Home | Metamath
Proof Explorer Theorem List (p. 107 of 449) | < Previous Next > |
Bad symbols? Try the
GIF version. |
||
Mirrors > Metamath Home Page > MPE Home Page > Theorem List Contents > Recent Proofs This page: Page List |
Color key: | Metamath Proof Explorer
(1-28623) |
Hilbert Space Explorer
(28624-30146) |
Users' Mathboxes
(30147-44804) |
Type | Label | Description |
---|---|---|
Statement | ||
Axiom | ax-pre-lttrn 10601 | Ordering on reals is transitive. Axiom 19 of 22 for real and complex numbers, justified by theorem axpre-lttrn 10577. Note: The more general version for extended reals is axlttrn 10702. Normally new proofs would use lttr 10706. (New usage is discouraged.) (Contributed by NM, 13-Oct-2005.) |
⊢ ((𝐴 ∈ ℝ ∧ 𝐵 ∈ ℝ ∧ 𝐶 ∈ ℝ) → ((𝐴 <ℝ 𝐵 ∧ 𝐵 <ℝ 𝐶) → 𝐴 <ℝ 𝐶)) | ||
Axiom | ax-pre-ltadd 10602 | Ordering property of addition on reals. Axiom 20 of 22 for real and complex numbers, justified by theorem axpre-ltadd 10578. Normally new proofs would use axltadd 10703. (New usage is discouraged.) (Contributed by NM, 13-Oct-2005.) |
⊢ ((𝐴 ∈ ℝ ∧ 𝐵 ∈ ℝ ∧ 𝐶 ∈ ℝ) → (𝐴 <ℝ 𝐵 → (𝐶 + 𝐴) <ℝ (𝐶 + 𝐵))) | ||
Axiom | ax-pre-mulgt0 10603 | The product of two positive reals is positive. Axiom 21 of 22 for real and complex numbers, justified by theorem axpre-mulgt0 10579. Normally new proofs would use axmulgt0 10704. (New usage is discouraged.) (Contributed by NM, 13-Oct-2005.) |
⊢ ((𝐴 ∈ ℝ ∧ 𝐵 ∈ ℝ) → ((0 <ℝ 𝐴 ∧ 0 <ℝ 𝐵) → 0 <ℝ (𝐴 · 𝐵))) | ||
Axiom | ax-pre-sup 10604* | A nonempty, bounded-above set of reals has a supremum. Axiom 22 of 22 for real and complex numbers, justified by theorem axpre-sup 10580. Note: Normally new proofs would use axsup 10705. (New usage is discouraged.) (Contributed by NM, 13-Oct-2005.) |
⊢ ((𝐴 ⊆ ℝ ∧ 𝐴 ≠ ∅ ∧ ∃𝑥 ∈ ℝ ∀𝑦 ∈ 𝐴 𝑦 <ℝ 𝑥) → ∃𝑥 ∈ ℝ (∀𝑦 ∈ 𝐴 ¬ 𝑥 <ℝ 𝑦 ∧ ∀𝑦 ∈ ℝ (𝑦 <ℝ 𝑥 → ∃𝑧 ∈ 𝐴 𝑦 <ℝ 𝑧))) | ||
Axiom | ax-addf 10605 |
Addition is an operation on the complex numbers. This deprecated axiom is
provided for historical compatibility but is not a bona fide axiom for
complex numbers (independent of set theory) since it cannot be interpreted
as a first- or second-order statement (see
https://us.metamath.org/downloads/schmidt-cnaxioms.pdf).
It may be
deleted in the future and should be avoided for new theorems. Instead,
the less specific addcl 10608 should be used. Note that uses of ax-addf 10605 can
be eliminated by using the defined operation
(𝑥
∈ ℂ, 𝑦 ∈
ℂ ↦ (𝑥 + 𝑦)) in place of +, from which
this axiom (with the defined operation in place of +) follows as a
theorem.
