Theorem List for Metamath Proof Explorer - 44801-44900 *Has distinct variable
group(s)
| Type | Label | Description |
|---|
| Statement |
|---|
| |
| Theorem | snssl 44801 |
If a singleton is a subclass of another class, then the singleton's
element is an element of that other class. This theorem is the
right-to-left implication of the biconditional snss 4810.
The proof of
this theorem was automatically generated from snsslVD 44800 using a tools
command file, translateMWO.cmd, by translating the proof into its
non-virtual deduction form and minimizing it. (Contributed by Alan
Sare, 25-Aug-2011.) (Proof modification is discouraged.)
(New usage is discouraged.)
|
| ⊢ 𝐴 ∈
V ⇒ ⊢ ({𝐴} ⊆ 𝐵 → 𝐴 ∈ 𝐵) |
| |
| Theorem | snelpwrVD 44802 |
Virtual deduction proof of snelpwi 5463. (Contributed by Alan Sare,
25-Aug-2011.) (Proof modification is discouraged.)
(New usage is discouraged.)
|
| ⊢ (𝐴 ∈ 𝐵 → {𝐴} ∈ 𝒫 𝐵) |
| |
| Theorem | unipwrVD 44803 |
Virtual deduction proof of unipwr 44804. (Contributed by Alan Sare,
25-Aug-2011.) (Proof modification is discouraged.)
(New usage is discouraged.)
|
| ⊢ 𝐴 ⊆ ∪ 𝒫 𝐴 |
| |
| Theorem | unipwr 44804 |
A class is a subclass of the union of its power class. This theorem is
the right-to-left subclass lemma of unipw 5470. The proof of this theorem
was automatically generated from unipwrVD 44803 using a tools command file ,
translateMWO.cmd , by translating the proof into its non-virtual
deduction form and minimizing it. (Contributed by Alan Sare,
25-Aug-2011.) (Proof modification is discouraged.)
(New usage is discouraged.)
|
| ⊢ 𝐴 ⊆ ∪ 𝒫 𝐴 |
| |
| Theorem | sstrALT2VD 44805 |
Virtual deduction proof of sstrALT2 44806. (Contributed by Alan Sare,
11-Sep-2011.) (Proof modification is discouraged.)
(New usage is discouraged.)
|
| ⊢ ((𝐴 ⊆ 𝐵 ∧ 𝐵 ⊆ 𝐶) → 𝐴 ⊆ 𝐶) |
| |
| Theorem | sstrALT2 44806 |
Virtual deduction proof of sstr 4017, transitivity of subclasses, Theorem
6 of [Suppes] p. 23. This theorem was
automatically generated from
sstrALT2VD 44805 using the command file
translate_without_overwriting.cmd . It was not minimized because the
automated minimization excluding duplicates generates a minimized proof
which, although not directly containing any duplicates, indirectly
contains a duplicate. That is, the trace back of the minimized proof
contains a duplicate. This is undesirable because some step(s) of the
minimized proof use the proven theorem. (Contributed by Alan Sare,
11-Sep-2011.) (Proof modification is discouraged.)
(New usage is discouraged.)
|
| ⊢ ((𝐴 ⊆ 𝐵 ∧ 𝐵 ⊆ 𝐶) → 𝐴 ⊆ 𝐶) |
| |
| Theorem | suctrALT2VD 44807 |
Virtual deduction proof of suctrALT2 44808. (Contributed by Alan Sare,
11-Sep-2011.) (Proof modification is discouraged.)
(New usage is discouraged.)
|
| ⊢ (Tr 𝐴 → Tr suc 𝐴) |
| |
| Theorem | suctrALT2 44808 |
Virtual deduction proof of suctr 6481. The successor of a transitive
class is transitive. This proof was generated automatically from the
virtual deduction proof suctrALT2VD 44807 using the tools command file
translate_without_overwriting_minimize_excluding_duplicates.cmd .
(Contributed by Alan Sare, 11-Sep-2011.)
(Proof modification is discouraged.) (New usage is discouraged.)
|
| ⊢ (Tr 𝐴 → Tr suc 𝐴) |
| |
| Theorem | elex2VD 44809* |
Virtual deduction proof of elex2 2821. (Contributed by Alan Sare,
25-Sep-2011.) (Proof modification is discouraged.)
(New usage is discouraged.)
|
| ⊢ (𝐴 ∈ 𝐵 → ∃𝑥 𝑥 ∈ 𝐵) |
| |
| Theorem | elex22VD 44810* |
Virtual deduction proof of elex22 3514. (Contributed by Alan Sare,
24-Oct-2011.) (Proof modification is discouraged.)
(New usage is discouraged.)
|
| ⊢ ((𝐴 ∈ 𝐵 ∧ 𝐴 ∈ 𝐶) → ∃𝑥(𝑥 ∈ 𝐵 ∧ 𝑥 ∈ 𝐶)) |
| |
| Theorem | eqsbc2VD 44811* |
Virtual deduction proof of eqsbc2 3873. (Contributed by Alan Sare,
24-Oct-2011.) (Proof modification is discouraged.)
(New usage is discouraged.)
|
| ⊢ (𝐴 ∈ 𝐵 → ([𝐴 / 𝑥]𝐶 = 𝑥 ↔ 𝐶 = 𝐴)) |
| |
| Theorem | zfregs2VD 44812* |
Virtual deduction proof of zfregs2 9802. (Contributed by Alan Sare,
24-Oct-2011.) (Proof modification is discouraged.)
(New usage is discouraged.)
|
| ⊢ (𝐴 ≠ ∅ → ¬
∀𝑥 ∈ 𝐴 ∃𝑦(𝑦 ∈ 𝐴 ∧ 𝑦 ∈ 𝑥)) |
| |
| Theorem | tpid3gVD 44813 |
Virtual deduction proof of tpid3g 4797. (Contributed by Alan Sare,
24-Oct-2011.) (Proof modification is discouraged.)
(New usage is discouraged.)
|
| ⊢ (𝐴 ∈ 𝐵 → 𝐴 ∈ {𝐶, 𝐷, 𝐴}) |
| |
| Theorem | en3lplem1VD 44814* |
Virtual deduction proof of en3lplem1 9681. (Contributed by Alan Sare,
24-Oct-2011.) (Proof modification is discouraged.)
(New usage is discouraged.)
|
| ⊢ ((𝐴 ∈ 𝐵 ∧ 𝐵 ∈ 𝐶 ∧ 𝐶 ∈ 𝐴) → (𝑥 = 𝐴 → ∃𝑦(𝑦 ∈ {𝐴, 𝐵, 𝐶} ∧ 𝑦 ∈ 𝑥))) |
| |
| Theorem | en3lplem2VD 44815* |
Virtual deduction proof of en3lplem2 9682. (Contributed by Alan Sare,
24-Oct-2011.) (Proof modification is discouraged.)
(New usage is discouraged.)
|
| ⊢ ((𝐴 ∈ 𝐵 ∧ 𝐵 ∈ 𝐶 ∧ 𝐶 ∈ 𝐴) → (𝑥 ∈ {𝐴, 𝐵, 𝐶} → ∃𝑦(𝑦 ∈ {𝐴, 𝐵, 𝐶} ∧ 𝑦 ∈ 𝑥))) |
| |
| Theorem | en3lpVD 44816 |
Virtual deduction proof of en3lp 9683. (Contributed by Alan Sare,
24-Oct-2011.) (Proof modification is discouraged.)
(New usage is discouraged.)
|
| ⊢ ¬ (𝐴 ∈ 𝐵 ∧ 𝐵 ∈ 𝐶 ∧ 𝐶 ∈ 𝐴) |
| |
| 21.41.7 Theorems proved using Virtual Deduction
with mmj2 assistance
|
| |
| Theorem | simplbi2VD 44817 |
Virtual deduction proof of simplbi2 500. The following user's proof is
completed by invoking mmj2's unify command and using mmj2's StepSelector
to pick all remaining steps of the Metamath proof.
| h1:: | ⊢ (𝜑 ↔ (𝜓 ∧ 𝜒))
| | 3:1,?: e0a 44743 | ⊢ ((𝜓 ∧ 𝜒) → 𝜑)
| | qed:3,?: e0a 44743 | ⊢ (𝜓 → (𝜒 → 𝜑))
|
The proof of simplbi2 500 was automatically derived from it.
(Contributed by Alan Sare, 31-Dec-2011.) (Proof modification is
discouraged.) (New usage is discouraged.)
|
| ⊢ (𝜑 ↔ (𝜓 ∧ 𝜒)) ⇒ ⊢ (𝜓 → (𝜒 → 𝜑)) |
| |
| Theorem | 3ornot23VD 44818 |
Virtual deduction proof of 3ornot23 44480. The following user's proof is
completed by invoking mmj2's unify command and using mmj2's StepSelector
to pick all remaining steps of the Metamath proof.
| 1:: | ⊢ ( (¬ 𝜑 ∧ ¬ 𝜓) ▶ (¬ 𝜑
∧ ¬ 𝜓) )
| | 2:: | ⊢ ( (¬ 𝜑 ∧ ¬ 𝜓) , (𝜒 ∨ 𝜑
∨ 𝜓) ▶ (𝜒 ∨ 𝜑 ∨ 𝜓) )
| | 3:1,?: e1a 44598 | ⊢ ( (¬ 𝜑 ∧ ¬ 𝜓) ▶ ¬ 𝜑 )
| | 4:1,?: e1a 44598 | ⊢ ( (¬ 𝜑 ∧ ¬ 𝜓) ▶ ¬ 𝜓 )
| | 5:3,4,?: e11 44659 | ⊢ ( (¬ 𝜑 ∧ ¬ 𝜓) ▶ ¬ (𝜑
∨ 𝜓) )
| | 6:2,?: e2 44602 | ⊢ ( (¬ 𝜑 ∧ ¬ 𝜓) , (𝜒 ∨ 𝜑
∨ 𝜓) ▶ (𝜒 ∨ (𝜑 ∨ 𝜓)) )
| | 7:5,6,?: e12 44695 | ⊢ ( (¬ 𝜑 ∧ ¬ 𝜓) , (𝜒 ∨ 𝜑
∨ 𝜓) ▶ 𝜒 )
| | 8:7: | ⊢ ( (¬ 𝜑 ∧ ¬ 𝜓) ▶ ((𝜒
∨ 𝜑 ∨ 𝜓) → 𝜒) )
| | qed:8: | ⊢ ((¬ 𝜑 ∧ ¬ 𝜓) → ((𝜒
∨ 𝜑 ∨ 𝜓) → 𝜒))
|
(Contributed by Alan Sare, 31-Dec-2011.)
(Proof modification is discouraged.) (New usage is discouraged.)
|
| ⊢ ((¬ 𝜑 ∧ ¬ 𝜓) → ((𝜒 ∨ 𝜑 ∨ 𝜓) → 𝜒)) |
| |
| Theorem | orbi1rVD 44819 |
Virtual deduction proof of orbi1r 44481. The following user's proof is
completed by invoking mmj2's unify command and using mmj2's StepSelector
to pick all remaining steps of the Metamath proof.
| 1:: | ⊢ ( (𝜑 ↔ 𝜓) ▶ (𝜑 ↔ 𝜓) )
| | 2:: | ⊢ ( (𝜑 ↔ 𝜓) , (𝜒 ∨ 𝜑)
▶ (𝜒 ∨ 𝜑) )
| | 3:2,?: e2 44602 | ⊢ ( (𝜑 ↔ 𝜓) , (𝜒 ∨ 𝜑)
▶ (𝜑 ∨ 𝜒) )
| | 4:1,3,?: e12 44695 | ⊢ ( (𝜑 ↔ 𝜓) , (𝜒 ∨ 𝜑)
▶ (𝜓 ∨ 𝜒) )
| | 5:4,?: e2 44602 | ⊢ ( (𝜑 ↔ 𝜓) , (𝜒 ∨ 𝜑)
▶ (𝜒 ∨ 𝜓) )
| | 6:5: | ⊢ ( (𝜑 ↔ 𝜓) ▶ ((𝜒 ∨ 𝜑)
→ (𝜒 ∨ 𝜓)) )
| | 7:: | ⊢ ( (𝜑 ↔ 𝜓) , (𝜒 ∨ 𝜓)
▶ (𝜒 ∨ 𝜓) )
| | 8:7,?: e2 44602 | ⊢ ( (𝜑 ↔ 𝜓) , (𝜒 ∨ 𝜓)
▶ (𝜓 ∨ 𝜒) )
| | 9:1,8,?: e12 44695 | ⊢ ( (𝜑 ↔ 𝜓) , (𝜒 ∨ 𝜓)
▶ (𝜑 ∨ 𝜒) )
| | 10:9,?: e2 44602 | ⊢ ( (𝜑 ↔ 𝜓) , (𝜒 ∨ 𝜓)
▶ (𝜒 ∨ 𝜑) )
| | 11:10: | ⊢ ( (𝜑 ↔ 𝜓) ▶ ((𝜒 ∨ 𝜓)
→ (𝜒 ∨ 𝜑)) )
| | 12:6,11,?: e11 44659 | ⊢ ( (𝜑 ↔ 𝜓) ▶ ((𝜒
∨ 𝜑) ↔ (𝜒 ∨ 𝜓)) )
| | qed:12: | ⊢ ((𝜑 ↔ 𝜓) → ((𝜒 ∨ 𝜑)
↔ (𝜒 ∨ 𝜓)))
|
(Contributed by Alan Sare, 31-Dec-2011.)
(Proof modification is discouraged.) (New usage is discouraged.)
|
| ⊢ ((𝜑 ↔ 𝜓) → ((𝜒 ∨ 𝜑) ↔ (𝜒 ∨ 𝜓))) |
| |
| Theorem | bitr3VD 44820 |
Virtual deduction proof of bitr3 352. The following user's proof is
completed by invoking mmj2's unify command and using mmj2's StepSelector
to pick all remaining steps of the Metamath proof.
| 1:: | ⊢ ( (𝜑 ↔ 𝜓) ▶ (𝜑
↔ 𝜓) )
| | 2:1,?: e1a 44598 | ⊢ ( (𝜑 ↔ 𝜓) ▶ (𝜓
↔ 𝜑) )
| | 3:: | ⊢ ( (𝜑 ↔ 𝜓) , (𝜑 ↔ 𝜒)
▶ (𝜑 ↔ 𝜒) )
| | 4:3,?: e2 44602 | ⊢ ( (𝜑 ↔ 𝜓) , (𝜑 ↔ 𝜒)
▶ (𝜒 ↔ 𝜑) )
| | 5:2,4,?: e12 44695 | ⊢ ( (𝜑 ↔ 𝜓) , (𝜑 ↔ 𝜒)
▶ (𝜓 ↔ 𝜒) )
| | 6:5: | ⊢ ( (𝜑 ↔ 𝜓) ▶ ((𝜑
↔ 𝜒) → (𝜓 ↔ 𝜒)) )
| | qed:6: | ⊢ ((𝜑 ↔ 𝜓) → ((𝜑 ↔ 𝜒)
→ (𝜓 ↔ 𝜒)))
|
(Contributed by Alan Sare, 31-Dec-2011.)
(Proof modification is discouraged.) (New usage is discouraged.)
|
| ⊢ ((𝜑 ↔ 𝜓) → ((𝜑 ↔ 𝜒) → (𝜓 ↔ 𝜒))) |
| |
| Theorem | 3orbi123VD 44821 |
Virtual deduction proof of 3orbi123 44482. The following user's proof is
completed by invoking mmj2's unify command and using mmj2's StepSelector
to pick all remaining steps of the Metamath proof.
| 1:: | ⊢ ( ((𝜑 ↔ 𝜓) ∧ (𝜒 ↔ 𝜃)
∧ (𝜏 ↔ 𝜂)) ▶ ((𝜑 ↔ 𝜓) ∧ (𝜒 ↔ 𝜃) ∧
(𝜏 ↔ 𝜂)) )
| | 2:1,?: e1a 44598 | ⊢ ( ((𝜑 ↔ 𝜓) ∧ (𝜒 ↔ 𝜃)
∧ (𝜏 ↔ 𝜂)) ▶ (𝜑 ↔ 𝜓) )
| | 3:1,?: e1a 44598 | ⊢ ( ((𝜑 ↔ 𝜓) ∧ (𝜒 ↔ 𝜃)
∧ (𝜏 ↔ 𝜂)) ▶ (𝜒 ↔ 𝜃) )
| | 4:1,?: e1a 44598 | ⊢ ( ((𝜑 ↔ 𝜓) ∧ (𝜒 ↔ 𝜃)
∧ (𝜏 ↔ 𝜂)) ▶ (𝜏 ↔ 𝜂) )
| | 5:2,3,?: e11 44659 | ⊢ ( ((𝜑 ↔ 𝜓) ∧ (𝜒 ↔ 𝜃)
∧ (𝜏 ↔ 𝜂)) ▶ ((𝜑 ∨ 𝜒) ↔ (𝜓 ∨ 𝜃)) )
| | 6:5,4,?: e11 44659 | ⊢ ( ((𝜑 ↔ 𝜓) ∧ (𝜒 ↔ 𝜃)
∧ (𝜏 ↔ 𝜂)) ▶ (((𝜑 ∨ 𝜒) ∨ 𝜏) ↔ ((𝜓 ∨ 𝜃)
∨ 𝜂)) )
| | 7:?: | ⊢ (((𝜑 ∨ 𝜒) ∨ 𝜏) ↔ (𝜑
∨ 𝜒 ∨ 𝜏))
| | 8:6,7,?: e10 44665 | ⊢ ( ((𝜑 ↔ 𝜓) ∧ (𝜒 ↔ 𝜃)
∧ (𝜏 ↔ 𝜂)) ▶ ((𝜑 ∨ 𝜒 ∨ 𝜏) ↔ ((𝜓 ∨ 𝜃)
∨ 𝜂)) )
| | 9:?: | ⊢ (((𝜓 ∨ 𝜃) ∨ 𝜂) ↔
(𝜓 ∨ 𝜃 ∨ 𝜂))
| | 10:8,9,?: e10 44665 | ⊢ ( ((𝜑 ↔ 𝜓) ∧ (𝜒
↔ 𝜃) ∧ (𝜏 ↔ 𝜂)) ▶ ((𝜑 ∨ 𝜒 ∨ 𝜏) ↔ (𝜓 ∨
𝜃 ∨ 𝜂)) )
| | qed:10: | ⊢ (((𝜑 ↔ 𝜓) ∧ (𝜒 ↔ 𝜃)
∧ (𝜏 ↔ 𝜂)) → ((𝜑 ∨ 𝜒 ∨ 𝜏) ↔ (𝜓 ∨ 𝜃
∨ 𝜂)))
|
(Contributed by Alan Sare, 31-Dec-2011.)
(Proof modification is discouraged.) (New usage is discouraged.)
|
| ⊢ (((𝜑 ↔ 𝜓) ∧ (𝜒 ↔ 𝜃) ∧ (𝜏 ↔ 𝜂)) → ((𝜑 ∨ 𝜒 ∨ 𝜏) ↔ (𝜓 ∨ 𝜃 ∨ 𝜂))) |
| |
| Theorem | sbc3orgVD 44822 |
Virtual deduction proof of the analogue of sbcor 3858 with three disjuncts.
The following user's proof is
completed by invoking mmj2's unify command and using mmj2's StepSelector
to pick all remaining steps of the Metamath proof.
| 1:: | ⊢ ( 𝐴 ∈ 𝐵 ▶ 𝐴 ∈ 𝐵 )
| | 2:1,?: e1a 44598 | ⊢ ( 𝐴 ∈ 𝐵 ▶ ([𝐴 / 𝑥]((𝜑
∨ 𝜓) ∨ 𝜒) ↔ ([𝐴 / 𝑥](𝜑 ∨ 𝜓)
∨ [𝐴 / 𝑥]𝜒)) )
| | 3:: | ⊢ (((𝜑 ∨ 𝜓) ∨ 𝜒) ↔ (𝜑
∨ 𝜓 ∨ 𝜒))
| | 32:3: | ⊢ ∀𝑥(((𝜑 ∨ 𝜓) ∨ 𝜒)
↔ (𝜑 ∨ 𝜓 ∨ 𝜒))
| | 33:1,32,?: e10 44665 | ⊢ ( 𝐴 ∈ 𝐵 ▶ [𝐴 / 𝑥](((𝜑
∨ 𝜓) ∨ 𝜒) ↔ (𝜑 ∨ 𝜓 ∨ 𝜒)) )
| | 4:1,33,?: e11 44659 | ⊢ ( 𝐴 ∈ 𝐵 ▶ ([𝐴 / 𝑥]((𝜑
∨ 𝜓) ∨ 𝜒) ↔ [𝐴 / 𝑥](𝜑 ∨ 𝜓 ∨ 𝜒)) )
| | 5:2,4,?: e11 44659 | ⊢ ( 𝐴 ∈ 𝐵 ▶ ([𝐴 / 𝑥](𝜑
∨ 𝜓 ∨ 𝜒) ↔ ([𝐴 / 𝑥](𝜑 ∨ 𝜓) ∨ [𝐴 / 𝑥]𝜒)) )
| | 6:1,?: e1a 44598 | ⊢ ( 𝐴 ∈ 𝐵 ▶ ([𝐴 / 𝑥](𝜑
∨ 𝜓) ↔ ([𝐴 / 𝑥]𝜑 ∨ [𝐴 / 𝑥]𝜓)) )
| | 7:6,?: e1a 44598 | ⊢ ( 𝐴 ∈ 𝐵 ▶ (([𝐴 / 𝑥](𝜑
∨ 𝜓) ∨ [𝐴 / 𝑥]𝜒) ↔ (([𝐴 / 𝑥]𝜑 ∨ [𝐴 / 𝑥]𝜓)
∨ [𝐴 / 𝑥]𝜒)) )
| | 8:5,7,?: e11 44659 | ⊢ ( 𝐴 ∈ 𝐵 ▶ ([𝐴 / 𝑥](𝜑
∨ 𝜓 ∨ 𝜒) ↔ (([𝐴 / 𝑥]𝜑 ∨ [𝐴 / 𝑥]𝜓)
∨ [𝐴 / 𝑥]𝜒)) )
| | 9:?: | ⊢ ((([𝐴 / 𝑥]𝜑
∨ [𝐴 / 𝑥]𝜓) ∨ [𝐴 / 𝑥]𝜒) ↔ ([𝐴 / 𝑥]𝜑
∨ [𝐴 / 𝑥]𝜓 ∨ [𝐴 / 𝑥]𝜒))
| | 10:8,9,?: e10 44665 | ⊢ ( 𝐴 ∈ 𝐵 ▶ ([𝐴 / 𝑥](𝜑
∨ 𝜓 ∨ 𝜒) ↔ ([𝐴 / 𝑥]𝜑 ∨ [𝐴 / 𝑥]𝜓
∨ [𝐴 / 𝑥]𝜒)) )
| | qed:10: | ⊢ (𝐴 ∈ 𝐵 → ([𝐴 / 𝑥](𝜑
∨ 𝜓 ∨ 𝜒) ↔ ([𝐴 / 𝑥]𝜑 ∨ [𝐴 / 𝑥]𝜓
∨ [𝐴 / 𝑥]𝜒)))
|
(Contributed by Alan Sare, 31-Dec-2011.) (Proof modification is
discouraged.) (New usage is discouraged.)
|
| ⊢ (𝐴 ∈ 𝐵 → ([𝐴 / 𝑥](𝜑 ∨ 𝜓 ∨ 𝜒) ↔ ([𝐴 / 𝑥]𝜑 ∨ [𝐴 / 𝑥]𝜓 ∨ [𝐴 / 𝑥]𝜒))) |
| |
| Theorem | 19.21a3con13vVD 44823* |
Virtual deduction proof of alrim3con13v 44504. The following user's
proof is completed by invoking mmj2's unify command and using mmj2's
StepSelector to pick all remaining steps of the Metamath proof.
| 1:: | ⊢ ( (𝜑 → ∀𝑥𝜑)
▶ (𝜑 → ∀𝑥𝜑) )
| | 2:: | ⊢ ( (𝜑 → ∀𝑥𝜑) , (𝜓 ∧ 𝜑
∧ 𝜒) ▶ (𝜓 ∧ 𝜑 ∧ 𝜒) )
| | 3:2,?: e2 44602 | ⊢ ( (𝜑 → ∀𝑥𝜑) , (𝜓
∧ 𝜑 ∧ 𝜒) ▶ 𝜓 )
| | 4:2,?: e2 44602 | ⊢ ( (𝜑 → ∀𝑥𝜑) , (𝜓
∧ 𝜑 ∧ 𝜒) ▶ 𝜑 )
| | 5:2,?: e2 44602 | ⊢ ( (𝜑 → ∀𝑥𝜑) , (𝜓
∧ 𝜑 ∧ 𝜒) ▶ 𝜒 )
| | 6:1,4,?: e12 44695 | ⊢ ( (𝜑 → ∀𝑥𝜑) , (𝜓
∧ 𝜑 ∧ 𝜒) ▶ ∀𝑥𝜑 )
| | 7:3,?: e2 44602 | ⊢ ( (𝜑 → ∀𝑥𝜑) , (𝜓
∧ 𝜑 ∧ 𝜒) ▶ ∀𝑥𝜓 )
| | 8:5,?: e2 44602 | ⊢ ( (𝜑 → ∀𝑥𝜑) , (𝜓
∧ 𝜑 ∧ 𝜒) ▶ ∀𝑥𝜒 )
| | 9:7,6,8,?: e222 44607 | ⊢ ( (𝜑 → ∀𝑥𝜑) , (𝜓
∧ 𝜑 ∧ 𝜒) ▶ (∀𝑥𝜓 ∧ ∀𝑥𝜑 ∧ ∀𝑥𝜒) )
| | 10:9,?: e2 44602 | ⊢ ( (𝜑 → ∀𝑥𝜑) , (𝜓
∧ 𝜑 ∧ 𝜒) ▶ ∀𝑥(𝜓 ∧ 𝜑 ∧ 𝜒) )
| | 11:10:in2 | ⊢ ( (𝜑 → ∀𝑥𝜑) ▶ ((𝜓
∧ 𝜑 ∧ 𝜒) → ∀𝑥(𝜓 ∧ 𝜑 ∧ 𝜒)) )
| | qed:11:in1 | ⊢ ((𝜑 → ∀𝑥𝜑) → ((𝜓
∧ 𝜑 ∧ 𝜒) → ∀𝑥(𝜓 ∧ 𝜑 ∧ 𝜒)))
|
(Contributed by Alan Sare, 31-Dec-2011.) (Proof modification is
discouraged.) (New usage is discouraged.)
|
| ⊢ ((𝜑 → ∀𝑥𝜑) → ((𝜓 ∧ 𝜑 ∧ 𝜒) → ∀𝑥(𝜓 ∧ 𝜑 ∧ 𝜒))) |
| |
| Theorem | exbirVD 44824 |
Virtual deduction proof of exbir 44449. The following user's proof is
completed by invoking mmj2's unify command and using mmj2's StepSelector
to pick all remaining steps of the Metamath proof.
| 1:: | ⊢ ( ((𝜑 ∧ 𝜓) → (𝜒 ↔ 𝜃))
▶ ((𝜑 ∧ 𝜓) → (𝜒 ↔ 𝜃)) )
| | 2:: | ⊢ ( ((𝜑 ∧ 𝜓) → (𝜒 ↔ 𝜃)) ,
(𝜑 ∧ 𝜓) ▶ (𝜑 ∧ 𝜓) )
| | 3:: | ⊢ ( ((𝜑 ∧ 𝜓) → (𝜒 ↔ 𝜃)) ,
(𝜑 ∧ 𝜓), 𝜃 ▶ 𝜃 )
| | 5:1,2,?: e12 44695 | ⊢ ( ((𝜑 ∧ 𝜓) → (𝜒
↔ 𝜃)), (𝜑 ∧ 𝜓) ▶ (𝜒 ↔ 𝜃) )
| | 6:3,5,?: e32 44729 | ⊢ ( ((𝜑 ∧ 𝜓) → (𝜒
↔ 𝜃)), (𝜑 ∧ 𝜓), 𝜃 ▶ 𝜒 )
| | 7:6: | ⊢ ( ((𝜑 ∧ 𝜓) → (𝜒
↔ 𝜃)), (𝜑 ∧ 𝜓) ▶ (𝜃 → 𝜒) )
| | 8:7: | ⊢ ( ((𝜑 ∧ 𝜓) → (𝜒 ↔ 𝜃))
▶ ((𝜑 ∧ 𝜓) → (𝜃 → 𝜒)) )
| | 9:8,?: e1a 44598 | ⊢ ( ((𝜑 ∧ 𝜓) → (𝜒
↔ 𝜃)) ▶ (𝜑 → (𝜓 → (𝜃 → 𝜒))) )
| | qed:9: | ⊢ (((𝜑 ∧ 𝜓) → (𝜒 ↔ 𝜃))
→ (𝜑 → (𝜓 → (𝜃 → 𝜒))))
|
(Contributed by Alan Sare, 13-Dec-2011.)
(Proof modification is discouraged.) (New usage is discouraged.)
|
| ⊢ (((𝜑 ∧ 𝜓) → (𝜒 ↔ 𝜃)) → (𝜑 → (𝜓 → (𝜃 → 𝜒)))) |
| |
| Theorem | exbiriVD 44825 |
Virtual deduction proof of exbiri 810. The following user's proof is
completed by invoking mmj2's unify command and using mmj2's StepSelector
to pick all remaining steps of the Metamath proof.
| h1:: | ⊢ ((𝜑 ∧ 𝜓) → (𝜒 ↔ 𝜃))
| | 2:: | ⊢ ( 𝜑 ▶ 𝜑 )
| | 3:: | ⊢ ( 𝜑 , 𝜓 ▶ 𝜓 )
| | 4:: | ⊢ ( 𝜑 , 𝜓 , 𝜃 ▶ 𝜃 )
| | 5:2,1,?: e10 44665 | ⊢ ( 𝜑 ▶ (𝜓 → (𝜒 ↔ 𝜃)) )
| | 6:3,5,?: e21 44701 | ⊢ ( 𝜑 , 𝜓 ▶ (𝜒 ↔ 𝜃) )
| | 7:4,6,?: e32 44729 | ⊢ ( 𝜑 , 𝜓 , 𝜃 ▶ 𝜒 )
| | 8:7: | ⊢ ( 𝜑 , 𝜓 ▶ (𝜃 → 𝜒) )
| | 9:8: | ⊢ ( 𝜑 ▶ (𝜓 → (𝜃 → 𝜒)) )
| | qed:9: | ⊢ (𝜑 → (𝜓 → (𝜃 → 𝜒)))
|
(Contributed by Alan Sare, 31-Dec-2011.) (Proof modification is
discouraged.) (New usage is discouraged.)
|
| ⊢ ((𝜑 ∧ 𝜓) → (𝜒 ↔ 𝜃)) ⇒ ⊢ (𝜑 → (𝜓 → (𝜃 → 𝜒))) |
| |
| Theorem | rspsbc2VD 44826* |
Virtual deduction proof of rspsbc2 44505. The following user's proof is
completed by invoking mmj2's unify command and using mmj2's StepSelector
to pick all remaining steps of the Metamath proof.
| 1:: | ⊢ ( 𝐴 ∈ 𝐵 ▶ 𝐴 ∈ 𝐵 )
| | 2:: | ⊢ ( 𝐴 ∈ 𝐵 , 𝐶 ∈ 𝐷 ▶ 𝐶 ∈ 𝐷 )
| | 3:: | ⊢ ( 𝐴 ∈ 𝐵 , 𝐶 ∈ 𝐷 , ∀𝑥 ∈ 𝐵
∀𝑦 ∈ 𝐷𝜑 ▶ ∀𝑥 ∈ 𝐵∀𝑦 ∈ 𝐷𝜑 )
| | 4:1,3,?: e13 44719 | ⊢ ( 𝐴 ∈ 𝐵 , 𝐶 ∈ 𝐷 , ∀𝑥 ∈ 𝐵
∀𝑦 ∈ 𝐷𝜑 ▶ [𝐴 / 𝑥]∀𝑦 ∈ 𝐷𝜑 )
| | 5:1,4,?: e13 44719 | ⊢ ( 𝐴 ∈ 𝐵 , 𝐶 ∈ 𝐷 , ∀𝑥 ∈ 𝐵
∀𝑦 ∈ 𝐷𝜑 ▶ ∀𝑦 ∈ 𝐷[𝐴 / 𝑥]𝜑 )
| | 6:2,5,?: e23 44726 | ⊢ ( 𝐴 ∈ 𝐵 , 𝐶 ∈ 𝐷 , ∀𝑥 ∈ 𝐵
∀𝑦 ∈ 𝐷𝜑 ▶ [𝐶 / 𝑦][𝐴 / 𝑥]𝜑 )
| | 7:6: | ⊢ ( 𝐴 ∈ 𝐵 , 𝐶 ∈ 𝐷 ▶ (∀𝑥 ∈ 𝐵
∀𝑦 ∈ 𝐷𝜑 → [𝐶 / 𝑦][𝐴 / 𝑥]𝜑) )
| | 8:7: | ⊢ ( 𝐴 ∈ 𝐵 ▶ (𝐶 ∈ 𝐷
→ (∀𝑥 ∈ 𝐵∀𝑦 ∈ 𝐷𝜑 → [𝐶 / 𝑦][𝐴 / 𝑥]𝜑)) )
| | qed:8: | ⊢ (𝐴 ∈ 𝐵 → (𝐶 ∈ 𝐷
→ (∀𝑥 ∈ 𝐵∀𝑦 ∈ 𝐷𝜑 → [𝐶 / 𝑦][𝐴 / 𝑥]𝜑)))
|
(Contributed by Alan Sare, 31-Dec-2011.) (Proof modification is
discouraged.) (New usage is discouraged.)
|
| ⊢ (𝐴 ∈ 𝐵 → (𝐶 ∈ 𝐷 → (∀𝑥 ∈ 𝐵 ∀𝑦 ∈ 𝐷 𝜑 → [𝐶 / 𝑦][𝐴 / 𝑥]𝜑))) |
| |
| Theorem | 3impexpVD 44827 |
Virtual deduction proof of 3impexp 1358. The following user's proof is
completed by invoking mmj2's unify command and using mmj2's StepSelector
to pick all remaining steps of the Metamath proof.
| 1:: | ⊢ ( ((𝜑 ∧ 𝜓 ∧ 𝜒)
→ 𝜃) ▶ ((𝜑 ∧ 𝜓 ∧ 𝜒) → 𝜃) )
| | 2:: | ⊢ ((𝜑 ∧ 𝜓 ∧ 𝜒)
↔ ((𝜑 ∧ 𝜓) ∧ 𝜒))
| | 3:1,2,?: e10 44665 | ⊢ ( ((𝜑 ∧ 𝜓 ∧ 𝜒)
→ 𝜃) ▶ (((𝜑 ∧ 𝜓) ∧ 𝜒) → 𝜃) )
| | 4:3,?: e1a 44598 | ⊢ ( ((𝜑 ∧ 𝜓 ∧ 𝜒)
→ 𝜃) ▶ ((𝜑 ∧ 𝜓) → (𝜒 → 𝜃)) )
| | 5:4,?: e1a 44598 | ⊢ ( ((𝜑 ∧ 𝜓 ∧ 𝜒)
→ 𝜃) ▶ (𝜑 → (𝜓 → (𝜒 → 𝜃))) )
| | 6:5: | ⊢ (((𝜑 ∧ 𝜓 ∧ 𝜒) → 𝜃)
→ (𝜑 → (𝜓 → (𝜒 → 𝜃))))
| | 7:: | ⊢ ( (𝜑 → (𝜓 → (𝜒
→ 𝜃))) ▶ (𝜑 → (𝜓 → (𝜒 → 𝜃))) )
| | 8:7,?: e1a 44598 | ⊢ ( (𝜑 → (𝜓 → (𝜒
→ 𝜃))) ▶ ((𝜑 ∧ 𝜓) → (𝜒 → 𝜃)) )
| | 9:8,?: e1a 44598 | ⊢ ( (𝜑 → (𝜓 → (𝜒
→ 𝜃))) ▶ (((𝜑 ∧ 𝜓) ∧ 𝜒) → 𝜃) )
| | 10:2,9,?: e01 44662 | ⊢ ( (𝜑 → (𝜓 → (𝜒
→ 𝜃))) ▶ ((𝜑 ∧ 𝜓 ∧ 𝜒) → 𝜃) )
| | 11:10: | ⊢ ((𝜑 → (𝜓 → (𝜒
→ 𝜃))) → ((𝜑 ∧ 𝜓 ∧ 𝜒) → 𝜃))
| | qed:6,11,?: e00 44739 | ⊢ (((𝜑 ∧ 𝜓 ∧ 𝜒)
→ 𝜃) ↔ (𝜑 → (𝜓 → (𝜒 → 𝜃))))
|
(Contributed by Alan Sare, 31-Dec-2011.)
(Proof modification is discouraged.) (New usage is discouraged.)
|
| ⊢ (((𝜑 ∧ 𝜓 ∧ 𝜒) → 𝜃) ↔ (𝜑 → (𝜓 → (𝜒 → 𝜃)))) |
| |
| Theorem | 3impexpbicomVD 44828 |
Virtual deduction proof of 3impexpbicom 44450. The following user's proof is
completed by invoking mmj2's unify command and using mmj2's StepSelector
to pick all remaining steps of the Metamath proof.
| 1:: | ⊢ ( ((𝜑 ∧ 𝜓 ∧ 𝜒)
→ (𝜃 ↔ 𝜏)) ▶ ((𝜑 ∧ 𝜓 ∧ 𝜒) → (𝜃 ↔ 𝜏)) )
| | 2:: | ⊢ ((𝜃 ↔ 𝜏) ↔ (𝜏
↔ 𝜃))
| | 3:1,2,?: e10 44665 | ⊢ ( ((𝜑 ∧ 𝜓 ∧ 𝜒)
→ (𝜃 ↔ 𝜏)) ▶ ((𝜑 ∧ 𝜓 ∧ 𝜒) → (𝜏 ↔ 𝜃)) )
| | 4:3,?: e1a 44598 | ⊢ ( ((𝜑 ∧ 𝜓 ∧ 𝜒)
→ (𝜃 ↔ 𝜏)) ▶ (𝜑 → (𝜓 → (𝜒 → (𝜏
↔ 𝜃)))) )
| | 5:4: | ⊢ (((𝜑 ∧ 𝜓 ∧ 𝜒)
→ (𝜃 ↔ 𝜏)) → (𝜑 → (𝜓 → (𝜒 → (𝜏
↔ 𝜃)))))
| | 6:: | ⊢ ( (𝜑 → (𝜓 → (𝜒
→ (𝜏 ↔ 𝜃)))) ▶ (𝜑 → (𝜓 → (𝜒 → (𝜏
↔ 𝜃)))) )
| | 7:6,?: e1a 44598 | ⊢ ( (𝜑 → (𝜓 → (𝜒
→ (𝜏 ↔ 𝜃)))) ▶ ((𝜑 ∧ 𝜓 ∧ 𝜒) → (𝜏
↔ 𝜃)) )
| | 8:7,2,?: e10 44665 | ⊢ ( (𝜑 → (𝜓 → (𝜒
→ (𝜏 ↔ 𝜃)))) ▶ ((𝜑 ∧ 𝜓 ∧ 𝜒) → (𝜃
↔ 𝜏)) )
| | 9:8: | ⊢ ((𝜑 → (𝜓 → (𝜒
→ (𝜏 ↔ 𝜃)))) → ((𝜑 ∧ 𝜓 ∧ 𝜒) → (𝜃
↔ 𝜏)))
| | qed:5,9,?: e00 44739 | ⊢ (((𝜑 ∧ 𝜓 ∧ 𝜒)
→ (𝜃 ↔ 𝜏)) ↔ (𝜑 → (𝜓 → (𝜒 → (𝜏
↔ 𝜃)))))
|
(Contributed by Alan Sare, 31-Dec-2011.)
