wlkd - Metamath Proof Explorer

	Metamath Proof Explorer		< Previous Next > Nearby theorems
Mirrors > Home > MPE Home > Th. List > wlkd		Structured version Visualization version GIF version

Theorem wlkd 28054

Description: Two words representing a walk in a graph. (Contributed by AV, 7-Feb-2021.)

**Hypotheses**
Ref	Expression
wlkd.p	⊢ (𝜑 → 𝑃 ∈ Word V)
wlkd.f	⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐹 ∈ Word V)
wlkd.l	⊢ (𝜑 → (♯‘𝑃) = ((♯‘𝐹) + 1))
wlkd.e	⊢ (𝜑 → ∀𝑘 ∈ (0..^(♯‘𝐹)){(𝑃‘𝑘), (𝑃‘(𝑘 + 1))} ⊆ (𝐼‘(𝐹‘𝑘)))
wlkd.n	⊢ (𝜑 → ∀𝑘 ∈ (0..^(♯‘𝐹))(𝑃‘𝑘) ≠ (𝑃‘(𝑘 + 1)))
wlkd.g	⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐺 ∈ 𝑊)
wlkd.v	⊢ 𝑉 = (Vtx‘𝐺)
wlkd.i	⊢ 𝐼 = (iEdg‘𝐺)
wlkd.a	⊢ (𝜑 → ∀𝑘 ∈ (0...(♯‘𝐹))(𝑃‘𝑘) ∈ 𝑉)

**Assertion**
Ref	Expression
wlkd	⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐹(Walks‘𝐺)𝑃)

Distinct variable groups: 𝑘,𝐹 𝑃,𝑘 𝑘,𝐼 𝜑,𝑘 𝑘,𝐺 𝑘,𝑉 Allowed substitution hint: 𝑊(𝑘)

**Proof of Theorem wlkd**
Step	Hyp	Ref	Expression
1		wlkd.p	. . 3 ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝑃 ∈ Word V)
2		wlkd.f	. . 3 ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐹 ∈ Word V)
3		wlkd.l	. . 3 ⊢ (𝜑 → (♯‘𝑃) = ((♯‘𝐹) + 1))
4		wlkd.e	. . 3 ⊢ (𝜑 → ∀𝑘 ∈ (0..^(♯‘𝐹)){(𝑃‘𝑘), (𝑃‘(𝑘 + 1))} ⊆ (𝐼‘(𝐹‘𝑘)))
5	1, 2, 3, 4	wlkdlem3 28052	. 2 ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐹 ∈ Word dom 𝐼)
6		wlkd.a	. . 3 ⊢ (𝜑 → ∀𝑘 ∈ (0...(♯‘𝐹))(𝑃‘𝑘) ∈ 𝑉)
7	1, 2, 3, 6	wlkdlem1 28050	. 2 ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝑃:(0...(♯‘𝐹))⟶𝑉)
8		wlkd.n	. . 3 ⊢ (𝜑 → ∀𝑘 ∈ (0..^(♯‘𝐹))(𝑃‘𝑘) ≠ (𝑃‘(𝑘 + 1)))
9	1, 2, 3, 4, 8	wlkdlem4 28053	. 2 ⊢ (𝜑 → ∀𝑘 ∈ (0..^(♯‘𝐹))if-((𝑃‘𝑘) = (𝑃‘(𝑘 + 1)), (𝐼‘(𝐹‘𝑘)) = {(𝑃‘𝑘)}, {(𝑃‘𝑘), (𝑃‘(𝑘 + 1))} ⊆ (𝐼‘(𝐹‘𝑘))))
10		wlkd.g	. . 3 ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐺 ∈ 𝑊)
11		wlkd.v	. . . 4 ⊢ 𝑉 = (Vtx‘𝐺)
12		wlkd.i	. . . 4 ⊢ 𝐼 = (iEdg‘𝐺)
13	11, 12	iswlk 27977	. . 3 ⊢ ((𝐺 ∈ 𝑊 ∧ 𝐹 ∈ Word V ∧ 𝑃 ∈ Word V) → (𝐹(Walks‘𝐺)𝑃 ↔ (𝐹 ∈ Word dom 𝐼 ∧ 𝑃:(0...(♯‘𝐹))⟶𝑉 ∧ ∀𝑘 ∈ (0..^(♯‘𝐹))if-((𝑃‘𝑘) = (𝑃‘(𝑘 + 1)), (𝐼‘(𝐹‘𝑘)) = {(𝑃‘𝑘)}, {(𝑃‘𝑘), (𝑃‘(𝑘 + 1))} ⊆ (𝐼‘(𝐹‘𝑘))))))
14	10, 2, 1, 13	syl3anc 1370	. 2 ⊢ (𝜑 → (𝐹(Walks‘𝐺)𝑃 ↔ (𝐹 ∈ Word dom 𝐼 ∧ 𝑃:(0...(♯‘𝐹))⟶𝑉 ∧ ∀𝑘 ∈ (0..^(♯‘𝐹))if-((𝑃‘𝑘) = (𝑃‘(𝑘 + 1)), (𝐼‘(𝐹‘𝑘)) = {(𝑃‘𝑘)}, {(𝑃‘𝑘), (𝑃‘(𝑘 + 1))} ⊆ (𝐼‘(𝐹‘𝑘))))))
15	5, 7, 9, 14	mpbir3and 1341	1 ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐹(Walks‘𝐺)𝑃)

