ewlkprop - Metamath Proof Explorer

	Metamath Proof Explorer		< Previous Next > Nearby theorems
Mirrors > Home > MPE Home > Th. List > ewlkprop		Structured version Visualization version GIF version

Theorem ewlkprop 29127

Description: Properties of an s-walk of edges. (Contributed by AV, 4-Jan-2021.)

**Hypothesis**
Ref	Expression
ewlksfval.i	⊢ 𝐼 = (iEdg‘𝐺)

**Assertion**
Ref	Expression
ewlkprop	⊢ (𝐹 ∈ (𝐺 EdgWalks 𝑆) → ((𝐺 ∈ V ∧ 𝑆 ∈ ℕ₀^*) ∧ 𝐹 ∈ Word dom 𝐼 ∧ ∀𝑘 ∈ (1..^(♯‘𝐹))𝑆 ≤ (♯‘((𝐼‘(𝐹‘(𝑘 − 1))) ∩ (𝐼‘(𝐹‘𝑘))))))

Distinct variable groups: 𝑘,𝐺 𝑆,𝑘 𝑘,𝐹 Allowed substitution hint: 𝐼(𝑘)

Proof of Theorem ewlkprop Dummy variables 𝑓 𝑔 𝑖 𝑠 are mutually distinct and distinct from all other variables.

