wlkd - Metamath Proof Explorer

	Metamath Proof Explorer		< Previous Next > Nearby theorems
Mirrors > Home > MPE Home > Th. List > wlkd		Structured version Visualization version GIF version

Theorem wlkd 27470

Description: Two words representing a walk in a graph. (Contributed by AV, 7-Feb-2021.)

**Hypotheses**
Ref	Expression
wlkd.p	⊢ (𝜑 → 𝑃 ∈ Word V)
wlkd.f	⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐹 ∈ Word V)
wlkd.l	⊢ (𝜑 → (♯‘𝑃) = ((♯‘𝐹) + 1))
wlkd.e	⊢ (𝜑 → ∀𝑘 ∈ (0..^(♯‘𝐹)){(𝑃‘𝑘), (𝑃‘(𝑘 + 1))} ⊆ (𝐼‘(𝐹‘𝑘)))
wlkd.n	⊢ (𝜑 → ∀𝑘 ∈ (0..^(♯‘𝐹))(𝑃‘𝑘) ≠ (𝑃‘(𝑘 + 1)))
wlkd.g	⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐺 ∈ 𝑊)
wlkd.v	⊢ 𝑉 = (Vtx‘𝐺)
wlkd.i	⊢ 𝐼 = (iEdg‘𝐺)
wlkd.a	⊢ (𝜑 → ∀𝑘 ∈ (0...(♯‘𝐹))(𝑃‘𝑘) ∈ 𝑉)

**Assertion**
Ref	Expression
wlkd	⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐹(Walks‘𝐺)𝑃)

Distinct variable groups: 𝑘,𝐹 𝑃,𝑘 𝑘,𝐼 𝜑,𝑘 𝑘,𝐺 𝑘,𝑉 Allowed substitution hint: 𝑊(𝑘)

**Proof of Theorem wlkd**
Step	Hyp	Ref	Expression
1		wlkd.p	. . 3 ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝑃 ∈ Word V)
2		wlkd.f	. . 3 ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐹 ∈ Word V)
3		wlkd.l	. . 3 ⊢ (𝜑 → (♯‘𝑃) = ((♯‘𝐹) + 1))
4		wlkd.e	. . 3 ⊢ (𝜑 → ∀𝑘 ∈ (0..^(♯‘𝐹)){(𝑃‘𝑘), (𝑃‘(𝑘 + 1))} ⊆ (𝐼‘(𝐹‘𝑘)))
5	1, 2, 3, 4	wlkdlem3 27468	. 2 ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐹 ∈ Word dom 𝐼)
6		wlkd.a	. . 3 ⊢ (𝜑 → ∀𝑘 ∈ (0...(♯‘𝐹))(𝑃‘𝑘) ∈ 𝑉)
7	1, 2, 3, 6	wlkdlem1 27466	. 2 ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝑃:(0...(♯‘𝐹))⟶𝑉)
8		wlkd.n	. . 3 ⊢ (𝜑 → ∀𝑘 ∈ (0..^(♯‘𝐹))(𝑃‘𝑘) ≠ (𝑃‘(𝑘 + 1)))
9	1, 2, 3, 4, 8	wlkdlem4 27469	. 2 ⊢ (𝜑 → ∀𝑘 ∈ (0..^(♯‘𝐹))if-((𝑃‘𝑘) = (𝑃‘(𝑘 + 1)), (𝐼‘(𝐹‘𝑘)) = {(𝑃‘𝑘)}, {(𝑃‘𝑘), (𝑃‘(𝑘 + 1))} ⊆ (𝐼‘(𝐹‘𝑘))))
10		wlkd.g	. . 3 ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐺 ∈ 𝑊)
11		wlkd.v	. . . 4 ⊢ 𝑉 = (Vtx‘𝐺)
12		wlkd.i	. . . 4 ⊢ 𝐼 = (iEdg‘𝐺)
13	11, 12	iswlk 27394	. . 3 ⊢ ((𝐺 ∈ 𝑊 ∧ 𝐹 ∈ Word V ∧ 𝑃 ∈ Word V) → (𝐹(Walks‘𝐺)𝑃 ↔ (𝐹 ∈ Word dom 𝐼 ∧ 𝑃:(0...(♯‘𝐹))⟶𝑉 ∧ ∀𝑘 ∈ (0..^(♯‘𝐹))if-((𝑃‘𝑘) = (𝑃‘(𝑘 + 1)), (𝐼‘(𝐹‘𝑘)) = {(𝑃‘𝑘)}, {(𝑃‘𝑘), (𝑃‘(𝑘 + 1))} ⊆ (𝐼‘(𝐹‘𝑘))))))
14	10, 2, 1, 13	syl3anc 1367	. 2 ⊢ (𝜑 → (𝐹(Walks‘𝐺)𝑃 ↔ (𝐹 ∈ Word dom 𝐼 ∧ 𝑃:(0...(♯‘𝐹))⟶𝑉 ∧ ∀𝑘 ∈ (0..^(♯‘𝐹))if-((𝑃‘𝑘) = (𝑃‘(𝑘 + 1)), (𝐼‘(𝐹‘𝑘)) = {(𝑃‘𝑘)}, {(𝑃‘𝑘), (𝑃‘(𝑘 + 1))} ⊆ (𝐼‘(𝐹‘𝑘))))))
15	5, 7, 9, 14	mpbir3and 1338	1 ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐹(Walks‘𝐺)𝑃)

