Theorem itgeq1f 26005

Description: Equality theorem for an integral. (Contributed by Mario Carneiro, 28-Jun-2014.) Avoid axioms. (Revised by GG, 1-Sep-2025.)

Hypotheses

Ref	Expression
itgeq1f.1	⊢ Ⅎ𝑥𝐴
itgeq1f.2	⊢ Ⅎ𝑥𝐵

Assertion

Ref	Expression
itgeq1f	⊢ (𝐴 = 𝐵 → ∫𝐴𝐶 d𝑥 = ∫𝐵𝐶 d𝑥)

Proof of Theorem itgeq1f

Dummy variables 𝑘 𝑦 are mutually distinct and distinct from all other variables.

Step	Hyp	Ref	Expression
1		itgeq1f.1	. . . . . . 7 ⊢ Ⅎ𝑥𝐴
2		itgeq1f.2	. . . . . . 7 ⊢ Ⅎ𝑥𝐵
3	1, 2	nfeq 2937	. . . . . 6 ⊢ Ⅎ𝑥 𝐴 = 𝐵
4		eleq2 2851	. . . . . . . . . 10 ⊢ (𝐴 = 𝐵 → (𝑥 ∈ 𝐴 ↔ 𝑥 ∈ 𝐵))
5	4	anbi1d 643	. . . . . . . . 9 ⊢ (𝐴 = 𝐵 → ((𝑥 ∈ 𝐴 ∧ 0 ≤ 𝑦) ↔ (𝑥 ∈ 𝐵 ∧ 0 ≤ 𝑦)))
6	5	ifbid 4509	. . . . . . . 8 ⊢ (𝐴 = 𝐵 → if((𝑥 ∈ 𝐴 ∧ 0 ≤ 𝑦), 𝑦, 0) = if((𝑥 ∈ 𝐵 ∧ 0 ≤ 𝑦), 𝑦, 0))
7	6	csbeq2dv 3857	. . . . . . 7 ⊢ (𝐴 = 𝐵 → ⦋(ℜ‘(𝐶 / (i↑𝑘))) / 𝑦⦌if((𝑥 ∈ 𝐴 ∧ 0 ≤ 𝑦), 𝑦, 0) = ⦋(ℜ‘(𝐶 / (i↑𝑘))) / 𝑦⦌if((𝑥 ∈ 𝐵 ∧ 0 ≤ 𝑦), 𝑦, 0))
8	7	adantr 486	. . . . . 6 ⊢ ((𝐴 = 𝐵 ∧ 𝑥 ∈ ℝ) → ⦋(ℜ‘(𝐶 / (i↑𝑘))) / 𝑦⦌if((𝑥 ∈ 𝐴 ∧ 0 ≤ 𝑦), 𝑦, 0) = ⦋(ℜ‘(𝐶 / (i↑𝑘))) / 𝑦⦌if((𝑥 ∈ 𝐵 ∧ 0 ≤ 𝑦), 𝑦, 0))
9	3, 8	mpteq2da 5201	. . . . 5 ⊢ (𝐴 = 𝐵 → (𝑥 ∈ ℝ ↦ ⦋(ℜ‘(𝐶 / (i↑𝑘))) / 𝑦⦌if((𝑥 ∈ 𝐴 ∧ 0 ≤ 𝑦), 𝑦, 0)) = (𝑥 ∈ ℝ ↦ ⦋(ℜ‘(𝐶 / (i↑𝑘))) / 𝑦⦌if((𝑥 ∈ 𝐵 ∧ 0 ≤ 𝑦), 𝑦, 0)))
10	9	fveq2d 6886	. . . 4 ⊢ (𝐴 = 𝐵 → (∫2‘(𝑥 ∈ ℝ ↦ ⦋(ℜ‘(𝐶 / (i↑𝑘))) / 𝑦⦌if((𝑥 ∈ 𝐴 ∧ 0 ≤ 𝑦), 𝑦, 0))) = (∫2‘(𝑥 ∈ ℝ ↦ ⦋(ℜ‘(𝐶 / (i↑𝑘))) / 𝑦⦌if((𝑥 ∈ 𝐵 ∧ 0 ≤ 𝑦), 𝑦, 0))))
11	10	oveq2d 7433	. . 3 ⊢ (𝐴 = 𝐵 → ((i↑𝑘) · (∫2‘(𝑥 ∈ ℝ ↦ ⦋(ℜ‘(𝐶 / (i↑𝑘))) / 𝑦⦌if((𝑥 ∈ 𝐴 ∧ 0 ≤ 𝑦), 𝑦, 0)))) = ((i↑𝑘) · (∫2‘(𝑥 ∈ ℝ ↦ ⦋(ℜ‘(𝐶 / (i↑𝑘))) / 𝑦⦌if((𝑥 ∈ 𝐵 ∧ 0 ≤ 𝑦), 𝑦, 0)))))
12	11	sumeq2sdv 15794	. 2 ⊢ (𝐴 = 𝐵 → Σ𝑘 ∈ (0...3)((i↑𝑘) · (∫2‘(𝑥 ∈ ℝ ↦ ⦋(ℜ‘(𝐶 / (i↑𝑘))) / 𝑦⦌if((𝑥 ∈ 𝐴 ∧ 0 ≤ 𝑦), 𝑦, 0)))) = Σ𝑘 ∈ (0...3)((i↑𝑘) · (∫2‘(𝑥 ∈ ℝ ↦ ⦋(ℜ‘(𝐶 / (i↑𝑘))) / 𝑦⦌if((𝑥 ∈ 𝐵 ∧ 0 ≤ 𝑦), 𝑦, 0)))))
13		df-itg 25857	. 2 ⊢ ∫𝐴𝐶 d𝑥 = Σ𝑘 ∈ (0...3)((i↑𝑘) · (∫2‘(𝑥 ∈ ℝ ↦ ⦋(ℜ‘(𝐶 / (i↑𝑘))) / 𝑦⦌if((𝑥 ∈ 𝐴 ∧ 0 ≤ 𝑦), 𝑦, 0))))
14		df-itg 25857	. 2 ⊢ ∫𝐵𝐶 d𝑥 = Σ𝑘 ∈ (0...3)((i↑𝑘) · (∫2‘(𝑥 ∈ ℝ ↦ ⦋(ℜ‘(𝐶 / (i↑𝑘))) / 𝑦⦌if((𝑥 ∈ 𝐵 ∧ 0 ≤ 𝑦), 𝑦, 0))))
15	12, 13, 14	3eqtr4g 2822	1 ⊢ (𝐴 = 𝐵 → ∫𝐴𝐶 d𝑥 = ∫𝐵𝐶 d𝑥)

