Home | Metamath
Proof Explorer Theorem List (p. 267 of 450) | < Previous Next > |
Bad symbols? Try the
GIF version. |
||
Mirrors > Metamath Home Page > MPE Home Page > Theorem List Contents > Recent Proofs This page: Page List |
Color key: | Metamath Proof Explorer
(1-28695) |
Hilbert Space Explorer
(28696-30218) |
Users' Mathboxes
(30219-44926) |
Type | Label | Description |
---|---|---|
Statement | ||
Theorem | cgrane4 26601 | Angles imply inequality. (Contributed by Thierry Arnoux, 1-Aug-2020.) |
⊢ 𝑃 = (Base‘𝐺) & ⊢ 𝐼 = (Itv‘𝐺) & ⊢ 𝐾 = (hlG‘𝐺) & ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐺 ∈ TarskiG) & ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐴 ∈ 𝑃) & ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐵 ∈ 𝑃) & ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐶 ∈ 𝑃) & ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐷 ∈ 𝑃) & ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐸 ∈ 𝑃) & ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐹 ∈ 𝑃) & ⊢ (𝜑 → 〈“𝐴𝐵𝐶”〉(cgrA‘𝐺)〈“𝐷𝐸𝐹”〉) ⇒ ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐸 ≠ 𝐹) | ||
Theorem | cgrahl1 26602 | Angle congruence is independent of the choice of points on the rays. Proposition 11.10 of [Schwabhauser] p. 95. (Contributed by Thierry Arnoux, 1-Aug-2020.) |
⊢ 𝑃 = (Base‘𝐺) & ⊢ 𝐼 = (Itv‘𝐺) & ⊢ 𝐾 = (hlG‘𝐺) & ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐺 ∈ TarskiG) & ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐴 ∈ 𝑃) & ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐵 ∈ 𝑃) & ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐶 ∈ 𝑃) & ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐷 ∈ 𝑃) & ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐸 ∈ 𝑃) & ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐹 ∈ 𝑃) & ⊢ (𝜑 → 〈“𝐴𝐵𝐶”〉(cgrA‘𝐺)〈“𝐷𝐸𝐹”〉) & ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝑋 ∈ 𝑃) & ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝑋(𝐾‘𝐸)𝐷) ⇒ ⊢ (𝜑 → 〈“𝐴𝐵𝐶”〉(cgrA‘𝐺)〈“𝑋𝐸𝐹”〉) | ||
Theorem | cgrahl2 26603 | Angle congruence is independent of the choice of points on the rays. Proposition 11.10 of [Schwabhauser] p. 95. (Contributed by Thierry Arnoux, 1-Aug-2020.) |
⊢ 𝑃 = (Base‘𝐺) & ⊢ 𝐼 = (Itv‘𝐺) & ⊢ 𝐾 = (hlG‘𝐺) & ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐺 ∈ TarskiG) & ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐴 ∈ 𝑃) & ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐵 ∈ 𝑃) & ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐶 ∈ 𝑃) & ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐷 ∈ 𝑃) & ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐸 ∈ 𝑃) & ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐹 ∈ 𝑃) & ⊢ (𝜑 → 〈“𝐴𝐵𝐶”〉(cgrA‘𝐺)〈“𝐷𝐸𝐹”〉) & ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝑋 ∈ 𝑃) & ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝑋(𝐾‘𝐸)𝐹) ⇒ ⊢ (𝜑 → 〈“𝐴𝐵𝐶”〉(cgrA‘𝐺)〈“𝐷𝐸𝑋”〉) | ||
Theorem | cgracgr 26604 | First direction of proposition 11.4 of [Schwabhauser] p. 95. Again, this is "half" of the proposition, i.e. only two additional points are used, while Schwabhauser has four. (Contributed by Thierry Arnoux, 31-Jul-2020.) |
⊢ 𝑃 = (Base‘𝐺) & ⊢ 𝐼 = (Itv‘𝐺) & ⊢ 𝐾 = (hlG‘𝐺) & ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐺 ∈ TarskiG) & ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐴 ∈ 𝑃) & ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐵 ∈ 𝑃) & ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐶 ∈ 𝑃) & ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐷 ∈ 𝑃) & ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐸 ∈ 𝑃) & ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐹 ∈ 𝑃) & ⊢ (𝜑 → 〈“𝐴𝐵𝐶”〉(cgrA‘𝐺)〈“𝐷𝐸𝐹”〉) & ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝑋 ∈ 𝑃) & ⊢ − = (dist‘𝐺) & ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝑌 ∈ 𝑃) & ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝑋(𝐾‘𝐵)𝐴) & ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝑌(𝐾‘𝐵)𝐶) & ⊢ (𝜑 → (𝐵 − 𝑋) = (𝐸 − 𝐷)) & ⊢ (𝜑 → (𝐵 − 𝑌) = (𝐸 − 𝐹)) ⇒ ⊢ (𝜑 → (𝑋 − 𝑌) = (𝐷 − 𝐹)) | ||
Theorem | cgraid 26605 | Angle congruence is reflexive. Theorem 11.6 of [Schwabhauser] p. 96. (Contributed by Thierry Arnoux, 31-Jul-2020.) |
⊢ 𝑃 = (Base‘𝐺) & ⊢ 𝐼 = (Itv‘𝐺) & ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐺 ∈ TarskiG) & ⊢ 𝐾 = (hlG‘𝐺) & ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐴 ∈ 𝑃) & ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐵 ∈ 𝑃) & ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐶 ∈ 𝑃) & ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐴 ≠ 𝐵) & ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐵 ≠ 𝐶) ⇒ ⊢ (𝜑 → 〈“𝐴𝐵𝐶”〉(cgrA‘𝐺)〈“𝐴𝐵𝐶”〉) | ||
Theorem | cgraswap 26606 | Swap rays in a congruence relation. Theorem 11.9 of [Schwabhauser] p. 96. (Contributed by Thierry Arnoux, 5-Mar-2020.) |
⊢ 𝑃 = (Base‘𝐺) & ⊢ 𝐼 = (Itv‘𝐺) & ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐺 ∈ TarskiG) & ⊢ 𝐾 = (hlG‘𝐺) & ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐴 ∈ 𝑃) & ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐵 ∈ 𝑃) & ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐶 ∈ 𝑃) & ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐴 ≠ 𝐵) & ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐵 ≠ 𝐶) ⇒ ⊢ (𝜑 → 〈“𝐴𝐵𝐶”〉(cgrA‘𝐺)〈“𝐶𝐵𝐴”〉) | ||
Theorem | cgrcgra 26607 | Triangle congruence implies angle congruence. This is a portion of CPCTC, focusing on a specific angle. (Contributed by Arnoux, 2-Aug-2020.) |
⊢ 𝑃 = (Base‘𝐺) & ⊢ 𝐼 = (Itv‘𝐺) & ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐺 ∈ TarskiG) & ⊢ 𝐾 = (hlG‘𝐺) & ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐴 ∈ 𝑃) & ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐵 ∈ 𝑃) & ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐶 ∈ 𝑃) & ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐷 ∈ 𝑃) & ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐸 ∈ 𝑃) & ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐹 ∈ 𝑃) & ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐴 ≠ 𝐵) & ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐵 ≠ 𝐶) & ⊢ (𝜑 → 〈“𝐴𝐵𝐶”〉(cgrG‘𝐺)〈“𝐷𝐸𝐹”〉) ⇒ ⊢ (𝜑 → 〈“𝐴𝐵𝐶”〉(cgrA‘𝐺)〈“𝐷𝐸𝐹”〉) | ||
Theorem | cgracom 26608 | Angle congruence commutes. Theorem 11.7 of [Schwabhauser] p. 97. (Contributed by Thierry Arnoux, 5-Mar-2020.) |
⊢ 𝑃 = (Base‘𝐺) & ⊢ 𝐼 = (Itv‘𝐺) & ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐺 ∈ TarskiG) & ⊢ 𝐾 = (hlG‘𝐺) & ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐴 ∈ 𝑃) & ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐵 ∈ 𝑃) & ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐶 ∈ 𝑃) & ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐷 ∈ 𝑃) & ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐸 ∈ 𝑃) & ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐹 ∈ 𝑃) & ⊢ (𝜑 → 〈“𝐴𝐵𝐶”〉(cgrA‘𝐺)〈“𝐷𝐸𝐹”〉) ⇒ ⊢ (𝜑 → 〈“𝐷𝐸𝐹”〉(cgrA‘𝐺)〈“𝐴𝐵𝐶”〉) | ||
Theorem | cgratr 26609 | Angle congruence is transitive. Theorem 11.8 of [Schwabhauser] p. 97. (Contributed by Thierry Arnoux, 5-Mar-2020.) |
