| Metamath
Proof Explorer Theorem List (p. 493 of 507) | < Previous Next > | |
| Bad symbols? Try the
GIF version. |
||
|
Mirrors > Metamath Home Page > MPE Home Page > Theorem List Contents > Recent Proofs This page: Page List |
||
| Color key: | (1-31270) |
(31271-32793) |
(32794-50672) |
| Type | Label | Description |
|---|---|---|
| Statement | ||
| Theorem | dmatALTbas 49201* | The base set of the algebra of 𝑁 x 𝑁 diagonal matrices over a ring 𝑅, i.e. the set of all 𝑁 x 𝑁 diagonal matrices over the ring 𝑅. (Contributed by AV, 8-Dec-2019.) |
| ⊢ 𝐴 = (𝑁 Mat 𝑅) & ⊢ 𝐵 = (Base‘𝐴) & ⊢ 0 = (0g‘𝑅) & ⊢ 𝐷 = (𝑁 DMatALT 𝑅) ⇒ ⊢ ((𝑁 ∈ Fin ∧ 𝑅 ∈ V) → (Base‘𝐷) = {𝑚 ∈ 𝐵 ∣ ∀𝑖 ∈ 𝑁 ∀𝑗 ∈ 𝑁 (𝑖 ≠ 𝑗 → (𝑖𝑚𝑗) = 0 )}) | ||
| Theorem | dmatALTbasel 49202* | An element of the base set of the algebra of 𝑁 x 𝑁 diagonal matrices over a ring 𝑅, i.e. an 𝑁 x 𝑁 diagonal matrix over the ring 𝑅. (Contributed by AV, 8-Dec-2019.) |
| ⊢ 𝐴 = (𝑁 Mat 𝑅) & ⊢ 𝐵 = (Base‘𝐴) & ⊢ 0 = (0g‘𝑅) & ⊢ 𝐷 = (𝑁 DMatALT 𝑅) ⇒ ⊢ ((𝑁 ∈ Fin ∧ 𝑅 ∈ V) → (𝑀 ∈ (Base‘𝐷) ↔ (𝑀 ∈ 𝐵 ∧ ∀𝑖 ∈ 𝑁 ∀𝑗 ∈ 𝑁 (𝑖 ≠ 𝑗 → (𝑖𝑀𝑗) = 0 )))) | ||
| Theorem | dmatbas 49203 | The set of all 𝑁 x 𝑁 diagonal matrices over (the ring) 𝑅 is the base set of the algebra of 𝑁 x 𝑁 diagonal matrices over (the ring) 𝑅. (Contributed by AV, 8-Dec-2019.) |
| ⊢ 𝐴 = (𝑁 Mat 𝑅) & ⊢ 𝐵 = (Base‘𝐴) & ⊢ 0 = (0g‘𝑅) & ⊢ 𝐷 = (𝑁 DMat 𝑅) ⇒ ⊢ ((𝑁 ∈ Fin ∧ 𝑅 ∈ 𝑉) → 𝐷 = (Base‘(𝑁 DMatALT 𝑅))) | ||
According to Wikipedia ("Linear combination", 29-Mar-2019,
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Linear_combination) "In mathematics, a
linear combination is an expression constructed from a set of terms by
multiplying each term by a constant and adding the results (e.g., a linear
combination of x and y would be any expression of the form ax + by, where a
and b are constants). The concept of linear combinations is central to
linear algebra and related fields of mathematics." In linear algebra, these
"terms" are "vectors" (elements from vector spaces or left modules), and the
constants are elements of the underlying field resp. ring. This corresponds
to the definition in [Lang] p. 129: "Let M be a module over a ring A and let
S be a subset of M. By a linear combination of elements of S (with
coefficients in A) one means a sum ∑x ∈S
axx where {ax} is a set of elements of A, ...". In the
definition in [Lang] p. 129, it is additionally claimed that "..., almost all
of which [elements of A] are equal to 0.". This is not necessarily required
in the following definition df-linc 49206, but it is essential if additions and
scalar multiplications of linear combinations are considered. Therefore, we
define the set of all linear combinations with finite support in df-lco 49207,
so that we can show that such sets are submodules of the corresponding
modules, see lincolss 49234.
| ||
| Syntax | clinc 49204 | Extend class notation with the operation constructing a linear combination (of vectors from a left module). |
| class linC | ||
| Syntax | clinco 49205 | Extend class notation with the operation constructing a set of linear combinations (of vectors from a left module) with finite support. |
| class LinCo | ||
| Definition | df-linc 49206* | Define the operation constructing a linear combination. Although this definition is taylored for linear combinations of vectors from left modules, it can be used for any structure having a Base, Scalar s and a scalar multiplication ·𝑠. (Contributed by AV, 29-Mar-2019.) |
| ⊢ linC = (𝑚 ∈ V ↦ (𝑠 ∈ ((Base‘(Scalar‘𝑚)) ↑m 𝑣), 𝑣 ∈ 𝒫 (Base‘𝑚) ↦ (𝑚 Σg (𝑥 ∈ 𝑣 ↦ ((𝑠‘𝑥)( ·𝑠 ‘𝑚)𝑥))))) | ||
| Definition | df-lco 49207* | Define the operation constructing the set of all linear combinations for a set of vectors. (Contributed by AV, 31-Mar-2019.) (Revised by AV, 28-Jul-2019.) |
| ⊢ LinCo = (𝑚 ∈ V, 𝑣 ∈ 𝒫 (Base‘𝑚) ↦ {𝑐 ∈ (Base‘𝑚) ∣ ∃𝑠 ∈ ((Base‘(Scalar‘𝑚)) ↑m 𝑣)(𝑠 finSupp (0g‘(Scalar‘𝑚)) ∧ 𝑐 = (𝑠( linC ‘𝑚)𝑣))}) | ||
| Theorem | lincop 49208* | A linear combination as operation. (Contributed by AV, 30-Mar-2019.) |
| ⊢ (𝑀 ∈ 𝑋 → ( linC ‘𝑀) = (𝑠 ∈ ((Base‘(Scalar‘𝑀)) ↑m 𝑣), 𝑣 ∈ 𝒫 (Base‘𝑀) ↦ (𝑀 Σg (𝑥 ∈ 𝑣 ↦ ((𝑠‘𝑥)( ·𝑠 ‘𝑀)𝑥))))) | ||
| Theorem | lincval 49209* | The value of a linear combination. (Contributed by AV, 30-Mar-2019.) |
| ⊢ ((𝑀 ∈ 𝑋 ∧ 𝑆 ∈ ((Base‘(Scalar‘𝑀)) ↑m 𝑉) ∧ 𝑉 ∈ 𝒫 (Base‘𝑀)) → (𝑆( linC ‘𝑀)𝑉) = (𝑀 Σg (𝑥 ∈ 𝑉 ↦ ((𝑆‘𝑥)( ·𝑠 ‘𝑀)𝑥)))) | ||
| Theorem | dflinc2 49210* | Alternative definition of linear combinations using the function operation. (Contributed by AV, 1-Apr-2019.) |
| ⊢ linC = (𝑚 ∈ V ↦ (𝑠 ∈ ((Base‘(Scalar‘𝑚)) ↑m 𝑣), 𝑣 ∈ 𝒫 (Base‘𝑚) ↦ (𝑚 Σg (𝑠 ∘f ( ·𝑠 ‘𝑚)( I ↾ 𝑣))))) | ||
