| Metamath
Proof Explorer Theorem List (p. 449 of 500) | < Previous Next > | |
| Bad symbols? Try the
GIF version. |
||
|
Mirrors > Metamath Home Page > MPE Home Page > Theorem List Contents > Recent Proofs This page: Page List |
||
| Color key: | (1-30909) |
(30910-32432) |
(32433-49920) |
| Type | Label | Description |
|---|---|---|
| Statement | ||
| Theorem | e10 44801 | A virtual deduction elimination rule (see mpisyl 21). (Contributed by Alan Sare, 14-Jun-2011.) (Proof modification is discouraged.) (New usage is discouraged.) |
| ⊢ ( 𝜑 ▶ 𝜓 ) & ⊢ 𝜒 & ⊢ (𝜓 → (𝜒 → 𝜃)) ⇒ ⊢ ( 𝜑 ▶ 𝜃 ) | ||
| Theorem | e10an 44802 | Conjunction form of e10 44801. (Contributed by Alan Sare, 15-Jun-2011.) (Proof modification is discouraged.) (New usage is discouraged.) |
| ⊢ ( 𝜑 ▶ 𝜓 ) & ⊢ 𝜒 & ⊢ ((𝜓 ∧ 𝜒) → 𝜃) ⇒ ⊢ ( 𝜑 ▶ 𝜃 ) | ||
| Theorem | ee10an 44803 | e10an 44802 without virtual deductions. sylancl 586 is also e10an 44802 without virtual deductions, except the order of the hypotheses is different. (Contributed by Alan Sare, 25-Jul-2011.) (Proof modification is discouraged.) (New usage is discouraged.) |
| ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝜓) & ⊢ 𝜒 & ⊢ ((𝜓 ∧ 𝜒) → 𝜃) ⇒ ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝜃) | ||
| Theorem | e02 44804 | A virtual deduction elimination rule. (Contributed by Alan Sare, 14-Jun-2011.) (Proof modification is discouraged.) (New usage is discouraged.) |
| ⊢ 𝜑 & ⊢ ( 𝜓 , 𝜒 ▶ 𝜃 ) & ⊢ (𝜑 → (𝜃 → 𝜏)) ⇒ ⊢ ( 𝜓 , 𝜒 ▶ 𝜏 ) | ||
| Theorem | e02an 44805 | Conjunction form of e02 44804. (Contributed by Alan Sare, 15-Jun-2011.) (Proof modification is discouraged.) (New usage is discouraged.) |
| ⊢ 𝜑 & ⊢ ( 𝜓 , 𝜒 ▶ 𝜃 ) & ⊢ ((𝜑 ∧ 𝜃) → 𝜏) ⇒ ⊢ ( 𝜓 , 𝜒 ▶ 𝜏 ) | ||
| Theorem | ee02an 44806 | e02an 44805 without virtual deductions. (Contributed by Alan Sare, 8-Jul-2011.) (Proof modification is discouraged.) (New usage is discouraged.) |
| ⊢ 𝜑 & ⊢ (𝜓 → (𝜒 → 𝜃)) & ⊢ ((𝜑 ∧ 𝜃) → 𝜏) ⇒ ⊢ (𝜓 → (𝜒 → 𝜏)) | ||
| Theorem | eel021old 44807 | el021old 44808 without virtual deductions. (Contributed by Alan Sare, 13-Jun-2015.) (Proof modification is discouraged.) (New usage is discouraged.) |
| ⊢ 𝜑 & ⊢ ((𝜓 ∧ 𝜒) → 𝜃) & ⊢ ((𝜑 ∧ 𝜃) → 𝜏) ⇒ ⊢ ((𝜓 ∧ 𝜒) → 𝜏) | ||
| Theorem | el021old 44808 | A virtual deduction elimination rule. (Contributed by Alan Sare, 13-Jun-2015.) (Proof modification is discouraged.) (New usage is discouraged.) |
| ⊢ 𝜑 & ⊢ ( ( 𝜓 , 𝜒 ) ▶ 𝜃 ) & ⊢ ((𝜑 ∧ 𝜃) → 𝜏) ⇒ ⊢ ( ( 𝜓 , 𝜒 ) ▶ 𝜏 ) | ||
| Theorem | eel000cT 44809 | An elimination deduction. (Contributed by Alan Sare, 4-Feb-2017.) (Proof modification is discouraged.) (New usage is discouraged.) |
| ⊢ 𝜑 & ⊢ 𝜓 & ⊢ 𝜒 & ⊢ ((𝜑 ∧ 𝜓 ∧ 𝜒) → 𝜃) ⇒ ⊢ (⊤ → 𝜃) | ||
| Theorem | eel0TT 44810 | An elimination deduction. (Contributed by Alan Sare, 4-Feb-2017.) (Proof modification is discouraged.) (New usage is discouraged.) |
| ⊢ 𝜑 & ⊢ (⊤ → 𝜓) & ⊢ (⊤ → 𝜒) & ⊢ ((𝜑 ∧ 𝜓 ∧ 𝜒) → 𝜃) ⇒ ⊢ 𝜃 | ||
| Theorem | eelT00 44811 | An elimination deduction. (Contributed by Alan Sare, 4-Feb-2017.) (Proof modification is discouraged.) (New usage is discouraged.) |
| ⊢ (⊤ → 𝜑) & ⊢ 𝜓 & ⊢ 𝜒 & ⊢ ((𝜑 ∧ 𝜓 ∧ 𝜒) → 𝜃) ⇒ ⊢ 𝜃 | ||
| Theorem | eelTTT 44812 | An elimination deduction. (Contributed by Alan Sare, 4-Feb-2017.) (Proof modification is discouraged.) (New usage is discouraged.) |
| ⊢ (⊤ → 𝜑) & ⊢ (⊤ → 𝜓) & ⊢ (⊤ → 𝜒) & ⊢ ((𝜑 ∧ 𝜓 ∧ 𝜒) → 𝜃) ⇒ ⊢ 𝜃 | ||
