| Metamath
Proof Explorer Theorem List (p. 449 of 503) | < Previous Next > | |
| Bad symbols? Try the
GIF version. |
||
|
Mirrors > Metamath Home Page > MPE Home Page > Theorem List Contents > Recent Proofs This page: Page List |
||
| Color key: | (1-31009) |
(31010-32532) |
(32533-50277) |
| Type | Label | Description |
|---|---|---|
| Statement | ||
| Theorem | pm10.14 44801 | Theorem *10.14 in [WhiteheadRussell] p. 146. (Contributed by Andrew Salmon, 17-Jun-2011.) |
| ⊢ ((∀𝑥𝜑 ∧ ∀𝑥𝜓) → ([𝑦 / 𝑥]𝜑 ∧ [𝑦 / 𝑥]𝜓)) | ||
| Theorem | pm10.251 44802 | Theorem *10.251 in [WhiteheadRussell] p. 149. (Contributed by Andrew Salmon, 17-Jun-2011.) |
| ⊢ (∀𝑥 ¬ 𝜑 → ¬ ∀𝑥𝜑) | ||
| Theorem | pm10.252 44803 | Theorem *10.252 in [WhiteheadRussell] p. 149. (Contributed by Andrew Salmon, 17-Jun-2011.) (New usage is discouraged.) |
| ⊢ (¬ ∃𝑥𝜑 ↔ ∀𝑥 ¬ 𝜑) | ||
| Theorem | pm10.253 44804 | Theorem *10.253 in [WhiteheadRussell] p. 149. (Contributed by Andrew Salmon, 17-Jun-2011.) |
| ⊢ (¬ ∀𝑥𝜑 ↔ ∃𝑥 ¬ 𝜑) | ||
| Theorem | albitr 44805 | Theorem *10.301 in [WhiteheadRussell] p. 151. (Contributed by Andrew Salmon, 24-May-2011.) |
| ⊢ ((∀𝑥(𝜑 ↔ 𝜓) ∧ ∀𝑥(𝜓 ↔ 𝜒)) → ∀𝑥(𝜑 ↔ 𝜒)) | ||
| Theorem | pm10.42 44806 | Theorem *10.42 in [WhiteheadRussell] p. 155. (Contributed by Andrew Salmon, 17-Jun-2011.) |
| ⊢ ((∃𝑥𝜑 ∨ ∃𝑥𝜓) ↔ ∃𝑥(𝜑 ∨ 𝜓)) | ||
| Theorem | pm10.52 44807* | Theorem *10.52 in [WhiteheadRussell] p. 155. (Contributed by Andrew Salmon, 24-May-2011.) |
| ⊢ (∃𝑥𝜑 → (∀𝑥(𝜑 → 𝜓) ↔ 𝜓)) | ||
| Theorem | pm10.53 44808 | Theorem *10.53 in [WhiteheadRussell] p. 155. (Contributed by Andrew Salmon, 24-May-2011.) |
| ⊢ (¬ ∃𝑥𝜑 → ∀𝑥(𝜑 → 𝜓)) | ||
| Theorem | pm10.541 44809* | Theorem *10.541 in [WhiteheadRussell] p. 155. (Contributed by Andrew Salmon, 24-May-2011.) |
| ⊢ (∀𝑥(𝜑 → (𝜒 ∨ 𝜓)) ↔ (𝜒 ∨ ∀𝑥(𝜑 → 𝜓))) | ||
| Theorem | pm10.542 44810* | Theorem *10.542 in [WhiteheadRussell] p. 156. (Contributed by Andrew Salmon, 24-May-2011.) |
| ⊢ (∀𝑥(𝜑 → (𝜒 → 𝜓)) ↔ (𝜒 → ∀𝑥(𝜑 → 𝜓))) | ||
| Theorem | pm10.55 44811 | Theorem *10.55 in [WhiteheadRussell] p. 156. (Contributed by Andrew Salmon, 24-May-2011.) |
| ⊢ ((∃𝑥(𝜑 ∧ 𝜓) ∧ ∀𝑥(𝜑 → 𝜓)) ↔ (∃𝑥𝜑 ∧ ∀𝑥(𝜑 → 𝜓))) | ||
| Theorem | pm10.56 44812 | Theorem *10.56 in [WhiteheadRussell] p. 156. (Contributed by Andrew Salmon, 24-May-2011.) |
| ⊢ ((∀𝑥(𝜑 → 𝜓) ∧ ∃𝑥(𝜑 ∧ 𝜒)) → ∃𝑥(𝜓 ∧ 𝜒)) | ||
| Theorem | pm10.57 44813 | Theorem *10.57 in [WhiteheadRussell] p. 156. (Contributed by Andrew Salmon, 24-May-2011.) |
| ⊢ (∀𝑥(𝜑 → (𝜓 ∨ 𝜒)) → (∀𝑥(𝜑 → 𝜓) ∨ ∃𝑥(𝜑 ∧ 𝜒))) | ||
