Theorem equivcmet 25200

Description: If two metrics are strongly equivalent, one is complete iff the other is. Unlike equivcau 25183, metss2 24376, this theorem does not have a one-directional form - it is possible for a metric 𝐶 that is strongly finer than the complete metric 𝐷 to be incomplete and vice versa. Consider 𝐷 = the metric on ℝ induced by the usual homeomorphism from (0, 1) against the usual metric 𝐶 on ℝ and against the discrete metric 𝐸 on ℝ. Then both 𝐶 and 𝐸 are complete but 𝐷 is not, and 𝐶 is strongly finer than 𝐷, which is strongly finer than 𝐸. (Contributed by Mario Carneiro, 15-Sep-2015.)

Hypotheses

Ref	Expression
equivcmet.1	⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐶 ∈ (Met‘𝑋))
equivcmet.2	⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐷 ∈ (Met‘𝑋))
equivcmet.3	⊢ (𝜑 → 𝑅 ∈ ℝ+)
equivcmet.4	⊢ (𝜑 → 𝑆 ∈ ℝ+)
equivcmet.5	⊢ ((𝜑 ∧ (𝑥 ∈ 𝑋 ∧ 𝑦 ∈ 𝑋)) → (𝑥𝐶𝑦) ≤ (𝑅 · (𝑥𝐷𝑦)))
equivcmet.6	⊢ ((𝜑 ∧ (𝑥 ∈ 𝑋 ∧ 𝑦 ∈ 𝑋)) → (𝑥𝐷𝑦) ≤ (𝑆 · (𝑥𝐶𝑦)))

Assertion

Ref	Expression
equivcmet	⊢ (𝜑 → (𝐶 ∈ (CMet‘𝑋) ↔ 𝐷 ∈ (CMet‘𝑋)))

Distinct variable groups:   𝑥,𝑦,𝐶   𝑥,𝐷,𝑦   𝜑,𝑥,𝑦   𝑥,𝑅,𝑦   𝑥,𝑋,𝑦   𝑥,𝑆,𝑦

Proof of Theorem equivcmet

Dummy variable 𝑓 is distinct from all other variables.

Step	Hyp	Ref	Expression
1		equivcmet.1	. . . 4 ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐶 ∈ (Met‘𝑋))
2		equivcmet.2	. . . 4 ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐷 ∈ (Met‘𝑋))
3	1, 2	2thd 265	. . 3 ⊢ (𝜑 → (𝐶 ∈ (Met‘𝑋) ↔ 𝐷 ∈ (Met‘𝑋)))
4		equivcmet.4	. . . . . 6 ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝑆 ∈ ℝ+)
5		equivcmet.6	. . . . . 6 ⊢ ((𝜑 ∧ (𝑥 ∈ 𝑋 ∧ 𝑦 ∈ 𝑋)) → (𝑥𝐷𝑦) ≤ (𝑆 · (𝑥𝐶𝑦)))
6	2, 1, 4, 5	equivcfil 25182	. . . . 5 ⊢ (𝜑 → (CauFil‘𝐶) ⊆ (CauFil‘𝐷))
7		equivcmet.3	. . . . . 6 ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝑅 ∈ ℝ+)
8		equivcmet.5	. . . . . 6 ⊢ ((𝜑 ∧ (𝑥 ∈ 𝑋 ∧ 𝑦 ∈ 𝑋)) → (𝑥𝐶𝑦) ≤ (𝑅 · (𝑥𝐷𝑦)))
9	1, 2, 7, 8	equivcfil 25182	. . . . 5 ⊢ (𝜑 → (CauFil‘𝐷) ⊆ (CauFil‘𝐶))
10	6, 9	eqssd 3994	. . . 4 ⊢ (𝜑 → (CauFil‘𝐶) = (CauFil‘𝐷))
11		eqid 2726	. . . . . . . 8 ⊢ (MetOpen‘𝐶) = (MetOpen‘𝐶)
12		eqid 2726	. . . . . . . 8 ⊢ (MetOpen‘𝐷) = (MetOpen‘𝐷)
13	11, 12, 1, 2, 7, 8	metss2 24376	. . . . . . 7 ⊢ (𝜑 → (MetOpen‘𝐶) ⊆ (MetOpen‘𝐷))
14	12, 11, 2, 1, 4, 5	metss2 24376	. . . . . . 7 ⊢ (𝜑 → (MetOpen‘𝐷) ⊆ (MetOpen‘𝐶))
15	13, 14	eqssd 3994	. . . . . 6 ⊢ (𝜑 → (MetOpen‘𝐶) = (MetOpen‘𝐷))
16	15	oveq1d 7420	. . . . 5 ⊢ (𝜑 → ((MetOpen‘𝐶) fLim 𝑓) = ((MetOpen‘𝐷) fLim 𝑓))
17	16	neeq1d 2994	. . . 4 ⊢ (𝜑 → (((MetOpen‘𝐶) fLim 𝑓) ≠ ∅ ↔ ((MetOpen‘𝐷) fLim 𝑓) ≠ ∅))
18	10, 17	raleqbidv 3336	. . 3 ⊢ (𝜑 → (∀𝑓 ∈ (CauFil‘𝐶)((MetOpen‘𝐶) fLim 𝑓) ≠ ∅ ↔ ∀𝑓 ∈ (CauFil‘𝐷)((MetOpen‘𝐷) fLim 𝑓) ≠ ∅))
19	3, 18	anbi12d 630	. 2 ⊢ (𝜑 → ((𝐶 ∈ (Met‘𝑋) ∧ ∀𝑓 ∈ (CauFil‘𝐶)((MetOpen‘𝐶) fLim 𝑓) ≠ ∅) ↔ (𝐷 ∈ (Met‘𝑋) ∧ ∀𝑓 ∈ (CauFil‘𝐷)((MetOpen‘𝐷) fLim 𝑓) ≠ ∅)))
20	11	iscmet 25167	. 2 ⊢ (𝐶 ∈ (CMet‘𝑋) ↔ (𝐶 ∈ (Met‘𝑋) ∧ ∀𝑓 ∈ (CauFil‘𝐶)((MetOpen‘𝐶) fLim 𝑓) ≠ ∅))
21	12	iscmet 25167	. 2 ⊢ (𝐷 ∈ (CMet‘𝑋) ↔ (𝐷 ∈ (Met‘𝑋) ∧ ∀𝑓 ∈ (CauFil‘𝐷)((MetOpen‘𝐷) fLim 𝑓) ≠ ∅))
22	19, 20, 21	3bitr4g 314	1 ⊢ (𝜑 → (𝐶 ∈ (CMet‘𝑋) ↔ 𝐷 ∈ (CMet‘𝑋)))