| Theorem | eelT11 44813 | An elimination deduction. (Contributed by Alan Sare, 4-Feb-2017.) (Proof modification is discouraged.) (New usage is discouraged.) |
| ⊢ (⊤ → 𝜑) & ⊢ (𝜓 → 𝜒) & ⊢ (𝜓 → 𝜃) & ⊢ ((𝜑 ∧ 𝜒 ∧ 𝜃) → 𝜏) ⇒ ⊢ (𝜓 → 𝜏) | ||
| Theorem | eelT1 44814 | Syllogism inference combined with modus ponens. (Contributed by Jeff Madsen, 2-Sep-2009.) (Revised by Alan Sare, 23-Dec-2016.) (Proof modification is discouraged.) (New usage is discouraged.) |
| ⊢ (⊤ → 𝜑) & ⊢ (𝜓 → 𝜒) & ⊢ ((𝜑 ∧ 𝜒) → 𝜃) ⇒ ⊢ (𝜓 → 𝜃) | ||
| Theorem | eelT12 44815 | An elimination deduction. (Contributed by Alan Sare, 4-Feb-2017.) (Proof modification is discouraged.) (New usage is discouraged.) |
| ⊢ (⊤ → 𝜑) & ⊢ (𝜓 → 𝜒) & ⊢ (𝜃 → 𝜏) & ⊢ ((𝜑 ∧ 𝜒 ∧ 𝜏) → 𝜂) ⇒ ⊢ ((𝜓 ∧ 𝜃) → 𝜂) | ||
| Theorem | eelTT1 44816 | An elimination deduction. (Contributed by Alan Sare, 4-Feb-2017.) (Proof modification is discouraged.) (New usage is discouraged.) |
| ⊢ (⊤ → 𝜑) & ⊢ (⊤ → 𝜓) & ⊢ (𝜒 → 𝜃) & ⊢ ((𝜑 ∧ 𝜓 ∧ 𝜃) → 𝜏) ⇒ ⊢ (𝜒 → 𝜏) | ||
| Theorem | eelT01 44817 | An elimination deduction. (Contributed by Alan Sare, 4-Feb-2017.) (Proof modification is discouraged.) (New usage is discouraged.) |
| ⊢ (⊤ → 𝜑) & ⊢ 𝜓 & ⊢ (𝜒 → 𝜃) & ⊢ ((𝜑 ∧ 𝜓 ∧ 𝜃) → 𝜏) ⇒ ⊢ (𝜒 → 𝜏) | ||
| Theorem | eel0T1 44818 | An elimination deduction. (Contributed by Alan Sare, 4-Feb-2017.) (Proof modification is discouraged.) (New usage is discouraged.) |
| ⊢ 𝜑 & ⊢ (⊤ → 𝜓) & ⊢ (𝜒 → 𝜃) & ⊢ ((𝜑 ∧ 𝜓 ∧ 𝜃) → 𝜏) ⇒ ⊢ (𝜒 → 𝜏) | ||
| Theorem | eel12131 44819 | An elimination deduction. (Contributed by Alan Sare, 17-Oct-2017.) |
| ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝜓) & ⊢ ((𝜑 ∧ 𝜒) → 𝜃) & ⊢ ((𝜑 ∧ 𝜏) → 𝜂) & ⊢ ((𝜓 ∧ 𝜃 ∧ 𝜂) → 𝜁) ⇒ ⊢ ((𝜑 ∧ 𝜒 ∧ 𝜏) → 𝜁) | ||
| Theorem | eel2131 44820 | syl2an 596 with antecedents in standard conjunction form. (Contributed by Alan Sare, 26-Aug-2016.) |
| ⊢ ((𝜑 ∧ 𝜓) → 𝜒) & ⊢ ((𝜑 ∧ 𝜃) → 𝜏) & ⊢ ((𝜒 ∧ 𝜏) → 𝜂) ⇒ ⊢ ((𝜑 ∧ 𝜓 ∧ 𝜃) → 𝜂) | ||
| Theorem | eel3132 44821 | syl2an 596 with antecedents in standard conjunction form. (Contributed by Alan Sare, 27-Aug-2016.) |
| ⊢ ((𝜑 ∧ 𝜓) → 𝜒) & ⊢ ((𝜃 ∧ 𝜓) → 𝜏) & ⊢ ((𝜒 ∧ 𝜏) → 𝜂) ⇒ ⊢ ((𝜑 ∧ 𝜃 ∧ 𝜓) → 𝜂) | ||
| Theorem | eel0321old 44822 | el0321old 44823 without virtual deductions. (Contributed by Alan Sare, 13-Jun-2015.) (Proof modification is discouraged.) (New usage is discouraged.) |
| ⊢ 𝜑 & ⊢ ((𝜓 ∧ 𝜒 ∧ 𝜃) → 𝜏) & ⊢ ((𝜑 ∧ 𝜏) → 𝜂) ⇒ ⊢ ((𝜓 ∧ 𝜒 ∧ 𝜃) → 𝜂) | ||
| Theorem | el0321old 44823 | A virtual deduction elimination rule. (Contributed by Alan Sare, 13-Jun-2015.) (Proof modification is discouraged.) (New usage is discouraged.) |
| ⊢ 𝜑 & ⊢ ( ( 𝜓 , 𝜒 , 𝜃 ) ▶ 𝜏 ) & ⊢ ((𝜑 ∧ 𝜏) → 𝜂) ⇒ ⊢ ( ( 𝜓 , 𝜒 , 𝜃 ) ▶ 𝜂 ) | ||
| Theorem | eel2122old 44824 | el2122old 44825 without virtual deductions. (Contributed by Alan Sare, 13-Jun-2015.) (Proof modification is discouraged.) (New usage is discouraged.) |
| ⊢ ((𝜑 ∧ 𝜓) → 𝜒) & ⊢ (𝜓 → 𝜃) & ⊢ (𝜓 → 𝜏) & ⊢ ((𝜒 ∧ 𝜃 ∧ 𝜏) → 𝜂) ⇒ ⊢ ((𝜑 ∧ 𝜓) → 𝜂) | ||
| Theorem | el2122old 44825 | A virtual deduction elimination rule. (Contributed by Alan Sare, 13-Jun-2015.) (Proof modification is discouraged.) (New usage is discouraged.) |
| ⊢ ( ( 𝜑 , 𝜓 ) ▶ 𝜒 ) & ⊢ ( 𝜓 ▶ 𝜃 ) & ⊢ ( 𝜓 ▶ 𝜏 ) & ⊢ ((𝜒 ∧ 𝜃 ∧ 𝜏) → 𝜂) ⇒ ⊢ ( ( 𝜑 , 𝜓 ) ▶ 𝜂 ) | ||
| Theorem | eel0000 44826 | Elimination rule similar to mp4an 693, except with a left-nested conjunction unification theorem. (Contributed by Alan Sare, 17-Oct-2017.) |
| ⊢ 𝜑 & ⊢ 𝜓 & ⊢ 𝜒 & ⊢ 𝜃 & ⊢ ((((𝜑 ∧ 𝜓) ∧ 𝜒) ∧ 𝜃) → 𝜏) ⇒ ⊢ 𝜏 | ||