| Theorem | 2alanimi 44814 | Removes two universal quantifiers from a statement. (Contributed by Andrew Salmon, 24-May-2011.) |
| ⊢ ((𝜑 ∧ 𝜓) → 𝜒) ⇒ ⊢ ((∀𝑥∀𝑦𝜑 ∧ ∀𝑥∀𝑦𝜓) → ∀𝑥∀𝑦𝜒) | ||
| Theorem | 2al2imi 44815 | Removes two universal quantifiers from a statement. (Contributed by Andrew Salmon, 24-May-2011.) |
| ⊢ (𝜑 → (𝜓 → 𝜒)) ⇒ ⊢ (∀𝑥∀𝑦𝜑 → (∀𝑥∀𝑦𝜓 → ∀𝑥∀𝑦𝜒)) | ||
| Theorem | pm11.11 44816 | Theorem *11.11 in [WhiteheadRussell] p. 159. (Contributed by Andrew Salmon, 17-Jun-2011.) |
| ⊢ 𝜑 ⇒ ⊢ ∀𝑧∀𝑤[𝑧 / 𝑥][𝑤 / 𝑦]𝜑 | ||
| Theorem | pm11.12 44817* | Theorem *11.12 in [WhiteheadRussell] p. 159. (Contributed by Andrew Salmon, 17-Jun-2011.) |
| ⊢ (∀𝑥∀𝑦(𝜑 ∨ 𝜓) → (𝜑 ∨ ∀𝑥∀𝑦𝜓)) | ||
| Theorem | 19.21vv 44818* | Compare Theorem *11.3 in [WhiteheadRussell] p. 161. Special case of theorem 19.21 of [Margaris] p. 90 with two quantifiers. See 19.21v 1941. (Contributed by Andrew Salmon, 24-May-2011.) |
| ⊢ (∀𝑥∀𝑦(𝜓 → 𝜑) ↔ (𝜓 → ∀𝑥∀𝑦𝜑)) | ||
| Theorem | 2alim 44819 | Theorem *11.32 in [WhiteheadRussell] p. 162. Theorem 19.20 of [Margaris] p. 90 with 2 quantifiers. (Contributed by Andrew Salmon, 24-May-2011.) |
| ⊢ (∀𝑥∀𝑦(𝜑 → 𝜓) → (∀𝑥∀𝑦𝜑 → ∀𝑥∀𝑦𝜓)) | ||
| Theorem | 2albi 44820 | Theorem *11.33 in [WhiteheadRussell] p. 162. Theorem 19.15 of [Margaris] p. 90 with 2 quantifiers. (Contributed by Andrew Salmon, 24-May-2011.) |
| ⊢ (∀𝑥∀𝑦(𝜑 ↔ 𝜓) → (∀𝑥∀𝑦𝜑 ↔ ∀𝑥∀𝑦𝜓)) | ||
| Theorem | 2exim 44821 | Theorem *11.34 in [WhiteheadRussell] p. 162. Theorem 19.22 of [Margaris] p. 90 with 2 quantifiers. (Contributed by Andrew Salmon, 24-May-2011.) |
| ⊢ (∀𝑥∀𝑦(𝜑 → 𝜓) → (∃𝑥∃𝑦𝜑 → ∃𝑥∃𝑦𝜓)) | ||
| Theorem | 2exbi 44822 | Theorem *11.341 in [WhiteheadRussell] p. 162. Theorem 19.18 of [Margaris] p. 90 with 2 quantifiers. (Contributed by Andrew Salmon, 24-May-2011.) |
| ⊢ (∀𝑥∀𝑦(𝜑 ↔ 𝜓) → (∃𝑥∃𝑦𝜑 ↔ ∃𝑥∃𝑦𝜓)) | ||
| Theorem | spsbce-2 44823 | Theorem *11.36 in [WhiteheadRussell] p. 162. (Contributed by Andrew Salmon, 24-May-2011.) |
| ⊢ ([𝑧 / 𝑥][𝑤 / 𝑦]𝜑 → ∃𝑥∃𝑦𝜑) | ||
| Theorem | 19.33-2 44824 | Theorem *11.421 in [WhiteheadRussell] p. 163. Theorem 19.33 of [Margaris] p. 90 with 2 quantifiers. (Contributed by Andrew Salmon, 24-May-2011.) |
| ⊢ ((∀𝑥∀𝑦𝜑 ∨ ∀𝑥∀𝑦𝜓) → ∀𝑥∀𝑦(𝜑 ∨ 𝜓)) | ||
| Theorem | 19.36vv 44825* | Theorem *11.43 in [WhiteheadRussell] p. 163. Theorem 19.36 of [Margaris] p. 90 with 2 quantifiers. (Contributed by Andrew Salmon, 25-May-2011.) |
| ⊢ (∃𝑥∃𝑦(𝜑 → 𝜓) ↔ (∀𝑥∀𝑦𝜑 → 𝜓)) | ||
| Theorem | 19.31vv 44826* | Theorem *11.44 in [WhiteheadRussell] p. 163. Theorem 19.31 of [Margaris] p. 90 with 2 quantifiers. (Contributed by Andrew Salmon, 24-May-2011.) |
