P. 289 of Theorem List - Metamath Proof Explorer

Theorem List for Metamath Proof Explorer - 28801-28900   *Has distinct variable group(s)

Type	Label	Description
Statement
Theorem	ragperp 28801	Deduce that two lines are perpendicular from a right angle statement. One direction of theorem 8.13 of [Schwabhauser] p. 59. (Contributed by Thierry Arnoux, 20-Oct-2019.)
⊢ 𝑃 = (Base‘𝐺)    &   ⊢ − = (dist‘𝐺)    &   ⊢ 𝐼 = (Itv‘𝐺)    &   ⊢ 𝐿 = (LineG‘𝐺)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐺 ∈ TarskiG)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐴 ∈ ran 𝐿)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐵 ∈ ran 𝐿)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝑋 ∈ (𝐴 ∩ 𝐵))    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝑈 ∈ 𝐴)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝑉 ∈ 𝐵)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝑈 ≠ 𝑋)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝑉 ≠ 𝑋)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → ⟨“𝑈𝑋𝑉”⟩ ∈ (∟G‘𝐺))    ⇒   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐴(⟂G‘𝐺)𝐵)
Theorem	footexALT 28802*	Alternative version of footex 28805 which minimization requires a notably long time. (Contributed by Thierry Arnoux, 19-Oct-2019.) (New usage is discouraged.) (Proof modification is discouraged.)
⊢ 𝑃 = (Base‘𝐺)    &   ⊢ − = (dist‘𝐺)    &   ⊢ 𝐼 = (Itv‘𝐺)    &   ⊢ 𝐿 = (LineG‘𝐺)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐺 ∈ TarskiG)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐴 ∈ ran 𝐿)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐶 ∈ 𝑃)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → ¬ 𝐶 ∈ 𝐴)    ⇒   ⊢ (𝜑 → ∃𝑥 ∈ 𝐴 (𝐶𝐿𝑥)(⟂G‘𝐺)𝐴)
Theorem	footexlem1 28803	Lemma for footex 28805. (Contributed by Thierry Arnoux, 19-Oct-2019.) (Revised by Thierry Arnoux, 1-Jul-2023.)
⊢ 𝑃 = (Base‘𝐺)    &   ⊢ − = (dist‘𝐺)    &   ⊢ 𝐼 = (Itv‘𝐺)    &   ⊢ 𝐿 = (LineG‘𝐺)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐺 ∈ TarskiG)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐴 ∈ ran 𝐿)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐶 ∈ 𝑃)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → ¬ 𝐶 ∈ 𝐴)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐸 ∈ 𝑃)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐹 ∈ 𝑃)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝑅 ∈ 𝑃)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝑋 ∈ 𝑃)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝑌 ∈ 𝑃)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝑍 ∈ 𝑃)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐷 ∈ 𝑃)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐴 = (𝐸𝐿𝐹))    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐸 ≠ 𝐹)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐸 ∈ (𝐹𝐼𝑌))    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → (𝐸 − 𝑌) = (𝐸 − 𝐶))    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐶 = (((pInvG‘𝐺)‘𝑅)‘𝑌))    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝑌 ∈ (𝐸𝐼𝑍))    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → (𝑌 − 𝑍) = (𝑌 − 𝑅))    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝑄 ∈ 𝑃)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝑌 ∈ (𝑅𝐼𝑄))    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → (𝑌 − 𝑄) = (𝑌 − 𝐸))    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝑌 ∈ ((((pInvG‘𝐺)‘𝑍)‘𝑄)𝐼𝐷))    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → (𝑌 − 𝐷) = (𝑌 − 𝐶))    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐷 = (((pInvG‘𝐺)‘𝑋)‘𝐶))    ⇒   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝑋 ∈ 𝐴)
Theorem	footexlem2 28804	Lemma for footex 28805. (Contributed by Thierry Arnoux, 19-Oct-2019.) (Revised by Thierry Arnoux, 1-Jul-2023.)
⊢ 𝑃 = (Base‘𝐺)    &   ⊢ − = (dist‘𝐺)    &   ⊢ 𝐼 = (Itv‘𝐺)    &   ⊢ 𝐿 = (LineG‘𝐺)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐺 ∈ TarskiG)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐴 ∈ ran 𝐿)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐶 ∈ 𝑃)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → ¬ 𝐶 ∈ 𝐴)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐸 ∈ 𝑃)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐹 ∈ 𝑃)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝑅 ∈ 𝑃)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝑋 ∈ 𝑃)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝑌 ∈ 𝑃)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝑍 ∈ 𝑃)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐷 ∈ 𝑃)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐴 = (𝐸𝐿𝐹))    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐸 ≠ 𝐹)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐸 ∈ (𝐹𝐼𝑌))    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → (𝐸 − 𝑌) = (𝐸 − 𝐶))    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐶 = (((pInvG‘𝐺)‘𝑅)‘𝑌))    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝑌 ∈ (𝐸𝐼𝑍))    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → (𝑌 − 𝑍) = (𝑌 − 𝑅))    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝑄 ∈ 𝑃)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝑌 ∈ (𝑅𝐼𝑄))    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → (𝑌 − 𝑄) = (𝑌 − 𝐸))    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝑌 ∈ ((((pInvG‘𝐺)‘𝑍)‘𝑄)𝐼𝐷))    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → (𝑌 − 𝐷) = (𝑌 − 𝐶))    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐷 = (((pInvG‘𝐺)‘𝑋)‘𝐶))    ⇒   ⊢ (𝜑 → (𝐶𝐿𝑋)(⟂G‘𝐺)𝐴)
Theorem	footex 28805*	From a point 𝐶 outside of a line 𝐴, there exists a point 𝑥 on 𝐴 such that (𝐶𝐿𝑥) is perpendicular to 𝐴. This point is unique, see foot 28806. (Contributed by Thierry Arnoux, 19-Oct-2019.) (Revised by Thierry Arnoux, 1-Jul-2023.)
⊢ 𝑃 = (Base‘𝐺)    &   ⊢ − = (dist‘𝐺)    &   ⊢ 𝐼 = (Itv‘𝐺)    &   ⊢ 𝐿 = (LineG‘𝐺)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐺 ∈ TarskiG)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐴 ∈ ran 𝐿)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐶 ∈ 𝑃)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → ¬ 𝐶 ∈ 𝐴)    ⇒   ⊢ (𝜑 → ∃𝑥 ∈ 𝐴 (𝐶𝐿𝑥)(⟂G‘𝐺)𝐴)
Theorem	foot 28806*	From a point 𝐶 outside of a line 𝐴, there exists a unique point 𝑥 on 𝐴 such that (𝐶𝐿𝑥) is perpendicular to 𝐴. That point is called the foot from 𝐶 on 𝐴. Theorem 8.18 of [Schwabhauser] p. 60. (Contributed by Thierry Arnoux, 19-Oct-2019.)
⊢ 𝑃 = (Base‘𝐺)    &   ⊢ − = (dist‘𝐺)    &   ⊢ 𝐼 = (Itv‘𝐺)    &   ⊢ 𝐿 = (LineG‘𝐺)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐺 ∈ TarskiG)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐴 ∈ ran 𝐿)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐶 ∈ 𝑃)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → ¬ 𝐶 ∈ 𝐴)    ⇒   ⊢ (𝜑 → ∃!𝑥 ∈ 𝐴 (𝐶𝐿𝑥)(⟂G‘𝐺)𝐴)
Theorem	footne 28807	Uniqueness of the foot point. (Contributed by Thierry Arnoux, 28-Feb-2020.)
⊢ 𝑃 = (Base‘𝐺)    &   ⊢ − = (dist‘𝐺)    &   ⊢ 𝐼 = (Itv‘𝐺)    &   ⊢ 𝐿 = (LineG‘𝐺)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐺 ∈ TarskiG)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐴 ∈ ran 𝐿)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝑋 ∈ 𝐴)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝑌 ∈ 𝑃)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → (𝑋𝐿𝑌)(⟂G‘𝐺)𝐴)    ⇒   ⊢ (𝜑 → ¬ 𝑌 ∈ 𝐴)
Theorem	footeq 28808	Uniqueness of the foot point. (Contributed by Thierry Arnoux, 1-Mar-2020.)
⊢ 𝑃 = (Base‘𝐺)    &   ⊢ − = (dist‘𝐺)    &   ⊢ 𝐼 = (Itv‘𝐺)    &   ⊢ 𝐿 = (LineG‘𝐺)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐺 ∈ TarskiG)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐴 ∈ ran 𝐿)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝑋 ∈ 𝐴)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝑌 ∈ 𝐴)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝑍 ∈ 𝑃)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → (𝑋𝐿𝑍)(⟂G‘𝐺)𝐴)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → (𝑌𝐿𝑍)(⟂G‘𝐺)𝐴)    ⇒   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝑋 = 𝑌)
Theorem	hlperpnel 28809	A point on a half-line which is perpendicular to a line cannot be on that line. (Contributed by Thierry Arnoux, 1-Mar-2020.)
⊢ 𝑃 = (Base‘𝐺)    &   ⊢ − = (dist‘𝐺)    &   ⊢ 𝐼 = (Itv‘𝐺)    &   ⊢ 𝐿 = (LineG‘𝐺)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐺 ∈ TarskiG)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐴 ∈ ran 𝐿)    &   ⊢ 𝐾 = (hlG‘𝐺)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝑈 ∈ 𝐴)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝑉 ∈ 𝑃)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝑊 ∈ 𝑃)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐴(⟂G‘𝐺)(𝑈𝐿𝑉))    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝑉(𝐾‘𝑈)𝑊)    ⇒   ⊢ (𝜑 → ¬ 𝑊 ∈ 𝐴)
Theorem	perprag 28810	Deduce a right angle from perpendicular lines. (Contributed by Thierry Arnoux, 10-Nov-2019.)
⊢ 𝑃 = (Base‘𝐺)    &   ⊢ − = (dist‘𝐺)    &   ⊢ 𝐼 = (Itv‘𝐺)    &   ⊢ 𝐿 = (LineG‘𝐺)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐺 ∈ TarskiG)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐴 ∈ 𝑃)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐵 ∈ 𝑃)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐶 ∈ (𝐴𝐿𝐵))    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐷 ∈ 𝑃)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → (𝐴𝐿𝐵)(⟂G‘𝐺)(𝐶𝐿𝐷))    ⇒   ⊢ (𝜑 → ⟨“𝐴𝐶𝐷”⟩ ∈ (∟G‘𝐺))
Theorem	perpdragALT 28811	Deduce a right angle from perpendicular lines. (Contributed by Thierry Arnoux, 12-Dec-2019.) (New usage is discouraged.) (Proof modification is discouraged.)
⊢ 𝑃 = (Base‘𝐺)    &   ⊢ − = (dist‘𝐺)    &   ⊢ 𝐼 = (Itv‘𝐺)    &   ⊢ 𝐿 = (LineG‘𝐺)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐺 ∈ TarskiG)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐴 ∈ 𝐷)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐵 ∈ 𝐷)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐶 ∈ 𝑃)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐷(⟂G‘𝐺)(𝐵𝐿𝐶))    ⇒   ⊢ (𝜑 → ⟨“𝐴𝐵𝐶”⟩ ∈ (∟G‘𝐺))
Theorem	perpdrag 28812	Deduce a right angle from perpendicular lines. (Contributed by Thierry Arnoux, 12-Dec-2019.)
⊢ 𝑃 = (Base‘𝐺)    &   ⊢ − = (dist‘𝐺)    &   ⊢ 𝐼 = (Itv‘𝐺)    &   ⊢ 𝐿 = (LineG‘𝐺)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐺 ∈ TarskiG)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐴 ∈ 𝐷)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐵 ∈ 𝐷)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐶 ∈ 𝑃)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐷(⟂G‘𝐺)(𝐵𝐿𝐶))    ⇒   ⊢ (𝜑 → ⟨“𝐴𝐵𝐶”⟩ ∈ (∟G‘𝐺))
Theorem	colperp 28813	Deduce a perpendicularity from perpendicularity and colinearity. (Contributed by Thierry Arnoux, 8-Dec-2019.)
