P. 493 of Theorem List - Metamath Proof Explorer

Theorem List for Metamath Proof Explorer - 49201-49300   *Has distinct variable group(s)

Type	Label	Description
Statement
Theorem	1arymaptf 49201*	The mapping of unary (endo)functions is a function into the set of endofunctions. (Contributed by AV, 18-May-2024.)
⊢ 𝐻 = (ℎ ∈ (1-aryF 𝑋) ↦ (𝑥 ∈ 𝑋 ↦ (ℎ‘{⟨0, 𝑥⟩})))    ⇒   ⊢ (𝑋 ∈ 𝑉 → 𝐻:(1-aryF 𝑋)⟶(𝑋 ↑m 𝑋))
Theorem	1arymaptf1 49202*	The mapping of unary (endo)functions is a one-to-one function into the set of endofunctions. (Contributed by AV, 19-May-2024.)
⊢ 𝐻 = (ℎ ∈ (1-aryF 𝑋) ↦ (𝑥 ∈ 𝑋 ↦ (ℎ‘{⟨0, 𝑥⟩})))    ⇒   ⊢ (𝑋 ∈ 𝑉 → 𝐻:(1-aryF 𝑋)–1-1→(𝑋 ↑m 𝑋))
Theorem	1arymaptfo 49203*	The mapping of unary (endo)functions is a function onto the set of endofunctions. (Contributed by AV, 18-May-2024.)
⊢ 𝐻 = (ℎ ∈ (1-aryF 𝑋) ↦ (𝑥 ∈ 𝑋 ↦ (ℎ‘{⟨0, 𝑥⟩})))    ⇒   ⊢ (𝑋 ∈ 𝑉 → 𝐻:(1-aryF 𝑋)–onto→(𝑋 ↑m 𝑋))
Theorem	1arymaptf1o 49204*	The mapping of unary (endo)functions is a one-to-one function onto the set of endofunctions. (Contributed by AV, 19-May-2024.)
⊢ 𝐻 = (ℎ ∈ (1-aryF 𝑋) ↦ (𝑥 ∈ 𝑋 ↦ (ℎ‘{⟨0, 𝑥⟩})))    ⇒   ⊢ (𝑋 ∈ 𝑉 → 𝐻:(1-aryF 𝑋)–1-1-onto→(𝑋 ↑m 𝑋))
Theorem	1aryenef 49205	The set of unary (endo)functions and the set of endofunctions are equinumerous. (Contributed by AV, 19-May-2024.)
⊢ (1-aryF 𝑋) ≈ (𝑋 ↑m 𝑋)
Theorem	1aryenefmnd 49206	The set of unary (endo)functions and the base set of the monoid of endofunctions are equinumerous. (Contributed by AV, 19-May-2024.)
⊢ (1-aryF 𝑋) ≈ (Base‘(EndoFMnd‘𝑋))
Theorem	2aryfvalel 49207	A binary (endo)function on a set 𝑋. (Contributed by AV, 20-May-2024.)
⊢ (𝑋 ∈ 𝑉 → (𝐹 ∈ (2-aryF 𝑋) ↔ 𝐹:(𝑋 ↑m {0, 1})⟶𝑋))
Theorem	fv2arycl 49208	Closure of a binary (endo)function. (Contributed by AV, 20-May-2024.)
⊢ ((𝐺 ∈ (2-aryF 𝑋) ∧ 𝐴 ∈ 𝑋 ∧ 𝐵 ∈ 𝑋) → (𝐺‘{⟨0, 𝐴⟩, ⟨1, 𝐵⟩}) ∈ 𝑋)
Theorem	2arympt 49209*	A binary (endo)function in maps-to notation. (Contributed by AV, 20-May-2024.)
⊢ 𝐹 = (𝑥 ∈ (𝑋 ↑m {0, 1}) ↦ ((𝑥‘0)𝑂(𝑥‘1)))    ⇒   ⊢ ((𝑋 ∈ 𝑉 ∧ 𝑂:(𝑋 × 𝑋)⟶𝑋) → 𝐹 ∈ (2-aryF 𝑋))
Theorem	2arymptfv 49210*	The value of a binary (endo)function in maps-to notation. (Contributed by AV, 20-May-2024.)
⊢ 𝐹 = (𝑥 ∈ (𝑋 ↑m {0, 1}) ↦ ((𝑥‘0)𝑂(𝑥‘1)))    ⇒   ⊢ ((𝑋 ∈ 𝑉 ∧ 𝐴 ∈ 𝑋 ∧ 𝐵 ∈ 𝑋) → (𝐹‘{⟨0, 𝐴⟩, ⟨1, 𝐵⟩}) = (𝐴𝑂𝐵))
Theorem	2arymaptfv 49211*	The value of the mapping of binary (endo)functions. (Contributed by AV, 21-May-2024.)
⊢ 𝐻 = (ℎ ∈ (2-aryF 𝑋) ↦ (𝑥 ∈ 𝑋, 𝑦 ∈ 𝑋 ↦ (ℎ‘{⟨0, 𝑥⟩, ⟨1, 𝑦⟩})))    ⇒   ⊢ (𝐹 ∈ (2-aryF 𝑋) → (𝐻‘𝐹) = (𝑥 ∈ 𝑋, 𝑦 ∈ 𝑋 ↦ (𝐹‘{⟨0, 𝑥⟩, ⟨1, 𝑦⟩})))
Theorem	2arymaptf 49212*	The mapping of binary (endo)functions is a function into the set of binary operations. (Contributed by AV, 21-May-2024.)
⊢ 𝐻 = (ℎ ∈ (2-aryF 𝑋) ↦ (𝑥 ∈ 𝑋, 𝑦 ∈ 𝑋 ↦ (ℎ‘{⟨0, 𝑥⟩, ⟨1, 𝑦⟩})))    ⇒   ⊢ (𝑋 ∈ 𝑉 → 𝐻:(2-aryF 𝑋)⟶(𝑋 ↑m (𝑋 × 𝑋)))
Theorem	2arymaptf1 49213*	The mapping of binary (endo)functions is a one-to-one function into the set of binary operations. (Contributed by AV, 22-May-2024.)
⊢ 𝐻 = (ℎ ∈ (2-aryF 𝑋) ↦ (𝑥 ∈ 𝑋, 𝑦 ∈ 𝑋 ↦ (ℎ‘{⟨0, 𝑥⟩, ⟨1, 𝑦⟩})))    ⇒   ⊢ (𝑋 ∈ 𝑉 → 𝐻:(2-aryF 𝑋)–1-1→(𝑋 ↑m (𝑋 × 𝑋)))
Theorem	2arymaptfo 49214*	The mapping of binary (endo)functions is a function onto the set of binary operations. (Contributed by AV, 23-May-2024.)
