ewlkle - Metamath Proof Explorer

	Metamath Proof Explorer		< Previous Next > Nearby theorems
Mirrors > Home > MPE Home > Th. List > ewlkle		Structured version Visualization version GIF version

Theorem ewlkle 30013

Description: An s-walk of edges is also a t-walk of edges if 𝑡 ≤ 𝑠. (Contributed by AV, 4-Jan-2021.)

**Assertion**
Ref	Expression
ewlkle	⊢ ((𝐹 ∈ (𝐺 EdgWalks 𝑆) ∧ 𝑇 ∈ ℕ₀^* ∧ 𝑇 ≤ 𝑆) → 𝐹 ∈ (𝐺 EdgWalks 𝑇))

Proof of Theorem ewlkle Dummy variable 𝑘 is distinct from all other variables.

Step	Hyp	Ref	Expression
1		eqid 2765	. . . 4 ⊢ (iEdg‘𝐺) = (iEdg‘𝐺)
2	1	ewlkprop 30011	. . 3 ⊢ (𝐹 ∈ (𝐺 EdgWalks 𝑆) → ((𝐺 ∈ V ∧ 𝑆 ∈ ℕ₀^*) ∧ 𝐹 ∈ Word dom (iEdg‘𝐺) ∧ ∀𝑘 ∈ (1..^(♯‘𝐹))𝑆 ≤ (♯‘(((iEdg‘𝐺)‘(𝐹‘(𝑘 − 1))) ∩ ((iEdg‘𝐺)‘(𝐹‘𝑘))))))
3		simpl2 1211	. . . . 5 ⊢ ((((𝐺 ∈ V ∧ 𝑆 ∈ ℕ₀^) ∧ 𝐹 ∈ Word dom (iEdg‘𝐺) ∧ ∀𝑘 ∈ (1..^(♯‘𝐹))𝑆 ≤ (♯‘(((iEdg‘𝐺)‘(𝐹‘(𝑘 − 1))) ∩ ((iEdg‘𝐺)‘(𝐹‘𝑘))))) ∧ (𝑇 ∈ ℕ₀^ ∧ 𝑇 ≤ 𝑆)) → 𝐹 ∈ Word dom (iEdg‘𝐺))
4		xnn0xr 12597	. . . . . . . . . . . . . . 15 ⊢ (𝑇 ∈ ℕ₀^* → 𝑇 ∈ ℝ^*)
5	4	adantl 487	. . . . . . . . . . . . . 14 ⊢ ((𝑆 ∈ ℕ₀^* ∧ 𝑇 ∈ ℕ₀^) → 𝑇 ∈ ℝ^)
6		xnn0xr 12597	. . . . . . . . . . . . . . 15 ⊢ (𝑆 ∈ ℕ₀^* → 𝑆 ∈ ℝ^*)
7	6	adantr 486	. . . . . . . . . . . . . 14 ⊢ ((𝑆 ∈ ℕ₀^* ∧ 𝑇 ∈ ℕ₀^) → 𝑆 ∈ ℝ^)
8		fvex 6898	. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 16 ⊢ ((iEdg‘𝐺)‘(𝐹‘(𝑘 − 1))) ∈ V