⊢ 𝑃 = (Base‘𝐺)    &   ⊢ − = (dist‘𝐺)    &   ⊢ 𝐼 = (Itv‘𝐺)    &   ⊢ 𝐿 = (LineG‘𝐺)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐺 ∈ TarskiG)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐴 ∈ 𝑃)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐵 ∈ 𝑃)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐶 ∈ 𝑃)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → (𝐴𝐿𝐵)(⟂G‘𝐺)𝐷)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → (𝐶 ∈ (𝐴𝐿𝐵) ∨ 𝐴 = 𝐵))    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐴 ≠ 𝐶)    ⇒   ⊢ (𝜑 → (𝐴𝐿𝐶)(⟂G‘𝐺)𝐷)
Theorem	colperpexlem1 28814	Lemma for colperp 28813. First part of lemma 8.20 of [Schwabhauser] p. 62. (Contributed by Thierry Arnoux, 27-Oct-2019.)
⊢ 𝑃 = (Base‘𝐺)    &   ⊢ − = (dist‘𝐺)    &   ⊢ 𝐼 = (Itv‘𝐺)    &   ⊢ 𝐿 = (LineG‘𝐺)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐺 ∈ TarskiG)    &   ⊢ 𝑆 = (pInvG‘𝐺)    &   ⊢ 𝑀 = (𝑆‘𝐴)    &   ⊢ 𝑁 = (𝑆‘𝐵)    &   ⊢ 𝐾 = (𝑆‘𝑄)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐴 ∈ 𝑃)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐵 ∈ 𝑃)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐶 ∈ 𝑃)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝑄 ∈ 𝑃)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → ⟨“𝐴𝐵𝐶”⟩ ∈ (∟G‘𝐺))    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → (𝐾‘(𝑀‘𝐶)) = (𝑁‘𝐶))    ⇒   ⊢ (𝜑 → ⟨“𝐵𝐴𝑄”⟩ ∈ (∟G‘𝐺))
Theorem	colperpexlem2 28815	Lemma for colperpex 28817. Second part of lemma 8.20 of [Schwabhauser] p. 62. (Contributed by Thierry Arnoux, 10-Nov-2019.)
⊢ 𝑃 = (Base‘𝐺)    &   ⊢ − = (dist‘𝐺)    &   ⊢ 𝐼 = (Itv‘𝐺)    &   ⊢ 𝐿 = (LineG‘𝐺)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐺 ∈ TarskiG)    &   ⊢ 𝑆 = (pInvG‘𝐺)    &   ⊢ 𝑀 = (𝑆‘𝐴)    &   ⊢ 𝑁 = (𝑆‘𝐵)    &   ⊢ 𝐾 = (𝑆‘𝑄)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐴 ∈ 𝑃)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐵 ∈ 𝑃)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐶 ∈ 𝑃)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝑄 ∈ 𝑃)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → ⟨“𝐴𝐵𝐶”⟩ ∈ (∟G‘𝐺))    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → (𝐾‘(𝑀‘𝐶)) = (𝑁‘𝐶))    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐵 ≠ 𝐶)    ⇒   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐴 ≠ 𝑄)
Theorem	colperpexlem3 28816*	Lemma for colperpex 28817. Case 1 of theorem 8.21 of [Schwabhauser] p. 63. (Contributed by Thierry Arnoux, 20-Nov-2019.)
⊢ 𝑃 = (Base‘𝐺)    &   ⊢ − = (dist‘𝐺)    &   ⊢ 𝐼 = (Itv‘𝐺)    &   ⊢ 𝐿 = (LineG‘𝐺)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐺 ∈ TarskiG)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐴 ∈ 𝑃)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐵 ∈ 𝑃)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐶 ∈ 𝑃)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐴 ≠ 𝐵)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → ¬ 𝐶 ∈ (𝐴𝐿𝐵))    ⇒   ⊢ (𝜑 → ∃𝑝 ∈ 𝑃 ((𝐴𝐿𝑝)(⟂G‘𝐺)(𝐴𝐿𝐵) ∧ ∃𝑡 ∈ 𝑃 ((𝑡 ∈ (𝐴𝐿𝐵) ∨ 𝐴 = 𝐵) ∧ 𝑡 ∈ (𝐶𝐼𝑝))))
Theorem	colperpex 28817*	In dimension 2 and above, on a line (𝐴𝐿𝐵) there is always a perpendicular 𝑃 from 𝐴 on a given plane (here given by 𝐶, in case 𝐶 does not lie on the line). Theorem 8.21 of [Schwabhauser] p. 63. (Contributed by Thierry Arnoux, 20-Nov-2019.)
⊢ 𝑃 = (Base‘𝐺)    &   ⊢ − = (dist‘𝐺)    &   ⊢ 𝐼 = (Itv‘𝐺)    &   ⊢ 𝐿 = (LineG‘𝐺)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐺 ∈ TarskiG)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐴 ∈ 𝑃)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐵 ∈ 𝑃)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐶 ∈ 𝑃)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐴 ≠ 𝐵)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐺DimTarskiG≥2)    ⇒   ⊢ (𝜑 → ∃𝑝 ∈ 𝑃 ((𝐴𝐿𝑝)(⟂G‘𝐺)(𝐴𝐿𝐵) ∧ ∃𝑡 ∈ 𝑃 ((𝑡 ∈ (𝐴𝐿𝐵) ∨ 𝐴 = 𝐵) ∧ 𝑡 ∈ (𝐶𝐼𝑝))))
Theorem	mideulem2 28818	Lemma for opphllem 28819, which is itself used for mideu 28822. (Contributed by Thierry Arnoux, 19-Feb-2020.)
⊢ 𝑃 = (Base‘𝐺)    &   ⊢ − = (dist‘𝐺)    &   ⊢ 𝐼 = (Itv‘𝐺)    &   ⊢ 𝐿 = (LineG‘𝐺)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐺 ∈ TarskiG)    &   ⊢ 𝑆 = (pInvG‘𝐺)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐴 ∈ 𝑃)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐵 ∈ 𝑃)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐴 ≠ 𝐵)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝑄 ∈ 𝑃)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝑂 ∈ 𝑃)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝑇 ∈ 𝑃)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → (𝐴𝐿𝐵)(⟂G‘𝐺)(𝑄𝐿𝐵))    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → (𝐴𝐿𝐵)(⟂G‘𝐺)(𝐴𝐿𝑂))    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝑇 ∈ (𝐴𝐿𝐵))    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝑇 ∈ (𝑄𝐼𝑂))    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝑅 ∈ 𝑃)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝑅 ∈ (𝐵𝐼𝑄))    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → (𝐴 − 𝑂) = (𝐵 − 𝑅))    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝑋 ∈ 𝑃)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝑋 ∈ (𝑇𝐼𝐵))    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝑋 ∈ (𝑅𝐼𝑂))    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝑍 ∈ 𝑃)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝑋 ∈ (((𝑆‘𝐴)‘𝑂)𝐼𝑍))    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → (𝑋 − 𝑍) = (𝑋 − 𝑅))    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝑀 ∈ 𝑃)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝑅 = ((𝑆‘𝑀)‘𝑍))    ⇒   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐵 = 𝑀)
Theorem	opphllem 28819*	Lemma 8.24 of [Schwabhauser] p. 66. This is used later for mideulem 28820 and later for opphl 28838. (Contributed by Thierry Arnoux, 21-Dec-2019.)
⊢ 𝑃 = (Base‘𝐺)    &   ⊢ − = (dist‘𝐺)    &   ⊢ 𝐼 = (Itv‘𝐺)    &   ⊢ 𝐿 = (LineG‘𝐺)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐺 ∈ TarskiG)    &   ⊢ 𝑆 = (pInvG‘𝐺)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐴 ∈ 𝑃)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐵 ∈ 𝑃)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐴 ≠ 𝐵)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝑄 ∈ 𝑃)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝑂 ∈ 𝑃)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝑇 ∈ 𝑃)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → (𝐴𝐿𝐵)(⟂G‘𝐺)(𝑄𝐿𝐵))    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → (𝐴𝐿𝐵)(⟂G‘𝐺)(𝐴𝐿𝑂))    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝑇 ∈ (𝐴𝐿𝐵))    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝑇 ∈ (𝑄𝐼𝑂))    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝑅 ∈ 𝑃)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝑅 ∈ (𝐵𝐼𝑄))    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → (𝐴 − 𝑂) = (𝐵 − 𝑅))    ⇒   ⊢ (𝜑 → ∃𝑥 ∈ 𝑃 (𝐵 = ((𝑆‘𝑥)‘𝐴) ∧ 𝑂 = ((𝑆‘𝑥)‘𝑅)))
Theorem	mideulem 28820*	Lemma for mideu 28822. We can assume mideulem.9 "without loss of generality". (Contributed by Thierry Arnoux, 25-Nov-2019.)
⊢ 𝑃 = (Base‘𝐺)    &   ⊢ − = (dist‘𝐺)    &   ⊢ 𝐼 = (Itv‘𝐺)    &   ⊢ 𝐿 = (LineG‘𝐺)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐺 ∈ TarskiG)    &   ⊢ 𝑆 = (pInvG‘𝐺)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐴 ∈ 𝑃)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐵 ∈ 𝑃)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐴 ≠ 𝐵)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝑄 ∈ 𝑃)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝑂 ∈ 𝑃)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝑇 ∈ 𝑃)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → (𝐴𝐿𝐵)(⟂G‘𝐺)(𝑄𝐿𝐵))    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → (𝐴𝐿𝐵)(⟂G‘𝐺)(𝐴𝐿𝑂))    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝑇 ∈ (𝐴𝐿𝐵))    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝑇 ∈ (𝑄𝐼𝑂))    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → (𝐴 − 𝑂)(≤G‘𝐺)(𝐵 − 𝑄))    ⇒   ⊢ (𝜑 → ∃𝑥 ∈ 𝑃 𝐵 = ((𝑆‘𝑥)‘𝐴))
Theorem	midex 28821*	Existence of the midpoint, part Theorem 8.22 of [Schwabhauser] p. 64. Note that this proof requires a construction in 2 dimensions or more, i.e. it does not prove the existence of a midpoint in dimension 1, for a geometry restricted to a line. (Contributed by Thierry Arnoux, 25-Nov-2019.)
⊢ 𝑃 = (Base‘𝐺)    &   ⊢ − = (dist‘𝐺)    &   ⊢ 𝐼 = (Itv‘𝐺)    &   ⊢ 𝐿 = (LineG‘𝐺)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐺 ∈ TarskiG)    &   ⊢ 𝑆 = (pInvG‘𝐺)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐴 ∈ 𝑃)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐵 ∈ 𝑃)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐺DimTarskiG≥2)    ⇒   ⊢ (𝜑 → ∃𝑥 ∈ 𝑃 𝐵 = ((𝑆‘𝑥)‘𝐴))
Theorem	mideu 28822*	Existence and uniqueness of the midpoint, Theorem 8.22 of [Schwabhauser] p. 64. (Contributed by Thierry Arnoux, 25-Nov-2019.)
⊢ 𝑃 = (Base‘𝐺)    &   ⊢ − = (dist‘𝐺)    &   ⊢ 𝐼 = (Itv‘𝐺)    &   ⊢ 𝐿 = (LineG‘𝐺)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐺 ∈ TarskiG)    &   ⊢ 𝑆 = (pInvG‘𝐺)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐴 ∈ 𝑃)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐵 ∈ 𝑃)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐺DimTarskiG≥2)    ⇒   ⊢ (𝜑 → ∃!𝑥 ∈ 𝑃 𝐵 = ((𝑆‘𝑥)‘𝐴))
16.2.14  Half-planes
Theorem	islnopp 28823*	The property for two points 𝐴 and 𝐵 to lie on the opposite sides of a set 𝐷 Definition 9.1 of [Schwabhauser] p. 67. (Contributed by Thierry Arnoux, 19-Dec-2019.)
⊢ 𝑃 = (Base‘𝐺)    &   ⊢ − = (dist‘𝐺)    &   ⊢ 𝐼 = (Itv‘𝐺)    &   ⊢ 𝑂 = {⟨𝑎, 𝑏⟩ ∣ ((𝑎 ∈ (𝑃 ∖ 𝐷) ∧ 𝑏 ∈ (𝑃 ∖ 𝐷)) ∧ ∃𝑡 ∈ 𝐷 𝑡 ∈ (𝑎𝐼𝑏))}    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐴 ∈ 𝑃)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐵 ∈ 𝑃)    ⇒   ⊢ (𝜑 → (𝐴𝑂𝐵 ↔ ((¬ 𝐴 ∈ 𝐷 ∧ ¬ 𝐵 ∈ 𝐷) ∧ ∃𝑡 ∈ 𝐷 𝑡 ∈ (𝐴𝐼𝐵))))
Theorem	islnoppd 28824*	Deduce that 𝐴 and 𝐵 lie on opposite sides of line 𝐿. (Contributed by Thierry Arnoux, 16-Aug-2020.)
