ewlkle - Metamath Proof Explorer

	Metamath Proof Explorer		< Previous Next > Nearby theorems
Mirrors > Home > MPE Home > Th. List > ewlkle		Structured version Visualization version GIF version

Theorem ewlkle 30179

Description: An s-walk of edges is also a t-walk of edges if 𝑡 ≤ 𝑠. (Contributed by AV, 4-Jan-2021.)

**Assertion**
Ref	Expression
ewlkle	⊢ ((𝐹 ∈ (𝐺 EdgWalks 𝑆) ∧ 𝑇 ∈ ℕ₀^* ∧ 𝑇 ≤ 𝑆) → 𝐹 ∈ (𝐺 EdgWalks 𝑇))

Proof of Theorem ewlkle Dummy variable 𝑘 is distinct from all other variables.

Step	Hyp	Ref	Expression
1		eqid 2761	. . . 4 ⊢ (iEdg‘𝐺) = (iEdg‘𝐺)
2	1	ewlkprop 30177	. . 3 ⊢ (𝐹 ∈ (𝐺 EdgWalks 𝑆) → ((𝐺 ∈ V ∧ 𝑆 ∈ ℕ₀^*) ∧ 𝐹 ∈ Word dom (iEdg‘𝐺) ∧ ∀𝑘 ∈ (1..^(♯‘𝐹))𝑆 ≤ (♯‘(((iEdg‘𝐺)‘(𝐹‘(𝑘 − 1))) ∩ ((iEdg‘𝐺)‘(𝐹‘𝑘))))))
3		simpl2 1211	. . . . 5 ⊢ ((((𝐺 ∈ V ∧ 𝑆 ∈ ℕ₀^) ∧ 𝐹 ∈ Word dom (iEdg‘𝐺) ∧ ∀𝑘 ∈ (1..^(♯‘𝐹))𝑆 ≤ (♯‘(((iEdg‘𝐺)‘(𝐹‘(𝑘 − 1))) ∩ ((iEdg‘𝐺)‘(𝐹‘𝑘))))) ∧ (𝑇 ∈ ℕ₀^ ∧ 𝑇 ≤ 𝑆)) → 𝐹 ∈ Word dom (iEdg‘𝐺))
4		xnn0xr 12677	. . . . . . . . . . . . . . 15 ⊢ (𝑇 ∈ ℕ₀^* → 𝑇 ∈ ℝ^*)
5	4	adantl 487	. . . . . . . . . . . . . 14 ⊢ ((𝑆 ∈ ℕ₀^* ∧ 𝑇 ∈ ℕ₀^) → 𝑇 ∈ ℝ^)
6		xnn0xr 12677	. . . . . . . . . . . . . . 15 ⊢ (𝑆 ∈ ℕ₀^* → 𝑆 ∈ ℝ^*)
7	6	adantr 486	. . . . . . . . . . . . . 14 ⊢ ((𝑆 ∈ ℕ₀^* ∧ 𝑇 ∈ ℕ₀^) → 𝑆 ∈ ℝ^)
8		fvex 6896	. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 16 ⊢ ((iEdg‘𝐺)‘(𝐹‘(𝑘 − 1))) ∈ V