| ⊢ (∀𝑥∀𝑦(𝜑 ∨ 𝜓) ↔ (∀𝑥∀𝑦𝜑 ∨ 𝜓)) | ||
| Theorem | 19.37vv 44827* | Theorem *11.46 in [WhiteheadRussell] p. 164. Theorem 19.37 of [Margaris] p. 90 with 2 quantifiers. (Contributed by Andrew Salmon, 24-May-2011.) |
| ⊢ (∃𝑥∃𝑦(𝜓 → 𝜑) ↔ (𝜓 → ∃𝑥∃𝑦𝜑)) | ||
| Theorem | 19.28vv 44828* | Theorem *11.47 in [WhiteheadRussell] p. 164. Theorem 19.28 of [Margaris] p. 90 with 2 quantifiers. (Contributed by Andrew Salmon, 24-May-2011.) |
| ⊢ (∀𝑥∀𝑦(𝜓 ∧ 𝜑) ↔ (𝜓 ∧ ∀𝑥∀𝑦𝜑)) | ||
| Theorem | pm11.52 44829 | Theorem *11.52 in [WhiteheadRussell] p. 164. (Contributed by Andrew Salmon, 24-May-2011.) |
| ⊢ (∃𝑥∃𝑦(𝜑 ∧ 𝜓) ↔ ¬ ∀𝑥∀𝑦(𝜑 → ¬ 𝜓)) | ||
| Theorem | aaanv 44830* | Theorem *11.56 in [WhiteheadRussell] p. 165. Special case of aaan 2338. (Contributed by Andrew Salmon, 24-May-2011.) |
| ⊢ ((∀𝑥𝜑 ∧ ∀𝑦𝜓) ↔ ∀𝑥∀𝑦(𝜑 ∧ 𝜓)) | ||
| Theorem | pm11.57 44831* | Theorem *11.57 in [WhiteheadRussell] p. 165. (Contributed by Andrew Salmon, 24-May-2011.) |
| ⊢ (∀𝑥𝜑 ↔ ∀𝑥∀𝑦(𝜑 ∧ [𝑦 / 𝑥]𝜑)) | ||
| Theorem | pm11.58 44832* | Theorem *11.58 in [WhiteheadRussell] p. 165. (Contributed by Andrew Salmon, 24-May-2011.) |
| ⊢ (∃𝑥𝜑 ↔ ∃𝑥∃𝑦(𝜑 ∧ [𝑦 / 𝑥]𝜑)) | ||
| Theorem | pm11.59 44833* | Theorem *11.59 in [WhiteheadRussell] p. 165. (Contributed by Andrew Salmon, 25-May-2011.) |
| ⊢ (∀𝑥(𝜑 → 𝜓) → ∀𝑦∀𝑥((𝜑 ∧ [𝑦 / 𝑥]𝜑) → (𝜓 ∧ [𝑦 / 𝑥]𝜓))) | ||
| Theorem | pm11.6 44834* | Theorem *11.6 in [WhiteheadRussell] p. 165. (Contributed by Andrew Salmon, 25-May-2011.) |
| ⊢ (∃𝑥(∃𝑦(𝜑 ∧ 𝜓) ∧ 𝜒) ↔ ∃𝑦(∃𝑥(𝜑 ∧ 𝜒) ∧ 𝜓)) | ||
| Theorem | pm11.61 44835* | Theorem *11.61 in [WhiteheadRussell] p. 166. (Contributed by Andrew Salmon, 24-May-2011.) |
| ⊢ (∃𝑦∀𝑥(𝜑 → 𝜓) → ∀𝑥(𝜑 → ∃𝑦𝜓)) | ||
| Theorem | pm11.62 44836* | Theorem *11.62 in [WhiteheadRussell] p. 166. Importation combined with the rearrangement with quantifiers. (Contributed by Andrew Salmon, 24-May-2011.) |
| ⊢ (∀𝑥∀𝑦((𝜑 ∧ 𝜓) → 𝜒) ↔ ∀𝑥(𝜑 → ∀𝑦(𝜓 → 𝜒))) | ||
| Theorem | pm11.63 44837 | Theorem *11.63 in [WhiteheadRussell] p. 166. (Contributed by Andrew Salmon, 24-May-2011.) |
| ⊢ (¬ ∃𝑥∃𝑦𝜑 → ∀𝑥∀𝑦(𝜑 → 𝜓)) | ||
| Theorem | pm11.7 44838 | Theorem *11.7 in [WhiteheadRussell] p. 166. (Contributed by Andrew Salmon, 24-May-2011.) |
| ⊢ (∃𝑥∃𝑦(𝜑 ∨ 𝜑) ↔ ∃𝑥∃𝑦𝜑) | ||
| Theorem | pm11.71 44839* | Theorem *11.71 in [WhiteheadRussell] p. 166. (Contributed by Andrew Salmon, 24-May-2011.) |
| ⊢ ((∃𝑥𝜑 ∧ ∃𝑦𝜒) → ((∀𝑥(𝜑 → 𝜓) ∧ ∀𝑦(𝜒 → 𝜃)) ↔ ∀𝑥∀𝑦((𝜑 ∧ 𝜒) → (𝜓 ∧ 𝜃)))) | ||
| Theorem | sbeqal1 44840* | If 𝑥 = 𝑦 always implies 𝑥 = 𝑧, then 𝑦 = 𝑧. (Contributed by Andrew Salmon, 2-Jun-2011.) |
