P. 289 of Theorem List - Metamath Proof Explorer

Theorem List for Metamath Proof Explorer - 28801-28900   *Has distinct variable group(s)

Type	Label	Description
Statement
Theorem	colperpex 28801*	In dimension 2 and above, on a line (𝐴𝐿𝐵) there is always a perpendicular 𝑃 from 𝐴 on a given plane (here given by 𝐶, in case 𝐶 does not lie on the line). Theorem 8.21 of [Schwabhauser] p. 63. (Contributed by Thierry Arnoux, 20-Nov-2019.)
⊢ 𝑃 = (Base‘𝐺)    &   ⊢ − = (dist‘𝐺)    &   ⊢ 𝐼 = (Itv‘𝐺)    &   ⊢ 𝐿 = (LineG‘𝐺)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐺 ∈ TarskiG)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐴 ∈ 𝑃)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐵 ∈ 𝑃)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐶 ∈ 𝑃)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐴 ≠ 𝐵)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐺DimTarskiG≥2)    ⇒   ⊢ (𝜑 → ∃𝑝 ∈ 𝑃 ((𝐴𝐿𝑝)(⟂G‘𝐺)(𝐴𝐿𝐵) ∧ ∃𝑡 ∈ 𝑃 ((𝑡 ∈ (𝐴𝐿𝐵) ∨ 𝐴 = 𝐵) ∧ 𝑡 ∈ (𝐶𝐼𝑝))))
Theorem	mideulem2 28802	Lemma for opphllem 28803, which is itself used for mideu 28806. (Contributed by Thierry Arnoux, 19-Feb-2020.)
⊢ 𝑃 = (Base‘𝐺)    &   ⊢ − = (dist‘𝐺)    &   ⊢ 𝐼 = (Itv‘𝐺)    &   ⊢ 𝐿 = (LineG‘𝐺)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐺 ∈ TarskiG)    &   ⊢ 𝑆 = (pInvG‘𝐺)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐴 ∈ 𝑃)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐵 ∈ 𝑃)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐴 ≠ 𝐵)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝑄 ∈ 𝑃)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝑂 ∈ 𝑃)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝑇 ∈ 𝑃)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → (𝐴𝐿𝐵)(⟂G‘𝐺)(𝑄𝐿𝐵))    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → (𝐴𝐿𝐵)(⟂G‘𝐺)(𝐴𝐿𝑂))    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝑇 ∈ (𝐴𝐿𝐵))    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝑇 ∈ (𝑄𝐼𝑂))    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝑅 ∈ 𝑃)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝑅 ∈ (𝐵𝐼𝑄))    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → (𝐴 − 𝑂) = (𝐵 − 𝑅))    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝑋 ∈ 𝑃)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝑋 ∈ (𝑇𝐼𝐵))    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝑋 ∈ (𝑅𝐼𝑂))    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝑍 ∈ 𝑃)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝑋 ∈ (((𝑆‘𝐴)‘𝑂)𝐼𝑍))    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → (𝑋 − 𝑍) = (𝑋 − 𝑅))    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝑀 ∈ 𝑃)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝑅 = ((𝑆‘𝑀)‘𝑍))    ⇒   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐵 = 𝑀)
Theorem	opphllem 28803*	Lemma 8.24 of [Schwabhauser] p. 66. This is used later for mideulem 28804 and later for opphl 28822. (Contributed by Thierry Arnoux, 21-Dec-2019.)
⊢ 𝑃 = (Base‘𝐺)    &   ⊢ − = (dist‘𝐺)    &   ⊢ 𝐼 = (Itv‘𝐺)    &   ⊢ 𝐿 = (LineG‘𝐺)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐺 ∈ TarskiG)    &   ⊢ 𝑆 = (pInvG‘𝐺)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐴 ∈ 𝑃)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐵 ∈ 𝑃)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐴 ≠ 𝐵)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝑄 ∈ 𝑃)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝑂 ∈ 𝑃)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝑇 ∈ 𝑃)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → (𝐴𝐿𝐵)(⟂G‘𝐺)(𝑄𝐿𝐵))    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → (𝐴𝐿𝐵)(⟂G‘𝐺)(𝐴𝐿𝑂))    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝑇 ∈ (𝐴𝐿𝐵))    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝑇 ∈ (𝑄𝐼𝑂))    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝑅 ∈ 𝑃)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝑅 ∈ (𝐵𝐼𝑄))    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → (𝐴 − 𝑂) = (𝐵 − 𝑅))    ⇒   ⊢ (𝜑 → ∃𝑥 ∈ 𝑃 (𝐵 = ((𝑆‘𝑥)‘𝐴) ∧ 𝑂 = ((𝑆‘𝑥)‘𝑅)))
Theorem	mideulem 28804*	Lemma for mideu 28806. We can assume mideulem.9 "without loss of generality". (Contributed by Thierry Arnoux, 25-Nov-2019.)
⊢ 𝑃 = (Base‘𝐺)    &   ⊢ − = (dist‘𝐺)    &   ⊢ 𝐼 = (Itv‘𝐺)    &   ⊢ 𝐿 = (LineG‘𝐺)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐺 ∈ TarskiG)    &   ⊢ 𝑆 = (pInvG‘𝐺)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐴 ∈ 𝑃)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐵 ∈ 𝑃)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐴 ≠ 𝐵)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝑄 ∈ 𝑃)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝑂 ∈ 𝑃)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝑇 ∈ 𝑃)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → (𝐴𝐿𝐵)(⟂G‘𝐺)(𝑄𝐿𝐵))    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → (𝐴𝐿𝐵)(⟂G‘𝐺)(𝐴𝐿𝑂))    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝑇 ∈ (𝐴𝐿𝐵))    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝑇 ∈ (𝑄𝐼𝑂))    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → (𝐴 − 𝑂)(≤G‘𝐺)(𝐵 − 𝑄))    ⇒   ⊢ (𝜑 → ∃𝑥 ∈ 𝑃 𝐵 = ((𝑆‘𝑥)‘𝐴))
Theorem	midex 28805*	Existence of the midpoint, part Theorem 8.22 of [Schwabhauser] p. 64. Note that this proof requires a construction in 2 dimensions or more, i.e. it does not prove the existence of a midpoint in dimension 1, for a geometry restricted to a line. (Contributed by Thierry Arnoux, 25-Nov-2019.)
⊢ 𝑃 = (Base‘𝐺)    &   ⊢ − = (dist‘𝐺)    &   ⊢ 𝐼 = (Itv‘𝐺)    &   ⊢ 𝐿 = (LineG‘𝐺)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐺 ∈ TarskiG)    &   ⊢ 𝑆 = (pInvG‘𝐺)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐴 ∈ 𝑃)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐵 ∈ 𝑃)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐺DimTarskiG≥2)    ⇒   ⊢ (𝜑 → ∃𝑥 ∈ 𝑃 𝐵 = ((𝑆‘𝑥)‘𝐴))
Theorem	mideu 28806*	Existence and uniqueness of the midpoint, Theorem 8.22 of [Schwabhauser] p. 64. (Contributed by Thierry Arnoux, 25-Nov-2019.)
⊢ 𝑃 = (Base‘𝐺)    &   ⊢ − = (dist‘𝐺)    &   ⊢ 𝐼 = (Itv‘𝐺)    &   ⊢ 𝐿 = (LineG‘𝐺)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐺 ∈ TarskiG)    &   ⊢ 𝑆 = (pInvG‘𝐺)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐴 ∈ 𝑃)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐵 ∈ 𝑃)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐺DimTarskiG≥2)    ⇒   ⊢ (𝜑 → ∃!𝑥 ∈ 𝑃 𝐵 = ((𝑆‘𝑥)‘𝐴))
16.2.14  Half-planes
Theorem	islnopp 28807*	The property for two points 𝐴 and 𝐵 to lie on the opposite sides of a set 𝐷 Definition 9.1 of [Schwabhauser] p. 67. (Contributed by Thierry Arnoux, 19-Dec-2019.)
⊢ 𝑃 = (Base‘𝐺)    &   ⊢ − = (dist‘𝐺)    &   ⊢ 𝐼 = (Itv‘𝐺)    &   ⊢ 𝑂 = {⟨𝑎, 𝑏⟩ ∣ ((𝑎 ∈ (𝑃 ∖ 𝐷) ∧ 𝑏 ∈ (𝑃 ∖ 𝐷)) ∧ ∃𝑡 ∈ 𝐷 𝑡 ∈ (𝑎𝐼𝑏))}    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐴 ∈ 𝑃)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐵 ∈ 𝑃)    ⇒   ⊢ (𝜑 → (𝐴𝑂𝐵 ↔ ((¬ 𝐴 ∈ 𝐷 ∧ ¬ 𝐵 ∈ 𝐷) ∧ ∃𝑡 ∈ 𝐷 𝑡 ∈ (𝐴𝐼𝐵))))
Theorem	islnoppd 28808*	Deduce that 𝐴 and 𝐵 lie on opposite sides of line 𝐿. (Contributed by Thierry Arnoux, 16-Aug-2020.)
⊢ 𝑃 = (Base‘𝐺)    &   ⊢ − = (dist‘𝐺)    &   ⊢ 𝐼 = (Itv‘𝐺)    &   ⊢ 𝑂 = {⟨𝑎, 𝑏⟩ ∣ ((𝑎 ∈ (𝑃 ∖ 𝐷) ∧ 𝑏 ∈ (𝑃 ∖ 𝐷)) ∧ ∃𝑡 ∈ 𝐷 𝑡 ∈ (𝑎𝐼𝑏))}    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐴 ∈ 𝑃)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐵 ∈ 𝑃)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐶 ∈ 𝐷)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → ¬ 𝐴 ∈ 𝐷)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → ¬ 𝐵 ∈ 𝐷)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐶 ∈ (𝐴𝐼𝐵))    ⇒   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐴𝑂𝐵)
Theorem	oppne1 28809*	Points lying on opposite sides of a line cannot be on the line. (Contributed by Thierry Arnoux, 3-Mar-2020.)
⊢ 𝑃 = (Base‘𝐺)    &   ⊢ − = (dist‘𝐺)    &   ⊢ 𝐼 = (Itv‘𝐺)    &   ⊢ 𝑂 = {⟨𝑎, 𝑏⟩ ∣ ((𝑎 ∈ (𝑃 ∖ 𝐷) ∧ 𝑏 ∈ (𝑃 ∖ 𝐷)) ∧ ∃𝑡 ∈ 𝐷 𝑡 ∈ (𝑎𝐼𝑏))}    &   ⊢ 𝐿 = (LineG‘𝐺)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐷 ∈ ran 𝐿)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐺 ∈ TarskiG)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐴 ∈ 𝑃)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐵 ∈ 𝑃)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐴𝑂𝐵)    ⇒   ⊢ (𝜑 → ¬ 𝐴 ∈ 𝐷)
Theorem	oppne2 28810*	Points lying on opposite sides of a line cannot be on the line. (Contributed by Thierry Arnoux, 3-Mar-2020.)
⊢ 𝑃 = (Base‘𝐺)    &   ⊢ − = (dist‘𝐺)    &   ⊢ 𝐼 = (Itv‘𝐺)    &   ⊢ 𝑂 = {⟨𝑎, 𝑏⟩ ∣ ((𝑎 ∈ (𝑃 ∖ 𝐷) ∧ 𝑏 ∈ (𝑃 ∖ 𝐷)) ∧ ∃𝑡 ∈ 𝐷 𝑡 ∈ (𝑎𝐼𝑏))}    &   ⊢ 𝐿 = (LineG‘𝐺)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐷 ∈ ran 𝐿)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐺 ∈ TarskiG)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐴 ∈ 𝑃)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐵 ∈ 𝑃)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐴𝑂𝐵)    ⇒   ⊢ (𝜑 → ¬ 𝐵 ∈ 𝐷)
Theorem	oppne3 28811*	Points lying on opposite sides of a line cannot be equal. (Contributed by Thierry Arnoux, 3-Aug-2020.)
⊢ 𝑃 = (Base‘𝐺)    &   ⊢ − = (dist‘𝐺)    &   ⊢ 𝐼 = (Itv‘𝐺)    &   ⊢ 𝑂 = {⟨𝑎, 𝑏⟩ ∣ ((𝑎 ∈ (𝑃 ∖ 𝐷) ∧ 𝑏 ∈ (𝑃 ∖ 𝐷)) ∧ ∃𝑡 ∈ 𝐷 𝑡 ∈ (𝑎𝐼𝑏))}    &   ⊢ 𝐿 = (LineG‘𝐺)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐷 ∈ ran 𝐿)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐺 ∈ TarskiG)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐴 ∈ 𝑃)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐵 ∈ 𝑃)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐴𝑂𝐵)    ⇒   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐴 ≠ 𝐵)
Theorem	oppcom 28812*	Commutativity rule for "opposite" Theorem 9.2 of [Schwabhauser] p. 67. (Contributed by Thierry Arnoux, 19-Dec-2019.)