| Theorem | eel00001 44827 | An elimination deduction. (Contributed by Alan Sare, 17-Oct-2017.) |
| ⊢ 𝜑 & ⊢ 𝜓 & ⊢ 𝜒 & ⊢ 𝜃 & ⊢ (𝜏 → 𝜂) & ⊢ (((((𝜑 ∧ 𝜓) ∧ 𝜒) ∧ 𝜃) ∧ 𝜂) → 𝜁) ⇒ ⊢ (𝜏 → 𝜁) | ||
| Theorem | eel00000 44828 | Elimination rule similar eel0000 44826, except with five hpothesis steps. (Contributed by Alan Sare, 17-Oct-2017.) |
| ⊢ 𝜑 & ⊢ 𝜓 & ⊢ 𝜒 & ⊢ 𝜃 & ⊢ 𝜏 & ⊢ (((((𝜑 ∧ 𝜓) ∧ 𝜒) ∧ 𝜃) ∧ 𝜏) → 𝜂) ⇒ ⊢ 𝜂 | ||
| Theorem | eel11111 44829 | Five-hypothesis elimination deduction for an assertion with a singleton virtual hypothesis collection. Similar to syl113anc 1384 except the unification theorem uses left-nested conjunction. (Contributed by Alan Sare, 17-Oct-2017.) |
| ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝜓) & ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝜒) & ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝜃) & ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝜏) & ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝜂) & ⊢ (((((𝜓 ∧ 𝜒) ∧ 𝜃) ∧ 𝜏) ∧ 𝜂) → 𝜁) ⇒ ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝜁) | ||
| Theorem | e12 44830 | A virtual deduction elimination rule (see sylsyld 61). (Contributed by Alan Sare, 21-Apr-2011.) (Proof modification is discouraged.) (New usage is discouraged.) |
| ⊢ ( 𝜑 ▶ 𝜓 ) & ⊢ ( 𝜑 , 𝜒 ▶ 𝜃 ) & ⊢ (𝜓 → (𝜃 → 𝜏)) ⇒ ⊢ ( 𝜑 , 𝜒 ▶ 𝜏 ) | ||
| Theorem | e12an 44831 | Conjunction form of e12 44830 (see syl6an 684). (Contributed by Alan Sare, 11-Jun-2011.) (Proof modification is discouraged.) (New usage is discouraged.) |
| ⊢ ( 𝜑 ▶ 𝜓 ) & ⊢ ( 𝜑 , 𝜒 ▶ 𝜃 ) & ⊢ ((𝜓 ∧ 𝜃) → 𝜏) ⇒ ⊢ ( 𝜑 , 𝜒 ▶ 𝜏 ) | ||
| Theorem | el12 44832 | Virtual deduction form of syl2an 596. (Contributed by Alan Sare, 23-Apr-2015.) (Proof modification is discouraged.) (New usage is discouraged.) |
| ⊢ ( 𝜑 ▶ 𝜓 ) & ⊢ ( 𝜏 ▶ 𝜒 ) & ⊢ ((𝜓 ∧ 𝜒) → 𝜃) ⇒ ⊢ ( ( 𝜑 , 𝜏 ) ▶ 𝜃 ) | ||
| Theorem | e20 44833 | A virtual deduction elimination rule (see syl6mpi 67). (Contributed by Alan Sare, 14-Jun-2011.) (Proof modification is discouraged.) (New usage is discouraged.) |
| ⊢ ( 𝜑 , 𝜓 ▶ 𝜒 ) & ⊢ 𝜃 & ⊢ (𝜒 → (𝜃 → 𝜏)) ⇒ ⊢ ( 𝜑 , 𝜓 ▶ 𝜏 ) | ||
| Theorem | e20an 44834 | Conjunction form of e20 44833. (Contributed by Alan Sare, 15-Jun-2011.) (Proof modification is discouraged.) (New usage is discouraged.) |
| ⊢ ( 𝜑 , 𝜓 ▶ 𝜒 ) & ⊢ 𝜃 & ⊢ ((𝜒 ∧ 𝜃) → 𝜏) ⇒ ⊢ ( 𝜑 , 𝜓 ▶ 𝜏 ) | ||
| Theorem | ee20an 44835 | e20an 44834 without virtual deductions. (Contributed by Alan Sare, 8-Jul-2011.) (Proof modification is discouraged.) (New usage is discouraged.) |
| ⊢ (𝜑 → (𝜓 → 𝜒)) & ⊢ 𝜃 & ⊢ ((𝜒 ∧ 𝜃) → 𝜏) ⇒ ⊢ (𝜑 → (𝜓 → 𝜏)) | ||
| Theorem | e21 44836 | A virtual deduction elimination rule (see syl6ci 71). (Contributed by Alan Sare, 12-Jun-2011.) (Proof modification is discouraged.) (New usage is discouraged.) |
| ⊢ ( 𝜑 , 𝜓 ▶ 𝜒 ) & ⊢ ( 𝜑 ▶ 𝜃 ) & ⊢ (𝜒 → (𝜃 → 𝜏)) ⇒ ⊢ ( 𝜑 , 𝜓 ▶ 𝜏 ) | ||
| Theorem | e21an 44837 | Conjunction form of e21 44836. (Contributed by Alan Sare, 15-Jun-2011.) (Proof modification is discouraged.) (New usage is discouraged.) |
| ⊢ ( 𝜑 , 𝜓 ▶ 𝜒 ) & ⊢ ( 𝜑 ▶ 𝜃 ) & ⊢ ((𝜒 ∧ 𝜃) → 𝜏) ⇒ ⊢ ( 𝜑 , 𝜓 ▶ 𝜏 ) | ||
| Theorem | ee21an 44838 | e21an 44837 without virtual deductions. (Contributed by Alan Sare, 8-Jul-2011.) (Proof modification is discouraged.) (New usage is discouraged.) |
| ⊢ (𝜑 → (𝜓 → 𝜒)) & ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝜃) & ⊢ ((𝜒 ∧ 𝜃) → 𝜏) ⇒ ⊢ (𝜑 → (𝜓 → 𝜏)) | ||
| Theorem | e333 44839 | A virtual deduction elimination rule. (Contributed by Alan Sare, 12-Jun-2011.) (Proof modification is discouraged.) (New usage is discouraged.) |