| ⊢ (∀𝑥(𝑥 = 𝑦 → 𝑥 = 𝑧) → 𝑦 = 𝑧) | ||
| Theorem | sbeqal1i 44841* | Suppose you know 𝑥 = 𝑦 implies 𝑥 = 𝑧, assuming 𝑥 and 𝑧 are distinct. Then, 𝑦 = 𝑧. (Contributed by Andrew Salmon, 3-Jun-2011.) |
| ⊢ (𝑥 = 𝑦 → 𝑥 = 𝑧) ⇒ ⊢ 𝑦 = 𝑧 | ||
| Theorem | sbeqal2i 44842* | If 𝑥 = 𝑦 implies 𝑥 = 𝑧, then we can infer 𝑧 = 𝑦. (Contributed by Andrew Salmon, 3-Jun-2011.) |
| ⊢ (𝑥 = 𝑦 → 𝑥 = 𝑧) ⇒ ⊢ 𝑧 = 𝑦 | ||
| Theorem | axc5c4c711 44843 | Proof of a theorem that can act as a sole axiom for pure predicate calculus with ax-gen 1797 as the inference rule. This proof extends the idea of axc5c711 39375 and related theorems. (Contributed by Andrew Salmon, 14-Jul-2011.) |
| ⊢ ((∀𝑥∀𝑦 ¬ ∀𝑥∀𝑦(∀𝑦𝜑 → 𝜓) → (𝜑 → ∀𝑦(∀𝑦𝜑 → 𝜓))) → (∀𝑦𝜑 → ∀𝑦𝜓)) | ||
| Theorem | axc5c4c711toc5 44844 | Rederivation of sp 2191 from axc5c4c711 44843. Note that ax6 2389 is used for the rederivation. (Contributed by Andrew Salmon, 14-Jul-2011.) Revised to use ax6v 1970 instead of ax6 2389, so that this rederivation requires only ax6v 1970 and propositional calculus. (Revised by BJ, 14-Sep-2019.) (Proof modification is discouraged.) (New usage is discouraged.) |
| ⊢ (∀𝑥𝜑 → 𝜑) | ||
| Theorem | axc5c4c711toc4 44845 | Rederivation of axc4 2327 from axc5c4c711 44843. Note that only propositional calculus is required for the rederivation. (Contributed by Andrew Salmon, 14-Jul-2011.) (Proof modification is discouraged.) (New usage is discouraged.) |
| ⊢ (∀𝑥(∀𝑥𝜑 → 𝜓) → (∀𝑥𝜑 → ∀𝑥𝜓)) | ||
| Theorem | axc5c4c711toc7 44846 | Rederivation of axc7 2323 from axc5c4c711 44843. Note that neither axc7 2323 nor ax-11 2163 are required for the rederivation. (Contributed by Andrew Salmon, 14-Jul-2011.) (Proof modification is discouraged.) (New usage is discouraged.) |
| ⊢ (¬ ∀𝑥 ¬ ∀𝑥𝜑 → 𝜑) | ||
| Theorem | axc5c4c711to11 44847 | Rederivation of ax-11 2163 from axc5c4c711 44843. Note that ax-11 2163 is not required for the rederivation. (Contributed by Andrew Salmon, 14-Jul-2011.) (Proof modification is discouraged.) (New usage is discouraged.) |
| ⊢ (∀𝑥∀𝑦𝜑 → ∀𝑦∀𝑥𝜑) | ||
| Theorem | axc11next 44848* | This theorem shows that, given axextb 2712, we can derive a version of axc11n 2431. However, it is weaker than axc11n 2431 because it has a distinct variable requirement. (Contributed by Andrew Salmon, 16-Jul-2011.) (Proof modification is discouraged.) (New usage is discouraged.) |
| ⊢ (∀𝑥 𝑥 = 𝑧 → ∀𝑧 𝑧 = 𝑥) | ||