9	8	inex1 5288	. . . . . . . . . . . . . . 15 ⊢ (((iEdg‘𝐺)‘(𝐹‘(𝑘 − 1))) ∩ ((iEdg‘𝐺)‘(𝐹‘𝑘))) ∈ V
10		hashxrcl 14411	. . . . . . . . . . . . . . 15 ⊢ ((((iEdg‘𝐺)‘(𝐹‘(𝑘 − 1))) ∩ ((iEdg‘𝐺)‘(𝐹‘𝑘))) ∈ V → (♯‘(((iEdg‘𝐺)‘(𝐹‘(𝑘 − 1))) ∩ ((iEdg‘𝐺)‘(𝐹‘𝑘)))) ∈ ℝ^*)
11	9, 10	mp1i 14	. . . . . . . . . . . . . 14 ⊢ ((𝑆 ∈ ℕ₀^* ∧ 𝑇 ∈ ℕ₀^) → (♯‘(((iEdg‘𝐺)‘(𝐹‘(𝑘 − 1))) ∩ ((iEdg‘𝐺)‘(𝐹‘𝑘)))) ∈ ℝ^)
12		xrletr 13199	. . . . . . . . . . . . . 14 ⊢ ((𝑇 ∈ ℝ^* ∧ 𝑆 ∈ ℝ^* ∧ (♯‘(((iEdg‘𝐺)‘(𝐹‘(𝑘 − 1))) ∩ ((iEdg‘𝐺)‘(𝐹‘𝑘)))) ∈ ℝ^*) → ((𝑇 ≤ 𝑆 ∧ 𝑆 ≤ (♯‘(((iEdg‘𝐺)‘(𝐹‘(𝑘 − 1))) ∩ ((iEdg‘𝐺)‘(𝐹‘𝑘))))) → 𝑇 ≤ (♯‘(((iEdg‘𝐺)‘(𝐹‘(𝑘 − 1))) ∩ ((iEdg‘𝐺)‘(𝐹‘𝑘))))))
13	5, 7, 11, 12	syl3anc 1398	. . . . . . . . . . . . 13 ⊢ ((𝑆 ∈ ℕ₀^* ∧ 𝑇 ∈ ℕ₀^*) → ((𝑇 ≤ 𝑆 ∧ 𝑆 ≤ (♯‘(((iEdg‘𝐺)‘(𝐹‘(𝑘 − 1))) ∩ ((iEdg‘𝐺)‘(𝐹‘𝑘))))) → 𝑇 ≤ (♯‘(((iEdg‘𝐺)‘(𝐹‘(𝑘 − 1))) ∩ ((iEdg‘𝐺)‘(𝐹‘𝑘))))))
14	13	exp4b 436	. . . . . . . . . . . 12 ⊢ (𝑆 ∈ ℕ₀^* → (𝑇 ∈ ℕ₀^* → (𝑇 ≤ 𝑆 → (𝑆 ≤ (♯‘(((iEdg‘𝐺)‘(𝐹‘(𝑘 − 1))) ∩ ((iEdg‘𝐺)‘(𝐹‘𝑘)))) → 𝑇 ≤ (♯‘(((iEdg‘𝐺)‘(𝐹‘(𝑘 − 1))) ∩ ((iEdg‘𝐺)‘(𝐹‘𝑘))))))))
15	14	adantl 487	. . . . . . . . . . 11 ⊢ ((𝐺 ∈ V ∧ 𝑆 ∈ ℕ₀^) → (𝑇 ∈ ℕ₀^ → (𝑇 ≤ 𝑆 → (𝑆 ≤ (♯‘(((iEdg‘𝐺)‘(𝐹‘(𝑘 − 1))) ∩ ((iEdg‘𝐺)‘(𝐹‘𝑘)))) → 𝑇 ≤ (♯‘(((iEdg‘𝐺)‘(𝐹‘(𝑘 − 1))) ∩ ((iEdg‘𝐺)‘(𝐹‘𝑘))))))))
