ewlkprop - Metamath Proof Explorer

	Metamath Proof Explorer		< Previous Next > Nearby theorems
Mirrors > Home > MPE Home > Th. List > ewlkprop		Structured version Visualization version GIF version

Theorem ewlkprop 27393

Description: Properties of an s-walk of edges. (Contributed by AV, 4-Jan-2021.)

**Hypothesis**
Ref	Expression
ewlksfval.i	⊢ 𝐼 = (iEdg‘𝐺)

**Assertion**
Ref	Expression
ewlkprop	⊢ (𝐹 ∈ (𝐺 EdgWalks 𝑆) → ((𝐺 ∈ V ∧ 𝑆 ∈ ℕ₀^*) ∧ 𝐹 ∈ Word dom 𝐼 ∧ ∀𝑘 ∈ (1..^(♯‘𝐹))𝑆 ≤ (♯‘((𝐼‘(𝐹‘(𝑘 − 1))) ∩ (𝐼‘(𝐹‘𝑘))))))

Distinct variable groups: 𝑘,𝐺 𝑆,𝑘 𝑘,𝐹 Allowed substitution hint: 𝐼(𝑘)

Proof of Theorem ewlkprop Dummy variables 𝑓 𝑔 𝑖 𝑠 are mutually distinct and distinct from all other variables.

