Theorem equivcmet 24833

Description: If two metrics are strongly equivalent, one is complete iff the other is. Unlike equivcau 24816, metss2 24020, this theorem does not have a one-directional form - it is possible for a metric 𝐶 that is strongly finer than the complete metric 𝐷 to be incomplete and vice versa. Consider 𝐷 = the metric on ℝ induced by the usual homeomorphism from (0, 1) against the usual metric 𝐶 on ℝ and against the discrete metric 𝐸 on ℝ. Then both 𝐶 and 𝐸 are complete but 𝐷 is not, and 𝐶 is strongly finer than 𝐷, which is strongly finer than 𝐸. (Contributed by Mario Carneiro, 15-Sep-2015.)

Hypotheses

Ref	Expression
equivcmet.1	⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐶 ∈ (Met‘𝑋))
equivcmet.2	⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐷 ∈ (Met‘𝑋))
equivcmet.3	⊢ (𝜑 → 𝑅 ∈ ℝ+)
equivcmet.4	⊢ (𝜑 → 𝑆 ∈ ℝ+)
equivcmet.5	⊢ ((𝜑 ∧ (𝑥 ∈ 𝑋 ∧ 𝑦 ∈ 𝑋)) → (𝑥𝐶𝑦) ≤ (𝑅 · (𝑥𝐷𝑦)))
equivcmet.6	⊢ ((𝜑 ∧ (𝑥 ∈ 𝑋 ∧ 𝑦 ∈ 𝑋)) → (𝑥𝐷𝑦) ≤ (𝑆 · (𝑥𝐶𝑦)))

Assertion

Ref	Expression
equivcmet	⊢ (𝜑 → (𝐶 ∈ (CMet‘𝑋) ↔ 𝐷 ∈ (CMet‘𝑋)))

Distinct variable groups:   𝑥,𝑦,𝐶   𝑥,𝐷,𝑦   𝜑,𝑥,𝑦   𝑥,𝑅,𝑦   𝑥,𝑋,𝑦   𝑥,𝑆,𝑦

Proof of Theorem equivcmet

Dummy variable 𝑓 is distinct from all other variables.

Step	Hyp	Ref	Expression
1		equivcmet.1	. . . 4 ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐶 ∈ (Met‘𝑋))
2		equivcmet.2	. . . 4 ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐷 ∈ (Met‘𝑋))
3	1, 2	2thd 264	. . 3 ⊢ (𝜑 → (𝐶 ∈ (Met‘𝑋) ↔ 𝐷 ∈ (Met‘𝑋)))
4		equivcmet.4	. . . . . 6 ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝑆 ∈ ℝ+)
5		equivcmet.6	. . . . . 6 ⊢ ((𝜑 ∧ (𝑥 ∈ 𝑋 ∧ 𝑦 ∈ 𝑋)) → (𝑥𝐷𝑦) ≤ (𝑆 · (𝑥𝐶𝑦)))
6	2, 1, 4, 5	equivcfil 24815	. . . . 5 ⊢ (𝜑 → (CauFil‘𝐶) ⊆ (CauFil‘𝐷))
7		equivcmet.3	. . . . . 6 ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝑅 ∈ ℝ+)
8		equivcmet.5	. . . . . 6 ⊢ ((𝜑 ∧ (𝑥 ∈ 𝑋 ∧ 𝑦 ∈ 𝑋)) → (𝑥𝐶𝑦) ≤ (𝑅 · (𝑥𝐷𝑦)))
9	1, 2, 7, 8	equivcfil 24815	. . . . 5 ⊢ (𝜑 → (CauFil‘𝐷) ⊆ (CauFil‘𝐶))
10	6, 9	eqssd 3999	. . . 4 ⊢ (𝜑 → (CauFil‘𝐶) = (CauFil‘𝐷))
11		eqid 2732	. . . . . . . 8 ⊢ (MetOpen‘𝐶) = (MetOpen‘𝐶)
12		eqid 2732	. . . . . . . 8 ⊢ (MetOpen‘𝐷) = (MetOpen‘𝐷)
13	11, 12, 1, 2, 7, 8	metss2 24020	. . . . . . 7 ⊢ (𝜑 → (MetOpen‘𝐶) ⊆ (MetOpen‘𝐷))
14	12, 11, 2, 1, 4, 5	metss2 24020	. . . . . . 7 ⊢ (𝜑 → (MetOpen‘𝐷) ⊆ (MetOpen‘𝐶))
15	13, 14	eqssd 3999	. . . . . 6 ⊢ (𝜑 → (MetOpen‘𝐶) = (MetOpen‘𝐷))
16	15	oveq1d 7423	. . . . 5 ⊢ (𝜑 → ((MetOpen‘𝐶) fLim 𝑓) = ((MetOpen‘𝐷) fLim 𝑓))
17	16	neeq1d 3000	. . . 4 ⊢ (𝜑 → (((MetOpen‘𝐶) fLim 𝑓) ≠ ∅ ↔ ((MetOpen‘𝐷) fLim 𝑓) ≠ ∅))
18	10, 17	raleqbidv 3342	. . 3 ⊢ (𝜑 → (∀𝑓 ∈ (CauFil‘𝐶)((MetOpen‘𝐶) fLim 𝑓) ≠ ∅ ↔ ∀𝑓 ∈ (CauFil‘𝐷)((MetOpen‘𝐷) fLim 𝑓) ≠ ∅))
19	3, 18	anbi12d 631	. 2 ⊢ (𝜑 → ((𝐶 ∈ (Met‘𝑋) ∧ ∀𝑓 ∈ (CauFil‘𝐶)((MetOpen‘𝐶) fLim 𝑓) ≠ ∅) ↔ (𝐷 ∈ (Met‘𝑋) ∧ ∀𝑓 ∈ (CauFil‘𝐷)((MetOpen‘𝐷) fLim 𝑓) ≠ ∅)))
20	11	iscmet 24800	. 2 ⊢ (𝐶 ∈ (CMet‘𝑋) ↔ (𝐶 ∈ (Met‘𝑋) ∧ ∀𝑓 ∈ (CauFil‘𝐶)((MetOpen‘𝐶) fLim 𝑓) ≠ ∅))
21	12	iscmet 24800	. 2 ⊢ (𝐷 ∈ (CMet‘𝑋) ↔ (𝐷 ∈ (Met‘𝑋) ∧ ∀𝑓 ∈ (CauFil‘𝐷)((MetOpen‘𝐷) fLim 𝑓) ≠ ∅))
22	19, 20, 21	3bitr4g 313	1 ⊢ (𝜑 → (𝐶 ∈ (CMet‘𝑋) ↔ 𝐷 ∈ (CMet‘𝑋)))

