P. 289 of Theorem List - Metamath Proof Explorer

Theorem List for Metamath Proof Explorer - 28801-28900   *Has distinct variable group(s)

Type	Label	Description
Statement
Theorem	nnexpscl 28801	Closure law for positive surreal integer exponentiation. (Contributed by Scott Fenton, 8-Nov-2025.)
⊢ ((𝐴 ∈ ℕs ∧ 𝑁 ∈ ℕ0s) → (𝐴↑s𝑁) ∈ ℕs)
Theorem	zexpscl 28802	Closure law for surreal integer exponentiation. (Contributed by Scott Fenton, 11-Dec-2025.)
⊢ ((𝐴 ∈ ℤs ∧ 𝑁 ∈ ℕ0s) → (𝐴↑s𝑁) ∈ ℤs)
Theorem	expadds 28803	Sum of exponents law for surreals. (Contributed by Scott Fenton, 7-Nov-2025.)
⊢ ((𝐴 ∈ No ∧ 𝑀 ∈ ℕ0s ∧ 𝑁 ∈ ℕ0s) → (𝐴↑s(𝑀 +s 𝑁)) = ((𝐴↑s𝑀) ·s (𝐴↑s𝑁)))
Theorem	expsne0 28804	A non-negative surreal integer power is nonzero if its base is nonzero. (Contributed by Scott Fenton, 7-Aug-2025.)
⊢ ((𝐴 ∈ No ∧ 𝐴 ≠ 0s ∧ 𝑁 ∈ ℕ0s) → (𝐴↑s𝑁) ≠ 0s )
Theorem	expsgt0 28805	A non-negative surreal integer power is positive if its base is positive. (Contributed by Scott Fenton, 7-Aug-2025.)
⊢ ((𝐴 ∈ No ∧ 𝑁 ∈ ℕ0s ∧ 0s <s 𝐴) → 0s <s (𝐴↑s𝑁))
Theorem	pw2recs 28806*	Any power of two has a multiplicative inverse. Note that this theorem does not require the axiom of infinity. (Contributed by Scott Fenton, 5-Sep-2025.)
⊢ (𝑁 ∈ ℕ0s → ∃𝑥 ∈ No ((2s↑s𝑁) ·s 𝑥) = 1s )
Theorem	pw2divscld 28807	Division closure for powers of two. (Contributed by Scott Fenton, 7-Nov-2025.)
⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐴 ∈ No )    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝑁 ∈ ℕ0s)    ⇒   ⊢ (𝜑 → (𝐴 /su (2s↑s𝑁)) ∈ No )
Theorem	pw2divmulsd 28808	Relationship between surreal division and multiplication for powers of two. (Contributed by Scott Fenton, 7-Nov-2025.)
⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐴 ∈ No )    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐵 ∈ No )    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝑁 ∈ ℕ0s)    ⇒   ⊢ (𝜑 → ((𝐴 /su (2s↑s𝑁)) = 𝐵 ↔ ((2s↑s𝑁) ·s 𝐵) = 𝐴))
Theorem	pw2divscan3d 28809	Cancellation law for surreal division by powers of two. (Contributed by Scott Fenton, 7-Nov-2025.)
⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐴 ∈ No )    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝑁 ∈ ℕ0s)    ⇒   ⊢ (𝜑 → (((2s↑s𝑁) ·s 𝐴) /su (2s↑s𝑁)) = 𝐴)
Theorem	pw2divscan2d 28810	A cancellation law for surreal division by powers of two. (Contributed by Scott Fenton, 7-Nov-2025.)
⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐴 ∈ No )    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝑁 ∈ ℕ0s)    ⇒   ⊢ (𝜑 → ((2s↑s𝑁) ·s (𝐴 /su (2s↑s𝑁))) = 𝐴)
Theorem	pw2divsassd 28811	An associative law for division by powers of two. (Contributed by Scott Fenton, 11-Dec-2025.)
⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐴 ∈ No )    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐵 ∈ No )    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝑁 ∈ ℕ0s)    ⇒   ⊢ (𝜑 → ((𝐴 ·s 𝐵) /su (2s↑s𝑁)) = (𝐴 ·s (𝐵 /su (2s↑s𝑁))))
Theorem	pw2divscan4d 28812	Cancellation law for divison by powers of two. (Contributed by Scott Fenton, 11-Dec-2025.)
⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐴 ∈ No )    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝑁 ∈ ℕ0s)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝑀 ∈ ℕ0s)    ⇒   ⊢ (𝜑 → (𝐴 /su (2s↑s𝑁)) = (((2s↑s𝑀) ·s 𝐴) /su (2s↑s(𝑁 +s 𝑀))))
Theorem	pw2gt0divsd 28813	Division of a positive surreal by a power of two. (Contributed by Scott Fenton, 7-Nov-2025.)
⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐴 ∈ No )    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝑁 ∈ ℕ0s)    ⇒   ⊢ (𝜑 → ( 0s <s 𝐴 ↔ 0s <s (𝐴 /su (2s↑s𝑁))))
Theorem	pw2ge0divsd 28814	Divison of a non-negative surreal by a power of two. (Contributed by Scott Fenton, 7-Nov-2025.)
⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐴 ∈ No )    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝑁 ∈ ℕ0s)    ⇒   ⊢ (𝜑 → ( 0s ≤s 𝐴 ↔ 0s ≤s (𝐴 /su (2s↑s𝑁))))
Theorem	pw2divsrecd 28815	Relationship between surreal division and reciprocal for powers of two. (Contributed by Scott Fenton, 7-Nov-2025.)
⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐴 ∈ No )    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝑁 ∈ ℕ0s)    ⇒   ⊢ (𝜑 → (𝐴 /su (2s↑s𝑁)) = (𝐴 ·s ( 1s /su (2s↑s𝑁))))
Theorem	pw2divsdird 28816	Distribution of surreal division over addition for powers of two. (Contributed by Scott Fenton, 7-Nov-2025.)
⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐴 ∈ No )    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐵 ∈ No )    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝑁 ∈ ℕ0s)    ⇒   ⊢ (𝜑 → ((𝐴 +s 𝐵) /su (2s↑s𝑁)) = ((𝐴 /su (2s↑s𝑁)) +s (𝐵 /su (2s↑s𝑁))))
Theorem	pw2divsnegd 28817	Move negative sign inside of a power of two division. (Contributed by Scott Fenton, 8-Nov-2025.)
⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐴 ∈ No )    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝑁 ∈ ℕ0s)    ⇒   ⊢ (𝜑 → ( -us ‘(𝐴 /su (2s↑s𝑁))) = (( -us ‘𝐴) /su (2s↑s𝑁)))
Theorem	pw2ltdivmulsd 28818	Surreal less-than relationship between division and multiplication for powers of two. (Contributed by Scott Fenton, 11-Dec-2025.)
⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐴 ∈ No )    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐵 ∈ No )    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝑁 ∈ ℕ0s)    ⇒   ⊢ (𝜑 → ((𝐴 /su (2s↑s𝑁)) <s 𝐵 ↔ 𝐴 <s ((2s↑s𝑁) ·s 𝐵)))
Theorem	pw2ltmuldivs2d 28819	Surreal less-than relationship between division and multiplication for powers of two. (Contributed by Scott Fenton, 11-Dec-2025.)
⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐴 ∈ No )    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐵 ∈ No )    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝑁 ∈ ℕ0s)    ⇒   ⊢ (𝜑 → (((2s↑s𝑁) ·s 𝐴) <s 𝐵 ↔ 𝐴 <s (𝐵 /su (2s↑s𝑁))))
Theorem	pw2ltsdiv1d 28820	Surreal less-than relationship for division by a power of two. (Contributed by Scott Fenton, 18-Jan-2026.)
⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐴 ∈ No )    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐵 ∈ No )    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝑁 ∈ ℕ0s)    ⇒   ⊢ (𝜑 → (𝐴 <s 𝐵 ↔ (𝐴 /su (2s↑s𝑁)) <s (𝐵 /su (2s↑s𝑁))))
Theorem	avglts1d 28821	Ordering property for average. (Contributed by Scott Fenton, 11-Dec-2025.)
⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐴 ∈ No )    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐵 ∈ No )    ⇒   ⊢ (𝜑 → (𝐴 <s 𝐵 ↔ 𝐴 <s ((𝐴 +s 𝐵) /su 2s)))
Theorem	avglts2d 28822	Ordering property for average. (Contributed by Scott Fenton, 11-Dec-2025.)
⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐴 ∈ No )    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐵 ∈ No )    ⇒   ⊢ (𝜑 → (𝐴 <s 𝐵 ↔ ((𝐴 +s 𝐵) /su 2s) <s 𝐵))
Theorem	pw2divs0d 28823	Division into zero is zero for a power of two. (Contributed by Scott Fenton, 21-Feb-2026.)
⊢ (𝜑 → 𝑁 ∈ ℕ0s)    ⇒   ⊢ (𝜑 → ( 0s /su (2s↑s𝑁)) = 0s )
Theorem	pw2divsidd 28824	Identity law for division over powers of two. (Contributed by Scott Fenton, 21-Feb-2026.)
⊢ (𝜑 → 𝑁 ∈ ℕ0s)    ⇒   ⊢ (𝜑 → ((2s↑s𝑁) /su (2s↑s𝑁)) = 1s )
Theorem	pw2ltdivmuls2d 28825	Surreal less-than relationship between division and multiplication for powers of two. (Contributed by Scott Fenton, 23-Feb-2026.)
⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐴 ∈ No )    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐵 ∈ No )    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝑁 ∈ ℕ0s)    ⇒   ⊢ (𝜑 → ((𝐴 /su (2s↑s𝑁)) <s 𝐵 ↔ 𝐴 <s (𝐵 ·s (2s↑s𝑁))))
Theorem	halfcut 28826	Relate the cut of twice of two numbers to the cut of the numbers. Lemma 4.2 of [Gonshor] p. 28. (Contributed by Scott Fenton, 7-Aug-2025.) Avoid the axiom of infinity. (Proof modified by Scott Fenton, 6-Sep-2025.)
⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐴 ∈ No )    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐵 ∈ No )    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐴 <s 𝐵)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → ({(2s ·s 𝐴)} |s {(2s ·s 𝐵)}) = (𝐴 +s 𝐵))    &   ⊢ 𝐶 = ({𝐴} |s {𝐵})    ⇒   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐶 = ((𝐴 +s 𝐵) /su 2s))
Theorem	addhalfcut 28827	The cut of a surreal non-negative integer and its successor is the original number plus one half. Part of theorem 4.2 of [Gonshor] p. 30. (Contributed by Scott Fenton, 13-Aug-2025.)
⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐴 ∈ ℕ0s)    ⇒   ⊢ (𝜑 → ({𝐴} |s {(𝐴 +s 1s )}) = (𝐴 +s ( 1s /su 2s)))
Theorem	pw2cut 28828	Extend halfcut 28826 to arbitrary powers of two. Part of theorem 4.2 of [Gonshor] p. 28. (Contributed by Scott Fenton, 18-Aug-2025.)
⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐴 ∈ No )    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐵 ∈ No )    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝑁 ∈ ℕ0s)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐴 <s 𝐵)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → ({(2s ·s 𝐴)} |s {(2s ·s 𝐵)}) = (𝐴 +s 𝐵))    ⇒   ⊢ (𝜑 → ({(𝐴 /su (2s↑s𝑁))} |s {(𝐵 /su (2s↑s𝑁))}) = ((𝐴 +s 𝐵) /su (2s↑s(𝑁 +s 1s ))))
Theorem	pw2cutp1 28829	Simplify pw2cut 28828 in the case of successors of surreal integers. (Contributed by Scott Fenton, 11-Nov-2025.)
⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐴 ∈ ℤs)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝑁 ∈ ℕ0s)    ⇒   ⊢ (𝜑 → ({(𝐴 /su (2s↑s𝑁))} |s {((𝐴 +s 1s ) /su (2s↑s𝑁))}) = (((2s ·s 𝐴) +s 1s ) /su (2s↑s(𝑁 +s 1s ))))
Theorem	pw2cut2 28830	Cut expression for powers of two. Theorem 12 of [Conway] p. 12-13. (Contributed by Scott Fenton, 18-Jan-2026.)
⊢ ((𝐴 ∈ ℤs ∧ 𝑁 ∈ ℕ0s) → (𝐴 /su (2s↑s𝑁)) = ({((𝐴 -s 1s ) /su (2s↑s𝑁))} |s {((𝐴 +s 1s ) /su (2s↑s𝑁))}))
Theorem	bdaypw2n0bndlem 28831	Lemma for bdaypw2n0bnd 28832. Prove the case with a successor. (Contributed by Scott Fenton, 21-Feb-2026.)
⊢ ((𝐴 ∈ ℕ0s ∧ 𝑁 ∈ ℕ0s ∧ 𝐴 <s (2s↑s(𝑁 +s 1s ))) → ( bday ‘(𝐴 /su (2s↑s(𝑁 +s 1s )))) ⊆ suc ( bday ‘(𝑁 +s 1s )))
Theorem	bdaypw2n0bnd 28832	Upper bound for the birthday of a proper fraction of a power of two. This is actually a strict equality when 𝐴 is odd, but we do not need this for the rest of our development. (Contributed by Scott Fenton, 22-Feb-2026.)
⊢ ((𝐴 ∈ ℕ0s ∧ 𝑁 ∈ ℕ0s ∧ 𝐴 <s (2s↑s𝑁)) → ( bday ‘(𝐴 /su (2s↑s𝑁))) ⊆ suc ( bday ‘𝑁))
Theorem	bdaypw2bnd 28833	Birthday bounding rule for non-negative dyadic rationals. (Contributed by Scott Fenton, 25-Feb-2026.)
⊢ (𝜑 → 𝑁 ∈ ℕ0s)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝑋 ∈ ℕ0s)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝑌 ∈ ℕ0s)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝑃 ∈ ℕ0s)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝑌 <s (2s↑s𝑃))    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → (𝑋 +s 𝑃) <s 𝑁)    ⇒   ⊢ (𝜑 → ( bday ‘(𝑋 +s (𝑌 /su (2s↑s𝑃)))) ⊆ ( bday ‘𝑁))
Theorem	bdayfinbndcbv 28834*	Lemma for bdayfinbnd 28837. Change some bound variables. (Contributed by Scott Fenton, 25-Feb-2026.)