⊢ 𝑃 = (Base‘𝐺)    &   ⊢ − = (dist‘𝐺)    &   ⊢ 𝐼 = (Itv‘𝐺)    &   ⊢ 𝑂 = {⟨𝑎, 𝑏⟩ ∣ ((𝑎 ∈ (𝑃 ∖ 𝐷) ∧ 𝑏 ∈ (𝑃 ∖ 𝐷)) ∧ ∃𝑡 ∈ 𝐷 𝑡 ∈ (𝑎𝐼𝑏))}    &   ⊢ 𝐿 = (LineG‘𝐺)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐷 ∈ ran 𝐿)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐺 ∈ TarskiG)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐴 ∈ 𝑃)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐵 ∈ 𝑃)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐴𝑂𝐵)    ⇒   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐵𝑂𝐴)
Theorem	opptgdim2 28813*	If two points opposite to a line exist, dimension must be 2 or more. (Contributed by Thierry Arnoux, 3-Mar-2020.)
⊢ 𝑃 = (Base‘𝐺)    &   ⊢ − = (dist‘𝐺)    &   ⊢ 𝐼 = (Itv‘𝐺)    &   ⊢ 𝑂 = {⟨𝑎, 𝑏⟩ ∣ ((𝑎 ∈ (𝑃 ∖ 𝐷) ∧ 𝑏 ∈ (𝑃 ∖ 𝐷)) ∧ ∃𝑡 ∈ 𝐷 𝑡 ∈ (𝑎𝐼𝑏))}    &   ⊢ 𝐿 = (LineG‘𝐺)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐷 ∈ ran 𝐿)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐺 ∈ TarskiG)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐴 ∈ 𝑃)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐵 ∈ 𝑃)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐴𝑂𝐵)    ⇒   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐺DimTarskiG≥2)
Theorem	oppnid 28814*	The "opposite to a line" relation is irreflexive. (Contributed by Thierry Arnoux, 4-Mar-2020.)
⊢ 𝑃 = (Base‘𝐺)    &   ⊢ − = (dist‘𝐺)    &   ⊢ 𝐼 = (Itv‘𝐺)    &   ⊢ 𝑂 = {⟨𝑎, 𝑏⟩ ∣ ((𝑎 ∈ (𝑃 ∖ 𝐷) ∧ 𝑏 ∈ (𝑃 ∖ 𝐷)) ∧ ∃𝑡 ∈ 𝐷 𝑡 ∈ (𝑎𝐼𝑏))}    &   ⊢ 𝐿 = (LineG‘𝐺)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐷 ∈ ran 𝐿)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐺 ∈ TarskiG)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐴 ∈ 𝑃)    ⇒   ⊢ (𝜑 → ¬ 𝐴𝑂𝐴)
Theorem	opphllem1 28815*	Lemma for opphl 28822. (Contributed by Thierry Arnoux, 20-Dec-2019.)
⊢ 𝑃 = (Base‘𝐺)    &   ⊢ − = (dist‘𝐺)    &   ⊢ 𝐼 = (Itv‘𝐺)    &   ⊢ 𝑂 = {⟨𝑎, 𝑏⟩ ∣ ((𝑎 ∈ (𝑃 ∖ 𝐷) ∧ 𝑏 ∈ (𝑃 ∖ 𝐷)) ∧ ∃𝑡 ∈ 𝐷 𝑡 ∈ (𝑎𝐼𝑏))}    &   ⊢ 𝐿 = (LineG‘𝐺)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐷 ∈ ran 𝐿)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐺 ∈ TarskiG)    &   ⊢ 𝑆 = ((pInvG‘𝐺)‘𝑀)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐴 ∈ 𝑃)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐵 ∈ 𝑃)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐶 ∈ 𝑃)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝑅 ∈ 𝐷)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐴𝑂𝐶)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝑀 ∈ 𝐷)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐴 = (𝑆‘𝐶))    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐴 ≠ 𝑅)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐵 ≠ 𝑅)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐵 ∈ (𝑅𝐼𝐴))    ⇒   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐵𝑂𝐶)
Theorem	opphllem2 28816*	Lemma for opphl 28822. Lemma 9.3 of [Schwabhauser] p. 68. (Contributed by Thierry Arnoux, 21-Dec-2019.)
⊢ 𝑃 = (Base‘𝐺)    &   ⊢ − = (dist‘𝐺)    &   ⊢ 𝐼 = (Itv‘𝐺)    &   ⊢ 𝑂 = {⟨𝑎, 𝑏⟩ ∣ ((𝑎 ∈ (𝑃 ∖ 𝐷) ∧ 𝑏 ∈ (𝑃 ∖ 𝐷)) ∧ ∃𝑡 ∈ 𝐷 𝑡 ∈ (𝑎𝐼𝑏))}    &   ⊢ 𝐿 = (LineG‘𝐺)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐷 ∈ ran 𝐿)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐺 ∈ TarskiG)    &   ⊢ 𝑆 = ((pInvG‘𝐺)‘𝑀)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐴 ∈ 𝑃)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐵 ∈ 𝑃)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐶 ∈ 𝑃)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝑅 ∈ 𝐷)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐴𝑂𝐶)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝑀 ∈ 𝐷)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐴 = (𝑆‘𝐶))    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐴 ≠ 𝑅)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐵 ≠ 𝑅)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → (𝐴 ∈ (𝑅𝐼𝐵) ∨ 𝐵 ∈ (𝑅𝐼𝐴)))    ⇒   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐵𝑂𝐶)
Theorem	opphllem3 28817*	Lemma for opphl 28822: We assume opphllem3.l "without loss of generality". (Contributed by Thierry Arnoux, 21-Feb-2020.)
⊢ 𝑃 = (Base‘𝐺)    &   ⊢ − = (dist‘𝐺)    &   ⊢ 𝐼 = (Itv‘𝐺)    &   ⊢ 𝑂 = {⟨𝑎, 𝑏⟩ ∣ ((𝑎 ∈ (𝑃 ∖ 𝐷) ∧ 𝑏 ∈ (𝑃 ∖ 𝐷)) ∧ ∃𝑡 ∈ 𝐷 𝑡 ∈ (𝑎𝐼𝑏))}    &   ⊢ 𝐿 = (LineG‘𝐺)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐷 ∈ ran 𝐿)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐺 ∈ TarskiG)    &   ⊢ 𝐾 = (hlG‘𝐺)    &   ⊢ 𝑁 = ((pInvG‘𝐺)‘𝑀)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐴 ∈ 𝑃)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐶 ∈ 𝑃)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝑅 ∈ 𝐷)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝑆 ∈ 𝐷)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝑀 ∈ 𝑃)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐴𝑂𝐶)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐷(⟂G‘𝐺)(𝐴𝐿𝑅))    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐷(⟂G‘𝐺)(𝐶𝐿𝑆))    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝑅 ≠ 𝑆)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → (𝑆 − 𝐶)(≤G‘𝐺)(𝑅 − 𝐴))    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝑈 ∈ 𝑃)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → (𝑁‘𝑅) = 𝑆)    ⇒   ⊢ (𝜑 → (𝑈(𝐾‘𝑅)𝐴 ↔ (𝑁‘𝑈)(𝐾‘𝑆)𝐶))
Theorem	opphllem4 28818*	Lemma for opphl 28822. (Contributed by Thierry Arnoux, 22-Feb-2020.)
⊢ 𝑃 = (Base‘𝐺)    &   ⊢ − = (dist‘𝐺)    &   ⊢ 𝐼 = (Itv‘𝐺)    &   ⊢ 𝑂 = {⟨𝑎, 𝑏⟩ ∣ ((𝑎 ∈ (𝑃 ∖ 𝐷) ∧ 𝑏 ∈ (𝑃 ∖ 𝐷)) ∧ ∃𝑡 ∈ 𝐷 𝑡 ∈ (𝑎𝐼𝑏))}    &   ⊢ 𝐿 = (LineG‘𝐺)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐷 ∈ ran 𝐿)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐺 ∈ TarskiG)    &   ⊢ 𝐾 = (hlG‘𝐺)    &   ⊢ 𝑁 = ((pInvG‘𝐺)‘𝑀)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐴 ∈ 𝑃)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐶 ∈ 𝑃)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝑅 ∈ 𝐷)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝑆 ∈ 𝐷)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝑀 ∈ 𝑃)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐴𝑂𝐶)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐷(⟂G‘𝐺)(𝐴𝐿𝑅))    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐷(⟂G‘𝐺)(𝐶𝐿𝑆))    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝑅 ≠ 𝑆)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → (𝑆 − 𝐶)(≤G‘𝐺)(𝑅 − 𝐴))    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝑈 ∈ 𝑃)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → (𝑁‘𝑅) = 𝑆)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝑉 ∈ 𝑃)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝑈(𝐾‘𝑅)𝐴)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝑉(𝐾‘𝑆)𝐶)    ⇒   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝑈𝑂𝑉)
Theorem	opphllem5 28819*	Second part of Lemma 9.4 of [Schwabhauser] p. 68. (Contributed by Thierry Arnoux, 2-Mar-2020.)
⊢ 𝑃 = (Base‘𝐺)    &   ⊢ − = (dist‘𝐺)    &   ⊢ 𝐼 = (Itv‘𝐺)    &   ⊢ 𝑂 = {⟨𝑎, 𝑏⟩ ∣ ((𝑎 ∈ (𝑃 ∖ 𝐷) ∧ 𝑏 ∈ (𝑃 ∖ 𝐷)) ∧ ∃𝑡 ∈ 𝐷 𝑡 ∈ (𝑎𝐼𝑏))}    &   ⊢ 𝐿 = (LineG‘𝐺)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐷 ∈ ran 𝐿)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐺 ∈ TarskiG)    &   ⊢ 𝐾 = (hlG‘𝐺)    &   ⊢ 𝑁 = ((pInvG‘𝐺)‘𝑀)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐴 ∈ 𝑃)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐶 ∈ 𝑃)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝑅 ∈ 𝐷)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝑆 ∈ 𝐷)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝑀 ∈ 𝑃)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐴𝑂𝐶)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐷(⟂G‘𝐺)(𝐴𝐿𝑅))    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐷(⟂G‘𝐺)(𝐶𝐿𝑆))    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝑈 ∈ 𝑃)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝑉 ∈ 𝑃)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝑈(𝐾‘𝑅)𝐴)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝑉(𝐾‘𝑆)𝐶)    ⇒   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝑈𝑂𝑉)
Theorem	opphllem6 28820*	First part of Lemma 9.4 of [Schwabhauser] p. 68. (Contributed by Thierry Arnoux, 3-Mar-2020.)
⊢ 𝑃 = (Base‘𝐺)    &   ⊢ − = (dist‘𝐺)    &   ⊢ 𝐼 = (Itv‘𝐺)    &   ⊢ 𝑂 = {⟨𝑎, 𝑏⟩ ∣ ((𝑎 ∈ (𝑃 ∖ 𝐷) ∧ 𝑏 ∈ (𝑃 ∖ 𝐷)) ∧ ∃𝑡 ∈ 𝐷 𝑡 ∈ (𝑎𝐼𝑏))}    &   ⊢ 𝐿 = (LineG‘𝐺)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐷 ∈ ran 𝐿)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐺 ∈ TarskiG)    &   ⊢ 𝐾 = (hlG‘𝐺)    &   ⊢ 𝑁 = ((pInvG‘𝐺)‘𝑀)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐴 ∈ 𝑃)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐶 ∈ 𝑃)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝑅 ∈ 𝐷)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝑆 ∈ 𝐷)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝑀 ∈ 𝑃)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐴𝑂𝐶)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐷(⟂G‘𝐺)(𝐴𝐿𝑅))    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐷(⟂G‘𝐺)(𝐶𝐿𝑆))    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝑈 ∈ 𝑃)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → (𝑁‘𝑅) = 𝑆)    ⇒   ⊢ (𝜑 → (𝑈(𝐾‘𝑅)𝐴 ↔ (𝑁‘𝑈)(𝐾‘𝑆)𝐶))
Theorem	oppperpex 28821*	Restating colperpex 28801 using the "opposite side of a line" relation. (Contributed by Thierry Arnoux, 2-Aug-2020.)
