wlkd - Metamath Proof Explorer

	Metamath Proof Explorer		< Previous Next > Nearby theorems
Mirrors > Home > MPE Home > Th. List > wlkd		Structured version Visualization version GIF version

Theorem wlkd 27956

Description: Two words representing a walk in a graph. (Contributed by AV, 7-Feb-2021.)

**Hypotheses**
Ref	Expression
wlkd.p	⊢ (𝜑 → 𝑃 ∈ Word V)
wlkd.f	⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐹 ∈ Word V)
wlkd.l	⊢ (𝜑 → (♯‘𝑃) = ((♯‘𝐹) + 1))
wlkd.e	⊢ (𝜑 → ∀𝑘 ∈ (0..^(♯‘𝐹)){(𝑃‘𝑘), (𝑃‘(𝑘 + 1))} ⊆ (𝐼‘(𝐹‘𝑘)))
wlkd.n	⊢ (𝜑 → ∀𝑘 ∈ (0..^(♯‘𝐹))(𝑃‘𝑘) ≠ (𝑃‘(𝑘 + 1)))
wlkd.g	⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐺 ∈ 𝑊)
wlkd.v	⊢ 𝑉 = (Vtx‘𝐺)
wlkd.i	⊢ 𝐼 = (iEdg‘𝐺)
wlkd.a	⊢ (𝜑 → ∀𝑘 ∈ (0...(♯‘𝐹))(𝑃‘𝑘) ∈ 𝑉)

**Assertion**
Ref	Expression
wlkd	⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐹(Walks‘𝐺)𝑃)

Distinct variable groups: 𝑘,𝐹 𝑃,𝑘 𝑘,𝐼 𝜑,𝑘 𝑘,𝐺 𝑘,𝑉 Allowed substitution hint: 𝑊(𝑘)

**Proof of Theorem wlkd**
Step	Hyp	Ref	Expression
1		wlkd.p	. . 3 ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝑃 ∈ Word V)
2		wlkd.f	. . 3 ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐹 ∈ Word V)
3		wlkd.l	. . 3 ⊢ (𝜑 → (♯‘𝑃) = ((♯‘𝐹) + 1))
4		wlkd.e	. . 3 ⊢ (𝜑 → ∀𝑘 ∈ (0..^(♯‘𝐹)){(𝑃‘𝑘), (𝑃‘(𝑘 + 1))} ⊆ (𝐼‘(𝐹‘𝑘)))
5	1, 2, 3, 4	wlkdlem3 27954	. 2 ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐹 ∈ Word dom 𝐼)
6		wlkd.a	. . 3 ⊢ (𝜑 → ∀𝑘 ∈ (0...(♯‘𝐹))(𝑃‘𝑘) ∈ 𝑉)
7	1, 2, 3, 6	wlkdlem1 27952	. 2 ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝑃:(0...(♯‘𝐹))⟶𝑉)
8		wlkd.n	. . 3 ⊢ (𝜑 → ∀𝑘 ∈ (0..^(♯‘𝐹))(𝑃‘𝑘) ≠ (𝑃‘(𝑘 + 1)))
9	1, 2, 3, 4, 8	wlkdlem4 27955	. 2 ⊢ (𝜑 → ∀𝑘 ∈ (0..^(♯‘𝐹))if-((𝑃‘𝑘) = (𝑃‘(𝑘 + 1)), (𝐼‘(𝐹‘𝑘)) = {(𝑃‘𝑘)}, {(𝑃‘𝑘), (𝑃‘(𝑘 + 1))} ⊆ (𝐼‘(𝐹‘𝑘))))
10		wlkd.g	. . 3 ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐺 ∈ 𝑊)
11		wlkd.v	. . . 4 ⊢ 𝑉 = (Vtx‘𝐺)
12		wlkd.i	. . . 4 ⊢ 𝐼 = (iEdg‘𝐺)
13	11, 12	iswlk 27880	. . 3 ⊢ ((𝐺 ∈ 𝑊 ∧ 𝐹 ∈ Word V ∧ 𝑃 ∈ Word V) → (𝐹(Walks‘𝐺)𝑃 ↔ (𝐹 ∈ Word dom 𝐼 ∧ 𝑃:(0...(♯‘𝐹))⟶𝑉 ∧ ∀𝑘 ∈ (0..^(♯‘𝐹))if-((𝑃‘𝑘) = (𝑃‘(𝑘 + 1)), (𝐼‘(𝐹‘𝑘)) = {(𝑃‘𝑘)}, {(𝑃‘𝑘), (𝑃‘(𝑘 + 1))} ⊆ (𝐼‘(𝐹‘𝑘))))))
14	10, 2, 1, 13	syl3anc 1369	. 2 ⊢ (𝜑 → (𝐹(Walks‘𝐺)𝑃 ↔ (𝐹 ∈ Word dom 𝐼 ∧ 𝑃:(0...(♯‘𝐹))⟶𝑉 ∧ ∀𝑘 ∈ (0..^(♯‘𝐹))if-((𝑃‘𝑘) = (𝑃‘(𝑘 + 1)), (𝐼‘(𝐹‘𝑘)) = {(𝑃‘𝑘)}, {(𝑃‘𝑘), (𝑃‘(𝑘 + 1))} ⊆ (𝐼‘(𝐹‘𝑘))))))
15	5, 7, 9, 14	mpbir3and 1340	1 ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐹(Walks‘𝐺)𝑃)