| Theorem | lcoop 49211* | A linear combination as operation. (Contributed by AV, 5-Apr-2019.) (Revised by AV, 28-Jul-2019.) |
| ⊢ 𝐵 = (Base‘𝑀) & ⊢ 𝑆 = (Scalar‘𝑀) & ⊢ 𝑅 = (Base‘𝑆) ⇒ ⊢ ((𝑀 ∈ 𝑋 ∧ 𝑉 ∈ 𝒫 𝐵) → (𝑀 LinCo 𝑉) = {𝑐 ∈ 𝐵 ∣ ∃𝑠 ∈ (𝑅 ↑m 𝑉)(𝑠 finSupp (0g‘𝑆) ∧ 𝑐 = (𝑠( linC ‘𝑀)𝑉))}) | ||
| Theorem | lcoval 49212* | The value of a linear combination. (Contributed by AV, 5-Apr-2019.) (Revised by AV, 28-Jul-2019.) |
| ⊢ 𝐵 = (Base‘𝑀) & ⊢ 𝑆 = (Scalar‘𝑀) & ⊢ 𝑅 = (Base‘𝑆) ⇒ ⊢ ((𝑀 ∈ 𝑋 ∧ 𝑉 ∈ 𝒫 𝐵) → (𝐶 ∈ (𝑀 LinCo 𝑉) ↔ (𝐶 ∈ 𝐵 ∧ ∃𝑠 ∈ (𝑅 ↑m 𝑉)(𝑠 finSupp (0g‘𝑆) ∧ 𝐶 = (𝑠( linC ‘𝑀)𝑉))))) | ||
| Theorem | lincfsuppcl 49213 | A linear combination of vectors (with finite support) is a vector. (Contributed by AV, 25-Apr-2019.) (Revised by AV, 28-Jul-2019.) |
| ⊢ 𝐵 = (Base‘𝑀) & ⊢ 𝑅 = (Scalar‘𝑀) & ⊢ 𝑆 = (Base‘𝑅) & ⊢ 0 = (0g‘𝑅) ⇒ ⊢ ((𝑀 ∈ LMod ∧ (𝑉 ∈ 𝑊 ∧ 𝑉 ⊆ 𝐵) ∧ (𝐹 ∈ (𝑆 ↑m 𝑉) ∧ 𝐹 finSupp 0 )) → (𝐹( linC ‘𝑀)𝑉) ∈ 𝐵) | ||
| Theorem | linccl 49214 | A linear combination of vectors is a vector. (Contributed by AV, 31-Mar-2019.) |
| ⊢ 𝐵 = (Base‘𝑀) & ⊢ 𝑅 = (Base‘(Scalar‘𝑀)) ⇒ ⊢ ((𝑀 ∈ LMod ∧ (𝑉 ∈ Fin ∧ 𝑉 ⊆ 𝐵 ∧ 𝑆 ∈ (𝑅 ↑m 𝑉))) → (𝑆( linC ‘𝑀)𝑉) ∈ 𝐵) | ||
| Theorem | lincval0 49215 | The value of an empty linear combination. (Contributed by AV, 12-Apr-2019.) |
| ⊢ (𝑀 ∈ 𝑋 → (∅( linC ‘𝑀)∅) = (0g‘𝑀)) | ||
| Theorem | lincvalsng 49216 | The linear combination over a singleton. (Contributed by AV, 25-May-2019.) |
| ⊢ 𝐵 = (Base‘𝑀) & ⊢ 𝑆 = (Scalar‘𝑀) & ⊢ 𝑅 = (Base‘𝑆) & ⊢ · = ( ·𝑠 ‘𝑀) ⇒ ⊢ ((𝑀 ∈ LMod ∧ 𝑉 ∈ 𝐵 ∧ 𝑌 ∈ 𝑅) → ({〈𝑉, 𝑌〉} ( linC ‘𝑀){𝑉}) = (𝑌 · 𝑉)) | ||
| Theorem | lincvalsn 49217 | The linear combination over a singleton. (Contributed by AV, 12-Apr-2019.) (Proof shortened by AV, 25-May-2019.) |
| ⊢ 𝐵 = (Base‘𝑀) & ⊢ 𝑆 = (Scalar‘𝑀) & ⊢ 𝑅 = (Base‘𝑆) & ⊢ · = ( ·𝑠 ‘𝑀) & ⊢ 𝐹 = {〈𝑉, 𝑌〉} ⇒ ⊢ ((𝑀 ∈ LMod ∧ 𝑉 ∈ 𝐵 ∧ 𝑌 ∈ 𝑅) → (𝐹( linC ‘𝑀){𝑉}) = (𝑌 · 𝑉)) | ||
| Theorem | lincvalpr 49218 | The linear combination over an unordered pair. (Contributed by AV, 16-Apr-2019.) |
| ⊢ 𝐵 = (Base‘𝑀) & ⊢ 𝑆 = (Scalar‘𝑀) & ⊢ 𝑅 = (Base‘𝑆) & ⊢ · = ( ·𝑠 ‘𝑀) & ⊢ + = (+g‘𝑀) & ⊢ 𝐹 = {〈𝑉, 𝑋〉, 〈𝑊, 𝑌〉} ⇒ ⊢ (((𝑀 ∈ LMod ∧ 𝑉 ≠ 𝑊) ∧ (𝑉 ∈ 𝐵 ∧ 𝑋 ∈ 𝑅) ∧ (𝑊 ∈ 𝐵 ∧ 𝑌 ∈ 𝑅)) → (𝐹( linC ‘𝑀){𝑉, 𝑊}) = ((𝑋 · 𝑉) + (𝑌 · 𝑊))) | ||
| Theorem | lincval1 49219 | The linear combination over a singleton mapping to 0. (Contributed by AV, 12-Apr-2019.) |
| ⊢ 𝐵 = (Base‘𝑀) & ⊢ 𝑆 = (Scalar‘𝑀) & ⊢ 𝑅 = (Base‘𝑆) & ⊢ 𝐹 = {〈𝑉, (0g‘𝑆)〉} ⇒ ⊢ ((𝑀 ∈ LMod ∧ 𝑉 ∈ 𝐵) → (𝐹( linC ‘𝑀){𝑉}) = (0g‘𝑀)) | ||
| Theorem | lcosn0 49220 | Properties of a linear combination over a singleton mapping to 0. (Contributed by AV, 12-Apr-2019.) (Revised by AV, 28-Jul-2019.) |
| ⊢ 𝐵 = (Base‘𝑀) & ⊢ 𝑆 = (Scalar‘𝑀) & ⊢ 𝑅 = (Base‘𝑆) & ⊢ 𝐹 = {〈𝑉, (0g‘𝑆)〉} ⇒ ⊢ ((𝑀 ∈ LMod ∧ 𝑉 ∈ 𝐵) → (𝐹 ∈ (𝑅 ↑m {𝑉}) ∧ 𝐹 finSupp (0g‘𝑆) ∧ (𝐹( linC ‘𝑀){𝑉}) = (0g‘𝑀))) | ||
| Theorem | lincvalsc0 49221* | The linear combination where all scalars are 0. (Contributed by AV, 12-Apr-2019.) |
| ⊢ 𝐵 = (Base‘𝑀) & ⊢ 𝑆 = (Scalar‘𝑀) & ⊢ 0 = (0g‘𝑆) & ⊢ 𝑍 = (0g‘𝑀) & ⊢ 𝐹 = (𝑥 ∈ 𝑉 ↦ 0 ) ⇒ ⊢ ((𝑀 ∈ LMod ∧ 𝑉 ∈ 𝒫 𝐵) → (𝐹( linC ‘𝑀)𝑉) = 𝑍) | ||
| Theorem | lcoc0 49222* | Properties of a linear combination where all scalars are 0. (Contributed by AV, 12-Apr-2019.) (Revised by AV, 28-Jul-2019.) |
| ⊢ 𝐵 = (Base‘𝑀) & ⊢ 𝑆 = (Scalar‘𝑀) & ⊢ 0 = (0g‘𝑆) & ⊢ 𝑍 = (0g‘𝑀) & ⊢ 𝐹 = (𝑥 ∈ 𝑉 ↦ 0 ) & ⊢ 𝑅 = (Base‘𝑆) ⇒ ⊢ ((𝑀 ∈ LMod ∧ 𝑉 ∈ 𝒫 𝐵) → (𝐹 ∈ (𝑅 ↑m 𝑉) ∧ 𝐹 finSupp 0 ∧ (𝐹( linC ‘𝑀)𝑉) = 𝑍)) | ||
| Theorem | linc0scn0 49223* | If a set contains the zero element of a module, there is a linear combination being 0 where not all scalars are 0. (Contributed by AV, 13-Apr-2019.) |
| ⊢ 𝐵 = (Base‘𝑀) & ⊢ 𝑆 = (Scalar‘𝑀) & ⊢ 0 = (0g‘𝑆) & ⊢ 1 = (1r‘𝑆) & ⊢ 𝑍 = (0g‘𝑀) & ⊢ 𝐹 = (𝑥 ∈ 𝑉 ↦ if(𝑥 = 𝑍, 1 , 0 )) ⇒ ⊢ ((𝑀 ∈ LMod ∧ 𝑉 ∈ 𝒫 𝐵) → (𝐹( linC ‘𝑀)𝑉) = 𝑍) | ||
| Theorem | lincdifsn 49224 | A vector is a linear combination of a set containing this vector. (Contributed by AV, 21-Apr-2019.) (Revised by AV, 28-Jul-2019.) |
| ⊢ 𝐵 = (Base‘𝑀) & ⊢ 𝑅 = (Scalar‘𝑀) & ⊢ 𝑆 = (Base‘𝑅) & ⊢ · = ( ·𝑠 ‘𝑀) & ⊢ + = (+g‘𝑀) & ⊢ 0 = (0g‘𝑅) ⇒ ⊢ (((𝑀 ∈ LMod ∧ 𝑉 ∈ 𝒫 𝐵 ∧ 𝑋 ∈ 𝑉) ∧ (𝐹 ∈ (𝑆 ↑m 𝑉) ∧ 𝐹 finSupp 0 ) ∧ 𝐺 = (𝐹 ↾ (𝑉 ∖ {𝑋}))) → (𝐹( linC ‘𝑀)𝑉) = ((𝐺( linC ‘𝑀)(𝑉 ∖ {𝑋})) + ((𝐹‘𝑋) · 𝑋))) | ||
| Theorem | linc1 49225* | A vector is a linear combination of a set containing this vector. (Contributed by AV, 18-Apr-2019.) (Proof shortened by AV, 28-Jul-2019.) |
| ⊢ 𝐵 = (Base‘𝑀) & ⊢ 𝑆 = (Scalar‘𝑀) & ⊢ 0 = (0g‘𝑆) & ⊢ 1 = (1r‘𝑆) & ⊢ 𝐹 = (𝑥 ∈ 𝑉 ↦ if(𝑥 = 𝑋, 1 , 0 )) ⇒ ⊢ ((𝑀 ∈ LMod ∧ 𝑉 ∈ 𝒫 𝐵 ∧ 𝑋 ∈ 𝑉) → (𝐹( linC ‘𝑀)𝑉) = 𝑋) | ||
