wlkd - Metamath Proof Explorer

	Metamath Proof Explorer		< Previous Next > Nearby theorems
Mirrors > Home > MPE Home > Th. List > wlkd		Structured version Visualization version GIF version

Theorem wlkd 29671

Description: Two words representing a walk in a graph. (Contributed by AV, 7-Feb-2021.)

**Hypotheses**
Ref	Expression
wlkd.p	⊢ (𝜑 → 𝑃 ∈ Word V)
wlkd.f	⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐹 ∈ Word V)
wlkd.l	⊢ (𝜑 → (♯‘𝑃) = ((♯‘𝐹) + 1))
wlkd.e	⊢ (𝜑 → ∀𝑘 ∈ (0..^(♯‘𝐹)){(𝑃‘𝑘), (𝑃‘(𝑘 + 1))} ⊆ (𝐼‘(𝐹‘𝑘)))
wlkd.n	⊢ (𝜑 → ∀𝑘 ∈ (0..^(♯‘𝐹))(𝑃‘𝑘) ≠ (𝑃‘(𝑘 + 1)))
wlkd.g	⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐺 ∈ 𝑊)
wlkd.v	⊢ 𝑉 = (Vtx‘𝐺)
wlkd.i	⊢ 𝐼 = (iEdg‘𝐺)
wlkd.a	⊢ (𝜑 → ∀𝑘 ∈ (0...(♯‘𝐹))(𝑃‘𝑘) ∈ 𝑉)

**Assertion**
Ref	Expression
wlkd	⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐹(Walks‘𝐺)𝑃)

Distinct variable groups: 𝑘,𝐹 𝑃,𝑘 𝑘,𝐼 𝜑,𝑘 𝑘,𝐺 𝑘,𝑉 Allowed substitution hint: 𝑊(𝑘)

**Proof of Theorem wlkd**
Step	Hyp	Ref	Expression
1		wlkd.p	. . 3 ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝑃 ∈ Word V)
2		wlkd.f	. . 3 ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐹 ∈ Word V)
3		wlkd.l	. . 3 ⊢ (𝜑 → (♯‘𝑃) = ((♯‘𝐹) + 1))
4		wlkd.e	. . 3 ⊢ (𝜑 → ∀𝑘 ∈ (0..^(♯‘𝐹)){(𝑃‘𝑘), (𝑃‘(𝑘 + 1))} ⊆ (𝐼‘(𝐹‘𝑘)))
5	1, 2, 3, 4	wlkdlem3 29669	. 2 ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐹 ∈ Word dom 𝐼)
6		wlkd.a	. . 3 ⊢ (𝜑 → ∀𝑘 ∈ (0...(♯‘𝐹))(𝑃‘𝑘) ∈ 𝑉)
7	1, 2, 3, 6	wlkdlem1 29667	. 2 ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝑃:(0...(♯‘𝐹))⟶𝑉)
8		wlkd.n	. . 3 ⊢ (𝜑 → ∀𝑘 ∈ (0..^(♯‘𝐹))(𝑃‘𝑘) ≠ (𝑃‘(𝑘 + 1)))
9	1, 2, 3, 4, 8	wlkdlem4 29670	. 2 ⊢ (𝜑 → ∀𝑘 ∈ (0..^(♯‘𝐹))if-((𝑃‘𝑘) = (𝑃‘(𝑘 + 1)), (𝐼‘(𝐹‘𝑘)) = {(𝑃‘𝑘)}, {(𝑃‘𝑘), (𝑃‘(𝑘 + 1))} ⊆ (𝐼‘(𝐹‘𝑘))))
10		wlkd.g	. . 3 ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐺 ∈ 𝑊)
11		wlkd.v	. . . 4 ⊢ 𝑉 = (Vtx‘𝐺)
12		wlkd.i	. . . 4 ⊢ 𝐼 = (iEdg‘𝐺)
13	11, 12	iswlk 29595	. . 3 ⊢ ((𝐺 ∈ 𝑊 ∧ 𝐹 ∈ Word V ∧ 𝑃 ∈ Word V) → (𝐹(Walks‘𝐺)𝑃 ↔ (𝐹 ∈ Word dom 𝐼 ∧ 𝑃:(0...(♯‘𝐹))⟶𝑉 ∧ ∀𝑘 ∈ (0..^(♯‘𝐹))if-((𝑃‘𝑘) = (𝑃‘(𝑘 + 1)), (𝐼‘(𝐹‘𝑘)) = {(𝑃‘𝑘)}, {(𝑃‘𝑘), (𝑃‘(𝑘 + 1))} ⊆ (𝐼‘(𝐹‘𝑘))))))
14	10, 2, 1, 13	syl3anc 1373	. 2 ⊢ (𝜑 → (𝐹(Walks‘𝐺)𝑃 ↔ (𝐹 ∈ Word dom 𝐼 ∧ 𝑃:(0...(♯‘𝐹))⟶𝑉 ∧ ∀𝑘 ∈ (0..^(♯‘𝐹))if-((𝑃‘𝑘) = (𝑃‘(𝑘 + 1)), (𝐼‘(𝐹‘𝑘)) = {(𝑃‘𝑘)}, {(𝑃‘𝑘), (𝑃‘(𝑘 + 1))} ⊆ (𝐼‘(𝐹‘𝑘))))))
15	5, 7, 9, 14	mpbir3and 1343	1 ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐹(Walks‘𝐺)𝑃)