Syntax hints:   → wi 4   ↔ wb 205   ∧ wa 396   ∈ wcel 2106   ≠ wne 2940  ∀wral 3061  ∅c0 4322   class class class wbr 5148  ‘cfv 6543  (class class class)co 7408   · cmul 11114   ≤ cle 11248  ℝ⁺crp 12973  Metcmet 20929  MetOpencmopn 20933   fLim cflim 23437  CauFilccfil 24768  CMetccmet 24770

This theorem was proved from axioms:  ax-mp 5  ax-1 6  ax-2 7  ax-3 8  ax-gen 1797  ax-4 1811  ax-5 1913  ax-6 1971  ax-7 2011  ax-8 2108  ax-9 2116  ax-10 2137  ax-11 2154  ax-12 2171  ax-ext 2703  ax-sep 5299  ax-nul 5306  ax-pow 5363  ax-pr 5427  ax-un 7724  ax-cnex 11165  ax-resscn 11166  ax-1cn 11167  ax-icn 11168  ax-addcl 11169  ax-addrcl 11170  ax-mulcl 11171  ax-mulrcl 11172  ax-mulcom 11173  ax-addass 11174  ax-mulass 11175  ax-distr 11176  ax-i2m1 11177  ax-1ne0 11178  ax-1rid 11179  ax-rnegex 11180  ax-rrecex 11181  ax-cnre 11182  ax-pre-lttri 11183  ax-pre-lttrn 11184  ax-pre-ltadd 11185  ax-pre-mulgt0 11186  ax-pre-sup 11187

This theorem depends on definitions:  df-bi 206  df-an 397  df-or 846  df-3or 1088  df-3an 1089  df-tru 1544  df-fal 1554  df-ex 1782  df-nf 1786  df-sb 2068  df-mo 2534  df-eu 2563  df-clab 2710  df-cleq 2724  df-clel 2810  df-nfc 2885  df-ne 2941  df-nel 3047  df-ral 3062  df-rex 3071  df-rmo 3376  df-reu 3377  df-rab 3433  df-v 3476  df-sbc 3778  df-csb 3894  df-dif 3951  df-un 3953  df-in 3955  df-ss 3965  df-pss 3967  df-nul 4323  df-if 4529  df-pw 4604  df-sn 4629  df-pr 4631  df-op 4635  df-uni 4909  df-iun 4999  df-br 5149  df-opab 5211  df-mpt 5232  df-tr 5266  df-id 5574  df-eprel 5580  df-po 5588  df-so 5589  df-fr 5631  df-we 5633  df-xp 5682  df-rel 5683  df-cnv 5684  df-co 5685  df-dm 5686  df-rn 5687  df-res 5688  df-ima 5689  df-pred 6300  df-ord 6367  df-on 6368  df-lim 6369  df-suc 6370  df-iota 6495  df-fun 6545  df-fn 6546  df-f 6547  df-f1 6548  df-fo 6549  df-f1o 6550  df-fv 6551  df-riota 7364  df-ov 7411  df-oprab 7412  df-mpo 7413  df-om 7855  df-1st 7974  df-2nd 7975  df-frecs 8265  df-wrecs 8296  df-recs 8370  df-rdg 8409  df-er 8702  df-map 8821  df-en 8939  df-dom 8940  df-sdom 8941  df-sup 9436  df-inf 9437  df-pnf 11249  df-mnf 11250  df-xr 11251  df-ltxr 11252  df-le 11253  df-sub 11445  df-neg 11446  df-div 11871  df-nn 12212  df-2 12274  df-n0 12472  df-z 12558  df-uz 12822  df-q 12932  df-rp 12974  df-xneg 13091  df-xadd 13092  df-xmul 13093  df-ico 13329  df-topgen 17388  df-psmet 20935  df-xmet 20936  df-met 20937  df-bl 20938  df-mopn 20939  df-fbas 20940  df-bases 22448  df-fil 23349  df-cfil 24771  df-cmet 24773

This theorem is referenced by: (None)