ewlkle - Metamath Proof Explorer

	Metamath Proof Explorer		< Previous Next > Nearby theorems
Mirrors > Home > MPE Home > Th. List > ewlkle		Structured version Visualization version GIF version

Theorem ewlkle 30195

Description: An s-walk of edges is also a t-walk of edges if 𝑡 ≤ 𝑠. (Contributed by AV, 4-Jan-2021.)

**Assertion**
Ref	Expression
ewlkle	⊢ ((𝐹 ∈ (𝐺 EdgWalks 𝑆) ∧ 𝑇 ∈ ℕ₀^* ∧ 𝑇 ≤ 𝑆) → 𝐹 ∈ (𝐺 EdgWalks 𝑇))

Proof of Theorem ewlkle Dummy variable 𝑘 is distinct from all other variables.

Step	Hyp	Ref	Expression
1		eqid 2760	. . . 4 ⊢ (iEdg‘𝐺) = (iEdg‘𝐺)
2	1	ewlkprop 30193	. . 3 ⊢ (𝐹 ∈ (𝐺 EdgWalks 𝑆) → ((𝐺 ∈ V ∧ 𝑆 ∈ ℕ₀^*) ∧ 𝐹 ∈ Word dom (iEdg‘𝐺) ∧ ∀𝑘 ∈ (1..^(♯‘𝐹))𝑆 ≤ (♯‘(((iEdg‘𝐺)‘(𝐹‘(𝑘 − 1))) ∩ ((iEdg‘𝐺)‘(𝐹‘𝑘))))))
3		simpl2 1211	. . . . 5 ⊢ ((((𝐺 ∈ V ∧ 𝑆 ∈ ℕ₀^) ∧ 𝐹 ∈ Word dom (iEdg‘𝐺) ∧ ∀𝑘 ∈ (1..^(♯‘𝐹))𝑆 ≤ (♯‘(((iEdg‘𝐺)‘(𝐹‘(𝑘 − 1))) ∩ ((iEdg‘𝐺)‘(𝐹‘𝑘))))) ∧ (𝑇 ∈ ℕ₀^ ∧ 𝑇 ≤ 𝑆)) → 𝐹 ∈ Word dom (iEdg‘𝐺))
4		xnn0xr 12691	. . . . . . . . . . . . . . 15 ⊢ (𝑇 ∈ ℕ₀^* → 𝑇 ∈ ℝ^*)
5	4	adantl 487	. . . . . . . . . . . . . 14 ⊢ ((𝑆 ∈ ℕ₀^* ∧ 𝑇 ∈ ℕ₀^) → 𝑇 ∈ ℝ^)
6		xnn0xr 12691	. . . . . . . . . . . . . . 15 ⊢ (𝑆 ∈ ℕ₀^* → 𝑆 ∈ ℝ^*)
7	6	adantr 486	. . . . . . . . . . . . . 14 ⊢ ((𝑆 ∈ ℕ₀^* ∧ 𝑇 ∈ ℕ₀^) → 𝑆 ∈ ℝ^)
8		fvex 6903	. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 16 ⊢ ((iEdg‘𝐺)‘(𝐹‘(𝑘 − 1))) ∈ V
