Home | Metamath
Proof Explorer Theorem List (p. 335 of 449) | < Previous Next > |
Bad symbols? Try the
GIF version. |
||
Mirrors > Metamath Home Page > MPE Home Page > Theorem List Contents > Recent Proofs This page: Page List |
Color key: | Metamath Proof Explorer
(1-28623) |
Hilbert Space Explorer
(28624-30146) |
Users' Mathboxes
(30147-44804) |
Type | Label | Description |
---|---|---|
Statement | ||
Definition | df-fs 33401* | The general five segment configuration is a generalization of the outer and inner five segment configurations. See brfs 33438 and fscgr 33439 for its use. Definition 4.15 of [Schwabhauser] p. 37. (Contributed by Scott Fenton, 5-Oct-2013.) |
⊢ FiveSeg = {〈𝑝, 𝑞〉 ∣ ∃𝑛 ∈ ℕ ∃𝑎 ∈ (𝔼‘𝑛)∃𝑏 ∈ (𝔼‘𝑛)∃𝑐 ∈ (𝔼‘𝑛)∃𝑑 ∈ (𝔼‘𝑛)∃𝑥 ∈ (𝔼‘𝑛)∃𝑦 ∈ (𝔼‘𝑛)∃𝑧 ∈ (𝔼‘𝑛)∃𝑤 ∈ (𝔼‘𝑛)(𝑝 = 〈〈𝑎, 𝑏〉, 〈𝑐, 𝑑〉〉 ∧ 𝑞 = 〈〈𝑥, 𝑦〉, 〈𝑧, 𝑤〉〉 ∧ (𝑎 Colinear 〈𝑏, 𝑐〉 ∧ 〈𝑎, 〈𝑏, 𝑐〉〉Cgr3〈𝑥, 〈𝑦, 𝑧〉〉 ∧ (〈𝑎, 𝑑〉Cgr〈𝑥, 𝑤〉 ∧ 〈𝑏, 𝑑〉Cgr〈𝑦, 𝑤〉)))} | ||
Theorem | brifs 33402 | Binary relation form of the inner five segment predicate. (Contributed by Scott Fenton, 26-Sep-2013.) |
⊢ (((𝑁 ∈ ℕ ∧ 𝐴 ∈ (𝔼‘𝑁) ∧ 𝐵 ∈ (𝔼‘𝑁)) ∧ (𝐶 ∈ (𝔼‘𝑁) ∧ 𝐷 ∈ (𝔼‘𝑁) ∧ 𝐸 ∈ (𝔼‘𝑁)) ∧ (𝐹 ∈ (𝔼‘𝑁) ∧ 𝐺 ∈ (𝔼‘𝑁) ∧ 𝐻 ∈ (𝔼‘𝑁))) → (〈〈𝐴, 𝐵〉, 〈𝐶, 𝐷〉〉 InnerFiveSeg 〈〈𝐸, 𝐹〉, 〈𝐺, 𝐻〉〉 ↔ ((𝐵 Btwn 〈𝐴, 𝐶〉 ∧ 𝐹 Btwn 〈𝐸, 𝐺〉) ∧ (〈𝐴, 𝐶〉Cgr〈𝐸, 𝐺〉 ∧ 〈𝐵, 𝐶〉Cgr〈𝐹, 𝐺〉) ∧ (〈𝐴, 𝐷〉Cgr〈𝐸, 𝐻〉 ∧ 〈𝐶, 𝐷〉Cgr〈𝐺, 𝐻〉)))) | ||
Theorem | ifscgr 33403 | Inner five segment congruence. Take two triangles, 𝐴𝐷𝐶 and 𝐸𝐻𝐺, with 𝐵 between 𝐴 and 𝐶 and 𝐹 between 𝐸 and 𝐺. If the other components of the triangles are congruent, then so are 𝐵𝐷 and 𝐹𝐻. Theorem 4.2 of [Schwabhauser] p. 34. (Contributed by Scott Fenton, 27-Sep-2013.) |
⊢ (((𝑁 ∈ ℕ ∧ 𝐴 ∈ (𝔼‘𝑁) ∧ 𝐵 ∈ (𝔼‘𝑁)) ∧ (𝐶 ∈ (𝔼‘𝑁) ∧ 𝐷 ∈ (𝔼‘𝑁) ∧ 𝐸 ∈ (𝔼‘𝑁)) ∧ (𝐹 ∈ (𝔼‘𝑁) ∧ 𝐺 ∈ (𝔼‘𝑁) ∧ 𝐻 ∈ (𝔼‘𝑁))) → (〈〈𝐴, 𝐵〉, 〈𝐶, 𝐷〉〉 InnerFiveSeg 〈〈𝐸, 𝐹〉, 〈𝐺, 𝐻〉〉 → 〈𝐵, 𝐷〉Cgr〈𝐹, 𝐻〉)) | ||
Theorem | cgrsub 33404 | Removing identical parts from the end of a line segment preserves congruence. Theorem 4.3 of [Schwabhauser] p. 35. (Contributed by Scott Fenton, 4-Oct-2013.) |
⊢ ((𝑁 ∈ ℕ ∧ (𝐴 ∈ (𝔼‘𝑁) ∧ 𝐵 ∈ (𝔼‘𝑁) ∧ 𝐶 ∈ (𝔼‘𝑁)) ∧ (𝐷 ∈ (𝔼‘𝑁) ∧ 𝐸 ∈ (𝔼‘𝑁) ∧ 𝐹 ∈ (𝔼‘𝑁))) → (((𝐵 Btwn 〈𝐴, 𝐶〉 ∧ 𝐸 Btwn 〈𝐷, 𝐹〉) ∧ (〈𝐴, 𝐶〉Cgr〈𝐷, 𝐹〉 ∧ 〈𝐵, 𝐶〉Cgr〈𝐸, 𝐹〉)) → 〈𝐴, 𝐵〉Cgr〈𝐷, 𝐸〉)) | ||
Theorem | brcgr3 33405 | Binary relation form of the three-place congruence predicate. (Contributed by Scott Fenton, 4-Oct-2013.) |
⊢ ((𝑁 ∈ ℕ ∧ (𝐴 ∈ (𝔼‘𝑁) ∧ 𝐵 ∈ (𝔼‘𝑁) ∧ 𝐶 ∈ (𝔼‘𝑁)) ∧ (𝐷 ∈ (𝔼‘𝑁) ∧ 𝐸 ∈ (𝔼‘𝑁) ∧ 𝐹 ∈ (𝔼‘𝑁))) → (〈𝐴, 〈𝐵, 𝐶〉〉Cgr3〈𝐷, 〈𝐸, 𝐹〉〉 ↔ (〈𝐴, 𝐵〉Cgr〈𝐷, 𝐸〉 ∧ 〈𝐴, 𝐶〉Cgr〈𝐷, 𝐹〉 ∧ 〈𝐵, 𝐶〉Cgr〈𝐸, 𝐹〉))) | ||
Theorem | cgr3permute3 33406 | Permutation law for three-place congruence. (Contributed by Scott Fenton, 5-Oct-2013.) |
⊢ ((𝑁 ∈ ℕ ∧ (𝐴 ∈ (𝔼‘𝑁) ∧ 𝐵 ∈ (𝔼‘𝑁) ∧ 𝐶 ∈ (𝔼‘𝑁)) ∧ (𝐷 ∈ (𝔼‘𝑁) ∧ 𝐸 ∈ (𝔼‘𝑁) ∧ 𝐹 ∈ (𝔼‘𝑁))) → (〈𝐴, 〈𝐵, 𝐶〉〉Cgr3〈𝐷, 〈𝐸, 𝐹〉〉 ↔ 〈𝐵, 〈𝐶, 𝐴〉〉Cgr3〈𝐸, 〈𝐹, 𝐷〉〉)) | ||
Theorem | cgr3permute1 33407 | Permutation law for three-place congruence. (Contributed by Scott Fenton, 5-Oct-2013.) |
⊢ ((𝑁 ∈ ℕ ∧ (𝐴 ∈ (𝔼‘𝑁) ∧ 𝐵 ∈ (𝔼‘𝑁) ∧ 𝐶 ∈ (𝔼‘𝑁)) ∧ (𝐷 ∈ (𝔼‘𝑁) ∧ 𝐸 ∈ (𝔼‘𝑁) ∧ 𝐹 ∈ (𝔼‘𝑁))) → (〈𝐴, 〈𝐵, 𝐶〉〉Cgr3〈𝐷, 〈𝐸, 𝐹〉〉 ↔ 〈𝐴, 〈𝐶, 𝐵〉〉Cgr3〈𝐷, 〈𝐹, 𝐸〉〉)) | ||
Theorem | cgr3permute2 33408 | Permutation law for three-place congruence. (Contributed by Scott Fenton, 5-Oct-2013.) |
⊢ ((𝑁 ∈ ℕ ∧ (𝐴 ∈ (𝔼‘𝑁) ∧ 𝐵 ∈ (𝔼‘𝑁) ∧ 𝐶 ∈ (𝔼‘𝑁)) ∧ (𝐷 ∈ (𝔼‘𝑁) ∧ 𝐸 ∈ (𝔼‘𝑁) ∧ 𝐹 ∈ (𝔼‘𝑁))) → (〈𝐴, 〈𝐵, 𝐶〉〉Cgr3〈𝐷, 〈𝐸, 𝐹〉〉 ↔ 〈𝐵, 〈𝐴, 𝐶〉〉Cgr3〈𝐸, 〈𝐷, 𝐹〉〉)) | ||
Theorem | cgr3permute4 33409 | Permutation law for three-place congruence. (Contributed by Scott Fenton, 5-Oct-2013.) |
⊢ ((𝑁 ∈ ℕ ∧ (𝐴 ∈ (𝔼‘𝑁) ∧ 𝐵 ∈ (𝔼‘𝑁) ∧ 𝐶 ∈ (𝔼‘𝑁)) ∧ (𝐷 ∈ (𝔼‘𝑁) ∧ 𝐸 ∈ (𝔼‘𝑁) ∧ 𝐹 ∈ (𝔼‘𝑁))) → (〈𝐴, 〈𝐵, 𝐶〉〉Cgr3〈𝐷, 〈𝐸, 𝐹〉〉 ↔ 〈𝐶, 〈𝐴, 𝐵〉〉Cgr3〈𝐹, 〈𝐷, 𝐸〉〉)) | ||
Theorem | cgr3permute5 33410 | Permutation law for three-place congruence. (Contributed by Scott Fenton, 5-Oct-2013.) |
⊢ ((𝑁 ∈ ℕ ∧ (𝐴 ∈ (𝔼‘𝑁) ∧ 𝐵 ∈ (𝔼‘𝑁) ∧ 𝐶 ∈ (𝔼‘𝑁)) ∧ (𝐷 ∈ (𝔼‘𝑁) ∧ 𝐸 ∈ (𝔼‘𝑁) ∧ 𝐹 ∈ (𝔼‘𝑁))) → (〈𝐴, 〈𝐵, 𝐶〉〉Cgr3〈𝐷, 〈𝐸, 𝐹〉〉 ↔ 〈𝐶, 〈𝐵, 𝐴〉〉Cgr3〈𝐹, 〈𝐸, 𝐷〉〉)) | ||
Theorem | cgr3tr4 33411 | Transitivity law for three-place congruence. (Contributed by Scott Fenton, 5-Oct-2013.) |
⊢ ((𝑁 ∈ ℕ ∧ ((𝐴 ∈ (𝔼‘𝑁) ∧ 𝐵 ∈ (𝔼‘𝑁) ∧ 𝐶 ∈ (𝔼‘𝑁)) ∧ (𝐷 ∈ (𝔼‘𝑁) ∧ 𝐸 ∈ (𝔼‘𝑁) ∧ 𝐹 ∈ (𝔼‘𝑁)) ∧ (𝐺 ∈ (𝔼‘𝑁) ∧ 𝐻 ∈ (𝔼‘𝑁) ∧ 𝐼 ∈ (𝔼‘𝑁)))) → ((〈𝐴, 〈𝐵, 𝐶〉〉Cgr3〈𝐷, 〈𝐸, 𝐹〉〉 ∧ 〈𝐴, 〈𝐵, 𝐶〉〉Cgr3〈𝐺, 〈𝐻, 𝐼〉〉) → 〈𝐷, 〈𝐸, 𝐹〉〉Cgr3〈𝐺, 〈𝐻, 𝐼〉〉)) | ||