16	15	imp32 424	. . . . . . . . . 10 ⊢ (((𝐺 ∈ V ∧ 𝑆 ∈ ℕ₀^) ∧ (𝑇 ∈ ℕ₀^ ∧ 𝑇 ≤ 𝑆)) → (𝑆 ≤ (♯‘(((iEdg‘𝐺)‘(𝐹‘(𝑘 − 1))) ∩ ((iEdg‘𝐺)‘(𝐹‘𝑘)))) → 𝑇 ≤ (♯‘(((iEdg‘𝐺)‘(𝐹‘(𝑘 − 1))) ∩ ((iEdg‘𝐺)‘(𝐹‘𝑘))))))
17	16	ralimdv 3181	. . . . . . . . 9 ⊢ (((𝐺 ∈ V ∧ 𝑆 ∈ ℕ₀^) ∧ (𝑇 ∈ ℕ₀^ ∧ 𝑇 ≤ 𝑆)) → (∀𝑘 ∈ (1..^(♯‘𝐹))𝑆 ≤ (♯‘(((iEdg‘𝐺)‘(𝐹‘(𝑘 − 1))) ∩ ((iEdg‘𝐺)‘(𝐹‘𝑘)))) → ∀𝑘 ∈ (1..^(♯‘𝐹))𝑇 ≤ (♯‘(((iEdg‘𝐺)‘(𝐹‘(𝑘 − 1))) ∩ ((iEdg‘𝐺)‘(𝐹‘𝑘))))))
18	17	ex 418	. . . . . . . 8 ⊢ ((𝐺 ∈ V ∧ 𝑆 ∈ ℕ₀^) → ((𝑇 ∈ ℕ₀^ ∧ 𝑇 ≤ 𝑆) → (∀𝑘 ∈ (1..^(♯‘𝐹))𝑆 ≤ (♯‘(((iEdg‘𝐺)‘(𝐹‘(𝑘 − 1))) ∩ ((iEdg‘𝐺)‘(𝐹‘𝑘)))) → ∀𝑘 ∈ (1..^(♯‘𝐹))𝑇 ≤ (♯‘(((iEdg‘𝐺)‘(𝐹‘(𝑘 − 1))) ∩ ((iEdg‘𝐺)‘(𝐹‘𝑘)))))))
19	18	com23 87	. . . . . . 7 ⊢ ((𝐺 ∈ V ∧ 𝑆 ∈ ℕ₀^) → (∀𝑘 ∈ (1..^(♯‘𝐹))𝑆 ≤ (♯‘(((iEdg‘𝐺)‘(𝐹‘(𝑘 − 1))) ∩ ((iEdg‘𝐺)‘(𝐹‘𝑘)))) → ((𝑇 ∈ ℕ₀^ ∧ 𝑇 ≤ 𝑆) → ∀𝑘 ∈ (1..^(♯‘𝐹))𝑇 ≤ (♯‘(((iEdg‘𝐺)‘(𝐹‘(𝑘 − 1))) ∩ ((iEdg‘𝐺)‘(𝐹‘𝑘)))))))
20	19	a1d 26	. . . . . 6 ⊢ ((𝐺 ∈ V ∧ 𝑆 ∈ ℕ₀^) → (𝐹 ∈ Word dom (iEdg‘𝐺) → (∀𝑘 ∈ (1..^(♯‘𝐹))𝑆 ≤ (♯‘(((iEdg‘𝐺)‘(𝐹‘(𝑘 − 1))) ∩ ((iEdg‘𝐺)‘(𝐹‘𝑘)))) → ((𝑇 ∈ ℕ₀^ ∧ 𝑇 ≤ 𝑆) → ∀𝑘 ∈ (1..^(♯‘𝐹))𝑇 ≤ (♯‘(((iEdg‘𝐺)‘(𝐹‘(𝑘 − 1))) ∩ ((iEdg‘𝐺)‘(𝐹‘𝑘))))))))
21	20	3imp1 1366	. . . . 5 ⊢ ((((𝐺 ∈ V ∧ 𝑆 ∈ ℕ₀^) ∧ 𝐹 ∈ Word dom (iEdg‘𝐺) ∧ ∀𝑘 ∈ (1..^(♯‘𝐹))𝑆 ≤ (♯‘(((iEdg‘𝐺)‘(𝐹‘(𝑘 − 1))) ∩ ((iEdg‘𝐺)‘(𝐹‘𝑘))))) ∧ (𝑇 ∈ ℕ₀^ ∧ 𝑇 ≤ 𝑆)) → ∀𝑘 ∈ (1..^(♯‘𝐹))𝑇 ≤ (♯‘(((iEdg‘𝐺)‘(𝐹‘(𝑘 − 1))) ∩ ((iEdg‘𝐺)‘(𝐹‘𝑘)))))
