ewlkprop - Metamath Proof Explorer

	Metamath Proof Explorer		< Previous Next > Nearby theorems
Mirrors > Home > MPE Home > Th. List > ewlkprop		Structured version Visualization version GIF version

Theorem ewlkprop 27383

Description: Properties of an s-walk of edges. (Contributed by AV, 4-Jan-2021.)

**Hypothesis**
Ref	Expression
ewlksfval.i	⊢ 𝐼 = (iEdg‘𝐺)

**Assertion**
Ref	Expression
ewlkprop	⊢ (𝐹 ∈ (𝐺 EdgWalks 𝑆) → ((𝐺 ∈ V ∧ 𝑆 ∈ ℕ₀^*) ∧ 𝐹 ∈ Word dom 𝐼 ∧ ∀𝑘 ∈ (1..^(♯‘𝐹))𝑆 ≤ (♯‘((𝐼‘(𝐹‘(𝑘 − 1))) ∩ (𝐼‘(𝐹‘𝑘))))))

Distinct variable groups: 𝑘,𝐺 𝑆,𝑘 𝑘,𝐹 Allowed substitution hint: 𝐼(𝑘)

Proof of Theorem ewlkprop Dummy variables 𝑓 𝑔 𝑖 𝑠 are mutually distinct and distinct from all other variables.