9	8	inex1 5277	. . . . . . . . . . . . . . 15 ⊢ (((iEdg‘𝐺)‘(𝐹‘(𝑘 − 1))) ∩ ((iEdg‘𝐺)‘(𝐹‘𝑘))) ∈ V
10		hashxrcl 14508	. . . . . . . . . . . . . . 15 ⊢ ((((iEdg‘𝐺)‘(𝐹‘(𝑘 − 1))) ∩ ((iEdg‘𝐺)‘(𝐹‘𝑘))) ∈ V → (♯‘(((iEdg‘𝐺)‘(𝐹‘(𝑘 − 1))) ∩ ((iEdg‘𝐺)‘(𝐹‘𝑘)))) ∈ ℝ^*)
11	9, 10	mp1i 14	. . . . . . . . . . . . . 14 ⊢ ((𝑆 ∈ ℕ₀^* ∧ 𝑇 ∈ ℕ₀^) → (♯‘(((iEdg‘𝐺)‘(𝐹‘(𝑘 − 1))) ∩ ((iEdg‘𝐺)‘(𝐹‘𝑘)))) ∈ ℝ^)
12		xrletr 13294	. . . . . . . . . . . . . 14 ⊢ ((𝑇 ∈ ℝ^* ∧ 𝑆 ∈ ℝ^* ∧ (♯‘(((iEdg‘𝐺)‘(𝐹‘(𝑘 − 1))) ∩ ((iEdg‘𝐺)‘(𝐹‘𝑘)))) ∈ ℝ^*) → ((𝑇 ≤ 𝑆 ∧ 𝑆 ≤ (♯‘(((iEdg‘𝐺)‘(𝐹‘(𝑘 − 1))) ∩ ((iEdg‘𝐺)‘(𝐹‘𝑘))))) → 𝑇 ≤ (♯‘(((iEdg‘𝐺)‘(𝐹‘(𝑘 − 1))) ∩ ((iEdg‘𝐺)‘(𝐹‘𝑘))))))
13	5, 7, 11, 12	syl3anc 1398	. . . . . . . . . . . . 13 ⊢ ((𝑆 ∈ ℕ₀^* ∧ 𝑇 ∈ ℕ₀^*) → ((𝑇 ≤ 𝑆 ∧ 𝑆 ≤ (♯‘(((iEdg‘𝐺)‘(𝐹‘(𝑘 − 1))) ∩ ((iEdg‘𝐺)‘(𝐹‘𝑘))))) → 𝑇 ≤ (♯‘(((iEdg‘𝐺)‘(𝐹‘(𝑘 − 1))) ∩ ((iEdg‘𝐺)‘(𝐹‘𝑘))))))
14	13	exp4b 436	. . . . . . . . . . . 12 ⊢ (𝑆 ∈ ℕ₀^* → (𝑇 ∈ ℕ₀^* → (𝑇 ≤ 𝑆 → (𝑆 ≤ (♯‘(((iEdg‘𝐺)‘(𝐹‘(𝑘 − 1))) ∩ ((iEdg‘𝐺)‘(𝐹‘𝑘)))) → 𝑇 ≤ (♯‘(((iEdg‘𝐺)‘(𝐹‘(𝑘 − 1))) ∩ ((iEdg‘𝐺)‘(𝐹‘𝑘))))))))
15	14	adantl 487	. . . . . . . . . . 11 ⊢ ((𝐺 ∈ V ∧ 𝑆 ∈ ℕ₀^) → (𝑇 ∈ ℕ₀^ → (𝑇 ≤ 𝑆 → (𝑆 ≤ (♯‘(((iEdg‘𝐺)‘(𝐹‘(𝑘 − 1))) ∩ ((iEdg‘𝐺)‘(𝐹‘𝑘)))) → 𝑇 ≤ (♯‘(((iEdg‘𝐺)‘(𝐹‘(𝑘 − 1))) ∩ ((iEdg‘𝐺)‘(𝐹‘𝑘))))))))