⊢ 𝐻 = (ℎ ∈ (2-aryF 𝑋) ↦ (𝑥 ∈ 𝑋, 𝑦 ∈ 𝑋 ↦ (ℎ‘{⟨0, 𝑥⟩, ⟨1, 𝑦⟩})))    ⇒   ⊢ (𝑋 ∈ 𝑉 → 𝐻:(2-aryF 𝑋)–onto→(𝑋 ↑m (𝑋 × 𝑋)))
Theorem	2arymaptf1o 49215*	The mapping of binary (endo)functions is a one-to-one function onto the set of binary operations. (Contributed by AV, 23-May-2024.)
⊢ 𝐻 = (ℎ ∈ (2-aryF 𝑋) ↦ (𝑥 ∈ 𝑋, 𝑦 ∈ 𝑋 ↦ (ℎ‘{⟨0, 𝑥⟩, ⟨1, 𝑦⟩})))    ⇒   ⊢ (𝑋 ∈ 𝑉 → 𝐻:(2-aryF 𝑋)–1-1-onto→(𝑋 ↑m (𝑋 × 𝑋)))
Theorem	2aryenef 49216	The set of binary (endo)functions and the set of binary operations are equinumerous. (Contributed by AV, 19-May-2024.)
⊢ (2-aryF 𝑋) ≈ (𝑋 ↑m (𝑋 × 𝑋))
21.48.21.13  The Ackermann function According to Wikipedia ("Ackermann function", 8-May-2024, https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Ackermann_function): "In computability theory, the Ackermann function, named after Wilhelm Ackermann, is one of the simplest and earliest-discovered examples of a total computable function that is not primitive recursive. ... One common version is the two-argument Ackermann-Péter function developed by Rózsa Péter and Raphael Robinson. Its value grows very rapidly; for example, A(4,2) results in 2^65536-3 [see ackval42 49256)], an integer of 19,729 decimal digits." In the following, the Ackermann function is defined as iterated 1-ary function (also mentioned in Wikipedia), see df-ack 49220, based on a definition IterComp of "the n-th iterate of (a class/function) f", see df-itco 49219. As an illustration, we have ((IterComp‘𝐹)‘3) = (𝐹 ∘ (𝐹 ∘ 𝐹))) (see itcoval3 49225). The following recursive definition of the Ackermann function follows immediately from Definition df-ack 49220: ((Ack‘(𝑀 + 1))‘𝑁) = (((IterComp‘(Ack‘𝑀))‘(𝑁 + 1))‘1)). That Definition df-ack 49220 is equivalent to Péter's definition is proven by the following three theorems: ackval0val 49246: ((Ack‘0)‘𝑀) = (𝑀 + 1); ackvalsuc0val 49247: ((Ack‘(𝑀 + 1))‘0) = ((Ack‘𝑀)‘1); ackvalsucsucval 49248: ((Ack‘(𝑀 + 1))‘(𝑁 + 1)) = ((Ack‘𝑀)‘((Ack‘(𝑀 + 1))‘𝑁)). The initial values of the Ackermann function are calculated in the following four theorems: ackval0012 49249: 𝐴(0, 0) = 1, 𝐴(0, 1) = 2, 𝐴(0, 2) = 3; ackval1012 49250: 𝐴(1, 0) = 2, 𝐴(1, 1) = 3, 𝐴(1, 3) = 4; ackval2012 49251: 𝐴(2, 0) = 3, 𝐴(2, 1) = 5, 𝐴(2, 3) = 7; ackval3012 49252: 𝐴(3, 0) = 5, 𝐴(3, 1) = ;13, 𝐴(3, 3) = ;29.
Syntax	citco 49217	Extend the definition of a class to include iterated functions.
class IterComp
Syntax	cack 49218	Extend the definition of a class to include the Ackermann function operator.
class Ack
Definition	df-itco 49219*	Define a function (recursively) that returns the n-th iterate of a class (usually a function) with regard to composition. (Contributed by Thierry Arnoux, 28-Apr-2024.) (Revised by AV, 2-May-2024.)
⊢ IterComp = (𝑓 ∈ V ↦ seq0((𝑔 ∈ V, 𝑗 ∈ V ↦ (𝑓 ∘ 𝑔)), (𝑖 ∈ ℕ0 ↦ if(𝑖 = 0, ( I ↾ dom 𝑓), 𝑓))))
Definition	df-ack 49220*	Define the Ackermann function (recursively). (Contributed by Thierry Arnoux, 28-Apr-2024.) (Revised by AV, 2-May-2024.)
⊢ Ack = seq0((𝑓 ∈ V, 𝑗 ∈ V ↦ (𝑛 ∈ ℕ0 ↦ (((IterComp‘𝑓)‘(𝑛 + 1))‘1))), (𝑖 ∈ ℕ0 ↦ if(𝑖 = 0, (𝑛 ∈ ℕ0 ↦ (𝑛 + 1)), 𝑖)))
Theorem	itcoval 49221*	The value of the function that returns the n-th iterate of a class (usually a function) with regard to composition. (Contributed by AV, 2-May-2024.)
⊢ (𝐹 ∈ 𝑉 → (IterComp‘𝐹) = seq0((𝑔 ∈ V, 𝑗 ∈ V ↦ (𝐹 ∘ 𝑔)), (𝑖 ∈ ℕ0 ↦ if(𝑖 = 0, ( I ↾ dom 𝐹), 𝐹))))
Theorem	itcoval0 49222	A function iterated zero times (defined as identity function). (Contributed by AV, 2-May-2024.)
⊢ (𝐹 ∈ 𝑉 → ((IterComp‘𝐹)‘0) = ( I ↾ dom 𝐹))
Theorem	itcoval1 49223	A function iterated once. (Contributed by AV, 2-May-2024.)
⊢ ((Rel 𝐹 ∧ 𝐹 ∈ 𝑉) → ((IterComp‘𝐹)‘1) = 𝐹)
Theorem	itcoval2 49224	A function iterated twice. (Contributed by AV, 2-May-2024.)
⊢ ((Rel 𝐹 ∧ 𝐹 ∈ 𝑉) → ((IterComp‘𝐹)‘2) = (𝐹 ∘ 𝐹))
Theorem	itcoval3 49225	A function iterated three times. (Contributed by AV, 2-May-2024.)
⊢ ((Rel 𝐹 ∧ 𝐹 ∈ 𝑉) → ((IterComp‘𝐹)‘3) = (𝐹 ∘ (𝐹 ∘ 𝐹)))
Theorem	itcoval0mpt 49226*	A mapping iterated zero times (defined as identity function). (Contributed by AV, 4-May-2024.)
⊢ 𝐹 = (𝑛 ∈ 𝐴 ↦ 𝐵)    ⇒   ⊢ ((𝐴 ∈ 𝑉 ∧ ∀𝑛 ∈ 𝐴 𝐵 ∈ 𝑊) → ((IterComp‘𝐹)‘0) = (𝑛 ∈ 𝐴 ↦ 𝑛))
Theorem	itcovalsuc 49227*	The value of the function that returns the n-th iterate of a function with regard to composition at a successor. (Contributed by AV, 4-May-2024.)
