MPE Home Metamath Proof Explorer < Previous   Next >
Nearby theorems
Mirrors  >  Home  >  MPE Home  >  Th. List  >  wlkv0 Structured version   Visualization version   GIF version

Theorem wlkv0 30110
Description: If there is a walk in the null graph (a class without vertices), it would be the pair consisting of empty sets. (Contributed by Alexander van der Vekens, 2-Sep-2018.) (Revised by AV, 5-Mar-2021.)
Assertion
Ref Expression
wlkv0 (((Vtx‘𝐺) = ∅ ∧ 𝑊 ∈ (Walks‘𝐺)) → ((1st𝑊) = ∅ ∧ (2nd𝑊) = ∅))

Proof of Theorem wlkv0
StepHypRef Expression
1 wlkcpr 30089 . . 3 (𝑊 ∈ (Walks‘𝐺) ↔ (1st𝑊)(Walks‘𝐺)(2nd𝑊))
2 eqid 2762 . . . . . 6 (iEdg‘𝐺) = (iEdg‘𝐺)
32wlkf 30075 . . . . 5 ((1st𝑊)(Walks‘𝐺)(2nd𝑊) → (1st𝑊) ∈ Word dom (iEdg‘𝐺))
4 eqid 2762 . . . . . 6 (Vtx‘𝐺) = (Vtx‘𝐺)
54wlkp 30077 . . . . 5 ((1st𝑊)(Walks‘𝐺)(2nd𝑊) → (2nd𝑊):(0...(♯‘(1st𝑊)))⟶(Vtx‘𝐺))
63, 5jca 521 . . . 4 ((1st𝑊)(Walks‘𝐺)(2nd𝑊) → ((1st𝑊) ∈ Word dom (iEdg‘𝐺) ∧ (2nd𝑊):(0...(♯‘(1st𝑊)))⟶(Vtx‘𝐺)))
7 feq3 6686 . . . . . . 7 ((Vtx‘𝐺) = ∅ → ((2nd𝑊):(0...(♯‘(1st𝑊)))⟶(Vtx‘𝐺) ↔ (2nd𝑊):(0...(♯‘(1st𝑊)))⟶∅))
8 f00 6761 . . . . . . 7 ((2nd𝑊):(0...(♯‘(1st𝑊)))⟶∅ ↔ ((2nd𝑊) = ∅ ∧ (0...(♯‘(1st𝑊))) = ∅))
97, 8bitrdi 290 . . . . . 6 ((Vtx‘𝐺) = ∅ → ((2nd𝑊):(0...(♯‘(1st𝑊)))⟶(Vtx‘𝐺) ↔ ((2nd𝑊) = ∅ ∧ (0...(♯‘(1st𝑊))) = ∅)))
10 0z 12629 . . . . . . . . . . . . 13 0 ∈ ℤ
11 nn0z 12642 . . . . . . . . . . . . 13 ((♯‘(1st𝑊)) ∈ ℕ0 → (♯‘(1st𝑊)) ∈ ℤ)
12 fzn 13596 . . . . . . . . . . . . 13 ((0 ∈ ℤ ∧ (♯‘(1st𝑊)) ∈ ℤ) → ((♯‘(1st𝑊)) < 0 ↔ (0...(♯‘(1st𝑊))) = ∅))
1310, 11, 12sylancr 599 . . . . . . . . . . . 12 ((♯‘(1st𝑊)) ∈ ℕ0 → ((♯‘(1st𝑊)) < 0 ↔ (0...(♯‘(1st𝑊))) = ∅))
14 nn0nlt0 12557 . . . . . . . . . . . . 13 ((♯‘(1st𝑊)) ∈ ℕ0 → ¬ (♯‘(1st𝑊)) < 0)
1514pm2.21d 122 . . . . . . . . . . . 12 ((♯‘(1st𝑊)) ∈ ℕ0 → ((♯‘(1st𝑊)) < 0 → (1st𝑊) = ∅))
1613, 15sylbird 263 . . . . . . . . . . 11 ((♯‘(1st𝑊)) ∈ ℕ0 → ((0...(♯‘(1st𝑊))) = ∅ → (1st𝑊) = ∅))
1716com12 33 . . . . . . . . . 10 ((0...(♯‘(1st𝑊))) = ∅ → ((♯‘(1st𝑊)) ∈ ℕ0 → (1st𝑊) = ∅))
1817adantl 487 . . . . . . . . 9 (((2nd𝑊) = ∅ ∧ (0...(♯‘(1st𝑊))) = ∅) → ((♯‘(1st𝑊)) ∈ ℕ0 → (1st𝑊) = ∅))
19 lencl 14600 . . . . . . . . 9 ((1st𝑊) ∈ Word dom (iEdg‘𝐺) → (♯‘(1st𝑊)) ∈ ℕ0)
2018, 19impel 515 . . . . . . . 8 ((((2nd𝑊) = ∅ ∧ (0...(♯‘(1st𝑊))) = ∅) ∧ (1st𝑊) ∈ Word dom (iEdg‘𝐺)) → (1st𝑊) = ∅)
21 simpll 779 . . . . . . . 8 ((((2nd𝑊) = ∅ ∧ (0...(♯‘(1st𝑊))) = ∅) ∧ (1st𝑊) ∈ Word dom (iEdg‘𝐺)) → (2nd𝑊) = ∅)
2220, 21jca 521 . . . . . . 7 ((((2nd𝑊) = ∅ ∧ (0...(♯‘(1st𝑊))) = ∅) ∧ (1st𝑊) ∈ Word dom (iEdg‘𝐺)) → ((1st𝑊) = ∅ ∧ (2nd𝑊) = ∅))
2322ex 418 . . . . . 6 (((2nd𝑊) = ∅ ∧ (0...(♯‘(1st𝑊))) = ∅) → ((1st𝑊) ∈ Word dom (iEdg‘𝐺) → ((1st𝑊) = ∅ ∧ (2nd𝑊) = ∅)))
249, 23biimtrdi 256 . . . . 5 ((Vtx‘𝐺) = ∅ → ((2nd𝑊):(0...(♯‘(1st𝑊)))⟶(Vtx‘𝐺) → ((1st𝑊) ∈ Word dom (iEdg‘𝐺) → ((1st𝑊) = ∅ ∧ (2nd𝑊) = ∅))))