Theorem | cgr3com 33412 | Commutativity law for three-place congruence. (Contributed by Scott Fenton, 5-Oct-2013.) |
⊢ ((𝑁 ∈ ℕ ∧ (𝐴 ∈ (𝔼‘𝑁) ∧ 𝐵 ∈ (𝔼‘𝑁) ∧ 𝐶 ∈ (𝔼‘𝑁)) ∧ (𝐷 ∈ (𝔼‘𝑁) ∧ 𝐸 ∈ (𝔼‘𝑁) ∧ 𝐹 ∈ (𝔼‘𝑁))) → (〈𝐴, 〈𝐵, 𝐶〉〉Cgr3〈𝐷, 〈𝐸, 𝐹〉〉 ↔ 〈𝐷, 〈𝐸, 𝐹〉〉Cgr3〈𝐴, 〈𝐵, 𝐶〉〉)) | ||
Theorem | cgr3rflx 33413 | Identity law for three-place congruence. (Contributed by Scott Fenton, 6-Oct-2013.) |
⊢ ((𝑁 ∈ ℕ ∧ (𝐴 ∈ (𝔼‘𝑁) ∧ 𝐵 ∈ (𝔼‘𝑁) ∧ 𝐶 ∈ (𝔼‘𝑁))) → 〈𝐴, 〈𝐵, 𝐶〉〉Cgr3〈𝐴, 〈𝐵, 𝐶〉〉) | ||
Theorem | cgrxfr 33414* | A line segment can be divided at the same place as a congruent line segment is divided. Theorem 4.5 of [Schwabhauser] p. 35. (Contributed by Scott Fenton, 4-Oct-2013.) |
⊢ ((𝑁 ∈ ℕ ∧ (𝐴 ∈ (𝔼‘𝑁) ∧ 𝐵 ∈ (𝔼‘𝑁) ∧ 𝐶 ∈ (𝔼‘𝑁)) ∧ (𝐷 ∈ (𝔼‘𝑁) ∧ 𝐹 ∈ (𝔼‘𝑁))) → ((𝐵 Btwn 〈𝐴, 𝐶〉 ∧ 〈𝐴, 𝐶〉Cgr〈𝐷, 𝐹〉) → ∃𝑒 ∈ (𝔼‘𝑁)(𝑒 Btwn 〈𝐷, 𝐹〉 ∧ 〈𝐴, 〈𝐵, 𝐶〉〉Cgr3〈𝐷, 〈𝑒, 𝐹〉〉))) | ||
Theorem | btwnxfr 33415 | A condition for extending betweenness to a new set of points based on congruence with another set of points. Theorem 4.6 of [Schwabhauser] p. 36. (Contributed by Scott Fenton, 4-Oct-2013.) |
⊢ ((𝑁 ∈ ℕ ∧ (𝐴 ∈ (𝔼‘𝑁) ∧ 𝐵 ∈ (𝔼‘𝑁) ∧ 𝐶 ∈ (𝔼‘𝑁)) ∧ (𝐷 ∈ (𝔼‘𝑁) ∧ 𝐸 ∈ (𝔼‘𝑁) ∧ 𝐹 ∈ (𝔼‘𝑁))) → ((𝐵 Btwn 〈𝐴, 𝐶〉 ∧ 〈𝐴, 〈𝐵, 𝐶〉〉Cgr3〈𝐷, 〈𝐸, 𝐹〉〉) → 𝐸 Btwn 〈𝐷, 𝐹〉)) | ||
Theorem | colinrel 33416 | Colinearity is a relationship. (Contributed by Scott Fenton, 7-Nov-2013.) (Revised by Mario Carneiro, 19-Apr-2014.) |
⊢ Rel Colinear | ||
Theorem | brcolinear2 33417* | Alternate colinearity binary relation. (Contributed by Scott Fenton, 7-Nov-2013.) (Revised by Mario Carneiro, 19-Apr-2014.) |
⊢ ((𝑄 ∈ 𝑉 ∧ 𝑅 ∈ 𝑊) → (𝑃 Colinear 〈𝑄, 𝑅〉 ↔ ∃𝑛 ∈ ℕ ((𝑃 ∈ (𝔼‘𝑛) ∧ 𝑄 ∈ (𝔼‘𝑛) ∧ 𝑅 ∈ (𝔼‘𝑛)) ∧ (𝑃 Btwn 〈𝑄, 𝑅〉 ∨ 𝑄 Btwn 〈𝑅, 𝑃〉 ∨ 𝑅 Btwn 〈𝑃, 𝑄〉)))) | ||
Theorem | brcolinear 33418 | The binary relation form of the colinearity predicate. (Contributed by Scott Fenton, 5-Oct-2013.) |
⊢ ((𝑁 ∈ ℕ ∧ (𝐴 ∈ (𝔼‘𝑁) ∧ 𝐵 ∈ (𝔼‘𝑁) ∧ 𝐶 ∈ (𝔼‘𝑁))) → (𝐴 Colinear 〈𝐵, 𝐶〉 ↔ (𝐴 Btwn 〈𝐵, 𝐶〉 ∨ 𝐵 Btwn 〈𝐶, 𝐴〉 ∨ 𝐶 Btwn 〈𝐴, 𝐵〉))) | ||
Theorem | colinearex 33419 | The colinear predicate exists. (Contributed by Scott Fenton, 25-Oct-2013.) (Revised by Mario Carneiro, 19-Apr-2014.) |
⊢ Colinear ∈ V | ||
Theorem | colineardim1 33420 | If 𝐴 is colinear with 𝐵 and 𝐶, then 𝐴 is in the same space as 𝐵. (Contributed by Scott Fenton, 25-Oct-2013.) (Revised by Mario Carneiro, 19-Apr-2014.) |
⊢ ((𝑁 ∈ ℕ ∧ (𝐴 ∈ 𝑉 ∧ 𝐵 ∈ (𝔼‘𝑁) ∧ 𝐶 ∈ 𝑊)) → (𝐴 Colinear 〈𝐵, 𝐶〉 → 𝐴 ∈ (𝔼‘𝑁))) | ||
Theorem | colinearperm1 33421 | Permutation law for colinearity. Part of theorem 4.11 of [Schwabhauser] p. 36. (Contributed by Scott Fenton, 5-Oct-2013.) |
⊢ ((𝑁 ∈ ℕ ∧ (𝐴 ∈ (𝔼‘𝑁) ∧ 𝐵 ∈ (𝔼‘𝑁) ∧ 𝐶 ∈ (𝔼‘𝑁))) → (𝐴 Colinear 〈𝐵, 𝐶〉 ↔ 𝐴 Colinear 〈𝐶, 𝐵〉)) | ||
Theorem | colinearperm3 33422 | Permutation law for colinearity. Part of theorem 4.11 of [Schwabhauser] p. 36. (Contributed by Scott Fenton, 5-Oct-2013.) |
⊢ ((𝑁 ∈ ℕ ∧ (𝐴 ∈ (𝔼‘𝑁) ∧ 𝐵 ∈ (𝔼‘𝑁) ∧ 𝐶 ∈ (𝔼‘𝑁))) → (𝐴 Colinear 〈𝐵, 𝐶〉 ↔ 𝐵 Colinear 〈𝐶, 𝐴〉)) | ||
Theorem | colinearperm2 33423 | Permutation law for colinearity. Part of theorem 4.11 of [Schwabhauser] p. 36. (Contributed by Scott Fenton, 5-Oct-2013.) |
⊢ ((𝑁 ∈ ℕ ∧ (𝐴 ∈ (𝔼‘𝑁) ∧ 𝐵 ∈ (𝔼‘𝑁) ∧ 𝐶 ∈ (𝔼‘𝑁))) → (𝐴 Colinear 〈𝐵, 𝐶〉 ↔ 𝐵 Colinear 〈𝐴, 𝐶〉)) | ||
Theorem | colinearperm4 33424 | Permutation law for colinearity. Part of theorem 4.11 of [Schwabhauser] p. 36. (Contributed by Scott Fenton, 5-Oct-2013.) |
⊢ ((𝑁 ∈ ℕ ∧ (𝐴 ∈ (𝔼‘𝑁) ∧ 𝐵 ∈ (𝔼‘𝑁) ∧ 𝐶 ∈ (𝔼‘𝑁))) → (𝐴 Colinear 〈𝐵, 𝐶〉 ↔ 𝐶 Colinear 〈𝐴, 𝐵〉)) | ||
Theorem | colinearperm5 33425 | Permutation law for colinearity. Part of theorem 4.11 of [Schwabhauser] p. 36. (Contributed by Scott Fenton, 5-Oct-2013.) |
⊢ ((𝑁 ∈ ℕ ∧ (𝐴 ∈ (𝔼‘𝑁) ∧ 𝐵 ∈ (𝔼‘𝑁) ∧ 𝐶 ∈ (𝔼‘𝑁))) → (𝐴 Colinear 〈𝐵, 𝐶〉 ↔ 𝐶 Colinear 〈𝐵, 𝐴〉)) | ||
Theorem | colineartriv1 33426 | Trivial case of colinearity. Theorem 4.12 of [Schwabhauser] p. 37. (Contributed by Scott Fenton, 5-Oct-2013.) |
⊢ ((𝑁 ∈ ℕ ∧ 𝐴 ∈ (𝔼‘𝑁) ∧ 𝐵 ∈ (𝔼‘𝑁)) → 𝐴 Colinear 〈𝐴, 𝐵〉) | ||
Theorem | colineartriv2 33427 | Trivial case of colinearity. (Contributed by Scott Fenton, 18-Oct-2013.) (Revised by Mario Carneiro, 19-Apr-2014.) |
⊢ ((𝑁 ∈ ℕ ∧ 𝐴 ∈ (𝔼‘𝑁) ∧ 𝐵 ∈ (𝔼‘𝑁)) → 𝐴 Colinear 〈𝐵, 𝐵〉) | ||
Theorem | btwncolinear1 33428 | Betweenness implies colinearity. (Contributed by Scott Fenton, 7-Oct-2013.) |
⊢ ((𝑁 ∈ ℕ ∧ (𝐴 ∈ (𝔼‘𝑁) ∧ 𝐵 ∈ (𝔼‘𝑁) ∧ 𝐶 ∈ (𝔼‘𝑁))) → (𝐶 Btwn 〈𝐴, 𝐵〉 → 𝐴 Colinear 〈𝐵, 𝐶〉)) | ||