⊢ 𝑃 = (Base‘𝐺)    &   ⊢ − = (dist‘𝐺)    &   ⊢ 𝐼 = (Itv‘𝐺)    &   ⊢ 𝑂 = {⟨𝑎, 𝑏⟩ ∣ ((𝑎 ∈ (𝑃 ∖ 𝐷) ∧ 𝑏 ∈ (𝑃 ∖ 𝐷)) ∧ ∃𝑡 ∈ 𝐷 𝑡 ∈ (𝑎𝐼𝑏))}    &   ⊢ 𝐿 = (LineG‘𝐺)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐷 ∈ ran 𝐿)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐺 ∈ TarskiG)    &   ⊢ 𝐾 = (hlG‘𝐺)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐴 ∈ 𝐷)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐶 ∈ 𝑃)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → ¬ 𝐶 ∈ 𝐷)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐺DimTarskiG≥2)    ⇒   ⊢ (𝜑 → ∃𝑝 ∈ 𝑃 ((𝐴𝐿𝑝)(⟂G‘𝐺)𝐷 ∧ 𝐶𝑂𝑝))
Theorem	opphl 28822*	If two points 𝐴 and 𝐶 lie on opposite sides of a line 𝐷, then any point of the half line (𝑅𝐴) also lies opposite to 𝐶. Theorem 9.5 of [Schwabhauser] p. 69. (Contributed by Thierry Arnoux, 3-Mar-2019.)
⊢ 𝑃 = (Base‘𝐺)    &   ⊢ − = (dist‘𝐺)    &   ⊢ 𝐼 = (Itv‘𝐺)    &   ⊢ 𝑂 = {⟨𝑎, 𝑏⟩ ∣ ((𝑎 ∈ (𝑃 ∖ 𝐷) ∧ 𝑏 ∈ (𝑃 ∖ 𝐷)) ∧ ∃𝑡 ∈ 𝐷 𝑡 ∈ (𝑎𝐼𝑏))}    &   ⊢ 𝐿 = (LineG‘𝐺)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐷 ∈ ran 𝐿)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐺 ∈ TarskiG)    &   ⊢ 𝐾 = (hlG‘𝐺)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐴 ∈ 𝑃)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐵 ∈ 𝑃)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐶 ∈ 𝑃)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐴𝑂𝐶)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝑅 ∈ 𝐷)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐴(𝐾‘𝑅)𝐵)    ⇒   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐵𝑂𝐶)
Theorem	outpasch 28823*	Axiom of Pasch, outer form. This was proven by Gupta from other axioms and is therefore presented as Theorem 9.6 in [Schwabhauser] p. 70. (Contributed by Thierry Arnoux, 16-Aug-2020.)
⊢ 𝑃 = (Base‘𝐺)    &   ⊢ 𝐼 = (Itv‘𝐺)    &   ⊢ 𝐿 = (LineG‘𝐺)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐺 ∈ TarskiG)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐴 ∈ 𝑃)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐵 ∈ 𝑃)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐶 ∈ 𝑃)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝑅 ∈ 𝑃)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝑄 ∈ 𝑃)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐶 ∈ (𝐴𝐼𝑅))    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝑄 ∈ (𝐵𝐼𝐶))    ⇒   ⊢ (𝜑 → ∃𝑥 ∈ 𝑃 (𝑥 ∈ (𝐴𝐼𝐵) ∧ 𝑄 ∈ (𝑅𝐼𝑥)))
Theorem	hlpasch 28824*	An application of the axiom of Pasch for half-lines. (Contributed by Thierry Arnoux, 15-Sep-2020.)
⊢ 𝑃 = (Base‘𝐺)    &   ⊢ 𝐼 = (Itv‘𝐺)    &   ⊢ 𝐾 = (hlG‘𝐺)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐺 ∈ TarskiG)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐴 ∈ 𝑃)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐵 ∈ 𝑃)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐶 ∈ 𝑃)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝑋 ∈ 𝑃)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐷 ∈ 𝑃)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐴 ≠ 𝐵)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐶(𝐾‘𝐵)𝐷)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐴 ∈ (𝑋𝐼𝐶))    ⇒   ⊢ (𝜑 → ∃𝑒 ∈ 𝑃 (𝐴(𝐾‘𝐵)𝑒 ∧ 𝑒 ∈ (𝑋𝐼𝐷)))
Syntax	chpg 28825	"Belong to the same open half-plane" relation for points in a geometry.
class hpG
Definition	df-hpg 28826*	Define the open half plane relation for a geometry 𝐺. Definition 9.7 of [Schwabhauser] p. 71. See hpgbr 28828 to find the same formulation. (Contributed by Thierry Arnoux, 4-Mar-2020.)
⊢ hpG = (𝑔 ∈ V ↦ (𝑑 ∈ ran (LineG‘𝑔) ↦ {⟨𝑎, 𝑏⟩ ∣ [(Base‘𝑔) / 𝑝][(Itv‘𝑔) / 𝑖]∃𝑐 ∈ 𝑝 (((𝑎 ∈ (𝑝 ∖ 𝑑) ∧ 𝑐 ∈ (𝑝 ∖ 𝑑)) ∧ ∃𝑡 ∈ 𝑑 𝑡 ∈ (𝑎𝑖𝑐)) ∧ ((𝑏 ∈ (𝑝 ∖ 𝑑) ∧ 𝑐 ∈ (𝑝 ∖ 𝑑)) ∧ ∃𝑡 ∈ 𝑑 𝑡 ∈ (𝑏𝑖𝑐)))}))
Theorem	ishpg 28827*	Value of the half-plane relation for a given line 𝐷. (Contributed by Thierry Arnoux, 4-Mar-2020.)
⊢ 𝑃 = (Base‘𝐺)    &   ⊢ 𝐼 = (Itv‘𝐺)    &   ⊢ 𝐿 = (LineG‘𝐺)    &   ⊢ 𝑂 = {⟨𝑎, 𝑏⟩ ∣ ((𝑎 ∈ (𝑃 ∖ 𝐷) ∧ 𝑏 ∈ (𝑃 ∖ 𝐷)) ∧ ∃𝑡 ∈ 𝐷 𝑡 ∈ (𝑎𝐼𝑏))}    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐺 ∈ TarskiG)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐷 ∈ ran 𝐿)    ⇒   ⊢ (𝜑 → ((hpG‘𝐺)‘𝐷) = {⟨𝑎, 𝑏⟩ ∣ ∃𝑐 ∈ 𝑃 (𝑎𝑂𝑐 ∧ 𝑏𝑂𝑐)})
Theorem	hpgbr 28828*	Half-planes : property for points 𝐴 and 𝐵 to belong to the same open half plane delimited by line 𝐷. Definition 9.7 of [Schwabhauser] p. 71. (Contributed by Thierry Arnoux, 4-Mar-2020.)
⊢ 𝑃 = (Base‘𝐺)    &   ⊢ 𝐼 = (Itv‘𝐺)    &   ⊢ 𝐿 = (LineG‘𝐺)    &   ⊢ 𝑂 = {⟨𝑎, 𝑏⟩ ∣ ((𝑎 ∈ (𝑃 ∖ 𝐷) ∧ 𝑏 ∈ (𝑃 ∖ 𝐷)) ∧ ∃𝑡 ∈ 𝐷 𝑡 ∈ (𝑎𝐼𝑏))}    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐺 ∈ TarskiG)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐷 ∈ ran 𝐿)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐴 ∈ 𝑃)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐵 ∈ 𝑃)    ⇒   ⊢ (𝜑 → (𝐴((hpG‘𝐺)‘𝐷)𝐵 ↔ ∃𝑐 ∈ 𝑃 (𝐴𝑂𝑐 ∧ 𝐵𝑂𝑐)))
Theorem	hpgne1 28829*	Points on the open half plane cannot lie on its border. (Contributed by Thierry Arnoux, 4-Mar-2020.)
⊢ 𝑃 = (Base‘𝐺)    &   ⊢ 𝐼 = (Itv‘𝐺)    &   ⊢ 𝐿 = (LineG‘𝐺)    &   ⊢ 𝑂 = {⟨𝑎, 𝑏⟩ ∣ ((𝑎 ∈ (𝑃 ∖ 𝐷) ∧ 𝑏 ∈ (𝑃 ∖ 𝐷)) ∧ ∃𝑡 ∈ 𝐷 𝑡 ∈ (𝑎𝐼𝑏))}    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐺 ∈ TarskiG)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐷 ∈ ran 𝐿)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐴 ∈ 𝑃)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐵 ∈ 𝑃)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐴((hpG‘𝐺)‘𝐷)𝐵)    ⇒   ⊢ (𝜑 → ¬ 𝐴 ∈ 𝐷)
Theorem	hpgne2 28830*	Points on the open half plane cannot lie on its border. (Contributed by Thierry Arnoux, 4-Mar-2020.)
⊢ 𝑃 = (Base‘𝐺)    &   ⊢ 𝐼 = (Itv‘𝐺)    &   ⊢ 𝐿 = (LineG‘𝐺)    &   ⊢ 𝑂 = {⟨𝑎, 𝑏⟩ ∣ ((𝑎 ∈ (𝑃 ∖ 𝐷) ∧ 𝑏 ∈ (𝑃 ∖ 𝐷)) ∧ ∃𝑡 ∈ 𝐷 𝑡 ∈ (𝑎𝐼𝑏))}    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐺 ∈ TarskiG)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐷 ∈ ran 𝐿)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐴 ∈ 𝑃)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐵 ∈ 𝑃)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐴((hpG‘𝐺)‘𝐷)𝐵)    ⇒   ⊢ (𝜑 → ¬ 𝐵 ∈ 𝐷)
Theorem	lnopp2hpgb 28831*	Theorem 9.8 of [Schwabhauser] p. 71. (Contributed by Thierry Arnoux, 4-Mar-2020.)
⊢ 𝑃 = (Base‘𝐺)    &   ⊢ 𝐼 = (Itv‘𝐺)    &   ⊢ 𝐿 = (LineG‘𝐺)    &   ⊢ 𝑂 = {⟨𝑎, 𝑏⟩ ∣ ((𝑎 ∈ (𝑃 ∖ 𝐷) ∧ 𝑏 ∈ (𝑃 ∖ 𝐷)) ∧ ∃𝑡 ∈ 𝐷 𝑡 ∈ (𝑎𝐼𝑏))}    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐺 ∈ TarskiG)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐷 ∈ ran 𝐿)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐴 ∈ 𝑃)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐵 ∈ 𝑃)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐶 ∈ 𝑃)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐴𝑂𝐶)    ⇒   ⊢ (𝜑 → (𝐵𝑂𝐶 ↔ 𝐴((hpG‘𝐺)‘𝐷)𝐵))
Theorem	lnoppnhpg 28832*	If two points lie on the opposite side of a line 𝐷, they are not on the same half-plane. Theorem 9.9 of [Schwabhauser] p. 72. (Contributed by Thierry Arnoux, 4-Mar-2020.)
⊢ 𝑃 = (Base‘𝐺)    &   ⊢ 𝐼 = (Itv‘𝐺)    &   ⊢ 𝐿 = (LineG‘𝐺)    &   ⊢ 𝑂 = {⟨𝑎, 𝑏⟩ ∣ ((𝑎 ∈ (𝑃 ∖ 𝐷) ∧ 𝑏 ∈ (𝑃 ∖ 𝐷)) ∧ ∃𝑡 ∈ 𝐷 𝑡 ∈ (𝑎𝐼𝑏))}    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐺 ∈ TarskiG)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐷 ∈ ran 𝐿)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐴 ∈ 𝑃)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐵 ∈ 𝑃)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐴𝑂𝐵)    ⇒   ⊢ (𝜑 → ¬ 𝐴((hpG‘𝐺)‘𝐷)𝐵)
Theorem	hpgerlem 28833*	Lemma for the proof that the half-plane relation is an equivalence relation. Lemma 9.10 of [Schwabhauser] p. 72. (Contributed by Thierry Arnoux, 4-Mar-2020.)