Colors of variables: wff setvar class

Syntax hints: → wi 4 ↔ wb 208 if-wif 1057 ∧ w3a 1083 = wceq 1537 ∈ wcel 2114 ≠ wne 3018 ∀wral 3140 Vcvv 3496 ⊆ wss 3938 {csn 4569 {cpr 4571 class class class wbr 5068 dom cdm 5557 ⟶wf 6353 ‘cfv 6357 (class class class)co 7158 0cc0 10539 1c1 10540 + caddc 10542 ...cfz 12895 ..^cfzo 13036 ♯chash 13693 Word cword 13864 Vtxcvtx 26783 iEdgciedg 26784 Walkscwlks 27380

This theorem was proved from axioms: ax-mp 5 ax-1 6 ax-2 7 ax-3 8 ax-gen 1796 ax-4 1810 ax-5 1911 ax-6 1970 ax-7 2015 ax-8 2116 ax-9 2124 ax-10 2145 ax-11 2161 ax-12 2177 ax-ext 2795 ax-rep 5192 ax-sep 5205 ax-nul 5212 ax-pow 5268 ax-pr 5332 ax-un 7463 ax-cnex 10595 ax-resscn 10596 ax-1cn 10597 ax-icn 10598 ax-addcl 10599 ax-addrcl 10600 ax-mulcl 10601 ax-mulrcl 10602 ax-mulcom 10603 ax-addass 10604 ax-mulass 10605 ax-distr 10606 ax-i2m1 10607 ax-1ne0 10608 ax-1rid 10609 ax-rnegex 10610 ax-rrecex 10611 ax-cnre 10612 ax-pre-lttri 10613 ax-pre-lttrn 10614 ax-pre-ltadd 10615 ax-pre-mulgt0 10616

This theorem depends on definitions: df-bi 209 df-an 399 df-or 844 df-ifp 1058 df-3or 1084 df-3an 1085 df-tru 1540 df-ex 1781 df-nf 1785 df-sb 2070 df-mo 2622 df-eu 2654 df-clab 2802 df-cleq 2816 df-clel 2895 df-nfc 2965 df-ne 3019 df-nel 3126 df-ral 3145 df-rex 3146 df-reu 3147 df-rab 3149 df-v 3498 df-sbc 3775 df-csb 3886 df-dif 3941 df-un 3943 df-in 3945 df-ss 3954 df-pss 3956 df-nul 4294 df-if 4470 df-pw 4543 df-sn 4570 df-pr 4572 df-tp 4574 df-op 4576 df-uni 4841 df-int 4879 df-iun 4923 df-br 5069 df-opab 5131 df-mpt 5149 df-tr 5175 df-id 5462 df-eprel 5467 df-po 5476 df-so 5477 df-fr 5516 df-we 5518 df-xp 5563 df-rel 5564 df-cnv 5565 df-co 5566 df-dm 5567 df-rn 5568 df-res 5569 df-ima 5570 df-pred 6150 df-ord 6196 df-on 6197 df-lim 6198 df-suc 6199 df-iota 6316 df-fun 6359 df-fn 6360 df-f 6361 df-f1 6362 df-fo 6363 df-f1o 6364 df-fv 6365 df-riota 7116 df-ov 7161 df-oprab 7162 df-mpo 7163 df-om 7583 df-1st 7691 df-2nd 7692 df-wrecs 7949 df-recs 8010 df-rdg 8048 df-1o 8104 df-oadd 8108 df-er 8291 df-map 8410 df-en 8512 df-dom 8513 df-sdom 8514 df-fin 8515 df-card 9370 df-pnf 10679 df-mnf 10680 df-xr 10681 df-ltxr 10682 df-le 10683 df-sub 10874 df-neg 10875 df-nn 11641 df-n0 11901 df-z 11985 df-uz 12247 df-fz 12896 df-fzo 13037 df-hash 13694 df-word 13865 df-wlks 27383

This theorem is referenced by: 2wlkd 27717 3wlkd 27951

W3C validator