⊢ 𝑃 = (Base‘𝐺) & ⊢ 𝐼 = (Itv‘𝐺) & ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐺 ∈ TarskiG) & ⊢ 𝐾 = (hlG‘𝐺) & ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐴 ∈ 𝑃) & ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐵 ∈ 𝑃) & ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐶 ∈ 𝑃) & ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐷 ∈ 𝑃) & ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐸 ∈ 𝑃) & ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐹 ∈ 𝑃) & ⊢ (𝜑 → 〈“𝐴𝐵𝐶”〉(cgrA‘𝐺)〈“𝐷𝐸𝐹”〉) & ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐻 ∈ 𝑃) & ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝑈 ∈ 𝑃) & ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐽 ∈ 𝑃) & ⊢ (𝜑 → 〈“𝐷𝐸𝐹”〉(cgrA‘𝐺)〈“𝐻𝑈𝐽”〉) ⇒ ⊢ (𝜑 → 〈“𝐴𝐵𝐶”〉(cgrA‘𝐺)〈“𝐻𝑈𝐽”〉) | ||
Theorem | flatcgra 26610 | Flat angles are congruent. (Contributed by Thierry Arnoux, 13-Feb-2023.) |
⊢ 𝑃 = (Base‘𝐺) & ⊢ 𝐼 = (Itv‘𝐺) & ⊢ − = (dist‘𝐺) & ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐺 ∈ TarskiG) & ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐴 ∈ 𝑃) & ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐵 ∈ 𝑃) & ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐶 ∈ 𝑃) & ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐷 ∈ 𝑃) & ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐸 ∈ 𝑃) & ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐹 ∈ 𝑃) & ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐵 ∈ (𝐴𝐼𝐶)) & ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐸 ∈ (𝐷𝐼𝐹)) & ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐴 ≠ 𝐵) & ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐶 ≠ 𝐵) & ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐷 ≠ 𝐸) & ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐹 ≠ 𝐸) ⇒ ⊢ (𝜑 → 〈“𝐴𝐵𝐶”〉(cgrA‘𝐺)〈“𝐷𝐸𝐹”〉) | ||
Theorem | cgraswaplr 26611 | Swap both side of angle congruence. (Contributed by Thierry Arnoux, 5-Oct-2020.) |
⊢ 𝑃 = (Base‘𝐺) & ⊢ 𝐼 = (Itv‘𝐺) & ⊢ − = (dist‘𝐺) & ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐺 ∈ TarskiG) & ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐴 ∈ 𝑃) & ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐵 ∈ 𝑃) & ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐶 ∈ 𝑃) & ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐷 ∈ 𝑃) & ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐸 ∈ 𝑃) & ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐹 ∈ 𝑃) & ⊢ (𝜑 → 〈“𝐴𝐵𝐶”〉(cgrA‘𝐺)〈“𝐷𝐸𝐹”〉) ⇒ ⊢ (𝜑 → 〈“𝐶𝐵𝐴”〉(cgrA‘𝐺)〈“𝐹𝐸𝐷”〉) | ||
Theorem | cgrabtwn 26612 | Angle congruence preserves flat angles. Part of Theorem 11.21 of [Schwabhauser] p. 97. (Contributed by Thierry Arnoux, 9-Aug-2020.) |
⊢ 𝑃 = (Base‘𝐺) & ⊢ 𝐼 = (Itv‘𝐺) & ⊢ − = (dist‘𝐺) & ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐺 ∈ TarskiG) & ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐴 ∈ 𝑃) & ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐵 ∈ 𝑃) & ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐶 ∈ 𝑃) & ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐷 ∈ 𝑃) & ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐸 ∈ 𝑃) & ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐹 ∈ 𝑃) & ⊢ (𝜑 → 〈“𝐴𝐵𝐶”〉(cgrA‘𝐺)〈“𝐷𝐸𝐹”〉) & ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐵 ∈ (𝐴𝐼𝐶)) ⇒ ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐸 ∈ (𝐷𝐼𝐹)) | ||
Theorem | cgrahl 26613 | Angle congruence preserves null angles. Part of Theorem 11.21 of [Schwabhauser] p. 97. (Contributed by Thierry Arnoux, 9-Aug-2020.) |
⊢ 𝑃 = (Base‘𝐺) & ⊢ 𝐼 = (Itv‘𝐺) & ⊢ − = (dist‘𝐺) & ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐺 ∈ TarskiG) & ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐴 ∈ 𝑃) & ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐵 ∈ 𝑃) & ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐶 ∈ 𝑃) & ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐷 ∈ 𝑃) & ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐸 ∈ 𝑃) & ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐹 ∈ 𝑃) & ⊢ (𝜑 → 〈“𝐴𝐵𝐶”〉(cgrA‘𝐺)〈“𝐷𝐸𝐹”〉) & ⊢ 𝐾 = (hlG‘𝐺) & ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐴(𝐾‘𝐵)𝐶) ⇒ ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐷(𝐾‘𝐸)𝐹) | ||
Theorem | cgracol 26614 | Angle congruence preserves colinearity. (Contributed by Thierry Arnoux, 9-Aug-2020.) |
⊢ 𝑃 = (Base‘𝐺) & ⊢ 𝐼 = (Itv‘𝐺) & ⊢ − = (dist‘𝐺) & ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐺 ∈ TarskiG) & ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐴 ∈ 𝑃) & ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐵 ∈ 𝑃) & ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐶 ∈ 𝑃) & ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐷 ∈ 𝑃) & ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐸 ∈ 𝑃) & ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐹 ∈ 𝑃) & ⊢ (𝜑 → 〈“𝐴𝐵𝐶”〉(cgrA‘𝐺)〈“𝐷𝐸𝐹”〉) & ⊢ 𝐿 = (LineG‘𝐺) & ⊢ (𝜑 → (𝐶 ∈ (𝐴𝐿𝐵) ∨ 𝐴 = 𝐵)) ⇒ ⊢ (𝜑 → (𝐹 ∈ (𝐷𝐿𝐸) ∨ 𝐷 = 𝐸)) | ||
Theorem | cgrancol 26615 | Angle congruence preserves non-colinearity. (Contributed by Thierry Arnoux, 9-Aug-2020.) |
⊢ 𝑃 = (Base‘𝐺) & ⊢ 𝐼 = (Itv‘𝐺) & ⊢ − = (dist‘𝐺) & ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐺 ∈ TarskiG) & ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐴 ∈ 𝑃) & ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐵 ∈ 𝑃) & ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐶 ∈ 𝑃) & ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐷 ∈ 𝑃) & ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐸 ∈ 𝑃) & ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐹 ∈ 𝑃) & ⊢ (𝜑 → 〈“𝐴𝐵𝐶”〉(cgrA‘𝐺)〈“𝐷𝐸𝐹”〉) & ⊢ 𝐿 = (LineG‘𝐺) & ⊢ (𝜑 → ¬ (𝐶 ∈ (𝐴𝐿𝐵) ∨ 𝐴 = 𝐵)) ⇒ ⊢ (𝜑 → ¬ (𝐹 ∈ (𝐷𝐿𝐸) ∨ 𝐷 = 𝐸)) | ||
Theorem | dfcgra2 26616* | This is the full statement of definition 11.2 of [Schwabhauser] p. 95. This proof serves to confirm that the definition we have chosen, df-cgra 26594 is indeed equivalent to the textbook's definition. (Contributed by Thierry Arnoux, 2-Aug-2020.) |
⊢ 𝑃 = (Base‘𝐺) & ⊢ 𝐼 = (Itv‘𝐺) & ⊢ − = (dist‘𝐺) & ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐺 ∈ TarskiG) & ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐴 ∈ 𝑃) & ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐵 ∈ 𝑃) & ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐶 ∈ 𝑃) & ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐷 ∈ 𝑃) & ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐸 ∈ 𝑃) & ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐹 ∈ 𝑃) ⇒ ⊢ (𝜑 → (〈“𝐴𝐵𝐶”〉(cgrA‘𝐺)〈“𝐷𝐸𝐹”〉 ↔ ((𝐴 ≠ 𝐵 ∧ 𝐶 ≠ 𝐵) ∧ (𝐷 ≠ 𝐸 ∧ 𝐹 ≠ 𝐸) ∧ ∃𝑎 ∈ 𝑃 ∃𝑐 ∈ 𝑃 ∃𝑑 ∈ 𝑃 ∃𝑓 ∈ 𝑃 (((𝐴 ∈ (𝐵𝐼𝑎) ∧ (𝐴 − 𝑎) = (𝐸 − 𝐷)) ∧ (𝐶 ∈ (𝐵𝐼𝑐) ∧ (𝐶 − 𝑐) = (𝐸 − 𝐹))) ∧ ((𝐷 ∈ (𝐸𝐼𝑑) ∧ (𝐷 − 𝑑) = (𝐵 − 𝐴)) ∧ (𝐹 ∈ (𝐸𝐼𝑓) ∧ (𝐹 − 𝑓) = (𝐵 − 𝐶))) ∧ (𝑎 − 𝑐) = (𝑑 − 𝑓))))) | ||
Theorem | sacgr 26617 | Supplementary angles of congruent angles are themselves congruent. Theorem 11.13 of [Schwabhauser] p. 98. (Contributed by Thierry Arnoux, 30-Sep-2020.) (Proof shortened by Igor Ieskov, 16-Feb-2023.) |
⊢ 𝑃 = (Base‘𝐺) & ⊢ 𝐼 = (Itv‘𝐺) & ⊢ − = (dist‘𝐺) & ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐺 ∈ TarskiG) & ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐴 ∈ 𝑃) & ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐵 ∈ 𝑃) & ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐶 ∈ 𝑃) & ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐷 ∈ 𝑃) & ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐸 ∈ 𝑃) & ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐹 ∈ 𝑃) & ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝑋 ∈ 𝑃) & ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝑌 ∈ 𝑃) & ⊢ (𝜑 → 〈“𝐴𝐵𝐶”〉(cgrA‘𝐺)〈“𝐷𝐸𝐹”〉) & ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐵 ∈ (𝐴𝐼𝑋)) & ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐸 ∈ (𝐷𝐼𝑌)) & ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐵 ≠ 𝑋) & ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐸 ≠ 𝑌) ⇒ ⊢ (𝜑 → 〈“𝑋𝐵𝐶”〉(cgrA‘𝐺)〈“𝑌𝐸𝐹”〉) | ||