Step	Hyp	Ref	Expression
1		df-ewlks 27378	. . 3 ⊢ EdgWalks = (𝑔 ∈ V, 𝑠 ∈ ℕ₀^* ↦ {𝑓 ∣ [(iEdg‘𝑔) / 𝑖](𝑓 ∈ Word dom 𝑖 ∧ ∀𝑘 ∈ (1..^(♯‘𝑓))𝑠 ≤ (♯‘((𝑖‘(𝑓‘(𝑘 − 1))) ∩ (𝑖‘(𝑓‘𝑘)))))})
2	1	elmpocl 7380	. 2 ⊢ (𝐹 ∈ (𝐺 EdgWalks 𝑆) → (𝐺 ∈ V ∧ 𝑆 ∈ ℕ₀^*))
3		simpr 487	. . 3 ⊢ ((𝐹 ∈ (𝐺 EdgWalks 𝑆) ∧ (𝐺 ∈ V ∧ 𝑆 ∈ ℕ₀^)) → (𝐺 ∈ V ∧ 𝑆 ∈ ℕ₀^))
4		ewlksfval.i	. . . . . . . . 9 ⊢ 𝐼 = (iEdg‘𝐺)
5	4	isewlk 27382	. . . . . . . 8 ⊢ ((𝐺 ∈ V ∧ 𝑆 ∈ ℕ₀^* ∧ 𝐹 ∈ (𝐺 EdgWalks 𝑆)) → (𝐹 ∈ (𝐺 EdgWalks 𝑆) ↔ (𝐹 ∈ Word dom 𝐼 ∧ ∀𝑘 ∈ (1..^(♯‘𝐹))𝑆 ≤ (♯‘((𝐼‘(𝐹‘(𝑘 − 1))) ∩ (𝐼‘(𝐹‘𝑘)))))))
6	5	3expa 1113	. . . . . . 7 ⊢ (((𝐺 ∈ V ∧ 𝑆 ∈ ℕ₀^*) ∧ 𝐹 ∈ (𝐺 EdgWalks 𝑆)) → (𝐹 ∈ (𝐺 EdgWalks 𝑆) ↔ (𝐹 ∈ Word dom 𝐼 ∧ ∀𝑘 ∈ (1..^(♯‘𝐹))𝑆 ≤ (♯‘((𝐼‘(𝐹‘(𝑘 − 1))) ∩ (𝐼‘(𝐹‘𝑘)))))))
7	6	biimpd 231	. . . . . 6 ⊢ (((𝐺 ∈ V ∧ 𝑆 ∈ ℕ₀^*) ∧ 𝐹 ∈ (𝐺 EdgWalks 𝑆)) → (𝐹 ∈ (𝐺 EdgWalks 𝑆) → (𝐹 ∈ Word dom 𝐼 ∧ ∀𝑘 ∈ (1..^(♯‘𝐹))𝑆 ≤ (♯‘((𝐼‘(𝐹‘(𝑘 − 1))) ∩ (𝐼‘(𝐹‘𝑘)))))))
8	7	expcom 416	. . . . 5 ⊢ (𝐹 ∈ (𝐺 EdgWalks 𝑆) → ((𝐺 ∈ V ∧ 𝑆 ∈ ℕ₀^*) → (𝐹 ∈ (𝐺 EdgWalks 𝑆) → (𝐹 ∈ Word dom 𝐼 ∧ ∀𝑘 ∈ (1..^(♯‘𝐹))𝑆 ≤ (♯‘((𝐼‘(𝐹‘(𝑘 − 1))) ∩ (𝐼‘(𝐹‘𝑘))))))))
9	8	pm2.43a 54	. . . 4 ⊢ (𝐹 ∈ (𝐺 EdgWalks 𝑆) → ((𝐺 ∈ V ∧ 𝑆 ∈ ℕ₀^*) → (𝐹 ∈ Word dom 𝐼 ∧ ∀𝑘 ∈ (1..^(♯‘𝐹))𝑆 ≤ (♯‘((𝐼‘(𝐹‘(𝑘 − 1))) ∩ (𝐼‘(𝐹‘𝑘)))))))
10	9	imp 409	. . 3 ⊢ ((𝐹 ∈ (𝐺 EdgWalks 𝑆) ∧ (𝐺 ∈ V ∧ 𝑆 ∈ ℕ₀^*)) → (𝐹 ∈ Word dom 𝐼 ∧ ∀𝑘 ∈ (1..^(♯‘𝐹))𝑆 ≤ (♯‘((𝐼‘(𝐹‘(𝑘 − 1))) ∩ (𝐼‘(𝐹‘𝑘))))))
11		3anass 1090	. . 3 ⊢ (((𝐺 ∈ V ∧ 𝑆 ∈ ℕ₀^) ∧ 𝐹 ∈ Word dom 𝐼 ∧ ∀𝑘 ∈ (1..^(♯‘𝐹))𝑆 ≤ (♯‘((𝐼‘(𝐹‘(𝑘 − 1))) ∩ (𝐼‘(𝐹‘𝑘))))) ↔ ((𝐺 ∈ V ∧ 𝑆 ∈ ℕ₀^) ∧ (𝐹 ∈ Word dom 𝐼 ∧ ∀𝑘 ∈ (1..^(♯‘𝐹))𝑆 ≤ (♯‘((𝐼‘(𝐹‘(𝑘 − 1))) ∩ (𝐼‘(𝐹‘𝑘)))))))
12	3, 10, 11	sylanbrc 585	. 2 ⊢ ((𝐹 ∈ (𝐺 EdgWalks 𝑆) ∧ (𝐺 ∈ V ∧ 𝑆 ∈ ℕ₀^)) → ((𝐺 ∈ V ∧ 𝑆 ∈ ℕ₀^) ∧ 𝐹 ∈ Word dom 𝐼 ∧ ∀𝑘 ∈ (1..^(♯‘𝐹))𝑆 ≤ (♯‘((𝐼‘(𝐹‘(𝑘 − 1))) ∩ (𝐼‘(𝐹‘𝑘))))))
13	2, 12	mpdan 685	1 ⊢ (𝐹 ∈ (𝐺 EdgWalks 𝑆) → ((𝐺 ∈ V ∧ 𝑆 ∈ ℕ₀^*) ∧ 𝐹 ∈ Word dom 𝐼 ∧ ∀𝑘 ∈ (1..^(♯‘𝐹))𝑆 ≤ (♯‘((𝐼‘(𝐹‘(𝑘 − 1))) ∩ (𝐼‘(𝐹‘𝑘))))))