⊢ 𝑃 = (Base‘𝐺)    &   ⊢ 𝐼 = (Itv‘𝐺)    &   ⊢ 𝐿 = (LineG‘𝐺)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐺 ∈ TarskiG)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐷 ∈ ran 𝐿)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐴 ∈ 𝑃)    &   ⊢ 𝑂 = {⟨𝑎, 𝑏⟩ ∣ ((𝑎 ∈ (𝑃 ∖ 𝐷) ∧ 𝑏 ∈ (𝑃 ∖ 𝐷)) ∧ ∃𝑡 ∈ 𝐷 𝑡 ∈ (𝑎𝐼𝑏))}    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → ¬ 𝐴 ∈ 𝐷)    ⇒   ⊢ (𝜑 → ∃𝑐 ∈ 𝑃 𝐴𝑂𝑐)
Theorem	hpgid 28834*	The half-plane relation is reflexive. Theorem 9.11 of [Schwabhauser] p. 72. (Contributed by Thierry Arnoux, 4-Mar-2020.)
⊢ 𝑃 = (Base‘𝐺)    &   ⊢ 𝐼 = (Itv‘𝐺)    &   ⊢ 𝐿 = (LineG‘𝐺)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐺 ∈ TarskiG)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐷 ∈ ran 𝐿)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐴 ∈ 𝑃)    &   ⊢ 𝑂 = {⟨𝑎, 𝑏⟩ ∣ ((𝑎 ∈ (𝑃 ∖ 𝐷) ∧ 𝑏 ∈ (𝑃 ∖ 𝐷)) ∧ ∃𝑡 ∈ 𝐷 𝑡 ∈ (𝑎𝐼𝑏))}    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → ¬ 𝐴 ∈ 𝐷)    ⇒   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐴((hpG‘𝐺)‘𝐷)𝐴)
Theorem	hpgcom 28835*	The half-plane relation commutes. Theorem 9.12 of [Schwabhauser] p. 72. (Contributed by Thierry Arnoux, 4-Mar-2020.)
⊢ 𝑃 = (Base‘𝐺)    &   ⊢ 𝐼 = (Itv‘𝐺)    &   ⊢ 𝐿 = (LineG‘𝐺)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐺 ∈ TarskiG)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐷 ∈ ran 𝐿)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐴 ∈ 𝑃)    &   ⊢ 𝑂 = {⟨𝑎, 𝑏⟩ ∣ ((𝑎 ∈ (𝑃 ∖ 𝐷) ∧ 𝑏 ∈ (𝑃 ∖ 𝐷)) ∧ ∃𝑡 ∈ 𝐷 𝑡 ∈ (𝑎𝐼𝑏))}    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐵 ∈ 𝑃)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐴((hpG‘𝐺)‘𝐷)𝐵)    ⇒   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐵((hpG‘𝐺)‘𝐷)𝐴)
Theorem	hpgtr 28836*	The half-plane relation is transitive. Theorem 9.13 of [Schwabhauser] p. 72. (Contributed by Thierry Arnoux, 4-Mar-2020.)
⊢ 𝑃 = (Base‘𝐺)    &   ⊢ 𝐼 = (Itv‘𝐺)    &   ⊢ 𝐿 = (LineG‘𝐺)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐺 ∈ TarskiG)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐷 ∈ ran 𝐿)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐴 ∈ 𝑃)    &   ⊢ 𝑂 = {⟨𝑎, 𝑏⟩ ∣ ((𝑎 ∈ (𝑃 ∖ 𝐷) ∧ 𝑏 ∈ (𝑃 ∖ 𝐷)) ∧ ∃𝑡 ∈ 𝐷 𝑡 ∈ (𝑎𝐼𝑏))}    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐵 ∈ 𝑃)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐴((hpG‘𝐺)‘𝐷)𝐵)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐶 ∈ 𝑃)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐵((hpG‘𝐺)‘𝐷)𝐶)    ⇒   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐴((hpG‘𝐺)‘𝐷)𝐶)
Theorem	colopp 28837*	Opposite sides of a line for colinear points. Theorem 9.18 of [Schwabhauser] p. 73. (Contributed by Thierry Arnoux, 3-Aug-2020.)
⊢ 𝑃 = (Base‘𝐺)    &   ⊢ 𝐼 = (Itv‘𝐺)    &   ⊢ 𝐿 = (LineG‘𝐺)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐺 ∈ TarskiG)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐷 ∈ ran 𝐿)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐴 ∈ 𝑃)    &   ⊢ 𝑂 = {⟨𝑎, 𝑏⟩ ∣ ((𝑎 ∈ (𝑃 ∖ 𝐷) ∧ 𝑏 ∈ (𝑃 ∖ 𝐷)) ∧ ∃𝑡 ∈ 𝐷 𝑡 ∈ (𝑎𝐼𝑏))}    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐵 ∈ 𝑃)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐶 ∈ 𝐷)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → (𝐶 ∈ (𝐴𝐿𝐵) ∨ 𝐴 = 𝐵))    ⇒   ⊢ (𝜑 → (𝐴𝑂𝐵 ↔ (𝐶 ∈ (𝐴𝐼𝐵) ∧ ¬ 𝐴 ∈ 𝐷 ∧ ¬ 𝐵 ∈ 𝐷)))
Theorem	colhp 28838*	Half-plane relation for colinear points. Theorem 9.19 of [Schwabhauser] p. 73. (Contributed by Thierry Arnoux, 3-Aug-2020.)
⊢ 𝑃 = (Base‘𝐺)    &   ⊢ 𝐼 = (Itv‘𝐺)    &   ⊢ 𝐿 = (LineG‘𝐺)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐺 ∈ TarskiG)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐷 ∈ ran 𝐿)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐴 ∈ 𝑃)    &   ⊢ 𝑂 = {⟨𝑎, 𝑏⟩ ∣ ((𝑎 ∈ (𝑃 ∖ 𝐷) ∧ 𝑏 ∈ (𝑃 ∖ 𝐷)) ∧ ∃𝑡 ∈ 𝐷 𝑡 ∈ (𝑎𝐼𝑏))}    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐵 ∈ 𝑃)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐶 ∈ 𝐷)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → (𝐶 ∈ (𝐴𝐿𝐵) ∨ 𝐴 = 𝐵))    &   ⊢ 𝐾 = (hlG‘𝐺)    ⇒   ⊢ (𝜑 → (𝐴((hpG‘𝐺)‘𝐷)𝐵 ↔ (𝐴(𝐾‘𝐶)𝐵 ∧ ¬ 𝐴 ∈ 𝐷)))
Theorem	hphl 28839*	If two points are on the same half-line with endpoint on a line, they are on the same half-plane defined by this line. (Contributed by Thierry Arnoux, 9-Aug-2020.)
⊢ 𝑃 = (Base‘𝐺)    &   ⊢ 𝐼 = (Itv‘𝐺)    &   ⊢ 𝐿 = (LineG‘𝐺)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐺 ∈ TarskiG)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐷 ∈ ran 𝐿)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐴 ∈ 𝑃)    &   ⊢ 𝑂 = {⟨𝑎, 𝑏⟩ ∣ ((𝑎 ∈ (𝑃 ∖ 𝐷) ∧ 𝑏 ∈ (𝑃 ∖ 𝐷)) ∧ ∃𝑡 ∈ 𝐷 𝑡 ∈ (𝑎𝐼𝑏))}    &   ⊢ 𝐾 = (hlG‘𝐺)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐴 ∈ 𝐷)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐵 ∈ 𝑃)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐶 ∈ 𝑃)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → ¬ 𝐵 ∈ 𝐷)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐵(𝐾‘𝐴)𝐶)    ⇒   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐵((hpG‘𝐺)‘𝐷)𝐶)
16.2.15  Midpoints and Line Mirroring
Syntax	cmid 28840	Declare the constant for the midpoint operation.
class midG
Syntax	clmi 28841	Declare the constant for the line mirroring function.
class lInvG
Definition	df-mid 28842*	Define the midpoint operation. Definition 10.1 of [Schwabhauser] p. 88. See ismidb 28846, midbtwn 28847, and midcgr 28848. (Contributed by Thierry Arnoux, 9-Jun-2019.)
⊢ midG = (𝑔 ∈ V ↦ (𝑎 ∈ (Base‘𝑔), 𝑏 ∈ (Base‘𝑔) ↦ (℩𝑚 ∈ (Base‘𝑔)𝑏 = (((pInvG‘𝑔)‘𝑚)‘𝑎))))
Definition	df-lmi 28843*	Define the line mirroring function. Definition 10.3 of [Schwabhauser] p. 89. See islmib 28855. (Contributed by Thierry Arnoux, 1-Dec-2019.)
⊢ lInvG = (𝑔 ∈ V ↦ (𝑚 ∈ ran (LineG‘𝑔) ↦ (𝑎 ∈ (Base‘𝑔) ↦ (℩𝑏 ∈ (Base‘𝑔)((𝑎(midG‘𝑔)𝑏) ∈ 𝑚 ∧ (𝑚(⟂G‘𝑔)(𝑎(LineG‘𝑔)𝑏) ∨ 𝑎 = 𝑏))))))
Theorem	midf 28844	Midpoint as a function. (Contributed by Thierry Arnoux, 1-Dec-2019.)
⊢ 𝑃 = (Base‘𝐺)    &   ⊢ − = (dist‘𝐺)    &   ⊢ 𝐼 = (Itv‘𝐺)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐺 ∈ TarskiG)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐺DimTarskiG≥2)    ⇒   ⊢ (𝜑 → (midG‘𝐺):(𝑃 × 𝑃)⟶𝑃)
Theorem	midcl 28845	Closure of the midpoint. (Contributed by Thierry Arnoux, 1-Dec-2019.)
⊢ 𝑃 = (Base‘𝐺)    &   ⊢ − = (dist‘𝐺)    &   ⊢ 𝐼 = (Itv‘𝐺)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐺 ∈ TarskiG)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐺DimTarskiG≥2)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐴 ∈ 𝑃)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐵 ∈ 𝑃)    ⇒   ⊢ (𝜑 → (𝐴(midG‘𝐺)𝐵) ∈ 𝑃)
Theorem	ismidb 28846	Property of the midpoint. (Contributed by Thierry Arnoux, 1-Dec-2019.)
⊢ 𝑃 = (Base‘𝐺)    &   ⊢ − = (dist‘𝐺)    &   ⊢ 𝐼 = (Itv‘𝐺)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐺 ∈ TarskiG)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐺DimTarskiG≥2)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐴 ∈ 𝑃)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐵 ∈ 𝑃)    &   ⊢ 𝑆 = (pInvG‘𝐺)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝑀 ∈ 𝑃)    ⇒   ⊢ (𝜑 → (𝐵 = ((𝑆‘𝑀)‘𝐴) ↔ (𝐴(midG‘𝐺)𝐵) = 𝑀))
Theorem	midbtwn 28847	Betweenness of midpoint. (Contributed by Thierry Arnoux, 7-Dec-2019.)
⊢ 𝑃 = (Base‘𝐺)    &   ⊢ − = (dist‘𝐺)    &   ⊢ 𝐼 = (Itv‘𝐺)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐺 ∈ TarskiG)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐺DimTarskiG≥2)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐴 ∈ 𝑃)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐵 ∈ 𝑃)    ⇒   ⊢ (𝜑 → (𝐴(midG‘𝐺)𝐵) ∈ (𝐴𝐼𝐵))
Theorem	midcgr 28848	Congruence of midpoint. (Contributed by Thierry Arnoux, 7-Dec-2019.)
⊢ 𝑃 = (Base‘𝐺)    &   ⊢ − = (dist‘𝐺)    &   ⊢ 𝐼 = (Itv‘𝐺)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐺 ∈ TarskiG)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐺DimTarskiG≥2)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐴 ∈ 𝑃)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐵 ∈ 𝑃)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → (𝐴(midG‘𝐺)𝐵) = 𝐶)    ⇒   ⊢ (𝜑 → (𝐶 − 𝐴) = (𝐶 − 𝐵))
Theorem	midid 28849	Midpoint of a null segment. (Contributed by Thierry Arnoux, 7-Dec-2019.)
⊢ 𝑃 = (Base‘𝐺)    &   ⊢ − = (dist‘𝐺)    &   ⊢ 𝐼 = (Itv‘𝐺)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐺 ∈ TarskiG)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐺DimTarskiG≥2)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐴 ∈ 𝑃)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐵 ∈ 𝑃)    ⇒   ⊢ (𝜑 → (𝐴(midG‘𝐺)𝐴) = 𝐴)
Theorem	midcom 28850	Commutativity rule for the midpoint. (Contributed by Thierry Arnoux, 2-Dec-2019.)
