wlkd - Metamath Proof Explorer

	Metamath Proof Explorer		< Previous Next > Nearby theorems
Mirrors > Home > MPE Home > Th. List > wlkd		Structured version Visualization version GIF version

Theorem wlkd 29704

Description: Two words representing a walk in a graph. (Contributed by AV, 7-Feb-2021.)

**Hypotheses**
Ref	Expression
wlkd.p	⊢ (𝜑 → 𝑃 ∈ Word V)
wlkd.f	⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐹 ∈ Word V)
wlkd.l	⊢ (𝜑 → (♯‘𝑃) = ((♯‘𝐹) + 1))
wlkd.e	⊢ (𝜑 → ∀𝑘 ∈ (0..^(♯‘𝐹)){(𝑃‘𝑘), (𝑃‘(𝑘 + 1))} ⊆ (𝐼‘(𝐹‘𝑘)))
wlkd.n	⊢ (𝜑 → ∀𝑘 ∈ (0..^(♯‘𝐹))(𝑃‘𝑘) ≠ (𝑃‘(𝑘 + 1)))
wlkd.g	⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐺 ∈ 𝑊)
wlkd.v	⊢ 𝑉 = (Vtx‘𝐺)
wlkd.i	⊢ 𝐼 = (iEdg‘𝐺)
wlkd.a	⊢ (𝜑 → ∀𝑘 ∈ (0...(♯‘𝐹))(𝑃‘𝑘) ∈ 𝑉)

**Assertion**
Ref	Expression
wlkd	⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐹(Walks‘𝐺)𝑃)

Distinct variable groups: 𝑘,𝐹 𝑃,𝑘 𝑘,𝐼 𝜑,𝑘 𝑘,𝐺 𝑘,𝑉 Allowed substitution hint: 𝑊(𝑘)

**Proof of Theorem wlkd**
Step	Hyp	Ref	Expression
1		wlkd.p	. . 3 ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝑃 ∈ Word V)
2		wlkd.f	. . 3 ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐹 ∈ Word V)
3		wlkd.l	. . 3 ⊢ (𝜑 → (♯‘𝑃) = ((♯‘𝐹) + 1))
4		wlkd.e	. . 3 ⊢ (𝜑 → ∀𝑘 ∈ (0..^(♯‘𝐹)){(𝑃‘𝑘), (𝑃‘(𝑘 + 1))} ⊆ (𝐼‘(𝐹‘𝑘)))
5	1, 2, 3, 4	wlkdlem3 29702	. 2 ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐹 ∈ Word dom 𝐼)
6		wlkd.a	. . 3 ⊢ (𝜑 → ∀𝑘 ∈ (0...(♯‘𝐹))(𝑃‘𝑘) ∈ 𝑉)
7	1, 2, 3, 6	wlkdlem1 29700	. 2 ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝑃:(0...(♯‘𝐹))⟶𝑉)
8		wlkd.n	. . 3 ⊢ (𝜑 → ∀𝑘 ∈ (0..^(♯‘𝐹))(𝑃‘𝑘) ≠ (𝑃‘(𝑘 + 1)))
9	1, 2, 3, 4, 8	wlkdlem4 29703	. 2 ⊢ (𝜑 → ∀𝑘 ∈ (0..^(♯‘𝐹))if-((𝑃‘𝑘) = (𝑃‘(𝑘 + 1)), (𝐼‘(𝐹‘𝑘)) = {(𝑃‘𝑘)}, {(𝑃‘𝑘), (𝑃‘(𝑘 + 1))} ⊆ (𝐼‘(𝐹‘𝑘))))
10		wlkd.g	. . 3 ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐺 ∈ 𝑊)
11		wlkd.v	. . . 4 ⊢ 𝑉 = (Vtx‘𝐺)
12		wlkd.i	. . . 4 ⊢ 𝐼 = (iEdg‘𝐺)
13	11, 12	iswlk 29628	. . 3 ⊢ ((𝐺 ∈ 𝑊 ∧ 𝐹 ∈ Word V ∧ 𝑃 ∈ Word V) → (𝐹(Walks‘𝐺)𝑃 ↔ (𝐹 ∈ Word dom 𝐼 ∧ 𝑃:(0...(♯‘𝐹))⟶𝑉 ∧ ∀𝑘 ∈ (0..^(♯‘𝐹))if-((𝑃‘𝑘) = (𝑃‘(𝑘 + 1)), (𝐼‘(𝐹‘𝑘)) = {(𝑃‘𝑘)}, {(𝑃‘𝑘), (𝑃‘(𝑘 + 1))} ⊆ (𝐼‘(𝐹‘𝑘))))))
14	10, 2, 1, 13	syl3anc 1373	. 2 ⊢ (𝜑 → (𝐹(Walks‘𝐺)𝑃 ↔ (𝐹 ∈ Word dom 𝐼 ∧ 𝑃:(0...(♯‘𝐹))⟶𝑉 ∧ ∀𝑘 ∈ (0..^(♯‘𝐹))if-((𝑃‘𝑘) = (𝑃‘(𝑘 + 1)), (𝐼‘(𝐹‘𝑘)) = {(𝑃‘𝑘)}, {(𝑃‘𝑘), (𝑃‘(𝑘 + 1))} ⊆ (𝐼‘(𝐹‘𝑘))))))
15	5, 7, 9, 14	mpbir3and 1343	1 ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐹(Walks‘𝐺)𝑃)