This axiom is justified by theorem axaddf 10556. (New usage is discouraged.) (Contributed by NM, 19-Oct-2004.) |
⊢ + :(ℂ × ℂ)⟶ℂ | ||
Axiom | ax-mulf 10606 |
Multiplication is an operation on the complex numbers. This deprecated
axiom is provided for historical compatibility but is not a bona fide
axiom for complex numbers (independent of set theory) since it cannot be
interpreted as a first- or second-order statement (see
https://us.metamath.org/downloads/schmidt-cnaxioms.pdf).
It may be
deleted in the future and should be avoided for new theorems. Instead,
the less specific ax-mulcl 10588 should be used. Note that uses of ax-mulf 10606
can be eliminated by using the defined operation
(𝑥
∈ ℂ, 𝑦 ∈
ℂ ↦ (𝑥 ·
𝑦)) in place of
·, from which
this axiom (with the defined operation in place of ·) follows as a
theorem.
This axiom is justified by theorem axmulf 10557. (New usage is discouraged.) (Contributed by NM, 19-Oct-2004.) |
⊢ · :(ℂ × ℂ)⟶ℂ | ||
Theorem | cnex 10607 | Alias for ax-cnex 10582. See also cnexALT 12375. (Contributed by Mario Carneiro, 17-Nov-2014.) |
⊢ ℂ ∈ V | ||
Theorem | addcl 10608 | Alias for ax-addcl 10586, for naming consistency with addcli 10636. Use this theorem instead of ax-addcl 10586 or axaddcl 10562. (Contributed by NM, 10-Mar-2008.) |
⊢ ((𝐴 ∈ ℂ ∧ 𝐵 ∈ ℂ) → (𝐴 + 𝐵) ∈ ℂ) | ||
Theorem | readdcl 10609 | Alias for ax-addrcl 10587, for naming consistency with readdcli 10645. (Contributed by NM, 10-Mar-2008.) |
⊢ ((𝐴 ∈ ℝ ∧ 𝐵 ∈ ℝ) → (𝐴 + 𝐵) ∈ ℝ) | ||
Theorem | mulcl 10610 | Alias for ax-mulcl 10588, for naming consistency with mulcli 10637. (Contributed by NM, 10-Mar-2008.) |
⊢ ((𝐴 ∈ ℂ ∧ 𝐵 ∈ ℂ) → (𝐴 · 𝐵) ∈ ℂ) | ||
Theorem | remulcl 10611 | Alias for ax-mulrcl 10589, for naming consistency with remulcli 10646. (Contributed by NM, 10-Mar-2008.) |
⊢ ((𝐴 ∈ ℝ ∧ 𝐵 ∈ ℝ) → (𝐴 · 𝐵) ∈ ℝ) | ||
Theorem | mulcom 10612 | Alias for ax-mulcom 10590, for naming consistency with mulcomi 10638. (Contributed by NM, 10-Mar-2008.) |
⊢ ((𝐴 ∈ ℂ ∧ 𝐵 ∈ ℂ) → (𝐴 · 𝐵) = (𝐵 · 𝐴)) | ||
Theorem | addass 10613 | Alias for ax-addass 10591, for naming consistency with addassi 10640. (Contributed by NM, 10-Mar-2008.) |
⊢ ((𝐴 ∈ ℂ ∧ 𝐵 ∈ ℂ ∧ 𝐶 ∈ ℂ) → ((𝐴 + 𝐵) + 𝐶) = (𝐴 + (𝐵 + 𝐶))) | ||
Theorem | mulass 10614 | Alias for ax-mulass 10592, for naming consistency with mulassi 10641. (Contributed by NM, 10-Mar-2008.) |
⊢ ((𝐴 ∈ ℂ ∧ 𝐵 ∈ ℂ ∧ 𝐶 ∈ ℂ) → ((𝐴 · 𝐵) · 𝐶) = (𝐴 · (𝐵 · 𝐶))) | ||
Theorem | adddi 10615 | Alias for ax-distr 10593, for naming consistency with adddii 10642. (Contributed by NM, 10-Mar-2008.) |
⊢ ((𝐴 ∈ ℂ ∧ 𝐵 ∈ ℂ ∧ 𝐶 ∈ ℂ) → (𝐴 · (𝐵 + 𝐶)) = ((𝐴 · 𝐵) + (𝐴 · 𝐶))) | ||
Theorem | recn 10616 | A real number is a complex number. (Contributed by NM, 10-Aug-1999.) |
