Theorem equivcmet 25365

Description: If two metrics are strongly equivalent, one is complete iff the other is. Unlike equivcau 25348, metss2 24541, this theorem does not have a one-directional form - it is possible for a metric 𝐶 that is strongly finer than the complete metric 𝐷 to be incomplete and vice versa. Consider 𝐷 = the metric on ℝ induced by the usual homeomorphism from (0, 1) against the usual metric 𝐶 on ℝ and against the discrete metric 𝐸 on ℝ. Then both 𝐶 and 𝐸 are complete but 𝐷 is not, and 𝐶 is strongly finer than 𝐷, which is strongly finer than 𝐸. (Contributed by Mario Carneiro, 15-Sep-2015.)

Hypotheses

Ref	Expression
equivcmet.1	⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐶 ∈ (Met‘𝑋))
equivcmet.2	⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐷 ∈ (Met‘𝑋))
equivcmet.3	⊢ (𝜑 → 𝑅 ∈ ℝ+)
equivcmet.4	⊢ (𝜑 → 𝑆 ∈ ℝ+)
equivcmet.5	⊢ ((𝜑 ∧ (𝑥 ∈ 𝑋 ∧ 𝑦 ∈ 𝑋)) → (𝑥𝐶𝑦) ≤ (𝑅 · (𝑥𝐷𝑦)))
equivcmet.6	⊢ ((𝜑 ∧ (𝑥 ∈ 𝑋 ∧ 𝑦 ∈ 𝑋)) → (𝑥𝐷𝑦) ≤ (𝑆 · (𝑥𝐶𝑦)))

Assertion

Ref	Expression
equivcmet	⊢ (𝜑 → (𝐶 ∈ (CMet‘𝑋) ↔ 𝐷 ∈ (CMet‘𝑋)))

Distinct variable groups:   𝑥,𝑦,𝐶   𝑥,𝐷,𝑦   𝜑,𝑥,𝑦   𝑥,𝑅,𝑦   𝑥,𝑋,𝑦   𝑥,𝑆,𝑦

Proof of Theorem equivcmet

Dummy variable 𝑓 is distinct from all other variables.

Step	Hyp	Ref	Expression
1		equivcmet.1	. . . 4 ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐶 ∈ (Met‘𝑋))
2		equivcmet.2	. . . 4 ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐷 ∈ (Met‘𝑋))
3	1, 2	2thd 265	. . 3 ⊢ (𝜑 → (𝐶 ∈ (Met‘𝑋) ↔ 𝐷 ∈ (Met‘𝑋)))
4		equivcmet.4	. . . . . 6 ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝑆 ∈ ℝ+)
5		equivcmet.6	. . . . . 6 ⊢ ((𝜑 ∧ (𝑥 ∈ 𝑋 ∧ 𝑦 ∈ 𝑋)) → (𝑥𝐷𝑦) ≤ (𝑆 · (𝑥𝐶𝑦)))
6	2, 1, 4, 5	equivcfil 25347	. . . . 5 ⊢ (𝜑 → (CauFil‘𝐶) ⊆ (CauFil‘𝐷))
7		equivcmet.3	. . . . . 6 ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝑅 ∈ ℝ+)
8		equivcmet.5	. . . . . 6 ⊢ ((𝜑 ∧ (𝑥 ∈ 𝑋 ∧ 𝑦 ∈ 𝑋)) → (𝑥𝐶𝑦) ≤ (𝑅 · (𝑥𝐷𝑦)))
9	1, 2, 7, 8	equivcfil 25347	. . . . 5 ⊢ (𝜑 → (CauFil‘𝐷) ⊆ (CauFil‘𝐶))
10	6, 9	eqssd 4013	. . . 4 ⊢ (𝜑 → (CauFil‘𝐶) = (CauFil‘𝐷))
11		eqid 2735	. . . . . . . 8 ⊢ (MetOpen‘𝐶) = (MetOpen‘𝐶)
12		eqid 2735	. . . . . . . 8 ⊢ (MetOpen‘𝐷) = (MetOpen‘𝐷)
13	11, 12, 1, 2, 7, 8	metss2 24541	. . . . . . 7 ⊢ (𝜑 → (MetOpen‘𝐶) ⊆ (MetOpen‘𝐷))
14	12, 11, 2, 1, 4, 5	metss2 24541	. . . . . . 7 ⊢ (𝜑 → (MetOpen‘𝐷) ⊆ (MetOpen‘𝐶))
15	13, 14	eqssd 4013	. . . . . 6 ⊢ (𝜑 → (MetOpen‘𝐶) = (MetOpen‘𝐷))
16	15	oveq1d 7446	. . . . 5 ⊢ (𝜑 → ((MetOpen‘𝐶) fLim 𝑓) = ((MetOpen‘𝐷) fLim 𝑓))
17	16	neeq1d 2998	. . . 4 ⊢ (𝜑 → (((MetOpen‘𝐶) fLim 𝑓) ≠ ∅ ↔ ((MetOpen‘𝐷) fLim 𝑓) ≠ ∅))
18	10, 17	raleqbidv 3344	. . 3 ⊢ (𝜑 → (∀𝑓 ∈ (CauFil‘𝐶)((MetOpen‘𝐶) fLim 𝑓) ≠ ∅ ↔ ∀𝑓 ∈ (CauFil‘𝐷)((MetOpen‘𝐷) fLim 𝑓) ≠ ∅))
19	3, 18	anbi12d 632	. 2 ⊢ (𝜑 → ((𝐶 ∈ (Met‘𝑋) ∧ ∀𝑓 ∈ (CauFil‘𝐶)((MetOpen‘𝐶) fLim 𝑓) ≠ ∅) ↔ (𝐷 ∈ (Met‘𝑋) ∧ ∀𝑓 ∈ (CauFil‘𝐷)((MetOpen‘𝐷) fLim 𝑓) ≠ ∅)))
20	11	iscmet 25332	. 2 ⊢ (𝐶 ∈ (CMet‘𝑋) ↔ (𝐶 ∈ (Met‘𝑋) ∧ ∀𝑓 ∈ (CauFil‘𝐶)((MetOpen‘𝐶) fLim 𝑓) ≠ ∅))
21	12	iscmet 25332	. 2 ⊢ (𝐷 ∈ (CMet‘𝑋) ↔ (𝐷 ∈ (Met‘𝑋) ∧ ∀𝑓 ∈ (CauFil‘𝐷)((MetOpen‘𝐷) fLim 𝑓) ≠ ∅))
22	19, 20, 21	3bitr4g 314	1 ⊢ (𝜑 → (𝐶 ∈ (CMet‘𝑋) ↔ 𝐷 ∈ (CMet‘𝑋)))

