P. 441 of Theorem List - Metamath Proof Explorer

Theorem List for Metamath Proof Explorer - 44001-44100   *Has distinct variable group(s)

Type	Label	Description
Statement
Theorem	sbgoldbo 44001*	If the strong binary Goldbach conjecture is valid, the original formulation of the Goldbach conjecture also holds: Every integer greater than 2 can be expressed as the sum of three "primes" with regarding 1 to be a prime (as Goldbach did). Original text: "Es scheint wenigstens, dass eine jede Zahl, die groesser ist als 2, ein aggregatum trium numerorum primorum sey." (Goldbach, 1742). (Contributed by AV, 25-Dec-2021.)
⊢ 𝑃 = ({1} ∪ ℙ)    ⇒   ⊢ (∀𝑛 ∈ Even (4 < 𝑛 → 𝑛 ∈ GoldbachEven ) → ∀𝑛 ∈ (ℤ≥‘3)∃𝑝 ∈ 𝑃 ∃𝑞 ∈ 𝑃 ∃𝑟 ∈ 𝑃 𝑛 = ((𝑝 + 𝑞) + 𝑟))
Theorem	nnsum3primes4 44002*	4 is the sum of at most 3 (actually 2) primes. (Contributed by AV, 2-Aug-2020.)
⊢ ∃𝑑 ∈ ℕ ∃𝑓 ∈ (ℙ ↑m (1...𝑑))(𝑑 ≤ 3 ∧ 4 = Σ𝑘 ∈ (1...𝑑)(𝑓‘𝑘))
Theorem	nnsum4primes4 44003*	4 is the sum of at most 4 (actually 2) primes. (Contributed by AV, 23-Jul-2020.) (Proof shortened by AV, 2-Aug-2020.)
⊢ ∃𝑑 ∈ ℕ ∃𝑓 ∈ (ℙ ↑m (1...𝑑))(𝑑 ≤ 4 ∧ 4 = Σ𝑘 ∈ (1...𝑑)(𝑓‘𝑘))
Theorem	nnsum3primesprm 44004*	Every prime is "the sum of at most 3" (actually one - the prime itself) primes. (Contributed by AV, 2-Aug-2020.) (Proof shortened by AV, 17-Apr-2021.)
⊢ (𝑃 ∈ ℙ → ∃𝑑 ∈ ℕ ∃𝑓 ∈ (ℙ ↑m (1...𝑑))(𝑑 ≤ 3 ∧ 𝑃 = Σ𝑘 ∈ (1...𝑑)(𝑓‘𝑘)))
Theorem	nnsum4primesprm 44005*	Every prime is "the sum of at most 4" (actually one - the prime itself) primes. (Contributed by AV, 23-Jul-2020.) (Proof shortened by AV, 2-Aug-2020.)
⊢ (𝑃 ∈ ℙ → ∃𝑑 ∈ ℕ ∃𝑓 ∈ (ℙ ↑m (1...𝑑))(𝑑 ≤ 4 ∧ 𝑃 = Σ𝑘 ∈ (1...𝑑)(𝑓‘𝑘)))
Theorem	nnsum3primesgbe 44006*	Any even Goldbach number is the sum of at most 3 (actually 2) primes. (Contributed by AV, 2-Aug-2020.)
⊢ (𝑁 ∈ GoldbachEven → ∃𝑑 ∈ ℕ ∃𝑓 ∈ (ℙ ↑m (1...𝑑))(𝑑 ≤ 3 ∧ 𝑁 = Σ𝑘 ∈ (1...𝑑)(𝑓‘𝑘)))
Theorem	nnsum4primesgbe 44007*	Any even Goldbach number is the sum of at most 4 (actually 2) primes. (Contributed by AV, 23-Jul-2020.) (Proof shortened by AV, 2-Aug-2020.)
⊢ (𝑁 ∈ GoldbachEven → ∃𝑑 ∈ ℕ ∃𝑓 ∈ (ℙ ↑m (1...𝑑))(𝑑 ≤ 4 ∧ 𝑁 = Σ𝑘 ∈ (1...𝑑)(𝑓‘𝑘)))
Theorem	nnsum3primesle9 44008*	Every integer greater than 1 and less than or equal to 8 is the sum of at most 3 primes. (Contributed by AV, 2-Aug-2020.)
⊢ ((𝑁 ∈ (ℤ≥‘2) ∧ 𝑁 ≤ 8) → ∃𝑑 ∈ ℕ ∃𝑓 ∈ (ℙ ↑m (1...𝑑))(𝑑 ≤ 3 ∧ 𝑁 = Σ𝑘 ∈ (1...𝑑)(𝑓‘𝑘)))
Theorem	nnsum4primesle9 44009*	Every integer greater than 1 and less than or equal to 8 is the sum of at most 4 primes. (Contributed by AV, 24-Jul-2020.) (Proof shortened by AV, 2-Aug-2020.)
⊢ ((𝑁 ∈ (ℤ≥‘2) ∧ 𝑁 ≤ 8) → ∃𝑑 ∈ ℕ ∃𝑓 ∈ (ℙ ↑m (1...𝑑))(𝑑 ≤ 4 ∧ 𝑁 = Σ𝑘 ∈ (1...𝑑)(𝑓‘𝑘)))
Theorem	nnsum4primesodd 44010*	If the (weak) ternary Goldbach conjecture is valid, then every odd integer greater than 5 is the sum of 3 primes. (Contributed by AV, 2-Jul-2020.)
⊢ (∀𝑚 ∈ Odd (5 < 𝑚 → 𝑚 ∈ GoldbachOddW ) → ((𝑁 ∈ (ℤ≥‘6) ∧ 𝑁 ∈ Odd ) → ∃𝑓 ∈ (ℙ ↑m (1...3))𝑁 = Σ𝑘 ∈ (1...3)(𝑓‘𝑘)))
Theorem	nnsum4primesoddALTV 44011*	If the (strong) ternary Goldbach conjecture is valid, then every odd integer greater than 7 is the sum of 3 primes. (Contributed by AV, 26-Jul-2020.)
⊢ (∀𝑚 ∈ Odd (7 < 𝑚 → 𝑚 ∈ GoldbachOdd ) → ((𝑁 ∈ (ℤ≥‘8) ∧ 𝑁 ∈ Odd ) → ∃𝑓 ∈ (ℙ ↑m (1...3))𝑁 = Σ𝑘 ∈ (1...3)(𝑓‘𝑘)))
Theorem	evengpop3 44012*	If the (weak) ternary Goldbach conjecture is valid, then every even integer greater than 8 is the sum of an odd Goldbach number and 3. (Contributed by AV, 24-Jul-2020.)
⊢ (∀𝑚 ∈ Odd (5 < 𝑚 → 𝑚 ∈ GoldbachOddW ) → ((𝑁 ∈ (ℤ≥‘9) ∧ 𝑁 ∈ Even ) → ∃𝑜 ∈ GoldbachOddW 𝑁 = (𝑜 + 3)))
Theorem	evengpoap3 44013*	If the (strong) ternary Goldbach conjecture is valid, then every even integer greater than 10 is the sum of an odd Goldbach number and 3. (Contributed by AV, 27-Jul-2020.) (Proof shortened by AV, 15-Sep-2021.)
⊢ (∀𝑚 ∈ Odd (7 < 𝑚 → 𝑚 ∈ GoldbachOdd ) → ((𝑁 ∈ (ℤ≥‘;12) ∧ 𝑁 ∈ Even ) → ∃𝑜 ∈ GoldbachOdd 𝑁 = (𝑜 + 3)))
Theorem	nnsum4primeseven 44014*	If the (weak) ternary Goldbach conjecture is valid, then every even integer greater than 8 is the sum of 4 primes. (Contributed by AV, 25-Jul-2020.)
⊢ (∀𝑚 ∈ Odd (5 < 𝑚 → 𝑚 ∈ GoldbachOddW ) → ((𝑁 ∈ (ℤ≥‘9) ∧ 𝑁 ∈ Even ) → ∃𝑓 ∈ (ℙ ↑m (1...4))𝑁 = Σ𝑘 ∈ (1...4)(𝑓‘𝑘)))
Theorem	nnsum4primesevenALTV 44015*	If the (strong) ternary Goldbach conjecture is valid, then every even integer greater than 10 is the sum of 4 primes. (Contributed by AV, 27-Jul-2020.)
⊢ (∀𝑚 ∈ Odd (7 < 𝑚 → 𝑚 ∈ GoldbachOdd ) → ((𝑁 ∈ (ℤ≥‘;12) ∧ 𝑁 ∈ Even ) → ∃𝑓 ∈ (ℙ ↑m (1...4))𝑁 = Σ𝑘 ∈ (1...4)(𝑓‘𝑘)))
Theorem	wtgoldbnnsum4prm 44016*	If the (weak) ternary Goldbach conjecture is valid, then every integer greater than 1 is the sum of at most 4 primes, showing that Schnirelmann's constant would be less than or equal to 4. See corollary 1.1 in [Helfgott] p. 4. (Contributed by AV, 25-Jul-2020.)
