P. 449 of Theorem List - Metamath Proof Explorer

Theorem List for Metamath Proof Explorer - 44801-44900   *Has distinct variable group(s)

Type	Label	Description
Statement
Axiom	ax-frege52a 44801	The case when the content of 𝜑 is identical with the content of 𝜓 and in which a proposition controlled by an element for which we substitute the content of 𝜑 is affirmed (in this specific case the identity logical function) and the same proposition, this time where we substituted the content of 𝜓, is denied does not take place. Part of Axiom 52 of [Frege1879] p. 50. (Contributed by RP, 24-Dec-2019.) (New usage is discouraged.)
⊢ ((𝜑 ↔ 𝜓) → (if-(𝜑, 𝜃, 𝜒) → if-(𝜓, 𝜃, 𝜒)))
Theorem	frege52aid 44802	The case when the content of 𝜑 is identical with the content of 𝜓 and in which 𝜑 is affirmed and 𝜓 is denied does not take place. Identical to biimp 218. Part of Axiom 52 of [Frege1879] p. 50. (Contributed by RP, 24-Dec-2019.) (Proof modification is discouraged.)
⊢ ((𝜑 ↔ 𝜓) → (𝜑 → 𝜓))
Theorem	frege53aid 44803	Specialization of frege53a 44804. Proposition 53 of [Frege1879] p. 50. (Contributed by RP, 24-Dec-2019.) (Proof modification is discouraged.)
⊢ (𝜑 → ((𝜑 ↔ 𝜓) → 𝜓))
Theorem	frege53a 44804	Lemma for frege55a 44812. Proposition 53 of [Frege1879] p. 50. (Contributed by RP, 24-Dec-2019.) (Proof modification is discouraged.)
⊢ (if-(𝜑, 𝜃, 𝜒) → ((𝜑 ↔ 𝜓) → if-(𝜓, 𝜃, 𝜒)))
Theorem	axfrege54a 44805	Justification for ax-frege54a 44806. Identical to biid 264. (Contributed by RP, 24-Dec-2019.)
⊢ (𝜑 ↔ 𝜑)
Axiom	ax-frege54a 44806	Reflexive equality of wffs. The content of 𝜑 is identical with the content of 𝜑. Part of Axiom 54 of [Frege1879] p. 50. Identical to biid 264. (Contributed by RP, 24-Dec-2019.) (New usage is discouraged.)
⊢ (𝜑 ↔ 𝜑)
Theorem	frege54cor0a 44807	Synonym for logical equivalence. (Contributed by RP, 24-Dec-2019.) (Proof modification is discouraged.)
⊢ ((𝜓 ↔ 𝜑) ↔ if-(𝜓, 𝜑, ¬ 𝜑))
Theorem	frege54cor1a 44808	Reflexive equality. (Contributed by RP, 24-Dec-2019.) (Proof modification is discouraged.)
⊢ if-(𝜑, 𝜑, ¬ 𝜑)
Theorem	frege55aid 44809	Lemma for frege57aid 44816. Core proof of Proposition 55 of [Frege1879] p. 50. (Contributed by RP, 24-Dec-2019.)
⊢ ((𝜑 ↔ 𝜓) → (𝜓 ↔ 𝜑))
Theorem	frege55lem1a 44810	Necessary deduction regarding substitution of value in equality. (Contributed by RP, 24-Dec-2019.) (Proof modification is discouraged.)
⊢ ((𝜏 → if-(𝜓, 𝜑, ¬ 𝜑)) → (𝜏 → (𝜓 ↔ 𝜑)))
Theorem	frege55lem2a 44811	Core proof of Proposition 55 of [Frege1879] p. 50. (Contributed by RP, 24-Dec-2019.) (Proof modification is discouraged.)
⊢ ((𝜑 ↔ 𝜓) → if-(𝜓, 𝜑, ¬ 𝜑))
Theorem	frege55a 44812	Proposition 55 of [Frege1879] p. 50. (Contributed by RP, 24-Dec-2019.) (Proof modification is discouraged.)
⊢ ((𝜑 ↔ 𝜓) → if-(𝜓, 𝜑, ¬ 𝜑))
Theorem	frege55cor1a 44813	Proposition 55 of [Frege1879] p. 50. (Contributed by RP, 24-Dec-2019.) (Proof modification is discouraged.)
⊢ ((𝜑 ↔ 𝜓) → (𝜓 ↔ 𝜑))
Theorem	frege56aid 44814	Lemma for frege57aid 44816. Proposition 56 of [Frege1879] p. 50. (Contributed by RP, 24-Dec-2019.) (Proof modification is discouraged.)
⊢ (((𝜑 ↔ 𝜓) → (𝜑 → 𝜓)) → ((𝜓 ↔ 𝜑) → (𝜑 → 𝜓)))
Theorem	frege56a 44815	Proposition 56 of [Frege1879] p. 50. (Contributed by RP, 24-Dec-2019.) (Proof modification is discouraged.)
⊢ (((𝜑 ↔ 𝜓) → (if-(𝜑, 𝜒, 𝜃) → if-(𝜓, 𝜒, 𝜃))) → ((𝜓 ↔ 𝜑) → (if-(𝜑, 𝜒, 𝜃) → if-(𝜓, 𝜒, 𝜃))))
Theorem	frege57aid 44816	This is the all important formula which allows to apply Frege-style definitions and explore their consequences. A closed form of biimpri 231. Proposition 57 of [Frege1879] p. 51. (Contributed by RP, 24-Dec-2019.) (Proof modification is discouraged.)
⊢ ((𝜑 ↔ 𝜓) → (𝜓 → 𝜑))
Theorem	frege57a 44817	Analogue of frege57aid 44816. Proposition 57 of [Frege1879] p. 51. (Contributed by RP, 24-Dec-2019.) (Proof modification is discouraged.)
⊢ ((𝜑 ↔ 𝜓) → (if-(𝜓, 𝜒, 𝜃) → if-(𝜑, 𝜒, 𝜃)))
Theorem	axfrege58a 44818	Identical to anifp 1088. Justification for ax-frege58a 44819. (Contributed by RP, 28-Mar-2020.)
⊢ ((𝜓 ∧ 𝜒) → if-(𝜑, 𝜓, 𝜒))
Axiom	ax-frege58a 44819	If ∀𝑥𝜑 is affirmed, [𝑦 / 𝑥]𝜑 cannot be denied. Identical to stdpc4 2105. Axiom 58 of [Frege1879] p. 51. (Contributed by RP, 28-Mar-2020.) (New usage is discouraged.)