Theorem | oacgr 26618 | Vertical angle theorem. Vertical, or opposite angles are the facing pair of angles formed when two lines intersect. Eudemus of Rhodes attributed the proof to Thales of Miletus. The proposition showed that since both of a pair of vertical angles are supplementary to both of the adjacent angles, the vertical angles are equal in measure. We follow the same path. Theorem 11.14 of [Schwabhauser] p. 98. (Contributed by Thierry Arnoux, 27-Sep-2020.) |
⊢ 𝑃 = (Base‘𝐺) & ⊢ 𝐼 = (Itv‘𝐺) & ⊢ − = (dist‘𝐺) & ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐺 ∈ TarskiG) & ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐴 ∈ 𝑃) & ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐵 ∈ 𝑃) & ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐶 ∈ 𝑃) & ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐷 ∈ 𝑃) & ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐸 ∈ 𝑃) & ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐹 ∈ 𝑃) & ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐵 ∈ (𝐴𝐼𝐷)) & ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐵 ∈ (𝐶𝐼𝐹)) & ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐵 ≠ 𝐴) & ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐵 ≠ 𝐶) & ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐵 ≠ 𝐷) & ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐵 ≠ 𝐹) ⇒ ⊢ (𝜑 → 〈“𝐴𝐵𝐶”〉(cgrA‘𝐺)〈“𝐷𝐵𝐹”〉) | ||
Theorem | acopy 26619* | Angle construction. Theorem 11.15 of [Schwabhauser] p. 98. This is Hilbert's axiom III.4 for geometry. (Contributed by Thierry Arnoux, 9-Aug-2020.) |
⊢ 𝑃 = (Base‘𝐺) & ⊢ 𝐼 = (Itv‘𝐺) & ⊢ − = (dist‘𝐺) & ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐺 ∈ TarskiG) & ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐴 ∈ 𝑃) & ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐵 ∈ 𝑃) & ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐶 ∈ 𝑃) & ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐷 ∈ 𝑃) & ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐸 ∈ 𝑃) & ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐹 ∈ 𝑃) & ⊢ 𝐿 = (LineG‘𝐺) & ⊢ (𝜑 → ¬ (𝐴 ∈ (𝐵𝐿𝐶) ∨ 𝐵 = 𝐶)) & ⊢ (𝜑 → ¬ (𝐷 ∈ (𝐸𝐿𝐹) ∨ 𝐸 = 𝐹)) ⇒ ⊢ (𝜑 → ∃𝑓 ∈ 𝑃 (〈“𝐴𝐵𝐶”〉(cgrA‘𝐺)〈“𝐷𝐸𝑓”〉 ∧ 𝑓((hpG‘𝐺)‘(𝐷𝐿𝐸))𝐹)) | ||
Theorem | acopyeu 26620 | Angle construction. Theorem 11.15 of [Schwabhauser] p. 98. This is Hilbert's axiom III.4 for geometry. Akin to a uniqueness theorem, this states that if two points 𝑋 and 𝑌 both fulfill the conditions, then they are on the same half-line. (Contributed by Thierry Arnoux, 9-Aug-2020.) |
⊢ 𝑃 = (Base‘𝐺) & ⊢ 𝐼 = (Itv‘𝐺) & ⊢ − = (dist‘𝐺) & ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐺 ∈ TarskiG) & ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐴 ∈ 𝑃) & ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐵 ∈ 𝑃) & ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐶 ∈ 𝑃) & ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐷 ∈ 𝑃) & ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐸 ∈ 𝑃) & ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐹 ∈ 𝑃) & ⊢ 𝐿 = (LineG‘𝐺) & ⊢ (𝜑 → ¬ (𝐴 ∈ (𝐵𝐿𝐶) ∨ 𝐵 = 𝐶)) & ⊢ (𝜑 → ¬ (𝐷 ∈ (𝐸𝐿𝐹) ∨ 𝐸 = 𝐹)) & ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝑋 ∈ 𝑃) & ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝑌 ∈ 𝑃) & ⊢ 𝐾 = (hlG‘𝐺) & ⊢ (𝜑 → 〈“𝐴𝐵𝐶”〉(cgrA‘𝐺)〈“𝐷𝐸𝑋”〉) & ⊢ (𝜑 → 〈“𝐴𝐵𝐶”〉(cgrA‘𝐺)〈“𝐷𝐸𝑌”〉) & ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝑋((hpG‘𝐺)‘(𝐷𝐿𝐸))𝐹) & ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝑌((hpG‘𝐺)‘(𝐷𝐿𝐸))𝐹) ⇒ ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝑋(𝐾‘𝐸)𝑌) | ||
Syntax | cinag 26621 | Extend class relation with the geometrical "point in angle" relation. |
class inA | ||
Syntax | cleag 26622 | Extend class relation with the "angle less than" relation. |
class ≤∠ | ||
Definition | df-inag 26623* | Definition of the geometrical "in angle" relation. (Contributed by Thierry Arnoux, 15-Aug-2020.) |
⊢ inA = (𝑔 ∈ V ↦ {〈𝑝, 𝑡〉 ∣ ((𝑝 ∈ (Base‘𝑔) ∧ 𝑡 ∈ ((Base‘𝑔) ↑m (0..^3))) ∧ (((𝑡‘0) ≠ (𝑡‘1) ∧ (𝑡‘2) ≠ (𝑡‘1) ∧ 𝑝 ≠ (𝑡‘1)) ∧ ∃𝑥 ∈ (Base‘𝑔)(𝑥 ∈ ((𝑡‘0)(Itv‘𝑔)(𝑡‘2)) ∧ (𝑥 = (𝑡‘1) ∨ 𝑥((hlG‘𝑔)‘(𝑡‘1))𝑝))))}) | ||
Theorem | isinag 26624* | Property for point 𝑋 to lie in the angle 〈“𝐴𝐵𝐶”〉. Definition 11.23 of [Schwabhauser] p. 101. (Contributed by Thierry Arnoux, 15-Aug-2020.) |
⊢ 𝑃 = (Base‘𝐺) & ⊢ 𝐼 = (Itv‘𝐺) & ⊢ 𝐾 = (hlG‘𝐺) & ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝑋 ∈ 𝑃) & ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐴 ∈ 𝑃) & ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐵 ∈ 𝑃) & ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐶 ∈ 𝑃) & ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐺 ∈ 𝑉) ⇒ ⊢ (𝜑 → (𝑋(inA‘𝐺)〈“𝐴𝐵𝐶”〉 ↔ ((𝐴 ≠ 𝐵 ∧ 𝐶 ≠ 𝐵 ∧ 𝑋 ≠ 𝐵) ∧ ∃𝑥 ∈ 𝑃 (𝑥 ∈ (𝐴𝐼𝐶) ∧ (𝑥 = 𝐵 ∨ 𝑥(𝐾‘𝐵)𝑋))))) | ||
Theorem | isinagd 26625 | Sufficient conditions for in-angle relation, deduction version. (Contributed by Thierry Arnoux, 20-Oct-2020.) |
⊢ 𝑃 = (Base‘𝐺) & ⊢ 𝐼 = (Itv‘𝐺) & ⊢ 𝐾 = (hlG‘𝐺) & ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝑋 ∈ 𝑃) & ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐴 ∈ 𝑃) & ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐵 ∈ 𝑃) & ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐶 ∈ 𝑃) & ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐺 ∈ 𝑉) & ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝑌 ∈ 𝑃) & ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐴 ≠ 𝐵) & ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐶 ≠ 𝐵) & ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝑋 ≠ 𝐵) & ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝑌 ∈ (𝐴𝐼𝐶)) & ⊢ (𝜑 → (𝑌 = 𝐵 ∨ 𝑌(𝐾‘𝐵)𝑋)) ⇒ ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝑋(inA‘𝐺)〈“𝐴𝐵𝐶”〉) | ||
Theorem | inagflat 26626 | Any point lies in a flat angle. (Contributed by Thierry Arnoux, 13-Feb-2023.) |
⊢ 𝑃 = (Base‘𝐺) & ⊢ 𝐼 = (Itv‘𝐺) & ⊢ 𝐾 = (hlG‘𝐺) & ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝑋 ∈ 𝑃) & ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐴 ∈ 𝑃) & ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐵 ∈ 𝑃) & ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐶 ∈ 𝑃) & ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐺 ∈ TarskiG) & ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝑋 ∈ 𝑃) & ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐴 ≠ 𝐵) & ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐶 ≠ 𝐵) & ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝑋 ≠ 𝐵) & ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐵 ∈ (𝐴𝐼𝐶)) ⇒ ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝑋(inA‘𝐺)〈“𝐴𝐵𝐶”〉) | ||
Theorem | inagswap 26627 | Swap the order of the half lines delimiting the angle. Theorem 11.24 of [Schwabhauser] p. 101. (Contributed by Thierry Arnoux, 15-Aug-2020.) |
⊢ 𝑃 = (Base‘𝐺) & ⊢ 𝐼 = (Itv‘𝐺) & ⊢ 𝐾 = (hlG‘𝐺) & ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝑋 ∈ 𝑃) & ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐴 ∈ 𝑃) & ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐵 ∈ 𝑃) & ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐶 ∈ 𝑃) & ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐺 ∈ TarskiG) & ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝑋(inA‘𝐺)〈“𝐴𝐵𝐶”〉) ⇒ ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝑋(inA‘𝐺)〈“𝐶𝐵𝐴”〉) | ||