⊢ (∀𝑚 ∈ Odd (5 < 𝑚 → 𝑚 ∈ GoldbachOddW ) → ∀𝑛 ∈ (ℤ≥‘2)∃𝑑 ∈ ℕ ∃𝑓 ∈ (ℙ ↑m (1...𝑑))(𝑑 ≤ 4 ∧ 𝑛 = Σ𝑘 ∈ (1...𝑑)(𝑓‘𝑘)))
Theorem	stgoldbnnsum4prm 44017*	If the (strong) ternary Goldbach conjecture is valid, then every integer greater than 1 is the sum of at most 4 primes. (Contributed by AV, 27-Jul-2020.)
⊢ (∀𝑚 ∈ Odd (7 < 𝑚 → 𝑚 ∈ GoldbachOdd ) → ∀𝑛 ∈ (ℤ≥‘2)∃𝑑 ∈ ℕ ∃𝑓 ∈ (ℙ ↑m (1...𝑑))(𝑑 ≤ 4 ∧ 𝑛 = Σ𝑘 ∈ (1...𝑑)(𝑓‘𝑘)))
Theorem	bgoldbnnsum3prm 44018*	If the binary Goldbach conjecture is valid, then every integer greater than 1 is the sum of at most 3 primes, showing that Schnirelmann's constant would be equal to 3. (Contributed by AV, 2-Aug-2020.)
⊢ (∀𝑚 ∈ Even (4 < 𝑚 → 𝑚 ∈ GoldbachEven ) → ∀𝑛 ∈ (ℤ≥‘2)∃𝑑 ∈ ℕ ∃𝑓 ∈ (ℙ ↑m (1...𝑑))(𝑑 ≤ 3 ∧ 𝑛 = Σ𝑘 ∈ (1...𝑑)(𝑓‘𝑘)))
Theorem	bgoldbtbndlem1 44019	Lemma 1 for bgoldbtbnd 44023: the odd numbers between 7 and 13 (exclusive) are odd Goldbach numbers. (Contributed by AV, 29-Jul-2020.)
⊢ ((𝑁 ∈ Odd ∧ 7 < 𝑁 ∧ 𝑁 ∈ (7[,);13)) → 𝑁 ∈ GoldbachOdd )
Theorem	bgoldbtbndlem2 44020*	Lemma 2 for bgoldbtbnd 44023. (Contributed by AV, 1-Aug-2020.)
⊢ (𝜑 → 𝑀 ∈ (ℤ≥‘;11))    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝑁 ∈ (ℤ≥‘;11))    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → ∀𝑛 ∈ Even ((4 < 𝑛 ∧ 𝑛 < 𝑁) → 𝑛 ∈ GoldbachEven ))    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐷 ∈ (ℤ≥‘3))    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐹 ∈ (RePart‘𝐷))    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → ∀𝑖 ∈ (0..^𝐷)((𝐹‘𝑖) ∈ (ℙ ∖ {2}) ∧ ((𝐹‘(𝑖 + 1)) − (𝐹‘𝑖)) < (𝑁 − 4) ∧ 4 < ((𝐹‘(𝑖 + 1)) − (𝐹‘𝑖))))    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → (𝐹‘0) = 7)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → (𝐹‘1) = ;13)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝑀 < (𝐹‘𝐷))    &   ⊢ 𝑆 = (𝑋 − (𝐹‘(𝐼 − 1)))    ⇒   ⊢ ((𝜑 ∧ 𝑋 ∈ Odd ∧ 𝐼 ∈ (1..^𝐷)) → ((𝑋 ∈ ((𝐹‘𝐼)[,)(𝐹‘(𝐼 + 1))) ∧ (𝑋 − (𝐹‘𝐼)) ≤ 4) → (𝑆 ∈ Even ∧ 𝑆 < 𝑁 ∧ 4 < 𝑆)))
Theorem	bgoldbtbndlem3 44021*	Lemma 3 for bgoldbtbnd 44023. (Contributed by AV, 1-Aug-2020.)
⊢ (𝜑 → 𝑀 ∈ (ℤ≥‘;11))    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝑁 ∈ (ℤ≥‘;11))    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → ∀𝑛 ∈ Even ((4 < 𝑛 ∧ 𝑛 < 𝑁) → 𝑛 ∈ GoldbachEven ))    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐷 ∈ (ℤ≥‘3))    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐹 ∈ (RePart‘𝐷))    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → ∀𝑖 ∈ (0..^𝐷)((𝐹‘𝑖) ∈ (ℙ ∖ {2}) ∧ ((𝐹‘(𝑖 + 1)) − (𝐹‘𝑖)) < (𝑁 − 4) ∧ 4 < ((𝐹‘(𝑖 + 1)) − (𝐹‘𝑖))))    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → (𝐹‘0) = 7)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → (𝐹‘1) = ;13)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝑀 < (𝐹‘𝐷))    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → (𝐹‘𝐷) ∈ ℝ)    &   ⊢ 𝑆 = (𝑋 − (𝐹‘𝐼))    ⇒   ⊢ ((𝜑 ∧ 𝑋 ∈ Odd ∧ 𝐼 ∈ (1..^𝐷)) → ((𝑋 ∈ ((𝐹‘𝐼)[,)(𝐹‘(𝐼 + 1))) ∧ 4 < 𝑆) → (𝑆 ∈ Even ∧ 𝑆 < 𝑁 ∧ 4 < 𝑆)))
Theorem	bgoldbtbndlem4 44022*	Lemma 4 for bgoldbtbnd 44023. (Contributed by AV, 1-Aug-2020.)
⊢ (𝜑 → 𝑀 ∈ (ℤ≥‘;11))    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝑁 ∈ (ℤ≥‘;11))    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → ∀𝑛 ∈ Even ((4 < 𝑛 ∧ 𝑛 < 𝑁) → 𝑛 ∈ GoldbachEven ))    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐷 ∈ (ℤ≥‘3))    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐹 ∈ (RePart‘𝐷))    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → ∀𝑖 ∈ (0..^𝐷)((𝐹‘𝑖) ∈ (ℙ ∖ {2}) ∧ ((𝐹‘(𝑖 + 1)) − (𝐹‘𝑖)) < (𝑁 − 4) ∧ 4 < ((𝐹‘(𝑖 + 1)) − (𝐹‘𝑖))))    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → (𝐹‘0) = 7)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → (𝐹‘1) = ;13)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝑀 < (𝐹‘𝐷))    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → (𝐹‘𝐷) ∈ ℝ)    ⇒   ⊢ (((𝜑 ∧ 𝐼 ∈ (1..^𝐷)) ∧ 𝑋 ∈ Odd ) → ((𝑋 ∈ ((𝐹‘𝐼)[,)(𝐹‘(𝐼 + 1))) ∧ (𝑋 − (𝐹‘𝐼)) ≤ 4) → ∃𝑝 ∈ ℙ ∃𝑞 ∈ ℙ ∃𝑟 ∈ ℙ ((𝑝 ∈ Odd ∧ 𝑞 ∈ Odd ∧ 𝑟 ∈ Odd ) ∧ 𝑋 = ((𝑝 + 𝑞) + 𝑟))))
Theorem	bgoldbtbnd 44023*	If the binary Goldbach conjecture is valid up to an integer 𝑁, and there is a series ("ladder") of primes with a difference of at most 𝑁 up to an integer 𝑀, then the strong ternary Goldbach conjecture is valid up to 𝑀, see section 1.2.2 in [Helfgott] p. 4 with N = 4 x 10^18, taken from [OeSilva], and M = 8.875 x 10^30. (Contributed by AV, 1-Aug-2020.)
⊢ (𝜑 → 𝑀 ∈ (ℤ≥‘;11))    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝑁 ∈ (ℤ≥‘;11))    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → ∀𝑛 ∈ Even ((4 < 𝑛 ∧ 𝑛 < 𝑁) → 𝑛 ∈ GoldbachEven ))    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐷 ∈ (ℤ≥‘3))    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐹 ∈ (RePart‘𝐷))    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → ∀𝑖 ∈ (0..^𝐷)((𝐹‘𝑖) ∈ (ℙ ∖ {2}) ∧ ((𝐹‘(𝑖 + 1)) − (𝐹‘𝑖)) < (𝑁 − 4) ∧ 4 < ((𝐹‘(𝑖 + 1)) − (𝐹‘𝑖))))    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → (𝐹‘0) = 7)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → (𝐹‘1) = ;13)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝑀 < (𝐹‘𝐷))    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → (𝐹‘𝐷) ∈ ℝ)    ⇒   ⊢ (𝜑 → ∀𝑛 ∈ Odd ((7 < 𝑛 ∧ 𝑛 < 𝑀) → 𝑛 ∈ GoldbachOdd ))
Axiom	ax-bgbltosilva 44024	The binary Goldbach conjecture is valid for all even numbers less than or equal to 4x10^18, see section 2 in [OeSilva] p. 2042. Temporarily provided as "axiom". (Contributed by AV, 3-Aug-2020.) (Revised by AV, 9-Sep-2021.)