| ⊢ ( 𝜑 , 𝜓 , 𝜒 ▶ 𝜃 ) & ⊢ ( 𝜑 , 𝜓 , 𝜒 ▶ 𝜏 ) & ⊢ ( 𝜑 , 𝜓 , 𝜒 ▶ 𝜂 ) & ⊢ (𝜃 → (𝜏 → (𝜂 → 𝜁))) ⇒ ⊢ ( 𝜑 , 𝜓 , 𝜒 ▶ 𝜁 ) | ||
| Theorem | e33 44840 | A virtual deduction elimination rule. (Contributed by Alan Sare, 12-Jun-2011.) (Proof modification is discouraged.) (New usage is discouraged.) |
| ⊢ ( 𝜑 , 𝜓 , 𝜒 ▶ 𝜃 ) & ⊢ ( 𝜑 , 𝜓 , 𝜒 ▶ 𝜏 ) & ⊢ (𝜃 → (𝜏 → 𝜂)) ⇒ ⊢ ( 𝜑 , 𝜓 , 𝜒 ▶ 𝜂 ) | ||
| Theorem | e33an 44841 | Conjunction form of e33 44840. (Contributed by Alan Sare, 15-Jun-2011.) (Proof modification is discouraged.) (New usage is discouraged.) |
| ⊢ ( 𝜑 , 𝜓 , 𝜒 ▶ 𝜃 ) & ⊢ ( 𝜑 , 𝜓 , 𝜒 ▶ 𝜏 ) & ⊢ ((𝜃 ∧ 𝜏) → 𝜂) ⇒ ⊢ ( 𝜑 , 𝜓 , 𝜒 ▶ 𝜂 ) | ||
| Theorem | ee33an 44842 | e33an 44841 without virtual deductions. (Contributed by Alan Sare, 8-Jul-2011.) (Proof modification is discouraged.) (New usage is discouraged.) |
| ⊢ (𝜑 → (𝜓 → (𝜒 → 𝜃))) & ⊢ (𝜑 → (𝜓 → (𝜒 → 𝜏))) & ⊢ ((𝜃 ∧ 𝜏) → 𝜂) ⇒ ⊢ (𝜑 → (𝜓 → (𝜒 → 𝜂))) | ||
| Theorem | e3 44843 | Meta-connective form of syl8 76. (Contributed by Alan Sare, 15-Jun-2011.) (Proof modification is discouraged.) (New usage is discouraged.) |
| ⊢ ( 𝜑 , 𝜓 , 𝜒 ▶ 𝜃 ) & ⊢ (𝜃 → 𝜏) ⇒ ⊢ ( 𝜑 , 𝜓 , 𝜒 ▶ 𝜏 ) | ||
| Theorem | e3bi 44844 | Biconditional form of e3 44843. syl8ib 256 is e3bi 44844 without virtual deductions. (Contributed by Alan Sare, 15-Jun-2011.) (Proof modification is discouraged.) (New usage is discouraged.) |
| ⊢ ( 𝜑 , 𝜓 , 𝜒 ▶ 𝜃 ) & ⊢ (𝜃 ↔ 𝜏) ⇒ ⊢ ( 𝜑 , 𝜓 , 𝜒 ▶ 𝜏 ) | ||
| Theorem | e3bir 44845 | Right biconditional form of e3 44843. (Contributed by Alan Sare, 15-Jun-2011.) (Proof modification is discouraged.) (New usage is discouraged.) |
| ⊢ ( 𝜑 , 𝜓 , 𝜒 ▶ 𝜃 ) & ⊢ (𝜏 ↔ 𝜃) ⇒ ⊢ ( 𝜑 , 𝜓 , 𝜒 ▶ 𝜏 ) | ||
| Theorem | e03 44846 | A virtual deduction elimination rule. (Contributed by Alan Sare, 12-Jun-2011.) (Proof modification is discouraged.) (New usage is discouraged.) |
| ⊢ 𝜑 & ⊢ ( 𝜓 , 𝜒 , 𝜃 ▶ 𝜏 ) & ⊢ (𝜑 → (𝜏 → 𝜂)) ⇒ ⊢ ( 𝜓 , 𝜒 , 𝜃 ▶ 𝜂 ) | ||
| Theorem | ee03 44847 | e03 44846 without virtual deductions. (Contributed by Alan Sare, 17-Jul-2011.) (Proof modification is discouraged.) (New usage is discouraged.) |
| ⊢ 𝜑 & ⊢ (𝜓 → (𝜒 → (𝜃 → 𝜏))) & ⊢ (𝜑 → (𝜏 → 𝜂)) ⇒ ⊢ (𝜓 → (𝜒 → (𝜃 → 𝜂))) | ||
| Theorem | e03an 44848 | Conjunction form of e03 44846. (Contributed by Alan Sare, 12-Jun-2011.) (Proof modification is discouraged.) (New usage is discouraged.) |
| ⊢ 𝜑 & ⊢ ( 𝜓 , 𝜒 , 𝜃 ▶ 𝜏 ) & ⊢ ((𝜑 ∧ 𝜏) → 𝜂) ⇒ ⊢ ( 𝜓 , 𝜒 , 𝜃 ▶ 𝜂 ) | ||
| Theorem | ee03an 44849 | Conjunction form of ee03 44847. (Contributed by Alan Sare, 18-Jul-2011.) (Proof modification is discouraged.) (New usage is discouraged.) |
| ⊢ 𝜑 & ⊢ (𝜓 → (𝜒 → (𝜃 → 𝜏))) & ⊢ ((𝜑 ∧ 𝜏) → 𝜂) ⇒ ⊢ (𝜓 → (𝜒 → (𝜃 → 𝜂))) | ||
| Theorem | e30 44850 | A virtual deduction elimination rule. (Contributed by Alan Sare, 12-Jun-2011.) (Proof modification is discouraged.) (New usage is discouraged.) |
| ⊢ ( 𝜑 , 𝜓 , 𝜒 ▶ 𝜃 ) & ⊢ 𝜏 & ⊢ (𝜃 → (𝜏 → 𝜂)) ⇒ ⊢ ( 𝜑 , 𝜓 , 𝜒 ▶ 𝜂 ) | ||
| Theorem | ee30 44851 | e30 44850 without virtual deductions. (Contributed by Alan Sare, 17-Jul-2011.) (Proof modification is discouraged.) (New usage is discouraged.) |
| ⊢ (𝜑 → (𝜓 → (𝜒 → 𝜃))) & ⊢ 𝜏 & ⊢ (𝜃 → (𝜏 → 𝜂)) ⇒ ⊢ (𝜑 → (𝜓 → (𝜒 → 𝜂))) | ||
| Theorem | e30an 44852 | A virtual deduction elimination rule. (Contributed by Alan Sare, 24-Jun-2011.) (Proof modification is discouraged.) (New usage is discouraged.) |
| ⊢ ( 𝜑 , 𝜓 , 𝜒 ▶ 𝜃 ) & ⊢ 𝜏 & ⊢ ((𝜃 ∧ 𝜏) → 𝜂) ⇒ ⊢ ( 𝜑 , 𝜓 , 𝜒 ▶ 𝜂 ) | ||