(Proof modification is discouraged.) (New usage is discouraged.)
|
| ⊢ (((𝜑 ∧ 𝜓 ∧ 𝜒) → (𝜃 ↔ 𝜏)) ↔ (𝜑 → (𝜓 → (𝜒 → (𝜏 ↔ 𝜃))))) |
| |
| Theorem | 3impexpbicomiVD 44829 |
Virtual deduction proof of 3impexpbicomi 44451. The following user's proof
is completed by invoking mmj2's unify command and using mmj2's
StepSelector to pick all remaining steps of the Metamath proof.
| h1:: | ⊢ ((𝜑 ∧ 𝜓 ∧ 𝜒) → (𝜃
↔ 𝜏))
| | qed:1,?: e0a 44743 | ⊢ (𝜑 → (𝜓 → (𝜒
→ (𝜏 ↔ 𝜃))))
|
(Contributed by Alan Sare, 31-Dec-2011.) (Proof modification is
discouraged.) (New usage is discouraged.)
|
| ⊢ ((𝜑 ∧ 𝜓 ∧ 𝜒) → (𝜃 ↔ 𝜏)) ⇒ ⊢ (𝜑 → (𝜓 → (𝜒 → (𝜏 ↔ 𝜃)))) |
| |
| Theorem | sbcoreleleqVD 44830* |
Virtual deduction proof of sbcoreleleq 44506. The following user's proof
is completed by invoking mmj2's unify command and using mmj2's
StepSelector to pick all remaining steps of the Metamath proof.
| 1:: | ⊢ ( 𝐴 ∈ 𝐵 ▶ 𝐴 ∈ 𝐵 )
| | 2:1,?: e1a 44598 | ⊢ ( 𝐴 ∈ 𝐵 ▶ ([𝐴 / 𝑦]𝑥 ∈
𝑦 ↔ 𝑥 ∈ 𝐴) )
| | 3:1,?: e1a 44598 | ⊢ ( 𝐴 ∈ 𝐵 ▶ ([𝐴 / 𝑦]𝑦 ∈
𝑥 ↔ 𝐴 ∈ 𝑥) )
| | 4:1,?: e1a 44598 | ⊢ ( 𝐴 ∈ 𝐵 ▶ ([𝐴 / 𝑦]𝑥 =
𝑦 ↔ 𝑥 = 𝐴) )
| | 5:2,3,4,?: e111 44645 | ⊢ ( 𝐴 ∈ 𝐵 ▶ ((𝑥 ∈ 𝐴
∨ 𝐴 ∈ 𝑥 ∨ 𝑥 = 𝐴) ↔ ([𝐴 / 𝑦]𝑥 ∈ 𝑦 ∨ [𝐴 / 𝑦]𝑦 ∈ 𝑥
∨ [𝐴 / 𝑦]𝑥 = 𝑦)) )
| | 6:1,?: e1a 44598 | ⊢ ( 𝐴 ∈ 𝐵
▶ ([𝐴 / 𝑦](𝑥 ∈ 𝑦 ∨ 𝑦 ∈ 𝑥 ∨ 𝑥 = 𝑦) ↔ ([𝐴 / 𝑦]𝑥
∈ 𝑦 ∨ [𝐴 / 𝑦]𝑦 ∈ 𝑥 ∨ [𝐴 / 𝑦]𝑥 = 𝑦)) )
| | 7:5,6: e11 44659 | ⊢ ( 𝐴 ∈ 𝐵 ▶ ([𝐴 / 𝑦](𝑥
∈ 𝑦 ∨ 𝑦 ∈ 𝑥 ∨ 𝑥 = 𝑦) ↔ (𝑥 ∈ 𝐴 ∨ 𝐴 ∈ 𝑥 ∨ 𝑥 = 𝐴)) )
| | qed:7: | ⊢ (𝐴 ∈ 𝐵 → ([𝐴 / 𝑦](𝑥 ∈ 𝑦
∨ 𝑦 ∈ 𝑥 ∨ 𝑥 = 𝑦) ↔ (𝑥 ∈ 𝐴 ∨ 𝐴 ∈ 𝑥 ∨ 𝑥 = 𝐴)))
|
(Contributed by Alan Sare, 31-Dec-2011.) (Proof modification is
discouraged.) (New usage is discouraged.)
|
| ⊢ (𝐴 ∈ 𝐵 → ([𝐴 / 𝑦](𝑥 ∈ 𝑦 ∨ 𝑦 ∈ 𝑥 ∨ 𝑥 = 𝑦) ↔ (𝑥 ∈ 𝐴 ∨ 𝐴 ∈ 𝑥 ∨ 𝑥 = 𝐴))) |
| |
| Theorem | hbra2VD 44831* |
Virtual deduction proof of nfra2 3384. The following user's proof is
completed by invoking mmj2's unify command and using mmj2's
StepSelector to pick all remaining steps of the Metamath proof.
| 1:: | ⊢ (∀𝑦 ∈ 𝐵∀𝑥 ∈ 𝐴𝜑 →
∀𝑦∀𝑦 ∈ 𝐵∀𝑥 ∈ 𝐴𝜑)
| | 2:: | ⊢ (∀𝑥 ∈ 𝐴∀𝑦 ∈ 𝐵𝜑 ↔
∀𝑦 ∈ 𝐵∀𝑥 ∈ 𝐴𝜑)
| | 3:1,2,?: e00 44739 | ⊢ (∀𝑥 ∈ 𝐴∀𝑦 ∈ 𝐵𝜑 →
∀𝑦∀𝑦 ∈ 𝐵∀𝑥 ∈ 𝐴𝜑)
| | 4:2: | ⊢ ∀𝑦(∀𝑥 ∈ 𝐴∀𝑦 ∈ 𝐵𝜑 ↔
∀𝑦 ∈ 𝐵∀𝑥 ∈ 𝐴𝜑)
| | 5:4,?: e0a 44743 | ⊢ (∀𝑦∀𝑥 ∈ 𝐴∀𝑦 ∈ 𝐵𝜑 ↔
∀𝑦∀𝑦 ∈ 𝐵∀𝑥 ∈ 𝐴𝜑)
| | qed:3,5,?: e00 44739 | ⊢ (∀𝑥 ∈ 𝐴∀𝑦 ∈ 𝐵𝜑 →
∀𝑦∀𝑥 ∈ 𝐴∀𝑦 ∈ 𝐵𝜑)
|
(Contributed by Alan Sare, 31-Dec-2011.) (Proof modification is
discouraged.) (New usage is discouraged.)
|
| ⊢ (∀𝑥 ∈ 𝐴 ∀𝑦 ∈ 𝐵 𝜑 → ∀𝑦∀𝑥 ∈ 𝐴 ∀𝑦 ∈ 𝐵 𝜑) |
| |
| Theorem | tratrbVD 44832* |
Virtual deduction proof of tratrb 44507. The following user's proof is
completed by invoking mmj2's unify command and using mmj2's StepSelector
to pick all remaining steps of the Metamath proof.
| 1:: | ⊢ ( (Tr 𝐴 ∧ ∀𝑥 ∈ 𝐴
∀𝑦 ∈ 𝐴(𝑥 ∈ 𝑦 ∨ 𝑦 ∈ 𝑥 ∨ 𝑥 = 𝑦) ∧ 𝐵 ∈ 𝐴)
▶ (Tr 𝐴 ∧ ∀𝑥 ∈ 𝐴∀𝑦 ∈ 𝐴(𝑥 ∈ 𝑦 ∨ 𝑦 ∈ 𝑥 ∨ 𝑥 = 𝑦)
∧ 𝐵 ∈ 𝐴) )
| | 2:1,?: e1a 44598 | ⊢ ( (Tr 𝐴 ∧ ∀𝑥 ∈ 𝐴
∀𝑦 ∈ 𝐴(𝑥 ∈ 𝑦 ∨ 𝑦 ∈ 𝑥 ∨ 𝑥 = 𝑦) ∧ 𝐵 ∈ 𝐴) ▶ Tr 𝐴 )
| | 3:1,?: e1a 44598 | ⊢ ( (Tr 𝐴 ∧ ∀𝑥 ∈ 𝐴
∀𝑦 ∈ 𝐴(𝑥 ∈ 𝑦 ∨ 𝑦 ∈ 𝑥 ∨ 𝑥 = 𝑦) ∧ 𝐵 ∈ 𝐴)
▶ ∀𝑥 ∈ 𝐴∀𝑦 ∈ 𝐴(𝑥 ∈ 𝑦 ∨ 𝑦 ∈ 𝑥 ∨ 𝑥 = 𝑦) )
| | 4:1,?: e1a 44598 | ⊢ ( (Tr 𝐴 ∧ ∀𝑥 ∈ 𝐴
∀𝑦 ∈ 𝐴(𝑥 ∈ 𝑦 ∨ 𝑦 ∈ 𝑥 ∨ 𝑥 = 𝑦) ∧ 𝐵 ∈ 𝐴) ▶ 𝐵 ∈ 𝐴 )
| | 5:: | ⊢ ( (Tr 𝐴 ∧ ∀𝑥 ∈ 𝐴
∀𝑦 ∈ 𝐴(𝑥 ∈ 𝑦 ∨ 𝑦 ∈ 𝑥 ∨ 𝑥 = 𝑦) ∧ 𝐵 ∈ 𝐴), (𝑥 ∈ 𝑦
∧ 𝑦 ∈ 𝐵) ▶ (𝑥 ∈ 𝑦 ∧ 𝑦 ∈ 𝐵) )
| | 6:5,?: e2 44602 | ⊢ ( (Tr 𝐴 ∧ ∀𝑥 ∈ 𝐴
∀𝑦 ∈ 𝐴(𝑥 ∈ 𝑦 ∨ 𝑦 ∈ 𝑥 ∨ 𝑥 = 𝑦) ∧ 𝐵 ∈ 𝐴), (𝑥 ∈ 𝑦
∧ 𝑦 ∈ 𝐵) ▶ 𝑥 ∈ 𝑦 )
| | 7:5,?: e2 44602 | ⊢ ( (Tr 𝐴 ∧ ∀𝑥 ∈ 𝐴
∀𝑦 ∈ 𝐴(𝑥 ∈ 𝑦 ∨ 𝑦 ∈ 𝑥 ∨ 𝑥 = 𝑦) ∧ 𝐵 ∈ 𝐴), (𝑥 ∈ 𝑦
∧ 𝑦 ∈ 𝐵) ▶ 𝑦 ∈ 𝐵 )
| | 8:2,7,4,?: e121 44627 | ⊢ ( (Tr 𝐴 ∧ ∀𝑥 ∈ 𝐴
∀𝑦 ∈ 𝐴(𝑥 ∈ 𝑦 ∨ 𝑦 ∈ 𝑥 ∨ 𝑥 = 𝑦) ∧ 𝐵 ∈ 𝐴), (𝑥 ∈ 𝑦
∧ 𝑦 ∈ 𝐵) ▶ 𝑦 ∈ 𝐴 )
| | 9:2,6,8,?: e122 44624 | ⊢ ( (Tr 𝐴 ∧ ∀𝑥 ∈ 𝐴
∀𝑦 ∈ 𝐴(𝑥 ∈ 𝑦 ∨ 𝑦 ∈ 𝑥 ∨ 𝑥 = 𝑦) ∧ 𝐵 ∈ 𝐴), (𝑥 ∈ 𝑦
∧ 𝑦 ∈ 𝐵) ▶ 𝑥 ∈ 𝐴 )
| | 10:: | ⊢ ( (Tr 𝐴 ∧ ∀𝑥 ∈ 𝐴
∀𝑦 ∈ 𝐴(𝑥 ∈ 𝑦 ∨ 𝑦 ∈ 𝑥 ∨ 𝑥 = 𝑦) ∧ 𝐵 ∈ 𝐴), (𝑥 ∈ 𝑦
∧ 𝑦 ∈ 𝐵), 𝐵 ∈ 𝑥 ▶ 𝐵 ∈ 𝑥 )
| | 11:6,7,10,?: e223 44606 | ⊢ ( (Tr 𝐴 ∧ ∀𝑥 ∈ 𝐴
∀𝑦 ∈ 𝐴(𝑥 ∈ 𝑦 ∨ 𝑦 ∈ 𝑥 ∨ 𝑥 = 𝑦) ∧ 𝐵 ∈ 𝐴), (𝑥 ∈ 𝑦
∧ 𝑦 ∈ 𝐵), 𝐵 ∈ 𝑥 ▶ (𝑥 ∈ 𝑦 ∧ 𝑦 ∈ 𝐵 ∧ 𝐵 ∈ 𝑥) )
| | 12:11: | ⊢ ( (Tr 𝐴 ∧ ∀𝑥 ∈ 𝐴
∀𝑦 ∈ 𝐴(𝑥 ∈ 𝑦 ∨ 𝑦 ∈ 𝑥 ∨ 𝑥 = 𝑦) ∧ 𝐵 ∈ 𝐴), (𝑥 ∈ 𝑦
∧ 𝑦 ∈ 𝐵) ▶ (𝐵 ∈ 𝑥 → (𝑥 ∈ 𝑦 ∧ 𝑦 ∈ 𝐵 ∧ 𝐵 ∈ 𝑥)) )
| | 13:: | ⊢ ¬ (𝑥 ∈ 𝑦 ∧ 𝑦 ∈ 𝐵
∧ 𝐵 ∈ 𝑥)
| | 14:12,13,?: e20 44698 | ⊢ ( (Tr 𝐴 ∧ ∀𝑥 ∈ 𝐴
∀𝑦 ∈ 𝐴(𝑥 ∈ 𝑦 ∨ 𝑦 ∈ 𝑥 ∨ 𝑥 = 𝑦) ∧ 𝐵 ∈ 𝐴), (𝑥 ∈ 𝑦
∧ 𝑦 ∈ 𝐵) ▶ ¬ 𝐵 ∈ 𝑥 )
| | 15:: | ⊢ ( (Tr 𝐴 ∧ ∀𝑥 ∈ 𝐴
∀𝑦 ∈ 𝐴(𝑥 ∈ 𝑦 ∨ 𝑦 ∈ 𝑥 ∨ 𝑥 = 𝑦) ∧ 𝐵 ∈ 𝐴), (𝑥 ∈ 𝑦
∧ 𝑦 ∈ 𝐵), 𝑥 = 𝐵 ▶ 𝑥 = 𝐵 )
| | 16:7,15,?: e23 44726 | ⊢ ( (Tr 𝐴 ∧ ∀𝑥 ∈ 𝐴
∀𝑦 ∈ 𝐴(𝑥 ∈ 𝑦 ∨ 𝑦 ∈ 𝑥 ∨ 𝑥 = 𝑦) ∧ 𝐵 ∈ 𝐴), (𝑥 ∈ 𝑦
∧ 𝑦 ∈ 𝐵), 𝑥 = 𝐵 ▶ 𝑦 ∈ 𝑥 )
| | 17:6,16,?: e23 44726 | ⊢ ( (Tr 𝐴 ∧ ∀𝑥 ∈ 𝐴
∀𝑦 ∈ 𝐴(𝑥 ∈ 𝑦 ∨ 𝑦 ∈ 𝑥 ∨ 𝑥 = 𝑦) ∧ 𝐵 ∈ 𝐴), (𝑥 ∈ 𝑦
∧ 𝑦 ∈ 𝐵), 𝑥 = 𝐵 ▶ (𝑥 ∈ 𝑦 ∧ 𝑦 ∈ 𝑥) )
| | 18:17: | ⊢ ( (Tr 𝐴 ∧ ∀𝑥 ∈ 𝐴
∀𝑦 ∈ 𝐴(𝑥 ∈ 𝑦 ∨ 𝑦 ∈ 𝑥 ∨ 𝑥 = 𝑦) ∧ 𝐵 ∈ 𝐴), (𝑥 ∈ 𝑦
∧ 𝑦 ∈ 𝐵) ▶ (𝑥 = 𝐵 → (𝑥 ∈ 𝑦 ∧ 𝑦 ∈ 𝑥)) )
| | 19:: | ⊢ ¬ (𝑥 ∈ 𝑦 ∧ 𝑦 ∈ 𝑥)
| | 20:18,19,?: e20 44698 | ⊢ ( (Tr 𝐴 ∧ ∀𝑥 ∈ 𝐴
∀𝑦 ∈ 𝐴(𝑥 ∈ 𝑦 ∨ 𝑦 ∈ 𝑥 ∨ 𝑥 = 𝑦) ∧ 𝐵 ∈ 𝐴), (𝑥 ∈ 𝑦
∧ 𝑦 ∈ 𝐵) ▶ ¬ 𝑥 = 𝐵 )
| | 21:3,?: e1a 44598 | ⊢ ( (Tr 𝐴 ∧ ∀𝑥 ∈ 𝐴
∀𝑦 ∈ 𝐴(𝑥 ∈ 𝑦 ∨ 𝑦 ∈ 𝑥 ∨ 𝑥 = 𝑦) ∧ 𝐵 ∈ 𝐴) ▶ ∀𝑦 ∈ 𝐴
∀𝑥 ∈ 𝐴(𝑥 ∈ 𝑦 ∨ 𝑦 ∈ 𝑥 ∨ 𝑥 = 𝑦) )
| | 22:21,9,4,?: e121 44627 | ⊢ ( (Tr 𝐴 ∧ ∀𝑥 ∈ 𝐴
∀𝑦 ∈ 𝐴(𝑥 ∈ 𝑦 ∨ 𝑦 ∈ 𝑥 ∨ 𝑥 = 𝑦) ∧ 𝐵 ∈ 𝐴), (𝑥 ∈ 𝑦
∧ 𝑦 ∈ 𝐵) ▶ [𝑥 / 𝑥][𝐵 / 𝑦](𝑥 ∈ 𝑦 ∨ 𝑦 ∈ 𝑥
∨ 𝑥 = 𝑦) )
| | 23:22,?: e2 44602 | ⊢ ( (Tr 𝐴 ∧ ∀𝑥 ∈ 𝐴
∀𝑦 ∈ 𝐴(𝑥 ∈ 𝑦 ∨ 𝑦 ∈ 𝑥 ∨ 𝑥 = 𝑦) ∧ 𝐵 ∈ 𝐴), (𝑥 ∈ 𝑦
∧ 𝑦 ∈ 𝐵) ▶ [𝐵 / 𝑦](𝑥 ∈ 𝑦 ∨ 𝑦 ∈ 𝑥 ∨ 𝑥 = 𝑦) )
| | 24:4,23,?: e12 44695 | ⊢ ( (Tr 𝐴 ∧ ∀𝑥 ∈ 𝐴
∀𝑦 ∈ 𝐴(𝑥 ∈ 𝑦 ∨ 𝑦 ∈ 𝑥 ∨ 𝑥 = 𝑦) ∧ 𝐵 ∈ 𝐴), (𝑥 ∈ 𝑦
∧ 𝑦 ∈ 𝐵) ▶ (𝑥 ∈ 𝐵 ∨ 𝐵 ∈ 𝑥 ∨ 𝑥 = 𝐵) )
| | 25:14,20,24,?: e222 44607 | ⊢ ( (Tr 𝐴 ∧ ∀𝑥 ∈ 𝐴
∀𝑦 ∈ 𝐴(𝑥 ∈ 𝑦 ∨ 𝑦 ∈ 𝑥 ∨ 𝑥 = 𝑦) ∧ 𝐵 ∈ 𝐴), (𝑥 ∈ 𝑦
∧ 𝑦 ∈ 𝐵) ▶ 𝑥 ∈ 𝐵 )
| | 26:25: | ⊢ ( (Tr 𝐴 ∧ ∀𝑥 ∈ 𝐴
∀𝑦 ∈ 𝐴(𝑥 ∈ 𝑦 ∨ 𝑦 ∈ 𝑥 ∨ 𝑥 = 𝑦) ∧ 𝐵 ∈ 𝐴) ▶ ((𝑥 ∈ 𝑦
∧ 𝑦 ∈ 𝐵) → 𝑥 ∈ 𝐵) )
| | 27:: | ⊢ (∀𝑥 ∈ 𝐴∀𝑦 ∈ 𝐴(𝑥 ∈ 𝑦
∨ 𝑦 ∈ 𝑥 ∨ 𝑥 = 𝑦) → ∀𝑦∀𝑥 ∈ 𝐴∀𝑦 ∈ 𝐴(𝑥 ∈ 𝑦 ∨
𝑦 ∈ 𝑥 ∨ 𝑥 = 𝑦))
| | 28:27,?: e0a 44743 | ⊢ ((Tr 𝐴 ∧ ∀𝑥 ∈ 𝐴
∀𝑦 ∈ 𝐴(𝑥 ∈ 𝑦 ∨ 𝑦 ∈ 𝑥 ∨ 𝑥 = 𝑦) ∧ 𝐵 ∈ 𝐴)
→ ∀𝑦(Tr 𝐴 ∧ ∀𝑥 ∈ 𝐴∀𝑦 ∈ 𝐴(𝑥 ∈ 𝑦 ∨ 𝑦 ∈ 𝑥
∨ 𝑥 = 𝑦) ∧ 𝐵 ∈ 𝐴))
| | 29:28,26: | ⊢ ( (Tr 𝐴 ∧ ∀𝑥 ∈ 𝐴
∀𝑦 ∈ 𝐴(𝑥 ∈ 𝑦 ∨ 𝑦 ∈ 𝑥 ∨ 𝑥 = 𝑦) ∧ 𝐵 ∈ 𝐴)
▶ ∀𝑦((𝑥 ∈ 𝑦 ∧ 𝑦 ∈ 𝐵) → 𝑥 ∈ 𝐵) )
| | 30:: | ⊢ (∀𝑥 ∈ 𝐴∀𝑦 ∈ 𝐴(𝑥 ∈ 𝑦
∨ 𝑦 ∈ 𝑥 ∨ 𝑥 = 𝑦) → ∀𝑥∀𝑥 ∈ 𝐴∀𝑦 ∈ 𝐴(𝑥 ∈ 𝑦
∨ 𝑦 ∈ 𝑥 ∨ 𝑥 = 𝑦))
| | 31:30,?: e0a 44743 | ⊢ ((Tr 𝐴 ∧ ∀𝑥 ∈ 𝐴
∀𝑦 ∈ 𝐴(𝑥 ∈ 𝑦 ∨ 𝑦 ∈ 𝑥 ∨ 𝑥 = 𝑦) ∧ 𝐵 ∈ 𝐴) → ∀𝑥(Tr 𝐴
∧ ∀𝑥 ∈ 𝐴∀𝑦 ∈ 𝐴(𝑥 ∈ 𝑦 ∨ 𝑦 ∈ 𝑥 ∨ 𝑥 = 𝑦) ∧ 𝐵 ∈ 𝐴))
| | 32:31,29: | ⊢ ( (Tr 𝐴 ∧ ∀𝑥 ∈ 𝐴
∀𝑦 ∈ 𝐴(𝑥 ∈ 𝑦 ∨ 𝑦 ∈ 𝑥 ∨ 𝑥 = 𝑦) ∧ 𝐵 ∈ 𝐴) ▶ ∀𝑥
∀𝑦((𝑥 ∈ 𝑦 ∧ 𝑦 ∈ 𝐵) → 𝑥 ∈ 𝐵) )
| | 33:32,?: e1a 44598 | ⊢ ( (Tr 𝐴 ∧ ∀𝑥 ∈ 𝐴
∀𝑦 ∈ 𝐴(𝑥 ∈ 𝑦 ∨ 𝑦 ∈ 𝑥 ∨ 𝑥 = 𝑦) ∧ 𝐵 ∈ 𝐴) ▶ Tr 𝐵 )
| | qed:33: | ⊢ ((Tr 𝐴 ∧ ∀𝑥 ∈ 𝐴
∀𝑦 ∈ 𝐴(𝑥 ∈ 𝑦 ∨ 𝑦 ∈ 𝑥 ∨ 𝑥 = 𝑦) ∧ 𝐵 ∈ 𝐴) → Tr 𝐵)
|
(Contributed by Alan Sare, 31-Dec-2011.) (Proof modification is
discouraged.) (New usage is discouraged.)
|
| ⊢ ((Tr 𝐴 ∧ ∀𝑥 ∈ 𝐴 ∀𝑦 ∈ 𝐴 (𝑥 ∈ 𝑦 ∨ 𝑦 ∈ 𝑥 ∨ 𝑥 = 𝑦) ∧ 𝐵 ∈ 𝐴) → Tr 𝐵) |
| |
| Theorem | al2imVD 44833 |
Virtual deduction proof of al2im 1812. The following user's proof is
completed by invoking mmj2's unify command and using mmj2's StepSelector
to pick all remaining steps of the Metamath proof.
| 1:: | ⊢ ( ∀𝑥(𝜑 → (𝜓 → 𝜒))
▶ ∀𝑥(𝜑 → (𝜓 → 𝜒)) )
| | 2:1,?: e1a 44598 | ⊢ ( ∀𝑥(𝜑 → (𝜓 → 𝜒))
▶ (∀𝑥𝜑 → ∀𝑥(𝜓 → 𝜒)) )
| | 3:: | ⊢ (∀𝑥(𝜓 → 𝜒) → (∀𝑥𝜓
→ ∀𝑥𝜒))
| | 4:2,3,?: e10 44665 | ⊢ ( ∀𝑥(𝜑 → (𝜓 → 𝜒))
▶ (∀𝑥𝜑 → (∀𝑥𝜓 → ∀𝑥𝜒)) )
| | qed:4: | ⊢ (∀𝑥(𝜑 → (𝜓 → 𝜒))
→ (∀𝑥𝜑 → (∀𝑥𝜓 → ∀𝑥𝜒)))
|
(Contributed by Alan Sare, 31-Dec-2011.)
(Proof modification is discouraged.) (New usage is discouraged.)
|
| ⊢ (∀𝑥(𝜑 → (𝜓 → 𝜒)) → (∀𝑥𝜑 → (∀𝑥𝜓 → ∀𝑥𝜒))) |
| |
| Theorem | syl5impVD 44834 |
Virtual deduction proof of syl5imp 44483. The following user's proof is
completed by invoking mmj2's unify command and using mmj2's StepSelector
to pick all remaining steps of the Metamath proof.
| 1:: | ⊢ ( (𝜑 → (𝜓 → 𝜒)) ▶ (𝜑
→ (𝜓 → 𝜒)) )
| | 2:1,?: e1a 44598 | ⊢ ( (𝜑 → (𝜓 → 𝜒)) ▶ (𝜓
→ (𝜑 → 𝜒)) )
| | 3:: | ⊢ ( (𝜑 → (𝜓 → 𝜒)) , (𝜃
→ 𝜓) ▶ (𝜃 → 𝜓) )
| | 4:3,2,?: e21 44701 | ⊢ ( (𝜑 → (𝜓 → 𝜒)) , (𝜃
→ 𝜓) ▶ (𝜃 → (𝜑 → 𝜒)) )
| | 5:4,?: e2 44602 | ⊢ ( (𝜑 → (𝜓 → 𝜒)) , (𝜃
→ 𝜓) ▶ (𝜑 → (𝜃 → 𝜒)) )
| | 6:5: | ⊢ ( (𝜑 → (𝜓 → 𝜒)) ▶ ((𝜃
→ 𝜓) → (𝜑 → (𝜃 → 𝜒))) )
| | qed:6: | ⊢ ((𝜑 → (𝜓 → 𝜒)) → ((𝜃
→ 𝜓) → (𝜑 → (𝜃 → 𝜒))))
|
(Contributed by Alan Sare, 31-Dec-2011.)
(Proof modification is discouraged.) (New usage is discouraged.)
|
| ⊢ ((𝜑 → (𝜓 → 𝜒)) → ((𝜃 → 𝜓) → (𝜑 → (𝜃 → 𝜒)))) |
| |
| Theorem | idiVD 44835 |
Virtual deduction proof of idiALT 44448. The following user's
proof is completed by invoking mmj2's unify command and using mmj2's
StepSelector to pick all remaining steps of the Metamath proof.
| h1:: | ⊢ 𝜑
| | qed:1,?: e0a 44743 | ⊢ 𝜑
|
(Contributed by Alan Sare, 31-Dec-2011.) (Proof modification is
discouraged.) (New usage is discouraged.)
|
| ⊢ 𝜑 ⇒ ⊢ 𝜑 |
| |
| Theorem | ancomstVD 44836 |
Closed form of ancoms 458. The following user's proof is completed by
invoking mmj2's unify command and using mmj2's StepSelector to pick all
remaining steps of the Metamath proof.
| 1:: | ⊢ ((𝜑 ∧ 𝜓) ↔ (𝜓 ∧ 𝜑))
| | qed:1,?: e0a 44743 | ⊢ (((𝜑 ∧ 𝜓) → 𝜒) ↔ ((𝜓
∧ 𝜑) → 𝜒))
|
The proof of ancomst 464 is derived automatically from it.
(Contributed by
Alan Sare, 25-Dec-2011.) (Proof modification is discouraged.)
(New usage is discouraged.)
|
| ⊢ (((𝜑 ∧ 𝜓) → 𝜒) ↔ ((𝜓 ∧ 𝜑) → 𝜒)) |
| |
| Theorem | ssralv2VD 44837* |
Quantification restricted to a subclass for two quantifiers. ssralv 4077
for two quantifiers. The following User's Proof is a Virtual Deduction
proof completed automatically by the tools program
completeusersproof.cmd, which invokes Mel L. O'Cat's mmj2 and Norm
Megill's Metamath Proof Assistant. ssralv2 44502 is ssralv2VD 44837 without
virtual deductions and was automatically derived from ssralv2VD 44837.
| 1:: | ⊢ ( (𝐴 ⊆ 𝐵 ∧ 𝐶 ⊆ 𝐷) ▶ (𝐴 ⊆ 𝐵
∧ 𝐶 ⊆ 𝐷) )
| | 2:: | ⊢ ( (𝐴 ⊆ 𝐵 ∧ 𝐶 ⊆ 𝐷) , ∀𝑥 ∈ 𝐵
∀𝑦 ∈ 𝐷𝜑 ▶ ∀𝑥 ∈ 𝐵∀𝑦 ∈ 𝐷𝜑 )
| | 3:1: | ⊢ ( (𝐴 ⊆ 𝐵 ∧ 𝐶 ⊆ 𝐷) ▶ 𝐴 ⊆ 𝐵 )
| | 4:3,2: | ⊢ ( (𝐴 ⊆ 𝐵 ∧ 𝐶 ⊆ 𝐷) , ∀𝑥 ∈ 𝐵
∀𝑦 ∈ 𝐷𝜑 ▶ ∀𝑥 ∈ 𝐴∀𝑦 ∈ 𝐷𝜑 )
| | 5:4: | ⊢ ( (𝐴 ⊆ 𝐵 ∧ 𝐶 ⊆ 𝐷) , ∀𝑥 ∈ 𝐵
∀𝑦 ∈ 𝐷𝜑 ▶ ∀𝑥(𝑥 ∈ 𝐴 → ∀𝑦 ∈ 𝐷𝜑) )
| | 6:5: | ⊢ ( (𝐴 ⊆ 𝐵 ∧ 𝐶 ⊆ 𝐷) , ∀𝑥 ∈ 𝐵
∀𝑦 ∈ 𝐷𝜑 ▶ (𝑥 ∈ 𝐴 → ∀𝑦 ∈ 𝐷𝜑) )
| | 7:: | ⊢ ( (𝐴 ⊆ 𝐵 ∧ 𝐶 ⊆ 𝐷) , ∀𝑥 ∈ 𝐵
∀𝑦 ∈ 𝐷𝜑, 𝑥 ∈ 𝐴 ▶ 𝑥 ∈ 𝐴 )
| | 8:7,6: | ⊢ ( (𝐴 ⊆ 𝐵 ∧ 𝐶 ⊆ 𝐷) , ∀𝑥 ∈ 𝐵
∀𝑦 ∈ 𝐷𝜑, 𝑥 ∈ 𝐴 ▶ ∀𝑦 ∈ 𝐷𝜑 )
| | 9:1: | ⊢ ( (𝐴 ⊆ 𝐵 ∧ 𝐶 ⊆ 𝐷) ▶ 𝐶 ⊆ 𝐷 )
| | 10:9,8: | ⊢ ( (𝐴 ⊆ 𝐵 ∧ 𝐶 ⊆ 𝐷) , ∀𝑥 ∈ 𝐵
∀𝑦 ∈ 𝐷𝜑, 𝑥 ∈ 𝐴 ▶ ∀𝑦 ∈ 𝐶𝜑 )
| | 11:10: | ⊢ ( (𝐴 ⊆ 𝐵 ∧ 𝐶 ⊆ 𝐷) , ∀𝑥 ∈ 𝐵
∀𝑦 ∈ 𝐷𝜑 ▶ (𝑥 ∈ 𝐴 → ∀𝑦 ∈ 𝐶𝜑) )
| | 12:: | ⊢ ((𝐴 ⊆ 𝐵 ∧ 𝐶 ⊆ 𝐷)
→ ∀𝑥(𝐴 ⊆ 𝐵 ∧ 𝐶 ⊆ 𝐷))
| | 13:: | ⊢ (∀𝑥 ∈ 𝐵∀𝑦 ∈ 𝐷𝜑
→ ∀𝑥∀𝑥 ∈ 𝐵∀𝑦 ∈ 𝐷𝜑)
| | 14:12,13,11: | ⊢ ( (𝐴 ⊆ 𝐵 ∧ 𝐶 ⊆ 𝐷) , ∀𝑥 ∈ 𝐵
∀𝑦 ∈ 𝐷𝜑 ▶ ∀𝑥(𝑥 ∈ 𝐴 → ∀𝑦 ∈ 𝐶𝜑) )
| | 15:14: | ⊢ ( (𝐴 ⊆ 𝐵 ∧ 𝐶 ⊆ 𝐷) , ∀𝑥 ∈ 𝐵
∀𝑦 ∈ 𝐷𝜑 ▶ ∀𝑥 ∈ 𝐴∀𝑦 ∈ 𝐶𝜑 )
| | 16:15: | ⊢ ( (𝐴 ⊆ 𝐵 ∧ 𝐶 ⊆ 𝐷)
▶ (∀𝑥 ∈ 𝐵∀𝑦 ∈ 𝐷𝜑 → ∀𝑥 ∈ 𝐴∀𝑦 ∈ 𝐶𝜑) )
| | qed:16: | ⊢ ((𝐴 ⊆ 𝐵 ∧ 𝐶 ⊆ 𝐷)
→ (∀𝑥 ∈ 𝐵∀𝑦 ∈ 𝐷𝜑 → ∀𝑥 ∈ 𝐴∀𝑦 ∈ 𝐶𝜑))
|
(Contributed by Alan Sare, 10-Feb-2012.) (Proof modification is
discouraged.) (New usage is discouraged.)
|
| ⊢ ((𝐴 ⊆ 𝐵 ∧ 𝐶 ⊆ 𝐷) → (∀𝑥 ∈ 𝐵 ∀𝑦 ∈ 𝐷 𝜑 → ∀𝑥 ∈ 𝐴 ∀𝑦 ∈ 𝐶 𝜑)) |
| |
| Theorem | ordelordALTVD 44838 |
An element of an ordinal class is ordinal. Proposition 7.6 of
[TakeutiZaring] p. 36. This is an alternate proof of ordelord 6417 using
the Axiom of Regularity indirectly through dford2 9689. dford2 is a
weaker definition of ordinal number. Given the Axiom of Regularity, it
need not be assumed that E Fr 𝐴 because this is inferred by the
Axiom of Regularity. The following User's Proof is a Virtual Deduction
proof completed automatically by the tools program
completeusersproof.cmd, which invokes Mel L. O'Cat's mmj2 and Norm
Megill's Metamath Proof Assistant. ordelordALT 44508 is ordelordALTVD 44838
without virtual deductions and was automatically derived from
ordelordALTVD 44838 using the tools program
translate..without..overwriting.cmd and the Metamath program "MM-PA>
MINIMIZE_WITH *" command.
| 1:: | ⊢ ( (Ord 𝐴 ∧ 𝐵 ∈ 𝐴) ▶ (Ord 𝐴
∧ 𝐵 ∈ 𝐴) )
| | 2:1: | ⊢ ( (Ord 𝐴 ∧ 𝐵 ∈ 𝐴) ▶ Ord 𝐴 )
| | 3:1: | ⊢ ( (Ord 𝐴 ∧ 𝐵 ∈ 𝐴) ▶ 𝐵 ∈ 𝐴 )
| | 4:2: | ⊢ ( (Ord 𝐴 ∧ 𝐵 ∈ 𝐴) ▶ Tr 𝐴 )
| | 5:2: | ⊢ ( (Ord 𝐴 ∧ 𝐵 ∈ 𝐴) ▶ ∀𝑥 ∈ 𝐴
∀𝑦 ∈ 𝐴(𝑥 ∈ 𝑦 ∨ 𝑥 = 𝑦 ∨ 𝑦 ∈ 𝑥) )
| | 6:4,3: | ⊢ ( (Ord 𝐴 ∧ 𝐵 ∈ 𝐴) ▶ 𝐵 ⊆ 𝐴 )
| | 7:6,6,5: | ⊢ ( (Ord 𝐴 ∧ 𝐵 ∈ 𝐴) ▶ ∀𝑥 ∈ 𝐵
∀𝑦 ∈ 𝐵(𝑥 ∈ 𝑦 ∨ 𝑥 = 𝑦 ∨ 𝑦 ∈ 𝑥) )
| | 8:: | ⊢ ((𝑥 ∈ 𝑦 ∨ 𝑥 = 𝑦 ∨ 𝑦 ∈ 𝑥)
↔ (𝑥 ∈ 𝑦 ∨ 𝑦 ∈ 𝑥 ∨ 𝑥 = 𝑦))
| | 9:8: | ⊢ ∀𝑦((𝑥 ∈ 𝑦 ∨ 𝑥 = 𝑦 ∨ 𝑦 ∈ 𝑥)
↔ (𝑥 ∈ 𝑦 ∨ 𝑦 ∈ 𝑥 ∨ 𝑥 = 𝑦))
| | 10:9: | ⊢ ∀𝑦 ∈ 𝐴((𝑥 ∈ 𝑦 ∨ 𝑥 = 𝑦
∨ 𝑦 ∈ 𝑥) ↔ (𝑥 ∈ 𝑦 ∨ 𝑦 ∈ 𝑥 ∨ 𝑥 = 𝑦))
| | 11:10: | ⊢ (∀𝑦 ∈ 𝐴(𝑥 ∈ 𝑦 ∨ 𝑥 = 𝑦
∨ 𝑦 ∈ 𝑥) ↔ ∀𝑦 ∈ 𝐴(𝑥 ∈ 𝑦 ∨ 𝑦 ∈ 𝑥 ∨ 𝑥 = 𝑦))
| | 12:11: | ⊢ ∀𝑥(∀𝑦 ∈ 𝐴(𝑥 ∈ 𝑦 ∨ 𝑥 = 𝑦
∨ 𝑦 ∈ 𝑥) ↔ ∀𝑦 ∈ 𝐴(𝑥 ∈ 𝑦 ∨ 𝑦 ∈ 𝑥 ∨ 𝑥 = 𝑦))
| | 13:12: | ⊢ ∀𝑥 ∈ 𝐴(∀𝑦 ∈ 𝐴(𝑥 ∈ 𝑦
∨ 𝑥 = 𝑦 ∨ 𝑦 ∈ 𝑥) ↔ ∀𝑦 ∈ 𝐴(𝑥 ∈ 𝑦 ∨ 𝑦 ∈ 𝑥 ∨ 𝑥 = 𝑦))
| | 14:13: | ⊢ (∀𝑥 ∈ 𝐴∀𝑦 ∈ 𝐴(𝑥 ∈ 𝑦
∨ 𝑥 = 𝑦 ∨ 𝑦 ∈ 𝑥) ↔ ∀𝑥 ∈ 𝐴∀𝑦 ∈ 𝐴(𝑥 ∈ 𝑦 ∨ 𝑦 ∈ 𝑥
∨ 𝑥 = 𝑦))
| | 15:14,5: | ⊢ ( (Ord 𝐴 ∧ 𝐵 ∈ 𝐴) ▶ ∀𝑥 ∈ 𝐴
∀𝑦 ∈ 𝐴(𝑥 ∈ 𝑦 ∨ 𝑦 ∈ 𝑥 ∨ 𝑥 = 𝑦) )
| | 16:4,15,3: | ⊢ ( (Ord 𝐴 ∧ 𝐵 ∈ 𝐴) ▶ Tr 𝐵 )
| | 17:16,7: | ⊢ ( (Ord 𝐴 ∧ 𝐵 ∈ 𝐴) ▶ Ord 𝐵 )
| | qed:17: | ⊢ ((Ord 𝐴 ∧ 𝐵 ∈ 𝐴) → Ord 𝐵)
|
(Contributed by Alan Sare, 12-Feb-2012.) (Proof modification is
discouraged.) (New usage is discouraged.)
|
| ⊢ ((Ord 𝐴 ∧ 𝐵 ∈ 𝐴) → Ord 𝐵) |
| |
| Theorem | equncomVD 44839 |
If a class equals the union of two other classes, then it equals the union
of those two classes commuted. The following User's Proof is a Virtual
Deduction proof completed automatically by the tools program
completeusersproof.cmd, which invokes Mel L. O'Cat's mmj2 and Norm
Megill's Metamath Proof Assistant. equncom 4182 is equncomVD 44839 without
virtual deductions and was automatically derived from equncomVD 44839.
| 1:: | ⊢ ( 𝐴 = (𝐵 ∪ 𝐶) ▶ 𝐴 = (𝐵 ∪ 𝐶) )
| | 2:: | ⊢ (𝐵 ∪ 𝐶) = (𝐶 ∪ 𝐵)
| | 3:1,2: | ⊢ ( 𝐴 = (𝐵 ∪ 𝐶) ▶ 𝐴 = (𝐶 ∪ 𝐵) )
| | 4:3: | ⊢ (𝐴 = (𝐵 ∪ 𝐶) → 𝐴 = (𝐶 ∪ 𝐵))
| | 5:: | ⊢ ( 𝐴 = (𝐶 ∪ 𝐵) ▶ 𝐴 = (𝐶 ∪ 𝐵) )
| | 6:5,2: | ⊢ ( 𝐴 = (𝐶 ∪ 𝐵) ▶ 𝐴 = (𝐵 ∪ 𝐶) )
| | 7:6: | ⊢ (𝐴 = (𝐶 ∪ 𝐵) → 𝐴 = (𝐵 ∪ 𝐶))
| | 8:4,7: | ⊢ (𝐴 = (𝐵 ∪ 𝐶) ↔ 𝐴 = (𝐶 ∪ 𝐵))
|
(Contributed by Alan Sare, 17-Feb-2012.)
(Proof modification is discouraged.) (New usage is discouraged.)
|
| ⊢ (𝐴 = (𝐵 ∪ 𝐶) ↔ 𝐴 = (𝐶 ∪ 𝐵)) |
| |
| Theorem | equncomiVD 44840 |
Inference form of equncom 4182. The following User's Proof is a
Virtual Deduction proof completed automatically by the tools program
completeusersproof.cmd, which invokes Mel L. O'Cat's mmj2 and Norm
Megill's Metamath Proof Assistant. equncomi 4183 is equncomiVD 44840 without
virtual deductions and was automatically derived from equncomiVD 44840.
| h1:: | ⊢ 𝐴 = (𝐵 ∪ 𝐶)
| | qed:1: | ⊢ 𝐴 = (𝐶 ∪ 𝐵)
|
(Contributed by Alan Sare, 18-Feb-2012.) (Proof modification is
discouraged.) (New usage is discouraged.)
|
| ⊢ 𝐴 = (𝐵 ∪ 𝐶) ⇒ ⊢ 𝐴 = (𝐶 ∪ 𝐵) |
| |
| Theorem | sucidALTVD 44841 |
A set belongs to its successor. Alternate proof of sucid 6477.
The following User's Proof is a Virtual Deduction proof
completed automatically by the tools program
completeusersproof.cmd, which invokes Mel L. O'Cat's mmj2 and Norm
Megill's Metamath Proof Assistant. sucidALT 44842 is sucidALTVD 44841
without virtual deductions and was automatically derived from
sucidALTVD 44841. This proof illustrates that
completeusersproof.cmd will generate a Metamath proof from any
User's Proof which is "conventional" in the sense that no step
is a virtual deduction, provided that all necessary unification
theorems and transformation deductions are in set.mm.
completeusersproof.cmd automatically converts such a
conventional proof into a Virtual Deduction proof for which each
step happens to be a 0-virtual hypothesis virtual deduction.
The user does not need to search for reference theorem labels or
deduction labels nor does he(she) need to use theorems and
deductions which unify with reference theorems and deductions in
set.mm. All that is necessary is that each theorem or deduction
of the User's Proof unifies with some reference theorem or
deduction in set.mm or is a semantic variation of some theorem
or deduction which unifies with some reference theorem or
deduction in set.mm. The definition of "semantic variation" has
not been precisely defined. If it is obvious that a theorem or
deduction has the same meaning as another theorem or deduction,
then it is a semantic variation of the latter theorem or
deduction. For example, step 4 of the User's Proof is a
semantic variation of the definition (axiom)
suc 𝐴 = (𝐴 ∪ {𝐴}), which unifies with df-suc 6401, a
reference definition (axiom) in set.mm. Also, a theorem or
deduction is said to be a semantic variation of another
theorem or deduction if it is obvious upon cursory inspection
that it has the same meaning as a weaker form of the latter
theorem or deduction. For example, the deduction Ord 𝐴
infers ∀𝑥 ∈ 𝐴∀𝑦 ∈ 𝐴(𝑥 ∈ 𝑦 ∨ 𝑥 = 𝑦 ∨ 𝑦 ∈ 𝑥) is a
semantic variation of the theorem (Ord 𝐴 ↔ (Tr 𝐴 ∧ ∀𝑥 ∈ 𝐴
∀𝑦 ∈ 𝐴(𝑥 ∈ 𝑦 ∨ 𝑥 = 𝑦 ∨ 𝑦 ∈ 𝑥))), which unifies with
the set.mm reference definition (axiom) dford2 9689.
| h1:: | ⊢ 𝐴 ∈ V
| | 2:1: | ⊢ 𝐴 ∈ {𝐴}
| | 3:2: | ⊢ 𝐴 ∈ ({𝐴} ∪ 𝐴)
| | 4:: | ⊢ suc 𝐴 = ({𝐴} ∪ 𝐴)
| | qed:3,4: | ⊢ 𝐴 ∈ suc 𝐴
|
(Contributed by Alan Sare, 18-Feb-2012.) (Proof modification is
discouraged.) (New usage is discouraged.)
|
| ⊢ 𝐴 ∈
V ⇒ ⊢ 𝐴 ∈ suc 𝐴 |
| |
| Theorem | sucidALT 44842 |
A set belongs to its successor. This proof was automatically derived
from sucidALTVD 44841 using translate_without_overwriting.cmd and
minimizing. (Contributed by Alan Sare, 18-Feb-2012.)
(Proof modification is discouraged.) (New usage is discouraged.)
|
| ⊢ 𝐴 ∈
V ⇒ ⊢ 𝐴 ∈ suc 𝐴 |
| |
| Theorem | sucidVD 44843 |
A set belongs to its successor. The following User's Proof is a
Virtual Deduction proof completed automatically by the tools
program completeusersproof.cmd, which invokes Mel L. O'Cat's mmj2
and Norm Megill's Metamath Proof Assistant.
sucid 6477 is sucidVD 44843 without virtual deductions and was automatically
derived from sucidVD 44843.
| h1:: | ⊢ 𝐴 ∈ V
| | 2:1: | ⊢ 𝐴 ∈ {𝐴}
| | 3:2: | ⊢ 𝐴 ∈ (𝐴 ∪ {𝐴})
| | 4:: | ⊢ suc 𝐴 = (𝐴 ∪ {𝐴})
| | qed:3,4: | ⊢ 𝐴 ∈ suc 𝐴
|
(Contributed by Alan Sare, 18-Feb-2012.) (Proof modification is
discouraged.) (New usage is discouraged.)
|
| ⊢ 𝐴 ∈
V ⇒ ⊢ 𝐴 ∈ suc 𝐴 |
| |
| Theorem | imbi12VD 44844 |
Implication form of imbi12i 350. The following User's Proof is a Virtual
Deduction proof completed automatically by the tools program
completeusersproof.cmd, which invokes Mel L. O'Cat's mmj2 and Norm
Megill's Metamath Proof Assistant. imbi12 346 is imbi12VD 44844 without virtual
deductions and was automatically derived from imbi12VD 44844.
| 1:: | ⊢ ( (𝜑 ↔ 𝜓) ▶ (𝜑 ↔ 𝜓) )
| | 2:: | ⊢ ( (𝜑 ↔ 𝜓) , (𝜒 ↔ 𝜃)
▶ (𝜒 ↔ 𝜃) )
| | 3:: | ⊢ ( (𝜑 ↔ 𝜓) , (𝜒 ↔ 𝜃) , (𝜑
→ 𝜒) ▶ (𝜑 → 𝜒) )
| | 4:1,3: | ⊢ ( (𝜑 ↔ 𝜓) , (𝜒 ↔ 𝜃) , (𝜑
→ 𝜒) ▶ (𝜓 → 𝜒) )
| | 5:2,4: | ⊢ ( (𝜑 ↔ 𝜓) , (𝜒 ↔ 𝜃) , (𝜑
→ 𝜒) ▶ (𝜓 → 𝜃) )
| | 6:5: | ⊢ ( (𝜑 ↔ 𝜓) , (𝜒 ↔ 𝜃)
▶ ((𝜑 → 𝜒) → (𝜓 → 𝜃)) )
| | 7:: | ⊢ ( (𝜑 ↔ 𝜓) , (𝜒 ↔ 𝜃) , (𝜓
→ 𝜃) ▶ (𝜓 → 𝜃) )
| | 8:1,7: | ⊢ ( (𝜑 ↔ 𝜓) , (𝜒 ↔ 𝜃) , (𝜓
→ 𝜃) ▶ (𝜑 → 𝜃) )
| | 9:2,8: | ⊢ ( (𝜑 ↔ 𝜓) , (𝜒 ↔ 𝜃) , (𝜓
→ 𝜃) ▶ (𝜑 → 𝜒) )
| | 10:9: | ⊢ ( (𝜑 ↔ 𝜓) , (𝜒 ↔ 𝜃)
▶ ((𝜓 → 𝜃) → (𝜑 → 𝜒)) )
| | 11:6,10: | ⊢ ( (𝜑 ↔ 𝜓) , (𝜒 ↔ 𝜃)
▶ ((𝜑 → 𝜒) ↔ (𝜓 → 𝜃)) )
| | 12:11: | ⊢ ( (𝜑 ↔ 𝜓) ▶ ((𝜒 ↔ 𝜃)
→ ((𝜑 → 𝜒) ↔ (𝜓 → 𝜃))) )
| | qed:12: | ⊢ ((𝜑 ↔ 𝜓) → ((𝜒 ↔ 𝜃)
→ ((𝜑 → 𝜒) ↔ (𝜓 → 𝜃))))
|
(Contributed by Alan Sare, 18-Mar-2012.)
(Proof modification is discouraged.) (New usage is discouraged.)
|
| ⊢ ((𝜑 ↔ 𝜓) → ((𝜒 ↔ 𝜃) → ((𝜑 → 𝜒) ↔ (𝜓 → 𝜃)))) |
| |
| Theorem | imbi13VD 44845 |
Join three logical equivalences to form equivalence of implications. The
following User's Proof is a Virtual Deduction proof completed
automatically by the tools program completeusersproof.cmd, which invokes
Mel L. O'Cat's mmj2 and Norm Megill's Metamath Proof Assistant. imbi13 44491
is imbi13VD 44845 without virtual deductions and was automatically derived
from imbi13VD 44845.
| 1:: | ⊢ ( (𝜑 ↔ 𝜓) ▶ (𝜑 ↔ 𝜓) )
| | 2:: | ⊢ ( (𝜑 ↔ 𝜓) , (𝜒 ↔ 𝜃)
▶ (𝜒 ↔ 𝜃) )
| | 3:: | ⊢ ( (𝜑 ↔ 𝜓) , (𝜒 ↔ 𝜃) , (𝜏
↔ 𝜂) ▶ (𝜏 ↔ 𝜂) )
| | 4:2,3: | ⊢ ( (𝜑 ↔ 𝜓) , (𝜒 ↔ 𝜃) , (𝜏
↔ 𝜂) ▶ ((𝜒 → 𝜏) ↔ (𝜃 → 𝜂)) )
| | 5:1,4: | ⊢ ( (𝜑 ↔ 𝜓) , (𝜒 ↔ 𝜃) , (𝜏
↔ 𝜂) ▶ ((𝜑 → (𝜒 → 𝜏)) ↔ (𝜓 → (𝜃 → 𝜂))) )
| | 6:5: | ⊢ ( (𝜑 ↔ 𝜓) , (𝜒 ↔ 𝜃)
▶ ((𝜏 ↔ 𝜂) → ((𝜑 → (𝜒 → 𝜏)) ↔ (𝜓 → (𝜃
→ 𝜂)))) )
| | 7:6: | ⊢ ( (𝜑 ↔ 𝜓) ▶ ((𝜒 ↔ 𝜃)
→ ((𝜏 ↔ 𝜂) → ((𝜑 → (𝜒 → 𝜏)) ↔ (𝜓 → (𝜃
→ 𝜂))))) )
| | qed:7: | ⊢ ((𝜑 ↔ 𝜓) → ((𝜒 ↔ 𝜃)
→ ((𝜏 ↔ 𝜂) → ((𝜑 → (𝜒 → 𝜏)) ↔ (𝜓 → (𝜃
→ 𝜂))))))
|
(Contributed by Alan Sare, 18-Mar-2012.) (Proof modification is
discouraged.) (New usage is discouraged.)
|
| ⊢ ((𝜑 ↔ 𝜓) → ((𝜒 ↔ 𝜃) → ((𝜏 ↔ 𝜂) → ((𝜑 → (𝜒 → 𝜏)) ↔ (𝜓 → (𝜃 → 𝜂)))))) |
| |
| Theorem | sbcim2gVD 44846 |
Distribution of class substitution over a left-nested implication.