⊢ (𝐴 ∈ ℝ → 𝐴 ∈ ℂ) | ||
Theorem | reex 10617 | The real numbers form a set. See also reexALT 12373. (Contributed by Mario Carneiro, 17-Nov-2014.) |
⊢ ℝ ∈ V | ||
Theorem | reelprrecn 10618 | Reals are a subset of the pair of real and complex numbers. (Contributed by David A. Wheeler, 8-Dec-2018.) |
⊢ ℝ ∈ {ℝ, ℂ} | ||
Theorem | cnelprrecn 10619 | Complex numbers are a subset of the pair of real and complex numbers . (Contributed by David A. Wheeler, 8-Dec-2018.) |
⊢ ℂ ∈ {ℝ, ℂ} | ||
Theorem | elimne0 10620 | Hypothesis for weak deduction theorem to eliminate 𝐴 ≠ 0. (Contributed by NM, 15-May-1999.) |
⊢ if(𝐴 ≠ 0, 𝐴, 1) ≠ 0 | ||
Theorem | adddir 10621 | Distributive law for complex numbers (right-distributivity). (Contributed by NM, 10-Oct-2004.) |
⊢ ((𝐴 ∈ ℂ ∧ 𝐵 ∈ ℂ ∧ 𝐶 ∈ ℂ) → ((𝐴 + 𝐵) · 𝐶) = ((𝐴 · 𝐶) + (𝐵 · 𝐶))) | ||
Theorem | 0cn 10622 | Zero is a complex number. See also 0cnALT 10863. (Contributed by NM, 19-Feb-2005.) |
⊢ 0 ∈ ℂ | ||
Theorem | 0cnd 10623 | Zero is a complex number, deduction form. (Contributed by David A. Wheeler, 8-Dec-2018.) |
⊢ (𝜑 → 0 ∈ ℂ) | ||
Theorem | c0ex 10624 | Zero is a set. (Contributed by David A. Wheeler, 7-Jul-2016.) |
⊢ 0 ∈ V | ||
Theorem | 1cnd 10625 | One is a complex number, deduction form. (Contributed by David A. Wheeler, 6-Dec-2018.) |
⊢ (𝜑 → 1 ∈ ℂ) | ||
Theorem | 1ex 10626 | One is a set. (Contributed by David A. Wheeler, 7-Jul-2016.) |
⊢ 1 ∈ V | ||
Theorem | cnre 10627* | Alias for ax-cnre 10599, for naming consistency. (Contributed by NM, 3-Jan-2013.) |
⊢ (𝐴 ∈ ℂ → ∃𝑥 ∈ ℝ ∃𝑦 ∈ ℝ 𝐴 = (𝑥 + (i · 𝑦))) | ||
Theorem | mulid1 10628 | The number 1 is an identity element for multiplication. Based on ideas by Eric Schmidt. (Contributed by Scott Fenton, 3-Jan-2013.) |
⊢ (𝐴 ∈ ℂ → (𝐴 · 1) = 𝐴) | ||
Theorem | mulid2 10629 | Identity law for multiplication. See mulid1 10628 for commuted version. (Contributed by NM, 8-Oct-1999.) |
⊢ (𝐴 ∈ ℂ → (1 · 𝐴) = 𝐴) | ||
Theorem | 1re 10630 | The number 1 is real. This used to be one of our postulates for complex numbers, but Eric Schmidt discovered that it could be derived from a weaker postulate, ax-1cn 10584, by exploiting properties of the imaginary unit i. (Contributed by Eric Schmidt, 11-Apr-2007.) (Revised by Scott Fenton, 3-Jan-2013.) |
⊢ 1 ∈ ℝ | ||
Theorem | 1red 10631 | The number 1 is real, deduction form. (Contributed by David A. Wheeler, 6-Dec-2018.) |
⊢ (𝜑 → 1 ∈ ℝ) | ||
Theorem | 0re 10632 | The number 0 is real. Remark: the first step could also be ax-icn 10585. See also 0reALT 10972. (Contributed by Eric Schmidt, 21-May-2007.) (Revised by Scott Fenton, 3-Jan-2013.) Reduce dependencies on axioms. (Revised by Steven Nguyen, 11-Oct-2022.) |
⊢ 0 ∈ ℝ | ||