⊢ 𝑃 = (Base‘𝐺)    &   ⊢ − = (dist‘𝐺)    &   ⊢ 𝐼 = (Itv‘𝐺)    &   ⊢ 𝑂 = {⟨𝑎, 𝑏⟩ ∣ ((𝑎 ∈ (𝑃 ∖ 𝐷) ∧ 𝑏 ∈ (𝑃 ∖ 𝐷)) ∧ ∃𝑡 ∈ 𝐷 𝑡 ∈ (𝑎𝐼𝑏))}    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐴 ∈ 𝑃)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐵 ∈ 𝑃)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐶 ∈ 𝐷)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → ¬ 𝐴 ∈ 𝐷)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → ¬ 𝐵 ∈ 𝐷)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐶 ∈ (𝐴𝐼𝐵))    ⇒   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐴𝑂𝐵)
Theorem	oppne1 28825*	Points lying on opposite sides of a line cannot be on the line. (Contributed by Thierry Arnoux, 3-Mar-2020.)
⊢ 𝑃 = (Base‘𝐺)    &   ⊢ − = (dist‘𝐺)    &   ⊢ 𝐼 = (Itv‘𝐺)    &   ⊢ 𝑂 = {⟨𝑎, 𝑏⟩ ∣ ((𝑎 ∈ (𝑃 ∖ 𝐷) ∧ 𝑏 ∈ (𝑃 ∖ 𝐷)) ∧ ∃𝑡 ∈ 𝐷 𝑡 ∈ (𝑎𝐼𝑏))}    &   ⊢ 𝐿 = (LineG‘𝐺)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐷 ∈ ran 𝐿)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐺 ∈ TarskiG)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐴 ∈ 𝑃)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐵 ∈ 𝑃)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐴𝑂𝐵)    ⇒   ⊢ (𝜑 → ¬ 𝐴 ∈ 𝐷)
Theorem	oppne2 28826*	Points lying on opposite sides of a line cannot be on the line. (Contributed by Thierry Arnoux, 3-Mar-2020.)
⊢ 𝑃 = (Base‘𝐺)    &   ⊢ − = (dist‘𝐺)    &   ⊢ 𝐼 = (Itv‘𝐺)    &   ⊢ 𝑂 = {⟨𝑎, 𝑏⟩ ∣ ((𝑎 ∈ (𝑃 ∖ 𝐷) ∧ 𝑏 ∈ (𝑃 ∖ 𝐷)) ∧ ∃𝑡 ∈ 𝐷 𝑡 ∈ (𝑎𝐼𝑏))}    &   ⊢ 𝐿 = (LineG‘𝐺)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐷 ∈ ran 𝐿)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐺 ∈ TarskiG)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐴 ∈ 𝑃)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐵 ∈ 𝑃)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐴𝑂𝐵)    ⇒   ⊢ (𝜑 → ¬ 𝐵 ∈ 𝐷)
Theorem	oppne3 28827*	Points lying on opposite sides of a line cannot be equal. (Contributed by Thierry Arnoux, 3-Aug-2020.)
⊢ 𝑃 = (Base‘𝐺)    &   ⊢ − = (dist‘𝐺)    &   ⊢ 𝐼 = (Itv‘𝐺)    &   ⊢ 𝑂 = {⟨𝑎, 𝑏⟩ ∣ ((𝑎 ∈ (𝑃 ∖ 𝐷) ∧ 𝑏 ∈ (𝑃 ∖ 𝐷)) ∧ ∃𝑡 ∈ 𝐷 𝑡 ∈ (𝑎𝐼𝑏))}    &   ⊢ 𝐿 = (LineG‘𝐺)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐷 ∈ ran 𝐿)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐺 ∈ TarskiG)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐴 ∈ 𝑃)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐵 ∈ 𝑃)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐴𝑂𝐵)    ⇒   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐴 ≠ 𝐵)
Theorem	oppcom 28828*	Commutativity rule for "opposite" Theorem 9.2 of [Schwabhauser] p. 67. (Contributed by Thierry Arnoux, 19-Dec-2019.)
⊢ 𝑃 = (Base‘𝐺)    &   ⊢ − = (dist‘𝐺)    &   ⊢ 𝐼 = (Itv‘𝐺)    &   ⊢ 𝑂 = {⟨𝑎, 𝑏⟩ ∣ ((𝑎 ∈ (𝑃 ∖ 𝐷) ∧ 𝑏 ∈ (𝑃 ∖ 𝐷)) ∧ ∃𝑡 ∈ 𝐷 𝑡 ∈ (𝑎𝐼𝑏))}    &   ⊢ 𝐿 = (LineG‘𝐺)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐷 ∈ ran 𝐿)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐺 ∈ TarskiG)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐴 ∈ 𝑃)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐵 ∈ 𝑃)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐴𝑂𝐵)    ⇒   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐵𝑂𝐴)
Theorem	opptgdim2 28829*	If two points opposite to a line exist, dimension must be 2 or more. (Contributed by Thierry Arnoux, 3-Mar-2020.)
⊢ 𝑃 = (Base‘𝐺)    &   ⊢ − = (dist‘𝐺)    &   ⊢ 𝐼 = (Itv‘𝐺)    &   ⊢ 𝑂 = {⟨𝑎, 𝑏⟩ ∣ ((𝑎 ∈ (𝑃 ∖ 𝐷) ∧ 𝑏 ∈ (𝑃 ∖ 𝐷)) ∧ ∃𝑡 ∈ 𝐷 𝑡 ∈ (𝑎𝐼𝑏))}    &   ⊢ 𝐿 = (LineG‘𝐺)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐷 ∈ ran 𝐿)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐺 ∈ TarskiG)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐴 ∈ 𝑃)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐵 ∈ 𝑃)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐴𝑂𝐵)    ⇒   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐺DimTarskiG≥2)
Theorem	oppnid 28830*	The "opposite to a line" relation is irreflexive. (Contributed by Thierry Arnoux, 4-Mar-2020.)
⊢ 𝑃 = (Base‘𝐺)    &   ⊢ − = (dist‘𝐺)    &   ⊢ 𝐼 = (Itv‘𝐺)    &   ⊢ 𝑂 = {⟨𝑎, 𝑏⟩ ∣ ((𝑎 ∈ (𝑃 ∖ 𝐷) ∧ 𝑏 ∈ (𝑃 ∖ 𝐷)) ∧ ∃𝑡 ∈ 𝐷 𝑡 ∈ (𝑎𝐼𝑏))}    &   ⊢ 𝐿 = (LineG‘𝐺)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐷 ∈ ran 𝐿)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐺 ∈ TarskiG)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐴 ∈ 𝑃)    ⇒   ⊢ (𝜑 → ¬ 𝐴𝑂𝐴)
Theorem	opphllem1 28831*	Lemma for opphl 28838. (Contributed by Thierry Arnoux, 20-Dec-2019.)
⊢ 𝑃 = (Base‘𝐺)    &   ⊢ − = (dist‘𝐺)    &   ⊢ 𝐼 = (Itv‘𝐺)    &   ⊢ 𝑂 = {⟨𝑎, 𝑏⟩ ∣ ((𝑎 ∈ (𝑃 ∖ 𝐷) ∧ 𝑏 ∈ (𝑃 ∖ 𝐷)) ∧ ∃𝑡 ∈ 𝐷 𝑡 ∈ (𝑎𝐼𝑏))}    &   ⊢ 𝐿 = (LineG‘𝐺)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐷 ∈ ran 𝐿)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐺 ∈ TarskiG)    &   ⊢ 𝑆 = ((pInvG‘𝐺)‘𝑀)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐴 ∈ 𝑃)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐵 ∈ 𝑃)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐶 ∈ 𝑃)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝑅 ∈ 𝐷)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐴𝑂𝐶)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝑀 ∈ 𝐷)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐴 = (𝑆‘𝐶))    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐴 ≠ 𝑅)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐵 ≠ 𝑅)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐵 ∈ (𝑅𝐼𝐴))    ⇒   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐵𝑂𝐶)
Theorem	opphllem2 28832*	Lemma for opphl 28838. Lemma 9.3 of [Schwabhauser] p. 68. (Contributed by Thierry Arnoux, 21-Dec-2019.)
⊢ 𝑃 = (Base‘𝐺)    &   ⊢ − = (dist‘𝐺)    &   ⊢ 𝐼 = (Itv‘𝐺)    &   ⊢ 𝑂 = {⟨𝑎, 𝑏⟩ ∣ ((𝑎 ∈ (𝑃 ∖ 𝐷) ∧ 𝑏 ∈ (𝑃 ∖ 𝐷)) ∧ ∃𝑡 ∈ 𝐷 𝑡 ∈ (𝑎𝐼𝑏))}    &   ⊢ 𝐿 = (LineG‘𝐺)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐷 ∈ ran 𝐿)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐺 ∈ TarskiG)    &   ⊢ 𝑆 = ((pInvG‘𝐺)‘𝑀)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐴 ∈ 𝑃)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐵 ∈ 𝑃)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐶 ∈ 𝑃)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝑅 ∈ 𝐷)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐴𝑂𝐶)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝑀 ∈ 𝐷)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐴 = (𝑆‘𝐶))    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐴 ≠ 𝑅)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐵 ≠ 𝑅)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → (𝐴 ∈ (𝑅𝐼𝐵) ∨ 𝐵 ∈ (𝑅𝐼𝐴)))    ⇒   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐵𝑂𝐶)
Theorem	opphllem3 28833*	Lemma for opphl 28838: We assume opphllem3.l "without loss of generality". (Contributed by Thierry Arnoux, 21-Feb-2020.)
⊢ 𝑃 = (Base‘𝐺)    &   ⊢ − = (dist‘𝐺)    &   ⊢ 𝐼 = (Itv‘𝐺)    &   ⊢ 𝑂 = {⟨𝑎, 𝑏⟩ ∣ ((𝑎 ∈ (𝑃 ∖ 𝐷) ∧ 𝑏 ∈ (𝑃 ∖ 𝐷)) ∧ ∃𝑡 ∈ 𝐷 𝑡 ∈ (𝑎𝐼𝑏))}    &   ⊢ 𝐿 = (LineG‘𝐺)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐷 ∈ ran 𝐿)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐺 ∈ TarskiG)    &   ⊢ 𝐾 = (hlG‘𝐺)    &   ⊢ 𝑁 = ((pInvG‘𝐺)‘𝑀)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐴 ∈ 𝑃)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐶 ∈ 𝑃)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝑅 ∈ 𝐷)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝑆 ∈ 𝐷)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝑀 ∈ 𝑃)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐴𝑂𝐶)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐷(⟂G‘𝐺)(𝐴𝐿𝑅))    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐷(⟂G‘𝐺)(𝐶𝐿𝑆))    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝑅 ≠ 𝑆)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → (𝑆 − 𝐶)(≤G‘𝐺)(𝑅 − 𝐴))    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝑈 ∈ 𝑃)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → (𝑁‘𝑅) = 𝑆)    ⇒   ⊢ (𝜑 → (𝑈(𝐾‘𝑅)𝐴 ↔ (𝑁‘𝑈)(𝐾‘𝑆)𝐶))
Theorem	opphllem4 28834*	Lemma for opphl 28838. (Contributed by Thierry Arnoux, 22-Feb-2020.)
⊢ 𝑃 = (Base‘𝐺)    &   ⊢ − = (dist‘𝐺)    &   ⊢ 𝐼 = (Itv‘𝐺)    &   ⊢ 𝑂 = {⟨𝑎, 𝑏⟩ ∣ ((𝑎 ∈ (𝑃 ∖ 𝐷) ∧ 𝑏 ∈ (𝑃 ∖ 𝐷)) ∧ ∃𝑡 ∈ 𝐷 𝑡 ∈ (𝑎𝐼𝑏))}    &   ⊢ 𝐿 = (LineG‘𝐺)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐷 ∈ ran 𝐿)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐺 ∈ TarskiG)    &   ⊢ 𝐾 = (hlG‘𝐺)    &   ⊢ 𝑁 = ((pInvG‘𝐺)‘𝑀)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐴 ∈ 𝑃)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐶 ∈ 𝑃)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝑅 ∈ 𝐷)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝑆 ∈ 𝐷)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝑀 ∈ 𝑃)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐴𝑂𝐶)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐷(⟂G‘𝐺)(𝐴𝐿𝑅))    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐷(⟂G‘𝐺)(𝐶𝐿𝑆))    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝑅 ≠ 𝑆)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → (𝑆 − 𝐶)(≤G‘𝐺)(𝑅 − 𝐴))    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝑈 ∈ 𝑃)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → (𝑁‘𝑅) = 𝑆)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝑉 ∈ 𝑃)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝑈(𝐾‘𝑅)𝐴)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝑉(𝐾‘𝑆)𝐶)    ⇒   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝑈𝑂𝑉)
Theorem	opphllem5 28835*	Second part of Lemma 9.4 of [Schwabhauser] p. 68. (Contributed by Thierry Arnoux, 2-Mar-2020.)
