Theorem itgeq1f 25967

Description: Equality theorem for an integral. (Contributed by Mario Carneiro, 28-Jun-2014.) Avoid axioms. (Revised by GG, 1-Sep-2025.)

Hypotheses

Ref	Expression
itgeq1f.1	⊢ Ⅎ𝑥𝐴
itgeq1f.2	⊢ Ⅎ𝑥𝐵

Assertion

Ref	Expression
itgeq1f	⊢ (𝐴 = 𝐵 → ∫𝐴𝐶 d𝑥 = ∫𝐵𝐶 d𝑥)

Proof of Theorem itgeq1f

Dummy variables 𝑘 𝑦 are mutually distinct and distinct from all other variables.

Step	Hyp	Ref	Expression
1		itgeq1f.1	. . . . . . 7 ⊢ Ⅎ𝑥𝐴
2		itgeq1f.2	. . . . . . 7 ⊢ Ⅎ𝑥𝐵
3	1, 2	nfeq 2941	. . . . . 6 ⊢ Ⅎ𝑥 𝐴 = 𝐵
4		eleq2 2855	. . . . . . . . . 10 ⊢ (𝐴 = 𝐵 → (𝑥 ∈ 𝐴 ↔ 𝑥 ∈ 𝐵))
5	4	anbi1d 643	. . . . . . . . 9 ⊢ (𝐴 = 𝐵 → ((𝑥 ∈ 𝐴 ∧ 0 ≤ 𝑦) ↔ (𝑥 ∈ 𝐵 ∧ 0 ≤ 𝑦)))
6	5	ifbid 4516	. . . . . . . 8 ⊢ (𝐴 = 𝐵 → if((𝑥 ∈ 𝐴 ∧ 0 ≤ 𝑦), 𝑦, 0) = if((𝑥 ∈ 𝐵 ∧ 0 ≤ 𝑦), 𝑦, 0))
7	6	csbeq2dv 3863	. . . . . . 7 ⊢ (𝐴 = 𝐵 → ⦋(ℜ‘(𝐶 / (i↑𝑘))) / 𝑦⦌if((𝑥 ∈ 𝐴 ∧ 0 ≤ 𝑦), 𝑦, 0) = ⦋(ℜ‘(𝐶 / (i↑𝑘))) / 𝑦⦌if((𝑥 ∈ 𝐵 ∧ 0 ≤ 𝑦), 𝑦, 0))
8	7	adantr 486	. . . . . 6 ⊢ ((𝐴 = 𝐵 ∧ 𝑥 ∈ ℝ) → ⦋(ℜ‘(𝐶 / (i↑𝑘))) / 𝑦⦌if((𝑥 ∈ 𝐴 ∧ 0 ≤ 𝑦), 𝑦, 0) = ⦋(ℜ‘(𝐶 / (i↑𝑘))) / 𝑦⦌if((𝑥 ∈ 𝐵 ∧ 0 ≤ 𝑦), 𝑦, 0))
9	3, 8	mpteq2da 5208	. . . . 5 ⊢ (𝐴 = 𝐵 → (𝑥 ∈ ℝ ↦ ⦋(ℜ‘(𝐶 / (i↑𝑘))) / 𝑦⦌if((𝑥 ∈ 𝐴 ∧ 0 ≤ 𝑦), 𝑦, 0)) = (𝑥 ∈ ℝ ↦ ⦋(ℜ‘(𝐶 / (i↑𝑘))) / 𝑦⦌if((𝑥 ∈ 𝐵 ∧ 0 ≤ 𝑦), 𝑦, 0)))
10	9	fveq2d 6892	. . . 4 ⊢ (𝐴 = 𝐵 → (∫2‘(𝑥 ∈ ℝ ↦ ⦋(ℜ‘(𝐶 / (i↑𝑘))) / 𝑦⦌if((𝑥 ∈ 𝐴 ∧ 0 ≤ 𝑦), 𝑦, 0))) = (∫2‘(𝑥 ∈ ℝ ↦ ⦋(ℜ‘(𝐶 / (i↑𝑘))) / 𝑦⦌if((𝑥 ∈ 𝐵 ∧ 0 ≤ 𝑦), 𝑦, 0))))
11	10	oveq2d 7439	. . 3 ⊢ (𝐴 = 𝐵 → ((i↑𝑘) · (∫2‘(𝑥 ∈ ℝ ↦ ⦋(ℜ‘(𝐶 / (i↑𝑘))) / 𝑦⦌if((𝑥 ∈ 𝐴 ∧ 0 ≤ 𝑦), 𝑦, 0)))) = ((i↑𝑘) · (∫2‘(𝑥 ∈ ℝ ↦ ⦋(ℜ‘(𝐶 / (i↑𝑘))) / 𝑦⦌if((𝑥 ∈ 𝐵 ∧ 0 ≤ 𝑦), 𝑦, 0)))))
12	11	sumeq2sdv 15780	. 2 ⊢ (𝐴 = 𝐵 → Σ𝑘 ∈ (0...3)((i↑𝑘) · (∫2‘(𝑥 ∈ ℝ ↦ ⦋(ℜ‘(𝐶 / (i↑𝑘))) / 𝑦⦌if((𝑥 ∈ 𝐴 ∧ 0 ≤ 𝑦), 𝑦, 0)))) = Σ𝑘 ∈ (0...3)((i↑𝑘) · (∫2‘(𝑥 ∈ ℝ ↦ ⦋(ℜ‘(𝐶 / (i↑𝑘))) / 𝑦⦌if((𝑥 ∈ 𝐵 ∧ 0 ≤ 𝑦), 𝑦, 0)))))
13		df-itg 25819	. 2 ⊢ ∫𝐴𝐶 d𝑥 = Σ𝑘 ∈ (0...3)((i↑𝑘) · (∫2‘(𝑥 ∈ ℝ ↦ ⦋(ℜ‘(𝐶 / (i↑𝑘))) / 𝑦⦌if((𝑥 ∈ 𝐴 ∧ 0 ≤ 𝑦), 𝑦, 0))))
14		df-itg 25819	. 2 ⊢ ∫𝐵𝐶 d𝑥 = Σ𝑘 ∈ (0...3)((i↑𝑘) · (∫2‘(𝑥 ∈ ℝ ↦ ⦋(ℜ‘(𝐶 / (i↑𝑘))) / 𝑦⦌if((𝑥 ∈ 𝐵 ∧ 0 ≤ 𝑦), 𝑦, 0))))
15	12, 13, 14	3eqtr4g 2826	1 ⊢ (𝐴 = 𝐵 → ∫𝐴𝐶 d𝑥 = ∫𝐵𝐶 d𝑥)