⊢ ((𝜓 ∧ 𝜒) → if-(𝜑, 𝜓, 𝜒))
Theorem	frege58acor 44820	Lemma for frege59a 44821. (Contributed by RP, 17-Apr-2020.) (Proof modification is discouraged.)
⊢ (((𝜓 → 𝜒) ∧ (𝜃 → 𝜏)) → (if-(𝜑, 𝜓, 𝜃) → if-(𝜑, 𝜒, 𝜏)))
Theorem	frege59a 44821	A kind of Aristotelian inference. Namely Felapton or Fesapo. Proposition 59 of [Frege1879] p. 51. Note: in the Bauer-Meenfelberg translation published in van Heijenoort's collection From Frege to Goedel, this proof has the frege12 44757 incorrectly referenced where frege30 44776 is in the original. (Contributed by RP, 17-Apr-2020.) (Proof modification is discouraged.)
⊢ (if-(𝜑, 𝜓, 𝜃) → (¬ if-(𝜑, 𝜒, 𝜏) → ¬ ((𝜓 → 𝜒) ∧ (𝜃 → 𝜏))))
Theorem	frege60a 44822	Swap antecedents of ax-frege58a 44819. Proposition 60 of [Frege1879] p. 52. (Contributed by RP, 17-Apr-2020.) (Proof modification is discouraged.)
⊢ (((𝜓 → (𝜒 → 𝜃)) ∧ (𝜏 → (𝜂 → 𝜁))) → (if-(𝜑, 𝜒, 𝜂) → (if-(𝜑, 𝜓, 𝜏) → if-(𝜑, 𝜃, 𝜁))))
Theorem	frege61a 44823	Lemma for frege65a 44827. Proposition 61 of [Frege1879] p. 52. (Contributed by RP, 17-Apr-2020.) (Proof modification is discouraged.)
⊢ ((if-(𝜑, 𝜓, 𝜒) → 𝜃) → ((𝜓 ∧ 𝜒) → 𝜃))
Theorem	frege62a 44824	A kind of Aristotelian inference. This judgement replaces the mode of inference barbara 2687 when the minor premise has a particular context. Proposition 62 of [Frege1879] p. 52. (Contributed by RP, 17-Apr-2020.) (Proof modification is discouraged.)
⊢ (if-(𝜑, 𝜓, 𝜃) → (((𝜓 → 𝜒) ∧ (𝜃 → 𝜏)) → if-(𝜑, 𝜒, 𝜏)))
Theorem	frege63a 44825	Proposition 63 of [Frege1879] p. 52. (Contributed by RP, 17-Apr-2020.) (Proof modification is discouraged.)
⊢ (if-(𝜑, 𝜓, 𝜃) → (𝜂 → (((𝜓 → 𝜒) ∧ (𝜃 → 𝜏)) → if-(𝜑, 𝜒, 𝜏))))
Theorem	frege64a 44826	Lemma for frege65a 44827. Proposition 64 of [Frege1879] p. 53. (Contributed by RP, 17-Apr-2020.) (Proof modification is discouraged.)
⊢ ((if-(𝜑, 𝜓, 𝜏) → if-(𝜎, 𝜒, 𝜂)) → (((𝜒 → 𝜃) ∧ (𝜂 → 𝜁)) → (if-(𝜑, 𝜓, 𝜏) → if-(𝜎, 𝜃, 𝜁))))
Theorem	frege65a 44827	A kind of Aristotelian inference. This judgement replaces the mode of inference barbara 2687 when the minor premise has a general context. Proposition 65 of [Frege1879] p. 53. (Contributed by RP, 17-Apr-2020.) (Proof modification is discouraged.)
⊢ (((𝜓 → 𝜒) ∧ (𝜏 → 𝜂)) → (((𝜒 → 𝜃) ∧ (𝜂 → 𝜁)) → (if-(𝜑, 𝜓, 𝜏) → if-(𝜑, 𝜃, 𝜁))))
Theorem	frege66a 44828	Swap antecedents of frege65a 44827. Proposition 66 of [Frege1879] p. 54. (Contributed by RP, 17-Apr-2020.) (Proof modification is discouraged.)
⊢ (((𝜒 → 𝜃) ∧ (𝜂 → 𝜁)) → (((𝜓 → 𝜒) ∧ (𝜏 → 𝜂)) → (if-(𝜑, 𝜓, 𝜏) → if-(𝜑, 𝜃, 𝜁))))
Theorem	frege67a 44829	Lemma for frege68a 44830. Proposition 67 of [Frege1879] p. 54. (Contributed by RP, 17-Apr-2020.) (Proof modification is discouraged.)
⊢ ((((𝜓 ∧ 𝜒) ↔ 𝜃) → (𝜃 → (𝜓 ∧ 𝜒))) → (((𝜓 ∧ 𝜒) ↔ 𝜃) → (𝜃 → if-(𝜑, 𝜓, 𝜒))))
Theorem	frege68a 44830	Combination of applying a definition and applying it to a specific instance. Proposition 68 of [Frege1879] p. 54. (Contributed by RP, 17-Apr-2020.) (Proof modification is discouraged.)
⊢ (((𝜓 ∧ 𝜒) ↔ 𝜃) → (𝜃 → if-(𝜑, 𝜓, 𝜒)))
21.38.6.6  _Begriffsschrift_ Chapter II with equivalence of sets
Theorem	axfrege52c 44831	Justification for ax-frege52c 44832. (Contributed by RP, 24-Dec-2019.)
⊢ (𝐴 = 𝐵 → ([𝐴 / 𝑥]𝜑 → [𝐵 / 𝑥]𝜑))
Axiom	ax-frege52c 44832	One side of dfsbcq 3740. Part of Axiom 52 of [Frege1879] p. 50. (Contributed by RP, 24-Dec-2019.) (New usage is discouraged.)
⊢ (𝐴 = 𝐵 → ([𝐴 / 𝑥]𝜑 → [𝐵 / 𝑥]𝜑))
Theorem	frege52b 44833	The case when the content of 𝑥 is identical with the content of 𝑦 and in which a proposition controlled by an element for which we substitute the content of 𝑥 is affirmed and the same proposition, this time where we substitute the content of 𝑦, is denied does not take place. In [𝑥 / 𝑧]𝜑, 𝑥 can also occur in other than the argument (𝑧) places. Hence 𝑥 may still be contained in [𝑦 / 𝑧]𝜑. Part of Axiom 52 of [Frege1879] p. 50. (Contributed by RP, 24-Dec-2019.) (Proof modification is discouraged.)