Theorem | inagne1 26628 | Deduce inequality from the in-angle relation. (Contributed by Thierry Arnoux, 29-Oct-2021.) |
⊢ 𝑃 = (Base‘𝐺) & ⊢ 𝐼 = (Itv‘𝐺) & ⊢ 𝐾 = (hlG‘𝐺) & ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝑋 ∈ 𝑃) & ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐴 ∈ 𝑃) & ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐵 ∈ 𝑃) & ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐶 ∈ 𝑃) & ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐺 ∈ TarskiG) & ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝑋(inA‘𝐺)〈“𝐴𝐵𝐶”〉) ⇒ ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐴 ≠ 𝐵) | ||
Theorem | inagne2 26629 | Deduce inequality from the in-angle relation. (Contributed by Thierry Arnoux, 29-Oct-2021.) |
⊢ 𝑃 = (Base‘𝐺) & ⊢ 𝐼 = (Itv‘𝐺) & ⊢ 𝐾 = (hlG‘𝐺) & ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝑋 ∈ 𝑃) & ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐴 ∈ 𝑃) & ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐵 ∈ 𝑃) & ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐶 ∈ 𝑃) & ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐺 ∈ TarskiG) & ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝑋(inA‘𝐺)〈“𝐴𝐵𝐶”〉) ⇒ ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐶 ≠ 𝐵) | ||
Theorem | inagne3 26630 | Deduce inequality from the in-angle relation. (Contributed by Thierry Arnoux, 29-Oct-2021.) |
⊢ 𝑃 = (Base‘𝐺) & ⊢ 𝐼 = (Itv‘𝐺) & ⊢ 𝐾 = (hlG‘𝐺) & ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝑋 ∈ 𝑃) & ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐴 ∈ 𝑃) & ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐵 ∈ 𝑃) & ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐶 ∈ 𝑃) & ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐺 ∈ TarskiG) & ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝑋(inA‘𝐺)〈“𝐴𝐵𝐶”〉) ⇒ ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝑋 ≠ 𝐵) | ||
Theorem | inaghl 26631 | The "point lie in angle" relation is independent of the points chosen on the half lines starting from 𝐵. Theorem 11.25 of [Schwabhauser] p. 101. (Contributed by Thierry Arnoux, 27-Sep-2020.) |
⊢ 𝑃 = (Base‘𝐺) & ⊢ 𝐼 = (Itv‘𝐺) & ⊢ 𝐾 = (hlG‘𝐺) & ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝑋 ∈ 𝑃) & ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐴 ∈ 𝑃) & ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐵 ∈ 𝑃) & ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐶 ∈ 𝑃) & ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐺 ∈ TarskiG) & ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝑋(inA‘𝐺)〈“𝐴𝐵𝐶”〉) & ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐷 ∈ 𝑃) & ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐹 ∈ 𝑃) & ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝑌 ∈ 𝑃) & ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐷(𝐾‘𝐵)𝐴) & ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐹(𝐾‘𝐵)𝐶) & ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝑌(𝐾‘𝐵)𝑋) ⇒ ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝑌(inA‘𝐺)〈“𝐷𝐵𝐹”〉) | ||
Definition | df-leag 26632* | Definition of the geometrical "angle less than" relation. Definition 11.27 of [Schwabhauser] p. 102. (Contributed by Thierry Arnoux, 7-Oct-2020.) |
⊢ ≤∠ = (𝑔 ∈ V ↦ {〈𝑎, 𝑏〉 ∣ ((𝑎 ∈ ((Base‘𝑔) ↑m (0..^3)) ∧ 𝑏 ∈ ((Base‘𝑔) ↑m (0..^3))) ∧ ∃𝑥 ∈ (Base‘𝑔)(𝑥(inA‘𝑔)〈“(𝑏‘0)(𝑏‘1)(𝑏‘2)”〉 ∧ 〈“(𝑎‘0)(𝑎‘1)(𝑎‘2)”〉(cgrA‘𝑔)〈“(𝑏‘0)(𝑏‘1)𝑥”〉))}) | ||
Theorem | isleag 26633* | Geometrical "less than" property for angles. Definition 11.27 of [Schwabhauser] p. 102. (Contributed by Thierry Arnoux, 7-Oct-2020.) |
⊢ 𝑃 = (Base‘𝐺) & ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐺 ∈ TarskiG) & ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐴 ∈ 𝑃) & ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐵 ∈ 𝑃) & ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐶 ∈ 𝑃) & ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐷 ∈ 𝑃) & ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐸 ∈ 𝑃) & ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐹 ∈ 𝑃) ⇒ ⊢ (𝜑 → (〈“𝐴𝐵𝐶”〉(≤∠‘𝐺)〈“𝐷𝐸𝐹”〉 ↔ ∃𝑥 ∈ 𝑃 (𝑥(inA‘𝐺)〈“𝐷𝐸𝐹”〉 ∧ 〈“𝐴𝐵𝐶”〉(cgrA‘𝐺)〈“𝐷𝐸𝑥”〉))) | ||
Theorem | isleagd 26634 | Sufficient condition for "less than" angle relation, deduction version (Contributed by Thierry Arnoux, 12-Oct-2020.) |
⊢ 𝑃 = (Base‘𝐺) & ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐺 ∈ TarskiG) & ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐴 ∈ 𝑃) & ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐵 ∈ 𝑃) & ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐶 ∈ 𝑃) & ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐷 ∈ 𝑃) & ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐸 ∈ 𝑃) & ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐹 ∈ 𝑃) & ⊢ ≤ = (≤∠‘𝐺) & ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝑋 ∈ 𝑃) & ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝑋(inA‘𝐺)〈“𝐷𝐸𝐹”〉) & ⊢ (𝜑 → 〈“𝐴𝐵𝐶”〉(cgrA‘𝐺)〈“𝐷𝐸𝑋”〉) ⇒ ⊢ (𝜑 → 〈“𝐴𝐵𝐶”〉 ≤ 〈“𝐷𝐸𝐹”〉) | ||
Theorem | leagne1 26635 | Deduce inequality from the less-than angle relation. (Contributed by Thierry Arnoux, 25-Feb-2023.) |
⊢ 𝑃 = (Base‘𝐺) & ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐺 ∈ TarskiG) & ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐴 ∈ 𝑃) & ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐵 ∈ 𝑃) & ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐶 ∈ 𝑃) & ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐷 ∈ 𝑃) & ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐸 ∈ 𝑃) & ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐹 ∈ 𝑃) & ⊢ (𝜑 → 〈“𝐴𝐵𝐶”〉(≤∠‘𝐺)〈“𝐷𝐸𝐹”〉) ⇒ ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐴 ≠ 𝐵) | ||
Theorem | leagne2 26636 | Deduce inequality from the less-than angle relation. (Contributed by Thierry Arnoux, 25-Feb-2023.) |
⊢ 𝑃 = (Base‘𝐺) & ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐺 ∈ TarskiG) & ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐴 ∈ 𝑃) & ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐵 ∈ 𝑃) & ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐶 ∈ 𝑃) & ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐷 ∈ 𝑃) & ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐸 ∈ 𝑃) & ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐹 ∈ 𝑃) & ⊢ (𝜑 → 〈“𝐴𝐵𝐶”〉(≤∠‘𝐺)〈“𝐷𝐸𝐹”〉) ⇒ ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐶 ≠ 𝐵) | ||
Theorem | leagne3 26637 | Deduce inequality from the less-than angle relation. (Contributed by Thierry Arnoux, 25-Feb-2023.) |
⊢ 𝑃 = (Base‘𝐺) & ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐺 ∈ TarskiG) & ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐴 ∈ 𝑃) & ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐵 ∈ 𝑃) & ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐶 ∈ 𝑃) & ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐷 ∈ 𝑃) & ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐸 ∈ 𝑃) & ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐹 ∈ 𝑃) & ⊢ (𝜑 → 〈“𝐴𝐵𝐶”〉(≤∠‘𝐺)〈“𝐷𝐸𝐹”〉) ⇒ ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐷 ≠ 𝐸) | ||
Theorem | leagne4 26638 | Deduce inequality from the less-than angle relation. (Contributed by Thierry Arnoux, 25-Feb-2023.) |