Similar to sbcimg 3856.
The following User's Proof is a Virtual Deduction proof completed
automatically by the tools program completeusersproof.cmd, which invokes
Mel L. O'Cat's mmj2 and Norm Megill's Metamath Proof Assistant.
sbcim2g 44509 is sbcim2gVD 44846 without virtual deductions and was automatically
derived from sbcim2gVD 44846.
| 1:: | ⊢ ( 𝐴 ∈ 𝐵 ▶ 𝐴 ∈ 𝐵 )
| | 2:: | ⊢ ( 𝐴 ∈ 𝐵 , [𝐴 / 𝑥](𝜑 → (𝜓
→ 𝜒)) ▶ [𝐴 / 𝑥](𝜑 → (𝜓 → 𝜒)) )
| | 3:1,2: | ⊢ ( 𝐴 ∈ 𝐵 , [𝐴 / 𝑥](𝜑 → (𝜓
→ 𝜒)) ▶ ([𝐴 / 𝑥]𝜑 → [𝐴 / 𝑥](𝜓 → 𝜒)) )
| | 4:1: | ⊢ ( 𝐴 ∈ 𝐵 ▶ ([𝐴 / 𝑥](𝜓 → 𝜒)
↔ ([𝐴 / 𝑥]𝜓 → [𝐴 / 𝑥]𝜒)) )
| | 5:3,4: | ⊢ ( 𝐴 ∈ 𝐵 , [𝐴 / 𝑥](𝜑 → (𝜓
→ 𝜒)) ▶ ([𝐴 / 𝑥]𝜑 → ([𝐴 / 𝑥]𝜓
→ [𝐴 / 𝑥]𝜒)) )
| | 6:5: | ⊢ ( 𝐴 ∈ 𝐵 ▶ ([𝐴 / 𝑥](𝜑 → (𝜓
→ 𝜒)) → ([𝐴 / 𝑥]𝜑 → ([𝐴 / 𝑥]𝜓
→ [𝐴 / 𝑥]𝜒))) )
| | 7:: | ⊢ ( 𝐴 ∈ 𝐵 , ([𝐴 / 𝑥]𝜑
→ ([𝐴 / 𝑥]𝜓 → [𝐴 / 𝑥]𝜒)) ▶ ([𝐴 / 𝑥]𝜑
→ ([𝐴 / 𝑥]𝜓 → [𝐴 / 𝑥]𝜒)) )
| | 8:4,7: | ⊢ ( 𝐴 ∈ 𝐵 , ([𝐴 / 𝑥]𝜑
→ ([𝐴 / 𝑥]𝜓 → [𝐴 / 𝑥]𝜒)) ▶ ([𝐴 / 𝑥]𝜑
→ [𝐴 / 𝑥](𝜓 → 𝜒)) )
| | 9:1: | ⊢ ( 𝐴 ∈ 𝐵 ▶ ([𝐴 / 𝑥](𝜑 → (𝜓
→ 𝜒)) ↔ ([𝐴 / 𝑥]𝜑 → [𝐴 / 𝑥](𝜓 → 𝜒))) )
| | 10:8,9: | ⊢ ( 𝐴 ∈ 𝐵 , ([𝐴 / 𝑥]𝜑
→ ([𝐴 / 𝑥]𝜓 → [𝐴 / 𝑥]𝜒)) ▶ [𝐴 / 𝑥](𝜑 → (𝜓
→ 𝜒)) )
| | 11:10: | ⊢ ( 𝐴 ∈ 𝐵 ▶ (([𝐴 / 𝑥]𝜑
→ ([𝐴 / 𝑥]𝜓 → [𝐴 / 𝑥]𝜒)) → [𝐴 / 𝑥](𝜑 → (𝜓
→ 𝜒))) )
| | 12:6,11: | ⊢ ( 𝐴 ∈ 𝐵 ▶ ([𝐴 / 𝑥](𝜑
→ (𝜓 → 𝜒)) ↔ ([𝐴 / 𝑥]𝜑 → ([𝐴 / 𝑥]𝜓
→ [𝐴 / 𝑥]𝜒))) )
| | qed:12: | ⊢ (𝐴 ∈ 𝐵 → ([𝐴 / 𝑥](𝜑 → (𝜓
→ 𝜒)) ↔ ([𝐴 / 𝑥]𝜑 → ([𝐴 / 𝑥]𝜓
→ [𝐴 / 𝑥]𝜒))))
|
(Contributed by Alan Sare, 18-Mar-2012.) (Proof modification is
discouraged.) (New usage is discouraged.)
|
| ⊢ (𝐴 ∈ 𝐵 → ([𝐴 / 𝑥](𝜑 → (𝜓 → 𝜒)) ↔ ([𝐴 / 𝑥]𝜑 → ([𝐴 / 𝑥]𝜓 → [𝐴 / 𝑥]𝜒)))) |
| |
| Theorem | sbcbiVD 44847 |
Implication form of sbcbii 3865.
The following User's Proof is a Virtual Deduction proof completed
automatically by the tools program completeusersproof.cmd, which invokes
Mel L. O'Cat's mmj2 and Norm Megill's Metamath Proof Assistant.
sbcbi 44510 is sbcbiVD 44847 without virtual deductions and was automatically
derived from sbcbiVD 44847.
| 1:: | ⊢ ( 𝐴 ∈ 𝐵 ▶ 𝐴 ∈ 𝐵 )
| | 2:: | ⊢ ( 𝐴 ∈ 𝐵 , ∀𝑥(𝜑 ↔ 𝜓)
▶ ∀𝑥(𝜑 ↔ 𝜓) )
| | 3:1,2: | ⊢ ( 𝐴 ∈ 𝐵 , ∀𝑥(𝜑 ↔ 𝜓)
▶ [𝐴 / 𝑥](𝜑 ↔ 𝜓) )
| | 4:1,3: | ⊢ ( 𝐴 ∈ 𝐵 , ∀𝑥(𝜑 ↔ 𝜓)
▶ ([𝐴 / 𝑥]𝜑 ↔ [𝐴 / 𝑥]𝜓) )
| | 5:4: | ⊢ ( 𝐴 ∈ 𝐵 ▶ (∀𝑥(𝜑 ↔ 𝜓)
→ ([𝐴 / 𝑥]𝜑 ↔ [𝐴 / 𝑥]𝜓)) )
| | qed:5: | ⊢ (𝐴 ∈ 𝐵 → (∀𝑥(𝜑 ↔ 𝜓)
→ ([𝐴 / 𝑥]𝜑 ↔ [𝐴 / 𝑥]𝜓)))
|
(Contributed by Alan Sare, 18-Mar-2012.) (Proof modification is
discouraged.) (New usage is discouraged.)
|
| ⊢ (𝐴 ∈ 𝐵 → (∀𝑥(𝜑 ↔ 𝜓) → ([𝐴 / 𝑥]𝜑 ↔ [𝐴 / 𝑥]𝜓))) |
| |
| Theorem | trsbcVD 44848* |
Formula-building inference rule for class substitution, substituting a
class variable for the setvar variable of the transitivity predicate.
The following User's Proof is a Virtual Deduction proof completed
automatically by the tools program completeusersproof.cmd, which invokes
Mel L. O'Cat's mmj2 and Norm Megill's Metamath Proof Assistant.
trsbc 44511 is trsbcVD 44848 without virtual deductions and was automatically
derived from trsbcVD 44848.
| 1:: | ⊢ ( 𝐴 ∈ 𝐵 ▶ 𝐴 ∈ 𝐵 )
| | 2:1: | ⊢ ( 𝐴 ∈ 𝐵 ▶ ([𝐴 / 𝑥]𝑧 ∈ 𝑦
↔ 𝑧 ∈ 𝑦) )
| | 3:1: | ⊢ ( 𝐴 ∈ 𝐵 ▶ ([𝐴 / 𝑥]𝑦 ∈ 𝑥
↔ 𝑦 ∈ 𝐴) )
| | 4:1: | ⊢ ( 𝐴 ∈ 𝐵 ▶ ([𝐴 / 𝑥]𝑧 ∈ 𝑥
↔ 𝑧 ∈ 𝐴) )
| | 5:1,2,3,4: | ⊢ ( 𝐴 ∈ 𝐵 ▶ (([𝐴 / 𝑥]𝑧 ∈ 𝑦
→ ([𝐴 / 𝑥]𝑦 ∈ 𝑥 → [𝐴 / 𝑥]𝑧 ∈ 𝑥)) ↔ (𝑧 ∈ 𝑦
→ (𝑦 ∈ 𝐴 → 𝑧 ∈ 𝐴))) )
| | 6:1: | ⊢ ( 𝐴 ∈ 𝐵 ▶ ([𝐴 / 𝑥](𝑧 ∈ 𝑦
→ (𝑦 ∈ 𝑥 → 𝑧 ∈ 𝑥)) ↔ ([𝐴 / 𝑥]𝑧 ∈ 𝑦 →
([𝐴 / 𝑥]𝑦 ∈ 𝑥 → [𝐴 / 𝑥]𝑧 ∈ 𝑥))) )
| | 7:5,6: | ⊢ ( 𝐴 ∈ 𝐵 ▶ ([𝐴 / 𝑥](𝑧 ∈ 𝑦
→ (𝑦 ∈ 𝑥 → 𝑧 ∈ 𝑥)) ↔ (𝑧 ∈ 𝑦 → (𝑦 ∈ 𝐴
→ 𝑧 ∈ 𝐴))) )
| | 8:: | ⊢ ((𝑧 ∈ 𝑦 → (𝑦 ∈ 𝐴
→ 𝑧 ∈ 𝐴)) ↔ ((𝑧 ∈ 𝑦 ∧ 𝑦 ∈ 𝐴) → 𝑧 ∈ 𝐴))
| | 9:7,8: | ⊢ ( 𝐴 ∈ 𝐵 ▶ ([𝐴 / 𝑥](𝑧 ∈ 𝑦
→ (𝑦 ∈ 𝑥 → 𝑧 ∈ 𝑥)) ↔ ((𝑧 ∈ 𝑦 ∧ 𝑦 ∈ 𝐴)
→ 𝑧 ∈ 𝐴)) )
| | 10:: | ⊢ ((𝑧 ∈ 𝑦 → (𝑦 ∈ 𝑥
→ 𝑧 ∈ 𝑥)) ↔ ((𝑧 ∈ 𝑦 ∧ 𝑦 ∈ 𝑥) → 𝑧 ∈ 𝑥))
| | 11:10: | ⊢ ∀𝑥((𝑧 ∈ 𝑦 → (𝑦 ∈ 𝑥
→ 𝑧 ∈ 𝑥)) ↔ ((𝑧 ∈ 𝑦 ∧ 𝑦 ∈ 𝑥) → 𝑧 ∈ 𝑥))
| | 12:1,11: | ⊢ ( 𝐴 ∈ 𝐵 ▶ ([𝐴 / 𝑥](𝑧 ∈ 𝑦
→ (𝑦 ∈ 𝑥 → 𝑧 ∈ 𝑥)) ↔ [𝐴 / 𝑥]((𝑧 ∈ 𝑦 ∧ 𝑦 ∈ 𝑥)
→ 𝑧 ∈ 𝑥)) )
| | 13:9,12: | ⊢ ( 𝐴 ∈ 𝐵 ▶ ([𝐴 / 𝑥]((𝑧 ∈ 𝑦
∧ 𝑦 ∈ 𝑥) → 𝑧 ∈ 𝑥) ↔ ((𝑧 ∈ 𝑦 ∧ 𝑦 ∈ 𝐴)
→ 𝑧 ∈ 𝐴)) )
| | 14:13: | ⊢ ( 𝐴 ∈ 𝐵 ▶ ∀𝑦([𝐴 / 𝑥]((𝑧
∈ 𝑦 ∧ 𝑦 ∈ 𝑥) → 𝑧 ∈ 𝑥) ↔ ((𝑧 ∈ 𝑦 ∧ 𝑦 ∈ 𝐴)
→ 𝑧 ∈ 𝐴)) )
| | 15:14: | ⊢ ( 𝐴 ∈ 𝐵 ▶ (∀𝑦[𝐴 / 𝑥]((𝑧
∈ 𝑦 ∧ 𝑦 ∈ 𝑥) → 𝑧 ∈ 𝑥) ↔ ∀𝑦((𝑧 ∈ 𝑦 ∧ 𝑦 ∈ 𝐴)
→ 𝑧 ∈ 𝐴)) )
| | 16:1: | ⊢ ( 𝐴 ∈ 𝐵 ▶ ([𝐴 / 𝑥]∀𝑦((𝑧
∈ 𝑦 ∧ 𝑦 ∈ 𝑥) → 𝑧 ∈ 𝑥) ↔ ∀𝑦[𝐴 / 𝑥]((𝑧 ∈ 𝑦
∧ 𝑦 ∈ 𝑥) → 𝑧 ∈ 𝑥)) )
| | 17:15,16: | ⊢ ( 𝐴 ∈ 𝐵 ▶ ([𝐴 / 𝑥]∀𝑦((𝑧
∈ 𝑦 ∧ 𝑦 ∈ 𝑥) → 𝑧 ∈ 𝑥) ↔ ∀𝑦((𝑧 ∈ 𝑦 ∧ 𝑦 ∈ 𝐴)
→ 𝑧 ∈ 𝐴)) )
| | 18:17: | ⊢ ( 𝐴 ∈ 𝐵 ▶ ∀𝑧([𝐴 / 𝑥]∀𝑦((
𝑧 ∈ 𝑦 ∧ 𝑦 ∈ 𝑥) → 𝑧 ∈ 𝑥) ↔ ∀𝑦((𝑧 ∈ 𝑦 ∧ 𝑦 ∈ 𝐴)
→ 𝑧 ∈ 𝐴)) )
| | 19:18: | ⊢ ( 𝐴 ∈ 𝐵 ▶ (∀𝑧[𝐴 / 𝑥]∀𝑦((
𝑧 ∈ 𝑦 ∧ 𝑦 ∈ 𝑥) → 𝑧 ∈ 𝑥) ↔ ∀𝑧∀𝑦((𝑧 ∈ 𝑦
∧ 𝑦 ∈ 𝐴) → 𝑧 ∈ 𝐴)) )
| | 20:1: | ⊢ ( 𝐴 ∈ 𝐵 ▶ ([𝐴 / 𝑥]∀𝑧∀𝑦((
𝑧 ∈ 𝑦 ∧ 𝑦 ∈ 𝑥) → 𝑧 ∈ 𝑥) ↔ ∀𝑧[𝐴 / 𝑥]∀𝑦((𝑧
∈ 𝑦 ∧ 𝑦 ∈ 𝑥) → 𝑧 ∈ 𝑥)) )
| | 21:19,20: | ⊢ ( 𝐴 ∈ 𝐵 ▶ ([𝐴 / 𝑥]∀𝑧∀𝑦((
𝑧 ∈ 𝑦 ∧ 𝑦 ∈ 𝑥) → 𝑧 ∈ 𝑥) ↔ ∀𝑧∀𝑦((𝑧 ∈ 𝑦
∧ 𝑦 ∈ 𝐴) → 𝑧 ∈ 𝐴)) )
| | 22:: | ⊢ (Tr 𝐴 ↔ ∀𝑧∀𝑦((𝑧 ∈ 𝑦
∧ 𝑦 ∈ 𝐴) → 𝑧 ∈ 𝐴))
| | 23:21,22: | ⊢ ( 𝐴 ∈ 𝐵 ▶ ([𝐴 / 𝑥]∀𝑧∀𝑦((
𝑧 ∈ 𝑦 ∧ 𝑦 ∈ 𝑥) → 𝑧 ∈ 𝑥) ↔ Tr 𝐴) )
| | 24:: | ⊢ (Tr 𝑥 ↔ ∀𝑧∀𝑦((𝑧 ∈ 𝑦 ∧ 𝑦
∈ 𝑥) → 𝑧 ∈ 𝑥))
| | 25:24: | ⊢ ∀𝑥(Tr 𝑥 ↔ ∀𝑧∀𝑦((𝑧 ∈ 𝑦
∧ 𝑦 ∈ 𝑥) → 𝑧 ∈ 𝑥))
| | 26:1,25: | ⊢ ( 𝐴 ∈ 𝐵 ▶ ([𝐴 / 𝑥]Tr 𝑥
↔ [𝐴 / 𝑥]∀𝑧∀𝑦((𝑧 ∈ 𝑦 ∧ 𝑦 ∈ 𝑥) → 𝑧 ∈ 𝑥)) )
| | 27:23,26: | ⊢ ( 𝐴 ∈ 𝐵 ▶ ([𝐴 / 𝑥]Tr 𝑥
↔ Tr 𝐴) )
| | qed:27: | ⊢ (𝐴 ∈ 𝐵 → ([𝐴 / 𝑥]Tr 𝑥
↔ Tr 𝐴))
|
(Contributed by Alan Sare, 18-Mar-2012.) (Proof modification is
discouraged.) (New usage is discouraged.)
|
| ⊢ (𝐴 ∈ 𝐵 → ([𝐴 / 𝑥]Tr 𝑥 ↔ Tr 𝐴)) |
| |
| Theorem | truniALTVD 44849* |
The union of a class of transitive sets is transitive.
The following User's Proof is a Virtual Deduction proof completed
automatically by the tools program completeusersproof.cmd, which invokes
Mel L. O'Cat's mmj2 and Norm Megill's Metamath Proof Assistant.
truniALT 44512 is truniALTVD 44849 without virtual deductions and was
automatically derived from truniALTVD 44849.
| 1:: | ⊢ ( ∀𝑥 ∈ 𝐴Tr 𝑥 ▶ ∀𝑥 ∈ 𝐴
Tr 𝑥 )
| | 2:: | ⊢ ( ∀𝑥 ∈ 𝐴Tr 𝑥 , (𝑧 ∈ 𝑦
∧ 𝑦 ∈ ∪ 𝐴) ▶ (𝑧 ∈ 𝑦 ∧ 𝑦 ∈ ∪ 𝐴) )
| | 3:2: | ⊢ ( ∀𝑥 ∈ 𝐴Tr 𝑥 , (𝑧 ∈ 𝑦
∧ 𝑦 ∈ ∪ 𝐴) ▶ 𝑧 ∈ 𝑦 )
| | 4:2: | ⊢ ( ∀𝑥 ∈ 𝐴Tr 𝑥 , (𝑧 ∈ 𝑦
∧ 𝑦 ∈ ∪ 𝐴) ▶ 𝑦 ∈ ∪ 𝐴 )
| | 5:4: | ⊢ ( ∀𝑥 ∈ 𝐴Tr 𝑥 , (𝑧 ∈ 𝑦
∧ 𝑦 ∈ ∪ 𝐴) ▶ ∃𝑞(𝑦 ∈ 𝑞 ∧ 𝑞 ∈ 𝐴) )
| | 6:: | ⊢ ( ∀𝑥 ∈ 𝐴Tr 𝑥 , (𝑧 ∈ 𝑦
∧ 𝑦 ∈ ∪ 𝐴), (𝑦 ∈ 𝑞 ∧ 𝑞 ∈ 𝐴) ▶ (𝑦 ∈ 𝑞 ∧ 𝑞 ∈ 𝐴) )
| | 7:6: | ⊢ ( ∀𝑥 ∈ 𝐴Tr 𝑥 , (𝑧 ∈ 𝑦
∧ 𝑦 ∈ ∪ 𝐴), (𝑦 ∈ 𝑞 ∧ 𝑞 ∈ 𝐴) ▶ 𝑦 ∈ 𝑞 )
| | 8:6: | ⊢ ( ∀𝑥 ∈ 𝐴Tr 𝑥 , (𝑧 ∈ 𝑦
∧ 𝑦 ∈ ∪ 𝐴), (𝑦 ∈ 𝑞 ∧ 𝑞 ∈ 𝐴) ▶ 𝑞 ∈ 𝐴 )
| | 9:1,8: | ⊢ ( ∀𝑥 ∈ 𝐴Tr 𝑥 , (𝑧 ∈ 𝑦
∧ 𝑦 ∈ ∪ 𝐴), (𝑦 ∈ 𝑞 ∧ 𝑞 ∈ 𝐴) ▶ [𝑞 / 𝑥]Tr 𝑥 )
| | 10:8,9: | ⊢ ( ∀𝑥 ∈ 𝐴Tr 𝑥 , (𝑧 ∈ 𝑦
∧ 𝑦 ∈ ∪ 𝐴), (𝑦 ∈ 𝑞 ∧ 𝑞 ∈ 𝐴) ▶ Tr 𝑞 )
| | 11:3,7,10: | ⊢ ( ∀𝑥 ∈ 𝐴Tr 𝑥 , (𝑧 ∈ 𝑦
∧ 𝑦 ∈ ∪ 𝐴), (𝑦 ∈ 𝑞 ∧ 𝑞 ∈ 𝐴) ▶ 𝑧 ∈ 𝑞 )
| | 12:11,8: | ⊢ ( ∀𝑥 ∈ 𝐴Tr 𝑥 , (𝑧 ∈ 𝑦
∧ 𝑦 ∈ ∪ 𝐴), (𝑦 ∈ 𝑞 ∧ 𝑞 ∈ 𝐴) ▶ 𝑧 ∈ ∪ 𝐴 )
| | 13:12: | ⊢ ( ∀𝑥 ∈ 𝐴Tr 𝑥 , (𝑧 ∈ 𝑦
∧ 𝑦 ∈ ∪ 𝐴) ▶ ((𝑦 ∈ 𝑞 ∧ 𝑞 ∈ 𝐴) → 𝑧 ∈ ∪ 𝐴) )
| | 14:13: | ⊢ ( ∀𝑥 ∈ 𝐴Tr 𝑥 , (𝑧 ∈ 𝑦
∧ 𝑦 ∈ ∪ 𝐴) ▶ ∀𝑞((𝑦 ∈ 𝑞 ∧ 𝑞 ∈ 𝐴) → 𝑧 ∈ ∪ 𝐴) )
| | 15:14: | ⊢ ( ∀𝑥 ∈ 𝐴Tr 𝑥 , (𝑧 ∈ 𝑦
∧ 𝑦 ∈ ∪ 𝐴) ▶ (∃𝑞(𝑦 ∈ 𝑞 ∧ 𝑞 ∈ 𝐴) → 𝑧 ∈ ∪ 𝐴) )
| | 16:5,15: | ⊢ ( ∀𝑥 ∈ 𝐴Tr 𝑥 , (𝑧 ∈ 𝑦
∧ 𝑦 ∈ ∪ 𝐴) ▶ 𝑧 ∈ ∪ 𝐴 )
| | 17:16: | ⊢ ( ∀𝑥 ∈ 𝐴Tr 𝑥 ▶ ((𝑧 ∈ 𝑦
∧ 𝑦 ∈ ∪ 𝐴) → 𝑧 ∈ ∪ 𝐴) )
| | 18:17: | ⊢ ( ∀𝑥 ∈ 𝐴Tr 𝑥
▶ ∀𝑧∀𝑦((𝑧 ∈ 𝑦 ∧ 𝑦 ∈ ∪ 𝐴) → 𝑧 ∈ ∪ 𝐴) )
| | 19:18: | ⊢ ( ∀𝑥 ∈ 𝐴Tr 𝑥 ▶ Tr ∪ 𝐴 )
| | qed:19: | ⊢ (∀𝑥 ∈ 𝐴Tr 𝑥 → Tr ∪ 𝐴)
|
(Contributed by Alan Sare, 18-Mar-2012.)
(Proof modification is discouraged.) (New usage is discouraged.)
|
| ⊢ (∀𝑥 ∈ 𝐴 Tr 𝑥 → Tr ∪
𝐴) |
| |
| Theorem | ee33VD 44850 |
Non-virtual deduction form of e33 44705.
The following User's Proof is a Virtual Deduction proof completed
automatically by the tools program completeusersproof.cmd, which invokes
Mel L. O'Cat's mmj2 and Norm Megill's Metamath Proof Assistant.
ee33 44492 is ee33VD 44850 without virtual deductions and was automatically
derived from ee33VD 44850.
| h1:: | ⊢ (𝜑 → (𝜓 → (𝜒 → 𝜃)))
| | h2:: | ⊢ (𝜑 → (𝜓 → (𝜒 → 𝜏)))
| | h3:: | ⊢ (𝜃 → (𝜏 → 𝜂))
| | 4:1,3: | ⊢ (𝜑 → (𝜓 → (𝜒 → (𝜏 → 𝜂))))
| | 5:4: | ⊢ (𝜏 → (𝜑 → (𝜓 → (𝜒 → 𝜂))))
| | 6:2,5: | ⊢ (𝜑 → (𝜓 → (𝜒 → (𝜑 → (𝜓
→ (𝜒 → 𝜂))))))
| | 7:6: | ⊢ (𝜓 → (𝜒 → (𝜑 → (𝜓 → (𝜒
→ 𝜂)))))
| | 8:7: | ⊢ (𝜒 → (𝜑 → (𝜓 → (𝜒 → 𝜂))))
| | qed:8: | ⊢ (𝜑 → (𝜓 → (𝜒 → 𝜂)))
|
(Contributed by Alan Sare, 18-Mar-2012.)
(Proof modification is discouraged.) (New usage is discouraged.)
|
| ⊢ (𝜑 → (𝜓 → (𝜒 → 𝜃))) & ⊢ (𝜑 → (𝜓 → (𝜒 → 𝜏))) & ⊢ (𝜃 → (𝜏 → 𝜂)) ⇒ ⊢ (𝜑 → (𝜓 → (𝜒 → 𝜂))) |
| |
| Theorem | trintALTVD 44851* |
The intersection of a class of transitive sets is transitive. Virtual
deduction proof of trintALT 44852.
The following User's Proof is a Virtual Deduction proof completed
automatically by the tools program completeusersproof.cmd, which invokes
Mel L. O'Cat's mmj2 and Norm Megill's Metamath Proof Assistant.
trintALT 44852 is trintALTVD 44851 without virtual deductions and was
automatically derived from trintALTVD 44851.
| 1:: | ⊢ ( ∀𝑥 ∈ 𝐴Tr 𝑥 ▶ ∀𝑥 ∈ 𝐴Tr 𝑥 )
| | 2:: | ⊢ ( ∀𝑥 ∈ 𝐴Tr 𝑥 , (𝑧 ∈ 𝑦 ∧ 𝑦 ∈
∩ 𝐴) ▶ (𝑧 ∈ 𝑦 ∧ 𝑦 ∈ ∩ 𝐴) )
| | 3:2: | ⊢ ( ∀𝑥 ∈ 𝐴Tr 𝑥 , (𝑧 ∈ 𝑦 ∧ 𝑦 ∈
∩ 𝐴) ▶ 𝑧 ∈ 𝑦 )
| | 4:2: | ⊢ ( ∀𝑥 ∈ 𝐴Tr 𝑥 , (𝑧 ∈ 𝑦 ∧ 𝑦 ∈
∩ 𝐴) ▶ 𝑦 ∈ ∩ 𝐴 )
| | 5:4: | ⊢ ( ∀𝑥 ∈ 𝐴Tr 𝑥 , (𝑧 ∈ 𝑦 ∧ 𝑦 ∈
∩ 𝐴) ▶ ∀𝑞 ∈ 𝐴𝑦 ∈ 𝑞 )
| | 6:5: | ⊢ ( ∀𝑥 ∈ 𝐴Tr 𝑥 , (𝑧 ∈ 𝑦 ∧ 𝑦 ∈
∩ 𝐴) ▶ (𝑞 ∈ 𝐴 → 𝑦 ∈ 𝑞) )
| | 7:: | ⊢ ( ∀𝑥 ∈ 𝐴Tr 𝑥 , (𝑧 ∈ 𝑦 ∧ 𝑦 ∈
∩ 𝐴), 𝑞 ∈ 𝐴 ▶ 𝑞 ∈ 𝐴 )
| | 8:7,6: | ⊢ ( ∀𝑥 ∈ 𝐴Tr 𝑥 , (𝑧 ∈ 𝑦 ∧ 𝑦 ∈
∩ 𝐴), 𝑞 ∈ 𝐴 ▶ 𝑦 ∈ 𝑞 )
| | 9:7,1: | ⊢ ( ∀𝑥 ∈ 𝐴Tr 𝑥 , (𝑧 ∈ 𝑦 ∧ 𝑦 ∈
∩ 𝐴), 𝑞 ∈ 𝐴 ▶ [𝑞 / 𝑥]Tr 𝑥 )
| | 10:7,9: | ⊢ ( ∀𝑥 ∈ 𝐴Tr 𝑥 , (𝑧 ∈ 𝑦 ∧ 𝑦 ∈
∩ 𝐴), 𝑞 ∈ 𝐴 ▶ Tr 𝑞 )
| | 11:10,3,8: | ⊢ ( ∀𝑥 ∈ 𝐴Tr 𝑥 , (𝑧 ∈ 𝑦 ∧ 𝑦 ∈
∩ 𝐴), 𝑞 ∈ 𝐴 ▶ 𝑧 ∈ 𝑞 )
| | 12:11: | ⊢ ( ∀𝑥 ∈ 𝐴Tr 𝑥 , (𝑧 ∈ 𝑦 ∧ 𝑦 ∈
∩ 𝐴) ▶ (𝑞 ∈ 𝐴 → 𝑧 ∈ 𝑞) )
| | 13:12: | ⊢ ( ∀𝑥 ∈ 𝐴Tr 𝑥 , (𝑧 ∈ 𝑦 ∧ 𝑦 ∈
∩ 𝐴) ▶ ∀𝑞(𝑞 ∈ 𝐴 → 𝑧 ∈ 𝑞) )
| | 14:13: | ⊢ ( ∀𝑥 ∈ 𝐴Tr 𝑥 , (𝑧 ∈ 𝑦 ∧ 𝑦 ∈
∩ 𝐴) ▶ ∀𝑞 ∈ 𝐴𝑧 ∈ 𝑞 )
| | 15:3,14: | ⊢ ( ∀𝑥 ∈ 𝐴Tr 𝑥 , (𝑧 ∈ 𝑦 ∧ 𝑦 ∈
∩ 𝐴) ▶ 𝑧 ∈ ∩ 𝐴 )
| | 16:15: | ⊢ ( ∀𝑥 ∈ 𝐴Tr 𝑥 ▶ ((𝑧 ∈ 𝑦 ∧ 𝑦
∈ ∩ 𝐴) → 𝑧 ∈ ∩ 𝐴) )
| | 17:16: | ⊢ ( ∀𝑥 ∈ 𝐴Tr 𝑥 ▶ ∀𝑧∀𝑦((𝑧
∈ 𝑦 ∧ 𝑦 ∈ ∩ 𝐴) → 𝑧 ∈ ∩ 𝐴) )
| | 18:17: | ⊢ ( ∀𝑥 ∈ 𝐴Tr 𝑥 ▶ Tr ∩ 𝐴 )
| | qed:18: | ⊢ (∀𝑥 ∈ 𝐴Tr 𝑥 → Tr ∩ 𝐴)
|
(Contributed by Alan Sare, 17-Apr-2012.)
(Proof modification is discouraged.) (New usage is discouraged.)
|
| ⊢ (∀𝑥 ∈ 𝐴 Tr 𝑥 → Tr ∩
𝐴) |
| |
| Theorem | trintALT 44852* |
The intersection of a class of transitive sets is transitive. Exercise
5(b) of [Enderton] p. 73. trintALT 44852 is an alternate proof of trint 5301.
trintALT 44852 is trintALTVD 44851 without virtual deductions and was
automatically derived from trintALTVD 44851 using the tools program
translate..without..overwriting.cmd and the Metamath program
"MM-PA>
MINIMIZE_WITH *" command. (Contributed by Alan Sare, 17-Apr-2012.)
(Proof modification is discouraged.) (New usage is discouraged.)
|
| ⊢ (∀𝑥 ∈ 𝐴 Tr 𝑥 → Tr ∩
𝐴) |
| |
| Theorem | undif3VD 44853 |
The first equality of Exercise 13 of [TakeutiZaring] p. 22. Virtual
deduction proof of undif3 4319.
The following User's Proof is a Virtual Deduction proof completed
automatically by the tools program completeusersproof.cmd, which invokes
Mel L. O'Cat's mmj2 and Norm Megill's Metamath Proof Assistant.
undif3 4319 is undif3VD 44853 without virtual deductions and was automatically
derived from undif3VD 44853.
| 1:: | ⊢ (𝑥 ∈ (𝐴 ∪ (𝐵 ∖ 𝐶)) ↔ (𝑥 ∈ 𝐴
∨ 𝑥 ∈ (𝐵 ∖ 𝐶)))
| | 2:: | ⊢ (𝑥 ∈ (𝐵 ∖ 𝐶) ↔ (𝑥 ∈ 𝐵 ∧ ¬ 𝑥 ∈
𝐶))
| | 3:2: | ⊢ ((𝑥 ∈ 𝐴 ∨ 𝑥 ∈ (𝐵 ∖ 𝐶)) ↔ (𝑥
∈ 𝐴 ∨ (𝑥 ∈ 𝐵 ∧ ¬ 𝑥 ∈ 𝐶)))
| | 4:1,3: | ⊢ (𝑥 ∈ (𝐴 ∪ (𝐵 ∖ 𝐶)) ↔ (𝑥 ∈ 𝐴
∨ (𝑥 ∈ 𝐵 ∧ ¬ 𝑥 ∈ 𝐶)))
| | 5:: | ⊢ ( 𝑥 ∈ 𝐴 ▶ 𝑥 ∈ 𝐴 )
| | 6:5: | ⊢ ( 𝑥 ∈ 𝐴 ▶ (𝑥 ∈ 𝐴 ∨ 𝑥 ∈ 𝐵) )
| | 7:5: | ⊢ ( 𝑥 ∈ 𝐴 ▶ (¬ 𝑥 ∈ 𝐶 ∨ 𝑥 ∈ 𝐴) )
| | 8:6,7: | ⊢ ( 𝑥 ∈ 𝐴 ▶ ((𝑥 ∈ 𝐴 ∨ 𝑥 ∈ 𝐵) ∧
(¬ 𝑥 ∈ 𝐶 ∨ 𝑥 ∈ 𝐴)) )
| | 9:8: | ⊢ (𝑥 ∈ 𝐴 → ((𝑥 ∈ 𝐴 ∨ 𝑥 ∈ 𝐵) ∧ (
¬ 𝑥 ∈ 𝐶 ∨ 𝑥 ∈ 𝐴)))
| | 10:: | ⊢ ( (𝑥 ∈ 𝐵 ∧ ¬ 𝑥 ∈ 𝐶) ▶ (𝑥 ∈ 𝐵
∧ ¬ 𝑥 ∈ 𝐶) )
| | 11:10: | ⊢ ( (𝑥 ∈ 𝐵 ∧ ¬ 𝑥 ∈ 𝐶) ▶ 𝑥 ∈ 𝐵 )
| | 12:10: | ⊢ ( (𝑥 ∈ 𝐵 ∧ ¬ 𝑥 ∈ 𝐶) ▶ ¬ 𝑥 ∈ 𝐶
)
| | 13:11: | ⊢ ( (𝑥 ∈ 𝐵 ∧ ¬ 𝑥 ∈ 𝐶) ▶ (𝑥 ∈ 𝐴
∨ 𝑥 ∈ 𝐵) )
| | 14:12: | ⊢ ( (𝑥 ∈ 𝐵 ∧ ¬ 𝑥 ∈ 𝐶) ▶ (¬ 𝑥 ∈
𝐶 ∨ 𝑥 ∈ 𝐴) )
| | 15:13,14: | ⊢ ( (𝑥 ∈ 𝐵 ∧ ¬ 𝑥 ∈ 𝐶) ▶ ((𝑥 ∈
𝐴 ∨ 𝑥 ∈ 𝐵) ∧ (¬ 𝑥 ∈ 𝐶 ∨ 𝑥 ∈ 𝐴)) )
| | 16:15: | ⊢ ((𝑥 ∈ 𝐵 ∧ ¬ 𝑥 ∈ 𝐶) → ((𝑥 ∈ 𝐴
∨ 𝑥 ∈ 𝐵) ∧ (¬ 𝑥 ∈ 𝐶 ∨ 𝑥 ∈ 𝐴)))
| | 17:9,16: | ⊢ ((𝑥 ∈ 𝐴 ∨ (𝑥 ∈ 𝐵 ∧ ¬ 𝑥 ∈ 𝐶))
→ ((𝑥 ∈ 𝐴 ∨ 𝑥 ∈ 𝐵) ∧ (¬ 𝑥 ∈ 𝐶 ∨ 𝑥 ∈ 𝐴)))
| | 18:: | ⊢ ( (𝑥 ∈ 𝐴 ∧ ¬ 𝑥 ∈ 𝐶) ▶ (𝑥 ∈ 𝐴
∧ ¬ 𝑥 ∈ 𝐶) )
| | 19:18: | ⊢ ( (𝑥 ∈ 𝐴 ∧ ¬ 𝑥 ∈ 𝐶) ▶ 𝑥 ∈ 𝐴 )
| | 20:18: | ⊢ ( (𝑥 ∈ 𝐴 ∧ ¬ 𝑥 ∈ 𝐶) ▶ ¬ 𝑥 ∈ 𝐶
)
| | 21:18: | ⊢ ( (𝑥 ∈ 𝐴 ∧ ¬ 𝑥 ∈ 𝐶) ▶ (𝑥 ∈ 𝐴
∨ (𝑥 ∈ 𝐵 ∧ ¬ 𝑥 ∈ 𝐶)) )
| | 22:21: | ⊢ ((𝑥 ∈ 𝐴 ∧ ¬ 𝑥 ∈ 𝐶) → (𝑥 ∈ 𝐴 ∨
(𝑥 ∈ 𝐵 ∧ ¬ 𝑥 ∈ 𝐶)))
| | 23:: | ⊢ ( (𝑥 ∈ 𝐴 ∧ 𝑥 ∈ 𝐴) ▶ (𝑥 ∈ 𝐴 ∧
𝑥 ∈ 𝐴) )
| | 24:23: | ⊢ ( (𝑥 ∈ 𝐴 ∧ 𝑥 ∈ 𝐴) ▶ 𝑥 ∈ 𝐴 )
| | 25:24: | ⊢ ( (𝑥 ∈ 𝐴 ∧ 𝑥 ∈ 𝐴) ▶ (𝑥 ∈ 𝐴 ∨
(𝑥 ∈ 𝐵 ∧ ¬ 𝑥 ∈ 𝐶)) )
| | 26:25: | ⊢ ((𝑥 ∈ 𝐴 ∧ 𝑥 ∈ 𝐴) → (𝑥 ∈ 𝐴 ∨ (
𝑥 ∈ 𝐵 ∧ ¬ 𝑥 ∈ 𝐶)))
| | 27:10: | ⊢ ( (𝑥 ∈ 𝐵 ∧ ¬ 𝑥 ∈ 𝐶) ▶ (𝑥 ∈ 𝐴
∨ (𝑥 ∈ 𝐵 ∧ ¬ 𝑥 ∈ 𝐶)) )
| | 28:27: | ⊢ ((𝑥 ∈ 𝐵 ∧ ¬ 𝑥 ∈ 𝐶) → (𝑥 ∈ 𝐴 ∨
(𝑥 ∈ 𝐵 ∧ ¬ 𝑥 ∈ 𝐶)))
| | 29:: | ⊢ ( (𝑥 ∈ 𝐵 ∧ 𝑥 ∈ 𝐴) ▶ (𝑥 ∈ 𝐵 ∧
𝑥 ∈ 𝐴) )
| | 30:29: | ⊢ ( (𝑥 ∈ 𝐵 ∧ 𝑥 ∈ 𝐴) ▶ 𝑥 ∈ 𝐴 )
| | 31:30: | ⊢ ( (𝑥 ∈ 𝐵 ∧ 𝑥 ∈ 𝐴) ▶ (𝑥 ∈ 𝐴 ∨
(𝑥 ∈ 𝐵 ∧ ¬ 𝑥 ∈ 𝐶)) )
| | 32:31: | ⊢ ((𝑥 ∈ 𝐵 ∧ 𝑥 ∈ 𝐴) → (𝑥 ∈ 𝐴 ∨ (
𝑥 ∈ 𝐵 ∧ ¬ 𝑥 ∈ 𝐶)))
| | 33:22,26: | ⊢ (((𝑥 ∈ 𝐴 ∧ ¬ 𝑥 ∈ 𝐶) ∨ (𝑥 ∈ 𝐴
∧ 𝑥 ∈ 𝐴)) → (𝑥 ∈ 𝐴 ∨ (𝑥 ∈ 𝐵 ∧ ¬ 𝑥 ∈ 𝐶)))
| | 34:28,32: | ⊢ (((𝑥 ∈ 𝐵 ∧ ¬ 𝑥 ∈ 𝐶) ∨ (𝑥 ∈ 𝐵
∧ 𝑥 ∈ 𝐴)) → (𝑥 ∈ 𝐴 ∨ (𝑥 ∈ 𝐵 ∧ ¬ 𝑥 ∈ 𝐶)))
| | 35:33,34: | ⊢ ((((𝑥 ∈ 𝐴 ∧ ¬ 𝑥 ∈ 𝐶) ∨ (𝑥 ∈
𝐴 ∧ 𝑥 ∈ 𝐴)) ∨ ((𝑥 ∈ 𝐵 ∧ ¬ 𝑥 ∈ 𝐶) ∨ (𝑥 ∈ 𝐵 ∧ 𝑥 ∈ 𝐴)))
→ (𝑥 ∈ 𝐴 ∨ (𝑥 ∈ 𝐵 ∧ ¬ 𝑥 ∈ 𝐶)))
| | 36:: | ⊢ ((((𝑥 ∈ 𝐴 ∧ ¬ 𝑥 ∈ 𝐶) ∨ (𝑥 ∈
𝐴 ∧ 𝑥 ∈ 𝐴)) ∨ ((𝑥 ∈ 𝐵 ∧ ¬ 𝑥 ∈ 𝐶) ∨ (𝑥 ∈ 𝐵 ∧ 𝑥 ∈ 𝐴)))
↔ ((𝑥 ∈ 𝐴 ∨ 𝑥 ∈ 𝐵) ∧ (¬ 𝑥 ∈ 𝐶 ∨ 𝑥 ∈ 𝐴)))
| | 37:36,35: | ⊢ (((𝑥 ∈ 𝐴 ∨ 𝑥 ∈ 𝐵) ∧ (¬ 𝑥 ∈ 𝐶
∨ 𝑥 ∈ 𝐴)) → (𝑥 ∈ 𝐴 ∨ (𝑥 ∈ 𝐵 ∧ ¬ 𝑥 ∈ 𝐶)))
| | 38:17,37: | ⊢ ((𝑥 ∈ 𝐴 ∨ (𝑥 ∈ 𝐵 ∧ ¬ 𝑥 ∈ 𝐶))
↔ ((𝑥 ∈ 𝐴 ∨ 𝑥 ∈ 𝐵) ∧ (¬ 𝑥 ∈ 𝐶 ∨ 𝑥 ∈ 𝐴)))
| | 39:: | ⊢ (𝑥 ∈ (𝐶 ∖ 𝐴) ↔ (𝑥 ∈ 𝐶 ∧ ¬ 𝑥 ∈
𝐴))
| | 40:39: | ⊢ (¬ 𝑥 ∈ (𝐶 ∖ 𝐴) ↔ ¬ (𝑥 ∈ 𝐶 ∧
¬ 𝑥 ∈ 𝐴))
| | 41:: | ⊢ (¬ (𝑥 ∈ 𝐶 ∧ ¬ 𝑥 ∈ 𝐴) ↔ (¬ 𝑥
∈ 𝐶 ∨ 𝑥 ∈ 𝐴))
| | 42:40,41: | ⊢ (¬ 𝑥 ∈ (𝐶 ∖ 𝐴) ↔ (¬ 𝑥 ∈ 𝐶 ∨ 𝑥
∈ 𝐴))
| | 43:: | ⊢ (𝑥 ∈ (𝐴 ∪ 𝐵) ↔ (𝑥 ∈ 𝐴 ∨ 𝑥 ∈ 𝐵
))
| | 44:43,42: | ⊢ ((𝑥 ∈ (𝐴 ∪ 𝐵) ∧ ¬ 𝑥 ∈ (𝐶 ∖ 𝐴)
) ↔ ((𝑥 ∈ 𝐴 ∨ 𝑥 ∈ 𝐵) ∧ (¬ 𝑥 ∈ 𝐶 ∧ 𝑥 ∈ 𝐴)))
| | 45:: | ⊢ (𝑥 ∈ ((𝐴 ∪ 𝐵) ∖ (𝐶 ∖ 𝐴)) ↔ (
𝑥 ∈ (𝐴 ∪ 𝐵) ∧ ¬ 𝑥 ∈ (𝐶 ∖ 𝐴)))
| | 46:45,44: | ⊢ (𝑥 ∈ ((𝐴 ∪ 𝐵) ∖ (𝐶 ∖ 𝐴)) ↔ (
(𝑥 ∈ 𝐴 ∨ 𝑥 ∈ 𝐵) ∧ (¬ 𝑥 ∈ 𝐶 ∨ 𝑥 ∈ 𝐴)))
| | 47:4,38: | ⊢ (𝑥 ∈ (𝐴 ∪ (𝐵 ∖ 𝐶)) ↔ ((𝑥 ∈ 𝐴
∨ 𝑥 ∈ 𝐵) ∧ (¬ 𝑥 ∈ 𝐶 ∨ 𝑥 ∈ 𝐴)))
| | 48:46,47: | ⊢ (𝑥 ∈ (𝐴 ∪ (𝐵 ∖ 𝐶)) ↔ 𝑥 ∈ ((𝐴
∪ 𝐵) ∖ (𝐶 ∖ 𝐴)))
| | 49:48: | ⊢ ∀𝑥(𝑥 ∈ (𝐴 ∪ (𝐵 ∖ 𝐶)) ↔ 𝑥 ∈
((𝐴 ∪ 𝐵) ∖ (𝐶 ∖ 𝐴)))
| | qed:49: | ⊢ (𝐴 ∪ (𝐵 ∖ 𝐶)) = ((𝐴 ∪ 𝐵) ∖ (𝐶
∖ 𝐴))
|
(Contributed by Alan Sare, 17-Apr-2012.)
