Theorem addsqn2reu 27801

Description: For each complex number 𝐶, there does not exist a unique complex number 𝑏, squared and added to a unique another complex number 𝑎 resulting in the given complex number 𝐶. Actually, for each complex number 𝑏, 𝑎 = (𝐶 − (𝑏↑2)) is unique.

Remark: This, together with addsq2reu 27800, shows that commutation of two unique quantifications need not be equivalent, and provides an evident justification of the fact that considering the pair of variables is necessary to obtain what we intuitively understand as "double unique existence". (Proposed by GL, 23-Jun-2023.). (Contributed by AV, 23-Jun-2023.)

Assertion

Ref	Expression
addsqn2reu	⊢ (𝐶 ∈ ℂ → ¬ ∃!𝑏 ∈ ℂ ∃!𝑎 ∈ ℂ (𝑎 + (𝑏↑2)) = 𝐶)

Distinct variable group:   𝐶,𝑎,𝑏

Proof of Theorem addsqn2reu

Step	Hyp	Ref	Expression
1		ax-1cn 11288	. . 3 ⊢ 1 ∈ ℂ
2		neg1cn 12335	. . 3 ⊢ -1 ∈ ℂ
3		1nn 12376	. . . 4 ⊢ 1 ∈ ℕ
4		nnneneg 12403	. . . 4 ⊢ (1 ∈ ℕ → 1 ≠ -1)
5	3, 4	ax-mp 5	. . 3 ⊢ 1 ≠ -1
6	1, 2, 5	3pm3.2i 1358	. 2 ⊢ (1 ∈ ℂ ∧ -1 ∈ ℂ ∧ 1 ≠ -1)
7		1cnd 11332	. . . . 5 ⊢ (𝐶 ∈ ℂ → 1 ∈ ℂ)
8		negeu 11577	. . . . 5 ⊢ ((1 ∈ ℂ ∧ 𝐶 ∈ ℂ) → ∃!𝑎 ∈ ℂ (1 + 𝑎) = 𝐶)
9	7, 8	mpancom 701	. . . 4 ⊢ (𝐶 ∈ ℂ → ∃!𝑎 ∈ ℂ (1 + 𝑎) = 𝐶)
10		sq1 14368	. . . . . . . . 9 ⊢ (1↑2) = 1
11	10	a1i 11	. . . . . . . 8 ⊢ ((𝐶 ∈ ℂ ∧ 𝑎 ∈ ℂ) → (1↑2) = 1)
12	11	oveq2d 7462	. . . . . . 7 ⊢ ((𝐶 ∈ ℂ ∧ 𝑎 ∈ ℂ) → (𝑎 + (1↑2)) = (𝑎 + 1))
13		id 23	. . . . . . . . 9 ⊢ (𝑎 ∈ ℂ → 𝑎 ∈ ℂ)
14		1cnd 11332	. . . . . . . . 9 ⊢ (𝑎 ∈ ℂ → 1 ∈ ℂ)
15	13, 14	addcomd 11542	. . . . . . . 8 ⊢ (𝑎 ∈ ℂ → (𝑎 + 1) = (1 + 𝑎))
16	15	adantl 487	. . . . . . 7 ⊢ ((𝐶 ∈ ℂ ∧ 𝑎 ∈ ℂ) → (𝑎 + 1) = (1 + 𝑎))
17	12, 16	eqtrd 2798	. . . . . 6 ⊢ ((𝐶 ∈ ℂ ∧ 𝑎 ∈ ℂ) → (𝑎 + (1↑2)) = (1 + 𝑎))