⊢ (𝑥 = 𝑦 → ([𝑥 / 𝑧]𝜑 → [𝑦 / 𝑧]𝜑))
Theorem	frege53b 44834	Lemma for frege102 (via frege92 44899). Proposition 53 of [Frege1879] p. 50. (Contributed by RP, 24-Dec-2019.) (Proof modification is discouraged.)
⊢ ([𝑦 / 𝑥]𝜑 → (𝑦 = 𝑧 → [𝑧 / 𝑥]𝜑))
Theorem	axfrege54c 44835	Reflexive equality of classes. Identical to eqid 2760. Justification for ax-frege54c 44836. (Contributed by RP, 24-Dec-2019.)
⊢ 𝐴 = 𝐴
Axiom	ax-frege54c 44836	Reflexive equality of sets (as classes). Part of Axiom 54 of [Frege1879] p. 50. Identical to eqid 2760. (Contributed by RP, 24-Dec-2019.) (New usage is discouraged.)
⊢ 𝐴 = 𝐴
Theorem	frege54b 44837	Reflexive equality of sets. The content of 𝑥 is identical with the content of 𝑥. Part of Axiom 54 of [Frege1879] p. 50. Slightly specialized version of eqid 2760. (Contributed by RP, 24-Dec-2019.) (Proof modification is discouraged.)
⊢ 𝑥 = 𝑥
Theorem	frege54cor1b 44838	Reflexive equality. (Contributed by RP, 24-Dec-2019.)
⊢ [𝑥 / 𝑦]𝑦 = 𝑥
Theorem	frege55lem1b 44839*	Necessary deduction regarding substitution of value in equality. (Contributed by RP, 24-Dec-2019.)
⊢ ((𝜑 → [𝑥 / 𝑦]𝑦 = 𝑧) → (𝜑 → 𝑥 = 𝑧))
Theorem	frege55lem2b 44840	Lemma for frege55b 44841. Core proof of Proposition 55 of [Frege1879] p. 50. (Contributed by RP, 24-Dec-2019.) (Proof modification is discouraged.)
⊢ (𝑥 = 𝑦 → [𝑦 / 𝑧]𝑧 = 𝑥)
Theorem	frege55b 44841	Lemma for frege57b 44843. Proposition 55 of [Frege1879] p. 50. Note that eqtr2 2781 incorporates eqcom 2767 which is stronger than this proposition which is identical to equcomi 2050. Is it possible that Frege tricked himself into assuming what he was out to prove? (Contributed by RP, 24-Dec-2019.) (Proof modification is discouraged.)
⊢ (𝑥 = 𝑦 → 𝑦 = 𝑥)
Theorem	frege56b 44842	Lemma for frege57b 44843. Proposition 56 of [Frege1879] p. 50. (Contributed by RP, 24-Dec-2019.) (Proof modification is discouraged.)
⊢ ((𝑥 = 𝑦 → ([𝑥 / 𝑧]𝜑 → [𝑦 / 𝑧]𝜑)) → (𝑦 = 𝑥 → ([𝑥 / 𝑧]𝜑 → [𝑦 / 𝑧]𝜑)))
Theorem	frege57b 44843	Analogue of frege57aid 44816. Proposition 57 of [Frege1879] p. 51. (Contributed by RP, 24-Dec-2019.) (Proof modification is discouraged.)
⊢ (𝑥 = 𝑦 → ([𝑦 / 𝑧]𝜑 → [𝑥 / 𝑧]𝜑))
Theorem	axfrege58b 44844	If ∀𝑥𝜑 is affirmed, [𝑦 / 𝑥]𝜑 cannot be denied. Identical to stdpc4 2105. Justification for ax-frege58b 44845. (Contributed by RP, 28-Mar-2020.)
⊢ (∀𝑥𝜑 → [𝑦 / 𝑥]𝜑)
Axiom	ax-frege58b 44845	If ∀𝑥𝜑 is affirmed, [𝑦 / 𝑥]𝜑 cannot be denied. Identical to stdpc4 2105. Axiom 58 of [Frege1879] p. 51. (Contributed by RP, 28-Mar-2020.) (New usage is discouraged.)
⊢ (∀𝑥𝜑 → [𝑦 / 𝑥]𝜑)
Theorem	frege58bid 44846	If ∀𝑥𝜑 is affirmed, 𝜑 cannot be denied. Identical to sp 2219. See ax-frege58b 44845 and frege58c 44865 for versions which more closely track the original. Axiom 58 of [Frege1879] p. 51. (Contributed by RP, 28-Mar-2020.) (Proof modification is discouraged.)
⊢ (∀𝑥𝜑 → 𝜑)
Theorem	frege58bcor 44847	Lemma for frege59b 44848. (Contributed by RP, 24-Dec-2019.) (Proof modification is discouraged.)
⊢ (∀𝑥(𝜑 → 𝜓) → ([𝑦 / 𝑥]𝜑 → [𝑦 / 𝑥]𝜓))
Theorem	frege59b 44848	A kind of Aristotelian inference. Namely Felapton or Fesapo. Proposition 59 of [Frege1879] p. 51. Note: in the Bauer-Meenfelberg translation published in van Heijenoort's collection From Frege to Goedel, this proof has the frege12 44757 incorrectly referenced where frege30 44776 is in the original. (Contributed by RP, 24-Dec-2019.) (Proof modification is discouraged.)
⊢ ([𝑦 / 𝑥]𝜑 → (¬ [𝑦 / 𝑥]𝜓 → ¬ ∀𝑥(𝜑 → 𝜓)))
Theorem	frege60b 44849	Swap antecedents of ax-frege58b 44845. Proposition 60 of [Frege1879] p. 52. (Contributed by RP, 24-Dec-2019.) (Proof modification is discouraged.)
⊢ (∀𝑥(𝜑 → (𝜓 → 𝜒)) → ([𝑦 / 𝑥]𝜓 → ([𝑦 / 𝑥]𝜑 → [𝑦 / 𝑥]𝜒)))
Theorem	frege61b 44850	Lemma for frege65b 44854. Proposition 61 of [Frege1879] p. 52. (Contributed by RP, 24-Dec-2019.) (Proof modification is discouraged.)