| Theorem | lincellss 49226 | A linear combination of a subset of a linear subspace is also contained in the linear subspace. (Contributed by AV, 20-Apr-2019.) (Revised by AV, 28-Jul-2019.) |
| ⊢ ((𝑀 ∈ LMod ∧ 𝑆 ∈ (LSubSp‘𝑀) ∧ 𝑉 ⊆ 𝑆) → ((𝐹 ∈ ((Base‘(Scalar‘𝑀)) ↑m 𝑉) ∧ 𝐹 finSupp (0g‘(Scalar‘𝑀))) → (𝐹( linC ‘𝑀)𝑉) ∈ 𝑆)) | ||
| Theorem | lco0 49227 | The set of empty linear combinations over a monoid is the singleton with the identity element of the monoid. (Contributed by AV, 12-Apr-2019.) |
| ⊢ (𝑀 ∈ Mnd → (𝑀 LinCo ∅) = {(0g‘𝑀)}) | ||
| Theorem | lcoel0 49228 | The zero vector is always a linear combination. (Contributed by AV, 12-Apr-2019.) (Proof shortened by AV, 30-Jul-2019.) |
| ⊢ ((𝑀 ∈ LMod ∧ 𝑉 ∈ 𝒫 (Base‘𝑀)) → (0g‘𝑀) ∈ (𝑀 LinCo 𝑉)) | ||
| Theorem | lincsum 49229 | The sum of two linear combinations is a linear combination, see also the proof in [Lang] p. 129. (Contributed by AV, 4-Apr-2019.) (Revised by AV, 28-Jul-2019.) |
| ⊢ + = (+g‘𝑀) & ⊢ 𝑋 = (𝐴( linC ‘𝑀)𝑉) & ⊢ 𝑌 = (𝐵( linC ‘𝑀)𝑉) & ⊢ 𝑆 = (Scalar‘𝑀) & ⊢ 𝑅 = (Base‘𝑆) & ⊢ ✚ = (+g‘𝑆) ⇒ ⊢ (((𝑀 ∈ LMod ∧ 𝑉 ∈ 𝒫 (Base‘𝑀)) ∧ (𝐴 ∈ (𝑅 ↑m 𝑉) ∧ 𝐵 ∈ (𝑅 ↑m 𝑉)) ∧ (𝐴 finSupp (0g‘𝑆) ∧ 𝐵 finSupp (0g‘𝑆))) → (𝑋 + 𝑌) = ((𝐴 ∘f ✚ 𝐵)( linC ‘𝑀)𝑉)) | ||
| Theorem | lincscm 49230* | A linear combinations multiplied with a scalar is a linear combination, see also the proof in [Lang] p. 129. (Contributed by AV, 9-Apr-2019.) (Revised by AV, 28-Jul-2019.) |
| ⊢ ∙ = ( ·𝑠 ‘𝑀) & ⊢ · = (.r‘(Scalar‘𝑀)) & ⊢ 𝑋 = (𝐴( linC ‘𝑀)𝑉) & ⊢ 𝑅 = (Base‘(Scalar‘𝑀)) & ⊢ 𝐹 = (𝑥 ∈ 𝑉 ↦ (𝑆 · (𝐴‘𝑥))) ⇒ ⊢ (((𝑀 ∈ LMod ∧ 𝑉 ∈ 𝒫 (Base‘𝑀)) ∧ (𝐴 ∈ (𝑅 ↑m 𝑉) ∧ 𝑆 ∈ 𝑅) ∧ 𝐴 finSupp (0g‘(Scalar‘𝑀))) → (𝑆 ∙ 𝑋) = (𝐹( linC ‘𝑀)𝑉)) | ||
| Theorem | lincsumcl 49231 | The sum of two linear combinations is a linear combination, see also the proof in [Lang] p. 129. (Contributed by AV, 4-Apr-2019.) (Proof shortened by AV, 28-Jul-2019.) |
| ⊢ + = (+g‘𝑀) ⇒ ⊢ (((𝑀 ∈ LMod ∧ 𝑉 ∈ 𝒫 (Base‘𝑀)) ∧ (𝐶 ∈ (𝑀 LinCo 𝑉) ∧ 𝐷 ∈ (𝑀 LinCo 𝑉))) → (𝐶 + 𝐷) ∈ (𝑀 LinCo 𝑉)) | ||
| Theorem | lincscmcl 49232 | The multiplication of a linear combination with a scalar is a linear combination, see also the proof in [Lang] p. 129. (Contributed by AV, 11-Apr-2019.) (Proof shortened by AV, 28-Jul-2019.) |
| ⊢ · = ( ·𝑠 ‘𝑀) & ⊢ 𝑅 = (Base‘(Scalar‘𝑀)) ⇒ ⊢ (((𝑀 ∈ LMod ∧ 𝑉 ∈ 𝒫 (Base‘𝑀)) ∧ 𝐶 ∈ 𝑅 ∧ 𝐷 ∈ (𝑀 LinCo 𝑉)) → (𝐶 · 𝐷) ∈ (𝑀 LinCo 𝑉)) | ||
| Theorem | lincsumscmcl 49233 | The sum of a linear combination and a multiplication of a linear combination with a scalar is a linear combination. (Contributed by AV, 11-Apr-2019.) |
| ⊢ · = ( ·𝑠 ‘𝑀) & ⊢ 𝑅 = (Base‘(Scalar‘𝑀)) & ⊢ + = (+g‘𝑀) ⇒ ⊢ (((𝑀 ∈ LMod ∧ 𝑉 ∈ 𝒫 (Base‘𝑀)) ∧ (𝐶 ∈ 𝑅 ∧ 𝐷 ∈ (𝑀 LinCo 𝑉) ∧ 𝐵 ∈ (𝑀 LinCo 𝑉))) → ((𝐶 · 𝐷) + 𝐵) ∈ (𝑀 LinCo 𝑉)) | ||
| Theorem | lincolss 49234 | According to the statement in [Lang] p. 129, the set (LSubSp‘𝑀) of all linear combinations of a set of vectors V is a submodule (generated by V) of the module M. The elements of V are called generators of (LSubSp‘𝑀). (Contributed by AV, 12-Apr-2019.) |
| ⊢ ((𝑀 ∈ LMod ∧ 𝑉 ∈ 𝒫 (Base‘𝑀)) → (𝑀 LinCo 𝑉) ∈ (LSubSp‘𝑀)) | ||
| Theorem | ellcoellss 49235* | Every linear combination of a subset of a linear subspace is also contained in the linear subspace. (Contributed by AV, 20-Apr-2019.) (Proof shortened by AV, 30-Jul-2019.) |
| ⊢ ((𝑀 ∈ LMod ∧ 𝑆 ∈ (LSubSp‘𝑀) ∧ 𝑉 ⊆ 𝑆) → ∀𝑥 ∈ (𝑀 LinCo 𝑉)𝑥 ∈ 𝑆) | ||
| Theorem | lcoss 49236 | A set of vectors of a module is a subset of the set of all linear combinations of the set. (Contributed by AV, 18-Apr-2019.) (Proof shortened by AV, 30-Jul-2019.) |
| ⊢ ((𝑀 ∈ LMod ∧ 𝑉 ∈ 𝒫 (Base‘𝑀)) → 𝑉 ⊆ (𝑀 LinCo 𝑉)) | ||
| Theorem | lspsslco 49237 | Lemma for lspeqlco 49239. (Contributed by AV, 17-Apr-2019.) |
| ⊢ 𝐵 = (Base‘𝑀) ⇒ ⊢ ((𝑀 ∈ LMod ∧ 𝑉 ∈ 𝒫 𝐵) → ((LSpan‘𝑀)‘𝑉) ⊆ (𝑀 LinCo 𝑉)) | ||
| Theorem | lcosslsp 49238 | Lemma for lspeqlco 49239. (Contributed by AV, 20-Apr-2019.) |
| ⊢ 𝐵 = (Base‘𝑀) ⇒ ⊢ ((𝑀 ∈ LMod ∧ 𝑉 ∈ 𝒫 𝐵) → (𝑀 LinCo 𝑉) ⊆ ((LSpan‘𝑀)‘𝑉)) | ||
| Theorem | lspeqlco 49239 | Equivalence of a span of a set of vectors of a left module defined as the intersection of all linear subspaces which each contain every vector in that set (see df-lsp 21093) and as the set of all linear combinations of the vectors of the set with finite support. (Contributed by AV, 20-Apr-2019.) |
| ⊢ 𝐵 = (Base‘𝑀) ⇒ ⊢ ((𝑀 ∈ LMod ∧ 𝑉 ∈ 𝒫 𝐵) → (𝑀 LinCo 𝑉) = ((LSpan‘𝑀)‘𝑉)) | ||
According to the definition in [Lang] p. 129: "A subset S of a module M is said
to be linearly independent (over [the ring] A) if whenever we have a
linear combination ∑x ∈S axx which is equal to
0, then ax=0 for all x∈S." This definition does not care for
the finiteness of the set S (because the definition of a linear combination