Step	Hyp	Ref	Expression
1		df-ewlks 27388	. . 3 ⊢ EdgWalks = (𝑔 ∈ V, 𝑠 ∈ ℕ₀^* ↦ {𝑓 ∣ [(iEdg‘𝑔) / 𝑖](𝑓 ∈ Word dom 𝑖 ∧ ∀𝑘 ∈ (1..^(♯‘𝑓))𝑠 ≤ (♯‘((𝑖‘(𝑓‘(𝑘 − 1))) ∩ (𝑖‘(𝑓‘𝑘)))))})
2	1	elmpocl 7367	. 2 ⊢ (𝐹 ∈ (𝐺 EdgWalks 𝑆) → (𝐺 ∈ V ∧ 𝑆 ∈ ℕ₀^*))
3		simpr 488	. . 3 ⊢ ((𝐹 ∈ (𝐺 EdgWalks 𝑆) ∧ (𝐺 ∈ V ∧ 𝑆 ∈ ℕ₀^)) → (𝐺 ∈ V ∧ 𝑆 ∈ ℕ₀^))
4		ewlksfval.i	. . . . . . . . 9 ⊢ 𝐼 = (iEdg‘𝐺)
5	4	isewlk 27392	. . . . . . . 8 ⊢ ((𝐺 ∈ V ∧ 𝑆 ∈ ℕ₀^* ∧ 𝐹 ∈ (𝐺 EdgWalks 𝑆)) → (𝐹 ∈ (𝐺 EdgWalks 𝑆) ↔ (𝐹 ∈ Word dom 𝐼 ∧ ∀𝑘 ∈ (1..^(♯‘𝐹))𝑆 ≤ (♯‘((𝐼‘(𝐹‘(𝑘 − 1))) ∩ (𝐼‘(𝐹‘𝑘)))))))
6	5	3expa 1115	. . . . . . 7 ⊢ (((𝐺 ∈ V ∧ 𝑆 ∈ ℕ₀^*) ∧ 𝐹 ∈ (𝐺 EdgWalks 𝑆)) → (𝐹 ∈ (𝐺 EdgWalks 𝑆) ↔ (𝐹 ∈ Word dom 𝐼 ∧ ∀𝑘 ∈ (1..^(♯‘𝐹))𝑆 ≤ (♯‘((𝐼‘(𝐹‘(𝑘 − 1))) ∩ (𝐼‘(𝐹‘𝑘)))))))
7	6	biimpd 232	. . . . . 6 ⊢ (((𝐺 ∈ V ∧ 𝑆 ∈ ℕ₀^*) ∧ 𝐹 ∈ (𝐺 EdgWalks 𝑆)) → (𝐹 ∈ (𝐺 EdgWalks 𝑆) → (𝐹 ∈ Word dom 𝐼 ∧ ∀𝑘 ∈ (1..^(♯‘𝐹))𝑆 ≤ (♯‘((𝐼‘(𝐹‘(𝑘 − 1))) ∩ (𝐼‘(𝐹‘𝑘)))))))
8	7	expcom 417	. . . . 5 ⊢ (𝐹 ∈ (𝐺 EdgWalks 𝑆) → ((𝐺 ∈ V ∧ 𝑆 ∈ ℕ₀^*) → (𝐹 ∈ (𝐺 EdgWalks 𝑆) → (𝐹 ∈ Word dom 𝐼 ∧ ∀𝑘 ∈ (1..^(♯‘𝐹))𝑆 ≤ (♯‘((𝐼‘(𝐹‘(𝑘 − 1))) ∩ (𝐼‘(𝐹‘𝑘))))))))
9	8	pm2.43a 54	. . . 4 ⊢ (𝐹 ∈ (𝐺 EdgWalks 𝑆) → ((𝐺 ∈ V ∧ 𝑆 ∈ ℕ₀^*) → (𝐹 ∈ Word dom 𝐼 ∧ ∀𝑘 ∈ (1..^(♯‘𝐹))𝑆 ≤ (♯‘((𝐼‘(𝐹‘(𝑘 − 1))) ∩ (𝐼‘(𝐹‘𝑘)))))))
10	9	imp 410	. . 3 ⊢ ((𝐹 ∈ (𝐺 EdgWalks 𝑆) ∧ (𝐺 ∈ V ∧ 𝑆 ∈ ℕ₀^*)) → (𝐹 ∈ Word dom 𝐼 ∧ ∀𝑘 ∈ (1..^(♯‘𝐹))𝑆 ≤ (♯‘((𝐼‘(𝐹‘(𝑘 − 1))) ∩ (𝐼‘(𝐹‘𝑘))))))
11		3anass 1092	. . 3 ⊢ (((𝐺 ∈ V ∧ 𝑆 ∈ ℕ₀^) ∧ 𝐹 ∈ Word dom 𝐼 ∧ ∀𝑘 ∈ (1..^(♯‘𝐹))𝑆 ≤ (♯‘((𝐼‘(𝐹‘(𝑘 − 1))) ∩ (𝐼‘(𝐹‘𝑘))))) ↔ ((𝐺 ∈ V ∧ 𝑆 ∈ ℕ₀^) ∧ (𝐹 ∈ Word dom 𝐼 ∧ ∀𝑘 ∈ (1..^(♯‘𝐹))𝑆 ≤ (♯‘((𝐼‘(𝐹‘(𝑘 − 1))) ∩ (𝐼‘(𝐹‘𝑘)))))))
12	3, 10, 11	sylanbrc 586	. 2 ⊢ ((𝐹 ∈ (𝐺 EdgWalks 𝑆) ∧ (𝐺 ∈ V ∧ 𝑆 ∈ ℕ₀^)) → ((𝐺 ∈ V ∧ 𝑆 ∈ ℕ₀^) ∧ 𝐹 ∈ Word dom 𝐼 ∧ ∀𝑘 ∈ (1..^(♯‘𝐹))𝑆 ≤ (♯‘((𝐼‘(𝐹‘(𝑘 − 1))) ∩ (𝐼‘(𝐹‘𝑘))))))
13	2, 12	mpdan 686	1 ⊢ (𝐹 ∈ (𝐺 EdgWalks 𝑆) → ((𝐺 ∈ V ∧ 𝑆 ∈ ℕ₀^*) ∧ 𝐹 ∈ Word dom 𝐼 ∧ ∀𝑘 ∈ (1..^(♯‘𝐹))𝑆 ≤ (♯‘((𝐼‘(𝐹‘(𝑘 − 1))) ∩ (𝐼‘(𝐹‘𝑘))))))

