢ ((ω ≼ (𝑥 ∪ ω) ∧ (𝑥 ∪ ω) ∈ GCH ∧ 𝒫 (𝑥 ∪ ω) ∈ GCH) → 𝒫 (𝑥 ∪ ω) ∈ dom card)
12	6, 8, 10, 11	mp3an2i 1458	. . . . . 6 ⊢ (GCH = V → 𝒫 (𝑥 ∪ ω) ∈ dom card)
13	3	canth2 8522	. . . . . . 7 ⊢ (𝑥 ∪ ω) ≺ 𝒫 (𝑥 ∪ ω)
14		sdomdom 8390	. . . . . . 7 ⊢ ((𝑥 ∪ ω) ≺ 𝒫 (𝑥 ∪ ω) → (𝑥 ∪ ω) ≼ 𝒫 (𝑥 ∪ ω))
15	13, 14	ax-mp 5	. . . . . 6 ⊢ (𝑥 ∪ ω) ≼ 𝒫 (𝑥 ∪ ω)
16		numdom 9315	. . . . . 6 ⊢ ((𝒫 (𝑥 ∪ ω) ∈ dom card ∧ (𝑥 ∪ ω) ≼ 𝒫 (𝑥 ∪ ω)) → (𝑥 ∪ ω) ∈ dom card)
17	12, 15, 16	sylancl 586	. . . . 5 ⊢ (GCH = V → (𝑥 ∪ ω) ∈ dom card)
18		ssun1 4073	. . . . 5 ⊢ 𝑥 ⊆ (𝑥 ∪ ω)
19		ssnum 9316	. . . . 5 ⊢ (((𝑥 ∪ ω) ∈ dom card ∧ 𝑥 ⊆ (𝑥 ∪ ω)) → 𝑥 ∈ dom card)
20	17, 18, 19	sylancl 586	. . . 4 ⊢ (GCH = V → 𝑥 ∈ dom card)
21	1	a1i 11	. . . 4 ⊢ (GCH = V → 𝑥 ∈ V)
22	20, 21	2thd 266	. . 3 ⊢ (GCH = V → (𝑥 ∈ dom card ↔ 𝑥 ∈ V))
23	22	eqrdv 2793	. 2 ⊢ (GCH = V → dom card = V)
24		dfac10 9414	. 2 ⊢ (CHOICE ↔ dom card = V)
25	23, 24	sylibr 235	1 ⊢ (GCH = V → CHOICE)

Syntax hints:   → wi 4   = wceq 1522   ∈ wcel 2081  Vcvv 3437   ∪ cun 3861   ⊆ wss 3863  𝒫 cpw 4457   class class class wbr 4966  dom cdm 5448  ωcom 7441   ≼ cdom 8360   ≺ csdm 8361  cardccrd 9215  CHOICEwac 9392  GCHcgch 9893

This theorem was proved from axioms:  ax-mp 5  ax-1 6  ax-2 7  ax-3 8  ax-gen 1777  ax-4 1791  ax-5 1888  ax-6 1947  ax-7 1992  ax-8 2083  ax-9 2091  ax-10 2112  ax-11 2126  ax-12 2141  ax-13 2344  ax-ext 2769  ax-rep 5086  ax-sep 5099  ax-nul 5106  ax-pow 5162  ax-pr 5226  ax-un 7324  ax-inf2 8955

This theorem depends on definitions:  df-bi 208  df-an 397  df-or 843  df-3or 1081  df-3an 1082  df-tru 1525  df-fal 1535  df-ex 1762  df-nf 1766  df-sb 2043  df-mo 2576  df-eu 2612  df-clab 2776  df-cleq 2788  df-clel 2863  df-nfc 2935  df-ne 2985  df-ral 3110  df-rex 3111  df-reu 3112  df-rmo 3113  df-rab 3114  df-v 3439  df-sbc 3710  df-csb 3816  df-dif 3866  df-un 3868  df-in 3870  df-ss 3878  df-pss 3880  df-nul 4216  df-if 4386  df-pw 4459  df-sn 4477  df-pr 4479  df-tp 4481  df-op 4483  df-uni 4750  df-int 4787  df-iun 4831  df-br 4967  df-opab 5029  df-mpt 5046  df-tr 5069  df-id 5353  df-eprel 5358  df-po 5367  df-so 5368  df-fr 5407  df-se 5408  df-we 5409  df-xp 5454  df-rel 5455  df-cnv 5456  df-co 5457  df-dm 5458  df-rn 5459  df-res 5460  df-ima 5461  df-pred 6028  df-ord 6074  df-on 6075  df-lim 6076  df-suc 6077  df-iota 6194  df-fun 6232  df-fn 6233  df-f 6234  df-f1 6235  df-fo 6236  df-f1o 6237  df-fv 6238  df-isom 6239  df-riota 6982  df-ov 7024  df-oprab 7025  df-mpo 7026  df-om 7442  df-1st 7550  df-2nd 7551  df-supp 7687  df-wrecs 7803  df-recs 7865  df-rdg 7903  df-seqom 7940  df-1o 7958  df-2o 7959  df-oadd 7962  df-omul 7963  df-oexp 7964  df-er 8144  df-map 8263  df-en 8363  df-dom 8364  df-sdom 8365  df-fin 8366  df-fsupp 8685  df-oi 8825  df-har 8873  df-wdom 8874  df-cnf 8976  df-dju 9181  df-card 9219  df-ac 9393  df-fin4 9560  df-gch 9894

This theorem is referenced by: (None)