⊢ ((𝑁 ∈ Even ∧ 4 < 𝑁 ∧ 𝑁 ≤ (4 · (;10↑;18))) → 𝑁 ∈ GoldbachEven )
Axiom	ax-tgoldbachgt 44025*	Temporary duplicate of tgoldbachgt 31934, provided as "axiom" as long as this theorem is in the mathbox of Thierry Arnoux: Odd integers greater than (;10↑;27) have at least a representation as a sum of three odd primes. Final statement in section 7.4 of [Helfgott] p. 70 , expressed using the set 𝐺 of odd numbers which can be written as a sum of three odd primes. (Contributed by Thierry Arnoux, 22-Dec-2021.)
⊢ 𝑂 = {𝑧 ∈ ℤ ∣ ¬ 2 ∥ 𝑧}    &   ⊢ 𝐺 = {𝑧 ∈ 𝑂 ∣ ∃𝑝 ∈ ℙ ∃𝑞 ∈ ℙ ∃𝑟 ∈ ℙ ((𝑝 ∈ 𝑂 ∧ 𝑞 ∈ 𝑂 ∧ 𝑟 ∈ 𝑂) ∧ 𝑧 = ((𝑝 + 𝑞) + 𝑟))}    ⇒   ⊢ ∃𝑚 ∈ ℕ (𝑚 ≤ (;10↑;27) ∧ ∀𝑛 ∈ 𝑂 (𝑚 < 𝑛 → 𝑛 ∈ 𝐺))
Theorem	tgoldbachgtALTV 44026*	Variant of Thierry Arnoux's tgoldbachgt 31934 using the symbols Odd and GoldbachOdd: The ternary Goldbach conjecture is valid for large odd numbers (i.e. for all odd numbers greater than a fixed 𝑚). This is proven by Helfgott (see section 7.4 in [Helfgott] p. 70) for 𝑚 = 10^27. (Contributed by AV, 2-Aug-2020.) (Revised by AV, 15-Jan-2022.)
⊢ ∃𝑚 ∈ ℕ (𝑚 ≤ (;10↑;27) ∧ ∀𝑛 ∈ Odd (𝑚 < 𝑛 → 𝑛 ∈ GoldbachOdd ))
Theorem	bgoldbachlt 44027*	The binary Goldbach conjecture is valid for small even numbers (i.e. for all even numbers less than or equal to a fixed big 𝑚). This is verified for m = 4 x 10^18 by Oliveira e Silva, see ax-bgbltosilva 44024. (Contributed by AV, 3-Aug-2020.) (Revised by AV, 9-Sep-2021.)
⊢ ∃𝑚 ∈ ℕ ((4 · (;10↑;18)) ≤ 𝑚 ∧ ∀𝑛 ∈ Even ((4 < 𝑛 ∧ 𝑛 < 𝑚) → 𝑛 ∈ GoldbachEven ))
Axiom	ax-hgprmladder 44028	There is a partition ("ladder") of primes from 7 to 8.8 x 10^30 with parts ("rungs") having lengths of at least 4 and at most N - 4, see section 1.2.2 in [Helfgott] p. 4. Temporarily provided as "axiom". (Contributed by AV, 3-Aug-2020.) (Revised by AV, 9-Sep-2021.)
⊢ ∃𝑑 ∈ (ℤ≥‘3)∃𝑓 ∈ (RePart‘𝑑)(((𝑓‘0) = 7 ∧ (𝑓‘1) = ;13 ∧ (𝑓‘𝑑) = (;89 · (;10↑;29))) ∧ ∀𝑖 ∈ (0..^𝑑)((𝑓‘𝑖) ∈ (ℙ ∖ {2}) ∧ ((𝑓‘(𝑖 + 1)) − (𝑓‘𝑖)) < ((4 · (;10↑;18)) − 4) ∧ 4 < ((𝑓‘(𝑖 + 1)) − (𝑓‘𝑖))))
Theorem	tgblthelfgott 44029	The ternary Goldbach conjecture is valid for all odd numbers less than 8.8 x 10^30 (actually 8.875694 x 10^30, see section 1.2.2 in [Helfgott] p. 4, using bgoldbachlt 44027, ax-hgprmladder 44028 and bgoldbtbnd 44023. (Contributed by AV, 4-Aug-2020.) (Revised by AV, 9-Sep-2021.)
⊢ ((𝑁 ∈ Odd ∧ 7 < 𝑁 ∧ 𝑁 < (;88 · (;10↑;29))) → 𝑁 ∈ GoldbachOdd )
Theorem	tgoldbachlt 44030*	The ternary Goldbach conjecture is valid for small odd numbers (i.e. for all odd numbers less than a fixed big 𝑚 greater than 8 x 10^30). This is verified for m = 8.875694 x 10^30 by Helfgott, see tgblthelfgott 44029. (Contributed by AV, 4-Aug-2020.) (Revised by AV, 9-Sep-2021.)
⊢ ∃𝑚 ∈ ℕ ((8 · (;10↑;30)) < 𝑚 ∧ ∀𝑛 ∈ Odd ((7 < 𝑛 ∧ 𝑛 < 𝑚) → 𝑛 ∈ GoldbachOdd ))
Theorem	tgoldbach 44031	The ternary Goldbach conjecture is valid. Main theorem in [Helfgott] p. 2. This follows from tgoldbachlt 44030 and ax-tgoldbachgt 44025. (Contributed by AV, 2-Aug-2020.) (Revised by AV, 9-Sep-2021.)
⊢ ∀𝑛 ∈ Odd (7 < 𝑛 → 𝑛 ∈ GoldbachOdd )
20.41.15  Graph theory (extension)
20.41.15.1  Isomorphic graphs In the following, a general definition of the isomorphy relation for graphs and specializations for simple hypergraphs (isomushgr 44040) and simple pseudographs (isomuspgr 44048) are provided. The latter corresponds to the definition in [Bollobas] p. 3). It is shown that the isomorphy relation for graphs is an equivalence relation (isomgrref 44049, isomgrsym 44050, isomgrtr 44053). Fianlly, isomorphic graphs with different representations are studied (strisomgrop 44054, ushrisomgr 44055). Maybe more important than graph isomorphy is the notion of graph isomorphism, which can be defined as in df-grisom 44034. Then 𝐴 IsomGr 𝐵 ↔ ∃𝑓𝑓 ∈ (𝐴 GrIsom 𝐵) resp. 𝐴 IsomGr 𝐵 ↔ (𝐴 GrIsom 𝐵) ≠ ∅. Notice that there can be multiple isomorphisms between two graphs (let ⟨{𝐴, 𝐵}, {{𝐴, 𝐵}}⟩ and ⟨{{𝑀, 𝑁}, {{𝑀, 𝑁}}⟩ be two graphs with two vertices and one edge, then 𝐴 ↦ 𝑀, 𝐵 ↦ 𝑁 and 𝐴 ↦ 𝑁, 𝐵 ↦ 𝑀 are two different isomorphisms between these graphs). Another approach could be to define a category of graphs (there are maybe multiple ones), where graph morphisms are couples consisting in a function on vertices and a function on edges with required compatibilities, as used in the definition of GrIsom. And then, a graph isomorphism is defined as an isomorphism in the category of graphs (something like "GraphIsom = ( Iso ` GraphCat )" ). Then general category theory theorems could be used, e.g., to show that graph isomorphy is an equivalence relation.
Syntax	cgrisom 44032	Extend class notation to include the graph ispmorphisms.
class GrIsom
Syntax	cisomgr 44033	Extend class notation to include the isomorphy relation for graphs.
class IsomGr
Definition	df-grisom 44034*	Define the class of all isomorphisms between two graphs. (Contributed by AV, 11-Dec-2022.)
⊢ GrIsom = (𝑥 ∈ V, 𝑦 ∈ V ↦ {⟨𝑓, 𝑔⟩ ∣ (𝑓:(Vtx‘𝑥)–1-1-onto→(Vtx‘𝑦) ∧ 𝑔:dom (iEdg‘𝑥)–1-1-onto→dom (iEdg‘𝑦) ∧ ∀𝑖 ∈ dom (iEdg‘𝑥)(𝑓 “ ((iEdg‘𝑥)‘𝑖)) = ((iEdg‘𝑦)‘(𝑔‘𝑖)))})
Definition	df-isomgr 44035*	Define the isomorphy relation for graphs. (Contributed by AV, 11-Nov-2022.)