This proof depends on syntax axioms:   → wi 4   ∧ wa 401   = wceq 1570   ∈ wcel 2146  Ⅎwnfc 2913  ⦋csb 3856  ifcif 4492   class class class wbr 5114   ↦ cmpt 5197  ‘cfv 6543  (class class class)co 7423  ℝcr 11117  0cc0 11118  ici 11120   · cmul 11123   ≤ cle 11262   / cdiv 11889  3c3 12314  ...cfz 13553  ↑cexp 14117  ℜcre 15174  Σcsu 15763  ∫₂citg2 25812  ∫citg 25814

This proof depends on axioms:  ax-mp 5  ax-1 6  ax-2 7  ax-3 8  ax-gen 1828  ax-4 1842  ax-5 1943  ax-6 2000  ax-7 2041  ax-8 2148  ax-9 2156  ax-10 2179  ax-11 2195  ax-12 2216  ax-ext 2738

This proof depends on definitions:  df-bi 210  df-an 402  df-or 862  df-3an 1105  df-tru 1573  df-fal 1583  df-ex 1813  df-nf 1817  df-sb 2100  df-clab 2745  df-cleq 2758  df-clel 2841  df-nfc 2915  df-ral 3083  df-rex 3093  df-rab 3420  df-v 3460  df-sbc 3748  df-csb 3857  df-dif 3911  df-un 3913  df-in 3915  df-ss 3925  df-nul 4290  df-if 4493  df-sn 4595  df-pr 4597  df-op 4601  df-uni 4878  df-br 5115  df-opab 5179  df-mpt 5198  df-xp 5672  df-cnv 5674  df-co 5675  df-dm 5676  df-rn 5677  df-res 5678  df-ima 5679  df-pred 6309  df-iota 6499  df-fv 6551  df-ov 7426  df-oprab 7427  df-mpo 7428  df-frecs 8287  df-wrecs 8318  df-recs 8367  df-rdg 8406  df-seq 14058  df-sum 15764  df-itg 25819

This theorem is used by: (None)