Theorem addsqn2reu 27750

Description: For each complex number 𝐶, there does not exist a unique complex number 𝑏, squared and added to a unique another complex number 𝑎 resulting in the given complex number 𝐶. Actually, for each complex number 𝑏, 𝑎 = (𝐶 − (𝑏↑2)) is unique.

Remark: This, together with addsq2reu 27749, shows that commutation of two unique quantifications need not be equivalent, and provides an evident justification of the fact that considering the pair of variables is necessary to obtain what we intuitively understand as "double unique existence". (Proposed by GL, 23-Jun-2023.). (Contributed by AV, 23-Jun-2023.)

Assertion

Ref	Expression
addsqn2reu	⊢ (𝐶 ∈ ℂ → ¬ ∃!𝑏 ∈ ℂ ∃!𝑎 ∈ ℂ (𝑎 + (𝑏↑2)) = 𝐶)

Distinct variable group:   𝐶,𝑎,𝑏

Proof of Theorem addsqn2reu

Step	Hyp	Ref	Expression
1		ax-1cn 11239	. . 3 ⊢ 1 ∈ ℂ
2		neg1cn 12286	. . 3 ⊢ -1 ∈ ℂ
3		1nn 12327	. . . 4 ⊢ 1 ∈ ℕ
4		nnneneg 12354	. . . 4 ⊢ (1 ∈ ℕ → 1 ≠ -1)
5	3, 4	ax-mp 5	. . 3 ⊢ 1 ≠ -1
6	1, 2, 5	3pm3.2i 1358	. 2 ⊢ (1 ∈ ℂ ∧ -1 ∈ ℂ ∧ 1 ≠ -1)
7		1cnd 11283	. . . . 5 ⊢ (𝐶 ∈ ℂ → 1 ∈ ℂ)
8		negeu 11528	. . . . 5 ⊢ ((1 ∈ ℂ ∧ 𝐶 ∈ ℂ) → ∃!𝑎 ∈ ℂ (1 + 𝑎) = 𝐶)
9	7, 8	mpancom 701	. . . 4 ⊢ (𝐶 ∈ ℂ → ∃!𝑎 ∈ ℂ (1 + 𝑎) = 𝐶)
10		sq1 14318	. . . . . . . . 9 ⊢ (1↑2) = 1
11	10	a1i 11	. . . . . . . 8 ⊢ ((𝐶 ∈ ℂ ∧ 𝑎 ∈ ℂ) → (1↑2) = 1)
12	11	oveq2d 7428	. . . . . . 7 ⊢ ((𝐶 ∈ ℂ ∧ 𝑎 ∈ ℂ) → (𝑎 + (1↑2)) = (𝑎 + 1))
13		id 23	. . . . . . . . 9 ⊢ (𝑎 ∈ ℂ → 𝑎 ∈ ℂ)
14		1cnd 11283	. . . . . . . . 9 ⊢ (𝑎 ∈ ℂ → 1 ∈ ℂ)
15	13, 14	addcomd 11493	. . . . . . . 8 ⊢ (𝑎 ∈ ℂ → (𝑎 + 1) = (1 + 𝑎))
16	15	adantl 487	. . . . . . 7 ⊢ ((𝐶 ∈ ℂ ∧ 𝑎 ∈ ℂ) → (𝑎 + 1) = (1 + 𝑎))
