wlkd - Metamath Proof Explorer

	Metamath Proof Explorer		< Previous Next > Nearby theorems
Mirrors > Home > MPE Home > Th. List > wlkd		Structured version Visualization version GIF version

Theorem wlkd 29719

Description: Two words representing a walk in a graph. (Contributed by AV, 7-Feb-2021.)

**Hypotheses**
Ref	Expression
wlkd.p	⊢ (𝜑 → 𝑃 ∈ Word V)
wlkd.f	⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐹 ∈ Word V)
wlkd.l	⊢ (𝜑 → (♯‘𝑃) = ((♯‘𝐹) + 1))
wlkd.e	⊢ (𝜑 → ∀𝑘 ∈ (0..^(♯‘𝐹)){(𝑃‘𝑘), (𝑃‘(𝑘 + 1))} ⊆ (𝐼‘(𝐹‘𝑘)))
wlkd.n	⊢ (𝜑 → ∀𝑘 ∈ (0..^(♯‘𝐹))(𝑃‘𝑘) ≠ (𝑃‘(𝑘 + 1)))
wlkd.g	⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐺 ∈ 𝑊)
wlkd.v	⊢ 𝑉 = (Vtx‘𝐺)
wlkd.i	⊢ 𝐼 = (iEdg‘𝐺)
wlkd.a	⊢ (𝜑 → ∀𝑘 ∈ (0...(♯‘𝐹))(𝑃‘𝑘) ∈ 𝑉)

**Assertion**
Ref	Expression
wlkd	⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐹(Walks‘𝐺)𝑃)

Distinct variable groups: 𝑘,𝐹 𝑃,𝑘 𝑘,𝐼 𝜑,𝑘 𝑘,𝐺 𝑘,𝑉 Allowed substitution hint: 𝑊(𝑘)

**Proof of Theorem wlkd**
Step	Hyp	Ref	Expression
1		wlkd.p	. . 3 ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝑃 ∈ Word V)
2		wlkd.f	. . 3 ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐹 ∈ Word V)
3		wlkd.l	. . 3 ⊢ (𝜑 → (♯‘𝑃) = ((♯‘𝐹) + 1))
4		wlkd.e	. . 3 ⊢ (𝜑 → ∀𝑘 ∈ (0..^(♯‘𝐹)){(𝑃‘𝑘), (𝑃‘(𝑘 + 1))} ⊆ (𝐼‘(𝐹‘𝑘)))
5	1, 2, 3, 4	wlkdlem3 29717	. 2 ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐹 ∈ Word dom 𝐼)
6		wlkd.a	. . 3 ⊢ (𝜑 → ∀𝑘 ∈ (0...(♯‘𝐹))(𝑃‘𝑘) ∈ 𝑉)
7	1, 2, 3, 6	wlkdlem1 29715	. 2 ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝑃:(0...(♯‘𝐹))⟶𝑉)
8		wlkd.n	. . 3 ⊢ (𝜑 → ∀𝑘 ∈ (0..^(♯‘𝐹))(𝑃‘𝑘) ≠ (𝑃‘(𝑘 + 1)))
9	1, 2, 3, 4, 8	wlkdlem4 29718	. 2 ⊢ (𝜑 → ∀𝑘 ∈ (0..^(♯‘𝐹))if-((𝑃‘𝑘) = (𝑃‘(𝑘 + 1)), (𝐼‘(𝐹‘𝑘)) = {(𝑃‘𝑘)}, {(𝑃‘𝑘), (𝑃‘(𝑘 + 1))} ⊆ (𝐼‘(𝐹‘𝑘))))
10		wlkd.g	. . 3 ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐺 ∈ 𝑊)
11		wlkd.v	. . . 4 ⊢ 𝑉 = (Vtx‘𝐺)
12		wlkd.i	. . . 4 ⊢ 𝐼 = (iEdg‘𝐺)
13	11, 12	iswlk 29643	. . 3 ⊢ ((𝐺 ∈ 𝑊 ∧ 𝐹 ∈ Word V ∧ 𝑃 ∈ Word V) → (𝐹(Walks‘𝐺)𝑃 ↔ (𝐹 ∈ Word dom 𝐼 ∧ 𝑃:(0...(♯‘𝐹))⟶𝑉 ∧ ∀𝑘 ∈ (0..^(♯‘𝐹))if-((𝑃‘𝑘) = (𝑃‘(𝑘 + 1)), (𝐼‘(𝐹‘𝑘)) = {(𝑃‘𝑘)}, {(𝑃‘𝑘), (𝑃‘(𝑘 + 1))} ⊆ (𝐼‘(𝐹‘𝑘))))))
14	10, 2, 1, 13	syl3anc 1370	. 2 ⊢ (𝜑 → (𝐹(Walks‘𝐺)𝑃 ↔ (𝐹 ∈ Word dom 𝐼 ∧ 𝑃:(0...(♯‘𝐹))⟶𝑉 ∧ ∀𝑘 ∈ (0..^(♯‘𝐹))if-((𝑃‘𝑘) = (𝑃‘(𝑘 + 1)), (𝐼‘(𝐹‘𝑘)) = {(𝑃‘𝑘)}, {(𝑃‘𝑘), (𝑃‘(𝑘 + 1))} ⊆ (𝐼‘(𝐹‘𝑘))))))
15	5, 7, 9, 14	mpbir3and 1341	1 ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐹(Walks‘𝐺)𝑃)