Theorem | btwncolinear2 33429 | Betweenness implies colinearity. (Contributed by Scott Fenton, 15-Oct-2013.) (Revised by Mario Carneiro, 19-Apr-2014.) |
⊢ ((𝑁 ∈ ℕ ∧ (𝐴 ∈ (𝔼‘𝑁) ∧ 𝐵 ∈ (𝔼‘𝑁) ∧ 𝐶 ∈ (𝔼‘𝑁))) → (𝐶 Btwn 〈𝐴, 𝐵〉 → 𝐴 Colinear 〈𝐶, 𝐵〉)) | ||
Theorem | btwncolinear3 33430 | Betweenness implies colinearity. (Contributed by Scott Fenton, 15-Oct-2013.) (Revised by Mario Carneiro, 19-Apr-2014.) |
⊢ ((𝑁 ∈ ℕ ∧ (𝐴 ∈ (𝔼‘𝑁) ∧ 𝐵 ∈ (𝔼‘𝑁) ∧ 𝐶 ∈ (𝔼‘𝑁))) → (𝐶 Btwn 〈𝐴, 𝐵〉 → 𝐵 Colinear 〈𝐴, 𝐶〉)) | ||
Theorem | btwncolinear4 33431 | Betweenness implies colinearity. (Contributed by Scott Fenton, 15-Oct-2013.) (Revised by Mario Carneiro, 19-Apr-2014.) |
⊢ ((𝑁 ∈ ℕ ∧ (𝐴 ∈ (𝔼‘𝑁) ∧ 𝐵 ∈ (𝔼‘𝑁) ∧ 𝐶 ∈ (𝔼‘𝑁))) → (𝐶 Btwn 〈𝐴, 𝐵〉 → 𝐵 Colinear 〈𝐶, 𝐴〉)) | ||
Theorem | btwncolinear5 33432 | Betweenness implies colinearity. (Contributed by Scott Fenton, 15-Oct-2013.) (Revised by Mario Carneiro, 19-Apr-2014.) |
⊢ ((𝑁 ∈ ℕ ∧ (𝐴 ∈ (𝔼‘𝑁) ∧ 𝐵 ∈ (𝔼‘𝑁) ∧ 𝐶 ∈ (𝔼‘𝑁))) → (𝐶 Btwn 〈𝐴, 𝐵〉 → 𝐶 Colinear 〈𝐴, 𝐵〉)) | ||
Theorem | btwncolinear6 33433 | Betweenness implies colinearity. (Contributed by Scott Fenton, 15-Oct-2013.) (Revised by Mario Carneiro, 19-Apr-2014.) |
⊢ ((𝑁 ∈ ℕ ∧ (𝐴 ∈ (𝔼‘𝑁) ∧ 𝐵 ∈ (𝔼‘𝑁) ∧ 𝐶 ∈ (𝔼‘𝑁))) → (𝐶 Btwn 〈𝐴, 𝐵〉 → 𝐶 Colinear 〈𝐵, 𝐴〉)) | ||
Theorem | colinearxfr 33434 | Transfer law for colinearity. Theorem 4.13 of [Schwabhauser] p. 37. (Contributed by Scott Fenton, 5-Oct-2013.) |
⊢ ((𝑁 ∈ ℕ ∧ (𝐴 ∈ (𝔼‘𝑁) ∧ 𝐵 ∈ (𝔼‘𝑁) ∧ 𝐶 ∈ (𝔼‘𝑁)) ∧ (𝐷 ∈ (𝔼‘𝑁) ∧ 𝐸 ∈ (𝔼‘𝑁) ∧ 𝐹 ∈ (𝔼‘𝑁))) → ((𝐵 Colinear 〈𝐴, 𝐶〉 ∧ 〈𝐴, 〈𝐵, 𝐶〉〉Cgr3〈𝐷, 〈𝐸, 𝐹〉〉) → 𝐸 Colinear 〈𝐷, 𝐹〉)) | ||
Theorem | lineext 33435* | Extend a line with a missing point. Theorem 4.14 of [Schwabhauser] p. 37. (Contributed by Scott Fenton, 6-Oct-2013.) |
⊢ ((𝑁 ∈ ℕ ∧ (𝐴 ∈ (𝔼‘𝑁) ∧ 𝐵 ∈ (𝔼‘𝑁) ∧ 𝐶 ∈ (𝔼‘𝑁)) ∧ (𝐷 ∈ (𝔼‘𝑁) ∧ 𝐸 ∈ (𝔼‘𝑁))) → ((𝐴 Colinear 〈𝐵, 𝐶〉 ∧ 〈𝐴, 𝐵〉Cgr〈𝐷, 𝐸〉) → ∃𝑓 ∈ (𝔼‘𝑁)〈𝐴, 〈𝐵, 𝐶〉〉Cgr3〈𝐷, 〈𝐸, 𝑓〉〉)) | ||
Theorem | brofs2 33436 | Change some conditions for outer five segment predicate. (Contributed by Scott Fenton, 6-Oct-2013.) |
⊢ (((𝑁 ∈ ℕ ∧ 𝐴 ∈ (𝔼‘𝑁) ∧ 𝐵 ∈ (𝔼‘𝑁)) ∧ (𝐶 ∈ (𝔼‘𝑁) ∧ 𝐷 ∈ (𝔼‘𝑁) ∧ 𝐸 ∈ (𝔼‘𝑁)) ∧ (𝐹 ∈ (𝔼‘𝑁) ∧ 𝐺 ∈ (𝔼‘𝑁) ∧ 𝐻 ∈ (𝔼‘𝑁))) → (〈〈𝐴, 𝐵〉, 〈𝐶, 𝐷〉〉 OuterFiveSeg 〈〈𝐸, 𝐹〉, 〈𝐺, 𝐻〉〉 ↔ (𝐵 Btwn 〈𝐴, 𝐶〉 ∧ 〈𝐴, 〈𝐵, 𝐶〉〉Cgr3〈𝐸, 〈𝐹, 𝐺〉〉 ∧ (〈𝐴, 𝐷〉Cgr〈𝐸, 𝐻〉 ∧ 〈𝐵, 𝐷〉Cgr〈𝐹, 𝐻〉)))) | ||
Theorem | brifs2 33437 | Change some conditions for inner five segment predicate. (Contributed by Scott Fenton, 6-Oct-2013.) |
⊢ (((𝑁 ∈ ℕ ∧ 𝐴 ∈ (𝔼‘𝑁) ∧ 𝐵 ∈ (𝔼‘𝑁)) ∧ (𝐶 ∈ (𝔼‘𝑁) ∧ 𝐷 ∈ (𝔼‘𝑁) ∧ 𝐸 ∈ (𝔼‘𝑁)) ∧ (𝐹 ∈ (𝔼‘𝑁) ∧ 𝐺 ∈ (𝔼‘𝑁) ∧ 𝐻 ∈ (𝔼‘𝑁))) → (〈〈𝐴, 𝐵〉, 〈𝐶, 𝐷〉〉 InnerFiveSeg 〈〈𝐸, 𝐹〉, 〈𝐺, 𝐻〉〉 ↔ (𝐵 Btwn 〈𝐴, 𝐶〉 ∧ 〈𝐴, 〈𝐵, 𝐶〉〉Cgr3〈𝐸, 〈𝐹, 𝐺〉〉 ∧ (〈𝐴, 𝐷〉Cgr〈𝐸, 𝐻〉 ∧ 〈𝐶, 𝐷〉Cgr〈𝐺, 𝐻〉)))) | ||
Theorem | brfs 33438 | Binary relation form of the general five segment predicate. (Contributed by Scott Fenton, 5-Oct-2013.) |
⊢ (((𝑁 ∈ ℕ ∧ 𝐴 ∈ (𝔼‘𝑁) ∧ 𝐵 ∈ (𝔼‘𝑁)) ∧ (𝐶 ∈ (𝔼‘𝑁) ∧ 𝐷 ∈ (𝔼‘𝑁) ∧ 𝐸 ∈ (𝔼‘𝑁)) ∧ (𝐹 ∈ (𝔼‘𝑁) ∧ 𝐺 ∈ (𝔼‘𝑁) ∧ 𝐻 ∈ (𝔼‘𝑁))) → (〈〈𝐴, 𝐵〉, 〈𝐶, 𝐷〉〉 FiveSeg 〈〈𝐸, 𝐹〉, 〈𝐺, 𝐻〉〉 ↔ (𝐴 Colinear 〈𝐵, 𝐶〉 ∧ 〈𝐴, 〈𝐵, 𝐶〉〉Cgr3〈𝐸, 〈𝐹, 𝐺〉〉 ∧ (〈𝐴, 𝐷〉Cgr〈𝐸, 𝐻〉 ∧ 〈𝐵, 𝐷〉Cgr〈𝐹, 𝐻〉)))) | ||
Theorem | fscgr 33439 | Congruence law for the general five segment configuration. Theorem 4.16 of [Schwabhauser] p. 37. (Contributed by Scott Fenton, 5-Oct-2013.) |
⊢ (((𝑁 ∈ ℕ ∧ 𝐴 ∈ (𝔼‘𝑁) ∧ 𝐵 ∈ (𝔼‘𝑁)) ∧ (𝐶 ∈ (𝔼‘𝑁) ∧ 𝐷 ∈ (𝔼‘𝑁) ∧ 𝐸 ∈ (𝔼‘𝑁)) ∧ (𝐹 ∈ (𝔼‘𝑁) ∧ 𝐺 ∈ (𝔼‘𝑁) ∧ 𝐻 ∈ (𝔼‘𝑁))) → ((〈〈𝐴, 𝐵〉, 〈𝐶, 𝐷〉〉 FiveSeg 〈〈𝐸, 𝐹〉, 〈𝐺, 𝐻〉〉 ∧ 𝐴 ≠ 𝐵) → 〈𝐶, 𝐷〉Cgr〈𝐺, 𝐻〉)) | ||
Theorem | linecgr 33440 | Congruence rule for lines. Theorem 4.17 of [Schwabhauser] p. 37. (Contributed by Scott Fenton, 6-Oct-2013.) |
⊢ ((𝑁 ∈ ℕ ∧ (𝐴 ∈ (𝔼‘𝑁) ∧ 𝐵 ∈ (𝔼‘𝑁) ∧ 𝐶 ∈ (𝔼‘𝑁)) ∧ (𝑃 ∈ (𝔼‘𝑁) ∧ 𝑄 ∈ (𝔼‘𝑁))) → (((𝐴 ≠ 𝐵 ∧ 𝐴 Colinear 〈𝐵, 𝐶〉) ∧ (〈𝐴, 𝑃〉Cgr〈𝐴, 𝑄〉 ∧ 〈𝐵, 𝑃〉Cgr〈𝐵, 𝑄〉)) → 〈𝐶, 𝑃〉Cgr〈𝐶, 𝑄〉)) | ||
Theorem | linecgrand 33441 | Deduction form of linecgr 33440. (Contributed by Scott Fenton, 14-Oct-2013.) |
⊢ (𝜑 → 𝑁 ∈ ℕ) & ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐴 ∈ (𝔼‘𝑁)) & ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐵 ∈ (𝔼‘𝑁)) & ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐶 ∈ (𝔼‘𝑁)) & ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝑃 ∈ (𝔼‘𝑁)) & ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝑄 ∈ (𝔼‘𝑁)) & ⊢ ((𝜑 ∧ 𝜓) → 𝐴 ≠ 𝐵) & ⊢ ((𝜑 ∧ 𝜓) → 𝐴 Colinear 〈𝐵, 𝐶〉) & ⊢ ((𝜑 ∧ 𝜓) → 〈𝐴, 𝑃〉Cgr〈𝐴, 𝑄〉) & ⊢ ((𝜑 ∧ 𝜓) → 〈𝐵, 𝑃〉Cgr〈𝐵, 𝑄〉) ⇒ ⊢ ((𝜑 ∧ 𝜓) → 〈𝐶, 𝑃〉Cgr〈𝐶, 𝑄〉) | ||