⊢ (([𝑥 / 𝑦]𝜑 → 𝜓) → (∀𝑦𝜑 → 𝜓))
Theorem	frege62b 44851	A kind of Aristotelian inference. This judgement replaces the mode of inference barbara 2687 when the minor premise has a particular context. Proposition 62 of [Frege1879] p. 52. (Contributed by RP, 24-Dec-2019.) (Proof modification is discouraged.)
⊢ ([𝑦 / 𝑥]𝜑 → (∀𝑥(𝜑 → 𝜓) → [𝑦 / 𝑥]𝜓))
Theorem	frege63b 44852	Lemma for frege91 44898. Proposition 63 of [Frege1879] p. 52. (Contributed by RP, 24-Dec-2019.) (Proof modification is discouraged.)
⊢ ([𝑦 / 𝑥]𝜑 → (𝜓 → (∀𝑥(𝜑 → 𝜒) → [𝑦 / 𝑥]𝜒)))
Theorem	frege64b 44853	Lemma for frege65b 44854. Proposition 64 of [Frege1879] p. 53. (Contributed by RP, 24-Dec-2019.) (Proof modification is discouraged.)
⊢ (([𝑥 / 𝑦]𝜑 → [𝑧 / 𝑦]𝜓) → (∀𝑦(𝜓 → 𝜒) → ([𝑥 / 𝑦]𝜑 → [𝑧 / 𝑦]𝜒)))
Theorem	frege65b 44854	A kind of Aristotelian inference. This judgement replaces the mode of inference barbara 2687 when the minor premise has a general context. Proposition 65 of [Frege1879] p. 53. In Frege care is taken to point out that the variables in the first clauses are independent of each other and of the final term so another valid translation could be : ⊢ (∀𝑥([𝑥 / 𝑎]𝜑 → [𝑥 / 𝑏]𝜓) → (∀𝑦([𝑦 / 𝑏]𝜓 → [𝑦 / 𝑐]𝜒) → ([𝑧 / 𝑎]𝜑 → [𝑧 / 𝑐]𝜒))). But that is perhaps too pedantic a translation for this exploration. (Contributed by RP, 24-Dec-2019.) (Proof modification is discouraged.)
⊢ (∀𝑥(𝜑 → 𝜓) → (∀𝑥(𝜓 → 𝜒) → ([𝑦 / 𝑥]𝜑 → [𝑦 / 𝑥]𝜒)))
Theorem	frege66b 44855	Swap antecedents of frege65b 44854. Proposition 66 of [Frege1879] p. 54. (Contributed by RP, 24-Dec-2019.) (Proof modification is discouraged.)
⊢ (∀𝑥(𝜑 → 𝜓) → (∀𝑥(𝜒 → 𝜑) → ([𝑦 / 𝑥]𝜒 → [𝑦 / 𝑥]𝜓)))
Theorem	frege67b 44856	Lemma for frege68b 44857. Proposition 67 of [Frege1879] p. 54. (Contributed by RP, 24-Dec-2019.) (Proof modification is discouraged.)
⊢ (((∀𝑥𝜑 ↔ 𝜓) → (𝜓 → ∀𝑥𝜑)) → ((∀𝑥𝜑 ↔ 𝜓) → (𝜓 → [𝑦 / 𝑥]𝜑)))
Theorem	frege68b 44857	Combination of applying a definition and applying it to a specific instance. Proposition 68 of [Frege1879] p. 54. (Contributed by RP, 24-Dec-2019.) (Proof modification is discouraged.)
⊢ ((∀𝑥𝜑 ↔ 𝜓) → (𝜓 → [𝑦 / 𝑥]𝜑))
21.38.6.7  _Begriffsschrift_ Chapter II with equivalence of classes Begriffsschrift Chapter II with equivalence of classes (where they are sets).
Theorem	frege53c 44858	Proposition 53 of [Frege1879] p. 50. (Contributed by RP, 24-Dec-2019.) (Proof modification is discouraged.)
⊢ ([𝐴 / 𝑥]𝜑 → (𝐴 = 𝐵 → [𝐵 / 𝑥]𝜑))
Theorem	frege54cor1c 44859*	Reflexive equality. (Contributed by RP, 24-Dec-2019.) (Revised by RP, 25-Apr-2020.)
⊢ 𝐴 ∈ 𝐶    ⇒   ⊢ [𝐴 / 𝑥]𝑥 = 𝐴
Theorem	frege55lem1c 44860*	Necessary deduction regarding substitution of value in equality. (Contributed by RP, 24-Dec-2019.)
⊢ ((𝜑 → [𝐴 / 𝑥]𝑥 = 𝐵) → (𝜑 → 𝐴 = 𝐵))
Theorem	frege55lem2c 44861*	Core proof of Proposition 55 of [Frege1879] p. 50. (Contributed by RP, 24-Dec-2019.) (Proof modification is discouraged.)
⊢ (𝑥 = 𝐴 → [𝐴 / 𝑧]𝑧 = 𝑥)
Theorem	frege55c 44862	Proposition 55 of [Frege1879] p. 50. (Contributed by RP, 24-Dec-2019.) (Proof modification is discouraged.)
⊢ (𝑥 = 𝐴 → 𝐴 = 𝑥)
Theorem	frege56c 44863*	Lemma for frege57c 44864. Proposition 56 of [Frege1879] p. 50. (Contributed by RP, 24-Dec-2019.) (Proof modification is discouraged.)
⊢ 𝐵 ∈ 𝐶    ⇒   ⊢ ((𝐴 = 𝐵 → ([𝐴 / 𝑥]𝜑 → [𝐵 / 𝑥]𝜑)) → (𝐵 = 𝐴 → ([𝐴 / 𝑥]𝜑 → [𝐵 / 𝑥]𝜑)))
Theorem	frege57c 44864*	Swap order of implication in ax-frege52c 44832. Proposition 57 of [Frege1879] p. 51. (Contributed by RP, 24-Dec-2019.) (Proof modification is discouraged.)
⊢ 𝐴 ∈ 𝐶    ⇒   ⊢ (𝐴 = 𝐵 → ([𝐵 / 𝑥]𝜑 → [𝐴 / 𝑥]𝜑))
Theorem	frege58c 44865	Principle related to sp 2219. Axiom 58 of [Frege1879] p. 51. (Contributed by RP, 24-Dec-2019.) (Proof modification is discouraged.)
