MPE Home Metamath Proof Explorer < Previous   Next >
Nearby theorems
Mirrors  >  Home  >  MPE Home  >  Th. List  >  addlid Structured version   Visualization version   GIF version

Theorem addlid 11399
Description: 0 is a left identity for addition. This used to be one of our complex number axioms, until it was discovered that it was dependent on the others. Based on ideas by Eric Schmidt. (Contributed by Scott Fenton, 3-Jan-2013.)
Assertion
Ref Expression
addlid (𝐴 ∈ ℂ → (0 + 𝐴) = 𝐴)

Proof of Theorem addlid
Dummy variables 𝑥 𝑦 are mutually distinct and distinct from all other variables.
StepHypRef Expression
1 cnegex 11397 . 2 (𝐴 ∈ ℂ → ∃𝑥 ∈ ℂ (𝐴 + 𝑥) = 0)
2 cnegex 11397 . . . 4 (𝑥 ∈ ℂ → ∃𝑦 ∈ ℂ (𝑥 + 𝑦) = 0)
32ad2antrl 740 . . 3 ((𝐴 ∈ ℂ ∧ (𝑥 ∈ ℂ ∧ (𝐴 + 𝑥) = 0)) → ∃𝑦 ∈ ℂ (𝑥 + 𝑦) = 0)
4 0cn 11204 . . . . . . . . . 10 0 ∈ ℂ
5 addass 11193 . . . . . . . . . 10 ((0 ∈ ℂ ∧ 0 ∈ ℂ ∧ 𝑦 ∈ ℂ) → ((0 + 0) + 𝑦) = (0 + (0 + 𝑦)))
64, 4, 5mp3an12 1479 . . . . . . . . 9 (𝑦 ∈ ℂ → ((0 + 0) + 𝑦) = (0 + (0 + 𝑦)))
76adantr 485 . . . . . . . 8 ((𝑦 ∈ ℂ ∧ (𝑥 + 𝑦) = 0) → ((0 + 0) + 𝑦) = (0 + (0 + 𝑦)))
873ad2ant3 1152 . . . . . . 7 ((𝐴 ∈ ℂ ∧ (𝑥 ∈ ℂ ∧ (𝐴 + 𝑥) = 0) ∧ (𝑦 ∈ ℂ ∧ (𝑥 + 𝑦) = 0)) → ((0 + 0) + 𝑦) = (0 + (0 + 𝑦)))
9 00id 11391 . . . . . . . . 9 (0 + 0) = 0
109oveq1i 7422 . . . . . . . 8 ((0 + 0) + 𝑦) = (0 + 𝑦)
11 simp1 1153 . . . . . . . . . . 11 ((𝐴 ∈ ℂ ∧ (𝑥 ∈ ℂ ∧ (𝐴 + 𝑥) = 0) ∧ (𝑦 ∈ ℂ ∧ (𝑥 + 𝑦) = 0)) → 𝐴 ∈ ℂ)
12 simp2l 1217 . . . . . . . . . . 11 ((𝐴 ∈ ℂ ∧ (𝑥 ∈ ℂ ∧ (𝐴 + 𝑥) = 0) ∧ (𝑦 ∈ ℂ ∧ (𝑥 + 𝑦) = 0)) → 𝑥 ∈ ℂ)
13 simp3l 1219 . . . . . . . . . . 11 ((𝐴 ∈ ℂ ∧ (𝑥 ∈ ℂ ∧ (𝐴 + 𝑥) = 0) ∧ (𝑦 ∈ ℂ ∧ (𝑥 + 𝑦) = 0)) → 𝑦 ∈ ℂ)
1411, 12, 13addassd 11237 . . . . . . . . . 10 ((𝐴 ∈ ℂ ∧ (𝑥 ∈ ℂ ∧ (𝐴 + 𝑥) = 0) ∧ (𝑦 ∈ ℂ ∧ (𝑥 + 𝑦) = 0)) → ((𝐴 + 𝑥) + 𝑦) = (𝐴 + (𝑥 + 𝑦)))
15 simp2r 1218 . . . . . . . . . . 11 ((𝐴 ∈ ℂ ∧ (𝑥 ∈ ℂ ∧ (𝐴 + 𝑥) = 0) ∧ (𝑦 ∈ ℂ ∧ (𝑥 + 𝑦) = 0)) → (𝐴 + 𝑥) = 0)
