Theorem equivcmet 23921

Description: If two metrics are strongly equivalent, one is complete iff the other is. Unlike equivcau 23904, metss2 23119, this theorem does not have a one-directional form - it is possible for a metric 𝐶 that is strongly finer than the complete metric 𝐷 to be incomplete and vice versa. Consider 𝐷 = the metric on ℝ induced by the usual homeomorphism from (0, 1) against the usual metric 𝐶 on ℝ and against the discrete metric 𝐸 on ℝ. Then both 𝐶 and 𝐸 are complete but 𝐷 is not, and 𝐶 is strongly finer than 𝐷, which is strongly finer than 𝐸. (Contributed by Mario Carneiro, 15-Sep-2015.)

Hypotheses

Ref	Expression
equivcmet.1	⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐶 ∈ (Met‘𝑋))
equivcmet.2	⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐷 ∈ (Met‘𝑋))
equivcmet.3	⊢ (𝜑 → 𝑅 ∈ ℝ+)
equivcmet.4	⊢ (𝜑 → 𝑆 ∈ ℝ+)
equivcmet.5	⊢ ((𝜑 ∧ (𝑥 ∈ 𝑋 ∧ 𝑦 ∈ 𝑋)) → (𝑥𝐶𝑦) ≤ (𝑅 · (𝑥𝐷𝑦)))
equivcmet.6	⊢ ((𝜑 ∧ (𝑥 ∈ 𝑋 ∧ 𝑦 ∈ 𝑋)) → (𝑥𝐷𝑦) ≤ (𝑆 · (𝑥𝐶𝑦)))

Assertion

Ref	Expression
equivcmet	⊢ (𝜑 → (𝐶 ∈ (CMet‘𝑋) ↔ 𝐷 ∈ (CMet‘𝑋)))

Distinct variable groups:   𝑥,𝑦,𝐶   𝑥,𝐷,𝑦   𝜑,𝑥,𝑦   𝑥,𝑅,𝑦   𝑥,𝑋,𝑦   𝑥,𝑆,𝑦

Proof of Theorem equivcmet

Dummy variable 𝑓 is distinct from all other variables.

Step	Hyp	Ref	Expression
1		equivcmet.1	. . . 4 ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐶 ∈ (Met‘𝑋))
2		equivcmet.2	. . . 4 ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐷 ∈ (Met‘𝑋))
3	1, 2	2thd 268	. . 3 ⊢ (𝜑 → (𝐶 ∈ (Met‘𝑋) ↔ 𝐷 ∈ (Met‘𝑋)))
4		equivcmet.4	. . . . . 6 ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝑆 ∈ ℝ+)
5		equivcmet.6	. . . . . 6 ⊢ ((𝜑 ∧ (𝑥 ∈ 𝑋 ∧ 𝑦 ∈ 𝑋)) → (𝑥𝐷𝑦) ≤ (𝑆 · (𝑥𝐶𝑦)))
6	2, 1, 4, 5	equivcfil 23903	. . . . 5 ⊢ (𝜑 → (CauFil‘𝐶) ⊆ (CauFil‘𝐷))
7		equivcmet.3	. . . . . 6 ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝑅 ∈ ℝ+)
8		equivcmet.5	. . . . . 6 ⊢ ((𝜑 ∧ (𝑥 ∈ 𝑋 ∧ 𝑦 ∈ 𝑋)) → (𝑥𝐶𝑦) ≤ (𝑅 · (𝑥𝐷𝑦)))
9	1, 2, 7, 8	equivcfil 23903	. . . . 5 ⊢ (𝜑 → (CauFil‘𝐷) ⊆ (CauFil‘𝐶))
10	6, 9	eqssd 3932	. . . 4 ⊢ (𝜑 → (CauFil‘𝐶) = (CauFil‘𝐷))
11		eqid 2798	. . . . . . . 8 ⊢ (MetOpen‘𝐶) = (MetOpen‘𝐶)
12		eqid 2798	. . . . . . . 8 ⊢ (MetOpen‘𝐷) = (MetOpen‘𝐷)
13	11, 12, 1, 2, 7, 8	metss2 23119	. . . . . . 7 ⊢ (𝜑 → (MetOpen‘𝐶) ⊆ (MetOpen‘𝐷))
14	12, 11, 2, 1, 4, 5	metss2 23119	. . . . . . 7 ⊢ (𝜑 → (MetOpen‘𝐷) ⊆ (MetOpen‘𝐶))
15	13, 14	eqssd 3932	. . . . . 6 ⊢ (𝜑 → (MetOpen‘𝐶) = (MetOpen‘𝐷))
16	15	oveq1d 7150	. . . . 5 ⊢ (𝜑 → ((MetOpen‘𝐶) fLim 𝑓) = ((MetOpen‘𝐷) fLim 𝑓))
17	16	neeq1d 3046	. . . 4 ⊢ (𝜑 → (((MetOpen‘𝐶) fLim 𝑓) ≠ ∅ ↔ ((MetOpen‘𝐷) fLim 𝑓) ≠ ∅))
18	10, 17	raleqbidv 3354	. . 3 ⊢ (𝜑 → (∀𝑓 ∈ (CauFil‘𝐶)((MetOpen‘𝐶) fLim 𝑓) ≠ ∅ ↔ ∀𝑓 ∈ (CauFil‘𝐷)((MetOpen‘𝐷) fLim 𝑓) ≠ ∅))
19	3, 18	anbi12d 633	. 2 ⊢ (𝜑 → ((𝐶 ∈ (Met‘𝑋) ∧ ∀𝑓 ∈ (CauFil‘𝐶)((MetOpen‘𝐶) fLim 𝑓) ≠ ∅) ↔ (𝐷 ∈ (Met‘𝑋) ∧ ∀𝑓 ∈ (CauFil‘𝐷)((MetOpen‘𝐷) fLim 𝑓) ≠ ∅)))
20	11	iscmet 23888	. 2 ⊢ (𝐶 ∈ (CMet‘𝑋) ↔ (𝐶 ∈ (Met‘𝑋) ∧ ∀𝑓 ∈ (CauFil‘𝐶)((MetOpen‘𝐶) fLim 𝑓) ≠ ∅))
21	12	iscmet 23888	. 2 ⊢ (𝐷 ∈ (CMet‘𝑋) ↔ (𝐷 ∈ (Met‘𝑋) ∧ ∀𝑓 ∈ (CauFil‘𝐷)((MetOpen‘𝐷) fLim 𝑓) ≠ ∅))
22	19, 20, 21	3bitr4g 317	1 ⊢ (𝜑 → (𝐶 ∈ (CMet‘𝑋) ↔ 𝐷 ∈ (CMet‘𝑋)))