16	15	imp32 424	. . . . . . . . . 10 ⊢ (((𝐺 ∈ V ∧ 𝑆 ∈ ℕ₀^) ∧ (𝑇 ∈ ℕ₀^ ∧ 𝑇 ≤ 𝑆)) → (𝑆 ≤ (♯‘(((iEdg‘𝐺)‘(𝐹‘(𝑘 − 1))) ∩ ((iEdg‘𝐺)‘(𝐹‘𝑘)))) → 𝑇 ≤ (♯‘(((iEdg‘𝐺)‘(𝐹‘(𝑘 − 1))) ∩ ((iEdg‘𝐺)‘(𝐹‘𝑘))))))
17	16	ralimdv 3176	. . . . . . . . 9 ⊢ (((𝐺 ∈ V ∧ 𝑆 ∈ ℕ₀^) ∧ (𝑇 ∈ ℕ₀^ ∧ 𝑇 ≤ 𝑆)) → (∀𝑘 ∈ (1..^(♯‘𝐹))𝑆 ≤ (♯‘(((iEdg‘𝐺)‘(𝐹‘(𝑘 − 1))) ∩ ((iEdg‘𝐺)‘(𝐹‘𝑘)))) → ∀𝑘 ∈ (1..^(♯‘𝐹))𝑇 ≤ (♯‘(((iEdg‘𝐺)‘(𝐹‘(𝑘 − 1))) ∩ ((iEdg‘𝐺)‘(𝐹‘𝑘))))))
18	17	ex 418	. . . . . . . 8 ⊢ ((𝐺 ∈ V ∧ 𝑆 ∈ ℕ₀^) → ((𝑇 ∈ ℕ₀^ ∧ 𝑇 ≤ 𝑆) → (∀𝑘 ∈ (1..^(♯‘𝐹))𝑆 ≤ (♯‘(((iEdg‘𝐺)‘(𝐹‘(𝑘 − 1))) ∩ ((iEdg‘𝐺)‘(𝐹‘𝑘)))) → ∀𝑘 ∈ (1..^(♯‘𝐹))𝑇 ≤ (♯‘(((iEdg‘𝐺)‘(𝐹‘(𝑘 − 1))) ∩ ((iEdg‘𝐺)‘(𝐹‘𝑘)))))))
19	18	com23 87	. . . . . . 7 ⊢ ((𝐺 ∈ V ∧ 𝑆 ∈ ℕ₀^) → (∀𝑘 ∈ (1..^(♯‘𝐹))𝑆 ≤ (♯‘(((iEdg‘𝐺)‘(𝐹‘(𝑘 − 1))) ∩ ((iEdg‘𝐺)‘(𝐹‘𝑘)))) → ((𝑇 ∈ ℕ₀^ ∧ 𝑇 ≤ 𝑆) → ∀𝑘 ∈ (1..^(♯‘𝐹))𝑇 ≤ (♯‘(((iEdg‘𝐺)‘(𝐹‘(𝑘 − 1))) ∩ ((iEdg‘𝐺)‘(𝐹‘𝑘)))))))
20	19	a1d 26	. . . . . 6 ⊢ ((𝐺 ∈ V ∧ 𝑆 ∈ ℕ₀^) → (𝐹 ∈ Word dom (iEdg‘𝐺) → (∀𝑘 ∈ (1..^(♯‘𝐹))𝑆 ≤ (♯‘(((iEdg‘𝐺)‘(𝐹‘(𝑘 − 1))) ∩ ((iEdg‘𝐺)‘(𝐹‘𝑘)))) → ((𝑇 ∈ ℕ₀^ ∧ 𝑇 ≤ 𝑆) → ∀𝑘 ∈ (1..^(♯‘𝐹))𝑇 ≤ (♯‘(((iEdg‘𝐺)‘(𝐹‘(𝑘 − 1))) ∩ ((iEdg‘𝐺)‘(𝐹‘𝑘))))))))
21	20	3imp1 1366	. . . . 5 ⊢ ((((𝐺 ∈ V ∧ 𝑆 ∈ ℕ₀^) ∧ 𝐹 ∈ Word dom (iEdg‘𝐺) ∧ ∀𝑘 ∈ (1..^(♯‘𝐹))𝑆 ≤ (♯‘(((iEdg‘𝐺)‘(𝐹‘(𝑘 − 1))) ∩ ((iEdg‘𝐺)‘(𝐹‘𝑘))))) ∧ (𝑇 ∈ ℕ₀^ ∧ 𝑇 ≤ 𝑆)) → ∀𝑘 ∈ (1..^(♯‘𝐹))𝑇 ≤ (♯‘(((iEdg‘𝐺)‘(𝐹‘(𝑘 − 1))) ∩ ((iEdg‘𝐺)‘(𝐹‘𝑘)))))