⊢ 𝐴 ∈ 𝐵    ⇒   ⊢ (∀𝑥𝜑 → [𝐴 / 𝑥]𝜑)
Theorem	frege59c 44866	A kind of Aristotelian inference. Proposition 59 of [Frege1879] p. 51. Note: in the Bauer-Meenfelberg translation published in van Heijenoort's collection From Frege to Goedel, this proof has the frege12 44757 incorrectly referenced where frege30 44776 is in the original. (Contributed by RP, 24-Dec-2019.) (Proof modification is discouraged.)
⊢ 𝐴 ∈ 𝐵    ⇒   ⊢ ([𝐴 / 𝑥]𝜑 → (¬ [𝐴 / 𝑥]𝜓 → ¬ ∀𝑥(𝜑 → 𝜓)))
Theorem	frege60c 44867	Swap antecedents of frege58c 44865. Proposition 60 of [Frege1879] p. 52. (Contributed by RP, 24-Dec-2019.) (Proof modification is discouraged.)
⊢ 𝐴 ∈ 𝐵    ⇒   ⊢ (∀𝑥(𝜑 → (𝜓 → 𝜒)) → ([𝐴 / 𝑥]𝜓 → ([𝐴 / 𝑥]𝜑 → [𝐴 / 𝑥]𝜒)))
Theorem	frege61c 44868	Lemma for frege65c 44872. Proposition 61 of [Frege1879] p. 52. (Contributed by RP, 24-Dec-2019.) (Proof modification is discouraged.)
⊢ 𝐴 ∈ 𝐵    ⇒   ⊢ (([𝐴 / 𝑥]𝜑 → 𝜓) → (∀𝑥𝜑 → 𝜓))
Theorem	frege62c 44869	A kind of Aristotelian inference. This judgement replaces the mode of inference barbara 2687 when the minor premise has a particular context. Proposition 62 of [Frege1879] p. 52. (Contributed by RP, 24-Dec-2019.) (Proof modification is discouraged.)
⊢ 𝐴 ∈ 𝐵    ⇒   ⊢ ([𝐴 / 𝑥]𝜑 → (∀𝑥(𝜑 → 𝜓) → [𝐴 / 𝑥]𝜓))
Theorem	frege63c 44870	Analogue of frege63b 44852. Proposition 63 of [Frege1879] p. 52. (Contributed by RP, 24-Dec-2019.) (Proof modification is discouraged.)
⊢ 𝐴 ∈ 𝐵    ⇒   ⊢ ([𝐴 / 𝑥]𝜑 → (𝜓 → (∀𝑥(𝜑 → 𝜒) → [𝐴 / 𝑥]𝜒)))
Theorem	frege64c 44871	Lemma for frege65c 44872. Proposition 64 of [Frege1879] p. 53. (Contributed by RP, 24-Dec-2019.) (Proof modification is discouraged.)
⊢ 𝐴 ∈ 𝐵    ⇒   ⊢ (([𝐶 / 𝑥]𝜑 → [𝐴 / 𝑥]𝜓) → (∀𝑥(𝜓 → 𝜒) → ([𝐶 / 𝑥]𝜑 → [𝐴 / 𝑥]𝜒)))
Theorem	frege65c 44872	A kind of Aristotelian inference. This judgement replaces the mode of inference barbara 2687 when the minor premise has a general context. Proposition 65 of [Frege1879] p. 53. (Contributed by RP, 24-Dec-2019.) (Proof modification is discouraged.)
⊢ 𝐴 ∈ 𝐵    ⇒   ⊢ (∀𝑥(𝜑 → 𝜓) → (∀𝑥(𝜓 → 𝜒) → ([𝐴 / 𝑥]𝜑 → [𝐴 / 𝑥]𝜒)))
Theorem	frege66c 44873	Swap antecedents of frege65c 44872. Proposition 66 of [Frege1879] p. 54. (Contributed by RP, 24-Dec-2019.) (Proof modification is discouraged.)
⊢ 𝐴 ∈ 𝐵    ⇒   ⊢ (∀𝑥(𝜑 → 𝜓) → (∀𝑥(𝜒 → 𝜑) → ([𝐴 / 𝑥]𝜒 → [𝐴 / 𝑥]𝜓)))
Theorem	frege67c 44874	Lemma for frege68c 44875. Proposition 67 of [Frege1879] p. 54. (Contributed by RP, 24-Dec-2019.) (Proof modification is discouraged.)
⊢ 𝐴 ∈ 𝐵    ⇒   ⊢ (((∀𝑥𝜑 ↔ 𝜓) → (𝜓 → ∀𝑥𝜑)) → ((∀𝑥𝜑 ↔ 𝜓) → (𝜓 → [𝐴 / 𝑥]𝜑)))
Theorem	frege68c 44875	Combination of applying a definition and applying it to a specific instance. Proposition 68 of [Frege1879] p. 54. (Contributed by RP, 24-Dec-2019.) (Proof modification is discouraged.)
⊢ 𝐴 ∈ 𝐵    ⇒   ⊢ ((∀𝑥𝜑 ↔ 𝜓) → (𝜓 → [𝐴 / 𝑥]𝜑))
21.38.6.8  _Begriffsschrift_ Chapter III Properties hereditary in a sequence (𝑅 “ 𝐴) ⊆ 𝐴 means membership in 𝐴 is hereditary in the sequence dictated by relation 𝑅. This differs from the set-theoretic notion that a set is hereditary in a property: that all of its elements have a property and all of their elements have the property and so-on. While the above notation is modern, it is cumbersome in the case when 𝐴 is complex and to more closely follow Frege, we abbreviate it with new notation 𝑅 hereditary 𝐴. This greatly shortens the statements for frege97 44904 and frege109 44916. dffrege69 44876 through frege75 44882 develop this, but translation to Metamath is pending some decisions. While Frege does not limit discussion to sets, we may have to depart from Frege by limiting 𝑅 or 𝐴 to sets when we quantify over all hereditary relations or all classes where membership is hereditary in a sequence dictated by 𝑅.
Theorem	dffrege69 44876*	If from the proposition that 𝑥 has property 𝐴 it can be inferred generally, whatever 𝑥 may be, that every result of an application of the procedure 𝑅 to 𝑥 has property 𝐴, then we say " Property 𝐴 is hereditary in the 𝑅-sequence. Definition 69 of [Frege1879] p. 55. (Contributed by RP, 28-Mar-2020.)