| Theorem | pm13.13a 44849 | One result of theorem *13.13 in [WhiteheadRussell] p. 178. A note on the section - to make the theorems more usable, and because inequality is notation for set theory (it is not defined in the predicate calculus section), this section will use classes instead of sets. (Contributed by Andrew Salmon, 3-Jun-2011.) |
| ⊢ ((𝜑 ∧ 𝑥 = 𝐴) → [𝐴 / 𝑥]𝜑) | ||
| Theorem | pm13.13b 44850 | Theorem *13.13 in [WhiteheadRussell] p. 178 with different variable substitution. (Contributed by Andrew Salmon, 3-Jun-2011.) |
| ⊢ (([𝐴 / 𝑥]𝜑 ∧ 𝑥 = 𝐴) → 𝜑) | ||
| Theorem | pm13.14 44851 | Theorem *13.14 in [WhiteheadRussell] p. 178. (Contributed by Andrew Salmon, 3-Jun-2011.) |
| ⊢ (([𝐴 / 𝑥]𝜑 ∧ ¬ 𝜑) → 𝑥 ≠ 𝐴) | ||
| Theorem | pm13.192 44852* | Theorem *13.192 in [WhiteheadRussell] p. 179. (Contributed by Andrew Salmon, 3-Jun-2011.) (Revised by NM, 4-Jan-2017.) |
| ⊢ (∃𝑦(∀𝑥(𝑥 = 𝐴 ↔ 𝑥 = 𝑦) ∧ 𝜑) ↔ [𝐴 / 𝑦]𝜑) | ||
| Theorem | pm13.193 44853 | Theorem *13.193 in [WhiteheadRussell] p. 179. (Contributed by Andrew Salmon, 3-Jun-2011.) |
| ⊢ ((𝜑 ∧ 𝑥 = 𝑦) ↔ ([𝑦 / 𝑥]𝜑 ∧ 𝑥 = 𝑦)) | ||
| Theorem | pm13.194 44854 | Theorem *13.194 in [WhiteheadRussell] p. 179. (Contributed by Andrew Salmon, 3-Jun-2011.) |
| ⊢ ((𝜑 ∧ 𝑥 = 𝑦) ↔ ([𝑦 / 𝑥]𝜑 ∧ 𝜑 ∧ 𝑥 = 𝑦)) | ||
| Theorem | pm13.195 44855* | Theorem *13.195 in [WhiteheadRussell] p. 179. This theorem is very similar to sbc5 3757. (Contributed by Andrew Salmon, 3-Jun-2011.) (Revised by NM, 4-Jan-2017.) |
| ⊢ (∃𝑦(𝑦 = 𝐴 ∧ 𝜑) ↔ [𝐴 / 𝑦]𝜑) | ||
| Theorem | pm13.196a 44856* | Theorem *13.196 in [WhiteheadRussell] p. 179. The only difference is the position of the substituted variable. (Contributed by Andrew Salmon, 3-Jun-2011.) |
| ⊢ (¬ 𝜑 ↔ ∀𝑦([𝑦 / 𝑥]𝜑 → 𝑦 ≠ 𝑥)) | ||
| Theorem | 2sbc6g 44857* | Theorem *13.21 in [WhiteheadRussell] p. 179. (Contributed by Andrew Salmon, 3-Jun-2011.) |
| ⊢ ((𝐴 ∈ 𝐶 ∧ 𝐵 ∈ 𝐷) → (∀𝑧∀𝑤((𝑧 = 𝐴 ∧ 𝑤 = 𝐵) → 𝜑) ↔ [𝐴 / 𝑧][𝐵 / 𝑤]𝜑)) | ||
| Theorem | 2sbc5g 44858* | Theorem *13.22 in [WhiteheadRussell] p. 179. (Contributed by Andrew Salmon, 3-Jun-2011.) |
| ⊢ ((𝐴 ∈ 𝐶 ∧ 𝐵 ∈ 𝐷) → (∃𝑧∃𝑤((𝑧 = 𝐴 ∧ 𝑤 = 𝐵) ∧ 𝜑) ↔ [𝐴 / 𝑧][𝐵 / 𝑤]𝜑)) | ||
| Theorem | iotain 44859 | Equivalence between two different forms of ℩. (Contributed by Andrew Salmon, 15-Jul-2011.) |
| ⊢ (∃!𝑥𝜑 → ∩ {𝑥 ∣ 𝜑} = (℩𝑥𝜑)) | ||
| Theorem | iotaexeu 44860 | The iota class exists. This theorem does not require ax-nul 5241 for its proof. (Contributed by Andrew Salmon, 11-Jul-2011.) |
| ⊢ (∃!𝑥𝜑 → (℩𝑥𝜑) ∈ V) | ||
| Theorem | iotasbc 44861* | Definition *14.01 in [WhiteheadRussell] p. 184. In Principia Mathematica, Russell and Whitehead define ℩ in terms of a function of (℩𝑥𝜑). Their definition differs in that a function of (℩𝑥𝜑) evaluates to "false" when there isn't a single 𝑥 that satisfies 𝜑. (Contributed by Andrew Salmon, 11-Jul-2011.) |