⊢ 𝑃 = (Base‘𝐺)    &   ⊢ − = (dist‘𝐺)    &   ⊢ 𝐼 = (Itv‘𝐺)    &   ⊢ 𝑂 = {⟨𝑎, 𝑏⟩ ∣ ((𝑎 ∈ (𝑃 ∖ 𝐷) ∧ 𝑏 ∈ (𝑃 ∖ 𝐷)) ∧ ∃𝑡 ∈ 𝐷 𝑡 ∈ (𝑎𝐼𝑏))}    &   ⊢ 𝐿 = (LineG‘𝐺)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐷 ∈ ran 𝐿)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐺 ∈ TarskiG)    &   ⊢ 𝐾 = (hlG‘𝐺)    &   ⊢ 𝑁 = ((pInvG‘𝐺)‘𝑀)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐴 ∈ 𝑃)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐶 ∈ 𝑃)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝑅 ∈ 𝐷)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝑆 ∈ 𝐷)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝑀 ∈ 𝑃)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐴𝑂𝐶)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐷(⟂G‘𝐺)(𝐴𝐿𝑅))    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐷(⟂G‘𝐺)(𝐶𝐿𝑆))    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝑈 ∈ 𝑃)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝑉 ∈ 𝑃)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝑈(𝐾‘𝑅)𝐴)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝑉(𝐾‘𝑆)𝐶)    ⇒   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝑈𝑂𝑉)
Theorem	opphllem6 28836*	First part of Lemma 9.4 of [Schwabhauser] p. 68. (Contributed by Thierry Arnoux, 3-Mar-2020.)
⊢ 𝑃 = (Base‘𝐺)    &   ⊢ − = (dist‘𝐺)    &   ⊢ 𝐼 = (Itv‘𝐺)    &   ⊢ 𝑂 = {⟨𝑎, 𝑏⟩ ∣ ((𝑎 ∈ (𝑃 ∖ 𝐷) ∧ 𝑏 ∈ (𝑃 ∖ 𝐷)) ∧ ∃𝑡 ∈ 𝐷 𝑡 ∈ (𝑎𝐼𝑏))}    &   ⊢ 𝐿 = (LineG‘𝐺)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐷 ∈ ran 𝐿)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐺 ∈ TarskiG)    &   ⊢ 𝐾 = (hlG‘𝐺)    &   ⊢ 𝑁 = ((pInvG‘𝐺)‘𝑀)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐴 ∈ 𝑃)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐶 ∈ 𝑃)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝑅 ∈ 𝐷)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝑆 ∈ 𝐷)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝑀 ∈ 𝑃)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐴𝑂𝐶)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐷(⟂G‘𝐺)(𝐴𝐿𝑅))    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐷(⟂G‘𝐺)(𝐶𝐿𝑆))    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝑈 ∈ 𝑃)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → (𝑁‘𝑅) = 𝑆)    ⇒   ⊢ (𝜑 → (𝑈(𝐾‘𝑅)𝐴 ↔ (𝑁‘𝑈)(𝐾‘𝑆)𝐶))
Theorem	oppperpex 28837*	Restating colperpex 28817 using the "opposite side of a line" relation. (Contributed by Thierry Arnoux, 2-Aug-2020.)
⊢ 𝑃 = (Base‘𝐺)    &   ⊢ − = (dist‘𝐺)    &   ⊢ 𝐼 = (Itv‘𝐺)    &   ⊢ 𝑂 = {⟨𝑎, 𝑏⟩ ∣ ((𝑎 ∈ (𝑃 ∖ 𝐷) ∧ 𝑏 ∈ (𝑃 ∖ 𝐷)) ∧ ∃𝑡 ∈ 𝐷 𝑡 ∈ (𝑎𝐼𝑏))}    &   ⊢ 𝐿 = (LineG‘𝐺)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐷 ∈ ran 𝐿)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐺 ∈ TarskiG)    &   ⊢ 𝐾 = (hlG‘𝐺)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐴 ∈ 𝐷)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐶 ∈ 𝑃)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → ¬ 𝐶 ∈ 𝐷)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐺DimTarskiG≥2)    ⇒   ⊢ (𝜑 → ∃𝑝 ∈ 𝑃 ((𝐴𝐿𝑝)(⟂G‘𝐺)𝐷 ∧ 𝐶𝑂𝑝))
Theorem	opphl 28838*	If two points 𝐴 and 𝐶 lie on opposite sides of a line 𝐷, then any point of the half line (𝑅𝐴) also lies opposite to 𝐶. Theorem 9.5 of [Schwabhauser] p. 69. (Contributed by Thierry Arnoux, 3-Mar-2019.)
⊢ 𝑃 = (Base‘𝐺)    &   ⊢ − = (dist‘𝐺)    &   ⊢ 𝐼 = (Itv‘𝐺)    &   ⊢ 𝑂 = {⟨𝑎, 𝑏⟩ ∣ ((𝑎 ∈ (𝑃 ∖ 𝐷) ∧ 𝑏 ∈ (𝑃 ∖ 𝐷)) ∧ ∃𝑡 ∈ 𝐷 𝑡 ∈ (𝑎𝐼𝑏))}    &   ⊢ 𝐿 = (LineG‘𝐺)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐷 ∈ ran 𝐿)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐺 ∈ TarskiG)    &   ⊢ 𝐾 = (hlG‘𝐺)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐴 ∈ 𝑃)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐵 ∈ 𝑃)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐶 ∈ 𝑃)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐴𝑂𝐶)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝑅 ∈ 𝐷)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐴(𝐾‘𝑅)𝐵)    ⇒   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐵𝑂𝐶)
Theorem	outpasch 28839*	Axiom of Pasch, outer form. This was proven by Gupta from other axioms and is therefore presented as Theorem 9.6 in [Schwabhauser] p. 70. (Contributed by Thierry Arnoux, 16-Aug-2020.)
⊢ 𝑃 = (Base‘𝐺)    &   ⊢ 𝐼 = (Itv‘𝐺)    &   ⊢ 𝐿 = (LineG‘𝐺)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐺 ∈ TarskiG)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐴 ∈ 𝑃)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐵 ∈ 𝑃)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐶 ∈ 𝑃)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝑅 ∈ 𝑃)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝑄 ∈ 𝑃)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐶 ∈ (𝐴𝐼𝑅))    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝑄 ∈ (𝐵𝐼𝐶))    ⇒   ⊢ (𝜑 → ∃𝑥 ∈ 𝑃 (𝑥 ∈ (𝐴𝐼𝐵) ∧ 𝑄 ∈ (𝑅𝐼𝑥)))
Theorem	hlpasch 28840*	An application of the axiom of Pasch for half-lines. (Contributed by Thierry Arnoux, 15-Sep-2020.)
⊢ 𝑃 = (Base‘𝐺)    &   ⊢ 𝐼 = (Itv‘𝐺)    &   ⊢ 𝐾 = (hlG‘𝐺)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐺 ∈ TarskiG)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐴 ∈ 𝑃)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐵 ∈ 𝑃)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐶 ∈ 𝑃)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝑋 ∈ 𝑃)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐷 ∈ 𝑃)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐴 ≠ 𝐵)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐶(𝐾‘𝐵)𝐷)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐴 ∈ (𝑋𝐼𝐶))    ⇒   ⊢ (𝜑 → ∃𝑒 ∈ 𝑃 (𝐴(𝐾‘𝐵)𝑒 ∧ 𝑒 ∈ (𝑋𝐼𝐷)))
Syntax	chpg 28841	"Belong to the same open half-plane" relation for points in a geometry.
class hpG
Definition	df-hpg 28842*	Define the open half plane relation for a geometry 𝐺. Definition 9.7 of [Schwabhauser] p. 71. See hpgbr 28844 to find the same formulation. (Contributed by Thierry Arnoux, 4-Mar-2020.)
⊢ hpG = (𝑔 ∈ V ↦ (𝑑 ∈ ran (LineG‘𝑔) ↦ {⟨𝑎, 𝑏⟩ ∣ [(Base‘𝑔) / 𝑝][(Itv‘𝑔) / 𝑖]∃𝑐 ∈ 𝑝 (((𝑎 ∈ (𝑝 ∖ 𝑑) ∧ 𝑐 ∈ (𝑝 ∖ 𝑑)) ∧ ∃𝑡 ∈ 𝑑 𝑡 ∈ (𝑎𝑖𝑐)) ∧ ((𝑏 ∈ (𝑝 ∖ 𝑑) ∧ 𝑐 ∈ (𝑝 ∖ 𝑑)) ∧ ∃𝑡 ∈ 𝑑 𝑡 ∈ (𝑏𝑖𝑐)))}))
Theorem	ishpg 28843*	Value of the half-plane relation for a given line 𝐷. (Contributed by Thierry Arnoux, 4-Mar-2020.)
⊢ 𝑃 = (Base‘𝐺)    &   ⊢ 𝐼 = (Itv‘𝐺)    &   ⊢ 𝐿 = (LineG‘𝐺)    &   ⊢ 𝑂 = {⟨𝑎, 𝑏⟩ ∣ ((𝑎 ∈ (𝑃 ∖ 𝐷) ∧ 𝑏 ∈ (𝑃 ∖ 𝐷)) ∧ ∃𝑡 ∈ 𝐷 𝑡 ∈ (𝑎𝐼𝑏))}    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐺 ∈ TarskiG)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐷 ∈ ran 𝐿)    ⇒   ⊢ (𝜑 → ((hpG‘𝐺)‘𝐷) = {⟨𝑎, 𝑏⟩ ∣ ∃𝑐 ∈ 𝑃 (𝑎𝑂𝑐 ∧ 𝑏𝑂𝑐)})
Theorem	hpgbr 28844*	Half-planes : property for points 𝐴 and 𝐵 to belong to the same open half plane delimited by line 𝐷. Definition 9.7 of [Schwabhauser] p. 71. (Contributed by Thierry Arnoux, 4-Mar-2020.)
⊢ 𝑃 = (Base‘𝐺)    &   ⊢ 𝐼 = (Itv‘𝐺)    &   ⊢ 𝐿 = (LineG‘𝐺)    &   ⊢ 𝑂 = {⟨𝑎, 𝑏⟩ ∣ ((𝑎 ∈ (𝑃 ∖ 𝐷) ∧ 𝑏 ∈ (𝑃 ∖ 𝐷)) ∧ ∃𝑡 ∈ 𝐷 𝑡 ∈ (𝑎𝐼𝑏))}    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐺 ∈ TarskiG)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐷 ∈ ran 𝐿)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐴 ∈ 𝑃)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐵 ∈ 𝑃)    ⇒   ⊢ (𝜑 → (𝐴((hpG‘𝐺)‘𝐷)𝐵 ↔ ∃𝑐 ∈ 𝑃 (𝐴𝑂𝑐 ∧ 𝐵𝑂𝑐)))
Theorem	hpgne1 28845*	Points on the open half plane cannot lie on its border. (Contributed by Thierry Arnoux, 4-Mar-2020.)
⊢ 𝑃 = (Base‘𝐺)    &   ⊢ 𝐼 = (Itv‘𝐺)    &   ⊢ 𝐿 = (LineG‘𝐺)    &   ⊢ 𝑂 = {⟨𝑎, 𝑏⟩ ∣ ((𝑎 ∈ (𝑃 ∖ 𝐷) ∧ 𝑏 ∈ (𝑃 ∖ 𝐷)) ∧ ∃𝑡 ∈ 𝐷 𝑡 ∈ (𝑎𝐼𝑏))}    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐺 ∈ TarskiG)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐷 ∈ ran 𝐿)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐴 ∈ 𝑃)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐵 ∈ 𝑃)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐴((hpG‘𝐺)‘𝐷)𝐵)    ⇒   ⊢ (𝜑 → ¬ 𝐴 ∈ 𝐷)
Theorem	hpgne2 28846*	Points on the open half plane cannot lie on its border. (Contributed by Thierry Arnoux, 4-Mar-2020.)