(Proof modification is discouraged.) (New usage is discouraged.)
|
| ⊢ (𝐴 ∪ (𝐵 ∖ 𝐶)) = ((𝐴 ∪ 𝐵) ∖ (𝐶 ∖ 𝐴)) |
| |
| Theorem | sbcssgVD 44854 |
Virtual deduction proof of sbcssg 4543.
The following User's Proof is a Virtual Deduction proof completed
automatically by the tools program completeusersproof.cmd, which invokes
Mel L. O'Cat's mmj2 and Norm Megill's Metamath Proof Assistant.
sbcssg 4543 is sbcssgVD 44854 without virtual deductions and was automatically
derived from sbcssgVD 44854.
| 1:: | ⊢ ( 𝐴 ∈ 𝐵 ▶ 𝐴 ∈ 𝐵 )
| | 2:1: | ⊢ ( 𝐴 ∈ 𝐵 ▶ ([𝐴 / 𝑥]𝑦 ∈ 𝐶 ↔ 𝑦
∈ ⦋𝐴 / 𝑥⦌𝐶) )
| | 3:1: | ⊢ ( 𝐴 ∈ 𝐵 ▶ ([𝐴 / 𝑥]𝑦 ∈ 𝐷 ↔ 𝑦
∈ ⦋𝐴 / 𝑥⦌𝐷) )
| | 4:2,3: | ⊢ ( 𝐴 ∈ 𝐵 ▶ (([𝐴 / 𝑥]𝑦 ∈ 𝐶 →
[𝐴 / 𝑥]𝑦 ∈ 𝐷) ↔ (𝑦 ∈ ⦋𝐴 / 𝑥⦌𝐶 → 𝑦 ∈ ⦋𝐴 / 𝑥⦌𝐷
)) )
| | 5:1: | ⊢ ( 𝐴 ∈ 𝐵 ▶ ([𝐴 / 𝑥](𝑦 ∈ 𝐶 →
𝑦 ∈ 𝐷) ↔ ([𝐴 / 𝑥]𝑦 ∈ 𝐶 → [𝐴 / 𝑥]𝑦 ∈ 𝐷)) )
| | 6:4,5: | ⊢ ( 𝐴 ∈ 𝐵 ▶ ([𝐴 / 𝑥](𝑦 ∈ 𝐶 →
𝑦 ∈ 𝐷) ↔ (𝑦 ∈ ⦋𝐴 / 𝑥⦌𝐶 → 𝑦 ∈ ⦋𝐴 / 𝑥⦌𝐷)) )
| | 7:6: | ⊢ ( 𝐴 ∈ 𝐵 ▶ ∀𝑦([𝐴 / 𝑥](𝑦 ∈
𝐶 → 𝑦 ∈ 𝐷) ↔ (𝑦 ∈ ⦋𝐴 / 𝑥⦌𝐶 → 𝑦 ∈ ⦋𝐴 / 𝑥⦌𝐷)) )
| | 8:7: | ⊢ ( 𝐴 ∈ 𝐵 ▶ (∀𝑦[𝐴 / 𝑥](𝑦 ∈
𝐶 → 𝑦 ∈ 𝐷) ↔ ∀𝑦(𝑦 ∈ ⦋𝐴 / 𝑥⦌𝐶 → 𝑦 ∈ ⦋𝐴 / 𝑥⦌𝐷)
) )
| | 9:1: | ⊢ ( 𝐴 ∈ 𝐵 ▶ ([𝐴 / 𝑥]∀𝑦(𝑦 ∈
𝐶 → 𝑦 ∈ 𝐷) ↔ ∀𝑦[𝐴 / 𝑥](𝑦 ∈ 𝐶 → 𝑦 ∈ 𝐷)) )
| | 10:8,9: | ⊢ ( 𝐴 ∈ 𝐵 ▶ ([𝐴 / 𝑥]∀𝑦(𝑦 ∈
𝐶 → 𝑦 ∈ 𝐷) ↔ ∀𝑦(𝑦 ∈ ⦋𝐴 / 𝑥⦌𝐶 → 𝑦 ∈ ⦋𝐴 / 𝑥⦌𝐷)
) )
| | 11:: | ⊢ (𝐶 ⊆ 𝐷 ↔ ∀𝑦(𝑦 ∈ 𝐶 → 𝑦 ∈ 𝐷))
| | 110:11: | ⊢ ∀𝑥(𝐶 ⊆ 𝐷 ↔ ∀𝑦(𝑦 ∈ 𝐶 → 𝑦 ∈
𝐷))
| | 12:1,110: | ⊢ ( 𝐴 ∈ 𝐵 ▶ ([𝐴 / 𝑥]𝐶 ⊆ 𝐷 ↔
[𝐴 / 𝑥]∀𝑦(𝑦 ∈ 𝐶 → 𝑦 ∈ 𝐷)) )
| | 13:10,12: | ⊢ ( 𝐴 ∈ 𝐵 ▶ ([𝐴 / 𝑥]𝐶 ⊆ 𝐷 ↔
∀𝑦(𝑦 ∈ ⦋𝐴 / 𝑥⦌𝐶 → 𝑦 ∈ ⦋𝐴 / 𝑥⦌𝐷)) )
| | 14:: | ⊢ (⦋𝐴 / 𝑥⦌𝐶 ⊆ ⦋𝐴 / 𝑥⦌𝐷 ↔ ∀
𝑦(𝑦 ∈ ⦋𝐴 / 𝑥⦌𝐶 → 𝑦 ∈ ⦋𝐴 / 𝑥⦌𝐷))
| | 15:13,14: | ⊢ ( 𝐴 ∈ 𝐵 ▶ ([𝐴 / 𝑥]𝐶 ⊆ 𝐷 ↔
⦋𝐴 / 𝑥⦌𝐶 ⊆ ⦋𝐴 / 𝑥⦌𝐷) )
| | qed:15: | ⊢ (𝐴 ∈ 𝐵 → ([𝐴 / 𝑥]𝐶 ⊆ 𝐷 ↔ ⦋
𝐴 / 𝑥⦌𝐶 ⊆ ⦋𝐴 / 𝑥⦌𝐷))
|
(Contributed by Alan Sare, 22-Jul-2012.)
(Proof modification is discouraged.) (New usage is discouraged.)
|
| ⊢ (𝐴 ∈ 𝐵 → ([𝐴 / 𝑥]𝐶 ⊆ 𝐷 ↔ ⦋𝐴 / 𝑥⦌𝐶 ⊆ ⦋𝐴 / 𝑥⦌𝐷)) |
| |
| Theorem | csbingVD 44855 |
Virtual deduction proof of csbin 4465.
The following User's Proof is a Virtual Deduction proof completed
automatically by the tools program completeusersproof.cmd, which invokes
Mel L. O'Cat's mmj2 and Norm Megill's Metamath Proof Assistant.
csbin 4465 is csbingVD 44855 without virtual deductions and was
automatically derived from csbingVD 44855.
| 1:: | ⊢ ( 𝐴 ∈ 𝐵 ▶ 𝐴 ∈ 𝐵 )
| | 2:: | ⊢ (𝐶 ∩ 𝐷) = {𝑦 ∣ (𝑦 ∈ 𝐶 ∧ 𝑦 ∈ 𝐷)
}
| | 20:2: | ⊢ ∀𝑥(𝐶 ∩ 𝐷) = {𝑦 ∣ (𝑦 ∈ 𝐶 ∧ 𝑦
∈ 𝐷)}
| | 30:1,20: | ⊢ ( 𝐴 ∈ 𝐵 ▶ [𝐴 / 𝑥](𝐶 ∩ 𝐷) =
{𝑦 ∣ (𝑦 ∈ 𝐶 ∧ 𝑦 ∈ 𝐷)} )
| | 3:1,30: | ⊢ ( 𝐴 ∈ 𝐵 ▶ ⦋𝐴 / 𝑥⦌(𝐶 ∩ 𝐷) =
⦋𝐴 / 𝑥⦌{𝑦 ∣ (𝑦 ∈ 𝐶 ∧ 𝑦 ∈ 𝐷)} )
| | 4:1: | ⊢ ( 𝐴 ∈ 𝐵 ▶ ⦋𝐴 / 𝑥⦌{𝑦 ∣ (𝑦 ∈ 𝐶
∧ 𝑦 ∈ 𝐷)} = {𝑦 ∣ [𝐴 / 𝑥](𝑦 ∈ 𝐶 ∧ 𝑦 ∈ 𝐷)} )
| | 5:3,4: | ⊢ ( 𝐴 ∈ 𝐵 ▶ ⦋𝐴 / 𝑥⦌(𝐶 ∩ 𝐷) =
{𝑦 ∣ [𝐴 / 𝑥](𝑦 ∈ 𝐶 ∧ 𝑦 ∈ 𝐷)} )
| | 6:1: | ⊢ ( 𝐴 ∈ 𝐵 ▶ ([𝐴 / 𝑥]𝑦 ∈ 𝐶 ↔ 𝑦
∈ ⦋𝐴 / 𝑥⦌𝐶) )
| | 7:1: | ⊢ ( 𝐴 ∈ 𝐵 ▶ ([𝐴 / 𝑥]𝑦 ∈ 𝐷 ↔ 𝑦
∈ ⦋𝐴 / 𝑥⦌𝐷) )
| | 8:6,7: | ⊢ ( 𝐴 ∈ 𝐵 ▶ (([𝐴 / 𝑥]𝑦 ∈ 𝐶 ∧
[𝐴 / 𝑥]𝑦 ∈ 𝐷) ↔ (𝑦 ∈ ⦋𝐴 / 𝑥⦌𝐶 ∧ 𝑦 ∈ ⦋𝐴 / 𝑥⦌𝐷
)) )
| | 9:1: | ⊢ ( 𝐴 ∈ 𝐵 ▶ ([𝐴 / 𝑥](𝑦 ∈ 𝐶 ∧
𝑦 ∈ 𝐷) ↔ ([𝐴 / 𝑥]𝑦 ∈ 𝐶 ∧ [𝐴 / 𝑥]𝑦 ∈ 𝐷)) )
| | 10:9,8: | ⊢ ( 𝐴 ∈ 𝐵 ▶ ([𝐴 / 𝑥](𝑦 ∈ 𝐶 ∧
𝑦 ∈ 𝐷) ↔ (𝑦 ∈ ⦋𝐴 / 𝑥⦌𝐶 ∧ 𝑦 ∈ ⦋𝐴 / 𝑥⦌𝐷)) )
| | 11:10: | ⊢ ( 𝐴 ∈ 𝐵 ▶ ∀𝑦([𝐴 / 𝑥](𝑦 ∈
𝐶 ∧ 𝑦 ∈ 𝐷) ↔ (𝑦 ∈ ⦋𝐴 / 𝑥⦌𝐶 ∧ 𝑦 ∈ ⦋𝐴 / 𝑥⦌𝐷)) )
| | 12:11: | ⊢ ( 𝐴 ∈ 𝐵 ▶ {𝑦 ∣ [𝐴 / 𝑥](𝑦 ∈ 𝐶
∧ 𝑦 ∈ 𝐷)} = {𝑦 ∣ (𝑦 ∈ ⦋𝐴 / 𝑥⦌𝐶 ∧ 𝑦 ∈ ⦋𝐴 / 𝑥⦌𝐷)} )
| | 13:5,12: | ⊢ ( 𝐴 ∈ 𝐵 ▶ ⦋𝐴 / 𝑥⦌(𝐶 ∩ 𝐷) =
{𝑦 ∣ (𝑦 ∈ ⦋𝐴 / 𝑥⦌𝐶 ∧ 𝑦 ∈ ⦋𝐴 / 𝑥⦌𝐷)} )
| | 14:: | ⊢ (⦋𝐴 / 𝑥⦌𝐶 ∩ ⦋𝐴 / 𝑥⦌𝐷) = {
𝑦 ∣ (𝑦 ∈ ⦋𝐴 / 𝑥⦌𝐶 ∧ 𝑦 ∈ ⦋𝐴 / 𝑥⦌𝐷)}
| | 15:13,14: | ⊢ ( 𝐴 ∈ 𝐵 ▶ ⦋𝐴 / 𝑥⦌(𝐶 ∩ 𝐷) =
(⦋𝐴 / 𝑥⦌𝐶 ∩ ⦋𝐴 / 𝑥⦌𝐷) )
| | qed:15: | ⊢ (𝐴 ∈ 𝐵 → ⦋𝐴 / 𝑥⦌(𝐶 ∩ 𝐷) = (
⦋𝐴 / 𝑥⦌𝐶 ∩ ⦋𝐴 / 𝑥⦌𝐷))
|
(Contributed by Alan Sare, 22-Jul-2012.) (Proof modification is
discouraged.) (New usage is discouraged.)
|
| ⊢ (𝐴 ∈ 𝐵 → ⦋𝐴 / 𝑥⦌(𝐶 ∩ 𝐷) = (⦋𝐴 / 𝑥⦌𝐶 ∩ ⦋𝐴 / 𝑥⦌𝐷)) |
| |
| Theorem | onfrALTlem5VD 44856* |
Virtual deduction proof of onfrALTlem5 44513.
The following User's Proof is a Virtual Deduction proof completed
automatically by the tools program completeusersproof.cmd, which invokes
Mel L. O'Cat's mmj2 and Norm Megill's Metamath Proof Assistant.
onfrALTlem5 44513 is onfrALTlem5VD 44856 without virtual deductions and was
automatically derived from onfrALTlem5VD 44856.
| 1:: | ⊢ 𝑎 ∈ V
| | 2:1: | ⊢ (𝑎 ∩ 𝑥) ∈ V
| | 3:2: | ⊢ ([(𝑎 ∩ 𝑥) / 𝑏]𝑏 = ∅ ↔ (𝑎
∩ 𝑥) = ∅)
| | 4:3: | ⊢ (¬ [(𝑎 ∩ 𝑥) / 𝑏]𝑏 = ∅ ↔
¬ (𝑎 ∩ 𝑥) = ∅)
| | 5:: | ⊢ ((𝑎 ∩ 𝑥) ≠ ∅ ↔ ¬ (𝑎 ∩ 𝑥
) = ∅)
| | 6:4,5: | ⊢ (¬ [(𝑎 ∩ 𝑥) / 𝑏]𝑏 = ∅ ↔
(𝑎 ∩ 𝑥) ≠ ∅)
| | 7:2: | ⊢ (¬ [(𝑎 ∩ 𝑥) / 𝑏]𝑏 = ∅ ↔
[(𝑎 ∩ 𝑥) / 𝑏]¬ 𝑏 = ∅)
| | 8:: | ⊢ (𝑏 ≠ ∅ ↔ ¬ 𝑏 = ∅)
| | 9:8: | ⊢ ∀𝑏(𝑏 ≠ ∅ ↔ ¬ 𝑏 = ∅)
| | 10:2,9: | ⊢ ([(𝑎 ∩ 𝑥) / 𝑏]𝑏 ≠ ∅ ↔
[(𝑎 ∩ 𝑥) / 𝑏]¬ 𝑏 = ∅)
| | 11:7,10: | ⊢ (¬ [(𝑎 ∩ 𝑥) / 𝑏]𝑏 = ∅ ↔
[(𝑎 ∩ 𝑥) / 𝑏]𝑏 ≠ ∅)
| | 12:6,11: | ⊢ ([(𝑎 ∩ 𝑥) / 𝑏]𝑏 ≠ ∅ ↔ (
𝑎 ∩ 𝑥) ≠ ∅)
| | 13:2: | ⊢ ([(𝑎 ∩ 𝑥) / 𝑏]𝑏 ⊆ (𝑎 ∩ 𝑥
) ↔ (𝑎 ∩ 𝑥) ⊆ (𝑎 ∩ 𝑥))
| | 14:12,13: | ⊢ (([(𝑎 ∩ 𝑥) / 𝑏]𝑏 ⊆ (𝑎 ∩
𝑥) ∧ [(𝑎 ∩ 𝑥) / 𝑏]𝑏 ≠ ∅) ↔ ((𝑎 ∩ 𝑥) ⊆ (𝑎
∩ 𝑥) ∧ (𝑎 ∩ 𝑥) ≠ ∅))
| | 15:2: | ⊢ ([(𝑎 ∩ 𝑥) / 𝑏](𝑏 ⊆ (𝑎 ∩
𝑥) ∧ 𝑏 ≠ ∅) ↔ ([(𝑎 ∩ 𝑥) / 𝑏]𝑏 ⊆ (𝑎 ∩ 𝑥) ∧
[(𝑎 ∩ 𝑥) / 𝑏]𝑏 ≠ ∅))
| | 16:15,14: | ⊢ ([(𝑎 ∩ 𝑥) / 𝑏](𝑏 ⊆ (𝑎 ∩
𝑥) ∧ 𝑏 ≠ ∅) ↔ ((𝑎 ∩ 𝑥) ⊆ (𝑎 ∩ 𝑥) ∧ (𝑎 ∩ 𝑥)
≠ ∅))
| | 17:2: | ⊢ ⦋(𝑎 ∩ 𝑥) / 𝑏⦌(𝑏 ∩ 𝑦) = (
⦋(𝑎 ∩ 𝑥) / 𝑏⦌𝑏 ∩ ⦋(𝑎 ∩ 𝑥) / 𝑏⦌𝑦)
| | 18:2: | ⊢ ⦋(𝑎 ∩ 𝑥) / 𝑏⦌𝑏 = (𝑎 ∩ 𝑥)
| | 19:2: | ⊢ ⦋(𝑎 ∩ 𝑥) / 𝑏⦌𝑦 = 𝑦
| | 20:18,19: | ⊢ (⦋(𝑎 ∩ 𝑥) / 𝑏⦌𝑏 ∩ ⦋(𝑎
∩ 𝑥) / 𝑏⦌𝑦) = ((𝑎 ∩ 𝑥) ∩ 𝑦)
| | 21:17,20: | ⊢ ⦋(𝑎 ∩ 𝑥) / 𝑏⦌(𝑏 ∩ 𝑦) = ((
𝑎 ∩ 𝑥) ∩ 𝑦)
| | 22:2: | ⊢ ([(𝑎 ∩ 𝑥) / 𝑏](𝑏 ∩ 𝑦) =
∅ ↔ ⦋(𝑎 ∩ 𝑥) / 𝑏⦌(𝑏 ∩ 𝑦) = ⦋(𝑎 ∩ 𝑥) / 𝑏⦌
∅)
| | 23:2: | ⊢ ⦋(𝑎 ∩ 𝑥) / 𝑏⦌∅ = ∅
| | 24:21,23: | ⊢ (⦋(𝑎 ∩ 𝑥) / 𝑏⦌(𝑏 ∩ 𝑦) =
⦋(𝑎 ∩ 𝑥) / 𝑏⦌∅ ↔ ((𝑎 ∩ 𝑥) ∩ 𝑦) = ∅)
| | 25:22,24: | ⊢ ([(𝑎 ∩ 𝑥) / 𝑏](𝑏 ∩ 𝑦) =
∅ ↔ ((𝑎 ∩ 𝑥) ∩ 𝑦) = ∅)
| | 26:2: | ⊢ ([(𝑎 ∩ 𝑥) / 𝑏]𝑦 ∈ 𝑏 ↔ 𝑦 ∈
(𝑎 ∩ 𝑥))
| | 27:25,26: | ⊢ (([(𝑎 ∩ 𝑥) / 𝑏]𝑦 ∈ 𝑏 ∧ [
(𝑎 ∩ 𝑥) / 𝑏](𝑏 ∩ 𝑦) = ∅) ↔ (𝑦 ∈ (𝑎 ∩ 𝑥) ∧ ((
𝑎 ∩ 𝑥) ∩ 𝑦) = ∅))
| | 28:2: | ⊢ ([(𝑎 ∩ 𝑥) / 𝑏](𝑦 ∈ 𝑏 ∧ (𝑏
∩ 𝑦) = ∅) ↔ ([(𝑎 ∩ 𝑥) / 𝑏]𝑦 ∈ 𝑏 ∧ [(𝑎 ∩ 𝑥)
/ 𝑏](𝑏 ∩ 𝑦) = ∅))
| | 29:27,28: | ⊢ ([(𝑎 ∩ 𝑥) / 𝑏](𝑦 ∈ 𝑏 ∧ (𝑏
∩ 𝑦) = ∅) ↔ (𝑦 ∈ (𝑎 ∩ 𝑥) ∧ ((𝑎 ∩ 𝑥) ∩ 𝑦) =
∅))
| | 30:29: | ⊢ ∀𝑦([(𝑎 ∩ 𝑥) / 𝑏](𝑦 ∈ 𝑏
∧ (𝑏 ∩ 𝑦) = ∅) ↔ (𝑦 ∈ (𝑎 ∩ 𝑥) ∧ ((𝑎 ∩ 𝑥) ∩
𝑦) = ∅))
| | 31:30: | ⊢ (∃𝑦[(𝑎 ∩ 𝑥) / 𝑏](𝑦 ∈ 𝑏
∧ (𝑏 ∩ 𝑦) = ∅) ↔ ∃𝑦(𝑦 ∈ (𝑎 ∩ 𝑥) ∧ ((𝑎 ∩ 𝑥)
∩ 𝑦) = ∅))
| | 32:: | ⊢ (∃𝑦 ∈ (𝑎 ∩ 𝑥)((𝑎 ∩ 𝑥) ∩
𝑦) = ∅ ↔ ∃𝑦(𝑦 ∈ (𝑎 ∩ 𝑥) ∧ ((𝑎 ∩ 𝑥) ∩ 𝑦) = ∅
))
| | 33:31,32: | ⊢ (∃𝑦[(𝑎 ∩ 𝑥) / 𝑏](𝑦 ∈ 𝑏
∧ (𝑏 ∩ 𝑦) = ∅) ↔ ∃𝑦 ∈ (𝑎 ∩ 𝑥)((𝑎 ∩ 𝑥) ∩ 𝑦)
= ∅)
| | 34:2: | ⊢ (∃𝑦[(𝑎 ∩ 𝑥) / 𝑏](𝑦 ∈ 𝑏
∧ (𝑏 ∩ 𝑦) = ∅) ↔ [(𝑎 ∩ 𝑥) / 𝑏]∃𝑦(𝑦 ∈ 𝑏 ∧ (
𝑏 ∩ 𝑦) = ∅))
| | 35:33,34: | ⊢ ([(𝑎 ∩ 𝑥) / 𝑏]∃𝑦(𝑦 ∈ 𝑏
∧ (𝑏 ∩ 𝑦) = ∅) ↔ ∃𝑦 ∈ (𝑎 ∩ 𝑥)((𝑎 ∩ 𝑥) ∩ 𝑦
) = ∅)
| | 36:: | ⊢ (∃𝑦 ∈ 𝑏(𝑏 ∩ 𝑦) = ∅ ↔ ∃𝑦
(𝑦 ∈ 𝑏 ∧ (𝑏 ∩ 𝑦) = ∅))
| | 37:36: | ⊢ ∀𝑏(∃𝑦 ∈ 𝑏(𝑏 ∩ 𝑦) = ∅ ↔
∃𝑦(𝑦 ∈ 𝑏 ∧ (𝑏 ∩ 𝑦) = ∅))
| | 38:2,37: | ⊢ ([(𝑎 ∩ 𝑥) / 𝑏]∃𝑦 ∈ 𝑏(𝑏
∩ 𝑦) = ∅ ↔ [(𝑎 ∩ 𝑥) / 𝑏]∃𝑦(𝑦 ∈ 𝑏 ∧ (𝑏 ∩ 𝑦)
= ∅))
| | 39:35,38: | ⊢ ([(𝑎 ∩ 𝑥) / 𝑏]∃𝑦 ∈ 𝑏(𝑏
∩ 𝑦) = ∅ ↔ ∃𝑦 ∈ (𝑎 ∩ 𝑥)((𝑎 ∩ 𝑥) ∩ 𝑦) = ∅)
| | 40:16,39: | ⊢ (([(𝑎 ∩ 𝑥) / 𝑏](𝑏 ⊆ (𝑎
∩ 𝑥) ∧ 𝑏 ≠ ∅) → [(𝑎 ∩ 𝑥) / 𝑏]∃𝑦 ∈ 𝑏(𝑏 ∩
𝑦) = ∅) ↔ (((𝑎 ∩ 𝑥) ⊆ (𝑎 ∩ 𝑥) ∧ (𝑎 ∩ 𝑥) ≠
∅) → ∃𝑦 ∈ (𝑎 ∩ 𝑥)((𝑎 ∩ 𝑥) ∩ 𝑦) = ∅))
| | 41:2: | ⊢ ([(𝑎 ∩ 𝑥) / 𝑏]((𝑏 ⊆ (𝑎
∩ 𝑥) ∧ 𝑏 ≠ ∅) → ∃𝑦 ∈ 𝑏(𝑏 ∩ 𝑦) = ∅) ↔ ([(𝑎
∩ 𝑥) / 𝑏](𝑏 ⊆ (𝑎 ∩ 𝑥) ∧ 𝑏 ≠ ∅) → [(𝑎 ∩ 𝑥) /
𝑏]∃𝑦 ∈ 𝑏(𝑏 ∩ 𝑦) = ∅))
| | qed:40,41: | ⊢ ([(𝑎 ∩ 𝑥) / 𝑏]((𝑏 ⊆ (𝑎
∩ 𝑥) ∧ 𝑏 ≠ ∅) → ∃𝑦 ∈ 𝑏(𝑏 ∩ 𝑦) = ∅) ↔ (((𝑎
∩ 𝑥) ⊆ (𝑎 ∩ 𝑥) ∧ (𝑎 ∩ 𝑥) ≠ ∅) → ∃𝑦 ∈ (𝑎 ∩ 𝑥
)((𝑎 ∩ 𝑥) ∩ 𝑦) = ∅))
|
(Contributed by Alan Sare, 22-Jul-2012.) (Proof modification is
discouraged.) (New usage is discouraged.)
|
| ⊢
([(𝑎 ∩
𝑥) / 𝑏]((𝑏 ⊆ (𝑎 ∩ 𝑥) ∧ 𝑏 ≠ ∅) → ∃𝑦 ∈ 𝑏 (𝑏 ∩ 𝑦) = ∅) ↔ (((𝑎 ∩ 𝑥) ⊆ (𝑎 ∩ 𝑥) ∧ (𝑎 ∩ 𝑥) ≠ ∅) → ∃𝑦 ∈ (𝑎 ∩ 𝑥)((𝑎 ∩ 𝑥) ∩ 𝑦) = ∅)) |
| |
| Theorem | onfrALTlem4VD 44857* |
Virtual deduction proof of onfrALTlem4 44514.
The following User's Proof is a Virtual Deduction proof completed
automatically by the tools program completeusersproof.cmd, which invokes
Mel L. O'Cat's mmj2 and Norm Megill's Metamath Proof Assistant.
onfrALTlem4 44514 is onfrALTlem4VD 44857 without virtual deductions and was
automatically derived from onfrALTlem4VD 44857.
| 1:: | ⊢ 𝑦 ∈ V
| | 2:1: | ⊢ ([𝑦 / 𝑥](𝑎 ∩ 𝑥) = ∅ ↔ ⦋
𝑦 / 𝑥⦌(𝑎 ∩ 𝑥) = ⦋𝑦 / 𝑥⦌∅)
| | 3:1: | ⊢ ⦋𝑦 / 𝑥⦌(𝑎 ∩ 𝑥) = (⦋𝑦 / 𝑥⦌
𝑎 ∩ ⦋𝑦 / 𝑥⦌𝑥)
| | 4:1: | ⊢ ⦋𝑦 / 𝑥⦌𝑎 = 𝑎
| | 5:1: | ⊢ ⦋𝑦 / 𝑥⦌𝑥 = 𝑦
| | 6:4,5: | ⊢ (⦋𝑦 / 𝑥⦌𝑎 ∩ ⦋𝑦 / 𝑥⦌𝑥) = (
𝑎 ∩ 𝑦)
| | 7:3,6: | ⊢ ⦋𝑦 / 𝑥⦌(𝑎 ∩ 𝑥) = (𝑎 ∩ 𝑦)
| | 8:1: | ⊢ ⦋𝑦 / 𝑥⦌∅ = ∅
| | 9:7,8: | ⊢ (⦋𝑦 / 𝑥⦌(𝑎 ∩ 𝑥) = ⦋𝑦 / 𝑥⦌
∅ ↔ (𝑎 ∩ 𝑦) = ∅)
| | 10:2,9: | ⊢ ([𝑦 / 𝑥](𝑎 ∩ 𝑥) = ∅ ↔ (𝑎
∩ 𝑦) = ∅)
| | 11:1: | ⊢ ([𝑦 / 𝑥]𝑥 ∈ 𝑎 ↔ 𝑦 ∈ 𝑎)
| | 12:11,10: | ⊢ (([𝑦 / 𝑥]𝑥 ∈ 𝑎 ∧ [𝑦 / 𝑥](
𝑎 ∩ 𝑥) = ∅) ↔ (𝑦 ∈ 𝑎 ∧ (𝑎 ∩ 𝑦) = ∅))
| | 13:1: | ⊢ ([𝑦 / 𝑥](𝑥 ∈ 𝑎 ∧ (𝑎 ∩ 𝑥) =
∅) ↔ ([𝑦 / 𝑥]𝑥 ∈ 𝑎 ∧ [𝑦 / 𝑥](𝑎 ∩ 𝑥) = ∅))
| | qed:13,12: | ⊢ ([𝑦 / 𝑥](𝑥 ∈ 𝑎 ∧ (𝑎 ∩ 𝑥) =
∅) ↔ (𝑦 ∈ 𝑎 ∧ (𝑎 ∩ 𝑦) = ∅))
|
(Contributed by Alan Sare, 22-Jul-2012.) (Proof modification is
discouraged.) (New usage is discouraged.)
|
| ⊢ ([𝑦 / 𝑥](𝑥 ∈ 𝑎 ∧ (𝑎 ∩ 𝑥) = ∅) ↔ (𝑦 ∈ 𝑎 ∧ (𝑎 ∩ 𝑦) = ∅)) |
| |
| Theorem | onfrALTlem3VD 44858* |
Virtual deduction proof of onfrALTlem3 44515.
The following User's Proof is a Virtual Deduction proof completed
automatically by the tools program completeusersproof.cmd, which invokes
Mel L. O'Cat's mmj2 and Norm Megill's Metamath Proof Assistant.
onfrALTlem3 44515 is onfrALTlem3VD 44858 without virtual deductions and was
automatically derived from onfrALTlem3VD 44858.
| 1:: | ⊢ ( (𝑎 ⊆ On ∧ 𝑎 ≠ ∅) ▶ (𝑎
⊆ On ∧ 𝑎 ≠ ∅) )
| | 2:: | ⊢ ( (𝑎 ⊆ On ∧ 𝑎 ≠ ∅) , (𝑥 ∈
𝑎 ∧ ¬ (𝑎 ∩ 𝑥) = ∅) ▶ (𝑥 ∈ 𝑎 ∧ ¬ (𝑎 ∩ 𝑥) = ∅) )
| | 3:2: | ⊢ ( (𝑎 ⊆ On ∧ 𝑎 ≠ ∅) , (𝑥 ∈
𝑎 ∧ ¬ (𝑎 ∩ 𝑥) = ∅) ▶ 𝑥 ∈ 𝑎 )
| | 4:1: | ⊢ ( (𝑎 ⊆ On ∧ 𝑎 ≠ ∅) ▶ 𝑎 ⊆
On )
| | 5:3,4: | ⊢ ( (𝑎 ⊆ On ∧ 𝑎 ≠ ∅) , (𝑥 ∈
𝑎 ∧ ¬ (𝑎 ∩ 𝑥) = ∅) ▶ 𝑥 ∈ On )
| | 6:5: | ⊢ ( (𝑎 ⊆ On ∧ 𝑎 ≠ ∅) , (𝑥 ∈
𝑎 ∧ ¬ (𝑎 ∩ 𝑥) = ∅) ▶ Ord 𝑥 )
| | 7:6: | ⊢ ( (𝑎 ⊆ On ∧ 𝑎 ≠ ∅) , (𝑥 ∈
𝑎 ∧ ¬ (𝑎 ∩ 𝑥) = ∅) ▶ E We 𝑥 )
| | 8:: | ⊢ (𝑎 ∩ 𝑥) ⊆ 𝑥
| | 9:7,8: | ⊢ ( (𝑎 ⊆ On ∧ 𝑎 ≠ ∅) , (𝑥 ∈
𝑎 ∧ ¬ (𝑎 ∩ 𝑥) = ∅) ▶ E We (𝑎 ∩ 𝑥) )
| | 10:9: | ⊢ ( (𝑎 ⊆ On ∧ 𝑎 ≠ ∅) , (𝑥 ∈
𝑎 ∧ ¬ (𝑎 ∩ 𝑥) = ∅) ▶ E Fr (𝑎 ∩ 𝑥) )
| | 11:10: | ⊢ ( (𝑎 ⊆ On ∧ 𝑎 ≠ ∅) , (𝑥 ∈
𝑎 ∧ ¬ (𝑎 ∩ 𝑥) = ∅) ▶ ∀𝑏((𝑏 ⊆ (𝑎 ∩ 𝑥) ∧ 𝑏 ≠
∅) → ∃𝑦 ∈ 𝑏(𝑏 ∩ 𝑦) = ∅) )
| | 12:: | ⊢ 𝑥 ∈ V
| | 13:12,8: | ⊢ (𝑎 ∩ 𝑥) ∈ V
| | 14:13,11: | ⊢ ( (𝑎 ⊆ On ∧ 𝑎 ≠ ∅) , (𝑥 ∈
𝑎 ∧ ¬ (𝑎 ∩ 𝑥) = ∅) ▶ [(𝑎 ∩ 𝑥) / 𝑏]((𝑏 ⊆ (𝑎
∩ 𝑥) ∧ 𝑏 ≠ ∅) → ∃𝑦 ∈ 𝑏(𝑏 ∩ 𝑦) = ∅) )
| | 15:: | ⊢ ([(𝑎 ∩ 𝑥) / 𝑏]((𝑏 ⊆ (𝑎
∩ 𝑥) ∧ 𝑏 ≠ ∅) → ∃𝑦 ∈ 𝑏(𝑏 ∩ 𝑦) = ∅) ↔ (((𝑎 ∩
𝑥) ⊆ (𝑎 ∩ 𝑥) ∧ (𝑎 ∩ 𝑥) ≠ ∅) → ∃𝑦 ∈ (𝑎 ∩ 𝑥)(
(𝑎 ∩ 𝑥) ∩ 𝑦) = ∅))
| | 16:14,15: | ⊢ ( (𝑎 ⊆ On ∧ 𝑎 ≠ ∅) , (𝑥 ∈
𝑎 ∧ ¬ (𝑎 ∩ 𝑥) = ∅) ▶ (((𝑎 ∩ 𝑥) ⊆ (𝑎 ∩ 𝑥) ∧ (
𝑎 ∩ 𝑥) ≠ ∅) → ∃𝑦 ∈ (𝑎 ∩ 𝑥)((𝑎 ∩ 𝑥) ∩ 𝑦) =
∅) )
| | 17:: | ⊢ (𝑎 ∩ 𝑥) ⊆ (𝑎 ∩ 𝑥)
| | 18:2: | ⊢ ( (𝑎 ⊆ On ∧ 𝑎 ≠ ∅) , (𝑥 ∈
𝑎 ∧ ¬ (𝑎 ∩ 𝑥) = ∅) ▶ ¬ (𝑎 ∩ 𝑥) = ∅ )
| | 19:18: | ⊢ ( (𝑎 ⊆ On ∧ 𝑎 ≠ ∅) , (𝑥 ∈
𝑎 ∧ ¬ (𝑎 ∩ 𝑥) = ∅) ▶ (𝑎 ∩ 𝑥) ≠ ∅ )
| | 20:17,19: | ⊢ ( (𝑎 ⊆ On ∧ 𝑎 ≠ ∅) , (𝑥 ∈
𝑎 ∧ ¬ (𝑎 ∩ 𝑥) = ∅) ▶ ((𝑎 ∩ 𝑥) ⊆ (𝑎 ∩ 𝑥) ∧ (𝑎 ∩
𝑥) ≠ ∅) )
| | qed:16,20: | ⊢ ( (𝑎 ⊆ On ∧ 𝑎 ≠ ∅) , (𝑥 ∈
𝑎 ∧ ¬ (𝑎 ∩ 𝑥) = ∅) ▶ ∃𝑦 ∈ (𝑎 ∩ 𝑥)((𝑎 ∩ 𝑥) ∩ 𝑦
) = ∅ )
|
(Contributed by Alan Sare, 22-Jul-2012.) (Proof modification is
discouraged.) (New usage is discouraged.)
|
| ⊢ ( (𝑎 ⊆ On ∧ 𝑎 ≠ ∅) , (𝑥 ∈ 𝑎 ∧ ¬ (𝑎 ∩ 𝑥) = ∅) ▶ ∃𝑦 ∈ (𝑎 ∩ 𝑥)((𝑎 ∩ 𝑥) ∩ 𝑦) = ∅ ) |
| |
| Theorem | simplbi2comtVD 44859 |
Virtual deduction proof of simplbi2comt 501.
The following User's Proof is a Virtual Deduction proof completed
automatically by the tools program completeusersproof.cmd, which invokes
Mel L. O'Cat's mmj2 and Norm Megill's Metamath Proof Assistant.
simplbi2comt 501 is simplbi2comtVD 44859 without virtual deductions and was
automatically derived from simplbi2comtVD 44859.
| 1:: | ⊢ ( (𝜑 ↔ (𝜓 ∧ 𝜒)) ▶ (𝜑 ↔ (
𝜓 ∧ 𝜒)) )
| | 2:1: | ⊢ ( (𝜑 ↔ (𝜓 ∧ 𝜒)) ▶ ((𝜓 ∧ 𝜒
) → 𝜑) )
| | 3:2: | ⊢ ( (𝜑 ↔ (𝜓 ∧ 𝜒)) ▶ (𝜓 → (𝜒
→ 𝜑)) )
| | 4:3: | ⊢ ( (𝜑 ↔ (𝜓 ∧ 𝜒)) ▶ (𝜒 → (𝜓
→ 𝜑)) )
| | qed:4: | ⊢ ((𝜑 ↔ (𝜓 ∧ 𝜒)) → (𝜒 → (𝜓
→ 𝜑)))
|
(Contributed by Alan Sare, 22-Jul-2012.) (Proof modification is
discouraged.) (New usage is discouraged.)
|
| ⊢ ((𝜑 ↔ (𝜓 ∧ 𝜒)) → (𝜒 → (𝜓 → 𝜑))) |
| |
| Theorem | onfrALTlem2VD 44860* |
Virtual deduction proof of onfrALTlem2 44517.
The following User's Proof is a Virtual Deduction proof completed
automatically by the tools program completeusersproof.cmd, which invokes
Mel L. O'Cat's mmj2 and Norm Megill's Metamath Proof Assistant.
onfrALTlem2 44517 is onfrALTlem2VD 44860 without virtual deductions and was
automatically derived from onfrALTlem2VD 44860.
| 1:: | ⊢ ( (𝑎 ⊆ On ∧ 𝑎 ≠ ∅) , (𝑥 ∈
𝑎 ∧ ¬ (𝑎 ∩ 𝑥) = ∅), ((𝑦 ∈ (𝑎 ∩ 𝑥) ∧ ((𝑎 ∩ 𝑥) ∩
𝑦) = ∅) ∧ 𝑧 ∈ (𝑎 ∩ 𝑦)) ▶ ((𝑦 ∈ (𝑎 ∩ 𝑥) ∧ ((𝑎 ∩
𝑥) ∩ 𝑦) = ∅) ∧ 𝑧 ∈ (𝑎 ∩ 𝑦)) )
| | 2:1: | ⊢ ( (𝑎 ⊆ On ∧ 𝑎 ≠ ∅) , (𝑥 ∈
𝑎 ∧ ¬ (𝑎 ∩ 𝑥) = ∅), ((𝑦 ∈ (𝑎 ∩ 𝑥) ∧ ((𝑎 ∩ 𝑥) ∩
𝑦) = ∅) ∧ 𝑧 ∈ (𝑎 ∩ 𝑦)) ▶ 𝑧 ∈ (𝑎 ∩ 𝑦) )
| | 3:2: | ⊢ ( (𝑎 ⊆ On ∧ 𝑎 ≠ ∅) , (𝑥 ∈
𝑎 ∧ ¬ (𝑎 ∩ 𝑥) = ∅), ((𝑦 ∈ (𝑎 ∩ 𝑥) ∧ ((𝑎 ∩ 𝑥) ∩
𝑦) = ∅) ∧ 𝑧 ∈ (𝑎 ∩ 𝑦)) ▶ 𝑧 ∈ 𝑎 )
| | 4:: | ⊢ ( (𝑎 ⊆ On ∧ 𝑎 ≠ ∅) ▶ (𝑎
⊆ On ∧ 𝑎 ≠ ∅) )
| | 5:: | ⊢ ( (𝑎 ⊆ On ∧ 𝑎 ≠ ∅) , (𝑥 ∈
𝑎 ∧ ¬ (𝑎 ∩ 𝑥) = ∅) ▶ (𝑥 ∈ 𝑎 ∧ ¬ (𝑎 ∩ 𝑥) = ∅) )
| | 6:5: | ⊢ ( (𝑎 ⊆ On ∧ 𝑎 ≠ ∅) , (𝑥 ∈
𝑎 ∧ ¬ (𝑎 ∩ 𝑥) = ∅) ▶ 𝑥 ∈ 𝑎 )
| | 7:4: | ⊢ ( (𝑎 ⊆ On ∧ 𝑎 ≠ ∅) ▶ 𝑎 ⊆
On )
| | 8:6,7: | ⊢ ( (𝑎 ⊆ On ∧ 𝑎 ≠ ∅) , (𝑥 ∈
𝑎 ∧ ¬ (𝑎 ∩ 𝑥) = ∅) ▶ 𝑥 ∈ On )
| | 9:8: | ⊢ ( (𝑎 ⊆ On ∧ 𝑎 ≠ ∅) , (𝑥 ∈
𝑎 ∧ ¬ (𝑎 ∩ 𝑥) = ∅) ▶ Ord 𝑥 )
| | 10:9: | ⊢ ( (𝑎 ⊆ On ∧ 𝑎 ≠ ∅) , (𝑥 ∈
𝑎 ∧ ¬ (𝑎 ∩ 𝑥) = ∅) ▶ Tr 𝑥 )
| | 11:1: | ⊢ ( (𝑎 ⊆ On ∧ 𝑎 ≠ ∅) , (𝑥 ∈
𝑎 ∧ ¬ (𝑎 ∩ 𝑥) = ∅), ((𝑦 ∈ (𝑎 ∩ 𝑥) ∧ ((𝑎 ∩ 𝑥) ∩
𝑦) = ∅) ∧ 𝑧 ∈ (𝑎 ∩ 𝑦)) ▶ 𝑦 ∈ (𝑎 ∩ 𝑥) )
| | 12:11: | ⊢ ( (𝑎 ⊆ On ∧ 𝑎 ≠ ∅) , (𝑥 ∈
𝑎 ∧ ¬ (𝑎 ∩ 𝑥) = ∅), ((𝑦 ∈ (𝑎 ∩ 𝑥) ∧ ((𝑎 ∩ 𝑥) ∩
𝑦) = ∅) ∧ 𝑧 ∈ (𝑎 ∩ 𝑦)) ▶ 𝑦 ∈ 𝑥 )
| | 13:2: | ⊢ ( (𝑎 ⊆ On ∧ 𝑎 ≠ ∅) , (𝑥 ∈
𝑎 ∧ ¬ (𝑎 ∩ 𝑥) = ∅), ((𝑦 ∈ (𝑎 ∩ 𝑥) ∧ ((𝑎 ∩ 𝑥) ∩
𝑦) = ∅) ∧ 𝑧 ∈ (𝑎 ∩ 𝑦)) ▶ 𝑧 ∈ 𝑦 )
| | 14:10,12,13: | ⊢ ( (𝑎 ⊆ On ∧ 𝑎 ≠ ∅) , (𝑥 ∈
𝑎 ∧ ¬ (𝑎 ∩ 𝑥) = ∅), ((𝑦 ∈ (𝑎 ∩ 𝑥) ∧ ((𝑎 ∩ 𝑥) ∩
𝑦) = ∅) ∧ 𝑧 ∈ (𝑎 ∩ 𝑦)) ▶ 𝑧 ∈ 𝑥 )
| | 15:3,14: | ⊢ ( (𝑎 ⊆ On ∧ 𝑎 ≠ ∅) , (𝑥 ∈
𝑎 ∧ ¬ (𝑎 ∩ 𝑥) = ∅), ((𝑦 ∈ (𝑎 ∩ 𝑥) ∧ ((𝑎 ∩ 𝑥) ∩
𝑦) = ∅) ∧ 𝑧 ∈ (𝑎 ∩ 𝑦)) ▶ 𝑧 ∈ (𝑎 ∩ 𝑥) )
| | 16:13,15: | ⊢ ( (𝑎 ⊆ On ∧ 𝑎 ≠ ∅) , (𝑥 ∈
𝑎 ∧ ¬ (𝑎 ∩ 𝑥) = ∅), ((𝑦 ∈ (𝑎 ∩ 𝑥) ∧ ((𝑎 ∩ 𝑥) ∩
𝑦) = ∅) ∧ 𝑧 ∈ (𝑎 ∩ 𝑦)) ▶ 𝑧 ∈ ((𝑎 ∩ 𝑥) ∩ 𝑦) )
| | 17:16: | ⊢ ( (𝑎 ⊆ On ∧ 𝑎 ≠ ∅) , (𝑥 ∈
𝑎 ∧ ¬ (𝑎 ∩ 𝑥) = ∅), (𝑦 ∈ (𝑎 ∩ 𝑥) ∧ ((𝑎 ∩ 𝑥) ∩ 𝑦
) = ∅) ▶ (𝑧 ∈ (𝑎 ∩ 𝑦) → 𝑧 ∈ ((𝑎 ∩ 𝑥) ∩ 𝑦)) )
| | 18:17: | ⊢ ( (𝑎 ⊆ On ∧ 𝑎 ≠ ∅) , (𝑥 ∈
𝑎 ∧ ¬ (𝑎 ∩ 𝑥) = ∅), (𝑦 ∈ (𝑎 ∩ 𝑥) ∧ ((𝑎 ∩ 𝑥) ∩ 𝑦
) = ∅) ▶ ∀𝑧(𝑧 ∈ (𝑎 ∩ 𝑦) → 𝑧 ∈ ((𝑎 ∩ 𝑥) ∩ 𝑦)) )
| | 19:18: | ⊢ ( (𝑎 ⊆ On ∧ 𝑎 ≠ ∅) , (𝑥 ∈
𝑎 ∧ ¬ (𝑎 ∩ 𝑥) = ∅), (𝑦 ∈ (𝑎 ∩ 𝑥) ∧ ((𝑎 ∩ 𝑥) ∩ 𝑦
) = ∅) ▶ (𝑎 ∩ 𝑦) ⊆ ((𝑎 ∩ 𝑥) ∩ 𝑦) )
| | 20:: | ⊢ ( (𝑎 ⊆ On ∧ 𝑎 ≠ ∅) , (𝑥 ∈
𝑎 ∧ ¬ (𝑎 ∩ 𝑥) = ∅), (𝑦 ∈ (𝑎 ∩ 𝑥) ∧ ((𝑎 ∩ 𝑥) ∩ 𝑦
) = ∅) ▶ (𝑦 ∈ (𝑎 ∩ 𝑥) ∧ ((𝑎 ∩ 𝑥) ∩ 𝑦) = ∅) )
| | 21:20: | ⊢ ( (𝑎 ⊆ On ∧ 𝑎 ≠ ∅) , (𝑥 ∈
𝑎 ∧ ¬ (𝑎 ∩ 𝑥) = ∅), (𝑦 ∈ (𝑎 ∩ 𝑥) ∧ ((𝑎 ∩ 𝑥) ∩ 𝑦
) = ∅) ▶ ((𝑎 ∩ 𝑥) ∩ 𝑦) = ∅ )
| | 22:19,21: | ⊢ ( (𝑎 ⊆ On ∧ 𝑎 ≠ ∅) , (𝑥 ∈
𝑎 ∧ ¬ (𝑎 ∩ 𝑥) = ∅), (𝑦 ∈ (𝑎 ∩ 𝑥) ∧ ((𝑎 ∩ 𝑥) ∩ 𝑦
) = ∅) ▶ (𝑎 ∩ 𝑦) = ∅ )
| | 23:20: | ⊢ ( (𝑎 ⊆ On ∧ 𝑎 ≠ ∅) , (𝑥 ∈
𝑎 ∧ ¬ (𝑎 ∩ 𝑥) = ∅), (𝑦 ∈ (𝑎 ∩ 𝑥) ∧ ((𝑎 ∩ 𝑥) ∩ 𝑦
) = ∅) ▶ 𝑦 ∈ (𝑎 ∩ 𝑥) )
| | 24:23: | ⊢ ( (𝑎 ⊆ On ∧ 𝑎 ≠ ∅) , (𝑥 ∈
𝑎 ∧ ¬ (𝑎 ∩ 𝑥) = ∅), (𝑦 ∈ (𝑎 ∩ 𝑥) ∧ ((𝑎 ∩ 𝑥) ∩ 𝑦
) = ∅) ▶ 𝑦 ∈ 𝑎 )
| | 25:22,24: | ⊢ ( (𝑎 ⊆ On ∧ 𝑎 ≠ ∅) , (𝑥 ∈
𝑎 ∧ ¬ (𝑎 ∩ 𝑥) = ∅), (𝑦 ∈ (𝑎 ∩ 𝑥) ∧ ((𝑎 ∩ 𝑥) ∩ 𝑦
) = ∅) ▶ (𝑦 ∈ 𝑎 ∧ (𝑎 ∩ 𝑦) = ∅) )
| | 26:25: | ⊢ ( (𝑎 ⊆ On ∧ 𝑎 ≠ ∅) , (𝑥 ∈
𝑎 ∧ ¬ (𝑎 ∩ 𝑥) = ∅) ▶ ((𝑦 ∈ (𝑎 ∩ 𝑥) ∧ ((𝑎 ∩ 𝑥)
∩ 𝑦) = ∅) → (𝑦 ∈ 𝑎 ∧ (𝑎 ∩ 𝑦) = ∅)) )
| | 27:26: | ⊢ ( (𝑎 ⊆ On ∧ 𝑎 ≠ ∅) , (𝑥 ∈
𝑎 ∧ ¬ (𝑎 ∩ 𝑥) = ∅) ▶ ∀𝑦((𝑦 ∈ (𝑎 ∩ 𝑥) ∧ ((𝑎 ∩ 𝑥
) ∩ 𝑦) = ∅) → (𝑦 ∈ 𝑎 ∧ (𝑎 ∩ 𝑦) = ∅)) )
| | 28:27: | ⊢ ( (𝑎 ⊆ On ∧ 𝑎 ≠ ∅) , (𝑥 ∈
𝑎 ∧ ¬ (𝑎 ∩ 𝑥) = ∅) ▶ (∃𝑦(𝑦 ∈ (𝑎 ∩ 𝑥) ∧ ((𝑎 ∩ 𝑥
) ∩ 𝑦) = ∅) → ∃𝑦(𝑦 ∈ 𝑎 ∧ (𝑎 ∩ 𝑦) = ∅)) )
| | 29:: | ⊢ ( (𝑎 ⊆ On ∧ 𝑎 ≠ ∅) , (𝑥 ∈
𝑎 ∧ ¬ (𝑎 ∩ 𝑥) = ∅) ▶ ∃𝑦 ∈ (𝑎 ∩ 𝑥)((𝑎 ∩ 𝑥) ∩ 𝑦
) = ∅ )
| | 30:29: | ⊢ ( (𝑎 ⊆ On ∧ 𝑎 ≠ ∅) , (𝑥 ∈
𝑎 ∧ ¬ (𝑎 ∩ 𝑥) = ∅) ▶ ∃𝑦(𝑦 ∈ (𝑎 ∩ 𝑥) ∧ ((𝑎 ∩ 𝑥)
∩ 𝑦) = ∅) )
| | 31:28,30: | ⊢ ( (𝑎 ⊆ On ∧ 𝑎 ≠ ∅) , (𝑥 ∈
𝑎 ∧ ¬ (𝑎 ∩ 𝑥) = ∅) ▶ ∃𝑦(𝑦 ∈ 𝑎 ∧ (𝑎 ∩ 𝑦) = ∅) )
| | qed:31: | ⊢ ( (𝑎 ⊆ On ∧ 𝑎 ≠ ∅) , (𝑥 ∈
𝑎 ∧ ¬ (𝑎 ∩ 𝑥) = ∅) ▶ ∃𝑦 ∈ 𝑎(𝑎 ∩ 𝑦) = ∅ )
|
(Contributed by Alan Sare, 22-Jul-2012.) (Proof modification is
discouraged.) (New usage is discouraged.)
|
| ⊢ ( (𝑎 ⊆ On ∧ 𝑎 ≠ ∅) , (𝑥 ∈ 𝑎 ∧ ¬ (𝑎 ∩ 𝑥) = ∅) ▶ ∃𝑦 ∈ 𝑎 (𝑎 ∩ 𝑦) = ∅ ) |
| |
| Theorem | onfrALTlem1VD 44861* |
Virtual deduction proof of onfrALTlem1 44519.