| Theorem | ee30an 44853 | Conjunction form of ee30 44851. (Contributed by Alan Sare, 17-Jul-2011.) (Proof modification is discouraged.) (New usage is discouraged.) |
| ⊢ (𝜑 → (𝜓 → (𝜒 → 𝜃))) & ⊢ 𝜏 & ⊢ ((𝜃 ∧ 𝜏) → 𝜂) ⇒ ⊢ (𝜑 → (𝜓 → (𝜒 → 𝜂))) | ||
| Theorem | e13 44854 | A virtual deduction elimination rule. (Contributed by Alan Sare, 13-Jun-2011.) (Proof modification is discouraged.) (New usage is discouraged.) |
| ⊢ ( 𝜑 ▶ 𝜓 ) & ⊢ ( 𝜑 , 𝜒 , 𝜃 ▶ 𝜏 ) & ⊢ (𝜓 → (𝜏 → 𝜂)) ⇒ ⊢ ( 𝜑 , 𝜒 , 𝜃 ▶ 𝜂 ) | ||
| Theorem | e13an 44855 | A virtual deduction elimination rule. (Contributed by Alan Sare, 24-Jun-2011.) (Proof modification is discouraged.) (New usage is discouraged.) |
| ⊢ ( 𝜑 ▶ 𝜓 ) & ⊢ ( 𝜑 , 𝜒 , 𝜃 ▶ 𝜏 ) & ⊢ ((𝜓 ∧ 𝜏) → 𝜂) ⇒ ⊢ ( 𝜑 , 𝜒 , 𝜃 ▶ 𝜂 ) | ||
| Theorem | ee13an 44856 | e13an 44855 without virtual deductions. (Contributed by Alan Sare, 8-Jul-2011.) (Proof modification is discouraged.) (New usage is discouraged.) |
| ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝜓) & ⊢ (𝜑 → (𝜒 → (𝜃 → 𝜏))) & ⊢ ((𝜓 ∧ 𝜏) → 𝜂) ⇒ ⊢ (𝜑 → (𝜒 → (𝜃 → 𝜂))) | ||
| Theorem | e31 44857 | A virtual deduction elimination rule. (Contributed by Alan Sare, 13-Jun-2011.) (Proof modification is discouraged.) (New usage is discouraged.) |
| ⊢ ( 𝜑 , 𝜓 , 𝜒 ▶ 𝜃 ) & ⊢ ( 𝜑 ▶ 𝜏 ) & ⊢ (𝜃 → (𝜏 → 𝜂)) ⇒ ⊢ ( 𝜑 , 𝜓 , 𝜒 ▶ 𝜂 ) | ||
| Theorem | ee31 44858 | e31 44857 without virtual deductions. (Contributed by Alan Sare, 25-Jul-2011.) (Proof modification is discouraged.) (New usage is discouraged.) |
| ⊢ (𝜑 → (𝜓 → (𝜒 → 𝜃))) & ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝜏) & ⊢ (𝜃 → (𝜏 → 𝜂)) ⇒ ⊢ (𝜑 → (𝜓 → (𝜒 → 𝜂))) | ||
| Theorem | e31an 44859 | A virtual deduction elimination rule. (Contributed by Alan Sare, 24-Jun-2011.) (Proof modification is discouraged.) (New usage is discouraged.) |
| ⊢ ( 𝜑 , 𝜓 , 𝜒 ▶ 𝜃 ) & ⊢ ( 𝜑 ▶ 𝜏 ) & ⊢ ((𝜃 ∧ 𝜏) → 𝜂) ⇒ ⊢ ( 𝜑 , 𝜓 , 𝜒 ▶ 𝜂 ) | ||
| Theorem | ee31an 44860 | e31an 44859 without virtual deductions. (Contributed by Alan Sare, 14-Jul-2011.) (Proof modification is discouraged.) (New usage is discouraged.) |
| ⊢ (𝜑 → (𝜓 → (𝜒 → 𝜃))) & ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝜏) & ⊢ ((𝜃 ∧ 𝜏) → 𝜂) ⇒ ⊢ (𝜑 → (𝜓 → (𝜒 → 𝜂))) | ||
| Theorem | e23 44861 | A virtual deduction elimination rule (see syl10 79). (Contributed by Alan Sare, 12-Jun-2011.) (Proof modification is discouraged.) (New usage is discouraged.) |
| ⊢ ( 𝜑 , 𝜓 ▶ 𝜒 ) & ⊢ ( 𝜑 , 𝜓 , 𝜃 ▶ 𝜏 ) & ⊢ (𝜒 → (𝜏 → 𝜂)) ⇒ ⊢ ( 𝜑 , 𝜓 , 𝜃 ▶ 𝜂 ) | ||
| Theorem | e23an 44862 | A virtual deduction elimination rule. (Contributed by Alan Sare, 24-Jun-2011.) (Proof modification is discouraged.) (New usage is discouraged.) |
| ⊢ ( 𝜑 , 𝜓 ▶ 𝜒 ) & ⊢ ( 𝜑 , 𝜓 , 𝜃 ▶ 𝜏 ) & ⊢ ((𝜒 ∧ 𝜏) → 𝜂) ⇒ ⊢ ( 𝜑 , 𝜓 , 𝜃 ▶ 𝜂 ) | ||
| Theorem | ee23an 44863 | e23an 44862 without virtual deductions. (Contributed by Alan Sare, 14-Jul-2011.) (Proof modification is discouraged.) (New usage is discouraged.) |
| ⊢ (𝜑 → (𝜓 → 𝜒)) & ⊢ (𝜑 → (𝜓 → (𝜃 → 𝜏))) & ⊢ ((𝜒 ∧ 𝜏) → 𝜂) ⇒ ⊢ (𝜑 → (𝜓 → (𝜃 → 𝜂))) | ||
| Theorem | e32 44864 | A virtual deduction elimination rule. (Contributed by Alan Sare, 12-Jun-2011.) (Proof modification is discouraged.) (New usage is discouraged.) |
| ⊢ ( 𝜑 , 𝜓 , 𝜒 ▶ 𝜃 ) & ⊢ ( 𝜑 , 𝜓 ▶ 𝜏 ) & ⊢ (𝜃 → (𝜏 → 𝜂)) ⇒ ⊢ ( 𝜑 , 𝜓 , 𝜒 ▶ 𝜂 ) | ||
| Theorem | ee32 44865 | e32 44864 without virtual deductions. (Contributed by Alan Sare, 18-Jul-2011.) (Proof modification is discouraged.) (New usage is discouraged.) |