Syntax hints:   → wi 4   ↔ wb 205   ∧ wa 395   ∈ wcel 2098   ≠ wne 2934  ∀wral 3055  ∅c0 4317   class class class wbr 5141  ‘cfv 6537  (class class class)co 7405   · cmul 11117   ≤ cle 11253  ℝ⁺crp 12980  Metcmet 21226  MetOpencmopn 21230   fLim cflim 23793  CauFilccfil 25135  CMetccmet 25137

This theorem was proved from axioms:  ax-mp 5  ax-1 6  ax-2 7  ax-3 8  ax-gen 1789  ax-4 1803  ax-5 1905  ax-6 1963  ax-7 2003  ax-8 2100  ax-9 2108  ax-10 2129  ax-11 2146  ax-12 2163  ax-ext 2697  ax-sep 5292  ax-nul 5299  ax-pow 5356  ax-pr 5420  ax-un 7722  ax-cnex 11168  ax-resscn 11169  ax-1cn 11170  ax-icn 11171  ax-addcl 11172  ax-addrcl 11173  ax-mulcl 11174  ax-mulrcl 11175  ax-mulcom 11176  ax-addass 11177  ax-mulass 11178  ax-distr 11179  ax-i2m1 11180  ax-1ne0 11181  ax-1rid 11182  ax-rnegex 11183  ax-rrecex 11184  ax-cnre 11185  ax-pre-lttri 11186  ax-pre-lttrn 11187  ax-pre-ltadd 11188  ax-pre-mulgt0 11189  ax-pre-sup 11190

This theorem depends on definitions:  df-bi 206  df-an 396  df-or 845  df-3or 1085  df-3an 1086  df-tru 1536  df-fal 1546  df-ex 1774  df-nf 1778  df-sb 2060  df-mo 2528  df-eu 2557  df-clab 2704  df-cleq 2718  df-clel 2804  df-nfc 2879  df-ne 2935  df-nel 3041  df-ral 3056  df-rex 3065  df-rmo 3370  df-reu 3371  df-rab 3427  df-v 3470  df-sbc 3773  df-csb 3889  df-dif 3946  df-un 3948  df-in 3950  df-ss 3960  df-pss 3962  df-nul 4318  df-if 4524  df-pw 4599  df-sn 4624  df-pr 4626  df-op 4630  df-uni 4903  df-iun 4992  df-br 5142  df-opab 5204  df-mpt 5225  df-tr 5259  df-id 5567  df-eprel 5573  df-po 5581  df-so 5582  df-fr 5624  df-we 5626  df-xp 5675  df-rel 5676  df-cnv 5677  df-co 5678  df-dm 5679  df-rn 5680  df-res 5681  df-ima 5682  df-pred 6294  df-ord 6361  df-on 6362  df-lim 6363  df-suc 6364  df-iota 6489  df-fun 6539  df-fn 6540  df-f 6541  df-f1 6542  df-fo 6543  df-f1o 6544  df-fv 6545  df-riota 7361  df-ov 7408  df-oprab 7409  df-mpo 7410  df-om 7853  df-1st 7974  df-2nd 7975  df-frecs 8267  df-wrecs 8298  df-recs 8372  df-rdg 8411  df-er 8705  df-map 8824  df-en 8942  df-dom 8943  df-sdom 8944  df-sup 9439  df-inf 9440  df-pnf 11254  df-mnf 11255  df-xr 11256  df-ltxr 11257  df-le 11258  df-sub 11450  df-neg 11451  df-div 11876  df-nn 12217  df-2 12279  df-n0 12477  df-z 12563  df-uz 12827  df-q 12937  df-rp 12981  df-xneg 13098  df-xadd 13099  df-xmul 13100  df-ico 13336  df-topgen 17398  df-psmet 21232  df-xmet 21233  df-met 21234  df-bl 21235  df-mopn 21236  df-fbas 21237  df-bases 22804  df-fil 23705  df-cfil 25138  df-cmet 25140

This theorem is referenced by: (None)