The following User's Proof is a Virtual Deduction proof completed
automatically by the tools program completeusersproof.cmd, which invokes
Mel L. O'Cat's mmj2 and Norm Megill's Metamath Proof Assistant.
onfrALTlem1 44519 is onfrALTlem1VD 44861 without virtual deductions and was
automatically derived from onfrALTlem1VD 44861.
| 1:: | ⊢ ( (𝑎 ⊆ On ∧ 𝑎 ≠ ∅) , (𝑥 ∈ 𝑎 ∧
(𝑎 ∩ 𝑥) = ∅) ▶ (𝑥 ∈ 𝑎 ∧ (𝑎 ∩ 𝑥) = ∅) )
| | 2:1: | ⊢ ( (𝑎 ⊆ On ∧ 𝑎 ≠ ∅) , (𝑥 ∈ 𝑎 ∧
(𝑎 ∩ 𝑥) = ∅) ▶ ∃𝑥(𝑥 ∈ 𝑎 ∧ (𝑎 ∩ 𝑥) = ∅) )
| | 3:2: | ⊢ ( (𝑎 ⊆ On ∧ 𝑎 ≠ ∅) , (𝑥 ∈ 𝑎 ∧
(𝑎 ∩ 𝑥) = ∅) ▶ ∃𝑦[𝑦 / 𝑥](𝑥 ∈ 𝑎 ∧ (𝑎 ∩ 𝑥) = ∅)
)
| | 4:: | ⊢ ([𝑦 / 𝑥](𝑥 ∈ 𝑎 ∧ (𝑎 ∩ 𝑥) = ∅
) ↔ (𝑦 ∈ 𝑎 ∧ (𝑎 ∩ 𝑦) = ∅))
| | 5:4: | ⊢ ∀𝑦([𝑦 / 𝑥](𝑥 ∈ 𝑎 ∧ (𝑎 ∩ 𝑥)
= ∅) ↔ (𝑦 ∈ 𝑎 ∧ (𝑎 ∩ 𝑦) = ∅))
| | 6:5: | ⊢ (∃𝑦[𝑦 / 𝑥](𝑥 ∈ 𝑎 ∧ (𝑎 ∩ 𝑥)
= ∅) ↔ ∃𝑦(𝑦 ∈ 𝑎 ∧ (𝑎 ∩ 𝑦) = ∅))
| | 7:3,6: | ⊢ ( (𝑎 ⊆ On ∧ 𝑎 ≠ ∅) , (𝑥 ∈ 𝑎 ∧
(𝑎 ∩ 𝑥) = ∅) ▶ ∃𝑦(𝑦 ∈ 𝑎 ∧ (𝑎 ∩ 𝑦) = ∅) )
| | 8:: | ⊢ (∃𝑦 ∈ 𝑎(𝑎 ∩ 𝑦) = ∅ ↔ ∃𝑦(
𝑦 ∈ 𝑎 ∧ (𝑎 ∩ 𝑦) = ∅))
| | qed:7,8: | ⊢ ( (𝑎 ⊆ On ∧ 𝑎 ≠ ∅) , (𝑥 ∈ 𝑎 ∧
(𝑎 ∩ 𝑥) = ∅) ▶ ∃𝑦 ∈ 𝑎(𝑎 ∩ 𝑦) = ∅ )
|
(Contributed by Alan Sare, 22-Jul-2012.) (Proof modification is
discouraged.) (New usage is discouraged.)
|
| ⊢ ( (𝑎 ⊆ On ∧ 𝑎 ≠ ∅) , (𝑥 ∈ 𝑎 ∧ (𝑎 ∩ 𝑥) = ∅) ▶ ∃𝑦 ∈ 𝑎 (𝑎 ∩ 𝑦) = ∅ ) |
| |
| Theorem | onfrALTVD 44862 |
Virtual deduction proof of onfrALT 44520.
The following User's Proof is a Virtual Deduction proof completed
automatically by the tools program completeusersproof.cmd, which invokes
Mel L. O'Cat's mmj2 and Norm Megill's Metamath Proof Assistant.
onfrALT 44520 is onfrALTVD 44862 without virtual deductions and was
automatically derived from onfrALTVD 44862.
| 1:: | ⊢ ( (𝑎 ⊆ On ∧ 𝑎 ≠ ∅) , (𝑥 ∈ 𝑎
∧ ¬ (𝑎 ∩ 𝑥) = ∅) ▶ ∃𝑦 ∈ 𝑎(𝑎 ∩ 𝑦) = ∅ )
| | 2:: | ⊢ ( (𝑎 ⊆ On ∧ 𝑎 ≠ ∅) , (𝑥 ∈ 𝑎
∧ (𝑎 ∩ 𝑥) = ∅) ▶ ∃𝑦 ∈ 𝑎(𝑎 ∩ 𝑦) = ∅ )
| | 3:1: | ⊢ ( (𝑎 ⊆ On ∧ 𝑎 ≠ ∅) , 𝑥 ∈ 𝑎 ▶
(¬ (𝑎 ∩ 𝑥) = ∅ → ∃𝑦 ∈ 𝑎(𝑎 ∩ 𝑦) = ∅) )
| | 4:2: | ⊢ ( (𝑎 ⊆ On ∧ 𝑎 ≠ ∅) , 𝑥 ∈ 𝑎 ▶
((𝑎 ∩ 𝑥) = ∅ → ∃𝑦 ∈ 𝑎(𝑎 ∩ 𝑦) = ∅) )
| | 5:: | ⊢ ((𝑎 ∩ 𝑥) = ∅ ∨ ¬ (𝑎 ∩ 𝑥) =
∅)
| | 6:5,4,3: | ⊢ ( (𝑎 ⊆ On ∧ 𝑎 ≠ ∅) , 𝑥 ∈ 𝑎 ▶
∃𝑦 ∈ 𝑎(𝑎 ∩ 𝑦) = ∅ )
| | 7:6: | ⊢ ( (𝑎 ⊆ On ∧ 𝑎 ≠ ∅) ▶ (𝑥 ∈ 𝑎
→ ∃𝑦 ∈ 𝑎(𝑎 ∩ 𝑦) = ∅) )
| | 8:7: | ⊢ ( (𝑎 ⊆ On ∧ 𝑎 ≠ ∅) ▶ ∀𝑥(𝑥
∈ 𝑎 → ∃𝑦 ∈ 𝑎(𝑎 ∩ 𝑦) = ∅) )
| | 9:8: | ⊢ ( (𝑎 ⊆ On ∧ 𝑎 ≠ ∅) ▶ (∃𝑥𝑥
∈ 𝑎 → ∃𝑦 ∈ 𝑎(𝑎 ∩ 𝑦) = ∅) )
| | 10:: | ⊢ (𝑎 ≠ ∅ ↔ ∃𝑥𝑥 ∈ 𝑎)
| | 11:9,10: | ⊢ ( (𝑎 ⊆ On ∧ 𝑎 ≠ ∅) ▶ (𝑎 ≠
∅ → ∃𝑦 ∈ 𝑎(𝑎 ∩ 𝑦) = ∅) )
| | 12:: | ⊢ ( (𝑎 ⊆ On ∧ 𝑎 ≠ ∅) ▶ (𝑎 ⊆
On ∧ 𝑎 ≠ ∅) )
| | 13:12: | ⊢ ( (𝑎 ⊆ On ∧ 𝑎 ≠ ∅) ▶ 𝑎 ≠
∅ )
| | 14:13,11: | ⊢ ( (𝑎 ⊆ On ∧ 𝑎 ≠ ∅) ▶ ∃𝑦 ∈
𝑎(𝑎 ∩ 𝑦) = ∅ )
| | 15:14: | ⊢ ((𝑎 ⊆ On ∧ 𝑎 ≠ ∅) → ∃𝑦 ∈ 𝑎
(𝑎 ∩ 𝑦) = ∅)
| | 16:15: | ⊢ ∀𝑎((𝑎 ⊆ On ∧ 𝑎 ≠ ∅) → ∃𝑦
∈ 𝑎(𝑎 ∩ 𝑦) = ∅)
| | qed:16: | ⊢ E Fr On
|
(Contributed by Alan Sare, 22-Jul-2012.) (Proof modification is
discouraged.) (New usage is discouraged.)
|
| ⊢ E Fr
On |
| |
| Theorem | csbeq2gVD 44863 |
Virtual deduction proof of csbeq2 3926.
The following User's Proof is a Virtual Deduction proof completed
automatically by the tools program completeusersproof.cmd, which invokes
Mel L. O'Cat's mmj2 and Norm Megill's Metamath Proof Assistant.
csbeq2 3926 is csbeq2gVD 44863 without virtual deductions and was
automatically derived from csbeq2gVD 44863.
| 1:: | ⊢ ( 𝐴 ∈ 𝑉 ▶ 𝐴 ∈ 𝑉 )
| | 2:1: | ⊢ ( 𝐴 ∈ 𝑉 ▶ (∀𝑥𝐵 = 𝐶 → [𝐴 / 𝑥]
𝐵 = 𝐶) )
| | 3:1: | ⊢ ( 𝐴 ∈ 𝑉 ▶ ([𝐴 / 𝑥]𝐵 = 𝐶 ↔ ⦋𝐴
/ 𝑥⦌𝐵 = ⦋𝐴 / 𝑥⦌𝐶) )
| | 4:2,3: | ⊢ ( 𝐴 ∈ 𝑉 ▶ (∀𝑥𝐵 = 𝐶 → ⦋𝐴 / 𝑥
⦌𝐵 = ⦋𝐴 / 𝑥⦌𝐶) )
| | qed:4: | ⊢ (𝐴 ∈ 𝑉 → (∀𝑥𝐵 = 𝐶 → ⦋𝐴 / 𝑥⦌
𝐵 = ⦋𝐴 / 𝑥⦌𝐶))
|
(Contributed by Alan Sare, 10-Nov-2012.) (Proof modification is
discouraged.) (New usage is discouraged.)
|
| ⊢ (𝐴 ∈ 𝑉 → (∀𝑥 𝐵 = 𝐶 → ⦋𝐴 / 𝑥⦌𝐵 = ⦋𝐴 / 𝑥⦌𝐶)) |
| |
| Theorem | csbsngVD 44864 |
Virtual deduction proof of csbsng 4733.
The following User's Proof is a Virtual Deduction proof completed
automatically by the tools program completeusersproof.cmd, which invokes
Mel L. O'Cat's mmj2 and Norm Megill's Metamath Proof Assistant.
csbsng 4733 is csbsngVD 44864 without virtual deductions and was automatically
derived from csbsngVD 44864.
| 1:: | ⊢ ( 𝐴 ∈ 𝑉 ▶ 𝐴 ∈ 𝑉 )
| | 2:1: | ⊢ ( 𝐴 ∈ 𝑉 ▶ ([𝐴 / 𝑥]𝑦 = 𝐵
↔ ⦋𝐴 / 𝑥⦌𝑦 = ⦋𝐴 / 𝑥⦌𝐵) )
| | 3:1: | ⊢ ( 𝐴 ∈ 𝑉 ▶ ⦋𝐴 / 𝑥⦌𝑦 = 𝑦 )
| | 4:3: | ⊢ ( 𝐴 ∈ 𝑉 ▶ (⦋𝐴 / 𝑥⦌𝑦 = ⦋𝐴
/ 𝑥⦌𝐵 ↔ 𝑦 = ⦋𝐴 / 𝑥⦌𝐵) )
| | 5:2,4: | ⊢ ( 𝐴 ∈ 𝑉 ▶ ([𝐴 / 𝑥]𝑦 = 𝐵
↔ 𝑦 = ⦋𝐴 / 𝑥⦌𝐵) )
| | 6:5: | ⊢ ( 𝐴 ∈ 𝑉 ▶ ∀𝑦([𝐴 / 𝑥]𝑦
= 𝐵 ↔ 𝑦 = ⦋𝐴 / 𝑥⦌𝐵) )
| | 7:6: | ⊢ ( 𝐴 ∈ 𝑉 ▶ {𝑦 ∣ [𝐴 / 𝑥]𝑦 =
𝐵} = {𝑦 ∣ 𝑦 = ⦋𝐴 / 𝑥⦌𝐵} )
| | 8:1: | ⊢ ( 𝐴 ∈ 𝑉 ▶ {𝑦 ∣ [𝐴 / 𝑥]𝑦 =
𝐵} = ⦋𝐴 / 𝑥⦌{𝑦 ∣ 𝑦 = 𝐵} )
| | 9:7,8: | ⊢ ( 𝐴 ∈ 𝑉 ▶ ⦋𝐴 / 𝑥⦌{𝑦 ∣ 𝑦
= 𝐵} = {𝑦 ∣ 𝑦 = ⦋𝐴 / 𝑥⦌𝐵} )
| | 10:: | ⊢ {𝐵} = {𝑦 ∣ 𝑦 = 𝐵}
| | 11:10: | ⊢ ∀𝑥{𝐵} = {𝑦 ∣ 𝑦 = 𝐵}
| | 12:1,11: | ⊢ ( 𝐴 ∈ 𝑉 ▶ ⦋𝐴 / 𝑥⦌{𝐵} = ⦋
𝐴 / 𝑥⦌{𝑦 ∣ 𝑦 = 𝐵} )
| | 13:9,12: | ⊢ ( 𝐴 ∈ 𝑉 ▶ ⦋𝐴 / 𝑥⦌{𝐵} = {
𝑦 ∣ 𝑦 = ⦋𝐴 / 𝑥⦌𝐵} )
| | 14:: | ⊢ {⦋𝐴 / 𝑥⦌𝐵} = {𝑦 ∣ 𝑦 = ⦋𝐴
/ 𝑥⦌𝐵}
| | 15:13,14: | ⊢ ( 𝐴 ∈ 𝑉 ▶ ⦋𝐴 / 𝑥⦌{𝐵} = {
⦋𝐴 / 𝑥⦌𝐵} )
| | qed:15: | ⊢ (𝐴 ∈ 𝑉 → ⦋𝐴 / 𝑥⦌{𝐵} = {⦋
𝐴 / 𝑥⦌𝐵})
|
(Contributed by Alan Sare, 10-Nov-2012.) (Proof modification is
discouraged.) (New usage is discouraged.)
|
| ⊢ (𝐴 ∈ 𝑉 → ⦋𝐴 / 𝑥⦌{𝐵} = {⦋𝐴 / 𝑥⦌𝐵}) |
| |
| Theorem | csbxpgVD 44865 |
Virtual deduction proof of csbxp 5799.
The following User's Proof is a Virtual Deduction proof completed
automatically by the tools program completeusersproof.cmd, which invokes
Mel L. O'Cat's mmj2 and Norm Megill's Metamath Proof Assistant.
csbxp 5799 is csbxpgVD 44865 without virtual deductions and was
automatically derived from csbxpgVD 44865.
| 1:: | ⊢ ( 𝐴 ∈ 𝑉 ▶ 𝐴 ∈ 𝑉 )
| | 2:1: | ⊢ ( 𝐴 ∈ 𝑉 ▶ ([𝐴 / 𝑥]𝑤 ∈ 𝐵 ↔
⦋𝐴 / 𝑥⦌𝑤 ∈ ⦋𝐴 / 𝑥⦌𝐵) )
| | 3:1: | ⊢ ( 𝐴 ∈ 𝑉 ▶ ⦋𝐴 / 𝑥⦌𝑤 = 𝑤 )
| | 4:3: | ⊢ ( 𝐴 ∈ 𝑉 ▶ (⦋𝐴 / 𝑥⦌𝑤 ∈ ⦋𝐴 /
𝑥⦌𝐵 ↔ 𝑤 ∈ ⦋𝐴 / 𝑥⦌𝐵) )
| | 5:2,4: | ⊢ ( 𝐴 ∈ 𝑉 ▶ ([𝐴 / 𝑥]𝑤 ∈ 𝐵 ↔ 𝑤
∈ ⦋𝐴 / 𝑥⦌𝐵) )
| | 6:1: | ⊢ ( 𝐴 ∈ 𝑉 ▶ ([𝐴 / 𝑥]𝑦 ∈ 𝐶 ↔
⦋𝐴 / 𝑥⦌𝑦 ∈ ⦋𝐴 / 𝑥⦌𝐶) )
| | 7:1: | ⊢ ( 𝐴 ∈ 𝑉 ▶ ⦋𝐴 / 𝑥⦌𝑦 = 𝑦 )
| | 8:7: | ⊢ ( 𝐴 ∈ 𝑉 ▶ (⦋𝐴 / 𝑥⦌𝑦 ∈ ⦋𝐴 /
𝑥⦌𝐶 ↔ 𝑦 ∈ ⦋𝐴 / 𝑥⦌𝐶) )
| | 9:6,8: | ⊢ ( 𝐴 ∈ 𝑉 ▶ ([𝐴 / 𝑥]𝑦 ∈ 𝐶 ↔ 𝑦
∈ ⦋𝐴 / 𝑥⦌𝐶) )
| | 10:5,9: | ⊢ ( 𝐴 ∈ 𝑉 ▶ (([𝐴 / 𝑥]𝑤 ∈ 𝐵 ∧
[𝐴 / 𝑥]𝑦 ∈ 𝐶) ↔ (𝑤 ∈ ⦋𝐴 / 𝑥⦌𝐵 ∧
𝑦 ∈ ⦋𝐴 / 𝑥⦌𝐶)) )
| | 11:1: | ⊢ ( 𝐴 ∈ 𝑉 ▶ ([𝐴 / 𝑥](𝑤 ∈ 𝐵 ∧
𝑦 ∈ 𝐶) ↔ ([𝐴 / 𝑥]𝑤 ∈ 𝐵 ∧ [𝐴 / 𝑥]𝑦 ∈ 𝐶)) )
| | 12:10,11: | ⊢ ( 𝐴 ∈ 𝑉 ▶ ([𝐴 / 𝑥](𝑤 ∈ 𝐵 ∧
𝑦 ∈ 𝐶) ↔ (𝑤 ∈ ⦋𝐴 / 𝑥⦌𝐵 ∧ 𝑦 ∈ ⦋𝐴 / 𝑥⦌𝐶)) )
| | 13:1: | ⊢ ( 𝐴 ∈ 𝑉 ▶ ([𝐴 / 𝑥]𝑧 = ⟨𝑤 ,
𝑦⟩ ↔ 𝑧 = ⟨𝑤, 𝑦⟩) )
| | 14:12,13: | ⊢ ( 𝐴 ∈ 𝑉 ▶ (([𝐴 / 𝑥]𝑧 = ⟨𝑤
, 𝑦⟩ ∧ [𝐴 / 𝑥](𝑤 ∈ 𝐵 ∧ 𝑦 ∈ 𝐶)) ↔ (𝑧 = ⟨𝑤, 𝑦⟩
∧ (𝑤 ∈ ⦋𝐴 / 𝑥⦌𝐵 ∧ 𝑦 ∈ ⦋𝐴 / 𝑥⦌𝐶))) )
| | 15:1: | ⊢ ( 𝐴 ∈ 𝑉 ▶ ([𝐴 / 𝑥](𝑧 = ⟨𝑤
, 𝑦⟩ ∧ (𝑤 ∈ 𝐵 ∧ 𝑦 ∈ 𝐶)) ↔ ([𝐴 / 𝑥]𝑧 = ⟨𝑤, 𝑦⟩
∧ [𝐴 / 𝑥](𝑤 ∈ 𝐵 ∧ 𝑦 ∈ 𝐶))) )
| | 16:14,15: | ⊢ ( 𝐴 ∈ 𝑉 ▶ ([𝐴 / 𝑥](𝑧 = ⟨𝑤
, 𝑦⟩ ∧ (𝑤 ∈ 𝐵 ∧ 𝑦 ∈ 𝐶)) ↔ (𝑧 = ⟨𝑤, 𝑦⟩ ∧
(𝑤 ∈ ⦋𝐴 / 𝑥⦌𝐵 ∧ 𝑦 ∈ ⦋𝐴 / 𝑥⦌𝐶))) )
| | 17:16: | ⊢ ( 𝐴 ∈ 𝑉 ▶ ∀𝑦([𝐴 / 𝑥](𝑧 =
⟨𝑤, 𝑦⟩ ∧ (𝑤 ∈ 𝐵 ∧ 𝑦 ∈ 𝐶)) ↔ (𝑧 = ⟨𝑤, 𝑦⟩ ∧
(𝑤 ∈ ⦋𝐴 / 𝑥⦌𝐵 ∧ 𝑦 ∈ ⦋𝐴 / 𝑥⦌𝐶))) )
| | 18:17: | ⊢ ( 𝐴 ∈ 𝑉 ▶ (∃𝑦[𝐴 / 𝑥](𝑧 =
⟨𝑤, 𝑦⟩ ∧ (𝑤 ∈ 𝐵 ∧ 𝑦 ∈ 𝐶)) ↔ ∃𝑦(𝑧 = ⟨𝑤, 𝑦⟩ ∧
(𝑤 ∈ ⦋𝐴 / 𝑥⦌𝐵 ∧ 𝑦 ∈ ⦋𝐴 / 𝑥⦌𝐶))) )
| | 19:1: | ⊢ ( 𝐴 ∈ 𝑉 ▶ ([𝐴 / 𝑥]∃𝑦(𝑧 =
⟨𝑤, 𝑦⟩ ∧ (𝑤 ∈ 𝐵 ∧ 𝑦 ∈ 𝐶)) ↔ ∃𝑦[𝐴 / 𝑥](𝑧 =
⟨𝑤, 𝑦⟩ ∧ (𝑤 ∈ 𝐵 ∧ 𝑦 ∈ 𝐶))) )
| | 20:18,19: | ⊢ ( 𝐴 ∈ 𝑉 ▶ ([𝐴 / 𝑥]∃𝑦(𝑧 =
⟨𝑤, 𝑦⟩ ∧ (𝑤 ∈ 𝐵 ∧ 𝑦 ∈ 𝐶)) ↔ ∃𝑦(𝑧 = ⟨𝑤, 𝑦⟩ ∧
(𝑤 ∈ ⦋𝐴 / 𝑥⦌𝐵 ∧ 𝑦 ∈ ⦋𝐴 / 𝑥⦌𝐶))) )
| | 21:20: | ⊢ ( 𝐴 ∈ 𝑉 ▶ ∀𝑤([𝐴 / 𝑥]∃𝑦(
𝑧 = ⟨𝑤, 𝑦⟩ ∧ (𝑤 ∈ 𝐵 ∧ 𝑦 ∈ 𝐶)) ↔ ∃𝑦(𝑧 =
⟨𝑤, 𝑦⟩ ∧ (𝑤 ∈ ⦋𝐴 / 𝑥⦌𝐵 ∧ 𝑦 ∈ ⦋𝐴 / 𝑥⦌𝐶))) )
| | 22:21: | ⊢ ( 𝐴 ∈ 𝑉 ▶ (∃𝑤[𝐴 / 𝑥]∃𝑦(
𝑧 = ⟨𝑤, 𝑦⟩ ∧ (𝑤 ∈ 𝐵 ∧ 𝑦 ∈ 𝐶)) ↔ ∃𝑤∃𝑦(𝑧 =
⟨𝑤, 𝑦⟩ ∧ (𝑤 ∈ ⦋𝐴 / 𝑥⦌𝐵 ∧ 𝑦 ∈ ⦋𝐴 / 𝑥⦌𝐶))) )
| | 23:1: | ⊢ ( 𝐴 ∈ 𝑉 ▶ ([𝐴 / 𝑥]∃𝑤∃𝑦(
𝑧 = ⟨𝑤, 𝑦⟩ ∧ (𝑤 ∈ 𝐵 ∧ 𝑦 ∈ 𝐶)) ↔ ∃𝑤[𝐴 / 𝑥]∃𝑦
(𝑧 = ⟨𝑤, 𝑦⟩ ∧ (𝑤 ∈ 𝐵 ∧ 𝑦 ∈ 𝐶))) )
| | 24:22,23: | ⊢ ( 𝐴 ∈ 𝑉 ▶ ([𝐴 / 𝑥]∃𝑤∃𝑦(
𝑧 = ⟨𝑤, 𝑦⟩ ∧ (𝑤 ∈ 𝐵 ∧ 𝑦 ∈ 𝐶)) ↔ ∃𝑤∃𝑦(𝑧 =
⟨𝑤, 𝑦⟩ ∧ (𝑤 ∈ ⦋𝐴 / 𝑥⦌𝐵 ∧ 𝑦 ∈ ⦋𝐴 / 𝑥⦌𝐶))) )
| | 25:24: | ⊢ ( 𝐴 ∈ 𝑉 ▶ ∀𝑧([𝐴 / 𝑥]∃𝑤∃
𝑦(𝑧 = ⟨𝑤, 𝑦⟩ ∧ (𝑤 ∈ 𝐵 ∧ 𝑦 ∈ 𝐶)) ↔ ∃𝑤∃𝑦(𝑧 =
⟨𝑤, 𝑦⟩ ∧ (𝑤 ∈ ⦋𝐴 / 𝑥⦌𝐵 ∧ 𝑦 ∈ ⦋𝐴 / 𝑥⦌𝐶))) )
| | 26:25: | ⊢ ( 𝐴 ∈ 𝑉 ▶ {𝑧 ∣ [𝐴 / 𝑥]∃𝑤∃
𝑦(𝑧 = ⟨𝑤, 𝑦⟩ ∧ (𝑤 ∈ 𝐵 ∧ 𝑦 ∈ 𝐶))} = {𝑧 ∣ ∃𝑤∃𝑦(
𝑧 = ⟨𝑤, 𝑦⟩ ∧ (𝑤 ∈ ⦋𝐴 / 𝑥⦌𝐵 ∧ 𝑦 ∈ ⦋𝐴 / 𝑥⦌𝐶))}
)
| | 27:1: | ⊢ ( 𝐴 ∈ 𝑉 ▶ ⦋𝐴 / 𝑥⦌{𝑧 ∣ ∃𝑤∃
𝑦(𝑧 = ⟨𝑤, 𝑦⟩ ∧ (𝑤 ∈ 𝐵 ∧ 𝑦 ∈ 𝐶))} = {𝑧 ∣ [𝐴 / 𝑥]
∃𝑤∃𝑦(𝑧 = ⟨𝑤, 𝑦⟩ ∧ (𝑤 ∈ 𝐵 ∧ 𝑦 ∈ 𝐶))} )
| | 28:26,27: | ⊢ ( 𝐴 ∈ 𝑉 ▶ ⦋𝐴 / 𝑥⦌{𝑧 ∣ ∃𝑤∃
𝑦(𝑧 = ⟨𝑤, 𝑦⟩ ∧ (𝑤 ∈ 𝐵 ∧ 𝑦 ∈ 𝐶))} = {𝑧 ∣ ∃𝑤∃𝑦(
𝑧 = ⟨𝑤, 𝑦⟩ ∧ (𝑤 ∈ ⦋𝐴 / 𝑥⦌𝐵 ∧ 𝑦 ∈ ⦋𝐴 / 𝑥⦌𝐶))}
)
| | 29:: | ⊢ {⟨𝑤 , 𝑦⟩ ∣ (𝑤 ∈ 𝐵 ∧ 𝑦 ∈ 𝐶)}
= {𝑧 ∣ ∃𝑤∃𝑦(𝑧 = ⟨𝑤, 𝑦⟩ ∧ (𝑤 ∈ 𝐵 ∧ 𝑦 ∈ 𝐶))}
| | 30:: | ⊢ (𝐵 × 𝐶) = {⟨𝑤 , 𝑦⟩ ∣ (𝑤 ∈ 𝐵
∧ 𝑦 ∈ 𝐶)}
| | 31:29,30: | ⊢ (𝐵 × 𝐶) = {𝑧 ∣ ∃𝑤∃𝑦(𝑧 = ⟨𝑤
, 𝑦⟩ ∧ (𝑤 ∈ 𝐵 ∧ 𝑦 ∈ 𝐶))}
| | 32:31: | ⊢ ∀𝑥(𝐵 × 𝐶) = {𝑧 ∣ ∃𝑤∃𝑦(𝑧 =
⟨𝑤, 𝑦⟩ ∧ (𝑤 ∈ 𝐵 ∧ 𝑦 ∈ 𝐶))}
| | 33:1,32: | ⊢ ( 𝐴 ∈ 𝑉 ▶ ⦋𝐴 / 𝑥⦌(𝐵 × 𝐶) =
⦋𝐴 / 𝑥⦌{𝑧 ∣ ∃𝑤∃𝑦(𝑧 = ⟨𝑤, 𝑦⟩ ∧ (𝑤 ∈ 𝐵 ∧
𝑦 ∈ 𝐶))} )
| | 34:28,33: | ⊢ ( 𝐴 ∈ 𝑉 ▶ ⦋𝐴 / 𝑥⦌(𝐵 × 𝐶) =
{𝑧 ∣ ∃𝑤∃𝑦(𝑧 = ⟨𝑤, 𝑦⟩ ∧ (𝑤 ∈ ⦋𝐴 / 𝑥⦌𝐵 ∧
𝑦 ∈ ⦋𝐴 / 𝑥⦌𝐶))} )
| | 35:: | ⊢ {⟨𝑤 , 𝑦⟩ ∣ (𝑤 ∈ ⦋𝐴 / 𝑥⦌𝐵 ∧
𝑦 ∈ ⦋𝐴 / 𝑥⦌𝐶)} = {𝑧 ∣ ∃𝑤∃𝑦(𝑧 = ⟨𝑤, 𝑦⟩ ∧
(𝑤 ∈ ⦋𝐴 / 𝑥⦌𝐵 ∧ 𝑦 ∈ ⦋𝐴 / 𝑥⦌𝐶))}
| | 36:: | ⊢ (⦋𝐴 / 𝑥⦌𝐵 × ⦋𝐴 / 𝑥⦌𝐶) = {
⟨𝑤, 𝑦⟩ ∣ (𝑤 ∈ ⦋𝐴 / 𝑥⦌𝐵 ∧ 𝑦 ∈ ⦋𝐴 / 𝑥⦌𝐶)}
| | 37:35,36: | ⊢ (⦋𝐴 / 𝑥⦌𝐵 × ⦋𝐴 / 𝑥⦌𝐶) = {𝑧
∣ ∃𝑤∃𝑦(𝑧 = ⟨𝑤, 𝑦⟩ ∧ (𝑤 ∈ ⦋𝐴 / 𝑥⦌𝐵 ∧
𝑦 ∈ ⦋𝐴 / 𝑥⦌𝐶))}
| | 38:34,37: | ⊢ ( 𝐴 ∈ 𝑉 ▶ ⦋𝐴 / 𝑥⦌(𝐵 × 𝐶) =
(⦋𝐴 / 𝑥⦌𝐵 × ⦋𝐴 / 𝑥⦌𝐶) )
| | qed:38: | ⊢ (𝐴 ∈ 𝑉 → ⦋𝐴 / 𝑥⦌(𝐵 × 𝐶) = (
⦋𝐴 / 𝑥⦌𝐵 × ⦋𝐴 / 𝑥⦌𝐶))
|
(Contributed by Alan Sare, 10-Nov-2012.) (Proof modification is
discouraged.) (New usage is discouraged.)
|
| ⊢ (𝐴 ∈ 𝑉 → ⦋𝐴 / 𝑥⦌(𝐵 × 𝐶) = (⦋𝐴 / 𝑥⦌𝐵 × ⦋𝐴 / 𝑥⦌𝐶)) |
| |
| Theorem | csbresgVD 44866 |
Virtual deduction proof of csbres 6012.
The following User's Proof is a Virtual Deduction proof completed
automatically by the tools program completeusersproof.cmd, which invokes
Mel L. O'Cat's mmj2 and Norm Megill's Metamath Proof Assistant.
csbres 6012 is csbresgVD 44866 without virtual deductions and was
automatically derived from csbresgVD 44866.
| 1:: | ⊢ ( 𝐴 ∈ 𝑉 ▶ 𝐴 ∈ 𝑉 )
| | 2:1: | ⊢ ( 𝐴 ∈ 𝑉 ▶ ⦋𝐴 / 𝑥⦌V = V )
| | 3:2: | ⊢ ( 𝐴 ∈ 𝑉 ▶ (⦋𝐴 / 𝑥⦌𝐶 × ⦋𝐴 /
𝑥⦌V) = (⦋𝐴 / 𝑥⦌𝐶 × V) )
| | 4:1: | ⊢ ( 𝐴 ∈ 𝑉 ▶ ⦋𝐴 / 𝑥⦌(𝐶 × V) =
(⦋𝐴 / 𝑥⦌𝐶 × ⦋𝐴 / 𝑥⦌V) )
| | 5:3,4: | ⊢ ( 𝐴 ∈ 𝑉 ▶ ⦋𝐴 / 𝑥⦌(𝐶 × V) =
(⦋𝐴 / 𝑥⦌𝐶 × V) )
| | 6:5: | ⊢ ( 𝐴 ∈ 𝑉 ▶ (⦋𝐴 / 𝑥⦌𝐵 ∩ ⦋𝐴 /
𝑥⦌(𝐶 × V)) =
(⦋𝐴 / 𝑥⦌𝐵 ∩ (⦋𝐴 / 𝑥⦌𝐶 × V)) )
| | 7:1: | ⊢ ( 𝐴 ∈ 𝑉 ▶ ⦋𝐴 / 𝑥⦌(𝐵 ∩ (𝐶 ×
V)) = (⦋𝐴 / 𝑥⦌𝐵 ∩ ⦋𝐴 / 𝑥⦌(𝐶 × V)) )
| | 8:6,7: | ⊢ ( 𝐴 ∈ 𝑉 ▶ ⦋𝐴 / 𝑥⦌(𝐵 ∩ (𝐶 ×
V)) = (⦋𝐴 / 𝑥⦌𝐵 ∩ (⦋𝐴 / 𝑥⦌𝐶 × V)) )
| | 9:: | ⊢ (𝐵 ↾ 𝐶) = (𝐵 ∩ (𝐶 × V))
| | 10:9: | ⊢ ∀𝑥(𝐵 ↾ 𝐶) = (𝐵 ∩ (𝐶 × V))
| | 11:1,10: | ⊢ ( 𝐴 ∈ 𝑉 ▶ ⦋𝐴 / 𝑥⦌(𝐵 ↾ 𝐶) =
⦋𝐴 / 𝑥⦌(𝐵 ∩ (𝐶 × V)) )
| | 12:8,11: | ⊢ ( 𝐴 ∈ 𝑉 ▶ ⦋𝐴 / 𝑥⦌(𝐵 ↾ 𝐶)
= (
⦋𝐴 / 𝑥⦌𝐵 ∩ (⦋𝐴 / 𝑥⦌𝐶 × V)) )
| | 13:: | ⊢ (⦋𝐴 / 𝑥⦌𝐵 ↾ ⦋𝐴 / 𝑥⦌𝐶) = (
⦋𝐴 / 𝑥⦌𝐵 ∩ (⦋𝐴 / 𝑥⦌𝐶 × V))
| | 14:12,13: | ⊢ ( 𝐴 ∈ 𝑉 ▶ ⦋𝐴 / 𝑥⦌(𝐵 ↾ 𝐶) =
(
⦋𝐴 / 𝑥⦌𝐵 ↾ ⦋𝐴 / 𝑥⦌𝐶) )
| | qed:14: | ⊢ (𝐴 ∈ 𝑉 → ⦋𝐴 / 𝑥⦌(𝐵 ↾ 𝐶) = (
⦋𝐴 / 𝑥⦌𝐵 ↾ ⦋𝐴 / 𝑥⦌𝐶))
|
(Contributed by Alan Sare, 10-Nov-2012.) (Proof modification is
discouraged.) (New usage is discouraged.)
|
| ⊢ (𝐴 ∈ 𝑉 → ⦋𝐴 / 𝑥⦌(𝐵 ↾ 𝐶) = (⦋𝐴 / 𝑥⦌𝐵 ↾ ⦋𝐴 / 𝑥⦌𝐶)) |
| |
| Theorem | csbrngVD 44867 |
Virtual deduction proof of csbrn 6234.
The following User's Proof is a Virtual Deduction proof completed
automatically by the tools program completeusersproof.cmd, which invokes
Mel L. O'Cat's mmj2 and Norm Megill's Metamath Proof Assistant.
csbrn 6234 is csbrngVD 44867 without virtual deductions and was
automatically derived from csbrngVD 44867.
| 1:: | ⊢ ( 𝐴 ∈ 𝑉 ▶ 𝐴 ∈ 𝑉 )
| | 2:1: | ⊢ ( 𝐴 ∈ 𝑉 ▶ ([𝐴 / 𝑥]⟨𝑤 , 𝑦⟩
∈ 𝐵 ↔ ⦋𝐴 / 𝑥⦌⟨𝑤, 𝑦⟩ ∈ ⦋𝐴 / 𝑥⦌𝐵) )
| | 3:1: | ⊢ ( 𝐴 ∈ 𝑉 ▶ ⦋𝐴 / 𝑥⦌⟨𝑤 , 𝑦⟩ =
⟨𝑤, 𝑦⟩ )
| | 4:3: | ⊢ ( 𝐴 ∈ 𝑉 ▶ (⦋𝐴 / 𝑥⦌⟨𝑤 , 𝑦⟩
∈ ⦋𝐴 / 𝑥⦌𝐵 ↔ ⟨𝑤, 𝑦⟩ ∈ ⦋𝐴 / 𝑥⦌𝐵) )
| | 5:2,4: | ⊢ ( 𝐴 ∈ 𝑉 ▶ ([𝐴 / 𝑥]⟨𝑤 , 𝑦⟩
∈ 𝐵 ↔ ⟨𝑤, 𝑦⟩ ∈ ⦋𝐴 / 𝑥⦌𝐵) )
| | 6:5: | ⊢ ( 𝐴 ∈ 𝑉 ▶ ∀𝑤([𝐴 / 𝑥]⟨𝑤 ,
𝑦⟩ ∈ 𝐵 ↔ ⟨𝑤, 𝑦⟩ ∈ ⦋𝐴 / 𝑥⦌𝐵) )
| | 7:6: | ⊢ ( 𝐴 ∈ 𝑉 ▶ (∃𝑤[𝐴 / 𝑥]⟨𝑤 ,
𝑦⟩ ∈ 𝐵 ↔ ∃𝑤⟨𝑤, 𝑦⟩ ∈ ⦋𝐴 / 𝑥⦌𝐵) )
| | 8:1: | ⊢ ( 𝐴 ∈ 𝑉 ▶ (∃𝑤[𝐴 / 𝑥]⟨𝑤 ,
𝑦⟩ ∈ 𝐵 ↔ [𝐴 / 𝑥]∃𝑤⟨𝑤, 𝑦⟩ ∈ 𝐵) )
| | 9:7,8: | ⊢ ( 𝐴 ∈ 𝑉 ▶ ([𝐴 / 𝑥]∃𝑤⟨𝑤
, 𝑦⟩ ∈ 𝐵 ↔ ∃𝑤⟨𝑤, 𝑦⟩ ∈ ⦋𝐴 / 𝑥⦌𝐵) )
| | 10:9: | ⊢ ( 𝐴 ∈ 𝑉 ▶ ∀𝑦([𝐴 / 𝑥]∃𝑤
⟨𝑤, 𝑦⟩ ∈ 𝐵 ↔ ∃𝑤⟨𝑤, 𝑦⟩ ∈ ⦋𝐴 / 𝑥⦌𝐵) )
| | 11:10: | ⊢ ( 𝐴 ∈ 𝑉 ▶ {𝑦 ∣ [𝐴 / 𝑥]∃𝑤⟨
𝑤, 𝑦⟩ ∈ 𝐵} = {𝑦 ∣ ∃𝑤⟨𝑤, 𝑦⟩ ∈ ⦋𝐴 / 𝑥⦌𝐵} )
| | 12:1: | ⊢ ( 𝐴 ∈ 𝑉 ▶ ⦋𝐴 / 𝑥⦌{𝑦 ∣ ∃𝑤
⟨𝑤, 𝑦⟩ ∈ 𝐵} = {𝑦 ∣ [𝐴 / 𝑥]∃𝑤⟨𝑤, 𝑦⟩ ∈ 𝐵} )
| | 13:11,12: | ⊢ ( 𝐴 ∈ 𝑉 ▶ ⦋𝐴 / 𝑥⦌{𝑦 ∣ ∃𝑤
⟨𝑤, 𝑦⟩ ∈ 𝐵} = {𝑦 ∣ ∃𝑤⟨𝑤, 𝑦⟩ ∈ ⦋𝐴 / 𝑥⦌𝐵} )
| | 14:: | ⊢ ran 𝐵 = {𝑦 ∣ ∃𝑤⟨𝑤 , 𝑦⟩ ∈ 𝐵}
| | 15:14: | ⊢ ∀𝑥ran 𝐵 = {𝑦 ∣ ∃𝑤⟨𝑤 , 𝑦⟩
∈ 𝐵}
| | 16:1,15: | ⊢ ( 𝐴 ∈ 𝑉 ▶ ⦋𝐴 / 𝑥⦌ran 𝐵 = ⦋𝐴 /
𝑥⦌{𝑦 ∣ ∃𝑤⟨𝑤, 𝑦⟩ ∈ 𝐵} )
| | 17:13,16: | ⊢ ( 𝐴 ∈ 𝑉 ▶ ⦋𝐴 / 𝑥⦌ran 𝐵 = {𝑦 ∣
∃𝑤⟨𝑤, 𝑦⟩ ∈ ⦋𝐴 / 𝑥⦌𝐵} )
| | 18:: | ⊢ ran ⦋𝐴 / 𝑥⦌𝐵 = {𝑦 ∣ ∃𝑤⟨𝑤
, 𝑦⟩ ∈ ⦋𝐴 / 𝑥⦌𝐵}
| | 19:17,18: | ⊢ ( 𝐴 ∈ 𝑉 ▶ ⦋𝐴 / 𝑥⦌ran 𝐵 = ran ⦋
𝐴 / 𝑥⦌𝐵 )
| | qed:19: | ⊢ (𝐴 ∈ 𝑉 → ⦋𝐴 / 𝑥⦌ran 𝐵 = ran ⦋𝐴
/ 𝑥⦌𝐵)
|
(Contributed by Alan Sare, 10-Nov-2012.) (Proof modification is
discouraged.) (New usage is discouraged.)
|
| ⊢ (𝐴 ∈ 𝑉 → ⦋𝐴 / 𝑥⦌ran 𝐵 = ran ⦋𝐴 / 𝑥⦌𝐵) |
| |
| Theorem | csbima12gALTVD 44868 |
Virtual deduction proof of csbima12 6108.