| ⊢ (∃!𝑥𝜑 → ([(℩𝑥𝜑) / 𝑦]𝜓 ↔ ∃𝑦(∀𝑥(𝜑 ↔ 𝑥 = 𝑦) ∧ 𝜓))) | ||
| Theorem | iotasbc2 44862* | Theorem *14.111 in [WhiteheadRussell] p. 184. (Contributed by Andrew Salmon, 11-Jul-2011.) |
| ⊢ ((∃!𝑥𝜑 ∧ ∃!𝑥𝜓) → ([(℩𝑥𝜑) / 𝑦][(℩𝑥𝜓) / 𝑧]𝜒 ↔ ∃𝑦∃𝑧(∀𝑥(𝜑 ↔ 𝑥 = 𝑦) ∧ ∀𝑥(𝜓 ↔ 𝑥 = 𝑧) ∧ 𝜒))) | ||
| Theorem | pm14.12 44863* | Theorem *14.12 in [WhiteheadRussell] p. 184. (Contributed by Andrew Salmon, 11-Jul-2011.) |
| ⊢ (∃!𝑥𝜑 → ∀𝑥∀𝑦((𝜑 ∧ [𝑦 / 𝑥]𝜑) → 𝑥 = 𝑦)) | ||
| Theorem | pm14.122a 44864* | Theorem *14.122 in [WhiteheadRussell] p. 185. (Contributed by Andrew Salmon, 9-Jun-2011.) |
| ⊢ (𝐴 ∈ 𝑉 → (∀𝑥(𝜑 ↔ 𝑥 = 𝐴) ↔ (∀𝑥(𝜑 → 𝑥 = 𝐴) ∧ [𝐴 / 𝑥]𝜑))) | ||
| Theorem | pm14.122b 44865* | Theorem *14.122 in [WhiteheadRussell] p. 185. (Contributed by Andrew Salmon, 9-Jun-2011.) |
| ⊢ (𝐴 ∈ 𝑉 → ((∀𝑥(𝜑 → 𝑥 = 𝐴) ∧ [𝐴 / 𝑥]𝜑) ↔ (∀𝑥(𝜑 → 𝑥 = 𝐴) ∧ ∃𝑥𝜑))) | ||
| Theorem | pm14.122c 44866* | Theorem *14.122 in [WhiteheadRussell] p. 185. (Contributed by Andrew Salmon, 9-Jun-2011.) |
| ⊢ (𝐴 ∈ 𝑉 → (∀𝑥(𝜑 ↔ 𝑥 = 𝐴) ↔ (∀𝑥(𝜑 → 𝑥 = 𝐴) ∧ ∃𝑥𝜑))) | ||
| Theorem | pm14.123a 44867* | Theorem *14.123 in [WhiteheadRussell] p. 185. (Contributed by Andrew Salmon, 9-Jun-2011.) |
| ⊢ ((𝐴 ∈ 𝑉 ∧ 𝐵 ∈ 𝑊) → (∀𝑧∀𝑤(𝜑 ↔ (𝑧 = 𝐴 ∧ 𝑤 = 𝐵)) ↔ (∀𝑧∀𝑤(𝜑 → (𝑧 = 𝐴 ∧ 𝑤 = 𝐵)) ∧ [𝐴 / 𝑧][𝐵 / 𝑤]𝜑))) | ||
| Theorem | pm14.123b 44868* | Theorem *14.123 in [WhiteheadRussell] p. 185. (Contributed by Andrew Salmon, 9-Jun-2011.) |
| ⊢ ((𝐴 ∈ 𝑉 ∧ 𝐵 ∈ 𝑊) → ((∀𝑧∀𝑤(𝜑 → (𝑧 = 𝐴 ∧ 𝑤 = 𝐵)) ∧ [𝐴 / 𝑧][𝐵 / 𝑤]𝜑) ↔ (∀𝑧∀𝑤(𝜑 → (𝑧 = 𝐴 ∧ 𝑤 = 𝐵)) ∧ ∃𝑧∃𝑤𝜑))) | ||
| Theorem | pm14.123c 44869* | Theorem *14.123 in [WhiteheadRussell] p. 185. (Contributed by Andrew Salmon, 9-Jun-2011.) |
| ⊢ ((𝐴 ∈ 𝑉 ∧ 𝐵 ∈ 𝑊) → (∀𝑧∀𝑤(𝜑 ↔ (𝑧 = 𝐴 ∧ 𝑤 = 𝐵)) ↔ (∀𝑧∀𝑤(𝜑 → (𝑧 = 𝐴 ∧ 𝑤 = 𝐵)) ∧ ∃𝑧∃𝑤𝜑))) | ||
| Theorem | pm14.18 44870 | Theorem *14.18 in [WhiteheadRussell] p. 189. (Contributed by Andrew Salmon, 11-Jul-2011.) |
| ⊢ (∃!𝑥𝜑 → (∀𝑥𝜓 → [(℩𝑥𝜑) / 𝑥]𝜓)) | ||
| Theorem | iotaequ 44871* | Theorem *14.2 in [WhiteheadRussell] p. 189. (Contributed by Andrew Salmon, 11-Jul-2011.) |
| ⊢ (℩𝑥𝑥 = 𝑦) = 𝑦 | ||
| Theorem | iotavalb 44872* | Theorem *14.202 in [WhiteheadRussell] p. 189. A biconditional version of iotaval 6464. (Contributed by Andrew Salmon, 11-Jul-2011.) |
| ⊢ (∃!𝑥𝜑 → (∀𝑥(𝜑 ↔ 𝑥 = 𝑦) ↔ (℩𝑥𝜑) = 𝑦)) | ||
| Theorem | iotasbc5 44873* | Theorem *14.205 in [WhiteheadRussell] p. 190. (Contributed by Andrew Salmon, 11-Jul-2011.) |
| ⊢ (∃!𝑥𝜑 → ([(℩𝑥𝜑) / 𝑦]𝜓 ↔ ∃𝑦(𝑦 = (℩𝑥𝜑) ∧ 𝜓))) | ||