⊢ (∀𝑥(𝑥 ∈ 𝐴 → ∀𝑦(𝑥𝑅𝑦 → 𝑦 ∈ 𝐴)) ↔ 𝑅 hereditary 𝐴)
Theorem	frege70 44877*	Lemma for frege72 44879. Proposition 70 of [Frege1879] p. 58. (Contributed by RP, 28-Mar-2020.) (Revised by RP, 3-Jul-2020.) (Proof modification is discouraged.)
⊢ 𝑋 ∈ 𝑉    ⇒   ⊢ (𝑅 hereditary 𝐴 → (𝑋 ∈ 𝐴 → ∀𝑦(𝑋𝑅𝑦 → 𝑦 ∈ 𝐴)))
Theorem	frege71 44878*	Lemma for frege72 44879. Proposition 71 of [Frege1879] p. 59. (Contributed by RP, 28-Mar-2020.) (Revised by RP, 3-Jul-2020.) (Proof modification is discouraged.)
⊢ 𝑋 ∈ 𝑉    ⇒   ⊢ ((∀𝑧(𝑋𝑅𝑧 → 𝑧 ∈ 𝐴) → (𝑋𝑅𝑌 → 𝑌 ∈ 𝐴)) → (𝑅 hereditary 𝐴 → (𝑋 ∈ 𝐴 → (𝑋𝑅𝑌 → 𝑌 ∈ 𝐴))))
Theorem	frege72 44879	If property 𝐴 is hereditary in the 𝑅-sequence, if 𝑥 has property 𝐴, and if 𝑦 is a result of an application of the procedure 𝑅 to 𝑥, then 𝑦 has property 𝐴. Proposition 72 of [Frege1879] p. 59. (Contributed by RP, 28-Mar-2020.) (Revised by RP, 5-Jul-2020.) (Proof modification is discouraged.)
⊢ 𝑋 ∈ 𝑈    &   ⊢ 𝑌 ∈ 𝑉    ⇒   ⊢ (𝑅 hereditary 𝐴 → (𝑋 ∈ 𝐴 → (𝑋𝑅𝑌 → 𝑌 ∈ 𝐴)))
Theorem	frege73 44880	Lemma for frege87 44894. Proposition 73 of [Frege1879] p. 59. (Contributed by RP, 28-Mar-2020.) (Revised by RP, 5-Jul-2020.) (Proof modification is discouraged.)
⊢ 𝑋 ∈ 𝑈    &   ⊢ 𝑌 ∈ 𝑉    ⇒   ⊢ ((𝑅 hereditary 𝐴 → 𝑋 ∈ 𝐴) → (𝑅 hereditary 𝐴 → (𝑋𝑅𝑌 → 𝑌 ∈ 𝐴)))
Theorem	frege74 44881	If 𝑋 has a property 𝐴 that is hereditary in the 𝑅-sequence, then every result of a application of the procedure 𝑅 to 𝑋 has the property 𝐴. Proposition 74 of [Frege1879] p. 60. (Contributed by RP, 28-Mar-2020.) (Revised by RP, 5-Jul-2020.) (Proof modification is discouraged.)
⊢ 𝑋 ∈ 𝑈    &   ⊢ 𝑌 ∈ 𝑉    ⇒   ⊢ (𝑋 ∈ 𝐴 → (𝑅 hereditary 𝐴 → (𝑋𝑅𝑌 → 𝑌 ∈ 𝐴)))
Theorem	frege75 44882*	If from the proposition that 𝑥 has property 𝐴, whatever 𝑥 may be, it can be inferred that every result of an application of the procedure 𝑅 to 𝑥 has property 𝐴, then property 𝐴 is hereditary in the 𝑅-sequence. Proposition 75 of [Frege1879] p. 60. (Contributed by RP, 28-Mar-2020.) (Proof modification is discouraged.)
⊢ (∀𝑥(𝑥 ∈ 𝐴 → ∀𝑦(𝑥𝑅𝑦 → 𝑦 ∈ 𝐴)) → 𝑅 hereditary 𝐴)
21.38.6.9  _Begriffsschrift_ Chapter III Following in a sequence 𝑝(t+‘𝑅)𝑐 means 𝑐 follows 𝑝 in the 𝑅-sequence. dffrege76 44883 through frege98 44905 develop this. This will be shown to be the transitive closure of the relation 𝑅. But more work needs to be done on transitive closure of relations before this is ready for Metamath.
Theorem	dffrege76 44883*	If from the two propositions that every result of an application of the procedure 𝑅 to 𝐵 has property 𝑓 and that property 𝑓 is hereditary in the 𝑅-sequence, it can be inferred, whatever 𝑓 may be, that 𝐸 has property 𝑓, then we say 𝐸 follows 𝐵 in the 𝑅-sequence. Definition 76 of [Frege1879] p. 60. Each of 𝐵, 𝐸 and 𝑅 must be sets. (Contributed by RP, 2-Jul-2020.)
⊢ 𝐵 ∈ 𝑈    &   ⊢ 𝐸 ∈ 𝑉    &   ⊢ 𝑅 ∈ 𝑊    ⇒   ⊢ (∀𝑓(𝑅 hereditary 𝑓 → (∀𝑎(𝐵𝑅𝑎 → 𝑎 ∈ 𝑓) → 𝐸 ∈ 𝑓)) ↔ 𝐵(t+‘𝑅)𝐸)
Theorem	frege77 44884*	If 𝑌 follows 𝑋 in the 𝑅-sequence, if property 𝐴 is hereditary in the 𝑅-sequence, and if every result of an application of the procedure 𝑅 to 𝑋 has the property 𝐴, then 𝑌 has property 𝐴. Proposition 77 of [Frege1879] p. 62. (Contributed by RP, 29-Jun-2020.) (Revised by RP, 2-Jul-2020.) (Proof modification is discouraged.)