⊢ (𝜑 → 𝑁 ∈ ℕ0s)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → ∀𝑧 ∈ No ((( bday ‘𝑧) ⊆ ( bday ‘𝑁) ∧ 0s ≤s 𝑧) → (𝑧 = 𝑁 ∨ ∃𝑥 ∈ ℕ0s ∃𝑦 ∈ ℕ0s ∃𝑝 ∈ ℕ0s (𝑧 = (𝑥 +s (𝑦 /su (2s↑s𝑝))) ∧ 𝑦 <s (2s↑s𝑝) ∧ (𝑥 +s 𝑝) <s 𝑁))))    ⇒   ⊢ (𝜑 → ∀𝑤 ∈ No ((( bday ‘𝑤) ⊆ ( bday ‘𝑁) ∧ 0s ≤s 𝑤) → (𝑤 = 𝑁 ∨ ∃𝑎 ∈ ℕ0s ∃𝑏 ∈ ℕ0s ∃𝑞 ∈ ℕ0s (𝑤 = (𝑎 +s (𝑏 /su (2s↑s𝑞))) ∧ 𝑏 <s (2s↑s𝑞) ∧ (𝑎 +s 𝑞) <s 𝑁))))
Theorem	bdayfinbndlem1 28835*	Lemma for bdayfinbnd 28837. Show the first half of the inductive step. (Contributed by Scott Fenton, 26-Feb-2026.)
⊢ (𝜑 → 𝑁 ∈ ℕ0s)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → ∀𝑧 ∈ No ((( bday ‘𝑧) ⊆ ( bday ‘𝑁) ∧ 0s ≤s 𝑧) → (𝑧 = 𝑁 ∨ ∃𝑥 ∈ ℕ0s ∃𝑦 ∈ ℕ0s ∃𝑝 ∈ ℕ0s (𝑧 = (𝑥 +s (𝑦 /su (2s↑s𝑝))) ∧ 𝑦 <s (2s↑s𝑝) ∧ (𝑥 +s 𝑝) <s 𝑁))))    ⇒   ⊢ (𝜑 → ∀𝑤 ∈ No ((( bday ‘𝑤) ⊆ ( bday ‘(𝑁 +s 1s )) ∧ 0s ≤s 𝑤) → (𝑤 = (𝑁 +s 1s ) ∨ ∃𝑎 ∈ ℕ0s ∃𝑏 ∈ ℕ0s ∃𝑞 ∈ ℕ0s (𝑤 = (𝑎 +s (𝑏 /su (2s↑s𝑞))) ∧ 𝑏 <s (2s↑s𝑞) ∧ (𝑎 +s 𝑞) <s (𝑁 +s 1s )))))
Theorem	bdayfinbndlem2 28836*	Lemma for bdayfinbnd 28837. Conduct the induction. (Contributed by Scott Fenton, 26-Feb-2026.)
⊢ (𝑁 ∈ ℕ0s → ∀𝑧 ∈ No ((( bday ‘𝑧) ⊆ ( bday ‘𝑁) ∧ 0s ≤s 𝑧) → (𝑧 = 𝑁 ∨ ∃𝑥 ∈ ℕ0s ∃𝑦 ∈ ℕ0s ∃𝑝 ∈ ℕ0s (𝑧 = (𝑥 +s (𝑦 /su (2s↑s𝑝))) ∧ 𝑦 <s (2s↑s𝑝) ∧ (𝑥 +s 𝑝) <s 𝑁))))
Theorem	bdayfinbnd 28837*	Given a non-negative integer and a non-negative surreal of lesser or equal birthday, show that the surreal can be expressed as a dyadic fraction with an upper bound on the integer and exponent. This proof follows the proof from Mizar at https://mizar.uwb.edu.pl/version/current/html/surrealn.html. (Contributed by Scott Fenton, 26-Feb-2026.)
⊢ (𝜑 → 𝑁 ∈ ℕ0s)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝑍 ∈ No )    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → ( bday ‘𝑍) ⊆ ( bday ‘𝑁))    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 0s ≤s 𝑍)    ⇒   ⊢ (𝜑 → (𝑍 = 𝑁 ∨ ∃𝑥 ∈ ℕ0s ∃𝑦 ∈ ℕ0s ∃𝑝 ∈ ℕ0s (𝑍 = (𝑥 +s (𝑦 /su (2s↑s𝑝))) ∧ 𝑦 <s (2s↑s𝑝) ∧ (𝑥 +s 𝑝) <s 𝑁)))
Theorem	z12bdaylem1 28838	Lemma for z12bday 28853. Prove an inequality for birthday ordering. (Contributed by Scott Fenton, 22-Feb-2026.)
⊢ (𝜑 → 𝑁 ∈ ℕ0s)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝑀 ∈ ℕ0s)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝑃 ∈ ℕ0s)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → ((2s ·s 𝑀) +s 1s ) <s (2s↑s𝑃))    ⇒   ⊢ (𝜑 → (𝑁 +s (((2s ·s 𝑀) +s 1s ) /su (2s↑s𝑃))) ≠ (𝑁 +s 𝑃))
Theorem	z12bdaylem2 28839	Lemma for z12bday 28853. Show the first half of the equality. (Contributed by Scott Fenton, 22-Feb-2026.)
⊢ (𝜑 → 𝑁 ∈ ℕ0s)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝑀 ∈ ℕ0s)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝑃 ∈ ℕ0s)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → ((2s ·s 𝑀) +s 1s ) <s (2s↑s𝑃))    ⇒   ⊢ (𝜑 → ( bday ‘(𝑁 +s (((2s ·s 𝑀) +s 1s ) /su (2s↑s𝑃)))) ⊆ ( bday ‘((𝑁 +s 𝑃) +s 1s )))
Theorem	elz12s 28840*	Membership in the dyadic fractions. (Contributed by Scott Fenton, 7-Aug-2025.)
⊢ (𝐴 ∈ ℤs[1/2] ↔ ∃𝑥 ∈ ℤs ∃𝑦 ∈ ℕ0s 𝐴 = (𝑥 /su (2s↑s𝑦)))
Theorem	elz12si 28841	Inference form of membership in the dyadic fractions. (Contributed by Scott Fenton, 21-Feb-2026.)
⊢ ((𝐴 ∈ ℤs ∧ 𝑁 ∈ ℕ0s) → (𝐴 /su (2s↑s𝑁)) ∈ ℤs[1/2])
Theorem	z12sex 28842	The class of dyadic fractions is a set. (Contributed by Scott Fenton, 7-Aug-2025.)
⊢ ℤs[1/2] ∈ V
Theorem	zz12s 28843	A surreal integer is a dyadic fraction. (Contributed by Scott Fenton, 7-Aug-2025.)
