Theorem gchac 10260

Description: The Generalized Continuum Hypothesis implies the Axiom of Choice. The original proof is due to Sierpiński (1947); we use a refinement of Sierpiński's result due to Specker. (Contributed by Mario Carneiro, 15-May-2015.)

Assertion

Ref	Expression
gchac	⊢ (GCH = V → CHOICE)

Proof of Theorem gchac

Step	Hyp	Ref	Expression
1		vex 3402	. . . . . . . . 9 ⊢ 𝑥 ∈ V
2		omex 9236	. . . . . . . . 9 ⊢ ω ∈ V
3	1, 2	unex 7509	. . . . . . . 8 ⊢ (𝑥 ∪ ω) ∈ V
4		ssun2 4073	. . . . . . . 8 ⊢ ω ⊆ (𝑥 ∪ ω)
5		ssdomg 8652	. . . . . . . 8 ⊢ ((𝑥 ∪ ω) ∈ V → (ω ⊆ (𝑥 ∪ ω) → ω ≼ (𝑥 ∪ ω)))
6	3, 4, 5	mp2 9	. . . . . . 7 ⊢ ω ≼ (𝑥 ∪ ω)
7		id 22	. . . . . . . 8 ⊢ (GCH = V → GCH = V)
8	3, 7	eleqtrrid 2838	. . . . . . 7 ⊢ (GCH = V → (𝑥 ∪ ω) ∈ GCH)
9	3	pwex 5258	. . . . . . . 8 ⊢ 𝒫 (𝑥 ∪ ω) ∈ V
10	9, 7	eleqtrrid 2838	. . . . . . 7 ⊢ (GCH = V → 𝒫 (𝑥 ∪ ω) ∈ GCH)
11		gchacg 10259	. . . . . . 7 ⊢ ((ω ≼ (𝑥 ∪ ω) ∧ (𝑥 ∪ ω) ∈ GCH ∧ 𝒫 (𝑥 ∪ ω) ∈ GCH) → 𝒫 (𝑥 ∪ ω) ∈ dom card)
12	6, 8, 10, 11	mp3an2i 1468	. . . . . 6 ⊢ (GCH = V → 𝒫 (𝑥 ∪ ω) ∈ dom card)
13	3	canth2 8777	. . . . . . 7 ⊢ (𝑥 ∪ ω) ≺ 𝒫 (𝑥 ∪ ω)
14		sdomdom 8634	. . . . . . 7 ⊢ ((𝑥 ∪ ω) ≺ 𝒫 (𝑥 ∪ ω) → (𝑥 ∪ ω) ≼ 𝒫 (𝑥 ∪ ω))
15	13, 14	ax-mp 5	. . . . . 6 ⊢ (𝑥 ∪ ω) ≼ 𝒫 (𝑥 ∪ ω)
16		numdom 9617	. . . . . 6 ⊢ ((𝒫 (𝑥 ∪ ω) ∈ dom card ∧ (𝑥 ∪ ω) ≼ 𝒫 (𝑥 ∪ ω)) → (𝑥 ∪ ω) ∈ dom card)
17	12, 15, 16	sylancl 589	. . . . 5 ⊢ (GCH = V → (𝑥 ∪ ω) ∈ dom card)
18		ssun1 4072	. . . . 5 ⊢ 𝑥 ⊆ (𝑥 ∪ ω)
19		ssnum 9618	. . . . 5 ⊢ (((𝑥 ∪ ω) ∈ dom card ∧ 𝑥 ⊆ (𝑥 ∪ ω)) → 𝑥 ∈ dom card)
20	17, 18, 19	sylancl 589	. . . 4 ⊢ (GCH = V → 𝑥 ∈ dom card)
21	1	a1i 11	. . . 4 ⊢ (GCH = V → 𝑥 ∈ V)
22	20, 21	2thd 268	. . 3 ⊢ (GCH = V → (𝑥 ∈ dom card ↔ 𝑥 ∈ V))
23	22	eqrdv 2734	. 2 ⊢ (GCH = V → dom card = V)
24		dfac10 9716	. 2 ⊢ (CHOICE ↔ dom card = V)
25	23, 24	sylibr 237	1 ⊢ (GCH = V → CHOICE)

Syntax hints:   → wi 4   = wceq 1543   ∈ wcel 2112  Vcvv 3398   ∪ cun 3851   ⊆ wss 3853  𝒫 cpw 4499   class class class wbr 5039  dom cdm 5536  ωcom 7622   ≼ cdom 8602   ≺ csdm 8603  cardccrd 9516  CHOICEwac 9694  GCHcgch 10199

This theorem was proved from axioms:  ax-mp 5  ax-1 6  ax-2 7  ax-3 8  ax-gen 1803  ax-4 1817  ax-5 1918  ax-6 1976  ax-7 2018  ax-8 2114  ax-9 2122  ax-10 2143  ax-11 2160  ax-12 2177  ax-ext 2708  ax-rep 5164  ax-sep 5177  ax-nul 5184  ax-pow 5243  ax-pr 5307  ax-un 7501  ax-inf2 9234

This theorem depends on definitions:  df-bi 210  df-an 400  df-or 848  df-3or 1090  df-3an 1091  df-tru 1546  df-fal 1556  df-ex 1788  df-nf 1792  df-sb 2073  df-mo 2539  df-eu 2568  df-clab 2715  df-cleq 2728  df-clel 2809  df-nfc 2879  df-ne 2933  df-ral 3056  df-rex 3057  df-reu 3058  df-rmo 3059  df-rab 3060  df-v 3400  df-sbc 3684  df-csb 3799  df-dif 3856  df-un 3858  df-in 3860  df-ss 3870  df-pss 3872  df-nul 4224  df-if 4426  df-pw 4501  df-sn 4528  df-pr 4530  df-tp 4532  df-op 4534  df-uni 4806  df-int 4846  df-iun 4892  df-br 5040  df-opab 5102  df-mpt 5121  df-tr 5147  df-id 5440  df-eprel 5445  df-po 5453  df-so 5454  df-fr 5494  df-se 5495  df-we 5496  df-xp 5542  df-rel 5543  df-cnv 5544  df-co 5545  df-dm 5546  df-rn 5547  df-res 5548  df-ima 5549  df-pred 6140  df-ord 6194  df-on 6195  df-lim 6196  df-suc 6197  df-iota 6316  df-fun 6360  df-fn 6361  df-f 6362  df-f1 6363  df-fo 6364  df-f1o 6365  df-fv 6366  df-isom 6367  df-riota 7148  df-ov 7194  df-oprab 7195  df-mpo 7196  df-om 7623  df-1st 7739  df-2nd 7740  df-supp 7882  df-wrecs 8025  df-recs 8086  df-rdg 8124  df-seqom 8162  df-1o 8180  df-2o 8181  df-oadd 8184  df-omul 8185  df-oexp 8186  df-er 8369  df-map 8488  df-en 8605  df-dom 8606  df-sdom 8607  df-fin 8608  df-fsupp 8964  df-oi 9104  df-har 9151  df-wdom 9159  df-cnf 9255  df-dju 9482  df-card 9520  df-ac 9695  df-fin4 9866  df-gch 10200

This theorem is referenced by: (None)