Colors of variables: wff setvar class

Syntax hints: → wi 4 ↔ wb 209 ∧ wa 399 ∧ w3a 1084 = wceq 1538 ∈ wcel 2111 {cab 2776 ∀wral 3106 Vcvv 3441 [wsbc 3720 ∩ cin 3880 class class class wbr 5030 dom cdm 5519 ‘cfv 6324 (class class class)co 7135 1c1 10527 ≤ cle 10665 − cmin 10859 ℕ₀^*cxnn0 11955 ..^cfzo 13028 ♯chash 13686 Word cword 13857 iEdgciedg 26790 EdgWalks cewlks 27385

This theorem was proved from axioms: ax-mp 5 ax-1 6 ax-2 7 ax-3 8 ax-gen 1797 ax-4 1811 ax-5 1911 ax-6 1970 ax-7 2015 ax-8 2113 ax-9 2121 ax-10 2142 ax-11 2158 ax-12 2175 ax-ext 2770 ax-rep 5154 ax-sep 5167 ax-nul 5174 ax-pow 5231 ax-pr 5295 ax-un 7441 ax-cnex 10582 ax-resscn 10583 ax-1cn 10584 ax-icn 10585 ax-addcl 10586 ax-addrcl 10587 ax-mulcl 10588 ax-mulrcl 10589 ax-mulcom 10590 ax-addass 10591 ax-mulass 10592 ax-distr 10593 ax-i2m1 10594 ax-1ne0 10595 ax-1rid 10596 ax-rnegex 10597 ax-rrecex 10598 ax-cnre 10599 ax-pre-lttri 10600 ax-pre-lttrn 10601 ax-pre-ltadd 10602 ax-pre-mulgt0 10603

This theorem depends on definitions: df-bi 210 df-an 400 df-or 845 df-3or 1085 df-3an 1086 df-tru 1541 df-ex 1782 df-nf 1786 df-sb 2070 df-mo 2598 df-eu 2629 df-clab 2777 df-cleq 2791 df-clel 2870 df-nfc 2938 df-ne 2988 df-nel 3092 df-ral 3111 df-rex 3112 df-reu 3113 df-rab 3115 df-v 3443 df-sbc 3721 df-csb 3829 df-dif 3884 df-un 3886 df-in 3888 df-ss 3898 df-pss 3900 df-nul 4244 df-if 4426 df-pw 4499 df-sn 4526 df-pr 4528 df-tp 4530 df-op 4532 df-uni 4801 df-int 4839 df-iun 4883 df-br 5031 df-opab 5093 df-mpt 5111 df-tr 5137 df-id 5425 df-eprel 5430 df-po 5438 df-so 5439 df-fr 5478 df-we 5480 df-xp 5525 df-rel 5526 df-cnv 5527 df-co 5528 df-dm 5529 df-rn 5530 df-res 5531 df-ima 5532 df-pred 6116 df-ord 6162 df-on 6163 df-lim 6164 df-suc 6165 df-iota 6283 df-fun 6326 df-fn 6327 df-f 6328 df-f1 6329 df-fo 6330 df-f1o 6331 df-fv 6332 df-riota 7093 df-ov 7138 df-oprab 7139 df-mpo 7140 df-om 7561 df-1st 7671 df-2nd 7672 df-wrecs 7930 df-recs 7991 df-rdg 8029 df-1o 8085 df-er 8272 df-map 8391 df-en 8493 df-dom 8494 df-sdom 8495 df-fin 8496 df-card 9352 df-pnf 10666 df-mnf 10667 df-xr 10668 df-ltxr 10669 df-le 10670 df-sub 10861 df-neg 10862 df-nn 11626 df-n0 11886 df-z 11970 df-uz 12232 df-fz 12886 df-fzo 13029 df-hash 13687 df-word 13858 df-ewlks 27388

This theorem is referenced by: ewlkinedg 27394 ewlkle 27395 upgrewlkle2 27396

W3C validator