⊢ (𝐴 ∈ ℤs → 𝐴 ∈ ℤs[1/2])
Theorem	z12no 28844	A dyadic is a surreal. (Contributed by Scott Fenton, 11-Dec-2025.)
⊢ (𝐴 ∈ ℤs[1/2] → 𝐴 ∈ No )
Theorem	z12addscl 28845	The dyadics are closed under addition. (Contributed by Scott Fenton, 11-Dec-2025.)
⊢ ((𝐴 ∈ ℤs[1/2] ∧ 𝐵 ∈ ℤs[1/2]) → (𝐴 +s 𝐵) ∈ ℤs[1/2])
Theorem	z12negscl 28846	The dyadics are closed under negation. (Contributed by Scott Fenton, 9-Nov-2025.)
⊢ (𝐴 ∈ ℤs[1/2] → ( -us ‘𝐴) ∈ ℤs[1/2])
Theorem	z12subscl 28847	The dyadics are closed under subtraction. (Contributed by Scott Fenton, 12-Dec-2025.)
⊢ ((𝐴 ∈ ℤs[1/2] ∧ 𝐵 ∈ ℤs[1/2]) → (𝐴 -s 𝐵) ∈ ℤs[1/2])
Theorem	z12shalf 28848	Half of a dyadic is a dyadic. (Contributed by Scott Fenton, 11-Dec-2025.)
⊢ (𝐴 ∈ ℤs[1/2] → (𝐴 /su 2s) ∈ ℤs[1/2])
Theorem	z12negsclb 28849	A surreal is a dyadic fraction iff its negative is. (Contributed by Scott Fenton, 9-Nov-2025.)
⊢ (𝐴 ∈ No → (𝐴 ∈ ℤs[1/2] ↔ ( -us ‘𝐴) ∈ ℤs[1/2]))
Theorem	z12zsodd 28850*	A dyadic fraction is either an integer or an odd number divided by a positive power of two. (Contributed by Scott Fenton, 5-Dec-2025.)
⊢ (𝐴 ∈ ℤs[1/2] → (𝐴 ∈ ℤs ∨ ∃𝑥 ∈ ℤs ∃𝑦 ∈ ℕs 𝐴 = (((2s ·s 𝑥) +s 1s ) /su (2s↑s𝑦))))
Theorem	z12sge0 28851*	An expression for non-negative dyadic rationals. (Contributed by Scott Fenton, 8-Nov-2025.)
⊢ ((𝐴 ∈ No ∧ 0s ≤s 𝐴) → (𝐴 ∈ ℤs[1/2] ↔ ∃𝑥 ∈ ℕ0s ∃𝑦 ∈ ℕ0s ∃𝑝 ∈ ℕ0s (𝐴 = (𝑥 +s (𝑦 /su (2s↑s𝑝))) ∧ 𝑦 <s (2s↑s𝑝))))
Theorem	z12bdaylem 28852	Lemma for z12bday 28853. Handle the non-negative case. (Contributed by Scott Fenton, 22-Feb-2026.)
⊢ ((𝐴 ∈ ℤs[1/2] ∧ 0s ≤s 𝐴) → ( bday ‘𝐴) ∈ ω)
Theorem	z12bday 28853	A dyadic fraction has a finite birthday. (Contributed by Scott Fenton, 20-Aug-2025.) (Proof shortened by Scott Fenton, 22-Feb-2026.)
⊢ (𝐴 ∈ ℤs[1/2] → ( bday ‘𝐴) ∈ ω)
Theorem	bdayfinlem 28854	Lemma for bdayfin 28855. Handle the non-negative case. (Contributed by Scott Fenton, 26-Feb-2026.)
⊢ ((𝐴 ∈ No ∧ 0s ≤s 𝐴 ∧ ( bday ‘𝐴) ∈ ω) → 𝐴 ∈ ℤs[1/2])
Theorem	bdayfin 28855	A surreal has a finite birthday iff it is a dyadic fraction. (Contributed by Scott Fenton, 26-Feb-2026.)
⊢ (𝐴 ∈ No → (𝐴 ∈ ℤs[1/2] ↔ ( bday ‘𝐴) ∈ ω))
Theorem	dfz12s2 28856	The set of dyadic fractions is the same as the old set of ω. (Contributed by Scott Fenton, 26-Feb-2026.)
⊢ ℤs[1/2] = ( O ‘ω)
15.6.6  Real numbers
Syntax	creno 28857	Declare the syntax for the surreal reals.
class ℝs
Definition	df-reno 28858*	Define the surreal reals. These are the finite numbers without any infintesimal parts. Definition from [Conway] p. 24. (Contributed by Scott Fenton, 15-Apr-2025.)
⊢ ℝs = {𝑥 ∈ No ∣ (∃𝑛 ∈ ℕs (( -us ‘𝑛) <s 𝑥 ∧ 𝑥 <s 𝑛) ∧ 𝑥 = ({𝑦 ∣ ∃𝑛 ∈ ℕs 𝑦 = (𝑥 -s ( 1s /su 𝑛))} |s {𝑦 ∣ ∃𝑛 ∈ ℕs 𝑦 = (𝑥 +s ( 1s /su 𝑛))}))}
Theorem	elreno 28859*	Membership in the set of surreal reals. (Contributed by Scott Fenton, 15-Apr-2025.)
⊢ (𝐴 ∈ ℝs ↔ (𝐴 ∈ No ∧ (∃𝑛 ∈ ℕs (( -us ‘𝑛) <s 𝐴 ∧ 𝐴 <s 𝑛) ∧ 𝐴 = ({𝑥 ∣ ∃𝑛 ∈ ℕs 𝑥 = (𝐴 -s ( 1s /su 𝑛))} |s {𝑥 ∣ ∃𝑛 ∈ ℕs 𝑥 = (𝐴 +s ( 1s /su 𝑛))}))))
Theorem	reno 28860	A surreal real is a surreal number. (Contributed by Scott Fenton, 19-Feb-2026.)
⊢ (𝐴 ∈ ℝs → 𝐴 ∈ No )
Theorem	renod 28861	A surreal real is a surreal number. (Contributed by Scott Fenton, 19-Feb-2026.)
⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐴 ∈ ℝs)    ⇒   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐴 ∈ No )
Theorem	recut 28862*	The cut involved in defining surreal reals is a genuine cut. (Contributed by Scott Fenton, 15-Apr-2025.)
⊢ (𝐴 ∈ No → {𝑥 ∣ ∃𝑛 ∈ ℕs 𝑥 = (𝐴 -s ( 1s /su 𝑛))} <<s {𝑥 ∣ ∃𝑛 ∈ ℕs 𝑥 = (𝐴 +s ( 1s /su 𝑛))})
Theorem	elreno2 28863*	Alternate characterization of the surreal reals. Theorem 4.4(b) of [Gonshor] p. 39. (Contributed by Scott Fenton, 29-Jan-2026.)