Theorem | 0red 10633 | The number 0 is real, deduction form. (Contributed by David A. Wheeler, 6-Dec-2018.) |
⊢ (𝜑 → 0 ∈ ℝ) | ||
Theorem | mulid1i 10634 | Identity law for multiplication. (Contributed by NM, 14-Feb-1995.) |
⊢ 𝐴 ∈ ℂ ⇒ ⊢ (𝐴 · 1) = 𝐴 | ||
Theorem | mulid2i 10635 | Identity law for multiplication. (Contributed by NM, 14-Feb-1995.) |
⊢ 𝐴 ∈ ℂ ⇒ ⊢ (1 · 𝐴) = 𝐴 | ||
Theorem | addcli 10636 | Closure law for addition. (Contributed by NM, 23-Nov-1994.) |
⊢ 𝐴 ∈ ℂ & ⊢ 𝐵 ∈ ℂ ⇒ ⊢ (𝐴 + 𝐵) ∈ ℂ | ||
Theorem | mulcli 10637 | Closure law for multiplication. (Contributed by NM, 23-Nov-1994.) |
⊢ 𝐴 ∈ ℂ & ⊢ 𝐵 ∈ ℂ ⇒ ⊢ (𝐴 · 𝐵) ∈ ℂ | ||
Theorem | mulcomi 10638 | Commutative law for multiplication. (Contributed by NM, 23-Nov-1994.) |
⊢ 𝐴 ∈ ℂ & ⊢ 𝐵 ∈ ℂ ⇒ ⊢ (𝐴 · 𝐵) = (𝐵 · 𝐴) | ||
Theorem | mulcomli 10639 | Commutative law for multiplication. (Contributed by NM, 23-Nov-1994.) |
⊢ 𝐴 ∈ ℂ & ⊢ 𝐵 ∈ ℂ & ⊢ (𝐴 · 𝐵) = 𝐶 ⇒ ⊢ (𝐵 · 𝐴) = 𝐶 | ||
Theorem | addassi 10640 | Associative law for addition. (Contributed by NM, 23-Nov-1994.) |
⊢ 𝐴 ∈ ℂ & ⊢ 𝐵 ∈ ℂ & ⊢ 𝐶 ∈ ℂ ⇒ ⊢ ((𝐴 + 𝐵) + 𝐶) = (𝐴 + (𝐵 + 𝐶)) | ||
Theorem | mulassi 10641 | Associative law for multiplication. (Contributed by NM, 23-Nov-1994.) |
⊢ 𝐴 ∈ ℂ & ⊢ 𝐵 ∈ ℂ & ⊢ 𝐶 ∈ ℂ ⇒ ⊢ ((𝐴 · 𝐵) · 𝐶) = (𝐴 · (𝐵 · 𝐶)) | ||
Theorem | adddii 10642 | Distributive law (left-distributivity). (Contributed by NM, 23-Nov-1994.) |
⊢ 𝐴 ∈ ℂ & ⊢ 𝐵 ∈ ℂ & ⊢ 𝐶 ∈ ℂ ⇒ ⊢ (𝐴 · (𝐵 + 𝐶)) = ((𝐴 · 𝐵) + (𝐴 · 𝐶)) | ||
Theorem | adddiri 10643 | Distributive law (right-distributivity). (Contributed by NM, 16-Feb-1995.) |
⊢ 𝐴 ∈ ℂ & ⊢ 𝐵 ∈ ℂ & ⊢ 𝐶 ∈ ℂ ⇒ ⊢ ((𝐴 + 𝐵) · 𝐶) = ((𝐴 · 𝐶) + (𝐵 · 𝐶)) | ||
Theorem | recni 10644 | A real number is a complex number. (Contributed by NM, 1-Mar-1995.) |
⊢ 𝐴 ∈ ℝ ⇒ ⊢ 𝐴 ∈ ℂ | ||
Theorem | readdcli 10645 | Closure law for addition of reals. (Contributed by NM, 17-Jan-1997.) |
⊢ 𝐴 ∈ ℝ & ⊢ 𝐵 ∈ ℝ ⇒ ⊢ (𝐴 + 𝐵) ∈ ℝ | ||
Theorem | remulcli 10646 | Closure law for multiplication of reals. (Contributed by NM, 17-Jan-1997.) |
⊢ 𝐴 ∈ ℝ & ⊢ 𝐵 ∈ ℝ ⇒ ⊢ (𝐴 · 𝐵) ∈ ℝ | ||
Theorem | mulid1d 10647 | Identity law for multiplication. (Contributed by Mario Carneiro, 27-May-2016.) |
⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐴 ∈ ℂ) ⇒ ⊢ (𝜑 → (𝐴 · 1) = 𝐴) | ||
Theorem | mulid2d 10648 | Identity law for multiplication. (Contributed by Mario Carneiro, 27-May-2016.) |
⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐴 ∈ ℂ) ⇒ ⊢ (𝜑 → (1 · 𝐴) = 𝐴) | ||
Theorem | addcld 10649 | Closure law for addition. (Contributed by Mario Carneiro, 27-May-2016.) |
⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐴 ∈ ℂ) & ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐵 ∈ ℂ) ⇒ ⊢ (𝜑 → (𝐴 + 𝐵) ∈ ℂ) | ||
Theorem | mulcld 10650 | Closure law for multiplication. (Contributed by Mario Carneiro, 27-May-2016.) |
⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐴 ∈ ℂ) & ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐵 ∈ ℂ) ⇒ ⊢ (𝜑 → (𝐴 · 𝐵) ∈ ℂ) | ||
Theorem | mulcomd 10651 | Commutative law for multiplication. (Contributed by Mario Carneiro, 27-May-2016.) |
⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐴 ∈ ℂ) & ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐵 ∈ ℂ) ⇒ ⊢ (𝜑 → (𝐴 · 𝐵) = (𝐵 · 𝐴)) | ||
Theorem | addassd 10652 | Associative law for addition. (Contributed by Mario Carneiro, 27-May-2016.) |
⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐴 ∈ ℂ) & ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐵 ∈ ℂ) & ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐶 ∈ ℂ) ⇒ ⊢ (𝜑 → ((𝐴 + 𝐵) + 𝐶) = (𝐴 + (𝐵 + 𝐶))) | ||
Theorem | mulassd 10653 | Associative law for multiplication. (Contributed by Mario Carneiro, 27-May-2016.) |
⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐴 ∈ ℂ) & ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐵 ∈ ℂ) & ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐶 ∈ ℂ) ⇒ ⊢ (𝜑 → ((𝐴 · 𝐵) · 𝐶) = (𝐴 · (𝐵 · 𝐶))) | ||
Theorem | adddid 10654 | Distributive law (left-distributivity). (Contributed by Mario Carneiro, 27-May-2016.) |
⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐴 ∈ ℂ) & ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐵 ∈ ℂ) & ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐶 ∈ ℂ) ⇒ ⊢ (𝜑 → (𝐴 · (𝐵 + 𝐶)) = ((𝐴 · 𝐵) + (𝐴 · 𝐶))) | ||
Theorem | adddird 10655 | Distributive law (right-distributivity). (Contributed by Mario Carneiro, 27-May-2016.) |
⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐴 ∈ ℂ) & ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐵 ∈ ℂ) & ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐶 ∈ ℂ) ⇒ ⊢ (𝜑 → ((𝐴 + 𝐵) · 𝐶) = ((𝐴 · 𝐶) + (𝐵 · 𝐶))) | ||
Theorem | adddirp1d 10656 | Distributive law, plus 1 version. (Contributed by Glauco Siliprandi, 11-Dec-2019.) |
⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐴 ∈ ℂ) & ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐵 ∈ ℂ) ⇒ ⊢ (𝜑 → ((𝐴 + 1) · 𝐵) = ((𝐴 · 𝐵) + 𝐵)) | ||
Theorem | joinlmuladdmuld 10657 | Join AB+CB into (A+C) on LHS. (Contributed by David A. Wheeler, 26-Oct-2019.) |
⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐴 ∈ ℂ) & ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐵 ∈ ℂ) & ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐶 ∈ ℂ) & ⊢ (𝜑 → ((𝐴 · 𝐵) + (𝐶 · 𝐵)) = 𝐷) ⇒ ⊢ (𝜑 → ((𝐴 + 𝐶) · 𝐵) = 𝐷) | ||
Theorem | recnd 10658 | Deduction from real number to complex number. (Contributed by NM, 26-Oct-1999.) |
⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐴 ∈ ℝ) ⇒ ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐴 ∈ ℂ) | ||