in [Lang] p.129 does already assure that only a finite number of coefficients
can be 0 in the sum). Our definition df-lininds 49242 does also neither claim that
the subset must be finite, nor that almost all coefficients within the linear
combination are 0. If this is required, it must be explicitly stated as
precondition in the corresponding theorems. | ||
| Syntax | clininds 49240 | Extend class notation with the relation between a module and its linearly independent subsets. |
| class linIndS | ||
| Syntax | clindeps 49241 | Extend class notation with the relation between a module and its linearly dependent subsets. |
| class linDepS | ||
| Definition | df-lininds 49242* | Define the relation between a module and its linearly independent subsets. (Contributed by AV, 12-Apr-2019.) (Revised by AV, 24-Apr-2019.) (Revised by AV, 30-Jul-2019.) |
| ⊢ linIndS = {〈𝑠, 𝑚〉 ∣ (𝑠 ∈ 𝒫 (Base‘𝑚) ∧ ∀𝑓 ∈ ((Base‘(Scalar‘𝑚)) ↑m 𝑠)((𝑓 finSupp (0g‘(Scalar‘𝑚)) ∧ (𝑓( linC ‘𝑚)𝑠) = (0g‘𝑚)) → ∀𝑥 ∈ 𝑠 (𝑓‘𝑥) = (0g‘(Scalar‘𝑚))))} | ||
| Theorem | rellininds 49243 | The class defining the relation between a module and its linearly independent subsets is a relation. (Contributed by AV, 13-Apr-2019.) |
| ⊢ Rel linIndS | ||
| Definition | df-lindeps 49244* | Define the relation between a module and its linearly dependent subsets. (Contributed by AV, 26-Apr-2019.) |
| ⊢ linDepS = {〈𝑠, 𝑚〉 ∣ ¬ 𝑠 linIndS 𝑚} | ||
| Theorem | linindsv 49245 | The classes of the module and its linearly independent subsets are sets. (Contributed by AV, 13-Apr-2019.) |
| ⊢ (𝑆 linIndS 𝑀 → (𝑆 ∈ V ∧ 𝑀 ∈ V)) | ||
| Theorem | islininds 49246* | The property of being a linearly independent subset. (Contributed by AV, 13-Apr-2019.) (Revised by AV, 30-Jul-2019.) |
| ⊢ 𝐵 = (Base‘𝑀) & ⊢ 𝑍 = (0g‘𝑀) & ⊢ 𝑅 = (Scalar‘𝑀) & ⊢ 𝐸 = (Base‘𝑅) & ⊢ 0 = (0g‘𝑅) ⇒ ⊢ ((𝑆 ∈ 𝑉 ∧ 𝑀 ∈ 𝑊) → (𝑆 linIndS 𝑀 ↔ (𝑆 ∈ 𝒫 𝐵 ∧ ∀𝑓 ∈ (𝐸 ↑m 𝑆)((𝑓 finSupp 0 ∧ (𝑓( linC ‘𝑀)𝑆) = 𝑍) → ∀𝑥 ∈ 𝑆 (𝑓‘𝑥) = 0 )))) | ||
| Theorem | linindsi 49247* | The implications of being a linearly independent subset. (Contributed by AV, 13-Apr-2019.) (Revised by AV, 30-Jul-2019.) |
| ⊢ 𝐵 = (Base‘𝑀) & ⊢ 𝑍 = (0g‘𝑀) & ⊢ 𝑅 = (Scalar‘𝑀) & ⊢ 𝐸 = (Base‘𝑅) & ⊢ 0 = (0g‘𝑅) ⇒ ⊢ (𝑆 linIndS 𝑀 → (𝑆 ∈ 𝒫 𝐵 ∧ ∀𝑓 ∈ (𝐸 ↑m 𝑆)((𝑓 finSupp 0 ∧ (𝑓( linC ‘𝑀)𝑆) = 𝑍) → ∀𝑥 ∈ 𝑆 (𝑓‘𝑥) = 0 ))) | ||
| Theorem | linindslinci 49248* | The implications of being a linearly independent subset and a linear combination of this subset being 0. (Contributed by AV, 24-Apr-2019.) (Revised by AV, 30-Jul-2019.) |
| ⊢ 𝐵 = (Base‘𝑀) & ⊢ 𝑍 = (0g‘𝑀) & ⊢ 𝑅 = (Scalar‘𝑀) & ⊢ 𝐸 = (Base‘𝑅) & ⊢ 0 = (0g‘𝑅) ⇒ ⊢ ((𝑆 linIndS 𝑀 ∧ (𝐹 ∈ (𝐸 ↑m 𝑆) ∧ 𝐹 finSupp 0 ∧ (𝐹( linC ‘𝑀)𝑆) = 𝑍)) → ∀𝑥 ∈ 𝑆 (𝐹‘𝑥) = 0 ) | ||
| Theorem | islinindfis 49249* | The property of being a linearly independent finite subset. (Contributed by AV, 27-Apr-2019.) |
| ⊢ 𝐵 = (Base‘𝑀) & ⊢ 𝑍 = (0g‘𝑀) & ⊢ 𝑅 = (Scalar‘𝑀) & ⊢ 𝐸 = (Base‘𝑅) & ⊢ 0 = (0g‘𝑅) ⇒ ⊢ ((𝑆 ∈ Fin ∧ 𝑀 ∈ 𝑊) → (𝑆 linIndS 𝑀 ↔ (𝑆 ∈ 𝒫 𝐵 ∧ ∀𝑓 ∈ (𝐸 ↑m 𝑆)((𝑓( linC ‘𝑀)𝑆) = 𝑍 → ∀𝑥 ∈ 𝑆 (𝑓‘𝑥) = 0 )))) | ||
| Theorem | islinindfiss 49250* | The property of being a linearly independent finite subset. (Contributed by AV, 27-Apr-2019.) |
| ⊢ 𝐵 = (Base‘𝑀) & ⊢ 𝑍 = (0g‘𝑀) & ⊢ 𝑅 = (Scalar‘𝑀) & ⊢ 𝐸 = (Base‘𝑅) & ⊢ 0 = (0g‘𝑅) ⇒ ⊢ ((𝑀 ∈ 𝑊 ∧ 𝑆 ∈ Fin ∧ 𝑆 ∈ 𝒫 𝐵) → (𝑆 linIndS 𝑀 ↔ ∀𝑓 ∈ (𝐸 ↑m 𝑆)((𝑓( linC ‘𝑀)𝑆) = 𝑍 → ∀𝑥 ∈ 𝑆 (𝑓‘𝑥) = 0 ))) | ||
| Theorem | linindscl 49251 | A linearly independent set is a subset of (the base set of) a module. (Contributed by AV, 13-Apr-2019.) |
| ⊢ (𝑆 linIndS 𝑀 → 𝑆 ∈ 𝒫 (Base‘𝑀)) | ||
| Theorem | lindepsnlininds 49252 | A linearly dependent subset is not a linearly independent subset. (Contributed by AV, 26-Apr-2019.) |
| ⊢ ((𝑆 ∈ 𝑉 ∧ 𝑀 ∈ 𝑊) → (𝑆 linDepS 𝑀 ↔ ¬ 𝑆 linIndS 𝑀)) | ||
| Theorem | islindeps 49253* | The property of being a linearly dependent subset. (Contributed by AV, 26-Apr-2019.) (Revised by AV, 30-Jul-2019.) |
| ⊢ 𝐵 = (Base‘𝑀) & ⊢ 𝑍 = (0g‘𝑀) & ⊢ 𝑅 = (Scalar‘𝑀) & ⊢ 𝐸 = (Base‘𝑅) & ⊢ 0 = (0g‘𝑅) ⇒ ⊢ ((𝑀 ∈ 𝑊 ∧ 𝑆 ∈ 𝒫 𝐵) → (𝑆 linDepS 𝑀 ↔ ∃𝑓 ∈ (𝐸 ↑m 𝑆)(𝑓 finSupp 0 ∧ (𝑓( linC ‘𝑀)𝑆) = 𝑍 ∧ ∃𝑥 ∈ 𝑆 (𝑓‘𝑥) ≠ 0 ))) | ||
| Theorem | lincext1 49254* | Property 1 of an extension of a linear combination. (Contributed by AV, 20-Apr-2019.) (Revised by AV, 29-Apr-2019.) |
| ⊢ 𝐵 = (Base‘𝑀) & ⊢ 𝑅 = (Scalar‘𝑀) & ⊢ 𝐸 = (Base‘𝑅) & ⊢ 0 = (0g‘𝑅) & ⊢ 𝑍 = (0g‘𝑀) & ⊢ 𝑁 = (invg‘𝑅) & ⊢ 𝐹 = (𝑧 ∈ 𝑆 ↦ if(𝑧 = 𝑋, (𝑁‘𝑌), (𝐺‘𝑧))) ⇒ ⊢ (((𝑀 ∈ LMod ∧ 𝑆 ∈ 𝒫 𝐵) ∧ (𝑌 ∈ 𝐸 ∧ 𝑋 ∈ 𝑆 ∧ 𝐺 ∈ (𝐸 ↑m (𝑆 ∖ {𝑋})))) → 𝐹 ∈ (𝐸 ↑m 𝑆)) | ||
| Theorem | lincext2 49255* | Property 2 of an extension of a linear combination. (Contributed by AV, 20-Apr-2019.) (Revised by AV, 30-Jul-2019.) |