22		simpl1l 1243	. . . . . 6 ⊢ ((((𝐺 ∈ V ∧ 𝑆 ∈ ℕ₀^) ∧ 𝐹 ∈ Word dom (iEdg‘𝐺) ∧ ∀𝑘 ∈ (1..^(♯‘𝐹))𝑆 ≤ (♯‘(((iEdg‘𝐺)‘(𝐹‘(𝑘 − 1))) ∩ ((iEdg‘𝐺)‘(𝐹‘𝑘))))) ∧ (𝑇 ∈ ℕ₀^ ∧ 𝑇 ≤ 𝑆)) → 𝐺 ∈ V)
23		simprl 783	. . . . . 6 ⊢ ((((𝐺 ∈ V ∧ 𝑆 ∈ ℕ₀^) ∧ 𝐹 ∈ Word dom (iEdg‘𝐺) ∧ ∀𝑘 ∈ (1..^(♯‘𝐹))𝑆 ≤ (♯‘(((iEdg‘𝐺)‘(𝐹‘(𝑘 − 1))) ∩ ((iEdg‘𝐺)‘(𝐹‘𝑘))))) ∧ (𝑇 ∈ ℕ₀^ ∧ 𝑇 ≤ 𝑆)) → 𝑇 ∈ ℕ₀^*)
24	1	isewlk 30010	. . . . . 6 ⊢ ((𝐺 ∈ V ∧ 𝑇 ∈ ℕ₀^* ∧ 𝐹 ∈ Word dom (iEdg‘𝐺)) → (𝐹 ∈ (𝐺 EdgWalks 𝑇) ↔ (𝐹 ∈ Word dom (iEdg‘𝐺) ∧ ∀𝑘 ∈ (1..^(♯‘𝐹))𝑇 ≤ (♯‘(((iEdg‘𝐺)‘(𝐹‘(𝑘 − 1))) ∩ ((iEdg‘𝐺)‘(𝐹‘𝑘)))))))
25	22, 23, 3, 24	syl3anc 1398	. . . . 5 ⊢ ((((𝐺 ∈ V ∧ 𝑆 ∈ ℕ₀^) ∧ 𝐹 ∈ Word dom (iEdg‘𝐺) ∧ ∀𝑘 ∈ (1..^(♯‘𝐹))𝑆 ≤ (♯‘(((iEdg‘𝐺)‘(𝐹‘(𝑘 − 1))) ∩ ((iEdg‘𝐺)‘(𝐹‘𝑘))))) ∧ (𝑇 ∈ ℕ₀^ ∧ 𝑇 ≤ 𝑆)) → (𝐹 ∈ (𝐺 EdgWalks 𝑇) ↔ (𝐹 ∈ Word dom (iEdg‘𝐺) ∧ ∀𝑘 ∈ (1..^(♯‘𝐹))𝑇 ≤ (♯‘(((iEdg‘𝐺)‘(𝐹‘(𝑘 − 1))) ∩ ((iEdg‘𝐺)‘(𝐹‘𝑘)))))))
26	3, 21, 25	mpbir2and 726	. . . 4 ⊢ ((((𝐺 ∈ V ∧ 𝑆 ∈ ℕ₀^) ∧ 𝐹 ∈ Word dom (iEdg‘𝐺) ∧ ∀𝑘 ∈ (1..^(♯‘𝐹))𝑆 ≤ (♯‘(((iEdg‘𝐺)‘(𝐹‘(𝑘 − 1))) ∩ ((iEdg‘𝐺)‘(𝐹‘𝑘))))) ∧ (𝑇 ∈ ℕ₀^ ∧ 𝑇 ≤ 𝑆)) → 𝐹 ∈ (𝐺 EdgWalks 𝑇))
27	26	ex 418	. . 3 ⊢ (((𝐺 ∈ V ∧ 𝑆 ∈ ℕ₀^) ∧ 𝐹 ∈ Word dom (iEdg‘𝐺) ∧ ∀𝑘 ∈ (1..^(♯‘𝐹))𝑆 ≤ (♯‘(((iEdg‘𝐺)‘(𝐹‘(𝑘 − 1))) ∩ ((iEdg‘𝐺)‘(𝐹‘𝑘))))) → ((𝑇 ∈ ℕ₀^ ∧ 𝑇 ≤ 𝑆) → 𝐹 ∈ (𝐺 EdgWalks 𝑇)))
28	2, 27	syl 18	. 2 ⊢ (𝐹 ∈ (𝐺 EdgWalks 𝑆) → ((𝑇 ∈ ℕ₀^* ∧ 𝑇 ≤ 𝑆) → 𝐹 ∈ (𝐺 EdgWalks 𝑇)))
29	28	3impib 1134	1 ⊢ ((𝐹 ∈ (𝐺 EdgWalks 𝑆) ∧ 𝑇 ∈ ℕ₀^* ∧ 𝑇 ≤ 𝑆) → 𝐹 ∈ (𝐺 EdgWalks 𝑇))