Theorem | lineid 33442 | Identity law for points on lines. Theorem 4.18 of [Schwabhauser] p. 38. (Contributed by Scott Fenton, 7-Oct-2013.) |
⊢ ((𝑁 ∈ ℕ ∧ (𝐴 ∈ (𝔼‘𝑁) ∧ 𝐵 ∈ (𝔼‘𝑁)) ∧ (𝐶 ∈ (𝔼‘𝑁) ∧ 𝐷 ∈ (𝔼‘𝑁))) → (((𝐴 ≠ 𝐵 ∧ 𝐴 Colinear 〈𝐵, 𝐶〉) ∧ (〈𝐴, 𝐶〉Cgr〈𝐴, 𝐷〉 ∧ 〈𝐵, 𝐶〉Cgr〈𝐵, 𝐷〉)) → 𝐶 = 𝐷)) | ||
Theorem | idinside 33443 | Law for finding a point inside a segment. Theorem 4.19 of [Schwabhauser] p. 38. (Contributed by Scott Fenton, 7-Oct-2013.) |
⊢ ((𝑁 ∈ ℕ ∧ (𝐴 ∈ (𝔼‘𝑁) ∧ 𝐵 ∈ (𝔼‘𝑁)) ∧ (𝐶 ∈ (𝔼‘𝑁) ∧ 𝐷 ∈ (𝔼‘𝑁))) → ((𝐶 Btwn 〈𝐴, 𝐵〉 ∧ 〈𝐴, 𝐶〉Cgr〈𝐴, 𝐷〉 ∧ 〈𝐵, 𝐶〉Cgr〈𝐵, 𝐷〉) → 𝐶 = 𝐷)) | ||
Theorem | endofsegid 33444 | If 𝐴, 𝐵, and 𝐶 fall in order on a line, and 𝐴𝐵 and 𝐴𝐶 are congruent, then 𝐶 = 𝐵. (Contributed by Scott Fenton, 7-Oct-2013.) |
⊢ ((𝑁 ∈ ℕ ∧ (𝐴 ∈ (𝔼‘𝑁) ∧ 𝐵 ∈ (𝔼‘𝑁) ∧ 𝐶 ∈ (𝔼‘𝑁))) → ((𝐵 Btwn 〈𝐴, 𝐶〉 ∧ 〈𝐴, 𝐶〉Cgr〈𝐴, 𝐵〉) → 𝐶 = 𝐵)) | ||
Theorem | endofsegidand 33445 | Deduction form of endofsegid 33444. (Contributed by Scott Fenton, 15-Oct-2013.) (Revised by Mario Carneiro, 19-Apr-2014.) |
⊢ (𝜑 → 𝑁 ∈ ℕ) & ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐴 ∈ (𝔼‘𝑁)) & ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐵 ∈ (𝔼‘𝑁)) & ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐶 ∈ (𝔼‘𝑁)) & ⊢ ((𝜑 ∧ 𝜓) → 𝐶 Btwn 〈𝐴, 𝐵〉) & ⊢ ((𝜑 ∧ 𝜓) → 〈𝐴, 𝐵〉Cgr〈𝐴, 𝐶〉) ⇒ ⊢ ((𝜑 ∧ 𝜓) → 𝐵 = 𝐶) | ||
Theorem | btwnconn1lem1 33446 | Lemma for btwnconn1 33460. The next several lemmas introduce various properties of hypothetical points that end up eliminating alternatives to connectivity. We begin by showing a congruence property of those hypothetical points. (Contributed by Scott Fenton, 8-Oct-2013.) |
⊢ ((((𝑁 ∈ ℕ ∧ 𝐴 ∈ (𝔼‘𝑁) ∧ 𝐵 ∈ (𝔼‘𝑁)) ∧ (𝐶 ∈ (𝔼‘𝑁) ∧ 𝐷 ∈ (𝔼‘𝑁) ∧ 𝑐 ∈ (𝔼‘𝑁)) ∧ (𝑑 ∈ (𝔼‘𝑁) ∧ 𝑏 ∈ (𝔼‘𝑁) ∧ 𝑋 ∈ (𝔼‘𝑁))) ∧ (((𝐴 ≠ 𝐵 ∧ 𝐵 ≠ 𝐶) ∧ (𝐵 Btwn 〈𝐴, 𝐶〉 ∧ 𝐵 Btwn 〈𝐴, 𝐷〉)) ∧ ((𝐷 Btwn 〈𝐴, 𝑐〉 ∧ 〈𝐷, 𝑐〉Cgr〈𝐶, 𝐷〉) ∧ (𝐶 Btwn 〈𝐴, 𝑑〉 ∧ 〈𝐶, 𝑑〉Cgr〈𝐶, 𝐷〉)) ∧ ((𝑐 Btwn 〈𝐴, 𝑏〉 ∧ 〈𝑐, 𝑏〉Cgr〈𝐶, 𝐵〉) ∧ (𝑑 Btwn 〈𝐴, 𝑋〉 ∧ 〈𝑑, 𝑋〉Cgr〈𝐷, 𝐵〉)))) → 〈𝐵, 𝑐〉Cgr〈𝑋, 𝐶〉) | ||
Theorem | btwnconn1lem2 33447 | Lemma for btwnconn1 33460. Now, we show that two of the hypotheticals we introduced in the first lemma are identical. (Contributed by Scott Fenton, 8-Oct-2013.) |
⊢ ((((𝑁 ∈ ℕ ∧ 𝐴 ∈ (𝔼‘𝑁) ∧ 𝐵 ∈ (𝔼‘𝑁)) ∧ (𝐶 ∈ (𝔼‘𝑁) ∧ 𝐷 ∈ (𝔼‘𝑁) ∧ 𝑐 ∈ (𝔼‘𝑁)) ∧ (𝑑 ∈ (𝔼‘𝑁) ∧ 𝑏 ∈ (𝔼‘𝑁) ∧ 𝑋 ∈ (𝔼‘𝑁))) ∧ (((𝐴 ≠ 𝐵 ∧ 𝐵 ≠ 𝐶) ∧ (𝐵 Btwn 〈𝐴, 𝐶〉 ∧ 𝐵 Btwn 〈𝐴, 𝐷〉)) ∧ ((𝐷 Btwn 〈𝐴, 𝑐〉 ∧ 〈𝐷, 𝑐〉Cgr〈𝐶, 𝐷〉) ∧ (𝐶 Btwn 〈𝐴, 𝑑〉 ∧ 〈𝐶, 𝑑〉Cgr〈𝐶, 𝐷〉)) ∧ ((𝑐 Btwn 〈𝐴, 𝑏〉 ∧ 〈𝑐, 𝑏〉Cgr〈𝐶, 𝐵〉) ∧ (𝑑 Btwn 〈𝐴, 𝑋〉 ∧ 〈𝑑, 𝑋〉Cgr〈𝐷, 𝐵〉)))) → 𝑋 = 𝑏) | ||
Theorem | btwnconn1lem3 33448 | Lemma for btwnconn1 33460. Establish the next congruence in the series. (Contributed by Scott Fenton, 8-Oct-2013.) |
⊢ ((((𝑁 ∈ ℕ ∧ 𝐴 ∈ (𝔼‘𝑁) ∧ 𝐵 ∈ (𝔼‘𝑁)) ∧ (𝐶 ∈ (𝔼‘𝑁) ∧ 𝐷 ∈ (𝔼‘𝑁) ∧ 𝑐 ∈ (𝔼‘𝑁)) ∧ (𝑑 ∈ (𝔼‘𝑁) ∧ 𝑏 ∈ (𝔼‘𝑁))) ∧ (((𝐴 ≠ 𝐵 ∧ 𝐵 ≠ 𝐶) ∧ (𝐵 Btwn 〈𝐴, 𝐶〉 ∧ 𝐵 Btwn 〈𝐴, 𝐷〉)) ∧ ((𝐷 Btwn 〈𝐴, 𝑐〉 ∧ 〈𝐷, 𝑐〉Cgr〈𝐶, 𝐷〉) ∧ (𝐶 Btwn 〈𝐴, 𝑑〉 ∧ 〈𝐶, 𝑑〉Cgr〈𝐶, 𝐷〉)) ∧ ((𝑐 Btwn 〈𝐴, 𝑏〉 ∧ 〈𝑐, 𝑏〉Cgr〈𝐶, 𝐵〉) ∧ (𝑑 Btwn 〈𝐴, 𝑏〉 ∧ 〈𝑑, 𝑏〉Cgr〈𝐷, 𝐵〉)))) → 〈𝐵, 𝑑〉Cgr〈𝑏, 𝐷〉) | ||
Theorem | btwnconn1lem4 33449 | Lemma for btwnconn1 33460. Assuming 𝐶 ≠ 𝑐, we now attempt to force 𝐷 = 𝑑 from here out via a series of congruences. (Contributed by Scott Fenton, 8-Oct-2013.) |
⊢ ((((𝑁 ∈ ℕ ∧ 𝐴 ∈ (𝔼‘𝑁) ∧ 𝐵 ∈ (𝔼‘𝑁)) ∧ (𝐶 ∈ (𝔼‘𝑁) ∧ 𝐷 ∈ (𝔼‘𝑁) ∧ 𝑐 ∈ (𝔼‘𝑁)) ∧ (𝑑 ∈ (𝔼‘𝑁) ∧ 𝑏 ∈ (𝔼‘𝑁))) ∧ (((𝐴 ≠ 𝐵 ∧ 𝐵 ≠ 𝐶 ∧ 𝐶 ≠ 𝑐) ∧ (𝐵 Btwn 〈𝐴, 𝐶〉 ∧ 𝐵 Btwn 〈𝐴, 𝐷〉)) ∧ ((𝐷 Btwn 〈𝐴, 𝑐〉 ∧ 〈𝐷, 𝑐〉Cgr〈𝐶, 𝐷〉) ∧ (𝐶 Btwn 〈𝐴, 𝑑〉 ∧ 〈𝐶, 𝑑〉Cgr〈𝐶, 𝐷〉)) ∧ ((𝑐 Btwn 〈𝐴, 𝑏〉 ∧ 〈𝑐, 𝑏〉Cgr〈𝐶, 𝐵〉) ∧ (𝑑 Btwn 〈𝐴, 𝑏〉 ∧ 〈𝑑, 𝑏〉Cgr〈𝐷, 𝐵〉)))) → 〈𝑑, 𝑐〉Cgr〈𝐷, 𝐶〉) | ||
Theorem | btwnconn1lem5 33450 | Lemma for btwnconn1 33460. Now, we introduce 𝐸, the intersection of 𝐶𝑐 and 𝐷𝑑. We begin by showing that it is the midpoint of 𝐶 and 𝑐. (Contributed by Scott Fenton, 8-Oct-2013.) |
⊢ ((((𝑁 ∈ ℕ ∧ 𝐴 ∈ (𝔼‘𝑁) ∧ 𝐵 ∈ (𝔼‘𝑁)) ∧ (𝐶 ∈ (𝔼‘𝑁) ∧ 𝐷 ∈ (𝔼‘𝑁) ∧ 𝑐 ∈ (𝔼‘𝑁)) ∧ (𝑑 ∈ (𝔼‘𝑁) ∧ 𝑏 ∈ (𝔼‘𝑁) ∧ 𝐸 ∈ (𝔼‘𝑁))) ∧ ((((𝐴 ≠ 𝐵 ∧ 𝐵 ≠ 𝐶 ∧ 𝐶 ≠ 𝑐) ∧ (𝐵 Btwn 〈𝐴, 𝐶〉 ∧ 𝐵 Btwn 〈𝐴, 𝐷〉)) ∧ ((𝐷 Btwn 〈𝐴, 𝑐〉 ∧ 〈𝐷, 𝑐〉Cgr〈𝐶, 𝐷〉) ∧ (𝐶 Btwn 〈𝐴, 𝑑〉 ∧ 〈𝐶, 𝑑〉Cgr〈𝐶, 𝐷〉)) ∧ ((𝑐 Btwn 〈𝐴, 𝑏〉 ∧ 〈𝑐, 𝑏〉Cgr〈𝐶, 𝐵〉) ∧ (𝑑 Btwn 〈𝐴, 𝑏〉 ∧ 〈𝑑, 𝑏〉Cgr〈𝐷, 𝐵〉))) ∧ (𝐸 Btwn 〈𝐶, 𝑐〉 ∧ 𝐸 Btwn 〈𝐷, 𝑑〉))) → 〈𝐸, 𝐶〉Cgr〈𝐸, 𝑐〉) | ||
Theorem | btwnconn1lem6 33451 | Lemma for btwnconn1 33460. Next, we show that 𝐸 is the midpoint of 𝐷 and 𝑑. (Contributed by Scott Fenton, 8-Oct-2013.) |