Colors of variables: wff setvar class

Syntax hints: → wi 4 ↔ wb 206 if-wif 1063 ∧ w3a 1087 = wceq 1540 ∈ wcel 2108 ≠ wne 2940 ∀wral 3061 Vcvv 3480 ⊆ wss 3951 {csn 4626 {cpr 4628 class class class wbr 5143 dom cdm 5685 ⟶wf 6557 ‘cfv 6561 (class class class)co 7431 0cc0 11155 1c1 11156 + caddc 11158 ...cfz 13547 ..^cfzo 13694 ♯chash 14369 Word cword 14552 Vtxcvtx 29013 iEdgciedg 29014 Walkscwlks 29614

This theorem was proved from axioms: ax-mp 5 ax-1 6 ax-2 7 ax-3 8 ax-gen 1795 ax-4 1809 ax-5 1910 ax-6 1967 ax-7 2007 ax-8 2110 ax-9 2118 ax-10 2141 ax-11 2157 ax-12 2177 ax-ext 2708 ax-rep 5279 ax-sep 5296 ax-nul 5306 ax-pow 5365 ax-pr 5432 ax-un 7755 ax-cnex 11211 ax-resscn 11212 ax-1cn 11213 ax-icn 11214 ax-addcl 11215 ax-addrcl 11216 ax-mulcl 11217 ax-mulrcl 11218 ax-mulcom 11219 ax-addass 11220 ax-mulass 11221 ax-distr 11222 ax-i2m1 11223 ax-1ne0 11224 ax-1rid 11225 ax-rnegex 11226 ax-rrecex 11227 ax-cnre 11228 ax-pre-lttri 11229 ax-pre-lttrn 11230 ax-pre-ltadd 11231 ax-pre-mulgt0 11232

This theorem depends on definitions: df-bi 207 df-an 396 df-or 849 df-ifp 1064 df-3or 1088 df-3an 1089 df-tru 1543 df-fal 1553 df-ex 1780 df-nf 1784 df-sb 2065 df-mo 2540 df-eu 2569 df-clab 2715 df-cleq 2729 df-clel 2816 df-nfc 2892 df-ne 2941 df-nel 3047 df-ral 3062 df-rex 3071 df-reu 3381 df-rab 3437 df-v 3482 df-sbc 3789 df-csb 3900 df-dif 3954 df-un 3956 df-in 3958 df-ss 3968 df-pss 3971 df-nul 4334 df-if 4526 df-pw 4602 df-sn 4627 df-pr 4629 df-op 4633 df-uni 4908 df-int 4947 df-iun 4993 df-br 5144 df-opab 5206 df-mpt 5226 df-tr 5260 df-id 5578 df-eprel 5584 df-po 5592 df-so 5593 df-fr 5637 df-we 5639 df-xp 5691 df-rel 5692 df-cnv 5693 df-co 5694 df-dm 5695 df-rn 5696 df-res 5697 df-ima 5698 df-pred 6321 df-ord 6387 df-on 6388 df-lim 6389 df-suc 6390 df-iota 6514 df-fun 6563 df-fn 6564 df-f 6565 df-f1 6566 df-fo 6567 df-f1o 6568 df-fv 6569 df-riota 7388 df-ov 7434 df-oprab 7435 df-mpo 7436 df-om 7888 df-1st 8014 df-2nd 8015 df-frecs 8306 df-wrecs 8337 df-recs 8411 df-rdg 8450 df-1o 8506 df-er 8745 df-map 8868 df-en 8986 df-dom 8987 df-sdom 8988 df-fin 8989 df-card 9979 df-pnf 11297 df-mnf 11298 df-xr 11299 df-ltxr 11300 df-le 11301 df-sub 11494 df-neg 11495 df-nn 12267 df-n0 12527 df-z 12614 df-uz 12879 df-fz 13548 df-fzo 13695 df-hash 14370 df-word 14553 df-wlks 29617

This theorem is referenced by: 2wlkd 29956 3wlkd 30189

W3C validator