Syntax hints:   → wi 4   ↔ wb 209   ∧ wa 399   ∈ wcel 2111   ≠ wne 2987  ∀wral 3106  ∅c0 4243   class class class wbr 5030  ‘cfv 6324  (class class class)co 7135   · cmul 10531   ≤ cle 10665  ℝ⁺crp 12377  Metcmet 20077  MetOpencmopn 20081   fLim cflim 22539  CauFilccfil 23856  CMetccmet 23858

This theorem was proved from axioms:  ax-mp 5  ax-1 6  ax-2 7  ax-3 8  ax-gen 1797  ax-4 1811  ax-5 1911  ax-6 1970  ax-7 2015  ax-8 2113  ax-9 2121  ax-10 2142  ax-11 2158  ax-12 2175  ax-ext 2770  ax-sep 5167  ax-nul 5174  ax-pow 5231  ax-pr 5295  ax-un 7441  ax-cnex 10582  ax-resscn 10583  ax-1cn 10584  ax-icn 10585  ax-addcl 10586  ax-addrcl 10587  ax-mulcl 10588  ax-mulrcl 10589  ax-mulcom 10590  ax-addass 10591  ax-mulass 10592  ax-distr 10593  ax-i2m1 10594  ax-1ne0 10595  ax-1rid 10596  ax-rnegex 10597  ax-rrecex 10598  ax-cnre 10599  ax-pre-lttri 10600  ax-pre-lttrn 10601  ax-pre-ltadd 10602  ax-pre-mulgt0 10603  ax-pre-sup 10604

This theorem depends on definitions:  df-bi 210  df-an 400  df-or 845  df-3or 1085  df-3an 1086  df-tru 1541  df-ex 1782  df-nf 1786  df-sb 2070  df-mo 2598  df-eu 2629  df-clab 2777  df-cleq 2791  df-clel 2870  df-nfc 2938  df-ne 2988  df-nel 3092  df-ral 3111  df-rex 3112  df-reu 3113  df-rmo 3114  df-rab 3115  df-v 3443  df-sbc 3721  df-csb 3829  df-dif 3884  df-un 3886  df-in 3888  df-ss 3898  df-pss 3900  df-nul 4244  df-if 4426  df-pw 4499  df-sn 4526  df-pr 4528  df-tp 4530  df-op 4532  df-uni 4801  df-iun 4883  df-br 5031  df-opab 5093  df-mpt 5111  df-tr 5137  df-id 5425  df-eprel 5430  df-po 5438  df-so 5439  df-fr 5478  df-we 5480  df-xp 5525  df-rel 5526  df-cnv 5527  df-co 5528  df-dm 5529  df-rn 5530  df-res 5531  df-ima 5532  df-pred 6116  df-ord 6162  df-on 6163  df-lim 6164  df-suc 6165  df-iota 6283  df-fun 6326  df-fn 6327  df-f 6328  df-f1 6329  df-fo 6330  df-f1o 6331  df-fv 6332  df-riota 7093  df-ov 7138  df-oprab 7139  df-mpo 7140  df-om 7561  df-1st 7671  df-2nd 7672  df-wrecs 7930  df-recs 7991  df-rdg 8029  df-er 8272  df-map 8391  df-en 8493  df-dom 8494  df-sdom 8495  df-sup 8890  df-inf 8891  df-pnf 10666  df-mnf 10667  df-xr 10668  df-ltxr 10669  df-le 10670  df-sub 10861  df-neg 10862  df-div 11287  df-nn 11626  df-2 11688  df-n0 11886  df-z 11970  df-uz 12232  df-q 12337  df-rp 12378  df-xneg 12495  df-xadd 12496  df-xmul 12497  df-ico 12732  df-topgen 16709  df-psmet 20083  df-xmet 20084  df-met 20085  df-bl 20086  df-mopn 20087  df-fbas 20088  df-bases 21551  df-fil 22451  df-cfil 23859  df-cmet 23861

This theorem is referenced by: (None)