18	17	eqeq1d 2765	. . . . 5 ⊢ ((𝐶 ∈ ℂ ∧ 𝑎 ∈ ℂ) → ((𝑎 + (1↑2)) = 𝐶 ↔ (1 + 𝑎) = 𝐶))
19	18	reubidva 3383	. . . 4 ⊢ (𝐶 ∈ ℂ → (∃!𝑎 ∈ ℂ (𝑎 + (1↑2)) = 𝐶 ↔ ∃!𝑎 ∈ ℂ (1 + 𝑎) = 𝐶))
20	9, 19	mpbird 260	. . 3 ⊢ (𝐶 ∈ ℂ → ∃!𝑎 ∈ ℂ (𝑎 + (1↑2)) = 𝐶)
21		neg1sqe1 14369	. . . . . . . . 9 ⊢ ( -1↑2) = 1
22	21	a1i 11	. . . . . . . 8 ⊢ ((𝐶 ∈ ℂ ∧ 𝑎 ∈ ℂ) → ( -1↑2) = 1)
23	22	oveq2d 7462	. . . . . . 7 ⊢ ((𝐶 ∈ ℂ ∧ 𝑎 ∈ ℂ) → (𝑎 + ( -1↑2)) = (𝑎 + 1))
24	23, 16	eqtrd 2798	. . . . . 6 ⊢ ((𝐶 ∈ ℂ ∧ 𝑎 ∈ ℂ) → (𝑎 + ( -1↑2)) = (1 + 𝑎))
25	24	eqeq1d 2765	. . . . 5 ⊢ ((𝐶 ∈ ℂ ∧ 𝑎 ∈ ℂ) → ((𝑎 + ( -1↑2)) = 𝐶 ↔ (1 + 𝑎) = 𝐶))
26	25	reubidva 3383	. . . 4 ⊢ (𝐶 ∈ ℂ → (∃!𝑎 ∈ ℂ (𝑎 + ( -1↑2)) = 𝐶 ↔ ∃!𝑎 ∈ ℂ (1 + 𝑎) = 𝐶))
27	9, 26	mpbird 260	. . 3 ⊢ (𝐶 ∈ ℂ → ∃!𝑎 ∈ ℂ (𝑎 + ( -1↑2)) = 𝐶)
28	20, 27	jca 521	. 2 ⊢ (𝐶 ∈ ℂ → (∃!𝑎 ∈ ℂ (𝑎 + (1↑2)) = 𝐶 ∧ ∃!𝑎 ∈ ℂ (𝑎 + ( -1↑2)) = 𝐶))
29		oveq1 7453	. . . . . 6 ⊢ (𝑏 = 1 → (𝑏↑2) = (1↑2))
30	29	oveq2d 7462	. . . . 5 ⊢ (𝑏 = 1 → (𝑎 + (𝑏↑2)) = (𝑎 + (1↑2)))
31	30	eqeq1d 2765	. . . 4 ⊢ (𝑏 = 1 → ((𝑎 + (𝑏↑2)) = 𝐶 ↔ (𝑎 + (1↑2)) = 𝐶))
32	31	reubidv 3385	. . 3 ⊢ (𝑏 = 1 → (∃!𝑎 ∈ ℂ (𝑎 + (𝑏↑2)) = 𝐶 ↔ ∃!𝑎 ∈ ℂ (𝑎 + (1↑2)) = 𝐶))
33		oveq1 7453	. . . . . 6 ⊢ (𝑏 = -1 → (𝑏↑2) = ( -1↑2))
34	33	oveq2d 7462	. . . . 5 ⊢ (𝑏 = -1 → (𝑎 + (𝑏↑2)) = (𝑎 + ( -1↑2)))
35	34	eqeq1d 2765	. . . 4 ⊢ (𝑏 = -1 → ((𝑎 + (𝑏↑2)) = 𝐶 ↔ (𝑎 + ( -1↑2)) = 𝐶))
36	35	reubidv 3385	. . 3 ⊢ (𝑏 = -1 → (∃!𝑎 ∈ ℂ (𝑎 + (𝑏↑2)) = 𝐶 ↔ ∃!𝑎 ∈ ℂ (𝑎 + ( -1↑2)) = 𝐶))
37	32, 36	2nreu 4405	. 2 ⊢ ((1 ∈ ℂ ∧ -1 ∈ ℂ ∧ 1 ≠ -1) → ((∃!𝑎 ∈ ℂ (𝑎 + (1↑2)) = 𝐶 ∧ ∃!𝑎 ∈ ℂ (𝑎 + ( -1↑2)) = 𝐶) → ¬ ∃!𝑏 ∈ ℂ ∃!𝑎 ∈ ℂ (𝑎 + (𝑏↑2)) = 𝐶))
38	6, 28, 37	mpsyl 69	1 ⊢ (𝐶 ∈ ℂ → ¬ ∃!𝑏 ∈ ℂ ∃!𝑎 ∈ ℂ (𝑎 + (𝑏↑2)) = 𝐶)