The following User's Proof is a Virtual Deduction proof completed
automatically by the tools program completeusersproof.cmd, which invokes
Mel L. O'Cat's mmj2 and Norm Megill's Metamath Proof Assistant.
csbima12 6108 is csbima12gALTVD 44868 without virtual deductions and was
automatically derived from csbima12gALTVD 44868.
| 1:: | ⊢ ( 𝐴 ∈ 𝐶 ▶ 𝐴 ∈ 𝐶 )
| | 2:1: | ⊢ ( 𝐴 ∈ 𝐶 ▶ ⦋𝐴 / 𝑥⦌(𝐹 ↾ 𝐵) =
(
⦋𝐴 / 𝑥⦌𝐹 ↾ ⦋𝐴 / 𝑥⦌𝐵) )
| | 3:2: | ⊢ ( 𝐴 ∈ 𝐶 ▶
ran ⦋𝐴 / 𝑥⦌(𝐹 ↾ 𝐵)
= ran (⦋𝐴 / 𝑥⦌𝐹 ↾ ⦋𝐴 / 𝑥⦌𝐵) )
| | 4:1: | ⊢ ( 𝐴 ∈ 𝐶 ▶
⦋𝐴 / 𝑥⦌ran (𝐹 ↾ 𝐵)
= ran ⦋𝐴 / 𝑥⦌(𝐹 ↾ 𝐵) )
| | 5:3,4: | ⊢ ( 𝐴 ∈ 𝐶 ▶
⦋𝐴 / 𝑥⦌ran (𝐹 ↾ 𝐵)
= ran (⦋𝐴 / 𝑥⦌𝐹 ↾ ⦋𝐴 / 𝑥⦌𝐵) )
| | 6:: | ⊢ (𝐹 “ 𝐵) = ran (𝐹 ↾ 𝐵)
| | 7:6: | ⊢ ∀𝑥(𝐹 “ 𝐵) = ran (𝐹 ↾ 𝐵)
| | 8:1,7: | ⊢ ( 𝐴 ∈ 𝐶 ▶ ⦋𝐴 / 𝑥⦌(𝐹 “ 𝐵) = ⦋
𝐴 / 𝑥⦌ran (𝐹 ↾ 𝐵) )
| | 9:5,8: | ⊢ ( 𝐴 ∈ 𝐶 ▶ ⦋𝐴 / 𝑥⦌(𝐹 “ 𝐵) =
ran (⦋𝐴 / 𝑥⦌𝐹 ↾ ⦋𝐴 / 𝑥⦌𝐵) )
| | 10:: | ⊢ (⦋𝐴 / 𝑥⦌𝐹 “ ⦋𝐴 / 𝑥⦌𝐵) = ran
(⦋𝐴 / 𝑥⦌𝐹 ↾ ⦋𝐴 / 𝑥⦌𝐵)
| | 11:9,10: | ⊢ ( 𝐴 ∈ 𝐶 ▶ ⦋𝐴 / 𝑥⦌(𝐹 “ 𝐵) = (
⦋𝐴 / 𝑥⦌𝐹 “ ⦋𝐴 / 𝑥⦌𝐵) )
| | qed:11: | ⊢ (𝐴 ∈ 𝐶 → ⦋𝐴 / 𝑥⦌(𝐹 “ 𝐵) = (⦋
𝐴 / 𝑥⦌𝐹 “ ⦋𝐴 / 𝑥⦌𝐵))
|
(Contributed by Alan Sare, 10-Nov-2012.) (Proof modification is
discouraged.) (New usage is discouraged.)
|
| ⊢ (𝐴 ∈ 𝐶 → ⦋𝐴 / 𝑥⦌(𝐹 “ 𝐵) = (⦋𝐴 / 𝑥⦌𝐹 “ ⦋𝐴 / 𝑥⦌𝐵)) |
| |
| Theorem | csbunigVD 44869 |
Virtual deduction proof of csbuni 4960.
The following User's Proof is a Virtual Deduction proof completed
automatically by the tools program completeusersproof.cmd, which invokes
Mel L. O'Cat's mmj2 and Norm Megill's Metamath Proof Assistant.
csbuni 4960 is csbunigVD 44869 without virtual deductions and was
automatically derived from csbunigVD 44869.
| 1:: | ⊢ ( 𝐴 ∈ 𝑉 ▶ 𝐴 ∈ 𝑉 )
| | 2:1: | ⊢ ( 𝐴 ∈ 𝑉 ▶ ([𝐴 / 𝑥]𝑧 ∈ 𝑦 ↔ 𝑧
∈ 𝑦) )
| | 3:1: | ⊢ ( 𝐴 ∈ 𝑉 ▶ ([𝐴 / 𝑥]𝑦 ∈ 𝐵 ↔ 𝑦
∈ ⦋𝐴 / 𝑥⦌𝐵) )
| | 4:2,3: | ⊢ ( 𝐴 ∈ 𝑉 ▶ (([𝐴 / 𝑥]𝑧 ∈ 𝑦 ∧
[𝐴 / 𝑥]𝑦 ∈ 𝐵) ↔ (𝑧 ∈ 𝑦 ∧ 𝑦 ∈ ⦋𝐴 / 𝑥⦌𝐵)) )
| | 5:1: | ⊢ ( 𝐴 ∈ 𝑉 ▶ ([𝐴 / 𝑥](𝑧 ∈ 𝑦 ∧
𝑦 ∈ 𝐵) ↔ ([𝐴 / 𝑥]𝑧 ∈ 𝑦 ∧ [𝐴 / 𝑥]𝑦 ∈ 𝐵)) )
| | 6:4,5: | ⊢ ( 𝐴 ∈ 𝑉 ▶ ([𝐴 / 𝑥](𝑧 ∈ 𝑦 ∧
𝑦 ∈ 𝐵) ↔ (𝑧 ∈ 𝑦 ∧ 𝑦 ∈ ⦋𝐴 / 𝑥⦌𝐵)) )
| | 7:6: | ⊢ ( 𝐴 ∈ 𝑉 ▶ ∀𝑦([𝐴 / 𝑥](𝑧 ∈
𝑦 ∧ 𝑦 ∈ 𝐵) ↔ (𝑧 ∈ 𝑦 ∧ 𝑦 ∈ ⦋𝐴 / 𝑥⦌𝐵)) )
| | 8:7: | ⊢ ( 𝐴 ∈ 𝑉 ▶ (∃𝑦[𝐴 / 𝑥](𝑧 ∈
𝑦 ∧ 𝑦 ∈ 𝐵) ↔ ∃𝑦(𝑧 ∈ 𝑦 ∧ 𝑦 ∈ ⦋𝐴 / 𝑥⦌𝐵)) )
| | 9:1: | ⊢ ( 𝐴 ∈ 𝑉 ▶ ([𝐴 / 𝑥]∃𝑦(𝑧 ∈
𝑦 ∧ 𝑦 ∈ 𝐵) ↔ ∃𝑦[𝐴 / 𝑥](𝑧 ∈ 𝑦 ∧ 𝑦 ∈ 𝐵)) )
| | 10:8,9: | ⊢ ( 𝐴 ∈ 𝑉 ▶ ([𝐴 / 𝑥]∃𝑦(𝑧 ∈
𝑦 ∧ 𝑦 ∈ 𝐵) ↔ ∃𝑦(𝑧 ∈ 𝑦 ∧ 𝑦 ∈ ⦋𝐴 / 𝑥⦌𝐵)) )
| | 11:10: | ⊢ ( 𝐴 ∈ 𝑉 ▶ ∀𝑧([𝐴 / 𝑥]∃𝑦(
𝑧 ∈ 𝑦 ∧ 𝑦 ∈ 𝐵) ↔ ∃𝑦(𝑧 ∈ 𝑦 ∧ 𝑦 ∈ ⦋𝐴 / 𝑥⦌𝐵)) )
| | 12:11: | ⊢ ( 𝐴 ∈ 𝑉 ▶ {𝑧 ∣ [𝐴 / 𝑥]∃𝑦(
𝑧 ∈ 𝑦 ∧ 𝑦 ∈ 𝐵)} = {𝑧 ∣ ∃𝑦(𝑧 ∈ 𝑦 ∧
𝑦 ∈ ⦋𝐴 / 𝑥⦌𝐵)} )
| | 13:1: | ⊢ ( 𝐴 ∈ 𝑉 ▶ ⦋𝐴 / 𝑥⦌{𝑧 ∣ ∃𝑦(𝑧
∈ 𝑦 ∧ 𝑦 ∈ 𝐵)} = {𝑧 ∣ [𝐴 / 𝑥]∃𝑦(𝑧 ∈ 𝑦 ∧ 𝑦 ∈ 𝐵)}
)
| | 14:12,13: | ⊢ ( 𝐴 ∈ 𝑉 ▶ ⦋𝐴 / 𝑥⦌{𝑧 ∣ ∃𝑦(𝑧
∈ 𝑦 ∧ 𝑦 ∈ 𝐵)} = {𝑧 ∣ ∃𝑦(𝑧 ∈ 𝑦 ∧
𝑦 ∈ ⦋𝐴 / 𝑥⦌𝐵)} )
| | 15:: | ⊢ ∪ 𝐵 = {𝑧 ∣ ∃𝑦(𝑧 ∈ 𝑦 ∧ 𝑦 ∈ 𝐵)}
| | 16:15: | ⊢ ∀𝑥∪ 𝐵 = {𝑧 ∣ ∃𝑦(𝑧 ∈ 𝑦 ∧ 𝑦 ∈
𝐵)}
| | 17:1,16: | ⊢ ( 𝐴 ∈ 𝑉 ▶ [𝐴 / 𝑥]∪ 𝐵 = {𝑧 ∣
∃𝑦(𝑧 ∈ 𝑦 ∧ 𝑦 ∈ 𝐵)} )
| | 18:1,17: | ⊢ ( 𝐴 ∈ 𝑉 ▶ ⦋𝐴 / 𝑥⦌∪ 𝐵 = ⦋𝐴 /
𝑥⦌{𝑧 ∣ ∃𝑦(𝑧 ∈ 𝑦 ∧ 𝑦 ∈ 𝐵)} )
| | 19:14,18: | ⊢ ( 𝐴 ∈ 𝑉 ▶ ⦋𝐴 / 𝑥⦌∪ 𝐵 = {𝑧 ∣
∃𝑦(𝑧 ∈ 𝑦 ∧ 𝑦 ∈ ⦋𝐴 / 𝑥⦌𝐵)} )
| | 20:: | ⊢ ∪ ⦋𝐴 / 𝑥⦌𝐵 = {𝑧 ∣ ∃𝑦(𝑧 ∈ 𝑦
∧ 𝑦 ∈ ⦋𝐴 / 𝑥⦌𝐵)}
| | 21:19,20: | ⊢ ( 𝐴 ∈ 𝑉 ▶ ⦋𝐴 / 𝑥⦌∪ 𝐵 = ∪ ⦋𝐴
/ 𝑥⦌𝐵 )
| | qed:21: | ⊢ (𝐴 ∈ 𝑉 → ⦋𝐴 / 𝑥⦌∪ 𝐵 = ∪ ⦋𝐴 /
𝑥⦌𝐵)
|
(Contributed by Alan Sare, 10-Nov-2012.) (Proof modification is
discouraged.) (New usage is discouraged.)
|
| ⊢ (𝐴 ∈ 𝑉 → ⦋𝐴 / 𝑥⦌∪
𝐵 = ∪ ⦋𝐴 / 𝑥⦌𝐵) |
| |
| Theorem | csbfv12gALTVD 44870 |
Virtual deduction proof of csbfv12 6968.
The following User's Proof is a Virtual Deduction proof completed
automatically by the tools program completeusersproof.cmd, which invokes
Mel L. O'Cat's mmj2 and Norm Megill's Metamath Proof Assistant.
csbfv12 6968 is csbfv12gALTVD 44870 without virtual deductions and was
automatically derived from csbfv12gALTVD 44870.
| 1:: | ⊢ ( 𝐴 ∈ 𝐶 ▶ 𝐴 ∈ 𝐶 )
| | 2:1: | ⊢ ( 𝐴 ∈ 𝐶 ▶ ⦋𝐴 / 𝑥⦌{𝑦} = {
𝑦} )
| | 3:1: | ⊢ ( 𝐴 ∈ 𝐶 ▶ ⦋𝐴 / 𝑥⦌(𝐹 “ {𝐵
}) = (⦋𝐴 / 𝑥⦌𝐹 “ ⦋𝐴 / 𝑥⦌{𝐵}) )
| | 4:1: | ⊢ ( 𝐴 ∈ 𝐶 ▶ ⦋𝐴 / 𝑥⦌{𝐵} = {
⦋𝐴 / 𝑥⦌𝐵} )
| | 5:4: | ⊢ ( 𝐴 ∈ 𝐶 ▶ (⦋𝐴 / 𝑥⦌𝐹 “ ⦋𝐴
/ 𝑥⦌{𝐵}) = (⦋𝐴 / 𝑥⦌𝐹 “ {⦋𝐴 / 𝑥⦌𝐵}) )
| | 6:3,5: | ⊢ ( 𝐴 ∈ 𝐶 ▶ ⦋𝐴 / 𝑥⦌(𝐹 “ {𝐵
}) = (⦋𝐴 / 𝑥⦌𝐹 “ {⦋𝐴 / 𝑥⦌𝐵}) )
| | 7:1: | ⊢ ( 𝐴 ∈ 𝐶 ▶ ([𝐴 / 𝑥](𝐹 “ {
𝐵}) = {𝑦} ↔ ⦋𝐴 / 𝑥⦌(𝐹 “ {𝐵}) = ⦋𝐴 / 𝑥⦌{𝑦}) )
| | 8:6,2: | ⊢ ( 𝐴 ∈ 𝐶 ▶ (⦋𝐴 / 𝑥⦌(𝐹 “ {
𝐵}) = ⦋𝐴 / 𝑥⦌{𝑦} ↔ (⦋𝐴 / 𝑥⦌𝐹 “ {⦋𝐴 / 𝑥⦌𝐵})
= {𝑦}) )
| | 9:7,8: | ⊢ ( 𝐴 ∈ 𝐶 ▶ ([𝐴 / 𝑥](𝐹 “ {
𝐵}) = {𝑦} ↔ (⦋𝐴 / 𝑥⦌𝐹 “ {⦋𝐴 / 𝑥⦌𝐵}) = {𝑦})
)
| | 10:9: | ⊢ ( 𝐴 ∈ 𝐶 ▶ ∀𝑦([𝐴 / 𝑥](𝐹
“ {𝐵}) = {𝑦} ↔ (⦋𝐴 / 𝑥⦌𝐹 “ {⦋𝐴 / 𝑥⦌𝐵}) =
{𝑦}) )
| | 11:10: | ⊢ ( 𝐴 ∈ 𝐶 ▶ {𝑦 ∣ [𝐴 / 𝑥](𝐹
“ {𝐵}) = {𝑦}} = {𝑦 ∣ (⦋𝐴 / 𝑥⦌𝐹 “ {⦋𝐴 / 𝑥⦌𝐵}) =
{𝑦}} )
| | 12:1: | ⊢ ( 𝐴 ∈ 𝐶 ▶ ⦋𝐴 / 𝑥⦌{𝑦 ∣ (𝐹
“ {𝐵}) = {𝑦}} = {𝑦 ∣ [𝐴 / 𝑥](𝐹 “ {𝐵}) = {𝑦}} )
| | 13:11,12: | ⊢ ( 𝐴 ∈ 𝐶 ▶ ⦋𝐴 / 𝑥⦌{𝑦 ∣ (𝐹
“ {𝐵}) = {𝑦}} = {𝑦 ∣ (⦋𝐴 / 𝑥⦌𝐹 “ {⦋𝐴 / 𝑥⦌𝐵}) =
{𝑦
}} )
| | 14:13: | ⊢ ( 𝐴 ∈ 𝐶 ▶ ∪ ⦋𝐴 / 𝑥⦌{𝑦 ∣ (
𝐹 “ {𝐵}) = {𝑦}} = ∪ {𝑦 ∣ (⦋𝐴 / 𝑥⦌𝐹 “
{⦋𝐴 / 𝑥⦌𝐵}) =
{𝑦}} )
| | 15:1: | ⊢ ( 𝐴 ∈ 𝐶 ▶ ⦋𝐴 / 𝑥⦌∪ {𝑦 ∣ (
𝐹 “ {𝐵}) = {𝑦}} = ∪ ⦋𝐴 / 𝑥⦌{𝑦 ∣ (𝐹 “ {𝐵}) =
{𝑦}} )
| | 16:14,15: | ⊢ ( 𝐴 ∈ 𝐶 ▶ ⦋𝐴 / 𝑥⦌∪ {𝑦 ∣ (
𝐹 “ {𝐵}) = {𝑦}} =
∪ {𝑦 ∣ (⦋𝐴 / 𝑥⦌𝐹 “ {⦋𝐴 / 𝑥⦌𝐵}) =
{𝑦}} )
| | 17:: | ⊢ (𝐹‘𝐵) =
∪ {𝑦 ∣ (𝐹 “ {𝐵}) =
{𝑦}}
| | 18:17: | ⊢ ∀𝑥(𝐹‘𝐵) = ∪ {𝑦 ∣ (𝐹 “ {𝐵
}) = {𝑦}}
| | 19:1,18: | ⊢ ( 𝐴 ∈ 𝐶 ▶ ⦋𝐴 / 𝑥⦌(𝐹‘𝐵)
= ⦋𝐴 / 𝑥⦌∪ {𝑦 ∣ (𝐹 “ {𝐵}) = {𝑦}} )
| | 20:16,19: | ⊢ ( 𝐴 ∈ 𝐶 ▶ ⦋𝐴 / 𝑥⦌(𝐹‘𝐵)
= ∪ {𝑦 ∣ (⦋𝐴 / 𝑥⦌𝐹 “ {⦋𝐴 / 𝑥⦌𝐵}) = {𝑦}} )
| | 21:: | ⊢ (⦋𝐴 / 𝑥⦌𝐹‘⦋𝐴 / 𝑥⦌𝐵) =
∪ {𝑦 ∣ (⦋𝐴 / 𝑥⦌𝐹 “ {⦋𝐴 / 𝑥⦌𝐵}) = {𝑦}}
| | 22:20,21: | ⊢ ( 𝐴 ∈ 𝐶 ▶ ⦋𝐴 / 𝑥⦌(𝐹‘𝐵)
= (⦋𝐴 / 𝑥⦌𝐹‘⦋𝐴 / 𝑥⦌𝐵) )
| | qed:22: | ⊢ (𝐴 ∈ 𝐶 → ⦋𝐴 / 𝑥⦌(𝐹‘𝐵) =
(⦋𝐴 / 𝑥⦌𝐹‘⦋𝐴 / 𝑥⦌𝐵))
|
(Contributed by Alan Sare, 10-Nov-2012.) (Proof modification is
discouraged.) (New usage is discouraged.)
|
| ⊢ (𝐴 ∈ 𝐶 → ⦋𝐴 / 𝑥⦌(𝐹‘𝐵) = (⦋𝐴 / 𝑥⦌𝐹‘⦋𝐴 / 𝑥⦌𝐵)) |
| |
| Theorem | con5VD 44871 |
Virtual deduction proof of con5 44493.
The following User's Proof is a Virtual Deduction proof completed
automatically by the tools program completeusersproof.cmd, which invokes
Mel L. O'Cat's mmj2 and Norm Megill's Metamath Proof Assistant.
con5 44493 is con5VD 44871 without virtual deductions and was automatically
derived from con5VD 44871.
| 1:: | ⊢ ( (𝜑 ↔ ¬ 𝜓) ▶ (𝜑 ↔ ¬ 𝜓) )
| | 2:1: | ⊢ ( (𝜑 ↔ ¬ 𝜓) ▶ (¬ 𝜓 → 𝜑) )
| | 3:2: | ⊢ ( (𝜑 ↔ ¬ 𝜓) ▶ (¬ 𝜑 → ¬ ¬ 𝜓
) )
| | 4:: | ⊢ (𝜓 ↔ ¬ ¬ 𝜓)
| | 5:3,4: | ⊢ ( (𝜑 ↔ ¬ 𝜓) ▶ (¬ 𝜑 → 𝜓) )
| | qed:5: | ⊢ ((𝜑 ↔ ¬ 𝜓) → (¬ 𝜑 → 𝜓))
|
(Contributed by Alan Sare, 21-Apr-2013.) (Proof modification is
discouraged.) (New usage is discouraged.)
|
| ⊢ ((𝜑 ↔ ¬ 𝜓) → (¬ 𝜑 → 𝜓)) |
| |
| Theorem | relopabVD 44872 |
Virtual deduction proof of relopab 5848.
The following User's Proof is a Virtual Deduction proof completed
automatically by the tools program completeusersproof.cmd, which invokes
Mel L. O'Cat's mmj2 and Norm Megill's Metamath Proof Assistant.
relopab 5848 is relopabVD 44872 without virtual deductions and was
automatically derived from relopabVD 44872.
| 1:: | ⊢ ( 𝑦 = 𝑣 ▶ 𝑦 = 𝑣 )
| | 2:1: | ⊢ ( 𝑦 = 𝑣 ▶ ⟨𝑥 , 𝑦⟩ = ⟨𝑥 , 𝑣
⟩ )
| | 3:: | ⊢ ( 𝑦 = 𝑣 , 𝑥 = 𝑢 ▶ 𝑥 = 𝑢 )
| | 4:3: | ⊢ ( 𝑦 = 𝑣 , 𝑥 = 𝑢 ▶ ⟨𝑥 , 𝑣⟩ = ⟨
𝑢, 𝑣⟩ )
| | 5:2,4: | ⊢ ( 𝑦 = 𝑣 , 𝑥 = 𝑢 ▶ ⟨𝑥 , 𝑦⟩ = ⟨
𝑢, 𝑣⟩ )
| | 6:5: | ⊢ ( 𝑦 = 𝑣 , 𝑥 = 𝑢 ▶ (𝑧 = ⟨𝑥 , 𝑦
⟩ → 𝑧 = ⟨𝑢, 𝑣⟩) )
| | 7:6: | ⊢ ( 𝑦 = 𝑣 ▶ (𝑥 = 𝑢 → (𝑧 = ⟨𝑥 ,
𝑦⟩ → 𝑧 = ⟨𝑢, 𝑣⟩)) )
| | 8:7: | ⊢ (𝑦 = 𝑣 → (𝑥 = 𝑢 → (𝑧 = ⟨𝑥 , 𝑦
⟩ → 𝑧 = ⟨𝑢, 𝑣⟩)))
| | 9:8: | ⊢ (∃𝑣𝑦 = 𝑣 → ∃𝑣(𝑥 = 𝑢 → (𝑧
= ⟨𝑥, 𝑦⟩ → 𝑧 = ⟨𝑢, 𝑣⟩)))
| | 90:: | ⊢ (𝑣 = 𝑦 ↔ 𝑦 = 𝑣)
| | 91:90: | ⊢ (∃𝑣𝑣 = 𝑦 ↔ ∃𝑣𝑦 = 𝑣)
| | 92:: | ⊢ ∃𝑣𝑣 = 𝑦
| | 10:91,92: | ⊢ ∃𝑣𝑦 = 𝑣
| | 11:9,10: | ⊢ ∃𝑣(𝑥 = 𝑢 → (𝑧 = ⟨𝑥 , 𝑦⟩ →
𝑧 = ⟨𝑢, 𝑣⟩))
| | 12:11: | ⊢ (𝑥 = 𝑢 → ∃𝑣(𝑧 = ⟨𝑥 , 𝑦⟩ →
𝑧 = ⟨𝑢, 𝑣⟩))
| | 13:: | ⊢ (∃𝑣(𝑧 = ⟨𝑥 , 𝑦⟩ → 𝑧 = ⟨𝑢
, 𝑣⟩) → (𝑧 = ⟨𝑥, 𝑦⟩ → ∃𝑣𝑧 = ⟨𝑢, 𝑣⟩))
| | 14:12,13: | ⊢ (𝑥 = 𝑢 → (𝑧 = ⟨𝑥 , 𝑦⟩ → ∃𝑣
𝑧 = ⟨𝑢, 𝑣⟩))
| | 15:14: | ⊢ (∃𝑢𝑥 = 𝑢 → ∃𝑢(𝑧 = ⟨𝑥 , 𝑦
⟩ → ∃𝑣𝑧 = ⟨𝑢, 𝑣⟩))
| | 150:: | ⊢ (𝑢 = 𝑥 ↔ 𝑥 = 𝑢)
| | 151:150: | ⊢ (∃𝑢𝑢 = 𝑥 ↔ ∃𝑢𝑥 = 𝑢)
| | 152:: | ⊢ ∃𝑢𝑢 = 𝑥
| | 16:151,152: | ⊢ ∃𝑢𝑥 = 𝑢
| | 17:15,16: | ⊢ ∃𝑢(𝑧 = ⟨𝑥 , 𝑦⟩ → ∃𝑣𝑧 = ⟨
𝑢, 𝑣⟩)
| | 18:17: | ⊢ (𝑧 = ⟨𝑥 , 𝑦⟩ → ∃𝑢∃𝑣𝑧 = ⟨
𝑢, 𝑣⟩)
| | 19:18: | ⊢ (∃𝑦𝑧 = ⟨𝑥 , 𝑦⟩ → ∃𝑦∃𝑢
∃𝑣𝑧 = ⟨𝑢, 𝑣⟩)
| | 20:: | ⊢ (∃𝑦∃𝑢∃𝑣𝑧 = ⟨𝑢 , 𝑣⟩ →
∃𝑢∃𝑣𝑧 = ⟨𝑢, 𝑣⟩)
| | 21:19,20: | ⊢ (∃𝑦𝑧 = ⟨𝑥 , 𝑦⟩ → ∃𝑢∃𝑣𝑧
= ⟨𝑢, 𝑣⟩)
| | 22:21: | ⊢ (∃𝑥∃𝑦𝑧 = ⟨𝑥 , 𝑦⟩ → ∃𝑥
∃𝑢∃𝑣𝑧 = ⟨𝑢, 𝑣⟩)
| | 23:: | ⊢ (∃𝑥∃𝑢∃𝑣𝑧 = ⟨𝑢 , 𝑣⟩ →
∃𝑢∃𝑣𝑧 = ⟨𝑢, 𝑣⟩)
| | 24:22,23: | ⊢ (∃𝑥∃𝑦𝑧 = ⟨𝑥 , 𝑦⟩ → ∃𝑢
∃𝑣𝑧 = ⟨𝑢, 𝑣⟩)
| | 25:24: | ⊢ {𝑧 ∣ ∃𝑥∃𝑦𝑧 = ⟨𝑥 , 𝑦⟩} ⊆
{𝑧 ∣ ∃𝑢∃𝑣𝑧 = ⟨𝑢, 𝑣⟩}
| | 26:: | ⊢ 𝑥 ∈ V
| | 27:: | ⊢ 𝑦 ∈ V
| | 28:26,27: | ⊢ (𝑥 ∈ V ∧ 𝑦 ∈ V)
| | 29:28: | ⊢ (𝑧 = ⟨𝑥 , 𝑦⟩ ↔ (𝑧 = ⟨𝑥 , 𝑦
⟩ ∧ (𝑥 ∈ V ∧ 𝑦 ∈ V)))
| | 30:29: | ⊢ (∃𝑦𝑧 = ⟨𝑥 , 𝑦⟩ ↔ ∃𝑦(𝑧 =
⟨𝑥, 𝑦⟩ ∧ (𝑥 ∈ V ∧ 𝑦 ∈ V)))
| | 31:30: | ⊢ (∃𝑥∃𝑦𝑧 = ⟨𝑥 , 𝑦⟩ ↔ ∃𝑥
∃𝑦(𝑧 = ⟨𝑥, 𝑦⟩ ∧ (𝑥 ∈ V ∧ 𝑦 ∈ V)))
| | 32:31: | ⊢ {𝑧 ∣ ∃𝑥∃𝑦𝑧 = ⟨𝑥 , 𝑦⟩} = {
𝑧 ∣ ∃𝑥∃𝑦(𝑧 = ⟨𝑥, 𝑦⟩ ∧ (𝑥 ∈ V ∧ 𝑦 ∈ V))}
| | 320:25,32: | ⊢ {𝑧 ∣ ∃𝑥∃𝑦(𝑧 = ⟨𝑥 , 𝑦⟩ ∧
(𝑥 ∈ V ∧ 𝑦 ∈ V))} ⊆ {𝑧 ∣ ∃𝑢∃𝑣𝑧 = ⟨𝑢, 𝑣⟩}
| | 33:: | ⊢ 𝑢 ∈ V
| | 34:: | ⊢ 𝑣 ∈ V
| | 35:33,34: | ⊢ (𝑢 ∈ V ∧ 𝑣 ∈ V)
| | 36:35: | ⊢ (𝑧 = ⟨𝑢 , 𝑣⟩ ↔ (𝑧 = ⟨𝑢 , 𝑣
⟩ ∧ (𝑢 ∈ V ∧ 𝑣 ∈ V)))
| | 37:36: | ⊢ (∃𝑣𝑧 = ⟨𝑢 , 𝑣⟩ ↔ ∃𝑣(𝑧 =
⟨𝑢, 𝑣⟩ ∧ (𝑢 ∈ V ∧ 𝑣 ∈ V)))
| | 38:37: | ⊢ (∃𝑢∃𝑣𝑧 = ⟨𝑢 , 𝑣⟩ ↔ ∃𝑢
∃𝑣(𝑧 = ⟨𝑢, 𝑣⟩ ∧ (𝑢 ∈ V ∧ 𝑣 ∈ V)))
| | 39:38: | ⊢ {𝑧 ∣ ∃𝑢∃𝑣𝑧 = ⟨𝑢 , 𝑣⟩} = {
𝑧 ∣ ∃𝑢∃𝑣(𝑧 = ⟨𝑢, 𝑣⟩ ∧ (𝑢 ∈ V ∧ 𝑣 ∈ V))}
| | 40:320,39: | ⊢ {𝑧 ∣ ∃𝑥∃𝑦(𝑧 = ⟨𝑥 , 𝑦⟩ ∧
(𝑥 ∈ V ∧ 𝑦 ∈ V))} ⊆ {𝑧 ∣ ∃𝑢∃𝑣(𝑧 = ⟨𝑢, 𝑣⟩ ∧
(𝑢 ∈ V ∧ 𝑣 ∈ V))}
| | 41:: | ⊢ {⟨𝑥 , 𝑦⟩ ∣ (𝑥 ∈ V ∧ 𝑦 ∈ V
)} = {𝑧 ∣ ∃𝑥∃𝑦(𝑧 = ⟨𝑥, 𝑦⟩ ∧ (𝑥 ∈ V ∧ 𝑦 ∈ V))
}
| | 42:: | ⊢ {⟨𝑢 , 𝑣⟩ ∣ (𝑢 ∈ V ∧ 𝑣 ∈ V
)} = {𝑧 ∣ ∃𝑢∃𝑣(𝑧 = ⟨𝑢, 𝑣⟩ ∧ (𝑢 ∈ V ∧ 𝑣 ∈ V))
}
| | 43:40,41,42: | ⊢ {⟨𝑥 , 𝑦⟩ ∣ (𝑥 ∈ V ∧ 𝑦 ∈ V
)} ⊆ {⟨𝑢, 𝑣⟩ ∣ (𝑢 ∈ V ∧ 𝑣 ∈ V)}
| | 44:: | ⊢ {⟨𝑢 , 𝑣⟩ ∣ (𝑢 ∈ V ∧ 𝑣 ∈ V
)} = (V × V)
| | 45:43,44: | ⊢ {⟨𝑥 , 𝑦⟩ ∣ (𝑥 ∈ V ∧ 𝑦 ∈ V
)} ⊆ (V × V)
| | 46:28: | ⊢ (𝜑 → (𝑥 ∈ V ∧ 𝑦 ∈ V))
| | 47:46: | ⊢ {⟨𝑥 , 𝑦⟩ ∣ 𝜑} ⊆ {⟨𝑥 , 𝑦⟩
∣ (𝑥 ∈ V ∧ 𝑦 ∈ V)}
| | 48:45,47: | ⊢ {⟨𝑥 , 𝑦⟩ ∣ 𝜑} ⊆ (V × V)
| | qed:48: | ⊢ Rel {⟨𝑥 , 𝑦⟩ ∣ 𝜑}
|
(Contributed by Alan Sare, 9-Jul-2013.) (Proof modification is
discouraged.) (New usage is discouraged.)
|
| ⊢ Rel
{⟨𝑥, 𝑦⟩ ∣ 𝜑} |
| |
| Theorem | 19.41rgVD 44873 |
Virtual deduction proof of 19.41rg 44521.
The following User's Proof is a Virtual Deduction proof completed
automatically by the tools program completeusersproof.cmd, which invokes
Mel L. O'Cat's mmj2 and Norm Megill's Metamath Proof Assistant. 19.41rg 44521
is 19.41rgVD 44873 without virtual deductions and was automatically derived
from 19.41rgVD 44873. (Contributed by Alan Sare, 8-Feb-2014.)
(Proof modification is discouraged.) (New usage is discouraged.)
| 1:: | ⊢ (𝜓 → (𝜑 → (𝜑 ∧ 𝜓)))
| | 2:1: | ⊢ ((𝜓 → ∀𝑥𝜓) → (𝜓 → (𝜑 → (
𝜑 ∧ 𝜓))))
| | 3:2: | ⊢ ∀𝑥((𝜓 → ∀𝑥𝜓) → (𝜓 → (𝜑
→ (𝜑 ∧ 𝜓))))
| | 4:3: | ⊢ (∀𝑥(𝜓 → ∀𝑥𝜓) → (∀𝑥𝜓 →
∀𝑥(𝜑 → (𝜑 ∧ 𝜓))))
| | 5:: | ⊢ ( ∀𝑥(𝜓 → ∀𝑥𝜓) ▶ ∀𝑥(𝜓
→ ∀𝑥𝜓) )
| | 6:4,5: | ⊢ ( ∀𝑥(𝜓 → ∀𝑥𝜓) ▶ (∀𝑥𝜓
→ ∀𝑥(𝜑 → (𝜑 ∧ 𝜓))) )
| | 7:: | ⊢ ( ∀𝑥(𝜓 → ∀𝑥𝜓) , ∀𝑥𝜓 ▶
∀𝑥𝜓 )
| | 8:6,7: | ⊢ ( ∀𝑥(𝜓 → ∀𝑥𝜓) , ∀𝑥𝜓 ▶
∀𝑥(𝜑 → (𝜑 ∧ 𝜓)) )
| | 9:8: | ⊢ ( ∀𝑥(𝜓 → ∀𝑥𝜓) , ∀𝑥𝜓 ▶
(∃𝑥𝜑 → ∃𝑥(𝜑 ∧ 𝜓)) )
| | 10:9: | ⊢ ( ∀𝑥(𝜓 → ∀𝑥𝜓) ▶ (∀𝑥𝜓
→ (∃𝑥𝜑 → ∃𝑥(𝜑 ∧ 𝜓))) )
| | 11:5: | ⊢ ( ∀𝑥(𝜓 → ∀𝑥𝜓) ▶ (𝜓 → ∀
𝑥𝜓) )
| | 12:10,11: | ⊢ ( ∀𝑥(𝜓 → ∀𝑥𝜓) ▶ (𝜓 → (
∃𝑥𝜑 → ∃𝑥(𝜑 ∧ 𝜓))) )
| | 13:12: | ⊢ ( ∀𝑥(𝜓 → ∀𝑥𝜓) ▶ (∃𝑥𝜑
→ (𝜓 → ∃𝑥(𝜑 ∧ 𝜓))) )
| | 14:13: | ⊢ ( ∀𝑥(𝜓 → ∀𝑥𝜓) ▶ ((∃𝑥
𝜑 ∧ 𝜓) → ∃𝑥(𝜑 ∧ 𝜓)) )
| | qed:14: | ⊢ (∀𝑥(𝜓 → ∀𝑥𝜓) → ((∃𝑥𝜑
∧ 𝜓) → ∃𝑥(𝜑 ∧ 𝜓)))
|
|
| ⊢ (∀𝑥(𝜓 → ∀𝑥𝜓) → ((∃𝑥𝜑 ∧ 𝜓) → ∃𝑥(𝜑 ∧ 𝜓))) |
| |
| Theorem | 2pm13.193VD 44874 |
Virtual deduction proof of 2pm13.193 44523.
The following User's Proof is a Virtual Deduction proof completed
automatically by the tools program completeusersproof.cmd, which invokes
Mel L. O'Cat's mmj2 and Norm Megill's Metamath Proof Assistant.
2pm13.193 44523 is 2pm13.193VD 44874 without virtual deductions and was
automatically derived from 2pm13.193VD 44874. (Contributed by Alan Sare,
8-Feb-2014.)
(Proof modification is discouraged.) (New usage is discouraged.)
| 1:: | ⊢ ( ((𝑥 = 𝑢 ∧ 𝑦 = 𝑣) ∧ [𝑢 / 𝑥][
𝑣 / 𝑦]𝜑) ▶ ((𝑥 = 𝑢 ∧ 𝑦 = 𝑣) ∧ [𝑢 / 𝑥][𝑣 / 𝑦]𝜑) )
| | 2:1: | ⊢ ( ((𝑥 = 𝑢 ∧ 𝑦 = 𝑣) ∧ [𝑢 / 𝑥][
𝑣 / 𝑦]𝜑) ▶ (𝑥 = 𝑢 ∧ 𝑦 = 𝑣) )
| | 3:2: | ⊢ ( ((𝑥 = 𝑢 ∧ 𝑦 = 𝑣) ∧ [𝑢 / 𝑥][
𝑣 / 𝑦]𝜑) ▶ 𝑥 = 𝑢 )
| | 4:1: | ⊢ ( ((𝑥 = 𝑢 ∧ 𝑦 = 𝑣) ∧ [𝑢 / 𝑥][
𝑣 / 𝑦]𝜑) ▶ [𝑢 / 𝑥][𝑣 / 𝑦]𝜑 )
| | 5:3,4: | ⊢ ( ((𝑥 = 𝑢 ∧ 𝑦 = 𝑣) ∧ [𝑢 / 𝑥][
𝑣 / 𝑦]𝜑) ▶ ([𝑢 / 𝑥][𝑣 / 𝑦]𝜑 ∧ 𝑥 = 𝑢) )
| | 6:5: | ⊢ ( ((𝑥 = 𝑢 ∧ 𝑦 = 𝑣) ∧ [𝑢 / 𝑥][
𝑣 / 𝑦]𝜑) ▶ ([𝑣 / 𝑦]𝜑 ∧ 𝑥 = 𝑢) )
| | 7:6: | ⊢ ( ((𝑥 = 𝑢 ∧ 𝑦 = 𝑣) ∧ [𝑢 / 𝑥][
𝑣 / 𝑦]𝜑) ▶ [𝑣 / 𝑦]𝜑 )
| | 8:2: | ⊢ ( ((𝑥 = 𝑢 ∧ 𝑦 = 𝑣) ∧ [𝑢 / 𝑥][
𝑣 / 𝑦]𝜑) ▶ 𝑦 = 𝑣 )
| | 9:7,8: | ⊢ ( ((𝑥 = 𝑢 ∧ 𝑦 = 𝑣) ∧ [𝑢 / 𝑥][
𝑣 / 𝑦]𝜑) ▶ ([𝑣 / 𝑦]𝜑 ∧ 𝑦 = 𝑣) )
| | 10:9: | ⊢ ( ((𝑥 = 𝑢 ∧ 𝑦 = 𝑣) ∧ [𝑢 / 𝑥][
𝑣 / 𝑦]𝜑) ▶ (𝜑 ∧ 𝑦 = 𝑣) )
| | 11:10: | ⊢ ( ((𝑥 = 𝑢 ∧ 𝑦 = 𝑣) ∧ [𝑢 / 𝑥][
𝑣 / 𝑦]𝜑) ▶ 𝜑 )
| | 12:2,11: | ⊢ ( ((𝑥 = 𝑢 ∧ 𝑦 = 𝑣) ∧ [𝑢 / 𝑥][
𝑣 / 𝑦]𝜑) ▶ ((𝑥 = 𝑢 ∧ 𝑦 = 𝑣) ∧ 𝜑) )
| | 13:12: | ⊢ (((𝑥 = 𝑢 ∧ 𝑦 = 𝑣) ∧ [𝑢 / 𝑥][𝑣
/ 𝑦]𝜑) → ((𝑥 = 𝑢 ∧ 𝑦 = 𝑣) ∧ 𝜑))
| | 14:: | ⊢ ( ((𝑥 = 𝑢 ∧ 𝑦 = 𝑣) ∧ 𝜑) ▶ ((
𝑥 = 𝑢 ∧ 𝑦 = 𝑣) ∧ 𝜑) )
| | 15:14: | ⊢ ( ((𝑥 = 𝑢 ∧ 𝑦 = 𝑣) ∧ 𝜑) ▶ (𝑥
= 𝑢 ∧ 𝑦 = 𝑣) )
| | 16:15: | ⊢ ( ((𝑥 = 𝑢 ∧ 𝑦 = 𝑣) ∧ 𝜑) ▶ 𝑦 =
𝑣 )
| | 17:14: | ⊢ ( ((𝑥 = 𝑢 ∧ 𝑦 = 𝑣) ∧ 𝜑) ▶ 𝜑
)
| | 18:16,17: | ⊢ ( ((𝑥 = 𝑢 ∧ 𝑦 = 𝑣) ∧ 𝜑) ▶ (
𝜑 ∧ 𝑦 = 𝑣) )
| | 19:18: | ⊢ ( ((𝑥 = 𝑢 ∧ 𝑦 = 𝑣) ∧ 𝜑) ▶ ([
𝑣 / 𝑦]𝜑 ∧ 𝑦 = 𝑣) )
| | 20:15: | ⊢ ( ((𝑥 = 𝑢 ∧ 𝑦 = 𝑣) ∧ 𝜑) ▶ 𝑥 =
𝑢 )
| | 21:19: | ⊢ ( ((𝑥 = 𝑢 ∧ 𝑦 = 𝑣) ∧ 𝜑) ▶ [𝑣
/ 𝑦]𝜑 )
| | 22:20,21: | ⊢ ( ((𝑥 = 𝑢 ∧ 𝑦 = 𝑣) ∧ 𝜑) ▶ ([
𝑣 / 𝑦]𝜑 ∧ 𝑥 = 𝑢) )
| | 23:22: | ⊢ ( ((𝑥 = 𝑢 ∧ 𝑦 = 𝑣) ∧ 𝜑) ▶ ([
𝑢 / 𝑥][𝑣 / 𝑦]𝜑 ∧ 𝑥 = 𝑢) )
| | 24:23: | ⊢ ( ((𝑥 = 𝑢 ∧ 𝑦 = 𝑣) ∧ 𝜑) ▶ [𝑢
/ 𝑥][𝑣 / 𝑦]𝜑 )
| | 25:15,24: | ⊢ ( ((𝑥 = 𝑢 ∧ 𝑦 = 𝑣) ∧ 𝜑) ▶ ((
𝑥 = 𝑢 ∧ 𝑦 = 𝑣) ∧ [𝑢 / 𝑥][𝑣 / 𝑦]𝜑) )
| | 26:25: | ⊢ (((𝑥 = 𝑢 ∧ 𝑦 = 𝑣) ∧ 𝜑) → ((𝑥
= 𝑢 ∧ 𝑦 = 𝑣) ∧ [𝑢 / 𝑥][𝑣 / 𝑦]𝜑))
| | qed:13,26: | ⊢ (((𝑥 = 𝑢 ∧ 𝑦 = 𝑣) ∧ [𝑢 / 𝑥][𝑣
/ 𝑦]𝜑) ↔ ((𝑥 = 𝑢 ∧ 𝑦 = 𝑣) ∧ 𝜑))
|
|
| ⊢ (((𝑥 = 𝑢 ∧ 𝑦 = 𝑣) ∧ [𝑢 / 𝑥][𝑣 / 𝑦]𝜑) ↔ ((𝑥 = 𝑢 ∧ 𝑦 = 𝑣) ∧ 𝜑)) |
| |
| Theorem | hbimpgVD 44875 |
Virtual deduction proof of hbimpg 44525.