Theorem | readdcld 10659 | Closure law for addition of reals. (Contributed by Mario Carneiro, 27-May-2016.) |
⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐴 ∈ ℝ) & ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐵 ∈ ℝ) ⇒ ⊢ (𝜑 → (𝐴 + 𝐵) ∈ ℝ) | ||
Theorem | remulcld 10660 | Closure law for multiplication of reals. (Contributed by Mario Carneiro, 27-May-2016.) |
⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐴 ∈ ℝ) & ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐵 ∈ ℝ) ⇒ ⊢ (𝜑 → (𝐴 · 𝐵) ∈ ℝ) | ||
Syntax | cpnf 10661 | Plus infinity. |
class +∞ | ||
Syntax | cmnf 10662 | Minus infinity. |
class -∞ | ||
Syntax | cxr 10663 | The set of extended reals (includes plus and minus infinity). |
class ℝ* | ||
Syntax | clt 10664 | 'Less than' predicate (extended to include the extended reals). |
class < | ||
Syntax | cle 10665 | Extend wff notation to include the 'less than or equal to' relation. |
class ≤ | ||
Definition | df-pnf 10666 |
Define plus infinity. Note that the definition is arbitrary, requiring
only that +∞ be a set not in ℝ and different from -∞
(df-mnf 10667). We use 𝒫 ∪ ℂ to make it independent of the
construction of ℂ, and Cantor's Theorem will
show that it is
different from any member of ℂ and therefore
ℝ. See pnfnre 10671,
mnfnre 10673, and pnfnemnf 10685.
A simpler possibility is to define +∞ as ℂ and -∞ as {ℂ}, but that approach requires the Axiom of Regularity to show that +∞ and -∞ are different from each other and from all members of ℝ. (Contributed by NM, 13-Oct-2005.) (New usage is discouraged.) |
⊢ +∞ = 𝒫 ∪ ℂ | ||
Definition | df-mnf 10667 | Define minus infinity as the power set of plus infinity. Note that the definition is arbitrary, requiring only that -∞ be a set not in ℝ and different from +∞ (see mnfnre 10673 and pnfnemnf 10685). (Contributed by NM, 13-Oct-2005.) (New usage is discouraged.) |
⊢ -∞ = 𝒫 +∞ | ||
Definition | df-xr 10668 | Define the set of extended reals that includes plus and minus infinity. Definition 12-3.1 of [Gleason] p. 173. (Contributed by NM, 13-Oct-2005.) |
⊢ ℝ* = (ℝ ∪ {+∞, -∞}) | ||
Definition | df-ltxr 10669* | Define 'less than' on the set of extended reals. Definition 12-3.1 of [Gleason] p. 173. Note that in our postulates for complex numbers, <ℝ is primitive and not necessarily a relation on ℝ. (Contributed by NM, 13-Oct-2005.) |
⊢ < = ({〈𝑥, 𝑦〉 ∣ (𝑥 ∈ ℝ ∧ 𝑦 ∈ ℝ ∧ 𝑥 <ℝ 𝑦)} ∪ (((ℝ ∪ {-∞}) × {+∞}) ∪ ({-∞} × ℝ))) | ||
Definition | df-le 10670 | Define 'less than or equal to' on the extended real subset of complex numbers. Theorem leloe 10716 relates it to 'less than' for reals. (Contributed by NM, 13-Oct-2005.) |
⊢ ≤ = ((ℝ* × ℝ*) ∖ ◡ < ) | ||