⊢ (𝐴 ∈ ℝs ↔ (𝐴 ∈ No ∧ (∃𝑛 ∈ ℕs (( -us ‘𝑛) <s 𝐴 ∧ 𝐴 <s 𝑛) ∧ ∀𝑥𝑂 ∈ (( L ‘𝐴) ∪ ( R ‘𝐴))∃𝑛 ∈ ℕs ( 1s /su 𝑛) ≤s (abss‘(𝐴 -s 𝑥𝑂)))))
Theorem	0reno 28864	Surreal zero is a surreal real. (Contributed by Scott Fenton, 15-Apr-2025.)
⊢ 0s ∈ ℝs
Theorem	1reno 28865	Surreal one is a surreal real. (Contributed by Scott Fenton, 18-Feb-2026.)
⊢ 1s ∈ ℝs
Theorem	renegscl 28866	The surreal reals are closed under negation. Part of theorem 13(ii) of [Conway] p. 24. (Contributed by Scott Fenton, 15-Apr-2025.)
⊢ (𝐴 ∈ ℝs → ( -us ‘𝐴) ∈ ℝs)
Theorem	readdscl 28867	The surreal reals are closed under addition. Part of theorem 13(ii) of [Conway] p. 24. (Contributed by Scott Fenton, 15-Apr-2025.)
⊢ ((𝐴 ∈ ℝs ∧ 𝐵 ∈ ℝs) → (𝐴 +s 𝐵) ∈ ℝs)
Theorem	remulscllem1 28868*	Lemma for remulscl 28870. Split a product of reciprocals of naturals. (Contributed by Scott Fenton, 16-Apr-2025.)
⊢ (∃𝑝 ∈ ℕs ∃𝑞 ∈ ℕs 𝐴 = (𝐵𝐹(( 1s /su 𝑝) ·s ( 1s /su 𝑞))) ↔ ∃𝑛 ∈ ℕs 𝐴 = (𝐵𝐹( 1s /su 𝑛)))
Theorem	remulscllem2 28869*	Lemma for remulscl 28870. Bound 𝐴 and 𝐵 above and below. (Contributed by Scott Fenton, 16-Apr-2025.)
⊢ (((𝐴 ∈ No ∧ 𝐵 ∈ No ) ∧ ((𝑁 ∈ ℕs ∧ 𝑀 ∈ ℕs) ∧ ((( -us ‘𝑁) <s 𝐴 ∧ 𝐴 <s 𝑁) ∧ (( -us ‘𝑀) <s 𝐵 ∧ 𝐵 <s 𝑀)))) → ∃𝑝 ∈ ℕs (( -us ‘𝑝) <s (𝐴 ·s 𝐵) ∧ (𝐴 ·s 𝐵) <s 𝑝))
Theorem	remulscl 28870	The surreal reals are closed under multiplication. Part of theorem 13(ii) of [Conway] p. 24. (Contributed by Scott Fenton, 16-Apr-2025.)
⊢ ((𝐴 ∈ ℝs ∧ 𝐵 ∈ ℝs) → (𝐴 ·s 𝐵) ∈ ℝs)
PART 16  ELEMENTARY GEOMETRY This part develops elementary geometry based on Tarski's axioms, following [Schwabhauser]. Tarski's geometry is a first-order theory with one sort, the "points". It has two primitive notions, the ternary predicate of "betweenness" and the quaternary predicate of "congruence". To adapt this theory to the framework of set.mm, and to be able to talk of *a* Tarski structure as a space satisfying the given axioms, we use the following definition, stated informally: A Tarski structure 𝑓 is a set (of points) (Base‘𝑓) together with functions (Itv‘𝑓) and (dist‘𝑓) on ((Base‘𝑓) × (Base‘𝑓)) satisfying certain axioms (given in Definitions df-trkg 28897 et sequentes). This allows to treat a Tarski structure as a special kind of extensible structure (see df-struct 17305). The translation to and from Tarski's treatment is as follows (given, again, informally). Suppose that one is given an extensible structure 𝑓. One defines a betweenness ternary predicate Btw by positing that, for any 𝑥, 𝑦, 𝑧 ∈ (Base‘𝑓), one has "Btw 𝑥𝑦𝑧 " if and only if 𝑦 ∈ 𝑥(Itv‘𝑓)𝑧, and a congruence quaternary predicate Congr by positing that, for any 𝑥, 𝑦, 𝑧, 𝑡 ∈ (Base‘𝑓), one has "Congr 𝑥𝑦𝑧𝑡 " if and only if 𝑥(dist‘𝑓)𝑦 = 𝑧(dist‘𝑓)𝑡. It is easy to check that if 𝑓 satisfies our Tarski axioms, then Btw and Congr satisfy Tarski's Tarski axioms when (Base‘𝑓) is interpreted as the universe of discourse. Conversely, suppose that one is given a set 𝑎, a ternary predicate Btw, and a quaternary predicate Congr. One defines the extensible structure 𝑓 such that (Base‘𝑓) is 𝑎, and (Itv‘𝑓) is the function which associates with each ⟨𝑥, 𝑦⟩ ∈ (𝑎 × 𝑎) the set of points 𝑧 ∈ 𝑎 such that "Btw 𝑥𝑧𝑦", and (dist‘𝑓) is the function which associates with each ⟨𝑥, 𝑦⟩ ∈ (𝑎 × 𝑎) the set of ordered pairs ⟨𝑧, 𝑡⟩ ∈ (𝑎 × 𝑎) such that "Congr 𝑥𝑦𝑧𝑡". It is easy to check that if Btw and Congr satisfy Tarski's Tarski axioms when 𝑎 is interpreted as the universe of discourse, then 𝑓 satisfies our Tarski axioms. We intentionally choose to represent congruence (without loss of generality) as 𝑥(dist‘𝑓)𝑦 = 𝑧(dist‘𝑓)𝑡 instead of "Congr 𝑥𝑦𝑧𝑡", as it is more convenient. It is always possible to define dist for any particular geometry to produce equal results when congruence is desired, and in many cases there is an obvious interpretation of "distance" between two points that can be useful in other situations. Encoding congruence as an equality of distances makes it easier to use these theorems in cases where there is a preferred distance function. We prove that representing a congruence relationship using a distance in the form 𝑥(dist‘𝑓)𝑦 = 𝑧(dist‘𝑓)𝑡 causes no loss of generality in tgjustc1 28919 and tgjustc2 28920, which in turn are supported by tgjustf 28917 and tgjustr 28918. A similar representation of congruence (using a "distance" function) is used in Axiom A1 of [Beeson2016] p. 5, which discusses how a large number of formalized proofs were found in Tarskian Geometry using OTTER. Their detailed proofs in Tarski Geometry, along with other information, are available at https://www.michaelbeeson.com/research/FormalTarski/ 28918. Most theorems are in deduction form, as this is a very general, simple, and convenient format to use in Metamath. An assertion in deduction form can be easily converted into an assertion in inference form (removing the antecedents 𝜑 →) by insert a ⊤ → in each hypothesis, using a1i 11, then using mptru 1577 to remove the final ⊤ → prefix. In some cases we represent, without loss of generality, an implication antecedent in [Schwabhauser] as a hypothesis. The implication can be retrieved from the by using simpr 490, the theorem as stated, and ex 418. For descriptions of individual axioms, we refer to the specific definitions below. A particular feature of Tarski's axioms is modularity, so by using various subsets of the set of axioms, we can define the classes of "absolute dimensionless Tarski structures" (df-trkg 28897), of "Euclidean dimensionless Tarski structures" (df-trkge 28895) and of "Tarski structures of dimension no less than N" (df-trkgld 28896). In this system, angles are not a primitive notion, but instead a derived notion (see df-cgra 29297 and iscgra 29298). To maintain its simplicity, in this system congruence between shapes (a finite sequence of points) is the case where corresponding segments between all corresponding points are congruent. This includes triangles (a shape of 3 distinct points). Note that this definition has no direct regard for angles. For more details and rationale, see df-cgrg 28956. The first section is devoted to the definitions of these various structures. The second section ("Tarskian geometry") develops the synthetic treatment of geometry. The remaining sections prove that real Euclidean spaces and complex Hilbert spaces, with intended interpretations, are Euclidean Tarski structures. Most of the work in this part is due to Thierry Arnoux, with earlier work by Mario Carneiro and Scott Fenton. See also the credits in the comment of each statement.