9	8	inex1 5277	. . . . . . . . . . . . . . 15 ⊢ (((iEdg‘𝐺)‘(𝐹‘(𝑘 − 1))) ∩ ((iEdg‘𝐺)‘(𝐹‘𝑘))) ∈ V
10		hashxrcl 14494	. . . . . . . . . . . . . . 15 ⊢ ((((iEdg‘𝐺)‘(𝐹‘(𝑘 − 1))) ∩ ((iEdg‘𝐺)‘(𝐹‘𝑘))) ∈ V → (♯‘(((iEdg‘𝐺)‘(𝐹‘(𝑘 − 1))) ∩ ((iEdg‘𝐺)‘(𝐹‘𝑘)))) ∈ ℝ^*)
11	9, 10	mp1i 14	. . . . . . . . . . . . . 14 ⊢ ((𝑆 ∈ ℕ₀^* ∧ 𝑇 ∈ ℕ₀^) → (♯‘(((iEdg‘𝐺)‘(𝐹‘(𝑘 − 1))) ∩ ((iEdg‘𝐺)‘(𝐹‘𝑘)))) ∈ ℝ^)
12		xrletr 13280	. . . . . . . . . . . . . 14 ⊢ ((𝑇 ∈ ℝ^* ∧ 𝑆 ∈ ℝ^* ∧ (♯‘(((iEdg‘𝐺)‘(𝐹‘(𝑘 − 1))) ∩ ((iEdg‘𝐺)‘(𝐹‘𝑘)))) ∈ ℝ^*) → ((𝑇 ≤ 𝑆 ∧ 𝑆 ≤ (♯‘(((iEdg‘𝐺)‘(𝐹‘(𝑘 − 1))) ∩ ((iEdg‘𝐺)‘(𝐹‘𝑘))))) → 𝑇 ≤ (♯‘(((iEdg‘𝐺)‘(𝐹‘(𝑘 − 1))) ∩ ((iEdg‘𝐺)‘(𝐹‘𝑘))))))
13	5, 7, 11, 12	syl3anc 1398	. . . . . . . . . . . . 13 ⊢ ((𝑆 ∈ ℕ₀^* ∧ 𝑇 ∈ ℕ₀^*) → ((𝑇 ≤ 𝑆 ∧ 𝑆 ≤ (♯‘(((iEdg‘𝐺)‘(𝐹‘(𝑘 − 1))) ∩ ((iEdg‘𝐺)‘(𝐹‘𝑘))))) → 𝑇 ≤ (♯‘(((iEdg‘𝐺)‘(𝐹‘(𝑘 − 1))) ∩ ((iEdg‘𝐺)‘(𝐹‘𝑘))))))
14	13	exp4b 436	. . . . . . . . . . . 12 ⊢ (𝑆 ∈ ℕ₀^* → (𝑇 ∈ ℕ₀^* → (𝑇 ≤ 𝑆 → (𝑆 ≤ (♯‘(((iEdg‘𝐺)‘(𝐹‘(𝑘 − 1))) ∩ ((iEdg‘𝐺)‘(𝐹‘𝑘)))) → 𝑇 ≤ (♯‘(((iEdg‘𝐺)‘(𝐹‘(𝑘 − 1))) ∩ ((iEdg‘𝐺)‘(𝐹‘𝑘))))))))
15	14	adantl 487	. . . . . . . . . . 11 ⊢ ((𝐺 ∈ V ∧ 𝑆 ∈ ℕ₀^) → (𝑇 ∈ ℕ₀^ → (𝑇 ≤ 𝑆 → (𝑆 ≤ (♯‘(((iEdg‘𝐺)‘(𝐹‘(𝑘 − 1))) ∩ ((iEdg‘𝐺)‘(𝐹‘𝑘)))) → 𝑇 ≤ (♯‘(((iEdg‘𝐺)‘(𝐹‘(𝑘 − 1))) ∩ ((iEdg‘𝐺)‘(𝐹‘𝑘))))))))