⊢ IsomGr = {⟨𝑥, 𝑦⟩ ∣ ∃𝑓(𝑓:(Vtx‘𝑥)–1-1-onto→(Vtx‘𝑦) ∧ ∃𝑔(𝑔:dom (iEdg‘𝑥)–1-1-onto→dom (iEdg‘𝑦) ∧ ∀𝑖 ∈ dom (iEdg‘𝑥)(𝑓 “ ((iEdg‘𝑥)‘𝑖)) = ((iEdg‘𝑦)‘(𝑔‘𝑖))))}
Theorem	isomgrrel 44036	The isomorphy relation for graphs is a relation. (Contributed by AV, 11-Nov-2022.)
⊢ Rel IsomGr
Theorem	isomgr 44037*	The isomorphy relation for two graphs. (Contributed by AV, 11-Nov-2022.)
⊢ 𝑉 = (Vtx‘𝐴)    &   ⊢ 𝑊 = (Vtx‘𝐵)    &   ⊢ 𝐼 = (iEdg‘𝐴)    &   ⊢ 𝐽 = (iEdg‘𝐵)    ⇒   ⊢ ((𝐴 ∈ 𝑋 ∧ 𝐵 ∈ 𝑌) → (𝐴 IsomGr 𝐵 ↔ ∃𝑓(𝑓:𝑉–1-1-onto→𝑊 ∧ ∃𝑔(𝑔:dom 𝐼–1-1-onto→dom 𝐽 ∧ ∀𝑖 ∈ dom 𝐼(𝑓 “ (𝐼‘𝑖)) = (𝐽‘(𝑔‘𝑖))))))
Theorem	isisomgr 44038*	Implications of two graphs being isomorphic. (Contributed by AV, 11-Nov-2022.)
⊢ 𝑉 = (Vtx‘𝐴)    &   ⊢ 𝑊 = (Vtx‘𝐵)    &   ⊢ 𝐼 = (iEdg‘𝐴)    &   ⊢ 𝐽 = (iEdg‘𝐵)    ⇒   ⊢ (𝐴 IsomGr 𝐵 → ∃𝑓(𝑓:𝑉–1-1-onto→𝑊 ∧ ∃𝑔(𝑔:dom 𝐼–1-1-onto→dom 𝐽 ∧ ∀𝑖 ∈ dom 𝐼(𝑓 “ (𝐼‘𝑖)) = (𝐽‘(𝑔‘𝑖)))))
Theorem	isomgreqve 44039	A set is isomorphic to a hypergraph if it has the same vertices and the same edges. (Contributed by AV, 11-Nov-2022.)
⊢ (((𝐴 ∈ UHGraph ∧ 𝐵 ∈ 𝑌) ∧ ((Vtx‘𝐴) = (Vtx‘𝐵) ∧ (iEdg‘𝐴) = (iEdg‘𝐵))) → 𝐴 IsomGr 𝐵)
Theorem	isomushgr 44040*	The isomorphy relation for two simple hypergraphs. (Contributed by AV, 28-Nov-2022.)
⊢ 𝑉 = (Vtx‘𝐴)    &   ⊢ 𝑊 = (Vtx‘𝐵)    &   ⊢ 𝐸 = (Edg‘𝐴)    &   ⊢ 𝐾 = (Edg‘𝐵)    ⇒   ⊢ ((𝐴 ∈ USHGraph ∧ 𝐵 ∈ USHGraph) → (𝐴 IsomGr 𝐵 ↔ ∃𝑓(𝑓:𝑉–1-1-onto→𝑊 ∧ ∃𝑔(𝑔:𝐸–1-1-onto→𝐾 ∧ ∀𝑒 ∈ 𝐸 (𝑓 “ 𝑒) = (𝑔‘𝑒)))))
Theorem	isomuspgrlem1 44041*	Lemma 1 for isomuspgr 44048. (Contributed by AV, 29-Nov-2022.)
⊢ 𝑉 = (Vtx‘𝐴)    &   ⊢ 𝑊 = (Vtx‘𝐵)    &   ⊢ 𝐸 = (Edg‘𝐴)    &   ⊢ 𝐾 = (Edg‘𝐵)    ⇒   ⊢ (((((𝐴 ∈ USPGraph ∧ 𝐵 ∈ USPGraph) ∧ 𝑓:𝑉–1-1-onto→𝑊) ∧ (𝑔:𝐸–1-1-onto→𝐾 ∧ ∀𝑒 ∈ 𝐸 (𝑓 “ 𝑒) = (𝑔‘𝑒))) ∧ (𝑎 ∈ 𝑉 ∧ 𝑏 ∈ 𝑉)) → ({(𝑓‘𝑎), (𝑓‘𝑏)} ∈ 𝐾 → {𝑎, 𝑏} ∈ 𝐸))
Theorem	isomuspgrlem2a 44042*	Lemma 1 for isomuspgrlem2 44047. (Contributed by AV, 29-Nov-2022.)
⊢ 𝑉 = (Vtx‘𝐴)    &   ⊢ 𝑊 = (Vtx‘𝐵)    &   ⊢ 𝐸 = (Edg‘𝐴)    &   ⊢ 𝐾 = (Edg‘𝐵)    &   ⊢ 𝐺 = (𝑥 ∈ 𝐸 ↦ (𝐹 “ 𝑥))    ⇒   ⊢ (𝐹 ∈ 𝑋 → ∀𝑒 ∈ 𝐸 (𝐹 “ 𝑒) = (𝐺‘𝑒))
Theorem	isomuspgrlem2b 44043*	Lemma 2 for isomuspgrlem2 44047. (Contributed by AV, 29-Nov-2022.)
⊢ 𝑉 = (Vtx‘𝐴)    &   ⊢ 𝑊 = (Vtx‘𝐵)    &   ⊢ 𝐸 = (Edg‘𝐴)    &   ⊢ 𝐾 = (Edg‘𝐵)    &   ⊢ 𝐺 = (𝑥 ∈ 𝐸 ↦ (𝐹 “ 𝑥))    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐴 ∈ USPGraph)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐹:𝑉–1-1-onto→𝑊)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → ∀𝑎 ∈ 𝑉 ∀𝑏 ∈ 𝑉 ({𝑎, 𝑏} ∈ 𝐸 ↔ {(𝐹‘𝑎), (𝐹‘𝑏)} ∈ 𝐾))    ⇒   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐺:𝐸⟶𝐾)
Theorem	isomuspgrlem2c 44044*	Lemma 3 for isomuspgrlem2 44047. (Contributed by AV, 29-Nov-2022.)
⊢ 𝑉 = (Vtx‘𝐴)    &   ⊢ 𝑊 = (Vtx‘𝐵)    &   ⊢ 𝐸 = (Edg‘𝐴)    &   ⊢ 𝐾 = (Edg‘𝐵)    &   ⊢ 𝐺 = (𝑥 ∈ 𝐸 ↦ (𝐹 “ 𝑥))    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐴 ∈ USPGraph)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐹:𝑉–1-1-onto→𝑊)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → ∀𝑎 ∈ 𝑉 ∀𝑏 ∈ 𝑉 ({𝑎, 𝑏} ∈ 𝐸 ↔ {(𝐹‘𝑎), (𝐹‘𝑏)} ∈ 𝐾))    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐹 ∈ 𝑋)    ⇒   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐺:𝐸–1-1→𝐾)
Theorem	isomuspgrlem2d 44045*	Lemma 4 for isomuspgrlem2 44047. (Contributed by AV, 1-Dec-2022.)
⊢ 𝑉 = (Vtx‘𝐴)    &   ⊢ 𝑊 = (Vtx‘𝐵)    &   ⊢ 𝐸 = (Edg‘𝐴)    &   ⊢ 𝐾 = (Edg‘𝐵)    &   ⊢ 𝐺 = (𝑥 ∈ 𝐸 ↦ (𝐹 “ 𝑥))    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐴 ∈ USPGraph)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐹:𝑉–1-1-onto→𝑊)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → ∀𝑎 ∈ 𝑉 ∀𝑏 ∈ 𝑉 ({𝑎, 𝑏} ∈ 𝐸 ↔ {(𝐹‘𝑎), (𝐹‘𝑏)} ∈ 𝐾))    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐹 ∈ 𝑋)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐵 ∈ USPGraph)    ⇒   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐺:𝐸–onto→𝐾)
Theorem	isomuspgrlem2e 44046*	Lemma 5 for isomuspgrlem2 44047. (Contributed by AV, 1-Dec-2022.)