22		simpl1l 1243	. . . . . 6 ⊢ ((((𝐺 ∈ V ∧ 𝑆 ∈ ℕ₀^) ∧ 𝐹 ∈ Word dom (iEdg‘𝐺) ∧ ∀𝑘 ∈ (1..^(♯‘𝐹))𝑆 ≤ (♯‘(((iEdg‘𝐺)‘(𝐹‘(𝑘 − 1))) ∩ ((iEdg‘𝐺)‘(𝐹‘𝑘))))) ∧ (𝑇 ∈ ℕ₀^ ∧ 𝑇 ≤ 𝑆)) → 𝐺 ∈ V)
23		simprl 783	. . . . . 6 ⊢ ((((𝐺 ∈ V ∧ 𝑆 ∈ ℕ₀^) ∧ 𝐹 ∈ Word dom (iEdg‘𝐺) ∧ ∀𝑘 ∈ (1..^(♯‘𝐹))𝑆 ≤ (♯‘(((iEdg‘𝐺)‘(𝐹‘(𝑘 − 1))) ∩ ((iEdg‘𝐺)‘(𝐹‘𝑘))))) ∧ (𝑇 ∈ ℕ₀^ ∧ 𝑇 ≤ 𝑆)) → 𝑇 ∈ ℕ₀^*)
24	1	isewlk 30192	. . . . . 6 ⊢ ((𝐺 ∈ V ∧ 𝑇 ∈ ℕ₀^* ∧ 𝐹 ∈ Word dom (iEdg‘𝐺)) → (𝐹 ∈ (𝐺 EdgWalks 𝑇) ↔ (𝐹 ∈ Word dom (iEdg‘𝐺) ∧ ∀𝑘 ∈ (1..^(♯‘𝐹))𝑇 ≤ (♯‘(((iEdg‘𝐺)‘(𝐹‘(𝑘 − 1))) ∩ ((iEdg‘𝐺)‘(𝐹‘𝑘)))))))
25	22, 23, 3, 24	syl3anc 1398	. . . . 5 ⊢ ((((𝐺 ∈ V ∧ 𝑆 ∈ ℕ₀^) ∧ 𝐹 ∈ Word dom (iEdg‘𝐺) ∧ ∀𝑘 ∈ (1..^(♯‘𝐹))𝑆 ≤ (♯‘(((iEdg‘𝐺)‘(𝐹‘(𝑘 − 1))) ∩ ((iEdg‘𝐺)‘(𝐹‘𝑘))))) ∧ (𝑇 ∈ ℕ₀^ ∧ 𝑇 ≤ 𝑆)) → (𝐹 ∈ (𝐺 EdgWalks 𝑇) ↔ (𝐹 ∈ Word dom (iEdg‘𝐺) ∧ ∀𝑘 ∈ (1..^(♯‘𝐹))𝑇 ≤ (♯‘(((iEdg‘𝐺)‘(𝐹‘(𝑘 − 1))) ∩ ((iEdg‘𝐺)‘(𝐹‘𝑘)))))))
26	3, 21, 25	mpbir2and 726	. . . 4 ⊢ ((((𝐺 ∈ V ∧ 𝑆 ∈ ℕ₀^) ∧ 𝐹 ∈ Word dom (iEdg‘𝐺) ∧ ∀𝑘 ∈ (1..^(♯‘𝐹))𝑆 ≤ (♯‘(((iEdg‘𝐺)‘(𝐹‘(𝑘 − 1))) ∩ ((iEdg‘𝐺)‘(𝐹‘𝑘))))) ∧ (𝑇 ∈ ℕ₀^ ∧ 𝑇 ≤ 𝑆)) → 𝐹 ∈ (𝐺 EdgWalks 𝑇))
27	26	ex 418	. . 3 ⊢ (((𝐺 ∈ V ∧ 𝑆 ∈ ℕ₀^) ∧ 𝐹 ∈ Word dom (iEdg‘𝐺) ∧ ∀𝑘 ∈ (1..^(♯‘𝐹))𝑆 ≤ (♯‘(((iEdg‘𝐺)‘(𝐹‘(𝑘 − 1))) ∩ ((iEdg‘𝐺)‘(𝐹‘𝑘))))) → ((𝑇 ∈ ℕ₀^ ∧ 𝑇 ≤ 𝑆) → 𝐹 ∈ (𝐺 EdgWalks 𝑇)))
28	2, 27	syl 18	. 2 ⊢ (𝐹 ∈ (𝐺 EdgWalks 𝑆) → ((𝑇 ∈ ℕ₀^* ∧ 𝑇 ≤ 𝑆) → 𝐹 ∈ (𝐺 EdgWalks 𝑇)))
29	28	3impib 1134	1 ⊢ ((𝐹 ∈ (𝐺 EdgWalks 𝑆) ∧ 𝑇 ∈ ℕ₀^* ∧ 𝑇 ≤ 𝑆) → 𝐹 ∈ (𝐺 EdgWalks 𝑇))