| ⊢ (𝜑 → (𝜓 → (𝜒 → 𝜃))) & ⊢ (𝜑 → (𝜓 → 𝜏)) & ⊢ (𝜃 → (𝜏 → 𝜂)) ⇒ ⊢ (𝜑 → (𝜓 → (𝜒 → 𝜂))) | ||
| Theorem | e32an 44866 | A virtual deduction elimination rule. (Contributed by Alan Sare, 24-Jun-2011.) (Proof modification is discouraged.) (New usage is discouraged.) |
| ⊢ ( 𝜑 , 𝜓 , 𝜒 ▶ 𝜃 ) & ⊢ ( 𝜑 , 𝜓 ▶ 𝜏 ) & ⊢ ((𝜃 ∧ 𝜏) → 𝜂) ⇒ ⊢ ( 𝜑 , 𝜓 , 𝜒 ▶ 𝜂 ) | ||
| Theorem | ee32an 44867 | e33an 44841 without virtual deductions. (Contributed by Alan Sare, 14-Jul-2011.) (Proof modification is discouraged.) (New usage is discouraged.) |
| ⊢ (𝜑 → (𝜓 → (𝜒 → 𝜃))) & ⊢ (𝜑 → (𝜓 → 𝜏)) & ⊢ ((𝜃 ∧ 𝜏) → 𝜂) ⇒ ⊢ (𝜑 → (𝜓 → (𝜒 → 𝜂))) | ||
| Theorem | e123 44868 | A virtual deduction elimination rule. (Contributed by Alan Sare, 12-Jun-2011.) (Proof modification is discouraged.) (New usage is discouraged.) |
| ⊢ ( 𝜑 ▶ 𝜓 ) & ⊢ ( 𝜑 , 𝜒 ▶ 𝜃 ) & ⊢ ( 𝜑 , 𝜒 , 𝜏 ▶ 𝜂 ) & ⊢ (𝜓 → (𝜃 → (𝜂 → 𝜁))) ⇒ ⊢ ( 𝜑 , 𝜒 , 𝜏 ▶ 𝜁 ) | ||
| Theorem | ee123 44869 | e123 44868 without virtual deductions. (Contributed by Alan Sare, 25-Jul-2011.) (Proof modification is discouraged.) (New usage is discouraged.) |
| ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝜓) & ⊢ (𝜑 → (𝜒 → 𝜃)) & ⊢ (𝜑 → (𝜒 → (𝜏 → 𝜂))) & ⊢ (𝜓 → (𝜃 → (𝜂 → 𝜁))) ⇒ ⊢ (𝜑 → (𝜒 → (𝜏 → 𝜁))) | ||
| Theorem | el123 44870 | A virtual deduction elimination rule. (Contributed by Alan Sare, 13-Jun-2015.) (Proof modification is discouraged.) (New usage is discouraged.) |
| ⊢ ( 𝜑 ▶ 𝜓 ) & ⊢ ( 𝜒 ▶ 𝜃 ) & ⊢ ( 𝜏 ▶ 𝜂 ) & ⊢ ((𝜓 ∧ 𝜃 ∧ 𝜂) → 𝜁) ⇒ ⊢ ( ( 𝜑 , 𝜒 , 𝜏 ) ▶ 𝜁 ) | ||
| Theorem | e233 44871 | A virtual deduction elimination rule. (Contributed by Alan Sare, 29-Feb-2012.) (Proof modification is discouraged.) (New usage is discouraged.) |
| ⊢ ( 𝜑 , 𝜓 ▶ 𝜒 ) & ⊢ ( 𝜑 , 𝜓 , 𝜃 ▶ 𝜏 ) & ⊢ ( 𝜑 , 𝜓 , 𝜃 ▶ 𝜂 ) & ⊢ (𝜒 → (𝜏 → (𝜂 → 𝜁))) ⇒ ⊢ ( 𝜑 , 𝜓 , 𝜃 ▶ 𝜁 ) | ||
| Theorem | e323 44872 | A virtual deduction elimination rule. (Contributed by Alan Sare, 17-Apr-2012.) (Proof modification is discouraged.) (New usage is discouraged.) |
| ⊢ ( 𝜑 , 𝜓 , 𝜒 ▶ 𝜃 ) & ⊢ ( 𝜑 , 𝜓 ▶ 𝜏 ) & ⊢ ( 𝜑 , 𝜓 , 𝜒 ▶ 𝜂 ) & ⊢ (𝜃 → (𝜏 → (𝜂 → 𝜁))) ⇒ ⊢ ( 𝜑 , 𝜓 , 𝜒 ▶ 𝜁 ) | ||
| Theorem | e000 44873 | A virtual deduction elimination rule. The non-virtual deduction form of e000 44873 is the virtual deduction form. (Contributed by Alan Sare, 14-Jun-2011.) (Proof modification is discouraged.) (New usage is discouraged.) |
| ⊢ 𝜑 & ⊢ 𝜓 & ⊢ 𝜒 & ⊢ (𝜑 → (𝜓 → (𝜒 → 𝜃))) ⇒ ⊢ 𝜃 | ||
| Theorem | e00 44874 | Elimination rule identical to mp2 9. The non-virtual deduction form is the virtual deduction form, which is mp2 9. (Contributed by Alan Sare, 14-Jun-2011.) (Proof modification is discouraged.) (New usage is discouraged.) |
| ⊢ 𝜑 & ⊢ 𝜓 & ⊢ (𝜑 → (𝜓 → 𝜒)) ⇒ ⊢ 𝜒 | ||
| Theorem | e00an 44875 | Elimination rule identical to mp2an 692. The non-virtual deduction form is the virtual deduction form, which is mp2an 692. (Contributed by Alan Sare, 15-Jun-2011.) (Proof modification is discouraged.) (New usage is discouraged.) |
| ⊢ 𝜑 & ⊢ 𝜓 & ⊢ ((𝜑 ∧ 𝜓) → 𝜒) ⇒ ⊢ 𝜒 | ||
| Theorem | eel00cT 44876 | An elimination deduction. (Contributed by Alan Sare, 4-Feb-2017.) (Proof modification is discouraged.) (New usage is discouraged.) |
| ⊢ 𝜑 & ⊢ 𝜓 & ⊢ ((𝜑 ∧ 𝜓) → 𝜒) ⇒ ⊢ (⊤ → 𝜒) | ||
| Theorem | eelTT 44877 | An elimination deduction. (Contributed by Alan Sare, 4-Feb-2017.) (Proof modification is discouraged.) (New usage is discouraged.) |
| ⊢ (⊤ → 𝜑) & ⊢ (⊤ → 𝜓) & ⊢ ((𝜑 ∧ 𝜓) → 𝜒) ⇒ ⊢ 𝜒 | ||