16.1  Definition and Tarski's Axioms of Geometry
Syntax	cstrkg 28871	Extends class notation with the class of Tarski geometries.
class TarskiG
Syntax	cstrkgc 28872	Extends class notation with the class of geometries fulfilling the congruence axioms.
class TarskiGC
Syntax	cstrkgb 28873	Extends class notation with the class of geometries fulfilling the betweenness axioms.
class TarskiGB
Syntax	cstrkgcb 28874	Extends class notation with the class of geometries fulfilling the congruence and betweenness axioms.
class TarskiGCB
Syntax	cstrkgld 28875	Extends class notation with the relation for geometries fulfilling the lower dimension axioms.
class DimTarskiG≥
Syntax	cstrkge 28876	Extends class notation with the class of geometries fulfilling Euclid's axiom.
class TarskiGE
Syntax	citv 28877	Declare the syntax for the Interval (segment) index extractor.
class Itv
Syntax	clng 28878	Declare the syntax for the Line function.
class LineG
Definition	df-itv 28879	Define the Interval (segment) index extractor for Tarski geometries. (Contributed by Thierry Arnoux, 24-Aug-2017.) Use its index-independent form itvid 28883 instead. (New usage is discouraged.)
⊢ Itv = Slot ;16
Definition	df-lng 28880	Define the line index extractor for geometries. (Contributed by Thierry Arnoux, 27-Mar-2019.) Use its index-independent form lngid 28884 instead. (New usage is discouraged.)
⊢ LineG = Slot ;17
Theorem	itvndx 28881	Index value of the Interval (segment) slot. Use ndxarg 17354. (Contributed by Thierry Arnoux, 24-Aug-2017.) (New usage is discouraged.)
⊢ (Itv‘ndx) = ;16
Theorem	lngndx 28882	Index value of the "line" slot. Use ndxarg 17354. (Contributed by Thierry Arnoux, 27-Mar-2019.) (New usage is discouraged.)
⊢ (LineG‘ndx) = ;17
Theorem	itvid 28883	Utility theorem: index-independent form of df-itv 28879. (Contributed by Thierry Arnoux, 24-Aug-2017.)
⊢ Itv = Slot (Itv‘ndx)
Theorem	lngid 28884	Utility theorem: index-independent form of df-lng 28880. (Contributed by Thierry Arnoux, 27-Mar-2019.)
⊢ LineG = Slot (LineG‘ndx)
Theorem	slotsinbpsd 28885	The slots Base, +g, ·𝑠 and dist are different from the slot Itv. Formerly part of ttglem 29435 and proofs using it. (Contributed by AV, 29-Oct-2024.)
⊢ (((Itv‘ndx) ≠ (Base‘ndx) ∧ (Itv‘ndx) ≠ (+g‘ndx)) ∧ ((Itv‘ndx) ≠ ( ·𝑠 ‘ndx) ∧ (Itv‘ndx) ≠ (dist‘ndx)))
Theorem	slotslnbpsd 28886	The slots Base, +g, ·𝑠 and dist are different from the slot LineG. Formerly part of ttglem 29435 and proofs using it. (Contributed by AV, 29-Oct-2024.)
⊢ (((LineG‘ndx) ≠ (Base‘ndx) ∧ (LineG‘ndx) ≠ (+g‘ndx)) ∧ ((LineG‘ndx) ≠ ( ·𝑠 ‘ndx) ∧ (LineG‘ndx) ≠ (dist‘ndx)))
Theorem	lngndxnitvndx 28887	The slot for the line is not the slot for the Interval (segment) in an extensible structure. Formerly part of proof for ttgval 29434. (Contributed by AV, 9-Nov-2024.)
⊢ (LineG‘ndx) ≠ (Itv‘ndx)
Theorem	trkgstr 28888	Functionality of a Tarski geometry. (Contributed by Thierry Arnoux, 24-Aug-2017.)
⊢ 𝑊 = {⟨(Base‘ndx), 𝑈⟩, ⟨(dist‘ndx), 𝐷⟩, ⟨(Itv‘ndx), 𝐼⟩}    ⇒   ⊢ 𝑊 Struct ⟨1, ;16⟩
Theorem	trkgbas 28889	The base set of a Tarski geometry. (Contributed by Thierry Arnoux, 24-Aug-2017.)
⊢ 𝑊 = {⟨(Base‘ndx), 𝑈⟩, ⟨(dist‘ndx), 𝐷⟩, ⟨(Itv‘ndx), 𝐼⟩}    ⇒   ⊢ (𝑈 ∈ 𝑉 → 𝑈 = (Base‘𝑊))
Theorem	trkgdist 28890	The measure of a distance in a Tarski geometry. (Contributed by Thierry Arnoux, 24-Aug-2017.)
⊢ 𝑊 = {⟨(Base‘ndx), 𝑈⟩, ⟨(dist‘ndx), 𝐷⟩, ⟨(Itv‘ndx), 𝐼⟩}    ⇒   ⊢ (𝐷 ∈ 𝑉 → 𝐷 = (dist‘𝑊))
Theorem	trkgitv 28891	The congruence relation in a Tarski geometry. (Contributed by Thierry Arnoux, 24-Aug-2017.)
⊢ 𝑊 = {⟨(Base‘ndx), 𝑈⟩, ⟨(dist‘ndx), 𝐷⟩, ⟨(Itv‘ndx), 𝐼⟩}    ⇒   ⊢ (𝐼 ∈ 𝑉 → 𝐼 = (Itv‘𝑊))
Definition	df-trkgc 28892*	Define the class of geometries fulfilling the congruence axioms of reflexivity, identity and transitivity. These are axioms A1 to A3 of [Schwabhauser] p. 10. With our distance based notation for congruence, transitivity of congruence boils down to transitivity of equality and is already given by eqtr 2781, so it is not listed in this definition. (Contributed by Thierry Arnoux, 24-Aug-2017.)