⊢ ((((𝑁 ∈ ℕ ∧ 𝐴 ∈ (𝔼‘𝑁) ∧ 𝐵 ∈ (𝔼‘𝑁)) ∧ (𝐶 ∈ (𝔼‘𝑁) ∧ 𝐷 ∈ (𝔼‘𝑁) ∧ 𝑐 ∈ (𝔼‘𝑁)) ∧ (𝑑 ∈ (𝔼‘𝑁) ∧ 𝑏 ∈ (𝔼‘𝑁) ∧ 𝐸 ∈ (𝔼‘𝑁))) ∧ ((((𝐴 ≠ 𝐵 ∧ 𝐵 ≠ 𝐶 ∧ 𝐶 ≠ 𝑐) ∧ (𝐵 Btwn 〈𝐴, 𝐶〉 ∧ 𝐵 Btwn 〈𝐴, 𝐷〉)) ∧ ((𝐷 Btwn 〈𝐴, 𝑐〉 ∧ 〈𝐷, 𝑐〉Cgr〈𝐶, 𝐷〉) ∧ (𝐶 Btwn 〈𝐴, 𝑑〉 ∧ 〈𝐶, 𝑑〉Cgr〈𝐶, 𝐷〉)) ∧ ((𝑐 Btwn 〈𝐴, 𝑏〉 ∧ 〈𝑐, 𝑏〉Cgr〈𝐶, 𝐵〉) ∧ (𝑑 Btwn 〈𝐴, 𝑏〉 ∧ 〈𝑑, 𝑏〉Cgr〈𝐷, 𝐵〉))) ∧ (𝐸 Btwn 〈𝐶, 𝑐〉 ∧ 𝐸 Btwn 〈𝐷, 𝑑〉))) → 〈𝐸, 𝐷〉Cgr〈𝐸, 𝑑〉) | ||
Theorem | btwnconn1lem7 33452 | Lemma for btwnconn1 33460. Under our assumptions, 𝐶 and 𝑑 are distinct. (Contributed by Scott Fenton, 8-Oct-2013.) |
⊢ ((((𝑁 ∈ ℕ ∧ 𝐴 ∈ (𝔼‘𝑁) ∧ 𝐵 ∈ (𝔼‘𝑁)) ∧ (𝐶 ∈ (𝔼‘𝑁) ∧ 𝐷 ∈ (𝔼‘𝑁) ∧ 𝑐 ∈ (𝔼‘𝑁)) ∧ (𝑑 ∈ (𝔼‘𝑁) ∧ 𝑏 ∈ (𝔼‘𝑁) ∧ 𝐸 ∈ (𝔼‘𝑁))) ∧ ((((𝐴 ≠ 𝐵 ∧ 𝐵 ≠ 𝐶 ∧ 𝐶 ≠ 𝑐) ∧ (𝐵 Btwn 〈𝐴, 𝐶〉 ∧ 𝐵 Btwn 〈𝐴, 𝐷〉)) ∧ ((𝐷 Btwn 〈𝐴, 𝑐〉 ∧ 〈𝐷, 𝑐〉Cgr〈𝐶, 𝐷〉) ∧ (𝐶 Btwn 〈𝐴, 𝑑〉 ∧ 〈𝐶, 𝑑〉Cgr〈𝐶, 𝐷〉)) ∧ ((𝑐 Btwn 〈𝐴, 𝑏〉 ∧ 〈𝑐, 𝑏〉Cgr〈𝐶, 𝐵〉) ∧ (𝑑 Btwn 〈𝐴, 𝑏〉 ∧ 〈𝑑, 𝑏〉Cgr〈𝐷, 𝐵〉))) ∧ (𝐸 Btwn 〈𝐶, 𝑐〉 ∧ 𝐸 Btwn 〈𝐷, 𝑑〉))) → 𝐶 ≠ 𝑑) | ||
Theorem | btwnconn1lem8 33453 | Lemma for btwnconn1 33460. Now, we introduce the last three points used in the construction: 𝑃, 𝑄, and 𝑅 will turn out to be equal further down, and will provide us with the key to the final statement. We begin by establishing congruence of 𝑅𝑃 and 𝐸𝑑. (Contributed by Scott Fenton, 8-Oct-2013.) |
⊢ ((((𝑁 ∈ ℕ ∧ 𝐴 ∈ (𝔼‘𝑁) ∧ 𝐵 ∈ (𝔼‘𝑁)) ∧ ((𝐶 ∈ (𝔼‘𝑁) ∧ 𝐷 ∈ (𝔼‘𝑁) ∧ 𝑐 ∈ (𝔼‘𝑁)) ∧ (𝑑 ∈ (𝔼‘𝑁) ∧ 𝑏 ∈ (𝔼‘𝑁) ∧ 𝐸 ∈ (𝔼‘𝑁))) ∧ (𝑃 ∈ (𝔼‘𝑁) ∧ 𝑄 ∈ (𝔼‘𝑁) ∧ 𝑅 ∈ (𝔼‘𝑁))) ∧ ((((𝐴 ≠ 𝐵 ∧ 𝐵 ≠ 𝐶 ∧ 𝐶 ≠ 𝑐) ∧ (𝐵 Btwn 〈𝐴, 𝐶〉 ∧ 𝐵 Btwn 〈𝐴, 𝐷〉)) ∧ ((𝐷 Btwn 〈𝐴, 𝑐〉 ∧ 〈𝐷, 𝑐〉Cgr〈𝐶, 𝐷〉) ∧ (𝐶 Btwn 〈𝐴, 𝑑〉 ∧ 〈𝐶, 𝑑〉Cgr〈𝐶, 𝐷〉)) ∧ ((𝑐 Btwn 〈𝐴, 𝑏〉 ∧ 〈𝑐, 𝑏〉Cgr〈𝐶, 𝐵〉) ∧ (𝑑 Btwn 〈𝐴, 𝑏〉 ∧ 〈𝑑, 𝑏〉Cgr〈𝐷, 𝐵〉))) ∧ ((𝐸 Btwn 〈𝐶, 𝑐〉 ∧ 𝐸 Btwn 〈𝐷, 𝑑〉) ∧ ((𝐶 Btwn 〈𝑐, 𝑃〉 ∧ 〈𝐶, 𝑃〉Cgr〈𝐶, 𝑑〉) ∧ (𝐶 Btwn 〈𝑑, 𝑅〉 ∧ 〈𝐶, 𝑅〉Cgr〈𝐶, 𝐸〉) ∧ (𝑅 Btwn 〈𝑃, 𝑄〉 ∧ 〈𝑅, 𝑄〉Cgr〈𝑅, 𝑃〉))))) → 〈𝑅, 𝑃〉Cgr〈𝐸, 𝑑〉) | ||
Theorem | btwnconn1lem9 33454 | Lemma for btwnconn1 33460. Now, a quick use of transitivity to establish congruence on 𝑅𝑄 and 𝐸𝐷. (Contributed by Scott Fenton, 8-Oct-2013.) |
⊢ ((((𝑁 ∈ ℕ ∧ 𝐴 ∈ (𝔼‘𝑁) ∧ 𝐵 ∈ (𝔼‘𝑁)) ∧ ((𝐶 ∈ (𝔼‘𝑁) ∧ 𝐷 ∈ (𝔼‘𝑁) ∧ 𝑐 ∈ (𝔼‘𝑁)) ∧ (𝑑 ∈ (𝔼‘𝑁) ∧ 𝑏 ∈ (𝔼‘𝑁) ∧ 𝐸 ∈ (𝔼‘𝑁))) ∧ (𝑃 ∈ (𝔼‘𝑁) ∧ 𝑄 ∈ (𝔼‘𝑁) ∧ 𝑅 ∈ (𝔼‘𝑁))) ∧ ((((𝐴 ≠ 𝐵 ∧ 𝐵 ≠ 𝐶 ∧ 𝐶 ≠ 𝑐) ∧ (𝐵 Btwn 〈𝐴, 𝐶〉 ∧ 𝐵 Btwn 〈𝐴, 𝐷〉)) ∧ ((𝐷 Btwn 〈𝐴, 𝑐〉 ∧ 〈𝐷, 𝑐〉Cgr〈𝐶, 𝐷〉) ∧ (𝐶 Btwn 〈𝐴, 𝑑〉 ∧ 〈𝐶, 𝑑〉Cgr〈𝐶, 𝐷〉)) ∧ ((𝑐 Btwn 〈𝐴, 𝑏〉 ∧ 〈𝑐, 𝑏〉Cgr〈𝐶, 𝐵〉) ∧ (𝑑 Btwn 〈𝐴, 𝑏〉 ∧ 〈𝑑, 𝑏〉Cgr〈𝐷, 𝐵〉))) ∧ ((𝐸 Btwn 〈𝐶, 𝑐〉 ∧ 𝐸 Btwn 〈𝐷, 𝑑〉) ∧ ((𝐶 Btwn 〈𝑐, 𝑃〉 ∧ 〈𝐶, 𝑃〉Cgr〈𝐶, 𝑑〉) ∧ (𝐶 Btwn 〈𝑑, 𝑅〉 ∧ 〈𝐶, 𝑅〉Cgr〈𝐶, 𝐸〉) ∧ (𝑅 Btwn 〈𝑃, 𝑄〉 ∧ 〈𝑅, 𝑄〉Cgr〈𝑅, 𝑃〉))))) → 〈𝑅, 𝑄〉Cgr〈𝐸, 𝐷〉) | ||
Theorem | btwnconn1lem10 33455 | Lemma for btwnconn1 33460. Now we establish a congruence that will give us 𝐷 = 𝑑 when we compute 𝑃 = 𝑄 later on. (Contributed by Scott Fenton, 8-Oct-2013.) |
⊢ ((((𝑁 ∈ ℕ ∧ 𝐴 ∈ (𝔼‘𝑁) ∧ 𝐵 ∈ (𝔼‘𝑁)) ∧ ((𝐶 ∈ (𝔼‘𝑁) ∧ 𝐷 ∈ (𝔼‘𝑁) ∧ 𝑐 ∈ (𝔼‘𝑁)) ∧ (𝑑 ∈ (𝔼‘𝑁) ∧ 𝑏 ∈ (𝔼‘𝑁) ∧ 𝐸 ∈ (𝔼‘𝑁))) ∧ (𝑃 ∈ (𝔼‘𝑁) ∧ 𝑄 ∈ (𝔼‘𝑁) ∧ 𝑅 ∈ (𝔼‘𝑁))) ∧ ((((𝐴 ≠ 𝐵 ∧ 𝐵 ≠ 𝐶 ∧ 𝐶 ≠ 𝑐) ∧ (𝐵 Btwn 〈𝐴, 𝐶〉 ∧ 𝐵 Btwn 〈𝐴, 𝐷〉)) ∧ ((𝐷 Btwn 〈𝐴, 𝑐〉 ∧ 〈𝐷, 𝑐〉Cgr〈𝐶, 𝐷〉) ∧ (𝐶 Btwn 〈𝐴, 𝑑〉 ∧ 〈𝐶, 𝑑〉Cgr〈𝐶, 𝐷〉)) ∧ ((𝑐 Btwn 〈𝐴, 𝑏〉 ∧ 〈𝑐, 𝑏〉Cgr〈𝐶, 𝐵〉) ∧ (𝑑 Btwn 〈𝐴, 𝑏〉 ∧ 〈𝑑, 𝑏〉Cgr〈𝐷, 𝐵〉))) ∧ ((𝐸 Btwn 〈𝐶, 𝑐〉 ∧ 𝐸 Btwn 〈𝐷, 𝑑〉) ∧ ((𝐶 Btwn 〈𝑐, 𝑃〉 ∧ 〈𝐶, 𝑃〉Cgr〈𝐶, 𝑑〉) ∧ (𝐶 Btwn 〈𝑑, 𝑅〉 ∧ 〈𝐶, 𝑅〉Cgr〈𝐶, 𝐸〉) ∧ (𝑅 Btwn 〈𝑃, 𝑄〉 ∧ 〈𝑅, 𝑄〉Cgr〈𝑅, 𝑃〉))))) → 〈𝑑, 𝐷〉Cgr〈𝑃, 𝑄〉) | ||
Theorem | btwnconn1lem11 33456 | Lemma for btwnconn1 33460. Now, we establish that 𝐷 and 𝑄 are equidistant from 𝐶. (Contributed by Scott Fenton, 8-Oct-2013.) |
⊢ ((((𝑁 ∈ ℕ ∧ 𝐴 ∈ (𝔼‘𝑁) ∧ 𝐵 ∈ (𝔼‘𝑁)) ∧ ((𝐶 ∈ (𝔼‘𝑁) ∧ 𝐷 ∈ (𝔼‘𝑁) ∧ 𝑐 ∈ (𝔼‘𝑁)) ∧ (𝑑 ∈ (𝔼‘𝑁) ∧ 𝑏 ∈ (𝔼‘𝑁) ∧ 𝐸 ∈ (𝔼‘𝑁))) ∧ (𝑃 ∈ (𝔼‘𝑁) ∧ 𝑄 ∈ (𝔼‘𝑁) ∧ 𝑅 ∈ (𝔼‘𝑁))) ∧ ((((𝐴 ≠ 𝐵 ∧ 𝐵 ≠ 𝐶 ∧ 𝐶 ≠ 𝑐) ∧ (𝐵 Btwn 〈𝐴, 𝐶〉 ∧ 𝐵 Btwn 〈𝐴, 𝐷〉)) ∧ ((𝐷 Btwn 〈𝐴, 𝑐〉 ∧ 〈𝐷, 𝑐〉Cgr〈𝐶, 𝐷〉) ∧ (𝐶 Btwn 〈𝐴, 𝑑〉 ∧ 〈𝐶, 𝑑〉Cgr〈𝐶, 𝐷〉)) ∧ ((𝑐 Btwn 〈𝐴, 𝑏〉 ∧ 〈𝑐, 𝑏〉Cgr〈𝐶, 𝐵〉) ∧ (𝑑 Btwn 〈𝐴, 𝑏〉 ∧ 〈𝑑, 𝑏〉Cgr〈𝐷, 𝐵〉))) ∧ ((𝐸 Btwn 〈𝐶, 𝑐〉 ∧ 𝐸 Btwn 〈𝐷, 𝑑〉) ∧ ((𝐶 Btwn 〈𝑐, 𝑃〉 ∧ 〈𝐶, 𝑃〉Cgr〈𝐶, 𝑑〉) ∧ (𝐶 Btwn 〈𝑑, 𝑅〉 ∧ 〈𝐶, 𝑅〉Cgr〈𝐶, 𝐸〉) ∧ (𝑅 Btwn 〈𝑃, 𝑄〉 ∧ 〈𝑅, 𝑄〉Cgr〈𝑅, 𝑃〉))))) → 〈𝐷, 𝐶〉Cgr〈𝑄, 𝐶〉) | ||
Theorem | btwnconn1lem12 33457 | Lemma for btwnconn1 33460. Using a long string of invocations of linecgr 33440, we show that 𝐷 = 𝑑. (Contributed by Scott Fenton, 9-Oct-2013.) |
