ewlkprop - Metamath Proof Explorer

	Metamath Proof Explorer		< Previous Next > Nearby theorems
Mirrors > Home > MPE Home > Th. List > ewlkprop		Structured version Visualization version GIF version

Theorem ewlkprop 30095

Description: Properties of an s-walk of edges. (Contributed by AV, 4-Jan-2021.)

**Hypothesis**
Ref	Expression
ewlksfval.i	⊢ 𝐼 = (iEdg‘𝐺)

**Assertion**
Ref	Expression
ewlkprop	⊢ (𝐹 ∈ (𝐺 EdgWalks 𝑆) → ((𝐺 ∈ V ∧ 𝑆 ∈ ℕ₀^*) ∧ 𝐹 ∈ Word dom 𝐼 ∧ ∀𝑘 ∈ (1..^(♯‘𝐹))𝑆 ≤ (♯‘((𝐼‘(𝐹‘(𝑘 − 1))) ∩ (𝐼‘(𝐹‘𝑘))))))

Distinct variable groups: 𝑘,𝐺 𝑆,𝑘 𝑘,𝐹 Allowed substitution hint: 𝐼(𝑘)

Proof of Theorem ewlkprop Dummy variables 𝑓 𝑔 𝑖 𝑠 are mutually distinct and distinct from all other variables.