Theorem | pnfnre 10671 | Plus infinity is not a real number. (Contributed by NM, 13-Oct-2005.) |
⊢ +∞ ∉ ℝ | ||
Theorem | pnfnre2 10672 | Plus infinity is not a real number. (Contributed by Glauco Siliprandi, 23-Oct-2021.) |
⊢ ¬ +∞ ∈ ℝ | ||
Theorem | mnfnre 10673 | Minus infinity is not a real number. (Contributed by NM, 13-Oct-2005.) |
⊢ -∞ ∉ ℝ | ||
Theorem | ressxr 10674 | The standard reals are a subset of the extended reals. (Contributed by NM, 14-Oct-2005.) |
⊢ ℝ ⊆ ℝ* | ||
Theorem | rexpssxrxp 10675 | The Cartesian product of standard reals are a subset of the Cartesian product of extended reals. (Contributed by David A. Wheeler, 8-Dec-2018.) |
⊢ (ℝ × ℝ) ⊆ (ℝ* × ℝ*) | ||
Theorem | rexr 10676 | A standard real is an extended real. (Contributed by NM, 14-Oct-2005.) |
⊢ (𝐴 ∈ ℝ → 𝐴 ∈ ℝ*) | ||
Theorem | 0xr 10677 | Zero is an extended real. (Contributed by Mario Carneiro, 15-Jun-2014.) |
⊢ 0 ∈ ℝ* | ||
Theorem | renepnf 10678 | No (finite) real equals plus infinity. (Contributed by NM, 14-Oct-2005.) (Proof shortened by Andrew Salmon, 19-Nov-2011.) |
⊢ (𝐴 ∈ ℝ → 𝐴 ≠ +∞) | ||
Theorem | renemnf 10679 | No real equals minus infinity. (Contributed by NM, 14-Oct-2005.) (Proof shortened by Andrew Salmon, 19-Nov-2011.) |
⊢ (𝐴 ∈ ℝ → 𝐴 ≠ -∞) | ||
Theorem | rexrd 10680 | A standard real is an extended real. (Contributed by Mario Carneiro, 28-May-2016.) |
⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐴 ∈ ℝ) ⇒ ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐴 ∈ ℝ*) | ||
Theorem | renepnfd 10681 | No (finite) real equals plus infinity. (Contributed by Mario Carneiro, 28-May-2016.) |
⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐴 ∈ ℝ) ⇒ ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐴 ≠ +∞) | ||
Theorem | renemnfd 10682 | No real equals minus infinity. (Contributed by Mario Carneiro, 28-May-2016.) |
⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐴 ∈ ℝ) ⇒ ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐴 ≠ -∞) | ||
Theorem | pnfex 10683 | Plus infinity exists. (Contributed by David A. Wheeler, 8-Dec-2018.) (Revised by Steven Nguyen, 7-Dec-2022.) |
⊢ +∞ ∈ V | ||
Theorem | pnfxr 10684 | Plus infinity belongs to the set of extended reals. (Contributed by NM, 13-Oct-2005.) (Proof shortened by Anthony Hart, 29-Aug-2011.) |
⊢ +∞ ∈ ℝ* | ||
Theorem | pnfnemnf 10685 | Plus and minus infinity are different elements of ℝ*. (Contributed by NM, 14-Oct-2005.) |
⊢ +∞ ≠ -∞ | ||
Theorem | mnfnepnf 10686 | Minus and plus infinity are different. (Contributed by David A. Wheeler, 8-Dec-2018.) |
⊢ -∞ ≠ +∞ | ||
Theorem | mnfxr 10687 | Minus infinity belongs to the set of extended reals. (Contributed by NM, 13-Oct-2005.) (Proof shortened by Anthony Hart, 29-Aug-2011.) (Proof shortened by Andrew Salmon, 19-Nov-2011.) |