⊢ 𝑃 = (Base‘𝐺)    &   ⊢ − = (dist‘𝐺)    &   ⊢ 𝐼 = (Itv‘𝐺)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐺 ∈ TarskiG)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐺DimTarskiG≥2)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐴 ∈ 𝑃)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐵 ∈ 𝑃)    ⇒   ⊢ (𝜑 → (𝐴(midG‘𝐺)𝐵) = (𝐵(midG‘𝐺)𝐴))
Theorem	mirmid 28851	Point inversion preserves midpoints. (Contributed by Thierry Arnoux, 12-Dec-2019.)
⊢ 𝑃 = (Base‘𝐺)    &   ⊢ − = (dist‘𝐺)    &   ⊢ 𝐼 = (Itv‘𝐺)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐺 ∈ TarskiG)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐺DimTarskiG≥2)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐴 ∈ 𝑃)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐵 ∈ 𝑃)    &   ⊢ 𝑆 = ((pInvG‘𝐺)‘𝑀)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝑀 ∈ 𝑃)    ⇒   ⊢ (𝜑 → ((𝑆‘𝐴)(midG‘𝐺)(𝑆‘𝐵)) = (𝑆‘(𝐴(midG‘𝐺)𝐵)))
Theorem	lmieu 28852*	Uniqueness of the line mirror point. Theorem 10.2 of [Schwabhauser] p. 88. (Contributed by Thierry Arnoux, 1-Dec-2019.)
⊢ 𝑃 = (Base‘𝐺)    &   ⊢ − = (dist‘𝐺)    &   ⊢ 𝐼 = (Itv‘𝐺)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐺 ∈ TarskiG)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐺DimTarskiG≥2)    &   ⊢ 𝐿 = (LineG‘𝐺)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐷 ∈ ran 𝐿)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐴 ∈ 𝑃)    ⇒   ⊢ (𝜑 → ∃!𝑏 ∈ 𝑃 ((𝐴(midG‘𝐺)𝑏) ∈ 𝐷 ∧ (𝐷(⟂G‘𝐺)(𝐴𝐿𝑏) ∨ 𝐴 = 𝑏)))
Theorem	lmif 28853	Line mirror as a function. (Contributed by Thierry Arnoux, 11-Dec-2019.)
⊢ 𝑃 = (Base‘𝐺)    &   ⊢ − = (dist‘𝐺)    &   ⊢ 𝐼 = (Itv‘𝐺)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐺 ∈ TarskiG)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐺DimTarskiG≥2)    &   ⊢ 𝑀 = ((lInvG‘𝐺)‘𝐷)    &   ⊢ 𝐿 = (LineG‘𝐺)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐷 ∈ ran 𝐿)    ⇒   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝑀:𝑃⟶𝑃)
Theorem	lmicl 28854	Closure of the line mirror. (Contributed by Thierry Arnoux, 11-Dec-2019.)
⊢ 𝑃 = (Base‘𝐺)    &   ⊢ − = (dist‘𝐺)    &   ⊢ 𝐼 = (Itv‘𝐺)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐺 ∈ TarskiG)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐺DimTarskiG≥2)    &   ⊢ 𝑀 = ((lInvG‘𝐺)‘𝐷)    &   ⊢ 𝐿 = (LineG‘𝐺)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐷 ∈ ran 𝐿)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐴 ∈ 𝑃)    ⇒   ⊢ (𝜑 → (𝑀‘𝐴) ∈ 𝑃)
Theorem	islmib 28855	Property of the line mirror. (Contributed by Thierry Arnoux, 11-Dec-2019.)
⊢ 𝑃 = (Base‘𝐺)    &   ⊢ − = (dist‘𝐺)    &   ⊢ 𝐼 = (Itv‘𝐺)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐺 ∈ TarskiG)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐺DimTarskiG≥2)    &   ⊢ 𝑀 = ((lInvG‘𝐺)‘𝐷)    &   ⊢ 𝐿 = (LineG‘𝐺)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐷 ∈ ran 𝐿)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐴 ∈ 𝑃)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐵 ∈ 𝑃)    ⇒   ⊢ (𝜑 → (𝐵 = (𝑀‘𝐴) ↔ ((𝐴(midG‘𝐺)𝐵) ∈ 𝐷 ∧ (𝐷(⟂G‘𝐺)(𝐴𝐿𝐵) ∨ 𝐴 = 𝐵))))
Theorem	lmicom 28856	The line mirroring function is an involution. Theorem 10.4 of [Schwabhauser] p. 89. (Contributed by Thierry Arnoux, 11-Dec-2019.)
⊢ 𝑃 = (Base‘𝐺)    &   ⊢ − = (dist‘𝐺)    &   ⊢ 𝐼 = (Itv‘𝐺)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐺 ∈ TarskiG)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐺DimTarskiG≥2)    &   ⊢ 𝑀 = ((lInvG‘𝐺)‘𝐷)    &   ⊢ 𝐿 = (LineG‘𝐺)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐷 ∈ ran 𝐿)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐴 ∈ 𝑃)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐵 ∈ 𝑃)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → (𝑀‘𝐴) = 𝐵)    ⇒   ⊢ (𝜑 → (𝑀‘𝐵) = 𝐴)
Theorem	lmilmi 28857	Line mirroring is an involution. Theorem 10.5 of [Schwabhauser] p. 89. (Contributed by Thierry Arnoux, 11-Dec-2019.)
⊢ 𝑃 = (Base‘𝐺)    &   ⊢ − = (dist‘𝐺)    &   ⊢ 𝐼 = (Itv‘𝐺)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐺 ∈ TarskiG)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐺DimTarskiG≥2)    &   ⊢ 𝑀 = ((lInvG‘𝐺)‘𝐷)    &   ⊢ 𝐿 = (LineG‘𝐺)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐷 ∈ ran 𝐿)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐴 ∈ 𝑃)    ⇒   ⊢ (𝜑 → (𝑀‘(𝑀‘𝐴)) = 𝐴)
Theorem	lmireu 28858*	Any point has a unique antecedent through line mirroring. Theorem 10.6 of [Schwabhauser] p. 89. (Contributed by Thierry Arnoux, 11-Dec-2019.)
⊢ 𝑃 = (Base‘𝐺)    &   ⊢ − = (dist‘𝐺)    &   ⊢ 𝐼 = (Itv‘𝐺)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐺 ∈ TarskiG)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐺DimTarskiG≥2)    &   ⊢ 𝑀 = ((lInvG‘𝐺)‘𝐷)    &   ⊢ 𝐿 = (LineG‘𝐺)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐷 ∈ ran 𝐿)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐴 ∈ 𝑃)    ⇒   ⊢ (𝜑 → ∃!𝑏 ∈ 𝑃 (𝑀‘𝑏) = 𝐴)
Theorem	lmieq 28859	Equality deduction for line mirroring. Theorem 10.7 of [Schwabhauser] p. 89. (Contributed by Thierry Arnoux, 11-Dec-2019.)
⊢ 𝑃 = (Base‘𝐺)    &   ⊢ − = (dist‘𝐺)    &   ⊢ 𝐼 = (Itv‘𝐺)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐺 ∈ TarskiG)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐺DimTarskiG≥2)    &   ⊢ 𝑀 = ((lInvG‘𝐺)‘𝐷)    &   ⊢ 𝐿 = (LineG‘𝐺)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐷 ∈ ran 𝐿)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐴 ∈ 𝑃)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐵 ∈ 𝑃)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → (𝑀‘𝐴) = (𝑀‘𝐵))    ⇒   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐴 = 𝐵)
Theorem	lmiinv 28860	The invariants of the line mirroring lie on the mirror line. Theorem 10.8 of [Schwabhauser] p. 89. (Contributed by Thierry Arnoux, 11-Dec-2019.)
⊢ 𝑃 = (Base‘𝐺)    &   ⊢ − = (dist‘𝐺)    &   ⊢ 𝐼 = (Itv‘𝐺)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐺 ∈ TarskiG)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐺DimTarskiG≥2)    &   ⊢ 𝑀 = ((lInvG‘𝐺)‘𝐷)    &   ⊢ 𝐿 = (LineG‘𝐺)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐷 ∈ ran 𝐿)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐴 ∈ 𝑃)    ⇒   ⊢ (𝜑 → ((𝑀‘𝐴) = 𝐴 ↔ 𝐴 ∈ 𝐷))
Theorem	lmicinv 28861	The mirroring line is an invariant. (Contributed by Thierry Arnoux, 8-Aug-2020.)
⊢ 𝑃 = (Base‘𝐺)    &   ⊢ − = (dist‘𝐺)    &   ⊢ 𝐼 = (Itv‘𝐺)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐺 ∈ TarskiG)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐺DimTarskiG≥2)    &   ⊢ 𝑀 = ((lInvG‘𝐺)‘𝐷)    &   ⊢ 𝐿 = (LineG‘𝐺)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐷 ∈ ran 𝐿)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐴 ∈ 𝑃)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐴 ∈ 𝐷)    ⇒   ⊢ (𝜑 → (𝑀‘𝐴) = 𝐴)
Theorem	lmimid 28862	If we have a right angle, then the mirror point is the point inversion. (Contributed by Thierry Arnoux, 15-Dec-2019.)
⊢ 𝑃 = (Base‘𝐺)    &   ⊢ − = (dist‘𝐺)    &   ⊢ 𝐼 = (Itv‘𝐺)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐺 ∈ TarskiG)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐺DimTarskiG≥2)    &   ⊢ 𝑀 = ((lInvG‘𝐺)‘𝐷)    &   ⊢ 𝐿 = (LineG‘𝐺)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐷 ∈ ran 𝐿)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐴 ∈ 𝑃)    &   ⊢ 𝑆 = ((pInvG‘𝐺)‘𝐵)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → ⟨“𝐴𝐵𝐶”⟩ ∈ (∟G‘𝐺))    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐴 ∈ 𝐷)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐵 ∈ 𝐷)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐶 ∈ 𝑃)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐴 ≠ 𝐵)    ⇒   ⊢ (𝜑 → (𝑀‘𝐶) = (𝑆‘𝐶))
Theorem	lmif1o 28863	The line mirroring function 𝑀 is a bijection. Theorem 10.9 of [Schwabhauser] p. 89. (Contributed by Thierry Arnoux, 11-Dec-2019.)
⊢ 𝑃 = (Base‘𝐺)    &   ⊢ − = (dist‘𝐺)    &   ⊢ 𝐼 = (Itv‘𝐺)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐺 ∈ TarskiG)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐺DimTarskiG≥2)    &   ⊢ 𝑀 = ((lInvG‘𝐺)‘𝐷)    &   ⊢ 𝐿 = (LineG‘𝐺)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐷 ∈ ran 𝐿)    ⇒   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝑀:𝑃–1-1-onto→𝑃)
Theorem	lmiisolem 28864	Lemma for lmiiso 28865. (Contributed by Thierry Arnoux, 14-Dec-2019.)
⊢ 𝑃 = (Base‘𝐺)    &   ⊢ − = (dist‘𝐺)    &   ⊢ 𝐼 = (Itv‘𝐺)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐺 ∈ TarskiG)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐺DimTarskiG≥2)    &   ⊢ 𝑀 = ((lInvG‘𝐺)‘𝐷)    &   ⊢ 𝐿 = (LineG‘𝐺)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐷 ∈ ran 𝐿)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐴 ∈ 𝑃)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐵 ∈ 𝑃)    &   ⊢ 𝑆 = ((pInvG‘𝐺)‘𝑍)    &   ⊢ 𝑍 = ((𝐴(midG‘𝐺)(𝑀‘𝐴))(midG‘𝐺)(𝐵(midG‘𝐺)(𝑀‘𝐵)))    ⇒   ⊢ (𝜑 → ((𝑀‘𝐴) − (𝑀‘𝐵)) = (𝐴 − 𝐵))
Theorem	lmiiso 28865	The line mirroring function is an isometry, i.e. it is conserves congruence. Because it is also a bijection, it is also a motion. Theorem 10.10 of [Schwabhauser] p. 89. (Contributed by Thierry Arnoux, 11-Dec-2019.)
⊢ 𝑃 = (Base‘𝐺)    &   ⊢ − = (dist‘𝐺)    &   ⊢ 𝐼 = (Itv‘𝐺)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐺 ∈ TarskiG)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐺DimTarskiG≥2)    &   ⊢ 𝑀 = ((lInvG‘𝐺)‘𝐷)    &   ⊢ 𝐿 = (LineG‘𝐺)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐷 ∈ ran 𝐿)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐴 ∈ 𝑃)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐵 ∈ 𝑃)    ⇒   ⊢ (𝜑 → ((𝑀‘𝐴) − (𝑀‘𝐵)) = (𝐴 − 𝐵))
Theorem	lmimot 28866	Line mirroring is a motion of the geometric space. Theorem 10.11 of [Schwabhauser] p. 90. (Contributed by Thierry Arnoux, 15-Dec-2019.)