⊢ ((𝐹 ∈ 𝑉 ∧ 𝑌 ∈ ℕ0 ∧ ((IterComp‘𝐹)‘𝑌) = 𝐺) → ((IterComp‘𝐹)‘(𝑌 + 1)) = (𝐺(𝑔 ∈ V, 𝑗 ∈ V ↦ (𝐹 ∘ 𝑔))𝐹))
Theorem	itcovalsucov 49228	The value of the function that returns the n-th iterate of a function with regard to composition at a successor. (Contributed by AV, 4-May-2024.)
⊢ ((𝐹 ∈ 𝑉 ∧ 𝑌 ∈ ℕ0 ∧ ((IterComp‘𝐹)‘𝑌) = 𝐺) → ((IterComp‘𝐹)‘(𝑌 + 1)) = (𝐹 ∘ 𝐺))
Theorem	itcovalendof 49229	The n-th iterate of an endofunction is an endofunction. (Contributed by AV, 7-May-2024.)
⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐴 ∈ 𝑉)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐹:𝐴⟶𝐴)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝑁 ∈ ℕ0)    ⇒   ⊢ (𝜑 → ((IterComp‘𝐹)‘𝑁):𝐴⟶𝐴)
Theorem	itcovalpclem1 49230*	Lemma 1 for itcovalpc 49232: induction basis. (Contributed by AV, 4-May-2024.)
⊢ 𝐹 = (𝑛 ∈ ℕ0 ↦ (𝑛 + 𝐶))    ⇒   ⊢ (𝐶 ∈ ℕ0 → ((IterComp‘𝐹)‘0) = (𝑛 ∈ ℕ0 ↦ (𝑛 + (𝐶 · 0))))
Theorem	itcovalpclem2 49231*	Lemma 2 for itcovalpc 49232: induction step. (Contributed by AV, 4-May-2024.)
⊢ 𝐹 = (𝑛 ∈ ℕ0 ↦ (𝑛 + 𝐶))    ⇒   ⊢ ((𝑦 ∈ ℕ0 ∧ 𝐶 ∈ ℕ0) → (((IterComp‘𝐹)‘𝑦) = (𝑛 ∈ ℕ0 ↦ (𝑛 + (𝐶 · 𝑦))) → ((IterComp‘𝐹)‘(𝑦 + 1)) = (𝑛 ∈ ℕ0 ↦ (𝑛 + (𝐶 · (𝑦 + 1))))))
Theorem	itcovalpc 49232*	The value of the function that returns the n-th iterate of the "plus a constant" function with regard to composition. (Contributed by AV, 4-May-2024.)
⊢ 𝐹 = (𝑛 ∈ ℕ0 ↦ (𝑛 + 𝐶))    ⇒   ⊢ ((𝐼 ∈ ℕ0 ∧ 𝐶 ∈ ℕ0) → ((IterComp‘𝐹)‘𝐼) = (𝑛 ∈ ℕ0 ↦ (𝑛 + (𝐶 · 𝐼))))
Theorem	itcovalt2lem2lem1 49233	Lemma 1 for itcovalt2lem2 49236. (Contributed by AV, 6-May-2024.)
⊢ (((𝑌 ∈ ℕ ∧ 𝐶 ∈ ℕ0) ∧ 𝑁 ∈ ℕ0) → (((𝑁 + 𝐶) · 𝑌) − 𝐶) ∈ ℕ0)
Theorem	itcovalt2lem2lem2 49234	Lemma 2 for itcovalt2lem2 49236. (Contributed by AV, 7-May-2024.)
⊢ (((𝑌 ∈ ℕ0 ∧ 𝐶 ∈ ℕ0) ∧ 𝑁 ∈ ℕ0) → ((2 · (((𝑁 + 𝐶) · (2↑𝑌)) − 𝐶)) + 𝐶) = (((𝑁 + 𝐶) · (2↑(𝑌 + 1))) − 𝐶))
Theorem	itcovalt2lem1 49235*	Lemma 1 for itcovalt2 49237: induction basis. (Contributed by AV, 5-May-2024.)
⊢ 𝐹 = (𝑛 ∈ ℕ0 ↦ ((2 · 𝑛) + 𝐶))    ⇒   ⊢ (𝐶 ∈ ℕ0 → ((IterComp‘𝐹)‘0) = (𝑛 ∈ ℕ0 ↦ (((𝑛 + 𝐶) · (2↑0)) − 𝐶)))
Theorem	itcovalt2lem2 49236*	Lemma 2 for itcovalt2 49237: induction step. (Contributed by AV, 7-May-2024.)
⊢ 𝐹 = (𝑛 ∈ ℕ0 ↦ ((2 · 𝑛) + 𝐶))    ⇒   ⊢ ((𝑦 ∈ ℕ0 ∧ 𝐶 ∈ ℕ0) → (((IterComp‘𝐹)‘𝑦) = (𝑛 ∈ ℕ0 ↦ (((𝑛 + 𝐶) · (2↑𝑦)) − 𝐶)) → ((IterComp‘𝐹)‘(𝑦 + 1)) = (𝑛 ∈ ℕ0 ↦ (((𝑛 + 𝐶) · (2↑(𝑦 + 1))) − 𝐶))))
Theorem	itcovalt2 49237*	The value of the function that returns the n-th iterate of the "times 2 plus a constant" function with regard to composition. (Contributed by AV, 7-May-2024.)
⊢ 𝐹 = (𝑛 ∈ ℕ0 ↦ ((2 · 𝑛) + 𝐶))    ⇒   ⊢ ((𝐼 ∈ ℕ0 ∧ 𝐶 ∈ ℕ0) → ((IterComp‘𝐹)‘𝐼) = (𝑛 ∈ ℕ0 ↦ (((𝑛 + 𝐶) · (2↑𝐼)) − 𝐶)))
Theorem	ackvalsuc1mpt 49238*	The Ackermann function at a successor of the first argument as a mapping of the second argument. (Contributed by Thierry Arnoux, 28-Apr-2024.) (Revised by AV, 4-May-2024.)
⊢ (𝑀 ∈ ℕ0 → (Ack‘(𝑀 + 1)) = (𝑛 ∈ ℕ0 ↦ (((IterComp‘(Ack‘𝑀))‘(𝑛 + 1))‘1)))
Theorem	ackvalsuc1 49239	The Ackermann function at a successor of the first argument and an arbitrary second argument. (Contributed by Thierry Arnoux, 28-Apr-2024.) (Revised by AV, 4-May-2024.)
⊢ ((𝑀 ∈ ℕ0 ∧ 𝑁 ∈ ℕ0) → ((Ack‘(𝑀 + 1))‘𝑁) = (((IterComp‘(Ack‘𝑀))‘(𝑁 + 1))‘1))
Theorem	ackval0 49240	The Ackermann function at 0. (Contributed by AV, 2-May-2024.)