17	12, 16	eqtrd 2796	. . . . . 6 ⊢ ((𝐶 ∈ ℂ ∧ 𝑎 ∈ ℂ) → (𝑎 + (1↑2)) = (1 + 𝑎))
18	17	eqeq1d 2763	. . . . 5 ⊢ ((𝐶 ∈ ℂ ∧ 𝑎 ∈ ℂ) → ((𝑎 + (1↑2)) = 𝐶 ↔ (1 + 𝑎) = 𝐶))
19	18	reubidva 3380	. . . 4 ⊢ (𝐶 ∈ ℂ → (∃!𝑎 ∈ ℂ (𝑎 + (1↑2)) = 𝐶 ↔ ∃!𝑎 ∈ ℂ (1 + 𝑎) = 𝐶))
20	9, 19	mpbird 260	. . 3 ⊢ (𝐶 ∈ ℂ → ∃!𝑎 ∈ ℂ (𝑎 + (1↑2)) = 𝐶)
21		neg1sqe1 14319	. . . . . . . . 9 ⊢ (-1↑2) = 1
22	21	a1i 11	. . . . . . . 8 ⊢ ((𝐶 ∈ ℂ ∧ 𝑎 ∈ ℂ) → (-1↑2) = 1)
23	22	oveq2d 7428	. . . . . . 7 ⊢ ((𝐶 ∈ ℂ ∧ 𝑎 ∈ ℂ) → (𝑎 + (-1↑2)) = (𝑎 + 1))
24	23, 16	eqtrd 2796	. . . . . 6 ⊢ ((𝐶 ∈ ℂ ∧ 𝑎 ∈ ℂ) → (𝑎 + (-1↑2)) = (1 + 𝑎))
25	24	eqeq1d 2763	. . . . 5 ⊢ ((𝐶 ∈ ℂ ∧ 𝑎 ∈ ℂ) → ((𝑎 + (-1↑2)) = 𝐶 ↔ (1 + 𝑎) = 𝐶))
26	25	reubidva 3380	. . . 4 ⊢ (𝐶 ∈ ℂ → (∃!𝑎 ∈ ℂ (𝑎 + (-1↑2)) = 𝐶 ↔ ∃!𝑎 ∈ ℂ (1 + 𝑎) = 𝐶))
27	9, 26	mpbird 260	. . 3 ⊢ (𝐶 ∈ ℂ → ∃!𝑎 ∈ ℂ (𝑎 + (-1↑2)) = 𝐶)
28	20, 27	jca 521	. 2 ⊢ (𝐶 ∈ ℂ → (∃!𝑎 ∈ ℂ (𝑎 + (1↑2)) = 𝐶 ∧ ∃!𝑎 ∈ ℂ (𝑎 + (-1↑2)) = 𝐶))
29		oveq1 7419	. . . . . 6 ⊢ (𝑏 = 1 → (𝑏↑2) = (1↑2))
30	29	oveq2d 7428	. . . . 5 ⊢ (𝑏 = 1 → (𝑎 + (𝑏↑2)) = (𝑎 + (1↑2)))
31	30	eqeq1d 2763	. . . 4 ⊢ (𝑏 = 1 → ((𝑎 + (𝑏↑2)) = 𝐶 ↔ (𝑎 + (1↑2)) = 𝐶))
32	31	reubidv 3382	. . 3 ⊢ (𝑏 = 1 → (∃!𝑎 ∈ ℂ (𝑎 + (𝑏↑2)) = 𝐶 ↔ ∃!𝑎 ∈ ℂ (𝑎 + (1↑2)) = 𝐶))
33		oveq1 7419	. . . . . 6 ⊢ (𝑏 = -1 → (𝑏↑2) = (-1↑2))
34	33	oveq2d 7428	. . . . 5 ⊢ (𝑏 = -1 → (𝑎 + (𝑏↑2)) = (𝑎 + (-1↑2)))
35	34	eqeq1d 2763	. . . 4 ⊢ (𝑏 = -1 → ((𝑎 + (𝑏↑2)) = 𝐶 ↔ (𝑎 + (-1↑2)) = 𝐶))
36	35	reubidv 3382	. . 3 ⊢ (𝑏 = -1 → (∃!𝑎 ∈ ℂ (𝑎 + (𝑏↑2)) = 𝐶 ↔ ∃!𝑎 ∈ ℂ (𝑎 + (-1↑2)) = 𝐶))
37	32, 36	2nreu 4402	. 2 ⊢ ((1 ∈ ℂ ∧ -1 ∈ ℂ ∧ 1 ≠ -1) → ((∃!𝑎 ∈ ℂ (𝑎 + (1↑2)) = 𝐶 ∧ ∃!𝑎 ∈ ℂ (𝑎 + (-1↑2)) = 𝐶) → ¬ ∃!𝑏 ∈ ℂ ∃!𝑎 ∈ ℂ (𝑎 + (𝑏↑2)) = 𝐶))
38	6, 28, 37	mpsyl 69	1 ⊢ (𝐶 ∈ ℂ → ¬ ∃!𝑏 ∈ ℂ ∃!𝑎 ∈ ℂ (𝑎 + (𝑏↑2)) = 𝐶)