⊢ 𝑋 ∈ 𝑈    &   ⊢ 𝑌 ∈ 𝑉    &   ⊢ 𝑅 ∈ 𝑊    &   ⊢ 𝐴 ∈ 𝐵    ⇒   ⊢ (𝑋(t+‘𝑅)𝑌 → (𝑅 hereditary 𝐴 → (∀𝑎(𝑋𝑅𝑎 → 𝑎 ∈ 𝐴) → 𝑌 ∈ 𝐴)))
Theorem	frege78 44885*	Commuted form of frege77 44884. Proposition 78 of [Frege1879] p. 63. (Contributed by RP, 1-Jul-2020.) (Revised by RP, 2-Jul-2020.) (Proof modification is discouraged.)
⊢ 𝑋 ∈ 𝑈    &   ⊢ 𝑌 ∈ 𝑉    &   ⊢ 𝑅 ∈ 𝑊    &   ⊢ 𝐴 ∈ 𝐵    ⇒   ⊢ (𝑅 hereditary 𝐴 → (∀𝑎(𝑋𝑅𝑎 → 𝑎 ∈ 𝐴) → (𝑋(t+‘𝑅)𝑌 → 𝑌 ∈ 𝐴)))
Theorem	frege79 44886*	Distributed form of frege78 44885. Proposition 79 of [Frege1879] p. 63. (Contributed by RP, 1-Jul-2020.) (Revised by RP, 3-Jul-2020.) (Proof modification is discouraged.)
⊢ 𝑋 ∈ 𝑈    &   ⊢ 𝑌 ∈ 𝑉    &   ⊢ 𝑅 ∈ 𝑊    &   ⊢ 𝐴 ∈ 𝐵    ⇒   ⊢ ((𝑅 hereditary 𝐴 → ∀𝑎(𝑋𝑅𝑎 → 𝑎 ∈ 𝐴)) → (𝑅 hereditary 𝐴 → (𝑋(t+‘𝑅)𝑌 → 𝑌 ∈ 𝐴)))
Theorem	frege80 44887*	Add additional condition to both clauses of frege79 44886. Proposition 80 of [Frege1879] p. 63. (Contributed by RP, 1-Jul-2020.) (Revised by RP, 5-Jul-2020.) (Proof modification is discouraged.)
⊢ 𝑋 ∈ 𝑈    &   ⊢ 𝑌 ∈ 𝑉    &   ⊢ 𝑅 ∈ 𝑊    &   ⊢ 𝐴 ∈ 𝐵    ⇒   ⊢ ((𝑋 ∈ 𝐴 → (𝑅 hereditary 𝐴 → ∀𝑎(𝑋𝑅𝑎 → 𝑎 ∈ 𝐴))) → (𝑋 ∈ 𝐴 → (𝑅 hereditary 𝐴 → (𝑋(t+‘𝑅)𝑌 → 𝑌 ∈ 𝐴))))
Theorem	frege81 44888	If 𝑋 has a property 𝐴 that is hereditary in the 𝑅 -sequence, and if 𝑌 follows 𝑋 in the 𝑅-sequence, then 𝑌 has property 𝐴. This is a form of induction attributed to Jakob Bernoulli. Proposition 81 of [Frege1879] p. 63. (Contributed by RP, 1-Jul-2020.) (Revised by RP, 5-Jul-2020.) (Proof modification is discouraged.)
⊢ 𝑋 ∈ 𝑈    &   ⊢ 𝑌 ∈ 𝑉    &   ⊢ 𝑅 ∈ 𝑊    &   ⊢ 𝐴 ∈ 𝐵    ⇒   ⊢ (𝑋 ∈ 𝐴 → (𝑅 hereditary 𝐴 → (𝑋(t+‘𝑅)𝑌 → 𝑌 ∈ 𝐴)))
Theorem	frege82 44889	Closed-form deduction based on frege81 44888. Proposition 82 of [Frege1879] p. 64. (Contributed by RP, 1-Jul-2020.) (Revised by RP, 5-Jul-2020.) (Proof modification is discouraged.)
⊢ 𝑋 ∈ 𝑈    &   ⊢ 𝑌 ∈ 𝑉    &   ⊢ 𝑅 ∈ 𝑊    &   ⊢ 𝐴 ∈ 𝐵    ⇒   ⊢ ((𝜑 → 𝑋 ∈ 𝐴) → (𝑅 hereditary 𝐴 → (𝜑 → (𝑋(t+‘𝑅)𝑌 → 𝑌 ∈ 𝐴))))
Theorem	frege83 44890	Apply commuted form of frege81 44888 when the property 𝑅 is hereditary in a disjunction of two properties, only one of which is known to be held by 𝑋. Proposition 83 of [Frege1879] p. 65. Here we introduce the union of classes where Frege has a disjunction of properties which are represented by membership in either of the classes. (Contributed by RP, 1-Jul-2020.) (Revised by RP, 5-Jul-2020.) (Proof modification is discouraged.)
⊢ 𝑋 ∈ 𝑆    &   ⊢ 𝑌 ∈ 𝑇    &   ⊢ 𝑅 ∈ 𝑈    &   ⊢ 𝐵 ∈ 𝑉    &   ⊢ 𝐶 ∈ 𝑊    ⇒   ⊢ (𝑅 hereditary (𝐵 ∪ 𝐶) → (𝑋 ∈ 𝐵 → (𝑋(t+‘𝑅)𝑌 → 𝑌 ∈ (𝐵 ∪ 𝐶))))
Theorem	frege84 44891	Commuted form of frege81 44888. Proposition 84 of [Frege1879] p. 65. (Contributed by RP, 1-Jul-2020.) (Revised by RP, 5-Jul-2020.) (Proof modification is discouraged.)
⊢ 𝑋 ∈ 𝑈    &   ⊢ 𝑌 ∈ 𝑉    &   ⊢ 𝑅 ∈ 𝑊    &   ⊢ 𝐴 ∈ 𝐵    ⇒   ⊢ (𝑅 hereditary 𝐴 → (𝑋 ∈ 𝐴 → (𝑋(t+‘𝑅)𝑌 → 𝑌 ∈ 𝐴)))
Theorem	frege85 44892*	Commuted form of frege77 44884. Proposition 85 of [Frege1879] p. 66. (Contributed by RP, 1-Jul-2020.) (Revised by RP, 5-Jul-2020.) (Proof modification is discouraged.)