⊢ 𝑃 = (Base‘𝐺) & ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐺 ∈ TarskiG) & ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐴 ∈ 𝑃) & ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐵 ∈ 𝑃) & ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐶 ∈ 𝑃) & ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐷 ∈ 𝑃) & ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐸 ∈ 𝑃) & ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐹 ∈ 𝑃) & ⊢ (𝜑 → 〈“𝐴𝐵𝐶”〉(≤∠‘𝐺)〈“𝐷𝐸𝐹”〉) ⇒ ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐹 ≠ 𝐸) | ||
Theorem | cgrg3col4 26639* | Lemma 11.28 of [Schwabhauser] p. 102. Extend a congruence of three points with a fourth colinear point. (Contributed by Thierry Arnoux, 8-Oct-2020.) |
⊢ 𝑃 = (Base‘𝐺) & ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐺 ∈ TarskiG) & ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐴 ∈ 𝑃) & ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐵 ∈ 𝑃) & ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐶 ∈ 𝑃) & ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐷 ∈ 𝑃) & ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐸 ∈ 𝑃) & ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐹 ∈ 𝑃) & ⊢ 𝐿 = (LineG‘𝐺) & ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝑋 ∈ 𝑃) & ⊢ (𝜑 → 〈“𝐴𝐵𝐶”〉(cgrG‘𝐺)〈“𝐷𝐸𝐹”〉) & ⊢ (𝜑 → (𝑋 ∈ (𝐴𝐿𝐶) ∨ 𝐴 = 𝐶)) ⇒ ⊢ (𝜑 → ∃𝑦 ∈ 𝑃 〈“𝐴𝐵𝐶𝑋”〉(cgrG‘𝐺)〈“𝐷𝐸𝐹𝑦”〉) | ||
Theorem | tgsas1 26640 | First congruence theorem: SAS (Side-Angle-Side): If two pairs of sides of two triangles are equal in length, and the included angles are equal in measurement, then third sides are equal in length. Theorem 11.49 of [Schwabhauser] p. 107. (Contributed by Thierry Arnoux, 1-Aug-2020.) |
⊢ 𝑃 = (Base‘𝐺) & ⊢ − = (dist‘𝐺) & ⊢ 𝐼 = (Itv‘𝐺) & ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐺 ∈ TarskiG) & ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐴 ∈ 𝑃) & ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐵 ∈ 𝑃) & ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐶 ∈ 𝑃) & ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐷 ∈ 𝑃) & ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐸 ∈ 𝑃) & ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐹 ∈ 𝑃) & ⊢ (𝜑 → (𝐴 − 𝐵) = (𝐷 − 𝐸)) & ⊢ (𝜑 → 〈“𝐴𝐵𝐶”〉(cgrA‘𝐺)〈“𝐷𝐸𝐹”〉) & ⊢ (𝜑 → (𝐵 − 𝐶) = (𝐸 − 𝐹)) ⇒ ⊢ (𝜑 → (𝐶 − 𝐴) = (𝐹 − 𝐷)) | ||
Theorem | tgsas 26641 | First congruence theorem: SAS (Side-Angle-Side): If two pairs of sides of two triangles are equal in length, and the included angles are equal in measurement, then the triangles are congruent. Theorem 11.49 of [Schwabhauser] p. 107. (Contributed by Thierry Arnoux, 1-Aug-2020.) |
⊢ 𝑃 = (Base‘𝐺) & ⊢ − = (dist‘𝐺) & ⊢ 𝐼 = (Itv‘𝐺) & ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐺 ∈ TarskiG) & ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐴 ∈ 𝑃) & ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐵 ∈ 𝑃) & ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐶 ∈ 𝑃) & ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐷 ∈ 𝑃) & ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐸 ∈ 𝑃) & ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐹 ∈ 𝑃) & ⊢ (𝜑 → (𝐴 − 𝐵) = (𝐷 − 𝐸)) & ⊢ (𝜑 → 〈“𝐴𝐵𝐶”〉(cgrA‘𝐺)〈“𝐷𝐸𝐹”〉) & ⊢ (𝜑 → (𝐵 − 𝐶) = (𝐸 − 𝐹)) ⇒ ⊢ (𝜑 → 〈“𝐴𝐵𝐶”〉(cgrG‘𝐺)〈“𝐷𝐸𝐹”〉) | ||
Theorem | tgsas2 26642 | First congruence theorem: SAS. Theorem 11.49 of [Schwabhauser] p. 107. (Contributed by Thierry Arnoux, 1-Aug-2020.) |
⊢ 𝑃 = (Base‘𝐺) & ⊢ − = (dist‘𝐺) & ⊢ 𝐼 = (Itv‘𝐺) & ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐺 ∈ TarskiG) & ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐴 ∈ 𝑃) & ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐵 ∈ 𝑃) & ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐶 ∈ 𝑃) & ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐷 ∈ 𝑃) & ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐸 ∈ 𝑃) & ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐹 ∈ 𝑃) & ⊢ (𝜑 → (𝐴 − 𝐵) = (𝐷 − 𝐸)) & ⊢ (𝜑 → 〈“𝐴𝐵𝐶”〉(cgrA‘𝐺)〈“𝐷𝐸𝐹”〉) & ⊢ (𝜑 → (𝐵 − 𝐶) = (𝐸 − 𝐹)) & ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐴 ≠ 𝐶) ⇒ ⊢ (𝜑 → 〈“𝐶𝐴𝐵”〉(cgrA‘𝐺)〈“𝐹𝐷𝐸”〉) | ||
Theorem | tgsas3 26643 | First congruence theorem: SAS. Theorem 11.49 of [Schwabhauser] p. 107. (Contributed by Thierry Arnoux, 1-Aug-2020.) |
⊢ 𝑃 = (Base‘𝐺) & ⊢ − = (dist‘𝐺) & ⊢ 𝐼 = (Itv‘𝐺) & ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐺 ∈ TarskiG) & ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐴 ∈ 𝑃) & ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐵 ∈ 𝑃) & ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐶 ∈ 𝑃) & ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐷 ∈ 𝑃) & ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐸 ∈ 𝑃) & ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐹 ∈ 𝑃) & ⊢ (𝜑 → (𝐴 − 𝐵) = (𝐷 − 𝐸)) & ⊢ (𝜑 → 〈“𝐴𝐵𝐶”〉(cgrA‘𝐺)〈“𝐷𝐸𝐹”〉) & ⊢ (𝜑 → (𝐵 − 𝐶) = (𝐸 − 𝐹)) & ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐴 ≠ 𝐶) ⇒ ⊢ (𝜑 → 〈“𝐵𝐶𝐴”〉(cgrA‘𝐺)〈“𝐸𝐹𝐷”〉) | ||
Theorem | tgasa1 26644 | Second congruence theorem: ASA. (Angle-Side-Angle): If two pairs of angles of two triangles are equal in measurement, and the included sides are equal in length, then the triangles are congruent. Theorem 11.50 of [Schwabhauser] p. 108. (Contributed by Thierry Arnoux, 15-Aug-2020.) |
⊢ 𝑃 = (Base‘𝐺) & ⊢ − = (dist‘𝐺) & ⊢ 𝐼 = (Itv‘𝐺) & ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐺 ∈ TarskiG) & ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐴 ∈ 𝑃) & ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐵 ∈ 𝑃) & ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐶 ∈ 𝑃) & ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐷 ∈ 𝑃) & ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐸 ∈ 𝑃) & ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐹 ∈ 𝑃) & ⊢ 𝐿 = (LineG‘𝐺) & ⊢ (𝜑 → ¬ (𝐶 ∈ (𝐴𝐿𝐵) ∨ 𝐴 = 𝐵)) & ⊢ (𝜑 → (𝐴 − 𝐵) = (𝐷 − 𝐸)) & ⊢ (𝜑 → 〈“𝐴𝐵𝐶”〉(cgrA‘𝐺)〈“𝐷𝐸𝐹”〉) & ⊢ (𝜑 → 〈“𝐶𝐴𝐵”〉(cgrA‘𝐺)〈“𝐹𝐷𝐸”〉) ⇒ ⊢ (𝜑 → (𝐵 − 𝐶) = (𝐸 − 𝐹)) | ||
Theorem | tgasa 26645 | Second congruence theorem: ASA. (Angle-Side-Angle): If two pairs of angles of two triangles are equal in measurement, and the included sides are equal in length, then the triangles are congruent. Theorem 11.50 of [Schwabhauser] p. 108. (Contributed by Thierry Arnoux, 15-Aug-2020.) |
⊢ 𝑃 = (Base‘𝐺) & ⊢ − = (dist‘𝐺) & ⊢ 𝐼 = (Itv‘𝐺) & ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐺 ∈ TarskiG) & ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐴 ∈ 𝑃) & ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐵 ∈ 𝑃) & ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐶 ∈ 𝑃) & ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐷 ∈ 𝑃) & ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐸 ∈ 𝑃) & ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐹 ∈ 𝑃) & ⊢ 𝐿 = (LineG‘𝐺) & ⊢ (𝜑 → ¬ (𝐶 ∈ (𝐴𝐿𝐵) ∨ 𝐴 = 𝐵)) & ⊢ (𝜑 → (𝐴 − 𝐵) = (𝐷 − 𝐸)) & ⊢ (𝜑 → 〈“𝐴𝐵𝐶”〉(cgrA‘𝐺)〈“𝐷𝐸𝐹”〉) & ⊢ (𝜑 → 〈“𝐶𝐴𝐵”〉(cgrA‘𝐺)〈“𝐹𝐷𝐸”〉) ⇒ ⊢ (𝜑 → 〈“𝐴𝐵𝐶”〉(cgrG‘𝐺)〈“𝐷𝐸𝐹”〉) | ||
Theorem | tgsss1 26646 | Third congruence theorem: SSS (Side-Side-Side): If the three pairs of sides of two triangles are equal in length, then the triangles are congruent. Theorem 11.51 of [Schwabhauser] p. 109. (Contributed by Thierry Arnoux, 1-Aug-2020.) |