The following User's Proof is a Virtual Deduction proof completed
automatically by the tools program completeusersproof.cmd, which invokes
Mel L. O'Cat's mmj2 and Norm Megill's Metamath Proof Assistant. hbimpg 44525
is hbimpgVD 44875 without virtual deductions and was automatically derived
from hbimpgVD 44875. (Contributed by Alan Sare, 8-Feb-2014.)
(Proof modification is discouraged.) (New usage is discouraged.)
| 1:: | ⊢ ( (∀𝑥(𝜑 → ∀𝑥𝜑) ∧ ∀𝑥(𝜓
→ ∀𝑥𝜓)) ▶ (∀𝑥(𝜑 → ∀𝑥𝜑) ∧ ∀𝑥(𝜓 →
∀𝑥𝜓)) )
| | 2:1: | ⊢ ( (∀𝑥(𝜑 → ∀𝑥𝜑) ∧ ∀𝑥(𝜓
→ ∀𝑥𝜓)) ▶ ∀𝑥(𝜑 → ∀𝑥𝜑) )
| | 3:: | ⊢ ( (∀𝑥(𝜑 → ∀𝑥𝜑) ∧ ∀𝑥(𝜓
→ ∀𝑥𝜓)), ¬ 𝜑 ▶ ¬ 𝜑 )
| | 4:2: | ⊢ ( (∀𝑥(𝜑 → ∀𝑥𝜑) ∧ ∀𝑥(𝜓
→ ∀𝑥𝜓)) ▶ ∀𝑥(¬ 𝜑 → ∀𝑥¬ 𝜑) )
| | 5:4: | ⊢ ( (∀𝑥(𝜑 → ∀𝑥𝜑) ∧ ∀𝑥(𝜓
→ ∀𝑥𝜓)) ▶ (¬ 𝜑 → ∀𝑥¬ 𝜑) )
| | 6:3,5: | ⊢ ( (∀𝑥(𝜑 → ∀𝑥𝜑) ∧ ∀𝑥(𝜓
→ ∀𝑥𝜓)), ¬ 𝜑 ▶ ∀𝑥¬ 𝜑 )
| | 7:: | ⊢ (¬ 𝜑 → (𝜑 → 𝜓))
| | 8:7: | ⊢ (∀𝑥¬ 𝜑 → ∀𝑥(𝜑 → 𝜓))
| | 9:6,8: | ⊢ ( (∀𝑥(𝜑 → ∀𝑥𝜑) ∧ ∀𝑥(𝜓
→ ∀𝑥𝜓)), ¬ 𝜑 ▶ ∀𝑥(𝜑 → 𝜓) )
| | 10:9: | ⊢ ( (∀𝑥(𝜑 → ∀𝑥𝜑) ∧ ∀𝑥(𝜓
→ ∀𝑥𝜓)) ▶ (¬ 𝜑 → ∀𝑥(𝜑 → 𝜓)) )
| | 11:: | ⊢ (𝜓 → (𝜑 → 𝜓))
| | 12:11: | ⊢ (∀𝑥𝜓 → ∀𝑥(𝜑 → 𝜓))
| | 13:1: | ⊢ ( (∀𝑥(𝜑 → ∀𝑥𝜑) ∧ ∀𝑥(𝜓
→ ∀𝑥𝜓)) ▶ ∀𝑥(𝜓 → ∀𝑥𝜓) )
| | 14:13: | ⊢ ( (∀𝑥(𝜑 → ∀𝑥𝜑) ∧ ∀𝑥(𝜓
→ ∀𝑥𝜓)) ▶ (𝜓 → ∀𝑥𝜓) )
| | 15:14,12: | ⊢ ( (∀𝑥(𝜑 → ∀𝑥𝜑) ∧ ∀𝑥(𝜓
→ ∀𝑥𝜓)) ▶ (𝜓 → ∀𝑥(𝜑 → 𝜓)) )
| | 16:10,15: | ⊢ ( (∀𝑥(𝜑 → ∀𝑥𝜑) ∧ ∀𝑥(𝜓
→ ∀𝑥𝜓)) ▶ ((¬ 𝜑 ∨ 𝜓) → ∀𝑥(𝜑 → 𝜓)) )
| | 17:: | ⊢ ((𝜑 → 𝜓) ↔ (¬ 𝜑 ∨ 𝜓))
| | 18:16,17: | ⊢ ( (∀𝑥(𝜑 → ∀𝑥𝜑) ∧ ∀𝑥(𝜓
→ ∀𝑥𝜓)) ▶ ((𝜑 → 𝜓) → ∀𝑥(𝜑 → 𝜓)) )
| | 19:: | ⊢ (∀𝑥(𝜑 → ∀𝑥𝜑) → ∀𝑥∀𝑥(
𝜑 → ∀𝑥𝜑))
| | 20:: | ⊢ (∀𝑥(𝜓 → ∀𝑥𝜓) → ∀𝑥∀𝑥(
𝜓 → ∀𝑥𝜓))
| | 21:19,20: | ⊢ ((∀𝑥(𝜑 → ∀𝑥𝜑) ∧ ∀𝑥(𝜓
→ ∀𝑥𝜓)) → ∀𝑥(∀𝑥(𝜑 → ∀𝑥𝜑) ∧ ∀𝑥(𝜓 →
∀𝑥𝜓)))
| | 22:21,18: | ⊢ ( (∀𝑥(𝜑 → ∀𝑥𝜑) ∧ ∀𝑥(𝜓
→ ∀𝑥𝜓)) ▶ ∀𝑥((𝜑 → 𝜓) → ∀𝑥(𝜑 → 𝜓)) )
| | qed:22: | ⊢ ((∀𝑥(𝜑 → ∀𝑥𝜑) ∧ ∀𝑥(𝜓
→ ∀𝑥𝜓)) → ∀𝑥((𝜑 → 𝜓) → ∀𝑥(𝜑 → 𝜓)))
|
|
| ⊢
((∀𝑥(𝜑 → ∀𝑥𝜑) ∧ ∀𝑥(𝜓 → ∀𝑥𝜓)) → ∀𝑥((𝜑 → 𝜓) → ∀𝑥(𝜑 → 𝜓))) |
| |
| Theorem | hbalgVD 44876 |
Virtual deduction proof of hbalg 44526.
The following User's Proof is a Virtual Deduction proof completed
automatically by the tools program completeusersproof.cmd, which invokes
Mel L. O'Cat's mmj2 and Norm Megill's Metamath Proof Assistant. hbalg 44526
is hbalgVD 44876 without virtual deductions and was automatically derived
from hbalgVD 44876. (Contributed by Alan Sare, 8-Feb-2014.)
(Proof modification is discouraged.) (New usage is discouraged.)
| 1:: | ⊢ ( ∀𝑦(𝜑 → ∀𝑥𝜑) ▶ ∀𝑦(𝜑
→ ∀𝑥𝜑) )
| | 2:1: | ⊢ ( ∀𝑦(𝜑 → ∀𝑥𝜑) ▶ (∀𝑦𝜑
→ ∀𝑦∀𝑥𝜑) )
| | 3:: | ⊢ (∀𝑦∀𝑥𝜑 → ∀𝑥∀𝑦𝜑)
| | 4:2,3: | ⊢ ( ∀𝑦(𝜑 → ∀𝑥𝜑) ▶ (∀𝑦𝜑
→ ∀𝑥∀𝑦𝜑) )
| | 5:: | ⊢ (∀𝑦(𝜑 → ∀𝑥𝜑) → ∀𝑦∀𝑦(
𝜑 → ∀𝑥𝜑))
| | 6:5,4: | ⊢ ( ∀𝑦(𝜑 → ∀𝑥𝜑) ▶ ∀𝑦(∀
𝑦𝜑 → ∀𝑥∀𝑦𝜑) )
| | qed:6: | ⊢ (∀𝑦(𝜑 → ∀𝑥𝜑) → ∀𝑦(∀𝑦
𝜑 → ∀𝑥∀𝑦𝜑))
|
|
| ⊢ (∀𝑦(𝜑 → ∀𝑥𝜑) → ∀𝑦(∀𝑦𝜑 → ∀𝑥∀𝑦𝜑)) |
| |
| Theorem | hbexgVD 44877 |
Virtual deduction proof of hbexg 44527.
The following User's Proof is a Virtual Deduction proof completed
automatically by the tools program completeusersproof.cmd, which invokes
Mel L. O'Cat's mmj2 and Norm Megill's Metamath Proof Assistant. hbexg 44527
is hbexgVD 44877 without virtual deductions and was automatically derived
from hbexgVD 44877. (Contributed by Alan Sare, 8-Feb-2014.)
(Proof modification is discouraged.) (New usage is discouraged.)
| 1:: | ⊢ ( ∀𝑥∀𝑦(𝜑 → ∀𝑥𝜑) ▶ ∀𝑥
∀𝑦(𝜑 → ∀𝑥𝜑) )
| | 2:1: | ⊢ ( ∀𝑥∀𝑦(𝜑 → ∀𝑥𝜑) ▶ ∀𝑦
∀𝑥(𝜑 → ∀𝑥𝜑) )
| | 3:2: | ⊢ ( ∀𝑥∀𝑦(𝜑 → ∀𝑥𝜑) ▶ ∀𝑥
(𝜑 → ∀𝑥𝜑) )
| | 4:3: | ⊢ ( ∀𝑥∀𝑦(𝜑 → ∀𝑥𝜑) ▶ ∀𝑥
(¬ 𝜑 → ∀𝑥¬ 𝜑) )
| | 5:: | ⊢ (∀𝑥∀𝑦(𝜑 → ∀𝑥𝜑) ↔ ∀𝑦
∀𝑥(𝜑 → ∀𝑥𝜑))
| | 6:: | ⊢ (∀𝑦∀𝑥(𝜑 → ∀𝑥𝜑) → ∀𝑦
∀𝑦∀𝑥(𝜑 → ∀𝑥𝜑))
| | 7:5: | ⊢ (∀𝑦∀𝑥∀𝑦(𝜑 → ∀𝑥𝜑) ↔
∀𝑦∀𝑦∀𝑥(𝜑 → ∀𝑥𝜑))
| | 8:5,6,7: | ⊢ (∀𝑥∀𝑦(𝜑 → ∀𝑥𝜑) → ∀𝑦
∀𝑥∀𝑦(𝜑 → ∀𝑥𝜑))
| | 9:8,4: | ⊢ ( ∀𝑥∀𝑦(𝜑 → ∀𝑥𝜑) ▶ ∀𝑦
∀𝑥(¬ 𝜑 → ∀𝑥¬ 𝜑) )
| | 10:9: | ⊢ ( ∀𝑥∀𝑦(𝜑 → ∀𝑥𝜑) ▶ ∀𝑥
∀𝑦(¬ 𝜑 → ∀𝑥¬ 𝜑) )
| | 11:10: | ⊢ ( ∀𝑥∀𝑦(𝜑 → ∀𝑥𝜑) ▶ ∀𝑦
(¬ 𝜑 → ∀𝑥¬ 𝜑) )
| | 12:11: | ⊢ ( ∀𝑥∀𝑦(𝜑 → ∀𝑥𝜑) ▶ ∀𝑦
(∀𝑦¬ 𝜑 → ∀𝑥∀𝑦¬ 𝜑) )
| | 13:12: | ⊢ ( ∀𝑥∀𝑦(𝜑 → ∀𝑥𝜑) ▶ (∀
𝑦¬ 𝜑 → ∀𝑥∀𝑦¬ 𝜑) )
| | 14:: | ⊢ (∀𝑥∀𝑦(𝜑 → ∀𝑥𝜑) → ∀𝑥
∀𝑥∀𝑦(𝜑 → ∀𝑥𝜑))
| | 15:13,14: | ⊢ ( ∀𝑥∀𝑦(𝜑 → ∀𝑥𝜑) ▶ ∀𝑥
(∀𝑦¬ 𝜑 → ∀𝑥∀𝑦¬ 𝜑) )
| | 16:15: | ⊢ ( ∀𝑥∀𝑦(𝜑 → ∀𝑥𝜑) ▶ ∀𝑥
(¬ ∀𝑦¬ 𝜑 → ∀𝑥¬ ∀𝑦¬ 𝜑) )
| | 17:16: | ⊢ ( ∀𝑥∀𝑦(𝜑 → ∀𝑥𝜑) ▶ (¬
∀𝑦¬ 𝜑 → ∀𝑥¬ ∀𝑦¬ 𝜑) )
| | 18:: | ⊢ (∃𝑦𝜑 ↔ ¬ ∀𝑦¬ 𝜑)
| | 19:17,18: | ⊢ ( ∀𝑥∀𝑦(𝜑 → ∀𝑥𝜑) ▶ (∃
𝑦𝜑 → ∀𝑥¬ ∀𝑦¬ 𝜑) )
| | 20:18: | ⊢ (∀𝑥∃𝑦𝜑 ↔ ∀𝑥¬ ∀𝑦¬ 𝜑)
| | 21:19,20: | ⊢ ( ∀𝑥∀𝑦(𝜑 → ∀𝑥𝜑) ▶ (∃
𝑦𝜑 → ∀𝑥∃𝑦𝜑) )
| | 22:8,21: | ⊢ ( ∀𝑥∀𝑦(𝜑 → ∀𝑥𝜑) ▶ ∀𝑦
(∃𝑦𝜑 → ∀𝑥∃𝑦𝜑) )
| | 23:14,22: | ⊢ ( ∀𝑥∀𝑦(𝜑 → ∀𝑥𝜑) ▶ ∀𝑥
∀𝑦(∃𝑦𝜑 → ∀𝑥∃𝑦𝜑) )
| | qed:23: | ⊢ ( ∀𝑥∀𝑦(𝜑 → ∀𝑥𝜑) ▶ ∀𝑥
∀𝑦(∃𝑦𝜑 → ∀𝑥∃𝑦𝜑) )
|
|
| ⊢ (∀𝑥∀𝑦(𝜑 → ∀𝑥𝜑) → ∀𝑥∀𝑦(∃𝑦𝜑 → ∀𝑥∃𝑦𝜑)) |
| |
| Theorem | ax6e2eqVD 44878* |
The following User's Proof is a Virtual Deduction proof (see wvd1 44540)
completed automatically by a Metamath tools program invoking mmj2 and
the Metamath Proof Assistant. ax6e2eq 44528 is ax6e2eqVD 44878 without virtual
deductions and was automatically derived from ax6e2eqVD 44878.
(Contributed by Alan Sare, 25-Mar-2014.)
(Proof modification is discouraged.) (New usage is discouraged.)
| 1:: | ⊢ ( ∀𝑥𝑥 = 𝑦 ▶ ∀𝑥𝑥 = 𝑦 )
| | 2:: | ⊢ ( ∀𝑥𝑥 = 𝑦 , 𝑥 = 𝑢 ▶ 𝑥 = 𝑢 )
| | 3:1: | ⊢ ( ∀𝑥𝑥 = 𝑦 ▶ 𝑥 = 𝑦 )
| | 4:2,3: | ⊢ ( ∀𝑥𝑥 = 𝑦 , 𝑥 = 𝑢 ▶ 𝑦 = 𝑢 )
| | 5:2,4: | ⊢ ( ∀𝑥𝑥 = 𝑦 , 𝑥 = 𝑢 ▶ (𝑥 = 𝑢 ∧ 𝑦
= 𝑢) )
| | 6:5: | ⊢ ( ∀𝑥𝑥 = 𝑦 ▶ (𝑥 = 𝑢 → (𝑥 = 𝑢 ∧
𝑦 = 𝑢)) )
| | 7:6: | ⊢ (∀𝑥𝑥 = 𝑦 → (𝑥 = 𝑢 → (𝑥 = 𝑢 ∧ 𝑦
= 𝑢)))
| | 8:7: | ⊢ (∀𝑥∀𝑥𝑥 = 𝑦 → ∀𝑥(𝑥 = 𝑢 → (
𝑥 = 𝑢 ∧ 𝑦 = 𝑢)))
| | 9:: | ⊢ (∀𝑥𝑥 = 𝑦 ↔ ∀𝑥∀𝑥𝑥 = 𝑦)
| | 10:8,9: | ⊢ (∀𝑥𝑥 = 𝑦 → ∀𝑥(𝑥 = 𝑢 → (𝑥 = 𝑢
∧ 𝑦 = 𝑢)))
| | 11:1,10: | ⊢ ( ∀𝑥𝑥 = 𝑦 ▶ ∀𝑥(𝑥 = 𝑢 → (𝑥 =
𝑢 ∧ 𝑦 = 𝑢)) )
| | 12:11: | ⊢ ( ∀𝑥𝑥 = 𝑦 ▶ (∃𝑥𝑥 = 𝑢 → ∃𝑥
(𝑥 = 𝑢 ∧ 𝑦 = 𝑢)) )
| | 13:: | ⊢ ∃𝑥𝑥 = 𝑢
| | 14:13,12: | ⊢ ( ∀𝑥𝑥 = 𝑦 ▶ ∃𝑥(𝑥 = 𝑢 ∧ 𝑦 = 𝑢
) )
| | 140:14: | ⊢ (∀𝑥𝑥 = 𝑦 → ∃𝑥(𝑥 = 𝑢 ∧ 𝑦 = 𝑢)
)
| | 141:140: | ⊢ (∀𝑥𝑥 = 𝑦 → ∀𝑥∃𝑥(𝑥 = 𝑢 ∧ 𝑦
= 𝑢))
| | 15:1,141: | ⊢ ( ∀𝑥𝑥 = 𝑦 ▶ ∀𝑥∃𝑥(𝑥 = 𝑢 ∧
𝑦 = 𝑢) )
| | 16:1,15: | ⊢ ( ∀𝑥𝑥 = 𝑦 ▶ ∀𝑦∃𝑥(𝑥 = 𝑢 ∧
𝑦 = 𝑢) )
| | 17:16: | ⊢ ( ∀𝑥𝑥 = 𝑦 ▶ ∃𝑦∃𝑥(𝑥 = 𝑢 ∧
𝑦 = 𝑢) )
| | 18:17: | ⊢ ( ∀𝑥𝑥 = 𝑦 ▶ ∃𝑥∃𝑦(𝑥 = 𝑢 ∧
𝑦 = 𝑢) )
| | 19:: | ⊢ ( 𝑢 = 𝑣 ▶ 𝑢 = 𝑣 )
| | 20:: | ⊢ ( 𝑢 = 𝑣 , (𝑥 = 𝑢 ∧ 𝑦 = 𝑢) ▶ (𝑥 =
𝑢 ∧ 𝑦 = 𝑢) )
| | 21:20: | ⊢ ( 𝑢 = 𝑣 , (𝑥 = 𝑢 ∧ 𝑦 = 𝑢) ▶ 𝑦 = 𝑢
)
| | 22:19,21: | ⊢ ( 𝑢 = 𝑣 , (𝑥 = 𝑢 ∧ 𝑦 = 𝑢) ▶ 𝑦 = 𝑣
)
| | 23:20: | ⊢ ( 𝑢 = 𝑣 , (𝑥 = 𝑢 ∧ 𝑦 = 𝑢) ▶ 𝑥 = 𝑢
)
| | 24:22,23: | ⊢ ( 𝑢 = 𝑣 , (𝑥 = 𝑢 ∧ 𝑦 = 𝑢) ▶ (𝑥 =
𝑢 ∧ 𝑦 = 𝑣) )
| | 25:24: | ⊢ ( 𝑢 = 𝑣 ▶ ((𝑥 = 𝑢 ∧ 𝑦 = 𝑢) → (
𝑥 = 𝑢 ∧ 𝑦 = 𝑣)) )
| | 26:25: | ⊢ ( 𝑢 = 𝑣 ▶ ∀𝑦((𝑥 = 𝑢 ∧ 𝑦 = 𝑢)
→ (𝑥 = 𝑢 ∧ 𝑦 = 𝑣)) )
| | 27:26: | ⊢ ( 𝑢 = 𝑣 ▶ (∃𝑦(𝑥 = 𝑢 ∧ 𝑦 = 𝑢)
→ ∃𝑦(𝑥 = 𝑢 ∧ 𝑦 = 𝑣)) )
| | 28:27: | ⊢ ( 𝑢 = 𝑣 ▶ ∀𝑥(∃𝑦(𝑥 = 𝑢 ∧ 𝑦 =
𝑢) → ∃𝑦(𝑥 = 𝑢 ∧ 𝑦 = 𝑣)) )
| | 29:28: | ⊢ ( 𝑢 = 𝑣 ▶ (∃𝑥∃𝑦(𝑥 = 𝑢 ∧ 𝑦 =
𝑢) → ∃𝑥∃𝑦(𝑥 = 𝑢 ∧ 𝑦 = 𝑣)) )
| | 30:29: | ⊢ (𝑢 = 𝑣 → (∃𝑥∃𝑦(𝑥 = 𝑢 ∧ 𝑦 = 𝑢
) → ∃𝑥∃𝑦(𝑥 = 𝑢 ∧ 𝑦 = 𝑣)))
| | 31:18,30: | ⊢ ( ∀𝑥𝑥 = 𝑦 ▶ (𝑢 = 𝑣 → ∃𝑥∃𝑦
(𝑥 = 𝑢 ∧ 𝑦 = 𝑣)) )
| | qed:31: | ⊢ (∀𝑥𝑥 = 𝑦 → (𝑢 = 𝑣 → ∃𝑥∃𝑦(
𝑥 = 𝑢 ∧ 𝑦 = 𝑣)))
|
|
| ⊢ (∀𝑥 𝑥 = 𝑦 → (𝑢 = 𝑣 → ∃𝑥∃𝑦(𝑥 = 𝑢 ∧ 𝑦 = 𝑣))) |
| |
| Theorem | ax6e2ndVD 44879* |
The following User's Proof is a Virtual Deduction proof (see wvd1 44540)
completed automatically by a Metamath tools program invoking mmj2 and
the Metamath Proof Assistant. ax6e2nd 44529 is ax6e2ndVD 44879 without virtual
deductions and was automatically derived from ax6e2ndVD 44879.
(Contributed by Alan Sare, 25-Mar-2014.)
(Proof modification is discouraged.) (New usage is discouraged.)
| 1:: | ⊢ ∃𝑦𝑦 = 𝑣
| | 2:: | ⊢ 𝑢 ∈ V
| | 3:1,2: | ⊢ (𝑢 ∈ V ∧ ∃𝑦𝑦 = 𝑣)
| | 4:3: | ⊢ ∃𝑦(𝑢 ∈ V ∧ 𝑦 = 𝑣)
| | 5:: | ⊢ (𝑢 ∈ V ↔ ∃𝑥𝑥 = 𝑢)
| | 6:5: | ⊢ ((𝑢 ∈ V ∧ 𝑦 = 𝑣) ↔ (∃𝑥𝑥 =
𝑢 ∧ 𝑦 = 𝑣))
| | 7:6: | ⊢ (∃𝑦(𝑢 ∈ V ∧ 𝑦 = 𝑣) ↔ ∃𝑦
(∃𝑥𝑥 = 𝑢 ∧ 𝑦 = 𝑣))
| | 8:4,7: | ⊢ ∃𝑦(∃𝑥𝑥 = 𝑢 ∧ 𝑦 = 𝑣)
| | 9:: | ⊢ (𝑧 = 𝑣 → ∀𝑥𝑧 = 𝑣)
| | 10:: | ⊢ (𝑦 = 𝑣 → ∀𝑧𝑦 = 𝑣)
| | 11:: | ⊢ ( 𝑧 = 𝑦 ▶ 𝑧 = 𝑦 )
| | 12:11: | ⊢ ( 𝑧 = 𝑦 ▶ (𝑧 = 𝑣 ↔ 𝑦 = 𝑣) )
| | 120:11: | ⊢ (𝑧 = 𝑦 → (𝑧 = 𝑣 ↔ 𝑦 = 𝑣))
| | 13:9,10,120: | ⊢ (¬ ∀𝑥𝑥 = 𝑦 → (𝑦 = 𝑣 → ∀𝑥𝑦
= 𝑣))
| | 14:: | ⊢ ( ¬ ∀𝑥𝑥 = 𝑦 ▶ ¬ ∀𝑥𝑥 = 𝑦 )
| | 15:14,13: | ⊢ ( ¬ ∀𝑥𝑥 = 𝑦 ▶ (𝑦 = 𝑣 → ∀𝑥
𝑦 = 𝑣) )
| | 16:15: | ⊢ (¬ ∀𝑥𝑥 = 𝑦 → (𝑦 = 𝑣 → ∀𝑥𝑦
= 𝑣))
| | 17:16: | ⊢ (∀𝑥¬ ∀𝑥𝑥 = 𝑦 → ∀𝑥(𝑦 = 𝑣
→ ∀𝑥𝑦 = 𝑣))
| | 18:: | ⊢ (¬ ∀𝑥𝑥 = 𝑦 → ∀𝑥¬ ∀𝑥𝑥 = 𝑦
)
| | 19:17,18: | ⊢ (¬ ∀𝑥𝑥 = 𝑦 → ∀𝑥(𝑦 = 𝑣 → ∀
𝑥𝑦 = 𝑣))
| | 20:14,19: | ⊢ ( ¬ ∀𝑥𝑥 = 𝑦 ▶ ∀𝑥(𝑦 = 𝑣 →
∀𝑥𝑦 = 𝑣) )
| | 21:20: | ⊢ ( ¬ ∀𝑥𝑥 = 𝑦 ▶ ((∃𝑥𝑥 = 𝑢
∧ 𝑦 = 𝑣) → ∃𝑥(𝑥 = 𝑢 ∧ 𝑦 = 𝑣)) )
| | 22:21: | ⊢ (¬ ∀𝑥𝑥 = 𝑦 → ((∃𝑥𝑥 = 𝑢 ∧
𝑦 = 𝑣) → ∃𝑥(𝑥 = 𝑢 ∧ 𝑦 = 𝑣)))
| | 23:22: | ⊢ (∀𝑦¬ ∀𝑥𝑥 = 𝑦 → ∀𝑦((∃𝑥
𝑥 = 𝑢 ∧ 𝑦 = 𝑣) → ∃𝑥(𝑥 = 𝑢 ∧ 𝑦 = 𝑣)))
| | 24:: | ⊢ (¬ ∀𝑥𝑥 = 𝑦 → ∀𝑦¬ ∀𝑥𝑥 = 𝑦
)
| | 25:23,24: | ⊢ (¬ ∀𝑥𝑥 = 𝑦 → ∀𝑦((∃𝑥𝑥 =
𝑢 ∧ 𝑦 = 𝑣) → ∃𝑥(𝑥 = 𝑢 ∧ 𝑦 = 𝑣)))
| | 26:14,25: | ⊢ ( ¬ ∀𝑥𝑥 = 𝑦 ▶ ∀𝑦((∃𝑥𝑥
= 𝑢 ∧ 𝑦 = 𝑣) → ∃𝑥(𝑥 = 𝑢 ∧ 𝑦 = 𝑣)) )
| | 27:26: | ⊢ ( ¬ ∀𝑥𝑥 = 𝑦 ▶ (∃𝑦(∃𝑥𝑥
= 𝑢 ∧ 𝑦 = 𝑣) → ∃𝑦∃𝑥(𝑥 = 𝑢 ∧ 𝑦 = 𝑣)) )
| | 28:8,27: | ⊢ ( ¬ ∀𝑥𝑥 = 𝑦 ▶ ∃𝑦∃𝑥(𝑥 =
𝑢 ∧ 𝑦 = 𝑣) )
| | 29:28: | ⊢ ( ¬ ∀𝑥𝑥 = 𝑦 ▶ ∃𝑥∃𝑦(𝑥 =
𝑢 ∧ 𝑦 = 𝑣) )
| | qed:29: | ⊢ (¬ ∀𝑥𝑥 = 𝑦 → ∃𝑥∃𝑦(𝑥 = 𝑢
∧ 𝑦 = 𝑣))
|
|
| ⊢ (¬
∀𝑥 𝑥 = 𝑦 → ∃𝑥∃𝑦(𝑥 = 𝑢 ∧ 𝑦 = 𝑣)) |
| |
| Theorem | ax6e2ndeqVD 44880* |
The following User's Proof is a Virtual Deduction proof (see wvd1 44540)
completed automatically by a Metamath tools program invoking mmj2 and
the Metamath Proof Assistant. ax6e2eq 44528 is ax6e2ndeqVD 44880 without virtual
deductions and was automatically derived from ax6e2ndeqVD 44880.
(Contributed by Alan Sare, 25-Mar-2014.)
(Proof modification is discouraged.) (New usage is discouraged.)
| 1:: | ⊢ ( 𝑢 ≠ 𝑣 ▶ 𝑢 ≠ 𝑣 )
| | 2:: | ⊢ ( 𝑢 ≠ 𝑣 , (𝑥 = 𝑢 ∧ 𝑦 = 𝑣) ▶ (
𝑥 = 𝑢 ∧ 𝑦 = 𝑣) )
| | 3:2: | ⊢ ( 𝑢 ≠ 𝑣 , (𝑥 = 𝑢 ∧ 𝑦 = 𝑣) ▶ 𝑥
= 𝑢 )
| | 4:1,3: | ⊢ ( 𝑢 ≠ 𝑣 , (𝑥 = 𝑢 ∧ 𝑦 = 𝑣) ▶ 𝑥
≠ 𝑣 )
| | 5:2: | ⊢ ( 𝑢 ≠ 𝑣 , (𝑥 = 𝑢 ∧ 𝑦 = 𝑣) ▶ 𝑦
= 𝑣 )
| | 6:4,5: | ⊢ ( 𝑢 ≠ 𝑣 , (𝑥 = 𝑢 ∧ 𝑦 = 𝑣) ▶ 𝑥
≠ 𝑦 )
| | 7:: | ⊢ (∀𝑥𝑥 = 𝑦 → 𝑥 = 𝑦)
| | 8:7: | ⊢ (¬ 𝑥 = 𝑦 → ¬ ∀𝑥𝑥 = 𝑦)
| | 9:: | ⊢ (¬ 𝑥 = 𝑦 ↔ 𝑥 ≠ 𝑦)
| | 10:8,9: | ⊢ (𝑥 ≠ 𝑦 → ¬ ∀𝑥𝑥 = 𝑦)
| | 11:6,10: | ⊢ ( 𝑢 ≠ 𝑣 , (𝑥 = 𝑢 ∧ 𝑦 = 𝑣) ▶
¬ ∀𝑥𝑥 = 𝑦 )
| | 12:11: | ⊢ ( 𝑢 ≠ 𝑣 ▶ ((𝑥 = 𝑢 ∧ 𝑦 = 𝑣)
→ ¬ ∀𝑥𝑥 = 𝑦) )
| | 13:12: | ⊢ ( 𝑢 ≠ 𝑣 ▶ ∀𝑥((𝑥 = 𝑢 ∧ 𝑦 =
𝑣) → ¬ ∀𝑥𝑥 = 𝑦) )
| | 14:13: | ⊢ ( 𝑢 ≠ 𝑣 ▶ (∃𝑥(𝑥 = 𝑢 ∧ 𝑦 =
𝑣) → ∃𝑥¬ ∀𝑥𝑥 = 𝑦) )
| | 15:: | ⊢ (¬ ∀𝑥𝑥 = 𝑦 → ∀𝑥¬ ∀𝑥𝑥 = 𝑦
)
| | 19:15: | ⊢ (∃𝑥¬ ∀𝑥𝑥 = 𝑦 ↔ ¬ ∀𝑥𝑥 =
𝑦)
| | 20:14,19: | ⊢ ( 𝑢 ≠ 𝑣 ▶ (∃𝑥(𝑥 = 𝑢 ∧ 𝑦 =
𝑣) → ¬ ∀𝑥𝑥 = 𝑦) )
| | 21:20: | ⊢ ( 𝑢 ≠ 𝑣 ▶ ∀𝑦(∃𝑥(𝑥 = 𝑢 ∧
𝑦 = 𝑣) → ¬ ∀𝑥𝑥 = 𝑦) )
| | 22:21: | ⊢ ( 𝑢 ≠ 𝑣 ▶ (∃𝑦∃𝑥(𝑥 = 𝑢 ∧
𝑦 = 𝑣) → ∃𝑦¬ ∀𝑥𝑥 = 𝑦) )
| | 23:: | ⊢ (∃𝑥∃𝑦(𝑥 = 𝑢 ∧ 𝑦 = 𝑣) ↔ ∃
𝑦∃𝑥(𝑥 = 𝑢 ∧ 𝑦 = 𝑣))
| | 24:22,23: | ⊢ ( 𝑢 ≠ 𝑣 ▶ (∃𝑥∃𝑦(𝑥 = 𝑢 ∧
𝑦 = 𝑣) → ∃𝑦¬ ∀𝑥𝑥 = 𝑦) )
| | 25:: | ⊢ (¬ ∀𝑥𝑥 = 𝑦 → ∀𝑦¬ ∀𝑥𝑥 = 𝑦
)
| | 26:25: | ⊢ (∃𝑦¬ ∀𝑥𝑥 = 𝑦 → ∃𝑦∀𝑦¬
∀𝑥𝑥 = 𝑦)
| | 260:: | ⊢ (∀𝑦¬ ∀𝑥𝑥 = 𝑦 → ∀𝑦∀𝑦¬
∀𝑥𝑥 = 𝑦)
| | 27:260: | ⊢ (∃𝑦∀𝑦¬ ∀𝑥𝑥 = 𝑦 ↔ ∀𝑦¬
∀𝑥𝑥 = 𝑦)
| | 270:26,27: | ⊢ (∃𝑦¬ ∀𝑥𝑥 = 𝑦 → ∀𝑦¬ ∀𝑥
𝑥 = 𝑦)
| | 28:: | ⊢ (∀𝑦¬ ∀𝑥𝑥 = 𝑦 → ¬ ∀𝑥𝑥 = 𝑦
)
| | 29:270,28: | ⊢ (∃𝑦¬ ∀𝑥𝑥 = 𝑦 → ¬ ∀𝑥𝑥 = 𝑦
)
| | 30:24,29: | ⊢ ( 𝑢 ≠ 𝑣 ▶ (∃𝑥∃𝑦(𝑥 = 𝑢 ∧
𝑦 = 𝑣) → ¬ ∀𝑥𝑥 = 𝑦) )
| | 31:30: | ⊢ ( 𝑢 ≠ 𝑣 ▶ (∃𝑥∃𝑦(𝑥 = 𝑢 ∧
𝑦 = 𝑣) → (¬ ∀𝑥𝑥 = 𝑦 ∨ 𝑢 = 𝑣)) )
| | 32:31: | ⊢ (𝑢 ≠ 𝑣 → (∃𝑥∃𝑦(𝑥 = 𝑢 ∧ 𝑦
= 𝑣) → (¬ ∀𝑥𝑥 = 𝑦 ∨ 𝑢 = 𝑣)))
| | 33:: | ⊢ ( 𝑢 = 𝑣 ▶ 𝑢 = 𝑣 )
| | 34:33: | ⊢ ( 𝑢 = 𝑣 ▶ (∃𝑥∃𝑦(𝑥 = 𝑢 ∧ 𝑦
= 𝑣) → 𝑢 = 𝑣) )
| | 35:34: | ⊢ ( 𝑢 = 𝑣 ▶ (∃𝑥∃𝑦(𝑥 = 𝑢 ∧ 𝑦
= 𝑣) → (¬ ∀𝑥𝑥 = 𝑦 ∨ 𝑢 = 𝑣)) )
| | 36:35: | ⊢ (𝑢 = 𝑣 → (∃𝑥∃𝑦(𝑥 = 𝑢 ∧ 𝑦 =
𝑣) → (¬ ∀𝑥𝑥 = 𝑦 ∨ 𝑢 = 𝑣)))
| | 37:: | ⊢ (𝑢 = 𝑣 ∨ 𝑢 ≠ 𝑣)
| | 38:32,36,37: | ⊢ (∃𝑥∃𝑦(𝑥 = 𝑢 ∧ 𝑦 = 𝑣) → (
¬ ∀𝑥𝑥 = 𝑦 ∨ 𝑢 = 𝑣))
| | 39:: | ⊢ (∀𝑥𝑥 = 𝑦 → (𝑢 = 𝑣 → ∃𝑥∃𝑦
(𝑥 = 𝑢 ∧ 𝑦 = 𝑣)))
| | 40:: | ⊢ (¬ ∀𝑥𝑥 = 𝑦 → ∃𝑥∃𝑦(𝑥 = 𝑢
∧ 𝑦 = 𝑣))
| | 41:40: | ⊢ (¬ ∀𝑥𝑥 = 𝑦 → (𝑢 = 𝑣 → ∃𝑥∃
𝑦(𝑥 = 𝑢 ∧ 𝑦 = 𝑣)))
| | 42:: | ⊢ (∀𝑥𝑥 = 𝑦 ∨ ¬ ∀𝑥𝑥 = 𝑦)
| | 43:39,41,42: | ⊢ (𝑢 = 𝑣 → ∃𝑥∃𝑦(𝑥 = 𝑢 ∧ 𝑦 = 𝑣
))
| | 44:40,43: | ⊢ ((¬ ∀𝑥𝑥 = 𝑦 ∨ 𝑢 = 𝑣) → ∃𝑥
∃𝑦(𝑥 = 𝑢 ∧ 𝑦 = 𝑣))
| | qed:38,44: | ⊢ ((¬ ∀𝑥𝑥 = 𝑦 ∨ 𝑢 = 𝑣) ↔ ∃𝑥
∃𝑦(𝑥 = 𝑢 ∧ 𝑦 = 𝑣))
|
|
| ⊢ ((¬
∀𝑥 𝑥 = 𝑦 ∨ 𝑢 = 𝑣) ↔ ∃𝑥∃𝑦(𝑥 = 𝑢 ∧ 𝑦 = 𝑣)) |
| |
| Theorem | 2sb5ndVD 44881* |
The following User's Proof is a Virtual Deduction proof (see wvd1 44540)
completed automatically by a Metamath tools program invoking mmj2 and
the Metamath Proof Assistant. 2sb5nd 44531 is 2sb5ndVD 44881 without virtual
deductions and was automatically derived from 2sb5ndVD 44881.
(Contributed by Alan Sare, 30-Apr-2014.)
(Proof modification is discouraged.) (New usage is discouraged.)
| 1:: | ⊢ (((𝑥 = 𝑢 ∧ 𝑦 = 𝑣) ∧ [𝑢 / 𝑥][
𝑣 / 𝑦]𝜑) ↔ ((𝑥 = 𝑢 ∧ 𝑦 = 𝑣) ∧ 𝜑))
| | 2:1: | ⊢ (∃𝑦((𝑥 = 𝑢 ∧ 𝑦 = 𝑣) ∧ [𝑢 /
𝑥][𝑣 / 𝑦]𝜑) ↔ ∃𝑦((𝑥 = 𝑢 ∧ 𝑦 = 𝑣) ∧ 𝜑))
| | 3:: | ⊢ ([𝑣 / 𝑦]𝜑 → ∀𝑦[𝑣 / 𝑦]𝜑)
| | 4:3: | ⊢ [𝑢 / 𝑥]([𝑣 / 𝑦]𝜑 → ∀𝑦[𝑣
/ 𝑦]𝜑)
| | 5:4: | ⊢ ([𝑢 / 𝑥][𝑣 / 𝑦]𝜑 → [𝑢 / 𝑥]
∀𝑦[𝑣 / 𝑦]𝜑)
| | 6:: | ⊢ ( ¬ ∀𝑥𝑥 = 𝑦 ▶ ¬ ∀𝑥𝑥 = 𝑦 )
| | 7:: | ⊢ (∀𝑦𝑦 = 𝑥 → ∀𝑥𝑥 = 𝑦)
| | 8:7: | ⊢ (¬ ∀𝑥𝑥 = 𝑦 → ¬ ∀𝑦𝑦 = 𝑥)
| | 9:6,8: | ⊢ ( ¬ ∀𝑥𝑥 = 𝑦 ▶ ¬ ∀𝑦𝑦 = 𝑥 )
| | 10:9: | ⊢ ([𝑢 / 𝑥]∀𝑦[𝑣 / 𝑦]𝜑 ↔ ∀
𝑦[𝑢 / 𝑥][𝑣 / 𝑦]𝜑)
| | 11:5,10: | ⊢ ([𝑢 / 𝑥][𝑣 / 𝑦]𝜑 → ∀𝑦[𝑢
/ 𝑥][𝑣 / 𝑦]𝜑)
| | 12:11: | ⊢ (¬ ∀𝑥𝑥 = 𝑦 → ([𝑢 / 𝑥][𝑣 /
𝑦]𝜑 → ∀𝑦[𝑢 / 𝑥][𝑣 / 𝑦]𝜑))
| | 13:: | ⊢ ([𝑢 / 𝑥][𝑣 / 𝑦]𝜑 → ∀𝑥[𝑢
/ 𝑥][𝑣 / 𝑦]𝜑)
| | 14:: | ⊢ ( ∀𝑥𝑥 = 𝑦 ▶ ∀𝑥𝑥 = 𝑦 )
| | 15:14: | ⊢ ( ∀𝑥𝑥 = 𝑦 ▶ (∀𝑥[𝑢 / 𝑥][
𝑣 / 𝑦]𝜑 → ∀𝑦[𝑢 / 𝑥][𝑣 / 𝑦]𝜑) )
| | 16:13,15: | ⊢ ( ∀𝑥𝑥 = 𝑦 ▶ ([𝑢 / 𝑥][𝑣 / 𝑦
]𝜑 → ∀𝑦[𝑢 / 𝑥][𝑣 / 𝑦]𝜑) )
| | 17:16: | ⊢ (∀𝑥𝑥 = 𝑦 → ([𝑢 / 𝑥][𝑣 / 𝑦]
𝜑 → ∀𝑦[𝑢 / 𝑥][𝑣 / 𝑦]𝜑))
| | 19:12,17: | ⊢ ([𝑢 / 𝑥][𝑣 / 𝑦]𝜑 → ∀𝑦[𝑢
/ 𝑥][𝑣 / 𝑦]𝜑)
| | 20:19: | ⊢ (∃𝑦((𝑥 = 𝑢 ∧ 𝑦 = 𝑣) ∧ [𝑢 /
𝑥][𝑣 / 𝑦]𝜑) ↔ (∃𝑦(𝑥 = 𝑢 ∧ 𝑦 = 𝑣) ∧
[𝑢 / 𝑥][𝑣 / 𝑦]𝜑))
| | 21:2,20: | ⊢ (∃𝑦((𝑥 = 𝑢 ∧ 𝑦 = 𝑣) ∧ 𝜑)
↔ (∃𝑦(𝑥 = 𝑢 ∧ 𝑦 = 𝑣) ∧ [𝑢 / 𝑥][𝑣 / 𝑦]𝜑))
| | 22:21: | ⊢ (∃𝑥∃𝑦((𝑥 = 𝑢 ∧ 𝑦 = 𝑣) ∧
𝜑) ↔ ∃𝑥(∃𝑦(𝑥 = 𝑢 ∧ 𝑦 = 𝑣) ∧
[𝑢 / 𝑥][𝑣 / 𝑦]𝜑))
| | 23:13: | ⊢ (∃𝑥(∃𝑦(𝑥 = 𝑢 ∧ 𝑦 = 𝑣) ∧ [
𝑢 / 𝑥][𝑣 / 𝑦]𝜑) ↔ (∃𝑥∃𝑦(𝑥 = 𝑢 ∧ 𝑦 = 𝑣) ∧
[𝑢 / 𝑥][𝑣 / 𝑦]𝜑))
| | 24:22,23: | ⊢ ((∃𝑥∃𝑦(𝑥 = 𝑢 ∧ 𝑦 = 𝑣) ∧ [
𝑢 / 𝑥][𝑣 / 𝑦]𝜑) ↔ ∃𝑥∃𝑦((𝑥 = 𝑢 ∧ 𝑦 = 𝑣) ∧ 𝜑))
| | 240:24: | ⊢ ((∃𝑥∃𝑦(𝑥 = 𝑢 ∧ 𝑦 = 𝑣) ∧ (
∃𝑥∃𝑦(𝑥 = 𝑢 ∧ 𝑦 = 𝑣) ∧ [𝑢 / 𝑥][𝑣 / 𝑦]𝜑)) ↔
(∃𝑥∃𝑦(𝑥 = 𝑢 ∧ 𝑦 = 𝑣) ∧ ∃𝑥∃𝑦((𝑥 = 𝑢 ∧ 𝑦 = 𝑣) ∧
𝜑)))
| | 241:: | ⊢ ((∃𝑥∃𝑦(𝑥 = 𝑢 ∧ 𝑦 = 𝑣) ∧ (
∃𝑥∃𝑦(𝑥 = 𝑢 ∧ 𝑦 = 𝑣) ∧ [𝑢 / 𝑥][𝑣 / 𝑦]𝜑)) ↔
(∃𝑥∃𝑦(𝑥 = 𝑢 ∧ 𝑦 = 𝑣) ∧ [𝑢 / 𝑥][𝑣 / 𝑦]𝜑))
| | 242:241,240: | ⊢ ((∃𝑥∃𝑦(𝑥 = 𝑢 ∧ 𝑦 = 𝑣) ∧ [
𝑢 / 𝑥][𝑣 / 𝑦]𝜑) ↔ (∃𝑥∃𝑦(𝑥 = 𝑢 ∧ 𝑦 = 𝑣) ∧
∃𝑥∃𝑦((𝑥 = 𝑢 ∧ 𝑦 = 𝑣) ∧ 𝜑)))
| | 243:: | ⊢ ((∃𝑥∃𝑦(𝑥 = 𝑢 ∧ 𝑦 = 𝑣) → (
[𝑢 / 𝑥][𝑣 / 𝑦]𝜑 ↔ ∃𝑥∃𝑦((𝑥 = 𝑢 ∧ 𝑦 = 𝑣) ∧
𝜑))) ↔ ((∃𝑥∃𝑦(𝑥 = 𝑢 ∧ 𝑦 = 𝑣) ∧
[𝑢 / 𝑥][𝑣 / 𝑦]𝜑) ↔ (∃𝑥∃𝑦(𝑥 = 𝑢 ∧ 𝑦 = 𝑣) ∧
∃𝑥∃𝑦((𝑥 = 𝑢 ∧ 𝑦 = 𝑣) ∧ 𝜑))))
| | 25:242,243: | ⊢ (∃𝑥∃𝑦(𝑥 = 𝑢 ∧ 𝑦 = 𝑣) → ([
𝑢 / 𝑥][𝑣 / 𝑦]𝜑 ↔ ∃𝑥∃𝑦((𝑥 = 𝑢 ∧ 𝑦 = 𝑣) ∧ 𝜑)))
| | 26:: | ⊢ ((¬ ∀𝑥𝑥 = 𝑦 ∨ 𝑢 = 𝑣) ↔ ∃𝑥
∃𝑦(𝑥 = 𝑢 ∧ 𝑦 = 𝑣))
| | qed:25,26: | ⊢ ((¬ ∀𝑥𝑥 = 𝑦 ∨ 𝑢 = 𝑣) → ([𝑢
/ 𝑥][𝑣 / 𝑦]𝜑 ↔ ∃𝑥∃𝑦((𝑥 = 𝑢 ∧ 𝑦 = 𝑣) ∧ 𝜑)))
|
|
| ⊢ ((¬
∀𝑥 𝑥 = 𝑦 ∨ 𝑢 = 𝑣) → ([𝑢 / 𝑥][𝑣 / 𝑦]𝜑 ↔ ∃𝑥∃𝑦((𝑥 = 𝑢 ∧ 𝑦 = 𝑣) ∧ 𝜑))) |
| |
| Theorem | 2uasbanhVD 44882* |
The following User's Proof is a Virtual Deduction proof (see wvd1 44540)
completed automatically by a Metamath tools program invoking mmj2 and
the Metamath Proof Assistant. 2uasbanh 44532 is 2uasbanhVD 44882 without
virtual deductions and was automatically derived from 2uasbanhVD 44882.