⊢ (Ack‘0) = (𝑛 ∈ ℕ0 ↦ (𝑛 + 1))
Theorem	ackval1 49241	The Ackermann function at 1. (Contributed by AV, 4-May-2024.)
⊢ (Ack‘1) = (𝑛 ∈ ℕ0 ↦ (𝑛 + 2))
Theorem	ackval2 49242	The Ackermann function at 2. (Contributed by AV, 4-May-2024.)
⊢ (Ack‘2) = (𝑛 ∈ ℕ0 ↦ ((2 · 𝑛) + 3))
Theorem	ackval3 49243	The Ackermann function at 3. (Contributed by AV, 7-May-2024.)
⊢ (Ack‘3) = (𝑛 ∈ ℕ0 ↦ ((2↑(𝑛 + 3)) − 3))
Theorem	ackendofnn0 49244	The Ackermann function at any nonnegative integer is an endofunction on the nonnegative integers. (Contributed by AV, 8-May-2024.)
⊢ (𝑀 ∈ ℕ0 → (Ack‘𝑀):ℕ0⟶ℕ0)
Theorem	ackfnnn0 49245	The Ackermann function at any nonnegative integer is a function on the nonnegative integers. (Contributed by AV, 4-May-2024.) (Proof shortened by AV, 8-May-2024.)
⊢ (𝑀 ∈ ℕ0 → (Ack‘𝑀) Fn ℕ0)
Theorem	ackval0val 49246	The Ackermann function at 0 (for the first argument). This is the first equation of Péter's definition of the Ackermann function. (Contributed by AV, 4-May-2024.)
⊢ (𝑀 ∈ ℕ0 → ((Ack‘0)‘𝑀) = (𝑀 + 1))
Theorem	ackvalsuc0val 49247	The Ackermann function at a successor (of the first argument). This is the second equation of Péter's definition of the Ackermann function. (Contributed by AV, 4-May-2024.)
⊢ (𝑀 ∈ ℕ0 → ((Ack‘(𝑀 + 1))‘0) = ((Ack‘𝑀)‘1))
Theorem	ackvalsucsucval 49248	The Ackermann function at the successors. This is the third equation of Péter's definition of the Ackermann function. (Contributed by AV, 8-May-2024.)
⊢ ((𝑀 ∈ ℕ0 ∧ 𝑁 ∈ ℕ0) → ((Ack‘(𝑀 + 1))‘(𝑁 + 1)) = ((Ack‘𝑀)‘((Ack‘(𝑀 + 1))‘𝑁)))
Theorem	ackval0012 49249	The Ackermann function at (0,0), (0,1), (0,2). (Contributed by AV, 2-May-2024.)
⊢ ⟨((Ack‘0)‘0), ((Ack‘0)‘1), ((Ack‘0)‘2)⟩ = ⟨1, 2, 3⟩
Theorem	ackval1012 49250	The Ackermann function at (1,0), (1,1), (1,2). (Contributed by AV, 4-May-2024.)
⊢ ⟨((Ack‘1)‘0), ((Ack‘1)‘1), ((Ack‘1)‘2)⟩ = ⟨2, 3, 4⟩
Theorem	ackval2012 49251	The Ackermann function at (2,0), (2,1), (2,2). (Contributed by AV, 4-May-2024.)
⊢ ⟨((Ack‘2)‘0), ((Ack‘2)‘1), ((Ack‘2)‘2)⟩ = ⟨3, 5, 7⟩
Theorem	ackval3012 49252	The Ackermann function at (3,0), (3,1), (3,2). (Contributed by AV, 7-May-2024.)
⊢ ⟨((Ack‘3)‘0), ((Ack‘3)‘1), ((Ack‘3)‘2)⟩ = ⟨5, ;13, ;29⟩
Theorem	ackval40 49253	The Ackermann function at (4,0). (Contributed by AV, 9-May-2024.)
⊢ ((Ack‘4)‘0) = ;13
Theorem	ackval41a 49254	The Ackermann function at (4,1). (Contributed by AV, 9-May-2024.)
⊢ ((Ack‘4)‘1) = ((2↑;16) − 3)
Theorem	ackval41 49255	The Ackermann function at (4,1). (Contributed by AV, 9-May-2024.)
⊢ ((Ack‘4)‘1) = ;;;;65533
Theorem	ackval42 49256	The Ackermann function at (4,2). (Contributed by AV, 9-May-2024.)
⊢ ((Ack‘4)‘2) = ((2↑;;;;65536) − 3)
Theorem	ackval42a 49257	The Ackermann function at (4,2), expressed with powers of 2. (Contributed by AV, 9-May-2024.)
⊢ ((Ack‘4)‘2) = ((2↑(2↑(2↑(2↑2)))) − 3)
Theorem	ackval50 49258	The Ackermann function at (5,0). (Contributed by AV, 9-May-2024.)
⊢ ((Ack‘5)‘0) = ;;;;65533
21.48.22  Elementary geometry (extension)
21.48.22.1  Auxiliary theorems
Theorem	fv1prop 49259	The function value of unordered pair of ordered pairs with first components 1 and 2 at 1. (Contributed by AV, 4-Feb-2023.)
⊢ (𝐴 ∈ 𝑉 → ({⟨1, 𝐴⟩, ⟨2, 𝐵⟩}‘1) = 𝐴)
Theorem	fv2prop 49260	The function value of unordered pair of ordered pairs with first components 1 and 2 at 1. (Contributed by AV, 4-Feb-2023.)
⊢ (𝐵 ∈ 𝑉 → ({⟨1, 𝐴⟩, ⟨2, 𝐵⟩}‘2) = 𝐵)
Theorem	submuladdmuld 49261	Transformation of a sum of a product of a difference and a product with the subtrahend of the difference. (Contributed by AV, 2-Feb-2023.)
⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐴 ∈ ℂ)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐵 ∈ ℂ)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐶 ∈ ℂ)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐷 ∈ ℂ)    ⇒   ⊢ (𝜑 → (((𝐴 − 𝐵) · 𝐶) + (𝐵 · 𝐷)) = ((𝐴 · 𝐶) + (𝐵 · (𝐷 − 𝐶))))
Theorem	affinecomb1 49262*	Combination of two real affine combinations, one class variable resolved. (Contributed by AV, 22-Jan-2023.)
⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐴 ∈ ℝ)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐵 ∈ ℝ)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐶 ∈ ℝ)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐵 ≠ 𝐶)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐸 ∈ ℝ)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐹 ∈ ℝ)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐺 ∈ ℝ)    &   ⊢ 𝑆 = ((𝐺 − 𝐹) / (𝐶 − 𝐵))    ⇒   ⊢ (𝜑 → (∃𝑡 ∈ ℝ (𝐴 = (((1 − 𝑡) · 𝐵) + (𝑡 · 𝐶)) ∧ 𝐸 = (((1 − 𝑡) · 𝐹) + (𝑡 · 𝐺))) ↔ 𝐸 = ((𝑆 · (𝐴 − 𝐵)) + 𝐹)))
Theorem	affinecomb2 49263*	Combination of two real affine combinations, presented without fraction. (Contributed by AV, 22-Jan-2023.)
⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐴 ∈ ℝ)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐵 ∈ ℝ)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐶 ∈ ℝ)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐵 ≠ 𝐶)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐸 ∈ ℝ)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐹 ∈ ℝ)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐺 ∈ ℝ)    ⇒   ⊢ (𝜑 → (∃𝑡 ∈ ℝ (𝐴 = (((1 − 𝑡) · 𝐵) + (𝑡 · 𝐶)) ∧ 𝐸 = (((1 − 𝑡) · 𝐹) + (𝑡 · 𝐺))) ↔ ((𝐶 − 𝐵) · 𝐸) = (((𝐺 − 𝐹) · 𝐴) + ((𝐹 · 𝐶) − (𝐵 · 𝐺)))))
Theorem	affineid 49264	Identity of an affine combination. (Contributed by AV, 2-Feb-2023.)
⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐴 ∈ ℂ)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝑇 ∈ ℂ)    ⇒   ⊢ (𝜑 → (((1 − 𝑇) · 𝐴) + (𝑇 · 𝐴)) = 𝐴)
Theorem	1subrec1sub 49265	Subtract the reciprocal of 1 minus a number from 1 results in the number divided by the number minus 1. (Contributed by AV, 15-Feb-2023.)
⊢ ((𝐴 ∈ ℂ ∧ 𝐴 ≠ 1) → (1 − (1 / (1 − 𝐴))) = (𝐴 / (𝐴 − 1)))
Theorem	resum2sqcl 49266	The sum of two squares of real numbers is a real number. (Contributed by AV, 7-Feb-2023.)
⊢ 𝑄 = ((𝐴↑2) + (𝐵↑2))    ⇒   ⊢ ((𝐴 ∈ ℝ ∧ 𝐵 ∈ ℝ) → 𝑄 ∈ ℝ)
Theorem	resum2sqgt0 49267	The sum of the square of a nonzero real number and the square of another real number is greater than zero. (Contributed by AV, 7-Feb-2023.)
⊢ 𝑄 = ((𝐴↑2) + (𝐵↑2))    ⇒   ⊢ (((𝐴 ∈ ℝ ∧ 𝐴 ≠ 0) ∧ 𝐵 ∈ ℝ) → 0 < 𝑄)
Theorem	resum2sqrp 49268	The sum of the square of a nonzero real number and the square of another real number is a positive real number. (Contributed by AV, 2-May-2023.)
⊢ 𝑄 = ((𝐴↑2) + (𝐵↑2))    ⇒   ⊢ (((𝐴 ∈ ℝ ∧ 𝐴 ≠ 0) ∧ 𝐵 ∈ ℝ) → 𝑄 ∈ ℝ+)
Theorem	resum2sqorgt0 49269	The sum of the square of two real numbers is greater than zero if at least one of the real numbers is nonzero. (Contributed by AV, 26-Feb-2023.)
⊢ 𝑄 = ((𝐴↑2) + (𝐵↑2))    ⇒   ⊢ ((𝐴 ∈ ℝ ∧ 𝐵 ∈ ℝ ∧ (𝐴 ≠ 0 ∨ 𝐵 ≠ 0)) → 0 < 𝑄)
Theorem	reorelicc 49270	Membership in and outside of a closed real interval. (Contributed by AV, 15-Feb-2023.)
⊢ ((𝐴 ∈ ℝ ∧ 𝐵 ∈ ℝ ∧ 𝐶 ∈ ℝ) → (𝐶 < 𝐴 ∨ 𝐶 ∈ (𝐴[,]𝐵) ∨ 𝐵 < 𝐶))
21.48.22.2  Real euclidean space of dimension 2
Theorem	rrx2pxel 49271	The x-coordinate of a point in a real Euclidean space of dimension 2 is a real number. (Contributed by AV, 2-Feb-2023.)
⊢ 𝐼 = {1, 2}    &   ⊢ 𝑃 = (ℝ ↑m 𝐼)    ⇒   ⊢ (𝑋 ∈ 𝑃 → (𝑋‘1) ∈ ℝ)
Theorem	rrx2pyel 49272	The y-coordinate of a point in a real Euclidean space of dimension 2 is a real number. (Contributed by AV, 2-Feb-2023.)
⊢ 𝐼 = {1, 2}    &   ⊢ 𝑃 = (ℝ ↑m 𝐼)    ⇒   ⊢ (𝑋 ∈ 𝑃 → (𝑋‘2) ∈ ℝ)
Theorem	prelrrx2 49273	An unordered pair of ordered pairs with first components 1 and 2 and real numbers as second components is a point in a real Euclidean space of dimension 2. (Contributed by AV, 4-Feb-2023.)
⊢ 𝐼 = {1, 2}    &   ⊢ 𝑃 = (ℝ ↑m 𝐼)    ⇒   ⊢ ((𝐴 ∈ ℝ ∧ 𝐵 ∈ ℝ) → {⟨1, 𝐴⟩, ⟨2, 𝐵⟩} ∈ 𝑃)
Theorem	prelrrx2b 49274	An unordered pair of ordered pairs with first components 1 and 2 and real numbers as second components is a point in a real Euclidean space of dimension 2, determined by its coordinates. (Contributed by AV, 7-May-2023.)
⊢ 𝐼 = {1, 2}    &   ⊢ 𝑃 = (ℝ ↑m 𝐼)    ⇒   ⊢ (((𝐴 ∈ ℝ ∧ 𝐵 ∈ ℝ) ∧ (𝑋 ∈ ℝ ∧ 𝑌 ∈ ℝ)) → ((𝑍 ∈ 𝑃 ∧ (((𝑍‘1) = 𝐴 ∧ (𝑍‘2) = 𝐵) ∨ ((𝑍‘1) = 𝑋 ∧ (𝑍‘2) = 𝑌))) ↔ 𝑍 ∈ {{⟨1, 𝐴⟩, ⟨2, 𝐵⟩}, {⟨1, 𝑋⟩, ⟨2, 𝑌⟩}}))
Theorem	rrx2pnecoorneor 49275	If two different points 𝑋 and 𝑌 in a real Euclidean space of dimension 2 are different, then they are different at least at one coordinate. (Contributed by AV, 26-Feb-2023.)
⊢ 𝐼 = {1, 2}    &   ⊢ 𝑃 = (ℝ ↑m 𝐼)    ⇒   ⊢ ((𝑋 ∈ 𝑃 ∧ 𝑌 ∈ 𝑃 ∧ 𝑋 ≠ 𝑌) → ((𝑋‘1) ≠ (𝑌‘1) ∨ (𝑋‘2) ≠ (𝑌‘2)))
Theorem	rrx2pnedifcoorneor 49276	If two different points 𝑋 and 𝑌 in a real Euclidean space of dimension 2 are different, then at least one difference of two corresponding coordinates is not 0. (Contributed by AV, 26-Feb-2023.)