This proof depends on syntax axioms:   → wi 4   ∧ wa 401   = wceq 1570   ∈ wcel 2145  Ⅎwnfc 2909  ⦋csb 3850  ifcif 4485   class class class wbr 5107   ↦ cmpt 5190  ‘cfv 6537  (class class class)co 7417  ℝcr 11127  0cc0 11128  ici 11130   · cmul 11133   ≤ cle 11272   / cdiv 11899  3c3 12324  ...cfz 13565  ↑cexp 14129  ℜcre 15188  Σcsu 15777  ∫₂citg2 25850  ∫citg 25852

This proof depends on axioms:  ax-mp 5  ax-1 6  ax-2 7  ax-3 8  ax-gen 1828  ax-4 1842  ax-5 1943  ax-6 2000  ax-7 2041  ax-8 2147  ax-9 2155  ax-10 2178  ax-11 2194  ax-12 2215  ax-ext 2734

This proof depends on definitions:  df-bi 210  df-an 402  df-or 862  df-3an 1105  df-tru 1573  df-fal 1583  df-ex 1813  df-nf 1817  df-sb 2100  df-clab 2741  df-cleq 2754  df-clel 2837  df-nfc 2911  df-ral 3079  df-rex 3089  df-rab 3415  df-v 3455  df-sbc 3743  df-csb 3851  df-dif 3905  df-un 3907  df-in 3909  df-ss 3919  df-nul 4283  df-if 4486  df-sn 4588  df-pr 4590  df-op 4594  df-uni 4871  df-br 5108  df-opab 5172  df-mpt 5191  df-xp 5665  df-cnv 5667  df-co 5668  df-dm 5669  df-rn 5670  df-res 5671  df-ima 5672  df-pred 6303  df-iota 6493  df-fv 6545  df-ov 7420  df-oprab 7421  df-mpo 7422  df-frecs 8284  df-wrecs 8315  df-recs 8364  df-rdg 8403  df-seq 14070  df-sum 15778  df-itg 25857

This theorem is used by: (None)