Colors of variables: wff setvar class

Syntax hints: → wi 4 ↔ wb 206 if-wif 1062 ∧ w3a 1086 = wceq 1540 ∈ wcel 2109 ≠ wne 2933 ∀wral 3052 Vcvv 3464 ⊆ wss 3931 {csn 4606 {cpr 4608 class class class wbr 5124 dom cdm 5659 ⟶wf 6532 ‘cfv 6536 (class class class)co 7410 0cc0 11134 1c1 11135 + caddc 11137 ...cfz 13529 ..^cfzo 13676 ♯chash 14353 Word cword 14536 Vtxcvtx 28980 iEdgciedg 28981 Walkscwlks 29581

This theorem was proved from axioms: ax-mp 5 ax-1 6 ax-2 7 ax-3 8 ax-gen 1795 ax-4 1809 ax-5 1910 ax-6 1967 ax-7 2008 ax-8 2111 ax-9 2119 ax-10 2142 ax-11 2158 ax-12 2178 ax-ext 2708 ax-rep 5254 ax-sep 5271 ax-nul 5281 ax-pow 5340 ax-pr 5407 ax-un 7734 ax-cnex 11190 ax-resscn 11191 ax-1cn 11192 ax-icn 11193 ax-addcl 11194 ax-addrcl 11195 ax-mulcl 11196 ax-mulrcl 11197 ax-mulcom 11198 ax-addass 11199 ax-mulass 11200 ax-distr 11201 ax-i2m1 11202 ax-1ne0 11203 ax-1rid 11204 ax-rnegex 11205 ax-rrecex 11206 ax-cnre 11207 ax-pre-lttri 11208 ax-pre-lttrn 11209 ax-pre-ltadd 11210 ax-pre-mulgt0 11211

This theorem depends on definitions: df-bi 207 df-an 396 df-or 848 df-ifp 1063 df-3or 1087 df-3an 1088 df-tru 1543 df-fal 1553 df-ex 1780 df-nf 1784 df-sb 2066 df-mo 2540 df-eu 2569 df-clab 2715 df-cleq 2728 df-clel 2810 df-nfc 2886 df-ne 2934 df-nel 3038 df-ral 3053 df-rex 3062 df-reu 3365 df-rab 3421 df-v 3466 df-sbc 3771 df-csb 3880 df-dif 3934 df-un 3936 df-in 3938 df-ss 3948 df-pss 3951 df-nul 4314 df-if 4506 df-pw 4582 df-sn 4607 df-pr 4609 df-op 4613 df-uni 4889 df-int 4928 df-iun 4974 df-br 5125 df-opab 5187 df-mpt 5207 df-tr 5235 df-id 5553 df-eprel 5558 df-po 5566 df-so 5567 df-fr 5611 df-we 5613 df-xp 5665 df-rel 5666 df-cnv 5667 df-co 5668 df-dm 5669 df-rn 5670 df-res 5671 df-ima 5672 df-pred 6295 df-ord 6360 df-on 6361 df-lim 6362 df-suc 6363 df-iota 6489 df-fun 6538 df-fn 6539 df-f 6540 df-f1 6541 df-fo 6542 df-f1o 6543 df-fv 6544 df-riota 7367 df-ov 7413 df-oprab 7414 df-mpo 7415 df-om 7867 df-1st 7993 df-2nd 7994 df-frecs 8285 df-wrecs 8316 df-recs 8390 df-rdg 8429 df-1o 8485 df-er 8724 df-map 8847 df-en 8965 df-dom 8966 df-sdom 8967 df-fin 8968 df-card 9958 df-pnf 11276 df-mnf 11277 df-xr 11278 df-ltxr 11279 df-le 11280 df-sub 11473 df-neg 11474 df-nn 12246 df-n0 12507 df-z 12594 df-uz 12858 df-fz 13530 df-fzo 13677 df-hash 14354 df-word 14537 df-wlks 29584

This theorem is referenced by: 2wlkd 29923 3wlkd 30156

W3C validator