⊢ 𝐼 = {1, 2}    &   ⊢ 𝑃 = (ℝ ↑m 𝐼)    &   ⊢ 𝐴 = ((𝑌‘1) − (𝑋‘1))    &   ⊢ 𝐵 = ((𝑌‘2) − (𝑋‘2))    ⇒   ⊢ ((𝑋 ∈ 𝑃 ∧ 𝑌 ∈ 𝑃 ∧ 𝑋 ≠ 𝑌) → (𝐴 ≠ 0 ∨ 𝐵 ≠ 0))
Theorem	rrx2pnedifcoorneorr 49277	If two different points 𝑋 and 𝑌 in a real Euclidean space of dimension 2 are different, then at least one difference of two corresponding coordinates is not 0. (Contributed by AV, 26-Feb-2023.)
⊢ 𝐼 = {1, 2}    &   ⊢ 𝑃 = (ℝ ↑m 𝐼)    &   ⊢ 𝐴 = ((𝑌‘1) − (𝑋‘1))    &   ⊢ 𝐵 = ((𝑋‘2) − (𝑌‘2))    ⇒   ⊢ ((𝑋 ∈ 𝑃 ∧ 𝑌 ∈ 𝑃 ∧ 𝑋 ≠ 𝑌) → (𝐴 ≠ 0 ∨ 𝐵 ≠ 0))
Theorem	rrx2xpref1o 49278*	There is a bijection between the set of ordered pairs of real numbers (the cartesian product of the real numbers) and the set of points in the two dimensional Euclidean plane (represented as mappings from {1, 2} to the real numbers). (Contributed by AV, 12-Mar-2023.)
⊢ 𝑅 = (ℝ ↑m {1, 2})    &   ⊢ 𝐹 = (𝑥 ∈ ℝ, 𝑦 ∈ ℝ ↦ {⟨1, 𝑥⟩, ⟨2, 𝑦⟩})    ⇒   ⊢ 𝐹:(ℝ × ℝ)–1-1-onto→𝑅
Theorem	rrx2xpreen 49279	The set of points in the two dimensional Euclidean plane and the set of ordered pairs of real numbers (the cartesian product of the real numbers) are equinumerous. (Contributed by AV, 12-Mar-2023.)
⊢ 𝑅 = (ℝ ↑m {1, 2})    ⇒   ⊢ 𝑅 ≈ (ℝ × ℝ)
Theorem	rrx2plord 49280*	The lexicographical ordering for points in the two dimensional Euclidean plane: a point is less than another point iff its first coordinate is less than the first coordinate of the other point, or the first coordinates of both points are equal and the second coordinate of the first point is less than the second coordinate of the other point: ⟨𝑎, 𝑏⟩ ≤ ⟨𝑥, 𝑦⟩ iff (𝑎 < 𝑥 ∨ (𝑎 = 𝑥 ∧ 𝑏 ≤ 𝑦)). (Contributed by AV, 12-Mar-2023.)
⊢ 𝑂 = {⟨𝑥, 𝑦⟩ ∣ ((𝑥 ∈ 𝑅 ∧ 𝑦 ∈ 𝑅) ∧ ((𝑥‘1) < (𝑦‘1) ∨ ((𝑥‘1) = (𝑦‘1) ∧ (𝑥‘2) < (𝑦‘2))))}    ⇒   ⊢ ((𝑋 ∈ 𝑅 ∧ 𝑌 ∈ 𝑅) → (𝑋𝑂𝑌 ↔ ((𝑋‘1) < (𝑌‘1) ∨ ((𝑋‘1) = (𝑌‘1) ∧ (𝑋‘2) < (𝑌‘2)))))
Theorem	rrx2plord1 49281*	The lexicographical ordering for points in the two dimensional Euclidean plane: a point is less than another point if its first coordinate is less than the first coordinate of the other point. (Contributed by AV, 12-Mar-2023.)
⊢ 𝑂 = {⟨𝑥, 𝑦⟩ ∣ ((𝑥 ∈ 𝑅 ∧ 𝑦 ∈ 𝑅) ∧ ((𝑥‘1) < (𝑦‘1) ∨ ((𝑥‘1) = (𝑦‘1) ∧ (𝑥‘2) < (𝑦‘2))))}    ⇒   ⊢ ((𝑋 ∈ 𝑅 ∧ 𝑌 ∈ 𝑅 ∧ (𝑋‘1) < (𝑌‘1)) → 𝑋𝑂𝑌)
Theorem	rrx2plord2 49282*	The lexicographical ordering for points in the two dimensional Euclidean plane: if the first coordinates of two points are equal, a point is less than another point iff the second coordinate of the point is less than the second coordinate of the other point. (Contributed by AV, 12-Mar-2023.)
⊢ 𝑂 = {⟨𝑥, 𝑦⟩ ∣ ((𝑥 ∈ 𝑅 ∧ 𝑦 ∈ 𝑅) ∧ ((𝑥‘1) < (𝑦‘1) ∨ ((𝑥‘1) = (𝑦‘1) ∧ (𝑥‘2) < (𝑦‘2))))}    &   ⊢ 𝑅 = (ℝ ↑m {1, 2})    ⇒   ⊢ ((𝑋 ∈ 𝑅 ∧ 𝑌 ∈ 𝑅 ∧ (𝑋‘1) = (𝑌‘1)) → (𝑋𝑂𝑌 ↔ (𝑋‘2) < (𝑌‘2)))
Theorem	rrx2plordisom 49283*	The set of points in the two dimensional Euclidean plane with the lexicographical ordering is isomorphic to the cartesian product of the real numbers with the lexicographical ordering implied by the ordering of the real numbers. (Contributed by AV, 12-Mar-2023.)
⊢ 𝑂 = {⟨𝑥, 𝑦⟩ ∣ ((𝑥 ∈ 𝑅 ∧ 𝑦 ∈ 𝑅) ∧ ((𝑥‘1) < (𝑦‘1) ∨ ((𝑥‘1) = (𝑦‘1) ∧ (𝑥‘2) < (𝑦‘2))))}    &   ⊢ 𝑅 = (ℝ ↑m {1, 2})    &   ⊢ 𝐹 = (𝑥 ∈ ℝ, 𝑦 ∈ ℝ ↦ {⟨1, 𝑥⟩, ⟨2, 𝑦⟩})    &   ⊢ 𝑇 = {⟨𝑥, 𝑦⟩ ∣ ((𝑥 ∈ (ℝ × ℝ) ∧ 𝑦 ∈ (ℝ × ℝ)) ∧ ((1st ‘𝑥) < (1st ‘𝑦) ∨ ((1st ‘𝑥) = (1st ‘𝑦) ∧ (2nd ‘𝑥) < (2nd ‘𝑦))))}    ⇒   ⊢ 𝐹 Isom 𝑇, 𝑂 ((ℝ × ℝ), 𝑅)
Theorem	rrx2plordso 49284*	The lexicographical ordering for points in the two dimensional Euclidean plane is a strict total ordering. (Contributed by AV, 12-Mar-2023.)