⊢ TarskiGC = {𝑓 ∣ [(Base‘𝑓) / 𝑝][(dist‘𝑓) / 𝑑](∀𝑥 ∈ 𝑝 ∀𝑦 ∈ 𝑝 (𝑥𝑑𝑦) = (𝑦𝑑𝑥) ∧ ∀𝑥 ∈ 𝑝 ∀𝑦 ∈ 𝑝 ∀𝑧 ∈ 𝑝 ((𝑥𝑑𝑦) = (𝑧𝑑𝑧) → 𝑥 = 𝑦))}
Definition	df-trkgb 28893*	Define the class of geometries fulfilling the 3 betweenness axioms in Tarski's Axiomatization of Geometry: identity, Axiom A6 of [Schwabhauser] p. 11, axiom of Pasch, Axiom A7 of [Schwabhauser] p. 12, and continuity, Axiom A11 of [Schwabhauser] p. 13. (Contributed by Thierry Arnoux, 24-Aug-2017.)
⊢ TarskiGB = {𝑓 ∣ [(Base‘𝑓) / 𝑝][(Itv‘𝑓) / 𝑖](∀𝑥 ∈ 𝑝 ∀𝑦 ∈ 𝑝 (𝑦 ∈ (𝑥𝑖𝑥) → 𝑥 = 𝑦) ∧ ∀𝑥 ∈ 𝑝 ∀𝑦 ∈ 𝑝 ∀𝑧 ∈ 𝑝 ∀𝑢 ∈ 𝑝 ∀𝑣 ∈ 𝑝 ((𝑢 ∈ (𝑥𝑖𝑧) ∧ 𝑣 ∈ (𝑦𝑖𝑧)) → ∃𝑎 ∈ 𝑝 (𝑎 ∈ (𝑢𝑖𝑦) ∧ 𝑎 ∈ (𝑣𝑖𝑥))) ∧ ∀𝑠 ∈ 𝒫 𝑝∀𝑡 ∈ 𝒫 𝑝(∃𝑎 ∈ 𝑝 ∀𝑥 ∈ 𝑠 ∀𝑦 ∈ 𝑡 𝑥 ∈ (𝑎𝑖𝑦) → ∃𝑏 ∈ 𝑝 ∀𝑥 ∈ 𝑠 ∀𝑦 ∈ 𝑡 𝑏 ∈ (𝑥𝑖𝑦)))}
Definition	df-trkgcb 28894*	Define the class of geometries fulfilling the five segment axiom, Axiom A5 of [Schwabhauser] p. 11, and segment construction axiom, Axiom A4 of [Schwabhauser] p. 11. (Contributed by Thierry Arnoux, 14-Mar-2019.)
⊢ TarskiGCB = {𝑓 ∣ [(Base‘𝑓) / 𝑝][(dist‘𝑓) / 𝑑][(Itv‘𝑓) / 𝑖](∀𝑥 ∈ 𝑝 ∀𝑦 ∈ 𝑝 ∀𝑧 ∈ 𝑝 ∀𝑢 ∈ 𝑝 ∀𝑎 ∈ 𝑝 ∀𝑏 ∈ 𝑝 ∀𝑐 ∈ 𝑝 ∀𝑣 ∈ 𝑝 (((𝑥 ≠ 𝑦 ∧ 𝑦 ∈ (𝑥𝑖𝑧) ∧ 𝑏 ∈ (𝑎𝑖𝑐)) ∧ (((𝑥𝑑𝑦) = (𝑎𝑑𝑏) ∧ (𝑦𝑑𝑧) = (𝑏𝑑𝑐)) ∧ ((𝑥𝑑𝑢) = (𝑎𝑑𝑣) ∧ (𝑦𝑑𝑢) = (𝑏𝑑𝑣)))) → (𝑧𝑑𝑢) = (𝑐𝑑𝑣)) ∧ ∀𝑥 ∈ 𝑝 ∀𝑦 ∈ 𝑝 ∀𝑎 ∈ 𝑝 ∀𝑏 ∈ 𝑝 ∃𝑧 ∈ 𝑝 (𝑦 ∈ (𝑥𝑖𝑧) ∧ (𝑦𝑑𝑧) = (𝑎𝑑𝑏)))}
Definition	df-trkge 28895*	Define the class of geometries fulfilling Euclid's axiom, Axiom A10 of [Schwabhauser] p. 13. (Contributed by Thierry Arnoux, 14-Mar-2019.)
⊢ TarskiGE = {𝑓 ∣ [(Base‘𝑓) / 𝑝][(Itv‘𝑓) / 𝑖]∀𝑥 ∈ 𝑝 ∀𝑦 ∈ 𝑝 ∀𝑧 ∈ 𝑝 ∀𝑢 ∈ 𝑝 ∀𝑣 ∈ 𝑝 ((𝑢 ∈ (𝑥𝑖𝑣) ∧ 𝑢 ∈ (𝑦𝑖𝑧) ∧ 𝑥 ≠ 𝑢) → ∃𝑎 ∈ 𝑝 ∃𝑏 ∈ 𝑝 (𝑦 ∈ (𝑥𝑖𝑎) ∧ 𝑧 ∈ (𝑥𝑖𝑏) ∧ 𝑣 ∈ (𝑎𝑖𝑏)))}
Definition	df-trkgld 28896*	Define the class of geometries fulfilling the lower dimension axiom for dimension 𝑛. For such geometries, there are three non-colinear points that are equidistant from 𝑛 − 1 distinct points. Derived from remarks in Tarski's System of Geometry, Alfred Tarski and Steven Givant, Bulletin of Symbolic Logic, Volume 5, Number 2 (1999), 175-214. (Contributed by Scott Fenton, 22-Apr-2013.) (Revised by Thierry Arnoux, 23-Nov-2019.)