| Theorem | pm14.24 44874* | Theorem *14.24 in [WhiteheadRussell] p. 191. (Contributed by Andrew Salmon, 12-Jul-2011.) |
| ⊢ (∃!𝑥𝜑 → ∀𝑦([𝑦 / 𝑥]𝜑 ↔ 𝑦 = (℩𝑥𝜑))) | ||
| Theorem | iotavalsb 44875* | Theorem *14.242 in [WhiteheadRussell] p. 192. (Contributed by Andrew Salmon, 11-Jul-2011.) |
| ⊢ (∀𝑥(𝜑 ↔ 𝑥 = 𝑦) → ([𝑦 / 𝑧]𝜓 ↔ [(℩𝑥𝜑) / 𝑧]𝜓)) | ||
| Theorem | sbiota1 44876 | Theorem *14.25 in [WhiteheadRussell] p. 192. (Contributed by Andrew Salmon, 12-Jul-2011.) |
| ⊢ (∃!𝑥𝜑 → (∀𝑥(𝜑 → 𝜓) ↔ [(℩𝑥𝜑) / 𝑥]𝜓)) | ||
| Theorem | sbaniota 44877 | Theorem *14.26 in [WhiteheadRussell] p. 192. (Contributed by Andrew Salmon, 12-Jul-2011.) |
| ⊢ (∃!𝑥𝜑 → (∃𝑥(𝜑 ∧ 𝜓) ↔ [(℩𝑥𝜑) / 𝑥]𝜓)) | ||
| Theorem | iotasbcq 44878 | Theorem *14.272 in [WhiteheadRussell] p. 193. (Contributed by Andrew Salmon, 11-Jul-2011.) |
| ⊢ (∀𝑥(𝜑 ↔ 𝜓) → ([(℩𝑥𝜑) / 𝑦]𝜒 ↔ [(℩𝑥𝜓) / 𝑦]𝜒)) | ||
| Theorem | elnev 44879* | Any set that contains one element less than the universe is not equal to it. (Contributed by Andrew Salmon, 16-Jun-2011.) |
| ⊢ (𝐴 ∈ V ↔ {𝑥 ∣ ¬ 𝑥 = 𝐴} ≠ V) | ||
| Theorem | rusbcALT 44880 | A version of Russell's paradox which is proven using proper substitution. (Contributed by Andrew Salmon, 18-Jun-2011.) (New usage is discouraged.) (Proof modification is discouraged.) |
| ⊢ {𝑥 ∣ 𝑥 ∉ 𝑥} ∉ V | ||
| Theorem | compeq 44881* | Equality between two ways of saying "the complement of 𝐴". (Contributed by Andrew Salmon, 15-Jul-2011.) |
| ⊢ (V ∖ 𝐴) = {𝑥 ∣ ¬ 𝑥 ∈ 𝐴} | ||
| Theorem | compne 44882 | The complement of 𝐴 is not equal to 𝐴. (Contributed by Andrew Salmon, 15-Jul-2011.) (Proof shortened by BJ, 11-Nov-2021.) |
| ⊢ (V ∖ 𝐴) ≠ 𝐴 | ||
| Theorem | compab 44883 | Two ways of saying "the complement of a class abstraction". (Contributed by Andrew Salmon, 15-Jul-2011.) (Proof shortened by Mario Carneiro, 11-Dec-2016.) |
| ⊢ (V ∖ {𝑧 ∣ 𝜑}) = {𝑧 ∣ ¬ 𝜑} | ||
| Theorem | conss2 44884 | Contrapositive law for subsets. (Contributed by Andrew Salmon, 15-Jul-2011.) |
| ⊢ (𝐴 ⊆ (V ∖ 𝐵) ↔ 𝐵 ⊆ (V ∖ 𝐴)) | ||
| Theorem | conss1 44885 | Contrapositive law for subsets. (Contributed by Andrew Salmon, 15-Jul-2011.) |
| ⊢ ((V ∖ 𝐴) ⊆ 𝐵 ↔ (V ∖ 𝐵) ⊆ 𝐴) | ||
| Theorem | ralbidar 44886 | More general form of ralbida 3249. (Contributed by Andrew Salmon, 25-Jul-2011.) |
| ⊢ (𝜑 → ∀𝑥 ∈ 𝐴 𝜑) & ⊢ ((𝜑 ∧ 𝑥 ∈ 𝐴) → (𝜓 ↔ 𝜒)) ⇒ ⊢ (𝜑 → (∀𝑥 ∈ 𝐴 𝜓 ↔ ∀𝑥 ∈ 𝐴 𝜒)) | ||
| Theorem | rexbidar 44887 | More general form of rexbida 3250. (Contributed by Andrew Salmon, 25-Jul-2011.) |
| ⊢ (𝜑 → ∀𝑥 ∈ 𝐴 𝜑) & ⊢ ((𝜑 ∧ 𝑥 ∈ 𝐴) → (𝜓 ↔ 𝜒)) ⇒ ⊢ (𝜑 → (∃𝑥 ∈ 𝐴 𝜓 ↔ ∃𝑥 ∈ 𝐴 𝜒)) | ||