Colors of variables: wff setvar class

This proof depends on syntax axioms: → wi 4 ↔ wb 209 ∧ wa 401 ∧ w3a 1103 ∈ wcel 2146 ∀wral 3081 Vcvv 3457 ∩ cin 3905 class class class wbr 5111 dom cdm 5663 ‘cfv 6540 (class class class)co 7419 1c1 11116 ℝ^*cxr 11257 ≤ cle 11259 − cmin 11456 ℕ₀^*cxnn0 12592 ..^cfzo 13699 ♯chash 14384 Word cword 14568 iEdgciedg 29402 EdgWalks cewlks 30003

This proof depends on axioms: ax-mp 5 ax-1 6 ax-2 7 ax-3 8 ax-gen 1828 ax-4 1842 ax-5 1943 ax-6 2000 ax-7 2041 ax-8 2148 ax-9 2156 ax-10 2179 ax-11 2195 ax-12 2216 ax-ext 2737 ax-rep 5240 ax-sep 5259 ax-nul 5271 ax-pow 5338 ax-pr 5406 ax-un 7742 ax-cnex 11171 ax-resscn 11172 ax-1cn 11173 ax-icn 11174 ax-addcl 11175 ax-addrcl 11176 ax-mulcl 11177 ax-mulrcl 11178 ax-mulcom 11179 ax-addass 11180 ax-mulass 11181 ax-distr 11182 ax-i2m1 11183 ax-1ne0 11184 ax-1rid 11185 ax-rnegex 11186 ax-rrecex 11187 ax-cnre 11188 ax-pre-lttri 11189 ax-pre-lttrn 11190 ax-pre-ltadd 11191 ax-pre-mulgt0 11192

This proof depends on definitions: df-bi 210 df-an 402 df-or 862 df-3or 1104 df-3an 1105 df-tru 1573 df-fal 1583 df-ex 1813 df-nf 1817 df-sb 2100 df-mo 2569 df-eu 2599 df-clab 2744 df-cleq 2757 df-clel 2840 df-nfc 2914 df-ne 2961 df-nel 3067 df-ral 3082 df-rex 3092 df-reu 3372 df-rab 3419 df-v 3459 df-sbc 3747 df-csb 3855 df-dif 3909 df-un 3911 df-in 3913 df-ss 3923 df-pss 3926 df-nul 4287 df-if 4490 df-pw 4566 df-sn 4592 df-pr 4594 df-op 4598 df-uni 4875 df-int 4915 df-iun 4960 df-br 5112 df-opab 5176 df-mpt 5195 df-tr 5221 df-id 5558 df-eprel 5563 df-po 5571 df-so 5572 df-fr 5616 df-we 5618 df-xp 5669 df-rel 5670 df-cnv 5671 df-co 5672 df-dm 5673 df-rn 5674 df-res 5675 df-ima 5676 df-pred 6306 df-ord 6367 df-on 6368 df-lim 6369 df-suc 6370 df-iota 6496 df-fun 6542 df-fn 6543 df-f 6544 df-f1 6545 df-fo 6546 df-f1o 6547 df-fv 6548 df-riota 7376 df-ov 7422 df-oprab 7423 df-mpo 7424 df-om 7869 df-1st 7992 df-2nd 7993 df-frecs 8284 df-wrecs 8315 df-recs 8364 df-rdg 8403 df-1o 8459 df-er 8700 df-map 8832 df-en 8950 df-dom 8951 df-sdom 8952 df-fin 8953 df-card 9941 df-pnf 11260 df-mnf 11261 df-xr 11262 df-ltxr 11263 df-le 11264 df-sub 11458 df-neg 11459 df-nn 12249 df-n0 12520 df-xnn0 12593 df-z 12607 df-uz 12879 df-fz 13552 df-fzo 13700 df-hash 14385 df-word 14569 df-ewlks 30006

This theorem is used by: (None)

W3C validator