⊢ DimTarskiG≥ = {⟨𝑔, 𝑛⟩ ∣ [(Base‘𝑔) / 𝑝][(dist‘𝑔) / 𝑑][(Itv‘𝑔) / 𝑖]∃𝑓(𝑓:(1..^𝑛)–1-1→𝑝 ∧ ∃𝑥 ∈ 𝑝 ∃𝑦 ∈ 𝑝 ∃𝑧 ∈ 𝑝 (∀𝑗 ∈ (2..^𝑛)(((𝑓‘1)𝑑𝑥) = ((𝑓‘𝑗)𝑑𝑥) ∧ ((𝑓‘1)𝑑𝑦) = ((𝑓‘𝑗)𝑑𝑦) ∧ ((𝑓‘1)𝑑𝑧) = ((𝑓‘𝑗)𝑑𝑧)) ∧ ¬ (𝑧 ∈ (𝑥𝑖𝑦) ∨ 𝑥 ∈ (𝑧𝑖𝑦) ∨ 𝑦 ∈ (𝑥𝑖𝑧))))}
Definition	df-trkg 28897*	Define the class of Tarski geometries. A Tarski geometry is a set of points, equipped with a betweenness relation (denoting that a point lies on a line segment between two other points) and a congruence relation (denoting equality of line segment lengths). Here, we are using the following: for congruence, (𝑥 − 𝑦) = (𝑧 − 𝑤) where − = (dist‘𝑊) for betweenness, 𝑦 ∈ (𝑥𝐼𝑧), where 𝐼 = (Itv‘𝑊) With this definition, the axiom A2 is actually equivalent to the transitivity of equality, eqtrd 2796. Tarski originally had more axioms, but later reduced his list to 11: A1 A kind of reflexivity for the congruence relation (TarskiGC) A2 Transitivity for the congruence relation (TarskiGC) A3 Identity for the congruence relation (TarskiGC) A4 Axiom of segment construction (TarskiGCB) A5 5-segment axiom (TarskiGCB) A6 Identity for the betweenness relation (TarskiGB) A7 Axiom of Pasch (TarskiGB) A8 Lower dimension axiom (◡DimTarskiG≥ “ {2}) A9 Upper dimension axiom (V ∖ (◡DimTarskiG≥ “ {3})) A10 Euclid's axiom (TarskiGE) A11 Axiom of continuity (TarskiGB) Our definition is split into 5 parts: congruence axioms TarskiGC (which metric spaces fulfill) betweenness axioms TarskiGB congruence and betweenness axioms TarskiGCB upper and lower dimension axioms DimTarskiG≥ axiom of Euclid / parallel postulate TarskiGE So our definition of a Tarskian Geometry includes the 3 axioms for the quaternary congruence relation (A1, A2, A3), the 3 axioms for the ternary betweenness relation (A6, A7, A11), and the 2 axioms of compatibility of the congruence and the betweenness relations (A4,A5). It does not include Euclid's axiom A10, nor the 2-dimensional axioms A8 (Lower dimension axiom) and A9 (Upper dimension axiom) so the number of dimensions of the geometry it formalizes is not constrained. Considering A2 as one of the 3 axioms for the quaternary congruence relation is somewhat conventional, because the transitivity of the congruence relation is automatically given by our choice to take the distance as this congruence relation in our definition of Tarski geometries. (Contributed by Thierry Arnoux, 24-Aug-2017.) (Revised by Thierry Arnoux, 27-Apr-2019.)
⊢ TarskiG = ((TarskiGC ∩ TarskiGB) ∩ (TarskiGCB ∩ {𝑓 ∣ [(Base‘𝑓) / 𝑝][(Itv‘𝑓) / 𝑖](LineG‘𝑓) = (𝑥 ∈ 𝑝, 𝑦 ∈ (𝑝 ∖ {𝑥}) ↦ {𝑧 ∈ 𝑝 ∣ (𝑧 ∈ (𝑥𝑖𝑦) ∨ 𝑥 ∈ (𝑧𝑖𝑦) ∨ 𝑦 ∈ (𝑥𝑖𝑧))})}))
Theorem	istrkgc 28898*	Property of being a Tarski geometry - congruence part. (Contributed by Thierry Arnoux, 14-Mar-2019.)
⊢ 𝑃 = (Base‘𝐺)    &   ⊢ − = (dist‘𝐺)    &   ⊢ 𝐼 = (Itv‘𝐺)    ⇒   ⊢ (𝐺 ∈ TarskiGC ↔ (𝐺 ∈ V ∧ (∀𝑥 ∈ 𝑃 ∀𝑦 ∈ 𝑃 (𝑥 − 𝑦) = (𝑦 − 𝑥) ∧ ∀𝑥 ∈ 𝑃 ∀𝑦 ∈ 𝑃 ∀𝑧 ∈ 𝑃 ((𝑥 − 𝑦) = (𝑧 − 𝑧) → 𝑥 = 𝑦))))
Theorem	istrkgb 28899*	Property of being a Tarski geometry - betweenness part. (Contributed by Thierry Arnoux, 14-Mar-2019.)
⊢ 𝑃 = (Base‘𝐺)    &   ⊢ − = (dist‘𝐺)    &   ⊢ 𝐼 = (Itv‘𝐺)    ⇒   ⊢ (𝐺 ∈ TarskiGB ↔ (𝐺 ∈ V ∧ (∀𝑥 ∈ 𝑃 ∀𝑦 ∈ 𝑃 (𝑦 ∈ (𝑥𝐼𝑥) → 𝑥 = 𝑦) ∧ ∀𝑥 ∈ 𝑃 ∀𝑦 ∈ 𝑃 ∀𝑧 ∈ 𝑃 ∀𝑢 ∈ 𝑃 ∀𝑣 ∈ 𝑃 ((𝑢 ∈ (𝑥𝐼𝑧) ∧ 𝑣 ∈ (𝑦𝐼𝑧)) → ∃𝑎 ∈ 𝑃 (𝑎 ∈ (𝑢𝐼𝑦) ∧ 𝑎 ∈ (𝑣𝐼𝑥))) ∧ ∀𝑠 ∈ 𝒫 𝑃∀𝑡 ∈ 𝒫 𝑃(∃𝑎 ∈ 𝑃 ∀𝑥 ∈ 𝑠 ∀𝑦 ∈ 𝑡 𝑥 ∈ (𝑎𝐼𝑦) → ∃𝑏 ∈ 𝑃 ∀𝑥 ∈ 𝑠 ∀𝑦 ∈ 𝑡 𝑏 ∈ (𝑥𝐼𝑦)))))
Theorem	istrkgcb 28900*	Property of being a Tarski geometry - congruence and betweenness part. (Contributed by Thierry Arnoux, 14-Mar-2019.)
⊢ 𝑃 = (Base‘𝐺)    &   ⊢ − = (dist‘𝐺)    &   ⊢ 𝐼 = (Itv‘𝐺)    ⇒   ⊢ (𝐺 ∈ TarskiGCB ↔ (𝐺 ∈ V ∧ (∀𝑥 ∈ 𝑃 ∀𝑦 ∈ 𝑃 ∀𝑧 ∈ 𝑃 ∀𝑢 ∈ 𝑃 ∀𝑎 ∈ 𝑃 ∀𝑏 ∈ 𝑃 ∀𝑐 ∈ 𝑃 ∀𝑣 ∈ 𝑃 (((𝑥 ≠ 𝑦 ∧ 𝑦 ∈ (𝑥𝐼𝑧) ∧ 𝑏 ∈ (𝑎𝐼𝑐)) ∧ (((𝑥 − 𝑦) = (𝑎 − 𝑏) ∧ (𝑦 − 𝑧) = (𝑏 − 𝑐)) ∧ ((𝑥 − 𝑢) = (𝑎 − 𝑣) ∧ (𝑦 − 𝑢) = (𝑏 − 𝑣)))) → (𝑧 − 𝑢) = (𝑐 − 𝑣)) ∧ ∀𝑥 ∈ 𝑃 ∀𝑦 ∈ 𝑃 ∀𝑎 ∈ 𝑃 ∀𝑏 ∈ 𝑃 ∃𝑧 ∈ 𝑃 (𝑦 ∈ (𝑥𝐼𝑧) ∧ (𝑦 − 𝑧) = (𝑎 − 𝑏)))))