⊢ 𝑃 = (Base‘𝐺)    &   ⊢ − = (dist‘𝐺)    &   ⊢ 𝐼 = (Itv‘𝐺)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐺 ∈ TarskiG)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐺DimTarskiG≥2)    &   ⊢ 𝑀 = ((lInvG‘𝐺)‘𝐷)    &   ⊢ 𝐿 = (LineG‘𝐺)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐷 ∈ ran 𝐿)    ⇒   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝑀 ∈ (𝐺Ismt𝐺))
Theorem	hypcgrlem1 28867	Lemma for hypcgr 28869, case where triangles share a cathetus. (Contributed by Thierry Arnoux, 15-Dec-2019.)
⊢ 𝑃 = (Base‘𝐺)    &   ⊢ − = (dist‘𝐺)    &   ⊢ 𝐼 = (Itv‘𝐺)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐺 ∈ TarskiG)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐺DimTarskiG≥2)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐴 ∈ 𝑃)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐵 ∈ 𝑃)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐶 ∈ 𝑃)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐷 ∈ 𝑃)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐸 ∈ 𝑃)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐹 ∈ 𝑃)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → ⟨“𝐴𝐵𝐶”⟩ ∈ (∟G‘𝐺))    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → ⟨“𝐷𝐸𝐹”⟩ ∈ (∟G‘𝐺))    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → (𝐴 − 𝐵) = (𝐷 − 𝐸))    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → (𝐵 − 𝐶) = (𝐸 − 𝐹))    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐵 = 𝐸)    &   ⊢ 𝑆 = ((lInvG‘𝐺)‘((𝐴(midG‘𝐺)𝐷)(LineG‘𝐺)𝐵))    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐶 = 𝐹)    ⇒   ⊢ (𝜑 → (𝐴 − 𝐶) = (𝐷 − 𝐹))
Theorem	hypcgrlem2 28868	Lemma for hypcgr 28869, case where triangles share one vertex 𝐵. (Contributed by Thierry Arnoux, 16-Dec-2019.)
⊢ 𝑃 = (Base‘𝐺)    &   ⊢ − = (dist‘𝐺)    &   ⊢ 𝐼 = (Itv‘𝐺)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐺 ∈ TarskiG)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐺DimTarskiG≥2)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐴 ∈ 𝑃)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐵 ∈ 𝑃)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐶 ∈ 𝑃)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐷 ∈ 𝑃)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐸 ∈ 𝑃)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐹 ∈ 𝑃)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → ⟨“𝐴𝐵𝐶”⟩ ∈ (∟G‘𝐺))    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → ⟨“𝐷𝐸𝐹”⟩ ∈ (∟G‘𝐺))    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → (𝐴 − 𝐵) = (𝐷 − 𝐸))    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → (𝐵 − 𝐶) = (𝐸 − 𝐹))    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐵 = 𝐸)    &   ⊢ 𝑆 = ((lInvG‘𝐺)‘((𝐶(midG‘𝐺)𝐹)(LineG‘𝐺)𝐵))    ⇒   ⊢ (𝜑 → (𝐴 − 𝐶) = (𝐷 − 𝐹))
Theorem	hypcgr 28869	If the catheti of two right-angled triangles are congruent, so is their hypothenuse. Theorem 10.12 of [Schwabhauser] p. 91. (Contributed by Thierry Arnoux, 16-Dec-2019.)
⊢ 𝑃 = (Base‘𝐺)    &   ⊢ − = (dist‘𝐺)    &   ⊢ 𝐼 = (Itv‘𝐺)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐺 ∈ TarskiG)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐺DimTarskiG≥2)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐴 ∈ 𝑃)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐵 ∈ 𝑃)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐶 ∈ 𝑃)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐷 ∈ 𝑃)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐸 ∈ 𝑃)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐹 ∈ 𝑃)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → ⟨“𝐴𝐵𝐶”⟩ ∈ (∟G‘𝐺))    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → ⟨“𝐷𝐸𝐹”⟩ ∈ (∟G‘𝐺))    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → (𝐴 − 𝐵) = (𝐷 − 𝐸))    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → (𝐵 − 𝐶) = (𝐸 − 𝐹))    ⇒   ⊢ (𝜑 → (𝐴 − 𝐶) = (𝐷 − 𝐹))
Theorem	lmiopp 28870*	Line mirroring produces points on the opposite side of the mirroring line. Theorem 10.14 of [Schwabhauser] p. 92. (Contributed by Thierry Arnoux, 2-Aug-2020.)
⊢ 𝑃 = (Base‘𝐺)    &   ⊢ − = (dist‘𝐺)    &   ⊢ 𝐼 = (Itv‘𝐺)    &   ⊢ 𝐿 = (LineG‘𝐺)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐺 ∈ TarskiG)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐺DimTarskiG≥2)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐷 ∈ ran 𝐿)    &   ⊢ 𝑂 = {⟨𝑎, 𝑏⟩ ∣ ((𝑎 ∈ (𝑃 ∖ 𝐷) ∧ 𝑏 ∈ (𝑃 ∖ 𝐷)) ∧ ∃𝑡 ∈ 𝐷 𝑡 ∈ (𝑎𝐼𝑏))}    &   ⊢ 𝑀 = ((lInvG‘𝐺)‘𝐷)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐴 ∈ 𝑃)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → ¬ 𝐴 ∈ 𝐷)    ⇒   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐴𝑂(𝑀‘𝐴))
Theorem	lnperpex 28871*	Existence of a perpendicular to a line 𝐿 at a given point 𝐴. Theorem 10.15 of [Schwabhauser] p. 92. (Contributed by Thierry Arnoux, 2-Aug-2020.)
⊢ 𝑃 = (Base‘𝐺)    &   ⊢ − = (dist‘𝐺)    &   ⊢ 𝐼 = (Itv‘𝐺)    &   ⊢ 𝐿 = (LineG‘𝐺)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐺 ∈ TarskiG)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐺DimTarskiG≥2)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐷 ∈ ran 𝐿)    &   ⊢ 𝑂 = {⟨𝑎, 𝑏⟩ ∣ ((𝑎 ∈ (𝑃 ∖ 𝐷) ∧ 𝑏 ∈ (𝑃 ∖ 𝐷)) ∧ ∃𝑡 ∈ 𝐷 𝑡 ∈ (𝑎𝐼𝑏))}    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐴 ∈ 𝐷)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝑄 ∈ 𝑃)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → ¬ 𝑄 ∈ 𝐷)    ⇒   ⊢ (𝜑 → ∃𝑝 ∈ 𝑃 (𝐷(⟂G‘𝐺)(𝑝𝐿𝐴) ∧ 𝑝((hpG‘𝐺)‘𝐷)𝑄))
Theorem	trgcopy 28872*	Triangle construction: a copy of a given triangle can always be constructed in such a way that one side is lying on a half-line, and the third vertex is on a given half-plane: existence part. First part of Theorem 10.16 of [Schwabhauser] p. 92. (Contributed by Thierry Arnoux, 4-Aug-2020.)
⊢ 𝑃 = (Base‘𝐺)    &   ⊢ − = (dist‘𝐺)    &   ⊢ 𝐼 = (Itv‘𝐺)    &   ⊢ 𝐿 = (LineG‘𝐺)    &   ⊢ 𝐾 = (hlG‘𝐺)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐺 ∈ TarskiG)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐴 ∈ 𝑃)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐵 ∈ 𝑃)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐶 ∈ 𝑃)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐷 ∈ 𝑃)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐸 ∈ 𝑃)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐹 ∈ 𝑃)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → ¬ (𝐴 ∈ (𝐵𝐿𝐶) ∨ 𝐵 = 𝐶))    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → ¬ (𝐷 ∈ (𝐸𝐿𝐹) ∨ 𝐸 = 𝐹))    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → (𝐴 − 𝐵) = (𝐷 − 𝐸))    ⇒   ⊢ (𝜑 → ∃𝑓 ∈ 𝑃 (⟨“𝐴𝐵𝐶”⟩(cgrG‘𝐺)⟨“𝐷𝐸𝑓”⟩ ∧ 𝑓((hpG‘𝐺)‘(𝐷𝐿𝐸))𝐹))
Theorem	trgcopyeulem 28873*	Lemma for trgcopyeu 28874. (Contributed by Thierry Arnoux, 8-Aug-2020.)
⊢ 𝑃 = (Base‘𝐺)    &   ⊢ − = (dist‘𝐺)    &   ⊢ 𝐼 = (Itv‘𝐺)    &   ⊢ 𝐿 = (LineG‘𝐺)    &   ⊢ 𝐾 = (hlG‘𝐺)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐺 ∈ TarskiG)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐴 ∈ 𝑃)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐵 ∈ 𝑃)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐶 ∈ 𝑃)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐷 ∈ 𝑃)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐸 ∈ 𝑃)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐹 ∈ 𝑃)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → ¬ (𝐴 ∈ (𝐵𝐿𝐶) ∨ 𝐵 = 𝐶))    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → ¬ (𝐷 ∈ (𝐸𝐿𝐹) ∨ 𝐸 = 𝐹))    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → (𝐴 − 𝐵) = (𝐷 − 𝐸))    &   ⊢ 𝑂 = {⟨𝑎, 𝑏⟩ ∣ ((𝑎 ∈ (𝑃 ∖ (𝐷𝐿𝐸)) ∧ 𝑏 ∈ (𝑃 ∖ (𝐷𝐿𝐸))) ∧ ∃𝑡 ∈ (𝐷𝐿𝐸)𝑡 ∈ (𝑎𝐼𝑏))}    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝑋 ∈ 𝑃)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝑌 ∈ 𝑃)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → ⟨“𝐴𝐵𝐶”⟩(cgrG‘𝐺)⟨“𝐷𝐸𝑋”⟩)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → ⟨“𝐴𝐵𝐶”⟩(cgrG‘𝐺)⟨“𝐷𝐸𝑌”⟩)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝑋((hpG‘𝐺)‘(𝐷𝐿𝐸))𝐹)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝑌((hpG‘𝐺)‘(𝐷𝐿𝐸))𝐹)    ⇒   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝑋 = 𝑌)
Theorem	trgcopyeu 28874*	Triangle construction: a copy of a given triangle can always be constructed in such a way that one side is lying on a half-line, and the third vertex is on a given half-plane: uniqueness part. Second part of Theorem 10.16 of [Schwabhauser] p. 92. (Contributed by Thierry Arnoux, 8-Aug-2020.)
⊢ 𝑃 = (Base‘𝐺)    &   ⊢ − = (dist‘𝐺)    &   ⊢ 𝐼 = (Itv‘𝐺)    &   ⊢ 𝐿 = (LineG‘𝐺)    &   ⊢ 𝐾 = (hlG‘𝐺)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐺 ∈ TarskiG)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐴 ∈ 𝑃)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐵 ∈ 𝑃)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐶 ∈ 𝑃)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐷 ∈ 𝑃)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐸 ∈ 𝑃)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐹 ∈ 𝑃)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → ¬ (𝐴 ∈ (𝐵𝐿𝐶) ∨ 𝐵 = 𝐶))    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → ¬ (𝐷 ∈ (𝐸𝐿𝐹) ∨ 𝐸 = 𝐹))    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → (𝐴 − 𝐵) = (𝐷 − 𝐸))    ⇒   ⊢ (𝜑 → ∃!𝑓 ∈ 𝑃 (⟨“𝐴𝐵𝐶”⟩(cgrG‘𝐺)⟨“𝐷𝐸𝑓”⟩ ∧ 𝑓((hpG‘𝐺)‘(𝐷𝐿𝐸))𝐹))
16.2.16  Congruence of angles
Syntax	ccgra 28875	Declare the constant for the congruence between angles relation.
class cgrA
Definition	df-cgra 28876*	Define the congruence relation between angles. As for triangles we use "words of points". See iscgra 28877 for a more human readable version. (Contributed by Thierry Arnoux, 30-Jul-2020.)