⊢ ((((𝑁 ∈ ℕ ∧ 𝐴 ∈ (𝔼‘𝑁) ∧ 𝐵 ∈ (𝔼‘𝑁)) ∧ ((𝐶 ∈ (𝔼‘𝑁) ∧ 𝐷 ∈ (𝔼‘𝑁) ∧ 𝑐 ∈ (𝔼‘𝑁)) ∧ (𝑑 ∈ (𝔼‘𝑁) ∧ 𝑏 ∈ (𝔼‘𝑁) ∧ 𝐸 ∈ (𝔼‘𝑁))) ∧ (𝑃 ∈ (𝔼‘𝑁) ∧ 𝑄 ∈ (𝔼‘𝑁) ∧ 𝑅 ∈ (𝔼‘𝑁))) ∧ ((((𝐴 ≠ 𝐵 ∧ 𝐵 ≠ 𝐶 ∧ 𝐶 ≠ 𝑐) ∧ (𝐵 Btwn 〈𝐴, 𝐶〉 ∧ 𝐵 Btwn 〈𝐴, 𝐷〉)) ∧ ((𝐷 Btwn 〈𝐴, 𝑐〉 ∧ 〈𝐷, 𝑐〉Cgr〈𝐶, 𝐷〉) ∧ (𝐶 Btwn 〈𝐴, 𝑑〉 ∧ 〈𝐶, 𝑑〉Cgr〈𝐶, 𝐷〉)) ∧ ((𝑐 Btwn 〈𝐴, 𝑏〉 ∧ 〈𝑐, 𝑏〉Cgr〈𝐶, 𝐵〉) ∧ (𝑑 Btwn 〈𝐴, 𝑏〉 ∧ 〈𝑑, 𝑏〉Cgr〈𝐷, 𝐵〉))) ∧ ((𝐸 Btwn 〈𝐶, 𝑐〉 ∧ 𝐸 Btwn 〈𝐷, 𝑑〉) ∧ ((𝐶 Btwn 〈𝑐, 𝑃〉 ∧ 〈𝐶, 𝑃〉Cgr〈𝐶, 𝑑〉) ∧ (𝐶 Btwn 〈𝑑, 𝑅〉 ∧ 〈𝐶, 𝑅〉Cgr〈𝐶, 𝐸〉) ∧ (𝑅 Btwn 〈𝑃, 𝑄〉 ∧ 〈𝑅, 𝑄〉Cgr〈𝑅, 𝑃〉))))) → 𝐷 = 𝑑) | ||
Theorem | btwnconn1lem13 33458 | Lemma for btwnconn1 33460. Begin back-filling and eliminating hypotheses. (Contributed by Scott Fenton, 9-Oct-2013.) |
⊢ ((((𝑁 ∈ ℕ ∧ 𝐴 ∈ (𝔼‘𝑁) ∧ 𝐵 ∈ (𝔼‘𝑁)) ∧ ((𝐶 ∈ (𝔼‘𝑁) ∧ 𝐷 ∈ (𝔼‘𝑁) ∧ 𝑐 ∈ (𝔼‘𝑁)) ∧ (𝑑 ∈ (𝔼‘𝑁) ∧ 𝑏 ∈ (𝔼‘𝑁)))) ∧ (((𝐴 ≠ 𝐵 ∧ 𝐵 ≠ 𝐶) ∧ (𝐵 Btwn 〈𝐴, 𝐶〉 ∧ 𝐵 Btwn 〈𝐴, 𝐷〉)) ∧ ((𝐷 Btwn 〈𝐴, 𝑐〉 ∧ 〈𝐷, 𝑐〉Cgr〈𝐶, 𝐷〉) ∧ (𝐶 Btwn 〈𝐴, 𝑑〉 ∧ 〈𝐶, 𝑑〉Cgr〈𝐶, 𝐷〉)) ∧ ((𝑐 Btwn 〈𝐴, 𝑏〉 ∧ 〈𝑐, 𝑏〉Cgr〈𝐶, 𝐵〉) ∧ (𝑑 Btwn 〈𝐴, 𝑏〉 ∧ 〈𝑑, 𝑏〉Cgr〈𝐷, 𝐵〉)))) → (𝐶 = 𝑐 ∨ 𝐷 = 𝑑)) | ||
Theorem | btwnconn1lem14 33459 | Lemma for btwnconn1 33460. Final statement of the theorem when 𝐵 ≠ 𝐶. (Contributed by Scott Fenton, 9-Oct-2013.) |
⊢ (((𝑁 ∈ ℕ ∧ (𝐴 ∈ (𝔼‘𝑁) ∧ 𝐵 ∈ (𝔼‘𝑁)) ∧ (𝐶 ∈ (𝔼‘𝑁) ∧ 𝐷 ∈ (𝔼‘𝑁))) ∧ ((𝐴 ≠ 𝐵 ∧ 𝐵 ≠ 𝐶) ∧ (𝐵 Btwn 〈𝐴, 𝐶〉 ∧ 𝐵 Btwn 〈𝐴, 𝐷〉))) → (𝐶 Btwn 〈𝐴, 𝐷〉 ∨ 𝐷 Btwn 〈𝐴, 𝐶〉)) | ||
Theorem | btwnconn1 33460 | Connectitivy law for betweenness. Theorem 5.1 of [Schwabhauser] p. 39-41. (Contributed by Scott Fenton, 9-Oct-2013.) |
⊢ ((𝑁 ∈ ℕ ∧ (𝐴 ∈ (𝔼‘𝑁) ∧ 𝐵 ∈ (𝔼‘𝑁)) ∧ (𝐶 ∈ (𝔼‘𝑁) ∧ 𝐷 ∈ (𝔼‘𝑁))) → ((𝐴 ≠ 𝐵 ∧ 𝐵 Btwn 〈𝐴, 𝐶〉 ∧ 𝐵 Btwn 〈𝐴, 𝐷〉) → (𝐶 Btwn 〈𝐴, 𝐷〉 ∨ 𝐷 Btwn 〈𝐴, 𝐶〉))) | ||
Theorem | btwnconn2 33461 | Another connectivity law for betweenness. Theorem 5.2 of [Schwabhauser] p. 41. (Contributed by Scott Fenton, 9-Oct-2013.) |
⊢ ((𝑁 ∈ ℕ ∧ (𝐴 ∈ (𝔼‘𝑁) ∧ 𝐵 ∈ (𝔼‘𝑁)) ∧ (𝐶 ∈ (𝔼‘𝑁) ∧ 𝐷 ∈ (𝔼‘𝑁))) → ((𝐴 ≠ 𝐵 ∧ 𝐵 Btwn 〈𝐴, 𝐶〉 ∧ 𝐵 Btwn 〈𝐴, 𝐷〉) → (𝐶 Btwn 〈𝐵, 𝐷〉 ∨ 𝐷 Btwn 〈𝐵, 𝐶〉))) | ||
Theorem | btwnconn3 33462 | Inner connectivity law for betweenness. Theorem 5.3 of [Schwabhauser] p. 41. (Contributed by Scott Fenton, 9-Oct-2013.) |
⊢ ((𝑁 ∈ ℕ ∧ (𝐴 ∈ (𝔼‘𝑁) ∧ 𝐵 ∈ (𝔼‘𝑁)) ∧ (𝐶 ∈ (𝔼‘𝑁) ∧ 𝐷 ∈ (𝔼‘𝑁))) → ((𝐵 Btwn 〈𝐴, 𝐷〉 ∧ 𝐶 Btwn 〈𝐴, 𝐷〉) → (𝐵 Btwn 〈𝐴, 𝐶〉 ∨ 𝐶 Btwn 〈𝐴, 𝐵〉))) | ||
Theorem | midofsegid 33463 | If two points fall in the same place in the middle of a segment, then they are identical. (Contributed by Scott Fenton, 16-Oct-2013.) (Revised by Mario Carneiro, 19-Apr-2014.) |
⊢ ((𝑁 ∈ ℕ ∧ (𝐴 ∈ (𝔼‘𝑁) ∧ 𝐵 ∈ (𝔼‘𝑁)) ∧ (𝐷 ∈ (𝔼‘𝑁) ∧ 𝐸 ∈ (𝔼‘𝑁))) → ((𝐷 Btwn 〈𝐴, 𝐵〉 ∧ 𝐸 Btwn 〈𝐴, 𝐵〉 ∧ 〈𝐴, 𝐷〉Cgr〈𝐴, 𝐸〉) → 𝐷 = 𝐸)) | ||
Theorem | segcon2 33464* | Generalization of axsegcon 26641. This time, we generate an endpoint for a segment on the ray 𝑄𝐴 congruent to 𝐵𝐶 and starting at 𝑄, as opposed to axsegcon 26641, where the segment starts at 𝐴 (Contributed by Scott Fenton, 14-Oct-2013.) Remove unneeded inequality. (Revised by Scott Fenton, 15-Oct-2013.) |
⊢ ((𝑁 ∈ ℕ ∧ (𝑄 ∈ (𝔼‘𝑁) ∧ 𝐴 ∈ (𝔼‘𝑁)) ∧ (𝐵 ∈ (𝔼‘𝑁) ∧ 𝐶 ∈ (𝔼‘𝑁))) → ∃𝑥 ∈ (𝔼‘𝑁)((𝐴 Btwn 〈𝑄, 𝑥〉 ∨ 𝑥 Btwn 〈𝑄, 𝐴〉) ∧ 〈𝑄, 𝑥〉Cgr〈𝐵, 𝐶〉)) | ||
Syntax | csegle 33465 | Declare the constant for the segment less than or equal to relationship. |
class Seg≤ | ||
Definition | df-segle 33466* | Define the segment length comparison relationship. This relationship expresses that the segment 𝐴𝐵 is no longer than 𝐶𝐷. In this section, we establish various properties of this relationship showing that it is a transitive, reflexive relationship on pairs of points that is substitutive under congruence. Definition 5.4 of [Schwabhauser] p. 41. (Contributed by Scott Fenton, 11-Oct-2013.) |
⊢ Seg≤ = {〈𝑝, 𝑞〉 ∣ ∃𝑛 ∈ ℕ ∃𝑎 ∈ (𝔼‘𝑛)∃𝑏 ∈ (𝔼‘𝑛)∃𝑐 ∈ (𝔼‘𝑛)∃𝑑 ∈ (𝔼‘𝑛)(𝑝 = 〈𝑎, 𝑏〉 ∧ 𝑞 = 〈𝑐, 𝑑〉 ∧ ∃𝑦 ∈ (𝔼‘𝑛)(𝑦 Btwn 〈𝑐, 𝑑〉 ∧ 〈𝑎, 𝑏〉Cgr〈𝑐, 𝑦〉))} | ||
Theorem | brsegle 33467* | Binary relation form of the segment comparison relationship. (Contributed by Scott Fenton, 11-Oct-2013.) |
⊢ ((𝑁 ∈ ℕ ∧ (𝐴 ∈ (𝔼‘𝑁) ∧ 𝐵 ∈ (𝔼‘𝑁)) ∧ (𝐶 ∈ (𝔼‘𝑁) ∧ 𝐷 ∈ (𝔼‘𝑁))) → (〈𝐴, 𝐵〉 Seg≤ 〈𝐶, 𝐷〉 ↔ ∃𝑦 ∈ (𝔼‘𝑁)(𝑦 Btwn 〈𝐶, 𝐷〉 ∧ 〈𝐴, 𝐵〉Cgr〈𝐶, 𝑦〉))) | ||
Theorem | brsegle2 33468* | Alternate characterization of segment comparison. Theorem 5.5 of [Schwabhauser] p. 41-42. (Contributed by Scott Fenton, 11-Oct-2013.) |
⊢ ((𝑁 ∈ ℕ ∧ (𝐴 ∈ (𝔼‘𝑁) ∧ 𝐵 ∈ (𝔼‘𝑁)) ∧ (𝐶 ∈ (𝔼‘𝑁) ∧ 𝐷 ∈ (𝔼‘𝑁))) → (〈𝐴, 𝐵〉 Seg≤ 〈𝐶, 𝐷〉 ↔ ∃𝑥 ∈ (𝔼‘𝑁)(𝐵 Btwn 〈𝐴, 𝑥〉 ∧ 〈𝐴, 𝑥〉Cgr〈𝐶, 𝐷〉))) | ||
Theorem | seglecgr12im 33469 | Substitution law for segment comparison under congruence. Theorem 5.6 of [Schwabhauser] p. 42. (Contributed by Scott Fenton, 11-Oct-2013.) |