⊢ 𝑉 = (Vtx‘𝐴)    &   ⊢ 𝑊 = (Vtx‘𝐵)    &   ⊢ 𝐸 = (Edg‘𝐴)    &   ⊢ 𝐾 = (Edg‘𝐵)    &   ⊢ 𝐺 = (𝑥 ∈ 𝐸 ↦ (𝐹 “ 𝑥))    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐴 ∈ USPGraph)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐹:𝑉–1-1-onto→𝑊)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → ∀𝑎 ∈ 𝑉 ∀𝑏 ∈ 𝑉 ({𝑎, 𝑏} ∈ 𝐸 ↔ {(𝐹‘𝑎), (𝐹‘𝑏)} ∈ 𝐾))    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐹 ∈ 𝑋)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐵 ∈ USPGraph)    ⇒   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐺:𝐸–1-1-onto→𝐾)
Theorem	isomuspgrlem2 44047*	Lemma 2 for isomuspgr 44048. (Contributed by AV, 1-Dec-2022.)
⊢ 𝑉 = (Vtx‘𝐴)    &   ⊢ 𝑊 = (Vtx‘𝐵)    &   ⊢ 𝐸 = (Edg‘𝐴)    &   ⊢ 𝐾 = (Edg‘𝐵)    ⇒   ⊢ (((𝐴 ∈ USPGraph ∧ 𝐵 ∈ USPGraph) ∧ 𝑓:𝑉–1-1-onto→𝑊) → (∀𝑎 ∈ 𝑉 ∀𝑏 ∈ 𝑉 ({𝑎, 𝑏} ∈ 𝐸 ↔ {(𝑓‘𝑎), (𝑓‘𝑏)} ∈ 𝐾) → ∃𝑔(𝑔:𝐸–1-1-onto→𝐾 ∧ ∀𝑒 ∈ 𝐸 (𝑓 “ 𝑒) = (𝑔‘𝑒))))
Theorem	isomuspgr 44048*	The isomorphy relation for two simple pseudographs. This corresponds to the definition in [Bollobas] p. 3. (Contributed by AV, 1-Dec-2022.)
⊢ 𝑉 = (Vtx‘𝐴)    &   ⊢ 𝑊 = (Vtx‘𝐵)    &   ⊢ 𝐸 = (Edg‘𝐴)    &   ⊢ 𝐾 = (Edg‘𝐵)    ⇒   ⊢ ((𝐴 ∈ USPGraph ∧ 𝐵 ∈ USPGraph) → (𝐴 IsomGr 𝐵 ↔ ∃𝑓(𝑓:𝑉–1-1-onto→𝑊 ∧ ∀𝑎 ∈ 𝑉 ∀𝑏 ∈ 𝑉 ({𝑎, 𝑏} ∈ 𝐸 ↔ {(𝑓‘𝑎), (𝑓‘𝑏)} ∈ 𝐾))))
Theorem	isomgrref 44049	The isomorphy relation is reflexive for hypergraphs. (Contributed by AV, 11-Nov-2022.)
⊢ (𝐺 ∈ UHGraph → 𝐺 IsomGr 𝐺)
Theorem	isomgrsym 44050	The isomorphy relation is symmetric for hypergraphs. (Contributed by AV, 11-Nov-2022.)
⊢ ((𝐴 ∈ UHGraph ∧ 𝐵 ∈ 𝑌) → (𝐴 IsomGr 𝐵 → 𝐵 IsomGr 𝐴))
Theorem	isomgrsymb 44051	The isomorphy relation is symmetric for hypergraphs. (Contributed by AV, 11-Nov-2022.)
⊢ ((𝐴 ∈ UHGraph ∧ 𝐵 ∈ UHGraph) → (𝐴 IsomGr 𝐵 ↔ 𝐵 IsomGr 𝐴))
Theorem	isomgrtrlem 44052*	Lemma for isomgrtr 44053. (Contributed by AV, 5-Dec-2022.)
⊢ (((((𝐴 ∈ UHGraph ∧ 𝐵 ∈ UHGraph ∧ 𝐶 ∈ 𝑋) ∧ 𝑓:(Vtx‘𝐴)–1-1-onto→(Vtx‘𝐵) ∧ 𝑣:(Vtx‘𝐵)–1-1-onto→(Vtx‘𝐶)) ∧ (𝑔:dom (iEdg‘𝐴)–1-1-onto→dom (iEdg‘𝐵) ∧ ∀𝑖 ∈ dom (iEdg‘𝐴)(𝑓 “ ((iEdg‘𝐴)‘𝑖)) = ((iEdg‘𝐵)‘(𝑔‘𝑖)))) ∧ (𝑤:dom (iEdg‘𝐵)–1-1-onto→dom (iEdg‘𝐶) ∧ ∀𝑘 ∈ dom (iEdg‘𝐵)(𝑣 “ ((iEdg‘𝐵)‘𝑘)) = ((iEdg‘𝐶)‘(𝑤‘𝑘)))) → ∀𝑗 ∈ dom (iEdg‘𝐴)((𝑣 ∘ 𝑓) “ ((iEdg‘𝐴)‘𝑗)) = ((iEdg‘𝐶)‘((𝑤 ∘ 𝑔)‘𝑗)))
Theorem	isomgrtr 44053	The isomorphy relation is transitive for hypergraphs. (Contributed by AV, 5-Dec-2022.)
⊢ ((𝐴 ∈ UHGraph ∧ 𝐵 ∈ UHGraph ∧ 𝐶 ∈ 𝑋) → ((𝐴 IsomGr 𝐵 ∧ 𝐵 IsomGr 𝐶) → 𝐴 IsomGr 𝐶))
Theorem	strisomgrop 44054	A graph represented as an extensible structure with vertices as base set and indexed edges is isomorphic to a hypergraph represented as ordered pair with the same vertices and edges. (Contributed by AV, 11-Nov-2022.)
⊢ 𝐺 = ⟨𝑉, 𝐸⟩    &   ⊢ 𝐻 = {⟨(Base‘ndx), 𝑉⟩, ⟨(.ef‘ndx), 𝐸⟩}    ⇒   ⊢ ((𝐺 ∈ UHGraph ∧ 𝑉 ∈ 𝑋 ∧ 𝐸 ∈ 𝑌) → 𝐺 IsomGr 𝐻)
Theorem	ushrisomgr 44055	A simple hypergraph (with arbitrarily indexed edges) is isomorphic to a graph with the same vertices and the same edges, indexed by the edges themselves. (Contributed by AV, 11-Nov-2022.)
⊢ 𝑉 = (Vtx‘𝐺)    &   ⊢ 𝐸 = (Edg‘𝐺)    &   ⊢ 𝐻 = ⟨𝑉, ( I ↾ 𝐸)⟩    ⇒   ⊢ (𝐺 ∈ USHGraph → 𝐺 IsomGr 𝐻)
20.41.15.2  Loop-free graphs - extension
Theorem	1hegrlfgr 44056*	A graph 𝐺 with one hyperedge joining at least two vertices is a loop-free graph. (Contributed by AV, 23-Feb-2021.)
⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐴 ∈ 𝑋)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐵 ∈ 𝑉)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐶 ∈ 𝑉)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐵 ≠ 𝐶)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐸 ∈ 𝒫 𝑉)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → (iEdg‘𝐺) = {⟨𝐴, 𝐸⟩})    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → {𝐵, 𝐶} ⊆ 𝐸)    ⇒   ⊢ (𝜑 → (iEdg‘𝐺):{𝐴}⟶{𝑥 ∈ 𝒫 𝑉 ∣ 2 ≤ (♯‘𝑥)})
20.41.15.3  Walks - extension
Syntax	cupwlks 44057	Extend class notation with walks (of a pseudograph).
class UPWalks
Definition	df-upwlks 44058*	Define the set of all walks (in a pseudograph), called "simple walks" in the following. According to Wikipedia ("Path (graph theory)", https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Path_(graph_theory), 3-Oct-2017): "A walk of length k in a graph is an alternating sequence of vertices and edges, v0 , e0 , v1 , e1 , v2 , ... , v(k-1) , e(k-1) , v(k) which begins and ends with vertices. If the graph is undirected, then the endpoints of e(i) are v(i) and v(i+1)." According to Bollobas: " A walk W in a graph is an alternating sequence of vertices and edges x0 , e1 , x1 , e2 , ... , e(l) , x(l) where e(i) = x(i-1)x(i), 0<i<=l.", see Definition of [Bollobas] p. 4. Therefore, a walk can be represented by two mappings f from { 1 , ... , n } and p from { 0 , ... , n }, where f enumerates the (indices of the) edges, and p enumerates the vertices. So the walk is represented by the following sequence: p(0) e(f(1)) p(1) e(f(2)) ... p(n-1) e(f(n)) p(n). Although this definition is also applicable for arbitrary hypergraphs, it allows only walks consisting of not proper hyperedges (i.e. edges connecting at most two vertices). Therefore, it should be used for pseudograhs only. (Contributed by Alexander van der Vekens and Mario Carneiro, 4-Oct-2017.) (Revised by AV, 28-Dec-2020.)