⊢ 𝑃 = (Base‘𝐺) & ⊢ − = (dist‘𝐺) & ⊢ 𝐼 = (Itv‘𝐺) & ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐺 ∈ TarskiG) & ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐴 ∈ 𝑃) & ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐵 ∈ 𝑃) & ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐶 ∈ 𝑃) & ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐷 ∈ 𝑃) & ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐸 ∈ 𝑃) & ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐹 ∈ 𝑃) & ⊢ (𝜑 → (𝐴 − 𝐵) = (𝐷 − 𝐸)) & ⊢ (𝜑 → (𝐵 − 𝐶) = (𝐸 − 𝐹)) & ⊢ (𝜑 → (𝐶 − 𝐴) = (𝐹 − 𝐷)) & ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐴 ≠ 𝐵) & ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐵 ≠ 𝐶) & ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐶 ≠ 𝐴) ⇒ ⊢ (𝜑 → 〈“𝐴𝐵𝐶”〉(cgrA‘𝐺)〈“𝐷𝐸𝐹”〉) | ||
Theorem | tgsss2 26647 | Third congruence theorem: SSS. Theorem 11.51 of [Schwabhauser] p. 109. (Contributed by Thierry Arnoux, 1-Aug-2020.) |
⊢ 𝑃 = (Base‘𝐺) & ⊢ − = (dist‘𝐺) & ⊢ 𝐼 = (Itv‘𝐺) & ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐺 ∈ TarskiG) & ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐴 ∈ 𝑃) & ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐵 ∈ 𝑃) & ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐶 ∈ 𝑃) & ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐷 ∈ 𝑃) & ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐸 ∈ 𝑃) & ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐹 ∈ 𝑃) & ⊢ (𝜑 → (𝐴 − 𝐵) = (𝐷 − 𝐸)) & ⊢ (𝜑 → (𝐵 − 𝐶) = (𝐸 − 𝐹)) & ⊢ (𝜑 → (𝐶 − 𝐴) = (𝐹 − 𝐷)) & ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐴 ≠ 𝐵) & ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐵 ≠ 𝐶) & ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐶 ≠ 𝐴) ⇒ ⊢ (𝜑 → 〈“𝐶𝐴𝐵”〉(cgrA‘𝐺)〈“𝐹𝐷𝐸”〉) | ||
Theorem | tgsss3 26648 | Third congruence theorem: SSS. Theorem 11.51 of [Schwabhauser] p. 109. (Contributed by Thierry Arnoux, 1-Aug-2020.) |
⊢ 𝑃 = (Base‘𝐺) & ⊢ − = (dist‘𝐺) & ⊢ 𝐼 = (Itv‘𝐺) & ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐺 ∈ TarskiG) & ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐴 ∈ 𝑃) & ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐵 ∈ 𝑃) & ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐶 ∈ 𝑃) & ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐷 ∈ 𝑃) & ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐸 ∈ 𝑃) & ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐹 ∈ 𝑃) & ⊢ (𝜑 → (𝐴 − 𝐵) = (𝐷 − 𝐸)) & ⊢ (𝜑 → (𝐵 − 𝐶) = (𝐸 − 𝐹)) & ⊢ (𝜑 → (𝐶 − 𝐴) = (𝐹 − 𝐷)) & ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐴 ≠ 𝐵) & ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐵 ≠ 𝐶) & ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐶 ≠ 𝐴) ⇒ ⊢ (𝜑 → 〈“𝐵𝐶𝐴”〉(cgrA‘𝐺)〈“𝐸𝐹𝐷”〉) | ||
Theorem | dfcgrg2 26649 | Congruence for two triangles can also be defined as congruence of sides and angles (6 parts). This is often the actual textbook definition of triangle congruence, see for example https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Congruence_(geometry)#Congruence_of_triangles With this definition, the "SSS" congruence theorem has an additional part, namely, that triangle congruence implies congruence of the sides (which means equality of the lengths). Because our development of elementary geometry strives to closely follow Schwabhaeuser's, our original definition of shape congruence, df-cgrg 26297, already covers that part: see trgcgr 26302. This theorem is also named "CPCTC", which stands for "Corresponding Parts of Congruent Triangles are Congruent", see https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Congruence_(geometry)#CPCTC 26302 (Contributed by Thierry Arnoux, 18-Jan-2023.) |
⊢ 𝑃 = (Base‘𝐺) & ⊢ − = (dist‘𝐺) & ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐺 ∈ TarskiG) & ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐴 ∈ 𝑃) & ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐵 ∈ 𝑃) & ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐶 ∈ 𝑃) & ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐷 ∈ 𝑃) & ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐸 ∈ 𝑃) & ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐹 ∈ 𝑃) & ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐴 ≠ 𝐵) & ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐵 ≠ 𝐶) & ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐶 ≠ 𝐴) ⇒ ⊢ (𝜑 → (〈“𝐴𝐵𝐶”〉(cgrG‘𝐺)〈“𝐷𝐸𝐹”〉 ↔ (((𝐴 − 𝐵) = (𝐷 − 𝐸) ∧ (𝐵 − 𝐶) = (𝐸 − 𝐹) ∧ (𝐶 − 𝐴) = (𝐹 − 𝐷)) ∧ (〈“𝐴𝐵𝐶”〉(cgrA‘𝐺)〈“𝐷𝐸𝐹”〉 ∧ 〈“𝐶𝐴𝐵”〉(cgrA‘𝐺)〈“𝐹𝐷𝐸”〉 ∧ 〈“𝐵𝐶𝐴”〉(cgrA‘𝐺)〈“𝐸𝐹𝐷”〉)))) | ||
Theorem | isoas 26650 | Congruence theorem for isocele triangles: if two angles of a triangle are congruent, then the corresponding sides also are. (Contributed by Thierry Arnoux, 5-Oct-2020.) |
⊢ 𝑃 = (Base‘𝐺) & ⊢ − = (dist‘𝐺) & ⊢ 𝐼 = (Itv‘𝐺) & ⊢ 𝐿 = (LineG‘𝐺) & ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐺 ∈ TarskiG) & ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐴 ∈ 𝑃) & ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐵 ∈ 𝑃) & ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐶 ∈ 𝑃) & ⊢ (𝜑 → ¬ (𝐶 ∈ (𝐴𝐿𝐵) ∨ 𝐴 = 𝐵)) & ⊢ (𝜑 → 〈“𝐴𝐵𝐶”〉(cgrA‘𝐺)〈“𝐴𝐶𝐵”〉) ⇒ ⊢ (𝜑 → (𝐴 − 𝐵) = (𝐴 − 𝐶)) | ||
Syntax | ceqlg 26651 | Declare the class of equilateral triangles. |
class eqltrG | ||
Definition | df-eqlg 26652* | Define the class of equilateral triangles. (Contributed by Thierry Arnoux, 27-Nov-2019.) |
⊢ eqltrG = (𝑔 ∈ V ↦ {𝑥 ∈ ((Base‘𝑔) ↑m (0..^3)) ∣ 𝑥(cgrG‘𝑔)〈“(𝑥‘1)(𝑥‘2)(𝑥‘0)”〉}) | ||
Theorem | iseqlg 26653 | Property of a triangle being equilateral. (Contributed by Thierry Arnoux, 5-Oct-2020.) |
⊢ 𝑃 = (Base‘𝐺) & ⊢ − = (dist‘𝐺) & ⊢ 𝐼 = (Itv‘𝐺) & ⊢ 𝐿 = (LineG‘𝐺) & ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐺 ∈ TarskiG) & ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐴 ∈ 𝑃) & ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐵 ∈ 𝑃) & ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐶 ∈ 𝑃) ⇒ ⊢ (𝜑 → (〈“𝐴𝐵𝐶”〉 ∈ (eqltrG‘𝐺) ↔ 〈“𝐴𝐵𝐶”〉(cgrG‘𝐺)〈“𝐵𝐶𝐴”〉)) | ||
Theorem | iseqlgd 26654 | Condition for a triangle to be equilateral. (Contributed by Thierry Arnoux, 5-Oct-2020.) |
⊢ 𝑃 = (Base‘𝐺) & ⊢ − = (dist‘𝐺) & ⊢ 𝐼 = (Itv‘𝐺) & ⊢ 𝐿 = (LineG‘𝐺) & ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐺 ∈ TarskiG) & ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐴 ∈ 𝑃) & ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐵 ∈ 𝑃) & ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐶 ∈ 𝑃) & ⊢ (𝜑 → (𝐴 − 𝐵) = (𝐵 − 𝐶)) & ⊢ (𝜑 → (𝐵 − 𝐶) = (𝐶 − 𝐴)) & ⊢ (𝜑 → (𝐶 − 𝐴) = (𝐴 − 𝐵)) ⇒ ⊢ (𝜑 → 〈“𝐴𝐵𝐶”〉 ∈ (eqltrG‘𝐺)) | ||
Theorem | f1otrgds 26655* | Convenient lemma for f1otrg 26657. (Contributed by Thierry Arnoux, 19-Mar-2019.) |
⊢ 𝑃 = (Base‘𝐺) & ⊢ 𝐷 = (dist‘𝐺) & ⊢ 𝐼 = (Itv‘𝐺) & ⊢ 𝐵 = (Base‘𝐻) & ⊢ 𝐸 = (dist‘𝐻) & ⊢ 𝐽 = (Itv‘𝐻) & ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐹:𝐵–1-1-onto→𝑃) & ⊢ ((𝜑 ∧ (𝑒 ∈ 𝐵 ∧ 𝑓 ∈ 𝐵)) → (𝑒𝐸𝑓) = ((𝐹‘𝑒)𝐷(𝐹‘𝑓))) & ⊢ ((𝜑 ∧ (𝑒 ∈ 𝐵 ∧ 𝑓 ∈ 𝐵 ∧ 𝑔 ∈ 𝐵)) → (𝑔 ∈ (𝑒𝐽𝑓) ↔ (𝐹‘𝑔) ∈ ((𝐹‘𝑒)𝐼(𝐹‘𝑓)))) & ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝑋 ∈ 𝐵) & ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝑌 ∈ 𝐵) ⇒ ⊢ (𝜑 → (𝑋𝐸𝑌) = ((𝐹‘𝑋)𝐷(𝐹‘𝑌))) | ||
Theorem | f1otrgitv 26656* | Convenient lemma for f1otrg 26657. (Contributed by Thierry Arnoux, 19-Mar-2019.) |
⊢ 𝑃 = (Base‘𝐺) & ⊢ 𝐷 = (dist‘𝐺) & ⊢ 𝐼 = (Itv‘𝐺) & ⊢ 𝐵 = (Base‘𝐻) & ⊢ 𝐸 = (dist‘𝐻) & ⊢ 𝐽 = (Itv‘𝐻) & ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐹:𝐵–1-1-onto→𝑃) & ⊢ ((𝜑 ∧ (𝑒 ∈ 𝐵 ∧ 𝑓 ∈ 𝐵)) → (𝑒𝐸𝑓) = ((𝐹‘𝑒)𝐷(𝐹‘𝑓))) & ⊢ ((𝜑 ∧ (𝑒 ∈ 𝐵 ∧ 𝑓 ∈ 𝐵 ∧ 𝑔 ∈ 𝐵)) → (𝑔 ∈ (𝑒𝐽𝑓) ↔ (𝐹‘𝑔) ∈ ((𝐹‘𝑒)𝐼(𝐹‘𝑓)))) & ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝑋 ∈ 𝐵) & ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝑌 ∈ 𝐵) & ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝑍 ∈ 𝐵) ⇒ ⊢ (𝜑 → (𝑍 ∈ (𝑋𝐽𝑌) ↔ (𝐹‘𝑍) ∈ ((𝐹‘𝑋)𝐼(𝐹‘𝑌)))) | ||