16	15	imp32 424	. . . . . . . . . 10 ⊢ (((𝐺 ∈ V ∧ 𝑆 ∈ ℕ₀^) ∧ (𝑇 ∈ ℕ₀^ ∧ 𝑇 ≤ 𝑆)) → (𝑆 ≤ (♯‘(((iEdg‘𝐺)‘(𝐹‘(𝑘 − 1))) ∩ ((iEdg‘𝐺)‘(𝐹‘𝑘)))) → 𝑇 ≤ (♯‘(((iEdg‘𝐺)‘(𝐹‘(𝑘 − 1))) ∩ ((iEdg‘𝐺)‘(𝐹‘𝑘))))))
17	16	ralimdv 3177	. . . . . . . . 9 ⊢ (((𝐺 ∈ V ∧ 𝑆 ∈ ℕ₀^) ∧ (𝑇 ∈ ℕ₀^ ∧ 𝑇 ≤ 𝑆)) → (∀𝑘 ∈ (1..^(♯‘𝐹))𝑆 ≤ (♯‘(((iEdg‘𝐺)‘(𝐹‘(𝑘 − 1))) ∩ ((iEdg‘𝐺)‘(𝐹‘𝑘)))) → ∀𝑘 ∈ (1..^(♯‘𝐹))𝑇 ≤ (♯‘(((iEdg‘𝐺)‘(𝐹‘(𝑘 − 1))) ∩ ((iEdg‘𝐺)‘(𝐹‘𝑘))))))
18	17	ex 418	. . . . . . . 8 ⊢ ((𝐺 ∈ V ∧ 𝑆 ∈ ℕ₀^) → ((𝑇 ∈ ℕ₀^ ∧ 𝑇 ≤ 𝑆) → (∀𝑘 ∈ (1..^(♯‘𝐹))𝑆 ≤ (♯‘(((iEdg‘𝐺)‘(𝐹‘(𝑘 − 1))) ∩ ((iEdg‘𝐺)‘(𝐹‘𝑘)))) → ∀𝑘 ∈ (1..^(♯‘𝐹))𝑇 ≤ (♯‘(((iEdg‘𝐺)‘(𝐹‘(𝑘 − 1))) ∩ ((iEdg‘𝐺)‘(𝐹‘𝑘)))))))
19	18	com23 87	. . . . . . 7 ⊢ ((𝐺 ∈ V ∧ 𝑆 ∈ ℕ₀^) → (∀𝑘 ∈ (1..^(♯‘𝐹))𝑆 ≤ (♯‘(((iEdg‘𝐺)‘(𝐹‘(𝑘 − 1))) ∩ ((iEdg‘𝐺)‘(𝐹‘𝑘)))) → ((𝑇 ∈ ℕ₀^ ∧ 𝑇 ≤ 𝑆) → ∀𝑘 ∈ (1..^(♯‘𝐹))𝑇 ≤ (♯‘(((iEdg‘𝐺)‘(𝐹‘(𝑘 − 1))) ∩ ((iEdg‘𝐺)‘(𝐹‘𝑘)))))))
20	19	a1d 26	. . . . . 6 ⊢ ((𝐺 ∈ V ∧ 𝑆 ∈ ℕ₀^) → (𝐹 ∈ Word dom (iEdg‘𝐺) → (∀𝑘 ∈ (1..^(♯‘𝐹))𝑆 ≤ (♯‘(((iEdg‘𝐺)‘(𝐹‘(𝑘 − 1))) ∩ ((iEdg‘𝐺)‘(𝐹‘𝑘)))) → ((𝑇 ∈ ℕ₀^ ∧ 𝑇 ≤ 𝑆) → ∀𝑘 ∈ (1..^(♯‘𝐹))𝑇 ≤ (♯‘(((iEdg‘𝐺)‘(𝐹‘(𝑘 − 1))) ∩ ((iEdg‘𝐺)‘(𝐹‘𝑘))))))))
21	20	3imp1 1366	. . . . 5 ⊢ ((((𝐺 ∈ V ∧ 𝑆 ∈ ℕ₀^) ∧ 𝐹 ∈ Word dom (iEdg‘𝐺) ∧ ∀𝑘 ∈ (1..^(♯‘𝐹))𝑆 ≤ (♯‘(((iEdg‘𝐺)‘(𝐹‘(𝑘 − 1))) ∩ ((iEdg‘𝐺)‘(𝐹‘𝑘))))) ∧ (𝑇 ∈ ℕ₀^ ∧ 𝑇 ≤ 𝑆)) → ∀𝑘 ∈ (1..^(♯‘𝐹))𝑇 ≤ (♯‘(((iEdg‘𝐺)‘(𝐹‘(𝑘 − 1))) ∩ ((iEdg‘𝐺)‘(𝐹‘𝑘)))))