⊢ 𝑃 = (Base‘𝐺)    &   ⊢ 𝐼 = (Itv‘𝐺)    &   ⊢ 𝐿 = (LineG‘𝐺)    &   ⊢ 𝑂 = {⟨𝑎, 𝑏⟩ ∣ ((𝑎 ∈ (𝑃 ∖ 𝐷) ∧ 𝑏 ∈ (𝑃 ∖ 𝐷)) ∧ ∃𝑡 ∈ 𝐷 𝑡 ∈ (𝑎𝐼𝑏))}    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐺 ∈ TarskiG)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐷 ∈ ran 𝐿)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐴 ∈ 𝑃)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐵 ∈ 𝑃)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐴((hpG‘𝐺)‘𝐷)𝐵)    ⇒   ⊢ (𝜑 → ¬ 𝐵 ∈ 𝐷)
Theorem	lnopp2hpgb 28847*	Theorem 9.8 of [Schwabhauser] p. 71. (Contributed by Thierry Arnoux, 4-Mar-2020.)
⊢ 𝑃 = (Base‘𝐺)    &   ⊢ 𝐼 = (Itv‘𝐺)    &   ⊢ 𝐿 = (LineG‘𝐺)    &   ⊢ 𝑂 = {⟨𝑎, 𝑏⟩ ∣ ((𝑎 ∈ (𝑃 ∖ 𝐷) ∧ 𝑏 ∈ (𝑃 ∖ 𝐷)) ∧ ∃𝑡 ∈ 𝐷 𝑡 ∈ (𝑎𝐼𝑏))}    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐺 ∈ TarskiG)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐷 ∈ ran 𝐿)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐴 ∈ 𝑃)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐵 ∈ 𝑃)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐶 ∈ 𝑃)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐴𝑂𝐶)    ⇒   ⊢ (𝜑 → (𝐵𝑂𝐶 ↔ 𝐴((hpG‘𝐺)‘𝐷)𝐵))
Theorem	lnoppnhpg 28848*	If two points lie on the opposite side of a line 𝐷, they are not on the same half-plane. Theorem 9.9 of [Schwabhauser] p. 72. (Contributed by Thierry Arnoux, 4-Mar-2020.)
⊢ 𝑃 = (Base‘𝐺)    &   ⊢ 𝐼 = (Itv‘𝐺)    &   ⊢ 𝐿 = (LineG‘𝐺)    &   ⊢ 𝑂 = {⟨𝑎, 𝑏⟩ ∣ ((𝑎 ∈ (𝑃 ∖ 𝐷) ∧ 𝑏 ∈ (𝑃 ∖ 𝐷)) ∧ ∃𝑡 ∈ 𝐷 𝑡 ∈ (𝑎𝐼𝑏))}    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐺 ∈ TarskiG)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐷 ∈ ran 𝐿)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐴 ∈ 𝑃)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐵 ∈ 𝑃)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐴𝑂𝐵)    ⇒   ⊢ (𝜑 → ¬ 𝐴((hpG‘𝐺)‘𝐷)𝐵)
Theorem	hpgerlem 28849*	Lemma for the proof that the half-plane relation is an equivalence relation. Lemma 9.10 of [Schwabhauser] p. 72. (Contributed by Thierry Arnoux, 4-Mar-2020.)
⊢ 𝑃 = (Base‘𝐺)    &   ⊢ 𝐼 = (Itv‘𝐺)    &   ⊢ 𝐿 = (LineG‘𝐺)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐺 ∈ TarskiG)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐷 ∈ ran 𝐿)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐴 ∈ 𝑃)    &   ⊢ 𝑂 = {⟨𝑎, 𝑏⟩ ∣ ((𝑎 ∈ (𝑃 ∖ 𝐷) ∧ 𝑏 ∈ (𝑃 ∖ 𝐷)) ∧ ∃𝑡 ∈ 𝐷 𝑡 ∈ (𝑎𝐼𝑏))}    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → ¬ 𝐴 ∈ 𝐷)    ⇒   ⊢ (𝜑 → ∃𝑐 ∈ 𝑃 𝐴𝑂𝑐)
Theorem	hpgid 28850*	The half-plane relation is reflexive. Theorem 9.11 of [Schwabhauser] p. 72. (Contributed by Thierry Arnoux, 4-Mar-2020.)
⊢ 𝑃 = (Base‘𝐺)    &   ⊢ 𝐼 = (Itv‘𝐺)    &   ⊢ 𝐿 = (LineG‘𝐺)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐺 ∈ TarskiG)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐷 ∈ ran 𝐿)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐴 ∈ 𝑃)    &   ⊢ 𝑂 = {⟨𝑎, 𝑏⟩ ∣ ((𝑎 ∈ (𝑃 ∖ 𝐷) ∧ 𝑏 ∈ (𝑃 ∖ 𝐷)) ∧ ∃𝑡 ∈ 𝐷 𝑡 ∈ (𝑎𝐼𝑏))}    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → ¬ 𝐴 ∈ 𝐷)    ⇒   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐴((hpG‘𝐺)‘𝐷)𝐴)
Theorem	hpgcom 28851*	The half-plane relation commutes. Theorem 9.12 of [Schwabhauser] p. 72. (Contributed by Thierry Arnoux, 4-Mar-2020.)
⊢ 𝑃 = (Base‘𝐺)    &   ⊢ 𝐼 = (Itv‘𝐺)    &   ⊢ 𝐿 = (LineG‘𝐺)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐺 ∈ TarskiG)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐷 ∈ ran 𝐿)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐴 ∈ 𝑃)    &   ⊢ 𝑂 = {⟨𝑎, 𝑏⟩ ∣ ((𝑎 ∈ (𝑃 ∖ 𝐷) ∧ 𝑏 ∈ (𝑃 ∖ 𝐷)) ∧ ∃𝑡 ∈ 𝐷 𝑡 ∈ (𝑎𝐼𝑏))}    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐵 ∈ 𝑃)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐴((hpG‘𝐺)‘𝐷)𝐵)    ⇒   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐵((hpG‘𝐺)‘𝐷)𝐴)
Theorem	hpgtr 28852*	The half-plane relation is transitive. Theorem 9.13 of [Schwabhauser] p. 72. (Contributed by Thierry Arnoux, 4-Mar-2020.)
⊢ 𝑃 = (Base‘𝐺)    &   ⊢ 𝐼 = (Itv‘𝐺)    &   ⊢ 𝐿 = (LineG‘𝐺)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐺 ∈ TarskiG)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐷 ∈ ran 𝐿)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐴 ∈ 𝑃)    &   ⊢ 𝑂 = {⟨𝑎, 𝑏⟩ ∣ ((𝑎 ∈ (𝑃 ∖ 𝐷) ∧ 𝑏 ∈ (𝑃 ∖ 𝐷)) ∧ ∃𝑡 ∈ 𝐷 𝑡 ∈ (𝑎𝐼𝑏))}    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐵 ∈ 𝑃)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐴((hpG‘𝐺)‘𝐷)𝐵)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐶 ∈ 𝑃)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐵((hpG‘𝐺)‘𝐷)𝐶)    ⇒   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐴((hpG‘𝐺)‘𝐷)𝐶)
Theorem	colopp 28853*	Opposite sides of a line for colinear points. Theorem 9.18 of [Schwabhauser] p. 73. (Contributed by Thierry Arnoux, 3-Aug-2020.)
⊢ 𝑃 = (Base‘𝐺)    &   ⊢ 𝐼 = (Itv‘𝐺)    &   ⊢ 𝐿 = (LineG‘𝐺)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐺 ∈ TarskiG)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐷 ∈ ran 𝐿)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐴 ∈ 𝑃)    &   ⊢ 𝑂 = {⟨𝑎, 𝑏⟩ ∣ ((𝑎 ∈ (𝑃 ∖ 𝐷) ∧ 𝑏 ∈ (𝑃 ∖ 𝐷)) ∧ ∃𝑡 ∈ 𝐷 𝑡 ∈ (𝑎𝐼𝑏))}    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐵 ∈ 𝑃)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐶 ∈ 𝐷)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → (𝐶 ∈ (𝐴𝐿𝐵) ∨ 𝐴 = 𝐵))    ⇒   ⊢ (𝜑 → (𝐴𝑂𝐵 ↔ (𝐶 ∈ (𝐴𝐼𝐵) ∧ ¬ 𝐴 ∈ 𝐷 ∧ ¬ 𝐵 ∈ 𝐷)))
Theorem	colhp 28854*	Half-plane relation for colinear points. Theorem 9.19 of [Schwabhauser] p. 73. (Contributed by Thierry Arnoux, 3-Aug-2020.)
⊢ 𝑃 = (Base‘𝐺)    &   ⊢ 𝐼 = (Itv‘𝐺)    &   ⊢ 𝐿 = (LineG‘𝐺)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐺 ∈ TarskiG)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐷 ∈ ran 𝐿)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐴 ∈ 𝑃)    &   ⊢ 𝑂 = {⟨𝑎, 𝑏⟩ ∣ ((𝑎 ∈ (𝑃 ∖ 𝐷) ∧ 𝑏 ∈ (𝑃 ∖ 𝐷)) ∧ ∃𝑡 ∈ 𝐷 𝑡 ∈ (𝑎𝐼𝑏))}    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐵 ∈ 𝑃)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐶 ∈ 𝐷)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → (𝐶 ∈ (𝐴𝐿𝐵) ∨ 𝐴 = 𝐵))    &   ⊢ 𝐾 = (hlG‘𝐺)    ⇒   ⊢ (𝜑 → (𝐴((hpG‘𝐺)‘𝐷)𝐵 ↔ (𝐴(𝐾‘𝐶)𝐵 ∧ ¬ 𝐴 ∈ 𝐷)))
Theorem	hphl 28855*	If two points are on the same half-line with endpoint on a line, they are on the same half-plane defined by this line. (Contributed by Thierry Arnoux, 9-Aug-2020.)
⊢ 𝑃 = (Base‘𝐺)    &   ⊢ 𝐼 = (Itv‘𝐺)    &   ⊢ 𝐿 = (LineG‘𝐺)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐺 ∈ TarskiG)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐷 ∈ ran 𝐿)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐴 ∈ 𝑃)    &   ⊢ 𝑂 = {⟨𝑎, 𝑏⟩ ∣ ((𝑎 ∈ (𝑃 ∖ 𝐷) ∧ 𝑏 ∈ (𝑃 ∖ 𝐷)) ∧ ∃𝑡 ∈ 𝐷 𝑡 ∈ (𝑎𝐼𝑏))}    &   ⊢ 𝐾 = (hlG‘𝐺)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐴 ∈ 𝐷)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐵 ∈ 𝑃)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐶 ∈ 𝑃)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → ¬ 𝐵 ∈ 𝐷)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐵(𝐾‘𝐴)𝐶)    ⇒   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐵((hpG‘𝐺)‘𝐷)𝐶)
16.2.15  Midpoints and Line Mirroring
Syntax	cmid 28856	Declare the constant for the midpoint operation.
class midG
Syntax	clmi 28857	Declare the constant for the line mirroring function.
class lInvG
Definition	df-mid 28858*	Define the midpoint operation. Definition 10.1 of [Schwabhauser] p. 88. See ismidb 28862, midbtwn 28863, and midcgr 28864. (Contributed by Thierry Arnoux, 9-Jun-2019.)
⊢ midG = (𝑔 ∈ V ↦ (𝑎 ∈ (Base‘𝑔), 𝑏 ∈ (Base‘𝑔) ↦ (℩𝑚 ∈ (Base‘𝑔)𝑏 = (((pInvG‘𝑔)‘𝑚)‘𝑎))))
Definition	df-lmi 28859*	Define the line mirroring function. Definition 10.3 of [Schwabhauser] p. 89. See islmib 28871. (Contributed by Thierry Arnoux, 1-Dec-2019.)