Theorem | f1otrg 26657* | A bijection between bases which conserves distances and intervals conserves also geometries. (Contributed by Thierry Arnoux, 23-Mar-2019.) |
⊢ 𝑃 = (Base‘𝐺) & ⊢ 𝐷 = (dist‘𝐺) & ⊢ 𝐼 = (Itv‘𝐺) & ⊢ 𝐵 = (Base‘𝐻) & ⊢ 𝐸 = (dist‘𝐻) & ⊢ 𝐽 = (Itv‘𝐻) & ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐹:𝐵–1-1-onto→𝑃) & ⊢ ((𝜑 ∧ (𝑒 ∈ 𝐵 ∧ 𝑓 ∈ 𝐵)) → (𝑒𝐸𝑓) = ((𝐹‘𝑒)𝐷(𝐹‘𝑓))) & ⊢ ((𝜑 ∧ (𝑒 ∈ 𝐵 ∧ 𝑓 ∈ 𝐵 ∧ 𝑔 ∈ 𝐵)) → (𝑔 ∈ (𝑒𝐽𝑓) ↔ (𝐹‘𝑔) ∈ ((𝐹‘𝑒)𝐼(𝐹‘𝑓)))) & ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐻 ∈ 𝑉) & ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐺 ∈ TarskiG) & ⊢ (𝜑 → (LineG‘𝐻) = (𝑥 ∈ 𝐵, 𝑦 ∈ (𝐵 ∖ {𝑥}) ↦ {𝑧 ∈ 𝐵 ∣ (𝑧 ∈ (𝑥𝐽𝑦) ∨ 𝑥 ∈ (𝑧𝐽𝑦) ∨ 𝑦 ∈ (𝑥𝐽𝑧))})) ⇒ ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐻 ∈ TarskiG) | ||
Theorem | f1otrge 26658* | A bijection between bases which conserves distances and intervals conserves also the property of being a Euclidean geometry. (Contributed by Thierry Arnoux, 23-Mar-2019.) |
⊢ 𝑃 = (Base‘𝐺) & ⊢ 𝐷 = (dist‘𝐺) & ⊢ 𝐼 = (Itv‘𝐺) & ⊢ 𝐵 = (Base‘𝐻) & ⊢ 𝐸 = (dist‘𝐻) & ⊢ 𝐽 = (Itv‘𝐻) & ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐹:𝐵–1-1-onto→𝑃) & ⊢ ((𝜑 ∧ (𝑒 ∈ 𝐵 ∧ 𝑓 ∈ 𝐵)) → (𝑒𝐸𝑓) = ((𝐹‘𝑒)𝐷(𝐹‘𝑓))) & ⊢ ((𝜑 ∧ (𝑒 ∈ 𝐵 ∧ 𝑓 ∈ 𝐵 ∧ 𝑔 ∈ 𝐵)) → (𝑔 ∈ (𝑒𝐽𝑓) ↔ (𝐹‘𝑔) ∈ ((𝐹‘𝑒)𝐼(𝐹‘𝑓)))) & ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐻 ∈ 𝑉) & ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐺 ∈ TarskiGE) ⇒ ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐻 ∈ TarskiGE) | ||
Syntax | cttg 26659 | Function to convert an algebraic structure to a Tarski geometry. |
class toTG | ||
Definition | df-ttg 26660* | Define a function converting a subcomplex Hilbert space to a Tarski Geometry. It does so by equipping the structure with a betweenness operation. Note that because the scalar product is applied over the interval (0[,]1), only spaces whose scalar field is a superset of that interval can be considered. (Contributed by Thierry Arnoux, 24-Mar-2019.) |
⊢ toTG = (𝑤 ∈ V ↦ ⦋(𝑥 ∈ (Base‘𝑤), 𝑦 ∈ (Base‘𝑤) ↦ {𝑧 ∈ (Base‘𝑤) ∣ ∃𝑘 ∈ (0[,]1)(𝑧(-g‘𝑤)𝑥) = (𝑘( ·𝑠 ‘𝑤)(𝑦(-g‘𝑤)𝑥))}) / 𝑖⦌((𝑤 sSet 〈(Itv‘ndx), 𝑖〉) sSet 〈(LineG‘ndx), (𝑥 ∈ (Base‘𝑤), 𝑦 ∈ (Base‘𝑤) ↦ {𝑧 ∈ (Base‘𝑤) ∣ (𝑧 ∈ (𝑥𝑖𝑦) ∨ 𝑥 ∈ (𝑧𝑖𝑦) ∨ 𝑦 ∈ (𝑥𝑖𝑧))})〉)) | ||
Theorem | ttgval 26661* | Define a function to augment a subcomplex Hilbert space with betweenness and a line definition. (Contributed by Thierry Arnoux, 25-Mar-2019.) |
⊢ 𝐺 = (toTG‘𝐻) & ⊢ 𝐵 = (Base‘𝐻) & ⊢ − = (-g‘𝐻) & ⊢ · = ( ·𝑠 ‘𝐻) & ⊢ 𝐼 = (Itv‘𝐺) ⇒ ⊢ (𝐻 ∈ 𝑉 → (𝐺 = ((𝐻 sSet 〈(Itv‘ndx), (𝑥 ∈ 𝐵, 𝑦 ∈ 𝐵 ↦ {𝑧 ∈ 𝐵 ∣ ∃𝑘 ∈ (0[,]1)(𝑧 − 𝑥) = (𝑘 · (𝑦 − 𝑥))})〉) sSet 〈(LineG‘ndx), (𝑥 ∈ 𝐵, 𝑦 ∈ 𝐵 ↦ {𝑧 ∈ 𝐵 ∣ (𝑧 ∈ (𝑥𝐼𝑦) ∨ 𝑥 ∈ (𝑧𝐼𝑦) ∨ 𝑦 ∈ (𝑥𝐼𝑧))})〉) ∧ 𝐼 = (𝑥 ∈ 𝐵, 𝑦 ∈ 𝐵 ↦ {𝑧 ∈ 𝐵 ∣ ∃𝑘 ∈ (0[,]1)(𝑧 − 𝑥) = (𝑘 · (𝑦 − 𝑥))}))) | ||
Theorem | ttglem 26662 | Lemma for ttgbas 26663 and ttgvsca 26666. (Contributed by Thierry Arnoux, 15-Apr-2019.) |
⊢ 𝐺 = (toTG‘𝐻) & ⊢ 𝐸 = Slot 𝑁 & ⊢ 𝑁 ∈ ℕ & ⊢ 𝑁 < ;16 ⇒ ⊢ (𝐸‘𝐻) = (𝐸‘𝐺) | ||
Theorem | ttgbas 26663 | The base set of a subcomplex Hilbert space augmented with betweenness. (Contributed by Thierry Arnoux, 25-Mar-2019.) |
⊢ 𝐺 = (toTG‘𝐻) & ⊢ 𝐵 = (Base‘𝐻) ⇒ ⊢ 𝐵 = (Base‘𝐺) | ||
Theorem | ttgplusg 26664 | The addition operation of a subcomplex Hilbert space augmented with betweenness. (Contributed by Thierry Arnoux, 25-Mar-2019.) |
⊢ 𝐺 = (toTG‘𝐻) & ⊢ + = (+g‘𝐻) ⇒ ⊢ + = (+g‘𝐺) | ||
Theorem | ttgsub 26665 | The subtraction operation of a subcomplex Hilbert space augmented with betweenness. (Contributed by Thierry Arnoux, 25-Mar-2019.) |
⊢ 𝐺 = (toTG‘𝐻) & ⊢ − = (-g‘𝐻) ⇒ ⊢ − = (-g‘𝐺) | ||
Theorem | ttgvsca 26666 | The scalar product of a subcomplex Hilbert space augmented with betweenness. (Contributed by Thierry Arnoux, 25-Mar-2019.) |
⊢ 𝐺 = (toTG‘𝐻) & ⊢ · = ( ·𝑠 ‘𝐻) ⇒ ⊢ · = ( ·𝑠 ‘𝐺) | ||
Theorem | ttgds 26667 | The metric of a subcomplex Hilbert space augmented with betweenness. (Contributed by Thierry Arnoux, 25-Mar-2019.) |
⊢ 𝐺 = (toTG‘𝐻) & ⊢ 𝐷 = (dist‘𝐻) ⇒ ⊢ 𝐷 = (dist‘𝐺) | ||
Theorem | ttgitvval 26668* | Betweenness for a subcomplex Hilbert space augmented with betweenness. (Contributed by Thierry Arnoux, 25-Mar-2019.) |
⊢ 𝐺 = (toTG‘𝐻) & ⊢ 𝐼 = (Itv‘𝐺) & ⊢ 𝑃 = (Base‘𝐻) & ⊢ − = (-g‘𝐻) & ⊢ · = ( ·𝑠 ‘𝐻) ⇒ ⊢ ((𝐻 ∈ 𝑉 ∧ 𝑋 ∈ 𝑃 ∧ 𝑌 ∈ 𝑃) → (𝑋𝐼𝑌) = {𝑧 ∈ 𝑃 ∣ ∃𝑘 ∈ (0[,]1)(𝑧 − 𝑋) = (𝑘 · (𝑌 − 𝑋))}) | ||
Theorem | ttgelitv 26669* | Betweenness for a subcomplex Hilbert space augmented with betweenness. (Contributed by Thierry Arnoux, 25-Mar-2019.) |
⊢ 𝐺 = (toTG‘𝐻) & ⊢ 𝐼 = (Itv‘𝐺) & ⊢ 𝑃 = (Base‘𝐻) & ⊢ − = (-g‘𝐻) & ⊢ · = ( ·𝑠 ‘𝐻) & ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝑋 ∈ 𝑃) & ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝑌 ∈ 𝑃) & ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐻 ∈ 𝑉) & ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝑍 ∈ 𝑃) ⇒ ⊢ (𝜑 → (𝑍 ∈ (𝑋𝐼𝑌) ↔ ∃𝑘 ∈ (0[,]1)(𝑍 − 𝑋) = (𝑘 · (𝑌 − 𝑋)))) | ||
Theorem | ttgbtwnid 26670 | Any subcomplex module equipped with the betweenness operation fulfills the identity of betweenness (Axiom A6). (Contributed by Thierry Arnoux, 26-Mar-2019.) |
⊢ 𝐺 = (toTG‘𝐻) & ⊢ 𝐼 = (Itv‘𝐺) & ⊢ 𝑃 = (Base‘𝐻) & ⊢ − = (-g‘𝐻) & ⊢ · = ( ·𝑠 ‘𝐻) & ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝑋 ∈ 𝑃) & ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝑌 ∈ 𝑃) & ⊢ 𝑅 = (Base‘(Scalar‘𝐻)) & ⊢ (𝜑 → (0[,]1) ⊆ 𝑅) & ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐻 ∈ ℂMod) & ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝑌 ∈ (𝑋𝐼𝑋)) ⇒ ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝑋 = 𝑌) | ||
Theorem | ttgcontlem1 26671 | Lemma for % ttgcont . (Contributed by Thierry Arnoux, 24-May-2019.) |
⊢ 𝐺 = (toTG‘𝐻) & ⊢ 𝐼 = (Itv‘𝐺) & ⊢ 𝑃 = (Base‘𝐻) & ⊢ − = (-g‘𝐻) & ⊢ · = ( ·𝑠 ‘𝐻) & ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝑋 ∈ 𝑃) & ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝑌 ∈ 𝑃) & ⊢ 𝑅 = (Base‘(Scalar‘𝐻)) & ⊢ (𝜑 → (0[,]1) ⊆ 𝑅) & ⊢ + = (+g‘𝐻) & ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐻 ∈ ℂVec) & ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐴 ∈ 𝑃) & ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝑁 ∈ 𝑃) & ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝑀 ≠ 0) & ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐾 ≠ 0) & ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐾 ≠ 1) & ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐿 ≠ 𝑀) & ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐿 ≤ (𝑀 / 𝐾)) & ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐿 ∈ (0[,]1)) & ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐾 ∈ (0[,]1)) & ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝑀 ∈ (0[,]𝐿)) & ⊢ (𝜑 → (𝑋 − 𝐴) = (𝐾 · (𝑌 − 𝐴))) & ⊢ (𝜑 → (𝑋 − 𝐴) = (𝑀 · (𝑁 − 𝐴))) & ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐵 = (𝐴 + (𝐿 · (𝑁 − 𝐴)))) ⇒ ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐵 ∈ (𝑋𝐼𝑌)) | ||
Theorem | xmstrkgc 26672 | Any metric space fulfills Tarski's geometry axioms of congruence. (Contributed by Thierry Arnoux, 13-Mar-2019.) |
⊢ (𝐺 ∈ ∞MetSp → 𝐺 ∈ TarskiGC) | ||
Theorem | cchhllem 26673* | Lemma for chlbas and chlvsca . (Contributed by Thierry Arnoux, 15-Apr-2019.) |
⊢ 𝐶 = (((subringAlg ‘ℂfld)‘ℝ) sSet 〈(·𝑖‘ndx), (𝑥 ∈ ℂ, 𝑦 ∈ ℂ ↦ (𝑥 · (∗‘𝑦)))〉) & ⊢ 𝐸 = Slot 𝑁 & ⊢ 𝑁 ∈ ℕ & ⊢ (𝑁 < 5 ∨ 8 < 𝑁) ⇒ ⊢ (𝐸‘ℂfld) = (𝐸‘𝐶) | ||