| ⊢ 𝐵 = (Base‘𝑀) & ⊢ 𝑅 = (Scalar‘𝑀) & ⊢ 𝐸 = (Base‘𝑅) & ⊢ 0 = (0g‘𝑅) & ⊢ 𝑍 = (0g‘𝑀) & ⊢ 𝑁 = (invg‘𝑅) & ⊢ 𝐹 = (𝑧 ∈ 𝑆 ↦ if(𝑧 = 𝑋, (𝑁‘𝑌), (𝐺‘𝑧))) ⇒ ⊢ (((𝑀 ∈ LMod ∧ 𝑆 ∈ 𝒫 𝐵) ∧ (𝑌 ∈ 𝐸 ∧ 𝑋 ∈ 𝑆 ∧ 𝐺 ∈ (𝐸 ↑m (𝑆 ∖ {𝑋}))) ∧ 𝐺 finSupp 0 ) → 𝐹 finSupp 0 ) | ||
| Theorem | lincext3 49256* | Property 3 of an extension of a linear combination. (Contributed by AV, 23-Apr-2019.) (Revised by AV, 30-Jul-2019.) |
| ⊢ 𝐵 = (Base‘𝑀) & ⊢ 𝑅 = (Scalar‘𝑀) & ⊢ 𝐸 = (Base‘𝑅) & ⊢ 0 = (0g‘𝑅) & ⊢ 𝑍 = (0g‘𝑀) & ⊢ 𝑁 = (invg‘𝑅) & ⊢ 𝐹 = (𝑧 ∈ 𝑆 ↦ if(𝑧 = 𝑋, (𝑁‘𝑌), (𝐺‘𝑧))) ⇒ ⊢ (((𝑀 ∈ LMod ∧ 𝑆 ∈ 𝒫 𝐵) ∧ (𝑌 ∈ 𝐸 ∧ 𝑋 ∈ 𝑆 ∧ 𝐺 ∈ (𝐸 ↑m (𝑆 ∖ {𝑋}))) ∧ (𝐺 finSupp 0 ∧ (𝑌( ·𝑠 ‘𝑀)𝑋) = (𝐺( linC ‘𝑀)(𝑆 ∖ {𝑋})))) → (𝐹( linC ‘𝑀)𝑆) = 𝑍) | ||
| Theorem | lindslinindsimp1 49257* | Implication 1 for lindslininds 49264. (Contributed by AV, 25-Apr-2019.) (Revised by AV, 30-Jul-2019.) (Proof shortened by II, 16-Feb-2023.) |
| ⊢ 𝑅 = (Scalar‘𝑀) & ⊢ 𝐵 = (Base‘𝑅) & ⊢ 0 = (0g‘𝑅) & ⊢ 𝑍 = (0g‘𝑀) ⇒ ⊢ ((𝑆 ∈ 𝑉 ∧ 𝑀 ∈ LMod) → ((𝑆 ∈ 𝒫 (Base‘𝑀) ∧ ∀𝑓 ∈ (𝐵 ↑m 𝑆)((𝑓 finSupp 0 ∧ (𝑓( linC ‘𝑀)𝑆) = 𝑍) → ∀𝑥 ∈ 𝑆 (𝑓‘𝑥) = 0 )) → (𝑆 ⊆ (Base‘𝑀) ∧ ∀𝑠 ∈ 𝑆 ∀𝑦 ∈ (𝐵 ∖ { 0 }) ¬ (𝑦( ·𝑠 ‘𝑀)𝑠) ∈ ((LSpan‘𝑀)‘(𝑆 ∖ {𝑠}))))) | ||
| Theorem | lindslinindimp2lem1 49258* | Lemma 1 for lindslinindsimp2 49263. (Contributed by AV, 25-Apr-2019.) |
| ⊢ 𝑅 = (Scalar‘𝑀) & ⊢ 𝐵 = (Base‘𝑅) & ⊢ 0 = (0g‘𝑅) & ⊢ 𝑍 = (0g‘𝑀) & ⊢ 𝑌 = ((invg‘𝑅)‘(𝑓‘𝑥)) & ⊢ 𝐺 = (𝑓 ↾ (𝑆 ∖ {𝑥})) ⇒ ⊢ (((𝑆 ∈ 𝑉 ∧ 𝑀 ∈ LMod) ∧ (𝑆 ⊆ (Base‘𝑀) ∧ 𝑥 ∈ 𝑆 ∧ 𝑓 ∈ (𝐵 ↑m 𝑆))) → 𝑌 ∈ 𝐵) | ||
| Theorem | lindslinindimp2lem2 49259* | Lemma 2 for lindslinindsimp2 49263. (Contributed by AV, 25-Apr-2019.) |
| ⊢ 𝑅 = (Scalar‘𝑀) & ⊢ 𝐵 = (Base‘𝑅) & ⊢ 0 = (0g‘𝑅) & ⊢ 𝑍 = (0g‘𝑀) & ⊢ 𝑌 = ((invg‘𝑅)‘(𝑓‘𝑥)) & ⊢ 𝐺 = (𝑓 ↾ (𝑆 ∖ {𝑥})) ⇒ ⊢ (((𝑆 ∈ 𝑉 ∧ 𝑀 ∈ LMod) ∧ (𝑆 ⊆ (Base‘𝑀) ∧ 𝑥 ∈ 𝑆 ∧ 𝑓 ∈ (𝐵 ↑m 𝑆))) → 𝐺 ∈ (𝐵 ↑m (𝑆 ∖ {𝑥}))) | ||
| Theorem | lindslinindimp2lem3 49260* | Lemma 3 for lindslinindsimp2 49263. (Contributed by AV, 25-Apr-2019.) (Revised by AV, 30-Jul-2019.) |
| ⊢ 𝑅 = (Scalar‘𝑀) & ⊢ 𝐵 = (Base‘𝑅) & ⊢ 0 = (0g‘𝑅) & ⊢ 𝑍 = (0g‘𝑀) & ⊢ 𝑌 = ((invg‘𝑅)‘(𝑓‘𝑥)) & ⊢ 𝐺 = (𝑓 ↾ (𝑆 ∖ {𝑥})) ⇒ ⊢ (((𝑆 ∈ 𝑉 ∧ 𝑀 ∈ LMod) ∧ (𝑆 ⊆ (Base‘𝑀) ∧ 𝑥 ∈ 𝑆) ∧ (𝑓 ∈ (𝐵 ↑m 𝑆) ∧ 𝑓 finSupp 0 )) → 𝐺 finSupp 0 ) | ||
| Theorem | lindslinindimp2lem4 49261* | Lemma 4 for lindslinindsimp2 49263. (Contributed by AV, 25-Apr-2019.) (Revised by AV, 30-Jul-2019.) (Proof shortened by II, 16-Feb-2023.) |
| ⊢ 𝑅 = (Scalar‘𝑀) & ⊢ 𝐵 = (Base‘𝑅) & ⊢ 0 = (0g‘𝑅) & ⊢ 𝑍 = (0g‘𝑀) & ⊢ 𝑌 = ((invg‘𝑅)‘(𝑓‘𝑥)) & ⊢ 𝐺 = (𝑓 ↾ (𝑆 ∖ {𝑥})) ⇒ ⊢ (((𝑆 ∈ 𝑉 ∧ 𝑀 ∈ LMod) ∧ (𝑆 ⊆ (Base‘𝑀) ∧ 𝑥 ∈ 𝑆) ∧ (𝑓 ∈ (𝐵 ↑m 𝑆) ∧ 𝑓 finSupp 0 ∧ (𝑓( linC ‘𝑀)𝑆) = 𝑍)) → (𝑀 Σg (𝑦 ∈ (𝑆 ∖ {𝑥}) ↦ ((𝑓‘𝑦)( ·𝑠 ‘𝑀)𝑦))) = (𝑌( ·𝑠 ‘𝑀)𝑥)) | ||
| Theorem | lindslinindsimp2lem5 49262* | Lemma 5 for lindslinindsimp2 49263. (Contributed by AV, 25-Apr-2019.) (Revised by AV, 30-Jul-2019.) |
| ⊢ 𝑅 = (Scalar‘𝑀) & ⊢ 𝐵 = (Base‘𝑅) & ⊢ 0 = (0g‘𝑅) & ⊢ 𝑍 = (0g‘𝑀) ⇒ ⊢ (((𝑆 ∈ 𝑉 ∧ 𝑀 ∈ LMod) ∧ (𝑆 ⊆ (Base‘𝑀) ∧ 𝑥 ∈ 𝑆)) → ((𝑓 ∈ (𝐵 ↑m 𝑆) ∧ (𝑓 finSupp 0 ∧ (𝑓( linC ‘𝑀)𝑆) = 𝑍)) → (∀𝑦 ∈ (𝐵 ∖ { 0 })∀𝑔 ∈ (𝐵 ↑m (𝑆 ∖ {𝑥}))(¬ 𝑔 finSupp 0 ∨ ¬ (𝑦( ·𝑠 ‘𝑀)𝑥) = (𝑔( linC ‘𝑀)(𝑆 ∖ {𝑥}))) → (𝑓‘𝑥) = 0 ))) | ||
| Theorem | lindslinindsimp2 49263* | Implication 2 for lindslininds 49264. (Contributed by AV, 26-Apr-2019.) (Revised by AV, 30-Jul-2019.) |
| ⊢ 𝑅 = (Scalar‘𝑀) & ⊢ 𝐵 = (Base‘𝑅) & ⊢ 0 = (0g‘𝑅) & ⊢ 𝑍 = (0g‘𝑀) ⇒ ⊢ ((𝑆 ∈ 𝑉 ∧ 𝑀 ∈ LMod) → ((𝑆 ⊆ (Base‘𝑀) ∧ ∀𝑠 ∈ 𝑆 ∀𝑦 ∈ (𝐵 ∖ { 0 }) ¬ (𝑦( ·𝑠 ‘𝑀)𝑠) ∈ ((LSpan‘𝑀)‘(𝑆 ∖ {𝑠}))) → (𝑆 ∈ 𝒫 (Base‘𝑀) ∧ ∀𝑓 ∈ (𝐵 ↑m 𝑆)((𝑓 finSupp 0 ∧ (𝑓( linC ‘𝑀)𝑆) = 𝑍) → ∀𝑥 ∈ 𝑆 (𝑓‘𝑥) = 0 )))) | ||
| Theorem | lindslininds 49264 | Equivalence of definitions df-linds 21957 and df-lininds 49242 for (linear) independence for (left) modules. (Contributed by AV, 26-Apr-2019.) (Proof shortened by AV, 30-Jul-2019.) |
| ⊢ ((𝑆 ∈ 𝑉 ∧ 𝑀 ∈ LMod) → (𝑆 linIndS 𝑀 ↔ 𝑆 ∈ (LIndS‘𝑀))) | ||
| Theorem | linds0 49265 | The empty set is always a linearly independent subset. (Contributed by AV, 13-Apr-2019.) (Revised by AV, 27-Apr-2019.) (Proof shortened by AV, 30-Jul-2019.) |
| ⊢ (𝑀 ∈ 𝑉 → ∅ linIndS 𝑀) | ||
| Theorem | el0ldep 49266 | A set containing the zero element of a module is always linearly dependent, if the underlying ring has at least two elements. (Contributed by AV, 13-Apr-2019.) (Revised by AV, 27-Apr-2019.) (Proof shortened by AV, 30-Jul-2019.) |
| ⊢ (((𝑀 ∈ LMod ∧ 1 < (♯‘(Base‘(Scalar‘𝑀)))) ∧ 𝑆 ∈ 𝒫 (Base‘𝑀) ∧ (0g‘𝑀) ∈ 𝑆) → 𝑆 linDepS 𝑀) | ||
| Theorem | el0ldepsnzr 49267 | A set containing the zero element of a module over a nonzero ring is always linearly dependent. (Contributed by AV, 14-Apr-2019.) (Revised by AV, 27-Apr-2019.) |