⊢ cgrA = (𝑔 ∈ V ↦ {⟨𝑎, 𝑏⟩ ∣ [(Base‘𝑔) / 𝑝][(hlG‘𝑔) / 𝑘]((𝑎 ∈ (𝑝 ↑m (0..^3)) ∧ 𝑏 ∈ (𝑝 ↑m (0..^3))) ∧ ∃𝑥 ∈ 𝑝 ∃𝑦 ∈ 𝑝 (𝑎(cgrG‘𝑔)⟨“𝑥(𝑏‘1)𝑦”⟩ ∧ 𝑥(𝑘‘(𝑏‘1))(𝑏‘0) ∧ 𝑦(𝑘‘(𝑏‘1))(𝑏‘2)))})
Theorem	iscgra 28877*	Property for two angles ABC and DEF to be congruent. This is a modified version of the definition 11.3 of [Schwabhauser] p. 95. where the number of constructed points has been reduced to two. We chose this version rather than the textbook version because it is shorter and therefore simpler to work with. Theorem dfcgra2 28898 shows that those definitions are indeed equivalent. (Contributed by Thierry Arnoux, 31-Jul-2020.)
⊢ 𝑃 = (Base‘𝐺)    &   ⊢ 𝐼 = (Itv‘𝐺)    &   ⊢ 𝐾 = (hlG‘𝐺)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐺 ∈ TarskiG)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐴 ∈ 𝑃)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐵 ∈ 𝑃)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐶 ∈ 𝑃)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐷 ∈ 𝑃)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐸 ∈ 𝑃)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐹 ∈ 𝑃)    ⇒   ⊢ (𝜑 → (⟨“𝐴𝐵𝐶”⟩(cgrA‘𝐺)⟨“𝐷𝐸𝐹”⟩ ↔ ∃𝑥 ∈ 𝑃 ∃𝑦 ∈ 𝑃 (⟨“𝐴𝐵𝐶”⟩(cgrG‘𝐺)⟨“𝑥𝐸𝑦”⟩ ∧ 𝑥(𝐾‘𝐸)𝐷 ∧ 𝑦(𝐾‘𝐸)𝐹)))
Theorem	iscgra1 28878*	A special version of iscgra 28877 where one distance is known to be equal. In this case, angle congruence can be written with only one quantifier. (Contributed by Thierry Arnoux, 9-Aug-2020.)
⊢ 𝑃 = (Base‘𝐺)    &   ⊢ 𝐼 = (Itv‘𝐺)    &   ⊢ 𝐾 = (hlG‘𝐺)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐺 ∈ TarskiG)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐴 ∈ 𝑃)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐵 ∈ 𝑃)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐶 ∈ 𝑃)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐷 ∈ 𝑃)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐸 ∈ 𝑃)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐹 ∈ 𝑃)    &   ⊢ − = (dist‘𝐺)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐴 ≠ 𝐵)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → (𝐴 − 𝐵) = (𝐷 − 𝐸))    ⇒   ⊢ (𝜑 → (⟨“𝐴𝐵𝐶”⟩(cgrA‘𝐺)⟨“𝐷𝐸𝐹”⟩ ↔ ∃𝑥 ∈ 𝑃 (⟨“𝐴𝐵𝐶”⟩(cgrG‘𝐺)⟨“𝐷𝐸𝑥”⟩ ∧ 𝑥(𝐾‘𝐸)𝐹)))
Theorem	iscgrad 28879	Sufficient conditions for angle congruence, deduction version. (Contributed by Thierry Arnoux, 1-Aug-2020.)
⊢ 𝑃 = (Base‘𝐺)    &   ⊢ 𝐼 = (Itv‘𝐺)    &   ⊢ 𝐾 = (hlG‘𝐺)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐺 ∈ TarskiG)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐴 ∈ 𝑃)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐵 ∈ 𝑃)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐶 ∈ 𝑃)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐷 ∈ 𝑃)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐸 ∈ 𝑃)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐹 ∈ 𝑃)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝑋 ∈ 𝑃)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝑌 ∈ 𝑃)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → ⟨“𝐴𝐵𝐶”⟩(cgrG‘𝐺)⟨“𝑋𝐸𝑌”⟩)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝑋(𝐾‘𝐸)𝐷)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝑌(𝐾‘𝐸)𝐹)    ⇒   ⊢ (𝜑 → ⟨“𝐴𝐵𝐶”⟩(cgrA‘𝐺)⟨“𝐷𝐸𝐹”⟩)
Theorem	cgrane1 28880	Angles imply inequality. (Contributed by Thierry Arnoux, 1-Aug-2020.)
⊢ 𝑃 = (Base‘𝐺)    &   ⊢ 𝐼 = (Itv‘𝐺)    &   ⊢ 𝐾 = (hlG‘𝐺)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐺 ∈ TarskiG)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐴 ∈ 𝑃)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐵 ∈ 𝑃)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐶 ∈ 𝑃)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐷 ∈ 𝑃)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐸 ∈ 𝑃)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐹 ∈ 𝑃)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → ⟨“𝐴𝐵𝐶”⟩(cgrA‘𝐺)⟨“𝐷𝐸𝐹”⟩)    ⇒   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐴 ≠ 𝐵)
Theorem	cgrane2 28881	Angles imply inequality. (Contributed by Thierry Arnoux, 1-Aug-2020.)
⊢ 𝑃 = (Base‘𝐺)    &   ⊢ 𝐼 = (Itv‘𝐺)    &   ⊢ 𝐾 = (hlG‘𝐺)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐺 ∈ TarskiG)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐴 ∈ 𝑃)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐵 ∈ 𝑃)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐶 ∈ 𝑃)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐷 ∈ 𝑃)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐸 ∈ 𝑃)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐹 ∈ 𝑃)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → ⟨“𝐴𝐵𝐶”⟩(cgrA‘𝐺)⟨“𝐷𝐸𝐹”⟩)    ⇒   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐵 ≠ 𝐶)
Theorem	cgrane3 28882	Angles imply inequality. (Contributed by Thierry Arnoux, 1-Aug-2020.)
⊢ 𝑃 = (Base‘𝐺)    &   ⊢ 𝐼 = (Itv‘𝐺)    &   ⊢ 𝐾 = (hlG‘𝐺)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐺 ∈ TarskiG)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐴 ∈ 𝑃)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐵 ∈ 𝑃)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐶 ∈ 𝑃)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐷 ∈ 𝑃)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐸 ∈ 𝑃)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐹 ∈ 𝑃)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → ⟨“𝐴𝐵𝐶”⟩(cgrA‘𝐺)⟨“𝐷𝐸𝐹”⟩)    ⇒   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐸 ≠ 𝐷)
Theorem	cgrane4 28883	Angles imply inequality. (Contributed by Thierry Arnoux, 1-Aug-2020.)
⊢ 𝑃 = (Base‘𝐺)    &   ⊢ 𝐼 = (Itv‘𝐺)    &   ⊢ 𝐾 = (hlG‘𝐺)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐺 ∈ TarskiG)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐴 ∈ 𝑃)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐵 ∈ 𝑃)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐶 ∈ 𝑃)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐷 ∈ 𝑃)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐸 ∈ 𝑃)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐹 ∈ 𝑃)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → ⟨“𝐴𝐵𝐶”⟩(cgrA‘𝐺)⟨“𝐷𝐸𝐹”⟩)    ⇒   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐸 ≠ 𝐹)
Theorem	cgrahl1 28884	Angle congruence is independent of the choice of points on the rays. Proposition 11.10 of [Schwabhauser] p. 95. (Contributed by Thierry Arnoux, 1-Aug-2020.)
⊢ 𝑃 = (Base‘𝐺)    &   ⊢ 𝐼 = (Itv‘𝐺)    &   ⊢ 𝐾 = (hlG‘𝐺)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐺 ∈ TarskiG)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐴 ∈ 𝑃)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐵 ∈ 𝑃)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐶 ∈ 𝑃)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐷 ∈ 𝑃)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐸 ∈ 𝑃)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐹 ∈ 𝑃)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → ⟨“𝐴𝐵𝐶”⟩(cgrA‘𝐺)⟨“𝐷𝐸𝐹”⟩)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝑋 ∈ 𝑃)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝑋(𝐾‘𝐸)𝐷)    ⇒   ⊢ (𝜑 → ⟨“𝐴𝐵𝐶”⟩(cgrA‘𝐺)⟨“𝑋𝐸𝐹”⟩)
Theorem	cgrahl2 28885	Angle congruence is independent of the choice of points on the rays. Proposition 11.10 of [Schwabhauser] p. 95. (Contributed by Thierry Arnoux, 1-Aug-2020.)
⊢ 𝑃 = (Base‘𝐺)    &   ⊢ 𝐼 = (Itv‘𝐺)    &   ⊢ 𝐾 = (hlG‘𝐺)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐺 ∈ TarskiG)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐴 ∈ 𝑃)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐵 ∈ 𝑃)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐶 ∈ 𝑃)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐷 ∈ 𝑃)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐸 ∈ 𝑃)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐹 ∈ 𝑃)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → ⟨“𝐴𝐵𝐶”⟩(cgrA‘𝐺)⟨“𝐷𝐸𝐹”⟩)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝑋 ∈ 𝑃)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝑋(𝐾‘𝐸)𝐹)    ⇒   ⊢ (𝜑 → ⟨“𝐴𝐵𝐶”⟩(cgrA‘𝐺)⟨“𝐷𝐸𝑋”⟩)
Theorem	cgracgr 28886	First direction of proposition 11.4 of [Schwabhauser] p. 95. Again, this is "half" of the proposition, i.e. only two additional points are used, while Schwabhauser has four. (Contributed by Thierry Arnoux, 31-Jul-2020.)
⊢ 𝑃 = (Base‘𝐺)    &   ⊢ 𝐼 = (Itv‘𝐺)    &   ⊢ 𝐾 = (hlG‘𝐺)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐺 ∈ TarskiG)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐴 ∈ 𝑃)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐵 ∈ 𝑃)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐶 ∈ 𝑃)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐷 ∈ 𝑃)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐸 ∈ 𝑃)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐹 ∈ 𝑃)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → ⟨“𝐴𝐵𝐶”⟩(cgrA‘𝐺)⟨“𝐷𝐸𝐹”⟩)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝑋 ∈ 𝑃)    &   ⊢ − = (dist‘𝐺)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝑌 ∈ 𝑃)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝑋(𝐾‘𝐵)𝐴)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝑌(𝐾‘𝐵)𝐶)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → (𝐵 − 𝑋) = (𝐸 − 𝐷))    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → (𝐵 − 𝑌) = (𝐸 − 𝐹))    ⇒   ⊢ (𝜑 → (𝑋 − 𝑌) = (𝐷 − 𝐹))
Theorem	cgraid 28887	Angle congruence is reflexive. Theorem 11.6 of [Schwabhauser] p. 96. (Contributed by Thierry Arnoux, 31-Jul-2020.)
⊢ 𝑃 = (Base‘𝐺)    &   ⊢ 𝐼 = (Itv‘𝐺)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐺 ∈ TarskiG)    &   ⊢ 𝐾 = (hlG‘𝐺)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐴 ∈ 𝑃)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐵 ∈ 𝑃)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐶 ∈ 𝑃)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐴 ≠ 𝐵)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐵 ≠ 𝐶)    ⇒   ⊢ (𝜑 → ⟨“𝐴𝐵𝐶”⟩(cgrA‘𝐺)⟨“𝐴𝐵𝐶”⟩)
Theorem	cgraswap 28888	Swap rays in a congruence relation. Theorem 11.9 of [Schwabhauser] p. 96. (Contributed by Thierry Arnoux, 5-Mar-2020.)
⊢ 𝑃 = (Base‘𝐺)    &   ⊢ 𝐼 = (Itv‘𝐺)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐺 ∈ TarskiG)    &   ⊢ 𝐾 = (hlG‘𝐺)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐴 ∈ 𝑃)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐵 ∈ 𝑃)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐶 ∈ 𝑃)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐴 ≠ 𝐵)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐵 ≠ 𝐶)    ⇒   ⊢ (𝜑 → ⟨“𝐴𝐵𝐶”⟩(cgrA‘𝐺)⟨“𝐶𝐵𝐴”⟩)
Theorem	cgrcgra 28889	Triangle congruence implies angle congruence. This is a portion of CPCTC, focusing on a specific angle. (Contributed by Arnoux, 2-Aug-2020.)
