Theorem gchac 10105

Description: The Generalized Continuum Hypothesis implies the Axiom of Choice. The original proof is due to Sierpiński (1947); we use a refinement of Sierpiński's result due to Specker. (Contributed by Mario Carneiro, 15-May-2015.)

Assertion

Ref	Expression
gchac	⊢ (GCH = V → CHOICE)

Proof of Theorem gchac

Step	Hyp	Ref	Expression
1		vex 3499	. . . . . . . . 9 ⊢ 𝑥 ∈ V
2		omex 9108	. . . . . . . . 9 ⊢ ω ∈ V
3	1, 2	unex 7471	. . . . . . . 8 ⊢ (𝑥 ∪ ω) ∈ V
4		ssun2 4151	. . . . . . . 8 ⊢ ω ⊆ (𝑥 ∪ ω)
5		ssdomg 8557	. . . . . . . 8 ⊢ ((𝑥 ∪ ω) ∈ V → (ω ⊆ (𝑥 ∪ ω) → ω ≼ (𝑥 ∪ ω)))
6	3, 4, 5	mp2 9	. . . . . . 7 ⊢ ω ≼ (𝑥 ∪ ω)
7		id 22	. . . . . . . 8 ⊢ (GCH = V → GCH = V)
8	3, 7	eleqtrrid 2922	. . . . . . 7 ⊢ (GCH = V → (𝑥 ∪ ω) ∈ GCH)
9	3	pwex 5283	. . . . . . . 8 ⊢ 𝒫 (𝑥 ∪ ω) ∈ V
10	9, 7	eleqtrrid 2922	. . . . . . 7 ⊢ (GCH = V → 𝒫 (𝑥 ∪ ω) ∈ GCH)
11		gchacg 10104	. . . . . . 7 ⊢ ((ω ≼ (𝑥 ∪ ω) ∧ (𝑥 ∪ ω) ∈ GCH ∧ 𝒫 (𝑥 ∪ ω) ∈ GCH) → 𝒫 (𝑥 ∪ ω) ∈ dom card)
12	6, 8, 10, 11	mp3an2i 1462	. . . . . 6 ⊢ (GCH = V → 𝒫 (𝑥 ∪ ω) ∈ dom card)
13	3	canth2 8672	. . . . . . 7 ⊢ (𝑥 ∪ ω) ≺ 𝒫 (𝑥 ∪ ω)
14		sdomdom 8539	. . . . . . 7 ⊢ ((𝑥 ∪ ω) ≺ 𝒫 (𝑥 ∪ ω) → (𝑥 ∪ ω) ≼ 𝒫 (𝑥 ∪ ω))
15	13, 14	ax-mp 5	. . . . . 6 ⊢ (𝑥 ∪ ω) ≼ 𝒫 (𝑥 ∪ ω)
16		numdom 9466	. . . . . 6 ⊢ ((𝒫 (𝑥 ∪ ω) ∈ dom card ∧ (𝑥 ∪ ω) ≼ 𝒫 (𝑥 ∪ ω)) → (𝑥 ∪ ω) ∈ dom card)
17	12, 15, 16	sylancl 588	. . . . 5 ⊢ (GCH = V → (𝑥 ∪ ω) ∈ dom card)
18		ssun1 4150	. . . . 5 ⊢ 𝑥 ⊆ (𝑥 ∪ ω)
19		ssnum 9467	. . . . 5 ⊢ (((𝑥 ∪ ω) ∈ dom card ∧ 𝑥 ⊆ (𝑥 ∪ ω)) → 𝑥 ∈ dom card)
20	17, 18, 19	sylancl 588	. . . 4 ⊢ (GCH = V → 𝑥 ∈ dom card)
21	1	a1i 11	. . . 4 ⊢ (GCH = V → 𝑥 ∈ V)
22	20, 21	2thd 267	. . 3 ⊢ (GCH = V → (𝑥 ∈ dom card ↔ 𝑥 ∈ V))
23	22	eqrdv 2821	. 2 ⊢ (GCH = V → dom card = V)
24		dfac10 9565	. 2 ⊢ (CHOICE ↔ dom card = V)
25	23, 24	sylibr 236	1 ⊢ (GCH = V → CHOICE)

Syntax hints:   → wi 4   = wceq 1537   ∈ wcel 2114  Vcvv 3496   ∪ cun 3936   ⊆ wss 3938  𝒫 cpw 4541   class class class wbr 5068  dom cdm 5557  ωcom 7582   ≼ cdom 8509   ≺ csdm 8510  cardccrd 9366  CHOICEwac 9543  GCHcgch 10044

This theorem was proved from axioms:  ax-mp 5  ax-1 6  ax-2 7  ax-3 8  ax-gen 1796  ax-4 1810  ax-5 1911  ax-6 1970  ax-7 2015  ax-8 2116  ax-9 2124  ax-10 2145  ax-11 2161  ax-12 2177  ax-ext 2795  ax-rep 5192  ax-sep 5205  ax-nul 5212  ax-pow 5268  ax-pr 5332  ax-un 7463  ax-inf2 9106

This theorem depends on definitions:  df-bi 209  df-an 399  df-or 844  df-3or 1084  df-3an 1085  df-tru 1540  df-fal 1550  df-ex 1781  df-nf 1785  df-sb 2070  df-mo 2622  df-eu 2654  df-clab 2802  df-cleq 2816  df-clel 2895  df-nfc 2965  df-ne 3019  df-ral 3145  df-rex 3146  df-reu 3147  df-rmo 3148  df-rab 3149  df-v 3498  df-sbc 3775  df-csb 3886  df-dif 3941  df-un 3943  df-in 3945  df-ss 3954  df-pss 3956  df-nul 4294  df-if 4470  df-pw 4543  df-sn 4570  df-pr 4572  df-tp 4574  df-op 4576  df-uni 4841  df-int 4879  df-iun 4923  df-br 5069  df-opab 5131  df-mpt 5149  df-tr 5175  df-id 5462  df-eprel 5467  df-po 5476  df-so 5477  df-fr 5516  df-se 5517  df-we 5518  df-xp 5563  df-rel 5564  df-cnv 5565  df-co 5566  df-dm 5567  df-rn 5568  df-res 5569  df-ima 5570  df-pred 6150  df-ord 6196  df-on 6197  df-lim 6198  df-suc 6199  df-iota 6316  df-fun 6359  df-fn 6360  df-f 6361  df-f1 6362  df-fo 6363  df-f1o 6364  df-fv 6365  df-isom 6366  df-riota 7116  df-ov 7161  df-oprab 7162  df-mpo 7163  df-om 7583  df-1st 7691  df-2nd 7692  df-supp 7833  df-wrecs 7949  df-recs 8010  df-rdg 8048  df-seqom 8086  df-1o 8104  df-2o 8105  df-oadd 8108  df-omul 8109  df-oexp 8110  df-er 8291  df-map 8410  df-en 8512  df-dom 8513  df-sdom 8514  df-fin 8515  df-fsupp 8836  df-oi 8976  df-har 9024  df-wdom 9025  df-cnf 9127  df-dju 9332  df-card 9370  df-ac 9544  df-fin4 9711  df-gch 10045

This theorem is referenced by: (None)