Theorem gchac 10507

Description: The Generalized Continuum Hypothesis implies the Axiom of Choice. The original proof is due to Sierpiński (1947); we use a refinement of Sierpiński's result due to Specker. (Contributed by Mario Carneiro, 15-May-2015.)

Assertion

Ref	Expression
gchac	⊢ (GCH = V → CHOICE)

Proof of Theorem gchac

Step	Hyp	Ref	Expression
1		vex 3445	. . . . . . . . 9 ⊢ 𝑥 ∈ V
2		omex 9469	. . . . . . . . 9 ⊢ ω ∈ V
3	1, 2	unex 7634	. . . . . . . 8 ⊢ (𝑥 ∪ ω) ∈ V
4		ssun2 4117	. . . . . . . 8 ⊢ ω ⊆ (𝑥 ∪ ω)
5		ssdomg 8836	. . . . . . . 8 ⊢ ((𝑥 ∪ ω) ∈ V → (ω ⊆ (𝑥 ∪ ω) → ω ≼ (𝑥 ∪ ω)))
6	3, 4, 5	mp2 9	. . . . . . 7 ⊢ ω ≼ (𝑥 ∪ ω)
7		id 22	. . . . . . . 8 ⊢ (GCH = V → GCH = V)
8	3, 7	eleqtrrid 2845	. . . . . . 7 ⊢ (GCH = V → (𝑥 ∪ ω) ∈ GCH)
9	3	pwex 5316	. . . . . . . 8 ⊢ 𝒫 (𝑥 ∪ ω) ∈ V
10	9, 7	eleqtrrid 2845	. . . . . . 7 ⊢ (GCH = V → 𝒫 (𝑥 ∪ ω) ∈ GCH)
11		gchacg 10506	. . . . . . 7 ⊢ ((ω ≼ (𝑥 ∪ ω) ∧ (𝑥 ∪ ω) ∈ GCH ∧ 𝒫 (𝑥 ∪ ω) ∈ GCH) → 𝒫 (𝑥 ∪ ω) ∈ dom card)
12	6, 8, 10, 11	mp3an2i 1465	. . . . . 6 ⊢ (GCH = V → 𝒫 (𝑥 ∪ ω) ∈ dom card)
13	3	canth2 8970	. . . . . . 7 ⊢ (𝑥 ∪ ω) ≺ 𝒫 (𝑥 ∪ ω)
14		sdomdom 8816	. . . . . . 7 ⊢ ((𝑥 ∪ ω) ≺ 𝒫 (𝑥 ∪ ω) → (𝑥 ∪ ω) ≼ 𝒫 (𝑥 ∪ ω))
15	13, 14	ax-mp 5	. . . . . 6 ⊢ (𝑥 ∪ ω) ≼ 𝒫 (𝑥 ∪ ω)
16		numdom 9864	. . . . . 6 ⊢ ((𝒫 (𝑥 ∪ ω) ∈ dom card ∧ (𝑥 ∪ ω) ≼ 𝒫 (𝑥 ∪ ω)) → (𝑥 ∪ ω) ∈ dom card)
17	12, 15, 16	sylancl 586	. . . . 5 ⊢ (GCH = V → (𝑥 ∪ ω) ∈ dom card)
18		ssun1 4116	. . . . 5 ⊢ 𝑥 ⊆ (𝑥 ∪ ω)
19		ssnum 9865	. . . . 5 ⊢ (((𝑥 ∪ ω) ∈ dom card ∧ 𝑥 ⊆ (𝑥 ∪ ω)) → 𝑥 ∈ dom card)
20	17, 18, 19	sylancl 586	. . . 4 ⊢ (GCH = V → 𝑥 ∈ dom card)
21	1	a1i 11	. . . 4 ⊢ (GCH = V → 𝑥 ∈ V)
22	20, 21	2thd 264	. . 3 ⊢ (GCH = V → (𝑥 ∈ dom card ↔ 𝑥 ∈ V))
23	22	eqrdv 2735	. 2 ⊢ (GCH = V → dom card = V)
24		dfac10 9963	. 2 ⊢ (CHOICE ↔ dom card = V)
25	23, 24	sylibr 233	1 ⊢ (GCH = V → CHOICE)

Syntax hints:   → wi 4   = wceq 1540   ∈ wcel 2105  Vcvv 3441   ∪ cun 3894   ⊆ wss 3896  𝒫 cpw 4543   class class class wbr 5085  dom cdm 5605  ωcom 7755   ≼ cdom 8777   ≺ csdm 8778  cardccrd 9761  CHOICEwac 9941  GCHcgch 10446

This theorem was proved from axioms:  ax-mp 5  ax-1 6  ax-2 7  ax-3 8  ax-gen 1796  ax-4 1810  ax-5 1912  ax-6 1970  ax-7 2010  ax-8 2107  ax-9 2115  ax-10 2136  ax-11 2153  ax-12 2170  ax-ext 2708  ax-rep 5222  ax-sep 5236  ax-nul 5243  ax-pow 5301  ax-pr 5365  ax-un 7626  ax-inf2 9467

This theorem depends on definitions:  df-bi 206  df-an 397  df-or 845  df-3or 1087  df-3an 1088  df-tru 1543  df-fal 1553  df-ex 1781  df-nf 1785  df-sb 2067  df-mo 2539  df-eu 2568  df-clab 2715  df-cleq 2729  df-clel 2815  df-nfc 2887  df-ne 2942  df-ral 3063  df-rex 3072  df-rmo 3350  df-reu 3351  df-rab 3405  df-v 3443  df-sbc 3726  df-csb 3842  df-dif 3899  df-un 3901  df-in 3903  df-ss 3913  df-pss 3915  df-nul 4267  df-if 4470  df-pw 4545  df-sn 4570  df-pr 4572  df-tp 4574  df-op 4576  df-uni 4849  df-int 4891  df-iun 4937  df-br 5086  df-opab 5148  df-mpt 5169  df-tr 5203  df-id 5505  df-eprel 5511  df-po 5519  df-so 5520  df-fr 5560  df-se 5561  df-we 5562  df-xp 5611  df-rel 5612  df-cnv 5613  df-co 5614  df-dm 5615  df-rn 5616  df-res 5617  df-ima 5618  df-pred 6222  df-ord 6289  df-on 6290  df-lim 6291  df-suc 6292  df-iota 6415  df-fun 6465  df-fn 6466  df-f 6467  df-f1 6468  df-fo 6469  df-f1o 6470  df-fv 6471  df-isom 6472  df-riota 7270  df-ov 7316  df-oprab 7317  df-mpo 7318  df-om 7756  df-1st 7874  df-2nd 7875  df-supp 8023  df-frecs 8142  df-wrecs 8173  df-recs 8247  df-rdg 8286  df-seqom 8324  df-1o 8342  df-2o 8343  df-oadd 8346  df-omul 8347  df-oexp 8348  df-er 8544  df-map 8663  df-en 8780  df-dom 8781  df-sdom 8782  df-fin 8783  df-fsupp 9197  df-oi 9337  df-har 9384  df-wdom 9392  df-cnf 9488  df-dju 9727  df-card 9765  df-ac 9942  df-fin4 10113  df-gch 10447

This theorem is referenced by: (None)