⊢ lInvG = (𝑔 ∈ V ↦ (𝑚 ∈ ran (LineG‘𝑔) ↦ (𝑎 ∈ (Base‘𝑔) ↦ (℩𝑏 ∈ (Base‘𝑔)((𝑎(midG‘𝑔)𝑏) ∈ 𝑚 ∧ (𝑚(⟂G‘𝑔)(𝑎(LineG‘𝑔)𝑏) ∨ 𝑎 = 𝑏))))))
Theorem	midf 28860	Midpoint as a function. (Contributed by Thierry Arnoux, 1-Dec-2019.)
⊢ 𝑃 = (Base‘𝐺)    &   ⊢ − = (dist‘𝐺)    &   ⊢ 𝐼 = (Itv‘𝐺)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐺 ∈ TarskiG)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐺DimTarskiG≥2)    ⇒   ⊢ (𝜑 → (midG‘𝐺):(𝑃 × 𝑃)⟶𝑃)
Theorem	midcl 28861	Closure of the midpoint. (Contributed by Thierry Arnoux, 1-Dec-2019.)
⊢ 𝑃 = (Base‘𝐺)    &   ⊢ − = (dist‘𝐺)    &   ⊢ 𝐼 = (Itv‘𝐺)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐺 ∈ TarskiG)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐺DimTarskiG≥2)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐴 ∈ 𝑃)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐵 ∈ 𝑃)    ⇒   ⊢ (𝜑 → (𝐴(midG‘𝐺)𝐵) ∈ 𝑃)
Theorem	ismidb 28862	Property of the midpoint. (Contributed by Thierry Arnoux, 1-Dec-2019.)
⊢ 𝑃 = (Base‘𝐺)    &   ⊢ − = (dist‘𝐺)    &   ⊢ 𝐼 = (Itv‘𝐺)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐺 ∈ TarskiG)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐺DimTarskiG≥2)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐴 ∈ 𝑃)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐵 ∈ 𝑃)    &   ⊢ 𝑆 = (pInvG‘𝐺)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝑀 ∈ 𝑃)    ⇒   ⊢ (𝜑 → (𝐵 = ((𝑆‘𝑀)‘𝐴) ↔ (𝐴(midG‘𝐺)𝐵) = 𝑀))
Theorem	midbtwn 28863	Betweenness of midpoint. (Contributed by Thierry Arnoux, 7-Dec-2019.)
⊢ 𝑃 = (Base‘𝐺)    &   ⊢ − = (dist‘𝐺)    &   ⊢ 𝐼 = (Itv‘𝐺)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐺 ∈ TarskiG)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐺DimTarskiG≥2)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐴 ∈ 𝑃)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐵 ∈ 𝑃)    ⇒   ⊢ (𝜑 → (𝐴(midG‘𝐺)𝐵) ∈ (𝐴𝐼𝐵))
Theorem	midcgr 28864	Congruence of midpoint. (Contributed by Thierry Arnoux, 7-Dec-2019.)
⊢ 𝑃 = (Base‘𝐺)    &   ⊢ − = (dist‘𝐺)    &   ⊢ 𝐼 = (Itv‘𝐺)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐺 ∈ TarskiG)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐺DimTarskiG≥2)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐴 ∈ 𝑃)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐵 ∈ 𝑃)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → (𝐴(midG‘𝐺)𝐵) = 𝐶)    ⇒   ⊢ (𝜑 → (𝐶 − 𝐴) = (𝐶 − 𝐵))
Theorem	midid 28865	Midpoint of a null segment. (Contributed by Thierry Arnoux, 7-Dec-2019.)
⊢ 𝑃 = (Base‘𝐺)    &   ⊢ − = (dist‘𝐺)    &   ⊢ 𝐼 = (Itv‘𝐺)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐺 ∈ TarskiG)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐺DimTarskiG≥2)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐴 ∈ 𝑃)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐵 ∈ 𝑃)    ⇒   ⊢ (𝜑 → (𝐴(midG‘𝐺)𝐴) = 𝐴)
Theorem	midcom 28866	Commutativity rule for the midpoint. (Contributed by Thierry Arnoux, 2-Dec-2019.)
⊢ 𝑃 = (Base‘𝐺)    &   ⊢ − = (dist‘𝐺)    &   ⊢ 𝐼 = (Itv‘𝐺)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐺 ∈ TarskiG)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐺DimTarskiG≥2)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐴 ∈ 𝑃)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐵 ∈ 𝑃)    ⇒   ⊢ (𝜑 → (𝐴(midG‘𝐺)𝐵) = (𝐵(midG‘𝐺)𝐴))
Theorem	mirmid 28867	Point inversion preserves midpoints. (Contributed by Thierry Arnoux, 12-Dec-2019.)
⊢ 𝑃 = (Base‘𝐺)    &   ⊢ − = (dist‘𝐺)    &   ⊢ 𝐼 = (Itv‘𝐺)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐺 ∈ TarskiG)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐺DimTarskiG≥2)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐴 ∈ 𝑃)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐵 ∈ 𝑃)    &   ⊢ 𝑆 = ((pInvG‘𝐺)‘𝑀)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝑀 ∈ 𝑃)    ⇒   ⊢ (𝜑 → ((𝑆‘𝐴)(midG‘𝐺)(𝑆‘𝐵)) = (𝑆‘(𝐴(midG‘𝐺)𝐵)))
Theorem	lmieu 28868*	Uniqueness of the line mirror point. Theorem 10.2 of [Schwabhauser] p. 88. (Contributed by Thierry Arnoux, 1-Dec-2019.)
⊢ 𝑃 = (Base‘𝐺)    &   ⊢ − = (dist‘𝐺)    &   ⊢ 𝐼 = (Itv‘𝐺)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐺 ∈ TarskiG)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐺DimTarskiG≥2)    &   ⊢ 𝐿 = (LineG‘𝐺)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐷 ∈ ran 𝐿)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐴 ∈ 𝑃)    ⇒   ⊢ (𝜑 → ∃!𝑏 ∈ 𝑃 ((𝐴(midG‘𝐺)𝑏) ∈ 𝐷 ∧ (𝐷(⟂G‘𝐺)(𝐴𝐿𝑏) ∨ 𝐴 = 𝑏)))
Theorem	lmif 28869	Line mirror as a function. (Contributed by Thierry Arnoux, 11-Dec-2019.)
⊢ 𝑃 = (Base‘𝐺)    &   ⊢ − = (dist‘𝐺)    &   ⊢ 𝐼 = (Itv‘𝐺)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐺 ∈ TarskiG)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐺DimTarskiG≥2)    &   ⊢ 𝑀 = ((lInvG‘𝐺)‘𝐷)    &   ⊢ 𝐿 = (LineG‘𝐺)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐷 ∈ ran 𝐿)    ⇒   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝑀:𝑃⟶𝑃)
Theorem	lmicl 28870	Closure of the line mirror. (Contributed by Thierry Arnoux, 11-Dec-2019.)
⊢ 𝑃 = (Base‘𝐺)    &   ⊢ − = (dist‘𝐺)    &   ⊢ 𝐼 = (Itv‘𝐺)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐺 ∈ TarskiG)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐺DimTarskiG≥2)    &   ⊢ 𝑀 = ((lInvG‘𝐺)‘𝐷)    &   ⊢ 𝐿 = (LineG‘𝐺)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐷 ∈ ran 𝐿)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐴 ∈ 𝑃)    ⇒   ⊢ (𝜑 → (𝑀‘𝐴) ∈ 𝑃)
Theorem	islmib 28871	Property of the line mirror. (Contributed by Thierry Arnoux, 11-Dec-2019.)
⊢ 𝑃 = (Base‘𝐺)    &   ⊢ − = (dist‘𝐺)    &   ⊢ 𝐼 = (Itv‘𝐺)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐺 ∈ TarskiG)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐺DimTarskiG≥2)    &   ⊢ 𝑀 = ((lInvG‘𝐺)‘𝐷)    &   ⊢ 𝐿 = (LineG‘𝐺)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐷 ∈ ran 𝐿)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐴 ∈ 𝑃)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐵 ∈ 𝑃)    ⇒   ⊢ (𝜑 → (𝐵 = (𝑀‘𝐴) ↔ ((𝐴(midG‘𝐺)𝐵) ∈ 𝐷 ∧ (𝐷(⟂G‘𝐺)(𝐴𝐿𝐵) ∨ 𝐴 = 𝐵))))
Theorem	lmicom 28872	The line mirroring function is an involution. Theorem 10.4 of [Schwabhauser] p. 89. (Contributed by Thierry Arnoux, 11-Dec-2019.)
⊢ 𝑃 = (Base‘𝐺)    &   ⊢ − = (dist‘𝐺)    &   ⊢ 𝐼 = (Itv‘𝐺)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐺 ∈ TarskiG)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐺DimTarskiG≥2)    &   ⊢ 𝑀 = ((lInvG‘𝐺)‘𝐷)    &   ⊢ 𝐿 = (LineG‘𝐺)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐷 ∈ ran 𝐿)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐴 ∈ 𝑃)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐵 ∈ 𝑃)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → (𝑀‘𝐴) = 𝐵)    ⇒   ⊢ (𝜑 → (𝑀‘𝐵) = 𝐴)
Theorem	lmilmi 28873	Line mirroring is an involution. Theorem 10.5 of [Schwabhauser] p. 89. (Contributed by Thierry Arnoux, 11-Dec-2019.)
⊢ 𝑃 = (Base‘𝐺)    &   ⊢ − = (dist‘𝐺)    &   ⊢ 𝐼 = (Itv‘𝐺)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐺 ∈ TarskiG)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐺DimTarskiG≥2)    &   ⊢ 𝑀 = ((lInvG‘𝐺)‘𝐷)    &   ⊢ 𝐿 = (LineG‘𝐺)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐷 ∈ ran 𝐿)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐴 ∈ 𝑃)    ⇒   ⊢ (𝜑 → (𝑀‘(𝑀‘𝐴)) = 𝐴)
Theorem	lmireu 28874*	Any point has a unique antecedent through line mirroring. Theorem 10.6 of [Schwabhauser] p. 89. (Contributed by Thierry Arnoux, 11-Dec-2019.)
⊢ 𝑃 = (Base‘𝐺)    &   ⊢ − = (dist‘𝐺)    &   ⊢ 𝐼 = (Itv‘𝐺)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐺 ∈ TarskiG)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐺DimTarskiG≥2)    &   ⊢ 𝑀 = ((lInvG‘𝐺)‘𝐷)    &   ⊢ 𝐿 = (LineG‘𝐺)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐷 ∈ ran 𝐿)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐴 ∈ 𝑃)    ⇒   ⊢ (𝜑 → ∃!𝑏 ∈ 𝑃 (𝑀‘𝑏) = 𝐴)
Theorem	lmieq 28875	Equality deduction for line mirroring. Theorem 10.7 of [Schwabhauser] p. 89. (Contributed by Thierry Arnoux, 11-Dec-2019.)
⊢ 𝑃 = (Base‘𝐺)    &   ⊢ − = (dist‘𝐺)    &   ⊢ 𝐼 = (Itv‘𝐺)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐺 ∈ TarskiG)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐺DimTarskiG≥2)    &   ⊢ 𝑀 = ((lInvG‘𝐺)‘𝐷)    &   ⊢ 𝐿 = (LineG‘𝐺)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐷 ∈ ran 𝐿)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐴 ∈ 𝑃)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐵 ∈ 𝑃)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → (𝑀‘𝐴) = (𝑀‘𝐵))    ⇒   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐴 = 𝐵)
Theorem	lmiinv 28876	The invariants of the line mirroring lie on the mirror line. Theorem 10.8 of [Schwabhauser] p. 89. (Contributed by Thierry Arnoux, 11-Dec-2019.)
⊢ 𝑃 = (Base‘𝐺)    &   ⊢ − = (dist‘𝐺)    &   ⊢ 𝐼 = (Itv‘𝐺)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐺 ∈ TarskiG)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐺DimTarskiG≥2)    &   ⊢ 𝑀 = ((lInvG‘𝐺)‘𝐷)    &   ⊢ 𝐿 = (LineG‘𝐺)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐷 ∈ ran 𝐿)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐴 ∈ 𝑃)    ⇒   ⊢ (𝜑 → ((𝑀‘𝐴) = 𝐴 ↔ 𝐴 ∈ 𝐷))
Theorem	lmicinv 28877	The mirroring line is an invariant. (Contributed by Thierry Arnoux, 8-Aug-2020.)