Colors of variables: wff setvar class

Syntax hints: → wi 4 ↔ wb 205 if-wif 1059 ∧ w3a 1085 = wceq 1539 ∈ wcel 2108 ≠ wne 2942 ∀wral 3063 Vcvv 3422 ⊆ wss 3883 {csn 4558 {cpr 4560 class class class wbr 5070 dom cdm 5580 ⟶wf 6414 ‘cfv 6418 (class class class)co 7255 0cc0 10802 1c1 10803 + caddc 10805 ...cfz 13168 ..^cfzo 13311 ♯chash 13972 Word cword 14145 Vtxcvtx 27269 iEdgciedg 27270 Walkscwlks 27866

This theorem was proved from axioms: ax-mp 5 ax-1 6 ax-2 7 ax-3 8 ax-gen 1799 ax-4 1813 ax-5 1914 ax-6 1972 ax-7 2012 ax-8 2110 ax-9 2118 ax-10 2139 ax-11 2156 ax-12 2173 ax-ext 2709 ax-rep 5205 ax-sep 5218 ax-nul 5225 ax-pow 5283 ax-pr 5347 ax-un 7566 ax-cnex 10858 ax-resscn 10859 ax-1cn 10860 ax-icn 10861 ax-addcl 10862 ax-addrcl 10863 ax-mulcl 10864 ax-mulrcl 10865 ax-mulcom 10866 ax-addass 10867 ax-mulass 10868 ax-distr 10869 ax-i2m1 10870 ax-1ne0 10871 ax-1rid 10872 ax-rnegex 10873 ax-rrecex 10874 ax-cnre 10875 ax-pre-lttri 10876 ax-pre-lttrn 10877 ax-pre-ltadd 10878 ax-pre-mulgt0 10879

This theorem depends on definitions: df-bi 206 df-an 396 df-or 844 df-ifp 1060 df-3or 1086 df-3an 1087 df-tru 1542 df-fal 1552 df-ex 1784 df-nf 1788 df-sb 2069 df-mo 2540 df-eu 2569 df-clab 2716 df-cleq 2730 df-clel 2817 df-nfc 2888 df-ne 2943 df-nel 3049 df-ral 3068 df-rex 3069 df-reu 3070 df-rab 3072 df-v 3424 df-sbc 3712 df-csb 3829 df-dif 3886 df-un 3888 df-in 3890 df-ss 3900 df-pss 3902 df-nul 4254 df-if 4457 df-pw 4532 df-sn 4559 df-pr 4561 df-tp 4563 df-op 4565 df-uni 4837 df-int 4877 df-iun 4923 df-br 5071 df-opab 5133 df-mpt 5154 df-tr 5188 df-id 5480 df-eprel 5486 df-po 5494 df-so 5495 df-fr 5535 df-we 5537 df-xp 5586 df-rel 5587 df-cnv 5588 df-co 5589 df-dm 5590 df-rn 5591 df-res 5592 df-ima 5593 df-pred 6191 df-ord 6254 df-on 6255 df-lim 6256 df-suc 6257 df-iota 6376 df-fun 6420 df-fn 6421 df-f 6422 df-f1 6423 df-fo 6424 df-f1o 6425 df-fv 6426 df-riota 7212 df-ov 7258 df-oprab 7259 df-mpo 7260 df-om 7688 df-1st 7804 df-2nd 7805 df-frecs 8068 df-wrecs 8099 df-recs 8173 df-rdg 8212 df-1o 8267 df-er 8456 df-map 8575 df-en 8692 df-dom 8693 df-sdom 8694 df-fin 8695 df-card 9628 df-pnf 10942 df-mnf 10943 df-xr 10944 df-ltxr 10945 df-le 10946 df-sub 11137 df-neg 11138 df-nn 11904 df-n0 12164 df-z 12250 df-uz 12512 df-fz 13169 df-fzo 13312 df-hash 13973 df-word 14146 df-wlks 27869

This theorem is referenced by: 2wlkd 28202 3wlkd 28435

W3C validator