⊢ (((𝑁 ∈ ℕ ∧ 𝐴 ∈ (𝔼‘𝑁) ∧ 𝐵 ∈ (𝔼‘𝑁)) ∧ (𝐶 ∈ (𝔼‘𝑁) ∧ 𝐷 ∈ (𝔼‘𝑁) ∧ 𝐸 ∈ (𝔼‘𝑁)) ∧ (𝐹 ∈ (𝔼‘𝑁) ∧ 𝐺 ∈ (𝔼‘𝑁) ∧ 𝐻 ∈ (𝔼‘𝑁))) → ((〈𝐴, 𝐵〉Cgr〈𝐸, 𝐹〉 ∧ 〈𝐶, 𝐷〉Cgr〈𝐺, 𝐻〉 ∧ 〈𝐴, 𝐵〉 Seg≤ 〈𝐶, 𝐷〉) → 〈𝐸, 𝐹〉 Seg≤ 〈𝐺, 𝐻〉)) | ||
Theorem | seglecgr12 33470 | Substitution law for segment comparison under congruence. Biconditional version. (Contributed by Scott Fenton, 15-Oct-2013.) (Revised by Mario Carneiro, 19-Apr-2014.) |
⊢ (((𝑁 ∈ ℕ ∧ 𝐴 ∈ (𝔼‘𝑁) ∧ 𝐵 ∈ (𝔼‘𝑁)) ∧ (𝐶 ∈ (𝔼‘𝑁) ∧ 𝐷 ∈ (𝔼‘𝑁) ∧ 𝐸 ∈ (𝔼‘𝑁)) ∧ (𝐹 ∈ (𝔼‘𝑁) ∧ 𝐺 ∈ (𝔼‘𝑁) ∧ 𝐻 ∈ (𝔼‘𝑁))) → ((〈𝐴, 𝐵〉Cgr〈𝐸, 𝐹〉 ∧ 〈𝐶, 𝐷〉Cgr〈𝐺, 𝐻〉) → (〈𝐴, 𝐵〉 Seg≤ 〈𝐶, 𝐷〉 ↔ 〈𝐸, 𝐹〉 Seg≤ 〈𝐺, 𝐻〉))) | ||
Theorem | seglerflx 33471 | Segment comparison is reflexive. Theorem 5.7 of [Schwabhauser] p. 42. (Contributed by Scott Fenton, 11-Oct-2013.) |
⊢ ((𝑁 ∈ ℕ ∧ 𝐴 ∈ (𝔼‘𝑁) ∧ 𝐵 ∈ (𝔼‘𝑁)) → 〈𝐴, 𝐵〉 Seg≤ 〈𝐴, 𝐵〉) | ||
Theorem | seglemin 33472 | Any segment is at least as long as a degenerate segment. Theorem 5.11 of [Schwabhauser] p. 42. (Contributed by Scott Fenton, 11-Oct-2013.) |
⊢ ((𝑁 ∈ ℕ ∧ (𝐴 ∈ (𝔼‘𝑁) ∧ 𝐵 ∈ (𝔼‘𝑁) ∧ 𝐶 ∈ (𝔼‘𝑁))) → 〈𝐴, 𝐴〉 Seg≤ 〈𝐵, 𝐶〉) | ||
Theorem | segletr 33473 | Segment less than is transitive. Theorem 5.8 of [Schwabhauser] p. 42. (Contributed by Scott Fenton, 11-Oct-2013.) |
⊢ ((𝑁 ∈ ℕ ∧ (𝐴 ∈ (𝔼‘𝑁) ∧ 𝐵 ∈ (𝔼‘𝑁) ∧ 𝐶 ∈ (𝔼‘𝑁)) ∧ (𝐷 ∈ (𝔼‘𝑁) ∧ 𝐸 ∈ (𝔼‘𝑁) ∧ 𝐹 ∈ (𝔼‘𝑁))) → ((〈𝐴, 𝐵〉 Seg≤ 〈𝐶, 𝐷〉 ∧ 〈𝐶, 𝐷〉 Seg≤ 〈𝐸, 𝐹〉) → 〈𝐴, 𝐵〉 Seg≤ 〈𝐸, 𝐹〉)) | ||
Theorem | segleantisym 33474 | Antisymmetry law for segment comparison. Theorem 5.9 of [Schwabhauser] p. 42. (Contributed by Scott Fenton, 14-Oct-2013.) |
⊢ ((𝑁 ∈ ℕ ∧ (𝐴 ∈ (𝔼‘𝑁) ∧ 𝐵 ∈ (𝔼‘𝑁)) ∧ (𝐶 ∈ (𝔼‘𝑁) ∧ 𝐷 ∈ (𝔼‘𝑁))) → ((〈𝐴, 𝐵〉 Seg≤ 〈𝐶, 𝐷〉 ∧ 〈𝐶, 𝐷〉 Seg≤ 〈𝐴, 𝐵〉) → 〈𝐴, 𝐵〉Cgr〈𝐶, 𝐷〉)) | ||
Theorem | seglelin 33475 | Linearity law for segment comparison. Theorem 5.10 of [Schwabhauser] p. 42. (Contributed by Scott Fenton, 14-Oct-2013.) |
⊢ ((𝑁 ∈ ℕ ∧ (𝐴 ∈ (𝔼‘𝑁) ∧ 𝐵 ∈ (𝔼‘𝑁)) ∧ (𝐶 ∈ (𝔼‘𝑁) ∧ 𝐷 ∈ (𝔼‘𝑁))) → (〈𝐴, 𝐵〉 Seg≤ 〈𝐶, 𝐷〉 ∨ 〈𝐶, 𝐷〉 Seg≤ 〈𝐴, 𝐵〉)) | ||
Theorem | btwnsegle 33476 | If 𝐵 falls between 𝐴 and 𝐶, then 𝐴𝐵 is no longer than 𝐴𝐶. (Contributed by Scott Fenton, 16-Oct-2013.) (Revised by Mario Carneiro, 19-Apr-2014.) |
⊢ ((𝑁 ∈ ℕ ∧ (𝐴 ∈ (𝔼‘𝑁) ∧ 𝐵 ∈ (𝔼‘𝑁) ∧ 𝐶 ∈ (𝔼‘𝑁))) → (𝐵 Btwn 〈𝐴, 𝐶〉 → 〈𝐴, 𝐵〉 Seg≤ 〈𝐴, 𝐶〉)) | ||
Theorem | colinbtwnle 33477 | Given three colinear points 𝐴, 𝐵, and 𝐶, 𝐵 falls in the middle iff the two segments to 𝐵 are no longer than 𝐴𝐶. Theorem 5.12 of [Schwabhauser] p. 42. (Contributed by Scott Fenton, 15-Oct-2013.) (Revised by Mario Carneiro, 19-Apr-2014.) |
⊢ ((𝑁 ∈ ℕ ∧ (𝐴 ∈ (𝔼‘𝑁) ∧ 𝐵 ∈ (𝔼‘𝑁) ∧ 𝐶 ∈ (𝔼‘𝑁))) → (𝐴 Colinear 〈𝐵, 𝐶〉 → (𝐵 Btwn 〈𝐴, 𝐶〉 ↔ (〈𝐴, 𝐵〉 Seg≤ 〈𝐴, 𝐶〉 ∧ 〈𝐵, 𝐶〉 Seg≤ 〈𝐴, 𝐶〉)))) | ||
Syntax | coutsideof 33478 | Declare the syntax for the outside of constant. |
class OutsideOf | ||
Definition | df-outsideof 33479 | The outside of relationship. This relationship expresses that 𝑃, 𝐴, and 𝐵 fall on a line, but 𝑃 is not on the segment 𝐴𝐵. This definition is taken from theorem 6.4 of [Schwabhauser] p. 43, since it requires no dummy variables. (Contributed by Scott Fenton, 17-Oct-2013.) |
⊢ OutsideOf = ( Colinear ∖ Btwn ) | ||
Theorem | broutsideof 33480 | Binary relation form of OutsideOf. Theorem 6.4 of [Schwabhauser] p. 43. (Contributed by Scott Fenton, 17-Oct-2013.) (Revised by Mario Carneiro, 19-Apr-2014.) |
⊢ (𝑃OutsideOf〈𝐴, 𝐵〉 ↔ (𝑃 Colinear 〈𝐴, 𝐵〉 ∧ ¬ 𝑃 Btwn 〈𝐴, 𝐵〉)) | ||
Theorem | broutsideof2 33481 | Alternate form of OutsideOf. Definition 6.1 of [Schwabhauser] p. 43. (Contributed by Scott Fenton, 17-Oct-2013.) (Revised by Mario Carneiro, 19-Apr-2014.) |
⊢ ((𝑁 ∈ ℕ ∧ (𝑃 ∈ (𝔼‘𝑁) ∧ 𝐴 ∈ (𝔼‘𝑁) ∧ 𝐵 ∈ (𝔼‘𝑁))) → (𝑃OutsideOf〈𝐴, 𝐵〉 ↔ (𝐴 ≠ 𝑃 ∧ 𝐵 ≠ 𝑃 ∧ (𝐴 Btwn 〈𝑃, 𝐵〉 ∨ 𝐵 Btwn 〈𝑃, 𝐴〉)))) | ||
Theorem | outsidene1 33482 | Outsideness implies inequality. (Contributed by Scott Fenton, 18-Oct-2013.) (Revised by Mario Carneiro, 19-Apr-2014.) |
⊢ ((𝑁 ∈ ℕ ∧ (𝑃 ∈ (𝔼‘𝑁) ∧ 𝐴 ∈ (𝔼‘𝑁) ∧ 𝐵 ∈ (𝔼‘𝑁))) → (𝑃OutsideOf〈𝐴, 𝐵〉 → 𝐴 ≠ 𝑃)) | ||
Theorem | outsidene2 33483 | Outsideness implies inequality. (Contributed by Scott Fenton, 18-Oct-2013.) (Revised by Mario Carneiro, 19-Apr-2014.) |
⊢ ((𝑁 ∈ ℕ ∧ (𝑃 ∈ (𝔼‘𝑁) ∧ 𝐴 ∈ (𝔼‘𝑁) ∧ 𝐵 ∈ (𝔼‘𝑁))) → (𝑃OutsideOf〈𝐴, 𝐵〉 → 𝐵 ≠ 𝑃)) | ||
Theorem | btwnoutside 33484 | A principle linking outsideness to betweenness. Theorem 6.2 of [Schwabhauser] p. 43. (Contributed by Scott Fenton, 18-Oct-2013.) (Revised by Mario Carneiro, 19-Apr-2014.) |