⊢ -∞ ∈ ℝ* | ||
Theorem | rexri 10688 | A standard real is an extended real (inference form.) (Contributed by David Moews, 28-Feb-2017.) |
⊢ 𝐴 ∈ ℝ ⇒ ⊢ 𝐴 ∈ ℝ* | ||
Theorem | 1xr 10689 | 1 is an extended real number. (Contributed by Glauco Siliprandi, 2-Jan-2022.) |
⊢ 1 ∈ ℝ* | ||
Theorem | renfdisj 10690 | The reals and the infinities are disjoint. (Contributed by NM, 25-Oct-2005.) (Proof shortened by Andrew Salmon, 19-Nov-2011.) |
⊢ (ℝ ∩ {+∞, -∞}) = ∅ | ||
Theorem | ltrelxr 10691 | "Less than" is a relation on extended reals. (Contributed by Mario Carneiro, 28-Apr-2015.) |
⊢ < ⊆ (ℝ* × ℝ*) | ||
Theorem | ltrel 10692 | "Less than" is a relation. (Contributed by NM, 14-Oct-2005.) |
⊢ Rel < | ||
Theorem | lerelxr 10693 | "Less than or equal to" is a relation on extended reals. (Contributed by Mario Carneiro, 28-Apr-2015.) |
⊢ ≤ ⊆ (ℝ* × ℝ*) | ||
Theorem | lerel 10694 | "Less than or equal to" is a relation. (Contributed by FL, 2-Aug-2009.) (Revised by Mario Carneiro, 28-Apr-2015.) |
⊢ Rel ≤ | ||
Theorem | xrlenlt 10695 | "Less than or equal to" expressed in terms of "less than", for extended reals. (Contributed by NM, 14-Oct-2005.) |
⊢ ((𝐴 ∈ ℝ* ∧ 𝐵 ∈ ℝ*) → (𝐴 ≤ 𝐵 ↔ ¬ 𝐵 < 𝐴)) | ||
Theorem | xrlenltd 10696 | "Less than or equal to" expressed in terms of "less than", for extended reals. (Contributed by Glauco Siliprandi, 17-Aug-2020.) |
⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐴 ∈ ℝ*) & ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐵 ∈ ℝ*) ⇒ ⊢ (𝜑 → (𝐴 ≤ 𝐵 ↔ ¬ 𝐵 < 𝐴)) | ||
Theorem | xrltnle 10697 | "Less than" expressed in terms of "less than or equal to", for extended reals. (Contributed by NM, 6-Feb-2007.) |
⊢ ((𝐴 ∈ ℝ* ∧ 𝐵 ∈ ℝ*) → (𝐴 < 𝐵 ↔ ¬ 𝐵 ≤ 𝐴)) | ||
Theorem | xrnltled 10698 | "Not less than" implies "less than or equal to". (Contributed by Glauco Siliprandi, 11-Dec-2019.) |
⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐴 ∈ ℝ*) & ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐵 ∈ ℝ*) & ⊢ (𝜑 → ¬ 𝐵 < 𝐴) ⇒ ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐴 ≤ 𝐵) | ||
Theorem | ssxr 10699 | The three (non-exclusive) possibilities implied by a subset of extended reals. (Contributed by NM, 25-Oct-2005.) (Proof shortened by Andrew Salmon, 19-Nov-2011.) |
⊢ (𝐴 ⊆ ℝ* → (𝐴 ⊆ ℝ ∨ +∞ ∈ 𝐴 ∨ -∞ ∈ 𝐴)) | ||
Theorem | ltxrlt 10700 | The standard less-than <ℝ and the extended real less-than < are identical when restricted to the non-extended reals ℝ. (Contributed by NM, 13-Oct-2005.) (Revised by Mario Carneiro, 28-Apr-2015.) |
⊢ ((𝐴 ∈ ℝ ∧ 𝐵 ∈ ℝ) → (𝐴 < 𝐵 ↔ 𝐴 <ℝ 𝐵)) |
< Previous Next > |
Copyright terms: Public domain | < Previous Next > |