⊢ UPWalks = (𝑔 ∈ V ↦ {⟨𝑓, 𝑝⟩ ∣ (𝑓 ∈ Word dom (iEdg‘𝑔) ∧ 𝑝:(0...(♯‘𝑓))⟶(Vtx‘𝑔) ∧ ∀𝑘 ∈ (0..^(♯‘𝑓))((iEdg‘𝑔)‘(𝑓‘𝑘)) = {(𝑝‘𝑘), (𝑝‘(𝑘 + 1))})})
Theorem	upwlksfval 44059*	The set of simple walks (in an undirected graph). (Contributed by Alexander van der Vekens, 19-Oct-2017.) (Revised by AV, 28-Dec-2020.)
⊢ 𝑉 = (Vtx‘𝐺)    &   ⊢ 𝐼 = (iEdg‘𝐺)    ⇒   ⊢ (𝐺 ∈ 𝑊 → (UPWalks‘𝐺) = {⟨𝑓, 𝑝⟩ ∣ (𝑓 ∈ Word dom 𝐼 ∧ 𝑝:(0...(♯‘𝑓))⟶𝑉 ∧ ∀𝑘 ∈ (0..^(♯‘𝑓))(𝐼‘(𝑓‘𝑘)) = {(𝑝‘𝑘), (𝑝‘(𝑘 + 1))})})
Theorem	isupwlk 44060*	Properties of a pair of functions to be a simple walk. (Contributed by Alexander van der Vekens, 20-Oct-2017.) (Revised by AV, 28-Dec-2020.)
⊢ 𝑉 = (Vtx‘𝐺)    &   ⊢ 𝐼 = (iEdg‘𝐺)    ⇒   ⊢ ((𝐺 ∈ 𝑊 ∧ 𝐹 ∈ 𝑈 ∧ 𝑃 ∈ 𝑍) → (𝐹(UPWalks‘𝐺)𝑃 ↔ (𝐹 ∈ Word dom 𝐼 ∧ 𝑃:(0...(♯‘𝐹))⟶𝑉 ∧ ∀𝑘 ∈ (0..^(♯‘𝐹))(𝐼‘(𝐹‘𝑘)) = {(𝑃‘𝑘), (𝑃‘(𝑘 + 1))})))
Theorem	isupwlkg 44061*	Generalization of isupwlk 44060: Conditions for two classes to represent a simple walk. (Contributed by AV, 5-Nov-2021.)
⊢ 𝑉 = (Vtx‘𝐺)    &   ⊢ 𝐼 = (iEdg‘𝐺)    ⇒   ⊢ (𝐺 ∈ 𝑊 → (𝐹(UPWalks‘𝐺)𝑃 ↔ (𝐹 ∈ Word dom 𝐼 ∧ 𝑃:(0...(♯‘𝐹))⟶𝑉 ∧ ∀𝑘 ∈ (0..^(♯‘𝐹))(𝐼‘(𝐹‘𝑘)) = {(𝑃‘𝑘), (𝑃‘(𝑘 + 1))})))
Theorem	upwlkbprop 44062	Basic properties of a simple walk. (Contributed by Alexander van der Vekens, 31-Oct-2017.) (Revised by AV, 29-Dec-2020.)
⊢ 𝑉 = (Vtx‘𝐺)    &   ⊢ 𝐼 = (iEdg‘𝐺)    ⇒   ⊢ (𝐹(UPWalks‘𝐺)𝑃 → (𝐺 ∈ V ∧ 𝐹 ∈ V ∧ 𝑃 ∈ V))
Theorem	upwlkwlk 44063	A simple walk is a walk. (Contributed by AV, 30-Dec-2020.) (Proof shortened by AV, 27-Feb-2021.)
⊢ (𝐹(UPWalks‘𝐺)𝑃 → 𝐹(Walks‘𝐺)𝑃)
Theorem	upgrwlkupwlk 44064	In a pseudograph, a walk is a simple walk. (Contributed by AV, 30-Dec-2020.) (Proof shortened by AV, 2-Jan-2021.)
⊢ ((𝐺 ∈ UPGraph ∧ 𝐹(Walks‘𝐺)𝑃) → 𝐹(UPWalks‘𝐺)𝑃)
Theorem	upgrwlkupwlkb 44065	In a pseudograph, the definitions for a walk and a simple walk are equivalent. (Contributed by AV, 30-Dec-2020.)
⊢ (𝐺 ∈ UPGraph → (𝐹(Walks‘𝐺)𝑃 ↔ 𝐹(UPWalks‘𝐺)𝑃))
Theorem	upgrisupwlkALT 44066*	Alternate proof of upgriswlk 27422 using the definition of UPGraph and related theorems. (Contributed by AV, 2-Jan-2021.) (Proof modification is discouraged.) (New usage is discouraged.)
⊢ 𝑉 = (Vtx‘𝐺)    &   ⊢ 𝐼 = (iEdg‘𝐺)    ⇒   ⊢ ((𝐺 ∈ UPGraph ∧ 𝐹 ∈ 𝑈 ∧ 𝑃 ∈ 𝑍) → (𝐹(Walks‘𝐺)𝑃 ↔ (𝐹 ∈ Word dom 𝐼 ∧ 𝑃:(0...(♯‘𝐹))⟶𝑉 ∧ ∀𝑘 ∈ (0..^(♯‘𝐹))(𝐼‘(𝐹‘𝑘)) = {(𝑃‘𝑘), (𝑃‘(𝑘 + 1))})))
20.41.15.4  Edges of graphs expressed as sets of unordered pairs
Theorem	upgredgssspr 44067	The set of edges of a pseudograph is a subset of the set of unordered pairs of vertices. (Contributed by AV, 24-Nov-2021.)
⊢ (𝐺 ∈ UPGraph → (Edg‘𝐺) ⊆ (Pairs‘(Vtx‘𝐺)))
Theorem	uspgropssxp 44068*	The set 𝐺 of "simple pseudographs" for a fixed set 𝑉 of vertices is a subset of a Cartesian product. For more details about the class 𝐺 of all "simple pseudographs" see comments on uspgrbisymrel 44078. (Contributed by AV, 24-Nov-2021.)
⊢ 𝑃 = 𝒫 (Pairs‘𝑉)    &   ⊢ 𝐺 = {⟨𝑣, 𝑒⟩ ∣ (𝑣 = 𝑉 ∧ ∃𝑞 ∈ USPGraph ((Vtx‘𝑞) = 𝑣 ∧ (Edg‘𝑞) = 𝑒))}    ⇒   ⊢ (𝑉 ∈ 𝑊 → 𝐺 ⊆ (𝑊 × 𝑃))
Theorem	uspgrsprfv 44069*	The value of the function 𝐹 which maps a "simple pseudograph" for a fixed set 𝑉 of vertices to the set of edges (i.e. range of the edge function) of the graph. Solely for 𝐺 as defined here, the function 𝐹 is a bijection between the "simple pseudographs" and the subsets of the set of pairs 𝑃 over the fixed set 𝑉 of vertices, see uspgrbispr 44075. (Contributed by AV, 24-Nov-2021.)
⊢ 𝑃 = 𝒫 (Pairs‘𝑉)    &   ⊢ 𝐺 = {⟨𝑣, 𝑒⟩ ∣ (𝑣 = 𝑉 ∧ ∃𝑞 ∈ USPGraph ((Vtx‘𝑞) = 𝑣 ∧ (Edg‘𝑞) = 𝑒))}    &   ⊢ 𝐹 = (𝑔 ∈ 𝐺 ↦ (2nd ‘𝑔))    ⇒   ⊢ (𝑋 ∈ 𝐺 → (𝐹‘𝑋) = (2nd ‘𝑋))
Theorem	uspgrsprf 44070*	The mapping 𝐹 is a function from the "simple pseudographs" with a fixed set of vertices 𝑉 into the subsets of the set of pairs over the set 𝑉. (Contributed by AV, 24-Nov-2021.)
⊢ 𝑃 = 𝒫 (Pairs‘𝑉)    &   ⊢ 𝐺 = {⟨𝑣, 𝑒⟩ ∣ (𝑣 = 𝑉 ∧ ∃𝑞 ∈ USPGraph ((Vtx‘𝑞) = 𝑣 ∧ (Edg‘𝑞) = 𝑒))}    &   ⊢ 𝐹 = (𝑔 ∈ 𝐺 ↦ (2nd ‘𝑔))    ⇒   ⊢ 𝐹:𝐺⟶𝑃
Theorem	uspgrsprf1 44071*	The mapping 𝐹 is a one-to-one function from the "simple pseudographs" with a fixed set of vertices 𝑉 into the subsets of the set of pairs over the set 𝑉. (Contributed by AV, 25-Nov-2021.)