Step	Hyp	Ref	Expression
1		df-ewlks 29122	. . 3 ⊢ EdgWalks = (𝑔 ∈ V, 𝑠 ∈ ℕ₀^* ↦ {𝑓 ∣ [(iEdg‘𝑔) / 𝑖](𝑓 ∈ Word dom 𝑖 ∧ ∀𝑘 ∈ (1..^(♯‘𝑓))𝑠 ≤ (♯‘((𝑖‘(𝑓‘(𝑘 − 1))) ∩ (𝑖‘(𝑓‘𝑘)))))})
2	1	elmpocl 7650	. 2 ⊢ (𝐹 ∈ (𝐺 EdgWalks 𝑆) → (𝐺 ∈ V ∧ 𝑆 ∈ ℕ₀^*))
3		simpr 483	. . 3 ⊢ ((𝐹 ∈ (𝐺 EdgWalks 𝑆) ∧ (𝐺 ∈ V ∧ 𝑆 ∈ ℕ₀^)) → (𝐺 ∈ V ∧ 𝑆 ∈ ℕ₀^))
4		ewlksfval.i	. . . . . . . . 9 ⊢ 𝐼 = (iEdg‘𝐺)
5	4	isewlk 29126	. . . . . . . 8 ⊢ ((𝐺 ∈ V ∧ 𝑆 ∈ ℕ₀^* ∧ 𝐹 ∈ (𝐺 EdgWalks 𝑆)) → (𝐹 ∈ (𝐺 EdgWalks 𝑆) ↔ (𝐹 ∈ Word dom 𝐼 ∧ ∀𝑘 ∈ (1..^(♯‘𝐹))𝑆 ≤ (♯‘((𝐼‘(𝐹‘(𝑘 − 1))) ∩ (𝐼‘(𝐹‘𝑘)))))))
6	5	3expa 1116	. . . . . . 7 ⊢ (((𝐺 ∈ V ∧ 𝑆 ∈ ℕ₀^*) ∧ 𝐹 ∈ (𝐺 EdgWalks 𝑆)) → (𝐹 ∈ (𝐺 EdgWalks 𝑆) ↔ (𝐹 ∈ Word dom 𝐼 ∧ ∀𝑘 ∈ (1..^(♯‘𝐹))𝑆 ≤ (♯‘((𝐼‘(𝐹‘(𝑘 − 1))) ∩ (𝐼‘(𝐹‘𝑘)))))))
7	6	biimpd 228	. . . . . 6 ⊢ (((𝐺 ∈ V ∧ 𝑆 ∈ ℕ₀^*) ∧ 𝐹 ∈ (𝐺 EdgWalks 𝑆)) → (𝐹 ∈ (𝐺 EdgWalks 𝑆) → (𝐹 ∈ Word dom 𝐼 ∧ ∀𝑘 ∈ (1..^(♯‘𝐹))𝑆 ≤ (♯‘((𝐼‘(𝐹‘(𝑘 − 1))) ∩ (𝐼‘(𝐹‘𝑘)))))))
8	7	expcom 412	. . . . 5 ⊢ (𝐹 ∈ (𝐺 EdgWalks 𝑆) → ((𝐺 ∈ V ∧ 𝑆 ∈ ℕ₀^*) → (𝐹 ∈ (𝐺 EdgWalks 𝑆) → (𝐹 ∈ Word dom 𝐼 ∧ ∀𝑘 ∈ (1..^(♯‘𝐹))𝑆 ≤ (♯‘((𝐼‘(𝐹‘(𝑘 − 1))) ∩ (𝐼‘(𝐹‘𝑘))))))))
9	8	pm2.43a 54	. . . 4 ⊢ (𝐹 ∈ (𝐺 EdgWalks 𝑆) → ((𝐺 ∈ V ∧ 𝑆 ∈ ℕ₀^*) → (𝐹 ∈ Word dom 𝐼 ∧ ∀𝑘 ∈ (1..^(♯‘𝐹))𝑆 ≤ (♯‘((𝐼‘(𝐹‘(𝑘 − 1))) ∩ (𝐼‘(𝐹‘𝑘)))))))
10	9	imp 405	. . 3 ⊢ ((𝐹 ∈ (𝐺 EdgWalks 𝑆) ∧ (𝐺 ∈ V ∧ 𝑆 ∈ ℕ₀^*)) → (𝐹 ∈ Word dom 𝐼 ∧ ∀𝑘 ∈ (1..^(♯‘𝐹))𝑆 ≤ (♯‘((𝐼‘(𝐹‘(𝑘 − 1))) ∩ (𝐼‘(𝐹‘𝑘))))))
11		3anass 1093	. . 3 ⊢ (((𝐺 ∈ V ∧ 𝑆 ∈ ℕ₀^) ∧ 𝐹 ∈ Word dom 𝐼 ∧ ∀𝑘 ∈ (1..^(♯‘𝐹))𝑆 ≤ (♯‘((𝐼‘(𝐹‘(𝑘 − 1))) ∩ (𝐼‘(𝐹‘𝑘))))) ↔ ((𝐺 ∈ V ∧ 𝑆 ∈ ℕ₀^) ∧ (𝐹 ∈ Word dom 𝐼 ∧ ∀𝑘 ∈ (1..^(♯‘𝐹))𝑆 ≤ (♯‘((𝐼‘(𝐹‘(𝑘 − 1))) ∩ (𝐼‘(𝐹‘𝑘)))))))
12	3, 10, 11	sylanbrc 581	. 2 ⊢ ((𝐹 ∈ (𝐺 EdgWalks 𝑆) ∧ (𝐺 ∈ V ∧ 𝑆 ∈ ℕ₀^)) → ((𝐺 ∈ V ∧ 𝑆 ∈ ℕ₀^) ∧ 𝐹 ∈ Word dom 𝐼 ∧ ∀𝑘 ∈ (1..^(♯‘𝐹))𝑆 ≤ (♯‘((𝐼‘(𝐹‘(𝑘 − 1))) ∩ (𝐼‘(𝐹‘𝑘))))))
13	2, 12	mpdan 683	1 ⊢ (𝐹 ∈ (𝐺 EdgWalks 𝑆) → ((𝐺 ∈ V ∧ 𝑆 ∈ ℕ₀^*) ∧ 𝐹 ∈ Word dom 𝐼 ∧ ∀𝑘 ∈ (1..^(♯‘𝐹))𝑆 ≤ (♯‘((𝐼‘(𝐹‘(𝑘 − 1))) ∩ (𝐼‘(𝐹‘𝑘))))))