22		simpl1l 1243	. . . . . 6 ⊢ ((((𝐺 ∈ V ∧ 𝑆 ∈ ℕ₀^) ∧ 𝐹 ∈ Word dom (iEdg‘𝐺) ∧ ∀𝑘 ∈ (1..^(♯‘𝐹))𝑆 ≤ (♯‘(((iEdg‘𝐺)‘(𝐹‘(𝑘 − 1))) ∩ ((iEdg‘𝐺)‘(𝐹‘𝑘))))) ∧ (𝑇 ∈ ℕ₀^ ∧ 𝑇 ≤ 𝑆)) → 𝐺 ∈ V)
23		simprl 783	. . . . . 6 ⊢ ((((𝐺 ∈ V ∧ 𝑆 ∈ ℕ₀^) ∧ 𝐹 ∈ Word dom (iEdg‘𝐺) ∧ ∀𝑘 ∈ (1..^(♯‘𝐹))𝑆 ≤ (♯‘(((iEdg‘𝐺)‘(𝐹‘(𝑘 − 1))) ∩ ((iEdg‘𝐺)‘(𝐹‘𝑘))))) ∧ (𝑇 ∈ ℕ₀^ ∧ 𝑇 ≤ 𝑆)) → 𝑇 ∈ ℕ₀^*)
24	1	isewlk 30176	. . . . . 6 ⊢ ((𝐺 ∈ V ∧ 𝑇 ∈ ℕ₀^* ∧ 𝐹 ∈ Word dom (iEdg‘𝐺)) → (𝐹 ∈ (𝐺 EdgWalks 𝑇) ↔ (𝐹 ∈ Word dom (iEdg‘𝐺) ∧ ∀𝑘 ∈ (1..^(♯‘𝐹))𝑇 ≤ (♯‘(((iEdg‘𝐺)‘(𝐹‘(𝑘 − 1))) ∩ ((iEdg‘𝐺)‘(𝐹‘𝑘)))))))
25	22, 23, 3, 24	syl3anc 1398	. . . . 5 ⊢ ((((𝐺 ∈ V ∧ 𝑆 ∈ ℕ₀^) ∧ 𝐹 ∈ Word dom (iEdg‘𝐺) ∧ ∀𝑘 ∈ (1..^(♯‘𝐹))𝑆 ≤ (♯‘(((iEdg‘𝐺)‘(𝐹‘(𝑘 − 1))) ∩ ((iEdg‘𝐺)‘(𝐹‘𝑘))))) ∧ (𝑇 ∈ ℕ₀^ ∧ 𝑇 ≤ 𝑆)) → (𝐹 ∈ (𝐺 EdgWalks 𝑇) ↔ (𝐹 ∈ Word dom (iEdg‘𝐺) ∧ ∀𝑘 ∈ (1..^(♯‘𝐹))𝑇 ≤ (♯‘(((iEdg‘𝐺)‘(𝐹‘(𝑘 − 1))) ∩ ((iEdg‘𝐺)‘(𝐹‘𝑘)))))))
26	3, 21, 25	mpbir2and 726	. . . 4 ⊢ ((((𝐺 ∈ V ∧ 𝑆 ∈ ℕ₀^) ∧ 𝐹 ∈ Word dom (iEdg‘𝐺) ∧ ∀𝑘 ∈ (1..^(♯‘𝐹))𝑆 ≤ (♯‘(((iEdg‘𝐺)‘(𝐹‘(𝑘 − 1))) ∩ ((iEdg‘𝐺)‘(𝐹‘𝑘))))) ∧ (𝑇 ∈ ℕ₀^ ∧ 𝑇 ≤ 𝑆)) → 𝐹 ∈ (𝐺 EdgWalks 𝑇))
27	26	ex 418	. . 3 ⊢ (((𝐺 ∈ V ∧ 𝑆 ∈ ℕ₀^) ∧ 𝐹 ∈ Word dom (iEdg‘𝐺) ∧ ∀𝑘 ∈ (1..^(♯‘𝐹))𝑆 ≤ (♯‘(((iEdg‘𝐺)‘(𝐹‘(𝑘 − 1))) ∩ ((iEdg‘𝐺)‘(𝐹‘𝑘))))) → ((𝑇 ∈ ℕ₀^ ∧ 𝑇 ≤ 𝑆) → 𝐹 ∈ (𝐺 EdgWalks 𝑇)))
28	2, 27	syl 18	. 2 ⊢ (𝐹 ∈ (𝐺 EdgWalks 𝑆) → ((𝑇 ∈ ℕ₀^* ∧ 𝑇 ≤ 𝑆) → 𝐹 ∈ (𝐺 EdgWalks 𝑇)))
29	28	3impib 1134	1 ⊢ ((𝐹 ∈ (𝐺 EdgWalks 𝑆) ∧ 𝑇 ∈ ℕ₀^* ∧ 𝑇 ≤ 𝑆) → 𝐹 ∈ (𝐺 EdgWalks 𝑇))