This proof depends on syntax axioms:  ¬ wn 3   → wi 4   ∧ wa 401   ∧ w3a 1103   = wceq 1570   ∈ wcel 2145   ≠ wne 2956  ∃!wreu 3364  (class class class)co 7412  ℂcc 11179  1c1 11182   + caddc 11184  -cneg 11523  ℕcn 12316  2c2 12378  ↑cexp 14184

This proof depends on axioms:  ax-mp 5  ax-1 6  ax-2 7  ax-3 8  ax-gen 1828  ax-4 1842  ax-5 1943  ax-6 2000  ax-7 2041  ax-8 2147  ax-9 2155  ax-10 2178  ax-11 2194  ax-12 2213  ax-ext 2733  ax-sep 5249  ax-nul 5260  ax-pow 5327  ax-pr 5391  ax-un 7740  ax-cnex 11237  ax-resscn 11238  ax-1cn 11239  ax-icn 11240  ax-addcl 11241  ax-addrcl 11242  ax-mulcl 11243  ax-mulrcl 11244  ax-mulcom 11245  ax-addass 11246  ax-mulass 11247  ax-distr 11248  ax-i2m1 11249  ax-1ne0 11250  ax-1rid 11251  ax-rnegex 11252  ax-rrecex 11253  ax-cnre 11254  ax-pre-lttri 11255  ax-pre-lttrn 11256  ax-pre-ltadd 11257  ax-pre-mulgt0 11258

This proof depends on definitions:  df-bi 210  df-an 402  df-or 862  df-3or 1104  df-3an 1105  df-tru 1573  df-fal 1583  df-ex 1813  df-nf 1817  df-sb 2100  df-mo 2565  df-eu 2595  df-clab 2740  df-cleq 2753  df-clel 2836  df-nfc 2910  df-ne 2957  df-nel 3063  df-ral 3078  df-rex 3088  df-rmo 3366  df-reu 3367  df-rab 3414  df-v 3453  df-sbc 3740  df-csb 3848  df-dif 3902  df-un 3904  df-in 3906  df-ss 3916  df-pss 3919  df-nul 4280  df-if 4483  df-pw 4559  df-sn 4585  df-pr 4587  df-op 4591  df-uni 4868  df-iun 4953  df-br 5104  df-opab 5168  df-mpt 5187  df-tr 5213  df-id 5546  df-eprel 5551  df-po 5559  df-so 5560  df-fr 5604  df-we 5606  df-xp 5657  df-rel 5658  df-cnv 5659  df-co 5660  df-dm 5661  df-rn 5662  df-res 5663  df-ima 5664  df-pred 6297  df-ord 6358  df-on 6359  df-lim 6360  df-suc 6361  df-iota 6487  df-fun 6533  df-fn 6534  df-f 6535  df-f1 6536  df-fo 6537  df-f1o 6538  df-fv 6539  df-riota 7369  df-ov 7415  df-oprab 7416  df-mpo 7417  df-om 7867  df-2nd 7991  df-frecs 8283  df-wrecs 8314  df-recs 8363  df-rdg 8402  df-er 8701  df-en 8958  df-dom 8959  df-sdom 8960  df-pnf 11326  df-mnf 11327  df-xr 11328  df-ltxr 11329  df-le 11330  df-sub 11524  df-neg 11525  df-div 11955  df-nn 12317  df-2 12386  df-n0 12588  df-z 12675  df-uz 12947  df-seq 14125  df-exp 14185

This theorem is used by: (None)