| Theorem | e0a 44878 | Elimination rule identical to ax-mp 5. The non-virtual deduction form is the virtual deduction form, which is ax-mp 5. (Contributed by Alan Sare, 14-Jun-2011.) (Proof modification is discouraged.) (New usage is discouraged.) |
| ⊢ 𝜑 & ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝜓) ⇒ ⊢ 𝜓 | ||
| Theorem | eelT 44879 | An elimination deduction. (Contributed by Alan Sare, 5-Feb-2017.) (Proof modification is discouraged.) (New usage is discouraged.) |
| ⊢ (⊤ → 𝜑) & ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝜓) ⇒ ⊢ 𝜓 | ||
| Theorem | eel0cT 44880 | An elimination deduction. (Contributed by Alan Sare, 4-Feb-2017.) (Proof modification is discouraged.) (New usage is discouraged.) |
| ⊢ 𝜑 & ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝜓) ⇒ ⊢ (⊤ → 𝜓) | ||
| Theorem | eelT0 44881 | An elimination deduction. (Contributed by Alan Sare, 4-Feb-2017.) (Proof modification is discouraged.) (New usage is discouraged.) |
| ⊢ (⊤ → 𝜑) & ⊢ 𝜓 & ⊢ ((𝜑 ∧ 𝜓) → 𝜒) ⇒ ⊢ 𝜒 | ||
| Theorem | e0bi 44882 | Elimination rule identical to mpbi 230. The non-virtual deduction form is the virtual deduction form, which is mpbi 230. (Contributed by Alan Sare, 15-Jun-2011.) (Proof modification is discouraged.) (New usage is discouraged.) |
| ⊢ 𝜑 & ⊢ (𝜑 ↔ 𝜓) ⇒ ⊢ 𝜓 | ||
| Theorem | e0bir 44883 | Elimination rule identical to mpbir 231. The non-virtual deduction form is the virtual deduction form, which is mpbir 231. (Contributed by Alan Sare, 15-Jun-2011.) (Proof modification is discouraged.) (New usage is discouraged.) |
| ⊢ 𝜑 & ⊢ (𝜓 ↔ 𝜑) ⇒ ⊢ 𝜓 | ||
| Theorem | uun0.1 44884 | Convention notation form of un0.1 44885. (Contributed by Alan Sare, 23-Apr-2015.) (Proof modification is discouraged.) (New usage is discouraged.) |
| ⊢ (⊤ → 𝜑) & ⊢ (𝜓 → 𝜒) & ⊢ ((⊤ ∧ 𝜓) → 𝜃) ⇒ ⊢ (𝜓 → 𝜃) | ||
| Theorem | un0.1 44885 | ⊤ is the constant true, a tautology (see df-tru 1544). Kleene's "empty conjunction" is logically equivalent to ⊤. In a virtual deduction we shall interpret ⊤ to be the empty wff or the empty collection of virtual hypotheses. ⊤ in a virtual deduction translated into conventional notation we shall interpret to be Kleene's empty conjunction. If 𝜃 is true given the empty collection of virtual hypotheses and another collection of virtual hypotheses, then it is true given only the other collection of virtual hypotheses. (Contributed by Alan Sare, 23-Apr-2015.) (Proof modification is discouraged.) (New usage is discouraged.) |
| ⊢ ( ⊤ ▶ 𝜑 ) & ⊢ ( 𝜓 ▶ 𝜒 ) & ⊢ ( ( ⊤ , 𝜓 ) ▶ 𝜃 ) ⇒ ⊢ ( 𝜓 ▶ 𝜃 ) | ||
| Theorem | uunT1 44886 | A deduction unionizing a non-unionized collection of virtual hypotheses. (Contributed by Alan Sare, 3-Dec-2015.) Proof was revised to accommodate a possible future version of df-tru 1544. (Revised by David A. Wheeler, 8-May-2019.) (Proof modification is discouraged.) (New usage is discouraged.) |
| ⊢ ((⊤ ∧ 𝜑) → 𝜓) ⇒ ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝜓) | ||
| Theorem | uunT1p1 44887 | A deduction unionizing a non-unionized collection of virtual hypotheses. (Contributed by Alan Sare, 4-Feb-2017.) (Proof modification is discouraged.) (New usage is discouraged.) |
| ⊢ ((𝜑 ∧ ⊤) → 𝜓) ⇒ ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝜓) | ||
| Theorem | uunT21 44888 | A deduction unionizing a non-unionized collection of virtual hypotheses. (Contributed by Alan Sare, 3-Dec-2015.) (Proof modification is discouraged.) (New usage is discouraged.) (Proof modification is discouraged.) (New usage is discouraged.) |