1615oveq1d 7427 . . . . . . . . . 10 ((𝐴 ∈ ℂ ∧ (𝑥 ∈ ℂ ∧ (𝐴 + 𝑥) = 0) ∧ (𝑦 ∈ ℂ ∧ (𝑥 + 𝑦) = 0)) → ((𝐴 + 𝑥) + 𝑦) = (0 + 𝑦))
17 simp3r 1220 . . . . . . . . . . 11 ((𝐴 ∈ ℂ ∧ (𝑥 ∈ ℂ ∧ (𝐴 + 𝑥) = 0) ∧ (𝑦 ∈ ℂ ∧ (𝑥 + 𝑦) = 0)) → (𝑥 + 𝑦) = 0)
1817oveq2d 7428 . . . . . . . . . 10 ((𝐴 ∈ ℂ ∧ (𝑥 ∈ ℂ ∧ (𝐴 + 𝑥) = 0) ∧ (𝑦 ∈ ℂ ∧ (𝑥 + 𝑦) = 0)) → (𝐴 + (𝑥 + 𝑦)) = (𝐴 + 0))
1914, 16, 183eqtr3rd 2806 . . . . . . . . 9 ((𝐴 ∈ ℂ ∧ (𝑥 ∈ ℂ ∧ (𝐴 + 𝑥) = 0) ∧ (𝑦 ∈ ℂ ∧ (𝑥 + 𝑦) = 0)) → (𝐴 + 0) = (0 + 𝑦))
20 addrid 11396 . . . . . . . . . 10 (𝐴 ∈ ℂ → (𝐴 + 0) = 𝐴)
21203ad2ant1 1150 . . . . . . . . 9 ((𝐴 ∈ ℂ ∧ (𝑥 ∈ ℂ ∧ (𝐴 + 𝑥) = 0) ∧ (𝑦 ∈ ℂ ∧ (𝑥 + 𝑦) = 0)) → (𝐴 + 0) = 𝐴)
2219, 21eqtr3d 2799 . . . . . . . 8 ((𝐴 ∈ ℂ ∧ (𝑥 ∈ ℂ ∧ (𝐴 + 𝑥) = 0) ∧ (𝑦 ∈ ℂ ∧ (𝑥 + 𝑦) = 0)) → (0 + 𝑦) = 𝐴)
2310, 22eqtrid 2809 . . . . . . 7 ((𝐴 ∈ ℂ ∧ (𝑥 ∈ ℂ ∧ (𝐴 + 𝑥) = 0) ∧ (𝑦 ∈ ℂ ∧ (𝑥 + 𝑦) = 0)) → ((0 + 0) + 𝑦) = 𝐴)
2422oveq2d 7428 . . . . . . 7 ((𝐴 ∈ ℂ ∧ (𝑥 ∈ ℂ ∧ (𝐴 + 𝑥) = 0) ∧ (𝑦 ∈ ℂ ∧ (𝑥 + 𝑦) = 0)) → (0 + (0 + 𝑦)) = (0 + 𝐴))
258, 23, 243eqtr3rd 2806 . . . . . 6 ((𝐴 ∈ ℂ ∧ (𝑥 ∈ ℂ ∧ (𝐴 + 𝑥) = 0) ∧ (𝑦 ∈ ℂ ∧ (𝑥 + 𝑦) = 0)) → (0 + 𝐴) = 𝐴)
26253expia 1138 . . . . 5 ((𝐴 ∈ ℂ ∧ (𝑥 ∈ ℂ ∧ (𝐴 + 𝑥) = 0)) → ((𝑦 ∈ ℂ ∧ (𝑥 + 𝑦) = 0) → (0 + 𝐴) = 𝐴))
2726expd 420 . . . 4 ((𝐴 ∈ ℂ ∧ (𝑥 ∈ ℂ ∧ (𝐴 + 𝑥) = 0)) → (𝑦 ∈ ℂ → ((𝑥 + 𝑦) = 0 → (0 + 𝐴) = 𝐴)))
2827rexlimdv 3163 . . 3 ((𝐴 ∈ ℂ ∧ (𝑥 ∈ ℂ ∧ (𝐴 + 𝑥) = 0)) → (∃𝑦 ∈ ℂ (𝑥 + 𝑦) = 0 → (0 + 𝐴) = 𝐴))
293, 28mpd 16 . 2 ((𝐴 ∈ ℂ ∧ (𝑥 ∈ ℂ ∧ (𝐴 + 𝑥) = 0)) → (0 + 𝐴) = 𝐴)
301, 29rexlimddv 3171 1 (𝐴 ∈ ℂ → (0 + 𝐴) = 𝐴)
Colors of variables:    wff setvar class
This proof depends on syntax axioms:  wi 4  wa 400  w3a 1102   = wceq 1569  wcel 2142  wrex 3088  (class class class)co 7412  cc 11104  0cc0 11106   + caddc 11109