This proof depends on syntax axioms:  ¬ wn 3   → wi 4   ∧ wa 401   ∧ w3a 1103   = wceq 1570   ∈ wcel 2147   ≠ wne 2959  ∃!wreu 3367  (class class class)co 7446  ℂcc 11228  1c1 11231   + caddc 11233   -cneg 11572  ℕcn 12365  2c2 12427  ↑cexp 14234

This proof depends on axioms:  ax-mp 5  ax-1 6  ax-2 7  ax-3 8  ax-gen 1828  ax-4 1842  ax-5 1945  ax-6 2002  ax-7 2043  ax-8 2149  ax-9 2157  ax-10 2180  ax-11 2197  ax-12 2216  ax-ext 2735  ax-sep 5253  ax-nul 5264  ax-pow 5332  ax-pr 5396  ax-un 7778  ax-cnex 11286  ax-resscn 11287  ax-1cn 11288  ax-icn 11289  ax-addcl 11290  ax-addrcl 11291  ax-mulcl 11292  ax-mulrcl 11293  ax-mulcom 11294  ax-addass 11295  ax-mulass 11296  ax-distr 11297  ax-i2m1 11298  ax-1ne0 11299  ax-1rid 11300  ax-rnegex 11301  ax-rrecex 11302  ax-cnre 11303  ax-pre-lttri 11304  ax-pre-lttrn 11305  ax-pre-ltadd 11306  ax-pre-mulgt0 11307

This proof depends on definitions:  df-bi 210  df-an 402  df-or 862  df-3or 1104  df-3an 1105  df-tru 1573  df-fal 1583  df-ex 1813  df-nf 1817  df-sb 2102  df-mo 2567  df-eu 2597  df-clab 2742  df-cleq 2755  df-clel 2839  df-nfc 2913  df-ne 2960  df-nel 3066  df-ral 3081  df-rex 3091  df-rmo 3369  df-reu 3370  df-rab 3417  df-v 3456  df-sbc 3743  df-csb 3852  df-ss 3901  df-pss 4017  df-dif 4050  df-in 4094  df-un 4154  df-nul 4282  df-if 4486  df-pw 4562  df-sn 4589  df-pr 4591  df-op 4839  df-uni 4871  df-iun 4956  df-br 5107  df-opab 5172  df-mpt 5191  df-tr 5217  df-id 5551  df-eprel 5556  df-po 5564  df-so 5565  df-fr 5609  df-we 5611  df-xp 5662  df-rel 5663  df-cnv 5664  df-co 5665  df-dm 5666  df-rn 5667  df-res 5668  df-ima 5669  df-pred 6325  df-ord 6386  df-on 6387  df-lim 6388  df-suc 6389  df-iota 6515  df-fun 6563  df-fn 6564  df-f 6565  df-f1 6566  df-fo 6567  df-f1o 6568  df-fv 6569  df-riota 7403  df-ov 7449  df-oprab 7450  df-mpo 7451  df-om 7905  df-2nd 8029  df-frecs 8330  df-wrecs 8361  df-recs 8410  df-rdg 8449  df-er 8748  df-en 9005  df-dom 9006  df-sdom 9007  df-pnf 11375  df-mnf 11376  df-xr 11377  df-ltxr 11378  df-le 11379  df-sub 11573  df-neg 11574  df-div 12004  df-nn 12366  df-2 12435  df-n0 12637  df-z 12724  df-uz 12996  df-seq 14175  df-exp 14235

This theorem is used by: (None)