Syntax | cee 26674 | Declare the syntax for the Euclidean space generator. |
class 𝔼 | ||
Syntax | cbtwn 26675 | Declare the syntax for the Euclidean betweenness predicate. |
class Btwn | ||
Syntax | ccgr 26676 | Declare the syntax for the Euclidean congruence predicate. |
class Cgr | ||
Definition | df-ee 26677 | Define the Euclidean space generator. For details, see elee 26680. (Contributed by Scott Fenton, 3-Jun-2013.) |
⊢ 𝔼 = (𝑛 ∈ ℕ ↦ (ℝ ↑m (1...𝑛))) | ||
Definition | df-btwn 26678* | Define the Euclidean betweenness predicate. For details, see brbtwn 26685. (Contributed by Scott Fenton, 3-Jun-2013.) |
⊢ Btwn = ◡{〈〈𝑥, 𝑧〉, 𝑦〉 ∣ ∃𝑛 ∈ ℕ ((𝑥 ∈ (𝔼‘𝑛) ∧ 𝑧 ∈ (𝔼‘𝑛) ∧ 𝑦 ∈ (𝔼‘𝑛)) ∧ ∃𝑡 ∈ (0[,]1)∀𝑖 ∈ (1...𝑛)(𝑦‘𝑖) = (((1 − 𝑡) · (𝑥‘𝑖)) + (𝑡 · (𝑧‘𝑖))))} | ||
Definition | df-cgr 26679* | Define the Euclidean congruence predicate. For details, see brcgr 26686. (Contributed by Scott Fenton, 3-Jun-2013.) |
⊢ Cgr = {〈𝑥, 𝑦〉 ∣ ∃𝑛 ∈ ℕ ((𝑥 ∈ ((𝔼‘𝑛) × (𝔼‘𝑛)) ∧ 𝑦 ∈ ((𝔼‘𝑛) × (𝔼‘𝑛))) ∧ Σ𝑖 ∈ (1...𝑛)((((1st ‘𝑥)‘𝑖) − ((2nd ‘𝑥)‘𝑖))↑2) = Σ𝑖 ∈ (1...𝑛)((((1st ‘𝑦)‘𝑖) − ((2nd ‘𝑦)‘𝑖))↑2))} | ||
Theorem | elee 26680 | Membership in a Euclidean space. We define Euclidean space here using Cartesian coordinates over 𝑁 space. We later abstract away from this using Tarski's geometry axioms, so this exact definition is unimportant. (Contributed by Scott Fenton, 3-Jun-2013.) |
⊢ (𝑁 ∈ ℕ → (𝐴 ∈ (𝔼‘𝑁) ↔ 𝐴:(1...𝑁)⟶ℝ)) | ||
Theorem | mptelee 26681* | A condition for a mapping to be an element of a Euclidean space. (Contributed by Scott Fenton, 7-Jun-2013.) |
⊢ (𝑁 ∈ ℕ → ((𝑘 ∈ (1...𝑁) ↦ (𝐴𝐹𝐵)) ∈ (𝔼‘𝑁) ↔ ∀𝑘 ∈ (1...𝑁)(𝐴𝐹𝐵) ∈ ℝ)) | ||
Theorem | eleenn 26682 | If 𝐴 is in (𝔼‘𝑁), then 𝑁 is a natural. (Contributed by Scott Fenton, 1-Jul-2013.) |
⊢ (𝐴 ∈ (𝔼‘𝑁) → 𝑁 ∈ ℕ) | ||
Theorem | eleei 26683 | The forward direction of elee 26680. (Contributed by Scott Fenton, 1-Jul-2013.) |
⊢ (𝐴 ∈ (𝔼‘𝑁) → 𝐴:(1...𝑁)⟶ℝ) | ||
Theorem | eedimeq 26684 | A point belongs to at most one Euclidean space. (Contributed by Scott Fenton, 1-Jul-2013.) |
⊢ ((𝐴 ∈ (𝔼‘𝑁) ∧ 𝐴 ∈ (𝔼‘𝑀)) → 𝑁 = 𝑀) | ||
Theorem | brbtwn 26685* | The binary relation form of the betweenness predicate. The statement 𝐴 Btwn 〈𝐵, 𝐶〉 should be informally read as "𝐴 lies on a line segment between 𝐵 and 𝐶. This exact definition is abstracted away by Tarski's geometry axioms later on. (Contributed by Scott Fenton, 3-Jun-2013.) |
⊢ ((𝐴 ∈ (𝔼‘𝑁) ∧ 𝐵 ∈ (𝔼‘𝑁) ∧ 𝐶 ∈ (𝔼‘𝑁)) → (𝐴 Btwn 〈𝐵, 𝐶〉 ↔ ∃𝑡 ∈ (0[,]1)∀𝑖 ∈ (1...𝑁)(𝐴‘𝑖) = (((1 − 𝑡) · (𝐵‘𝑖)) + (𝑡 · (𝐶‘𝑖))))) | ||
Theorem | brcgr 26686* | The binary relation form of the congruence predicate. The statement 〈𝐴, 𝐵〉Cgr〈𝐶, 𝐷〉 should be read informally as "the 𝑁 dimensional point 𝐴 is as far from 𝐵 as 𝐶 is from 𝐷, or "the line segment 𝐴𝐵 is congruent to the line segment 𝐶𝐷. This particular definition is encapsulated by Tarski's axioms later on. (Contributed by Scott Fenton, 3-Jun-2013.) |
⊢ (((𝐴 ∈ (𝔼‘𝑁) ∧ 𝐵 ∈ (𝔼‘𝑁)) ∧ (𝐶 ∈ (𝔼‘𝑁) ∧ 𝐷 ∈ (𝔼‘𝑁))) → (〈𝐴, 𝐵〉Cgr〈𝐶, 𝐷〉 ↔ Σ𝑖 ∈ (1...𝑁)(((𝐴‘𝑖) − (𝐵‘𝑖))↑2) = Σ𝑖 ∈ (1...𝑁)(((𝐶‘𝑖) − (𝐷‘𝑖))↑2))) | ||
Theorem | fveere 26687 | The function value of a point is a real. (Contributed by Scott Fenton, 10-Jun-2013.) |
⊢ ((𝐴 ∈ (𝔼‘𝑁) ∧ 𝐼 ∈ (1...𝑁)) → (𝐴‘𝐼) ∈ ℝ) | ||
Theorem | fveecn 26688 | The function value of a point is a complex. (Contributed by Scott Fenton, 10-Jun-2013.) |
⊢ ((𝐴 ∈ (𝔼‘𝑁) ∧ 𝐼 ∈ (1...𝑁)) → (𝐴‘𝐼) ∈ ℂ) | ||
Theorem | eqeefv 26689* | Two points are equal iff they agree in all dimensions. (Contributed by Scott Fenton, 10-Jun-2013.) |
⊢ ((𝐴 ∈ (𝔼‘𝑁) ∧ 𝐵 ∈ (𝔼‘𝑁)) → (𝐴 = 𝐵 ↔ ∀𝑖 ∈ (1...𝑁)(𝐴‘𝑖) = (𝐵‘𝑖))) | ||
Theorem | eqeelen 26690* | Two points are equal iff the square of the distance between them is zero. (Contributed by Scott Fenton, 10-Jun-2013.) (Revised by Mario Carneiro, 22-May-2014.) |
⊢ ((𝐴 ∈ (𝔼‘𝑁) ∧ 𝐵 ∈ (𝔼‘𝑁)) → (𝐴 = 𝐵 ↔ Σ𝑖 ∈ (1...𝑁)(((𝐴‘𝑖) − (𝐵‘𝑖))↑2) = 0)) | ||
Theorem | brbtwn2 26691* | Alternate characterization of betweenness, with no existential quantifiers. (Contributed by Scott Fenton, 24-Jun-2013.) |
⊢ ((𝐴 ∈ (𝔼‘𝑁) ∧ 𝐵 ∈ (𝔼‘𝑁) ∧ 𝐶 ∈ (𝔼‘𝑁)) → (𝐴 Btwn 〈𝐵, 𝐶〉 ↔ (∀𝑖 ∈ (1...𝑁)(((𝐵‘𝑖) − (𝐴‘𝑖)) · ((𝐶‘𝑖) − (𝐴‘𝑖))) ≤ 0 ∧ ∀𝑖 ∈ (1...𝑁)∀𝑗 ∈ (1...𝑁)(((𝐵‘𝑖) − (𝐴‘𝑖)) · ((𝐶‘𝑗) − (𝐴‘𝑗))) = (((𝐵‘𝑗) − (𝐴‘𝑗)) · ((𝐶‘𝑖) − (𝐴‘𝑖)))))) | ||
Theorem | colinearalglem1 26692 | Lemma for colinearalg 26696. Expand out a multiplication. (Contributed by Scott Fenton, 24-Jun-2013.) |
⊢ (((𝐴 ∈ ℂ ∧ 𝐵 ∈ ℂ ∧ 𝐶 ∈ ℂ) ∧ (𝐷 ∈ ℂ ∧ 𝐸 ∈ ℂ ∧ 𝐹 ∈ ℂ)) → (((𝐵 − 𝐴) · (𝐹 − 𝐷)) = ((𝐸 − 𝐷) · (𝐶 − 𝐴)) ↔ ((𝐵 · 𝐹) − ((𝐴 · 𝐹) + (𝐵 · 𝐷))) = ((𝐶 · 𝐸) − ((𝐴 · 𝐸) + (𝐶 · 𝐷))))) | ||
Theorem | colinearalglem2 26693* | Lemma for colinearalg 26696. Translate between two forms of the colinearity condition. (Contributed by Scott Fenton, 24-Jun-2013.) |
⊢ ((𝐴 ∈ (𝔼‘𝑁) ∧ 𝐵 ∈ (𝔼‘𝑁) ∧ 𝐶 ∈ (𝔼‘𝑁)) → (∀𝑖 ∈ (1...𝑁)∀𝑗 ∈ (1...𝑁)(((𝐵‘𝑖) − (𝐴‘𝑖)) · ((𝐶‘𝑗) − (𝐴‘𝑗))) = (((𝐵‘𝑗) − (𝐴‘𝑗)) · ((𝐶‘𝑖) − (𝐴‘𝑖))) ↔ ∀𝑖 ∈ (1...𝑁)∀𝑗 ∈ (1...𝑁)(((𝐶‘𝑖) − (𝐵‘𝑖)) · ((𝐴‘𝑗) − (𝐵‘𝑗))) = (((𝐶‘𝑗) − (𝐵‘𝑗)) · ((𝐴‘𝑖) − (𝐵‘𝑖))))) | ||
Theorem | colinearalglem3 26694* | Lemma for colinearalg 26696. Translate between two forms of the colinearity condition. (Contributed by Scott Fenton, 24-Jun-2013.) |
⊢ ((𝐴 ∈ (𝔼‘𝑁) ∧ 𝐵 ∈ (𝔼‘𝑁) ∧ 𝐶 ∈ (𝔼‘𝑁)) → (∀𝑖 ∈ (1...𝑁)∀𝑗 ∈ (1...𝑁)(((𝐵‘𝑖) − (𝐴‘𝑖)) · ((𝐶‘𝑗) − (𝐴‘𝑗))) = (((𝐵‘𝑗) − (𝐴‘𝑗)) · ((𝐶‘𝑖) − (𝐴‘𝑖))) ↔ ∀𝑖 ∈ (1...𝑁)∀𝑗 ∈ (1...𝑁)(((𝐴‘𝑖) − (𝐶‘𝑖)) · ((𝐵‘𝑗) − (𝐶‘𝑗))) = (((𝐴‘𝑗) − (𝐶‘𝑗)) · ((𝐵‘𝑖) − (𝐶‘𝑖))))) | ||
Theorem | colinearalglem4 26695* | Lemma for colinearalg 26696. Prove a disjunction that will be needed in the final proof. (Contributed by Scott Fenton, 27-Jun-2013.) |
⊢ (((𝐴 ∈ (𝔼‘𝑁) ∧ 𝐶 ∈ (𝔼‘𝑁)) ∧ 𝐾 ∈ ℝ) → (∀𝑖 ∈ (1...𝑁)((((𝐾 · ((𝐶‘𝑖) − (𝐴‘𝑖))) + (𝐴‘𝑖)) − (𝐴‘𝑖)) · ((𝐶‘𝑖) − (𝐴‘𝑖))) ≤ 0 ∨ ∀𝑖 ∈ (1...𝑁)(((𝐶‘𝑖) − ((𝐾 · ((𝐶‘𝑖) − (𝐴‘𝑖))) + (𝐴‘𝑖))) · ((𝐴‘𝑖) − ((𝐾 · ((𝐶‘𝑖) − (𝐴‘𝑖))) + (𝐴‘𝑖)))) ≤ 0 ∨ ∀𝑖 ∈ (1...𝑁)(((𝐴‘𝑖) − (𝐶‘𝑖)) · (((𝐾 · ((𝐶‘𝑖) − (𝐴‘𝑖))) + (𝐴‘𝑖)) − (𝐶‘𝑖))) ≤ 0)) | ||
Theorem | colinearalg 26696* | An algebraic characterization of colinearity. Note the similarity to brbtwn2 26691. (Contributed by Scott Fenton, 24-Jun-2013.) |
⊢ ((𝐴 ∈ (𝔼‘𝑁) ∧ 𝐵 ∈ (𝔼‘𝑁) ∧ 𝐶 ∈ (𝔼‘𝑁)) → ((𝐴 Btwn 〈𝐵, 𝐶〉 ∨ 𝐵 Btwn 〈𝐶, 𝐴〉 ∨ 𝐶 Btwn 〈𝐴, 𝐵〉) ↔ ∀𝑖 ∈ (1...𝑁)∀𝑗 ∈ (1...𝑁)(((𝐵‘𝑖) − (𝐴‘𝑖)) · ((𝐶‘𝑗) − (𝐴‘𝑗))) = (((𝐵‘𝑗) − (𝐴‘𝑗)) · ((𝐶‘𝑖) − (𝐴‘𝑖))))) | ||
Theorem | eleesub 26697* | Membership of a subtraction mapping in a Euclidean space. (Contributed by Scott Fenton, 17-Jul-2013.) |
⊢ 𝐶 = (𝑖 ∈ (1...𝑁) ↦ ((𝐴‘𝑖) − (𝐵‘𝑖))) ⇒ ⊢ ((𝐴 ∈ (𝔼‘𝑁) ∧ 𝐵 ∈ (𝔼‘𝑁)) → 𝐶 ∈ (𝔼‘𝑁)) | ||
Theorem | eleesubd 26698* | Membership of a subtraction mapping in a Euclidean space. Deduction form of eleesub 26697. (Contributed by Scott Fenton, 17-Jul-2013.) |
⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐶 = (𝑖 ∈ (1...𝑁) ↦ ((𝐴‘𝑖) − (𝐵‘𝑖)))) ⇒ ⊢ ((𝜑 ∧ 𝐴 ∈ (𝔼‘𝑁) ∧ 𝐵 ∈ (𝔼‘𝑁)) → 𝐶 ∈ (𝔼‘𝑁)) | ||
Theorem | axdimuniq 26699 | The unique dimension axiom. If a point is in 𝑁 dimensional space and in 𝑀 dimensional space, then 𝑁 = 𝑀. This axiom is not traditionally presented with Tarski's axioms, but we require it here as we are considering spaces in arbitrary dimensions. (Contributed by Scott Fenton, 24-Sep-2013.) |
⊢ (((𝑁 ∈ ℕ ∧ 𝐴 ∈ (𝔼‘𝑁)) ∧ (𝑀 ∈ ℕ ∧ 𝐴 ∈ (𝔼‘𝑀))) → 𝑁 = 𝑀) | ||
Theorem | axcgrrflx 26700 | 𝐴 is as far from 𝐵 as 𝐵 is from 𝐴. Axiom A1 of [Schwabhauser] p. 10. (Contributed by Scott Fenton, 3-Jun-2013.) |
⊢ ((𝑁 ∈ ℕ ∧ 𝐴 ∈ (𝔼‘𝑁) ∧ 𝐵 ∈ (𝔼‘𝑁)) → 〈𝐴, 𝐵〉Cgr〈𝐵, 𝐴〉) |
< Previous Next > |
Copyright terms: Public domain | < Previous Next > |