Colors of variables: wff setvar class

Syntax hints: → wi 4 ↔ wb 206 if-wif 1062 ∧ w3a 1086 = wceq 1537 ∈ wcel 2106 ≠ wne 2938 ∀wral 3059 Vcvv 3478 ⊆ wss 3963 {csn 4631 {cpr 4633 class class class wbr 5148 dom cdm 5689 ⟶wf 6559 ‘cfv 6563 (class class class)co 7431 0cc0 11153 1c1 11154 + caddc 11156 ...cfz 13544 ..^cfzo 13691 ♯chash 14366 Word cword 14549 Vtxcvtx 29028 iEdgciedg 29029 Walkscwlks 29629

This theorem was proved from axioms: ax-mp 5 ax-1 6 ax-2 7 ax-3 8 ax-gen 1792 ax-4 1806 ax-5 1908 ax-6 1965 ax-7 2005 ax-8 2108 ax-9 2116 ax-10 2139 ax-11 2155 ax-12 2175 ax-ext 2706 ax-rep 5285 ax-sep 5302 ax-nul 5312 ax-pow 5371 ax-pr 5438 ax-un 7754 ax-cnex 11209 ax-resscn 11210 ax-1cn 11211 ax-icn 11212 ax-addcl 11213 ax-addrcl 11214 ax-mulcl 11215 ax-mulrcl 11216 ax-mulcom 11217 ax-addass 11218 ax-mulass 11219 ax-distr 11220 ax-i2m1 11221 ax-1ne0 11222 ax-1rid 11223 ax-rnegex 11224 ax-rrecex 11225 ax-cnre 11226 ax-pre-lttri 11227 ax-pre-lttrn 11228 ax-pre-ltadd 11229 ax-pre-mulgt0 11230

This theorem depends on definitions: df-bi 207 df-an 396 df-or 848 df-ifp 1063 df-3or 1087 df-3an 1088 df-tru 1540 df-fal 1550 df-ex 1777 df-nf 1781 df-sb 2063 df-mo 2538 df-eu 2567 df-clab 2713 df-cleq 2727 df-clel 2814 df-nfc 2890 df-ne 2939 df-nel 3045 df-ral 3060 df-rex 3069 df-reu 3379 df-rab 3434 df-v 3480 df-sbc 3792 df-csb 3909 df-dif 3966 df-un 3968 df-in 3970 df-ss 3980 df-pss 3983 df-nul 4340 df-if 4532 df-pw 4607 df-sn 4632 df-pr 4634 df-op 4638 df-uni 4913 df-int 4952 df-iun 4998 df-br 5149 df-opab 5211 df-mpt 5232 df-tr 5266 df-id 5583 df-eprel 5589 df-po 5597 df-so 5598 df-fr 5641 df-we 5643 df-xp 5695 df-rel 5696 df-cnv 5697 df-co 5698 df-dm 5699 df-rn 5700 df-res 5701 df-ima 5702 df-pred 6323 df-ord 6389 df-on 6390 df-lim 6391 df-suc 6392 df-iota 6516 df-fun 6565 df-fn 6566 df-f 6567 df-f1 6568 df-fo 6569 df-f1o 6570 df-fv 6571 df-riota 7388 df-ov 7434 df-oprab 7435 df-mpo 7436 df-om 7888 df-1st 8013 df-2nd 8014 df-frecs 8305 df-wrecs 8336 df-recs 8410 df-rdg 8449 df-1o 8505 df-er 8744 df-map 8867 df-en 8985 df-dom 8986 df-sdom 8987 df-fin 8988 df-card 9977 df-pnf 11295 df-mnf 11296 df-xr 11297 df-ltxr 11298 df-le 11299 df-sub 11492 df-neg 11493 df-nn 12265 df-n0 12525 df-z 12612 df-uz 12877 df-fz 13545 df-fzo 13692 df-hash 14367 df-word 14550 df-wlks 29632

This theorem is referenced by: 2wlkd 29966 3wlkd 30199

W3C validator