(Contributed by Alan Sare, 31-May-2014.)
(Proof modification is discouraged.) (New usage is discouraged.)
| h1:: | ⊢ (𝜒 ↔ (∃𝑥∃𝑦((𝑥 = 𝑢 ∧ 𝑦 =
𝑣) ∧ 𝜑) ∧ ∃𝑥∃𝑦((𝑥 = 𝑢 ∧ 𝑦 = 𝑣) ∧ 𝜓)))
| | 100:1: | ⊢ (𝜒 → (∃𝑥∃𝑦((𝑥 = 𝑢 ∧ 𝑦 =
𝑣) ∧ 𝜑) ∧ ∃𝑥∃𝑦((𝑥 = 𝑢 ∧ 𝑦 = 𝑣) ∧ 𝜓)))
| | 2:100: | ⊢ ( 𝜒 ▶ (∃𝑥∃𝑦((𝑥 = 𝑢 ∧ 𝑦
= 𝑣) ∧ 𝜑) ∧ ∃𝑥∃𝑦((𝑥 = 𝑢 ∧ 𝑦 = 𝑣) ∧ 𝜓)) )
| | 3:2: | ⊢ ( 𝜒 ▶ ∃𝑥∃𝑦((𝑥 = 𝑢 ∧ 𝑦 =
𝑣) ∧ 𝜑) )
| | 4:3: | ⊢ ( 𝜒 ▶ ∃𝑥∃𝑦(𝑥 = 𝑢 ∧ 𝑦 = 𝑣
) )
| | 5:4: | ⊢ ( 𝜒 ▶ (¬ ∀𝑥𝑥 = 𝑦 ∨ 𝑢 = 𝑣)
)
| | 6:5: | ⊢ ( 𝜒 ▶ ([𝑢 / 𝑥][𝑣 / 𝑦]𝜑
↔ ∃𝑥∃𝑦((𝑥 = 𝑢 ∧ 𝑦 = 𝑣) ∧ 𝜑)) )
| | 7:3,6: | ⊢ ( 𝜒 ▶ [𝑢 / 𝑥][𝑣 / 𝑦]𝜑 )
| | 8:2: | ⊢ ( 𝜒 ▶ ∃𝑥∃𝑦((𝑥 = 𝑢 ∧ 𝑦 =
𝑣) ∧ 𝜓) )
| | 9:5: | ⊢ ( 𝜒 ▶ ([𝑢 / 𝑥][𝑣 / 𝑦]𝜓
↔ ∃𝑥∃𝑦((𝑥 = 𝑢 ∧ 𝑦 = 𝑣) ∧ 𝜓)) )
| | 10:8,9: | ⊢ ( 𝜒 ▶ [𝑢 / 𝑥][𝑣 / 𝑦]𝜓 )
| | 101:: | ⊢ ([𝑣 / 𝑦](𝜑 ∧ 𝜓) ↔ ([𝑣 /
𝑦]𝜑 ∧ [𝑣 / 𝑦]𝜓))
| | 102:101: | ⊢ ([𝑢 / 𝑥][𝑣 / 𝑦](𝜑 ∧ 𝜓)
↔ [𝑢 / 𝑥]([𝑣 / 𝑦]𝜑 ∧ [𝑣 / 𝑦]𝜓))
| | 103:: | ⊢ ([𝑢 / 𝑥]([𝑣 / 𝑦]𝜑 ∧ [𝑣 / 𝑦
]𝜓) ↔ ([𝑢 / 𝑥][𝑣 / 𝑦]𝜑 ∧ [𝑢 / 𝑥][𝑣 / 𝑦]𝜓))
| | 104:102,103: | ⊢ ([𝑢 / 𝑥][𝑣 / 𝑦](𝜑 ∧ 𝜓)
↔ ([𝑢 / 𝑥][𝑣 / 𝑦]𝜑 ∧ [𝑢 / 𝑥][𝑣 / 𝑦]𝜓))
| | 11:7,10,104: | ⊢ ( 𝜒 ▶ [𝑢 / 𝑥][𝑣 / 𝑦](𝜑 ∧
𝜓) )
| | 110:5: | ⊢ ( 𝜒 ▶ ([𝑢 / 𝑥][𝑣 / 𝑦](𝜑
∧ 𝜓) ↔ ∃𝑥∃𝑦((𝑥 = 𝑢 ∧ 𝑦 = 𝑣) ∧ (𝜑 ∧ 𝜓))) )
| | 12:11,110: | ⊢ ( 𝜒 ▶ ∃𝑥∃𝑦((𝑥 = 𝑢 ∧ 𝑦 =
𝑣) ∧ (𝜑 ∧ 𝜓)) )
| | 120:12: | ⊢ (𝜒 → ∃𝑥∃𝑦((𝑥 = 𝑢 ∧ 𝑦 = 𝑣
) ∧ (𝜑 ∧ 𝜓)))
| | 13:1,120: | ⊢ ((∃𝑥∃𝑦((𝑥 = 𝑢 ∧ 𝑦 = 𝑣) ∧
𝜑) ∧ ∃𝑥∃𝑦((𝑥 = 𝑢 ∧ 𝑦 = 𝑣) ∧ 𝜓)) →
∃𝑥∃𝑦((𝑥 = 𝑢
∧ 𝑦 = 𝑣) ∧ (𝜑 ∧ 𝜓)))
| | 14:: | ⊢ ( ((𝑥 = 𝑢 ∧ 𝑦 = 𝑣) ∧ (𝜑 ∧ 𝜓
)) ▶ ((𝑥 = 𝑢 ∧ 𝑦 = 𝑣) ∧ (𝜑 ∧ 𝜓)) )
| | 15:14: | ⊢ ( ((𝑥 = 𝑢 ∧ 𝑦 = 𝑣) ∧ (𝜑 ∧ 𝜓
)) ▶ (𝑥 = 𝑢 ∧ 𝑦 = 𝑣) )
| | 16:14: | ⊢ ( ((𝑥 = 𝑢 ∧ 𝑦 = 𝑣) ∧ (𝜑 ∧ 𝜓
)) ▶ (𝜑 ∧ 𝜓) )
| | 17:16: | ⊢ ( ((𝑥 = 𝑢 ∧ 𝑦 = 𝑣) ∧ (𝜑 ∧ 𝜓
)) ▶ 𝜑 )
| | 18:15,17: | ⊢ ( ((𝑥 = 𝑢 ∧ 𝑦 = 𝑣) ∧ (𝜑 ∧ 𝜓
)) ▶ ((𝑥 = 𝑢 ∧ 𝑦 = 𝑣) ∧ 𝜑) )
| | 19:18: | ⊢ (((𝑥 = 𝑢 ∧ 𝑦 = 𝑣) ∧ (𝜑 ∧ 𝜓
)) → ((𝑥 = 𝑢 ∧ 𝑦 = 𝑣) ∧ 𝜑))
| | 20:19: | ⊢ (∃𝑦((𝑥 = 𝑢 ∧ 𝑦 = 𝑣) ∧ (𝜑
∧ 𝜓)) → ∃𝑦((𝑥 = 𝑢 ∧ 𝑦 = 𝑣) ∧ 𝜑))
| | 21:20: | ⊢ (∃𝑥∃𝑦((𝑥 = 𝑢 ∧ 𝑦 = 𝑣) ∧ (
𝜑 ∧ 𝜓)) → ∃𝑥∃𝑦((𝑥 = 𝑢 ∧ 𝑦 = 𝑣) ∧ 𝜑))
| | 22:16: | ⊢ ( ((𝑥 = 𝑢 ∧ 𝑦 = 𝑣) ∧ (𝜑 ∧ 𝜓
)) ▶ 𝜓 )
| | 23:15,22: | ⊢ ( ((𝑥 = 𝑢 ∧ 𝑦 = 𝑣) ∧ (𝜑 ∧ 𝜓
)) ▶ ((𝑥 = 𝑢 ∧ 𝑦 = 𝑣) ∧ 𝜓) )
| | 24:23: | ⊢ (((𝑥 = 𝑢 ∧ 𝑦 = 𝑣) ∧ (𝜑 ∧ 𝜓
)) → ((𝑥 = 𝑢 ∧ 𝑦 = 𝑣) ∧ 𝜓))
| | 25:24: | ⊢ (∃𝑦((𝑥 = 𝑢 ∧ 𝑦 = 𝑣) ∧ (𝜑
∧ 𝜓)) → ∃𝑦((𝑥 = 𝑢 ∧ 𝑦 = 𝑣) ∧ 𝜓))
| | 26:25: | ⊢ (∃𝑥∃𝑦((𝑥 = 𝑢 ∧ 𝑦 = 𝑣) ∧ (
𝜑 ∧ 𝜓)) → ∃𝑥∃𝑦((𝑥 = 𝑢 ∧ 𝑦 = 𝑣) ∧ 𝜓))
| | 27:21,26: | ⊢ (∃𝑥∃𝑦((𝑥 = 𝑢 ∧ 𝑦 = 𝑣) ∧ (
𝜑 ∧ 𝜓)) → (∃𝑥∃𝑦((𝑥 = 𝑢 ∧ 𝑦 = 𝑣) ∧ 𝜑) ∧
∃𝑥∃𝑦(
(𝑥 = 𝑢 ∧ 𝑦 = 𝑣) ∧ 𝜓)))
| | qed:13,27: | ⊢ (∃𝑥∃𝑦((𝑥 = 𝑢 ∧ 𝑦 = 𝑣) ∧ (
𝜑 ∧ 𝜓)) ↔ (∃𝑥∃𝑦((𝑥 = 𝑢 ∧ 𝑦 = 𝑣) ∧ 𝜑) ∧
∃𝑥∃𝑦(
(𝑥 = 𝑢 ∧ 𝑦 = 𝑣) ∧ 𝜓)))
|
|
| ⊢ (𝜒 ↔ (∃𝑥∃𝑦((𝑥 = 𝑢 ∧ 𝑦 = 𝑣) ∧ 𝜑) ∧ ∃𝑥∃𝑦((𝑥 = 𝑢 ∧ 𝑦 = 𝑣) ∧ 𝜓))) ⇒ ⊢ (∃𝑥∃𝑦((𝑥 = 𝑢 ∧ 𝑦 = 𝑣) ∧ (𝜑 ∧ 𝜓)) ↔ (∃𝑥∃𝑦((𝑥 = 𝑢 ∧ 𝑦 = 𝑣) ∧ 𝜑) ∧ ∃𝑥∃𝑦((𝑥 = 𝑢 ∧ 𝑦 = 𝑣) ∧ 𝜓))) |
| |
| Theorem | e2ebindVD 44883 |
The following User's Proof is a Virtual Deduction proof (see wvd1 44540)
completed automatically by a Metamath tools program invoking mmj2 and the
Metamath Proof Assistant. e2ebind 44534 is e2ebindVD 44883 without virtual
deductions and was automatically derived from e2ebindVD 44883.
| 1:: | ⊢ (𝜑 ↔ 𝜑)
| | 2:1: | ⊢ (∀𝑦𝑦 = 𝑥 → (𝜑 ↔ 𝜑))
| | 3:2: | ⊢ (∀𝑦𝑦 = 𝑥 → (∃𝑦𝜑 ↔ ∃𝑥𝜑
))
| | 4:: | ⊢ ( ∀𝑦𝑦 = 𝑥 ▶ ∀𝑦𝑦 = 𝑥 )
| | 5:3,4: | ⊢ ( ∀𝑦𝑦 = 𝑥 ▶ (∃𝑦𝜑 ↔ ∃𝑥
𝜑) )
| | 6:: | ⊢ (∀𝑦𝑦 = 𝑥 → ∀𝑦∀𝑦𝑦 = 𝑥)
| | 7:5,6: | ⊢ ( ∀𝑦𝑦 = 𝑥 ▶ ∀𝑦(∃𝑦𝜑 ↔
∃𝑥𝜑) )
| | 8:7: | ⊢ ( ∀𝑦𝑦 = 𝑥 ▶ (∃𝑦∃𝑦𝜑 ↔
∃𝑦∃𝑥𝜑) )
| | 9:: | ⊢ (∃𝑦∃𝑥𝜑 ↔ ∃𝑥∃𝑦𝜑)
| | 10:8,9: | ⊢ ( ∀𝑦𝑦 = 𝑥 ▶ (∃𝑦∃𝑦𝜑 ↔
∃𝑥∃𝑦𝜑) )
| | 11:: | ⊢ (∃𝑦𝜑 → ∀𝑦∃𝑦𝜑)
| | 12:11: | ⊢ (∃𝑦∃𝑦𝜑 ↔ ∃𝑦𝜑)
| | 13:10,12: | ⊢ ( ∀𝑦𝑦 = 𝑥 ▶ (∃𝑥∃𝑦𝜑 ↔
∃𝑦𝜑) )
| | 14:13: | ⊢ (∀𝑦𝑦 = 𝑥 → (∃𝑥∃𝑦𝜑 ↔ ∃
𝑦𝜑))
| | 15:: | ⊢ (∀𝑦𝑦 = 𝑥 ↔ ∀𝑥𝑥 = 𝑦)
| | qed:14,15: | ⊢ (∀𝑥𝑥 = 𝑦 → (∃𝑥∃𝑦𝜑 ↔ ∃
𝑦𝜑))
|
(Contributed by Alan Sare, 27-Nov-2014.) (Proof modification is
discouraged.) (New usage is discouraged.)
|
| ⊢ (∀𝑥 𝑥 = 𝑦 → (∃𝑥∃𝑦𝜑 ↔ ∃𝑦𝜑)) |
| |
| 21.41.8 Virtual Deduction transcriptions of
textbook proofs
|
| |
| Theorem | sb5ALTVD 44884* |
The following User's Proof is a Natural Deduction Sequent Calculus
transcription of the Fitch-style Natural Deduction proof of Unit 20
Excercise 3.a., which is sb5 2277, found in the "Answers to Starred
Exercises" on page 457 of "Understanding Symbolic Logic", Fifth
Edition (2008), by Virginia Klenk. The same proof may also be
interpreted as a Virtual Deduction Hilbert-style axiomatic proof. It
was completed automatically by the tools program completeusersproof.cmd,
which invokes Mel L. O'Cat's mmj2 and Norm Megill's Metamath Proof
Assistant. sb5ALT 44496 is sb5ALTVD 44884 without virtual deductions and
was automatically derived from sb5ALTVD 44884.
| 1:: | ⊢ ( [𝑦 / 𝑥]𝜑 ▶ [𝑦 / 𝑥]𝜑 )
| | 2:: | ⊢ [𝑦 / 𝑥]𝑥 = 𝑦
| | 3:1,2: | ⊢ ( [𝑦 / 𝑥]𝜑 ▶ [𝑦 / 𝑥](𝑥 = 𝑦
∧ 𝜑) )
| | 4:3: | ⊢ ( [𝑦 / 𝑥]𝜑 ▶ ∃𝑥(𝑥 = 𝑦 ∧ 𝜑
) )
| | 5:4: | ⊢ ([𝑦 / 𝑥]𝜑 → ∃𝑥(𝑥 = 𝑦 ∧ 𝜑)
)
| | 6:: | ⊢ ( ∃𝑥(𝑥 = 𝑦 ∧ 𝜑) ▶ ∃𝑥(𝑥 =
𝑦 ∧ 𝜑) )
| | 7:: | ⊢ ( ∃𝑥(𝑥 = 𝑦 ∧ 𝜑) , (𝑥 = 𝑦 ∧ 𝜑
) ▶ (𝑥 = 𝑦 ∧ 𝜑) )
| | 8:7: | ⊢ ( ∃𝑥(𝑥 = 𝑦 ∧ 𝜑) , (𝑥 = 𝑦 ∧ 𝜑
) ▶ 𝜑 )
| | 9:7: | ⊢ ( ∃𝑥(𝑥 = 𝑦 ∧ 𝜑) , (𝑥 = 𝑦 ∧ 𝜑
) ▶ 𝑥 = 𝑦 )
| | 10:8,9: | ⊢ ( ∃𝑥(𝑥 = 𝑦 ∧ 𝜑) , (𝑥 = 𝑦 ∧ 𝜑
) ▶ [𝑦 / 𝑥]𝜑 )
| | 101:: | ⊢ ([𝑦 / 𝑥]𝜑 → ∀𝑥[𝑦 / 𝑥]𝜑)
| | 11:101,10: | ⊢ (∃𝑥(𝑥 = 𝑦 ∧ 𝜑) → [𝑦 / 𝑥]𝜑
)
| | 12:5,11: | ⊢ (([𝑦 / 𝑥]𝜑 → ∃𝑥(𝑥 = 𝑦 ∧ 𝜑
)) ∧ (∃𝑥(𝑥 = 𝑦 ∧ 𝜑) → [𝑦 / 𝑥]𝜑))
| | qed:12: | ⊢ ([𝑦 / 𝑥]𝜑 ↔ ∃𝑥(𝑥 = 𝑦 ∧ 𝜑)
)
|
(Contributed by Alan Sare, 21-Apr-2013.) (Proof modification is
discouraged.) (New usage is discouraged.)
|
| ⊢ ([𝑦 / 𝑥]𝜑 ↔ ∃𝑥(𝑥 = 𝑦 ∧ 𝜑)) |
| |
| Theorem | vk15.4jVD 44885 |
The following User's Proof is a Natural Deduction Sequent Calculus
transcription of the Fitch-style Natural Deduction proof of Unit 15
Excercise 4.f. found in the "Answers to Starred Exercises" on page 442
of "Understanding Symbolic Logic", Fifth Edition (2008), by Virginia
Klenk. The same proof may also be interpreted to be a Virtual Deduction
Hilbert-style axiomatic proof. It was completed automatically by the
tools program completeusersproof.cmd, which invokes Mel L. O'Cat's mmj2
and Norm Megill's Metamath Proof Assistant. vk15.4j 44499 is vk15.4jVD 44885
without virtual deductions and was automatically derived
from vk15.4jVD 44885. Step numbers greater than 25 are additional steps
necessary for the sequent calculus proof not contained in the
Fitch-style proof. Otherwise, step i of the User's Proof corresponds to
step i of the Fitch-style proof.
| h1:: | ⊢ ¬ (∃𝑥¬ 𝜑 ∧ ∃𝑥(𝜓 ∧
¬ 𝜒))
| | h2:: | ⊢ (∀𝑥𝜒 → ¬ ∃𝑥(𝜃 ∧ 𝜏
))
| | h3:: | ⊢ ¬ ∀𝑥(𝜏 → 𝜑)
| | 4:: | ⊢ ( ¬ ∃𝑥¬ 𝜃 ▶ ¬ ∃𝑥¬
𝜃 )
| | 5:4: | ⊢ ( ¬ ∃𝑥¬ 𝜃 ▶ ∀𝑥𝜃 )
| | 6:3: | ⊢ ∃𝑥(𝜏 ∧ ¬ 𝜑)
| | 7:: | ⊢ ( ¬ ∃𝑥¬ 𝜃 , (𝜏 ∧ ¬
𝜑) ▶ (𝜏 ∧ ¬ 𝜑) )
| | 8:7: | ⊢ ( ¬ ∃𝑥¬ 𝜃 , (𝜏 ∧ ¬
𝜑) ▶ 𝜏 )
| | 9:7: | ⊢ ( ¬ ∃𝑥¬ 𝜃 , (𝜏 ∧ ¬
𝜑) ▶ ¬ 𝜑 )
| | 10:5: | ⊢ ( ¬ ∃𝑥¬ 𝜃 ▶ 𝜃 )
| | 11:10,8: | ⊢ ( ¬ ∃𝑥¬ 𝜃 , (𝜏 ∧ ¬
𝜑) ▶ (𝜃 ∧ 𝜏) )
| | 12:11: | ⊢ ( ¬ ∃𝑥¬ 𝜃 , (𝜏 ∧ ¬
𝜑) ▶ ∃𝑥(𝜃 ∧ 𝜏) )
| | 13:12: | ⊢ ( ¬ ∃𝑥¬ 𝜃 , (𝜏 ∧ ¬
𝜑) ▶ ¬ ¬ ∃𝑥(𝜃 ∧ 𝜏) )
| | 14:2,13: | ⊢ ( ¬ ∃𝑥¬ 𝜃 , (𝜏 ∧ ¬
𝜑) ▶ ¬ ∀𝑥𝜒 )
| | 140:: | ⊢ (∃𝑥¬ 𝜃 → ∀𝑥∃𝑥¬ 𝜃
)
| | 141:140: | ⊢ (¬ ∃𝑥¬ 𝜃 → ∀𝑥¬ ∃𝑥
¬ 𝜃)
| | 142:: | ⊢ (∀𝑥𝜒 → ∀𝑥∀𝑥𝜒)
| | 143:142: | ⊢ (¬ ∀𝑥𝜒 → ∀𝑥¬ ∀𝑥𝜒
)
| | 144:6,14,141,143: | ⊢ ( ¬ ∃𝑥¬ 𝜃 ▶ ¬ ∀𝑥𝜒
)
| | 15:1: | ⊢ (¬ ∃𝑥¬ 𝜑 ∨ ¬ ∃𝑥(𝜓
∧ ¬ 𝜒))
| | 16:9: | ⊢ ( ¬ ∃𝑥¬ 𝜃 , (𝜏 ∧ ¬
𝜑) ▶ ∃𝑥¬ 𝜑 )
| | 161:: | ⊢ (∃𝑥¬ 𝜑 → ∀𝑥∃𝑥¬ 𝜑
)
| | 162:6,16,141,161: | ⊢ ( ¬ ∃𝑥¬ 𝜃 ▶ ∃𝑥¬ 𝜑
)
| | 17:162: | ⊢ ( ¬ ∃𝑥¬ 𝜃 ▶ ¬ ¬ ∃𝑥
¬ 𝜑 )
| | 18:15,17: | ⊢ ( ¬ ∃𝑥¬ 𝜃 ▶ ¬ ∃𝑥(
𝜓 ∧ ¬ 𝜒) )
| | 19:18: | ⊢ ( ¬ ∃𝑥¬ 𝜃 ▶ ∀𝑥(𝜓
→ 𝜒) )
| | 20:144: | ⊢ ( ¬ ∃𝑥¬ 𝜃 ▶ ∃𝑥¬ 𝜒
)
| | 21:: | ⊢ ( ¬ ∃𝑥¬ 𝜃 , ¬ 𝜒 ▶ ¬
𝜒 )
| | 22:19: | ⊢ ( ¬ ∃𝑥¬ 𝜃 ▶ (𝜓 → 𝜒
) )
| | 23:21,22: | ⊢ ( ¬ ∃𝑥¬ 𝜃 , ¬ 𝜒 ▶ ¬
𝜓 )
| | 24:23: | ⊢ ( ¬ ∃𝑥¬ 𝜃 , ¬ 𝜒 ▶ ∃
𝑥¬ 𝜓 )
| | 240:: | ⊢ (∃𝑥¬ 𝜓 → ∀𝑥∃𝑥¬ 𝜓
)
| | 241:20,24,141,240: | ⊢ ( ¬ ∃𝑥¬ 𝜃 ▶ ∃𝑥¬ 𝜓
)
| | 25:241: | ⊢ ( ¬ ∃𝑥¬ 𝜃 ▶ ¬ ∀𝑥𝜓
)
| | qed:25: | ⊢ (¬ ∃𝑥¬ 𝜃 → ¬ ∀𝑥𝜓)
|
(Contributed by Alan Sare, 21-Apr-2013.) (Proof modification is
discouraged.) (New usage is discouraged.)
|
| ⊢ ¬
(∃𝑥 ¬ 𝜑 ∧ ∃𝑥(𝜓 ∧ ¬ 𝜒)) & ⊢ (∀𝑥𝜒 → ¬ ∃𝑥(𝜃 ∧ 𝜏)) & ⊢ ¬
∀𝑥(𝜏 → 𝜑) ⇒ ⊢ (¬ ∃𝑥 ¬ 𝜃 → ¬ ∀𝑥𝜓) |
| |
| Theorem | notnotrALTVD 44886 |
The following User's Proof is a Natural Deduction Sequent Calculus
transcription of the Fitch-style Natural Deduction proof of Theorem 5 of
Section 14 of [Margaris] p. 59 (which is notnotr 130). The same proof
may also be interpreted as a Virtual Deduction Hilbert-style
axiomatic proof. It was completed automatically by the tools program
completeusersproof.cmd, which invokes Mel L. O'Cat's mmj2 and Norm
Megill's Metamath Proof Assistant. notnotrALT 44500 is notnotrALTVD 44886
without virtual deductions and was automatically derived
from notnotrALTVD 44886. Step i of the User's Proof corresponds to
step i of the Fitch-style proof.
| 1:: | ⊢ ( ¬ ¬ 𝜑 ▶ ¬ ¬ 𝜑 )
| | 2:: | ⊢ (¬ ¬ 𝜑 → (¬ 𝜑 → ¬ ¬ ¬ 𝜑))
| | 3:1: | ⊢ ( ¬ ¬ 𝜑 ▶ (¬ 𝜑 → ¬ ¬ ¬ 𝜑) )
| | 4:: | ⊢ ((¬ 𝜑 → ¬ ¬ ¬ 𝜑) → (¬ ¬ 𝜑 →
𝜑))
| | 5:3: | ⊢ ( ¬ ¬ 𝜑 ▶ (¬ ¬ 𝜑 → 𝜑) )
| | 6:5,1: | ⊢ ( ¬ ¬ 𝜑 ▶ 𝜑 )
| | qed:6: | ⊢ (¬ ¬ 𝜑 → 𝜑)
|
(Contributed by Alan Sare, 21-Apr-2013.) (Proof modification is
discouraged.) (New usage is discouraged.)
|
| ⊢ (¬ ¬
𝜑 → 𝜑) |
| |
| Theorem | con3ALTVD 44887 |
The following User's Proof is a Natural Deduction Sequent Calculus
transcription of the Fitch-style Natural Deduction proof of Theorem 7 of
Section 14 of [Margaris] p. 60 (which is con3 153). The same proof may
also be interpreted to be a Virtual Deduction Hilbert-style axiomatic
proof. It was completed automatically by the tools program
completeusersproof.cmd, which invokes Mel L. O'Cat's mmj2 and Norm
Megill's Metamath Proof Assistant. con3ALT2 44501 is con3ALTVD 44887 without
virtual deductions and was automatically derived from con3ALTVD 44887.
Step i of the User's Proof corresponds to step i of the Fitch-style proof.
| 1:: | ⊢ ( (𝜑 → 𝜓) ▶ (𝜑 → 𝜓) )
| | 2:: | ⊢ ( (𝜑 → 𝜓) , ¬ ¬ 𝜑 ▶ ¬ ¬ 𝜑 )
| | 3:: | ⊢ (¬ ¬ 𝜑 → 𝜑)
| | 4:2: | ⊢ ( (𝜑 → 𝜓) , ¬ ¬ 𝜑 ▶ 𝜑 )
| | 5:1,4: | ⊢ ( (𝜑 → 𝜓) , ¬ ¬ 𝜑 ▶ 𝜓 )
| | 6:: | ⊢ (𝜓 → ¬ ¬ 𝜓)
| | 7:6,5: | ⊢ ( (𝜑 → 𝜓) , ¬ ¬ 𝜑 ▶ ¬ ¬ 𝜓 )
| | 8:7: | ⊢ ( (𝜑 → 𝜓) ▶ (¬ ¬ 𝜑 → ¬ ¬ 𝜓
) )
| | 9:: | ⊢ ((¬ ¬ 𝜑 → ¬ ¬ 𝜓) → (¬ 𝜓 →
¬ 𝜑))
| | 10:8: | ⊢ ( (𝜑 → 𝜓) ▶ (¬ 𝜓 → ¬ 𝜑) )
| | qed:10: | ⊢ ((𝜑 → 𝜓) → (¬ 𝜓 → ¬ 𝜑))
|
(Contributed by Alan Sare, 21-Apr-2013.) (Proof modification is
discouraged.) (New usage is discouraged.)
|
| ⊢ ((𝜑 → 𝜓) → (¬ 𝜓 → ¬ 𝜑)) |
| |
| 21.41.9 Theorems proved using conjunction-form
Virtual Deduction
|
| |
| Theorem | elpwgdedVD 44888 |
Membership in a power class. Theorem 86 of [Suppes] p. 47. Derived
from elpwg 4625. In form of VD deduction with 𝜑 and 𝜓 as
variable virtual hypothesis collections based on Mario Carneiro's
metavariable concept. elpwgded 44535 is elpwgdedVD 44888 using conventional
notation. (Contributed by Alan Sare, 23-Apr-2015.)
(Proof modification is discouraged.) (New usage is discouraged.)
|
| ⊢ ( 𝜑 ▶ 𝐴 ∈ V ) & ⊢ ( 𝜓 ▶ 𝐴 ⊆ 𝐵 )
⇒ ⊢ ( ( 𝜑 , 𝜓 ) ▶ 𝐴 ∈ 𝒫 𝐵 ) |
| |
| Theorem | sspwimp 44889 |
If a class is a subclass of another class, then its power class is a
subclass of that other class's power class. Left-to-right implication
of Exercise 18 of [TakeutiZaring]
p. 18. For the biconditional, see
sspwb 5469. The proof sspwimp 44889, using conventional notation, was
translated from virtual deduction form, sspwimpVD 44890, using a
translation program. (Contributed by Alan Sare, 23-Apr-2015.)
(Proof modification is discouraged.) (New usage is discouraged.)
|
| ⊢ (𝐴 ⊆ 𝐵 → 𝒫 𝐴 ⊆ 𝒫 𝐵) |
| |
| Theorem | sspwimpVD 44890 |
The following User's Proof is a Virtual Deduction proof (see wvd1 44540)
using conjunction-form virtual hypothesis collections. It was completed
manually, but has the potential to be completed automatically by a tools
program which would invoke Mel L. O'Cat's mmj2 and Norm Megill's
Metamath Proof Assistant.
sspwimp 44889 is sspwimpVD 44890 without virtual deductions and was derived
from sspwimpVD 44890. (Contributed by Alan Sare, 23-Apr-2015.)
(Proof modification is discouraged.) (New usage is discouraged.)
| 1:: | ⊢ ( 𝐴 ⊆ 𝐵 ▶ 𝐴 ⊆ 𝐵 )
| | 2:: | ⊢ ( .............. 𝑥 ∈ 𝒫 𝐴
▶ 𝑥 ∈ 𝒫 𝐴 )
| | 3:2: | ⊢ ( .............. 𝑥 ∈ 𝒫 𝐴
▶ 𝑥 ⊆ 𝐴 )
| | 4:3,1: | ⊢ ( ( 𝐴 ⊆ 𝐵 , 𝑥 ∈ 𝒫 𝐴 ) ▶ 𝑥 ⊆ 𝐵 )
| | 5:: | ⊢ 𝑥 ∈ V
| | 6:4,5: | ⊢ ( ( 𝐴 ⊆ 𝐵 , 𝑥 ∈ 𝒫 𝐴 ) ▶ 𝑥 ∈ 𝒫 𝐵
)
| | 7:6: | ⊢ ( 𝐴 ⊆ 𝐵 ▶ (𝑥 ∈ 𝒫 𝐴 → 𝑥 ∈ 𝒫 𝐵)
)
| | 8:7: | ⊢ ( 𝐴 ⊆ 𝐵 ▶ ∀𝑥(𝑥 ∈ 𝒫 𝐴 → 𝑥 ∈
𝒫 𝐵) )
| | 9:8: | ⊢ ( 𝐴 ⊆ 𝐵 ▶ 𝒫 𝐴 ⊆ 𝒫 𝐵 )
| | qed:9: | ⊢ (𝐴 ⊆ 𝐵 → 𝒫 𝐴 ⊆ 𝒫 𝐵)
|
|
| ⊢ (𝐴 ⊆ 𝐵 → 𝒫 𝐴 ⊆ 𝒫 𝐵) |
| |
| Theorem | sspwimpcf 44891 |
If a class is a subclass of another class, then its power class is a
subclass of that other class's power class. Left-to-right implication
of Exercise 18 of [TakeutiZaring]
p. 18. sspwimpcf 44891, using
conventional notation, was translated from its virtual deduction form,
sspwimpcfVD 44892, using a translation program. (Contributed
by Alan Sare,
13-Jun-2015.) (Proof modification is discouraged.)
(New usage is discouraged.)
|
| ⊢ (𝐴 ⊆ 𝐵 → 𝒫 𝐴 ⊆ 𝒫 𝐵) |
| |
| Theorem | sspwimpcfVD 44892 |
The following User's Proof is a Virtual Deduction proof (see wvd1 44540)
using conjunction-form virtual hypothesis collections. It was completed
automatically by a tools program which would invokes Mel L. O'Cat's mmj2
and Norm Megill's Metamath Proof Assistant.
sspwimpcf 44891 is sspwimpcfVD 44892 without virtual deductions and was derived
from sspwimpcfVD 44892.
The version of completeusersproof.cmd used is capable of only generating
conjunction-form unification theorems, not unification deductions.
(Contributed by Alan Sare, 13-Jun-2015.)
(Proof modification is discouraged.) (New usage is discouraged.)
| 1:: | ⊢ ( 𝐴 ⊆ 𝐵 ▶ 𝐴 ⊆ 𝐵 )
| | 2:: | ⊢ ( ........... 𝑥 ∈ 𝒫 𝐴
▶ 𝑥 ∈ 𝒫 𝐴 )
| | 3:2: | ⊢ ( ........... 𝑥 ∈ 𝒫 𝐴
▶ 𝑥 ⊆ 𝐴 )
| | 4:3,1: | ⊢ ( ( 𝐴 ⊆ 𝐵 , 𝑥 ∈ 𝒫 𝐴 ) ▶ 𝑥 ⊆ 𝐵 )
| | 5:: | ⊢ 𝑥 ∈ V
| | 6:4,5: | ⊢ ( ( 𝐴 ⊆ 𝐵 , 𝑥 ∈ 𝒫 𝐴 ) ▶ 𝑥 ∈ 𝒫 𝐵
)
| | 7:6: | ⊢ ( 𝐴 ⊆ 𝐵 ▶ (𝑥 ∈ 𝒫 𝐴 → 𝑥 ∈ 𝒫 𝐵)
)
| | 8:7: | ⊢ ( 𝐴 ⊆ 𝐵 ▶ ∀𝑥(𝑥 ∈ 𝒫 𝐴 → 𝑥 ∈
𝒫 𝐵) )
| | 9:8: | ⊢ ( 𝐴 ⊆ 𝐵 ▶ 𝒫 𝐴 ⊆ 𝒫 𝐵 )
| | qed:9: | ⊢ (𝐴 ⊆ 𝐵 → 𝒫 𝐴 ⊆ 𝒫 𝐵)
|
|
| ⊢ (𝐴 ⊆ 𝐵 → 𝒫 𝐴 ⊆ 𝒫 𝐵) |
| |
| Theorem | suctrALTcf 44893 |
The successor of a transitive class is transitive. suctrALTcf 44893, using
conventional notation, was translated from virtual deduction form,
suctrALTcfVD 44894, using a translation program. (Contributed
by Alan
Sare, 13-Jun-2015.) (Proof modification is discouraged.)
(New usage is discouraged.)
|
| ⊢ (Tr 𝐴 → Tr suc 𝐴) |
| |
| Theorem | suctrALTcfVD 44894 |
The following User's Proof is a Virtual Deduction proof (see wvd1 44540)
using conjunction-form virtual hypothesis collections. The
conjunction-form version of completeusersproof.cmd. It allows the User
to avoid superflous virtual hypotheses. This proof was completed
automatically by a tools program which invokes Mel L. O'Cat's
mmj2 and Norm Megill's Metamath Proof Assistant. suctrALTcf 44893
is suctrALTcfVD 44894 without virtual deductions and was derived
automatically from suctrALTcfVD 44894. The version of
completeusersproof.cmd used is capable of only generating
conjunction-form unification theorems, not unification deductions.
(Contributed by Alan Sare, 13-Jun-2015.)
(Proof modification is discouraged.) (New usage is discouraged.)
| 1:: | ⊢ ( Tr 𝐴 ▶ Tr 𝐴 )
| | 2:: | ⊢ ( ......... (𝑧 ∈ 𝑦 ∧ 𝑦 ∈
suc 𝐴) ▶ (𝑧 ∈ 𝑦 ∧ 𝑦 ∈ suc 𝐴) )
| | 3:2: | ⊢ ( ......... (𝑧 ∈ 𝑦 ∧ 𝑦 ∈
suc 𝐴) ▶ 𝑧 ∈ 𝑦 )
| | 4:: | ⊢ ( ...................................
....... 𝑦 ∈ 𝐴 ▶ 𝑦 ∈ 𝐴 )
| | 5:1,3,4: | ⊢ ( ( Tr 𝐴 , (𝑧 ∈ 𝑦 ∧ 𝑦 ∈ suc 𝐴)
, 𝑦 ∈ 𝐴 ) ▶ 𝑧 ∈ 𝐴 )
| | 6:: | ⊢ 𝐴 ⊆ suc 𝐴
| | 7:5,6: | ⊢ ( ( Tr 𝐴 , (𝑧 ∈ 𝑦 ∧ 𝑦 ∈ suc 𝐴)
, 𝑦 ∈ 𝐴 ) ▶ 𝑧 ∈ suc 𝐴 )
| | 8:7: | ⊢ ( ( Tr 𝐴 , (𝑧 ∈ 𝑦 ∧ 𝑦 ∈ suc 𝐴)
) ▶ (𝑦 ∈ 𝐴 → 𝑧 ∈ suc 𝐴) )
| | 9:: | ⊢ ( ...................................
...... 𝑦 = 𝐴 ▶ 𝑦 = 𝐴 )
| | 10:3,9: | ⊢ ( ........ ( (𝑧 ∈ 𝑦 ∧ 𝑦 ∈
suc 𝐴), 𝑦 = 𝐴 ) ▶ 𝑧 ∈ 𝐴 )
| | 11:10,6: | ⊢ ( ........ ( (𝑧 ∈ 𝑦 ∧ 𝑦 ∈
suc 𝐴), 𝑦 = 𝐴 ) ▶ 𝑧 ∈ suc 𝐴 )
| | 12:11: | ⊢ ( .......... (𝑧 ∈ 𝑦 ∧ 𝑦 ∈
suc 𝐴) ▶ (𝑦 = 𝐴 → 𝑧 ∈ suc 𝐴) )
| | 13:2: | ⊢ ( .......... (𝑧 ∈ 𝑦 ∧ 𝑦 ∈
suc 𝐴) ▶ 𝑦 ∈ suc 𝐴 )
| | 14:13: | ⊢ ( .......... (𝑧 ∈ 𝑦 ∧ 𝑦 ∈
suc 𝐴) ▶ (𝑦 ∈ 𝐴 ∨ 𝑦 = 𝐴) )
| | 15:8,12,14: | ⊢ ( ( Tr 𝐴 , (𝑧 ∈ 𝑦 ∧ 𝑦 ∈ suc 𝐴)
) ▶ 𝑧 ∈ suc 𝐴 )
| | 16:15: | ⊢ ( Tr 𝐴 ▶ ((𝑧 ∈ 𝑦 ∧ 𝑦 ∈
suc 𝐴) → 𝑧 ∈ suc 𝐴) )
| | 17:16: | ⊢ ( Tr 𝐴 ▶ ∀𝑧∀𝑦((𝑧 ∈
𝑦 ∧ 𝑦 ∈ suc 𝐴) → 𝑧 ∈ suc 𝐴) )
| | 18:17: | ⊢ ( Tr 𝐴 ▶ Tr suc 𝐴 )
| | qed:18: | ⊢ (Tr 𝐴 → Tr suc 𝐴)
|
|
| ⊢ (Tr 𝐴 → Tr suc 𝐴) |
| |
| 21.41.10 Theorems with a VD proof in
conventional notation derived from a VD proof
|
| |
| Theorem | suctrALT3 44895 |
The successor of a transitive class is transitive. suctrALT3 44895 is the
completed proof in conventional notation of the Virtual Deduction proof
https://us.metamath.org/other/completeusersproof/suctralt3vd.html 44895.
It was completed manually. The potential for automated derivation from
the VD proof exists. See wvd1 44540 for a description of Virtual
Deduction.
Some sub-theorems of the proof were completed using a unification
deduction (e.g., the sub-theorem whose assertion is step 19 used
jaoded 44537). Unification deductions employ Mario
Carneiro's metavariable
concept. Some sub-theorems were completed using a unification theorem
(e.g., the sub-theorem whose assertion is step 24 used dftr2 5285) .
(Contributed by Alan Sare, 3-Dec-2015.)
(Proof modification is discouraged.) (New usage is discouraged.)
|
| ⊢ (Tr 𝐴 → Tr suc 𝐴) |
| |
| Theorem | sspwimpALT 44896 |
If a class is a subclass of another class, then its power class is a
subclass of that other class's power class. Left-to-right implication
of Exercise 18 of [TakeutiZaring]
p. 18. sspwimpALT 44896 is the completed
proof in conventional notation of the Virtual Deduction proof
https://us.metamath.org/other/completeusersproof/sspwimpaltvd.html 44896.
It was completed manually. The potential for automated derivation from
the VD proof exists. See wvd1 44540 for a description of Virtual
Deduction.
Some sub-theorems of the proof were completed using a unification
deduction (e.g., the sub-theorem whose assertion is step 9 used
elpwgded 44535). Unification deductions employ Mario
Carneiro's
metavariable concept. Some sub-theorems were completed using a
unification theorem (e.g., the sub-theorem whose assertion is step 5
used elpwi 4629). (Contributed by Alan Sare, 3-Dec-2015.)
(Proof modification is discouraged.) (New usage is discouraged.)
|
| ⊢ (𝐴 ⊆ 𝐵 → 𝒫 𝐴 ⊆ 𝒫 𝐵) |
| |
| Theorem | unisnALT 44897 |
A set equals the union of its singleton. Theorem 8.2 of [Quine] p. 53.
The User manually input on a mmj2 Proof Worksheet, without labels, all
steps of unisnALT 44897 except 1, 11, 15, 21, and 30. With
execution of the
mmj2 unification command, mmj2 could find labels for all steps except
for 2, 12, 16, 22, and 31 (and the then non-existing steps 1, 11, 15,
21, and 30). mmj2 could not find reference theorems for those five steps
because the hypothesis field of each of these steps was empty and none
of those steps unifies with a theorem in set.mm. Each of these five
steps is a semantic variation of a theorem in set.mm and is 2-step
provable. mmj2 does not have the ability to automatically generate the
semantic variation in set.mm of a theorem in a mmj2 Proof Worksheet
unless the theorem in the Proof Worksheet is labeled with a 1-hypothesis
deduction whose hypothesis is a theorem in set.mm which unifies with the
theorem in the Proof Worksheet. The stepprover.c program, which invokes
mmj2, has this capability. stepprover.c automatically generated steps 1,
11, 15, 21, and 30, labeled all steps, and generated the RPN proof of
unisnALT 44897. Roughly speaking, stepprover.c added to
the Proof
Worksheet a labeled duplicate step of each non-unifying theorem for each
label in a text file, labels.txt, containing a list of labels provided
by the User. Upon mmj2 unification, stepprover.c identified a label for
each of the five theorems which 2-step proves it. For unisnALT 44897, the
label list is a list of all 1-hypothesis propositional calculus
deductions in set.mm. stepproverp.c is the same as stepprover.c except
that it intermittently pauses during execution, allowing the User to
observe the changes to a text file caused by the execution of particular
statements of the program. (Contributed by Alan Sare, 19-Aug-2016.)
(Proof modification is discouraged.) (New usage is discouraged.)
|
| ⊢ 𝐴 ∈
V ⇒ ⊢ ∪
{𝐴} = 𝐴 |
| |
| 21.41.11 Theorems with a proof in conventional
notation derived from a VD proof
Theorems with a proof in conventional notation automatically derived by
completeusersproof.c from a Virtual Deduction User's Proof.
|
| |
| Theorem | notnotrALT2 44898 |
Converse of double negation. Theorem *2.14 of [WhiteheadRussell] p. 102.
Proof derived by completeusersproof.c from User's Proof in
VirtualDeductionProofs.txt. (Contributed by Alan Sare, 11-Sep-2016.)
(Proof modification is discouraged.) (New usage is discouraged.)
|
| ⊢ (¬ ¬
𝜑 → 𝜑) |
| |
| Theorem | sspwimpALT2 44899 |
If a class is a subclass of another class, then its power class is a
subclass of that other class's power class. Left-to-right implication
of Exercise 18 of [TakeutiZaring]
p. 18. Proof derived by
completeusersproof.c from User's Proof in VirtualDeductionProofs.txt.
The User's Proof in html format is displayed in
https://us.metamath.org/other/completeusersproof/sspwimpaltvd.html.
(Contributed by Alan Sare, 11-Sep-2016.)
(Proof modification is discouraged.) (New usage is discouraged.)
|
| ⊢ (𝐴 ⊆ 𝐵 → 𝒫 𝐴 ⊆ 𝒫 𝐵) |
| |
| Theorem | e2ebindALT 44900 |
Absorption of an existential quantifier of a double existential quantifier
of non-distinct variables. The proof is derived by completeusersproof.c
from User's Proof in VirtualDeductionProofs.txt. The User's Proof in html
format is displayed in e2ebindVD 44883. (Contributed by Alan Sare,
11-Sep-2016.) (Proof modification is discouraged.)
(New usage is discouraged.)
|
| ⊢ (∀𝑥 𝑥 = 𝑦 → (∃𝑥∃𝑦𝜑 ↔ ∃𝑦𝜑)) |
Home
Hilbert Space Explorer
Users' Mathboxes