Colors of variables: wff setvar class

Syntax hints: → wi 4 ↔ wb 205 if-wif 1060 ∧ w3a 1086 = wceq 1539 ∈ wcel 2106 ≠ wne 2943 ∀wral 3064 Vcvv 3432 ⊆ wss 3887 {csn 4561 {cpr 4563 class class class wbr 5074 dom cdm 5589 ⟶wf 6429 ‘cfv 6433 (class class class)co 7275 0cc0 10871 1c1 10872 + caddc 10874 ...cfz 13239 ..^cfzo 13382 ♯chash 14044 Word cword 14217 Vtxcvtx 27366 iEdgciedg 27367 Walkscwlks 27963

This theorem was proved from axioms: ax-mp 5 ax-1 6 ax-2 7 ax-3 8 ax-gen 1798 ax-4 1812 ax-5 1913 ax-6 1971 ax-7 2011 ax-8 2108 ax-9 2116 ax-10 2137 ax-11 2154 ax-12 2171 ax-ext 2709 ax-rep 5209 ax-sep 5223 ax-nul 5230 ax-pow 5288 ax-pr 5352 ax-un 7588 ax-cnex 10927 ax-resscn 10928 ax-1cn 10929 ax-icn 10930 ax-addcl 10931 ax-addrcl 10932 ax-mulcl 10933 ax-mulrcl 10934 ax-mulcom 10935 ax-addass 10936 ax-mulass 10937 ax-distr 10938 ax-i2m1 10939 ax-1ne0 10940 ax-1rid 10941 ax-rnegex 10942 ax-rrecex 10943 ax-cnre 10944 ax-pre-lttri 10945 ax-pre-lttrn 10946 ax-pre-ltadd 10947 ax-pre-mulgt0 10948

This theorem depends on definitions: df-bi 206 df-an 397 df-or 845 df-ifp 1061 df-3or 1087 df-3an 1088 df-tru 1542 df-fal 1552 df-ex 1783 df-nf 1787 df-sb 2068 df-mo 2540 df-eu 2569 df-clab 2716 df-cleq 2730 df-clel 2816 df-nfc 2889 df-ne 2944 df-nel 3050 df-ral 3069 df-rex 3070 df-reu 3072 df-rab 3073 df-v 3434 df-sbc 3717 df-csb 3833 df-dif 3890 df-un 3892 df-in 3894 df-ss 3904 df-pss 3906 df-nul 4257 df-if 4460 df-pw 4535 df-sn 4562 df-pr 4564 df-op 4568 df-uni 4840 df-int 4880 df-iun 4926 df-br 5075 df-opab 5137 df-mpt 5158 df-tr 5192 df-id 5489 df-eprel 5495 df-po 5503 df-so 5504 df-fr 5544 df-we 5546 df-xp 5595 df-rel 5596 df-cnv 5597 df-co 5598 df-dm 5599 df-rn 5600 df-res 5601 df-ima 5602 df-pred 6202 df-ord 6269 df-on 6270 df-lim 6271 df-suc 6272 df-iota 6391 df-fun 6435 df-fn 6436 df-f 6437 df-f1 6438 df-fo 6439 df-f1o 6440 df-fv 6441 df-riota 7232 df-ov 7278 df-oprab 7279 df-mpo 7280 df-om 7713 df-1st 7831 df-2nd 7832 df-frecs 8097 df-wrecs 8128 df-recs 8202 df-rdg 8241 df-1o 8297 df-er 8498 df-map 8617 df-en 8734 df-dom 8735 df-sdom 8736 df-fin 8737 df-card 9697 df-pnf 11011 df-mnf 11012 df-xr 11013 df-ltxr 11014 df-le 11015 df-sub 11207 df-neg 11208 df-nn 11974 df-n0 12234 df-z 12320 df-uz 12583 df-fz 13240 df-fzo 13383 df-hash 14045 df-word 14218 df-wlks 27966

This theorem is referenced by: 2wlkd 28301 3wlkd 28534

W3C validator