Colors of variables: wff setvar class

Syntax hints: → wi 4 ↔ wb 208 ∧ wa 398 ∧ w3a 1082 = wceq 1536 ∈ wcel 2113 {cab 2798 ∀wral 3137 Vcvv 3491 [wsbc 3768 ∩ cin 3928 class class class wbr 5059 dom cdm 5548 ‘cfv 6348 (class class class)co 7149 1c1 10531 ≤ cle 10669 − cmin 10863 ℕ₀^*cxnn0 11961 ..^cfzo 13030 ♯chash 13687 Word cword 13858 iEdgciedg 26780 EdgWalks cewlks 27375

This theorem was proved from axioms: ax-mp 5 ax-1 6 ax-2 7 ax-3 8 ax-gen 1795 ax-4 1809 ax-5 1910 ax-6 1969 ax-7 2014 ax-8 2115 ax-9 2123 ax-10 2144 ax-11 2160 ax-12 2176 ax-ext 2792 ax-rep 5183 ax-sep 5196 ax-nul 5203 ax-pow 5259 ax-pr 5323 ax-un 7454 ax-cnex 10586 ax-resscn 10587 ax-1cn 10588 ax-icn 10589 ax-addcl 10590 ax-addrcl 10591 ax-mulcl 10592 ax-mulrcl 10593 ax-mulcom 10594 ax-addass 10595 ax-mulass 10596 ax-distr 10597 ax-i2m1 10598 ax-1ne0 10599 ax-1rid 10600 ax-rnegex 10601 ax-rrecex 10602 ax-cnre 10603 ax-pre-lttri 10604 ax-pre-lttrn 10605 ax-pre-ltadd 10606 ax-pre-mulgt0 10607

This theorem depends on definitions: df-bi 209 df-an 399 df-or 844 df-3or 1083 df-3an 1084 df-tru 1539 df-ex 1780 df-nf 1784 df-sb 2069 df-mo 2621 df-eu 2653 df-clab 2799 df-cleq 2813 df-clel 2892 df-nfc 2962 df-ne 3016 df-nel 3123 df-ral 3142 df-rex 3143 df-reu 3144 df-rab 3146 df-v 3493 df-sbc 3769 df-csb 3877 df-dif 3932 df-un 3934 df-in 3936 df-ss 3945 df-pss 3947 df-nul 4285 df-if 4461 df-pw 4534 df-sn 4561 df-pr 4563 df-tp 4565 df-op 4567 df-uni 4832 df-int 4870 df-iun 4914 df-br 5060 df-opab 5122 df-mpt 5140 df-tr 5166 df-id 5453 df-eprel 5458 df-po 5467 df-so 5468 df-fr 5507 df-we 5509 df-xp 5554 df-rel 5555 df-cnv 5556 df-co 5557 df-dm 5558 df-rn 5559 df-res 5560 df-ima 5561 df-pred 6141 df-ord 6187 df-on 6188 df-lim 6189 df-suc 6190 df-iota 6307 df-fun 6350 df-fn 6351 df-f 6352 df-f1 6353 df-fo 6354 df-f1o 6355 df-fv 6356 df-riota 7107 df-ov 7152 df-oprab 7153 df-mpo 7154 df-om 7574 df-1st 7682 df-2nd 7683 df-wrecs 7940 df-recs 8001 df-rdg 8039 df-1o 8095 df-er 8282 df-map 8401 df-en 8503 df-dom 8504 df-sdom 8505 df-fin 8506 df-card 9361 df-pnf 10670 df-mnf 10671 df-xr 10672 df-ltxr 10673 df-le 10674 df-sub 10865 df-neg 10866 df-nn 11632 df-n0 11892 df-z 11976 df-uz 12238 df-fz 12890 df-fzo 13031 df-hash 13688 df-word 13859 df-ewlks 27378

This theorem is referenced by: ewlkinedg 27384 ewlkle 27385 upgrewlkle2 27386

W3C validator