⊢ 𝑃 = 𝒫 (Pairs‘𝑉)    &   ⊢ 𝐺 = {⟨𝑣, 𝑒⟩ ∣ (𝑣 = 𝑉 ∧ ∃𝑞 ∈ USPGraph ((Vtx‘𝑞) = 𝑣 ∧ (Edg‘𝑞) = 𝑒))}    &   ⊢ 𝐹 = (𝑔 ∈ 𝐺 ↦ (2nd ‘𝑔))    ⇒   ⊢ 𝐹:𝐺–1-1→𝑃
Theorem	uspgrsprfo 44072*	The mapping 𝐹 is a function from the "simple pseudographs" with a fixed set of vertices 𝑉 onto the subsets of the set of pairs over the set 𝑉. (Contributed by AV, 25-Nov-2021.)
⊢ 𝑃 = 𝒫 (Pairs‘𝑉)    &   ⊢ 𝐺 = {⟨𝑣, 𝑒⟩ ∣ (𝑣 = 𝑉 ∧ ∃𝑞 ∈ USPGraph ((Vtx‘𝑞) = 𝑣 ∧ (Edg‘𝑞) = 𝑒))}    &   ⊢ 𝐹 = (𝑔 ∈ 𝐺 ↦ (2nd ‘𝑔))    ⇒   ⊢ (𝑉 ∈ 𝑊 → 𝐹:𝐺–onto→𝑃)
Theorem	uspgrsprf1o 44073*	The mapping 𝐹 is a bijection between the "simple pseudographs" with a fixed set of vertices 𝑉 and the subsets of the set of pairs over the set 𝑉. See also the comments on uspgrbisymrel 44078. (Contributed by AV, 25-Nov-2021.)
⊢ 𝑃 = 𝒫 (Pairs‘𝑉)    &   ⊢ 𝐺 = {⟨𝑣, 𝑒⟩ ∣ (𝑣 = 𝑉 ∧ ∃𝑞 ∈ USPGraph ((Vtx‘𝑞) = 𝑣 ∧ (Edg‘𝑞) = 𝑒))}    &   ⊢ 𝐹 = (𝑔 ∈ 𝐺 ↦ (2nd ‘𝑔))    ⇒   ⊢ (𝑉 ∈ 𝑊 → 𝐹:𝐺–1-1-onto→𝑃)
Theorem	uspgrex 44074*	The class 𝐺 of all "simple pseudographs" with a fixed set of vertices 𝑉 is a set. (Contributed by AV, 26-Nov-2021.)
⊢ 𝑃 = 𝒫 (Pairs‘𝑉)    &   ⊢ 𝐺 = {⟨𝑣, 𝑒⟩ ∣ (𝑣 = 𝑉 ∧ ∃𝑞 ∈ USPGraph ((Vtx‘𝑞) = 𝑣 ∧ (Edg‘𝑞) = 𝑒))}    ⇒   ⊢ (𝑉 ∈ 𝑊 → 𝐺 ∈ V)
Theorem	uspgrbispr 44075*	There is a bijection between the "simple pseudographs" with a fixed set of vertices 𝑉 and the subsets of the set of pairs over the set 𝑉. (Contributed by AV, 26-Nov-2021.)
⊢ 𝑃 = 𝒫 (Pairs‘𝑉)    &   ⊢ 𝐺 = {⟨𝑣, 𝑒⟩ ∣ (𝑣 = 𝑉 ∧ ∃𝑞 ∈ USPGraph ((Vtx‘𝑞) = 𝑣 ∧ (Edg‘𝑞) = 𝑒))}    ⇒   ⊢ (𝑉 ∈ 𝑊 → ∃𝑓 𝑓:𝐺–1-1-onto→𝑃)
Theorem	uspgrspren 44076*	The set 𝐺 of the "simple pseudographs" with a fixed set of vertices 𝑉 and the class 𝑃 of subsets of the set of pairs over the fixed set 𝑉 are equinumerous. (Contributed by AV, 27-Nov-2021.)
⊢ 𝑃 = 𝒫 (Pairs‘𝑉)    &   ⊢ 𝐺 = {⟨𝑣, 𝑒⟩ ∣ (𝑣 = 𝑉 ∧ ∃𝑞 ∈ USPGraph ((Vtx‘𝑞) = 𝑣 ∧ (Edg‘𝑞) = 𝑒))}    ⇒   ⊢ (𝑉 ∈ 𝑊 → 𝐺 ≈ 𝑃)
Theorem	uspgrymrelen 44077*	The set 𝐺 of the "simple pseudographs" with a fixed set of vertices 𝑉 and the class 𝑅 of the symmetric relations on the fixed set 𝑉 are equinumerous. For more details about the class 𝐺 of all "simple pseudographs" see comments on uspgrbisymrel 44078. (Contributed by AV, 27-Nov-2021.)
⊢ 𝐺 = {⟨𝑣, 𝑒⟩ ∣ (𝑣 = 𝑉 ∧ ∃𝑞 ∈ USPGraph ((Vtx‘𝑞) = 𝑣 ∧ (Edg‘𝑞) = 𝑒))}    &   ⊢ 𝑅 = {𝑟 ∈ 𝒫 (𝑉 × 𝑉) ∣ ∀𝑥 ∈ 𝑉 ∀𝑦 ∈ 𝑉 (𝑥𝑟𝑦 ↔ 𝑦𝑟𝑥)}    ⇒   ⊢ (𝑉 ∈ 𝑊 → 𝐺 ≈ 𝑅)
Theorem	uspgrbisymrel 44078*	There is a bijection between the "simple pseudographs" for a fixed set 𝑉 of vertices and the class 𝑅 of the symmetric relations on the fixed set 𝑉. The simple pseudographs, which are graphs without hyper- or multiedges, but which may contain loops, are expressed as ordered pairs of the vertices and the edges (as proper or improper unordered pairs of vertices, not as indexed edges!) in this theorem. That class 𝐺 of such simple pseudographs is a set (if 𝑉 is a set, see uspgrex 44074) of equivalence classes of graphs abstracting from the index sets of their edge functions. Solely for this abstraction, there is a bijection between the "simple pseudographs" as members of 𝐺 and the symmetric relations 𝑅 on the fixed set 𝑉 of vertices. This theorem would not hold for 𝐺 = {𝑔 ∈ USPGraph ∣ (Vtx‘𝑔) = 𝑉} and even not for 𝐺 = {⟨𝑣, 𝑒⟩ ∣ (𝑣 = 𝑉 ∧ ⟨𝑣, 𝑒⟩ ∈ USPGraph)}, because these are much bigger classes. (Proposed by Gerard Lang, 16-Nov-2021.) (Contributed by AV, 27-Nov-2021.)
⊢ 𝐺 = {⟨𝑣, 𝑒⟩ ∣ (𝑣 = 𝑉 ∧ ∃𝑞 ∈ USPGraph ((Vtx‘𝑞) = 𝑣 ∧ (Edg‘𝑞) = 𝑒))}    &   ⊢ 𝑅 = {𝑟 ∈ 𝒫 (𝑉 × 𝑉) ∣ ∀𝑥 ∈ 𝑉 ∀𝑦 ∈ 𝑉 (𝑥𝑟𝑦 ↔ 𝑦𝑟𝑥)}    ⇒   ⊢ (𝑉 ∈ 𝑊 → ∃𝑓 𝑓:𝐺–1-1-onto→𝑅)
Theorem	uspgrbisymrelALT 44079*	Alternate proof of uspgrbisymrel 44078 not using the definition of equinumerosity. (Contributed by AV, 26-Nov-2021.) (New usage is discouraged.) (Proof modification is discouraged.)
⊢ 𝐺 = {⟨𝑣, 𝑒⟩ ∣ (𝑣 = 𝑉 ∧ ∃𝑞 ∈ USPGraph ((Vtx‘𝑞) = 𝑣 ∧ (Edg‘𝑞) = 𝑒))}    &   ⊢ 𝑅 = {𝑟 ∈ 𝒫 (𝑉 × 𝑉) ∣ ∀𝑥 ∈ 𝑉 ∀𝑦 ∈ 𝑉 (𝑥𝑟𝑦 ↔ 𝑦𝑟𝑥)}    ⇒   ⊢ (𝑉 ∈ 𝑊 → ∃𝑓 𝑓:𝐺–1-1-onto→𝑅)
20.41.16  Monoids (extension)
20.41.16.1  Auxiliary theorems
Theorem	ovn0dmfun 44080	If a class operation value for two operands is not the empty set, then the operands are contained in the domain of the class, and the class restricted to the operands is a function, analogous to fvfundmfvn0 6708. (Contributed by AV, 27-Jan-2020.)