Colors of variables: wff setvar class

This proof depends on syntax axioms: → wi 4 ↔ wb 209 ∧ wa 401 ∧ w3a 1103 ∈ wcel 2145 ∀wral 3077 Vcvv 3451 ∩ cin 3898 class class class wbr 5103 dom cdm 5651 ‘cfv 6537 (class class class)co 7418 1c1 11194 ℝ^*cxr 11335 ≤ cle 11337 − cmin 11534 ℕ₀^*cxnn0 12672 ..^cfzo 13781 ♯chash 14467 Word cword 14651 iEdgciedg 29568 EdgWalks cewlks 30169

This proof depends on axioms: ax-mp 5 ax-1 6 ax-2 7 ax-3 8 ax-gen 1828 ax-4 1842 ax-5 1943 ax-6 2000 ax-7 2041 ax-8 2147 ax-9 2155 ax-10 2178 ax-11 2194 ax-12 2213 ax-ext 2733 ax-rep 5232 ax-sep 5249 ax-nul 5260 ax-pow 5327 ax-pr 5391 ax-un 7749 ax-cnex 11249 ax-resscn 11250 ax-1cn 11251 ax-icn 11252 ax-addcl 11253 ax-addrcl 11254 ax-mulcl 11255 ax-mulrcl 11256 ax-mulcom 11257 ax-addass 11258 ax-mulass 11259 ax-distr 11260 ax-i2m1 11261 ax-1ne0 11262 ax-1rid 11263 ax-rnegex 11264 ax-rrecex 11265 ax-cnre 11266 ax-pre-lttri 11267 ax-pre-lttrn 11268 ax-pre-ltadd 11269 ax-pre-mulgt0 11270

This proof depends on definitions: df-bi 210 df-an 402 df-or 862 df-3or 1104 df-3an 1105 df-tru 1573 df-fal 1583 df-ex 1813 df-nf 1817 df-sb 2100 df-mo 2565 df-eu 2595 df-clab 2740 df-cleq 2753 df-clel 2836 df-nfc 2910 df-ne 2957 df-nel 3063 df-ral 3078 df-rex 3088 df-reu 3367 df-rab 3414 df-v 3453 df-sbc 3740 df-csb 3848 df-dif 3902 df-un 3904 df-in 3906 df-ss 3916 df-pss 3919 df-nul 4280 df-if 4483 df-pw 4559 df-sn 4585 df-pr 4587 df-op 4591 df-uni 4868 df-int 4908 df-iun 4953 df-br 5104 df-opab 5168 df-mpt 5187 df-tr 5213 df-id 5546 df-eprel 5551 df-po 5559 df-so 5560 df-fr 5604 df-we 5606 df-xp 5657 df-rel 5658 df-cnv 5659 df-co 5660 df-dm 5661 df-rn 5662 df-res 5663 df-ima 5664 df-pred 6303 df-ord 6364 df-on 6365 df-lim 6366 df-suc 6367 df-iota 6493 df-fun 6539 df-fn 6540 df-f 6541 df-f1 6542 df-fo 6543 df-f1o 6544 df-fv 6545 df-riota 7375 df-ov 7421 df-oprab 7422 df-mpo 7423 df-om 7876 df-1st 7999 df-2nd 8000 df-frecs 8292 df-wrecs 8323 df-recs 8372 df-rdg 8411 df-1o 8469 df-er 8710 df-map 8842 df-en 8967 df-dom 8968 df-sdom 8969 df-fin 8970 df-card 10013 df-pnf 11338 df-mnf 11339 df-xr 11340 df-ltxr 11341 df-le 11342 df-sub 11536 df-neg 11537 df-nn 12329 df-n0 12600 df-xnn0 12673 df-z 12687 df-uz 12959 df-fz 13633 df-fzo 13782 df-hash 14468 df-word 14652 df-ewlks 30172

This theorem is used by: (None)

W3C validator