| ⊢ (((𝑀 ∈ LMod ∧ (Scalar‘𝑀) ∈ NzRing) ∧ 𝑆 ∈ 𝒫 (Base‘𝑀) ∧ (0g‘𝑀) ∈ 𝑆) → 𝑆 linDepS 𝑀) | ||
| Theorem | lindsrng01 49268 | Any subset of a module is always linearly independent if the underlying ring has at most one element. Since the underlying ring cannot be the empty set (see lmodsn0 20995), this means that the underlying ring has only one element, so it is a zero ring. (Contributed by AV, 14-Apr-2019.) (Revised by AV, 27-Apr-2019.) |
| ⊢ 𝐵 = (Base‘𝑀) & ⊢ 𝑅 = (Scalar‘𝑀) & ⊢ 𝐸 = (Base‘𝑅) ⇒ ⊢ ((𝑀 ∈ LMod ∧ ((♯‘𝐸) = 0 ∨ (♯‘𝐸) = 1) ∧ 𝑆 ∈ 𝒫 𝐵) → 𝑆 linIndS 𝑀) | ||
| Theorem | lindszr 49269 | Any subset of a module over a zero ring is always linearly independent. (Contributed by AV, 27-Apr-2019.) |
| ⊢ ((𝑀 ∈ LMod ∧ ¬ (Scalar‘𝑀) ∈ NzRing ∧ 𝑆 ∈ 𝒫 (Base‘𝑀)) → 𝑆 linIndS 𝑀) | ||
| Theorem | snlindsntorlem 49270* | Lemma for snlindsntor 49271. (Contributed by AV, 15-Apr-2019.) |
| ⊢ 𝐵 = (Base‘𝑀) & ⊢ 𝑅 = (Scalar‘𝑀) & ⊢ 𝑆 = (Base‘𝑅) & ⊢ 0 = (0g‘𝑅) & ⊢ 𝑍 = (0g‘𝑀) & ⊢ · = ( ·𝑠 ‘𝑀) ⇒ ⊢ ((𝑀 ∈ LMod ∧ 𝑋 ∈ 𝐵) → (∀𝑓 ∈ (𝑆 ↑m {𝑋})((𝑓( linC ‘𝑀){𝑋}) = 𝑍 → (𝑓‘𝑋) = 0 ) → ∀𝑠 ∈ 𝑆 ((𝑠 · 𝑋) = 𝑍 → 𝑠 = 0 ))) | ||
| Theorem | snlindsntor 49271* | A singleton is linearly independent iff it does not contain a torsion element. According to Wikipedia ("Torsion (algebra)", 15-Apr-2019, https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Torsion_(algebra)): "An element m of a module M over a ring R is called a torsion element of the module if there exists a regular element r of the ring (an element that is neither a left nor a right zero divisor) that annihilates m, i.e., (𝑟 · 𝑚) = 0. In an integral domain (a commutative ring without zero divisors), every nonzero element is regular, so a torsion element of a module over an integral domain is one annihilated by a nonzero element of the integral domain." Analogously, the definition in [Lang] p. 147 states that "An element x of [a module] E [over a ring R] is called a torsion element if there exists 𝑎 ∈ 𝑅, 𝑎 ≠ 0, such that 𝑎 · 𝑥 = 0. This definition includes the zero element of the module. Some authors, however, exclude the zero element from the definition of torsion elements. (Contributed by AV, 14-Apr-2019.) (Revised by AV, 27-Apr-2019.) |
| ⊢ 𝐵 = (Base‘𝑀) & ⊢ 𝑅 = (Scalar‘𝑀) & ⊢ 𝑆 = (Base‘𝑅) & ⊢ 0 = (0g‘𝑅) & ⊢ 𝑍 = (0g‘𝑀) & ⊢ · = ( ·𝑠 ‘𝑀) ⇒ ⊢ ((𝑀 ∈ LMod ∧ 𝑋 ∈ 𝐵) → (∀𝑠 ∈ (𝑆 ∖ { 0 })(𝑠 · 𝑋) ≠ 𝑍 ↔ {𝑋} linIndS 𝑀)) | ||
| Theorem | ldepsprlem 49272 | Lemma for ldepspr 49273. (Contributed by AV, 16-Apr-2019.) |
| ⊢ 𝐵 = (Base‘𝑀) & ⊢ 𝑅 = (Scalar‘𝑀) & ⊢ 𝑆 = (Base‘𝑅) & ⊢ 0 = (0g‘𝑅) & ⊢ 𝑍 = (0g‘𝑀) & ⊢ · = ( ·𝑠 ‘𝑀) & ⊢ 1 = (1r‘𝑅) & ⊢ 𝑁 = (invg‘𝑅) ⇒ ⊢ ((𝑀 ∈ LMod ∧ (𝑋 ∈ 𝐵 ∧ 𝑌 ∈ 𝐵 ∧ 𝐴 ∈ 𝑆)) → (𝑋 = (𝐴 · 𝑌) → (( 1 · 𝑋)(+g‘𝑀)((𝑁‘𝐴) · 𝑌)) = 𝑍)) | ||
| Theorem | ldepspr 49273 | If a vector is a scalar multiple of another vector, the (unordered pair containing the) two vectors are linearly dependent. (Contributed by AV, 16-Apr-2019.) (Revised by AV, 27-Apr-2019.) (Proof shortened by AV, 30-Jul-2019.) |
| ⊢ 𝐵 = (Base‘𝑀) & ⊢ 𝑅 = (Scalar‘𝑀) & ⊢ 𝑆 = (Base‘𝑅) & ⊢ 0 = (0g‘𝑅) & ⊢ 𝑍 = (0g‘𝑀) & ⊢ · = ( ·𝑠 ‘𝑀) ⇒ ⊢ ((𝑀 ∈ LMod ∧ (𝑋 ∈ 𝐵 ∧ 𝑌 ∈ 𝐵 ∧ 𝑋 ≠ 𝑌)) → ((𝐴 ∈ 𝑆 ∧ 𝑋 = (𝐴 · 𝑌)) → {𝑋, 𝑌} linDepS 𝑀)) | ||
| Theorem | lincresunit3lem3 49274 | Lemma 3 for lincresunit3 49281. (Contributed by AV, 18-May-2019.) |
| ⊢ 𝐵 = (Base‘𝑀) & ⊢ 𝑅 = (Scalar‘𝑀) & ⊢ 𝐸 = (Base‘𝑅) & ⊢ 𝑈 = (Unit‘𝑅) & ⊢ 𝑁 = (invg‘𝑅) & ⊢ · = ( ·𝑠 ‘𝑀) ⇒ ⊢ (((𝑀 ∈ LMod ∧ 𝑋 ∈ 𝐵 ∧ 𝑌 ∈ 𝐵) ∧ 𝐴 ∈ 𝑈) → (((𝑁‘𝐴) · 𝑋) = ((𝑁‘𝐴) · 𝑌) ↔ 𝑋 = 𝑌)) | ||
| Theorem | lincresunitlem1 49275 | Lemma 1 for properties of a specially modified restriction of a linear combination containing a unit as scalar. (Contributed by AV, 18-May-2019.) |
| ⊢ 𝐵 = (Base‘𝑀) & ⊢ 𝑅 = (Scalar‘𝑀) & ⊢ 𝐸 = (Base‘𝑅) & ⊢ 𝑈 = (Unit‘𝑅) & ⊢ 0 = (0g‘𝑅) & ⊢ 𝑍 = (0g‘𝑀) & ⊢ 𝑁 = (invg‘𝑅) & ⊢ 𝐼 = (invr‘𝑅) & ⊢ · = (.r‘𝑅) & ⊢ 𝐺 = (𝑠 ∈ (𝑆 ∖ {𝑋}) ↦ ((𝐼‘(𝑁‘(𝐹‘𝑋))) · (𝐹‘𝑠))) ⇒ ⊢ (((𝑆 ∈ 𝒫 𝐵 ∧ 𝑀 ∈ LMod ∧ 𝑋 ∈ 𝑆) ∧ (𝐹 ∈ (𝐸 ↑m 𝑆) ∧ (𝐹‘𝑋) ∈ 𝑈)) → (𝐼‘(𝑁‘(𝐹‘𝑋))) ∈ 𝐸) | ||
| Theorem | lincresunitlem2 49276 | Lemma for properties of a specially modified restriction of a linear combination containing a unit as scalar. (Contributed by AV, 18-May-2019.) |
| ⊢ 𝐵 = (Base‘𝑀) & ⊢ 𝑅 = (Scalar‘𝑀) & ⊢ 𝐸 = (Base‘𝑅) & ⊢ 𝑈 = (Unit‘𝑅) & ⊢ 0 = (0g‘𝑅) & ⊢ 𝑍 = (0g‘𝑀) & ⊢ 𝑁 = (invg‘𝑅) & ⊢ 𝐼 = (invr‘𝑅) & ⊢ · = (.r‘𝑅) & ⊢ 𝐺 = (𝑠 ∈ (𝑆 ∖ {𝑋}) ↦ ((𝐼‘(𝑁‘(𝐹‘𝑋))) · (𝐹‘𝑠))) ⇒ ⊢ ((((𝑆 ∈ 𝒫 𝐵 ∧ 𝑀 ∈ LMod ∧ 𝑋 ∈ 𝑆) ∧ (𝐹 ∈ (𝐸 ↑m 𝑆) ∧ (𝐹‘𝑋) ∈ 𝑈)) ∧ 𝑌 ∈ 𝑆) → ((𝐼‘(𝑁‘(𝐹‘𝑋))) · (𝐹‘𝑌)) ∈ 𝐸) | ||
| Theorem | lincresunit1 49277* | Property 1 of a specially modified restriction of a linear combination containing a unit as scalar. (Contributed by AV, 18-May-2019.) |