⊢ 𝑋 ∈ 𝑈    &   ⊢ 𝑌 ∈ 𝑉    &   ⊢ 𝑅 ∈ 𝑊    &   ⊢ 𝐴 ∈ 𝐵    ⇒   ⊢ (𝑋(t+‘𝑅)𝑌 → (∀𝑧(𝑋𝑅𝑧 → 𝑧 ∈ 𝐴) → (𝑅 hereditary 𝐴 → 𝑌 ∈ 𝐴)))
Theorem	frege86 44893*	Conclusion about element one past 𝑌 in the 𝑅-sequence. Proposition 86 of [Frege1879] p. 66. (Contributed by RP, 1-Jul-2020.) (Revised by RP, 7-Jul-2020.) (Proof modification is discouraged.)
⊢ 𝑋 ∈ 𝑈    &   ⊢ 𝑌 ∈ 𝑉    &   ⊢ 𝑅 ∈ 𝑊    &   ⊢ 𝐴 ∈ 𝐵    ⇒   ⊢ (((𝑅 hereditary 𝐴 → 𝑌 ∈ 𝐴) → (𝑅 hereditary 𝐴 → (𝑌𝑅𝑍 → 𝑍 ∈ 𝐴))) → (𝑋(t+‘𝑅)𝑌 → (∀𝑤(𝑋𝑅𝑤 → 𝑤 ∈ 𝐴) → (𝑅 hereditary 𝐴 → (𝑌𝑅𝑍 → 𝑍 ∈ 𝐴)))))
Theorem	frege87 44894*	If 𝑍 is a result of an application of the procedure 𝑅 to an object 𝑌 that follows 𝑋 in the 𝑅-sequence and if every result of an application of the procedure 𝑅 to 𝑋 has a property 𝐴 that is hereditary in the 𝑅-sequence, then 𝑍 has property 𝐴. Proposition 87 of [Frege1879] p. 66. (Contributed by RP, 1-Jul-2020.) (Revised by RP, 7-Jul-2020.) (Proof modification is discouraged.)
⊢ 𝑋 ∈ 𝑈    &   ⊢ 𝑌 ∈ 𝑉    &   ⊢ 𝑍 ∈ 𝑊    &   ⊢ 𝑅 ∈ 𝑆    &   ⊢ 𝐴 ∈ 𝐵    ⇒   ⊢ (𝑋(t+‘𝑅)𝑌 → (∀𝑤(𝑋𝑅𝑤 → 𝑤 ∈ 𝐴) → (𝑅 hereditary 𝐴 → (𝑌𝑅𝑍 → 𝑍 ∈ 𝐴))))
Theorem	frege88 44895*	Commuted form of frege87 44894. Proposition 88 of [Frege1879] p. 67. (Contributed by RP, 1-Jul-2020.) (Revised by RP, 7-Jul-2020.) (Proof modification is discouraged.)
⊢ 𝑋 ∈ 𝑈    &   ⊢ 𝑌 ∈ 𝑉    &   ⊢ 𝑍 ∈ 𝑊    &   ⊢ 𝑅 ∈ 𝑆    &   ⊢ 𝐴 ∈ 𝐵    ⇒   ⊢ (𝑌𝑅𝑍 → (𝑋(t+‘𝑅)𝑌 → (∀𝑤(𝑋𝑅𝑤 → 𝑤 ∈ 𝐴) → (𝑅 hereditary 𝐴 → 𝑍 ∈ 𝐴))))
Theorem	frege89 44896*	One direction of dffrege76 44883. Proposition 89 of [Frege1879] p. 68. (Contributed by RP, 1-Jul-2020.) (Revised by RP, 2-Jul-2020.) (Proof modification is discouraged.)
⊢ 𝑋 ∈ 𝑈    &   ⊢ 𝑌 ∈ 𝑉    &   ⊢ 𝑅 ∈ 𝑊    ⇒   ⊢ (∀𝑓(𝑅 hereditary 𝑓 → (∀𝑤(𝑋𝑅𝑤 → 𝑤 ∈ 𝑓) → 𝑌 ∈ 𝑓)) → 𝑋(t+‘𝑅)𝑌)
Theorem	frege90 44897*	Add antecedent to frege89 44896. Proposition 90 of [Frege1879] p. 68. (Contributed by RP, 1-Jul-2020.) (Revised by RP, 2-Jul-2020.) (Proof modification is discouraged.)
⊢ 𝑋 ∈ 𝑈    &   ⊢ 𝑌 ∈ 𝑉    &   ⊢ 𝑅 ∈ 𝑊    ⇒   ⊢ ((𝜑 → ∀𝑓(𝑅 hereditary 𝑓 → (∀𝑤(𝑋𝑅𝑤 → 𝑤 ∈ 𝑓) → 𝑌 ∈ 𝑓))) → (𝜑 → 𝑋(t+‘𝑅)𝑌))
Theorem	frege91 44898	Every result of an application of a procedure 𝑅 to an object 𝑋 follows that 𝑋 in the 𝑅-sequence. Proposition 91 of [Frege1879] p. 68. (Contributed by RP, 2-Jul-2020.) (Revised by RP, 5-Jul-2020.) (Proof modification is discouraged.)
⊢ 𝑋 ∈ 𝑈    &   ⊢ 𝑌 ∈ 𝑉    &   ⊢ 𝑅 ∈ 𝑊    ⇒   ⊢ (𝑋𝑅𝑌 → 𝑋(t+‘𝑅)𝑌)
Theorem	frege92 44899	Inference from frege91 44898. Proposition 92 of [Frege1879] p. 69. (Contributed by RP, 2-Jul-2020.) (Revised by RP, 5-Jul-2020.) (Proof modification is discouraged.)
⊢ 𝑋 ∈ 𝑈    &   ⊢ 𝑌 ∈ 𝑉    &   ⊢ 𝑅 ∈ 𝑊    ⇒   ⊢ (𝑋 = 𝑍 → (𝑋𝑅𝑌 → 𝑍(t+‘𝑅)𝑌))
Theorem	frege93 44900*	Necessary condition for two elements to be related by the transitive closure. Proposition 93 of [Frege1879] p. 70. (Contributed by RP, 2-Jul-2020.) (Revised by RP, 5-Jul-2020.) (Proof modification is discouraged.)
⊢ 𝑋 ∈ 𝑈    &   ⊢ 𝑌 ∈ 𝑉    &   ⊢ 𝑅 ∈ 𝑊    ⇒   ⊢ (∀𝑓(∀𝑧(𝑋𝑅𝑧 → 𝑧 ∈ 𝑓) → (𝑅 hereditary 𝑓 → 𝑌 ∈ 𝑓)) → 𝑋(t+‘𝑅)𝑌)