Theorem usgrres1 29830

Description: Restricting a simple graph by removing one vertex results in a simple graph. Remark: This restricted graph is not a subgraph of the original graph in the sense of df-subgr 29783 since the domains of the edge functions may not be compatible. (Contributed by Alexander van der Vekens, 2-Jan-2018.) (Revised by AV, 10-Jan-2020.) (Revised by AV, 23-Oct-2020.) (Proof shortened by AV, 27-Nov-2020.)

Hypotheses

Ref	Expression
upgrres1.v	⊢ 𝑉 = (Vtx‘𝐺)
upgrres1.e	⊢ 𝐸 = (Edg‘𝐺)
upgrres1.f	⊢ 𝐹 = {𝑒 ∈ 𝐸 ∣ 𝑁 ∉ 𝑒}
upgrres1.s	⊢ 𝑆 = ⟨(𝑉 ∖ {𝑁}), ( I ↾ 𝐹)⟩

Assertion

Ref	Expression
usgrres1	⊢ ((𝐺 ∈ USGraph ∧ 𝑁 ∈ 𝑉) → 𝑆 ∈ USGraph)

Distinct variable groups:   𝑒,𝐸   𝑒,𝐺   𝑒,𝑁   𝑒,𝑉

Allowed substitution hints:   𝑆(𝑒)   𝐹(𝑒)

Proof of Theorem usgrres1

Dummy variable 𝑝 is distinct from all other variables.

Step	Hyp	Ref	Expression
1		f1oi 6851	. . . . 5 ⊢ ( I ↾ 𝐹):𝐹–1-1-onto→𝐹
2		f1of1 6811	. . . . 5 ⊢ (( I ↾ 𝐹):𝐹–1-1-onto→𝐹 → ( I ↾ 𝐹):𝐹–1-1→𝐹)
3	1, 2	mp1i 14	. . . 4 ⊢ ((𝐺 ∈ USGraph ∧ 𝑁 ∈ 𝑉) → ( I ↾ 𝐹):𝐹–1-1→𝐹)
4		eqidd 2761	. . . . 5 ⊢ ((𝐺 ∈ USGraph ∧ 𝑁 ∈ 𝑉) → ( I ↾ 𝐹) = ( I ↾ 𝐹))
5		dmresi 6042	. . . . . 6 ⊢ dom ( I ↾ 𝐹) = 𝐹
6	5	a1i 11	. . . . 5 ⊢ ((𝐺 ∈ USGraph ∧ 𝑁 ∈ 𝑉) → dom ( I ↾ 𝐹) = 𝐹)
7		eqidd 2761	. . . . 5 ⊢ ((𝐺 ∈ USGraph ∧ 𝑁 ∈ 𝑉) → 𝐹 = 𝐹)
8	4, 6, 7	f1eq123d 6804	. . . 4 ⊢ ((𝐺 ∈ USGraph ∧ 𝑁 ∈ 𝑉) → (( I ↾ 𝐹):dom ( I ↾ 𝐹)–1-1→𝐹 ↔ ( I ↾ 𝐹):𝐹–1-1→𝐹))
9	3, 8	mpbird 260	. . 3 ⊢ ((𝐺 ∈ USGraph ∧ 𝑁 ∈ 𝑉) → ( I ↾ 𝐹):dom ( I ↾ 𝐹)–1-1→𝐹)
10		usgrumgr 29696	. . . 4 ⊢ (𝐺 ∈ USGraph → 𝐺 ∈ UMGraph)
11		upgrres1.v	. . . . 5 ⊢ 𝑉 = (Vtx‘𝐺)
12		upgrres1.e	. . . . 5 ⊢ 𝐸 = (Edg‘𝐺)
13		upgrres1.f	. . . . 5 ⊢ 𝐹 = {𝑒 ∈ 𝐸 ∣ 𝑁 ∉ 𝑒}
14	11, 12, 13	umgrres1lem 29825	. . . 4 ⊢ ((𝐺 ∈ UMGraph ∧ 𝑁 ∈ 𝑉) → ran ( I ↾ 𝐹) ⊆ {𝑝 ∈ 𝒫 (𝑉 ∖ {𝑁}) ∣ (♯‘𝑝) = 2})
15	10, 14	sylan 592	. . 3 ⊢ ((𝐺 ∈ USGraph ∧ 𝑁 ∈ 𝑉) → ran ( I ↾ 𝐹) ⊆ {𝑝 ∈ 𝒫 (𝑉 ∖ {𝑁}) ∣ (♯‘𝑝) = 2})
16		f1ssr 6774	. . 3 ⊢ ((( I ↾ 𝐹):dom ( I ↾ 𝐹)–1-1→𝐹 ∧ ran ( I ↾ 𝐹) ⊆ {𝑝 ∈ 𝒫 (𝑉 ∖ {𝑁}) ∣ (♯‘𝑝) = 2}) → ( I ↾ 𝐹):dom ( I ↾ 𝐹)–1-1→{𝑝 ∈ 𝒫 (𝑉 ∖ {𝑁}) ∣ (♯‘𝑝) = 2})
17	9, 15, 16	syl2anc 596	. 2 ⊢ ((𝐺 ∈ USGraph ∧ 𝑁 ∈ 𝑉) → ( I ↾ 𝐹):dom ( I ↾ 𝐹)–1-1→{𝑝 ∈ 𝒫 (𝑉 ∖ {𝑁}) ∣ (♯‘𝑝) = 2})
18		upgrres1.s	. . . 4 ⊢ 𝑆 = ⟨(𝑉 ∖ {𝑁}), ( I ↾ 𝐹)⟩
19		opex 5431	. . . 4 ⊢ ⟨(𝑉 ∖ {𝑁}), ( I ↾ 𝐹)⟩ ∈ V
20	18, 19	eqeltri 2856	. . 3 ⊢ 𝑆 ∈ V
21	11, 12, 13, 18	upgrres1lem2 29826	. . . . 5 ⊢ (Vtx‘𝑆) = (𝑉 ∖ {𝑁})
22	21	eqcomi 2769	. . . 4 ⊢ (𝑉 ∖ {𝑁}) = (Vtx‘𝑆)
23	11, 12, 13, 18	upgrres1lem3 29827	. . . . 5 ⊢ (iEdg‘𝑆) = ( I ↾ 𝐹)
24	23	eqcomi 2769	. . . 4 ⊢ ( I ↾ 𝐹) = (iEdg‘𝑆)
25	22, 24	isusgrs 29671	. . 3 ⊢ (𝑆 ∈ V → (𝑆 ∈ USGraph ↔ ( I ↾ 𝐹):dom ( I ↾ 𝐹)–1-1→{𝑝 ∈ 𝒫 (𝑉 ∖ {𝑁}) ∣ (♯‘𝑝) = 2}))
26	20, 25	mp1i 14	. 2 ⊢ ((𝐺 ∈ USGraph ∧ 𝑁 ∈ 𝑉) → (𝑆 ∈ USGraph ↔ ( I ↾ 𝐹):dom ( I ↾ 𝐹)–1-1→{𝑝 ∈ 𝒫 (𝑉 ∖ {𝑁}) ∣ (♯‘𝑝) = 2}))
27	17, 26	mpbird 260	1 ⊢ ((𝐺 ∈ USGraph ∧ 𝑁 ∈ 𝑉) → 𝑆 ∈ USGraph)