| Theorem | dropab1 44888 | Theorem to aid use of the distinctor reduction theorem with ordered pair class abstraction. (Contributed by Andrew Salmon, 25-Jul-2011.) |
| ⊢ (∀𝑥 𝑥 = 𝑦 → {〈𝑥, 𝑧〉 ∣ 𝜑} = {〈𝑦, 𝑧〉 ∣ 𝜑}) | ||
| Theorem | dropab2 44889 | Theorem to aid use of the distinctor reduction theorem with ordered pair class abstraction. (Contributed by Andrew Salmon, 25-Jul-2011.) |
| ⊢ (∀𝑥 𝑥 = 𝑦 → {〈𝑧, 𝑥〉 ∣ 𝜑} = {〈𝑧, 𝑦〉 ∣ 𝜑}) | ||
| Theorem | ipo0 44890 | If the identity relation partially orders any class, then that class is the null class. (Contributed by Andrew Salmon, 25-Jul-2011.) |
| ⊢ ( I Po 𝐴 ↔ 𝐴 = ∅) | ||
| Theorem | ifr0 44891 | A class that is founded by the identity relation is null. (Contributed by Andrew Salmon, 25-Jul-2011.) |
| ⊢ ( I Fr 𝐴 ↔ 𝐴 = ∅) | ||
| Theorem | ordpss 44892 | ordelpss 6343 with an antecedent removed. (Contributed by Andrew Salmon, 25-Jul-2011.) |
| ⊢ (Ord 𝐵 → (𝐴 ∈ 𝐵 → 𝐴 ⊊ 𝐵)) | ||
| Theorem | fvsb 44893* | Explicit substitution of a value of a function into a wff. (Contributed by Andrew Salmon, 1-Aug-2011.) |
| ⊢ (∃!𝑦 𝐴𝐹𝑦 → ([(𝐹‘𝐴) / 𝑥]𝜑 ↔ ∃𝑥(∀𝑦(𝐴𝐹𝑦 ↔ 𝑦 = 𝑥) ∧ 𝜑))) | ||
| Theorem | fveqsb 44894* | Implicit substitution of a value of a function into a wff. (Contributed by Andrew Salmon, 1-Aug-2011.) |
| ⊢ (𝑥 = (𝐹‘𝐴) → (𝜑 ↔ 𝜓)) & ⊢ Ⅎ𝑥𝜓 ⇒ ⊢ (∃!𝑦 𝐴𝐹𝑦 → (𝜓 ↔ ∃𝑥(∀𝑦(𝐴𝐹𝑦 ↔ 𝑦 = 𝑥) ∧ 𝜑))) | ||
| Theorem | xpexb 44895 | A Cartesian product exists iff its converse does. Corollary 6.9(1) in [TakeutiZaring] p. 26. (Contributed by Andrew Salmon, 13-Nov-2011.) |
| ⊢ ((𝐴 × 𝐵) ∈ V ↔ (𝐵 × 𝐴) ∈ V) | ||
| Theorem | trelpss 44896 | An element of a transitive set is a proper subset of it. Theorem 7.2 in [TakeutiZaring] p. 35. Unlike tz7.2 5605, ax-reg 9498 is required for its proof. (Contributed by Andrew Salmon, 13-Nov-2011.) |
| ⊢ ((Tr 𝐴 ∧ 𝐵 ∈ 𝐴) → 𝐵 ⊊ 𝐴) | ||
| Theorem | addcomgi 44897 | Generalization of commutative law for addition. Simplifies proofs dealing with vectors. However, it is dependent on our particular definition of ordered pair. (Contributed by Andrew Salmon, 28-Jan-2012.) (Revised by Mario Carneiro, 6-May-2015.) |
| ⊢ (𝐴 + 𝐵) = (𝐵 + 𝐴) | ||
| Syntax | cplusr 44898 | Introduce the operation of vector addition. |
| class +𝑟 | ||
| Syntax | cminusr 44899 | Introduce the operation of vector subtraction. |
| class -𝑟 | ||
| Syntax | ctimesr 44900 | Introduce the operation of scalar multiplication. |
| class .𝑣 | ||
| < Previous Next > |
| Copyright terms: Public domain | < Previous Next > |