⊢ ((𝑁 ∈ ℕ ∧ (𝐴 ∈ (𝔼‘𝑁) ∧ 𝐵 ∈ (𝔼‘𝑁)) ∧ (𝐶 ∈ (𝔼‘𝑁) ∧ 𝑃 ∈ (𝔼‘𝑁))) → (((𝐴 ≠ 𝑃 ∧ 𝐵 ≠ 𝑃 ∧ 𝐶 ≠ 𝑃) ∧ 𝑃 Btwn 〈𝐴, 𝐶〉) → (𝑃 Btwn 〈𝐵, 𝐶〉 ↔ 𝑃OutsideOf〈𝐴, 𝐵〉))) | ||
Theorem | broutsideof3 33485* | Characterization of outsideness in terms of relationship to a fourth point. Theorem 6.3 of [Schwabhauser] p. 43. (Contributed by Scott Fenton, 18-Oct-2013.) (Revised by Mario Carneiro, 19-Apr-2014.) |
⊢ ((𝑁 ∈ ℕ ∧ (𝑃 ∈ (𝔼‘𝑁) ∧ 𝐴 ∈ (𝔼‘𝑁) ∧ 𝐵 ∈ (𝔼‘𝑁))) → (𝑃OutsideOf〈𝐴, 𝐵〉 ↔ (𝐴 ≠ 𝑃 ∧ 𝐵 ≠ 𝑃 ∧ ∃𝑐 ∈ (𝔼‘𝑁)(𝑐 ≠ 𝑃 ∧ 𝑃 Btwn 〈𝐴, 𝑐〉 ∧ 𝑃 Btwn 〈𝐵, 𝑐〉)))) | ||
Theorem | outsideofrflx 33486 | Reflexitivity of outsideness. Theorem 6.5 of [Schwabhauser] p. 44. (Contributed by Scott Fenton, 18-Oct-2013.) (Revised by Mario Carneiro, 19-Apr-2014.) |
⊢ ((𝑁 ∈ ℕ ∧ 𝑃 ∈ (𝔼‘𝑁) ∧ 𝐴 ∈ (𝔼‘𝑁)) → (𝐴 ≠ 𝑃 → 𝑃OutsideOf〈𝐴, 𝐴〉)) | ||
Theorem | outsideofcom 33487 | Commutitivity law for outsideness. Theorem 6.6 of [Schwabhauser] p. 44. (Contributed by Scott Fenton, 18-Oct-2013.) (Revised by Mario Carneiro, 19-Apr-2014.) |
⊢ ((𝑁 ∈ ℕ ∧ (𝑃 ∈ (𝔼‘𝑁) ∧ 𝐴 ∈ (𝔼‘𝑁) ∧ 𝐵 ∈ (𝔼‘𝑁))) → (𝑃OutsideOf〈𝐴, 𝐵〉 ↔ 𝑃OutsideOf〈𝐵, 𝐴〉)) | ||
Theorem | outsideoftr 33488 | Transitivity law for outsideness. Theorem 6.7 of [Schwabhauser] p. 44. (Contributed by Scott Fenton, 18-Oct-2013.) (Revised by Mario Carneiro, 19-Apr-2014.) |
⊢ ((𝑁 ∈ ℕ ∧ (𝐴 ∈ (𝔼‘𝑁) ∧ 𝐵 ∈ (𝔼‘𝑁)) ∧ (𝐶 ∈ (𝔼‘𝑁) ∧ 𝑃 ∈ (𝔼‘𝑁))) → ((𝑃OutsideOf〈𝐴, 𝐵〉 ∧ 𝑃OutsideOf〈𝐵, 𝐶〉) → 𝑃OutsideOf〈𝐴, 𝐶〉)) | ||
Theorem | outsideofeq 33489 | Uniqueness law for OutsideOf. Analogue of segconeq 33369. (Contributed by Scott Fenton, 24-Oct-2013.) (Revised by Mario Carneiro, 19-Apr-2014.) |
⊢ ((𝑁 ∈ ℕ ∧ (𝐴 ∈ (𝔼‘𝑁) ∧ 𝑅 ∈ (𝔼‘𝑁) ∧ 𝐵 ∈ (𝔼‘𝑁)) ∧ (𝐶 ∈ (𝔼‘𝑁) ∧ 𝑋 ∈ (𝔼‘𝑁) ∧ 𝑌 ∈ (𝔼‘𝑁))) → (((𝐴OutsideOf〈𝑋, 𝑅〉 ∧ 〈𝐴, 𝑋〉Cgr〈𝐵, 𝐶〉) ∧ (𝐴OutsideOf〈𝑌, 𝑅〉 ∧ 〈𝐴, 𝑌〉Cgr〈𝐵, 𝐶〉)) → 𝑋 = 𝑌)) | ||
Theorem | outsideofeu 33490* | Given a nondegenerate ray, there is a unique point congruent to the segment 𝐵𝐶 lying on the ray 𝐴𝑅. Theorem 6.11 of [Schwabhauser] p. 44. (Contributed by Scott Fenton, 23-Oct-2013.) (Revised by Mario Carneiro, 19-Apr-2014.) |
⊢ ((𝑁 ∈ ℕ ∧ (𝐴 ∈ (𝔼‘𝑁) ∧ 𝑅 ∈ (𝔼‘𝑁)) ∧ (𝐵 ∈ (𝔼‘𝑁) ∧ 𝐶 ∈ (𝔼‘𝑁))) → ((𝑅 ≠ 𝐴 ∧ 𝐵 ≠ 𝐶) → ∃!𝑥 ∈ (𝔼‘𝑁)(𝐴OutsideOf〈𝑥, 𝑅〉 ∧ 〈𝐴, 𝑥〉Cgr〈𝐵, 𝐶〉))) | ||
Theorem | outsidele 33491 | Relate OutsideOf to Seg≤. Theorem 6.13 of [Schwabhauser] p. 45. (Contributed by Scott Fenton, 24-Oct-2013.) (Revised by Mario Carneiro, 19-Apr-2014.) |
⊢ ((𝑁 ∈ ℕ ∧ (𝑃 ∈ (𝔼‘𝑁) ∧ 𝐴 ∈ (𝔼‘𝑁) ∧ 𝐵 ∈ (𝔼‘𝑁))) → (𝑃OutsideOf〈𝐴, 𝐵〉 → (〈𝑃, 𝐴〉 Seg≤ 〈𝑃, 𝐵〉 ↔ 𝐴 Btwn 〈𝑃, 𝐵〉))) | ||
Theorem | outsideofcol 33492 | Outside of implies colinearity. (Contributed by Scott Fenton, 26-Oct-2013.) (Revised by Mario Carneiro, 19-Apr-2014.) |
⊢ (𝑃OutsideOf〈𝑄, 𝑅〉 → 𝑃 Colinear 〈𝑄, 𝑅〉) | ||
Syntax | cline2 33493 | Declare the constant for the line function. |
class Line | ||
Syntax | cray 33494 | Declare the constant for the ray function. |
class Ray | ||
Syntax | clines2 33495 | Declare the constant for the set of all lines. |
class LinesEE | ||
Definition | df-line2 33496* | Define the Line function. This function generates the line passing through the distinct points 𝑎 and 𝑏. Adapted from definition 6.14 of [Schwabhauser] p. 45. (Contributed by Scott Fenton, 25-Oct-2013.) |
⊢ Line = {〈〈𝑎, 𝑏〉, 𝑙〉 ∣ ∃𝑛 ∈ ℕ ((𝑎 ∈ (𝔼‘𝑛) ∧ 𝑏 ∈ (𝔼‘𝑛) ∧ 𝑎 ≠ 𝑏) ∧ 𝑙 = [〈𝑎, 𝑏〉]◡ Colinear )} | ||
Definition | df-ray 33497* | Define the Ray function. This function generates the set of all points that lie on the ray starting at 𝑝 and passing through 𝑎. Definition 6.8 of [Schwabhauser] p. 44. (Contributed by Scott Fenton, 21-Oct-2013.) |
⊢ Ray = {〈〈𝑝, 𝑎〉, 𝑟〉 ∣ ∃𝑛 ∈ ℕ ((𝑝 ∈ (𝔼‘𝑛) ∧ 𝑎 ∈ (𝔼‘𝑛) ∧ 𝑝 ≠ 𝑎) ∧ 𝑟 = {𝑥 ∈ (𝔼‘𝑛) ∣ 𝑝OutsideOf〈𝑎, 𝑥〉})} | ||
Definition | df-lines2 33498 | Define the set of all lines. Definition 6.14, part 2 of [Schwabhauser] p. 45. See ellines 33511 for membership. (Contributed by Scott Fenton, 28-Oct-2013.) |
⊢ LinesEE = ran Line | ||
Theorem | funray 33499 | Show that the Ray relationship is a function. (Contributed by Scott Fenton, 21-Oct-2013.) (Revised by Mario Carneiro, 19-Apr-2014.) |
⊢ Fun Ray | ||
Theorem | fvray 33500* | Calculate the value of the Ray function. (Contributed by Scott Fenton, 21-Oct-2013.) (Revised by Mario Carneiro, 19-Apr-2014.) |
⊢ ((𝑁 ∈ ℕ ∧ (𝑃 ∈ (𝔼‘𝑁) ∧ 𝐴 ∈ (𝔼‘𝑁) ∧ 𝑃 ≠ 𝐴)) → (𝑃Ray𝐴) = {𝑥 ∈ (𝔼‘𝑁) ∣ 𝑃OutsideOf〈𝐴, 𝑥〉}) |
< Previous Next > |
Copyright terms: Public domain | < Previous Next > |