Colors of variables: wff setvar class

Syntax hints: → wi 4 ↔ wb 205 ∧ wa 394 ∧ w3a 1085 = wceq 1539 ∈ wcel 2104 {cab 2707 ∀wral 3059 Vcvv 3472 [wsbc 3776 ∩ cin 3946 class class class wbr 5147 dom cdm 5675 ‘cfv 6542 (class class class)co 7411 1c1 11113 ≤ cle 11253 − cmin 11448 ℕ₀^*cxnn0 12548 ..^cfzo 13631 ♯chash 14294 Word cword 14468 iEdgciedg 28524 EdgWalks cewlks 29119

This theorem was proved from axioms: ax-mp 5 ax-1 6 ax-2 7 ax-3 8 ax-gen 1795 ax-4 1809 ax-5 1911 ax-6 1969 ax-7 2009 ax-8 2106 ax-9 2114 ax-10 2135 ax-11 2152 ax-12 2169 ax-ext 2701 ax-rep 5284 ax-sep 5298 ax-nul 5305 ax-pow 5362 ax-pr 5426 ax-un 7727 ax-cnex 11168 ax-resscn 11169 ax-1cn 11170 ax-icn 11171 ax-addcl 11172 ax-addrcl 11173 ax-mulcl 11174 ax-mulrcl 11175 ax-mulcom 11176 ax-addass 11177 ax-mulass 11178 ax-distr 11179 ax-i2m1 11180 ax-1ne0 11181 ax-1rid 11182 ax-rnegex 11183 ax-rrecex 11184 ax-cnre 11185 ax-pre-lttri 11186 ax-pre-lttrn 11187 ax-pre-ltadd 11188 ax-pre-mulgt0 11189

This theorem depends on definitions: df-bi 206 df-an 395 df-or 844 df-3or 1086 df-3an 1087 df-tru 1542 df-fal 1552 df-ex 1780 df-nf 1784 df-sb 2066 df-mo 2532 df-eu 2561 df-clab 2708 df-cleq 2722 df-clel 2808 df-nfc 2883 df-ne 2939 df-nel 3045 df-ral 3060 df-rex 3069 df-reu 3375 df-rab 3431 df-v 3474 df-sbc 3777 df-csb 3893 df-dif 3950 df-un 3952 df-in 3954 df-ss 3964 df-pss 3966 df-nul 4322 df-if 4528 df-pw 4603 df-sn 4628 df-pr 4630 df-op 4634 df-uni 4908 df-int 4950 df-iun 4998 df-br 5148 df-opab 5210 df-mpt 5231 df-tr 5265 df-id 5573 df-eprel 5579 df-po 5587 df-so 5588 df-fr 5630 df-we 5632 df-xp 5681 df-rel 5682 df-cnv 5683 df-co 5684 df-dm 5685 df-rn 5686 df-res 5687 df-ima 5688 df-pred 6299 df-ord 6366 df-on 6367 df-lim 6368 df-suc 6369 df-iota 6494 df-fun 6544 df-fn 6545 df-f 6546 df-f1 6547 df-fo 6548 df-f1o 6549 df-fv 6550 df-riota 7367 df-ov 7414 df-oprab 7415 df-mpo 7416 df-om 7858 df-1st 7977 df-2nd 7978 df-frecs 8268 df-wrecs 8299 df-recs 8373 df-rdg 8412 df-1o 8468 df-er 8705 df-map 8824 df-en 8942 df-dom 8943 df-sdom 8944 df-fin 8945 df-card 9936 df-pnf 11254 df-mnf 11255 df-xr 11256 df-ltxr 11257 df-le 11258 df-sub 11450 df-neg 11451 df-nn 12217 df-n0 12477 df-z 12563 df-uz 12827 df-fz 13489 df-fzo 13632 df-hash 14295 df-word 14469 df-ewlks 29122

This theorem is referenced by: ewlkinedg 29128 ewlkle 29129 upgrewlkle2 29130

W3C validator