⊢ 𝑃 = (Base‘𝐺)    &   ⊢ 𝐼 = (Itv‘𝐺)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐺 ∈ TarskiG)    &   ⊢ 𝐾 = (hlG‘𝐺)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐴 ∈ 𝑃)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐵 ∈ 𝑃)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐶 ∈ 𝑃)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐷 ∈ 𝑃)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐸 ∈ 𝑃)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐹 ∈ 𝑃)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐴 ≠ 𝐵)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐵 ≠ 𝐶)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → ⟨“𝐴𝐵𝐶”⟩(cgrG‘𝐺)⟨“𝐷𝐸𝐹”⟩)    ⇒   ⊢ (𝜑 → ⟨“𝐴𝐵𝐶”⟩(cgrA‘𝐺)⟨“𝐷𝐸𝐹”⟩)
Theorem	cgracom 28890	Angle congruence commutes. Theorem 11.7 of [Schwabhauser] p. 97. (Contributed by Thierry Arnoux, 5-Mar-2020.)
⊢ 𝑃 = (Base‘𝐺)    &   ⊢ 𝐼 = (Itv‘𝐺)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐺 ∈ TarskiG)    &   ⊢ 𝐾 = (hlG‘𝐺)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐴 ∈ 𝑃)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐵 ∈ 𝑃)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐶 ∈ 𝑃)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐷 ∈ 𝑃)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐸 ∈ 𝑃)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐹 ∈ 𝑃)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → ⟨“𝐴𝐵𝐶”⟩(cgrA‘𝐺)⟨“𝐷𝐸𝐹”⟩)    ⇒   ⊢ (𝜑 → ⟨“𝐷𝐸𝐹”⟩(cgrA‘𝐺)⟨“𝐴𝐵𝐶”⟩)
Theorem	cgratr 28891	Angle congruence is transitive. Theorem 11.8 of [Schwabhauser] p. 97. (Contributed by Thierry Arnoux, 5-Mar-2020.)
⊢ 𝑃 = (Base‘𝐺)    &   ⊢ 𝐼 = (Itv‘𝐺)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐺 ∈ TarskiG)    &   ⊢ 𝐾 = (hlG‘𝐺)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐴 ∈ 𝑃)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐵 ∈ 𝑃)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐶 ∈ 𝑃)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐷 ∈ 𝑃)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐸 ∈ 𝑃)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐹 ∈ 𝑃)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → ⟨“𝐴𝐵𝐶”⟩(cgrA‘𝐺)⟨“𝐷𝐸𝐹”⟩)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐻 ∈ 𝑃)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝑈 ∈ 𝑃)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐽 ∈ 𝑃)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → ⟨“𝐷𝐸𝐹”⟩(cgrA‘𝐺)⟨“𝐻𝑈𝐽”⟩)    ⇒   ⊢ (𝜑 → ⟨“𝐴𝐵𝐶”⟩(cgrA‘𝐺)⟨“𝐻𝑈𝐽”⟩)
Theorem	flatcgra 28892	Flat angles are congruent. (Contributed by Thierry Arnoux, 13-Feb-2023.)
⊢ 𝑃 = (Base‘𝐺)    &   ⊢ 𝐼 = (Itv‘𝐺)    &   ⊢ − = (dist‘𝐺)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐺 ∈ TarskiG)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐴 ∈ 𝑃)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐵 ∈ 𝑃)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐶 ∈ 𝑃)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐷 ∈ 𝑃)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐸 ∈ 𝑃)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐹 ∈ 𝑃)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐵 ∈ (𝐴𝐼𝐶))    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐸 ∈ (𝐷𝐼𝐹))    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐴 ≠ 𝐵)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐶 ≠ 𝐵)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐷 ≠ 𝐸)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐹 ≠ 𝐸)    ⇒   ⊢ (𝜑 → ⟨“𝐴𝐵𝐶”⟩(cgrA‘𝐺)⟨“𝐷𝐸𝐹”⟩)
Theorem	cgraswaplr 28893	Swap both side of angle congruence. (Contributed by Thierry Arnoux, 5-Oct-2020.)
⊢ 𝑃 = (Base‘𝐺)    &   ⊢ 𝐼 = (Itv‘𝐺)    &   ⊢ − = (dist‘𝐺)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐺 ∈ TarskiG)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐴 ∈ 𝑃)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐵 ∈ 𝑃)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐶 ∈ 𝑃)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐷 ∈ 𝑃)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐸 ∈ 𝑃)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐹 ∈ 𝑃)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → ⟨“𝐴𝐵𝐶”⟩(cgrA‘𝐺)⟨“𝐷𝐸𝐹”⟩)    ⇒   ⊢ (𝜑 → ⟨“𝐶𝐵𝐴”⟩(cgrA‘𝐺)⟨“𝐹𝐸𝐷”⟩)
Theorem	cgrabtwn 28894	Angle congruence preserves flat angles. Part of Theorem 11.21 of [Schwabhauser] p. 97. (Contributed by Thierry Arnoux, 9-Aug-2020.)
⊢ 𝑃 = (Base‘𝐺)    &   ⊢ 𝐼 = (Itv‘𝐺)    &   ⊢ − = (dist‘𝐺)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐺 ∈ TarskiG)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐴 ∈ 𝑃)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐵 ∈ 𝑃)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐶 ∈ 𝑃)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐷 ∈ 𝑃)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐸 ∈ 𝑃)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐹 ∈ 𝑃)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → ⟨“𝐴𝐵𝐶”⟩(cgrA‘𝐺)⟨“𝐷𝐸𝐹”⟩)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐵 ∈ (𝐴𝐼𝐶))    ⇒   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐸 ∈ (𝐷𝐼𝐹))
Theorem	cgrahl 28895	Angle congruence preserves null angles. Part of Theorem 11.21 of [Schwabhauser] p. 97. (Contributed by Thierry Arnoux, 9-Aug-2020.)
⊢ 𝑃 = (Base‘𝐺)    &   ⊢ 𝐼 = (Itv‘𝐺)    &   ⊢ − = (dist‘𝐺)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐺 ∈ TarskiG)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐴 ∈ 𝑃)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐵 ∈ 𝑃)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐶 ∈ 𝑃)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐷 ∈ 𝑃)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐸 ∈ 𝑃)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐹 ∈ 𝑃)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → ⟨“𝐴𝐵𝐶”⟩(cgrA‘𝐺)⟨“𝐷𝐸𝐹”⟩)    &   ⊢ 𝐾 = (hlG‘𝐺)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐴(𝐾‘𝐵)𝐶)    ⇒   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐷(𝐾‘𝐸)𝐹)
Theorem	cgracol 28896	Angle congruence preserves colinearity. (Contributed by Thierry Arnoux, 9-Aug-2020.)
⊢ 𝑃 = (Base‘𝐺)    &   ⊢ 𝐼 = (Itv‘𝐺)    &   ⊢ − = (dist‘𝐺)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐺 ∈ TarskiG)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐴 ∈ 𝑃)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐵 ∈ 𝑃)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐶 ∈ 𝑃)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐷 ∈ 𝑃)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐸 ∈ 𝑃)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐹 ∈ 𝑃)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → ⟨“𝐴𝐵𝐶”⟩(cgrA‘𝐺)⟨“𝐷𝐸𝐹”⟩)    &   ⊢ 𝐿 = (LineG‘𝐺)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → (𝐶 ∈ (𝐴𝐿𝐵) ∨ 𝐴 = 𝐵))    ⇒   ⊢ (𝜑 → (𝐹 ∈ (𝐷𝐿𝐸) ∨ 𝐷 = 𝐸))
Theorem	cgrancol 28897	Angle congruence preserves non-colinearity. (Contributed by Thierry Arnoux, 9-Aug-2020.)
⊢ 𝑃 = (Base‘𝐺)    &   ⊢ 𝐼 = (Itv‘𝐺)    &   ⊢ − = (dist‘𝐺)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐺 ∈ TarskiG)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐴 ∈ 𝑃)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐵 ∈ 𝑃)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐶 ∈ 𝑃)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐷 ∈ 𝑃)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐸 ∈ 𝑃)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐹 ∈ 𝑃)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → ⟨“𝐴𝐵𝐶”⟩(cgrA‘𝐺)⟨“𝐷𝐸𝐹”⟩)    &   ⊢ 𝐿 = (LineG‘𝐺)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → ¬ (𝐶 ∈ (𝐴𝐿𝐵) ∨ 𝐴 = 𝐵))    ⇒   ⊢ (𝜑 → ¬ (𝐹 ∈ (𝐷𝐿𝐸) ∨ 𝐷 = 𝐸))
Theorem	dfcgra2 28898*	This is the full statement of definition 11.2 of [Schwabhauser] p. 95. This proof serves to confirm that the definition we have chosen, df-cgra 28876 is indeed equivalent to the textbook's definition. (Contributed by Thierry Arnoux, 2-Aug-2020.)
⊢ 𝑃 = (Base‘𝐺)    &   ⊢ 𝐼 = (Itv‘𝐺)    &   ⊢ − = (dist‘𝐺)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐺 ∈ TarskiG)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐴 ∈ 𝑃)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐵 ∈ 𝑃)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐶 ∈ 𝑃)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐷 ∈ 𝑃)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐸 ∈ 𝑃)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐹 ∈ 𝑃)    ⇒   ⊢ (𝜑 → (⟨“𝐴𝐵𝐶”⟩(cgrA‘𝐺)⟨“𝐷𝐸𝐹”⟩ ↔ ((𝐴 ≠ 𝐵 ∧ 𝐶 ≠ 𝐵) ∧ (𝐷 ≠ 𝐸 ∧ 𝐹 ≠ 𝐸) ∧ ∃𝑎 ∈ 𝑃 ∃𝑐 ∈ 𝑃 ∃𝑑 ∈ 𝑃 ∃𝑓 ∈ 𝑃 (((𝐴 ∈ (𝐵𝐼𝑎) ∧ (𝐴 − 𝑎) = (𝐸 − 𝐷)) ∧ (𝐶 ∈ (𝐵𝐼𝑐) ∧ (𝐶 − 𝑐) = (𝐸 − 𝐹))) ∧ ((𝐷 ∈ (𝐸𝐼𝑑) ∧ (𝐷 − 𝑑) = (𝐵 − 𝐴)) ∧ (𝐹 ∈ (𝐸𝐼𝑓) ∧ (𝐹 − 𝑓) = (𝐵 − 𝐶))) ∧ (𝑎 − 𝑐) = (𝑑 − 𝑓)))))
Theorem	sacgr 28899	Supplementary angles of congruent angles are themselves congruent. Theorem 11.13 of [Schwabhauser] p. 98. (Contributed by Thierry Arnoux, 30-Sep-2020.) (Proof shortened by Igor Ieskov, 16-Feb-2023.)
⊢ 𝑃 = (Base‘𝐺)    &   ⊢ 𝐼 = (Itv‘𝐺)    &   ⊢ − = (dist‘𝐺)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐺 ∈ TarskiG)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐴 ∈ 𝑃)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐵 ∈ 𝑃)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐶 ∈ 𝑃)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐷 ∈ 𝑃)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐸 ∈ 𝑃)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐹 ∈ 𝑃)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝑋 ∈ 𝑃)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝑌 ∈ 𝑃)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → ⟨“𝐴𝐵𝐶”⟩(cgrA‘𝐺)⟨“𝐷𝐸𝐹”⟩)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐵 ∈ (𝐴𝐼𝑋))    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐸 ∈ (𝐷𝐼𝑌))    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐵 ≠ 𝑋)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐸 ≠ 𝑌)    ⇒   ⊢ (𝜑 → ⟨“𝑋𝐵𝐶”⟩(cgrA‘𝐺)⟨“𝑌𝐸𝐹”⟩)
Theorem	oacgr 28900	Vertical angle theorem. Vertical, or opposite angles are the facing pair of angles formed when two lines intersect. Eudemus of Rhodes attributed the proof to Thales of Miletus. The proposition showed that since both of a pair of vertical angles are supplementary to both of the adjacent angles, the vertical angles are equal in measure. We follow the same path. Theorem 11.14 of [Schwabhauser] p. 98. (Contributed by Thierry Arnoux, 27-Sep-2020.)
⊢ 𝑃 = (Base‘𝐺)    &   ⊢ 𝐼 = (Itv‘𝐺)    &   ⊢ − = (dist‘𝐺)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐺 ∈ TarskiG)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐴 ∈ 𝑃)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐵 ∈ 𝑃)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐶 ∈ 𝑃)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐷 ∈ 𝑃)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐸 ∈ 𝑃)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐹 ∈ 𝑃)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐵 ∈ (𝐴𝐼𝐷))    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐵 ∈ (𝐶𝐼𝐹))    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐵 ≠ 𝐴)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐵 ≠ 𝐶)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐵 ≠ 𝐷)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐵 ≠ 𝐹)    ⇒   ⊢ (𝜑 → ⟨“𝐴𝐵𝐶”⟩(cgrA‘𝐺)⟨“𝐷𝐵𝐹”⟩)