Syntax hints:   → wi 4   ↔ wb 206   ∧ wa 395   ∈ wcel 2106   ≠ wne 2938  ∀wral 3059  ∅c0 4339   class class class wbr 5148  ‘cfv 6563  (class class class)co 7431   · cmul 11158   ≤ cle 11294  ℝ⁺crp 13032  Metcmet 21368  MetOpencmopn 21372   fLim cflim 23958  CauFilccfil 25300  CMetccmet 25302

This theorem was proved from axioms:  ax-mp 5  ax-1 6  ax-2 7  ax-3 8  ax-gen 1792  ax-4 1806  ax-5 1908  ax-6 1965  ax-7 2005  ax-8 2108  ax-9 2116  ax-10 2139  ax-11 2155  ax-12 2175  ax-ext 2706  ax-sep 5302  ax-nul 5312  ax-pow 5371  ax-pr 5438  ax-un 7754  ax-cnex 11209  ax-resscn 11210  ax-1cn 11211  ax-icn 11212  ax-addcl 11213  ax-addrcl 11214  ax-mulcl 11215  ax-mulrcl 11216  ax-mulcom 11217  ax-addass 11218  ax-mulass 11219  ax-distr 11220  ax-i2m1 11221  ax-1ne0 11222  ax-1rid 11223  ax-rnegex 11224  ax-rrecex 11225  ax-cnre 11226  ax-pre-lttri 11227  ax-pre-lttrn 11228  ax-pre-ltadd 11229  ax-pre-mulgt0 11230  ax-pre-sup 11231

This theorem depends on definitions:  df-bi 207  df-an 396  df-or 848  df-3or 1087  df-3an 1088  df-tru 1540  df-fal 1550  df-ex 1777  df-nf 1781  df-sb 2063  df-mo 2538  df-eu 2567  df-clab 2713  df-cleq 2727  df-clel 2814  df-nfc 2890  df-ne 2939  df-nel 3045  df-ral 3060  df-rex 3069  df-rmo 3378  df-reu 3379  df-rab 3434  df-v 3480  df-sbc 3792  df-csb 3909  df-dif 3966  df-un 3968  df-in 3970  df-ss 3980  df-pss 3983  df-nul 4340  df-if 4532  df-pw 4607  df-sn 4632  df-pr 4634  df-op 4638  df-uni 4913  df-iun 4998  df-br 5149  df-opab 5211  df-mpt 5232  df-tr 5266  df-id 5583  df-eprel 5589  df-po 5597  df-so 5598  df-fr 5641  df-we 5643  df-xp 5695  df-rel 5696  df-cnv 5697  df-co 5698  df-dm 5699  df-rn 5700  df-res 5701  df-ima 5702  df-pred 6323  df-ord 6389  df-on 6390  df-lim 6391  df-suc 6392  df-iota 6516  df-fun 6565  df-fn 6566  df-f 6567  df-f1 6568  df-fo 6569  df-f1o 6570  df-fv 6571  df-riota 7388  df-ov 7434  df-oprab 7435  df-mpo 7436  df-om 7888  df-1st 8013  df-2nd 8014  df-frecs 8305  df-wrecs 8336  df-recs 8410  df-rdg 8449  df-er 8744  df-map 8867  df-en 8985  df-dom 8986  df-sdom 8987  df-sup 9480  df-inf 9481  df-pnf 11295  df-mnf 11296  df-xr 11297  df-ltxr 11298  df-le 11299  df-sub 11492  df-neg 11493  df-div 11919  df-nn 12265  df-2 12327  df-n0 12525  df-z 12612  df-uz 12877  df-q 12989  df-rp 13033  df-xneg 13152  df-xadd 13153  df-xmul 13154  df-ico 13390  df-topgen 17490  df-psmet 21374  df-xmet 21375  df-met 21376  df-bl 21377  df-mopn 21378  df-fbas 21379  df-bases 22969  df-fil 23870  df-cfil 25303  df-cmet 25305

This theorem is referenced by: (None)