⊢ 𝑂 = {⟨𝑥, 𝑦⟩ ∣ ((𝑥 ∈ 𝑅 ∧ 𝑦 ∈ 𝑅) ∧ ((𝑥‘1) < (𝑦‘1) ∨ ((𝑥‘1) = (𝑦‘1) ∧ (𝑥‘2) < (𝑦‘2))))}    &   ⊢ 𝑅 = (ℝ ↑m {1, 2})    ⇒   ⊢ 𝑂 Or 𝑅
Theorem	ehl2eudisval0 49285	The Euclidean distance of a point to the origin in a real Euclidean space of dimension 2. (Contributed by AV, 26-Feb-2023.)
⊢ 𝐸 = (𝔼hil‘2)    &   ⊢ 𝑋 = (ℝ ↑m {1, 2})    &   ⊢ 𝐷 = (dist‘𝐸)    &   ⊢ 0 = ({1, 2} × {0})    ⇒   ⊢ (𝐹 ∈ 𝑋 → (𝐹𝐷 0 ) = (√‘(((𝐹‘1)↑2) + ((𝐹‘2)↑2))))
Theorem	ehl2eudis0lt 49286	An upper bound of the Euclidean distance of a point to the origin in a real Euclidean space of dimension 2. (Contributed by AV, 9-May-2023.)
⊢ 𝐸 = (𝔼hil‘2)    &   ⊢ 𝑋 = (ℝ ↑m {1, 2})    &   ⊢ 𝐷 = (dist‘𝐸)    &   ⊢ 0 = ({1, 2} × {0})    ⇒   ⊢ ((𝐹 ∈ 𝑋 ∧ 𝑅 ∈ ℝ+) → ((𝐹𝐷 0 ) < 𝑅 ↔ (((𝐹‘1)↑2) + ((𝐹‘2)↑2)) < (𝑅↑2)))
21.48.22.3  Spheres and lines in real Euclidean spaces
Syntax	cline 49287	Declare the syntax for lines in generalized real Euclidean spaces.
class LineM
Syntax	csph 49288	Declare the syntax for spheres in generalized real Euclidean spaces.
class Sphere
Definition	df-line 49289*	Definition of lines passing through two different points in a left module (or any extended structure having a base set, an addition, and a scalar multiplication). (Contributed by AV, 14-Jan-2023.)
⊢ LineM = (𝑤 ∈ V ↦ (𝑥 ∈ (Base‘𝑤), 𝑦 ∈ ((Base‘𝑤) ∖ {𝑥}) ↦ {𝑝 ∈ (Base‘𝑤) ∣ ∃𝑡 ∈ (Base‘(Scalar‘𝑤))𝑝 = ((((1r‘(Scalar‘𝑤))(-g‘(Scalar‘𝑤))𝑡)( ·𝑠 ‘𝑤)𝑥)(+g‘𝑤)(𝑡( ·𝑠 ‘𝑤)𝑦))}))
Definition	df-sph 49290*	Definition of spheres for given centers and radii in a metric space (or more generally, in a distance space, see distspace 24345, or even in any extended structure having a base set and a distance function into the real numbers. (Contributed by AV, 14-Jan-2023.)
⊢ Sphere = (𝑤 ∈ V ↦ (𝑥 ∈ (Base‘𝑤), 𝑟 ∈ (0[,]+∞) ↦ {𝑝 ∈ (Base‘𝑤) ∣ (𝑝(dist‘𝑤)𝑥) = 𝑟}))
Theorem	lines 49291*	The lines passing through two different points in a left module (or any extended structure having a base set, an addition, and a scalar multiplication). (Contributed by AV, 14-Jan-2023.)
⊢ 𝐵 = (Base‘𝑊)    &   ⊢ 𝐿 = (LineM‘𝑊)    &   ⊢ 𝑆 = (Scalar‘𝑊)    &   ⊢ 𝐾 = (Base‘𝑆)    &   ⊢ · = ( ·𝑠 ‘𝑊)    &   ⊢ + = (+g‘𝑊)    &   ⊢ − = (-g‘𝑆)    &   ⊢ 1 = (1r‘𝑆)    ⇒   ⊢ (𝑊 ∈ 𝑉 → 𝐿 = (𝑥 ∈ 𝐵, 𝑦 ∈ (𝐵 ∖ {𝑥}) ↦ {𝑝 ∈ 𝐵 ∣ ∃𝑡 ∈ 𝐾 𝑝 = ((( 1 − 𝑡) · 𝑥) + (𝑡 · 𝑦))}))
Theorem	line 49292*	The line passing through the two different points 𝑋 and 𝑌 in a left module (or any extended structure having a base set, an addition, and a scalar multiplication). (Contributed by AV, 14-Jan-2023.)
⊢ 𝐵 = (Base‘𝑊)    &   ⊢ 𝐿 = (LineM‘𝑊)    &   ⊢ 𝑆 = (Scalar‘𝑊)    &   ⊢ 𝐾 = (Base‘𝑆)    &   ⊢ · = ( ·𝑠 ‘𝑊)    &   ⊢ + = (+g‘𝑊)    &   ⊢ − = (-g‘𝑆)    &   ⊢ 1 = (1r‘𝑆)    ⇒   ⊢ ((𝑊 ∈ 𝑉 ∧ (𝑋 ∈ 𝐵 ∧ 𝑌 ∈ 𝐵 ∧ 𝑋 ≠ 𝑌)) → (𝑋𝐿𝑌) = {𝑝 ∈ 𝐵 ∣ ∃𝑡 ∈ 𝐾 𝑝 = ((( 1 − 𝑡) · 𝑋) + (𝑡 · 𝑌))})
Theorem	rrxlines 49293*	Definition of lines passing through two different points in a generalized real Euclidean space of finite dimension. (Contributed by AV, 14-Jan-2023.)
⊢ 𝐸 = (ℝ^‘𝐼)    &   ⊢ 𝑃 = (ℝ ↑m 𝐼)    &   ⊢ 𝐿 = (LineM‘𝐸)    &   ⊢ · = ( ·𝑠 ‘𝐸)    &   ⊢ + = (+g‘𝐸)    ⇒   ⊢ (𝐼 ∈ Fin → 𝐿 = (𝑥 ∈ 𝑃, 𝑦 ∈ (𝑃 ∖ {𝑥}) ↦ {𝑝 ∈ 𝑃 ∣ ∃𝑡 ∈ ℝ 𝑝 = (((1 − 𝑡) · 𝑥) + (𝑡 · 𝑦))}))
Theorem	rrxline 49294*	The line passing through the two different points 𝑋 and 𝑌 in a generalized real Euclidean space of finite dimension. (Contributed by AV, 14-Jan-2023.)