| ⊢ 𝐵 = (Base‘𝑀) & ⊢ 𝑅 = (Scalar‘𝑀) & ⊢ 𝐸 = (Base‘𝑅) & ⊢ 𝑈 = (Unit‘𝑅) & ⊢ 0 = (0g‘𝑅) & ⊢ 𝑍 = (0g‘𝑀) & ⊢ 𝑁 = (invg‘𝑅) & ⊢ 𝐼 = (invr‘𝑅) & ⊢ · = (.r‘𝑅) & ⊢ 𝐺 = (𝑠 ∈ (𝑆 ∖ {𝑋}) ↦ ((𝐼‘(𝑁‘(𝐹‘𝑋))) · (𝐹‘𝑠))) ⇒ ⊢ (((𝑆 ∈ 𝒫 𝐵 ∧ 𝑀 ∈ LMod ∧ 𝑋 ∈ 𝑆) ∧ (𝐹 ∈ (𝐸 ↑m 𝑆) ∧ (𝐹‘𝑋) ∈ 𝑈)) → 𝐺 ∈ (𝐸 ↑m (𝑆 ∖ {𝑋}))) | ||
| Theorem | lincresunit2 49278* | Property 2 of a specially modified restriction of a linear combination containing a unit as scalar. (Contributed by AV, 18-May-2019.) |
| ⊢ 𝐵 = (Base‘𝑀) & ⊢ 𝑅 = (Scalar‘𝑀) & ⊢ 𝐸 = (Base‘𝑅) & ⊢ 𝑈 = (Unit‘𝑅) & ⊢ 0 = (0g‘𝑅) & ⊢ 𝑍 = (0g‘𝑀) & ⊢ 𝑁 = (invg‘𝑅) & ⊢ 𝐼 = (invr‘𝑅) & ⊢ · = (.r‘𝑅) & ⊢ 𝐺 = (𝑠 ∈ (𝑆 ∖ {𝑋}) ↦ ((𝐼‘(𝑁‘(𝐹‘𝑋))) · (𝐹‘𝑠))) ⇒ ⊢ (((𝑆 ∈ 𝒫 𝐵 ∧ 𝑀 ∈ LMod ∧ 𝑋 ∈ 𝑆) ∧ (𝐹 ∈ (𝐸 ↑m 𝑆) ∧ (𝐹‘𝑋) ∈ 𝑈 ∧ 𝐹 finSupp 0 )) → 𝐺 finSupp 0 ) | ||
| Theorem | lincresunit3lem1 49279* | Lemma 1 for lincresunit3 49281. (Contributed by AV, 17-May-2019.) |
| ⊢ 𝐵 = (Base‘𝑀) & ⊢ 𝑅 = (Scalar‘𝑀) & ⊢ 𝐸 = (Base‘𝑅) & ⊢ 𝑈 = (Unit‘𝑅) & ⊢ 0 = (0g‘𝑅) & ⊢ 𝑍 = (0g‘𝑀) & ⊢ 𝑁 = (invg‘𝑅) & ⊢ 𝐼 = (invr‘𝑅) & ⊢ · = (.r‘𝑅) & ⊢ 𝐺 = (𝑠 ∈ (𝑆 ∖ {𝑋}) ↦ ((𝐼‘(𝑁‘(𝐹‘𝑋))) · (𝐹‘𝑠))) ⇒ ⊢ (((𝑆 ∈ 𝒫 𝐵 ∧ 𝑀 ∈ LMod ∧ 𝑋 ∈ 𝑆) ∧ (𝐹 ∈ (𝐸 ↑m 𝑆) ∧ (𝐹‘𝑋) ∈ 𝑈 ∧ 𝑧 ∈ (𝑆 ∖ {𝑋}))) → ((𝑁‘(𝐹‘𝑋))( ·𝑠 ‘𝑀)((𝐺‘𝑧)( ·𝑠 ‘𝑀)𝑧)) = ((𝐹‘𝑧)( ·𝑠 ‘𝑀)𝑧)) | ||
| Theorem | lincresunit3lem2 49280* | Lemma 2 for lincresunit3 49281. (Contributed by AV, 18-May-2019.) (Proof shortened by AV, 30-Jul-2019.) |
| ⊢ 𝐵 = (Base‘𝑀) & ⊢ 𝑅 = (Scalar‘𝑀) & ⊢ 𝐸 = (Base‘𝑅) & ⊢ 𝑈 = (Unit‘𝑅) & ⊢ 0 = (0g‘𝑅) & ⊢ 𝑍 = (0g‘𝑀) & ⊢ 𝑁 = (invg‘𝑅) & ⊢ 𝐼 = (invr‘𝑅) & ⊢ · = (.r‘𝑅) & ⊢ 𝐺 = (𝑠 ∈ (𝑆 ∖ {𝑋}) ↦ ((𝐼‘(𝑁‘(𝐹‘𝑋))) · (𝐹‘𝑠))) ⇒ ⊢ (((𝑆 ∈ 𝒫 𝐵 ∧ 𝑀 ∈ LMod ∧ 𝑋 ∈ 𝑆) ∧ (𝐹 ∈ (𝐸 ↑m 𝑆) ∧ (𝐹‘𝑋) ∈ 𝑈 ∧ 𝐹 finSupp 0 )) → ((𝑁‘(𝐹‘𝑋))( ·𝑠 ‘𝑀)(𝑀 Σg (𝑧 ∈ (𝑆 ∖ {𝑋}) ↦ ((𝐺‘𝑧)( ·𝑠 ‘𝑀)𝑧)))) = ((𝐹 ↾ (𝑆 ∖ {𝑋}))( linC ‘𝑀)(𝑆 ∖ {𝑋}))) | ||
| Theorem | lincresunit3 49281* | Property 3 of a specially modified restriction of a linear combination in a vector space. (Contributed by AV, 18-May-2019.) (Proof shortened by AV, 30-Jul-2019.) |
| ⊢ 𝐵 = (Base‘𝑀) & ⊢ 𝑅 = (Scalar‘𝑀) & ⊢ 𝐸 = (Base‘𝑅) & ⊢ 𝑈 = (Unit‘𝑅) & ⊢ 0 = (0g‘𝑅) & ⊢ 𝑍 = (0g‘𝑀) & ⊢ 𝑁 = (invg‘𝑅) & ⊢ 𝐼 = (invr‘𝑅) & ⊢ · = (.r‘𝑅) & ⊢ 𝐺 = (𝑠 ∈ (𝑆 ∖ {𝑋}) ↦ ((𝐼‘(𝑁‘(𝐹‘𝑋))) · (𝐹‘𝑠))) ⇒ ⊢ (((𝑆 ∈ 𝒫 𝐵 ∧ 𝑀 ∈ LMod ∧ 𝑋 ∈ 𝑆) ∧ (𝐹 ∈ (𝐸 ↑m 𝑆) ∧ (𝐹‘𝑋) ∈ 𝑈 ∧ 𝐹 finSupp 0 ) ∧ (𝐹( linC ‘𝑀)𝑆) = 𝑍) → (𝐺( linC ‘𝑀)(𝑆 ∖ {𝑋})) = 𝑋) | ||
| Theorem | lincreslvec3 49282* | Property 3 of a specially modified restriction of a linear combination in a vector space. (Contributed by AV, 18-May-2019.) (Proof shortened by AV, 30-Jul-2019.) |
| ⊢ 𝐵 = (Base‘𝑀) & ⊢ 𝑅 = (Scalar‘𝑀) & ⊢ 𝐸 = (Base‘𝑅) & ⊢ 𝑈 = (Unit‘𝑅) & ⊢ 0 = (0g‘𝑅) & ⊢ 𝑍 = (0g‘𝑀) & ⊢ 𝑁 = (invg‘𝑅) & ⊢ 𝐼 = (invr‘𝑅) & ⊢ · = (.r‘𝑅) & ⊢ 𝐺 = (𝑠 ∈ (𝑆 ∖ {𝑋}) ↦ ((𝐼‘(𝑁‘(𝐹‘𝑋))) · (𝐹‘𝑠))) ⇒ ⊢ (((𝑆 ∈ 𝒫 𝐵 ∧ 𝑀 ∈ LVec ∧ 𝑋 ∈ 𝑆) ∧ (𝐹 ∈ (𝐸 ↑m 𝑆) ∧ (𝐹‘𝑋) ≠ 0 ∧ 𝐹 finSupp 0 ) ∧ (𝐹( linC ‘𝑀)𝑆) = 𝑍) → (𝐺( linC ‘𝑀)(𝑆 ∖ {𝑋})) = 𝑋) | ||
| Theorem | islindeps2 49283* | Conditions for being a linearly dependent subset of a (left) module over a nonzero ring. (Contributed by AV, 29-Apr-2019.) (Proof shortened by AV, 30-Jul-2019.) |
| ⊢ 𝐵 = (Base‘𝑀) & ⊢ 𝑍 = (0g‘𝑀) & ⊢ 𝑅 = (Scalar‘𝑀) & ⊢ 𝐸 = (Base‘𝑅) & ⊢ 0 = (0g‘𝑅) ⇒ ⊢ ((𝑀 ∈ LMod ∧ 𝑆 ∈ 𝒫 𝐵 ∧ 𝑅 ∈ NzRing) → (∃𝑠 ∈ 𝑆 ∃𝑓 ∈ (𝐸 ↑m (𝑆 ∖ {𝑠}))(𝑓 finSupp 0 ∧ (𝑓( linC ‘𝑀)(𝑆 ∖ {𝑠})) = 𝑠) → 𝑆 linDepS 𝑀)) | ||
| Theorem | islininds2 49284* | Implication of being a linearly independent subset of a (left) module over a nonzero ring. (Contributed by AV, 29-Apr-2019.) (Proof shortened by AV, 30-Jul-2019.) |
| ⊢ 𝐵 = (Base‘𝑀) & ⊢ 𝑍 = (0g‘𝑀) & ⊢ 𝑅 = (Scalar‘𝑀) & ⊢ 𝐸 = (Base‘𝑅) & ⊢ 0 = (0g‘𝑅) ⇒ ⊢ ((𝑀 ∈ LMod ∧ 𝑆 ∈ 𝒫 𝐵 ∧ 𝑅 ∈ NzRing) → (𝑆 linIndS 𝑀 → ∀𝑠 ∈ 𝑆 ∀𝑓 ∈ (𝐸 ↑m (𝑆 ∖ {𝑠}))(¬ 𝑓 finSupp 0 ∨ (𝑓( linC ‘𝑀)(𝑆 ∖ {𝑠})) ≠ 𝑠))) | ||
| Theorem | isldepslvec2 49285* | Alternative definition of being a linearly dependent subset of a (left) vector space. In this case, the reverse implication of islindeps2 49283 holds, so that both definitions are equivalent (see theorem 1.6 in [Roman] p. 46 and the note in [Roman] p. 112: if a nontrivial linear combination of elements (where not all of the coefficients are 0) in an R-vector space is 0, then and only then each of the elements is a linear combination of the others. (Contributed by AV, 30-Apr-2019.) (Proof shortened by AV, 30-Jul-2019.) |
| ⊢ 𝐵 = (Base‘𝑀) & ⊢ 𝑍 = (0g‘𝑀) & ⊢ 𝑅 = (Scalar‘𝑀) & ⊢ 𝐸 = (Base‘𝑅) & ⊢ 0 = (0g‘𝑅) ⇒ ⊢ ((𝑀 ∈ LVec ∧ 𝑆 ∈ 𝒫 𝐵) → (∃𝑠 ∈ 𝑆 ∃𝑓 ∈ (𝐸 ↑m (𝑆 ∖ {𝑠}))(𝑓 finSupp 0 ∧ (𝑓( linC ‘𝑀)(𝑆 ∖ {𝑠})) = 𝑠) ↔ 𝑆 linDepS 𝑀)) | ||
| Theorem | lindssnlvec 49286 | A singleton not containing the zero element of a vector space is always linearly independent. (Contributed by AV, 16-Apr-2019.) (Revised by AV, 28-Apr-2019.) |