2524impcomd 417 . . . 4 ((Vtx‘𝐺) = ∅ → (((1st𝑊) ∈ Word dom (iEdg‘𝐺) ∧ (2nd𝑊):(0...(♯‘(1st𝑊)))⟶(Vtx‘𝐺)) → ((1st𝑊) = ∅ ∧ (2nd𝑊) = ∅)))
266, 25syl5 35 . . 3 ((Vtx‘𝐺) = ∅ → ((1st𝑊)(Walks‘𝐺)(2nd𝑊) → ((1st𝑊) = ∅ ∧ (2nd𝑊) = ∅)))
271, 26biimtrid 245 . 2 ((Vtx‘𝐺) = ∅ → (𝑊 ∈ (Walks‘𝐺) → ((1st𝑊) = ∅ ∧ (2nd𝑊) = ∅)))
2827imp 412 1 (((Vtx‘𝐺) = ∅ ∧ 𝑊 ∈ (Walks‘𝐺)) → ((1st𝑊) = ∅ ∧ (2nd𝑊) = ∅))
Colors of variables:    wff setvar class
This proof depends on syntax axioms:  wi 4  wb 209  wa 401   = wceq 1570  wcel 2145  c0 4282   class class class wbr 5107  dom cdm 5659  wf 6533  cfv 6537  (class class class)co 7416  1st c1st 7987  2nd c2nd 7988  0cc0 11127   < clt 11270  0cn0 12531  cz 12618  ...cfz 13563  chash 14396  Word cword 14580  Vtxcvtx 29454  iEdgciedg 29455  Walkscwlks 30057
This proof depends on axioms:  ax-mp 5  ax-1 6  ax-2 7  ax-3 8  ax-gen 1828  ax-4 1842  ax-5 1943  ax-6 2000  ax-7 2041  ax-8 2147  ax-9 2155  ax-10 2178  ax-11 2194  ax-12 2215  ax-ext 2734  ax-rep 5236  ax-sep 5255  ax-nul 5267  ax-pow 5334  ax-pr 5402  ax-un 7739  ax-cnex 11183  ax-resscn 11184  ax-1cn 11185  ax-icn 11186  ax-addcl 11187  ax-addrcl 11188  ax-mulcl 11189  ax-mulrcl 11190  ax-mulcom 11191  ax-addass 11192  ax-mulass 11193  ax-distr 11194  ax-i2m1 11195  ax-1ne0 11196  ax-1rid 11197  ax-rnegex 11198  ax-rrecex 11199  ax-cnre 11200  ax-pre-lttri 11201  ax-pre-lttrn 11202  ax-pre-ltadd 11203  ax-pre-mulgt0 11204
This proof depends on definitions:  df-bi 210  df-an 402  df-or 862  df-ifp 1079  df-3or 1104  df-3an 1105  df-tru 1573  df-fal 1583  df-ex 1813  df-nf 1817  df-sb 2100  df-mo 2566  df-eu 2596  df-clab 2741  df-cleq 2754  df-clel 2837  df-nfc 2911  df-ne 2958  df-nel 3064  df-ral 3079  df-rex 3089  df-reu 3368  df-rab 3415  df-v 3455  df-sbc 3743  df-csb 3851  df-dif 3905  df-un 3907  df-in 3909  df-ss 3919  df-pss 3922  df-nul 4283  df-if 4486  df-pw 4562  df-sn 4588  df-pr 4590  df-op 4594  df-uni 4871  df-int 4911  df-iun 4956  df-br 5108  df-opab 5172  df-mpt 5191  df-tr 5217  df-id 5554  df-eprel 5559  df-po 5567  df-so 5568  df-fr 5612  df-we 5614  df-xp 5665  df-rel 5666  df-cnv 5667  df-co 5668  df-dm 5669  df-rn 5670  df-res 5671  df-ima 5672  df-pred 6303  df-ord 6364  df-on 6365  df-lim 6366  df-suc 6367  df-iota 6493  df-fun 6539  df-fn 6540  df-f 6541  df-f1 6542  df-fo 6543  df-f1o 6544  df-fv 6545  df-riota 7373  df-ov 7419  df-oprab 7420  df-mpo 7421  df-om 7866  df-1st 7989  df-2nd 7990  df-frecs 8283  df-wrecs 8314  df-recs 8363  df-rdg 8402  df-1o 8458  df-er 8699  df-map 8831  df-en 8956  df-dom 8957  df-sdom 8958  df-fin 8959  df-card 9947  df-pnf 11272  df-mnf 11273  df-xr 11274  df-ltxr 11275  df-le 11276  df-sub 11470  df-neg 11471  df-nn 12261  df-n0 12532  df-z 12619  df-uz 12891  df-fz 13564  df-fzo 13712  df-hash 14397  df-word 14581  df-wlks 30060
This theorem is used by:  g0wlk0  30111
  Copyright terms: Public domain W3C validator