Step	Hyp	Ref	Expression
1		df-ewlks 30090	. . 3 ⊢ EdgWalks = (𝑔 ∈ V, 𝑠 ∈ ℕ₀^* ↦ {𝑓 ∣ [(iEdg‘𝑔) / 𝑖](𝑓 ∈ Word dom 𝑖 ∧ ∀𝑘 ∈ (1..^(♯‘𝑓))𝑠 ≤ (♯‘((𝑖‘(𝑓‘(𝑘 − 1))) ∩ (𝑖‘(𝑓‘𝑘)))))})
2	1	elmpocl 7658	. 2 ⊢ (𝐹 ∈ (𝐺 EdgWalks 𝑆) → (𝐺 ∈ V ∧ 𝑆 ∈ ℕ₀^*))
3		simpr 490	. . 3 ⊢ ((𝐹 ∈ (𝐺 EdgWalks 𝑆) ∧ (𝐺 ∈ V ∧ 𝑆 ∈ ℕ₀^)) → (𝐺 ∈ V ∧ 𝑆 ∈ ℕ₀^))
4		ewlksfval.i	. . . . . . . . 9 ⊢ 𝐼 = (iEdg‘𝐺)
5	4	isewlk 30094	. . . . . . . 8 ⊢ ((𝐺 ∈ V ∧ 𝑆 ∈ ℕ₀^* ∧ 𝐹 ∈ (𝐺 EdgWalks 𝑆)) → (𝐹 ∈ (𝐺 EdgWalks 𝑆) ↔ (𝐹 ∈ Word dom 𝐼 ∧ ∀𝑘 ∈ (1..^(♯‘𝐹))𝑆 ≤ (♯‘((𝐼‘(𝐹‘(𝑘 − 1))) ∩ (𝐼‘(𝐹‘𝑘)))))))
6	5	3expa 1136	. . . . . . 7 ⊢ (((𝐺 ∈ V ∧ 𝑆 ∈ ℕ₀^*) ∧ 𝐹 ∈ (𝐺 EdgWalks 𝑆)) → (𝐹 ∈ (𝐺 EdgWalks 𝑆) ↔ (𝐹 ∈ Word dom 𝐼 ∧ ∀𝑘 ∈ (1..^(♯‘𝐹))𝑆 ≤ (♯‘((𝐼‘(𝐹‘(𝑘 − 1))) ∩ (𝐼‘(𝐹‘𝑘)))))))
7	6	biimpd 232	. . . . . 6 ⊢ (((𝐺 ∈ V ∧ 𝑆 ∈ ℕ₀^*) ∧ 𝐹 ∈ (𝐺 EdgWalks 𝑆)) → (𝐹 ∈ (𝐺 EdgWalks 𝑆) → (𝐹 ∈ Word dom 𝐼 ∧ ∀𝑘 ∈ (1..^(♯‘𝐹))𝑆 ≤ (♯‘((𝐼‘(𝐹‘(𝑘 − 1))) ∩ (𝐼‘(𝐹‘𝑘)))))))
8	7	expcom 419	. . . . 5 ⊢ (𝐹 ∈ (𝐺 EdgWalks 𝑆) → ((𝐺 ∈ V ∧ 𝑆 ∈ ℕ₀^*) → (𝐹 ∈ (𝐺 EdgWalks 𝑆) → (𝐹 ∈ Word dom 𝐼 ∧ ∀𝑘 ∈ (1..^(♯‘𝐹))𝑆 ≤ (♯‘((𝐼‘(𝐹‘(𝑘 − 1))) ∩ (𝐼‘(𝐹‘𝑘))))))))
9	8	pm2.43a 55	. . . 4 ⊢ (𝐹 ∈ (𝐺 EdgWalks 𝑆) → ((𝐺 ∈ V ∧ 𝑆 ∈ ℕ₀^*) → (𝐹 ∈ Word dom 𝐼 ∧ ∀𝑘 ∈ (1..^(♯‘𝐹))𝑆 ≤ (♯‘((𝐼‘(𝐹‘(𝑘 − 1))) ∩ (𝐼‘(𝐹‘𝑘)))))))
10	9	imp 412	. . 3 ⊢ ((𝐹 ∈ (𝐺 EdgWalks 𝑆) ∧ (𝐺 ∈ V ∧ 𝑆 ∈ ℕ₀^*)) → (𝐹 ∈ Word dom 𝐼 ∧ ∀𝑘 ∈ (1..^(♯‘𝐹))𝑆 ≤ (♯‘((𝐼‘(𝐹‘(𝑘 − 1))) ∩ (𝐼‘(𝐹‘𝑘))))))
11		3anass 1111	. . 3 ⊢ (((𝐺 ∈ V ∧ 𝑆 ∈ ℕ₀^) ∧ 𝐹 ∈ Word dom 𝐼 ∧ ∀𝑘 ∈ (1..^(♯‘𝐹))𝑆 ≤ (♯‘((𝐼‘(𝐹‘(𝑘 − 1))) ∩ (𝐼‘(𝐹‘𝑘))))) ↔ ((𝐺 ∈ V ∧ 𝑆 ∈ ℕ₀^) ∧ (𝐹 ∈ Word dom 𝐼 ∧ ∀𝑘 ∈ (1..^(♯‘𝐹))𝑆 ≤ (♯‘((𝐼‘(𝐹‘(𝑘 − 1))) ∩ (𝐼‘(𝐹‘𝑘)))))))
12	3, 10, 11	sylanbrc 595	. 2 ⊢ ((𝐹 ∈ (𝐺 EdgWalks 𝑆) ∧ (𝐺 ∈ V ∧ 𝑆 ∈ ℕ₀^)) → ((𝐺 ∈ V ∧ 𝑆 ∈ ℕ₀^) ∧ 𝐹 ∈ Word dom 𝐼 ∧ ∀𝑘 ∈ (1..^(♯‘𝐹))𝑆 ≤ (♯‘((𝐼‘(𝐹‘(𝑘 − 1))) ∩ (𝐼‘(𝐹‘𝑘))))))
13	2, 12	mpdan 700	1 ⊢ (𝐹 ∈ (𝐺 EdgWalks 𝑆) → ((𝐺 ∈ V ∧ 𝑆 ∈ ℕ₀^*) ∧ 𝐹 ∈ Word dom 𝐼 ∧ ∀𝑘 ∈ (1..^(♯‘𝐹))𝑆 ≤ (♯‘((𝐼‘(𝐹‘(𝑘 − 1))) ∩ (𝐼‘(𝐹‘𝑘))))))