| ⊢ ((⊤ ∧ (𝜑 ∧ 𝜓)) → 𝜒) ⇒ ⊢ ((𝜑 ∧ 𝜓) → 𝜒) | ||
| Theorem | uun121 44889 | A deduction unionizing a non-unionized collection of virtual hypotheses. (Contributed by Alan Sare, 4-Feb-2017.) (Proof modification is discouraged.) (New usage is discouraged.) |
| ⊢ ((𝜑 ∧ (𝜑 ∧ 𝜓)) → 𝜒) ⇒ ⊢ ((𝜑 ∧ 𝜓) → 𝜒) | ||
| Theorem | uun121p1 44890 | A deduction unionizing a non-unionized collection of virtual hypotheses. (Contributed by Alan Sare, 4-Feb-2017.) (Proof modification is discouraged.) (New usage is discouraged.) |
| ⊢ (((𝜑 ∧ 𝜓) ∧ 𝜑) → 𝜒) ⇒ ⊢ ((𝜑 ∧ 𝜓) → 𝜒) | ||
| Theorem | uun132 44891 | A deduction unionizing a non-unionized collection of virtual hypotheses. (Contributed by Alan Sare, 4-Feb-2017.) (Proof modification is discouraged.) (New usage is discouraged.) |
| ⊢ ((𝜑 ∧ (𝜓 ∧ 𝜒)) → 𝜃) ⇒ ⊢ ((𝜑 ∧ 𝜓 ∧ 𝜒) → 𝜃) | ||
| Theorem | uun132p1 44892 | A deduction unionizing a non-unionized collection of virtual hypotheses. (Contributed by Alan Sare, 4-Feb-2017.) (Proof modification is discouraged.) (New usage is discouraged.) |
| ⊢ (((𝜓 ∧ 𝜒) ∧ 𝜑) → 𝜃) ⇒ ⊢ ((𝜑 ∧ 𝜓 ∧ 𝜒) → 𝜃) | ||
| Theorem | anabss7p1 44893 | A deduction unionizing a non-unionized collection of virtual hypotheses. This would have been named uun221 if the zeroth permutation did not exist in set.mm as anabss7 673. (Contributed by Alan Sare, 4-Feb-2017.) (Proof modification is discouraged.) (New usage is discouraged.) |
| ⊢ (((𝜓 ∧ 𝜑) ∧ 𝜑) → 𝜒) ⇒ ⊢ ((𝜓 ∧ 𝜑) → 𝜒) | ||
| Theorem | un10 44894 | A unionizing deduction. (Contributed by Alan Sare, 28-Apr-2015.) (Proof modification is discouraged.) (New usage is discouraged.) |
| ⊢ ( ( 𝜑 , ⊤ ) ▶ 𝜓 ) ⇒ ⊢ ( 𝜑 ▶ 𝜓 ) | ||
| Theorem | un01 44895 | A unionizing deduction. (Contributed by Alan Sare, 28-Apr-2015.) (Proof modification is discouraged.) (New usage is discouraged.) |
| ⊢ ( ( ⊤ , 𝜑 ) ▶ 𝜓 ) ⇒ ⊢ ( 𝜑 ▶ 𝜓 ) | ||
| Theorem | un2122 44896 | A deduction unionizing a non-unionized collection of virtual hypotheses. (Contributed by Alan Sare, 3-Dec-2015.) (Proof modification is discouraged.) (New usage is discouraged.) |
| ⊢ (((𝜑 ∧ 𝜓) ∧ 𝜓 ∧ 𝜓) → 𝜒) ⇒ ⊢ ((𝜑 ∧ 𝜓) → 𝜒) | ||
| Theorem | uun2131 44897 | A deduction unionizing a non-unionized collection of virtual hypotheses. (Contributed by Alan Sare, 4-Feb-2017.) (Proof modification is discouraged.) (New usage is discouraged.) |
| ⊢ (((𝜑 ∧ 𝜓) ∧ (𝜑 ∧ 𝜒)) → 𝜃) ⇒ ⊢ ((𝜑 ∧ 𝜓 ∧ 𝜒) → 𝜃) | ||
| Theorem | uun2131p1 44898 | A deduction unionizing a non-unionized collection of virtual hypotheses. (Contributed by Alan Sare, 4-Feb-2017.) (Proof modification is discouraged.) (New usage is discouraged.) |
| ⊢ (((𝜑 ∧ 𝜒) ∧ (𝜑 ∧ 𝜓)) → 𝜃) ⇒ ⊢ ((𝜑 ∧ 𝜓 ∧ 𝜒) → 𝜃) | ||
| Theorem | uunTT1 44899 | A deduction unionizing a non-unionized collection of virtual hypotheses. (Contributed by Alan Sare, 4-Feb-2017.) (Proof modification is discouraged.) (New usage is discouraged.) |
| ⊢ ((⊤ ∧ ⊤ ∧ 𝜑) → 𝜓) ⇒ ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝜓) | ||
| Theorem | uunTT1p1 44900 | A deduction unionizing a non-unionized collection of virtual hypotheses. (Contributed by Alan Sare, 4-Feb-2017.) (Proof modification is discouraged.) (New usage is discouraged.) |
| ⊢ ((⊤ ∧ 𝜑 ∧ ⊤) → 𝜓) ⇒ ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝜓) | ||
| < Previous Next > |
| Copyright terms: Public domain | < Previous Next > |