⊢ 𝐸 = (ℝ^‘𝐼)    &   ⊢ 𝑃 = (ℝ ↑m 𝐼)    &   ⊢ 𝐿 = (LineM‘𝐸)    &   ⊢ · = ( ·𝑠 ‘𝐸)    &   ⊢ + = (+g‘𝐸)    ⇒   ⊢ ((𝐼 ∈ Fin ∧ (𝑋 ∈ 𝑃 ∧ 𝑌 ∈ 𝑃 ∧ 𝑋 ≠ 𝑌)) → (𝑋𝐿𝑌) = {𝑝 ∈ 𝑃 ∣ ∃𝑡 ∈ ℝ 𝑝 = (((1 − 𝑡) · 𝑋) + (𝑡 · 𝑌))})
Theorem	rrxlinesc 49295*	Definition of lines passing through two different points in a generalized real Euclidean space of finite dimension, expressed by their coordinates. (Contributed by AV, 13-Feb-2023.)
⊢ 𝐸 = (ℝ^‘𝐼)    &   ⊢ 𝑃 = (ℝ ↑m 𝐼)    &   ⊢ 𝐿 = (LineM‘𝐸)    ⇒   ⊢ (𝐼 ∈ Fin → 𝐿 = (𝑥 ∈ 𝑃, 𝑦 ∈ (𝑃 ∖ {𝑥}) ↦ {𝑝 ∈ 𝑃 ∣ ∃𝑡 ∈ ℝ ∀𝑖 ∈ 𝐼 (𝑝‘𝑖) = (((1 − 𝑡) · (𝑥‘𝑖)) + (𝑡 · (𝑦‘𝑖)))}))
Theorem	rrxlinec 49296*	The line passing through the two different points 𝑋 and 𝑌 in a generalized real Euclidean space of finite dimension, expressed by its coordinates. Remark: This proof is shorter and requires less distinct variables than the proof using rrxlinesc 49295. (Contributed by AV, 13-Feb-2023.)
⊢ 𝐸 = (ℝ^‘𝐼)    &   ⊢ 𝑃 = (ℝ ↑m 𝐼)    &   ⊢ 𝐿 = (LineM‘𝐸)    ⇒   ⊢ ((𝐼 ∈ Fin ∧ (𝑋 ∈ 𝑃 ∧ 𝑌 ∈ 𝑃 ∧ 𝑋 ≠ 𝑌)) → (𝑋𝐿𝑌) = {𝑝 ∈ 𝑃 ∣ ∃𝑡 ∈ ℝ ∀𝑖 ∈ 𝐼 (𝑝‘𝑖) = (((1 − 𝑡) · (𝑋‘𝑖)) + (𝑡 · (𝑌‘𝑖)))})
Theorem	eenglngeehlnmlem1 49297*	Lemma 1 for eenglngeehlnm 49299. (Contributed by AV, 15-Feb-2023.)
⊢ (((𝑁 ∈ ℕ ∧ 𝑥 ∈ (ℝ ↑m (1...𝑁)) ∧ 𝑦 ∈ ((ℝ ↑m (1...𝑁)) ∖ {𝑥})) ∧ 𝑝 ∈ (ℝ ↑m (1...𝑁))) → ((∃𝑘 ∈ (0[,]1)∀𝑖 ∈ (1...𝑁)(𝑝‘𝑖) = (((1 − 𝑘) · (𝑥‘𝑖)) + (𝑘 · (𝑦‘𝑖))) ∨ ∃𝑙 ∈ (0[,)1)∀𝑖 ∈ (1...𝑁)(𝑥‘𝑖) = (((1 − 𝑙) · (𝑝‘𝑖)) + (𝑙 · (𝑦‘𝑖))) ∨ ∃𝑚 ∈ (0(,]1)∀𝑖 ∈ (1...𝑁)(𝑦‘𝑖) = (((1 − 𝑚) · (𝑥‘𝑖)) + (𝑚 · (𝑝‘𝑖)))) → ∃𝑡 ∈ ℝ ∀𝑖 ∈ (1...𝑁)(𝑝‘𝑖) = (((1 − 𝑡) · (𝑥‘𝑖)) + (𝑡 · (𝑦‘𝑖)))))
Theorem	eenglngeehlnmlem2 49298*	Lemma 2 for eenglngeehlnm 49299. (Contributed by AV, 15-Feb-2023.)
⊢ (((𝑁 ∈ ℕ ∧ 𝑥 ∈ (ℝ ↑m (1...𝑁)) ∧ 𝑦 ∈ ((ℝ ↑m (1...𝑁)) ∖ {𝑥})) ∧ 𝑝 ∈ (ℝ ↑m (1...𝑁))) → (∃𝑡 ∈ ℝ ∀𝑖 ∈ (1...𝑁)(𝑝‘𝑖) = (((1 − 𝑡) · (𝑥‘𝑖)) + (𝑡 · (𝑦‘𝑖))) → (∃𝑘 ∈ (0[,]1)∀𝑖 ∈ (1...𝑁)(𝑝‘𝑖) = (((1 − 𝑘) · (𝑥‘𝑖)) + (𝑘 · (𝑦‘𝑖))) ∨ ∃𝑙 ∈ (0[,)1)∀𝑖 ∈ (1...𝑁)(𝑥‘𝑖) = (((1 − 𝑙) · (𝑝‘𝑖)) + (𝑙 · (𝑦‘𝑖))) ∨ ∃𝑚 ∈ (0(,]1)∀𝑖 ∈ (1...𝑁)(𝑦‘𝑖) = (((1 − 𝑚) · (𝑥‘𝑖)) + (𝑚 · (𝑝‘𝑖))))))
Theorem	eenglngeehlnm 49299	The line definition in the Tarski structure for the Euclidean geometry (see elntg 29120) corresponds to the definition of lines passing through two different points in a left module (see rrxlines 49293). (Contributed by AV, 16-Feb-2023.)
⊢ (𝑁 ∈ ℕ → (LineG‘(EEG‘𝑁)) = (LineM‘(𝔼hil‘𝑁)))
Theorem	rrx2line 49300*	The line passing through the two different points 𝑋 and 𝑌 in a real Euclidean space of dimension 2. (Contributed by AV, 22-Jan-2023.) (Proof shortened by AV, 13-Feb-2023.)
⊢ 𝐼 = {1, 2}    &   ⊢ 𝐸 = (ℝ^‘𝐼)    &   ⊢ 𝑃 = (ℝ ↑m 𝐼)    &   ⊢ 𝐿 = (LineM‘𝐸)    ⇒   ⊢ ((𝑋 ∈ 𝑃 ∧ 𝑌 ∈ 𝑃 ∧ 𝑋 ≠ 𝑌) → (𝑋𝐿𝑌) = {𝑝 ∈ 𝑃 ∣ ∃𝑡 ∈ ℝ ((𝑝‘1) = (((1 − 𝑡) · (𝑋‘1)) + (𝑡 · (𝑌‘1))) ∧ (𝑝‘2) = (((1 − 𝑡) · (𝑋‘2)) + (𝑡 · (𝑌‘2))))})