⊢ 𝑃 = (Base‘𝐺)    &   ⊢ − = (dist‘𝐺)    &   ⊢ 𝐼 = (Itv‘𝐺)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐺 ∈ TarskiG)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐺DimTarskiG≥2)    &   ⊢ 𝑀 = ((lInvG‘𝐺)‘𝐷)    &   ⊢ 𝐿 = (LineG‘𝐺)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐷 ∈ ran 𝐿)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐴 ∈ 𝑃)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐴 ∈ 𝐷)    ⇒   ⊢ (𝜑 → (𝑀‘𝐴) = 𝐴)
Theorem	lmimid 28878	If we have a right angle, then the mirror point is the point inversion. (Contributed by Thierry Arnoux, 15-Dec-2019.)
⊢ 𝑃 = (Base‘𝐺)    &   ⊢ − = (dist‘𝐺)    &   ⊢ 𝐼 = (Itv‘𝐺)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐺 ∈ TarskiG)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐺DimTarskiG≥2)    &   ⊢ 𝑀 = ((lInvG‘𝐺)‘𝐷)    &   ⊢ 𝐿 = (LineG‘𝐺)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐷 ∈ ran 𝐿)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐴 ∈ 𝑃)    &   ⊢ 𝑆 = ((pInvG‘𝐺)‘𝐵)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → ⟨“𝐴𝐵𝐶”⟩ ∈ (∟G‘𝐺))    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐴 ∈ 𝐷)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐵 ∈ 𝐷)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐶 ∈ 𝑃)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐴 ≠ 𝐵)    ⇒   ⊢ (𝜑 → (𝑀‘𝐶) = (𝑆‘𝐶))
Theorem	lmif1o 28879	The line mirroring function 𝑀 is a bijection. Theorem 10.9 of [Schwabhauser] p. 89. (Contributed by Thierry Arnoux, 11-Dec-2019.)
⊢ 𝑃 = (Base‘𝐺)    &   ⊢ − = (dist‘𝐺)    &   ⊢ 𝐼 = (Itv‘𝐺)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐺 ∈ TarskiG)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐺DimTarskiG≥2)    &   ⊢ 𝑀 = ((lInvG‘𝐺)‘𝐷)    &   ⊢ 𝐿 = (LineG‘𝐺)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐷 ∈ ran 𝐿)    ⇒   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝑀:𝑃–1-1-onto→𝑃)
Theorem	lmiisolem 28880	Lemma for lmiiso 28881. (Contributed by Thierry Arnoux, 14-Dec-2019.)
⊢ 𝑃 = (Base‘𝐺)    &   ⊢ − = (dist‘𝐺)    &   ⊢ 𝐼 = (Itv‘𝐺)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐺 ∈ TarskiG)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐺DimTarskiG≥2)    &   ⊢ 𝑀 = ((lInvG‘𝐺)‘𝐷)    &   ⊢ 𝐿 = (LineG‘𝐺)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐷 ∈ ran 𝐿)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐴 ∈ 𝑃)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐵 ∈ 𝑃)    &   ⊢ 𝑆 = ((pInvG‘𝐺)‘𝑍)    &   ⊢ 𝑍 = ((𝐴(midG‘𝐺)(𝑀‘𝐴))(midG‘𝐺)(𝐵(midG‘𝐺)(𝑀‘𝐵)))    ⇒   ⊢ (𝜑 → ((𝑀‘𝐴) − (𝑀‘𝐵)) = (𝐴 − 𝐵))
Theorem	lmiiso 28881	The line mirroring function is an isometry, i.e. it is conserves congruence. Because it is also a bijection, it is also a motion. Theorem 10.10 of [Schwabhauser] p. 89. (Contributed by Thierry Arnoux, 11-Dec-2019.)
⊢ 𝑃 = (Base‘𝐺)    &   ⊢ − = (dist‘𝐺)    &   ⊢ 𝐼 = (Itv‘𝐺)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐺 ∈ TarskiG)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐺DimTarskiG≥2)    &   ⊢ 𝑀 = ((lInvG‘𝐺)‘𝐷)    &   ⊢ 𝐿 = (LineG‘𝐺)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐷 ∈ ran 𝐿)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐴 ∈ 𝑃)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐵 ∈ 𝑃)    ⇒   ⊢ (𝜑 → ((𝑀‘𝐴) − (𝑀‘𝐵)) = (𝐴 − 𝐵))
Theorem	lmimot 28882	Line mirroring is a motion of the geometric space. Theorem 10.11 of [Schwabhauser] p. 90. (Contributed by Thierry Arnoux, 15-Dec-2019.)
⊢ 𝑃 = (Base‘𝐺)    &   ⊢ − = (dist‘𝐺)    &   ⊢ 𝐼 = (Itv‘𝐺)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐺 ∈ TarskiG)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐺DimTarskiG≥2)    &   ⊢ 𝑀 = ((lInvG‘𝐺)‘𝐷)    &   ⊢ 𝐿 = (LineG‘𝐺)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐷 ∈ ran 𝐿)    ⇒   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝑀 ∈ (𝐺Ismt𝐺))
Theorem	hypcgrlem1 28883	Lemma for hypcgr 28885, case where triangles share a cathetus. (Contributed by Thierry Arnoux, 15-Dec-2019.)
⊢ 𝑃 = (Base‘𝐺)    &   ⊢ − = (dist‘𝐺)    &   ⊢ 𝐼 = (Itv‘𝐺)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐺 ∈ TarskiG)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐺DimTarskiG≥2)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐴 ∈ 𝑃)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐵 ∈ 𝑃)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐶 ∈ 𝑃)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐷 ∈ 𝑃)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐸 ∈ 𝑃)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐹 ∈ 𝑃)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → ⟨“𝐴𝐵𝐶”⟩ ∈ (∟G‘𝐺))    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → ⟨“𝐷𝐸𝐹”⟩ ∈ (∟G‘𝐺))    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → (𝐴 − 𝐵) = (𝐷 − 𝐸))    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → (𝐵 − 𝐶) = (𝐸 − 𝐹))    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐵 = 𝐸)    &   ⊢ 𝑆 = ((lInvG‘𝐺)‘((𝐴(midG‘𝐺)𝐷)(LineG‘𝐺)𝐵))    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐶 = 𝐹)    ⇒   ⊢ (𝜑 → (𝐴 − 𝐶) = (𝐷 − 𝐹))
Theorem	hypcgrlem2 28884	Lemma for hypcgr 28885, case where triangles share one vertex 𝐵. (Contributed by Thierry Arnoux, 16-Dec-2019.)
⊢ 𝑃 = (Base‘𝐺)    &   ⊢ − = (dist‘𝐺)    &   ⊢ 𝐼 = (Itv‘𝐺)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐺 ∈ TarskiG)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐺DimTarskiG≥2)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐴 ∈ 𝑃)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐵 ∈ 𝑃)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐶 ∈ 𝑃)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐷 ∈ 𝑃)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐸 ∈ 𝑃)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐹 ∈ 𝑃)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → ⟨“𝐴𝐵𝐶”⟩ ∈ (∟G‘𝐺))    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → ⟨“𝐷𝐸𝐹”⟩ ∈ (∟G‘𝐺))    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → (𝐴 − 𝐵) = (𝐷 − 𝐸))    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → (𝐵 − 𝐶) = (𝐸 − 𝐹))    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐵 = 𝐸)    &   ⊢ 𝑆 = ((lInvG‘𝐺)‘((𝐶(midG‘𝐺)𝐹)(LineG‘𝐺)𝐵))    ⇒   ⊢ (𝜑 → (𝐴 − 𝐶) = (𝐷 − 𝐹))
Theorem	hypcgr 28885	If the catheti of two right-angled triangles are congruent, so is their hypothenuse. Theorem 10.12 of [Schwabhauser] p. 91. (Contributed by Thierry Arnoux, 16-Dec-2019.)
⊢ 𝑃 = (Base‘𝐺)    &   ⊢ − = (dist‘𝐺)    &   ⊢ 𝐼 = (Itv‘𝐺)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐺 ∈ TarskiG)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐺DimTarskiG≥2)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐴 ∈ 𝑃)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐵 ∈ 𝑃)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐶 ∈ 𝑃)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐷 ∈ 𝑃)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐸 ∈ 𝑃)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐹 ∈ 𝑃)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → ⟨“𝐴𝐵𝐶”⟩ ∈ (∟G‘𝐺))    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → ⟨“𝐷𝐸𝐹”⟩ ∈ (∟G‘𝐺))    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → (𝐴 − 𝐵) = (𝐷 − 𝐸))    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → (𝐵 − 𝐶) = (𝐸 − 𝐹))    ⇒   ⊢ (𝜑 → (𝐴 − 𝐶) = (𝐷 − 𝐹))
Theorem	lmiopp 28886*	Line mirroring produces points on the opposite side of the mirroring line. Theorem 10.14 of [Schwabhauser] p. 92. (Contributed by Thierry Arnoux, 2-Aug-2020.)
⊢ 𝑃 = (Base‘𝐺)    &   ⊢ − = (dist‘𝐺)    &   ⊢ 𝐼 = (Itv‘𝐺)    &   ⊢ 𝐿 = (LineG‘𝐺)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐺 ∈ TarskiG)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐺DimTarskiG≥2)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐷 ∈ ran 𝐿)    &   ⊢ 𝑂 = {⟨𝑎, 𝑏⟩ ∣ ((𝑎 ∈ (𝑃 ∖ 𝐷) ∧ 𝑏 ∈ (𝑃 ∖ 𝐷)) ∧ ∃𝑡 ∈ 𝐷 𝑡 ∈ (𝑎𝐼𝑏))}    &   ⊢ 𝑀 = ((lInvG‘𝐺)‘𝐷)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐴 ∈ 𝑃)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → ¬ 𝐴 ∈ 𝐷)    ⇒   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐴𝑂(𝑀‘𝐴))
Theorem	lnperpex 28887*	Existence of a perpendicular to a line 𝐿 at a given point 𝐴. Theorem 10.15 of [Schwabhauser] p. 92. (Contributed by Thierry Arnoux, 2-Aug-2020.)
⊢ 𝑃 = (Base‘𝐺)    &   ⊢ − = (dist‘𝐺)    &   ⊢ 𝐼 = (Itv‘𝐺)    &   ⊢ 𝐿 = (LineG‘𝐺)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐺 ∈ TarskiG)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐺DimTarskiG≥2)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐷 ∈ ran 𝐿)    &   ⊢ 𝑂 = {⟨𝑎, 𝑏⟩ ∣ ((𝑎 ∈ (𝑃 ∖ 𝐷) ∧ 𝑏 ∈ (𝑃 ∖ 𝐷)) ∧ ∃𝑡 ∈ 𝐷 𝑡 ∈ (𝑎𝐼𝑏))}    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐴 ∈ 𝐷)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝑄 ∈ 𝑃)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → ¬ 𝑄 ∈ 𝐷)    ⇒   ⊢ (𝜑 → ∃𝑝 ∈ 𝑃 (𝐷(⟂G‘𝐺)(𝑝𝐿𝐴) ∧ 𝑝((hpG‘𝐺)‘𝐷)𝑄))
Theorem	trgcopy 28888*	Triangle construction: a copy of a given triangle can always be constructed in such a way that one side is lying on a half-line, and the third vertex is on a given half-plane: existence part. First part of Theorem 10.16 of [Schwabhauser] p. 92. (Contributed by Thierry Arnoux, 4-Aug-2020.)
⊢ 𝑃 = (Base‘𝐺)    &   ⊢ − = (dist‘𝐺)    &   ⊢ 𝐼 = (Itv‘𝐺)    &   ⊢ 𝐿 = (LineG‘𝐺)    &   ⊢ 𝐾 = (hlG‘𝐺)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐺 ∈ TarskiG)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐴 ∈ 𝑃)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐵 ∈ 𝑃)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐶 ∈ 𝑃)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐷 ∈ 𝑃)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐸 ∈ 𝑃)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐹 ∈ 𝑃)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → ¬ (𝐴 ∈ (𝐵𝐿𝐶) ∨ 𝐵 = 𝐶))    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → ¬ (𝐷 ∈ (𝐸𝐿𝐹) ∨ 𝐸 = 𝐹))    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → (𝐴 − 𝐵) = (𝐷 − 𝐸))    ⇒   ⊢ (𝜑 → ∃𝑓 ∈ 𝑃 (⟨“𝐴𝐵𝐶”⟩(cgrG‘𝐺)⟨“𝐷𝐸𝑓”⟩ ∧ 𝑓((hpG‘𝐺)‘(𝐷𝐿𝐸))𝐹))
Theorem	trgcopyeulem 28889*	Lemma for trgcopyeu 28890. (Contributed by Thierry Arnoux, 8-Aug-2020.)