Colors of variables: wff setvar class

This proof depends on syntax axioms: → wi 4 ↔ wb 209 ∧ wa 401 ∧ w3a 1103 ∈ wcel 2144 ∀wral 3076 Vcvv 3450 ∩ cin 4088 class class class wbr 5102 dom cdm 5651 ‘cfv 6543 (class class class)co 7424 1c1 11208 ℝ^*cxr 11349 ≤ cle 11351 − cmin 11548 ℕ₀^*cxnn0 12686 ..^cfzo 13795 ♯chash 14481 Word cword 14665 iEdgciedg 29584 EdgWalks cewlks 30185

This proof depends on axioms: ax-mp 5 ax-1 6 ax-2 7 ax-3 8 ax-gen 1827 ax-4 1841 ax-5 1942 ax-6 1999 ax-7 2040 ax-8 2146 ax-9 2154 ax-10 2177 ax-11 2193 ax-12 2212 ax-ext 2732 ax-rep 5231 ax-sep 5248 ax-nul 5259 ax-pow 5327 ax-pr 5391 ax-un 7755 ax-cnex 11263 ax-resscn 11264 ax-1cn 11265 ax-icn 11266 ax-addcl 11267 ax-addrcl 11268 ax-mulcl 11269 ax-mulrcl 11270 ax-mulcom 11271 ax-addass 11272 ax-mulass 11273 ax-distr 11274 ax-i2m1 11275 ax-1ne0 11276 ax-1rid 11277 ax-rnegex 11278 ax-rrecex 11279 ax-cnre 11280 ax-pre-lttri 11281 ax-pre-lttrn 11282 ax-pre-ltadd 11283 ax-pre-mulgt0 11284

This proof depends on definitions: df-bi 210 df-an 402 df-or 862 df-3or 1104 df-3an 1105 df-tru 1572 df-fal 1582 df-ex 1812 df-nf 1816 df-sb 2099 df-mo 2564 df-eu 2594 df-clab 2739 df-cleq 2752 df-clel 2835 df-nfc 2909 df-ne 2956 df-nel 3062 df-ral 3077 df-rex 3087 df-reu 3366 df-rab 3413 df-v 3452 df-sbc 3739 df-csb 3848 df-ss 3897 df-pss 4013 df-dif 4046 df-in 4090 df-un 4150 df-nul 4278 df-if 4482 df-pw 4558 df-sn 4585 df-pr 4587 df-op 4835 df-uni 4867 df-int 4907 df-iun 4952 df-br 5103 df-opab 5167 df-mpt 5186 df-tr 5212 df-id 5546 df-eprel 5551 df-po 5559 df-so 5560 df-fr 5604 df-we 5606 df-xp 5657 df-rel 5658 df-cnv 5659 df-co 5660 df-dm 5661 df-rn 5662 df-res 5663 df-ima 5664 df-pred 6307 df-ord 6368 df-on 6369 df-lim 6370 df-suc 6371 df-iota 6497 df-fun 6545 df-fn 6546 df-f 6547 df-f1 6548 df-fo 6549 df-f1o 6550 df-fv 6551 df-riota 7381 df-ov 7427 df-oprab 7428 df-mpo 7429 df-om 7882 df-1st 8005 df-2nd 8006 df-frecs 8306 df-wrecs 8337 df-recs 8386 df-rdg 8425 df-1o 8483 df-er 8724 df-map 8856 df-en 8981 df-dom 8982 df-sdom 8983 df-fin 8984 df-card 10027 df-pnf 11352 df-mnf 11353 df-xr 11354 df-ltxr 11355 df-le 11356 df-sub 11550 df-neg 11551 df-nn 12343 df-n0 12614 df-xnn0 12687 df-z 12701 df-uz 12973 df-fz 13647 df-fzo 13796 df-hash 14482 df-word 14666 df-ewlks 30188

This theorem is used by: (None)

W3C validator