Colors of variables: wff setvar class

This proof depends on syntax axioms: → wi 4 ↔ wb 209 ∧ wa 401 ∧ w3a 1103 = wceq 1570 ∈ wcel 2145 {cab 2738 ∀wral 3076 Vcvv 3450 [wsbc 3739 ∩ cin 3898 class class class wbr 5103 dom cdm 5655 ‘cfv 6535 (class class class)co 7416 1c1 11150 ≤ cle 11293 − cmin 11490 ℕ₀^*cxnn0 12626 ..^cfzo 13734 ♯chash 14419 Word cword 14603 iEdgciedg 29486 EdgWalks cewlks 30087

This proof depends on axioms: ax-mp 5 ax-1 6 ax-2 7 ax-3 8 ax-gen 1828 ax-4 1842 ax-5 1943 ax-6 2000 ax-7 2041 ax-8 2147 ax-9 2155 ax-10 2178 ax-11 2194 ax-12 2213 ax-ext 2732 ax-rep 5232 ax-sep 5251 ax-nul 5263 ax-pow 5330 ax-pr 5398 ax-un 7742 ax-cnex 11205 ax-resscn 11206 ax-1cn 11207 ax-icn 11208 ax-addcl 11209 ax-addrcl 11210 ax-mulcl 11211 ax-mulrcl 11212 ax-mulcom 11213 ax-addass 11214 ax-mulass 11215 ax-distr 11216 ax-i2m1 11217 ax-1ne0 11218 ax-1rid 11219 ax-rnegex 11220 ax-rrecex 11221 ax-cnre 11222 ax-pre-lttri 11223 ax-pre-lttrn 11224 ax-pre-ltadd 11225 ax-pre-mulgt0 11226

This proof depends on definitions: df-bi 210 df-an 402 df-or 862 df-3or 1104 df-3an 1105 df-tru 1573 df-fal 1583 df-ex 1813 df-nf 1817 df-sb 2100 df-mo 2564 df-eu 2594 df-clab 2739 df-cleq 2752 df-clel 2835 df-nfc 2909 df-ne 2956 df-nel 3062 df-ral 3077 df-rex 3087 df-reu 3366 df-rab 3413 df-v 3452 df-sbc 3740 df-csb 3848 df-dif 3902 df-un 3904 df-in 3906 df-ss 3916 df-pss 3919 df-nul 4280 df-if 4483 df-pw 4559 df-sn 4585 df-pr 4587 df-op 4591 df-uni 4868 df-int 4908 df-iun 4953 df-br 5104 df-opab 5168 df-mpt 5187 df-tr 5213 df-id 5550 df-eprel 5555 df-po 5563 df-so 5564 df-fr 5608 df-we 5610 df-xp 5661 df-rel 5662 df-cnv 5663 df-co 5664 df-dm 5665 df-rn 5666 df-res 5667 df-ima 5668 df-pred 6301 df-ord 6362 df-on 6363 df-lim 6364 df-suc 6365 df-iota 6491 df-fun 6537 df-fn 6538 df-f 6539 df-f1 6540 df-fo 6541 df-f1o 6542 df-fv 6543 df-riota 7373 df-ov 7419 df-oprab 7420 df-mpo 7421 df-om 7869 df-1st 7992 df-2nd 7993 df-frecs 8285 df-wrecs 8316 df-recs 8365 df-rdg 8404 df-1o 8462 df-er 8703 df-map 8835 df-en 8960 df-dom 8961 df-sdom 8962 df-fin 8963 df-card 9969 df-pnf 11294 df-mnf 11295 df-xr 11296 df-ltxr 11297 df-le 11298 df-sub 11492 df-neg 11493 df-nn 12283 df-n0 12554 df-z 12641 df-uz 12913 df-fz 13587 df-fzo 13735 df-hash 14420 df-word 14604 df-ewlks 30090

This theorem is used by: ewlkinedg 30096 ewlkle 30097 upgrewlkle2 30098

W3C validator