⊢ 𝑃 = (Base‘𝐺)    &   ⊢ − = (dist‘𝐺)    &   ⊢ 𝐼 = (Itv‘𝐺)    &   ⊢ 𝐿 = (LineG‘𝐺)    &   ⊢ 𝐾 = (hlG‘𝐺)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐺 ∈ TarskiG)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐴 ∈ 𝑃)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐵 ∈ 𝑃)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐶 ∈ 𝑃)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐷 ∈ 𝑃)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐸 ∈ 𝑃)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐹 ∈ 𝑃)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → ¬ (𝐴 ∈ (𝐵𝐿𝐶) ∨ 𝐵 = 𝐶))    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → ¬ (𝐷 ∈ (𝐸𝐿𝐹) ∨ 𝐸 = 𝐹))    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → (𝐴 − 𝐵) = (𝐷 − 𝐸))    &   ⊢ 𝑂 = {⟨𝑎, 𝑏⟩ ∣ ((𝑎 ∈ (𝑃 ∖ (𝐷𝐿𝐸)) ∧ 𝑏 ∈ (𝑃 ∖ (𝐷𝐿𝐸))) ∧ ∃𝑡 ∈ (𝐷𝐿𝐸)𝑡 ∈ (𝑎𝐼𝑏))}    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝑋 ∈ 𝑃)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝑌 ∈ 𝑃)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → ⟨“𝐴𝐵𝐶”⟩(cgrG‘𝐺)⟨“𝐷𝐸𝑋”⟩)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → ⟨“𝐴𝐵𝐶”⟩(cgrG‘𝐺)⟨“𝐷𝐸𝑌”⟩)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝑋((hpG‘𝐺)‘(𝐷𝐿𝐸))𝐹)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝑌((hpG‘𝐺)‘(𝐷𝐿𝐸))𝐹)    ⇒   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝑋 = 𝑌)
Theorem	trgcopyeu 28890*	Triangle construction: a copy of a given triangle can always be constructed in such a way that one side is lying on a half-line, and the third vertex is on a given half-plane: uniqueness part. Second part of Theorem 10.16 of [Schwabhauser] p. 92. (Contributed by Thierry Arnoux, 8-Aug-2020.)
⊢ 𝑃 = (Base‘𝐺)    &   ⊢ − = (dist‘𝐺)    &   ⊢ 𝐼 = (Itv‘𝐺)    &   ⊢ 𝐿 = (LineG‘𝐺)    &   ⊢ 𝐾 = (hlG‘𝐺)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐺 ∈ TarskiG)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐴 ∈ 𝑃)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐵 ∈ 𝑃)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐶 ∈ 𝑃)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐷 ∈ 𝑃)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐸 ∈ 𝑃)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐹 ∈ 𝑃)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → ¬ (𝐴 ∈ (𝐵𝐿𝐶) ∨ 𝐵 = 𝐶))    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → ¬ (𝐷 ∈ (𝐸𝐿𝐹) ∨ 𝐸 = 𝐹))    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → (𝐴 − 𝐵) = (𝐷 − 𝐸))    ⇒   ⊢ (𝜑 → ∃!𝑓 ∈ 𝑃 (⟨“𝐴𝐵𝐶”⟩(cgrG‘𝐺)⟨“𝐷𝐸𝑓”⟩ ∧ 𝑓((hpG‘𝐺)‘(𝐷𝐿𝐸))𝐹))
16.2.16  Congruence of angles
Syntax	ccgra 28891	Declare the constant for the congruence between angles relation.
class cgrA
Definition	df-cgra 28892*	Define the congruence relation between angles. As for triangles we use "words of points". See iscgra 28893 for a more human readable version. (Contributed by Thierry Arnoux, 30-Jul-2020.)
⊢ cgrA = (𝑔 ∈ V ↦ {⟨𝑎, 𝑏⟩ ∣ [(Base‘𝑔) / 𝑝][(hlG‘𝑔) / 𝑘]((𝑎 ∈ (𝑝 ↑m (0..^3)) ∧ 𝑏 ∈ (𝑝 ↑m (0..^3))) ∧ ∃𝑥 ∈ 𝑝 ∃𝑦 ∈ 𝑝 (𝑎(cgrG‘𝑔)⟨“𝑥(𝑏‘1)𝑦”⟩ ∧ 𝑥(𝑘‘(𝑏‘1))(𝑏‘0) ∧ 𝑦(𝑘‘(𝑏‘1))(𝑏‘2)))})
Theorem	iscgra 28893*	Property for two angles ABC and DEF to be congruent. This is a modified version of the definition 11.3 of [Schwabhauser] p. 95. where the number of constructed points has been reduced to two. We chose this version rather than the textbook version because it is shorter and therefore simpler to work with. Theorem dfcgra2 28914 shows that those definitions are indeed equivalent. (Contributed by Thierry Arnoux, 31-Jul-2020.)
⊢ 𝑃 = (Base‘𝐺)    &   ⊢ 𝐼 = (Itv‘𝐺)    &   ⊢ 𝐾 = (hlG‘𝐺)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐺 ∈ TarskiG)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐴 ∈ 𝑃)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐵 ∈ 𝑃)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐶 ∈ 𝑃)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐷 ∈ 𝑃)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐸 ∈ 𝑃)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐹 ∈ 𝑃)    ⇒   ⊢ (𝜑 → (⟨“𝐴𝐵𝐶”⟩(cgrA‘𝐺)⟨“𝐷𝐸𝐹”⟩ ↔ ∃𝑥 ∈ 𝑃 ∃𝑦 ∈ 𝑃 (⟨“𝐴𝐵𝐶”⟩(cgrG‘𝐺)⟨“𝑥𝐸𝑦”⟩ ∧ 𝑥(𝐾‘𝐸)𝐷 ∧ 𝑦(𝐾‘𝐸)𝐹)))
Theorem	iscgra1 28894*	A special version of iscgra 28893 where one distance is known to be equal. In this case, angle congruence can be written with only one quantifier. (Contributed by Thierry Arnoux, 9-Aug-2020.)
⊢ 𝑃 = (Base‘𝐺)    &   ⊢ 𝐼 = (Itv‘𝐺)    &   ⊢ 𝐾 = (hlG‘𝐺)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐺 ∈ TarskiG)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐴 ∈ 𝑃)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐵 ∈ 𝑃)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐶 ∈ 𝑃)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐷 ∈ 𝑃)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐸 ∈ 𝑃)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐹 ∈ 𝑃)    &   ⊢ − = (dist‘𝐺)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐴 ≠ 𝐵)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → (𝐴 − 𝐵) = (𝐷 − 𝐸))    ⇒   ⊢ (𝜑 → (⟨“𝐴𝐵𝐶”⟩(cgrA‘𝐺)⟨“𝐷𝐸𝐹”⟩ ↔ ∃𝑥 ∈ 𝑃 (⟨“𝐴𝐵𝐶”⟩(cgrG‘𝐺)⟨“𝐷𝐸𝑥”⟩ ∧ 𝑥(𝐾‘𝐸)𝐹)))
Theorem	iscgrad 28895	Sufficient conditions for angle congruence, deduction version. (Contributed by Thierry Arnoux, 1-Aug-2020.)
⊢ 𝑃 = (Base‘𝐺)    &   ⊢ 𝐼 = (Itv‘𝐺)    &   ⊢ 𝐾 = (hlG‘𝐺)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐺 ∈ TarskiG)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐴 ∈ 𝑃)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐵 ∈ 𝑃)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐶 ∈ 𝑃)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐷 ∈ 𝑃)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐸 ∈ 𝑃)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐹 ∈ 𝑃)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝑋 ∈ 𝑃)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝑌 ∈ 𝑃)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → ⟨“𝐴𝐵𝐶”⟩(cgrG‘𝐺)⟨“𝑋𝐸𝑌”⟩)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝑋(𝐾‘𝐸)𝐷)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝑌(𝐾‘𝐸)𝐹)    ⇒   ⊢ (𝜑 → ⟨“𝐴𝐵𝐶”⟩(cgrA‘𝐺)⟨“𝐷𝐸𝐹”⟩)
Theorem	cgrane1 28896	Angles imply inequality. (Contributed by Thierry Arnoux, 1-Aug-2020.)
⊢ 𝑃 = (Base‘𝐺)    &   ⊢ 𝐼 = (Itv‘𝐺)    &   ⊢ 𝐾 = (hlG‘𝐺)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐺 ∈ TarskiG)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐴 ∈ 𝑃)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐵 ∈ 𝑃)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐶 ∈ 𝑃)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐷 ∈ 𝑃)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐸 ∈ 𝑃)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐹 ∈ 𝑃)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → ⟨“𝐴𝐵𝐶”⟩(cgrA‘𝐺)⟨“𝐷𝐸𝐹”⟩)    ⇒   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐴 ≠ 𝐵)
Theorem	cgrane2 28897	Angles imply inequality. (Contributed by Thierry Arnoux, 1-Aug-2020.)
⊢ 𝑃 = (Base‘𝐺)    &   ⊢ 𝐼 = (Itv‘𝐺)    &   ⊢ 𝐾 = (hlG‘𝐺)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐺 ∈ TarskiG)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐴 ∈ 𝑃)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐵 ∈ 𝑃)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐶 ∈ 𝑃)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐷 ∈ 𝑃)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐸 ∈ 𝑃)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐹 ∈ 𝑃)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → ⟨“𝐴𝐵𝐶”⟩(cgrA‘𝐺)⟨“𝐷𝐸𝐹”⟩)    ⇒   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐵 ≠ 𝐶)
Theorem	cgrane3 28898	Angles imply inequality. (Contributed by Thierry Arnoux, 1-Aug-2020.)
⊢ 𝑃 = (Base‘𝐺)    &   ⊢ 𝐼 = (Itv‘𝐺)    &   ⊢ 𝐾 = (hlG‘𝐺)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐺 ∈ TarskiG)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐴 ∈ 𝑃)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐵 ∈ 𝑃)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐶 ∈ 𝑃)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐷 ∈ 𝑃)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐸 ∈ 𝑃)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐹 ∈ 𝑃)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → ⟨“𝐴𝐵𝐶”⟩(cgrA‘𝐺)⟨“𝐷𝐸𝐹”⟩)    ⇒   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐸 ≠ 𝐷)
Theorem	cgrane4 28899	Angles imply inequality. (Contributed by Thierry Arnoux, 1-Aug-2020.)
⊢ 𝑃 = (Base‘𝐺)    &   ⊢ 𝐼 = (Itv‘𝐺)    &   ⊢ 𝐾 = (hlG‘𝐺)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐺 ∈ TarskiG)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐴 ∈ 𝑃)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐵 ∈ 𝑃)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐶 ∈ 𝑃)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐷 ∈ 𝑃)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐸 ∈ 𝑃)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐹 ∈ 𝑃)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → ⟨“𝐴𝐵𝐶”⟩(cgrA‘𝐺)⟨“𝐷𝐸𝐹”⟩)    ⇒   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐸 ≠ 𝐹)
Theorem	cgrahl1 28900	Angle congruence is independent of the choice of points on the rays. Proposition 11.10 of [Schwabhauser] p. 95. (Contributed by Thierry Arnoux, 1-Aug-2020.)
⊢ 𝑃 = (Base‘𝐺)    &   ⊢ 𝐼 = (Itv‘𝐺)    &   ⊢ 𝐾 = (hlG‘𝐺)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐺 ∈ TarskiG)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐴 ∈ 𝑃)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐵 ∈ 𝑃)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐶 ∈ 𝑃)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐷 ∈ 𝑃)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐸 ∈ 𝑃)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐹 ∈ 𝑃)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → ⟨“𝐴𝐵𝐶”⟩(cgrA‘𝐺)⟨“𝐷𝐸𝐹”⟩)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝑋 ∈ 𝑃)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝑋(𝐾‘𝐸)𝐷)    ⇒   ⊢ (𝜑 → ⟨“𝐴𝐵𝐶”⟩(cgrA‘𝐺)⟨“𝑋𝐸𝐹”⟩)