| ⊢ ((𝑀 ∈ LVec ∧ 𝑆 ∈ (Base‘𝑀) ∧ 𝑆 ≠ (0g‘𝑀)) → {𝑆} linIndS 𝑀) | ||
| Theorem | lmod1lem1 49287* | Lemma 1 for lmod1 49292. (Contributed by AV, 28-Apr-2019.) |
| ⊢ 𝑀 = ({〈(Base‘ndx), {𝐼}〉, 〈(+g‘ndx), {〈〈𝐼, 𝐼〉, 𝐼〉}〉, 〈(Scalar‘ndx), 𝑅〉} ∪ {〈( ·𝑠 ‘ndx), (𝑥 ∈ (Base‘𝑅), 𝑦 ∈ {𝐼} ↦ 𝑦)〉}) ⇒ ⊢ ((𝐼 ∈ 𝑉 ∧ 𝑅 ∈ Ring ∧ 𝑟 ∈ (Base‘𝑅)) → (𝑟( ·𝑠 ‘𝑀)𝐼) ∈ {𝐼}) | ||
| Theorem | lmod1lem2 49288* | Lemma 2 for lmod1 49292. (Contributed by AV, 28-Apr-2019.) |
| ⊢ 𝑀 = ({〈(Base‘ndx), {𝐼}〉, 〈(+g‘ndx), {〈〈𝐼, 𝐼〉, 𝐼〉}〉, 〈(Scalar‘ndx), 𝑅〉} ∪ {〈( ·𝑠 ‘ndx), (𝑥 ∈ (Base‘𝑅), 𝑦 ∈ {𝐼} ↦ 𝑦)〉}) ⇒ ⊢ ((𝐼 ∈ 𝑉 ∧ 𝑅 ∈ Ring ∧ 𝑟 ∈ (Base‘𝑅)) → (𝑟( ·𝑠 ‘𝑀)(𝐼(+g‘𝑀)𝐼)) = ((𝑟( ·𝑠 ‘𝑀)𝐼)(+g‘𝑀)(𝑟( ·𝑠 ‘𝑀)𝐼))) | ||
| Theorem | lmod1lem3 49289* | Lemma 3 for lmod1 49292. (Contributed by AV, 29-Apr-2019.) |
| ⊢ 𝑀 = ({〈(Base‘ndx), {𝐼}〉, 〈(+g‘ndx), {〈〈𝐼, 𝐼〉, 𝐼〉}〉, 〈(Scalar‘ndx), 𝑅〉} ∪ {〈( ·𝑠 ‘ndx), (𝑥 ∈ (Base‘𝑅), 𝑦 ∈ {𝐼} ↦ 𝑦)〉}) ⇒ ⊢ (((𝐼 ∈ 𝑉 ∧ 𝑅 ∈ Ring) ∧ (𝑞 ∈ (Base‘𝑅) ∧ 𝑟 ∈ (Base‘𝑅))) → ((𝑞(+g‘(Scalar‘𝑀))𝑟)( ·𝑠 ‘𝑀)𝐼) = ((𝑞( ·𝑠 ‘𝑀)𝐼)(+g‘𝑀)(𝑟( ·𝑠 ‘𝑀)𝐼))) | ||
| Theorem | lmod1lem4 49290* | Lemma 4 for lmod1 49292. (Contributed by AV, 29-Apr-2019.) |
| ⊢ 𝑀 = ({〈(Base‘ndx), {𝐼}〉, 〈(+g‘ndx), {〈〈𝐼, 𝐼〉, 𝐼〉}〉, 〈(Scalar‘ndx), 𝑅〉} ∪ {〈( ·𝑠 ‘ndx), (𝑥 ∈ (Base‘𝑅), 𝑦 ∈ {𝐼} ↦ 𝑦)〉}) ⇒ ⊢ (((𝐼 ∈ 𝑉 ∧ 𝑅 ∈ Ring) ∧ (𝑞 ∈ (Base‘𝑅) ∧ 𝑟 ∈ (Base‘𝑅))) → ((𝑞(.r‘(Scalar‘𝑀))𝑟)( ·𝑠 ‘𝑀)𝐼) = (𝑞( ·𝑠 ‘𝑀)(𝑟( ·𝑠 ‘𝑀)𝐼))) | ||
| Theorem | lmod1lem5 49291* | Lemma 5 for lmod1 49292. (Contributed by AV, 28-Apr-2019.) |
| ⊢ 𝑀 = ({〈(Base‘ndx), {𝐼}〉, 〈(+g‘ndx), {〈〈𝐼, 𝐼〉, 𝐼〉}〉, 〈(Scalar‘ndx), 𝑅〉} ∪ {〈( ·𝑠 ‘ndx), (𝑥 ∈ (Base‘𝑅), 𝑦 ∈ {𝐼} ↦ 𝑦)〉}) ⇒ ⊢ ((𝐼 ∈ 𝑉 ∧ 𝑅 ∈ Ring) → ((1r‘(Scalar‘𝑀))( ·𝑠 ‘𝑀)𝐼) = 𝐼) | ||
| Theorem | lmod1 49292* | The (smallest) structure representing a zero module over an arbitrary ring. (Contributed by AV, 29-Apr-2019.) |
| ⊢ 𝑀 = ({〈(Base‘ndx), {𝐼}〉, 〈(+g‘ndx), {〈〈𝐼, 𝐼〉, 𝐼〉}〉, 〈(Scalar‘ndx), 𝑅〉} ∪ {〈( ·𝑠 ‘ndx), (𝑥 ∈ (Base‘𝑅), 𝑦 ∈ {𝐼} ↦ 𝑦)〉}) ⇒ ⊢ ((𝐼 ∈ 𝑉 ∧ 𝑅 ∈ Ring) → 𝑀 ∈ LMod) | ||
| Theorem | lmod1zr 49293 | The (smallest) structure representing a zero module over a zero ring. (Contributed by AV, 29-Apr-2019.) |
| ⊢ 𝑅 = {〈(Base‘ndx), {𝑍}〉, 〈(+g‘ndx), {〈〈𝑍, 𝑍〉, 𝑍〉}〉, 〈(.r‘ndx), {〈〈𝑍, 𝑍〉, 𝑍〉}〉} & ⊢ 𝑀 = ({〈(Base‘ndx), {𝐼}〉, 〈(+g‘ndx), {〈〈𝐼, 𝐼〉, 𝐼〉}〉, 〈(Scalar‘ndx), 𝑅〉} ∪ {〈( ·𝑠 ‘ndx), {〈〈𝑍, 𝐼〉, 𝐼〉}〉}) ⇒ ⊢ ((𝐼 ∈ 𝑉 ∧ 𝑍 ∈ 𝑊) → 𝑀 ∈ LMod) | ||
| Theorem | lmod1zrnlvec 49294 | There is a (left) module (a zero module) which is not a (left) vector space. (Contributed by AV, 29-Apr-2019.) |
| ⊢ 𝑅 = {〈(Base‘ndx), {𝑍}〉, 〈(+g‘ndx), {〈〈𝑍, 𝑍〉, 𝑍〉}〉, 〈(.r‘ndx), {〈〈𝑍, 𝑍〉, 𝑍〉}〉} & ⊢ 𝑀 = ({〈(Base‘ndx), {𝐼}〉, 〈(+g‘ndx), {〈〈𝐼, 𝐼〉, 𝐼〉}〉, 〈(Scalar‘ndx), 𝑅〉} ∪ {〈( ·𝑠 ‘ndx), {〈〈𝑍, 𝐼〉, 𝐼〉}〉}) ⇒ ⊢ ((𝐼 ∈ 𝑉 ∧ 𝑍 ∈ 𝑊) → 𝑀 ∉ LVec) | ||
| Theorem | lmodn0 49295 | Left modules exist. (Contributed by AV, 29-Apr-2019.) |
| ⊢ LMod ≠ ∅ | ||
| Theorem | zlmodzxzequa 49296 | Example of an equation within the ℤ-module ℤ × ℤ (see example in [Roman] p. 112 for a linearly dependent set). (Contributed by AV, 22-May-2019.) (Revised by AV, 10-Jun-2019.) |
| ⊢ 𝑍 = (ℤring freeLMod {0, 1}) & ⊢ 0 = {〈0, 0〉, 〈1, 0〉} & ⊢ ∙ = ( ·𝑠 ‘𝑍) & ⊢ − = (-g‘𝑍) & ⊢ 𝐴 = {〈0, 3〉, 〈1, 6〉} & ⊢ 𝐵 = {〈0, 2〉, 〈1, 4〉} ⇒ ⊢ ((2 ∙ 𝐴) − (3 ∙ 𝐵)) = 0 | ||
| Theorem | zlmodzxznm 49297 | Example of a linearly dependent set whose elements are not linear combinations of the others, see note in [Roman] p. 112). (Contributed by AV, 23-May-2019.) (Revised by AV, 10-Jun-2019.) |
| ⊢ 𝑍 = (ℤring freeLMod {0, 1}) & ⊢ 0 = {〈0, 0〉, 〈1, 0〉} & ⊢ ∙ = ( ·𝑠 ‘𝑍) & ⊢ − = (-g‘𝑍) & ⊢ 𝐴 = {〈0, 3〉, 〈1, 6〉} & ⊢ 𝐵 = {〈0, 2〉, 〈1, 4〉} ⇒ ⊢ ∀𝑖 ∈ ℤ ((𝑖 ∙ 𝐴) ≠ 𝐵 ∧ (𝑖 ∙ 𝐵) ≠ 𝐴) | ||
| Theorem | zlmodzxzldeplem 49298 | A and B are not equal. (Contributed by AV, 24-May-2019.) (Revised by AV, 10-Jun-2019.) |
| ⊢ 𝑍 = (ℤring freeLMod {0, 1}) & ⊢ 𝐴 = {〈0, 3〉, 〈1, 6〉} & ⊢ 𝐵 = {〈0, 2〉, 〈1, 4〉} ⇒ ⊢ 𝐴 ≠ 𝐵 | ||
| Theorem | zlmodzxzequap 49299 | Example of an equation within the ℤ-module ℤ × ℤ (see example in [Roman] p. 112 for a linearly dependent set), written as a sum. (Contributed by AV, 24-May-2019.) (Revised by AV, 10-Jun-2019.) |
| ⊢ 𝑍 = (ℤring freeLMod {0, 1}) & ⊢ 𝐴 = {〈0, 3〉, 〈1, 6〉} & ⊢ 𝐵 = {〈0, 2〉, 〈1, 4〉} & ⊢ 0 = {〈0, 0〉, 〈1, 0〉} & ⊢ + = (+g‘𝑍) & ⊢ ∙ = ( ·𝑠 ‘𝑍) ⇒ ⊢ ((2 ∙ 𝐴) + (-3 ∙ 𝐵)) = 0 | ||
| Theorem | zlmodzxzldeplem1 49300 | Lemma 1 for zlmodzxzldep 49304. (Contributed by AV, 24-May-2019.) (Revised by AV, 10-Jun-2019.) |
| ⊢ 𝑍 = (ℤring freeLMod {0, 1}) & ⊢ 𝐴 = {〈0, 3〉, 〈1, 6〉} & ⊢ 𝐵 = {〈0, 2〉, 〈1, 4〉} & ⊢ 𝐹 = {〈𝐴, 2〉, 〈𝐵, -3〉} ⇒ ⊢ 𝐹 ∈ (ℤ ↑m {𝐴, 𝐵}) | ||
| < Previous Next > |
| Copyright terms: Public domain | < Previous Next > |