This proof depends on syntax axioms:   → wi 4   ↔ wb 209   ∧ wa 401   = wceq 1570   ∈ wcel 2145   ∉ wnel 3061  {crab 3412  Vcvv 3450   ∖ cdif 3895   ⊆ wss 3898  𝒫 cpw 4556  {csn 4583  ⟨cop 4589   I cid 5541  dom cdm 5647  ran crn 5648   ↾ cres 5649  –1-1→wf1 6524  –1-1-onto→wf1o 6526  ‘cfv 6527  2c2 12367  ♯chash 14442  Vtxcvtx 29508  iEdgciedg 29509  Edgcedg 29559  UMGraphcumgr 29593  USGraphcusgr 29664

This proof depends on axioms:  ax-mp 5  ax-1 6  ax-2 7  ax-3 8  ax-gen 1828  ax-4 1842  ax-5 1943  ax-6 2000  ax-7 2041  ax-8 2147  ax-9 2155  ax-10 2178  ax-11 2194  ax-12 2213  ax-ext 2732  ax-sep 5248  ax-nul 5259  ax-pow 5326  ax-pr 5390  ax-un 7734  ax-cnex 11228  ax-resscn 11229  ax-1cn 11230  ax-icn 11231  ax-addcl 11232  ax-addrcl 11233  ax-mulcl 11234  ax-mulrcl 11235  ax-mulcom 11236  ax-addass 11237  ax-mulass 11238  ax-distr 11239  ax-i2m1 11240  ax-1ne0 11241  ax-1rid 11242  ax-rnegex 11243  ax-rrecex 11244  ax-cnre 11245  ax-pre-lttri 11246  ax-pre-lttrn 11247  ax-pre-ltadd 11248  ax-pre-mulgt0 11249

This proof depends on definitions:  df-bi 210  df-an 402  df-or 862  df-3or 1104  df-3an 1105  df-tru 1573  df-fal 1583  df-ex 1813  df-nf 1817  df-sb 2100  df-mo 2564  df-eu 2594  df-clab 2739  df-cleq 2752  df-clel 2835  df-nfc 2909  df-ne 2956  df-nel 3062  df-ral 3077  df-rex 3087  df-reu 3366  df-rab 3413  df-v 3452  df-sbc 3739  df-csb 3847  df-dif 3901  df-un 3903  df-in 3905  df-ss 3915  df-pss 3918  df-nul 4279  df-if 4482  df-pw 4558  df-sn 4584  df-pr 4586  df-op 4590  df-uni 4867  df-int 4907  df-iun 4952  df-br 5103  df-opab 5167  df-mpt 5186  df-tr 5212  df-id 5542  df-eprel 5547  df-po 5555  df-so 5556  df-fr 5600  df-we 5602  df-xp 5653  df-rel 5654  df-cnv 5655  df-co 5656  df-dm 5657  df-rn 5658  df-res 5659  df-ima 5660  df-pred 6293  df-ord 6354  df-on 6355  df-lim 6356  df-suc 6357  df-iota 6483  df-fun 6529  df-fn 6530  df-f 6531  df-f1 6532  df-fo 6533  df-f1o 6534  df-fv 6535  df-riota 7365  df-ov 7411  df-oprab 7412  df-mpo 7413  df-om 7861  df-1st 7984  df-2nd 7985  df-frecs 8277  df-wrecs 8308  df-recs 8357  df-rdg 8396  df-1o 8454  df-er 8695  df-en 8952  df-dom 8953  df-sdom 8954  df-fin 8955  df-card 9992  df-pnf 11317  df-mnf 11318  df-xr 11319  df-ltxr 11320  df-le 11321  df-sub 11515  df-neg 11516  df-nn 12306  df-2 12375  df-n0 12577  df-z 12664  df-uz 12936  df-fz 13610  df-hash 14443  df-vtx 29510  df-iedg 29511  df-edg 29560  df-uhgr 29570  df-upgr 29594  df-umgr 29595  df-usgr 29666

This theorem is used by:  fusgrfis  29845  cusgrres  29963