This proof depends on axioms:  ax-mp 5  ax-1 6  ax-2 7  ax-3 8  ax-gen 1824  ax-4 1838  ax-5 1939  ax-6 1996  ax-7 2037  ax-8 2144  ax-9 2152  ax-10 2175  ax-11 2191  ax-12 2212  ax-ext 2734  ax-sep 5256  ax-nul 5268  ax-pow 5335  ax-pr 5403  ax-un 7734  ax-resscn 11163  ax-1cn 11164  ax-icn 11165  ax-addcl 11166  ax-addrcl 11167  ax-mulcl 11168  ax-mulrcl 11169  ax-mulcom 11170  ax-addass 11171  ax-mulass 11172  ax-distr 11173  ax-i2m1 11174  ax-1ne0 11175  ax-1rid 11176  ax-rnegex 11177  ax-rrecex 11178  ax-cnre 11179  ax-pre-lttri 11180  ax-pre-lttrn 11181  ax-pre-ltadd 11182
This proof depends on definitions:  df-bi 210  df-an 401  df-or 861  df-3or 1103  df-3an 1104  df-tru 1572  df-fal 1582  df-ex 1809  df-nf 1813  df-sb 2096  df-mo 2566  df-eu 2596  df-clab 2741  df-cleq 2754  df-clel 2837  df-nfc 2911  df-ne 2958  df-nel 3064  df-ral 3079  df-rex 3089  df-rab 3416  df-v 3456  df-sbc 3744  df-csb 3853  df-dif 3907  df-un 3909  df-in 3911  df-ss 3921  df-nul 4286  df-if 4487  df-pw 4563  df-sn 4589  df-pr 4591  df-op 4595  df-uni 4872  df-br 5109  df-opab 5173  df-mpt 5192  df-id 5555  df-po 5568  df-so 5569  df-xp 5666  df-rel 5667  df-cnv 5668  df-co 5669  df-dm 5670  df-rn 5671  df-res 5672  df-ima 5673  df-iota 6492  df-fun 6538  df-fn 6539  df-f 6540  df-f1 6541  df-fo 6542  df-f1o 6543  df-fv 6544  df-ov 7415  df-er 8692  df-en 8942  df-dom 8943  df-sdom 8944  df-pnf 11251  df-mnf 11252  df-ltxr 11254
This theorem is used by:  addcan  11400  addlidi  11404  addlidd  11417  negneg  11514  fzo0addel  13754  fzoaddel2  13756  divfl0  13864  modid  13936  modsumfzodifsn  13987  swrdspsleq  14710  swrds1  14711  isercolllem3  15725  sumrblem  15769  summolem2a  15773  fsum0diag2  15841  eftlub  16171  gcdid  16591  chnccat  18688  cnaddablx  19944  cnaddabl  19945  cnaddid  19946  cncrng  21554  cnlmod  25310  ptolemy  26672  logtayl  26836  leibpilem2  27117  axcontlem2  29326  cnaddabloOLD  30944  cnidOLD  30945  gsumzrsum  33394  dvcosax  46668  2zrngamnd  49040  aacllem  50649
  Copyright terms: Public domain W3C validator