⊢ ((𝐴𝐹𝐵) ≠ ∅ → (⟨𝐴, 𝐵⟩ ∈ dom 𝐹 ∧ Fun (𝐹 ↾ {⟨𝐴, 𝐵⟩})))
Theorem	xpsnopab 44081*	A Cartesian product with a singleton expressed as ordered-pair class abstraction. (Contributed by AV, 27-Jan-2020.)
⊢ ({𝑋} × 𝐶) = {⟨𝑎, 𝑏⟩ ∣ (𝑎 = 𝑋 ∧ 𝑏 ∈ 𝐶)}
Theorem	xpiun 44082*	A Cartesian product expressed as indexed union of ordered-pair class abstractions. (Contributed by AV, 27-Jan-2020.)
⊢ (𝐵 × 𝐶) = ∪ 𝑥 ∈ 𝐵 {⟨𝑎, 𝑏⟩ ∣ (𝑎 = 𝑥 ∧ 𝑏 ∈ 𝐶)}
Theorem	ovn0ssdmfun 44083*	If a class' operation value for two operands is not the empty set, the operands are contained in the domain of the class, and the class restricted to the operands is a function, analogous to fvfundmfvn0 6708. (Contributed by AV, 27-Jan-2020.)
⊢ (∀𝑎 ∈ 𝐷 ∀𝑏 ∈ 𝐸 (𝑎𝐹𝑏) ≠ ∅ → ((𝐷 × 𝐸) ⊆ dom 𝐹 ∧ Fun (𝐹 ↾ (𝐷 × 𝐸))))
Theorem	fnxpdmdm 44084	The domain of the domain of a function over a Cartesian square. (Contributed by AV, 13-Jan-2020.)
⊢ (𝐹 Fn (𝐴 × 𝐴) → dom dom 𝐹 = 𝐴)
Theorem	cnfldsrngbas 44085	The base set of a subring of the field of complex numbers. (Contributed by AV, 31-Jan-2020.)
⊢ 𝑅 = (ℂfld ↾s 𝑆)    ⇒   ⊢ (𝑆 ⊆ ℂ → 𝑆 = (Base‘𝑅))
Theorem	cnfldsrngadd 44086	The group addition operation of a subring of the field of complex numbers. (Contributed by AV, 31-Jan-2020.)
⊢ 𝑅 = (ℂfld ↾s 𝑆)    ⇒   ⊢ (𝑆 ∈ 𝑉 → + = (+g‘𝑅))
Theorem	cnfldsrngmul 44087	The ring multiplication operation of a subring of the field of complex numbers. (Contributed by AV, 31-Jan-2020.)
⊢ 𝑅 = (ℂfld ↾s 𝑆)    ⇒   ⊢ (𝑆 ∈ 𝑉 → · = (.r‘𝑅))
20.41.16.2  Magmas, Semigroups and Monoids (extension)
Theorem	plusfreseq 44088	If the empty set is not contained in the range of the group addition function of an extensible structure (not necessarily a magma), the restriction of the addition operation to (the Cartesian square of) the base set is the functionalization of it. (Contributed by AV, 28-Jan-2020.)
⊢ 𝐵 = (Base‘𝑀)    &   ⊢ + = (+g‘𝑀)    &   ⊢ ⨣ = (+𝑓‘𝑀)    ⇒   ⊢ (∅ ∉ ran ⨣ → ( + ↾ (𝐵 × 𝐵)) = ⨣ )
Theorem	mgmplusfreseq 44089	If the empty set is not contained in the base set of a magma, the restriction of the addition operation to (the Cartesian square of) the base set is the functionalization of it. (Contributed by AV, 28-Jan-2020.)
⊢ 𝐵 = (Base‘𝑀)    &   ⊢ + = (+g‘𝑀)    &   ⊢ ⨣ = (+𝑓‘𝑀)    ⇒   ⊢ ((𝑀 ∈ Mgm ∧ ∅ ∉ 𝐵) → ( + ↾ (𝐵 × 𝐵)) = ⨣ )
Theorem	0mgm 44090	A set with an empty base set is always a magma. (Contributed by AV, 25-Feb-2020.)
⊢ (Base‘𝑀) = ∅    ⇒   ⊢ (𝑀 ∈ 𝑉 → 𝑀 ∈ Mgm)
Theorem	mgmpropd 44091*	If two structures have the same (nonempty) base set, and the values of their group (addition) operations are equal for all pairs of elements of the base set, one is a magma iff the other one is. (Contributed by AV, 25-Feb-2020.)
⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐵 = (Base‘𝐾))    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐵 = (Base‘𝐿))    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐵 ≠ ∅)    &   ⊢ ((𝜑 ∧ (𝑥 ∈ 𝐵 ∧ 𝑦 ∈ 𝐵)) → (𝑥(+g‘𝐾)𝑦) = (𝑥(+g‘𝐿)𝑦))    ⇒   ⊢ (𝜑 → (𝐾 ∈ Mgm ↔ 𝐿 ∈ Mgm))
Theorem	ismgmd 44092*	Deduce a magma from its properties. (Contributed by AV, 25-Feb-2020.)
⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐵 = (Base‘𝐺))    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐺 ∈ 𝑉)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → + = (+g‘𝐺))    &   ⊢ ((𝜑 ∧ 𝑥 ∈ 𝐵 ∧ 𝑦 ∈ 𝐵) → (𝑥 + 𝑦) ∈ 𝐵)    ⇒   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐺 ∈ Mgm)
20.41.16.3  Magma homomorphisms and submagmas
Syntax	cmgmhm 44093	Hom-set generator class for magmas.
class MgmHom
Syntax	csubmgm 44094	Class function taking a magma to its lattice of submagmas.
class SubMgm
Definition	df-mgmhm 44095*	A magma homomorphism is a function on the base sets which preserves the binary operation. (Contributed by AV, 24-Feb-2020.)
⊢ MgmHom = (𝑠 ∈ Mgm, 𝑡 ∈ Mgm ↦ {𝑓 ∈ ((Base‘𝑡) ↑m (Base‘𝑠)) ∣ ∀𝑥 ∈ (Base‘𝑠)∀𝑦 ∈ (Base‘𝑠)(𝑓‘(𝑥(+g‘𝑠)𝑦)) = ((𝑓‘𝑥)(+g‘𝑡)(𝑓‘𝑦))})
Definition	df-submgm 44096*	A submagma is a subset of a magma which is closed under the operation. Such subsets are themselves magmas. (Contributed by AV, 24-Feb-2020.)
⊢ SubMgm = (𝑠 ∈ Mgm ↦ {𝑡 ∈ 𝒫 (Base‘𝑠) ∣ ∀𝑥 ∈ 𝑡 ∀𝑦 ∈ 𝑡 (𝑥(+g‘𝑠)𝑦) ∈ 𝑡})
Theorem	mgmhmrcl 44097	Reverse closure of a magma homomorphism. (Contributed by AV, 24-Feb-2020.)
⊢ (𝐹 ∈ (𝑆 MgmHom 𝑇) → (𝑆 ∈ Mgm ∧ 𝑇 ∈ Mgm))
Theorem	submgmrcl 44098	Reverse closure for submagmas. (Contributed by AV, 24-Feb-2020.)
⊢ (𝑆 ∈ (SubMgm‘𝑀) → 𝑀 ∈ Mgm)
Theorem	ismgmhm 44099*	Property of a magma homomorphism. (Contributed by AV, 25-Feb-2020.)
⊢ 𝐵 = (Base‘𝑆)    &   ⊢ 𝐶 = (Base‘𝑇)    &   ⊢ + = (+g‘𝑆)    &   ⊢ ⨣ = (+g‘𝑇)    ⇒   ⊢ (𝐹 ∈ (𝑆 MgmHom 𝑇) ↔ ((𝑆 ∈ Mgm ∧ 𝑇 ∈ Mgm) ∧ (𝐹:𝐵⟶𝐶 ∧ ∀𝑥 ∈ 𝐵 ∀𝑦 ∈ 𝐵 (𝐹‘(𝑥 + 𝑦)) = ((𝐹‘𝑥) ⨣ (𝐹‘𝑦)))))
Theorem	mgmhmf 44100	A magma homomorphism is a function. (Contributed by AV, 25-Feb-2020.)
⊢ 𝐵 = (Base‘𝑆)    &   ⊢ 𝐶 = (Base‘𝑇)    ⇒   ⊢ (𝐹 ∈ (𝑆 MgmHom 𝑇) → 𝐹:𝐵⟶𝐶)